Minimum Internal Control Standards, 26620-26623 [2018-10365]
Download as PDF
26620
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 111 / Friday, June 8, 2018 / Proposed Rules
acceptance receipt is on or before that
date.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Dockets
Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Dockets Management
Staff, FDA will post your comment, as
well as any attachments, except for
information submitted, marked and
identified, as confidential, if submitted
as detailed in ‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2017–N–6189 for ‘‘Tobacco Product
Standard for Nicotine Level of
Combusted Cigarettes.’’ Received
comments, those filed in a timely
manner (see ADDRESSES), will be placed
in the docket and, except for those
submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Dockets Management Staff between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:24 Jun 07, 2018
Jkt 244001
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The
second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
for public viewing and posted on
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
both copies to the Dockets Management
Staff. If you do not wish your name and
contact information to be made publicly
available, you can provide this
information on the cover sheet and not
in the body of your comments and you
must identify this information as
‘‘confidential.’’ Any information marked
as ‘‘confidential’’ will not be disclosed
except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20
and other applicable disclosure law. For
more information about FDA’s posting
of comments to public dockets, see 80
FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://www.gpo.gov/
fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/201523389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Dockets Management
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gerie Voss, Center for Tobacco
Products, Food and Drug
Administration, Document Control
Center, 10903 New Hampshire Ave.,
Bldg. 71, Rm. G335, Silver Spring, MD
20993, 1–877–CTP–1373, AskCTP@
fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
Federal Register of March 16, 2018,
FDA published an ANPRM with a 90day comment period to obtain
information for consideration in
developing a tobacco product standard
to set a maximum nicotine level in
combusted cigarettes so that they are
minimally addictive or nonaddictive.
Comments on the scope of products to
be covered, maximum nicotine level for
a potential nicotine tobacco product
standard, implementation methods,
analytical testing methods, technical
achievability, possible countervailing
effects, and other topics will aid FDA in
its consideration regarding development
of a tobacco product standard to set a
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
maximum nicotine level in combusted
cigarettes.
The Agency has received a number of
requests for a 90-day extension of the
comment period for the ANPRM and
one request for a 120-day extension.
FDA has considered the requests and is
extending the comment period for the
ANPRM for an additional 30 days, until
July 16, 2018. The Agency believes that
a 30-day extension allows adequate time
for interested persons to submit
comments without significantly
delaying any potential regulatory action
on these important issues.
Dated: June 5, 2018.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018–12368 Filed 6–7–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Indian Gaming Commission
25 CFR Part 543
RIN 3141–AA60
Minimum Internal Control Standards
National Indian Gaming
Commission, Department of the Interior.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The National Indian Gaming
Commission (NIGC) proposes to amend
its minimum internal control standards
for Class II gaming under the Indian
Gaming Regulatory Act to correct an
erroneous deletion of the key control
standards and to make other minor edits
and additions for clarity.
DATES: Written comments on this
proposed rule must be received on or
before July 9, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any one of the following methods,
however, please note that comments
sent by electronic mail are strongly
encouraged.
D Email comments to: 543_
comments@nigc.gov.
D Mail comments to: National Indian
Gaming Commission, 1849 C Street NW,
MS 1621, Washington, DC 20240.
D Fax comments to: National Indian
Gaming Commission at 202–632–0045.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Lawson at (202) 632–7003 or by
fax (202) 632–7066 (these numbers are
not toll free).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act
(IGRA or Act), Public Law 100–497, 25
E:\FR\FM\08JNP1.SGM
08JNP1
26621
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 111 / Friday, June 8, 2018 / Proposed Rules
U.S.C. 2701 et seq., was signed into law
on October 17, 1988. The Act
established the National Indian Gaming
Commission (‘‘NIGC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’)
and set out a comprehensive framework
for the regulation of gaming on Indian
lands. On January 5, 1999, the NIGC
published a final rule in the Federal
Register called Minimum Internal
Control Standards. 64 FR 590. The rule
added a new part to the Commission’s
regulations establishing Minimum
Internal Control Standards (MICS) to
reduce the risk of loss because of
customer or employee access to cash
and cash equivalents within a casino.
The rule contains standards and
procedures that govern cash handling,
documentation, game integrity,
auditing, surveillance, and variances, as
well as other areas.
The Commission recognized from
their inception that the MICS would
require periodic review and updates to
keep pace with technology and has
substantively amended them numerous
times, most recently in late 2013 (78 FR
63873).
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
The rule does not have an effect on the
economy of $100 million or more. The
rule will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State,
local government agencies or geographic
regions, nor will the proposed rule have
a significant adverse effect on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of the enterprises, to compete with
foreign based enterprises.
II. Development of the Rule
In accordance with Executive Order
12988, the Commission has determined
that the rule does not unduly burden the
judicial system and meets the
requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of the Order.
On September 21, 2012, the
Commission concluded nearly two years
of consultation and drafting with the
publication of comprehensive
amendments, additions, and updates to
Part 543, the minimum internal control
standards (MICS) for Class II gaming
operations (77 FR 58708). The
regulations require tribes to establish
controls and implement procedures at
least as stringent as those described in
this part to maintain the integrity of the
gaming operation. In late 2013, the
Commission published a final rule,
adding kiosk drop, count, fill, and
surveillance standards to Part 543 (78
FR 63873).
Now, the Commission proposes
additional revisions, largely technical in
nature, that are meant to correct earlier
editing oversights and to better clarify
the intent of the provisions.
III. Regulatory Matters
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The rule will not have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities as defined under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.
Moreover, Indian Tribes are not
considered to be small entities for the
purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
The rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:24 Jun 07, 2018
Jkt 244001
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Commission, as an independent
regulatory agency, is exempt from
compliance with the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act, 2 U.S.C. 1502(1);
2 U.S.C. 658(1).
Takings
In accordance with Executive Order
12630, the Commission has determined
that the rule does not have significant
takings implications. A takings
implication assessment is not required.
Civil Justice Reform
National Environmental Policy Act
The Commission has determined that
the rule does not constitute a major
federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment and
that no detailed statement is required
pursuant to the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C. 4321, et
seq.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection
requirements contained in this rule
were previously approved by the Office
of Management and Budget as required
by 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq., and assigned
OMB Control Number 3141–0009. The
OMB control number expires on
November 30, 2018.
Tribal Consultation
The National Indian Gaming
Commission is committed to fulfilling
its tribal consultation obligations—
whether directed by statute or
administrative action such as Executive
Order (E.O.) 13175 (Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments)—by adhering to the
consultation framework described in its
Consultation Policy published July 15,
2013. The NIGC’s consultation policy
specifies that it will consult with tribes
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
on Commission Action with Tribal
Implications, which is defined as: Any
Commission regulation, rulemaking,
policy, guidance, legislative proposal, or
operational activity that may have a
substantial direct effect on an Indian
tribe on matters including, but not
limited to the ability of an Indian tribe
to regulate its Indian gaming; an Indian
tribe’s formal relationship with the
Commission; or the consideration of the
Commission’s trust responsibilities to
Indian tribes.
The key control language proposed
here is the most substantive of all the
changes and was the subject of
extensive consultation in 2012 (77 FR
58708). The language proposed here has
not changed since initially adopted. It
was inadvertently written over with the
addition of kiosk controls in 2013. The
remaining changes are all technical in
nature, correcting numbering and
adding minor clarifications.
List of Subjects in 25 CFR Part 543
Accounting, Administrative practice
and procedure, Gambling, Indian—
Indian lands, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons discussed in the
Preamble, the Commission proposes to
amend 25 CFR part 543 as follows:
PART 543—MINIMUM INTERNAL
CONTROL STANDARDS FOR CLASS II
GAMING
1. The authority for part 543
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 25 U.S.C. 2702(2), 2706(b)(1–4),
2706(b)(10).
2. Amend § 543.10 by revising
paragraph (e) to read as follows:
■
§ 543.10 What are the minimum internal
control standards for card games?
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Standards for reconciliation of
card room bank. Two agents—one of
whom must be a supervisory agent—
must independently count the main
card room bank and table inventory at
the end of each shift and record the
following information:
(1) Date;
(2) Shift;
(3) Table number (if applicable);
(4) Amount by denomination;
(5) Amount in total; and
(6) Signatures of both agents.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Amend § 543.17 by revising
paragraphs (d), (i)(4)(i), and (j) to read as
follows:
§ 543.17 What are the minimum internal
control standards for drop and count?
*
E:\FR\FM\08JNP1.SGM
*
*
08JNP1
*
*
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
26622
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 111 / Friday, June 8, 2018 / Proposed Rules
(d) Card game drop standards.
Controls must be established and
procedures implemented to ensure
security of the drop process. Such
controls must include the following:
(1) Surveillance must be notified
when the drop is to begin so that
surveillance may monitor the activities.
(2) At least two agents must be
involved in the removal of the drop box,
at least one of whom is independent of
the card games department.
(3) Once the drop is started, it must
continue until finished.
(4) All drop boxes may be removed
only at the time previously designated
by the gaming operation and reported to
the TGRA. If an emergency drop is
required, surveillance must be notified
before the drop is conducted and the
TGRA must be informed within a
timeframe approved by the TGRA.
(5) At the end of each shift:
(i) All locked card game drop boxes
must be removed from the tables by an
agent independent of the card game
shift being dropped;
(ii) For any tables opened during the
shift, a separate drop box must be
placed on each table, or a gaming
operation may utilize a single drop box
with separate openings and
compartments for each shift; and
(iii) Card game drop boxes must be
transported directly to the count room
or other equivalently secure area by a
minimum of two agents, at least one of
whom is independent of the card game
shift being dropped, until the count
takes place.
(6) All tables that were not open
during a shift and therefore not part of
the drop must be documented.
(7) All card game drop boxes must be
posted with a number corresponding to
a permanent number on the gaming
table and marked to indicate game, table
number, and shift, if applicable.
*
*
*
*
*
(i) * * *
(4) * * *
(i) The count of each box must be
recorded in ink or other permanent form
of recordation.
*
*
*
*
*
(j) Controlled keys. Controls must be
established and procedures
implemented to safeguard the use,
access, and security of keys in
accordance with the following:
(1) Each of the following requires a
separate and unique key lock or
alternative secure access method:
(i) Drop cabinet;
(ii) Drop box release;
(iii) Drop box content; and
(iv) Storage racks and carts used for
the drop.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:24 Jun 07, 2018
Jkt 244001
(2) Access to and return of keys or
equivalents must be documented with
the date, time, and signature or other
unique identifier of the agent accessing
or returning the key(s).
(i) For Tier A and B operations, at
least two (2) drop team agents are
required to be present to access and
return keys. For Tier C operations, at
least three (3) drop team agents are
required to be present to access and
return keys.
(ii) For Tier A and B operations, at
least two (2) count team agents are
required to be present at the time count
room and other count keys are issued
for the count. For Tier C operations, at
least three (two for card game drop box
keys in operations with three tables or
fewer) count team agents are required to
be present at the time count room and
other count keys are issued for the
count.
(3) Documentation of all keys,
including duplicates, must be
maintained, including:
(i) Unique identifier for each
individual key;
(ii) Key storage location;
(iii) Number of keys made,
duplicated, and destroyed; and
(iv) Authorization and access.
(4) Custody of all keys involved in the
drop and count must be maintained by
a department independent of the count
and the drop agents as well as those
departments being dropped and
counted.
(5) Other than the count team, no
agent may have access to the drop box
content keys while in possession of
storage rack keys and/or release keys.
(6) Other than the count team, only
agents authorized to remove drop boxes
are allowed access to drop box release
keys.
(7) Any use of keys at times other than
the scheduled drop and count must be
properly authorized and documented.
(8) Emergency manual keys, such as
an override key, for computerized,
electronic, and alternative key systems
must be maintained in accordance with
the following:
(i) Access to the emergency manual
key(s) used to access the box containing
the player interface drop and count keys
requires the physical involvement of at
least three agents from separate
departments, including management.
The date, time, and reason for access,
must be documented with the signatures
of all participating persons signing out/
in the emergency manual key(s);
(ii) The custody of the emergency
manual keys requires the presence of
two agents from separate departments
from the time of their issuance until the
time of their return; and
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(iii) Routine physical maintenance
that requires access to the emergency
manual key(s), and does not involve
accessing the player interface drop and
count keys, only requires the presence
of two agents from separate
departments. The date, time, and reason
for access must be documented with the
signatures of all participating agents
signing out/in the emergency manual
key(s).
(9) Controls must be established and
procedures implemented to safeguard
the use, access, and security of keys for
kiosks.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Amend § 543.18 by revising
paragraph (d)(6)(v) to read as follows:
§ 543.18 What are the minimum internal
control standards for the cage, vault, kiosk,
cash and cash equivalents?
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * *
(6) * * *
(v) Dollar amount per financial
instrument redeemed;
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. Amend 543.23 by revising
paragraph (c)(1)(viii) to read as follows:
§ 543.23 What are the minimum internal
control standards for audit and accounting?
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(viii) Drop and count standards,
including supervision, count room
access, count team, card game drop
standards, player interface and financial
instrument drop standards, card game
count standards, player interface
financial instrument count standards,
collecting currency cassettes and
financial instrument storage
components from kiosks, kiosk count
standards, and controlled keys;
*
*
*
*
*
■ 6. Amend 543.24 by revising
paragraphs (a) and (d)(5) to read as
follows:
§ 543.24 What are the minimum internal
control standards for auditing revenue?
(a) Supervision. Supervision must be
provided as needed for revenue audit by
an agent(s) with authority equal to or
greater than those being supervised.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(5) Complimentary services or items.
At least monthly, review the reports
required in § 543.13(c). These reports
must be made available to those entities
authorized by the TGRA or by tribal law
or ordinance.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: May 1, 2018, Washington, DC.
E:\FR\FM\08JNP1.SGM
08JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 111 / Friday, June 8, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Dated: May 7, 2018.
Jonodev O. Chaudhuri,
Chairman.
Dated: May 1, 2018.
Kathryn Isom-Clause,
Vice Chair.
Dated: May 4, 2018.
E. Sequoyah Simermeyer,
Associate Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 2018–10365 Filed 6–7–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7565–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS–R6–ES–2018–0008;
FXES11130900000–189–FF09E42000]
RIN 1018–BC02
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Removing Oenothera
coloradensis (Colorado Butterfly Plant)
From the Federal List of Endangered
and Threatened Plants
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), propose to
remove the Colorado butterfly plant
(Oenothera coloradensis, currently
listed as Gaura neomexicana ssp.
coloradensis) from the Federal List of
Endangered and Threatened Plants
(List) due to recovery. This
determination is based on a thorough
review of the best available scientific
and commercial data, which indicate
that the threats to the Colorado butterfly
plant have been eliminated or reduced
to the point that it has recovered, and
that this plant is no longer likely to
become endangered in the foreseeable
future and, therefore, no longer meets
the definition of a threatened species
under the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended (Act). This proposed
rule, if made final, would also remove
the currently designated critical habitat
for the Colorado butterfly plant. We are
seeking information, data, and
comments from the public on the
proposed rule to remove the Colorado
butterfly plant from the List (i.e.,
‘‘delist’’ the species). In addition, we are
also seeking input on considerations for
post-delisting monitoring of the
Colorado butterfly plant.
DATES: We will accept comments
received or postmarked on or before
August 7, 2018. Comments submitted
electronically using the Federal
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:24 Jun 07, 2018
Jkt 244001
eRulemaking Portal (see ADDRESSES,
below), must be received by 11:59 p.m.
Eastern Time on the closing date. We
must receive requests for public
hearings, in writing, at the address
shown in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT by July 23, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Written comments: You may
submit written comments by one of the
following methods:
• Electronically: Go to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. In the Search box,
enter Docket No. FWS–R6–ES–2018–
0008, which is the docket number for
this rulemaking. Then, click on the
Search button. On the resulting page, in
the Search panel on the left side of the
screen, under the Document Type
heading, click on the Proposed Rules
link to locate this document. You may
submit a comment by clicking on the
blue ‘‘Comment Now!’’ box. If your
comments will fit in the provided
comment box, please use this feature of
https://www.regulations.gov, as it is most
compatible with our comment review
procedures. If you attach your
comments as a separate document, our
preferred file format is Microsoft Word.
If you attach multiple comments (such
as form letters), our preferred formation
is a spreadsheet in Microsoft Excel.
• By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail
or hand-delivery to: Public Comments
Processing, Attn: FWS–R6–ES–2018–
0008; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service;
MS: BPHC; 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls
Church, VA 22041–3803.
We request that you submit written
comments only by the methods
described above. We will post all
comments on https://
www.regulations.gov. This generally
means that we will post any personal
information you provide us (see Public
Comments, below, for more details).
Document availability: This proposed
rule and supporting documents,
including a copy of the draft postdelisting monitoring plan referenced in
this document, are available on https://
www.regulations.gov at Docket No.
FWS–R6–ES–2018–0008. In addition,
the supporting file for this proposed
rule will be available for public
inspection, by appointment, during
normal business hours at the Wyoming
Ecological Services Field Office; 5353
Yellowstone Road, Suite 308A,
Cheyenne, WY 82009; telephone: 307–
772–2374. Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Relay
Service at 800–877–8339.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tyler A. Abbott, Field Supervisor,
telephone: 307–772–2374. Direct all
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
26623
questions or requests for additional
information to: COLORADO
BUTTERFLY PLANT QUESTIONS, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service; Wyoming
Ecological Services Field Office; 5353
Yellowstone Road, Suite 308A,
Cheyenne, WY 82009. Individuals who
are hearing-impaired or speechimpaired may call the Federal Relay
Service at 800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Information Requested
Public Comments
We want any final action resulting
from this proposal to be as accurate as
possible. Therefore, we invite tribal and
governmental agencies, the scientific
community, industry, and other
interested parties to submit comments
or recommendations concerning any
aspect of this proposed rule. Comments
should be as specific as possible. We
particularly seek comments and new
information concerning:
(1) Our analyses of the Colorado
butterfly plant’s abundance,
distribution, and population trends;
(2) Potential impacts from
disturbances, such as grazing and
residential, urban, and energy
development;
(3) Conservation activities within the
plant’s range;
(4) Potential impacts from the effects
of climate change; and
(5) Input on considerations for postdelisting monitoring of the Colorado
butterfly plant.
Please include sufficient supporting
information with your submission (such
as scientific journal articles or other
publications) to allow us to verify any
scientific or commercial information
you include. Please note that
submissions merely stating support for
or opposition to the action under
consideration without providing
supporting information, although noted,
may not meet the standard of
information required by section
4(b)(1)(A) of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.), which directs that determinations
as to whether any species is an
endangered or threatened species must
be made ‘‘solely on the basis of the best
scientific and commercial data
available.’’
To issue a final rule to implement this
proposed action, we will take into
consideration all comments and any
additional information we receive. Such
communications may lead to a final rule
that differs from this proposal. All
comments, including commenters’
names and addresses, if provided to us,
will become part of the supporting
record.
E:\FR\FM\08JNP1.SGM
08JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 111 (Friday, June 8, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 26620-26623]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-10365]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Indian Gaming Commission
25 CFR Part 543
RIN 3141-AA60
Minimum Internal Control Standards
AGENCY: National Indian Gaming Commission, Department of the Interior.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC) proposes to amend
its minimum internal control standards for Class II gaming under the
Indian Gaming Regulatory Act to correct an erroneous deletion of the
key control standards and to make other minor edits and additions for
clarity.
DATES: Written comments on this proposed rule must be received on or
before July 9, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any one of the following methods,
however, please note that comments sent by electronic mail are strongly
encouraged.
[ssquf] Email comments to: [email protected].
[ssquf] Mail comments to: National Indian Gaming Commission, 1849 C
Street NW, MS 1621, Washington, DC 20240.
[ssquf] Fax comments to: National Indian Gaming Commission at 202-
632-0045.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Lawson at (202) 632-7003 or
by fax (202) 632-7066 (these numbers are not toll free).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA or Act), Public Law 100-497,
25
[[Page 26621]]
U.S.C. 2701 et seq., was signed into law on October 17, 1988. The Act
established the National Indian Gaming Commission (``NIGC'' or
``Commission'') and set out a comprehensive framework for the
regulation of gaming on Indian lands. On January 5, 1999, the NIGC
published a final rule in the Federal Register called Minimum Internal
Control Standards. 64 FR 590. The rule added a new part to the
Commission's regulations establishing Minimum Internal Control
Standards (MICS) to reduce the risk of loss because of customer or
employee access to cash and cash equivalents within a casino. The rule
contains standards and procedures that govern cash handling,
documentation, game integrity, auditing, surveillance, and variances,
as well as other areas.
The Commission recognized from their inception that the MICS would
require periodic review and updates to keep pace with technology and
has substantively amended them numerous times, most recently in late
2013 (78 FR 63873).
II. Development of the Rule
On September 21, 2012, the Commission concluded nearly two years of
consultation and drafting with the publication of comprehensive
amendments, additions, and updates to Part 543, the minimum internal
control standards (MICS) for Class II gaming operations (77 FR 58708).
The regulations require tribes to establish controls and implement
procedures at least as stringent as those described in this part to
maintain the integrity of the gaming operation. In late 2013, the
Commission published a final rule, adding kiosk drop, count, fill, and
surveillance standards to Part 543 (78 FR 63873).
Now, the Commission proposes additional revisions, largely
technical in nature, that are meant to correct earlier editing
oversights and to better clarify the intent of the provisions.
III. Regulatory Matters
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial number
of small entities as defined under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601, et seq. Moreover, Indian Tribes are not considered to be
small entities for the purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
The rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. The rule does not have an
effect on the economy of $100 million or more. The rule will not cause
a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual
industries, Federal, State, local government agencies or geographic
regions, nor will the proposed rule have a significant adverse effect
on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of the enterprises, to compete with foreign based
enterprises.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Commission, as an independent regulatory agency, is exempt from
compliance with the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, 2 U.S.C. 1502(1); 2
U.S.C. 658(1).
Takings
In accordance with Executive Order 12630, the Commission has
determined that the rule does not have significant takings
implications. A takings implication assessment is not required.
Civil Justice Reform
In accordance with Executive Order 12988, the Commission has
determined that the rule does not unduly burden the judicial system and
meets the requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of the Order.
National Environmental Policy Act
The Commission has determined that the rule does not constitute a
major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human
environment and that no detailed statement is required pursuant to the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection requirements contained in this rule were
previously approved by the Office of Management and Budget as required
by 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq., and assigned OMB Control Number 3141-0009.
The OMB control number expires on November 30, 2018.
Tribal Consultation
The National Indian Gaming Commission is committed to fulfilling
its tribal consultation obligations--whether directed by statute or
administrative action such as Executive Order (E.O.) 13175
(Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments)--by
adhering to the consultation framework described in its Consultation
Policy published July 15, 2013. The NIGC's consultation policy
specifies that it will consult with tribes on Commission Action with
Tribal Implications, which is defined as: Any Commission regulation,
rulemaking, policy, guidance, legislative proposal, or operational
activity that may have a substantial direct effect on an Indian tribe
on matters including, but not limited to the ability of an Indian tribe
to regulate its Indian gaming; an Indian tribe's formal relationship
with the Commission; or the consideration of the Commission's trust
responsibilities to Indian tribes.
The key control language proposed here is the most substantive of
all the changes and was the subject of extensive consultation in 2012
(77 FR 58708). The language proposed here has not changed since
initially adopted. It was inadvertently written over with the addition
of kiosk controls in 2013. The remaining changes are all technical in
nature, correcting numbering and adding minor clarifications.
List of Subjects in 25 CFR Part 543
Accounting, Administrative practice and procedure, Gambling,
Indian--Indian lands, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons discussed in the Preamble, the Commission proposes
to amend 25 CFR part 543 as follows:
PART 543--MINIMUM INTERNAL CONTROL STANDARDS FOR CLASS II GAMING
0
1. The authority for part 543 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 25 U.S.C. 2702(2), 2706(b)(1-4), 2706(b)(10).
0
2. Amend Sec. 543.10 by revising paragraph (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 543.10 What are the minimum internal control standards for card
games?
* * * * *
(e) Standards for reconciliation of card room bank. Two agents--one
of whom must be a supervisory agent--must independently count the main
card room bank and table inventory at the end of each shift and record
the following information:
(1) Date;
(2) Shift;
(3) Table number (if applicable);
(4) Amount by denomination;
(5) Amount in total; and
(6) Signatures of both agents.
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec. 543.17 by revising paragraphs (d), (i)(4)(i), and (j)
to read as follows:
Sec. 543.17 What are the minimum internal control standards for drop
and count?
* * * * *
[[Page 26622]]
(d) Card game drop standards. Controls must be established and
procedures implemented to ensure security of the drop process. Such
controls must include the following:
(1) Surveillance must be notified when the drop is to begin so that
surveillance may monitor the activities.
(2) At least two agents must be involved in the removal of the drop
box, at least one of whom is independent of the card games department.
(3) Once the drop is started, it must continue until finished.
(4) All drop boxes may be removed only at the time previously
designated by the gaming operation and reported to the TGRA. If an
emergency drop is required, surveillance must be notified before the
drop is conducted and the TGRA must be informed within a timeframe
approved by the TGRA.
(5) At the end of each shift:
(i) All locked card game drop boxes must be removed from the tables
by an agent independent of the card game shift being dropped;
(ii) For any tables opened during the shift, a separate drop box
must be placed on each table, or a gaming operation may utilize a
single drop box with separate openings and compartments for each shift;
and
(iii) Card game drop boxes must be transported directly to the
count room or other equivalently secure area by a minimum of two
agents, at least one of whom is independent of the card game shift
being dropped, until the count takes place.
(6) All tables that were not open during a shift and therefore not
part of the drop must be documented.
(7) All card game drop boxes must be posted with a number
corresponding to a permanent number on the gaming table and marked to
indicate game, table number, and shift, if applicable.
* * * * *
(i) * * *
(4) * * *
(i) The count of each box must be recorded in ink or other
permanent form of recordation.
* * * * *
(j) Controlled keys. Controls must be established and procedures
implemented to safeguard the use, access, and security of keys in
accordance with the following:
(1) Each of the following requires a separate and unique key lock
or alternative secure access method:
(i) Drop cabinet;
(ii) Drop box release;
(iii) Drop box content; and
(iv) Storage racks and carts used for the drop.
(2) Access to and return of keys or equivalents must be documented
with the date, time, and signature or other unique identifier of the
agent accessing or returning the key(s).
(i) For Tier A and B operations, at least two (2) drop team agents
are required to be present to access and return keys. For Tier C
operations, at least three (3) drop team agents are required to be
present to access and return keys.
(ii) For Tier A and B operations, at least two (2) count team
agents are required to be present at the time count room and other
count keys are issued for the count. For Tier C operations, at least
three (two for card game drop box keys in operations with three tables
or fewer) count team agents are required to be present at the time
count room and other count keys are issued for the count.
(3) Documentation of all keys, including duplicates, must be
maintained, including:
(i) Unique identifier for each individual key;
(ii) Key storage location;
(iii) Number of keys made, duplicated, and destroyed; and
(iv) Authorization and access.
(4) Custody of all keys involved in the drop and count must be
maintained by a department independent of the count and the drop agents
as well as those departments being dropped and counted.
(5) Other than the count team, no agent may have access to the drop
box content keys while in possession of storage rack keys and/or
release keys.
(6) Other than the count team, only agents authorized to remove
drop boxes are allowed access to drop box release keys.
(7) Any use of keys at times other than the scheduled drop and
count must be properly authorized and documented.
(8) Emergency manual keys, such as an override key, for
computerized, electronic, and alternative key systems must be
maintained in accordance with the following:
(i) Access to the emergency manual key(s) used to access the box
containing the player interface drop and count keys requires the
physical involvement of at least three agents from separate
departments, including management. The date, time, and reason for
access, must be documented with the signatures of all participating
persons signing out/in the emergency manual key(s);
(ii) The custody of the emergency manual keys requires the presence
of two agents from separate departments from the time of their issuance
until the time of their return; and
(iii) Routine physical maintenance that requires access to the
emergency manual key(s), and does not involve accessing the player
interface drop and count keys, only requires the presence of two agents
from separate departments. The date, time, and reason for access must
be documented with the signatures of all participating agents signing
out/in the emergency manual key(s).
(9) Controls must be established and procedures implemented to
safeguard the use, access, and security of keys for kiosks.
* * * * *
0
4. Amend Sec. 543.18 by revising paragraph (d)(6)(v) to read as
follows:
Sec. 543.18 What are the minimum internal control standards for the
cage, vault, kiosk, cash and cash equivalents?
* * * * *
(d) * *
(6) * * *
(v) Dollar amount per financial instrument redeemed;
* * * * *
0
5. Amend 543.23 by revising paragraph (c)(1)(viii) to read as follows:
Sec. 543.23 What are the minimum internal control standards for
audit and accounting?
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(viii) Drop and count standards, including supervision, count room
access, count team, card game drop standards, player interface and
financial instrument drop standards, card game count standards, player
interface financial instrument count standards, collecting currency
cassettes and financial instrument storage components from kiosks,
kiosk count standards, and controlled keys;
* * * * *
0
6. Amend 543.24 by revising paragraphs (a) and (d)(5) to read as
follows:
Sec. 543.24 What are the minimum internal control standards for
auditing revenue?
(a) Supervision. Supervision must be provided as needed for revenue
audit by an agent(s) with authority equal to or greater than those
being supervised.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(5) Complimentary services or items. At least monthly, review the
reports required in Sec. 543.13(c). These reports must be made
available to those entities authorized by the TGRA or by tribal law or
ordinance.
* * * * *
Dated: May 1, 2018, Washington, DC.
[[Page 26623]]
Dated: May 7, 2018.
Jonodev O. Chaudhuri,
Chairman.
Dated: May 1, 2018.
Kathryn Isom-Clause,
Vice Chair.
Dated: May 4, 2018.
E. Sequoyah Simermeyer,
Associate Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 2018-10365 Filed 6-7-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7565-01-P