Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Certain Electric Scissor Lifts, 24811-24813 [2018-11504]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 104 / Wednesday, May 30, 2018 / Notices
24811
TABLE 1—ANNUALIZED ESTIMATED BURDEN FOR 2019 NSDUH—Continued
Number of
respondents
Instrument
Total ..............................................................................
Written comments and
recommendations concerning the
proposed information collection should
be sent by June 29, 2018 to the
SAMHSA Desk Officer at the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
OMB. To ensure timely receipt of
comments, and to avoid potential delays
in OMB’s receipt and processing of mail
sent through the U.S. Postal Service,
commenters are encouraged to submit
their comments to OMB via email to:
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov.
Although commenters are encouraged to
send their comments via email,
commenters may also fax their
comments to 202–395–7285.
Commenters may also mail them to:
OMB, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, New Executive
Office Building, Room 10102,
Washington, DC 20503.
Summer King,
Statistician.
[FR Doc. 2018–11536 Filed 5–29–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162–20–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Notice of Issuance of Final
Determination Concerning Certain
Electric Scissor Lifts
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of final determination.
AGENCY:
This document provides
notice that U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (‘‘CBP’’) has issued a final
determination concerning the country of
origin of certain electric scissor lifts.
Based upon the facts presented, CBP has
concluded that the country of origin of
the electric scissor lifts in question is
the United States, for purposes of U.S.
Government procurement.
DATES: The final determination was
issued on May 21, 2018. A copy of the
final determination is attached. Any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 C.F.R.
177.22(d), may seek judicial review of
this final determination within June 29,
2018.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:04 May 29, 2018
Jkt 244001
137,231
Responses
per
respondent
........................
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Yuliya A. Gulis, Valuation and Special
Programs Branch, Regulations and
Rulings, Office of Trade, at (202) 325–
0042.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that on May 21, 2018
pursuant to subpart B of Part 177, U.S.
Customs and Border Protection
Regulations (19 C.F.R. part 177, subpart
B), CBP issued a final determination
concerning the country of origin of
certain electric scissor lifts (R Series
Scissor Lift models 2632R, 3246R, and
4045R), produced by JLG Industries,
Inc., which may be offered to the U.S.
Government under an undesignated
government procurement contract. This
final determination, HQ H294980, was
issued under procedures set forth at 19
C.F.R. part 177, subpart B, which
implements Title III of the Trade
Agreements Act of 1979, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2511–18). In the final
determination, CBP concluded that the
country of origin of the electric scissor
lifts is the United States for purposes of
U.S. Government procurement.
Section 177.29, CBP Regulations (19
C.F.R. 177.29), provides that a notice of
final determination shall be published
in the Federal Register within 60 days
of the date the final determination is
issued. Section 177.30, CBP Regulations
(19 C.F.R. 177.30), provides that any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 C.F.R.
177.22(d), may seek judicial review of a
final determination within 30 days of
publication of such determination in the
Federal Register.
Dated: May 21, 2018.
Alice A. Kipel,
Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings,
Office of Trade.
HQ H294980
May 21, 2018
OT:RR:CTF:VS H294980 YAG
CATEGORY: Origin
Mr. Thomas A. Coulter
411 East Franklin Street, Suite 500
Richmond, VA 23219
RE: U.S. Government Procurement;
Country of Origin of Electric Scissor
Lifts; Title III, Trade Agreements Act of
1979 (19 U.S.C. § 2511 et seq.); Subpart
B, Part 177, CBP Regulations
Dear Mr. Coulter:
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Total number
of responses
218,980
Hours per
response
........................
Total burden
hours
79,851
This is in response to your
correspondence dated March 1, 2018,
requesting a final determination, on
behalf of your client, JLG Industries, Inc.
(‘‘JLG’’), concerning the country of
origin of certain electric scissor lifts,
pursuant to subpart B of Part 177 of the
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(‘‘CBP’’) Regulations (19 C.F.R. § 177.21
et seq.).
We note that JLG is a party-at-interest
within the meaning of 19 C.F.R.
§ 177.22(d)(1) and is entitled to request
this final determination.
FACTS:
JLG is an Oshkosh Corporation
Company, headquartered in
McConnellsburg, Pennsylvania, and a
global leader in the manufacture of
electric powered and engine powered
aerial work platforms. The electric
scissor lifts under consideration are part
of the JLG R Series family of Scissor Lift
products. The R Series is partially
assembled in Tianjin, China and then
shipped to the United States for
additional manufacturing and testing,
and final assembly. Once completed, the
product will be introduced in commerce
and offered for sale, lease, or rental to
the U.S. Government.
CBP has previously issued an
advisory country of origin ruling
concerning JLG’s electric scissor lifts
and determined them to be of U.S.origin. The R Series under review in this
case are stated to be new models and 95
percent of the processing is the same,
except there is a slight increase in the
low-level, unskilled assembly in China
and an increase in high-level skilled
work on the brain of the product
performed in the United States.
The three R Series Scissor Lift models
that JLG plans to manufacture are the
2632R, the 3246R, and the 4045R
models. While the function of all three
models is the same, the models differ in
specifications, such as size and platform
capacity. A Bill of Material was
submitted for Model 4045R. You state
that the Bills of Material for the other
two R Series Scissor Lift models are
substantially the same. As reflected in
the detailed Bill of Material, there are 29
separate sub-assemblies/components, in
varying quantities, of the R Series
Scissor Lift. Approximately 40 percent
of the parts are of U.S.-origin and 60
E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM
30MYN1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
24812
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 104 / Wednesday, May 30, 2018 / Notices
percent of Chinese origin. The
remaining few components are sourced
from South Korea, Italy, Ireland, and
Germany (all designated countries for
U.S. Government procurement
purposes).
JLG also submitted charts outlining
the 25 separate operational sequences,
man hours and skill level, for the
operations performed in China and the
United States in the manufacture of the
R Series Scissor Lift. You state that the
15 operations performed in the United
States are complex and meaningful, and
require medium skill to accomplish,
while the 10 operations performed in
China are relatively simple hardware
assembly and packaging. The following
processes are performed in China:
assembling the front and rear frame,
assembling components (doors, etc.),
assembling hydraulic tank and steering
hose, building up and installing arm,
building up routing and frame covers,
installing rails and packaging the
partially assembled unit into a cargo
container for shipment to the United
States. As imported, the Chinese good is
stated to be a non-operable platform.
You assert that the operations
performed in the United States result in
a ‘‘self-propelled, saleable, scissor lift.’’
Further, you claim a significant part of
the final manufacturing and assembly
process of JLG’s electric scissor lift
occurring in the United States consists
of functional testing, quality
verification, machine calibration,
dimensional and structural inspection,
and testing, requiring specialized
employee training and skill.
The electric scissor lifts have three
control modules that act as the ‘‘brain’’
of the machine. It is stated that these
modules are the most critical
components in controlling the
machine’s functions. These modules
are: (1) the platform module, (2) the
power controller module, and (3) the
logic module. With the exception of the
shell of the logic module, which is
manufactured in Mexico, all three
control modules are manufactured in
the United States. The other smart
components that interface with the
modules referenced above, are also
manufactured, assembled, and installed
in the United States. These components
include batteries, a platform control box
(allows the user to lift and lower the
platform, and drive and steer the
machine), and ground control panel (a
secondary operator interface that allows
the user to lift and lower the platform
while not in the work platform). Finally,
all software contained in the ‘‘brain’’ is
developed and programmed entirely in
the United States. The software and
module development consumed over
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:04 May 29, 2018
Jkt 244001
8,000 hours of engineering time. The
modules are installed and tested in the
United States. Final machine calibration
of the electric scissor lifts is also
performed subsequent to importation.
ISSUE:
What is the country of origin of the
electric scissor lifts for purposes of U.S.
Government procurement?
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
CBP issues country of origin advisory
rulings and final determinations as to
whether an article is or would be a
product of a designated country or
instrumentality for the purposes of
granting waivers of certain ‘‘Buy
American’’ restrictions in U.S. law or
practice for products offered for sale to
the U.S. Government, pursuant to
subpart B of Part 177, 19 C.F.R. § 177.21
et seq., which implements Title III of the
Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (‘‘TAA’’),
as amended (19 U.S.C. § 2511 et seq.).
Under the rule of origin set forth
under 19 U.S.C. § 2518(4)(B):
An article is a product of a country or
instrumentality only if (i) it is wholly
the growth, product, or manufacture of
that country or instrumentality, or (ii) in
the case of an article which consists in
whole or in part of materials from
another country or instrumentality, it
has been substantially transformed into
a new and different article of commerce
with a name, character, or use distinct
from that of the article or articles from
which it was so transformed.
See also 19 C.F.R. § 177.22(a).
In rendering final determinations for
purposes of U.S. Government
procurement, CBP applies the
provisions of subpart B of Part 177
consistent with the Federal Procurement
Regulations. See 19 C.F.R. § 177.21. In
this regard, CBP recognizes that the
Federal Acquisition Regulations restrict
the U.S. Government’s purchase of
products to U.S.-made or designated
country end products for acquisitions
subject to the Trade Agreements Act.
See 48 C.F.R. § 25.403(c)(1). The Federal
Acquisition Regulations define ‘‘U.S.made end product’’ as ‘‘an article that is
mined, produced, or manufactured in
the United States or that is substantially
transformed in the United States into a
new and different article of commerce
with a name, character, or use distinct
from that of the article or articles from
which it was transformed.’’ See 48 C.F.R
§ 25.003.
In determining whether the
combining of parts or materials
constitutes a substantial transformation,
the determinative issue is the extent of
the operations performed and whether
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the parts lose their identity and become
an integral part of the new article.
Belcrest Linens v. United States, 6 C.I.T.
204, 573 F. Supp. 1149 (1983), aff’d, 741
F.2d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 1984). If the
manufacturing or combining process is
a minor one that leaves the identity of
the imported article intact, a substantial
transformation has not occurred.
Uniroyal, Inc. v. United States, 3 C.I.T.
220, 542 F. Supp. 1026 (1982).
In Headquarters Ruling Letter (‘‘HQ’’)
H022169, dated May 2, 2008, a glider
(consisting of a frame, finished cab,
axels, and wheels) was imported into
the United States and assembled with
approximately 87 different component
parts (including the essential parts: a
motor, controller, and charger of
Canadian origin; a gear box and axel of
U.S. origin; and brakes of Indian origin)
into an electric mini-truck. The process
consisted of eight assembly work
stations involving attachment and
installation operations, as well as
quality control and testing of the
product. CBP held that the imported
glider and other foreign components
were substantially transformed into an
electric mini-truck by the assembly
operations that took place in the United
States. Our decision was based on
finding that the imported glider lost its
individual identity and became an
integral part of a new article possessing
a new name, character, and use.
Likewise, in HQ H155115, dated May
24, 2011, CBP found that assembly in
the United States of an imported glider,
and other imported and U.S.-origin
parts constituted a substantial
transformation into an article with a
new name, character, and use. The
assembly process in the United States
was complex and time-consuming and
involved a significant U.S. contribution
in both parts and labor.
Similarly, in HQ H118435, dated
October 13, 2010, the assembly of a
chassis, plastic body parts, and various
miscellaneous pieces of plastic trim
from China and U.S.-origin battery
packs, motors, electronics, wiring
assemblies, seats, and chargers into
electric golf and recreational vehicles
was considered a substantial
transformation. CBP found that a
substantial transformation occurred in
the United States given the complexity
and duration of the U.S. manufacturing
process, along with the fact that
between 12 and 17 of the 53 to 62
components were U.S. components and
critical in making the electric vehicle.
Based on the information provided in
your letter and consistent with CBP
rulings cited above, we note that while
many important components of the R
Series Scissor Lift products are of
E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM
30MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 104 / Wednesday, May 30, 2018 / Notices
Chinese origin, and many significant
processing operations occur in China,
the Chinese operations require less skill
and precision, and the product remains
inoperable when imported into the
United States. In contrast, the final
assembly of the product, 15 out of 25
operational sequences of which are
performed in the United States, requires
a good deal more skill, precision and
technical expertise. Many of the critical
operations involved in completing the
product, such as installing the work
platforms’ software, manufacturing the
‘‘brain’’ of the system and attaching the
modules to the product, are also
performed in the United States. More
importantly, 40 percent of the remaining
components of the electric scissor lifts
are of U.S.-origin. This includes the
three control modules, which act as the
‘‘brain’’ of the machine, without which
the machine cannot function; batteries;
the platform control box; and, the
ground control panel. We also recognize
that the software contained in the three
modules is completely developed and
programmed in the United States. In
addition, significant operations to
produce the product are performed in
the United States, such as sophisticated
testing, inspection, calibration and
preparation of the product.
Consequently, we find that the imported
partially assembled R Series lifts are
substantially transformed as a result of
the assembly operations performed in
the United States to produce the fully
functional and operational electric
scissor lifts. Based on the information
presented, it is our opinion that the
country of origin of the RS Scissor Lift
is the United States.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
HOLDING:
Based on the facts provided, the
finished electric scissor lifts will be
considered a product of the United
States for purposes of U.S. Government
procurement.
Notice of this final determination will
be given in the Federal Register, as
required by 19 C.F.R. § 177.29. Any
party-at-interest other than the party
which requested this final
determination may request, pursuant to
19 C.F.R. § 177.31, that CBP reexamine
the matter anew and issue a new final
determination. Pursuant to 19 C.F.R.
§ 177.30, any party-at-interest may,
within 30 days of publication of the
Federal Register Notice referenced
above, seek judicial review of this final
determination before the Court of
International Trade.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:04 May 29, 2018
Jkt 244001
Sincerely,
Alice A. Kipel, Executive Director
Regulations and Rulings
Office of Trade
[FR Doc. 2018–11504 Filed 5–29–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Transportation Security Administration
Revision of Agency Information
Collection Activity Under OMB Review:
TSA End of Course Level 1
Evaluation—Instructor-Led Classroom
Training
Transportation Security
Administration, DHS.
ACTION: 30-Day notice.
AGENCY:
This notice announces that
the Transportation Security
Administration (TSA) has forwarded the
Information Collection Request (ICR),
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control number 1652–0041,
abstracted below to OMB for review and
approval of a revision of the currently
approved collection under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). The
ICR describes the nature of the
information collection and its expected
burden. The collection involves the
submission of ratings and written
comments about the quality of training
instruction from TSA students who
successfully complete TSA instructorled classroom training. TSA students
include TSA personnel, as well as State
and local civilian personnel, who attend
the Explosives Detection Canine
Handler Course, Passenger Screening
Canine Handler Course, Bridge Course,
Canine Technical Operations Course, or
the Office of Security Operations Canine
(OSO) Management Course at the
Canine Training Center (CTC).
DATES: Send your comments by June 29,
2018. A comment to OMB is most
effective if OMB receives it within 30
days of publication.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments on
the proposed information collection to
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, OMB. Comments should be
addressed to Desk Officer, Department
of Homeland Security/TSA, and sent via
electronic mail to dhsdeskofficer@
omb.eop.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christina A. Walsh, TSA PRA Officer,
Office of Information Technology (OIT),
TSA–11, Transportation Security
Administration, 601 South 12th Street,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24813
Arlington, VA 20598–6011; telephone
(571) 227–2062; email TSAPRA@
tsa.dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: TSA
published a Federal Register notice,
with a 60-day comment period soliciting
comments, of the following collection of
information on January 26, 2018, 83 FR
4502.
Comments Invited
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), an agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a valid OMB control
number. The ICR documentation will be
available at https://www.reginfo.gov
upon its submission to OMB. Therefore,
in preparation for OMB review and
approval of the following information
collection, TSA is soliciting comments
to—
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
information requirement is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions
of the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including using
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Consistent with the requirements of
Executive Order (E.O.) 13771, Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs, and E.O. 13777, Enforcing the
Regulatory Reform Agenda, TSA is also
requesting comments on the extent to
which this request for information could
be modified to reduce the burden on
respondents.
Information Collection Requirement
Title: TSA End of Course Level 1
Evaluation—Instructor-Led Classroom
Training.
Type of Request: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
OMB Control Number: 1652–0041.
Forms(s): TSA Form 1904A.
Affected Public: Canine Handlers.
Abstract: TSA’s CTC delivers the
Explosives Detection Canine Handler
Course, Passenger Screening Canine
Handler Course, Bridge Course, Canine
Technical Operations Course, and the
OSO Management Course 1 to TSA
1 Because CTC is the sole DHS source for all TSAtrained canines and handlers, the TSA has
E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM
Continued
30MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 30, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24811-24813]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-11504]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Certain
Electric Scissor Lifts
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of final determination.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document provides notice that U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (``CBP'') has issued a final determination concerning the
country of origin of certain electric scissor lifts. Based upon the
facts presented, CBP has concluded that the country of origin of the
electric scissor lifts in question is the United States, for purposes
of U.S. Government procurement.
DATES: The final determination was issued on May 21, 2018. A copy of
the final determination is attached. Any party-at-interest, as defined
in 19 C.F.R. 177.22(d), may seek judicial review of this final
determination within June 29, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yuliya A. Gulis, Valuation and Special
Programs Branch, Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade, at (202)
325-0042.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that on May 21, 2018
pursuant to subpart B of Part 177, U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Regulations (19 C.F.R. part 177, subpart B), CBP issued a final
determination concerning the country of origin of certain electric
scissor lifts (R Series Scissor Lift models 2632R, 3246R, and 4045R),
produced by JLG Industries, Inc., which may be offered to the U.S.
Government under an undesignated government procurement contract. This
final determination, HQ H294980, was issued under procedures set forth
at 19 C.F.R. part 177, subpart B, which implements Title III of the
Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2511-18). In the
final determination, CBP concluded that the country of origin of the
electric scissor lifts is the United States for purposes of U.S.
Government procurement.
Section 177.29, CBP Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177.29), provides that a
notice of final determination shall be published in the Federal
Register within 60 days of the date the final determination is issued.
Section 177.30, CBP Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177.30), provides that any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 C.F.R. 177.22(d), may seek judicial
review of a final determination within 30 days of publication of such
determination in the Federal Register.
Dated: May 21, 2018.
Alice A. Kipel,
Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade.
HQ H294980
May 21, 2018
OT:RR:CTF:VS H294980 YAG
CATEGORY: Origin
Mr. Thomas A. Coulter 411 East Franklin Street, Suite 500 Richmond, VA
23219
RE: U.S. Government Procurement; Country of Origin of Electric Scissor
Lifts; Title III, Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (19 U.S.C. Sec. 2511 et
seq.); Subpart B, Part 177, CBP Regulations
Dear Mr. Coulter:
This is in response to your correspondence dated March 1, 2018,
requesting a final determination, on behalf of your client, JLG
Industries, Inc. (``JLG''), concerning the country of origin of certain
electric scissor lifts, pursuant to subpart B of Part 177 of the U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') Regulations (19 C.F.R. Sec.
177.21 et seq.).
We note that JLG is a party-at-interest within the meaning of 19
C.F.R. Sec. 177.22(d)(1) and is entitled to request this final
determination.
FACTS:
JLG is an Oshkosh Corporation Company, headquartered in
McConnellsburg, Pennsylvania, and a global leader in the manufacture of
electric powered and engine powered aerial work platforms. The electric
scissor lifts under consideration are part of the JLG R Series family
of Scissor Lift products. The R Series is partially assembled in
Tianjin, China and then shipped to the United States for additional
manufacturing and testing, and final assembly. Once completed, the
product will be introduced in commerce and offered for sale, lease, or
rental to the U.S. Government.
CBP has previously issued an advisory country of origin ruling
concerning JLG's electric scissor lifts and determined them to be of
U.S.-origin. The R Series under review in this case are stated to be
new models and 95 percent of the processing is the same, except there
is a slight increase in the low-level, unskilled assembly in China and
an increase in high-level skilled work on the brain of the product
performed in the United States.
The three R Series Scissor Lift models that JLG plans to
manufacture are the 2632R, the 3246R, and the 4045R models. While the
function of all three models is the same, the models differ in
specifications, such as size and platform capacity. A Bill of Material
was submitted for Model 4045R. You state that the Bills of Material for
the other two R Series Scissor Lift models are substantially the same.
As reflected in the detailed Bill of Material, there are 29 separate
sub-assemblies/components, in varying quantities, of the R Series
Scissor Lift. Approximately 40 percent of the parts are of U.S.-origin
and 60
[[Page 24812]]
percent of Chinese origin. The remaining few components are sourced
from South Korea, Italy, Ireland, and Germany (all designated countries
for U.S. Government procurement purposes).
JLG also submitted charts outlining the 25 separate operational
sequences, man hours and skill level, for the operations performed in
China and the United States in the manufacture of the R Series Scissor
Lift. You state that the 15 operations performed in the United States
are complex and meaningful, and require medium skill to accomplish,
while the 10 operations performed in China are relatively simple
hardware assembly and packaging. The following processes are performed
in China: assembling the front and rear frame, assembling components
(doors, etc.), assembling hydraulic tank and steering hose, building up
and installing arm, building up routing and frame covers, installing
rails and packaging the partially assembled unit into a cargo container
for shipment to the United States. As imported, the Chinese good is
stated to be a non-operable platform. You assert that the operations
performed in the United States result in a ``self-propelled, saleable,
scissor lift.'' Further, you claim a significant part of the final
manufacturing and assembly process of JLG's electric scissor lift
occurring in the United States consists of functional testing, quality
verification, machine calibration, dimensional and structural
inspection, and testing, requiring specialized employee training and
skill.
The electric scissor lifts have three control modules that act as
the ``brain'' of the machine. It is stated that these modules are the
most critical components in controlling the machine's functions. These
modules are: (1) the platform module, (2) the power controller module,
and (3) the logic module. With the exception of the shell of the logic
module, which is manufactured in Mexico, all three control modules are
manufactured in the United States. The other smart components that
interface with the modules referenced above, are also manufactured,
assembled, and installed in the United States. These components include
batteries, a platform control box (allows the user to lift and lower
the platform, and drive and steer the machine), and ground control
panel (a secondary operator interface that allows the user to lift and
lower the platform while not in the work platform). Finally, all
software contained in the ``brain'' is developed and programmed
entirely in the United States. The software and module development
consumed over 8,000 hours of engineering time. The modules are
installed and tested in the United States. Final machine calibration of
the electric scissor lifts is also performed subsequent to importation.
ISSUE:
What is the country of origin of the electric scissor lifts for
purposes of U.S. Government procurement?
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
CBP issues country of origin advisory rulings and final
determinations as to whether an article is or would be a product of a
designated country or instrumentality for the purposes of granting
waivers of certain ``Buy American'' restrictions in U.S. law or
practice for products offered for sale to the U.S. Government, pursuant
to subpart B of Part 177, 19 C.F.R. Sec. 177.21 et seq., which
implements Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (``TAA''), as
amended (19 U.S.C. Sec. 2511 et seq.).
Under the rule of origin set forth under 19 U.S.C. Sec.
2518(4)(B):
An article is a product of a country or instrumentality only if (i) it
is wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of that country or
instrumentality, or (ii) in the case of an article which consists in
whole or in part of materials from another country or instrumentality,
it has been substantially transformed into a new and different article
of commerce with a name, character, or use distinct from that of the
article or articles from which it was so transformed.
See also 19 C.F.R. Sec. 177.22(a).
In rendering final determinations for purposes of U.S. Government
procurement, CBP applies the provisions of subpart B of Part 177
consistent with the Federal Procurement Regulations. See 19 C.F.R.
Sec. 177.21. In this regard, CBP recognizes that the Federal
Acquisition Regulations restrict the U.S. Government's purchase of
products to U.S.-made or designated country end products for
acquisitions subject to the Trade Agreements Act. See 48 C.F.R. Sec.
25.403(c)(1). The Federal Acquisition Regulations define ``U.S.-made
end product'' as ``an article that is mined, produced, or manufactured
in the United States or that is substantially transformed in the United
States into a new and different article of commerce with a name,
character, or use distinct from that of the article or articles from
which it was transformed.'' See 48 C.F.R Sec. 25.003.
In determining whether the combining of parts or materials
constitutes a substantial transformation, the determinative issue is
the extent of the operations performed and whether the parts lose their
identity and become an integral part of the new article. Belcrest
Linens v. United States, 6 C.I.T. 204, 573 F. Supp. 1149 (1983), aff'd,
741 F.2d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 1984). If the manufacturing or combining
process is a minor one that leaves the identity of the imported article
intact, a substantial transformation has not occurred. Uniroyal, Inc.
v. United States, 3 C.I.T. 220, 542 F. Supp. 1026 (1982).
In Headquarters Ruling Letter (``HQ'') H022169, dated May 2, 2008,
a glider (consisting of a frame, finished cab, axels, and wheels) was
imported into the United States and assembled with approximately 87
different component parts (including the essential parts: a motor,
controller, and charger of Canadian origin; a gear box and axel of U.S.
origin; and brakes of Indian origin) into an electric mini-truck. The
process consisted of eight assembly work stations involving attachment
and installation operations, as well as quality control and testing of
the product. CBP held that the imported glider and other foreign
components were substantially transformed into an electric mini-truck
by the assembly operations that took place in the United States. Our
decision was based on finding that the imported glider lost its
individual identity and became an integral part of a new article
possessing a new name, character, and use. Likewise, in HQ H155115,
dated May 24, 2011, CBP found that assembly in the United States of an
imported glider, and other imported and U.S.-origin parts constituted a
substantial transformation into an article with a new name, character,
and use. The assembly process in the United States was complex and
time-consuming and involved a significant U.S. contribution in both
parts and labor.
Similarly, in HQ H118435, dated October 13, 2010, the assembly of a
chassis, plastic body parts, and various miscellaneous pieces of
plastic trim from China and U.S.-origin battery packs, motors,
electronics, wiring assemblies, seats, and chargers into electric golf
and recreational vehicles was considered a substantial transformation.
CBP found that a substantial transformation occurred in the United
States given the complexity and duration of the U.S. manufacturing
process, along with the fact that between 12 and 17 of the 53 to 62
components were U.S. components and critical in making the electric
vehicle.
Based on the information provided in your letter and consistent
with CBP rulings cited above, we note that while many important
components of the R Series Scissor Lift products are of
[[Page 24813]]
Chinese origin, and many significant processing operations occur in
China, the Chinese operations require less skill and precision, and the
product remains inoperable when imported into the United States. In
contrast, the final assembly of the product, 15 out of 25 operational
sequences of which are performed in the United States, requires a good
deal more skill, precision and technical expertise. Many of the
critical operations involved in completing the product, such as
installing the work platforms' software, manufacturing the ``brain'' of
the system and attaching the modules to the product, are also performed
in the United States. More importantly, 40 percent of the remaining
components of the electric scissor lifts are of U.S.-origin. This
includes the three control modules, which act as the ``brain'' of the
machine, without which the machine cannot function; batteries; the
platform control box; and, the ground control panel. We also recognize
that the software contained in the three modules is completely
developed and programmed in the United States. In addition, significant
operations to produce the product are performed in the United States,
such as sophisticated testing, inspection, calibration and preparation
of the product. Consequently, we find that the imported partially
assembled R Series lifts are substantially transformed as a result of
the assembly operations performed in the United States to produce the
fully functional and operational electric scissor lifts. Based on the
information presented, it is our opinion that the country of origin of
the RS Scissor Lift is the United States.
HOLDING:
Based on the facts provided, the finished electric scissor lifts
will be considered a product of the United States for purposes of U.S.
Government procurement.
Notice of this final determination will be given in the Federal
Register, as required by 19 C.F.R. Sec. 177.29. Any party-at-interest
other than the party which requested this final determination may
request, pursuant to 19 C.F.R. Sec. 177.31, that CBP reexamine the
matter anew and issue a new final determination. Pursuant to 19 C.F.R.
Sec. 177.30, any party-at-interest may, within 30 days of publication
of the Federal Register Notice referenced above, seek judicial review
of this final determination before the Court of International Trade.
Sincerely,
Alice A. Kipel, Executive Director Regulations and Rulings Office of
Trade
[FR Doc. 2018-11504 Filed 5-29-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P