Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Red River, Shreveport, LA, 28785-28787 [2018-13321]
Download as PDF
28785
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 83, No. 120
Thursday, June 21, 2018
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2017–0911]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Red
River, Shreveport, LA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
change the operating schedule that
governs the draws of the Union Pacific
Railroad bridge, mile 227.0, and the
Midsouth Railroad bridge, mile 228.2,
across the Red River at Shreveport, LA.
This proposed rule would allow the
drawbridges to permanently remain in
the closed-to-navigation position, no
longer opening for vessel traffic. While
there is vessel traffic on the waterway,
no one has requested that either
drawbridge open since 2007. Union
Pacific Railroad and Midsouth Railroad,
the bridge owners, requested to update
the operating schedule accordingly.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
July 23, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2017–0911 using Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
SUMMARY:
If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Mr. Eric A.
Washburn, Bridge Administrator,
Western Rivers, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone 314–269–2378, email
Eric.Washburn@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:10 Jun 20, 2018
Jkt 244001
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose and Legal
Basis
The Coast Guard proposes to change
the operating schedule that governs the
draws of the Union Pacific Railroad
bridge, mile 227.0, and the Midsouth
Railroad bridge, mile 228.2, across the
Red River at Shreveport, LA. The Red
River extends approximately 294.0
miles from mile marker 304.0 on the
Lower Mississippi River to Shreveport,
LA, then through Twelve Mile and
Cypress Bayous to its head of navigation
near Daingerfield, TX. Regulations for
the operation of drawbridges on the Red
River are contained in 33 CFR 117.491.
The Union Pacific Railroad bridge, mile
227.0, and the Midsouth Railroad
bridge, mile 228.2, are currently the
only bridges governed by the regulations
in 33 CFR 117.491(c), which state that,
‘‘the draws of the bridges above mile
105.8 through mile 234.4 shall open on
signal if at least 48 hours notice is
given.’’
Navigation on the Red River in the
vicinity of these bridges consists
primarily of recreational craft, and
commercial use of the waterway is only
possible during periods of high water.
Moreover, the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers does not maintain any project
depth or navigable channel on this
reach of the Red River, nor does the U.S.
Coast Guard maintain any aids to
navigation above mile 211.4. Under 33
CFR 117.491(d), the bridges above mile
234.4 need not open for the passage of
vessels. There are no alternate routes for
vessels transiting this section of the Red
River.
Union Pacific Railroad owns the
Union Pacific Railroad bridge, mile
227.0, across the Red River at
Shreveport, LA, and has requested that
the drawbridge regulation be amended
to allow the bridge to remain in the
permanently closed position. Union
Pacific provided the Coast Guard with
bridge logs that indicate that there has
been no request for a bridge opening
since 2007. In the closed position, the
Union Pacific Railroad bridge, mile
227.0, provides 15.1 feet of vertical
clearance at mean high water.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Midsouth Railroad owns the
Midsouth Railroad bridge, mile 228.2,
across the Red River at Shreveport, LA,
and has also requested that the
drawbridge remain in the permanently
closed position. Midsouth Railroad
provided the Coast Guard with bridge
logs that indicate that there has been no
request for a bridge opening since 2007.
In the closed position, the Midsouth
Railroad bridge, mile 228.2, provides
37.0 feet of vertical clearance at mean
high water.
Under 33 CFR 117.39, the District
Commander may authorize a
drawbridge to remain in the closed to
navigation position and be untended
when there have been no requests for
drawbridge openings for two years. Due
to the lack of significant navigation on
this portion of the Red River that
requires draws to open and the fact that
there has been no request to open the
draws in over ten years, the Coast Guard
believes that this proposed rule is
reasonable, and if implemented, should
continue to meet the present and future
needs of navigation. Based on the
records provided by Union Pacific
Railroad and Midsouth Railroad, it is
expected that the proposed change will
have no known impact to navigation or
other waterway users. The Coast Guard
proposes this rulemaking under
authority of 33 U.S.C. 499.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to amend
33 CFR 117.491(c), which governs the
operating schedule of the draws of the
Union Pacific Railroad bridge, mile
marker (MM) 227.0 and the Midsouth
Railroad bridge, MM 228.2, across the
Red River at Shreveport, LA. The
regulation currently requires the draws
of the bridges above mile 105.8 through
mile 234.4 to open on signal if at least
48 hours’ notice is given. This proposed
rule would allow the bridges to remain
closed to the passage of vessels.
However, pursuant to 33 CFR 117.39,
this rulemaking would include a
provision that requires the owner or
agency controlling the bridge to the
draw to full operation within three
months if the District Commander
provides a notification that needs of
navigation require resumed operation of
the spans. The regulatory text and
changes we are proposing appear at the
end of this document.
E:\FR\FM\21JNP1.SGM
21JNP1
28786
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 120 / Thursday, June 21, 2018 / Proposed Rules
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and Executive
Orders and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This NPRM has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the fact that these
drawbridges do not currently open for
the passage of vessels due to the lack of
navigation on the river. The last
recorded opening of the drawbridges
was in 2007. Consultation with the
bridge owners indicated that currently
no bridge tender positions are assigned
to the bridges.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the bridge
may be small entities, for the reasons
stated in section IV.A. above, this
proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:10 Jun 20, 2018
Jkt 244001
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Government
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and have determined that it is
consistent with the fundamental
federalism principles and preemption
requirements described in Executive
Order 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
If you believe this proposed rule has
implications for federalism or Indian
tribes, please contact the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
proposed rule will not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this proposed rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a
preliminary determination that this
action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. This proposed rule
involves changing the operating
schedule that governs the draws of two
bridges on the Red River near
Shreveport, LA to remain permanently
closed to navigation. Normally such
actions are categorically excluded from
further review, under paragraph L49 of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 01. A
preliminary Record of Environmental
Consideration is not required for this
proposed rule. We seek any comments
or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
E:\FR\FM\21JNP1.SGM
21JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 120 / Thursday, June 21, 2018 / Proposed Rules
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, visit https://
www.regulations.gov/privacynotice.
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in this docket and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
website’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. In § 117.491, revise paragraph (c) to
read as follows:
■
§ 117.491
Red River.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) The draws of the bridges above
mile 105.8 through mile 234.4 need not
open for passage of vessels. The owner
or agency controlling the bridge must
restore the draw to full operation within
three months if notified by the District
Commander that the needs of navigation
require resumed operation of the spans.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: June 12, 2018.
P.F. Thomas,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2018–13321 Filed 6–20–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2018–0463]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Beaufort Water Festival
Air Show, Beaufort, SC
AGENCY:
Coast Guard, DHS.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:10 Jun 20, 2018
Jkt 244001
ACTION:
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a temporary safety zone on the
waters of the Beaufort River in Beaufort,
SC. The safety zone is needed to ensure
safety of life on navigable waters of the
United States during the Beaufort Water
Festival Air Show. This proposed
regulation will prohibit persons and
vessels from entering, transiting
through, anchoring in, or remaining
within the regulated area unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Charleston (COTP) or a designated
representative. We invite your
comments on this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before July 23, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2018–0463 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant
Justin Heck, Sector Charleston Office of
Waterways Management, Coast Guard;
telephone (843) 740–3184, email
Justin.C.Heck@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
COTP Captain of the Port
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
On April 27, 2018, the Coast Guard
received a marine event application for
the 2018 Beaufort Water Festival Air
Show that will take place from 12 p.m.
until 5 p.m. on July 21, 2018. The safety
zone is necessary to ensure the safety of
life on the navigable waters of the
United States during the Beaufort Water
Festival Air Show. The COTP has
determined that potential hazards
associated with the airshow would be a
safety concern for anyone within the
regulated area.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to
ensure the safety of vessels and the
navigable waters within the regulated
area before, during, and after the
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
28787
scheduled event. The Coast Guard
proposes this rulemaking under
authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP proposes to establish a
safety zone from 12 p.m. until 5 p.m. on
July 21, 2018. The safety zone would
encompass a portion of the waterway
that is 700 feet wide by 2600 feet in
length on the waters of the Beaufort
River in Beaufort, SC. No vessel or
person would be permitted to enter,
transit through, anchor in, or remain
within the safety zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP or a
designated representative. The Coast
Guard would provide notice of the
safety zone by Local Notice to Mariners,
Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and onscene designated representatives. The
regulatory text we are proposing appears
at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This NPRM has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, duration,
and time-of-day of the safety zone. The
safety zone will only be enforced for 5
hours, vessel traffic will be able to safely
operate in the surrounding area during
the enforcement period, and the rule
will allow vessels to seek permission to
enter the zone. Moreover, the Coast
Guard will provide advance notification
of the safety zone to the local maritime
community by Local Notice to Mariners
and Broadcast Notice to Mariners via
VHF–FM marine channel 16.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
E:\FR\FM\21JNP1.SGM
21JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 120 (Thursday, June 21, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 28785-28787]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13321]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 120 / Thursday, June 21, 2018 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 28785]]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG-2017-0911]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Red River, Shreveport, LA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to change the operating schedule that
governs the draws of the Union Pacific Railroad bridge, mile 227.0, and
the Midsouth Railroad bridge, mile 228.2, across the Red River at
Shreveport, LA. This proposed rule would allow the drawbridges to
permanently remain in the closed-to-navigation position, no longer
opening for vessel traffic. While there is vessel traffic on the
waterway, no one has requested that either drawbridge open since 2007.
Union Pacific Railroad and Midsouth Railroad, the bridge owners,
requested to update the operating schedule accordingly.
DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before July 23, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2017-0911 using Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for
instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Mr. Eric A. Washburn, Bridge Administrator, Western
Rivers, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 314-269-2378, email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose and Legal Basis
The Coast Guard proposes to change the operating schedule that
governs the draws of the Union Pacific Railroad bridge, mile 227.0, and
the Midsouth Railroad bridge, mile 228.2, across the Red River at
Shreveport, LA. The Red River extends approximately 294.0 miles from
mile marker 304.0 on the Lower Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA,
then through Twelve Mile and Cypress Bayous to its head of navigation
near Daingerfield, TX. Regulations for the operation of drawbridges on
the Red River are contained in 33 CFR 117.491. The Union Pacific
Railroad bridge, mile 227.0, and the Midsouth Railroad bridge, mile
228.2, are currently the only bridges governed by the regulations in 33
CFR 117.491(c), which state that, ``the draws of the bridges above mile
105.8 through mile 234.4 shall open on signal if at least 48 hours
notice is given.''
Navigation on the Red River in the vicinity of these bridges
consists primarily of recreational craft, and commercial use of the
waterway is only possible during periods of high water. Moreover, the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers does not maintain any project depth or
navigable channel on this reach of the Red River, nor does the U.S.
Coast Guard maintain any aids to navigation above mile 211.4. Under 33
CFR 117.491(d), the bridges above mile 234.4 need not open for the
passage of vessels. There are no alternate routes for vessels
transiting this section of the Red River.
Union Pacific Railroad owns the Union Pacific Railroad bridge, mile
227.0, across the Red River at Shreveport, LA, and has requested that
the drawbridge regulation be amended to allow the bridge to remain in
the permanently closed position. Union Pacific provided the Coast Guard
with bridge logs that indicate that there has been no request for a
bridge opening since 2007. In the closed position, the Union Pacific
Railroad bridge, mile 227.0, provides 15.1 feet of vertical clearance
at mean high water.
Midsouth Railroad owns the Midsouth Railroad bridge, mile 228.2,
across the Red River at Shreveport, LA, and has also requested that the
drawbridge remain in the permanently closed position. Midsouth Railroad
provided the Coast Guard with bridge logs that indicate that there has
been no request for a bridge opening since 2007. In the closed
position, the Midsouth Railroad bridge, mile 228.2, provides 37.0 feet
of vertical clearance at mean high water.
Under 33 CFR 117.39, the District Commander may authorize a
drawbridge to remain in the closed to navigation position and be
untended when there have been no requests for drawbridge openings for
two years. Due to the lack of significant navigation on this portion of
the Red River that requires draws to open and the fact that there has
been no request to open the draws in over ten years, the Coast Guard
believes that this proposed rule is reasonable, and if implemented,
should continue to meet the present and future needs of navigation.
Based on the records provided by Union Pacific Railroad and Midsouth
Railroad, it is expected that the proposed change will have no known
impact to navigation or other waterway users. The Coast Guard proposes
this rulemaking under authority of 33 U.S.C. 499.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to amend 33 CFR 117.491(c), which governs
the operating schedule of the draws of the Union Pacific Railroad
bridge, mile marker (MM) 227.0 and the Midsouth Railroad bridge, MM
228.2, across the Red River at Shreveport, LA. The regulation currently
requires the draws of the bridges above mile 105.8 through mile 234.4
to open on signal if at least 48 hours' notice is given. This proposed
rule would allow the bridges to remain closed to the passage of
vessels. However, pursuant to 33 CFR 117.39, this rulemaking would
include a provision that requires the owner or agency controlling the
bridge to the draw to full operation within three months if the
District Commander provides a notification that needs of navigation
require resumed operation of the spans. The regulatory text and changes
we are proposing appear at the end of this document.
[[Page 28786]]
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on these statutes and Executive Orders and we discuss
First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on the fact that
these drawbridges do not currently open for the passage of vessels due
to the lack of navigation on the river. The last recorded opening of
the drawbridges was in 2007. Consultation with the bridge owners
indicated that currently no bridge tender positions are assigned to the
bridges.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the bridge may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section IV.A. above, this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Government
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule will not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this
proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves changing
the operating schedule that governs the draws of two bridges on the Red
River near Shreveport, LA to remain permanently closed to navigation.
Normally such actions are categorically excluded from further review,
under paragraph L49 of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual
023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A preliminary Record of Environmental
Consideration is not required for this proposed rule. We seek any
comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
[[Page 28787]]
We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, visit https://www.regulations.gov/privacynotice.
Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in this docket
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. In Sec. 117.491, revise paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 117.491 Red River.
* * * * *
(c) The draws of the bridges above mile 105.8 through mile 234.4
need not open for passage of vessels. The owner or agency controlling
the bridge must restore the draw to full operation within three months
if notified by the District Commander that the needs of navigation
require resumed operation of the spans.
* * * * *
Dated: June 12, 2018.
P.F. Thomas,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2018-13321 Filed 6-20-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P