Alaska; Hunting and Trapping in National Preserves, 23621-23624 [2018-10735]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 22, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, visit https://
www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in the docket, and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
website’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:16 May 21, 2018
Jkt 244001
2. In § 165.164, revise paragraph (a)(3)
to read as follows:
(a) * * *
(3) Marine Air Terminal, LaGuardia
Airport Security Zone: All waters of
Bowery Bay, Queens, New York, inside
of a line drawn from the start of the
Rikers Island Bridge in Queens at
approximate position 40°46′37″ N,
073°53′30″ W to the intersecting point
on the southern side of Rikers Island at
approximate position 40°47′12″ N,
073°53′06″ W, then a line drawn east to
the western end of LaGuardia Airport at
approximate position 40°47′00″ N,
073°52′44″ W, then a line drawn south
following the shoreline back to the point
of origin at 40°46′37″ N, 073°53′30″ W
(NAD 1983).
■
Dated: May 7, 2018.
M.H. Day,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port New York.
[FR Doc. 2018–10899 Filed 5–21–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
36 CFR Part 13
[NPS–AKRO–25579; PPAKAKROZ5,
PPMPRLE1Y.L00000]
RIN 1024–AE38
Alaska; Hunting and Trapping in
National Preserves
National Park Service, Interior.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The National Park Service
proposes to amend its regulations for
sport hunting and trapping in national
preserves in Alaska. This proposed rule
would remove a regulatory provision
issued by the National Park Service in
2015 that prohibited certain sport
hunting practices that are otherwise
permitted by the State of Alaska. These
proposed changes are consistent with
Secretary of the Interior Orders 3347
and 3356.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule
must be received by 11:59 p.m. EST on
July 23, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Regulation Identifier
Number (RIN) 1024–AE38, by either of
the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail or hand deliver to: National
Park Service, Regional Director, Alaska
Regional Office, 240 West 5th Ave.,
Anchorage, AK 99501.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
23621
• Instructions: Comments will not be
accepted by fax, email, or in any way
other than those specified above. All
submissions received must include the
words ‘‘National Park Service’’ or
‘‘NPS’’ and must include the docket
number or RIN (1024–AE38) for this
rulemaking. Comments received will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
• Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Herbert C. Frost, Regional Director,
Alaska Regional Office, 240 West 5th
Ave., Anchorage, AK 99501. Phone
(907) 644–3510. Email: AKR_
Regulations@nps.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On October 23, 2015, the National
Park Service (NPS) published a final
rule (Final Rule) to amend its
regulations for sport hunting and
trapping in national preserves in Alaska
(80 FR 64325). The Final Rule codified
prohibitions on certain types of harvest
practices that are otherwise permitted
by the State of Alaska. The practices are:
Taking any black bear, including cubs
and sows with cubs, with artificial light
at den sites; harvesting brown bears over
bait; taking wolves and coyotes
(including pups) during the denning
season (between May 1 and August 9);
taking swimming caribou; taking
caribou from motorboats under power;
taking black bears over bait; and using
dogs to hunt black bears. This rule is
inconsistent with State of Alaska’s
hunting regulations found at 5 AAC Part
85.
Since the publication of the Final
Rule, the Secretary of the Interior issued
two Secretarial Orders regarding how
the Department of the Interior should
manage recreational hunting and
trapping in the lands and waters it
administers, and directing greater
collaboration with state, tribe, and
territorial partners in doing so.
On March 2, 2017, Secretary Zinke
signed Secretarial Order 3347,
Conservation Stewardship and Outdoor
Recreation. Part of the stated purpose of
Secretarial Order 3347 is to increase
outdoor recreation and improve the
management of game species and their
habitat. Secretarial Order 3347 directs
the Department of the Interior to
identify specific actions to (1) expand
access significantly for recreational
hunting and fishing on public lands;
and (2) improve recreational hunting
E:\FR\FM\22MYP1.SGM
22MYP1
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
23622
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 22, 2018 / Proposed Rules
and fishing cooperation, consultation,
and communication with state wildlife
managers.
On September 15, 2017, Secretary
Zinke signed Secretarial Order 3356,
Hunting, Fishing, Recreational
Shooting, and Wildlife Conservation
Opportunities and Coordination with
State, Tribes, and Territories. Part of the
stated purpose of Secretarial Order 3356
is to increase outdoor recreation
opportunities for all Americans in
greater collaboration with state partners,
including opportunities to hunt.
Secretarial Order 3356 directs the NPS
to (1) identify whether hunting
opportunities on Department lands
could be expanded; (2) work
cooperatively with state wildlife
agencies to enhance their access to
Department lands for wildlife
management actions; (3) work
cooperatively with state wildlife
agencies to ensure that hunting
regulations for Department lands and
waters complement the regulations on
the surrounding lands and waters; and
(4) work in close coordination and
cooperation with the appropriate state
wildlife agency to begin the necessary
process to modify regulations in order to
advance shared wildlife conservation
goals/objectives that align predator
management programs, seasons, and
methods of take permitted on all
Department-managed lands and waters
with corresponding programs, seasons,
and methods established by state
wildlife management agencies.
The purpose of this proposed rule is
to align sport hunting regulations in
national preserves in Alaska with State
of Alaska regulations and to enhance
consistency with harvest regulations on
surrounding non-federal lands and
waters in furtherance of Secretarial
Orders 3347 and 3356. The proposed
rule would apply the State of Alaska’s
hunting regulations to national preserve
lands, with limited exceptions found
elsewhere in NPS regulations. See, e.g.,
36 CFR 13.42(d).
The 2015 Final Rule prohibits the
hunting practices otherwise permitted
by the State of Alaska because NPS
found those practices: (1) To have intent
or potential to alter or manipulate
natural predator-prey dynamics, and
associated natural ecological processes
for the purpose of increasing harvest of
ungulates by man; (2) to adversely
impact public safety; or (3) to be
inconsistent with federal law
authorizing sport hunting in national
preserves in Alaska. However, states
have primary jurisdiction to manage
wildlife throughout their state. In
addition, NPS has broad discretion in
managing wildlife on national preserves
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:16 May 21, 2018
Jkt 244001
under applicable laws, policies, and
regulations.
Taking into account the Secretarial
Orders described above, NPS has reconsidered its earlier conclusions and
determined that these previously
prohibited practices can be allowed
consistent with the goal of aligning its
rules with those of the State. Allowing
these practices is consistent with NPS
Management Policy 4.4.3 which
provides that NPS does not allow
activities to reduce the numbers of
native species for the purpose of
increasing the numbers of harvested
species. The discussion in the 2015 rule
of an action’s ‘‘intent or potential’’ to
manipulate predator dynamics goes
beyond the plain language of section
4.4.3 of Management Policies.
Additionally, the State of Alaska
disputes that the hunting methods and
seasons (allowed by the state but
prohibited by current NPS regulations)
are intended to function as a predator
control program. Rather, the State
asserts the hunting regulations are
intended to provide opportunity for
harvests of wolves, coyotes, bears, and
other species as requested by the public.
The State also maintains that any effects
to the natural abundances, diversities,
distributions, densities, age-class
distributions, populations, habitats,
genetics, and behaviors of wildlife from
implementing its regulations are likely
negligible. As noted below, NPS will
prepare an environmental assessment
for this regulation to determine whether
it will have any significant impacts on
wildlife or other resources.
With respect to the practices that NPS
previously determined to be
inconsistent with federal law
authorizing harvest for sport purposes
in national preserves in Alaska, no
applicable federal law or regulation
defines ‘‘sport hunting.’’ With regard to
NPS’s statement in the 2015 rule that
baiting poses an increased public safety
risk, the State of Alaska’s position is
that baiting does not cause bears to
become food-conditioned, and therefore
a greater safety concern.
Proposed Rule
For the above stated reasons, the NPS
proposes to remove paragraphs (f) and
(g) of 36 CFR 13.42. Paragraph (f) states
that State of Alaska management actions
or laws or regulations that authorize
taking of wildlife are not adopted in
park areas if they are related to predator
reduction efforts, which is defined as
efforts with the intent or potential to
alter or manipulate natural predatorprey dynamics and associated natural
ecological processes, in order to
increase harvest of ungulates by
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
humans. Paragraph (g) sets forth a table
of prohibited methods of taking wildlife
for sport purposes in national preserves
in Alaska. Most of these prohibited
methods are also prohibited by the State
of Alaska. Some of them, however,
conflict with authorizations by the State
of Alaska as explained above. The NPS
believes that removing paragraphs (f)
and (g) would implement the directive
announced in Secretarial Orders 3347
and 3356 by increasing hunting
opportunities in national preserves and
promoting consistency between federal
regulations and state wildlife harvest
regulations. In addition, the proposed
rule would remove the definitions of
‘‘Big game’’, ‘‘Cub bear’’, ‘‘Fur animal’’,
and ‘‘Furbearer’’ from section 13.1
because those terms are only used in
paragraphs (f) and (g).
Compliance With Other Laws,
Executive Orders and Department
Policy
Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs in the Office of Management and
Budget will review all significant rules.
The Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has determined that
this rule is not significant.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the
principles of Executive Order 12866
while calling for improvements in the
nation’s regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty,
and to use the best, most innovative,
and least burdensome tools for
achieving regulatory ends. The
executive order directs agencies to
consider regulatory approaches that
reduce burdens and maintain flexibility
and freedom of choice for the public
where these approaches are relevant,
feasible, and consistent with regulatory
objectives. Executive Order 13563
emphasizes further that regulations
must be based on the best available
science and that the rulemaking process
must allow for public participation and
an open exchange of ideas. The NPS has
developed this rule in a manner
consistent with these requirements.
Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs (Executive Order
13771)
This rule is not an E.O. 13771
regulatory action because this rule is not
significant under Executive Order
12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule will not have a significant
economic effect on a substantial number
of small entities under the Regulatory
E:\FR\FM\22MYP1.SGM
22MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 22, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
This certification is based on the costbenefit and regulatory flexibility
analyses found in the report entitled
‘‘Cost-Benefit and Regulatory Flexibility
Analyses: Proposed Revisions to Sport
Hunting and Trapping Regulations in
National Preserves in Alaska’’ which
can be viewed online at https://
parkplanning.nps.gov/akro.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule:
(a) Does not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more.
(b) Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, federal, state, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions.
(c) Does not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)
This rule does not impose an
unfunded mandate on state, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of more than $100 million per year. The
rule does not have a significant or
unique effect on state, local or tribal
governments or the private sector. It
addresses public use of national park
lands, and imposes no requirements on
other agencies or governments. A
statement containing the information
required by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act is not required.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
This rule does not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
takings implications under Executive
Order 12630. A takings implication
assessment is not required.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
Under the criteria in section 1 of
Executive Order 13132, the rule does
not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant the preparation
of a Federalism summary impact
statement. This proposed rule only
affects use of federally-administered
lands and waters. It has no outside
effects on other areas. A Federalism
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:16 May 21, 2018
Jkt 244001
23623
summary impact statement is not
required.
Effects on the Energy Supply (Executive
Order 13211)
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order
12988)
This rule is not a significant energy
action under the definition in Executive
Order 13211. A Statement of Energy
Effects in not required.
This rule complies with the
requirements of Executive Order 12988.
This rule:
(a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a)
requiring that all regulations be
reviewed to eliminate errors and
ambiguity and be written to minimize
litigation; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2)
requiring that all regulations be written
in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
Consultation With Indian Tribes
(Executive Order 13175 and
Department Policy)
The Department of the Interior strives
to strengthen its government-to
government relationship with Indian
Tribes through a commitment to
consultation with Indian Tribes and
recognition of their right to selfgovernance and tribal sovereignty. We
have evaluated this rule under the
criteria in Executive Order 13175 and
under the Department’s tribal
consultation and Alaska Native Claims
Settlement Act (ANCSA) Native
Corporation policies and have
determined that the rule may have
substantial direct effect on federally
recognized Indian tribes. The NPS has
invited Alaska native tribes and
corporations to consult on the proposed
rule and has consulted with those tribes
and corporations that have requested
consultation.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain
information collection requirements,
and a submission to the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act is not
required. The NPS may not conduct or
sponsor and you are not required to
respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
National Environmental Policy Act
NPS will prepare an environmental
assessment to determine whether this
rule will have a significant impact on
the quality of the human environment
under the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA).
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Clarity of This Rule
The NPS is required by Executive
Orders 12866 (section 1(b)(12)) and
12988 (section 3(b)(1)(B)), and 13563
(section 1(a)), and by the Presidential
Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write
all rules in plain language. This means
that each rule the NPS publishes must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address
readers directly;
(c) Use common, everyday words and
clear language rather than jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and
sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever
possible.
If you feel that the NPS has not met
these requirements, send the NPS
comments by one of the methods listed
in the ADDRESSES section. To better help
the NPS revise the rule, your comments
should be as specific as possible. For
example, you should identify the
numbers of the sections or paragraphs
that you find unclear, which sections or
sentences are too long, the sections
where you feel lists or tables would be
useful, etc.
Public Participation
It is the policy of the Department of
the Interior, whenever practicable, to
afford the public an opportunity to
participate in the rulemaking process.
Accordingly, interested persons may
submit written comments regarding this
proposed rule by one of the methods
listed in the ADDRESSES section of this
document.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask the NPS in your
comment to withhold your personal
identifying information from public
review, the NPS cannot guarantee that it
will be able to do so.
E:\FR\FM\22MYP1.SGM
22MYP1
23624
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 22, 2018 / Proposed Rules
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 13
Alaska, National Parks, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
In consideration of the foregoing, the
National Park Service proposes to
amend 36 CFR part 13 as set forth
below:
PART 13—NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM
UNITS IN ALASKA
1. The authority citation for part 13
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 3124; 54 U.S.C.
100101, 100751, 320102; Sec. 13.1204 also
issued under Sec. 1035, Pub. L. 104–333, 110
Stat. 4240.
§ 13.1
[Amended]
2. In § 13.1 remove the definitions of
‘‘Big game’’, ‘‘Cub bear’’, ‘‘Fur animal’’,
and ‘‘Furbearer’’.
■
§ 13.42
[Amended]
3. In § 13.42, remove and reserve
paragraphs (f) and (g).
■
David L. Bernhardt,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–10735 Filed 5–21–18; 8:45 am]
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
BILLING CODE 4310–EJ–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:16 May 21, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\22MYP1.SGM
22MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 22, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 23621-23624]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-10735]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
36 CFR Part 13
[NPS-AKRO-25579; PPAKAKROZ5, PPMPRLE1Y.L00000]
RIN 1024-AE38
Alaska; Hunting and Trapping in National Preserves
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Park Service proposes to amend its regulations
for sport hunting and trapping in national preserves in Alaska. This
proposed rule would remove a regulatory provision issued by the
National Park Service in 2015 that prohibited certain sport hunting
practices that are otherwise permitted by the State of Alaska. These
proposed changes are consistent with Secretary of the Interior Orders
3347 and 3356.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule must be received by 11:59 p.m. EST
on July 23, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Regulation Identifier
Number (RIN) 1024-AE38, by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail or hand deliver to: National Park Service, Regional
Director, Alaska Regional Office, 240 West 5th Ave., Anchorage, AK
99501.
Instructions: Comments will not be accepted by fax, email,
or in any way other than those specified above. All submissions
received must include the words ``National Park Service'' or ``NPS''
and must include the docket number or RIN (1024-AE38) for this
rulemaking. Comments received will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background
documents or comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Herbert C. Frost, Regional Director,
Alaska Regional Office, 240 West 5th Ave., Anchorage, AK 99501. Phone
(907) 644-3510. Email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On October 23, 2015, the National Park Service (NPS) published a
final rule (Final Rule) to amend its regulations for sport hunting and
trapping in national preserves in Alaska (80 FR 64325). The Final Rule
codified prohibitions on certain types of harvest practices that are
otherwise permitted by the State of Alaska. The practices are: Taking
any black bear, including cubs and sows with cubs, with artificial
light at den sites; harvesting brown bears over bait; taking wolves and
coyotes (including pups) during the denning season (between May 1 and
August 9); taking swimming caribou; taking caribou from motorboats
under power; taking black bears over bait; and using dogs to hunt black
bears. This rule is inconsistent with State of Alaska's hunting
regulations found at 5 AAC Part 85.
Since the publication of the Final Rule, the Secretary of the
Interior issued two Secretarial Orders regarding how the Department of
the Interior should manage recreational hunting and trapping in the
lands and waters it administers, and directing greater collaboration
with state, tribe, and territorial partners in doing so.
On March 2, 2017, Secretary Zinke signed Secretarial Order 3347,
Conservation Stewardship and Outdoor Recreation. Part of the stated
purpose of Secretarial Order 3347 is to increase outdoor recreation and
improve the management of game species and their habitat. Secretarial
Order 3347 directs the Department of the Interior to identify specific
actions to (1) expand access significantly for recreational hunting and
fishing on public lands; and (2) improve recreational hunting
[[Page 23622]]
and fishing cooperation, consultation, and communication with state
wildlife managers.
On September 15, 2017, Secretary Zinke signed Secretarial Order
3356, Hunting, Fishing, Recreational Shooting, and Wildlife
Conservation Opportunities and Coordination with State, Tribes, and
Territories. Part of the stated purpose of Secretarial Order 3356 is to
increase outdoor recreation opportunities for all Americans in greater
collaboration with state partners, including opportunities to hunt.
Secretarial Order 3356 directs the NPS to (1) identify whether hunting
opportunities on Department lands could be expanded; (2) work
cooperatively with state wildlife agencies to enhance their access to
Department lands for wildlife management actions; (3) work
cooperatively with state wildlife agencies to ensure that hunting
regulations for Department lands and waters complement the regulations
on the surrounding lands and waters; and (4) work in close coordination
and cooperation with the appropriate state wildlife agency to begin the
necessary process to modify regulations in order to advance shared
wildlife conservation goals/objectives that align predator management
programs, seasons, and methods of take permitted on all Department-
managed lands and waters with corresponding programs, seasons, and
methods established by state wildlife management agencies.
The purpose of this proposed rule is to align sport hunting
regulations in national preserves in Alaska with State of Alaska
regulations and to enhance consistency with harvest regulations on
surrounding non-federal lands and waters in furtherance of Secretarial
Orders 3347 and 3356. The proposed rule would apply the State of
Alaska's hunting regulations to national preserve lands, with limited
exceptions found elsewhere in NPS regulations. See, e.g., 36 CFR
13.42(d).
The 2015 Final Rule prohibits the hunting practices otherwise
permitted by the State of Alaska because NPS found those practices: (1)
To have intent or potential to alter or manipulate natural predator-
prey dynamics, and associated natural ecological processes for the
purpose of increasing harvest of ungulates by man; (2) to adversely
impact public safety; or (3) to be inconsistent with federal law
authorizing sport hunting in national preserves in Alaska. However,
states have primary jurisdiction to manage wildlife throughout their
state. In addition, NPS has broad discretion in managing wildlife on
national preserves under applicable laws, policies, and regulations.
Taking into account the Secretarial Orders described above, NPS has
re-considered its earlier conclusions and determined that these
previously prohibited practices can be allowed consistent with the goal
of aligning its rules with those of the State. Allowing these practices
is consistent with NPS Management Policy 4.4.3 which provides that NPS
does not allow activities to reduce the numbers of native species for
the purpose of increasing the numbers of harvested species. The
discussion in the 2015 rule of an action's ``intent or potential'' to
manipulate predator dynamics goes beyond the plain language of section
4.4.3 of Management Policies. Additionally, the State of Alaska
disputes that the hunting methods and seasons (allowed by the state but
prohibited by current NPS regulations) are intended to function as a
predator control program. Rather, the State asserts the hunting
regulations are intended to provide opportunity for harvests of wolves,
coyotes, bears, and other species as requested by the public. The State
also maintains that any effects to the natural abundances, diversities,
distributions, densities, age-class distributions, populations,
habitats, genetics, and behaviors of wildlife from implementing its
regulations are likely negligible. As noted below, NPS will prepare an
environmental assessment for this regulation to determine whether it
will have any significant impacts on wildlife or other resources.
With respect to the practices that NPS previously determined to be
inconsistent with federal law authorizing harvest for sport purposes in
national preserves in Alaska, no applicable federal law or regulation
defines ``sport hunting.'' With regard to NPS's statement in the 2015
rule that baiting poses an increased public safety risk, the State of
Alaska's position is that baiting does not cause bears to become food-
conditioned, and therefore a greater safety concern.
Proposed Rule
For the above stated reasons, the NPS proposes to remove paragraphs
(f) and (g) of 36 CFR 13.42. Paragraph (f) states that State of Alaska
management actions or laws or regulations that authorize taking of
wildlife are not adopted in park areas if they are related to predator
reduction efforts, which is defined as efforts with the intent or
potential to alter or manipulate natural predator-prey dynamics and
associated natural ecological processes, in order to increase harvest
of ungulates by humans. Paragraph (g) sets forth a table of prohibited
methods of taking wildlife for sport purposes in national preserves in
Alaska. Most of these prohibited methods are also prohibited by the
State of Alaska. Some of them, however, conflict with authorizations by
the State of Alaska as explained above. The NPS believes that removing
paragraphs (f) and (g) would implement the directive announced in
Secretarial Orders 3347 and 3356 by increasing hunting opportunities in
national preserves and promoting consistency between federal
regulations and state wildlife harvest regulations. In addition, the
proposed rule would remove the definitions of ``Big game'', ``Cub
bear'', ``Fur animal'', and ``Furbearer'' from section 13.1 because
those terms are only used in paragraphs (f) and (g).
Compliance With Other Laws, Executive Orders and Department Policy
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs in the Office of Management and Budget will review
all significant rules. The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has determined that this rule is not significant.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the principles of Executive Order
12866 while calling for improvements in the nation's regulatory system
to promote predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best,
most innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory
ends. The executive order directs agencies to consider regulatory
approaches that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of
choice for the public where these approaches are relevant, feasible,
and consistent with regulatory objectives. Executive Order 13563
emphasizes further that regulations must be based on the best available
science and that the rulemaking process must allow for public
participation and an open exchange of ideas. The NPS has developed this
rule in a manner consistent with these requirements.
Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs (Executive Order
13771)
This rule is not an E.O. 13771 regulatory action because this rule
is not significant under Executive Order 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule will not have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
[[Page 23623]]
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). This certification is based on
the cost-benefit and regulatory flexibility analyses found in the
report entitled ``Cost-Benefit and Regulatory Flexibility Analyses:
Proposed Revisions to Sport Hunting and Trapping Regulations in
National Preserves in Alaska'' which can be viewed online at https://parkplanning.nps.gov/akro.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule:
(a) Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million
or more.
(b) Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, federal, state, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions.
(c) Does not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)
This rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on state, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100 million per
year. The rule does not have a significant or unique effect on state,
local or tribal governments or the private sector. It addresses public
use of national park lands, and imposes no requirements on other
agencies or governments. A statement containing the information
required by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act is not required.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
This rule does not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have takings implications under Executive Order 12630. A takings
implication assessment is not required.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
Under the criteria in section 1 of Executive Order 13132, the rule
does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism summary impact statement. This proposed
rule only affects use of federally-administered lands and waters. It
has no outside effects on other areas. A Federalism summary impact
statement is not required.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order 12988)
This rule complies with the requirements of Executive Order 12988.
This rule:
(a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all
regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and ambiguity and be
written to minimize litigation; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all
regulations be written in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
Consultation With Indian Tribes (Executive Order 13175 and Department
Policy)
The Department of the Interior strives to strengthen its
government-to government relationship with Indian Tribes through a
commitment to consultation with Indian Tribes and recognition of their
right to self-governance and tribal sovereignty. We have evaluated this
rule under the criteria in Executive Order 13175 and under the
Department's tribal consultation and Alaska Native Claims Settlement
Act (ANCSA) Native Corporation policies and have determined that the
rule may have substantial direct effect on federally recognized Indian
tribes. The NPS has invited Alaska native tribes and corporations to
consult on the proposed rule and has consulted with those tribes and
corporations that have requested consultation.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain information collection requirements, and
a submission to the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork
Reduction Act is not required. The NPS may not conduct or sponsor and
you are not required to respond to a collection of information unless
it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
National Environmental Policy Act
NPS will prepare an environmental assessment to determine whether
this rule will have a significant impact on the quality of the human
environment under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA).
Effects on the Energy Supply (Executive Order 13211)
This rule is not a significant energy action under the definition
in Executive Order 13211. A Statement of Energy Effects in not
required.
Clarity of This Rule
The NPS is required by Executive Orders 12866 (section 1(b)(12))
and 12988 (section 3(b)(1)(B)), and 13563 (section 1(a)), and by the
Presidential Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write all rules in plain
language. This means that each rule the NPS publishes must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address readers directly;
(c) Use common, everyday words and clear language rather than
jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever possible.
If you feel that the NPS has not met these requirements, send the
NPS comments by one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section. To
better help the NPS revise the rule, your comments should be as
specific as possible. For example, you should identify the numbers of
the sections or paragraphs that you find unclear, which sections or
sentences are too long, the sections where you feel lists or tables
would be useful, etc.
Public Participation
It is the policy of the Department of the Interior, whenever
practicable, to afford the public an opportunity to participate in the
rulemaking process. Accordingly, interested persons may submit written
comments regarding this proposed rule by one of the methods listed in
the ADDRESSES section of this document.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask the NPS in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, the NPS cannot guarantee that it will
be able to do so.
[[Page 23624]]
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 13
Alaska, National Parks, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
In consideration of the foregoing, the National Park Service
proposes to amend 36 CFR part 13 as set forth below:
PART 13--NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM UNITS IN ALASKA
0
1. The authority citation for part 13 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 3124; 54 U.S.C. 100101, 100751, 320102;
Sec. 13.1204 also issued under Sec. 1035, Pub. L. 104-333, 110 Stat.
4240.
Sec. 13.1 [Amended]
0
2. In Sec. 13.1 remove the definitions of ``Big game'', ``Cub bear'',
``Fur animal'', and ``Furbearer''.
Sec. 13.42 [Amended]
0
3. In Sec. 13.42, remove and reserve paragraphs (f) and (g).
David L. Bernhardt,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-10735 Filed 5-21-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-EJ-P