Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes, 26833-26836 [2018-12285]
Download as PDF
26833
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 83, No. 112
Monday, June 11, 2018
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2017–0904; Product
Identifier 2017–NM–071–AD; Amendment
39–19310; AD 2018–12–06]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 787–8 and
787–9 airplanes. This AD was prompted
by a report of an in-service reliability
issue of a latent flow sensor failure
combined with single cabin air
compressor (CAC) operation. This
condition resulted in reduced airflow
which led to a persistent single CAC
surge condition that caused overheat
damage to the CAC inlet. This AD
requires installing new pack control
unit (PCU) software for the cabin air
conditioning and temperature control
system (CACTCS) and new CAC outlet
pressure sensor J-tube hardware, and
doing related investigative and
corrective actions if necessary. We are
issuing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective July 16,
2018.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in this AD
as of July 16, 2018.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this final rule, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes,
Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC
110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740–5600;
telephone 562–797–1717; internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:51 Jun 08, 2018
Jkt 244001
may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
It is also available on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA–2017–
0904.
deck, and interruption to in-service air
conditioning.
Examining the AD Docket
Support for the NPRM
A commenter, Nicholas Weber, and
the Air Line Pilots Association,
International (ALPA) had no objection
to the NPRM. United Airlines and
Jetstar Airways agreed with the NPRM
but submitted comments, which are
addressed below.
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2017–
0904; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this final rule,
the regulatory evaluation, any
comments received, and other
information. The address for Docket
Operations (phone: 800–647–5527) is
Docket Operations, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Allison Buss, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental
Systems Section, FAA, Seattle ACO
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax: 206–
231–3564; email: allison.buss@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to certain Boeing Model 787–8
and 787–9 airplanes. The NPRM
published in the Federal Register on
October 6, 2017 (82 FR 46719). The
NPRM was prompted by a report of an
in-service reliability issue of a latent
flow sensor failure combined with
single CAC operation. This condition
resulted in reduced airflow which led to
a persistent single CAC surge condition
that caused overheat damage to the CAC
inlet. The NPRM proposed to require
installing new PCU software for the
CACTCS and new CAC outlet pressure
sensor J-tube hardware, and doing
related investigative and corrective
actions if necessary. We are issuing this
AD to prevent CAC inlet overheating
leading to structural degradation of the
CAC inlet, fumes in the cabin and flight
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this final rule.
The following presents the comments
received on the NPRM and the FAA’s
response to each comment.
Request to Reference Latest Service
Information
Boeing and Etihad Airways requested
we refer to Boeing Service Bulletin
B787–81205–SB210077–00, Issue 004,
dated September 22, 2017. Boeing stated
that the NPRM refers to Boeing Service
Bulletin B787–81205–SB210077–00,
Issue 003, dated October 20, 2016, and
it should be Issue 004 instead.
We agree that this final rule should
refer to the latest service information.
We have reviewed Boeing Service
Bulletin B787–81205–SB210077–00,
Issue 004, dated September 22, 2017,
which provides minor corrections. We
have determined the revised actions
have no effect on airplanes on which the
earlier actions were completed. We
revised the ‘‘Related Service
Information under 1 CFR part 51’’
paragraph of this final rule to refer to
Boeing Service Bulletin B787–81205–
SB210077–00, Issue 004, dated
September 22, 2017. We revised
paragraphs (c)(2) and (g)(1) of this AD to
refer to Boeing Service Bulletin B787–
81205–SB210077–00, Issue 004, dated
September 22, 2017. We also added
paragraph (h)(5) to this AD to provide
credit for using Boeing Service Bulletin
B787–81205–SB210077–00, Issue 003,
dated October 20, 2016, to accomplish
the required actions in paragraph (g) of
this AD, provided those actions were
performed before the effective date of
this AD.
Request To Allow Updated Software
Version
Jetstar Airways and United Airlines
requested that paragraph (g) of the
proposed AD be updated to allow for
compliance to also be met by installing
E:\FR\FM\11JNR1.SGM
11JNR1
26834
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 112 / Monday, June 11, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
the newer PCU Y–103 (software part
number (P/N) HAM56–21PC–1030)
software per Boeing Service Bulletin
B787–81205–SB210083–00, Issue 001,
dated February 9, 2017. Jetstar Airways
stated that since the release of Boeing
Service Bulletin B787–81205–
SB210075–00, Issue 003, dated March
29, 2017; and Boeing Service Bulletin
B787–81205–SB210077–00, Issue 003,
dated October 20, 2016; which describe
procedures for installation of PCU Y–
102 (software P/N HAM57–21PC–1020)
software via Work Package 1, there has
been new PCU Y–103 software released
per Boeing Service Bulletin B787–
81205–SB210083–00, Issue 001, dated
February 9, 2017. Jetstar stated its
understanding that Work Packages 2
and 3 of Boeing Service Bulletin B787–
81205–SB210075–00, Issue 003, dated
March 29, 2017; or Boeing Service
Bulletin B787–81205–SB210077–00,
Issue 003, dated October 20, 2016; must
also be done in order to meet
compliance with the proposed AD.
We agree because we reviewed Boeing
Service Bulletin B787–81205–
SB210083–00, Issue 001, dated February
9, 2017, and we have determined that
compliance can be met by installing the
new PCU Y–103 (software P/N HAM56–
21PC–1030) software or installing the
previous PCU Y–102 (software P/N
HAM57–21PC–1020) software, provided
that Work Packages 2 and 3 of Boeing
Service Bulletin B787–81205–
SB210075–00, Issue 003, dated March
29, 2017; or Boeing Service Bulletin
B787–81205–SB210077–00, Issue 004,
dated September 22, 2017; are also
done. We revised the ‘‘Related Service
Information under 1 CFR part 51’’
paragraph of this final rule to include
Boeing Service Bulletin B787–81205–
SB210083–00, Issue 001, dated February
9, 2017. We have revised paragraphs
(g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD to allow
Boeing Service Bulletin B787–81205–
SB210083–00, Issue 001, dated February
9, 2017, as an optional method of
compliance for Work Package 1 of
Boeing Service Bulletin B787–81205–
SB210075–00, Issue 003, dated March
29, 2017; and Boeing Service Bulletin
B787–81205–SB210077–00, Issue 004,
dated September 22, 2017.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
Request To Include Required for
Compliance (RC) Steps
United Airlines observed Boeing
Service Bulletin B787–81205–
SB210075–00, Issue 003, dated March
29, 2017; and Boeing Service Bulletin
B787–81205–SB210077–00, Issue 004,
dated September 22, 2017; do not
contain steps that are designated as RC
(Required for Compliance).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:51 Jun 08, 2018
Jkt 244001
We infer the commenter is requesting
that Boeing revise the service
information or that we clarify which
steps are RC. We disagree with making
any changes because the operators can
still complete the AD requirements with
the steps contained in the
Accomplishment Instructions of the
referenced service information. In
addition, waiting for Boeing to change
the service information would delay the
release of the AD. Further, certain steps
include aircraft maintenance manual
(AMM) reference material. When the
words ‘‘refer to’’ are used and the
operator has an accepted alternative
procedure, the accepted alternative
procedure can be used without the need
to obtain an alternative method of
compliance (AMOC). We have not
changed this AD in this regard.
Requests To Clarify the Discussion
Section
Boeing requested that we make
several clarifications to the Discussion
section of the NPRM. Boeing requested
that the following changes be made to
the Discussion section of the NPRM:
• Add the following statement: ‘‘The
redesigned CAC outlet pressure sensor JTube hardware is to prevent transducer
fouling, which could compromise surge
detection.’’ Boeing stated the NPRM
does not describe the purpose of the
hardware change.
• In the sentence, ‘‘Smarter
Environmental Control System ensures
that airflow is distributed equally across
the CACs,’’ replace the phrase ‘‘Smarter
Environmental Control System’’ with
‘‘the system controller.’’ Boeing stated
airflow distribution amongst CACs does
not pertain to what they refer to as the
Smarter Environmental Control System,
and the fundamental control approach
for CACs attempts to distribute flow
equally across CACs.
• Modify the sentence ‘‘PCU software
logic was only designed to detect the
surge when both CACs were operating
on the same pack, and therefore, it was
unable to detect a persistent single CAC
surge condition which led to CAC inlet
overheating’’ to ‘‘PCU software logic
was only designed to react to the surge
when both CACs are operating on the
same pack, and therefore, it was unable
to command a termination of the
persistent single CAC surge condition
which led to CAC inlet overheating.’’
Boeing stated that when only a single
CAC is operating on a pack and airflow
drops to an unintended low level, the
surge will be detected by the system
controls. Boeing explained that due to a
software requirements error, the CAC
will not be shut down and the surge can
persist. Boeing concluded that the issue
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
is not that the surge is undetected but
rather that the issue is that the controls
fail to react to that surge condition.
• Modify the sentence ‘‘In addition,
we received a report of an in-service
event involving foreign object debris in
the CAC inlet and accumulation at the
ozone converter that also led to a
persistent single CAC surge resulting in
overheat damage to the CAC inlet
housing’’ to ‘‘In addition, we received a
report of an in-service event involving
persistent single CAC surge resulting in
overheat damage to the CAC inlet
housing and foreign object debris in the
CAC inlet and accumulation at the
ozone converter.’’ Boeing stated that
aspects of this particular event are
unknown; however, it is likely the
foreign object debris was a result of the
persistent surge event.
• Modify the sentence ‘‘The proposed
PCU software change would redistribute
the airflow to provide more flow to a
single CAC, reducing the potential for a
CAC surge’’ to ‘‘The PCU software
change enables a single CAC in surge to
be commanded off in order to prevent
the persistent surge condition.
Additionally, the software redistributes
the airflow to provide more flow to a
single CAC, reducing the potential for a
CAC surge.’’ Boeing stated the software
changes are not ‘‘proposed’’ and already
exist. Boeing also stated the key
software feature needed for persistent
surge prevention was not in the original
sentence.
• Modify the sentence ‘‘Reduced
airflow leading to persistent CAC surge
conditions and CAC inlet overheating, if
not corrected, could result in structural
degradation of the CAC inlet, and fumes
in the cabin and flight deck, as well as
causing interruption to in-service air
conditioning’’ to ‘‘PCU controls that do
not react to a single CAC in persistent
CAC surge conditions leading to CAC
inlet overheating, if not corrected, could
result in structural degradation of the
CAC inlet, and fumes in the cabin and
flight deck, as well as causing
interruption to in-service air
conditioning.’’ Boeing stated that the
purpose of the redistribution of CAC
airflow is to minimize surge occurrence
and does not relate to the overall
prevention of CAC inlet overheat.
We agree that the changes requested
by Boeing are accurate. However, since
the text of the NPRM that Boeing
referenced is not restated in this final
rule, no change to the final rule is
necessary.
Request for Credit for Previous Actions
Accomplished
Boeing and Etihad Airways requested
that we include Boeing Service Bulletin
E:\FR\FM\11JNR1.SGM
11JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 112 / Monday, June 11, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
B787–81205–SB210077–00, Issue 001,
dated April 19, 2016, as a method of
compliance in the proposed AD. Boeing
also requested that we include Boeing
Service Bulletin B787–81205–
SB210075–00, Issue 001, dated February
24, 2016. Boeing requested that the
service information be added to
paragraph (h) of the proposed AD as
credit for previous actions. Boeing
stated that not all service information
revisions were included in paragraph
(h) of the proposed AD, yet they all
warrant credit for addressing the AD.
Etihad Airways noted that incorporation
of all revisions of Boeing Service
Bulletin B787–81205–SB210075–00
comply with the proposed AD
requirements.
We agree. We have reviewed Boeing
Service Bulletin B787–81205–
SB210075–00, Issue 001, dated February
24, 2016; and Boeing Service Bulletin
B787–81205–SB210077–00, Issue 001,
dated April 19, 2016; and the changes
made to later revisions are clarifications.
We have determined that airplanes on
which the actions specified in the
earlier revisions were done would be
compliant with this AD.
In paragraph (h)(1) of this AD, we
added Boeing Service Bulletin B787–
81205–SB210075–00, Issue 001, dated
February 24, 2016, to provide credit and
redesignated subsequent paragraphs
accordingly. We also added paragraph
(h)(3) of this AD to add Boeing Service
Bulletin B787–81205–SB210077–00,
Issue 001, dated April 19, 2016.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data,
considered the comments received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting this
final rule with the changes described
previously and minor editorial changes.
We have determined that these minor
changes:
• Are consistent with the intent that
was proposed in the NPRM for
addressing the unsafe condition; and
• Do not add any additional burden
upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM.
We also determined that these
changes will not increase the economic
burden on any operator or increase the
scope of this final rule.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
We reviewed Boeing Service Bulletin
B787–81205–SB210075–00, Issue 003,
26835
dated March 29, 2017; and Boeing
Service Bulletin B787–81205–
SB210077–00, Issue 004, dated
September 22, 2017. The service
information describes procedures for
installing new PCU software for the
CACTCS and new CAC outlet pressure
sensor J-tube hardware, and doing
related investigative and corrective
actions. These documents are distinct
since they apply to different airplane
models.
We reviewed Boeing Service Bulletin
B787–81205–SB210083–00, Issue 001,
dated February 9, 2017. The service
information describes procedures for
installing new PCU software for the
CACTCS to recover the CAC from surges
by reconfiguration flow schedules.
This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties
have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 62
airplanes of U.S. registry. We estimate
the following costs to comply with this
AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Software Installation ........................................
Modify Left and Right Inboard and Outboard
CAC Modules.
1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 .................
20 work-hours × $85 per hour = $1,700 ........
We have received no definitive data
that would enable us to provide cost
estimates for the on-condition actions
specified in this AD.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:51 Jun 08, 2018
Jkt 244001
Parts cost
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
This AD is issued in accordance with
authority delegated by the Executive
Director, Aircraft Certification Service,
as authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C.
In accordance with that order, issuance
of ADs is normally a function of the
Compliance and Airworthiness
Division, but during this transition
period, the Executive Director has
delegated the authority to issue ADs
applicable to transport category
airplanes and associated appliances to
the Director of the System Oversight
Division.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
$0
22,821
Cost per
product
$85
24,521
Cost on U.S.
operators
$5,270
1,520,302
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
E:\FR\FM\11JNR1.SGM
11JNR1
26836
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 112 / Monday, June 11, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
2018–12–06 The Boeing Company:
Amendment 39–19310; Docket No.
FAA–2017–0904; Product Identifier
2017–NM–071–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective July 16, 2018.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company
Model 787–8 and 787–9 airplanes,
certificated in any category, as identified in
the applicable service information specified
in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD.
(1) Boeing Service Bulletin B787–81205–
SB210075–00, Issue 003, dated March 29,
2017 (for Model 787–8 airplanes);
(2) Boeing Service Bulletin B787–81205–
SB210077–00, Issue 004, dated September
22, 2017 (for Model 787–9 airplanes).
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 21, Air conditioning.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a report of an
in-service reliability issue involving a latent
flow sensor failure combined with single
cabin air compressor (CAC) operation. This
condition resulted in reduced airflow which
led to a persistent single CAC surge condition
that caused overheat damage to the CAC
inlet. We are issuing this AD to prevent CAC
inlet overheating leading to structural
degradation of the CAC inlet, fumes in the
cabin and flight deck, and interruption to inservice air conditioning.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Software and Hardware Installation
Within 36 months after the effective date
of this AD: Install new pack control unit
(PCU) software for the cabin air conditioning
and temperature control system (CACTCS)
and new CAC outlet pressure sensor J-tube
hardware, and do all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions; in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of the applicable service
information specified in paragraph (g)(1) or
(g)(2) of this AD. Related investigative and
corrective actions must be done before
further flight.
(1) Boeing Service Bulletin B787–81205–
SB210075–00, Issue 003, dated March 29,
2017 (for Boeing Model 787–8 airplanes); or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:51 Jun 08, 2018
Jkt 244001
Boeing Service Bulletin B787–81205–
SB210077–00, Issue 004, dated September
22, 2017 (for Boeing Model 787–9 airplanes).
(2) Boeing Service Bulletin B787–81205–
SB210083–00, Issue 001, dated February 9,
2017 (for all airplanes); and Work Packages
2 and 3 of the applicable service information
identified in paragraph (g)(1) of this AD.
(h) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the
actions specified in paragraph (g) of this AD,
if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using the applicable
service information specified in paragraphs
(h)(1) through (h)(5) of this AD.
(1) Boeing Service Bulletin B787–81205–
SB210075–00, Issue 001, dated February 24,
2016 (for Model 787–8 airplanes);
(2) Boeing Service Bulletin B787–81205–
SB210075–00, Issue 002, dated May 11, 2016
(for Model 787–8 airplanes);
(3) Boeing Service Bulletin B787–81205–
SB210077–00, Issue 001, dated April 19,
2016 (for Model 787–9 airplanes);
(4) Boeing Service Bulletin B787–81205–
SB210077–00, Issue 002, dated May 11, 2016
(for Model 787–9 airplanes);
(5) Boeing Service Bulletin B787–81205–
SB210077–00, Issue 003, dated October 20,
2016 (for Model 787–9 airplanes).
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with
14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (j) of this
AD. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANMSeattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair,
modification, or alteration required by this
AD if it is approved by the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO
Branch, to make those findings. To be
approved, the repair method, modification
deviation, or alteration deviation must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(j) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Allison Buss, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems
Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
phone and fax: 206–231–3564; email:
allison.buss@faa.gov.
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Service Bulletin B787–81205–
SB210075–00, Issue 003, dated March 29,
2017;
(ii) Boeing Service Bulletin B787–81205–
SB210077–00, Issue 004, dated September
22, 2017;
(iii) Boeing Service Bulletin B787–81205–
SB210083–00, Issue 001, dated February 9,
2017.
(3) For The Boeing Company service
information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention:
Contractual & Data Services (C&DS), 2600
Westminster Blvd., MC 110–SK57, Seal
Beach, CA 90740–5600; telephone 562–797–
1717; internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on May
31, 2018.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–12285 Filed 6–8–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2017–1163; Product
Identifier 2017–CE–041–AD; Amendment
39–19260; AD 2018–09–04]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Gulfstream
Aerospace Corporation Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
The FAA is correcting an
airworthiness directive (AD) that
published in the Federal Register. The
AD applies to certain Gulfstream
Aerospace Corporation Models G–IV
and GIV–X airplanes. Paragraphs (h)(3)
through (5) of the AD incorrectly
reference Customer Bulletin 238A as
Customer Bulletin 283A. This document
corrects that error. In all other respects,
the original document remains the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11JNR1.SGM
11JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 112 (Monday, June 11, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 26833-26836]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12285]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 112 / Monday, June 11, 2018 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 26833]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2017-0904; Product Identifier 2017-NM-071-AD; Amendment
39-19310; AD 2018-12-06]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 787-8 and 787-9 airplanes. This AD was
prompted by a report of an in-service reliability issue of a latent
flow sensor failure combined with single cabin air compressor (CAC)
operation. This condition resulted in reduced airflow which led to a
persistent single CAC surge condition that caused overheat damage to
the CAC inlet. This AD requires installing new pack control unit (PCU)
software for the cabin air conditioning and temperature control system
(CACTCS) and new CAC outlet pressure sensor J-tube hardware, and doing
related investigative and corrective actions if necessary. We are
issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective July 16, 2018.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of July 16,
2018.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA
90740-5600; telephone 562-797-1717; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195. It is also available on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
0904.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
0904; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this final rule, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for Docket Operations (phone: 800-647-
5527) is Docket Operations, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Allison Buss, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Section, FAA, Seattle ACO
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax: 206-
231-3564; email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain Boeing Model 787-8
and 787-9 airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on
October 6, 2017 (82 FR 46719). The NPRM was prompted by a report of an
in-service reliability issue of a latent flow sensor failure combined
with single CAC operation. This condition resulted in reduced airflow
which led to a persistent single CAC surge condition that caused
overheat damage to the CAC inlet. The NPRM proposed to require
installing new PCU software for the CACTCS and new CAC outlet pressure
sensor J-tube hardware, and doing related investigative and corrective
actions if necessary. We are issuing this AD to prevent CAC inlet
overheating leading to structural degradation of the CAC inlet, fumes
in the cabin and flight deck, and interruption to in-service air
conditioning.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this final rule. The following presents the comments received on the
NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment.
Support for the NPRM
A commenter, Nicholas Weber, and the Air Line Pilots Association,
International (ALPA) had no objection to the NPRM. United Airlines and
Jetstar Airways agreed with the NPRM but submitted comments, which are
addressed below.
Request to Reference Latest Service Information
Boeing and Etihad Airways requested we refer to Boeing Service
Bulletin B787-81205-SB210077-00, Issue 004, dated September 22, 2017.
Boeing stated that the NPRM refers to Boeing Service Bulletin B787-
81205-SB210077-00, Issue 003, dated October 20, 2016, and it should be
Issue 004 instead.
We agree that this final rule should refer to the latest service
information. We have reviewed Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-
SB210077-00, Issue 004, dated September 22, 2017, which provides minor
corrections. We have determined the revised actions have no effect on
airplanes on which the earlier actions were completed. We revised the
``Related Service Information under 1 CFR part 51'' paragraph of this
final rule to refer to Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210077-00,
Issue 004, dated September 22, 2017. We revised paragraphs (c)(2) and
(g)(1) of this AD to refer to Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-
SB210077-00, Issue 004, dated September 22, 2017. We also added
paragraph (h)(5) to this AD to provide credit for using Boeing Service
Bulletin B787-81205-SB210077-00, Issue 003, dated October 20, 2016, to
accomplish the required actions in paragraph (g) of this AD, provided
those actions were performed before the effective date of this AD.
Request To Allow Updated Software Version
Jetstar Airways and United Airlines requested that paragraph (g) of
the proposed AD be updated to allow for compliance to also be met by
installing
[[Page 26834]]
the newer PCU Y-103 (software part number (P/N) HAM56-21PC-1030)
software per Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210083-00, Issue 001,
dated February 9, 2017. Jetstar Airways stated that since the release
of Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210075-00, Issue 003, dated
March 29, 2017; and Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210077-00,
Issue 003, dated October 20, 2016; which describe procedures for
installation of PCU Y-102 (software P/N HAM57-21PC-1020) software via
Work Package 1, there has been new PCU Y-103 software released per
Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210083-00, Issue 001, dated
February 9, 2017. Jetstar stated its understanding that Work Packages 2
and 3 of Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210075-00, Issue 003,
dated March 29, 2017; or Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210077-
00, Issue 003, dated October 20, 2016; must also be done in order to
meet compliance with the proposed AD.
We agree because we reviewed Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-
SB210083-00, Issue 001, dated February 9, 2017, and we have determined
that compliance can be met by installing the new PCU Y-103 (software P/
N HAM56-21PC-1030) software or installing the previous PCU Y-102
(software P/N HAM57-21PC-1020) software, provided that Work Packages 2
and 3 of Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210075-00, Issue 003,
dated March 29, 2017; or Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210077-
00, Issue 004, dated September 22, 2017; are also done. We revised the
``Related Service Information under 1 CFR part 51'' paragraph of this
final rule to include Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210083-00,
Issue 001, dated February 9, 2017. We have revised paragraphs (g)(1)
and (g)(2) of this AD to allow Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-
SB210083-00, Issue 001, dated February 9, 2017, as an optional method
of compliance for Work Package 1 of Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-
SB210075-00, Issue 003, dated March 29, 2017; and Boeing Service
Bulletin B787-81205-SB210077-00, Issue 004, dated September 22, 2017.
Request To Include Required for Compliance (RC) Steps
United Airlines observed Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-
SB210075-00, Issue 003, dated March 29, 2017; and Boeing Service
Bulletin B787-81205-SB210077-00, Issue 004, dated September 22, 2017;
do not contain steps that are designated as RC (Required for
Compliance).
We infer the commenter is requesting that Boeing revise the service
information or that we clarify which steps are RC. We disagree with
making any changes because the operators can still complete the AD
requirements with the steps contained in the Accomplishment
Instructions of the referenced service information. In addition,
waiting for Boeing to change the service information would delay the
release of the AD. Further, certain steps include aircraft maintenance
manual (AMM) reference material. When the words ``refer to'' are used
and the operator has an accepted alternative procedure, the accepted
alternative procedure can be used without the need to obtain an
alternative method of compliance (AMOC). We have not changed this AD in
this regard.
Requests To Clarify the Discussion Section
Boeing requested that we make several clarifications to the
Discussion section of the NPRM. Boeing requested that the following
changes be made to the Discussion section of the NPRM:
Add the following statement: ``The redesigned CAC outlet
pressure sensor J-Tube hardware is to prevent transducer fouling, which
could compromise surge detection.'' Boeing stated the NPRM does not
describe the purpose of the hardware change.
In the sentence, ``Smarter Environmental Control System
ensures that airflow is distributed equally across the CACs,'' replace
the phrase ``Smarter Environmental Control System'' with ``the system
controller.'' Boeing stated airflow distribution amongst CACs does not
pertain to what they refer to as the Smarter Environmental Control
System, and the fundamental control approach for CACs attempts to
distribute flow equally across CACs.
Modify the sentence ``PCU software logic was only designed
to detect the surge when both CACs were operating on the same pack, and
therefore, it was unable to detect a persistent single CAC surge
condition which led to CAC inlet overheating'' to ``PCU software logic
was only designed to react to the surge when both CACs are operating on
the same pack, and therefore, it was unable to command a termination of
the persistent single CAC surge condition which led to CAC inlet
overheating.'' Boeing stated that when only a single CAC is operating
on a pack and airflow drops to an unintended low level, the surge will
be detected by the system controls. Boeing explained that due to a
software requirements error, the CAC will not be shut down and the
surge can persist. Boeing concluded that the issue is not that the
surge is undetected but rather that the issue is that the controls fail
to react to that surge condition.
Modify the sentence ``In addition, we received a report of
an in-service event involving foreign object debris in the CAC inlet
and accumulation at the ozone converter that also led to a persistent
single CAC surge resulting in overheat damage to the CAC inlet
housing'' to ``In addition, we received a report of an in-service event
involving persistent single CAC surge resulting in overheat damage to
the CAC inlet housing and foreign object debris in the CAC inlet and
accumulation at the ozone converter.'' Boeing stated that aspects of
this particular event are unknown; however, it is likely the foreign
object debris was a result of the persistent surge event.
Modify the sentence ``The proposed PCU software change
would redistribute the airflow to provide more flow to a single CAC,
reducing the potential for a CAC surge'' to ``The PCU software change
enables a single CAC in surge to be commanded off in order to prevent
the persistent surge condition. Additionally, the software
redistributes the airflow to provide more flow to a single CAC,
reducing the potential for a CAC surge.'' Boeing stated the software
changes are not ``proposed'' and already exist. Boeing also stated the
key software feature needed for persistent surge prevention was not in
the original sentence.
Modify the sentence ``Reduced airflow leading to
persistent CAC surge conditions and CAC inlet overheating, if not
corrected, could result in structural degradation of the CAC inlet, and
fumes in the cabin and flight deck, as well as causing interruption to
in-service air conditioning'' to ``PCU controls that do not react to a
single CAC in persistent CAC surge conditions leading to CAC inlet
overheating, if not corrected, could result in structural degradation
of the CAC inlet, and fumes in the cabin and flight deck, as well as
causing interruption to in-service air conditioning.'' Boeing stated
that the purpose of the redistribution of CAC airflow is to minimize
surge occurrence and does not relate to the overall prevention of CAC
inlet overheat.
We agree that the changes requested by Boeing are accurate.
However, since the text of the NPRM that Boeing referenced is not
restated in this final rule, no change to the final rule is necessary.
Request for Credit for Previous Actions Accomplished
Boeing and Etihad Airways requested that we include Boeing Service
Bulletin
[[Page 26835]]
B787-81205-SB210077-00, Issue 001, dated April 19, 2016, as a method of
compliance in the proposed AD. Boeing also requested that we include
Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210075-00, Issue 001, dated
February 24, 2016. Boeing requested that the service information be
added to paragraph (h) of the proposed AD as credit for previous
actions. Boeing stated that not all service information revisions were
included in paragraph (h) of the proposed AD, yet they all warrant
credit for addressing the AD. Etihad Airways noted that incorporation
of all revisions of Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210075-00
comply with the proposed AD requirements.
We agree. We have reviewed Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-
SB210075-00, Issue 001, dated February 24, 2016; and Boeing Service
Bulletin B787-81205-SB210077-00, Issue 001, dated April 19, 2016; and
the changes made to later revisions are clarifications. We have
determined that airplanes on which the actions specified in the earlier
revisions were done would be compliant with this AD.
In paragraph (h)(1) of this AD, we added Boeing Service Bulletin
B787-81205-SB210075-00, Issue 001, dated February 24, 2016, to provide
credit and redesignated subsequent paragraphs accordingly. We also
added paragraph (h)(3) of this AD to add Boeing Service Bulletin B787-
81205-SB210077-00, Issue 001, dated April 19, 2016.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this final rule with the changes described previously and minor
editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for addressing the unsafe condition; and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this final
rule.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
We reviewed Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210075-00, Issue
003, dated March 29, 2017; and Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-
SB210077-00, Issue 004, dated September 22, 2017. The service
information describes procedures for installing new PCU software for
the CACTCS and new CAC outlet pressure sensor J-tube hardware, and
doing related investigative and corrective actions. These documents are
distinct since they apply to different airplane models.
We reviewed Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210083-00, Issue
001, dated February 9, 2017. The service information describes
procedures for installing new PCU software for the CACTCS to recover
the CAC from surges by reconfiguration flow schedules.
This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 62 airplanes of U.S. registry. We
estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Software Installation................. 1 work-hour x $85 per $0 $85 $5,270
hour = $85.
Modify Left and Right Inboard and 20 work-hours x $85 per 22,821 24,521 1,520,302
Outboard CAC Modules. hour = $1,700.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes and
associated appliances to the Director of the System Oversight Division.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
[[Page 26836]]
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2018-12-06 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-19310; Docket No. FAA-
2017-0904; Product Identifier 2017-NM-071-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective July 16, 2018.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 787-8 and 787-9
airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified in the
applicable service information specified in paragraphs (c)(1) and
(c)(2) of this AD.
(1) Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210075-00, Issue 003,
dated March 29, 2017 (for Model 787-8 airplanes);
(2) Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210077-00, Issue 004,
dated September 22, 2017 (for Model 787-9 airplanes).
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 21, Air
conditioning.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a report of an in-service reliability
issue involving a latent flow sensor failure combined with single
cabin air compressor (CAC) operation. This condition resulted in
reduced airflow which led to a persistent single CAC surge condition
that caused overheat damage to the CAC inlet. We are issuing this AD
to prevent CAC inlet overheating leading to structural degradation
of the CAC inlet, fumes in the cabin and flight deck, and
interruption to in-service air conditioning.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Software and Hardware Installation
Within 36 months after the effective date of this AD: Install
new pack control unit (PCU) software for the cabin air conditioning
and temperature control system (CACTCS) and new CAC outlet pressure
sensor J-tube hardware, and do all applicable related investigative
and corrective actions; in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of the applicable service information specified in
paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD. Related investigative and
corrective actions must be done before further flight.
(1) Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210075-00, Issue 003,
dated March 29, 2017 (for Boeing Model 787-8 airplanes); or Boeing
Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210077-00, Issue 004, dated September
22, 2017 (for Boeing Model 787-9 airplanes).
(2) Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210083-00, Issue 001,
dated February 9, 2017 (for all airplanes); and Work Packages 2 and
3 of the applicable service information identified in paragraph
(g)(1) of this AD.
(h) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the actions specified in
paragraph (g) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using the applicable service information
specified in paragraphs (h)(1) through (h)(5) of this AD.
(1) Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210075-00, Issue 001,
dated February 24, 2016 (for Model 787-8 airplanes);
(2) Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210075-00, Issue 002,
dated May 11, 2016 (for Model 787-8 airplanes);
(3) Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210077-00, Issue 001,
dated April 19, 2016 (for Model 787-9 airplanes);
(4) Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210077-00, Issue 002,
dated May 11, 2016 (for Model 787-9 airplanes);
(5) Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210077-00, Issue 003,
dated October 20, 2016 (for Model 787-9 airplanes).
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request
to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the
manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of the
person identified in paragraph (j) of this AD. Information may be
emailed to: [email protected].
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, to make those findings. To be approved,
the repair method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation
must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval
must specifically refer to this AD.
(j) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact Allison Buss,
Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Section,
FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
phone and fax: 206-231-3564; email: [email protected].
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210075-00, Issue 003,
dated March 29, 2017;
(ii) Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210077-00, Issue 004,
dated September 22, 2017;
(iii) Boeing Service Bulletin B787-81205-SB210083-00, Issue 001,
dated February 9, 2017.
(3) For The Boeing Company service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual
& Data Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal
Beach, CA 90740-5600; telephone 562-797-1717; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on May 31, 2018.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-12285 Filed 6-8-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P