Safety Zone; City of North Charleston Fireworks, North Charleston, SC, 24441-24443 [2018-11474]
Download as PDF
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 103 / Tuesday, May 29, 2018 / Proposed Rules
applicable. Provide a list of those
notified, the concerns raised and the
mitigations made to address the
concerns:
a. Tenants, FBOs, airlines, and local
users (e.g., DOD, etc.).
b. Air traffic control tower.
c. Local aviation organizations.
d. Airport security and local law
enforcement agencies.
e. Flight Standards District Office.
12. An explanation of how the event
benefits the airport and is compliant
with the FAA Policy on Revenue Use.
a. For an event proposed by a
commercial/for-profit party:
i. Financial benefits must be equal to
at least the fair market value of the
subject property use.
ii. In-kind services or benefits must be
equivalent to FMV compensation.
iii. Airport revenue cannot be used
toward conducting the event (e.g., use of
airport staff must be reimbursed,
equipment rental, advertisement of the
event cannot be funded in part or whole
by the airport).
iv. The event should also generate
intangible benefits for the airport such
as community goodwill and community
interest.
b. For an event organized by a nonprofit/charitable organization or by the
airport sponsor itself on its own behalf.
In all non-profit nonaeronautical cases
there needs to be a benefit to the airport
that clearly outweighs the loss or
displacement of aeronautical activities.
Examples of benefits to the airport may
include:
i. Advertising for the airport included
in the event advertising at no cost to the
airport.
ii. A percentage of ticket sales paid to
the airport.
iii. Intangible benefits (e.g.,
community goodwill, increasing local
awareness of the airport, encouraging
local and community support of the
airport, generating an interest in airport
use).
c. For events proposed by a party
other than the airport sponsor, the event
proponent should assume the costs of
the event, e.g., equipment rental,
advertisement of the event, staffing, and
restoration of facilities to pre-event
conditions.
13. Approval of the closure of airport
facilities for a nonaeronautical event is
a Federal action that requires
environmental review.
Issued in Washington, DC, on May 23,
2018.
Kevin C. Willis,
Director, Office of Airport Compliance and
Management Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2018–11466 Filed 5–25–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 May 25, 2018
Jkt 244001
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2018–0171]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; City of North Charleston
Fireworks, North Charleston, SC
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a temporary safety zone for
certain navigable waters of the Cooper
River in North Charleston, SC. This
action is necessary to provide for the
safety of the general public, spectators,
vessels, and the marine environment
from potential hazards during a
fireworks display. This proposed
rulemaking would prohibit persons and
vessels from entering, transiting
through, anchoring in, or remaining
within the safety zone unless authorized
by the Captain of the Port Charleston
(COTP) or a designated representative.
We invite your comments on this
proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before June 28, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2018–0171 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
SUMMARY:
If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant
Justin Heck, Sector Charleston Office of
Waterways Management, Coast Guard;
telephone (843) 740–3184, email
Justin.C.Heck@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
COTP Captain of the Port
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
On February 23, 2018, the City of
North Charleston notified the Coast
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
24441
Guard that it will be conducting a
fireworks display from 10 p.m. to 11
p.m. on July 4, 2018. The fireworks are
to be launched from a barge along the
bank of the Cooper River at River Front
Park in North Charleston, SC. Hazards
from firework displays include
accidental discharge of fireworks,
dangerous projectiles, and falling hot
embers or other debris. The Captain of
the Port Charleston (COTP) has
determined that potential hazards
associated with the fireworks to be used
in this display would be a safety
concern for anyone within a 500-yard
radius of the barge.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to
ensure the safety of vessels and the
navigable waters within a 500-yard
radius of the fireworks barge before,
during, and after the scheduled event.
The Coast Guard proposes this
rulemaking under authority in 33 U.S.C.
1231.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP proposes to establish a
safety zone from 9:45 p.m. to 11:15 p.m.
on July 4, 2018. The safety zone would
cover all navigable waters within 500
yards of the fireworks barge located at
River Front Park on the Cooper River in
North Charleston, SC. The duration of
the zone is intended to ensure the safety
of vessels and these navigable waters
before, during, and after the scheduled
10 p.m. to 11 p.m. fireworks display. No
vessel or person would be permitted to
enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the safety zone without
obtaining permission from the COTP or
a designated representative. The
regulatory text we are proposing appears
at the end of this document. The Coast
Guard would provide notice of the
safety zone by Local Notice to Mariners,
Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and onscene designated representatives.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This NPRM has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
E:\FR\FM\29MYP1.SGM
29MYP1
24442
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 103 / Tuesday, May 29, 2018 / Proposed Rules
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, duration,
and time-of-day of the safety zone. The
safety zone will only be enforced for an
hour and a half, and although persons
and vessels may not enter, transit
through, anchor in, or remain within the
safety zone without authorization from
the Captain of the Port Charleston or a
designated representative, vessel traffic
would be able to safely operate in the
surrounding area during the
enforcement period and the rule would
allow vessels to seek permission to enter
the zone. Moreover, the Coast Guard
will provide advance notification of the
safety zone to the local maritime
community by Local Notice to Mariners
and Broadcast Notice to Mariners via
VHF–FM marine channel 16.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
We have considered the impact of this
proposed rule on small entities. This
rule may affect the following entities,
some of which may be small entities:
The owner or operators of vessels
intending to enter, transit through,
anchor in, or remain within the
regulated area during the enforcement
period. For the reasons stated in section
IV.A. above, this proposed rule would
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 May 25, 2018
Jkt 244001
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for
a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and have determined that it is
consistent with the fundamental
federalism principles and preemption
requirements described in Executive
Order 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
If you believe this proposed rule has
implications for federalism or Indian
tribes, please contact the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a
preliminary determination that this
action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. This proposed rule
involves a safety zone lasting an hour
and a half that would prohibit entry
within 500 yards of a barge from which
fireworks will be launched. Normally
such actions are categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph L
60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS
Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01,
Rev. 01. A preliminary Record of
Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
E:\FR\FM\29MYP1.SGM
29MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 103 / Tuesday, May 29, 2018 / Proposed Rules
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, you may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding the Federal Docket
Management System in the March 24,
2005, issue of the Federal Register (70
FR 15086).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in the docket, and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
website’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add a temporary § 165.T07–0171 to
read as follows:
■
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 165.T07–0171 Safety Zone; City of North
Charleston Fireworks, North Charleston,
SC.
(a) Location. This rule establishes a
safety zone on all waters within a 500yard radius of the barge, from which
fireworks will be launched on the bank
of the Cooper River at River Front Park
in North Charleston, SC.
(b) Definition. The term ‘‘designated
representative’’ means Coast Guard
Patrol Commanders, including Coast
Guard coxswains, petty officers, and
other officers operating Coast Guard
vessels, and Federal, state, and local
officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Charleston in the
enforcement of the regulated areas.
(c) Regulations.
(1) All persons and vessels are
prohibited from entering, transiting
through, anchoring in, or remaining
within the regulated area unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Charleston or a designated
representative.
(2) Persons and vessels desiring to
enter, transit through, anchor in, or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 May 25, 2018
Jkt 244001
remain within the regulated area may
contact the Captain of the Port
Charleston by telephone at 843–740–
7050, or a designated representative via
VHF radio on channel 16, to request
authorization. If authorization to enter,
transit through, anchor in, or remain
within the regulated area is granted by
the Captain of the Port Charleston or a
designated representative, all persons
and vessels receiving such authorization
must comply with the instructions of
the Captain of the Port Charleston or a
designated representative.
(3) The Coast Guard will provide
notice of the regulated area by Local
Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to
Mariners, and on-scene designated
representatives.
(d) Enforcement Period. This rule will
be enforced on July 4, 2018 from 9:45
p.m. until 11:15 p.m.
Dated: May 16, 2018.
J.W. Reed,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Charleston.
[FR Doc. 2018–11474 Filed 5–25–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2018–0380]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Willamette River, Lake
Oswego, OR
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a temporary safety zone for
certain waters of the Willamette River
near Lake Oswego, OR. This action is
necessary to provide for the safety of life
on these navigable waters during a
fireworks display on July 4, 2018. This
proposed rulemaking would prohibit
persons and vessels from being in the
safety zone unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Columbia River or a
designated representative. We invite
your comments on this proposed
rulemaking.
SUMMARY:
Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before June 13, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2018–0380 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
24443
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email LCDR Laura
Springer, Waterways Management
Division, Marine Safety Unit Portland,
U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 503–240–
9319, email msupdxwwm@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
On April 17, 2018, the City of Lake
Oswego notified the Coast Guard that it
will be conducting a fireworks display
from 10 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. on July 4,
2018, to commemorate Independence
Day. The fireworks will launch from a
barge in the Willamette River
approximately 150 yards east of George
Rodgers Park in Lake Oswego, OR.
Hazards from firework displays include
accidental discharge of fireworks,
dangerous projectiles, and falling hot
embers or other debris. The Captain of
the Port Columbia River has determined
that potential hazards associated with
the fireworks in this display are a safety
concern for anyone within a 450-yard
radius of the barge.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to
ensure the safety of vessels and the
navigable waters within a 450-yard
radius of the fireworks barge before,
during, and after the scheduled event.
The Coast Guard proposes this
rulemaking under authority in 33 U.S.C.
1231.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Captain of the Port Columbia
River proposes to establish a safety zone
from 9 p.m. to 11:30 p.m. on July 4,
2018. The safety zone would cover all
navigable waters of the Willamette River
within 450-yards of a barge located at
45°24′37.46″ N, 122°39′29.70″ W, in
vicinity of George Rogers Park in Lake
Oswego, OR. The duration of the zone
is intended to ensure the safety of
vessels and these navigable waters
before, during, and after the scheduled
10 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. fireworks display.
No vessel or person would be permitted
to enter the safety zone without
obtaining permission from the COTP or
a designated representative. The
E:\FR\FM\29MYP1.SGM
29MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 29, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 24441-24443]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-11474]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2018-0171]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; City of North Charleston Fireworks, North
Charleston, SC
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone
for certain navigable waters of the Cooper River in North Charleston,
SC. This action is necessary to provide for the safety of the general
public, spectators, vessels, and the marine environment from potential
hazards during a fireworks display. This proposed rulemaking would
prohibit persons and vessels from entering, transiting through,
anchoring in, or remaining within the safety zone unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port Charleston (COTP) or a designated
representative. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before June 28, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2018-0171 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant Justin Heck, Sector
Charleston Office of Waterways Management, Coast Guard; telephone (843)
740-3184, email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
COTP Captain of the Port
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
On February 23, 2018, the City of North Charleston notified the
Coast Guard that it will be conducting a fireworks display from 10 p.m.
to 11 p.m. on July 4, 2018. The fireworks are to be launched from a
barge along the bank of the Cooper River at River Front Park in North
Charleston, SC. Hazards from firework displays include accidental
discharge of fireworks, dangerous projectiles, and falling hot embers
or other debris. The Captain of the Port Charleston (COTP) has
determined that potential hazards associated with the fireworks to be
used in this display would be a safety concern for anyone within a 500-
yard radius of the barge.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of vessels
and the navigable waters within a 500-yard radius of the fireworks
barge before, during, and after the scheduled event. The Coast Guard
proposes this rulemaking under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP proposes to establish a safety zone from 9:45 p.m. to
11:15 p.m. on July 4, 2018. The safety zone would cover all navigable
waters within 500 yards of the fireworks barge located at River Front
Park on the Cooper River in North Charleston, SC. The duration of the
zone is intended to ensure the safety of vessels and these navigable
waters before, during, and after the scheduled 10 p.m. to 11 p.m.
fireworks display. No vessel or person would be permitted to enter,
transit through, anchor in, or remain within the safety zone without
obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated representative. The
regulatory text we are proposing appears at the end of this document.
The Coast Guard would provide notice of the safety zone by Local Notice
to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and on-scene designated
representatives.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been
designated a ``significant
[[Page 24442]]
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt from the requirements of
Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-day of the safety zone. The safety zone
will only be enforced for an hour and a half, and although persons and
vessels may not enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the
safety zone without authorization from the Captain of the Port
Charleston or a designated representative, vessel traffic would be able
to safely operate in the surrounding area during the enforcement period
and the rule would allow vessels to seek permission to enter the zone.
Moreover, the Coast Guard will provide advance notification of the
safety zone to the local maritime community by Local Notice to Mariners
and Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
We have considered the impact of this proposed rule on small
entities. This rule may affect the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: The owner or operators of vessels intending to
enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the regulated area
during the enforcement period. For the reasons stated in section IV.A.
above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves a safety
zone lasting an hour and a half that would prohibit entry within 500
yards of a barge from which fireworks will be launched. Normally such
actions are categorically excluded from further review under paragraph
L 60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01,
Rev. 01. A preliminary Record of Environmental Consideration supporting
this determination is available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
[[Page 24443]]
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal
Register (70 FR 15086).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add a temporary Sec. 165.T07-0171 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T07-0171 Safety Zone; City of North Charleston Fireworks,
North Charleston, SC.
(a) Location. This rule establishes a safety zone on all waters
within a 500-yard radius of the barge, from which fireworks will be
launched on the bank of the Cooper River at River Front Park in North
Charleston, SC.
(b) Definition. The term ``designated representative'' means Coast
Guard Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty
officers, and other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and
Federal, state, and local officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Charleston in the enforcement of the regulated
areas.
(c) Regulations.
(1) All persons and vessels are prohibited from entering,
transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the regulated
area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a
designated representative.
(2) Persons and vessels desiring to enter, transit through, anchor
in, or remain within the regulated area may contact the Captain of the
Port Charleston by telephone at 843-740-7050, or a designated
representative via VHF radio on channel 16, to request authorization.
If authorization to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within
the regulated area is granted by the Captain of the Port Charleston or
a designated representative, all persons and vessels receiving such
authorization must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the
Port Charleston or a designated representative.
(3) The Coast Guard will provide notice of the regulated area by
Local Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and on-scene
designated representatives.
(d) Enforcement Period. This rule will be enforced on July 4, 2018
from 9:45 p.m. until 11:15 p.m.
Dated: May 16, 2018.
J.W. Reed,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Charleston.
[FR Doc. 2018-11474 Filed 5-25-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P