Migratory Bird Hunting; Proposed 2019-20 Migratory Game Bird Hunting Regulations (Preliminary) With Requests for Indian Tribal Proposals; Notice of Meetings, 27836-27844 [2018-12773]
Download as PDF
27836
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 115 / Thursday, June 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 20
[Docket No. FWS–HQ–MB–2018–0030;
FF09M21200–189–FXMB1231099BPP0]
RIN 1018–BD10
Migratory Bird Hunting; Proposed
2019–20 Migratory Game Bird Hunting
Regulations (Preliminary) With
Requests for Indian Tribal Proposals;
Notice of Meetings
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; availability of
supplemental information.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (hereinafter the Service or we)
proposes to establish annual hunting
regulations for certain migratory game
birds for the 2019–20 hunting season.
We annually prescribe outside limits
(frameworks) within which States may
select hunting seasons. This proposed
rule provides the regulatory schedule,
announces the Service Migratory Bird
Regulations Committee (SRC) and
Flyway Council meetings, describes the
proposed regulatory alternatives for the
2019–20 duck hunting seasons, and
requests proposals from Indian tribes
that wish to establish special migratory
game bird hunting regulations on
Federal Indian reservations and ceded
lands. Migratory bird hunting seasons
provide opportunities for recreation and
sustenance; aid Federal, State, and tribal
governments in the management of
migratory game birds; and permit
harvests at levels compatible with
migratory game bird population status
and habitat conditions.
DATES:
Comments: You may comment on the
general harvest strategy and the
proposed regulatory alternatives for the
2019–20 season until July 18, 2018.
Following subsequent Federal Register
documents, you will be given an
opportunity to submit comments on the
proposed frameworks by January 15,
2019. Tribes must submit proposals and
related comments on or before
December 1, 2018.
Meetings: The SRC will conduct a
meeting on July 10, 2018, to identify
and discuss preliminary issues
concerning the 2019–20 migratory bird
hunting regulations. The meeting will
commence at approximately 11:00 a.m.
EDT. The SRC will meet to consider and
develop proposed regulations for the
2019–20 migratory game bird hunting
seasons on October 16–17, 2018.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Jun 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
Meetings on both days are open to the
public and will commence at
approximately 8:30 a.m.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on the proposals by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments
on Docket No. FWS–HQ–MB–2018–
0030.
• U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public
Comments Processing, Attn: FWS–HQ–
MB–2018–0030; Division of Policy,
Performance, and Management
Programs; U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, MS: BPHC; 5275 Leesburg Pike,
Falls Church, VA 22041.
We will not accept emailed or faxed
comments. We will post all comments
on https://www.regulations.gov. This
generally means that your entire
submission—including any personal
identifying information—will be posted
on the website. See the Public
Comments section, below, for more
information.
Meetings: The July 10, 2018, SRC
meeting will be available to the public
via teleconference in the Rachel Carson
conference room at 5275 Leesburg Pike,
Falls Church, VA 22041. The October
16–17, 2018, SRC meeting will be at the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 5600
American Boulevard, Bloomington, MN
55437.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron
W. Kokel at: Division of Migratory Bird
Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Department of the Interior, MS:
MB, 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church,
VA 22041; (703) 358–1714.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
New Process for the Annual Migratory
Game Bird Hunting Regulations
As part of DOI’s retrospective
regulatory review, 3 years ago we
developed a schedule for migratory
game bird hunting regulations that is
more efficient and provides hunting
season dates earlier than was possible
under the old process. The new process
makes planning easier for the States and
all parties interested in migratory bird
hunting. Beginning in the summer of
2015, with the development of the
2016–17 hunting seasons, we started
promulgating our annual migratory
game bird hunting regulations using a
new schedule that combines the
previously used early- and late-season
regulatory processes into a single
process. We make decisions for harvest
management based on predictions
derived from long-term biological
information and established harvest
strategies and, therefore, can establish
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
migratory bird hunting seasons earlier
than the system we used for many years.
Under the new process, we develop
proposed hunting season frameworks
for a given year in the fall of the prior
year. We then finalize those frameworks
a few months later, thereby enabling the
State agencies to select and publish
their season dates in early summer. This
proposed rule is the first in a series of
proposed and final rulemaking
documents for the establishment of the
2019–20 hunting seasons.
Background and Overview
Migratory game birds are those bird
species so designated in conventions
between the United States and several
foreign nations for the protection and
management of these birds. Under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C.
703–712), the Secretary of the Interior is
authorized to determine when ‘‘hunting,
taking, capture, killing, possession, sale,
purchase, shipment, transportation,
carriage, or export of any * * * bird, or
any part, nest, or egg’’ of migratory game
birds can take place, and to adopt
regulations for this purpose. These
regulations are written after giving due
regard to ‘‘the zones of temperature and
to the distribution, abundance,
economic value, breeding habits, and
times and lines of migratory flight of
such birds’’ and are updated annually
(16 U.S.C. 704(a)). This responsibility
has been delegated to the Service as the
lead Federal agency for managing and
conserving migratory birds in the
United States. However, migratory game
bird management is a cooperative effort
of State, Tribal, and Federal
governments.
The Service develops migratory game
bird hunting regulations by establishing
the frameworks, or outside limits, for
season lengths, bag limits, and areas for
migratory game bird hunting.
Acknowledging regional differences in
hunting conditions, the Service has
administratively divided the Nation into
four Flyways for the primary purpose of
managing migratory game birds. Each
Flyway (Atlantic, Mississippi, Central,
and Pacific) has a Flyway Council, a
formal organization generally composed
of one member from each State and
Province in that Flyway. The Flyway
Councils, established through the
Association of Fish and Wildlife
Agencies, also assist in researching and
providing migratory game bird
management information for Federal,
State, and Provincial governments, as
well as private conservation entities and
the general public.
The process for adopting migratory
game bird hunting regulations, located
in title 50 of the Code of Federal
E:\FR\FM\14JNP2.SGM
14JNP2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 115 / Thursday, June 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Regulations (CFR) at part 20, is
constrained by three primary factors.
Legal and administrative considerations
dictate how long the rulemaking process
will last. Most importantly, however,
the biological cycle of migratory game
birds controls the timing of datagathering activities and thus the dates
on which these results are available for
consideration and deliberation.
For the regulatory cycle, Service
biologists gather, analyze, and interpret
biological survey data and provide this
information to all those involved in the
process through a series of published
status reports and presentations to
Flyway Councils and other interested
parties. Because the Service is required
to take abundance of migratory game
birds and other factors into
consideration, the Service undertakes a
number of surveys throughout the year
in conjunction with Service Regional
Offices, the Canadian Wildlife Service,
and State and Provincial wildlifemanagement agencies. To determine the
appropriate frameworks for each
species, we consider factors such as
population size and trend, geographical
distribution, annual breeding effort,
condition of breeding and wintering
habitat, number of hunters, and
anticipated harvest. After frameworks
are established for season lengths, bag
limits, and areas for migratory game bird
hunting, States may select season dates,
bag limits, and other regulatory options
for the hunting seasons. States may
always be more conservative in their
selections than the Federal frameworks,
but never more liberal.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Service Migratory Bird Regulations
Committee Meetings
The SRC will conduct an open
meeting on July 10, 2018, to discuss
preliminary issues for the 2019–20
regulations, and on October 16–17,
2018, to review information on the
current status of migratory game birds
and develop 2019–20 migratory game
bird regulations recommendations for
these species. In accordance with
Departmental policy, these meetings are
open to public observation. You may
submit written comments to the Service
on the matters discussed. See DATES and
ADDRESSES for information about these
meetings.
Announcement of Flyway Council
Meetings
Service representatives will be
present at the individual meetings of the
four Flyway Councils this August and
September. Although agendas are not
yet available, these meetings usually
commence at 8 a.m. on the days
indicated.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Jun 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
Atlantic Flyway Council: September
27–28, 2018; Hotel 1620 Plymouth
Harbor, 180 Water Street, Plymouth,
MA.
Mississippi Flyway Council: August
23–24, 2018; Radisson Hotel Winnipeg
Downtown, 288 Portage Avenue,
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Central Flyway Council: August 30–
31, 2018; Elk Ridge Resort and
Conference Centre, Waskesiu Lake,
Saskatchewan, Canada.
Pacific Flyway Council: September 28,
2018; Drury Inn and Suites, Flagstaff,
AZ.
Notice of Intent To Establish Open
Seasons
This document announces our intent
to establish open hunting seasons and
daily bag and possession limits for
certain designated groups or species of
migratory game birds for 2019–20 in the
contiguous United States, Alaska,
Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin
Islands, under §§ 20.101 through 20.107,
20.109, and 20.110 of subpart K of 50
CFR part 20. For the 2019–20 migratory
game bird hunting season, we will
propose regulations for certain
designated members of the avian
families Anatidae (ducks, geese, and
swans); Columbidae (doves and
pigeons); Gruidae (cranes); Rallidae
(rails, coots, moorhens, and gallinules);
and Scolopacidae (woodcock and
snipe). We describe these proposals
under Proposed 2019–20 Migratory
Game Bird Hunting Regulations
(Preliminary) in this document. We
annually publish definitions of flyways
and management units, and a
description of the data used in and the
factors affecting the regulatory process
(see May 30, 2017, Federal Register (82
FR 24786) for the latest definitions and
descriptions).
Regulatory Schedule for 2019–20
This document is the first in a series
of proposed, supplemental, and final
rulemaking documents for migratory
game bird hunting regulations. We will
publish additional supplemental
proposals for public comment in the
Federal Register as population, habitat,
harvest, and other information become
available. Major steps in the 2019–20
regulatory cycle relating to open public
meetings and Federal Register
notifications are illustrated in the
diagram at the end of this proposed rule.
All publication dates of Federal
Register documents are target dates. All
sections of this and subsequent
documents outlining hunting
frameworks and guidelines are
organized under numbered headings.
These headings are:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
27837
1. Ducks
A. General Harvest Strategy
B. Regulatory Alternatives
C. Zones and Split Seasons
D. Special Seasons/Species Management
i. September Teal Seasons
ii. September Teal/Wood Duck Seasons
iii. Black Ducks
iv. Canvasbacks
v. Pintails
vi. Scaup
vii. Mottled Ducks
viii. Wood Ducks
ix. Youth Hunt
x. Mallard Management Units
xi. Other
2. Sea Ducks
3. Mergansers
4. Canada Geese
A. Special Early Seasons
B. Regular Seasons
C. Special Late Seasons
5. White-Fronted Geese
6. Brant
7. Snow and Ross’s (Light) Geese
8. Swans
9. Sandhill Cranes
10. Coots
11. Moorhens and Gallinules
12. Rails
13. Snipe
14. Woodcock
15. Band-Tailed Pigeons
16. Doves
17. Alaska
18. Hawaii
19. Puerto Rico
20. Virgin Islands
21. Falconry
22. Other
Later sections of this and subsequent
documents will refer only to numbered
items requiring your attention.
Therefore, it is important to note that we
will omit those items requiring no
attention, so remaining numbered items
will be discontinuous, making the list
appear incomplete.
The proposed regulatory alternatives
for the 2019–20 duck hunting seasons
are contained at the end of this
document. We plan to publish final
regulatory alternatives in late-August.
We plan to publish proposed season
frameworks in mid-December 2018. We
plan to publish final season frameworks
in late February 2019.
Review of Public Comments
This proposed rulemaking contains
the proposed regulatory alternatives for
the 2019–20 duck hunting seasons. This
proposed rulemaking also describes
other recommended changes or specific
preliminary proposals that vary from the
2018–19 regulations and issues
requiring early discussion, action, or the
attention of the States or tribes. We will
publish responses to all proposals and
written comments when we develop
final frameworks for the 2019–20
season. We seek additional information
and comments on this proposed rule.
E:\FR\FM\14JNP2.SGM
14JNP2
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
27838
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 115 / Thursday, June 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Consolidation of Rulemaking
Documents
For administrative purposes, this
document consolidates the notice of our
intent to establish open migratory game
bird hunting seasons and the request for
tribal proposals with the preliminary
proposals for the annual hunting
regulations-development process. We
will publish the remaining proposed
and final rulemaking documents
separately. For inquiries on tribal
guidelines and proposals, tribes should
contact the following personnel:
Region 1 (Idaho, Oregon, Washington,
Hawaii, and the Pacific Islands)—
Nanette Seto, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, 911 NE 11th Avenue, Portland,
OR 97232–4181; (503) 231–6164.
Region 2 (Arizona, New Mexico,
Oklahoma, and Texas)—Scott Carleton,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 500 Gold
Avenue SW, Albuquerque, NM 87102;
(505) 248–6639.
Region 3 (Illinois, Indiana, Iowa,
Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio,
and Wisconsin)—Tom Cooper, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, 5600 American
Blvd. West, Suite 990, Bloomington, MN
55437–1458; (612) 713–5101.
Region 4 (Alabama, Arkansas, Florida,
Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana,
Mississippi, North Carolina, Puerto
Rico, Virgin Islands, South Carolina,
and Tennessee)—Laurel Barnhill, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, 1875 Century
Boulevard, Room 324, Atlanta, GA
30345; (404) 679–4000.
Region 5 (Connecticut, Delaware,
Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New
Hampshire, New Jersey, New York,
Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont,
Virginia, and West Virginia)—Pam
Toschik, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
300 Westgate Center Drive, Hadley, MA
01035–9589; (413) 253–8610.
Region 6 (Colorado, Kansas, Montana,
Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota,
Utah, and Wyoming)—Brian Smith, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, P.O. Box
25486, Denver Federal Building,
Denver, CO 80225; (303) 236–8145.
Region 7 (Alaska)—Eric Taylor, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, 1011 East
Tudor Road, Anchorage, AK 99503;
(907) 786–3423.
Region 8 (California and Nevada)—
Amedee Brickey, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, 2800 Cottage Way, Sacramento,
CA 95825–1846; (916) 414–6480.
Requests for Tribal Proposals
Background
Beginning with the 1985–86 hunting
season, we have employed guidelines
described in the June 4, 1985, Federal
Register (50 FR 23467) to establish
special migratory game bird hunting
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Jun 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
regulations on Federal Indian
reservations (including off-reservation
trust lands) and ceded lands. We
developed these guidelines in response
to tribal requests for our recognition of
their reserved hunting rights, and for
some tribes, recognition of their
authority to regulate hunting by both
tribal and nontribal members
throughout their reservations. The
guidelines include possibilities for:
(1) On-reservation hunting by both
tribal and nontribal members, with
hunting by nontribal members on some
reservations to take place within Federal
frameworks, but on dates different from
those selected by the surrounding
State(s);
(2) On-reservation hunting by tribal
members only, outside of usual Federal
frameworks for season dates, season
length, and daily bag and possession
limits; and
(3) Off-reservation hunting by tribal
members on ceded lands, outside of
usual framework dates and season
length, with some added flexibility in
daily bag and possession limits.
In all cases, tribal regulations
established under the guidelines must
be consistent with the annual March 11
to August 31 closed season mandated by
the 1916 Convention Between the
United States and Great Britain (for
Canada) for the Protection of Migratory
Birds (Convention). The guidelines are
applicable to those tribes that have
reserved hunting rights on Federal
Indian reservations (including offreservation trust lands) and ceded lands.
They also may be applied to the
establishment of migratory game bird
hunting regulations for nontribal
members on all lands within the
exterior boundaries of reservations
where tribes have full wildlifemanagement authority over such
hunting, or where the tribes and affected
States otherwise have reached
agreement over hunting by nontribal
members on non-Indian lands.
Tribes usually have the authority to
regulate migratory game bird hunting by
nonmembers on Indian-owned
reservation lands, subject to our
approval. The question of jurisdiction is
more complex on reservations that
include lands owned by non-Indians,
especially when the surrounding States
have established or intend to establish
regulations governing migratory bird
hunting by non-Indians on these lands.
In such cases, we encourage the tribes
and States to reach agreement on
regulations that would apply throughout
the reservations. When appropriate, we
will consult with a tribe and State with
the aim of facilitating an accord. We
also will consult jointly with tribal and
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
State officials in the affected States
where tribes may wish to establish
special hunting regulations for tribal
members on ceded lands. It is
incumbent upon the tribe and/or the
State to request consultation as a result
of the proposal being published in the
Federal Register. We will not presume
to make a determination, without being
advised by either a tribe or a State, that
any issue is or is not worthy of formal
consultation.
One of the guidelines provides for the
continuation of tribal members’ harvest
of migratory game birds on reservations
where such harvest is a customary
practice. We do not oppose this harvest,
provided it does not take place during
the closed season required by the
Convention, and it is not so large as to
adversely affect the status of the
migratory game bird resource. Since the
inception of these guidelines, we have
reached annual agreement with tribes
for migratory game bird hunting by
tribal members on their lands or on
lands where they have reserved hunting
rights. We will continue to consult with
tribes that wish to reach a mutual
agreement on hunting regulations for
on-reservation hunting by tribal
members. Tribes should not view the
guidelines as inflexible. We believe that
they provide appropriate opportunity to
accommodate the reserved hunting
rights and management authority of
Indian tribes while also ensuring that
the migratory game bird resource
receives necessary protection. The
conservation of this important
international resource is paramount.
Use of the guidelines is not required if
a tribe wishes to observe the hunting
regulations established by the State(s) in
which the reservation is located.
Details Needed in Tribal Proposals
Tribes that wish to use the guidelines
to establish special hunting regulations
for the 2019–20 migratory game bird
hunting season should submit a
proposal that includes: (1) The
requested migratory game bird hunting
season dates and other details regarding
the proposed regulations; (2) Harvest
anticipated under the proposed
regulations; and (3) Tribal capabilities to
enforce migratory game bird hunting
regulations. For those situations where
it could be shown that failure to limit
Tribal harvest could seriously impact
the migratory game bird resource, we
also request information on the methods
employed to monitor harvest and any
potential steps taken to limit level of
harvest.
A tribe that desires the earliest
possible opening of the migratory game
bird season for nontribal members
E:\FR\FM\14JNP2.SGM
14JNP2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 115 / Thursday, June 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules
should specify this request in its
proposal, rather than request a date that
might not be within the final Federal
frameworks. Similarly, unless a tribe
wishes to set more restrictive
regulations than Federal regulations will
permit for nontribal members, the
proposal should request the same daily
bag and possession limits and season
length for migratory game birds that
Federal regulations are likely to permit
the States in the Flyway in which the
reservation is located.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Tribal Proposal Procedures
We will publish details of tribal
proposals for public review in later
Federal Register documents. Because of
the time required for review by us and
the public, Indian tribes that desire
special migratory game bird hunting
regulations for the 2019–20 hunting
season should submit their proposals no
later than December 1, 2018. Tribes
should direct inquiries regarding the
guidelines and proposals to the
appropriate Service Regional Office
listed above under the caption
Consolidation of Rulemaking
Documents. Tribes that request special
migratory game bird hunting regulations
for tribal members on ceded lands
should send a courtesy copy of the
proposal to officials in the affected
State(s).
Public Comments
The Department of the Interior’s
policy is, whenever practicable, to
afford the public an opportunity to
participate in the rulemaking process.
Accordingly, we invite interested
persons to submit written comments,
suggestions, or recommendations
regarding the proposed regulations.
Before promulgation of final migratory
game bird hunting regulations, we will
take into consideration all comments we
receive. Such comments, and any
additional information we receive, may
lead to final regulations that differ from
these proposals.
You may submit your comments and
materials concerning this proposed rule
by one of the methods listed in
ADDRESSES. We will not accept
comments sent by email or fax or to an
address not listed in ADDRESSES.
Finally, we will not consider handdelivered comments that we do not
receive, or mailed comments that are
not postmarked, by the date specified in
DATES. We will post all comments in
their entirety—including your personal
identifying information—on https://
www.regulations.gov. Before including
your address, phone number, email
address, or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Jun 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
should be aware that your entire
comment—including your personal
identifying information—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so. Comments and materials we
receive, as well as supporting
documentation we used in preparing
this proposed rule, will be available for
public inspection on https://
www.regulations.gov, or by
appointment, during normal business
hours, at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Division of Migratory Bird
Management, 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls
Church, VA 22041.
For each series of proposed
rulemakings, we will establish specific
comment periods. We will consider, but
may not respond in detail to, each
comment. As in the past, we will
summarize all comments we receive
during the comment period and respond
to them after the closing date in any
final rules.
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) Consideration
The programmatic document,
‘‘Second Final Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement:
Issuance of Annual Regulations
Permitting the Sport Hunting of
Migratory Birds (EIS 20130139),’’ filed
with the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) on May 24, 2013,
addresses NEPA compliance by the
Service for issuance of the annual
framework regulations for hunting of
migratory game bird species. We
published a notice of availability in the
Federal Register on May 31, 2013 (78
FR 32686), and our Record of Decision
on July 26, 2013 (78 FR 45376). We also
address NEPA compliance for waterfowl
hunting frameworks through the annual
preparation of separate environmental
assessments, the most recent being
‘‘Duck Hunting Regulations for 2018–
19,’’ with its corresponding May 2018,
finding of no significant impact. In
addition, an August 1985 environmental
assessment entitled ‘‘Guidelines for
Migratory Bird Hunting Regulations on
Federal Indian Reservations and Ceded
Lands’’ is available from the address
indicated under the caption FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Endangered Species Act Consideration
Before issuance of the 2019–20
migratory game bird hunting
regulations, we will comply with
provisions of the Endangered Species
Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C.
1531–1543; hereinafter the Act), to
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
27839
ensure that hunting is not likely to
jeopardize the continued existence of
any species designated as endangered or
threatened or modify or destroy its
critical habitat and is consistent with
conservation programs for those species.
Consultations under section 7 of the Act
may cause us to change proposals in
this and future supplemental proposed
rulemaking documents.
Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 provides
that the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) in the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) will
review all significant rules. OIRA has
reviewed this rule and has determined
that this rule is significant because it
would have an annual effect of $100
million or more on the economy.
E.O. 13563 reaffirms the principles of
E.O. 12866 while calling for
improvements in the nation’s regulatory
system to promote predictability, to
reduce uncertainty, and to use the best,
most innovative, and least burdensome
tools for achieving regulatory ends. The
executive order directs agencies to
consider regulatory approaches that
reduce burdens and maintain flexibility
and freedom of choice for the public
where these approaches are relevant,
feasible, and consistent with regulatory
objectives. E.O. 13563 emphasizes
further that regulations must be based
on the best available science and that
the rulemaking process must allow for
public participation and an open
exchange of ideas. We have developed
this rule in a manner consistent with
these requirements.
An economic analysis was prepared
for the 2019–20 season. This analysis
was based on data from the 2011
National Hunting and Fishing Survey,
the most recent year for which data are
available (see discussion in Regulatory
Flexibility Act section below). This
analysis estimated consumer surplus for
three alternatives for duck hunting
(estimates for other species are not
quantified due to lack of data). The
alternatives are (1) issue restrictive
regulations allowing fewer days than
those issued during the 2018–19 season,
(2) issue moderate regulations allowing
more days than those in alternative 1,
and (3) issue liberal regulations
identical to the regulations in the 2018–
19 season. For the 2018–19 season, we
chose Alternative 3, with an estimated
consumer surplus across all flyways of
$334–$440 million with a mid-point
estimate of $387 million. We also chose
alternative 3 for the 2009–10 through
2017–18 seasons. We will select
regulations for the 2019–20 season in
E:\FR\FM\14JNP2.SGM
14JNP2
27840
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 115 / Thursday, June 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules
October. The 2019–20 analysis is part of
the record for this rule and is available
at https://www.regulations.gov at Docket
No. FWS–HQ–MB–2018–0030.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The annual migratory bird hunting
regulations have a significant economic
impact on substantial numbers of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). We analyzed
the economic impacts of the annual
hunting regulations on small business
entities in detail as part of the 1981 costbenefit analysis. This analysis was
revised annually from 1990 through
1995. In 1995, the Service issued a
Small Entity Flexibility Analysis
(Analysis), which was subsequently
updated in 1996, 1998, 2004, 2008,
2013, 2018, and 2019. The primary
source of information about hunter
expenditures for migratory game bird
hunting is the National Hunting and
Fishing Survey, which is generally
conducted at 5-year intervals. The 2019
Analysis is based on the 2011 National
Hunting and Fishing Survey and the
U.S. Department of Commerce’s County
Business Patterns, from which it was
estimated that migratory bird hunters
would spend approximately $1.5 billion
at small businesses in 2019. Copies of
the Analysis are available upon request
from the Division of Migratory Bird
Management (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT) or from https://
www.regulations.gov at Docket No.
FWS–HQ–MB–2018–0030.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Clarity of the Rule
We are required by E.O. 12866 and
12988 and by the Presidential
Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write
all rules in plain language. This means
that each rule we publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address
readers directly;
(c) Use clear language rather than
jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and
sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever
possible.
If you feel that we have not met these
requirements, send us comments by one
of the methods listed in ADDRESSES. To
better help us revise the rule, your
comments should be as specific as
possible. For example, you should tell
us the numbers of the sections or
paragraphs that are unclearly written,
which sections or sentences are too
long, the sections where you feel lists or
tables would be useful, etc.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Jun 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This proposed rule is a major rule
under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act. For the reasons outlined
above, this rule would have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million
or more. However, because this rule
would establish hunting seasons, we do
not plan to defer the effective date
under the exemption contained in 5
U.S.C. 808(1).
Paperwork Reduction Act
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number. This rule does not
contain any new collection of
information that require approval by
OMB under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
OMB has previously approved the
information collection requirements
associated with migratory bird surveys
and the procedures for establishing
annual migratory bird hunting seasons
under the following OMB control
numbers:
• 1018–0019, ‘‘North American
Woodcock Singing Ground Survey’’
(expires 5/31/2018, and in accordance
with 5 CFR 1320.10, an agency may
continue to conduct or sponsor this
collection of information while the
submission is pending at OMB).
• 1018–0023, ‘‘Migratory Bird
Surveys, 50 CFR 20.20’’ (expires 8/31/
2020). Includes Migratory Bird Harvest
Information Program, Migratory Bird
Hunter Surveys, Sandhill Crane Survey,
and Parts Collection Survey.
• 1018–0171, ‘‘Establishment of
Annual Migratory Bird Hunting
Seasons, 50 CFR part 20’’ (expires 06/
30/2021)
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
We have determined and certify, in
compliance with the requirements of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, 2
U.S.C. 1502 et seq., that this proposed
rulemaking would not impose a cost of
$100 million or more in any given year
on local or State government or private
entities. Therefore, this rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.
Civil Justice Reform—Executive Order
12988
The Department, in promulgating this
proposed rule, has determined that this
proposed rule will not unduly burden
the judicial system and that it meets the
requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of E.O. 12988.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Takings Implication Assessment
In accordance with E.O. 12630, this
proposed rule, authorized by the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act, does not
have significant takings implications
and does not affect any constitutionally
protected property rights. This rule
would not result in the physical
occupancy of property, the physical
invasion of property, or the regulatory
taking of any property. In fact, this rule
would allow hunters to exercise
otherwise unavailable privileges and,
therefore, reduce restrictions on the use
of private and public property.
Energy Effects—Executive Order 13211
E.O. 13211 requires agencies to
prepare Statements of Energy Effects
when undertaking certain actions.
While this proposed rule is a significant
regulatory action under E.O. 12866, it is
not expected to adversely affect energy
supplies, distribution, or use. Therefore,
this action is not a significant energy
action and no Statement of Energy
Effects is required.
Government-to-Government
Relationship With Tribes
In accordance with the President’s
memorandum of April 29, 1994,
‘‘Government-to-Government Relations
with Native American Tribal
Governments’’ (59 FR 22951), E.O.
13175, and 512 DM 2, we have
evaluated possible effects on Federally
recognized Indian tribes and have
determined that there are no effects on
Indian trust resources. However, in this
proposed rule, we solicit proposals for
special migratory bird hunting
regulations for certain tribes on Federal
Indian reservations, off-reservation trust
lands, and ceded lands for the 2019–20
migratory bird hunting season. The
resulting proposals will be contained in
a separate proposed rule. By virtue of
these actions, we have consulted with
tribes affected by this rule.
Federalism Effects
Due to the migratory nature of certain
species of birds, the Federal
Government has been given
responsibility over these species by the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act. We annually
prescribe frameworks from which the
States make selections regarding the
hunting of migratory birds, and we
employ guidelines to establish special
regulations on Federal Indian
reservations and ceded lands. This
process preserves the ability of the
States and tribes to determine which
seasons meet their individual needs.
Any State or Indian tribe may be more
restrictive than the Federal frameworks
at any time. The frameworks are
E:\FR\FM\14JNP2.SGM
14JNP2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 115 / Thursday, June 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules
developed in a cooperative process with
the States and the Flyway Councils.
This process allows States to participate
in the development of frameworks from
which they will make selections,
thereby having an influence on their
own regulations. These rules do not
have a substantial direct effect on fiscal
capacity, change the roles or
responsibilities of Federal or State
governments, or intrude on State policy
or administration. Therefore, in
accordance with E.O. 13132, these
regulations do not have significant
federalism effects and do not have
sufficient federalism implications to
warrant the preparation of a federalism
summary impact statement.
Executive Order 13771—Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 3,
2017) because it is issued with respect
to routine hunting and fishing activities.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 20
Exports, Hunting, Imports, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Transportation, Wildlife.
Authority
The rules that eventually will be
promulgated for the 2019–20 hunting
season are authorized under 16 U.S.C.
703–711, 712, and 742 a–j.
Dated: May 11, 2018.
Susan Combs,
Senior Advisor to the Secretary, Exercising
the Authority of the Assistant Secretary for
Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
Proposed 2019–20 Migratory Game
Bird Hunting Regulations (Preliminary)
Pending current information on
populations, harvest, and habitat
conditions, and receipt of
recommendations from the four Flyway
Councils, we may defer specific
regulatory proposals. No changes from
the 2018–19 frameworks in the
Mississippi, Central, and Pacific
Flyways are being proposed at this time.
Other issues requiring early discussion,
action, or the attention of the States or
tribes are contained below:
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
1. Ducks
Categories used to discuss issues
related to duck harvest management are:
(A) General Harvest Strategy, (B)
Regulatory Alternatives, (C) Zones and
Split Seasons, and (D) Special Seasons/
Species Management. Only those
categories containing substantial
recommendations are discussed below.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Jun 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
A. General Harvest Strategy
We propose to continue using
adaptive harvest management (AHM) to
help determine appropriate duckhunting regulations for the 2019–20
season. AHM permits sound resource
decisions in the face of uncertain
regulatory impacts and provides a
mechanism for reducing that
uncertainty over time. We use AHM to
evaluate four alternative regulatory
levels for duck hunting in the
Mississippi, Central, and Pacific
Flyways based on the population status
of mallards. We are proposing to use
AHM based on the population status of
a suite of four species in the Atlantic
Flyway (see below). We have specific
hunting strategies for species of special
concern, such as black ducks, scaup,
and pintails.
Mississippi, Central, and Pacific
Flyways
The prescribed regulatory alternative
for the Mississippi, Central, and Pacific
Flyways is based on the status of
mallard populations that contribute
primarily to each Flyway. In the Central
and Mississippi Flyways, we set
hunting regulations based on the status
and dynamics of mid-continent
mallards. Mid-continent mallards are
those breeding in central North America
(Federal survey strata 13–18, 20–50, and
75–77, and State surveys in Minnesota,
Wisconsin, and Michigan). In the Pacific
Flyway, we set hunting regulations
based on the status and dynamics of
western mallards. Western mallards are
those breeding in Alaska and the
northern Yukon Territory (as based on
Federal surveys in strata 1–12), and in
California, Oregon, Washington, and
British Columbia (as based on State- or
Province-conducted surveys).
For the 2019–20 season, we
recommend continuing to use
independent optimization to determine
the optimal regulatory choice for each
mallard stock. This means that we
would develop regulations for midcontinent mallards and western
mallards independently, based upon the
breeding stock that contributes
primarily to each Flyway. We detailed
implementation of this AHM decision
framework for western and midcontinent mallards in the July 24, 2008,
Federal Register (73 FR 43290).
Atlantic Flyway
Since 2000, the Service has used an
AHM protocol based on the status of
eastern mallards to establish the annual
framework regulations for duck hunting
seasons in the Atlantic Flyway. This
protocol assumes that the mallard is an
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
27841
appropriate surrogate for other duck
species in the Atlantic Flyway. By 2010
it was apparent that the biological
models used in the AHM protocol were
performing poorly in terms of accurately
predicting the following year’s eastern
mallard breeding population, and this
performance problem led to a
comprehensive review of duck harvest
management in the Atlantic Flyway.
Following that review, the Atlantic
Flyway Council (AFC) determined that
eastern mallards do not adequately
represent duck harvest dynamics
throughout the entire flyway; they do
not represent the breeding ecology and
habitat requirements of other important
Atlantic Flyway duck species because
their breeding range does not overlap
with that of other ducks that breed in
the flyway; and their breeding and/or
wintering habitat needs differ from
many of the other duck species in the
Flyway. Thus, although mallards
comprise nearly 20 percent of the
Atlantic Flyway’s duck harvest, the
status of eastern mallards does not
necessarily reflect that of other Atlantic
Flyway duck species. For example,
mallards in eastern North America have
declined at an annual rate of 1 percent
since 1998, whereas over the same time
period all other duck species in eastern
North America for which robust
population estimates are available are
stable or increasing.
The AFC decided that a decision
framework based upon a suite of duck
species that better represents the habitat
needs and harvest distribution of ducks
in the Atlantic Flyway would be
superior to the current eastern mallard
AHM framework, and we concur.
Accordingly, the Service and the AFC
began working in 2013 to develop a
multi-stock AHM protocol for setting
annual duck hunting season frameworks
for the Atlantic Flyway.
The multi-stock protocol development
has now been completed, and we
propose to adopt it in place of the
eastern mallard AHM. The protocol is
based on a suite of four species that
represents the dynamics of duck harvest
in the Atlantic Flyway and the various
habitat types used by waterfowl
throughout the Atlantic Flyway: Greenwinged teal (Anas crecca), common
goldeneye (Bucephala clangula), ringnecked duck (Aythya collaris), and
wood duck (Aix sponsa). These species
comprise more than 40 percent of the
Atlantic Flyway’s total duck harvest,
and they reflect regional variation in
harvest composition. The selected
species represent upland nesters in
boreal and southern Canada (greenwinged teal), over-water nesters in
boreal Canada (ring-necked duck),
E:\FR\FM\14JNP2.SGM
14JNP2
27842
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 115 / Thursday, June 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
cavity nesters in the United States and
southern Canada (wood duck), and
cavity nesters in boreal Canada
(goldeneye). The most important winter
waterfowl habitats in the Atlantic
Flyway (salt marsh, freshwater marsh,
tidal waters, freshwater ponds and
lakes, rivers and streams) are important
to at least one of these four species.
Species selection was also influenced
by our need for sufficient time series of
estimates of annual abundance and
estimates of harvest rate or annual
harvest. The proposed protocol has a
harvest objective of no more than 98
percent of maximum sustainable longterm yield for any of the four species.
Regulatory alternatives would be the
same as those used in the eastern
mallard AHM, except that the mallard
bag limit would not be prescribed by the
optimal regulatory alternative as
determined by the multi-stock AHM
protocol. Further details on biological
models used in the protocol, data
sources, optimization methods, and
simulation results are available at https://
www.regulations.gov and on our website
at https://www.fws.gov/birds/index.php.
Although season length in the
Atlantic Flyway would be determined
by the proposed multi-stock protocol,
the daily bag limit for black ducks will
still be determined by the international
black duck AHM harvest strategy. The
mallard bag limit in the Atlantic Flyway
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Jun 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
will be based on a separate assessment
of the harvest potential of eastern
mallards.
Final 2019–20 AHM Protocol
We will detail the final AHM protocol
for the 2019–20 season in the
supplemental proposed rule, which we
will publish in late August (see
Schedule of Biological Information
Availability, Regulations Meetings and
Federal Register Publications for the
2019–20 Seasons at the end of this
proposed rule for further information).
We will propose a specific regulatory
alternative in December for each of the
Flyways to use for their 2019–20
seasons after status information
becomes available in late August 2018.
B. Regulatory Alternatives
The basic structure of the current
regulatory alternatives for AHM was
adopted in 1997. In 2002, based upon
recommendations from the Flyway
Councils, we extended framework dates
in the ‘‘moderate’’ and ‘‘liberal’’
regulatory alternatives by changing the
opening date from the Saturday nearest
October 1 to the Saturday nearest
September 24, and by changing the
closing date from the Sunday nearest
January 20 to the last Sunday in
January. These extended dates were
made available with no associated
penalty in season length or bag limits.
At that time we stated our desire to keep
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
these changes in place for 3 years to
allow for a reasonable opportunity to
monitor the impacts of framework-date
extensions on harvest distribution and
rates of harvest before considering any
subsequent use (67 FR 12501; March 19,
2002).
For 2019–20, we propose to utilize the
same regulatory alternatives that are in
effect for the 2018–19 season (see
accompanying table for specifics of the
regulatory alternatives) for the
Mississippi, Central, and Pacific
Flyways. For the Atlantic Flyway, per
our discussion above under section A.
General Harvest Strategy, under the
proposed multi-stock AHM protocol for
the Atlantic Flyway, the mallard bag
limit would not be prescribed by the
regulatory alternative, but would
instead be based on a separate
assessment of the harvest potential of
eastern mallards. We will propose a
specific mallard bag limit for the
Atlantic Flyway in December.
Alternatives are specified for each
Flyway and are designated as ‘‘RES’’ for
the restrictive, ‘‘MOD’’ for the moderate,
and ‘‘LIB’’ for the liberal alternative.
Comments on the proposed alternatives
will be accepted until July 18, 2018.
Following receipt of public input, we
will finalize the regulatory alternatives
for each of the Flyways for the 2019–20
seasons in late-August 2018.
BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
E:\FR\FM\14JNP2.SGM
14JNP2
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Jkt 244001
PACIFIC FLYWAY (b)(c)
RES
LIB
I MOD
I
ATLANTIC FLYWAY
I MOD
I
LIB
RES
Beg1nn1ng
Shooting
Time
1/2 hr.
before
sunnse
1/2 hr
before
sunrise
1/2 hr.
before
sunrise
1/2 hr
before
sunrise
1/2 hr.
before
sunrise
1/2 hr.
before
sunrise
1/2 hr
before
sunnse
1/2 hr.
before
sunrise
1/2 hr.
before
sunrise
1/2 hr.
before
sunrise
1/2 hr
before
sunrise
1/2 hr.
before
sunrise
Ending
Shooting
T1me
Sunset
Sunset
Sunset
Sunset
Sunset
Sunset
Sunset
Sunset
Sunset
Sunset
Sunset
Sunset
Opening
Date
Oct 1
Sat nearest
Sept 24
Sat nearest
Sept 24
Sat nearest
Oct 1
Sat nearest
Oct1
Sat nearest
Sept 24
Sat nearest
Sept 24
Sat nearest
Oct 1
Sat nearest
Sept 24
Sat nearest
Sept 24
Closing
Date
Jan. 20
Last Sunday
in Jan.
Last Sunday
in Jan.
Sun. nearest Last Sunday
Jan. 20
in Jan.
Last Sunday
in Jan.
Sun. nearest Last Sunday
Jan. 20
in Jan.
Last Sunday
1n Jan.
Season
Length (1n days)
30
45
60
30
45
60
39
60
74
60
86
107
Daily Bag
3
6
6
3
6
6
3
6
6
4
7
7
(d)
2/1
4/1
4/2
3/1
5/1
5/2
3/1
5/2
7/2
PO 00000
MISSISSIPPI FLYWAY
LIB
I MOD
I
CENTRAL FLYWAY (a)
LIB
I MOD I
RES
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sat nearest Sat nearest
Sept 24
Sept 24
Sun. nearest Last Sunday
Jan. 20
in Jan.
Last Sunday
1n Jan.
RES
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\14JNP2.SGM
Species/Sex Limits within the Overall Daily Bag Limit
Mallard (Total/Female)
(a)
(d)
(d)
14JNP2
In the High Plains Mallard Management Unit, all regulations would be the same as the remainder of the Central Flyway, with the exception of season length. Additional days would
be allowed under the various alternatives as follows: restrictive- 12, moderate and liberal - 23. Under all alternatives, additional days must be on or after the Saturday nearest
December 10.
(b) In the Columbia Basin Mallard Management Unit, all regulations would be the same as the remainder of the Pacific Flyway, w~h the exception of season length. Under all alternatives
except the liberal a~ernative, an additional 7 days would be allowed.
(c) In Alaska, framework dates, bag limits, and season length would be different from the remainder of the Pacific Flyway. The bag limit (depending on the area) would be 5-8 under the restrictive
alternative, and 7-10 under the moderate and liberal alternatives. Under all alternatives, season length would be 107 days and framework dates would be Sep. 1 -Jan. 26.
(d) Under the proposed multi-stock AHM protocol for the Atlantic Flyway, the mallard bag limit would not be prescribed by the regulatory alternative.
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 115 / Thursday, June 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules
16:47 Jun 13, 2018
PROPOSED REGULA TORY ALTERNATIVES FOR DUCK HUNTING DURING THE 2019-20 SEASON
27843
EP14JN18.000
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS2
27844
SURVEY & ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE
March- June, 2018
SPRING POPULATION SURVEYS
MEETING SCHEDULE
I
June 15, 2018
II
PROPOSED RULEMAKING (PRELIMINARY)
I
PO 00000
'II
I
Frm 00010
August 15, 2018
WATERFOWL STATUS REPORT
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
August 20, 2018
AHM REPORT w'OPTIMAL ALTERNATIVES,
WE BLESS and CRANE STATUS
INFORMATION, DOVE and WOODCOCK
REGULA TORY ALTERNATIVES, and
HUNTER ACTr\/ITY and HARVEST REPORT
FEDERAL REGISTER SCHEDULE
July 10, 2018- Falls Church, VA
SRC Meeting
I
I
I
II
II
I
I
August 15- September 30, 2018
Flyway Tech And Council Meetings
October 16-17, 2018- Bloomington, MN
SRC Regulatory Meeting
WITH STATUS INFORMATION
and ISSUES
August 15, 2018
SUPPLEMENTAL PROPOSALS
I
I
E:\FR\FM\14JNP2.SGM
December 10, 2018
PROPOSED SEASON FRAMEWORKS
(30 Day Comment Period)
December 15, 2018- January31, 2019
FALL and WINTER SURVEY
INFORMATION for CRANES
and WATERFOWL
14JNP2
I
March 2019 (at North Am. Coni)
Flyway Council Mtgs
I
II
II
II
February 25, 2019
RNALSEASONFRAMEWORKS
June1,2019
ALL HUNTING SEASONS SELECTIONS
(Season Selections Due Apri/30)
I
EP14JN18.001
September 1, 2019 and later
ALL HUNTING SEASONS
I
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 115 / Thursday, June 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Jkt 244001
[FR Doc. 2018–12773 Filed 6–13–18; 8:45 am]
16:47 Jun 13, 2018
BILLING CODE 4333–15–C
VerDate Sep<11>2014
SCHEDULE OF BIOLOGICAL INFORMATION AVAILABILITY, REGULATIONS MEETINGS AND
FEDERAL REGISTER PUBLICATIONS FOR THE 2019-20 SEASONS
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 115 (Thursday, June 14, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 27836-27844]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12773]
[[Page 27835]]
Vol. 83
Thursday,
No. 115
June 14, 2018
Part II
Department of the Interior
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fish and Wildlife Service
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
50 CFR Part 20
Migratory Bird Hunting; Proposed 2019-20 Migratory Game Bird Hunting
Regulations (Preliminary) With Requests for Indian Tribal Proposals;
Notice of Meetings; Proposed Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 83 , No. 115 / Thursday, June 14, 2018 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 27836]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 20
[Docket No. FWS-HQ-MB-2018-0030; FF09M21200-189-FXMB1231099BPP0]
RIN 1018-BD10
Migratory Bird Hunting; Proposed 2019-20 Migratory Game Bird
Hunting Regulations (Preliminary) With Requests for Indian Tribal
Proposals; Notice of Meetings
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; availability of supplemental information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (hereinafter the Service or
we) proposes to establish annual hunting regulations for certain
migratory game birds for the 2019-20 hunting season. We annually
prescribe outside limits (frameworks) within which States may select
hunting seasons. This proposed rule provides the regulatory schedule,
announces the Service Migratory Bird Regulations Committee (SRC) and
Flyway Council meetings, describes the proposed regulatory alternatives
for the 2019-20 duck hunting seasons, and requests proposals from
Indian tribes that wish to establish special migratory game bird
hunting regulations on Federal Indian reservations and ceded lands.
Migratory bird hunting seasons provide opportunities for recreation and
sustenance; aid Federal, State, and tribal governments in the
management of migratory game birds; and permit harvests at levels
compatible with migratory game bird population status and habitat
conditions.
DATES:
Comments: You may comment on the general harvest strategy and the
proposed regulatory alternatives for the 2019-20 season until July 18,
2018. Following subsequent Federal Register documents, you will be
given an opportunity to submit comments on the proposed frameworks by
January 15, 2019. Tribes must submit proposals and related comments on
or before December 1, 2018.
Meetings: The SRC will conduct a meeting on July 10, 2018, to
identify and discuss preliminary issues concerning the 2019-20
migratory bird hunting regulations. The meeting will commence at
approximately 11:00 a.m. EDT. The SRC will meet to consider and develop
proposed regulations for the 2019-20 migratory game bird hunting
seasons on October 16-17, 2018. Meetings on both days are open to the
public and will commence at approximately 8:30 a.m.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on the proposals by one of the
following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments on Docket No. FWS-HQ-
MB-2018-0030.
U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public Comments Processing,
Attn: FWS-HQ-MB-2018-0030; Division of Policy, Performance, and
Management Programs; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, MS: BPHC; 5275
Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041.
We will not accept emailed or faxed comments. We will post all
comments on https://www.regulations.gov. This generally means that your
entire submission--including any personal identifying information--will
be posted on the website. See the Public Comments section, below, for
more information.
Meetings: The July 10, 2018, SRC meeting will be available to the
public via teleconference in the Rachel Carson conference room at 5275
Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041. The October 16-17, 2018, SRC
meeting will be at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 5600 American
Boulevard, Bloomington, MN 55437.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron W. Kokel at: Division of Migratory
Bird Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the
Interior, MS: MB, 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041; (703)
358-1714.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
New Process for the Annual Migratory Game Bird Hunting Regulations
As part of DOI's retrospective regulatory review, 3 years ago we
developed a schedule for migratory game bird hunting regulations that
is more efficient and provides hunting season dates earlier than was
possible under the old process. The new process makes planning easier
for the States and all parties interested in migratory bird hunting.
Beginning in the summer of 2015, with the development of the 2016-17
hunting seasons, we started promulgating our annual migratory game bird
hunting regulations using a new schedule that combines the previously
used early- and late-season regulatory processes into a single process.
We make decisions for harvest management based on predictions derived
from long-term biological information and established harvest
strategies and, therefore, can establish migratory bird hunting seasons
earlier than the system we used for many years. Under the new process,
we develop proposed hunting season frameworks for a given year in the
fall of the prior year. We then finalize those frameworks a few months
later, thereby enabling the State agencies to select and publish their
season dates in early summer. This proposed rule is the first in a
series of proposed and final rulemaking documents for the establishment
of the 2019-20 hunting seasons.
Background and Overview
Migratory game birds are those bird species so designated in
conventions between the United States and several foreign nations for
the protection and management of these birds. Under the Migratory Bird
Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703-712), the Secretary of the Interior is
authorized to determine when ``hunting, taking, capture, killing,
possession, sale, purchase, shipment, transportation, carriage, or
export of any * * * bird, or any part, nest, or egg'' of migratory game
birds can take place, and to adopt regulations for this purpose. These
regulations are written after giving due regard to ``the zones of
temperature and to the distribution, abundance, economic value,
breeding habits, and times and lines of migratory flight of such
birds'' and are updated annually (16 U.S.C. 704(a)). This
responsibility has been delegated to the Service as the lead Federal
agency for managing and conserving migratory birds in the United
States. However, migratory game bird management is a cooperative effort
of State, Tribal, and Federal governments.
The Service develops migratory game bird hunting regulations by
establishing the frameworks, or outside limits, for season lengths, bag
limits, and areas for migratory game bird hunting. Acknowledging
regional differences in hunting conditions, the Service has
administratively divided the Nation into four Flyways for the primary
purpose of managing migratory game birds. Each Flyway (Atlantic,
Mississippi, Central, and Pacific) has a Flyway Council, a formal
organization generally composed of one member from each State and
Province in that Flyway. The Flyway Councils, established through the
Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, also assist in researching
and providing migratory game bird management information for Federal,
State, and Provincial governments, as well as private conservation
entities and the general public.
The process for adopting migratory game bird hunting regulations,
located in title 50 of the Code of Federal
[[Page 27837]]
Regulations (CFR) at part 20, is constrained by three primary factors.
Legal and administrative considerations dictate how long the rulemaking
process will last. Most importantly, however, the biological cycle of
migratory game birds controls the timing of data-gathering activities
and thus the dates on which these results are available for
consideration and deliberation.
For the regulatory cycle, Service biologists gather, analyze, and
interpret biological survey data and provide this information to all
those involved in the process through a series of published status
reports and presentations to Flyway Councils and other interested
parties. Because the Service is required to take abundance of migratory
game birds and other factors into consideration, the Service undertakes
a number of surveys throughout the year in conjunction with Service
Regional Offices, the Canadian Wildlife Service, and State and
Provincial wildlife-management agencies. To determine the appropriate
frameworks for each species, we consider factors such as population
size and trend, geographical distribution, annual breeding effort,
condition of breeding and wintering habitat, number of hunters, and
anticipated harvest. After frameworks are established for season
lengths, bag limits, and areas for migratory game bird hunting, States
may select season dates, bag limits, and other regulatory options for
the hunting seasons. States may always be more conservative in their
selections than the Federal frameworks, but never more liberal.
Service Migratory Bird Regulations Committee Meetings
The SRC will conduct an open meeting on July 10, 2018, to discuss
preliminary issues for the 2019-20 regulations, and on October 16-17,
2018, to review information on the current status of migratory game
birds and develop 2019-20 migratory game bird regulations
recommendations for these species. In accordance with Departmental
policy, these meetings are open to public observation. You may submit
written comments to the Service on the matters discussed. See DATES and
ADDRESSES for information about these meetings.
Announcement of Flyway Council Meetings
Service representatives will be present at the individual meetings
of the four Flyway Councils this August and September. Although agendas
are not yet available, these meetings usually commence at 8 a.m. on the
days indicated.
Atlantic Flyway Council: September 27-28, 2018; Hotel 1620 Plymouth
Harbor, 180 Water Street, Plymouth, MA.
Mississippi Flyway Council: August 23-24, 2018; Radisson Hotel
Winnipeg Downtown, 288 Portage Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Central Flyway Council: August 30-31, 2018; Elk Ridge Resort and
Conference Centre, Waskesiu Lake, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Pacific Flyway Council: September 28, 2018; Drury Inn and Suites,
Flagstaff, AZ.
Notice of Intent To Establish Open Seasons
This document announces our intent to establish open hunting
seasons and daily bag and possession limits for certain designated
groups or species of migratory game birds for 2019-20 in the contiguous
United States, Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands,
under Sec. Sec. 20.101 through 20.107, 20.109, and 20.110 of subpart K
of 50 CFR part 20. For the 2019-20 migratory game bird hunting season,
we will propose regulations for certain designated members of the avian
families Anatidae (ducks, geese, and swans); Columbidae (doves and
pigeons); Gruidae (cranes); Rallidae (rails, coots, moorhens, and
gallinules); and Scolopacidae (woodcock and snipe). We describe these
proposals under Proposed 2019-20 Migratory Game Bird Hunting
Regulations (Preliminary) in this document. We annually publish
definitions of flyways and management units, and a description of the
data used in and the factors affecting the regulatory process (see May
30, 2017, Federal Register (82 FR 24786) for the latest definitions and
descriptions).
Regulatory Schedule for 2019-20
This document is the first in a series of proposed, supplemental,
and final rulemaking documents for migratory game bird hunting
regulations. We will publish additional supplemental proposals for
public comment in the Federal Register as population, habitat, harvest,
and other information become available. Major steps in the 2019-20
regulatory cycle relating to open public meetings and Federal Register
notifications are illustrated in the diagram at the end of this
proposed rule. All publication dates of Federal Register documents are
target dates. All sections of this and subsequent documents outlining
hunting frameworks and guidelines are organized under numbered
headings. These headings are:
1. Ducks
A. General Harvest Strategy
B. Regulatory Alternatives
C. Zones and Split Seasons
D. Special Seasons/Species Management
i. September Teal Seasons
ii. September Teal/Wood Duck Seasons
iii. Black Ducks
iv. Canvasbacks
v. Pintails
vi. Scaup
vii. Mottled Ducks
viii. Wood Ducks
ix. Youth Hunt
x. Mallard Management Units
xi. Other
2. Sea Ducks
3. Mergansers
4. Canada Geese
A. Special Early Seasons
B. Regular Seasons
C. Special Late Seasons
5. White-Fronted Geese
6. Brant
7. Snow and Ross's (Light) Geese
8. Swans
9. Sandhill Cranes
10. Coots
11. Moorhens and Gallinules
12. Rails
13. Snipe
14. Woodcock
15. Band-Tailed Pigeons
16. Doves
17. Alaska
18. Hawaii
19. Puerto Rico
20. Virgin Islands
21. Falconry
22. Other
Later sections of this and subsequent documents will refer only to
numbered items requiring your attention. Therefore, it is important to
note that we will omit those items requiring no attention, so remaining
numbered items will be discontinuous, making the list appear
incomplete.
The proposed regulatory alternatives for the 2019-20 duck hunting
seasons are contained at the end of this document. We plan to publish
final regulatory alternatives in late-August. We plan to publish
proposed season frameworks in mid-December 2018. We plan to publish
final season frameworks in late February 2019.
Review of Public Comments
This proposed rulemaking contains the proposed regulatory
alternatives for the 2019-20 duck hunting seasons. This proposed
rulemaking also describes other recommended changes or specific
preliminary proposals that vary from the 2018-19 regulations and issues
requiring early discussion, action, or the attention of the States or
tribes. We will publish responses to all proposals and written comments
when we develop final frameworks for the 2019-20 season. We seek
additional information and comments on this proposed rule.
[[Page 27838]]
Consolidation of Rulemaking Documents
For administrative purposes, this document consolidates the notice
of our intent to establish open migratory game bird hunting seasons and
the request for tribal proposals with the preliminary proposals for the
annual hunting regulations-development process. We will publish the
remaining proposed and final rulemaking documents separately. For
inquiries on tribal guidelines and proposals, tribes should contact the
following personnel:
Region 1 (Idaho, Oregon, Washington, Hawaii, and the Pacific
Islands)--Nanette Seto, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 911 NE 11th
Avenue, Portland, OR 97232-4181; (503) 231-6164.
Region 2 (Arizona, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas)--Scott
Carleton, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 500 Gold Avenue SW,
Albuquerque, NM 87102; (505) 248-6639.
Region 3 (Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri,
Ohio, and Wisconsin)--Tom Cooper, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 5600
American Blvd. West, Suite 990, Bloomington, MN 55437-1458; (612) 713-
5101.
Region 4 (Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana,
Mississippi, North Carolina, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, South
Carolina, and Tennessee)--Laurel Barnhill, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, 1875 Century Boulevard, Room 324, Atlanta, GA 30345; (404)
679-4000.
Region 5 (Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts,
New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island,
Vermont, Virginia, and West Virginia)--Pam Toschik, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 300 Westgate Center Drive, Hadley, MA 01035-9589;
(413) 253-8610.
Region 6 (Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, South
Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming)--Brian Smith, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, P.O. Box 25486, Denver Federal Building, Denver, CO 80225;
(303) 236-8145.
Region 7 (Alaska)--Eric Taylor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
1011 East Tudor Road, Anchorage, AK 99503; (907) 786-3423.
Region 8 (California and Nevada)--Amedee Brickey, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 2800 Cottage Way, Sacramento, CA 95825-1846; (916)
414-6480.
Requests for Tribal Proposals
Background
Beginning with the 1985-86 hunting season, we have employed
guidelines described in the June 4, 1985, Federal Register (50 FR
23467) to establish special migratory game bird hunting regulations on
Federal Indian reservations (including off-reservation trust lands) and
ceded lands. We developed these guidelines in response to tribal
requests for our recognition of their reserved hunting rights, and for
some tribes, recognition of their authority to regulate hunting by both
tribal and nontribal members throughout their reservations. The
guidelines include possibilities for:
(1) On-reservation hunting by both tribal and nontribal members,
with hunting by nontribal members on some reservations to take place
within Federal frameworks, but on dates different from those selected
by the surrounding State(s);
(2) On-reservation hunting by tribal members only, outside of usual
Federal frameworks for season dates, season length, and daily bag and
possession limits; and
(3) Off-reservation hunting by tribal members on ceded lands,
outside of usual framework dates and season length, with some added
flexibility in daily bag and possession limits.
In all cases, tribal regulations established under the guidelines
must be consistent with the annual March 11 to August 31 closed season
mandated by the 1916 Convention Between the United States and Great
Britain (for Canada) for the Protection of Migratory Birds
(Convention). The guidelines are applicable to those tribes that have
reserved hunting rights on Federal Indian reservations (including off-
reservation trust lands) and ceded lands. They also may be applied to
the establishment of migratory game bird hunting regulations for
nontribal members on all lands within the exterior boundaries of
reservations where tribes have full wildlife-management authority over
such hunting, or where the tribes and affected States otherwise have
reached agreement over hunting by nontribal members on non-Indian
lands.
Tribes usually have the authority to regulate migratory game bird
hunting by nonmembers on Indian-owned reservation lands, subject to our
approval. The question of jurisdiction is more complex on reservations
that include lands owned by non-Indians, especially when the
surrounding States have established or intend to establish regulations
governing migratory bird hunting by non-Indians on these lands. In such
cases, we encourage the tribes and States to reach agreement on
regulations that would apply throughout the reservations. When
appropriate, we will consult with a tribe and State with the aim of
facilitating an accord. We also will consult jointly with tribal and
State officials in the affected States where tribes may wish to
establish special hunting regulations for tribal members on ceded
lands. It is incumbent upon the tribe and/or the State to request
consultation as a result of the proposal being published in the Federal
Register. We will not presume to make a determination, without being
advised by either a tribe or a State, that any issue is or is not
worthy of formal consultation.
One of the guidelines provides for the continuation of tribal
members' harvest of migratory game birds on reservations where such
harvest is a customary practice. We do not oppose this harvest,
provided it does not take place during the closed season required by
the Convention, and it is not so large as to adversely affect the
status of the migratory game bird resource. Since the inception of
these guidelines, we have reached annual agreement with tribes for
migratory game bird hunting by tribal members on their lands or on
lands where they have reserved hunting rights. We will continue to
consult with tribes that wish to reach a mutual agreement on hunting
regulations for on-reservation hunting by tribal members. Tribes should
not view the guidelines as inflexible. We believe that they provide
appropriate opportunity to accommodate the reserved hunting rights and
management authority of Indian tribes while also ensuring that the
migratory game bird resource receives necessary protection. The
conservation of this important international resource is paramount. Use
of the guidelines is not required if a tribe wishes to observe the
hunting regulations established by the State(s) in which the
reservation is located.
Details Needed in Tribal Proposals
Tribes that wish to use the guidelines to establish special hunting
regulations for the 2019-20 migratory game bird hunting season should
submit a proposal that includes: (1) The requested migratory game bird
hunting season dates and other details regarding the proposed
regulations; (2) Harvest anticipated under the proposed regulations;
and (3) Tribal capabilities to enforce migratory game bird hunting
regulations. For those situations where it could be shown that failure
to limit Tribal harvest could seriously impact the migratory game bird
resource, we also request information on the methods employed to
monitor harvest and any potential steps taken to limit level of
harvest.
A tribe that desires the earliest possible opening of the migratory
game bird season for nontribal members
[[Page 27839]]
should specify this request in its proposal, rather than request a date
that might not be within the final Federal frameworks. Similarly,
unless a tribe wishes to set more restrictive regulations than Federal
regulations will permit for nontribal members, the proposal should
request the same daily bag and possession limits and season length for
migratory game birds that Federal regulations are likely to permit the
States in the Flyway in which the reservation is located.
Tribal Proposal Procedures
We will publish details of tribal proposals for public review in
later Federal Register documents. Because of the time required for
review by us and the public, Indian tribes that desire special
migratory game bird hunting regulations for the 2019-20 hunting season
should submit their proposals no later than December 1, 2018. Tribes
should direct inquiries regarding the guidelines and proposals to the
appropriate Service Regional Office listed above under the caption
Consolidation of Rulemaking Documents. Tribes that request special
migratory game bird hunting regulations for tribal members on ceded
lands should send a courtesy copy of the proposal to officials in the
affected State(s).
Public Comments
The Department of the Interior's policy is, whenever practicable,
to afford the public an opportunity to participate in the rulemaking
process. Accordingly, we invite interested persons to submit written
comments, suggestions, or recommendations regarding the proposed
regulations. Before promulgation of final migratory game bird hunting
regulations, we will take into consideration all comments we receive.
Such comments, and any additional information we receive, may lead to
final regulations that differ from these proposals.
You may submit your comments and materials concerning this proposed
rule by one of the methods listed in ADDRESSES. We will not accept
comments sent by email or fax or to an address not listed in ADDRESSES.
Finally, we will not consider hand-delivered comments that we do not
receive, or mailed comments that are not postmarked, by the date
specified in DATES. We will post all comments in their entirety--
including your personal identifying information--on https://www.regulations.gov. Before including your address, phone number, email
address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you
should be aware that your entire comment--including your personal
identifying information--may be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal
identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we
will be able to do so. Comments and materials we receive, as well as
supporting documentation we used in preparing this proposed rule, will
be available for public inspection on https://www.regulations.gov, or by
appointment, during normal business hours, at the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Division of Migratory Bird Management, 5275 Leesburg
Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041.
For each series of proposed rulemakings, we will establish specific
comment periods. We will consider, but may not respond in detail to,
each comment. As in the past, we will summarize all comments we receive
during the comment period and respond to them after the closing date in
any final rules.
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Consideration
The programmatic document, ``Second Final Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement: Issuance of Annual Regulations
Permitting the Sport Hunting of Migratory Birds (EIS 20130139),'' filed
with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on May 24, 2013,
addresses NEPA compliance by the Service for issuance of the annual
framework regulations for hunting of migratory game bird species. We
published a notice of availability in the Federal Register on May 31,
2013 (78 FR 32686), and our Record of Decision on July 26, 2013 (78 FR
45376). We also address NEPA compliance for waterfowl hunting
frameworks through the annual preparation of separate environmental
assessments, the most recent being ``Duck Hunting Regulations for 2018-
19,'' with its corresponding May 2018, finding of no significant
impact. In addition, an August 1985 environmental assessment entitled
``Guidelines for Migratory Bird Hunting Regulations on Federal Indian
Reservations and Ceded Lands'' is available from the address indicated
under the caption FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Endangered Species Act Consideration
Before issuance of the 2019-20 migratory game bird hunting
regulations, we will comply with provisions of the Endangered Species
Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543; hereinafter the Act), to
ensure that hunting is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence
of any species designated as endangered or threatened or modify or
destroy its critical habitat and is consistent with conservation
programs for those species. Consultations under section 7 of the Act
may cause us to change proposals in this and future supplemental
proposed rulemaking documents.
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 provides that the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) in the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) will review all significant rules. OIRA has reviewed
this rule and has determined that this rule is significant because it
would have an annual effect of $100 million or more on the economy.
E.O. 13563 reaffirms the principles of E.O. 12866 while calling for
improvements in the nation's regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best, most
innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory ends.
The executive order directs agencies to consider regulatory approaches
that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of choice for
the public where these approaches are relevant, feasible, and
consistent with regulatory objectives. E.O. 13563 emphasizes further
that regulations must be based on the best available science and that
the rulemaking process must allow for public participation and an open
exchange of ideas. We have developed this rule in a manner consistent
with these requirements.
An economic analysis was prepared for the 2019-20 season. This
analysis was based on data from the 2011 National Hunting and Fishing
Survey, the most recent year for which data are available (see
discussion in Regulatory Flexibility Act section below). This analysis
estimated consumer surplus for three alternatives for duck hunting
(estimates for other species are not quantified due to lack of data).
The alternatives are (1) issue restrictive regulations allowing fewer
days than those issued during the 2018-19 season, (2) issue moderate
regulations allowing more days than those in alternative 1, and (3)
issue liberal regulations identical to the regulations in the 2018-19
season. For the 2018-19 season, we chose Alternative 3, with an
estimated consumer surplus across all flyways of $334-$440 million with
a mid-point estimate of $387 million. We also chose alternative 3 for
the 2009-10 through 2017-18 seasons. We will select regulations for the
2019-20 season in
[[Page 27840]]
October. The 2019-20 analysis is part of the record for this rule and
is available at https://www.regulations.gov at Docket No. FWS-HQ-MB-
2018-0030.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The annual migratory bird hunting regulations have a significant
economic impact on substantial numbers of small entities under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). We analyzed the
economic impacts of the annual hunting regulations on small business
entities in detail as part of the 1981 cost-benefit analysis. This
analysis was revised annually from 1990 through 1995. In 1995, the
Service issued a Small Entity Flexibility Analysis (Analysis), which
was subsequently updated in 1996, 1998, 2004, 2008, 2013, 2018, and
2019. The primary source of information about hunter expenditures for
migratory game bird hunting is the National Hunting and Fishing Survey,
which is generally conducted at 5-year intervals. The 2019 Analysis is
based on the 2011 National Hunting and Fishing Survey and the U.S.
Department of Commerce's County Business Patterns, from which it was
estimated that migratory bird hunters would spend approximately $1.5
billion at small businesses in 2019. Copies of the Analysis are
available upon request from the Division of Migratory Bird Management
(see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) or from https://www.regulations.gov at Docket No. FWS-HQ-MB-2018-0030.
Clarity of the Rule
We are required by E.O. 12866 and 12988 and by the Presidential
Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write all rules in plain language. This
means that each rule we publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address readers directly;
(c) Use clear language rather than jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever possible.
If you feel that we have not met these requirements, send us
comments by one of the methods listed in ADDRESSES. To better help us
revise the rule, your comments should be as specific as possible. For
example, you should tell us the numbers of the sections or paragraphs
that are unclearly written, which sections or sentences are too long,
the sections where you feel lists or tables would be useful, etc.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This proposed rule is a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. For the reasons outlined
above, this rule would have an annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more. However, because this rule would establish hunting
seasons, we do not plan to defer the effective date under the exemption
contained in 5 U.S.C. 808(1).
Paperwork Reduction Act
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number. This rule does not contain any new
collection of information that require approval by OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). OMB has
previously approved the information collection requirements associated
with migratory bird surveys and the procedures for establishing annual
migratory bird hunting seasons under the following OMB control numbers:
1018-0019, ``North American Woodcock Singing Ground
Survey'' (expires 5/31/2018, and in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10, an
agency may continue to conduct or sponsor this collection of
information while the submission is pending at OMB).
1018-0023, ``Migratory Bird Surveys, 50 CFR 20.20''
(expires 8/31/2020). Includes Migratory Bird Harvest Information
Program, Migratory Bird Hunter Surveys, Sandhill Crane Survey, and
Parts Collection Survey.
1018-0171, ``Establishment of Annual Migratory Bird
Hunting Seasons, 50 CFR part 20'' (expires 06/30/2021)
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
We have determined and certify, in compliance with the requirements
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, 2 U.S.C. 1502 et seq., that this
proposed rulemaking would not impose a cost of $100 million or more in
any given year on local or State government or private entities.
Therefore, this rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.
Civil Justice Reform--Executive Order 12988
The Department, in promulgating this proposed rule, has determined
that this proposed rule will not unduly burden the judicial system and
that it meets the requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of E.O.
12988.
Takings Implication Assessment
In accordance with E.O. 12630, this proposed rule, authorized by
the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, does not have significant takings
implications and does not affect any constitutionally protected
property rights. This rule would not result in the physical occupancy
of property, the physical invasion of property, or the regulatory
taking of any property. In fact, this rule would allow hunters to
exercise otherwise unavailable privileges and, therefore, reduce
restrictions on the use of private and public property.
Energy Effects--Executive Order 13211
E.O. 13211 requires agencies to prepare Statements of Energy
Effects when undertaking certain actions. While this proposed rule is a
significant regulatory action under E.O. 12866, it is not expected to
adversely affect energy supplies, distribution, or use. Therefore, this
action is not a significant energy action and no Statement of Energy
Effects is required.
Government-to-Government Relationship With Tribes
In accordance with the President's memorandum of April 29, 1994,
``Government-to-Government Relations with Native American Tribal
Governments'' (59 FR 22951), E.O. 13175, and 512 DM 2, we have
evaluated possible effects on Federally recognized Indian tribes and
have determined that there are no effects on Indian trust resources.
However, in this proposed rule, we solicit proposals for special
migratory bird hunting regulations for certain tribes on Federal Indian
reservations, off-reservation trust lands, and ceded lands for the
2019-20 migratory bird hunting season. The resulting proposals will be
contained in a separate proposed rule. By virtue of these actions, we
have consulted with tribes affected by this rule.
Federalism Effects
Due to the migratory nature of certain species of birds, the
Federal Government has been given responsibility over these species by
the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. We annually prescribe frameworks from
which the States make selections regarding the hunting of migratory
birds, and we employ guidelines to establish special regulations on
Federal Indian reservations and ceded lands. This process preserves the
ability of the States and tribes to determine which seasons meet their
individual needs. Any State or Indian tribe may be more restrictive
than the Federal frameworks at any time. The frameworks are
[[Page 27841]]
developed in a cooperative process with the States and the Flyway
Councils. This process allows States to participate in the development
of frameworks from which they will make selections, thereby having an
influence on their own regulations. These rules do not have a
substantial direct effect on fiscal capacity, change the roles or
responsibilities of Federal or State governments, or intrude on State
policy or administration. Therefore, in accordance with E.O. 13132,
these regulations do not have significant federalism effects and do not
have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a
federalism summary impact statement.
Executive Order 13771--Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339,
February 3, 2017) because it is issued with respect to routine hunting
and fishing activities.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 20
Exports, Hunting, Imports, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Transportation, Wildlife.
Authority
The rules that eventually will be promulgated for the 2019-20
hunting season are authorized under 16 U.S.C. 703-711, 712, and 742 a-
j.
Dated: May 11, 2018.
Susan Combs,
Senior Advisor to the Secretary, Exercising the Authority of the
Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
Proposed 2019-20 Migratory Game Bird Hunting Regulations (Preliminary)
Pending current information on populations, harvest, and habitat
conditions, and receipt of recommendations from the four Flyway
Councils, we may defer specific regulatory proposals. No changes from
the 2018-19 frameworks in the Mississippi, Central, and Pacific Flyways
are being proposed at this time. Other issues requiring early
discussion, action, or the attention of the States or tribes are
contained below:
1. Ducks
Categories used to discuss issues related to duck harvest
management are: (A) General Harvest Strategy, (B) Regulatory
Alternatives, (C) Zones and Split Seasons, and (D) Special Seasons/
Species Management. Only those categories containing substantial
recommendations are discussed below.
A. General Harvest Strategy
We propose to continue using adaptive harvest management (AHM) to
help determine appropriate duck-hunting regulations for the 2019-20
season. AHM permits sound resource decisions in the face of uncertain
regulatory impacts and provides a mechanism for reducing that
uncertainty over time. We use AHM to evaluate four alternative
regulatory levels for duck hunting in the Mississippi, Central, and
Pacific Flyways based on the population status of mallards. We are
proposing to use AHM based on the population status of a suite of four
species in the Atlantic Flyway (see below). We have specific hunting
strategies for species of special concern, such as black ducks, scaup,
and pintails.
Mississippi, Central, and Pacific Flyways
The prescribed regulatory alternative for the Mississippi, Central,
and Pacific Flyways is based on the status of mallard populations that
contribute primarily to each Flyway. In the Central and Mississippi
Flyways, we set hunting regulations based on the status and dynamics of
mid-continent mallards. Mid-continent mallards are those breeding in
central North America (Federal survey strata 13-18, 20-50, and 75-77,
and State surveys in Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michigan). In the
Pacific Flyway, we set hunting regulations based on the status and
dynamics of western mallards. Western mallards are those breeding in
Alaska and the northern Yukon Territory (as based on Federal surveys in
strata 1-12), and in California, Oregon, Washington, and British
Columbia (as based on State- or Province-conducted surveys).
For the 2019-20 season, we recommend continuing to use independent
optimization to determine the optimal regulatory choice for each
mallard stock. This means that we would develop regulations for mid-
continent mallards and western mallards independently, based upon the
breeding stock that contributes primarily to each Flyway. We detailed
implementation of this AHM decision framework for western and mid-
continent mallards in the July 24, 2008, Federal Register (73 FR
43290).
Atlantic Flyway
Since 2000, the Service has used an AHM protocol based on the
status of eastern mallards to establish the annual framework
regulations for duck hunting seasons in the Atlantic Flyway. This
protocol assumes that the mallard is an appropriate surrogate for other
duck species in the Atlantic Flyway. By 2010 it was apparent that the
biological models used in the AHM protocol were performing poorly in
terms of accurately predicting the following year's eastern mallard
breeding population, and this performance problem led to a
comprehensive review of duck harvest management in the Atlantic Flyway.
Following that review, the Atlantic Flyway Council (AFC) determined
that eastern mallards do not adequately represent duck harvest dynamics
throughout the entire flyway; they do not represent the breeding
ecology and habitat requirements of other important Atlantic Flyway
duck species because their breeding range does not overlap with that of
other ducks that breed in the flyway; and their breeding and/or
wintering habitat needs differ from many of the other duck species in
the Flyway. Thus, although mallards comprise nearly 20 percent of the
Atlantic Flyway's duck harvest, the status of eastern mallards does not
necessarily reflect that of other Atlantic Flyway duck species. For
example, mallards in eastern North America have declined at an annual
rate of 1 percent since 1998, whereas over the same time period all
other duck species in eastern North America for which robust population
estimates are available are stable or increasing.
The AFC decided that a decision framework based upon a suite of
duck species that better represents the habitat needs and harvest
distribution of ducks in the Atlantic Flyway would be superior to the
current eastern mallard AHM framework, and we concur. Accordingly, the
Service and the AFC began working in 2013 to develop a multi-stock AHM
protocol for setting annual duck hunting season frameworks for the
Atlantic Flyway.
The multi-stock protocol development has now been completed, and we
propose to adopt it in place of the eastern mallard AHM. The protocol
is based on a suite of four species that represents the dynamics of
duck harvest in the Atlantic Flyway and the various habitat types used
by waterfowl throughout the Atlantic Flyway: Green-winged teal (Anas
crecca), common goldeneye (Bucephala clangula), ring-necked duck
(Aythya collaris), and wood duck (Aix sponsa). These species comprise
more than 40 percent of the Atlantic Flyway's total duck harvest, and
they reflect regional variation in harvest composition. The selected
species represent upland nesters in boreal and southern Canada (green-
winged teal), over-water nesters in boreal Canada (ring-necked duck),
[[Page 27842]]
cavity nesters in the United States and southern Canada (wood duck),
and cavity nesters in boreal Canada (goldeneye). The most important
winter waterfowl habitats in the Atlantic Flyway (salt marsh,
freshwater marsh, tidal waters, freshwater ponds and lakes, rivers and
streams) are important to at least one of these four species.
Species selection was also influenced by our need for sufficient
time series of estimates of annual abundance and estimates of harvest
rate or annual harvest. The proposed protocol has a harvest objective
of no more than 98 percent of maximum sustainable long-term yield for
any of the four species. Regulatory alternatives would be the same as
those used in the eastern mallard AHM, except that the mallard bag
limit would not be prescribed by the optimal regulatory alternative as
determined by the multi-stock AHM protocol. Further details on
biological models used in the protocol, data sources, optimization
methods, and simulation results are available at https://www.regulations.gov and on our website at https://www.fws.gov/birds/index.php.
Although season length in the Atlantic Flyway would be determined
by the proposed multi-stock protocol, the daily bag limit for black
ducks will still be determined by the international black duck AHM
harvest strategy. The mallard bag limit in the Atlantic Flyway will be
based on a separate assessment of the harvest potential of eastern
mallards.
Final 2019-20 AHM Protocol
We will detail the final AHM protocol for the 2019-20 season in the
supplemental proposed rule, which we will publish in late August (see
Schedule of Biological Information Availability, Regulations Meetings
and Federal Register Publications for the 2019-20 Seasons at the end of
this proposed rule for further information). We will propose a specific
regulatory alternative in December for each of the Flyways to use for
their 2019-20 seasons after status information becomes available in
late August 2018.
B. Regulatory Alternatives
The basic structure of the current regulatory alternatives for AHM
was adopted in 1997. In 2002, based upon recommendations from the
Flyway Councils, we extended framework dates in the ``moderate'' and
``liberal'' regulatory alternatives by changing the opening date from
the Saturday nearest October 1 to the Saturday nearest September 24,
and by changing the closing date from the Sunday nearest January 20 to
the last Sunday in January. These extended dates were made available
with no associated penalty in season length or bag limits. At that time
we stated our desire to keep these changes in place for 3 years to
allow for a reasonable opportunity to monitor the impacts of framework-
date extensions on harvest distribution and rates of harvest before
considering any subsequent use (67 FR 12501; March 19, 2002).
For 2019-20, we propose to utilize the same regulatory alternatives
that are in effect for the 2018-19 season (see accompanying table for
specifics of the regulatory alternatives) for the Mississippi, Central,
and Pacific Flyways. For the Atlantic Flyway, per our discussion above
under section A. General Harvest Strategy, under the proposed multi-
stock AHM protocol for the Atlantic Flyway, the mallard bag limit would
not be prescribed by the regulatory alternative, but would instead be
based on a separate assessment of the harvest potential of eastern
mallards. We will propose a specific mallard bag limit for the Atlantic
Flyway in December. Alternatives are specified for each Flyway and are
designated as ``RES'' for the restrictive, ``MOD'' for the moderate,
and ``LIB'' for the liberal alternative. Comments on the proposed
alternatives will be accepted until July 18, 2018. Following receipt of
public input, we will finalize the regulatory alternatives for each of
the Flyways for the 2019-20 seasons in late-August 2018.
BILLING CODE 4333-15-P
[[Page 27843]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP14JN18.000
[[Page 27844]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP14JN18.001
[FR Doc. 2018-12773 Filed 6-13-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333-15-C