Social Security Administration Violence Evaluation and Reporting System, 27728-27730 [2018-12819]
Download as PDF
27728
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 115 / Thursday, June 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules
the ALIs required by paragraph (i) of AD
2017–22–03.
(2) For airplanes identified in Airbus
A318/A319/A320/A321 Airworthiness
Limitation Section Part 2—Damage Tolerant
Airworthiness Limitation Items (DT–ALI),
Variation 6.1, dated May 18, 2017:
Concurrently with the revision required by
paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, revise the
maintenance or inspection program, as
applicable, to incorporate the ALIs specified
in Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321
Airworthiness Limitation Section Part 2—
Damage Tolerant Airworthiness Limitation
Items (DT–ALI), Variation 6.1, dated May 18,
2017. The initial compliance time for
accomplishing the actions is at the applicable
time identified in the ALIs specified in
Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321
Airworthiness Limitation Section Part 2—
Damage Tolerant Airworthiness Limitation
Items (DT–ALI), Variation 6.1, dated May 18,
2017, or within 90 days after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs later;
without exceeding the inspection intervals in
the ALIs required by paragraph (i) of AD
2017–22–03.
(3) For airplanes identified in Airbus
A318/A319/A320/A321 Airworthiness
Limitation Section Part 2—Damage Tolerant
Airworthiness Limitation Items (DT–ALI),
Variation 6.2, dated May 24, 2017:
Concurrently with the revision required by
paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, revise the
maintenance or inspection program, as
applicable, to incorporate the ALIs specified
in A318/A319/A320/A321 Airworthiness
Limitation Section Part 2—Damage Tolerant
Airworthiness Limitation Items (DT–ALI),
Variation 6.2, dated May 24, 2017. The initial
compliance time for accomplishing the
actions is at the applicable time identified in
the ALIs specified in Airbus A318/A319/
A320/A321 Airworthiness Limitation Section
Part 2—Damage Tolerant Airworthiness
Limitation Items (DT–ALI), Variation 6.2,
dated May 24, 2017, or within 90 days after
the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later; without exceeding the
inspection intervals in the ALIs required by
paragraph (i) of AD 2017–22–03.
(h) No Alternative Actions, Intervals, and
Critical Design Configuration Control
Limitations (CDCCLs)
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
After the maintenance or inspection
program has been revised as required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, no alternative
actions (e.g., inspections) or intervals may be
used unless the actions or intervals are
approved as an alternative method of
compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (j)(1) of
this AD.
(i) Terminating Action for Other FAA ADs
(1) Accomplishing the action required by
paragraph (g) of this AD terminates the
requirements of paragraphs (g) and (j) of AD
2016–09–06.
(2) Accomplishing the action required by
paragraph (g) of this AD terminates the
requirements of paragraphs (g)(2) and (i) of
AD 2017–22–03.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Jun 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
(j) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Section, send it
to the attention of the person identified in
paragraph (k)(2) of this AD. Information may
be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOCREQUESTS@faa.gov.
(i) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(ii) AMOCs previously approved for AD
2015–05–02, Amendment 39–18112 (80 FR
15152, March 23, 2015) that required
incorporation of the service information in
paragraphs (j)(1)(ii)(A), (j)(1)(ii)(B),
(j)(1)(ii)(C), or (j)(1)(ii)(D), are approved as
AMOCs for the corresponding provisions of
this AD.
(A) Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321
Airworthiness Limitation Section Part 2—
Damage Tolerant Airworthiness Limitation
Items (DT–ALI), Revision 06, dated April 10,
2017.
(B) Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321
Airworthiness Limitation Section Part 2—
Damage Tolerant Airworthiness Limitation
Items (DT–ALI), Variation 6.1, dated May 18,
2017.
(C) Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321
Airworthiness Limitation Section Part 2
–Damage Tolerant Airworthiness Limitation
Items (DT–ALI), Variation 6.2, dated May 24,
2017.
(D) A318/A319/A320/A321 Airworthiness
Limitation Section Part 2—Damage Tolerant
Airworthiness Limitation Items (DT–ALI),
Variation 6.3, October 24, 2017.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer, the action must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, International Section,
Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or the
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or
Airbus’s EASA Design Organization
Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA,
the approval must include the DOAauthorized signature.
(k) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA AD
2017–0231, dated November 21, 2017, for
related information. This MCAI may be
found in the AD docket on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–0512.
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Section, Transport Standards
Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax 206–
231–3223.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus, Airworthiness
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Office—EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France;
telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@
airbus.com; internet https://www.airbus.com.
You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on June
6, 2018.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–12733 Filed 6–13–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
20 CFR Part 401
[Docket No. SSA–2015–0003]
RIN 0960–AI08
Social Security Administration
Violence Evaluation and Reporting
System
Social Security Administration.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
In today’s Federal Register,
the Social Security Administration
(SSA) separately published, notice of a
new system of records, Social Security
Administration Violence Evaluation and
Reporting System (SSAvers). Because
this system will contain investigatory
material compiled for law enforcement
purposes, this proposed rule will
exempt those records from specific
provisions of the Privacy Act.
DATES: To ensure that your comments
are considered, we must receive them
no later than July 16, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any one of three methods—internet,
fax, or mail. Do not submit the same
comments multiple times or by more
than one method. Regardless of which
method you choose, please state that
your comments refer to Docket No.
SSA–2015–0003, so that we may
associate your comments with the
correct regulation.
Caution: You should be careful to
include in your comments only
information that you wish to make
publicly available. We strongly urge you
not to include in your comments any
personal information, such as Social
Security numbers or medical
information.
1. Internet: We strongly recommend
that you submit your comments via the
internet. Please visit the Federal
eRulemaking portal at https://
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14JNP1.SGM
14JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 115 / Thursday, June 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules
www.regulations.gov. Use the Search
function to find docket number SSA–
2015–0003. The system will issue a
tracking number to confirm your
submission. You will not be able to
view your comment immediately
because we must post each comment
manually. It may take up to a week for
your comment to be viewable.
2. Fax: Fax comments to (410) 966–
2830.
3. Mail: Address your comments to
the Office of Regulations and Reports
Clearance, Social Security
Administration, 3100 West High Rise,
6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore,
Maryland 21235–6401.
Comments are available for public
viewing on the Federal eRulemaking
portal at https://www.regulations.gov or
in person, during regular business
hours, by arranging with the contact
person identified below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pamela J. Carcirieri, Supervisory
Government Information Specialist,
SSA, Office of Privacy and Disclosure,
6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore,
Maryland 21235–6401, Phone: (410)
965–0355, for information about this
rule. For information on eligibility or
filing for benefits, call our national tollfree number, 1–800–772–1213 or TTY
1–800–325–0778, or visit our internet
site, Social Security Online, at https://
www.socialsecurity.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Background
In accordance with the Privacy Act (5
U.S.C. 552a), we are issuing public
notice of our intent to establish a new
system of records entitled, Social
Security Administration Violence
Evaluation and Reporting System
(SSAvers) (60–0379). On April 18, 2012,
President Obama issued the
memorandum, Establishing Policies for
Addressing Domestic Violence in the
Federal Workforce, which directed the
Office of Personnel Management to
issue guidance to all departments and
agencies to create policy that addressed
domestic violence, sexual assault, and
stalking. Because of this guidance, we
developed the Workplace and Domestic
Violence policy and program. We
established SSAvers as part of this
policy and program to record, review,
investigate, and respond to allegations
of workplace and domestic violence
affecting our employees and contractors.
We are establishing SSAvers as part of
our compliance efforts under Title VII of
the Civil Rights Act of 1964;
Congressional Accountability Act of
1995; 29 U.S.C. 51, Occupational Safety
and Health Act of 1970; 29 CFR 1960,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Jun 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
Basic Program Elements for Federal
Employee Occupational Safety and
Health Programs and Related Matters;
41 CFR 102–74, Subpart C, Conduct on
Federal Property; 5 CFR 735, Employee
Responsibilities and Conduct; 5 CFR
2635, Standards of Ethical Conduct for
Employees of the Executive Branch; and
various other statutes related to
handling incidents of workplace and
domestic violence.
SSAvers will capture and house
information regarding alleged incidents
of workplace and domestic violence
filed by SSA employees and SSA
contractors, and will allow SSA’s Crisis
Advisory Team (CAT) to review and
respond to the reported allegations. Due
to the investigatory nature of
information that we will maintain in
this system of records, we propose this
rule to add SSAvers to the list of SSA
systems that are exempt from specific
provisions of the Privacy Act pursuant
to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2).
Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
We will consider all comments
received on or before the close of
business on the comment closing date
previously indicated, and we will make
the comments available for examination
in the docket at the previously noted
address. We will file comments received
after the comment closing date in the
docket, and we will consider them to
the extent practicable. We may publish
a final rule at any time after close of the
comment period.
Clarity of This Rule
Executive Order 12866, as
supplemented by Executive Order
13563, requires each agency to write all
rules in plain language. In addition to
your substantive comments on this
interim final rule, we invite your
comments on how to make the rule
easier to understand.
For example:
• Would more, but shorter, sections
be better?
• Are the requirements in the rule
clearly stated?
• Have we organized the material to
suit your needs?
• Could we improve clarity by adding
tables, lists, or diagrams?
• What else could we do to make the
rule easier to understand?
• Does the rule contain technical
language or jargon that is not clear?
• Would a different format make the
rule easier to understand, e.g. grouping
and order of sections, use of headings,
paragraphing?
Regulatory Procedures
SSA will publish a final rule
responding to any comments received
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
27729
and, if appropriate, will amend
provisions of the rule.
Executive Order 12866, as
Supplemented by Executive Order
13563
We consulted with the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
determined that this final rule does not
meet the criteria for a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866, as supplemented by Executive
Order 13563. Therefore, OMB did not
review it.
We also determined that this final
rule meets the plain language
requirement of Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
We analyzed this proposed rule in
accordance with the principles and
criteria established by Executive Order
13132, and we determined that the
proposed rule will not have sufficient
Federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism assessment.
We also determined that this proposed
rule will not preempt any State law or
State regulation or affect the States’
abilities to discharge traditional State
governmental functions.
Executive Order 12372
(Intergovernmental Review)
The regulations effectuating Executive
Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to
this proposed rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
We certify that this proposed rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
because it affects individuals only.
Therefore, the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, as amended, does not require us to
prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis.
Paperwork Reduction Act
These rules do not create any new or
affect any existing collections and,
therefore, do not require Office of
Management and Budget approval
under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
List of Subjects in 20 CFR Part 401
Administrative practice and
procedure, Privacy.
Nancy Berryhill,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, we are amending part 401 of
title 20 of the Code of Federal
Regulations as set forth below:
E:\FR\FM\14JNP1.SGM
14JNP1
27730
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 115 / Thursday, June 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules
PART 401—PRIVACY AND
DISCLOSURE OF OFFICIAL RECORDS
AND INFORMATION
1. The authority citation for part 401
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Secs. 205, 702(a)(5), 1106, and
1141 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
405, 902(a)(5), 1306, and 1320b–11); 5 U.S.C.
552 and 552a; 8 U.S.C. 1360; 26 U.S.C. 6103;
30 U.S.C. 923.
2. Amend § 401.85, by adding
paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(G) to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) * * *
(G) Social Security Administration
Violence Evaluation and Reporting
System, SSA.
*
*
*
*
*
■
[FR Doc. 2018–12819 Filed 6–13–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2016–0963]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Tchefuncta River, Madisonville, LA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
change the operating schedule that
governs the State Route 22 Bridge
(Madisonville (SR 22) swing span
bridge) across the Tchefuncta River,
mile 2.5, at Madisonville, St. Tammany
Parish, Louisiana. This action is
necessary to relieve vehicular traffic
congestion along SR 22 near
Madisonville, LA during peak,
afternoon weekday traffic periods.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before July 16, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2016–0963 using Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email Mr. Doug
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Jun 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
Blakemore, Eighth Coast Guard District
Bridge Administrator; telephone (504)
671–2128, email Douglas.A.Blakemore@
uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
LA–DOTD Louisiana Department of
Transportation and Development
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
SNPRM Supplemental notice of proposed
rulemaking
II. Background, Purpose and Legal
Basis
The State Route 22 Bridge
(Madisonville (SR 22) swing span
bridge) across the Tchefuncta River,
mile 2.5, at Madisonville, St. Tammany
Parish, Louisiana, is regulated under 33
CFR 117.500 and has a vertical
clearance of 6.2 feet above Mean High
Water in the closed-to-navigation
position and unlimited clearance in the
open-to-navigation position. The draw
of this bridge opens on signal from 7
p.m. to 6 a.m. From 6 a.m. to 7 p.m., the
draw opens on the hour and half hour,
except that from 6 a.m. to 9 a.m. and
from 4 p.m. to 7 p.m. Monday through
Friday except federal holidays, the draw
opens only on the hour. Navigation on
the waterway consists primarily of
recreational traffic as the largest
commercial facility upstream of the
bridge is no longer in service.
On November 4, 2016, at the request
of the Louisiana Department of
Transportation and Development (LA–
DOTD), the Coast Guard issued a
temporary deviation titled ‘‘Drawbridge
Operation Regulations; Tchefuncta
River, Madisonville, LA’’ (81 FR 76866).
There, we stated that the 180-day
deviation would test a temporary
change to the operating schedule of the
Madisonville (SR 22) swing span bridge
to determine whether a permanent
change is necessary. From November 21,
2016 through May 18, 2017, this
deviation extended the time between
openings from 30 minutes to an hour
between 6 a.m. and 7 p.m. daily, and
allowed the bridge to remain closed at
8 a.m., 5 p.m., and 6 p.m.. Monday
through Friday except federal holidays.
During the comment period that closed
on January 18, 2017, we received no
comments.
On November 4, 2016, concurrent
with the test deviation and on the basis
of a recent traffic study conducted by
LA–DOTD, the Coast Guard published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
titled ‘‘Drawbridge Operation
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Regulations; Tchefuncta River,
Madisonville, LA’’ (81 FR 76889).
There, we stated that the traffic study
indicated that the intersection of SR 22
and SR 21/SR1077 is over capacity at
peak hours and causes unacceptable
levels of delay to roadway traffic, which
is compounded by the opening of the
Madisonville (SR 22) swing span bridge
during peak hours. The traffic study also
indicated that a combination of
modifications of the traffic controls at
this intersection and the operating
schedule of the Madisonville (SR 22)
swing span bridge would enhance the
flow of vehicular traffic over SR 22. The
NPRM proposed a change to the
schedule of the Madisonville (SR 22)
swing span bridge that extended the
time between openings from 30 minutes
to an hour between 6 a.m. and 7 p.m.
daily, and allowed the bridge to remain
closed at 8 a.m., 5 p.m., and 6 p.m..
Monday through Friday except federal
holidays. During the comment period
that closed on January 18, 2017, we
received no comments.
LA–DOTD planned to conduct a study
of vehicular traffic flow over the bridge
as it related to a four way stop sign and
traffic light at the intersection of SR 22
and SR 21 during the temporary
deviation period. The LA–DOTD
planned to complete four separate traffic
studies at this intersection: A baseline
traffic analysis across the SR 22 bridge
with the original regulation and a fourway stop sign in place at the
intersection of SR 22 and SR 21, a traffic
analysis with the temporary deviation to
the regulation and a four-way stop sign
in place at the intersection of SR 22 and
SR 21, a traffic analysis with the
temporary deviation to the regulation
and a traffic light in place at the
intersection of SR 22 and SR 21, and a
traffic analysis with the original
regulation and a traffic light in place at
the intersection of SR 22 and SR 21. On
May 18, 2017, the temporary deviation
expired at the end of its scheduled 180
days.
III. Discussion of Comments and
Change
On May 26, 2017, LA–DOTD
requested that the Coast Guard
permanently change the regulation
based on information provided in the
traffic study, which is available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. LA–DOTD also provided
supplemental data and information on
the population growth in St. Tammany
Parish, including information on vehicle
traffic counts on SR 22 from 2015, the
locations of schools in the vicinity of SR
22 that contribute to vehicle congestion,
St. Tammany Parish projected
E:\FR\FM\14JNP1.SGM
14JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 115 (Thursday, June 14, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 27728-27730]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12819]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
20 CFR Part 401
[Docket No. SSA-2015-0003]
RIN 0960-AI08
Social Security Administration Violence Evaluation and Reporting
System
AGENCY: Social Security Administration.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In today's Federal Register, the Social Security
Administration (SSA) separately published, notice of a new system of
records, Social Security Administration Violence Evaluation and
Reporting System (SSAvers). Because this system will contain
investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes, this
proposed rule will exempt those records from specific provisions of the
Privacy Act.
DATES: To ensure that your comments are considered, we must receive
them no later than July 16, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any one of three methods--
internet, fax, or mail. Do not submit the same comments multiple times
or by more than one method. Regardless of which method you choose,
please state that your comments refer to Docket No. SSA-2015-0003, so
that we may associate your comments with the correct regulation.
Caution: You should be careful to include in your comments only
information that you wish to make publicly available. We strongly urge
you not to include in your comments any personal information, such as
Social Security numbers or medical information.
1. Internet: We strongly recommend that you submit your comments
via the internet. Please visit the Federal eRulemaking portal at http:/
/
[[Page 27729]]
www.regulations.gov. Use the Search function to find docket number SSA-
2015-0003. The system will issue a tracking number to confirm your
submission. You will not be able to view your comment immediately
because we must post each comment manually. It may take up to a week
for your comment to be viewable.
2. Fax: Fax comments to (410) 966-2830.
3. Mail: Address your comments to the Office of Regulations and
Reports Clearance, Social Security Administration, 3100 West High Rise,
6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21235-6401.
Comments are available for public viewing on the Federal
eRulemaking portal at https://www.regulations.gov or in person, during
regular business hours, by arranging with the contact person identified
below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pamela J. Carcirieri, Supervisory
Government Information Specialist, SSA, Office of Privacy and
Disclosure, 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21235-6401,
Phone: (410) 965-0355, for information about this rule. For information
on eligibility or filing for benefits, call our national toll-free
number, 1-800-772-1213 or TTY 1-800-325-0778, or visit our internet
site, Social Security Online, at https://www.socialsecurity.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In accordance with the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a), we are issuing
public notice of our intent to establish a new system of records
entitled, Social Security Administration Violence Evaluation and
Reporting System (SSAvers) (60-0379). On April 18, 2012, President
Obama issued the memorandum, Establishing Policies for Addressing
Domestic Violence in the Federal Workforce, which directed the Office
of Personnel Management to issue guidance to all departments and
agencies to create policy that addressed domestic violence, sexual
assault, and stalking. Because of this guidance, we developed the
Workplace and Domestic Violence policy and program. We established
SSAvers as part of this policy and program to record, review,
investigate, and respond to allegations of workplace and domestic
violence affecting our employees and contractors.
We are establishing SSAvers as part of our compliance efforts under
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; Congressional Accountability
Act of 1995; 29 U.S.C. 51, Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970;
29 CFR 1960, Basic Program Elements for Federal Employee Occupational
Safety and Health Programs and Related Matters; 41 CFR 102-74, Subpart
C, Conduct on Federal Property; 5 CFR 735, Employee Responsibilities
and Conduct; 5 CFR 2635, Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of
the Executive Branch; and various other statutes related to handling
incidents of workplace and domestic violence.
SSAvers will capture and house information regarding alleged
incidents of workplace and domestic violence filed by SSA employees and
SSA contractors, and will allow SSA's Crisis Advisory Team (CAT) to
review and respond to the reported allegations. Due to the
investigatory nature of information that we will maintain in this
system of records, we propose this rule to add SSAvers to the list of
SSA systems that are exempt from specific provisions of the Privacy Act
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2).
Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
We will consider all comments received on or before the close of
business on the comment closing date previously indicated, and we will
make the comments available for examination in the docket at the
previously noted address. We will file comments received after the
comment closing date in the docket, and we will consider them to the
extent practicable. We may publish a final rule at any time after close
of the comment period.
Clarity of This Rule
Executive Order 12866, as supplemented by Executive Order 13563,
requires each agency to write all rules in plain language. In addition
to your substantive comments on this interim final rule, we invite your
comments on how to make the rule easier to understand.
For example:
Would more, but shorter, sections be better?
Are the requirements in the rule clearly stated?
Have we organized the material to suit your needs?
Could we improve clarity by adding tables, lists, or
diagrams?
What else could we do to make the rule easier to
understand?
Does the rule contain technical language or jargon that is
not clear?
Would a different format make the rule easier to
understand, e.g. grouping and order of sections, use of headings,
paragraphing?
Regulatory Procedures
SSA will publish a final rule responding to any comments received
and, if appropriate, will amend provisions of the rule.
Executive Order 12866, as Supplemented by Executive Order 13563
We consulted with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and
determined that this final rule does not meet the criteria for a
significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563. Therefore, OMB did not review
it.
We also determined that this final rule meets the plain language
requirement of Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
We analyzed this proposed rule in accordance with the principles
and criteria established by Executive Order 13132, and we determined
that the proposed rule will not have sufficient Federalism implications
to warrant the preparation of a Federalism assessment. We also
determined that this proposed rule will not preempt any State law or
State regulation or affect the States' abilities to discharge
traditional State governmental functions.
Executive Order 12372 (Intergovernmental Review)
The regulations effectuating Executive Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities apply
to this proposed rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
We certify that this proposed rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because it
affects individuals only. Therefore, the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as
amended, does not require us to prepare a regulatory flexibility
analysis.
Paperwork Reduction Act
These rules do not create any new or affect any existing
collections and, therefore, do not require Office of Management and
Budget approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
List of Subjects in 20 CFR Part 401
Administrative practice and procedure, Privacy.
Nancy Berryhill,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, we are amending part 401 of
title 20 of the Code of Federal Regulations as set forth below:
[[Page 27730]]
PART 401--PRIVACY AND DISCLOSURE OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AND
INFORMATION
0
1. The authority citation for part 401 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 205, 702(a)(5), 1106, and 1141 of the Social
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 405, 902(a)(5), 1306, and 1320b-11); 5
U.S.C. 552 and 552a; 8 U.S.C. 1360; 26 U.S.C. 6103; 30 U.S.C. 923.
0
2. Amend Sec. 401.85, by adding paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(G) to read as
follows:
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) * * *
(G) Social Security Administration Violence Evaluation and
Reporting System, SSA.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2018-12819 Filed 6-13-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191-02-P