Airworthiness Directives; Airbus, 26882-26884 [2018-12229]
Download as PDF
26882
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 112 / Monday, June 11, 2018 / Proposed Rules
(j) Other Acceptable Installation Method
Installation of an HMCA SW standard
approved after the effective date of this AD
is acceptable for compliance with the
corresponding actions required by paragraph
(h) of this AD, provided the conditions
required by paragraphs (j)(1) and (j)(2) of this
AD are met.
(1) The HMCA SW standard must be
approved by the Manager, International
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA;
the European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA); or Airbus’s EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by
the DOA, the approval must include the
DOA-authorized signature.
(2) The installation must be accomplished
in accordance with the modification
instructions approved by the Manager,
International Section, Transport Standards
Branch, FAA; the EASA; or Airbus’s EASA
DOA. If approved by the DOA, the approval
must include the DOA-authorized signature.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
(k) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Section, send it
to the attention of the person identified in
paragraph (l)(2) of this AD. Information may
be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOCREQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer, the action must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, International Section,
Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or the
EASA; or Airbus’s EASA DOA. If approved
by the DOA, the approval must include the
DOA-authorized signature.
(l) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA AD
2017–0200, dated October 10, 2017, for
related information. You may examine the
MCAI on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA–2018–0505.
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact Kathleen Arrigotti, Aerospace
Engineer, International Section, Transport
Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th
St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and
fax 206–231–3218.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness
Office—EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33
5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email
continued-airworthiness.a350@airbus.com;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Jun 08, 2018
Jkt 244001
internet https://www.airbus.com. You may
view this service information at the FAA,
Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 206–231–3195.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on May
29, 2018.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–12230 Filed 6–8–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2018–0506; Product
Identifier 2018–NM–045–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Airbus Model A350–941 airplanes. This
proposed AD was prompted by the
discovery of inadequate corrosion
protection in certain areas of the
horizontal stabilizer and the rear
fuselage cone structure. This proposed
AD would require application of sealant
and protective treatment on the affected
areas of the horizontal stabilizer and the
rear fuselage cone structure and, for
certain airplanes, modification of the
trimmable horizontal stabilizer (THS)
torsion box and re-identification of the
elevator. We are proposing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these
products.
SUMMARY:
We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by July 26, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
For service information identified in
this NPRM, contact Airbus SAS,
Airworthiness Office—EAL, 1 Rond
Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36
96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email
continued-airworthiness.a350@
airbus.com; internet https://
www.airbus.com. You may view this
service information at the FAA,
Transport Standards Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–
0506; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this NPRM, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone
800–647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathleen Arrigotti, Aerospace Engineer,
International Section, Transport
Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
telephone and fax 206–231–3218.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposal. Send your comments to
an address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2018–0506; Product Identifier 2018–
NM–045–AD’’ at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this NPRM. We will consider
all comments received by the closing
date and may amend this NPRM based
on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this NPRM.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Union, has issued EASA AD 2018–0036,
dated February 7, 2018 (referred to after
this as the Mandatory Continuing
E:\FR\FM\11JNP1.SGM
11JNP1
26883
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 112 / Monday, June 11, 2018 / Proposed Rules
110281) and [Airbus] SB A350–55–P003
(Airbus mod 107877 and mod 108494) to
provide modification instructions for inservice pre-mod aeroplanes.
For the reasons described above, this
[EASA] AD requires application of sealant
and protective treatment on the affected areas
of the HTP and fuselage at S19 and, for
certain aeroplanes, modification of the
trimmable horizontal stabilizer (THS) torsion
box [and re-identification of the elevator].
Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the
MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition
for certain Airbus Model A350–941
airplanes. The MCAI states:
In some areas of the Horizontal Tail Plane
(HTP) [horizontal stabilizer] and fuselage
Section (S) 19 [rear fuselage cone structure],
the interfay sealant for multimaterial joints
(hybrid joints) was only applied on the
surface in direct contact with aluminium
parts and not between all surfaces of the joint
parts. This situation does not ensure full
barrier properties. To avoid any risk of water
ingress in multi-material-stacks involving
aluminium, it is necessary to apply interfay
sealant between all assembled parts, even
between parts made of corrosion resistant
material. This ensures a double barrier in the
joint and prevents subsequent potential
galvanic corrosion on the aluminum holes on
top of the single barrier already applied in
aluminium parts.
This condition, if not corrected, could
reduce the structural integrity of the HTP and
fuselage at S19.
To address this unsafe condition, Airbus
developed production mod [Modification]
106695 for fuselage at S19 and mod 107824
for HTP to improve protection against
corrosion, and issued [Airbus] SB [Service
Bulletin] A350–53–P029 (Airbus mod
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
Airbus has issued Service Bulletin
A350–53–P029, dated November 17,
2017. This service information describes
procedures to apply sealant and
protective treatment on the affected
areas of the rear fuselage cone structure.
Airbus has issued Service Bulletin
A350–55–P003, dated November 6,
2017. This service information describes
procedures to apply sealant and
protective treatment on the affected
areas of the horizontal stabilizer, modify
the THS torsion box in zone 330 and
340, and re-identify the elevator in zone
335 and 345.
The service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties
have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type designs.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
affects 6 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to
comply with this proposed AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS FOR REQUIRED ACTIONS
Labor cost
Parts cost
Cost per product
Up to 57 work-hours × $85 per hour = $4,845 ....................................................
Unavailable ...........
Up to $4,845 .........
According to the manufacturer, some
or all of the costs of this proposed AD
may be covered under warranty, thereby
reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty
coverage for affected individuals. As a
result, we have included all known
costs in our cost estimate.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Jun 08, 2018
Jkt 244001
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
This proposed AD is issued in
accordance with authority delegated by
the Executive Director, Aircraft
Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance
with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance
and Airworthiness Division, but during
this transition period, the Executive
Director has delegated the authority to
issue ADs applicable to transport
category airplanes to the Director of the
System Oversight Division.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Cost on U.S.
operators
Up to $29,070.
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
E:\FR\FM\11JNP1.SGM
11JNP1
26884
§ 39.13
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 112 / Monday, June 11, 2018 / Proposed Rules
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
Airbus: Docket No. FAA–2018–0506; Product
Identifier 2018–NM–045–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by July 26,
2018.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Model A350–
941 airplanes certificated in any category, all
manufacturer serial numbers, except those on
which Airbus Modification 106695 (or
retrofit Modification 110281) and
Modification 107824 (or retrofit Modification
107877 and retrofit Modification 108494)
have been embodied in production.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 53, Fuselage; 55, Stabilizers.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by the discovery of
inadequate corrosion protection in certain
areas of the horizontal stabilizer and the rear
fuselage cone structure. We are issuing this
AD to prevent reduced structural integrity of
the horizontal stabilizer and the rear fuselage
cone structure.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
(g) Definitions
(1) For the purpose of this AD, Group 1
airplanes are those with manufacturer serial
numbers (MSNs) listed in Section 1.A.,
‘‘Applicability’’ of Airbus Service Bulletin
A350–53–P029, dated November 17, 2017.
(2) For the purpose of this AD, Group 2
airplanes are those with MSNs listed in
Section 1.A., ‘‘Applicability’’ of Airbus
Service Bulletin A350–55–P003, dated
November 6, 2017.
(h) Modification
(1) For Group 1 airplanes: Before exceeding
36 months since the date of issuance of the
original standard airworthiness certificate or
date of issuance of the original export
certificate of airworthiness, or within 90 days
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later, apply sealant and protective
treatment on the affected areas of the rear
fuselage cone structure, as defined in, and in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A350–
53–P029, dated November 17, 2017.
(2) For Group 2 airplanes: Before exceeding
36 months since the date of issuance of the
original standard airworthiness certificate or
date of issuance of the original export
certificate of airworthiness, or within 90 days
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later, accomplish concurrently the
actions specified in paragraphs (h)(2)(i) and
(h)(2)(ii) of this AD, in accordance with the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Jun 08, 2018
Jkt 244001
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin A350–55–P003, dated
November 6, 2017.
(i) Apply sealant and protective treatment
on the affected areas of the horizontal
stabilizer, as defined in Airbus Service
Bulletin A350–55–P003, dated November 6,
2017.
(ii) Modify the trimmable horizontal
stabilizer (THS) torsion box in zone 330 and
340, and re-identify the elevator in zone 335
and 345.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness
Office—EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33
5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email
continued-airworthiness.a350@airbus.com;
internet https://www.airbus.com. You may
view this service information at the FAA,
Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 206–231–3195.
(i) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Section, send it
to the attention of the person identified in
paragraph (j)(2) of this AD. Information may
be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOCREQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer, the action must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, International Section,
Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or the
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or
Airbus’s EASA Design Organization
Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA,
the approval must include the DOAauthorized signature.
(3) Required for Compliance (RC): If any
service information contains procedures or
tests that are identified as RC, those
procedures and tests must be done to comply
with this AD; any procedures or tests that are
not identified as RC are recommended. Those
procedures and tests that are not identified
as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator’s
maintenance or inspection program without
obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided
the procedures and tests identified as RC can
be done and the airplane can be put back in
an airworthy condition. Any substitutions or
changes to procedures or tests identified as
RC require approval of an AMOC.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on May
25, 2018.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.
(j) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA AD
2018–0036, dated February 7, 2018, for
related information. This MCAI may be
found in the AD docket on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–0506.
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact Kathleen Arrigotti, Aerospace
Engineer, International Section, Transport
Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th
St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and
fax 206–231–3218.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
[FR Doc. 2018–12229 Filed 6–8–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2018–0508; Product
Identifier 2018–NM–012–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Airbus Model A350–941 airplanes. This
proposed AD was prompted by a
determination that more restrictive
maintenance requirements and
airworthiness limitations are necessary.
This proposed AD would require
revising the maintenance or inspection
program, as applicable, to incorporate
new or more restrictive maintenance
requirements and airworthiness
limitations. We are proposing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these
products.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by July 26, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11JNP1.SGM
11JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 112 (Monday, June 11, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 26882-26884]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12229]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2018-0506; Product Identifier 2018-NM-045-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Airbus Model A350-941 airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted
by the discovery of inadequate corrosion protection in certain areas of
the horizontal stabilizer and the rear fuselage cone structure. This
proposed AD would require application of sealant and protective
treatment on the affected areas of the horizontal stabilizer and the
rear fuselage cone structure and, for certain airplanes, modification
of the trimmable horizontal stabilizer (THS) torsion box and re-
identification of the elevator. We are proposing this AD to address the
unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 26, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Airbus
SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707
Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 45
80; email [email protected]; internet https://www.airbus.com. You may view this service information at the FAA,
Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 206-
231-3195.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0506; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received,
and other information. The street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments
will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Arrigotti, Aerospace
Engineer, International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax 206-231-3218.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2018-0506;
Product Identifier 2018-NM-045-AD'' at the beginning of your comments.
We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this NPRM. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend this NPRM based on
those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this NPRM.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA AD
2018-0036, dated February 7, 2018 (referred to after this as the
Mandatory Continuing
[[Page 26883]]
Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe
condition for certain Airbus Model A350-941 airplanes. The MCAI states:
In some areas of the Horizontal Tail Plane (HTP) [horizontal
stabilizer] and fuselage Section (S) 19 [rear fuselage cone
structure], the interfay sealant for multimaterial joints (hybrid
joints) was only applied on the surface in direct contact with
aluminium parts and not between all surfaces of the joint parts.
This situation does not ensure full barrier properties. To avoid any
risk of water ingress in multi-material-stacks involving aluminium,
it is necessary to apply interfay sealant between all assembled
parts, even between parts made of corrosion resistant material. This
ensures a double barrier in the joint and prevents subsequent
potential galvanic corrosion on the aluminum holes on top of the
single barrier already applied in aluminium parts.
This condition, if not corrected, could reduce the structural
integrity of the HTP and fuselage at S19.
To address this unsafe condition, Airbus developed production
mod [Modification] 106695 for fuselage at S19 and mod 107824 for HTP
to improve protection against corrosion, and issued [Airbus] SB
[Service Bulletin] A350-53-P029 (Airbus mod 110281) and [Airbus] SB
A350-55-P003 (Airbus mod 107877 and mod 108494) to provide
modification instructions for in-service pre-mod aeroplanes.
For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD requires
application of sealant and protective treatment on the affected
areas of the HTP and fuselage at S19 and, for certain aeroplanes,
modification of the trimmable horizontal stabilizer (THS) torsion
box [and re-identification of the elevator].
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
Airbus has issued Service Bulletin A350-53-P029, dated November 17,
2017. This service information describes procedures to apply sealant
and protective treatment on the affected areas of the rear fuselage
cone structure.
Airbus has issued Service Bulletin A350-55-P003, dated November 6,
2017. This service information describes procedures to apply sealant
and protective treatment on the affected areas of the horizontal
stabilizer, modify the THS torsion box in zone 330 and 340, and re-
identify the elevator in zone 335 and 345.
The service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type designs.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 6 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:
Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product Cost on U.S. operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Up to 57 work-hours x $85 per hour = Unavailable............ Up to $4,845........... Up to $29,070.
$4,845.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the manufacturer, some or all of the costs of this
proposed AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost
impact on affected individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for
affected individuals. As a result, we have included all known costs in
our cost estimate.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
This proposed AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated
by the Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as
authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order,
issuance of ADs is normally a function of the Compliance and
Airworthiness Division, but during this transition period, the
Executive Director has delegated the authority to issue ADs applicable
to transport category airplanes to the Director of the System Oversight
Division.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
[[Page 26884]]
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2018-0506; Product Identifier 2018-NM-045-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by July 26, 2018.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Model A350-941 airplanes certificated
in any category, all manufacturer serial numbers, except those on
which Airbus Modification 106695 (or retrofit Modification 110281)
and Modification 107824 (or retrofit Modification 107877 and
retrofit Modification 108494) have been embodied in production.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage;
55, Stabilizers.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by the discovery of inadequate corrosion
protection in certain areas of the horizontal stabilizer and the
rear fuselage cone structure. We are issuing this AD to prevent
reduced structural integrity of the horizontal stabilizer and the
rear fuselage cone structure.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Definitions
(1) For the purpose of this AD, Group 1 airplanes are those with
manufacturer serial numbers (MSNs) listed in Section 1.A.,
``Applicability'' of Airbus Service Bulletin A350-53-P029, dated
November 17, 2017.
(2) For the purpose of this AD, Group 2 airplanes are those with
MSNs listed in Section 1.A., ``Applicability'' of Airbus Service
Bulletin A350-55-P003, dated November 6, 2017.
(h) Modification
(1) For Group 1 airplanes: Before exceeding 36 months since the
date of issuance of the original standard airworthiness certificate
or date of issuance of the original export certificate of
airworthiness, or within 90 days after the effective date of this
AD, whichever occurs later, apply sealant and protective treatment
on the affected areas of the rear fuselage cone structure, as
defined in, and in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of Airbus Service Bulletin A350-53-P029, dated November 17, 2017.
(2) For Group 2 airplanes: Before exceeding 36 months since the
date of issuance of the original standard airworthiness certificate
or date of issuance of the original export certificate of
airworthiness, or within 90 days after the effective date of this
AD, whichever occurs later, accomplish concurrently the actions
specified in paragraphs (h)(2)(i) and (h)(2)(ii) of this AD, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service
Bulletin A350-55-P003, dated November 6, 2017.
(i) Apply sealant and protective treatment on the affected areas
of the horizontal stabilizer, as defined in Airbus Service Bulletin
A350-55-P003, dated November 6, 2017.
(ii) Modify the trimmable horizontal stabilizer (THS) torsion
box in zone 330 and 340, and re-identify the elevator in zone 335
and 345.
(i) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Section, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (j)(2) of this AD. Information
may be emailed to: [email protected]. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or the European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus's EASA Design Organization Approval
(DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-
authorized signature.
(3) Required for Compliance (RC): If any service information
contains procedures or tests that are identified as RC, those
procedures and tests must be done to comply with this AD; any
procedures or tests that are not identified as RC are recommended.
Those procedures and tests that are not identified as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in accordance with the
operator's maintenance or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the procedures and tests identified as
RC can be done and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition. Any substitutions or changes to procedures or tests
identified as RC require approval of an AMOC.
(j) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) EASA AD 2018-0036, dated February 7, 2018, for related
information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the internet
at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket
No. FAA-2018-0506.
(2) For more information about this AD, contact Kathleen
Arrigotti, Aerospace Engineer, International Section, Transport
Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
telephone and fax 206-231-3218.
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96;
fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email [email protected]; internet https://www.airbus.com. You
may view this service information at the FAA, Transport Standards
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on May 25, 2018.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-12229 Filed 6-8-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P