Draft Environmental Assessment for the Potential Issuance of a Bald Eagle Take Permit for Courtenay Wind Farm, Stutsman County, ND, 23288-23289 [2018-10629]

Download as PDF 23288 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 97 / Friday, May 18, 2018 / Notices AGENCY: as Xcel Energy (applicant), for a 5-year take permit for bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) under the Eagle Act. The applicant would implement a conservation program to avoid and minimize the project’s impacts to eagles, as described in the applicant’s Eagle Conservation Plan. We invite public comment on the DEA. DATES: To ensure consideration, please send your written comments by June 18, 2018. ADDRESSES: To request further information or submit written comments, please use one of the following methods, and note that your information request or comments are in reference to the Courtenay Wind Farm DEA: • Internet: Documents may be viewed on the internet at https://www.fws.gov/ mountain-prairie/wind/. • Email: FW6WindEnergy@fws.gov. Include ‘‘Courtenay Wind Farm DEA’’ in the subject line of the message. • U.S. Mail: Courtenay Wind Farm DEA, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Mountain-Prairie Region, Attention: Hillary White, P.O. Box 25486 DFC, Denver, CO 80225. • Hand-Delivery/Courier: Courtenay Wind Farm DEA, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Mountain-Prairie Region, Attention: Hillary White, 134 Union Blvd., Lakewood, CO 80228. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hillary White, Migratory Bird Program, at FW6WindEnergy@fws.gov (email) or 303–236–4770 (telephone); or Brian Smith, at FW6WindEnergy@fws.gov (email) or 303–236–4403 (telephone). Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf may call the Federal Relay Service at 1–800–877–8339 to contact the above individuals. The Federal Relay Service is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, for you to leave a message or question for the above individuals. You will receive a reply during normal business hours. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announces the availability of a draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for the potential issuance of a take permit for bald eagles pursuant to the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (Eagle Act), in association with the operation of the Courtenay Wind Farm (project) in Stutsman County, North Dakota. The DEA was prepared in response to an application from Northern States Power Company—Minnesota, doing business Introduction The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is considering an application under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668a–d; Eagle Act) for a bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) take permit from Northern States Power Company— Minnesota, doing business as Xcel Energy (applicant), for a 5-year take permit for bald eagles under the 2009 regulations (74 FR 46836, September 11, 2009). The Service published changes to eagle permitting regulations (81 FR 91494, December 16, 2016), which took effect on January 15, 2017. Applicants a. United States Police Canine Association (USPCA), b. North American Police Working Dog Association (NAPWDA), c. International Police Working Dog Association (IPWDA), d. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), Department of Defense (DoD), or other Federal government agencies, e. TSA, or f. Similar organization that TSA approves as having a commensurate level of certifications for the purpose of the 3PK9–CP. 6. Can provide 3PK9–C certifications at air cargo/shipping locations throughout the United States as defined in 49 CFR part 1500.3. 7. Must have capability to video record certification events and maintain recordings in digital format for a minimum of two years. 8. Must ensure the applicant will not conduct assessments for which there exists a conflict of interest as defined in the 3PK9–C Certifier Order. Interested persons can obtain a copy of the application instructions by submitting a request for information to the email address noted under ADDRESSES. Dated: May 14, 2018. Kimberly Walton, Chief of Mission Support. [FR Doc. 2018–10636 Filed 5–17–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110–05–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service [FWS–R6–MB–2017–N185; FF06M00000– XXX–FRMB48720660190] Draft Environmental Assessment for the Potential Issuance of a Bald Eagle Take Permit for Courtenay Wind Farm, Stutsman County, ND Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of availability. daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:38 May 17, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 who submitted permit applications before July 14, 2017, may choose to be considered for issuance of an eagle take permit under either the original 2009 regulations or the 2016 revised regulations (81 FR 91494). The applicant submitted the permit application on April 11, 2016, and has chosen to be considered under the 2009 regulations. The project is an existing operational wind facility in Stutsman County, North Dakota. The application includes an Eagle Conservation Plan (ECP) as the foundation of the applicant’s permit application. The ECP describes actions that have been taken, as well as proposed future actions, to avoid and minimize adverse effects on eagles. We have prepared this DEA to evaluate the impacts of issuing or not issuing the eagle take permit for compliance with our Eagle Act permitting regulations in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 50 CFR 22.26, as well as impacts of implementing the supporting ECP, which is included as an appendix to the DEA. Background The Eagle Act allows us to authorize bald eagle take ‘‘for the protection . . . of agricultural or other interests in any particular locality.’’ The 2009 regulations authorize the limited take of bald eagles under the Eagle Act, where the take to be authorized is associated with otherwise lawful activities (74 FR 46836). The Eagle Act’s implementing regulations define ‘‘take’’ as to ‘‘pursue, shoot, shoot at, poison, wound, kill, capture, trap, collect, destroy, molest, or disturb’’ individuals, their nests and eggs (50 CFR 22.3); and ‘‘disturb’’ is further defined as ‘‘to agitate or bother a bald or golden eagle to a degree that causes . . . (1) injury to an eagle, . . . (2) a decrease in its productivity, . . . or (3) nest abandonment’’ (50 CFR 22.3). The project is predicted to result in recurring bald eagle mortalities over the life of the project, so the appropriate type of take permit is the permit under 50 CFR 22.26. We may consider issuance of eagle take permits if (1) the incidental take is necessary to protect legitimate interests; (2) the take is compatible with the preservation standard of the Eagle Act— providing for stable or increasing breeding populations; and (3) the take has been avoided and minimized to the degree achievable through implementation of Advanced Compensation Practices, and the remaining take is unavoidable. The Service must determine that the direct and indirect effects of the take, together E:\FR\FM\18MYN1.SGM 18MYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 97 / Friday, May 18, 2018 / Notices with the cumulative effects of other permitted take and additional factors affecting eagle populations, are compatible with the preservation of bald eagles and golden eagles. Proposed Action The permit applicant, Northern States Power Company—Minnesota, doing business as Xcel Energy, is operating an approximately 200.5-megatwatt commercial wind energy facility in Stutsman County, North Dakota. The 100-turbine project, sited entirely on private land, became operational on December 1, 2016. The applicant developed an ECP based on our guidance contained in the Eagle Conservation Plan Guidance Module 1: Land-Based Wind Energy Version 2 (Service 2013) (ECP Guidance) (https://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/ pdf/management/eagleconservation planguidance.pdf). As recommended in the Service’s ECP Guidance, the applicant’s plan outlines avoidance and minimization measures, contains a risk assessment, and includes advanced conservation practices and adaptive management. The applicant submitted the ECP as part of the permit application, and if we issue the permit, then the conservation commitments would become conditions of the permit. The Service independently evaluated the risk of bald eagle fatalities from project operations and compared that risk to the conservation measures to which the applicant committed. We used our Collision Risk Model to estimate the number of annual bald eagle fatalities resulting from operation and maintenance of the project. This is an essential step in the Service’s evaluation of an application for a permit for take of eagles because issuing criteria require permitted take to comply with the Eagle Act’s preservation standard. In the DEA, we evaluate the risk and offsetting conservation measures, and the implications for direct, indirect, and cumulative effects of issuing a permit and a No Action alternative. daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES National Environmental Policy Act Compliance Our consideration of whether or not to issue a 5-year ETP is an action subject to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Our DEA analyzes the risk of bald eagle take associated with operation and maintenance of the project, and assesses the potential effects of permit issuance and a No Action alternative (i.e., do not issue an ETP) on the human and natural environment. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:38 May 17, 2018 Jkt 244001 23289 Public Comments DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR We invite public comment on the proposed DEA. If you wish, you may submit comments by any one of the methods discussed in ADDRESSES. We will consider public comments on the DEA when making the final determination on NEPA compliance and permit issuance. Fish and Wildlife Service Public Availability of Comments All comments and materials we receive become part of the public record associated with this action. Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. All submissions from organizations or businesses, and from individuals identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations or businesses, and from individuals identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations or businesses, will be made available for public disclosure in their entirety. Next Steps The public process for the proposed Federal permit action will be completed after the public comment period, at which time we will evaluate the permit application and comments submitted thereupon to determine whether the application meets the permitting requirements under the Eagle Act, applicable regulations, and NEPA requirements. Upon completion of that evaluation, we will select our course of action. Authority We provide this notice under section 668a of the Eagle Act (16 U.S.C. 668– 668d) and the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and its implementing regulations (40 CFR 1506.6 and 43 CFR 46.300). Matt Hogan, Deputy Regional Director, USFWS MountainPrairie Region, Lakewood, Colorado. [FR Doc. 2018–10629 Filed 5–17–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4333–15–P PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 [FWS–R8–R–2018–N008; FF08RSDC00– 189–F1611MD–FXRS12610800000] Otay River Estuary Restoration Project, South San Diego Bay Unit of the San Diego Bay National Wildlife Refuge, California; Final Environmental Impact Statement Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of availability; final environmental impact statement. AGENCY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, announce the availability of a final environmental impact statement (EIS) for a proposed project to restore coastal wetlands at the south end of San Diego Bay. The Otay River Estuary Restoration Project is located within the South San Diego Bay Unit of the San Diego Bay National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) in San Diego County, California. This notice advises the public that the final EIS is now available to the public. The final EIS describes the alternatives identified to restore two portions of the South San Diego Bay Unit of the San Diego Bay NWR to coastal wetlands to benefit native fish, wildlife, and plant species. ADDRESSES: Document Availability: You may obtain copies of the EIS and related documents in the following places: • Internet: https://www.fws.gov/ refuge/San_Diego_Bay/what_we_do/ Resource_Management/Otay_ Restoration.html. • In Person: Æ San Diego National Wildlife Refuge Complex Headquarters, 1080 Gunpowder Point Drive, Chula Vista, CA 91910; telephone: 619–476–9150, extension 103. Æ Chula Vista Public Library, Civic Center Branch, 365 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910; telephone: 619–691– 5069. Æ San Diego County Library, Imperial Beach Branch Library, 810 Imperial Beach Blvd. Imperial Beach, CA 91932; telephone: 619–424–6981. Æ Chula Vista Public Library, South Chula Vista Branch, 389 Orange Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91911; telephone: 619–585–5755. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Collins, Refuge Manager, San Diego Bay National Wildlife Refuge at 619–575–2704, extension 302 (telephone) or brian_collins@fws.gov (email); or Andy Yuen, Project Leader, 619–476–9150, extension 100 (telephone), or andy_yuen@fws.gov (email). SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\18MYN1.SGM 18MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 97 (Friday, May 18, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23288-23289]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-10629]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

[FWS-R6-MB-2017-N185; FF06M00000-XXX-FRMB48720660190]


Draft Environmental Assessment for the Potential Issuance of a 
Bald Eagle Take Permit for Courtenay Wind Farm, Stutsman County, ND

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announces the availability 
of a draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) under the National 
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for the potential issuance of a take 
permit for bald eagles pursuant to the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection 
Act (Eagle Act), in association with the operation of the Courtenay 
Wind Farm (project) in Stutsman County, North Dakota. The DEA was 
prepared in response to an application from Northern States Power 
Company--Minnesota, doing business as Xcel Energy (applicant), for a 5-
year take permit for bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) under the 
Eagle Act. The applicant would implement a conservation program to 
avoid and minimize the project's impacts to eagles, as described in the 
applicant's Eagle Conservation Plan. We invite public comment on the 
DEA.

DATES: To ensure consideration, please send your written comments by 
June 18, 2018.

ADDRESSES: To request further information or submit written comments, 
please use one of the following methods, and note that your information 
request or comments are in reference to the Courtenay Wind Farm DEA:
     Internet: Documents may be viewed on the internet at 
https://www.fws.gov/mountain-prairie/wind/.
     Email: [email protected]. Include ``Courtenay Wind 
Farm DEA'' in the subject line of the message.
     U.S. Mail: Courtenay Wind Farm DEA, U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, Mountain-Prairie Region, Attention: Hillary White, P.O. Box 
25486 DFC, Denver, CO 80225.
     Hand-Delivery/Courier: Courtenay Wind Farm DEA, U.S. Fish 
and Wildlife Service, Mountain-Prairie Region, Attention: Hillary 
White, 134 Union Blvd., Lakewood, CO 80228.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hillary White, Migratory Bird Program, 
at [email protected] (email) or 303-236-4770 (telephone); or Brian 
Smith, at [email protected] (email) or 303-236-4403 (telephone). 
Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf may call the 
Federal Relay Service at 1-800-877-8339 to contact the above 
individuals. The Federal Relay Service is available 24 hours a day, 7 
days a week, for you to leave a message or question for the above 
individuals. You will receive a reply during normal business hours.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Introduction

    The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is considering an 
application under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 
668a-d; Eagle Act) for a bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) take 
permit from Northern States Power Company--Minnesota, doing business as 
Xcel Energy (applicant), for a 5-year take permit for bald eagles under 
the 2009 regulations (74 FR 46836, September 11, 2009). The Service 
published changes to eagle permitting regulations (81 FR 91494, 
December 16, 2016), which took effect on January 15, 2017. Applicants 
who submitted permit applications before July 14, 2017, may choose to 
be considered for issuance of an eagle take permit under either the 
original 2009 regulations or the 2016 revised regulations (81 FR 
91494). The applicant submitted the permit application on April 11, 
2016, and has chosen to be considered under the 2009 regulations. The 
project is an existing operational wind facility in Stutsman County, 
North Dakota. The application includes an Eagle Conservation Plan (ECP) 
as the foundation of the applicant's permit application. The ECP 
describes actions that have been taken, as well as proposed future 
actions, to avoid and minimize adverse effects on eagles.
    We have prepared this DEA to evaluate the impacts of issuing or not 
issuing the eagle take permit for compliance with our Eagle Act 
permitting regulations in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 50 
CFR 22.26, as well as impacts of implementing the supporting ECP, which 
is included as an appendix to the DEA.

Background

    The Eagle Act allows us to authorize bald eagle take ``for the 
protection . . . of agricultural or other interests in any particular 
locality.'' The 2009 regulations authorize the limited take of bald 
eagles under the Eagle Act, where the take to be authorized is 
associated with otherwise lawful activities (74 FR 46836). The Eagle 
Act's implementing regulations define ``take'' as to ``pursue, shoot, 
shoot at, poison, wound, kill, capture, trap, collect, destroy, molest, 
or disturb'' individuals, their nests and eggs (50 CFR 22.3); and 
``disturb'' is further defined as ``to agitate or bother a bald or 
golden eagle to a degree that causes . . . (1) injury to an eagle, . . 
. (2) a decrease in its productivity, . . . or (3) nest abandonment'' 
(50 CFR 22.3). The project is predicted to result in recurring bald 
eagle mortalities over the life of the project, so the appropriate type 
of take permit is the permit under 50 CFR 22.26.
    We may consider issuance of eagle take permits if (1) the 
incidental take is necessary to protect legitimate interests; (2) the 
take is compatible with the preservation standard of the Eagle Act--
providing for stable or increasing breeding populations; and (3) the 
take has been avoided and minimized to the degree achievable through 
implementation of Advanced Compensation Practices, and the remaining 
take is unavoidable. The Service must determine that the direct and 
indirect effects of the take, together

[[Page 23289]]

with the cumulative effects of other permitted take and additional 
factors affecting eagle populations, are compatible with the 
preservation of bald eagles and golden eagles.

Proposed Action

    The permit applicant, Northern States Power Company--Minnesota, 
doing business as Xcel Energy, is operating an approximately 200.5-
megatwatt commercial wind energy facility in Stutsman County, North 
Dakota. The 100-turbine project, sited entirely on private land, became 
operational on December 1, 2016.
    The applicant developed an ECP based on our guidance contained in 
the Eagle Conservation Plan Guidance Module 1: Land-Based Wind Energy 
Version 2 (Service 2013) (ECP Guidance) (https://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/management/eagleconservationplanguidance.pdf).
    As recommended in the Service's ECP Guidance, the applicant's plan 
outlines avoidance and minimization measures, contains a risk 
assessment, and includes advanced conservation practices and adaptive 
management. The applicant submitted the ECP as part of the permit 
application, and if we issue the permit, then the conservation 
commitments would become conditions of the permit.
    The Service independently evaluated the risk of bald eagle 
fatalities from project operations and compared that risk to the 
conservation measures to which the applicant committed. We used our 
Collision Risk Model to estimate the number of annual bald eagle 
fatalities resulting from operation and maintenance of the project. 
This is an essential step in the Service's evaluation of an application 
for a permit for take of eagles because issuing criteria require 
permitted take to comply with the Eagle Act's preservation standard. In 
the DEA, we evaluate the risk and offsetting conservation measures, and 
the implications for direct, indirect, and cumulative effects of 
issuing a permit and a No Action alternative.

National Environmental Policy Act Compliance

    Our consideration of whether or not to issue a 5-year ETP is an 
action subject to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Our DEA 
analyzes the risk of bald eagle take associated with operation and 
maintenance of the project, and assesses the potential effects of 
permit issuance and a No Action alternative (i.e., do not issue an ETP) 
on the human and natural environment.

Public Comments

    We invite public comment on the proposed DEA. If you wish, you may 
submit comments by any one of the methods discussed in ADDRESSES. We 
will consider public comments on the DEA when making the final 
determination on NEPA compliance and permit issuance.

Public Availability of Comments

    All comments and materials we receive become part of the public 
record associated with this action. Before including your address, 
phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information 
in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment--
including your personal identifying information--may be made publicly 
available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold 
your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot 
guarantee that we will be able to do so. All submissions from 
organizations or businesses, and from individuals identifying 
themselves as representatives or officials of organizations or 
businesses, and from individuals identifying themselves as 
representatives or officials of organizations or businesses, will be 
made available for public disclosure in their entirety.

Next Steps

    The public process for the proposed Federal permit action will be 
completed after the public comment period, at which time we will 
evaluate the permit application and comments submitted thereupon to 
determine whether the application meets the permitting requirements 
under the Eagle Act, applicable regulations, and NEPA requirements. 
Upon completion of that evaluation, we will select our course of 
action.

Authority

    We provide this notice under section 668a of the Eagle Act (16 
U.S.C. 668-668d) and the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and its implementing regulations (40 CFR 1506.6 
and 43 CFR 46.300).

Matt Hogan,
Deputy Regional Director, USFWS Mountain-Prairie Region, Lakewood, 
Colorado.
[FR Doc. 2018-10629 Filed 5-17-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4333-15-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.