Policy Statement Regarding Long-Term Authorizations To Export Natural Gas to Non-Free Trade Agreement Countries, 28841-28843 [2018-13427]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 120 / Thursday, June 21, 2018 / Notices
ID number and title, by the following
method:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name, Docket
ID number, and title for this Federal
Register document. The general policy
for comments and other submissions
from members of the public is to make
these submissions available for public
viewing on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. Frederick
Licari.
Requests for copies of the information
collection proposal should be sent to
Mr. Licari at whs.mc-alex.esd.mbx.dddod-information-collections@mail.mil.
Dated: June 15, 2018.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register, Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2018–13288 Filed 6–20–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[Docket No.: ED–2018–ICCD–0044]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission to the Office of
Management and Budget for Review
and Approval; Comment Request;
National Assessment of Educational
Progress (NAEP) 2019 and 2020
National Center for Education
Statistics (NCES), Department of
Education (ED).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, ED is
proposing a revision of an existing
information collection.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before July 23,
2018.
ADDRESSES: To access and review all the
documents related to the information
collection listed in this notice, please
use https://www.regulations.gov by
searching the Docket ID number ED–
2018–ICCD–0044. Comments submitted
in response to this notice should be
submitted electronically through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov by selecting the
Docket ID number or via postal mail,
commercial delivery, or hand delivery.
Please note that comments submitted by
fax or email and those submitted after
the comment period will not be
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Jun 20, 2018
Jkt 244001
accepted. Written requests for
information or comments submitted by
postal mail or delivery should be
addressed to the Director of the
Information Collection Clearance
Division, U.S. Department of Education,
400 Maryland Avenue SW, LBJ, Room
206–06, Washington, DC 20202–4537.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
specific questions related to collection
activities, please contact Kashka
Kubzdela, 202–245–7377 or email
NCES.Information.Collections@ed.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Department of Education (ED), in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)), provides the general
public and Federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed,
revised, and continuing collections of
information. This helps the Department
assess the impact of its information
collection requirements and minimize
the public’s reporting burden. It also
helps the public understand the
Department’s information collection
requirements and provide the requested
data in the desired format. ED is
soliciting comments on the proposed
information collection request (ICR) that
is described below. The Department of
Education is especially interested in
public comment addressing the
following issues: (1) Is this collection
necessary to the proper functions of the
Department; (2) will this information be
processed and used in a timely manner;
(3) is the estimate of burden accurate;
(4) how might the Department enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (5) how
might the Department minimize the
burden of this collection on the
respondents, including through the use
of information technology. Please note
that written comments received in
response to this notice will be
considered public records.
Title of Collection: National
Assessment of Educational Progress
(NAEP) 2019 and 2020.
OMB Control Number: 1850–0928.
Type of Review: A revision of an
existing information collection.
Respondents/Affected Public:
Individuals or Households.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 712,888.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 379,934.
Abstract: The National Assessment of
Educational Progress (NAEP),
conducted by the National Center for
Education Statistics (NCES), is a
federally authorized survey of student
achievement at grades 4, 8, and 12 in
various subject areas, such as
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28841
mathematics, reading, writing, science,
U.S. history, civics, geography,
economics, technology and engineering
literacy (TEL), and the arts. The
National Assessment of Educational
Progress Authorization Act (Pub. L.
107–279 Title III, section 303) requires
the assessment to collect data on
specified student groups and
characteristics, including information
organized by race/ethnicity, gender,
socio-economic status, disability, and
limited English proficiency. It requires
fair and accurate presentation of
achievement data and permits the
collection of background, noncognitive,
or descriptive information that is related
to academic achievement and aids in
fair reporting of results. The intent of
the law is to provide representative
sample data on student achievement for
the nation, the states, and
subpopulations of students and to
monitor progress over time. The nature
of NAEP is that burden alternates from
a relatively low burden in national-level
administration years to a substantial
burden increase in state-level
administration years when the sample
has to allow for estimates for individual
states and some of the large urban
districts. The request to conduct NAEP
2017–2019 was approved in August
2016, with the latest change requests
approved in March 2018 (OMB# 1850–
0928 v.1–9). This request updates the
scope, sampling, procedures, and
materials to be used in NAEP in 2019
and 2020, including operational
assessments, pilot tests, and special
studies. The NAEP results will be
reported to the public through the
Nation’s Report Card as well as other
online NAEP tools.
Dated: June 18, 2018.
Kate Mullan,
Acting Director, Information Collection
Clearance Division, Office of the Chief Privacy
Officer, Office of Management.
[FR Doc. 2018–13351 Filed 6–20–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Policy Statement Regarding LongTerm Authorizations To Export Natural
Gas to Non-Free Trade Agreement
Countries
Office of Fossil Energy,
Department of Energy.
ACTION: Policy statement.
AGENCY:
The Department of Energy
(DOE) stands behind the long-term
authorizations it has issued under the
Natural Gas Act, approving the export of
natural gas (including liquefied natural
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM
21JNN1
28842
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 120 / Thursday, June 21, 2018 / Notices
gas) to non-free trade agreement
countries. DOE is firmly committed to
the durability and stability of the nonFTA export authorizations it has granted
to date, and to any export authorizations
issued by DOE in the future.
DATES: This policy statement is
applicable on June 21, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy Sweeney, U.S. Department of
Energy (FE–34), Office of Regulation
and International Engagement, Office of
Fossil Energy, Forrestal Building, Room
3E–042, 1000 Independence Avenue
SW, Washington, DC 20585; (202) 586–
2627; or Cassandra Bernstein or Ronald
(R.J.) Colwell, U.S. Department of
Energy (GC–76), Office of the Assistant
General Counsel for Electricity and
Fossil Energy, Forrestal Building, Room
6D–033, 1000 Independence Ave. SW,
Washington, DC 20585; (202) 586–9793
or (202) 586–8499.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. Statutory Background
The Department of Energy (DOE),
Office of Fossil Energy (FE), is
responsible for authorizing exports of
domestically produced natural gas,
including liquefied natural gas (LNG), to
foreign nations pursuant to section 3 of
the Natural Gas Act (NGA).1 Under
section 3(a) of the NGA, DOE/FE
reviews applications to export natural
gas to countries with which the United
States has not entered into a free trade
agreement (FTA) requiring national
treatment for trade in natural gas and
with which trade is not prohibited by
U.S. law or policy (non-FTA countries).2
NGA section 3(a) states that DOE ‘‘shall
issue such order upon application,
unless, after opportunity for hearing, it
finds that the proposed exportation or
importation will not be consistent with
the public interest.’’ 3 DOE has
consistently interpreted this provision
as creating a rebuttable presumption
that a proposed export of natural gas is
in the public interest.4 Accordingly,
1 15
U.S.C. 717b.
policy statement applies to authorizations
to export natural gas to non-FTA countries under
section 3(a) of the NGA, 15 U.S.C. 717b(a) (non-FTA
authorizations). With regard to exports to FTA
countries, NGA section 3(c) was amended by
section 201 of the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (Pub.
L. 102–486) to require that FTA applications ‘‘shall
be deemed to be consistent with the public interest’’
and granted ‘‘without modification or delay.’’ 15
U.S.C. 717b(c).
3 15 U.S.C. 717b(a).
4 See Sierra Club v. U.S. Dep’t of Energy, 867 F.3d
189, 203 (D.C. Cir. 2017) (‘‘We have construed
[NGA section 3(a)] as containing a ‘general
presumption favoring [export] authorization.’ ’’)
(quoting W. Va. Pub. Servs. Comm’n v. U.S. Dep’t
of Energy, 681 F.2d 847, 856 (D.C. Cir. 1982)).
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
2 This
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Jun 20, 2018
Jkt 244001
DOE will conduct an informal
adjudication and grant an application to
export LNG to non-FTA countries under
NGA section 3(a) unless DOE finds that
the proposed exportation will not be
consistent with the public interest.5
Additionally, under section 16 of the
NGA, DOE is authorized to ‘‘prescribe,
issue, make, amend, and rescind such
[export] orders . . . as it may find
necessary or appropriate . . .’’ to
satisfy its statutory responsibilities.6
B. Regulatory Background
To date, DOE/FE has issued 29 final
long-term authorizations to export LNG
and compressed natural gas to non-FTA
countries in a cumulative volume
totaling 21.35 billion cubic feet per day
of natural gas (approximately 7.79
trillion cubic feet per year).7 Each of
these authorizations has a term of 20
years, with additional time provided for
LNG export operations to commence. In
each authorization, DOE/FE has
included a statement acknowledging its
authority under NGA section 16 to
‘‘make, amend, and rescind such
[export] orders . . . as it may find
necessary or appropriate . . . .’’ to
satisfy its statutory responsibilities.8
In these authorizations, DOE has
stated that ‘‘[s]ome commenters [have]
asked DOE to clarify the circumstances
under which the agency would exercise
its authority to revoke (in whole or in
part) previously issued LNG export
authorizations.’’ 9 In response, DOE has
stated that it ‘‘cannot precisely identify
all the circumstances under which such
action would be taken.’’ 10 DOE has
maintained, however, that ‘‘ ‘[i]n the
event of any unforeseen developments
of such significant consequence as to
put the public interest at risk, DOE/FE
5 Before reaching a final decision on any non-FTA
application, DOE must also comply with the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA),
42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq. See, e.g., Eagle LNG Partners
Jacksonville II LLC, DOE/FE Order No. 4078, FE
Docket No FE Docket No. 17–79–LNG, Opinion and
Order Granting Long-Term, Multi-Contract
Authorization to Export Liquefied Natural Gas in
ISO Containers Loaded at the Eagle Maxville
Facility in Jacksonville, Florida, and Exported by
Vessel to Free Trade Agreement and Non-Free
Trade Agreement Nations, at 34–37 (Sept. 15, 2017).
6 15 U.S.C. 717o.
7 15 U.S.C. 717b(a); see Eagle LNG Partners
Jacksonville II LLC, DOE/FE Order No. 4078, at 34–
37.
8 Eagle LNG Partners Jacksonville II LLC, DOE/FE
Order No. 4078, at 33 n.98 (quoting 15 U.S.C. 717o);
see also Sabine Pass Liquefaction, LLC, DOE/FE
Order No. 2961, FE Docket No. 10–111–LNG,
Opinion and Order Conditionally Granting LongTerm Authorization to Export Liquefied Natural Gas
from Sabine Pass LNG Terminal to Non-Free Trade
Agreement Nations, at 33 n.45 (quoting 15 U.S.C.
717o) (May 20, 2011).
9 Eagle LNG Partners Jacksonville II LLC, DOE/FE
Order No. 4078, at 33 n.98.
10 Id.
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
is fully authorized to take action as
necessary to protect the public
interest.’ ’’ 11
DOE/FE has never rescinded a longterm non-FTA export authorization for
any reason. Further, DOE has no record
of ever having vacated or rescinded an
authorization to import or export
natural gas over the objections of the
authorization holder.12
DOE has rescinded (or ‘‘vacated’’) one
long-term LNG export authorization to
FTA countries (see supra note 2)—DOE/
FE Order No. 3482, issued to Louisiana
LNG Energy LLC (LLNG) on August 28,
2014.13 DOE/FE vacated this order in
2017 on the basis of LLNG’s own
prolonged inaction, after LLNG
effectively self-terminated its proposed
LNG export project.14 Specifically,
LLNG: (i) Failed to participate in its ongoing FERC process, such that FERC
terminated LLNG’s pre-filing review
process; 15 and (ii) failed to comply with
its DOE/FE reporting obligations under
the terms of its FTA order, for a period
of more than 18 months.16 Throughout
this 18-month time period, DOE/FE
made repeated efforts to contact LLNG,
with no success.17 Even after DOE/FE
issued an Order to Show Cause—
inviting LLNG to respond and explain
the circumstances—LLNG took no
action.18 The evidence clearly showed
11 Id. (quoting Sabine Pass Liquefaction, LLC,
DOE/FE Order No. 2961, at 33 n.45).
12 See Ltr. from Paula Gant, U.S. Dep’t of Energy,
to Sen. Lisa Murkowski, at 1 (Oct. 17, 2013),
available at: https://www.energy.senate.gov/public/
index.cfm/files/serve?File_id=9E99E412-CE05449D-8893-DC8D64C32D02 (last viewed June 8,
2018).
13 Louisiana LNG Energy LLC, DOE/FE Order No.
3482, FE Docket No. 14–19–LNG, Order Granting
Long-Term, Multi-Contract Authorization to Export
Liquefied Natural Gas by Vessel from the Proposed
Louisiana LNG Energy Project in Plaquemines
Parish, Louisiana, to Free Trade Agreement Nations
(Aug. 28, 2014).
14 See Louisiana LNG Energy LLC, DOE/FE Order
No. 3482–A, FE Docket Nos. 14–19–LNG & 14–29–
LNG, Order Vacating Long-Term, Multi-Contract
Authorization to Export Liquefied Natural Gas by
Vessel to Free Trade Agreement Nations and
Dismissing Application to Export Liquefied Natural
Gas by Vessel to Non-Free Trade Agreement
Nations, at 2–4 (July 24, 2017); see also Louisiana
LNG Energy LLC, FE Docket Nos. 14–19–LNG & 14–
29–LNG, Order to Show Cause, at 2–5 (June 12,
2017).
15 See Letter from Ann Miles, Director of FERC’s
Office of Energy Projects, to Martin Houston,
Chairman of LLNG, Re: Pre-Filing Review
Termination of the Mississippi River LNG Project,
FERC Docket No. PF14–17–000 (Dec. 13, 2016)
(FERC observing that LLNG ‘‘has not filed the
application needed for staff to continue the
environmental review of [the] project’’), cited in
Louisiana LNG Energy LLC, DOE/FE Order No.
3482–A, at 3 n.9.
16 See Louisiana LNG Energy LLC, DOE/FE Order
No. 3482–A, at 2–3.
17 See id. at 3.
18 See Louisiana LNG Energy LLC, Order to Show
Cause, at 5 (providing 30 days for LLNG to show
E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM
21JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 120 / Thursday, June 21, 2018 / Notices
that LLNG neither wished to move
forward with its proposed LNG export
facility nor to maintain its FTA
authorization.19 DOE/FE therefore
vacated LLNG’s FTA authorization
under NGA section 16, but it did so
without objection by LLNG and without
prejudice to LLNG, should LLNG wish
to seek an export LNG authorization in
the future.20
The LLNG proceeding was a highly
unusual scenario where all evidence
indicated that the company was no
longer pursuing its proposed LNG
export project and had, in fact, ceased
to exist as a commercial operation. In
vacating LLNG’s FTA order without
prejudice, DOE responded appropriately
in both implementing its statutory
authority under NGA section 16 and in
upholding the integrity of its natural gas
regulatory program under 10 CFR part
590.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
II. DOE/FE Policy on Non-FTA Export
Authorizations
Potential importers of U.S. LNG and
financiers of LNG export projects
(collectively, interested stakeholders)
have expressed concern about DOE/FE
rescinding one or more non-FTA export
authorizations in the future. In raising
this concern, they point to the language
in the existing non-FTA authorizations
(quoted above) in which DOE/FE has
observed its authority under NGA
section 16 to ‘‘make, amend, and
rescind such [export] orders . . . as it
may find necessary or appropriate
. . . .’’ Citing DOE/FE’s language, they
have asked what potential
‘‘developments’’ in the U.S. LNG market
could rise to the level of ‘‘such
significant consequence as to put the
public interest at risk’’—such that DOE
would unilaterally rescind one or more
non-FTA export authorizations or take
other action to protect the public
interest under NGA section 3(a).
As a preliminary matter, DOE/FE
wishes to allay concerns about the
security of existing (or future) non-FTA
export authorizations. In this policy
statement, DOE/FE affirms its
commitment to all export authorizations
issued under the NGA, including longterm authorizations approving the
export of LNG to non-FTA countries. As
indicated above, DOE/FE currently has
issued 29 final non-FTA export
authorizations, based on a thorough
cause, in writing, why its authorization should not
be vacated—to which LLNG never responded);
Louisiana LNG Energy LLC, DOE/FE Order No.
3482–A, at 3.
19 See Louisiana LNG Energy LLC, DOE/FE Order
No. 3482–A, at 3–4.
20 See id. at 4 (also dismissing LLNG’s pending
non-FTA application without prejudice).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Jun 20, 2018
Jkt 244001
consideration of the public interest
under section 3(a) of the NGA. In each
of these proceedings, DOE/FE reviewed
a substantial administrative record
addressing factors including economic
impacts, international impacts, security
of natural gas supply, and
environmental impacts, among others.
In granting each application, DOE/FE
concluded that exports of U.S. LNG will
generate net economic benefits to the
broader U.S. economy and will provide
energy security and environmental
benefits to the global community
(including emerging economies
presently reliant upon more carbon
intensive fuels).21
DOE/FE stands firmly behind these
factual findings and legal conclusions—
many of which have been challenged
and upheld in federal court.22
Authorization holders, as well as any
interested stakeholders, thus should
have the utmost confidence in the
validity of DOE/FE’s LNG export
authorizations for the full term of each
non-FTA order. Indeed, as noted above,
DOE has never rescinded a non-FTA
export authorization for any reason.
DOE has vacated one FTA order under
NGA section 16, but the circumstances
of that proceeding were based solely on
the inaction of the authorization
holder.23
As a matter of law, DOE preserves its
authority to take action as necessary or
appropriate to carry out its duties under
the NGA.24 However, DOE does not
foresee a scenario where it would
rescind one or more non-FTA
authorizations. The United States
government takes very seriously the
investment-backed expectations of
private parties subject to its regulatory
jurisdiction. In particular, DOE
understands the far-ranging economic
investments and natural gas supply
commitments associated with these
authorizations over their full term—
affecting both U.S. and global interests.
DOE emphasizes that it remains
committed to the durability and stability
of the export authorizations it has
granted under the NGA, as well as to
supporting the approved export of U.S.
natural gas around the world.
21 See, e.g., Eagle LNG Partners Jacksonville II
LLC, DOE/FE Order No. 4078, at 23–38.
22 In 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit issued four decisions
upholding non-FTA export authorizations issued by
DOE/FE under NGA section 3(a). See, e.g., Sierra
Club vs. U.S. Dep’t of Energy, 867 F.3d 189; Sierra
Club v. U.S. Dep’t of Energy, Nos. 16–1186, 16–
1252, 16–1253, 703 Fed. Appx. 1 (D.C. Cir. Nov. 1,
2017).
23 See supra at 4–5.
24 15 U.S.C. 717o.
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28843
Issued in Washington, DC, on June 15,
2018.
Steven E. Winberg,
Assistant Secretary, Office of Fossil Energy.
[FR Doc. 2018–13427 Filed 6–19–18; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2013–0566; FRL–9979–72–
OAR]
RIN 2060–AT68
Public Hearing for and Extension of
Comment Period on Review of the
Primary National Ambient Air Quality
Standard for Sulfur Oxides
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of public hearing and
extension of public comment period.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is announcing that a
public hearing will be held on the EPA’s
proposed decision in its ‘‘Review of the
Primary National Ambient Air Quality
Standard for Sulfur Oxides,’’ which was
published in the Federal Register on
June 8, 2018 (83 FR 26752). The EPA is
proposing to retain the existing standard
without revision. The hearing will be
held on Tuesday, July 10, 2018, in
Washington, DC. The EPA is
additionally announcing a 17-day
extension of the comment period for
this proposed decision. The original
comment period was to end on July 23,
2018. The extended comment period
will now close on August 9, 2018.
DATES: The public hearing will be held
on July 10, 2018, in Washington, DC
(see SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for
additional information on the public
hearing). The comment period on the
proposed decision announced in the
Federal Register on June 8, 2018 (83 FR
26752), is extended. Comments must be
received on or before August 9, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Public Hearing. The July 10,
2018, public hearing will be held at the
EPA, William Jefferson Clinton East
Building, Room 1117, 1201 Constitution
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20004.
Identification is required. If your
driver’s license is issued by America
Samoa, you must present an additional
form of identification to enter (see
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for
additional information on this location).
Submit your comments, identified by
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2013–
0566, to the Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM
21JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 120 (Thursday, June 21, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28841-28843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13427]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Policy Statement Regarding Long-Term Authorizations To Export
Natural Gas to Non-Free Trade Agreement Countries
AGENCY: Office of Fossil Energy, Department of Energy.
ACTION: Policy statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) stands behind the long-term
authorizations it has issued under the Natural Gas Act, approving the
export of natural gas (including liquefied natural
[[Page 28842]]
gas) to non-free trade agreement countries. DOE is firmly committed to
the durability and stability of the non-FTA export authorizations it
has granted to date, and to any export authorizations issued by DOE in
the future.
DATES: This policy statement is applicable on June 21, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Sweeney, U.S. Department of Energy
(FE-34), Office of Regulation and International Engagement, Office of
Fossil Energy, Forrestal Building, Room 3E-042, 1000 Independence
Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585; (202) 586-2627; or Cassandra Bernstein
or Ronald (R.J.) Colwell, U.S. Department of Energy (GC-76), Office of
the Assistant General Counsel for Electricity and Fossil Energy,
Forrestal Building, Room 6D-033, 1000 Independence Ave. SW, Washington,
DC 20585; (202) 586-9793 or (202) 586-8499.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. Statutory Background
The Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Fossil Energy (FE), is
responsible for authorizing exports of domestically produced natural
gas, including liquefied natural gas (LNG), to foreign nations pursuant
to section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA).\1\ Under section 3(a) of the
NGA, DOE/FE reviews applications to export natural gas to countries
with which the United States has not entered into a free trade
agreement (FTA) requiring national treatment for trade in natural gas
and with which trade is not prohibited by U.S. law or policy (non-FTA
countries).\2\ NGA section 3(a) states that DOE ``shall issue such
order upon application, unless, after opportunity for hearing, it finds
that the proposed exportation or importation will not be consistent
with the public interest.'' \3\ DOE has consistently interpreted this
provision as creating a rebuttable presumption that a proposed export
of natural gas is in the public interest.\4\ Accordingly, DOE will
conduct an informal adjudication and grant an application to export LNG
to non-FTA countries under NGA section 3(a) unless DOE finds that the
proposed exportation will not be consistent with the public
interest.\5\ Additionally, under section 16 of the NGA, DOE is
authorized to ``prescribe, issue, make, amend, and rescind such
[export] orders . . . as it may find necessary or appropriate . . .''
to satisfy its statutory responsibilities.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 717b.
\2\ This policy statement applies to authorizations to export
natural gas to non-FTA countries under section 3(a) of the NGA, 15
U.S.C. 717b(a) (non-FTA authorizations). With regard to exports to
FTA countries, NGA section 3(c) was amended by section 201 of the
Energy Policy Act of 1992 (Pub. L. 102-486) to require that FTA
applications ``shall be deemed to be consistent with the public
interest'' and granted ``without modification or delay.'' 15 U.S.C.
717b(c).
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 717b(a).
\4\ See Sierra Club v. U.S. Dep't of Energy, 867 F.3d 189, 203
(D.C. Cir. 2017) (``We have construed [NGA section 3(a)] as
containing a `general presumption favoring [export] authorization.'
'') (quoting W. Va. Pub. Servs. Comm'n v. U.S. Dep't of Energy, 681
F.2d 847, 856 (D.C. Cir. 1982)).
\5\ Before reaching a final decision on any non-FTA application,
DOE must also comply with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq. See, e.g., Eagle LNG Partners
Jacksonville II LLC, DOE/FE Order No. 4078, FE Docket No FE Docket
No. 17-79-LNG, Opinion and Order Granting Long-Term, Multi-Contract
Authorization to Export Liquefied Natural Gas in ISO Containers
Loaded at the Eagle Maxville Facility in Jacksonville, Florida, and
Exported by Vessel to Free Trade Agreement and Non-Free Trade
Agreement Nations, at 34-37 (Sept. 15, 2017).
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 717o.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Regulatory Background
To date, DOE/FE has issued 29 final long-term authorizations to
export LNG and compressed natural gas to non-FTA countries in a
cumulative volume totaling 21.35 billion cubic feet per day of natural
gas (approximately 7.79 trillion cubic feet per year).\7\ Each of these
authorizations has a term of 20 years, with additional time provided
for LNG export operations to commence. In each authorization, DOE/FE
has included a statement acknowledging its authority under NGA section
16 to ``make, amend, and rescind such [export] orders . . . as it may
find necessary or appropriate . . . .'' to satisfy its statutory
responsibilities.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 717b(a); see Eagle LNG Partners Jacksonville II
LLC, DOE/FE Order No. 4078, at 34-37.
\8\ Eagle LNG Partners Jacksonville II LLC, DOE/FE Order No.
4078, at 33 n.98 (quoting 15 U.S.C. 717o); see also Sabine Pass
Liquefaction, LLC, DOE/FE Order No. 2961, FE Docket No. 10-111-LNG,
Opinion and Order Conditionally Granting Long-Term Authorization to
Export Liquefied Natural Gas from Sabine Pass LNG Terminal to Non-
Free Trade Agreement Nations, at 33 n.45 (quoting 15 U.S.C. 717o)
(May 20, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In these authorizations, DOE has stated that ``[s]ome commenters
[have] asked DOE to clarify the circumstances under which the agency
would exercise its authority to revoke (in whole or in part) previously
issued LNG export authorizations.'' \9\ In response, DOE has stated
that it ``cannot precisely identify all the circumstances under which
such action would be taken.'' \10\ DOE has maintained, however, that ``
`[i]n the event of any unforeseen developments of such significant
consequence as to put the public interest at risk, DOE/FE is fully
authorized to take action as necessary to protect the public interest.'
'' \11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Eagle LNG Partners Jacksonville II LLC, DOE/FE Order No.
4078, at 33 n.98.
\10\ Id.
\11\ Id. (quoting Sabine Pass Liquefaction, LLC, DOE/FE Order
No. 2961, at 33 n.45).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOE/FE has never rescinded a long-term non-FTA export authorization
for any reason. Further, DOE has no record of ever having vacated or
rescinded an authorization to import or export natural gas over the
objections of the authorization holder.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Ltr. from Paula Gant, U.S. Dep't of Energy, to Sen.
Lisa Murkowski, at 1 (Oct. 17, 2013), available at: https://www.energy.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/files/serve?File_id=9E99E412-CE05-449D-8893-DC8D64C32D02 (last viewed June 8, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOE has rescinded (or ``vacated'') one long-term LNG export
authorization to FTA countries (see supra note 2)--DOE/FE Order No.
3482, issued to Louisiana LNG Energy LLC (LLNG) on August 28, 2014.\13\
DOE/FE vacated this order in 2017 on the basis of LLNG's own prolonged
inaction, after LLNG effectively self-terminated its proposed LNG
export project.\14\ Specifically, LLNG: (i) Failed to participate in
its on-going FERC process, such that FERC terminated LLNG's pre-filing
review process; \15\ and (ii) failed to comply with its DOE/FE
reporting obligations under the terms of its FTA order, for a period of
more than 18 months.\16\ Throughout this 18-month time period, DOE/FE
made repeated efforts to contact LLNG, with no success.\17\ Even after
DOE/FE issued an Order to Show Cause--inviting LLNG to respond and
explain the circumstances--LLNG took no action.\18\ The evidence
clearly showed
[[Page 28843]]
that LLNG neither wished to move forward with its proposed LNG export
facility nor to maintain its FTA authorization.\19\ DOE/FE therefore
vacated LLNG's FTA authorization under NGA section 16, but it did so
without objection by LLNG and without prejudice to LLNG, should LLNG
wish to seek an export LNG authorization in the future.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ Louisiana LNG Energy LLC, DOE/FE Order No. 3482, FE Docket
No. 14-19-LNG, Order Granting Long-Term, Multi-Contract
Authorization to Export Liquefied Natural Gas by Vessel from the
Proposed Louisiana LNG Energy Project in Plaquemines Parish,
Louisiana, to Free Trade Agreement Nations (Aug. 28, 2014).
\14\ See Louisiana LNG Energy LLC, DOE/FE Order No. 3482-A, FE
Docket Nos. 14-19-LNG & 14-29-LNG, Order Vacating Long-Term, Multi-
Contract Authorization to Export Liquefied Natural Gas by Vessel to
Free Trade Agreement Nations and Dismissing Application to Export
Liquefied Natural Gas by Vessel to Non-Free Trade Agreement Nations,
at 2-4 (July 24, 2017); see also Louisiana LNG Energy LLC, FE Docket
Nos. 14-19-LNG & 14-29-LNG, Order to Show Cause, at 2-5 (June 12,
2017).
\15\ See Letter from Ann Miles, Director of FERC's Office of
Energy Projects, to Martin Houston, Chairman of LLNG, Re: Pre-Filing
Review Termination of the Mississippi River LNG Project, FERC Docket
No. PF14-17-000 (Dec. 13, 2016) (FERC observing that LLNG ``has not
filed the application needed for staff to continue the environmental
review of [the] project''), cited in Louisiana LNG Energy LLC, DOE/
FE Order No. 3482-A, at 3 n.9.
\16\ See Louisiana LNG Energy LLC, DOE/FE Order No. 3482-A, at
2-3.
\17\ See id. at 3.
\18\ See Louisiana LNG Energy LLC, Order to Show Cause, at 5
(providing 30 days for LLNG to show cause, in writing, why its
authorization should not be vacated--to which LLNG never responded);
Louisiana LNG Energy LLC, DOE/FE Order No. 3482-A, at 3.
\19\ See Louisiana LNG Energy LLC, DOE/FE Order No. 3482-A, at
3-4.
\20\ See id. at 4 (also dismissing LLNG's pending non-FTA
application without prejudice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The LLNG proceeding was a highly unusual scenario where all
evidence indicated that the company was no longer pursuing its proposed
LNG export project and had, in fact, ceased to exist as a commercial
operation. In vacating LLNG's FTA order without prejudice, DOE
responded appropriately in both implementing its statutory authority
under NGA section 16 and in upholding the integrity of its natural gas
regulatory program under 10 CFR part 590.
II. DOE/FE Policy on Non-FTA Export Authorizations
Potential importers of U.S. LNG and financiers of LNG export
projects (collectively, interested stakeholders) have expressed concern
about DOE/FE rescinding one or more non-FTA export authorizations in
the future. In raising this concern, they point to the language in the
existing non-FTA authorizations (quoted above) in which DOE/FE has
observed its authority under NGA section 16 to ``make, amend, and
rescind such [export] orders . . . as it may find necessary or
appropriate . . . .'' Citing DOE/FE's language, they have asked what
potential ``developments'' in the U.S. LNG market could rise to the
level of ``such significant consequence as to put the public interest
at risk''--such that DOE would unilaterally rescind one or more non-FTA
export authorizations or take other action to protect the public
interest under NGA section 3(a).
As a preliminary matter, DOE/FE wishes to allay concerns about the
security of existing (or future) non-FTA export authorizations. In this
policy statement, DOE/FE affirms its commitment to all export
authorizations issued under the NGA, including long-term authorizations
approving the export of LNG to non-FTA countries. As indicated above,
DOE/FE currently has issued 29 final non-FTA export authorizations,
based on a thorough consideration of the public interest under section
3(a) of the NGA. In each of these proceedings, DOE/FE reviewed a
substantial administrative record addressing factors including economic
impacts, international impacts, security of natural gas supply, and
environmental impacts, among others. In granting each application, DOE/
FE concluded that exports of U.S. LNG will generate net economic
benefits to the broader U.S. economy and will provide energy security
and environmental benefits to the global community (including emerging
economies presently reliant upon more carbon intensive fuels).\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ See, e.g., Eagle LNG Partners Jacksonville II LLC, DOE/FE
Order No. 4078, at 23-38.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOE/FE stands firmly behind these factual findings and legal
conclusions--many of which have been challenged and upheld in federal
court.\22\ Authorization holders, as well as any interested
stakeholders, thus should have the utmost confidence in the validity of
DOE/FE's LNG export authorizations for the full term of each non-FTA
order. Indeed, as noted above, DOE has never rescinded a non-FTA export
authorization for any reason. DOE has vacated one FTA order under NGA
section 16, but the circumstances of that proceeding were based solely
on the inaction of the authorization holder.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ In 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit issued four decisions upholding non-FTA export
authorizations issued by DOE/FE under NGA section 3(a). See, e.g.,
Sierra Club vs. U.S. Dep't of Energy, 867 F.3d 189; Sierra Club v.
U.S. Dep't of Energy, Nos. 16-1186, 16-1252, 16-1253, 703 Fed. Appx.
1 (D.C. Cir. Nov. 1, 2017).
\23\ See supra at 4-5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As a matter of law, DOE preserves its authority to take action as
necessary or appropriate to carry out its duties under the NGA.\24\
However, DOE does not foresee a scenario where it would rescind one or
more non-FTA authorizations. The United States government takes very
seriously the investment-backed expectations of private parties subject
to its regulatory jurisdiction. In particular, DOE understands the far-
ranging economic investments and natural gas supply commitments
associated with these authorizations over their full term--affecting
both U.S. and global interests. DOE emphasizes that it remains
committed to the durability and stability of the export authorizations
it has granted under the NGA, as well as to supporting the approved
export of U.S. natural gas around the world.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ 15 U.S.C. 717o.
Issued in Washington, DC, on June 15, 2018.
Steven E. Winberg,
Assistant Secretary, Office of Fossil Energy.
[FR Doc. 2018-13427 Filed 6-19-18; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P