Airworthiness Directives; Robinson Helicopter Company Helicopters, 23829-23831 [2018-10919]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2018 / Proposed Rules
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
AgustaWestland S.p.A.: Docket No. FAA–
2017–1081; Product Identifier 2017–SW–
090–AD.
(a) Applicability
This AD applies to AgustaWestland S.p.A.
Model AW189 helicopters, certificated in any
category, with a tail plane lower fitting P/N
8G5350A07051 installed.
(2) For operations conducted under a 14
CFR part 119 operating certificate or under
14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that
you notify your principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office before
operating any aircraft complying with this
AD through an AMOC.
(g) Additional Information
(1) Leonardo Helicopters Bollettino
Tecnico (BT) No. 189–038, Revision B, and
BT No. 189–070, Revision A, both dated
October 13, 2016, which are not incorporated
by reference, contain additional information
about the subject of this AD. For service
information identified in this AD, contact
Leonardo S.p.A. Helicopters, Matteo Ragazzi,
Head of Airworthiness, Viale G.Agusta 520,
21017 C.Costa di Samarate (Va) Italy;
telephone +39–0331–711756; fax +39–0331–
229046; or at https://www.leonardocompany
.com/-/bulletins. You may review the
referenced service information at the FAA,
Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest
Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N–
321, Fort Worth, TX 76177.
(2) The subject of this AD is addressed in
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD
No. 2016–0161, dated August 8, 2016. You
may view the EASA AD on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov in the AD Docket.
(h) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC)
Code: 5510, Horizontal Stabilizer Structure.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on May 15,
2018.
Scott A. Horn,
Deputy Director for Regulatory Operations,
Compliance & Airworthiness Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
(b) Unsafe Condition
This AD defines the unsafe condition as a
crack on a tail plane fitting, which could
result in failure of the tail plane fitting and
loss of helicopter control.
[FR Doc. 2018–10918 Filed 5–22–18; 8:45 am]
(c) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by July 23,
2018.
Federal Aviation Administration
(d) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each
action required by this AD within the
specified compliance time unless it has
already been accomplished prior to that time.
[Docket No. FAA–2017–0947; Product
Identifier 2017–SW–059–AD]
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Safety Management
Section, Rotorcraft Standards Branch, FAA,
may approve AMOCs for this AD. Send your
proposal to: Martin R. Crane, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Regulations & Policy Section,
Rotorcraft Standards Branch, FAA, 10101
Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177;
telephone (817) 222–5110; email 9-ASWFTW-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
16:37 May 22, 2018
Jkt 244001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
14 CFR Part 39
(e) Required Actions
Within 50 hours time-in-service, install tail
plane retromodification kit part number
8G0000P00511.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Robinson
Helicopter Company Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for
Robinson Helicopter Company
(Robinson) Model R44 and R44 II
helicopters. This proposed AD would
require visually checking each tail rotor
blade for a crack. This proposed AD is
prompted by a report of cracking in
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
23829
certain tail rotor blades. The actions of
this proposed AD are intended to
address an unsafe condition on these
products.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by July 23, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Send comments to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to the
‘‘Mail’’ address between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2017–
0947; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this proposed
AD, the economic evaluation, any
comments received, and other
information. The street address for
Docket Operations (telephone 800–647–
5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
For service information identified in
this proposed rule, contact Robinson
Helicopter Company, 2901 Airport
Drive, Torrance, CA 90505; telephone
(310) 539–0508; fax (310) 539–5198; or
at https://www.robinsonheli.com/
servelib.htm. You may review the
referenced service information at the
FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood
Pkwy., Room 6N–321, Fort Worth, TX
76177.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James Guo, Aerospace Engineer, Los
Angeles ACO Branch, Compliance &
Airworthiness Division, FAA, 3960
Paramount Blvd., Lakewood, California
90712; telephone (562) 627–5357; email
james.guo@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to participate in this
rulemaking by submitting written
comments, data, or views. We also
invite comments relating to the
economic, environmental, energy, or
federalism impacts that might result
E:\FR\FM\23MYP1.SGM
23MYP1
23830
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2018 / Proposed Rules
from adopting the proposals in this
document. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the
proposal, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. To ensure the docket
does not contain duplicate comments,
commenters should send only one copy
of written comments, or if comments are
filed electronically, commenters should
submit only one time.
We will file in the docket all
comments that we receive, as well as a
report summarizing each substantive
public contact with FAA personnel
concerning this proposed rulemaking.
Before acting on this proposal, we will
consider all comments we receive on or
before the closing date for comments.
We will consider comments filed after
the comment period has closed if it is
possible to do so without incurring
expense or delay. We may change this
proposal in light of the comments we
receive.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Discussion
We propose to adopt a new AD for
Robinson R44 and R44 II helicopters
with a tail rotor blade part number (P/
N) C029–1 or P/N C029–2 installed.
This proposed AD would require
checking the tail rotor blades for cracks
within 50 hours time-in-service (TIS)
and thereafter before each flight.
This proposed AD is prompted by
reports of P/N C029–1 and P/N C029–
2 tail rotor blades with fatigue cracks at
the leading edge. The cracks were
caused by high fatigue stresses due to
resonance when the blades were at high
pitch angles from large left pedal inputs.
Robinson consequently issued R44
Service Bulletin SB–83, dated May 30,
2012 (SB–83). At the time SB–83 was
issued, the reports of cracking on the
tail rotor blade were isolated and
infrequent. Since 2015, five events have
been reported of helicopters with
cracking on tail rotor blades. Therefore,
we are proposing actions that are
intended to detect a cracked tail rotor
blade and prevent loss of the blade and
subsequent loss of directional control.
FAA’s Determination
We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all known relevant
information and determined that an
unsafe condition exists and is likely to
exist or develop on other products of
these same type designs.
Related Service Information
We have reviewed Robinson SB–83
which specifies, within 10 flight hours
or by June 30, 2012, whichever occurs
first, inserting a caution page into the
Pilot’s Operating Handbook. The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:37 May 22, 2018
Jkt 244001
caution page specifies inspecting the
leading edges of each tail rotor blade for
a crack before each flight. The caution
page also advises that to reduce fatigue
stress damage to the tail rotor blades,
pilots should avoid maneuvers that
require large left pedal inputs. SB–83
specifies that the caution page may be
removed when the tail rotor blades are
replaced with tail rotor blade P/N C029–
3.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require
within 50 hours TIS and thereafter
before each flight, visually checking
each tail rotor blade for a crack in the
tail leading edge, paying particular
attention to the most inboard white
paint stripe. An owner/operator (pilot)
may perform the required visual check
and must enter compliance with the
applicable paragraph of the AD into the
helicopter maintenance records in
accordance with 14 CFR 43.9(a)(1)
through (4) and 91.417(a)(2)(v). A pilot
may perform this check because it
involves only a visual check and can be
performed equally well by a pilot or a
mechanic. This check is an exception to
our standard maintenance regulations.
This proposed AD also would require
before further flight, replacing any
cracked tail rotor blade.
Differences Between This Proposed AD
and the Service Information
Robinson SB SB–83 requires
compliance within 10 flight hours or by
June 30, 2012, whichever occurs first.
This proposed AD would require
compliance within 50 hours TIS. Given
the helicopter’s history and the type of
operations conducted by the current
fleet, we determined that this
compliance time is adequate to reduce
the risk of a crack on the tail rotor blade
to an acceptable level.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
would affect 1,631 helicopters of U.S.
Registry and that labor costs average $85
per work-hour. Visually checking the
tail rotor blades for a crack would
require 0.2 hour for a cost of $17 per
helicopter and $27,727 for the U.S. fleet
per check cycle. Replacing a tail rotor
blade, if required, would require 2
work-hours and parts would cost $3,080
for a cost of $3,250 per blade.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed, I certify
this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska to the extent that it justifies
making a regulatory distinction; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by Reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
E:\FR\FM\23MYP1.SGM
23MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2018 / Proposed Rules
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
Robinson Helicopter Company: Product No.
FAA–2017–0947; Product Identifier
2017–SW–059–AD.
(a) Applicability
This AD applies to Robinson Helicopter
Company (Robinson) Model R44 and R44 II
helicopters, certificated in any category, with
a tail rotor blade part number (P/N) C029–1
or P/N C029–2 installed.
(b) Unsafe Condition
This AD defines the unsafe condition as a
crack in a tail rotor blade. This condition
could result in the loss of the tail rotor and
subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
this AD. For service information identified in
this AD, contact Robinson Helicopter
Company, 2901 Airport Drive, Torrance, CA
90505; telephone (310) 539–0508; fax (310)
539–5198; or at https://
www.robinsonheli.com/servelib.htm. You
may review a copy of information at the
FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy.,
Room 6N–321, Fort Worth, TX 76177.
(h) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC)
Code: 6410, Tail Rotor Blades.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on May 14,
2018.
Scott A. Horn,
Deputy Director for Regulatory Operations,
Compliance & Airworthiness Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–10919 Filed 5–22–18; 8:45 am]
(d) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each
action required by this AD within the
specified compliance time unless it has
already been accomplished prior to that time.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(e) Required Actions
Within 50 hours TIS after the effective date
of this AD and thereafter before each flight:
(1) Visually check each tail rotor blade for
a crack in the tail leading edge, paying
particular attention to the area in the most
inboard white paint stripe. Wipe the blades
clean, if necessary, to ensure any potential
crack is visible. The actions required by this
paragraph may be performed by the owner/
operator (pilot) holding at least a private pilot
certificate and must be entered into the
aircraft records showing compliance with
this AD in accordance with 14 CFR 43.9(a)(1)
through (4) and 14 CFR 91.417(a)(2)(v). The
record must be maintained as required by 14
CFR 91.417, 121.380, or 135.439.
(2) If there is a crack, before further flight,
replace the tail rotor blade.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
(c) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by July 23,
2018.
[Docket No. FAA–2018–0255; Airspace
Docket No. 18–ASO–6]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOC)
(1) The Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch,
FAA, may approve AMOCs for this AD. Send
your proposal to: James Guo, Aerospace
Engineer, Los Angeles ACO Branch,
Compliance & Airworthiness Division, FAA,
3960 Paramount Blvd., Lakewood, California
90712; telephone (562) 627–5357; email
james.guo@faa.gov.
(2) For operations conducted under a 14
CFR part 119 operating certificate or under
14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that
you notify your principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office before
operating any aircraft complying with this
AD through an AMOC.
(g) Additional Information
Robinson Helicopter Company R44 Service
Bulletin SB–83, dated May 30, 2012, which
is not incorporated by reference, contains
additional information about the subject of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:37 May 22, 2018
Jkt 244001
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
RIN 2120–AA66
Proposed Revocation of Class E
Airspace; St Marys, GA
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
This action proposes to
remove Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface
at St Marys, GA, because St Marys
Airport has closed, and controlled
airspace is no longer required at this
location.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before July 9, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on this rule
to: U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, West Bldg Ground Floor,
Rm W12–140, Washington, DC 20590;
Telephone: 800–647–5527, or (202)
366–9826. You must identify the Docket
No. FAA–2018–0255; Airspace Docket
No. 18–ASO–6, at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit and
review received comments through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
You may review the public docket
containing the proposal, any comments
received, and any final disposition in
person in the Dockets Office between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except federal holidays.
FAA Order 7400.11B, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, and
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
23831
subsequent amendments can be viewed
on line at https://www.faa.gov/air_
traffic/publications/. For further
information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591;
telephone: (202) 267–8783. The Order is
also available for inspection at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of FAA
Order 7400.11B at NARA, call (202)
741–6030, or go to https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/
ibr-locations.html.
FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on
September 15.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Fornito, Operations Support Group,
Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation
Administration, 1701 Columbia Ave.,
College Park, GA 30337; telephone (404)
305–6364.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for This Rulemaking
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in title
49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I,
Section 106 describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the agency’s
authority. This proposed rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use
of airspace necessary to ensure the
safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
airspace. This regulation is within the
scope of that authority as it would
remove Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface
at St Marys Airport, St Marys, GA, due
to the closing of this airport.
Comments Invited
Interested persons are invited to
comment on this rule by submitting
such written data, views, or arguments,
as they may desire. Comments that
provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are
particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the
proposal. Comments are specifically
invited on the overall regulatory,
aeronautical, economic, environmental,
and energy-related aspects of the
proposal.
Communications should identify both
docket numbers (FAA Docket No. FAA–
2018–0255; Airspace Docket No. 18–
E:\FR\FM\23MYP1.SGM
23MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 23, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 23829-23831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-10919]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2017-0947; Product Identifier 2017-SW-059-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Robinson Helicopter Company Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
Robinson Helicopter Company (Robinson) Model R44 and R44 II
helicopters. This proposed AD would require visually checking each tail
rotor blade for a crack. This proposed AD is prompted by a report of
cracking in certain tail rotor blades. The actions of this proposed AD
are intended to address an unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 23, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: Send comments to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to the ``Mail'' address between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
0947; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this proposed AD, the economic evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for Docket Operations (telephone
800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available
in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
For service information identified in this proposed rule, contact
Robinson Helicopter Company, 2901 Airport Drive, Torrance, CA 90505;
telephone (310) 539-0508; fax (310) 539-5198; or at https://www.robinsonheli.com/servelib.htm. You may review the referenced
service information at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N-321, Fort Worth, TX
76177.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Guo, Aerospace Engineer, Los
Angeles ACO Branch, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, FAA, 3960
Paramount Blvd., Lakewood, California 90712; telephone (562) 627-5357;
email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
written comments, data, or views. We also invite comments relating to
the economic, environmental, energy, or federalism impacts that might
result
[[Page 23830]]
from adopting the proposals in this document. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the reason for
any recommended change, and include supporting data. To ensure the
docket does not contain duplicate comments, commenters should send only
one copy of written comments, or if comments are filed electronically,
commenters should submit only one time.
We will file in the docket all comments that we receive, as well as
a report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel
concerning this proposed rulemaking. Before acting on this proposal, we
will consider all comments we receive on or before the closing date for
comments. We will consider comments filed after the comment period has
closed if it is possible to do so without incurring expense or delay.
We may change this proposal in light of the comments we receive.
Discussion
We propose to adopt a new AD for Robinson R44 and R44 II
helicopters with a tail rotor blade part number (P/N) C029-1 or P/N
C029-2 installed. This proposed AD would require checking the tail
rotor blades for cracks within 50 hours time-in-service (TIS) and
thereafter before each flight.
This proposed AD is prompted by reports of P/N C029-1 and P/N C029-
2 tail rotor blades with fatigue cracks at the leading edge. The cracks
were caused by high fatigue stresses due to resonance when the blades
were at high pitch angles from large left pedal inputs. Robinson
consequently issued R44 Service Bulletin SB-83, dated May 30, 2012 (SB-
83). At the time SB-83 was issued, the reports of cracking on the tail
rotor blade were isolated and infrequent. Since 2015, five events have
been reported of helicopters with cracking on tail rotor blades.
Therefore, we are proposing actions that are intended to detect a
cracked tail rotor blade and prevent loss of the blade and subsequent
loss of directional control.
FAA's Determination
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all known relevant
information and determined that an unsafe condition exists and is
likely to exist or develop on other products of these same type
designs.
Related Service Information
We have reviewed Robinson SB-83 which specifies, within 10 flight
hours or by June 30, 2012, whichever occurs first, inserting a caution
page into the Pilot's Operating Handbook. The caution page specifies
inspecting the leading edges of each tail rotor blade for a crack
before each flight. The caution page also advises that to reduce
fatigue stress damage to the tail rotor blades, pilots should avoid
maneuvers that require large left pedal inputs. SB-83 specifies that
the caution page may be removed when the tail rotor blades are replaced
with tail rotor blade P/N C029-3.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require within 50 hours TIS and thereafter
before each flight, visually checking each tail rotor blade for a crack
in the tail leading edge, paying particular attention to the most
inboard white paint stripe. An owner/operator (pilot) may perform the
required visual check and must enter compliance with the applicable
paragraph of the AD into the helicopter maintenance records in
accordance with 14 CFR 43.9(a)(1) through (4) and 91.417(a)(2)(v). A
pilot may perform this check because it involves only a visual check
and can be performed equally well by a pilot or a mechanic. This check
is an exception to our standard maintenance regulations.
This proposed AD also would require before further flight,
replacing any cracked tail rotor blade.
Differences Between This Proposed AD and the Service Information
Robinson SB SB-83 requires compliance within 10 flight hours or by
June 30, 2012, whichever occurs first. This proposed AD would require
compliance within 50 hours TIS. Given the helicopter's history and the
type of operations conducted by the current fleet, we determined that
this compliance time is adequate to reduce the risk of a crack on the
tail rotor blade to an acceptable level.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 1,631 helicopters of
U.S. Registry and that labor costs average $85 per work-hour. Visually
checking the tail rotor blades for a crack would require 0.2 hour for a
cost of $17 per helicopter and $27,727 for the U.S. fleet per check
cycle. Replacing a tail rotor blade, if required, would require 2 work-
hours and parts would cost $3,080 for a cost of $3,250 per blade.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed, I certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent that
it justifies making a regulatory distinction; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply
with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
Reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
[[Page 23831]]
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
Robinson Helicopter Company: Product No. FAA-2017-0947; Product
Identifier 2017-SW-059-AD.
(a) Applicability
This AD applies to Robinson Helicopter Company (Robinson) Model
R44 and R44 II helicopters, certificated in any category, with a
tail rotor blade part number (P/N) C029-1 or P/N C029-2 installed.
(b) Unsafe Condition
This AD defines the unsafe condition as a crack in a tail rotor
blade. This condition could result in the loss of the tail rotor and
subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
(c) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by July 23, 2018.
(d) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each action required by this
AD within the specified compliance time unless it has already been
accomplished prior to that time.
(e) Required Actions
Within 50 hours TIS after the effective date of this AD and
thereafter before each flight:
(1) Visually check each tail rotor blade for a crack in the tail
leading edge, paying particular attention to the area in the most
inboard white paint stripe. Wipe the blades clean, if necessary, to
ensure any potential crack is visible. The actions required by this
paragraph may be performed by the owner/operator (pilot) holding at
least a private pilot certificate and must be entered into the
aircraft records showing compliance with this AD in accordance with
14 CFR 43.9(a)(1) through (4) and 14 CFR 91.417(a)(2)(v). The record
must be maintained as required by 14 CFR 91.417, 121.380, or
135.439.
(2) If there is a crack, before further flight, replace the tail
rotor blade.
(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOC)
(1) The Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, may approve AMOCs
for this AD. Send your proposal to: James Guo, Aerospace Engineer,
Los Angeles ACO Branch, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, FAA,
3960 Paramount Blvd., Lakewood, California 90712; telephone (562)
627-5357; email [email protected].
(2) For operations conducted under a 14 CFR part 119 operating
certificate or under 14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that you
notify your principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office before operating any aircraft
complying with this AD through an AMOC.
(g) Additional Information
Robinson Helicopter Company R44 Service Bulletin SB-83, dated
May 30, 2012, which is not incorporated by reference, contains
additional information about the subject of this AD. For service
information identified in this AD, contact Robinson Helicopter
Company, 2901 Airport Drive, Torrance, CA 90505; telephone (310)
539-0508; fax (310) 539-5198; or at https://www.robinsonheli.com/servelib.htm. You may review a copy of information at the FAA,
Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood
Pkwy., Room 6N-321, Fort Worth, TX 76177.
(h) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code: 6410, Tail Rotor
Blades.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on May 14, 2018.
Scott A. Horn,
Deputy Director for Regulatory Operations, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-10919 Filed 5-22-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P