Airworthiness Directives; the Boeing Company Airplanes, 26556-26559 [2018-12279]
Download as PDF
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
26556
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 111 / Friday, June 8, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
(v) Add together the amounts
computed in paragraphs (c)(3)(i)
through (v) of this section and from that
sum deduct any payment made
pursuant to paragraph (c)(1) of this
section.
(d) Handler underpayment proration.
If a handler has not received full
payment from the market administrator
pursuant to § 1051.72 by the payment
date specified in paragraph (a), (b), or (c)
of this section, the handler may reduce
pro rata its payments to producers or to
the cooperative association (with
respect to receipts described in
paragraph (b) of this section, prorating
the underpayment to the volume of milk
received from the cooperative
association in proportion to the total
milk received from producers by the
handler), but not by more than the
amount of the underpayment. The
payments shall be completed on the
next scheduled payment date after
receipt of the balance due from the
market administrator.
(e) Payments to missing or deceased
producers. If a handler claims that a
required payment to a producer cannot
be made because the producer is
deceased or cannot be located, or
because the cooperative association or
its lawful successor or assignee is no
longer in existence, the payment shall
be made to the producer-settlement
fund, and in the event that the handler
subsequently locates and pays the
producer or a lawful claimant, or in the
event that the handler no longer exists
and a lawful claim is later established,
the market administrator shall make the
required payment from the producersettlement fund to the handler or to the
lawful claimant, as the case may be.
(f) Producer payment record. In
making payments to producers pursuant
to this section, each handler shall
furnish each producer, except a
producer whose milk was received from
a cooperative association handler
described in § 1000.9(a) or (c), a
supporting statement in a form that may
be retained by the recipient which shall
show:
(1) The name, address, Grade A
identifier assigned by a duly constituted
regulatory agency, and payroll number
of the producer;
(2) The daily and total pounds, and
the month and dates such milk was
received from that producer;
(3) The total pounds of butterfat,
protein, and other solids contained in
the producer’s milk;
(4) The minimum rate or rates at
which payment to the producer is
required pursuant to the order in this
part;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Jun 07, 2018
Jkt 244001
(5) The rate used in making payment
if the rate is other than the applicable
minimum rate;
(6) The amount, or rate per
hundredweight, or rate per pound of
component, and the nature of each
deduction claimed by the handler; and
(7) The net amount of payment to the
producer or cooperative association.
§ 1051.74
[Reserved]
For purposes of making payments for
producer milk and nonpool milk, a
plant location adjustment shall be
determined by subtracting the Class I
price specified in § 1051.51 from the
Class I price at the plant’s location. The
difference, plus or minus as the case
may be, shall be used to adjust the
payments required pursuant to
§§ 1051.73 and 1000.76.
§ 1051.76 Payments by a handler
operating a partially regulated distributing
plant.
See § 1000.76.
See § 1000.86.
Subpart D—Miscellaneous Provisions
§ 1051.90
Dates.
Dated: June 4, 2018.
Bruce Summers,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–12245 Filed 6–7–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2018–0074; Product
Identifier 2017–NM–148–AD; Amendment
39–19309; AD 2018–12–05]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; the Boeing
Company Airplanes
Charges on overdue accounts.
Administrative Assessment and
Marketing Service Deduction
On or before the payment receipt date
specified under § 1051.71, each handler
shall pay to the market administrator its
pro rata share of the expense of
administration of the order at a rate
specified by the market administrator
that is no more than 8 cents per
hundredweight with respect to:
(a) Receipts of producer milk
(including the handler’s own
production) other than such receipts by
a handler described in § 1000.9(c) that
were delivered to pool plants of other
handlers;
(b) Receipts from a handler described
in § 1000.9(c);
(c) Receipts of concentrated fluid milk
products from unregulated supply
plants and receipts of nonfluid milk
products assigned to Class I use
pursuant to § 1000.43(d) and other
source milk allocated to Class I pursuant
to § 1000.44(a)(3) and (8) and the
corresponding steps of § 1000.44(b),
except other source milk that is
excluded from the computations
pursuant to § 1051.60(h) and (i); and
(d) Route disposition in the marketing
area from a partially regulated
distributing plant that exceeds the skim
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all The
Boeing Company Model 737–100, –200,
–200C, –300, –400, and –500 series
airplanes. This AD was prompted by
reports of cracks found in the rear spar
web and lower chord on the left and
right wings. This AD requires repetitive
detailed inspections for cracking of the
rear spar web and lower chord, and
applicable on-condition actions. We are
issuing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective July 13,
2018.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of July 13, 2018.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this final rule, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes,
Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC
110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740–5600;
telephone 562–797–1717; internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
SUMMARY:
§ 1051.85 Assessment for order
administration.
Frm 00010
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
See § 1000.78.
PO 00000
Deduction for marketing
Adjustment of accounts.
See § 1000.77.
§ 1051.78
§ 1051.86
services.
See § 1000.90.
§ 1051.75 Plant location adjustments for
producer milk and nonpool milk.
§ 1051.77
milk and butterfat subtracted pursuant
to § 1000.76(a)(1)(i) and (ii).
E:\FR\FM\08JNR1.SGM
08JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 111 / Friday, June 8, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
flight loads and adversely affect the
structural integrity of the airplane.
It is also available on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–
0074.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–
0074; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this final rule,
the regulatory evaluation, any
comments received, and other
information. The address for Docket
Operations (phone: 800–647–5527) is
Docket Operations, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Payman Soltani, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles
ACO Branch, 3960 Paramount
Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712–4137;
phone: 562–627–5313; fax: 562–627–
5210; email: payman.soltani@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to all The Boeing Company Model
737–100, –200, –200C, –300, –400, and
–500 series airplanes. The NPRM
published in the Federal Register on
February 9, 2018 (83 FR 5743). The
NPRM was prompted by reports of
cracks found in the rear spar web and
lower chord on the left and right wings.
The NPRM proposed to require
repetitive detailed inspections for
cracking of the rear spar web and lower
chord, and applicable on-condition
actions.
We are issuing this AD to address
cracks in the rear spar of the left and
right wing between wing buttock line
(WBL) 91 and WBL 155, which could
lead to the inability of a principal
structural element to sustain required
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this final rule.
The following presents the comments
received on the NPRM and the FAA’s
response to each comment.
Support for the NPRM
The Boeing Company stated its
support for the NPRM.
Request To Require the Same Grace
Period Regardless of Inspection Method
Southwest Airlines (Southwest),
requested that we revise paragraph (h)
of the proposed AD, which refers to the
‘‘Compliance’’ section of Boeing Alert
Requirements Bulletin 737–57A1337
RB, dated September 14, 2017, regarding
the different compliance times for the
two inspection methods given in Table
1 of the ‘‘Compliance’’ section for Group
2 airplanes. Southwest stated that the
planned inspection method should have
no bearing on the timing of the
inspection, and therefore the
compliance times should be the same
for both options. They did not specify
which of the two compliance times they
would favor.
We acknowledge the commenter’s
request. While the compliance times for
inspections are not normally dependent
on the planned inspection method, in
this case, the initial compliance times
were adjusted to account for differences
in the probability of detection using a
visual inspection versus an eddy current
inspection. Because an eddy current
inspection is more capable of detecting
smaller cracks than a visual inspection,
the initial compliance time was
shortened for those airplanes that are
inspected using the visual inspection
option. We have not changed this AD in
this regard.
Effect of Winglets on Accomplishment
of the Proposed Actions
Aviation Partners Boeing stated that
the installation of winglets using
Supplemental Type Certificate (STC)
ST01219SE does not affect the actions
specified in the NPRM.
26557
We agree with the commenter. We
have redesignated paragraph (c) of the
proposed AD as paragraph (c)(1) of this
AD and added paragraph (c)(2) to this
AD to state that installation of STC
ST01219SE does not affect the ability to
accomplish the actions required by this
AD. Therefore, for airplanes on which
STC ST01219SE is installed, a ‘‘change
in product’’ alternative method of
compliance (AMOC) approval request is
not necessary to comply with the
requirements of 14 CFR 39.17.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data,
considered the comments received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting this
final rule with the changes described
previously and minor editorial changes.
We have determined that these minor
changes:
• Are consistent with the intent that
was proposed in the NPRM for
addressing the unsafe condition; and
• Do not add any additional burden
upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM.
We also determined that these
changes will not increase the economic
burden on any operator or increase the
scope of this final rule.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
We reviewed Boeing Alert
Requirements Bulletin 737–57A1337
RB, dated September 14, 2017. This
service information describes
procedures for repetitive detailed or
surface High Frequency Eddy Current
(HFEC) inspections for cracking of the
rear spar web and lower chord, and
applicable on-condition actions. This
service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties
have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 160
airplanes of U.S. registry. We estimate
the following costs to comply with this
AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS FOR REQUIRED ACTIONS
Labor cost
Inspections .............
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
Action
Up to 22 work-hours × $85 per hour = up to $1,870 per
inspection cycle.
We have received no definitive data
that would enable us to provide cost
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Jun 07, 2018
Jkt 244001
Parts cost
$0
estimates for the on-condition actions
specified in this AD.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Cost per product
Cost on U.S. operators
Up to $1,870 per
Up to $299,200 per ininspection cycle.
spection cycle.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
E:\FR\FM\08JNR1.SGM
08JNR1
26558
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 111 / Friday, June 8, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
This AD is issued in accordance with
authority delegated by the Executive
Director, Aircraft Certification Service,
as authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C.
In accordance with that order, issuance
of ADs is normally a function of the
Compliance and Airworthiness
Division, but during this transition
period, the Executive Director has
delegated the authority to issue ADs
applicable to transport category
airplanes and associated appliances to
the Director of the System Oversight
Division.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Jun 07, 2018
Jkt 244001
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
2018–12–05 The Boeing Company:
Amendment 39–19309; Docket No.
FAA–2018–0074; Product Identifier
2017–NM–148–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective July 13, 2018.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
(1) This AD applies to all The Boeing
Company Model 737–100, –200, –200C,
–300, –400, and –500 series airplanes,
certificated in any category.
(2) Installation of Supplemental Type
Certificate (STC) ST01219SE (https://
rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_
Library/rgstc.nsf/0/ebd1cec7b301293
e86257cb30045557a/$FILE/ST01219SE.pdf)
does not affect the ability to accomplish the
actions required by this AD. Therefore, for
airplanes on which STC ST01219SE is
installed, a ‘‘change in product’’ alternative
method of compliance (AMOC) approval
request is not necessary to comply with the
requirements of 14 CFR 39.17.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 57, Wings.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of cracks
found in the rear spar web and lower chord
on the left and right wings. We are issuing
this AD to detect and correct cracks in the
rear spar of the left and right wing between
wing buttock line (WBL) 91 and WBL 155,
which could lead to the inability of a
principal structural element to sustain
required flight loads and adversely affect the
structural integrity of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Required Actions for Group 1 Airplanes
For airplanes identified as Group 1 in
Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 737–
57A1337 RB, dated September 14, 2017:
Within 120 days after the effective date of
this AD, inspect the airplane and do all
applicable corrective actions using a method
approved in accordance with the procedures
specified in paragraph (j) of this AD.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(h) Required Actions for Group 2 Airplanes
For airplanes identified as Group 2 in
Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 737–
57A1337 RB, dated September 14, 2017:
Except as required by paragraph (i) of this
AD, at the applicable times specified in the
‘‘Compliance’’ section of Boeing Alert
Requirements Bulletin 737–57A1337 RB,
dated September 14, 2017, do all applicable
actions identified in, and in accordance with,
the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Alert Requirements Bulletin 737–57A1337
RB, dated September 14, 2017.
Note 1 to paragraph (h) of this AD:
Guidance for accomplishing the actions
required by this AD is included in Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 737–57A1337, dated
September 14, 2017, which is referred to in
Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 737–
57A1337 RB, dated September 14, 2017.
(i) Exceptions to Service Information
Specifications
(1) For purposes of determining
compliance with the requirements of this AD:
Where Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin
737–57A1337 RB, dated September 14, 2017,
uses the phrase ‘‘the original issue date of
Requirements Bulletin 737–57A1337 RB,’’
this AD requires using ‘‘the effective date of
this AD.’’
(2) Where Boeing Alert Requirements
Bulletin 737–57A1337 RB, dated September
14, 2017, specifies contacting Boeing, this AD
requires repair using a method approved in
accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (j) of this AD.
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with
14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (k)(1) of
this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9ANM-LAACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair,
modification, or alteration required by this
AD if it is approved by the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Los Angeles
ACO Branch, to make those findings. To be
approved, the repair method, modification
deviation, or alteration deviation must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(k) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Payman Soltani, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO
Branch, 3960 Paramount Boulevard,
Lakewood, CA 90712–4137; phone: 562–627–
E:\FR\FM\08JNR1.SGM
08JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 111 / Friday, June 8, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
5313; fax: 562–627–5210; email:
payman.soltani@faa.gov.
(2) Service information identified in this
AD that is not incorporated by reference is
available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (l)(3) and (l)(4) of this AD.
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin
737–57A1337 RB, dated September 14, 2017.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd.,
MC 110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740–5600;
telephone 562–797–1717; internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on May
31, 2018.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–12279 Filed 6–7–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2017–1020; Product
Identifier 2017–NM–114–AD; Amendment
39–19306; AD 2018–12–02]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Airbus Model A318–111 and –112
airplanes; Model A319–111, –112, –113,
–114, and –115 airplanes; Model A320–
211, –212, –214, and –216 airplanes;
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Jun 07, 2018
Jkt 244001
and Model A321–111, –112, –211, –212,
and –213 airplanes. This AD was
prompted by a review of maintenance
instructions for a blend repair of the
snout diameter of the main beam
assembly of the forward engine mount
that would create an excessive gap
between the bearing mono-ball and the
snout. This AD requires modifying the
main beam assembly of the forward
engine mount. We are issuing this AD
to address the unsafe condition on these
products.
DATES: This AD is effective July 13,
2018.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in this AD
as of July 13, 2018.
ADDRESSES: For Airbus service
information identified in this final rule,
contact Airbus, Airworthiness Office–
EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France;
telephone: +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax: +33
5 61 93 44 51; email: account.airwortheas@airbus.com; internet: https://
www.airbus.com. For Goodrich service
information identified in this final rule,
contact Goodrich Corporation,
Aerostructures, 850 Lagoon Drive, Chula
Vista, CA 91910–2098; phone: 619–691–
2719; email: jan.lewis@goodrich.com;
internet: https://www.goodrich.com/
TechPubs. You may view this
referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
It is also available on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA–2017–
1020.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2017–
1020; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Office (telephone 800–647–
5527) is Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Section, Transport
Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
26559
216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198–6547;
telephone 425–227–1405; fax 425–227–
1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to all Airbus Model A318–111
and –112 airplanes; Model A319–111,
–112, –113, –114, and –115 airplanes;
Model A320–211, –212, –214, and –216
airplanes; and Model A321–111, –112,
–211, –212, and –213 airplanes. The
NPRM published in the Federal
Register on October 24, 2017 (82 FR
49146) (‘‘the NPRM’’). The NPRM was
prompted by a review of maintenance
instructions for a blend repair of the
snout diameter of the main beam
assembly of the forward engine mount
that would create an excessive gap
between the bearing mono-ball and the
snout. The NPRM proposed to require
modifying the main beam assembly of
the forward engine mount. We are
issuing this AD to prevent in-flight
failure of a forward engine mount, and
consequent detachment of an engine,
which could result in reduced
controllability of the airplane.
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Union, has issued EASA AD 2017–
0132R1, dated November 22, 2017
(referred to after this as the Mandatory
Continuing Airworthiness Information,
or ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe
condition for all Airbus Model A318–
111 and –112 airplanes; Model A319–
111, –112, –113, –114, and –115
airplanes; Model A320–211, –212, –214,
and –216 airplanes; and Model A321–
111, –112, –211, –212, and –213
airplanes. The MCAI states:
A review of maintenance instructions
revealed that the Goodrich Aerospace
CFM56–5B, Forward Engine Mount
Component Maintenance Manual (CMM) 71–
21–08, revision (rev.) 1 up to 46 (inclusive),
repair 10 (Blend Repair-Beam Assembly
Snout Diameter), provides instructions to
blend the wear on the forward engine mount
assembly, Part Number (P/N) 642–2000–9,
642–2000–13, or 642–2000–25, creating an
excessive gap between the bearing mono-ball
and the snout of the forward engine mount
main beam assembly, P/N 642–2006–501, or
P/N 642–2006–503.
This condition, if not detected and
corrected, could lead to in-flight failure of a
forward engine mount and consequent
detachment of an engine, possibly resulting
in reduced control of the aeroplane and
injury to persons on the ground.
To address this potential unsafe condition,
Airbus issued Service Bulletin (SB) A320–
71–1065 and SB A320–71–1066, and
E:\FR\FM\08JNR1.SGM
08JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 111 (Friday, June 8, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 26556-26559]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12279]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2018-0074; Product Identifier 2017-NM-148-AD; Amendment
39-19309; AD 2018-12-05]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; the Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all The
Boeing Company Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400, and -500 series
airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports of cracks found in the rear
spar web and lower chord on the left and right wings. This AD requires
repetitive detailed inspections for cracking of the rear spar web and
lower chord, and applicable on-condition actions. We are issuing this
AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective July 13, 2018.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of July 13,
2018.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA
90740-5600; telephone 562-797-1717; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195.
[[Page 26557]]
It is also available on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-0074.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0074; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this final rule, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for Docket Operations (phone: 800-647-
5527) is Docket Operations, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Payman Soltani, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO Branch, 3960 Paramount
Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-5313; fax: 562-627-
5210; email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to all The Boeing Company
Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes. The
NPRM published in the Federal Register on February 9, 2018 (83 FR
5743). The NPRM was prompted by reports of cracks found in the rear
spar web and lower chord on the left and right wings. The NPRM proposed
to require repetitive detailed inspections for cracking of the rear
spar web and lower chord, and applicable on-condition actions.
We are issuing this AD to address cracks in the rear spar of the
left and right wing between wing buttock line (WBL) 91 and WBL 155,
which could lead to the inability of a principal structural element to
sustain required flight loads and adversely affect the structural
integrity of the airplane.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this final rule. The following presents the comments received on the
NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment.
Support for the NPRM
The Boeing Company stated its support for the NPRM.
Request To Require the Same Grace Period Regardless of Inspection
Method
Southwest Airlines (Southwest), requested that we revise paragraph
(h) of the proposed AD, which refers to the ``Compliance'' section of
Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 737-57A1337 RB, dated September 14,
2017, regarding the different compliance times for the two inspection
methods given in Table 1 of the ``Compliance'' section for Group 2
airplanes. Southwest stated that the planned inspection method should
have no bearing on the timing of the inspection, and therefore the
compliance times should be the same for both options. They did not
specify which of the two compliance times they would favor.
We acknowledge the commenter's request. While the compliance times
for inspections are not normally dependent on the planned inspection
method, in this case, the initial compliance times were adjusted to
account for differences in the probability of detection using a visual
inspection versus an eddy current inspection. Because an eddy current
inspection is more capable of detecting smaller cracks than a visual
inspection, the initial compliance time was shortened for those
airplanes that are inspected using the visual inspection option. We
have not changed this AD in this regard.
Effect of Winglets on Accomplishment of the Proposed Actions
Aviation Partners Boeing stated that the installation of winglets
using Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) ST01219SE does not affect the
actions specified in the NPRM.
We agree with the commenter. We have redesignated paragraph (c) of
the proposed AD as paragraph (c)(1) of this AD and added paragraph
(c)(2) to this AD to state that installation of STC ST01219SE does not
affect the ability to accomplish the actions required by this AD.
Therefore, for airplanes on which STC ST01219SE is installed, a
``change in product'' alternative method of compliance (AMOC) approval
request is not necessary to comply with the requirements of 14 CFR
39.17.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this final rule with the changes described previously and minor
editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for addressing the unsafe condition; and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this final
rule.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
We reviewed Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 737-57A1337 RB,
dated September 14, 2017. This service information describes procedures
for repetitive detailed or surface High Frequency Eddy Current (HFEC)
inspections for cracking of the rear spar web and lower chord, and
applicable on-condition actions. This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties have access to it through
their normal course of business or by the means identified in the
ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 160 airplanes of U.S. registry. We
estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product Cost on U.S. operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspections............. Up to 22 work- $0 Up to $1,870 per Up to $299,200 per inspection
hours x $85 inspection cycle. cycle.
per hour = up
to $1,870 per
inspection
cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue
[[Page 26558]]
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes and
associated appliances to the Director of the System Oversight Division.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2018-12-05 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-19309; Docket No. FAA-
2018-0074; Product Identifier 2017-NM-148-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective July 13, 2018.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
(1) This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model 737-100, -
200, -200C, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes, certificated in
any category.
(2) Installation of Supplemental Type Certificate (STC)
ST01219SE (https://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/
rgstc.nsf/0/ebd1cec7b301293e86257cb30045557a/$FILE/ST01219SE.pdf)
does not affect the ability to accomplish the actions required by
this AD. Therefore, for airplanes on which STC ST01219SE is
installed, a ``change in product'' alternative method of compliance
(AMOC) approval request is not necessary to comply with the
requirements of 14 CFR 39.17.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57, Wings.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of cracks found in the rear spar
web and lower chord on the left and right wings. We are issuing this
AD to detect and correct cracks in the rear spar of the left and
right wing between wing buttock line (WBL) 91 and WBL 155, which
could lead to the inability of a principal structural element to
sustain required flight loads and adversely affect the structural
integrity of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Required Actions for Group 1 Airplanes
For airplanes identified as Group 1 in Boeing Alert Requirements
Bulletin 737-57A1337 RB, dated September 14, 2017: Within 120 days
after the effective date of this AD, inspect the airplane and do all
applicable corrective actions using a method approved in accordance
with the procedures specified in paragraph (j) of this AD.
(h) Required Actions for Group 2 Airplanes
For airplanes identified as Group 2 in Boeing Alert Requirements
Bulletin 737-57A1337 RB, dated September 14, 2017: Except as
required by paragraph (i) of this AD, at the applicable times
specified in the ``Compliance'' section of Boeing Alert Requirements
Bulletin 737-57A1337 RB, dated September 14, 2017, do all applicable
actions identified in, and in accordance with, the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 737-57A1337 RB,
dated September 14, 2017.
Note 1 to paragraph (h) of this AD: Guidance for accomplishing
the actions required by this AD is included in Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-57A1337, dated September 14, 2017, which is referred to
in Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 737-57A1337 RB, dated
September 14, 2017.
(i) Exceptions to Service Information Specifications
(1) For purposes of determining compliance with the requirements
of this AD: Where Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 737-57A1337 RB,
dated September 14, 2017, uses the phrase ``the original issue date
of Requirements Bulletin 737-57A1337 RB,'' this AD requires using
``the effective date of this AD.''
(2) Where Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 737-57A1337 RB,
dated September 14, 2017, specifies contacting Boeing, this AD
requires repair using a method approved in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (j) of this AD.
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority
to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to
the manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (k)(1) of this AD. Information
may be emailed to: [email protected].
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the
Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch, to make those findings. To be
approved, the repair method, modification deviation, or alteration
deviation must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(k) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Payman Soltani,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO Branch,
3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-
[[Page 26559]]
5313; fax: 562-627-5210; email: [email protected].
(2) Service information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (l)(3) and (l)(4) of this AD.
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 737-57A1337 RB, dated
September 14, 2017.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-
5600; telephone 562-797-1717; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on May 31, 2018.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-12279 Filed 6-7-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P