Alpha-cypermethrin; Pesticide Tolerances, 25941-25943 [2018-12066]
Download as PDF
25941
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 5, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Inert ingredients
*
Limits
*
*
*
Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), a-(1-oxoalkyl)-w-methoxy-, where the alkyl
chain contains a minimum of 6 and a maximum of 18 carbons and
the oxyethylene content is 3–13 moles (CAS Reg. No. 53100–65–5,
194289–64–0, 34398–00–0, 9006–27–3, 32761–35–6, 53467–81–5,
518299–31–5, and 34397–99–4).
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0234; FRL–9976–73]
Alpha-cypermethrin; Pesticide
Tolerances
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
This regulation amends
existing tolerances for residues of alphacypermethrin in or on fruit, citrus group
10–10 and hog fat. EPA is modifying
these tolerances under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) to
correct an error in a previous
rulemaking that established these
tolerances at an unintended level.
DATES: This regulation is effective June
5, 2018. Objections and requests for
hearings must be received on or before
August 6, 2018, and must be filed in
accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
SUMMARY:
The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0234, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:50 Jun 04, 2018
Jkt 244001
*
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of EPA’s tolerance
regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through
the Government Printing Office’s e-CFR
site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/textidx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/
40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing
request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
Frm 00061
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
Stabilizer, solubilizing agent.
*
Michael L. Goodis, Director,
Registration Division (7505P), Office of
Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001;
main telephone number: (703) 305–
7090; email address: RDFRNotices@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
*
Not to exceed 25% by weight in
pesticide formulation.
I. General Information
AGENCY:
ADDRESSES:
*
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[FR Doc. 2018–12060 Filed 6–4–18; 8:45 am]
Uses
*
*
OPP–2010–0234 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing
must be in writing, and must be
received by the Hearing Clerk on or
before August 6, 2018. Addresses for
mail and hand delivery of objections
and hearing requests are provided in 40
CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing (excluding
any Confidential Business Information
(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
objection or hearing request, identified
by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2010–0234, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be CBI or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on
commenting or visiting the docket,
along with more information about
dockets generally, is available at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Proposed Rule
In the Federal Register of December
26, 2017 (82 FR 60940) (FRL–9969–97),
EPA, pursuant to FFDCA section 408(e),
21 U.S.C. 346a(e), proposed revisions to
existing tolerances for the insecticide
alpha-cypermethrin to reduce the
allowable levels of the pesticide in or on
fruit, citrus, group 10–10 from 10 parts
per million (ppm) to 0.35 ppm and in
E:\FR\FM\05JNR1.SGM
05JNR1
25942
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 5, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
or on hog, fat from 1.0 ppm to 0.10 ppm.
EPA proposed this action in order to
correct a typographical error that
occurred in the final rule establishing
these tolerances on February 1, 2013 (78
FR 7266) (FRL–9376–1). In support of
the 2013 final rule, EPA reviewed
residue field trial data and determined
that the appropriate tolerance levels for
fruit, citrus, group 10–10 and hog, fat
were 0.35ppm and 0.10 ppm,
respectively. Unfortunately, the
instruction to the Federal Register
contained incorrect tolerance values for
these commodities, resulting in
incorrect tolerance levels being finalized
in that rule. The proposal would correct
that error.
In the proposal, EPA discussed the
Agency’s assessment of risk and
proposed determination of safety for
aggregate exposures to alphacypermethrin. In summary, the Agency
concluded that the proposed tolerances
for fruit, citrus, group 10–10 and hog, fat
would be safe.
Two comments were received on the
proposal. One simply read ‘‘Good’’ and
the other was related to the impact of
wind-power facilities on bat
populations and is therefore not
relevant to this action.
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and
Determination of Safety
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA
allows EPA to establish a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ This includes
exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include
occupational exposure. Section
408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to
give special consideration to exposure
of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a
tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue. . . .’’
Consistent with FFDCA section
408(b)(2)(D), and the factors specified in
FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has
reviewed the available scientific data
and other relevant information in
support of this action. EPA has
sufficient data to assess the hazards of
and to make a determination on
aggregate exposure for alpha-
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:50 Jun 04, 2018
Jkt 244001
cypermethrin including exposure
resulting from the tolerances established
by this action. EPA’s assessment of
exposures and risks associated with
alpha-cypermethrin can be found in the
proposed rule published December 26,
2017, and EPA is incorporating its
findings in that preamble into this final
rule. For the reasons stated in the
proposal, EPA concludes that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to the general population,
including infants and children, from
aggregate exposure to alphacypermethrin.
IV. International Trade Considerations
A. International Residue Limits
As noted in the proposal, EPA seeks
to harmonize U.S. tolerances with
international standards whenever
possible, consistent with U.S. food
safety standards and agricultural
practices. EPA considers the
international maximum residue limits
(MRLs) established by the Codex
Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as
required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4).
There is a Codex MRL established for
citrus fruits at 0.3 ppm but not one for
hog fat. Because the U.S. use patterns
differ from those upon which the Codex
MRLs are based, EPA is not
harmonizing the U.S. tolerance for
citrus fruit.
B. World Trade Organization Sanitary
and Phytosanitary Measures Agreement
In this Final Rule, EPA is reducing the
existing tolerances for commodities in
crop group 10–10 from 10 ppm to 0.35
ppm and on hog, fat from 1.0 ppm to 0.1
ppm. The Agency is reducing these
tolerances to correct the tolerance levels
that EPA intended to establish in a
previous rulemaking based on available
residue data.
In accordance with the World Trade
Organization’s (WTO) Sanitary and
Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)
Agreement, EPA notified the WTO of its
proposed tolerance revision on January
10, 2018. See https://spsims.wto.org/en/
Notifications/Search, U.S. Notification
(G/SPS/N/USA/2976). EPA also intends
to submit another notification to the
WTO in order to satisfy its obligation to
promptly publish this rule in such a
manner as to enable interested WTO
members to become acquainted with
this rule. In addition, the SPS
Agreement requires that Members
provide a ‘‘reasonable interval’’ between
the publication of a regulation subject to
the Agreement and its entry into force
to allow time for producers in exporting
Member countries to adapt to the new
requirement. At this time, EPA is
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
establishing an expiration date for the
existing tolerances to allow those
tolerances to remain in effect for a
period of six months after the effective
date of this final rule, in order to
address this requirement.
This reduction in tolerance levels is
not discriminatory; the same food safety
standard contained in the FFDCA
applies equally to domestically
produced and imported foods. The new
tolerance levels are supported by
available residue data.
V. Conclusion
Therefore, tolerances are established
for residues of alpha-cypermethrin,
alpha-cypermethrin, in or on fruit,
citrus group 10–10 and hog fat at 0.35
and 0.10 ppm.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This action amends existing
tolerances under FFDCA section 408(e)
in an action taken on the Agency’s own
initiative. The Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) has exempted these
types of actions from review under
Executive Order 12866, entitled
‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review’’ (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because
this action has been exempted from
review under Executive Order 12866
due to its lack of significance, this
action is not subject to Executive Order
13211, entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001), nor is it
subject to Executive Order 13771,
entitled ‘‘Reducing Regulations and
Controlling Regulatory Costs’’ ((82 FR
9339, February 3, 2017). This action
does not contain any information
collections subject to OMB approval
under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), or
impose any enforceable duty or contain
any unfunded mandate as described
under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et
seq.). Nor does it require any special
considerations under Executive Order
12898, entitled ‘‘Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994); or OMB review or any Agency
action under Executive Order 13045,
entitled ‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act
E:\FR\FM\05JNR1.SGM
05JNR1
25943
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 5, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). Pursuant
to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the Agency
previously assessed whether
establishment of tolerances, exemptions
from tolerances, raising of tolerance
levels, expansion of exemptions, or
revocations might significantly impact a
substantial number of small entities and
concluded that, as a general matter,
these actions do not impose a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. These analyses
for tolerance establishments and
modifications, and for tolerance
revocations were published in the
Federal Register of May 4, 1981 (46 FR
24950) and December 17, 1997 (62 FR
66020) (FRL–5753–1), respectively, and
were provided to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration. In a memorandum
dated May 25, 2001, EPA determined
that eight conditions must all be
satisfied in order for an import tolerance
or tolerance exemption revocation to
adversely affect a significant number of
small entity importers, and that there is
a negligible joint probability of all eight
conditions holding simultaneously with
respect to any particular revocation.
Furthermore, for alpha-cypermethrin,
the Agency knows of no extraordinary
circumstances that exist as to the
present rule that would change EPA’s
previous analysis. Taking into account
this analysis, and available information
concerning the pesticides listed in this
rule, EPA hereby certifies that this rule
will not have a significant negative
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. In addition,
the Agency has determined that this
action will not have a substantial direct
effect on States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132,
entitled ‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). Executive Order
13132 requires EPA to develop an
accountable process to ensure
‘‘meaningful and timely input by State
and local officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have federalism
implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have
federalism implications’’ is defined in
the Executive order to include
regulations that have ‘‘substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.’’ This
action directly regulates growers, food
processors, food handlers, and food
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:50 Jun 04, 2018
Jkt 244001
retailers, not States. This action does not
alter the relationships or distribution of
power and responsibilities established
by Congress in the preemption
provisions of FFDCA section 408(n)(4).
For these same reasons, the Agency has
determined that this action does not
have any ‘‘tribal implications’’ as
described in Executive Order 13175,
entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000). Executive
Order 13175, requires EPA to develop
an accountable process to ensure
‘‘meaningful and timely input by tribal
officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have tribal
implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have tribal
implications’’ is defined in the
Executive order to include regulations
that have ‘‘substantial direct effects on
one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and the Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.’’ This
action will not have substantial direct
effects on tribal governments, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as
specified in Executive Order 13175.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this action.
VII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: April 30, 2018.
Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2. In § 180.418, in the table in
paragraph (a)(3):
■ i. Amend the existing entries for
‘‘Fruit, citrus, group 10–10’’; and ‘‘Hog,
fat’’ by adding footnote references and
add footnote 1 to the end of the table;
and
■ ii. Add alphabetically new entries for
‘‘Fruit, citrus, group 10–10’’; and ‘‘Hog,
fat’’.
The additions to the table in
paragraph (a)(3) read as follows:
■
§ 180.418 Cypermethrin and isomers
alpha-cypermethrin and zeta-cypermethrin;
tolerances for residues.
(a)(3) * * *
Parts per
million
Commodity
*
*
*
*
Fruit, citrus, group 10–10 1 .........
Fruit, citrus, group 10–10 ...........
*
*
*
*
Hog, fat 1 .....................................
Hog, fat .......................................
*
*
*
*
*
10
0.35
*
1.0
0.10
*
1 This tolerance expires on December 5,
2018.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2018–12066 Filed 6–4–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
42 CFR Part 10
RIN 0906–AB18
340B Drug Pricing Program Ceiling
Price and Manufacturer Civil Monetary
Penalties Regulation
Health Resources and Services
Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final rule; further delay of
effective date.
AGENCY:
The Health Resources and
Services Administration (HRSA)
administers section 340B of the Public
Health Service Act (PHSA), known as
the ‘‘340B Drug Pricing Program’’ or the
‘‘340B Program.’’ HRSA published a
final rule on January 5, 2017, that set
forth the calculation of the ceiling price
and application of civil monetary
penalties. The final rule applied to all
drug manufacturers that are required to
make their drugs available to covered
entities under the 340B Program. On
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\05JNR1.SGM
05JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 5, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 25941-25943]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12066]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0234; FRL-9976-73]
Alpha-cypermethrin; Pesticide Tolerances
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation amends existing tolerances for residues of
alpha-cypermethrin in or on fruit, citrus group 10-10 and hog fat. EPA
is modifying these tolerances under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) to correct an error in a previous rulemaking that
established these tolerances at an unintended level.
DATES: This regulation is effective June 5, 2018. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before August 6, 2018, and
must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR
part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0234, is available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305-5805. Please review the visitor instructions and
additional information about the docket available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael L. Goodis, Director,
Registration Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington,
DC 20460-0001; main telephone number: (703) 305-7090; email address:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?
You may access a frequently updated electronic version of EPA's
tolerance regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through the Government
Printing Office's e-CFR site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0234 in the subject line on the first
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must
be in writing, and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before
August 6, 2018. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and
hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0234, by one of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Proposed Rule
In the Federal Register of December 26, 2017 (82 FR 60940) (FRL-
9969-97), EPA, pursuant to FFDCA section 408(e), 21 U.S.C. 346a(e),
proposed revisions to existing tolerances for the insecticide alpha-
cypermethrin to reduce the allowable levels of the pesticide in or on
fruit, citrus, group 10-10 from 10 parts per million (ppm) to 0.35 ppm
and in
[[Page 25942]]
or on hog, fat from 1.0 ppm to 0.10 ppm. EPA proposed this action in
order to correct a typographical error that occurred in the final rule
establishing these tolerances on February 1, 2013 (78 FR 7266) (FRL-
9376-1). In support of the 2013 final rule, EPA reviewed residue field
trial data and determined that the appropriate tolerance levels for
fruit, citrus, group 10-10 and hog, fat were 0.35ppm and 0.10 ppm,
respectively. Unfortunately, the instruction to the Federal Register
contained incorrect tolerance values for these commodities, resulting
in incorrect tolerance levels being finalized in that rule. The
proposal would correct that error.
In the proposal, EPA discussed the Agency's assessment of risk and
proposed determination of safety for aggregate exposures to alpha-
cypermethrin. In summary, the Agency concluded that the proposed
tolerances for fruit, citrus, group 10-10 and hog, fat would be safe.
Two comments were received on the proposal. One simply read
``Good'' and the other was related to the impact of wind-power
facilities on bat populations and is therefore not relevant to this
action.
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure.
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . .
.''
Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), and the factors
specified in FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the available
scientific data and other relevant information in support of this
action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a
determination on aggregate exposure for alpha-cypermethrin including
exposure resulting from the tolerances established by this action.
EPA's assessment of exposures and risks associated with alpha-
cypermethrin can be found in the proposed rule published December 26,
2017, and EPA is incorporating its findings in that preamble into this
final rule. For the reasons stated in the proposal, EPA concludes that
there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the general
population, including infants and children, from aggregate exposure to
alpha-cypermethrin.
IV. International Trade Considerations
A. International Residue Limits
As noted in the proposal, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances
with international standards whenever possible, consistent with U.S.
food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA considers the
international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established by the Codex
Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA section
408(b)(4).
There is a Codex MRL established for citrus fruits at 0.3 ppm but
not one for hog fat. Because the U.S. use patterns differ from those
upon which the Codex MRLs are based, EPA is not harmonizing the U.S.
tolerance for citrus fruit.
B. World Trade Organization Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures
Agreement
In this Final Rule, EPA is reducing the existing tolerances for
commodities in crop group 10-10 from 10 ppm to 0.35 ppm and on hog, fat
from 1.0 ppm to 0.1 ppm. The Agency is reducing these tolerances to
correct the tolerance levels that EPA intended to establish in a
previous rulemaking based on available residue data.
In accordance with the World Trade Organization's (WTO) Sanitary
and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS) Agreement, EPA notified the WTO of its
proposed tolerance revision on January 10, 2018. See https://spsims.wto.org/en/Notifications/Search, U.S. Notification (G/SPS/N/USA/
2976). EPA also intends to submit another notification to the WTO in
order to satisfy its obligation to promptly publish this rule in such a
manner as to enable interested WTO members to become acquainted with
this rule. In addition, the SPS Agreement requires that Members provide
a ``reasonable interval'' between the publication of a regulation
subject to the Agreement and its entry into force to allow time for
producers in exporting Member countries to adapt to the new
requirement. At this time, EPA is establishing an expiration date for
the existing tolerances to allow those tolerances to remain in effect
for a period of six months after the effective date of this final rule,
in order to address this requirement.
This reduction in tolerance levels is not discriminatory; the same
food safety standard contained in the FFDCA applies equally to
domestically produced and imported foods. The new tolerance levels are
supported by available residue data.
V. Conclusion
Therefore, tolerances are established for residues of alpha-
cypermethrin, alpha-cypermethrin, in or on fruit, citrus group 10-10
and hog fat at 0.35 and 0.10 ppm.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This action amends existing tolerances under FFDCA section 408(e)
in an action taken on the Agency's own initiative. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866 due to its lack of
significance, this action is not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001), nor
is it subject to Executive Order 13771, entitled ``Reducing Regulations
and Controlling Regulatory Costs'' ((82 FR 9339, February 3, 2017).
This action does not contain any information collections subject to OMB
approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.), or impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate
as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
(2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.). Nor does it require any special considerations
under Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994); or OMB review or any
Agency action under Executive Order 13045, entitled ``Protection of
Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not involve any technical
standards that would require Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
[[Page 25943]]
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the Agency previously assessed
whether establishment of tolerances, exemptions from tolerances,
raising of tolerance levels, expansion of exemptions, or revocations
might significantly impact a substantial number of small entities and
concluded that, as a general matter, these actions do not impose a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
These analyses for tolerance establishments and modifications, and for
tolerance revocations were published in the Federal Register of May 4,
1981 (46 FR 24950) and December 17, 1997 (62 FR 66020) (FRL-5753-1),
respectively, and were provided to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of
the Small Business Administration. In a memorandum dated May 25, 2001,
EPA determined that eight conditions must all be satisfied in order for
an import tolerance or tolerance exemption revocation to adversely
affect a significant number of small entity importers, and that there
is a negligible joint probability of all eight conditions holding
simultaneously with respect to any particular revocation. Furthermore,
for alpha-cypermethrin, the Agency knows of no extraordinary
circumstances that exist as to the present rule that would change EPA's
previous analysis. Taking into account this analysis, and available
information concerning the pesticides listed in this rule, EPA hereby
certifies that this rule will not have a significant negative economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. In addition, the
Agency has determined that this action will not have a substantial
direct effect on States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified
in Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August
10, 1999). Executive Order 13132 requires EPA to develop an accountable
process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input by State and local
officials in the development of regulatory policies that have
federalism implications.'' ``Policies that have federalism
implications'' is defined in the Executive order to include regulations
that have ``substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.'' This action directly regulates growers, food processors,
food handlers, and food retailers, not States. This action does not
alter the relationships or distribution of power and responsibilities
established by Congress in the preemption provisions of FFDCA section
408(n)(4). For these same reasons, the Agency has determined that this
action does not have any ``tribal implications'' as described in
Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). Executive
Order 13175, requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure
``meaningful and timely input by tribal officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have tribal implications.'' ``Policies that
have tribal implications'' is defined in the Executive order to include
regulations that have ``substantial direct effects on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
the Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.'' This action will
not have substantial direct effects on tribal governments, on the
relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified in Executive Order 13175.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action.
VII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: April 30, 2018.
Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. In Sec. 180.418, in the table in paragraph (a)(3):
0
i. Amend the existing entries for ``Fruit, citrus, group 10-10''; and
``Hog, fat'' by adding footnote references and add footnote 1 to the
end of the table; and
0
ii. Add alphabetically new entries for ``Fruit, citrus, group 10-10'';
and ``Hog, fat''.
The additions to the table in paragraph (a)(3) read as follows:
Sec. 180.418 Cypermethrin and isomers alpha-cypermethrin and zeta-
cypermethrin; tolerances for residues.
(a)(3) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parts per
Commodity million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fruit, citrus, group 10-10 \1\.............................. 10
Fruit, citrus, group 10-10.................................. 0.35
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hog, fat \1\................................................ 1.0
Hog, fat.................................................... 0.10
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ This tolerance expires on December 5, 2018.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2018-12066 Filed 6-4-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P