Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; Fisheries Off West Coast States; Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery; Annual Specifications and Management Measures for the 2018 Tribal and Non-Tribal Fisheries for Pacific Whiting, 22401-22411 [2018-10230]
Download as PDF
22401
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 94 / Tuesday, May 15, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
and upon request from the Austin
Ecological Services Field Office (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
Authors
The primary authors of this final rule
are the staff members of the Austin
Ecological Services Field Office, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (see
ADDRESSES).
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 17
Endangered and threatened species,
Exports, Imports, Reporting and
Scientific name
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361–1407; 1531–
1544; and 4201–4245; unless otherwise
noted.
recordkeeping requirements,
Transportation.
Regulation Promulgation
Accordingly, we amend part 17,
subchapter B of chapter I, title 50 of the
Code of Federal Regulations, as set forth
below:
PART 17—ENDANGERED AND
THREATENED WILDLIFE AND PLANTS
1. The authority citation for part 17
continues to read as follows:
Where listed
Status
*
*
Tobusch fishhook cactus.
*
Wherever found ............
§ 17.12
*
■
Common name
2. Amend § 17.12(h) by removing the
entry for ‘‘Ancistrocactus tobuschii’’
and adding the following entry to the
List of Endangered and Threatened
Plants in alphabetical order under
Flowering Plants:
■
T
Endangered and threatened plants.
*
*
(h) * * *
*
*
Listing citations and applicable rules
FLOWERING PLANTS
*
Sclerocactus
brevihamatus ssp.
tobuschii.
*
*
*
Dated: April 20, 2018.
James W. Kurth,
Deputy Director Exercising the Authority of
the Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 660
Electronic Access
[Docket No. 171023999–8440–02]
RIN 0648–BH31
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions;
Fisheries Off West Coast States;
Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery;
Annual Specifications and
Management Measures for the 2018
Tribal and Non-Tribal Fisheries for
Pacific Whiting
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
NMFS issues this final rule
for the 2018 Pacific whiting fishery
under the authority of the Pacific Coast
Groundfish Fishery Management Plan
(FMP), the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act), and the Pacific
Whiting Act of 2006. This final rule
announces the 2018 U.S. Total
Allowable Catch of 441,433 metric tons
(mt) of Pacific whiting, establishes a
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 May 14, 2018
Jkt 244001
This final rule is accessible via the
internet at the Office of the Federal
Register website at https://
www.federalregister.gov. Background
information and documents are
available at the NMFS West Coast
Region website at https://
www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/
fisheries/management/whiting/pacific_
whiting.html and at the Pacific Fishery
Management Council’s website at https://
www.pcouncil.org/.
The final environmental impact
statement regarding Harvest
Specifications and Management
Measures for 2015–2016 and Biennial
Periods Thereafter, and the Final
Environmental Assessment for Pacific
Coast Groundfish Harvest Specifications
and Management Measures for 2017–
2018 and Amendment 27 to the Pacific
Coast Groundfish Fishery Management
Plan, are available on the NMFS West
Coast Region website at:
www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/
publications/nepa/groundfish/
groundfish_nepa_documents.html and
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4700
*
*
44 FR 64736, 11/7/1979; 83 FR [Insert Federal
Register page where the document begins],
5/15/2018.
*
tribal allocation of 77,251 mt,
establishes a set-aside for research and
bycatch of 1,500 mt, and announces the
allocations of Pacific whiting to the nontribal fishery for 2018. The catch limits
in this rule are intended to ensure the
long-term sustainability of the Pacific
whiting stock.
DATES: Effective May 15, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Frank Lockhart (West Coast Region,
NMFS), phone: 206–526–6142, and
email: Frank.Lockhart@noaa.gov.
[FR Doc. 2018–10206 Filed 5–14–18; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY:
*
*
Sfmt 4700
*
*
copies are available from Chuck Tracy,
Executive Director, Pacific Fishery
Management Council (Council), 7700
NE Ambassador Place, Portland, OR
97220, phone: 503–820–2280.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This final rule announces the total
allowable catch (TAC) for Pacific
whiting, which was determined under
the terms of the Agreement with Canada
on Pacific Hake/Whiting (Agreement)
and the Pacific Whiting Act of 2006
(Whiting Act). The Agreement and the
Whiting Act establish bilateral bodies to
implement the terms of the Agreement.
The bilateral bodies include: The Joint
Management Committee (JMC), which
recommends the annual catch level for
Pacific whiting; the Joint Technical
Committee (JTC), which conducts the
Pacific whiting stock assessment; the
Scientific Review Group (SRG), which
reviews the stock assessment; and the
Advisory Panel (AP), which provides
stakeholder input to the JMC.
The Agreement establishes a default
harvest policy of F–40 percent, which
means a fishing mortality rate that
would reduce the biomass to 40 percent
of the estimated unfished level (F–40).
The Agreement also allocates 73.88
percent of the TAC to the United States
and 26.12 percent of the TAC to Canada.
The JMC is primarily responsible for
developing a TAC recommendation to
the United States and Canada. The
Secretary of Commerce, in consultation
with the Secretary of State, has the
authority to accept or reject this
recommendation.
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
22402
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 94 / Tuesday, May 15, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
2018 Pacific Whiting Stock Assessment
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
The JTC completed a stock assessment
for Pacific whiting in March 2018. The
assessment is available at https://
www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/
fisheries/management/whiting/pacific_
whiting_treaty.html. The assessment
presents a model that depends primarily
upon an acoustic survey biomass index
and catches of the transboundary Pacific
whiting stock to estimate the biomass of
the current stock. The most recent
survey, conducted collaboratively
between the Canadian Department of
Fisheries and Oceans and NMFS, was
completed in 2017.
Pacific whiting spawning stock
biomass has been relatively stable since
2013. The 2018 spawning biomass
estimated to be 1.357 million mt.
Relative female spawning biomass for
2018 is estimated at 66.7 percent of the
unfished levels. The stock is currently
estimated to be at its highest level since
the 1980s, as a result of an exceptionally
strong 2010 cohort and above average
2014 cohort. As with past estimates,
there is a considerable range of
uncertainty associated with this
estimate, because the youngest cohorts
that make up a large portion of the
survey biomass have not been observed
for very long.
The JTC provided tables showing
catch alternatives for 2018. Using the
default F–40 percent harvest rate
identified in the Agreement (Paragraph
1 of Article III), the coastwide TAC for
2018 would be 725,984 mt. Projections
setting the 2018 and 2019 catch equal to
the 2017 TAC of 597,500 mt show the
estimated median relative spawning
biomass decreasing from 67 percent in
2018 to 59 percent in 2019 and to 50
percent in 2020, with a 36 percent
chance of the spawning biomass falling
below 40 percent of estimated historic
biomass levels in 2020. There is an
estimated 73 percent chance of the
spawning biomass declining from 2018
to 2019, and an 82 percent chance of it
declining from 2019 to 2020 under this
constant catch level. However, the 2018
estimate of median stock biomass is
well above the overfished threshold,
and fishing intensity is below the F–40
percent target. This indicates that the
coastal Pacific whiting stock is not
overfished and that overfishing is not
occurring.
Scientific and Management Reviews
The SRG, a bilateral body created
under the Agreement, met in
Lynnwood, Washington on February
26–March 1, 2018, to review the draft
stock assessment document. The SRG
determined that the 2018 Pacific
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 May 14, 2018
Jkt 244001
whiting assessment report and
appendices present the best available
scientific information for the
management of Pacific whiting. During
the meeting, however, the SRG raised a
concern that the model results and
corresponding estimates of spawning
stock biomass are strongly affected by
the choice of weights-at-age used in
estimating fecundity. To consider the
variability in stock status estimates, the
SRG requested that the JTC analyze two
approaches using different weights-atage (Appendix A in the stock
assessment report). The first approach is
consistent with previous assessments,
and includes time-invariant fecundityat-age based on the average vector of
weights-at-age over all years. The
second approach is derived from an
alternative model using time-varying
fecundity-at-age calculated with annual
estimates of mean weights-at-age. The
range of uncertainty of each model
includes the median estimate of current
spawning biomass estimated by the
other model. However, the alternative
model estimates that 2018 spawning
stock biomass is lower and much closer
to the reference point (B40) than the
base-case model. The SRG’s analysis
suggested that this may be because
weights-at-age are important to
calculating unfished spawning biomass
(B0), and the alternative model
estimates a higher B0 as a consequence
of using higher mean weights-at-age in
the early years of the time series (1975–
1979). The probability that 2018
spawning biomass is below the B40
reference point is estimated as 7 percent
by the base-case model and 48 percent
by the alternative model. Despite
substantial discussion, the SRG was
unable to offer advice on which model
is more plausible, and requested
additional work in the coming year from
the JTC to address the issue.
The AP and JMC met on March 5–6,
2018, in Lynnwood, Washington, to
develop advice on a 2018 coastwide
TAC. The AP provided its 2018 TAC
recommendation to the JMC on March 6,
2018. The JMC reviewed the advice of
the JTC, the SRG, and the AP, and
agreed on a TAC recommendation for
transmittal to the United States and
Canadian Governments.
The Agreement directs the JMC to
base the catch limit recommendation on
the default harvest rate unless scientific
evidence demonstrates that a different
rate is necessary to sustain the offshore
Pacific whiting resource. After
consideration of the 2018 stock
assessment and other relevant scientific
information, the JMC did not use the
default harvest rate, and instead agreed
on a more conservative approach, using
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the same catch limits as 2017. There
were three primary reasons for choosing
a TAC below the default level of F–40
percent. First, the growth of the 2010
year class is slowing, which the recent
historic-high catch has in part depended
on, and JMC members wanted to extend
the harvest available from this year
class. Second, the 2018 stock
assessment estimated a lower
abundance than last year’s assessment
for the 2014 year class, which
comprised more of the 2016 fall catch
than the large 2010 cohort, so the JMC
did not want to increase mortality on
this year class, which is anticipated to
be important to the fishery over the next
several years. Finally, the overall
abundance of Pacific hake/whiting is
projected to begin declining from its
recent historic high levels, and the JMC
did not want to accelerate this decline
by increasing the TAC. This
conservative TAC setting process,
endorsed by the AP, resulted in a TAC
that is less than what it would be using
the default harvest rate under the
Agreement.
The recommendation for an
unadjusted 2018 U.S. TAC of 382,532
mt, plus 58,901 mt carryover of
uncaught quota from 2017 results in an
adjusted U.S. TAC of 441,433 mt for
2018 (73.88 percent of the coastwide
TAC). This recommendation is
consistent with the best available
scientific information, provisions of the
Agreement, and the Whiting Act. The
recommendation was transmitted via
letter to the United States and Canadian
Governments on March 6, 2018. NMFS,
under delegation of authority from the
Secretary of Commerce, approved the
adjusted TAC recommendation of
441,433 mt for U.S. fisheries on April
23, 2018.
Tribal Fishery Allocation
This final rule establishes the tribal
allocation of Pacific whiting for 2018.
NMFS issued a proposed rule regarding
this allocation on January 24, 2018 (83
FR 3291). This action finalizes the tribal
allocation. Since 1996, NMFS has been
allocating a portion of the U.S. TAC of
Pacific whiting to the tribal fishery.
Regulations for the Pacific Coast
Groundfish Fishery Management Plan
specify that the tribal allocation is
subtracted from the total U.S. Pacific
whiting TAC. The tribal Pacific whiting
fishery is managed separately from the
non-tribal Pacific whiting fishery, and is
not governed by limited entry or open
access regulations or allocations.
The proposed rule described the tribal
allocation as 17.5 percent of the U.S.
TAC, and projected a range of potential
tribal allocations for 2018 based on a
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 94 / Tuesday, May 15, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
range of U.S. TACs over the last 10 years
(plus or minus 25 percent to capture
variability in stock abundance). As
described in the proposed rule, the
resulting range of potential tribal
allocations was 17,842 to 96,563 mt.
Applying the approach described in the
proposed rule, NMFS is establishing the
2018 tribal allocation of 77,251 mt (17.5
percent of the U.S. TAC) in this final
rule. In 2009, NMFS, the states of
Washington and Oregon, and the tribes
with treaty rights to harvest whiting
started a process to determine the longterm tribal allocation for Pacific
whiting; however, no long-term
allocation has been determined. While
new scientific information or
discussions with the relevant parties
may impact that decision, the best
available scientific information to date
suggests that 77,251 mt is within the
likely range of potential treaty right
amounts.
As with prior tribal Pacific whiting
allocations, this final rule is not
intended to establish precedent for
future Pacific whiting seasons, or for the
determination of the total amount of
whiting to which the Tribes are entitled
under their treaty right. Rather, this rule
adopts an interim allocation. The longterm tribal treaty amount will be based
on further development of scientific
information and additional coordination
and discussion with and among the
coastal tribes and the states of
Washington and Oregon.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
Harvest Guidelines and Allocations
In addition to the tribal allocation
described in the proposed rule, this
final rule establishes the fishery harvest
guideline (HG), called the non-tribal
allocation, which had not yet been
determined at the time the proposed
rule was published. Although this was
not part of the proposed rule, the
environmental assessment for the 2017–
2018 harvest specifications rule (see
ELECTRONIC ACCESS) analyzed a
range of TAC alternatives for 2018, and
the final 2018 TAC falls within this
analyzed range. In addition, via the
2017–2018 specifications rulemaking
process, the public had an opportunity
to comment on the 2017–2018 TACs for
whiting, just as they did for all species
in the groundfish FMP. NMFS follows
this process because, unlike for all other
groundfish species, the TAC for whiting
is decided in a highly abbreviated
annual process from February through
April of every year, and the normal
rulemaking process would not allow for
the fishery to open with the new TAC
on the annual season opening date of
May 15.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 May 14, 2018
Jkt 244001
The HG is allocated among the three
non-tribal sectors of the Pacific whiting
fishery. The 2018 fishery HG for Pacific
whiting is 362,682 mt. This amount was
determined by deducting the 77,251 mt
tribal allocation and the 1,500 mt
allocation for scientific research catch
and fishing mortality in non-groundfish
fisheries from the total U.S. TAC of
441,433 mt.
NMFS did not include the HG in the
tribal whiting proposed rule published
on January 24, 2018 (83 FR 3291), for
two reasons related to timing and
process. First, a recommendation on the
coastwide TAC for Pacific whiting for
2018, under the terms of the Agreement
with Canada, was not available during
development of the proposed rule.
NMFS, under delegation of authority
from the Secretary of Commerce,
approved a U.S. TAC on April 23, 2018.
Second, the fishery HG is established
following deductions from the U.S. TAC
for the tribal allocation, mortality in
scientific research activities, and fishing
mortality in non-groundfish fisheries.
The Council recommends to NMFS the
research and bycatch set-aside on an
annual basis, based on estimates of
scientific research catch and estimated
bycatch mortality in non-groundfish
fisheries.
The regulations further allocate the
fishery HG among the non-tribal
catcher/processor (C/P) Coop Program,
Mothership (MS) Coop Program, and
Shorebased Individual Fishing Quota
(IFQ) Program sectors of the Pacific
whiting fishery. The C/P Coop Program
is allocated 34 percent (123,312 mt for
2018), the MS Coop Program is allocated
24 percent (87,044 mt for 2018), and the
Shorebased IFQ Program is allocated 42
percent (152,326.5 mt for 2018). The
fishery south of 42° N lat. may not take
more than 7,616 mt (5 percent of the
Shorebased IFQ Program allocation)
prior to May 15, the start of the primary
Pacific whiting season north of 42° N
lat.
22403
perch from a total catch limit allocation
to a set-aside (January 8, 2018; 83 FR
757). These set asides as well as the
allocations of canary and widow
rockfish to the Pacific whiting fishery
are described in the footnotes to Table
2.b to part 660, subpart C and are not
changed in this rulemaking.
Comments and Responses
On January 24, 2018, NMFS issued a
proposed rule for the allocation and
management of the 2018 tribal Pacific
whiting fishery (83 FR 3291). The
comment period on the proposed rule
closed on February 23, 2018. No
relevant comments were received, and
no changes were made from the
proposed allocation and management
measures for the 2018 tribal Pacific
whiting fishery.
Classification
The Annual Specifications and
Management Measures for the 2018
Tribal and non-Tribal Fisheries for
Pacific Whiting are issued under the
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Act,
and the Whiting Act of 2006. The
measures are in accordance with 50 CFR
part 660, subparts C through G, the
regulations implementing the Pacific
Coast Groundfish FMP, and NMFS has
determined that this rule is consistent
with the national standards of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act and other
applicable laws.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) and
(d)(3), the NMFS Assistant
Administrator finds good cause to waive
prior public notice and comment and
delay in effectiveness for those
provisions in this final rule that were
not included in proposed rule (83 FR
3291), e.g., the U.S. TAC, as delaying
this rule would be impracticable and
contrary to the public interest. The
annual harvest specifications for Pacific
whiting must be implemented by the
start of the primary Pacific whiting
season, which begins on May 15, 2018,
or the primary Pacific whiting fishery
will effectively remain closed.
TABLE 1—2018 PACIFIC WHITING
Every year, NMFS conducts a Pacific
ALLOCATIONS
whiting stock assessment with
participation from U.S. and Canadian
2018 Pacific
scientists. The 2018 stock assessment
whiting
Sector
for Pacific whiting was prepared in
allocation
(mt)
early 2018, and included updated total
catch, length and age data from the U.S.
Tribal .......................................
77,251 and Canadian fisheries from 2017, and
Catcher/Processor (C/P) Coop
biomass indices from the 2017 Joint
Program ..............................
123,312
U.S.-Canadian acoustic/midwater trawl
Mothership (MS) Coop Program ....................................
87,044 surveys. Because of this late availability
Shorebased IFQ Program ......
152,326.5 of the most recent data for the
assessment, and the need for time to
In 2018, NMFS published a final rule
conduct the treaty process for
changing the management of
determining the TAC using the most
darkblotched rockfish and Pacific ocean recent assessment, a determination on
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
22404
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 94 / Tuesday, May 15, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
TAC could not be completed before
April 23, 2018. Thus, it is not possible
to allow for notice and comment before
the start of the primary Pacific whiting
season on May 15.
A delay in implementing the Pacific
whiting harvest specifications to allow
for notice and comment would be
contrary to the public interest because it
would require either a shorter primary
whiting season or development of a
TAC without the most recent data. A
shorter season could prevent the tribal
and non-tribal fisheries from attaining
their 2018 allocations, which would
result in unnecessary short-term adverse
economic effects for the Pacific whiting
fishing vessels and the associated
fishing communities. A TAC
determined without the most recent
data could fail to account for significant
fluctuations in the biomass of this
relatively short-lived species. To
prevent these adverse effects and to
allow the Pacific whiting season to
commence, it is in the best interest of
the public to waive prior notice and
comment.
In addition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3), the NMFS Assistant
Administrator finds good cause to waive
the 30-day delay in effectiveness.
Waiving the 30-day delay in
effectiveness will not have a negative
impact on any entities, as there are no
new compliance requirements or other
burdens placed on the fishing
community with this rule. Failure to
make this final rule effective at the start
of the fishing year will undermine the
intent of the rule, which is to promote
the optimal utilization and conservation
of Pacific whiting. Making this rule
effective immediately would also serve
the best interests of the public because
it will allow for the longest possible
Pacific whiting fishing season and
therefore the best possible economic
outcome for those whose livelihoods
depend on this fishery. Because the 30day delay in effectiveness would
potentially cause significant financial
harm without providing any
corresponding benefits, this final rule is
effective upon publication in the
Federal Register.
The Office of Management and Budget
has determined that this final rule is not
significant for purposes of Executive
Order 12866. This rule is not an
Executive Order 13771 regulatory action
because this rule is not significant under
Executive Order 12866.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
The description of this action, its
purpose, and its legal basis are
described in the preamble to the
proposed rule and are not repeated here.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 May 14, 2018
Jkt 244001
A final regulatory flexibility analysis
(FRFA) was prepared and incorporates
the initial regulatory flexibility analysis
(IRFA). NMFS also prepared a
Regulatory Impact Review (RIR) for this
action. A copy of the RIR/FRFA is
available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES).
A summary of the FRFA, per the
requirements of 5 U.S.C. 604 follows.
A Summary of the Significant Issues
Raised by the Public in Response to the
IRFA, a Summary of the Agency’s
Assessment of Such Issues, and a
Statement of Any Changes Made in the
Final Rule as a Result of Such
Comments
NMFS published a proposed rule on
January 24, 2018 (83 FR 13291), for the
allocation of the 2018 tribal Pacific
whiting fishery. The comment period on
the proposed rule closed on February
23, 2018, and no comments were
received from either the public or the
Small Business Administration on the
initial regulatory flexibility analysis
(IRFA) or the economic impacts of this
action generally.
Description and Estimate of Number of
Small Entities To Which the Rule
Would Apply
The FRFA describes the impacts on
small entities, which are defined in the
IRFA for this action and not repeated
here.
The current Shorebased IFQ Program
is composed of 180 Quota Share
permits/accounts, 154 vessel accounts,
and 47 first receivers, only a portion of
which participate in the Pacific whiting
fishery. These regulations also directly
affect participants in the MS Coop
Program, a general term to describe the
limited access program that applies to
eligible harvesters and processors in the
MS sector of the Pacific whiting at-sea
trawl fishery. This program currently
consists of six MS processor permits,
and a catcher vessel fleet currently
composed of a single coop, with 34
Mothership/Catcher Vessel (MS/CV)
endorsed permits (with three permits
each having two catch history
assignments).
These regulations also directly affect
the C/P Coop Program, composed of 10
C/P endorsed permits owned by three
companies that have formed a single
coop. These coops are considered large
entities from several perspectives; they
have participants that are large entities,
and have in total more than 750
employees worldwide including
affiliates.
Although there are three non-tribal
sectors, many companies participate in
two sectors and some participate in all
three sectors. As part of the permit
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
application processes for the non-tribal
fisheries, based on a review of the Small
Business Administration size criteria,
permit applicants were asked if they
considered themselves a ‘‘small’’
business, and to provide detailed
ownership information. After
accounting for cross participation,
multiple quota share account holders,
and affiliation through ownership,
NMFS estimates there are 103 non-tribal
entities directly affected by these final
regulations, 89 of which are considered
‘‘small’’ businesses.
Description of the Steps the Agency Has
Taken To Minimize the Significant
Economic Impact on Small Entities
Consistent With the Stated Objectives of
Applicable Statutes
Sector allocations in 2018 are the
same as those in 2017. NMFS concludes
that this rule will have similar outcomes
as 2017 for both large and small entities,
and will not disproportionately affect
small entities. The U.S. portion of the
TAC is divided between tribal, at-sea
mothership, at-sea catcher processors,
and shoreside whiting sectors at fixed
percentages described above. Within the
non-tribal sectors, a catch share program
allocates whiting to the individual
vessel level based on history in the
shoreside and mothership sectors. The
catcher-processor coop harvests
according to a coop agreement with
agreed upon allocations to each
company, which have not changed in
the past eight years. With allocation
determined down to the individual level
in each sector, the TAC should benefit
both large and small entities equal to the
proportion of the individual level, and
small entities would not feel
disproportionate effects relative to large
entities. With the high 2018 TAC, small
entities are expected to benefit, and
experience no adverse effects from this
rule.
NMFS considered two alternatives for
this action: The ‘‘No-Action’’ and the
‘‘Proposed Action.’’ Under the Proposed
Action alternative, NMFS proposed to
set the tribal allocation percentage at
17.5 percent, as requested by the tribes.
These requests reflect the level of
participation in the fishery that will
allow the tribes to exercise their treaty
right to fish for Pacific whiting.
Consideration of a percentage lower
than the tribal request of 17.5 percent is
not appropriate in this instance. As a
matter of policy, NMFS has historically
supported the harvest levels requested
by the tribes. Based on the information
available to NMFS, the tribal request is
within their tribal treaty rights. A higher
percentage would arguably also be
within the scope of the treaty right.
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
22405
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 94 / Tuesday, May 15, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
However, a higher percentage would
unnecessarily limit the non-tribal
fishery. Under the no-action alternative,
NMFS would not make an allocation to
the tribal sector. This alternative was
considered, but the regulatory
framework provides for a tribal
allocation on an annual basis only.
Therefore, the no-action alternative
would result in no allocation of Pacific
whiting to the tribal sector in 2018,
which would be inconsistent with
NMFS’ responsibility to manage the
fishery consistent with the tribes’ treaty
rights. Given that there is a tribal
request for allocation in 2018, this
alternative received no further
consideration.
Description of Projected Reporting,
Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements
There are no reporting or
recordkeeping requirements associated
with this final rule. No federal rules
have been identified that duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with this action.
Small Entity Compliance Guide
Section 212 of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 states that, for each rule or group
of related rules for which an agency is
required to prepare a FRFA, the agency
shall publish one or more guides to
assist small entities in complying with
the rule, and shall designate such
publications as ‘‘small entity
compliance guides.’’ The agency shall
explain the actions a small entity is
required to take to comply with a rule
or group of rules. As part of this
rulemaking process, a small entity
compliance guide will be sent to
stakeholders, and copies of this final
rule and guides (i.e., information
bulletins) are available from NMFS at
the following website: https://
www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/
fisheries/management/whiting/pacific_
whiting.html.
Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
Pursuant to Executive Order 13175,
this final rule was developed after
meaningful collaboration with tribal
officials from the area covered by the
FMP. Consistent with the MagnusonStevens Act at 16 U.S.C. 1852(b)(5), one
of the voting members of the Pacific
Council is a representative of an Indian
tribe with federally recognized fishing
rights from the area of the Council’s
jurisdiction. In addition, NMFS has
coordinated specifically with the tribes
interested in the whiting fishery
regarding the issues addressed by this
final rule.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 660
Fisheries, Fishing, Indian fisheries.
Dated: May 9, 2018.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 660 is amended
as follows:
PART 660—FISHERIES OFF WEST
COAST STATES
1. The authority citation for part 660
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., 16
U.S.C. 773 et seq., and 16 U.S.C. 7001 et seq.
2. In § 660.50, revise paragraph (f)(4)
to read as follows:
■
§ 660.50 Pacific Coast treaty Indian
fisheries.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(4) Pacific whiting. The tribal
allocation for 2018 is 77,251 mt.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Table 2a to part 660, subpart C, is
revised to read as follows:
TABLE 2a TO PART 660, SUBPART C—2018, AND BEYOND, SPECIFICATIONS OF OFL, ABC, ACL, ACT AND FISHERY
HARVEST GUIDELINES
[Weights in metric tons]
Species
Area
BOCACCIO c .....................................
COWCOD d ........................................
DARKBLOTCHED ROCKFISH e .......
PACIFIC OCEAN PERCH f ...............
YELLOWEYE ROCKFISH g ...............
Arrowtooth flounder h .........................
Big skate i ..........................................
Black rockfish j ...................................
Black rockfish k ..................................
S of 40°10′ N lat. .............................
S of 40°10′ N lat. .............................
Coastwide ........................................
N of 40°10′ N lat. .............................
Coastwide ........................................
Coastwide ........................................
Coastwide ........................................
California (South of 42° N lat.) ........
Oregon (Between 46°16′ N lat. and
42° N lat.).
Washington (N of 46°16′ N lat.) ......
S of 40°10′ N lat. .............................
California (South of 42° N lat.) ........
Oregon (Between 46°16′ N lat. and
42° N lat.).
S of 34°27′ N lat. .............................
Coastwide ........................................
S of 40°10′ N lat. .............................
Coastwide ........................................
Coastwide ........................................
N of 40°10′ N lat. .............................
S of 40°10′ N lat. .............................
Coastwide ........................................
Coastwide ........................................
N of 34°27′ N lat. .............................
S of 34°27′ N lat. .............................
Coastwide ........................................
Coastwide ........................................
Coastwide ........................................
Coastwide ........................................
N of 36° N lat. ..................................
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
Black rockfish l ...................................
Blackgill rockfish m .............................
Cabezon n ..........................................
Cabezon o ..........................................
California scorpionfish p .....................
Canary rockfish q ...............................
Chilipepper r .......................................
Dover sole s .......................................
English sole t ......................................
Lingcod u ............................................
Lingcod v ............................................
Longnose skate w ..............................
Longspine thornyhead x .....................
Longspine thornyhead .......................
Longspine thornyhead .......................
Pacific cod y .......................................
Pacific whiting z ..................................
Petrale sole aa ....................................
Sablefish ............................................
Sablefish bb ........................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 May 14, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00057
OFL
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ACL a
ABC
Fishery HG b
2,013
71
683
984
58
16,498
541
347
570
1,924
64
653
941
48
13,743
494
332
520
741
10
653
281
20
13,743
494
332
520
726
8
576
232
14
11,645
437
331
519
315
NA
156
49
301
NA
149
47
301
NA
149
47
283
NA
149
47
278
1,596
2,623
90,282
8,255
3,310
1,373
2,526
4,339
NA
NA
3,200
725,984
3,152
8,329
NA
254
1,526
2,507
86,310
7,537
3,110
1,144
2,415
3,614
NA
NA
2,221
150
1,526
2,507
50,000
7,537
3,110
1,144
2,000
NA
2,747
867
1,600
148
1,467
2,461
48,406
7,324
2,832
1,135
1,853
NA
2,700
864
1,091
362,682
2,772
NA
See Table 2c
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
z
z
3,013
7,604
NA
3,013
NA
5,475
15MYR1
22406
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 94 / Tuesday, May 15, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 2a TO PART 660, SUBPART C—2018, AND BEYOND, SPECIFICATIONS OF OFL, ABC, ACL, ACT AND FISHERY
HARVEST GUIDELINES—Continued
[Weights in metric tons]
Species
Area
OFL
Sablefish cc ........................................
Shortbelly rockfish dd .........................
Shortspine thornyhead ee ...................
Shortspine thornyhead ......................
Shortspine thornyhead ......................
Spiny dogfish ff ...................................
Splitnose rockfish gg ...........................
Starry flounder hh ...............................
Widow rockfish ii ................................
Yellowtail rockfish jj ............................
Minor Nearshore Rockfish kk .............
Minor Shelf Rockfish ll .......................
Minor Slope Rockfish mm ...................
Minor Nearshore Rockfish nn .............
Minor Shelf Rockfish oo ......................
Minor Slope Rockfish pp .....................
Other Flatfish qq .................................
Other Fish rr .......................................
S of 36° N lat. ..................................
Coastwide ........................................
Coastwide ........................................
N of 34°27′ N lat. .............................
S of 34°27′ N lat. .............................
Coastwide ........................................
S of 40°10′ N lat. .............................
Coastwide ........................................
Coastwide ........................................
N of 40°10′ N lat. .............................
N of 40°10′ N lat. .............................
N of 40°10′ N lat. .............................
N of 40°10′ N lat. .............................
S of 40°10′ N lat. .............................
S of 40°10′ N lat. .............................
S of 40°10′ N lat. .............................
Coastwide ........................................
Coastwide ........................................
NA
6,950
3,116
NA
NA
2,500
1,842
1,847
13,237
6,574
119
2,302
1,896
1,344
1,918
829
9,690
501
ACL a
ABC
NA
5,789
2,596
NA
NA
2,083
1,761
1,282
12,655
6,002
105
2,048
1,754
1,180
1,625
719
7,281
441
a Annual
1,939
489
NA
1,639
856
1,745
1,750
1,272
12,437
4,972
103
1,963
1,689
1,175
1,577
689
7,077
441
catch limits (ACLs), annual catch targets (ACTs) and harvest guidelines (HGs) are specified as total catch values.
harvest guidelines means the harvest guideline or quota after subtracting Pacific Coast treaty Indian tribes allocations and projected
catch, projected research catch, deductions for fishing mortality in non-groundfish fisheries, and deductions for EFPs from the ACL or ACT.
c Bocaccio. A stock assessment was conducted in 2015 for the bocaccio stock between the U.S.-Mexico border and Cape Blanco. The stock is
managed with stock-specific harvest specifications south of 40deg;10′ N lat. and within the Minor Shelf Rockfish complex north of 40deg;10′ N
lat. A historical catch distribution of approximately 7.4 percent was used to apportion the assessed stock to the area north of 40deg;10′ N lat.
The bocaccio stock was estimated to be at 36.8 percent of its unfished biomass in 2015. The OFL of 2,013 mt is projected in the 2015 stock assessment using an FMSY proxy of F50%. The ABC of 1,924 mt is a 4.4 percent reduction from the OFL (s = 0.36/P* = 0.45) because it is a category 1 stock. The 741 mt ACL is based on the current rebuilding plan with a target year to rebuild of 2022 and an SPR harvest rate of 77.7 percent. 15.4 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the incidental open access fishery (0.8 mt), EFP catch (10 mt) and research catch (4.6
mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 725.6 mt. The California recreational fishery has an HG of 305.5 mt.
d Cowcod. A stock assessment for the Conception Area was conducted in 2013 and the stock was estimated to be at 33.9 percent of its
unfished biomass in 2013. The Conception Area OFL of 59 mt is projected in the 2013 rebuilding analysis using an FMSY proxy of F50%. The
OFL contribution of 12 mt for the unassessed portion of the stock in the Monterey area is based on depletion-based stock reduction analysis.
The OFLs for the Monterey and Conception areas were summed to derive the south of 40deg;10′ N lat. OFL of 71 mt. The ABC for the area
south of 40deg;10′ N lat. is 64 mt. The assessed portion of the stock in the Conception Area is considered category 2, with a Conception area
contribution to the ABC of 54 mt, which is an 8.7 percent reduction from the Conception area OFL (s = 0.72/P* = 0.45). The unassessed portion
of the stock in the Monterey area is considered a category 3 stock, with a contribution to the ABC of 10 mt, which is a 16.6 percent reduction
from the Monterey area OFL (s = 1.44/P* = 0.45). A single ACL of 10 mt is being set for both areas combined. The ACL of 10 mt is based on
the rebuilding plan with a target year to rebuild of 2020 and an SPR harvest rate of 82.7 percent, which is equivalent to an exploitation rate
(catch over age 11+ biomass) of 0.007. 2 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the incidental open access fishery (less than 0.1 mt),
EFP fishing (less than 0.1 mt) and research activity (2 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 8 mt. Any additional mortality in research activities will be
deducted from the ACL. A single ACT of 4 mt is being set for both areas combined.
e Darkblotched rockfish. A 2015 stock assessment estimated the stock to be at 39 percent of its unfished biomass in 2015. The OFL of 683 mt
is projected in the 2015 stock assessment using an FMSY proxy of F50%. The ABC of 653 mt is a 4.4 percent reduction from the OFL (s = 0.36/
P* = 0.45) because it is a category 1 stock. The ACL is set equal to the ABC, as the stock is projected to be above its target biomass of B40% in
2017. 77.3 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (0.2 mt), the incidental open access fishery (24.5 mt), EFP catch (0.1
mt), research catch (2.5 mt) and an additional deduction for unforeseen catch events (50 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 575.8 mt.
f Pacific ocean perch. A stock assessment was conducted in 2011 and the stock was estimated to be at 19.1 percent of its unfished biomass in
2011. The OFL of 984 mt for the area north of 40deg;10′ N lat. is based on an updated catch-only projection of the 2011 rebuilding analysis
using an F50% FMSY proxy. The ABC of 941 mt is a 4.4 percent reduction from the OFL (s = 0.36/P* = 0.45) as it is a category 1 stock. The ACL
is based on the current rebuilding plan with a target year to rebuild of 2051 and a constant catch amount of 281 mt in 2017 and 2018, followed
in 2019 and beyond by ACLs based on an SPR harvest rate of 86.4 percent. 49.4 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (9.2 mt), the incidental open access fishery (10 mt), research catch (5.2 mt) and an additional deduction for unforeseen catch events (25 mt),
resulting in a fishery HG of 231.6 mt.
g Yelloweye rockfish. A stock assessment update was conducted in 2011. The stock was estimated to be at 21.4 percent of its unfished biomass in 2011. The 58 mt coastwide OFL is based on a catch-only update of the 2011 stock assessment, assuming actual catches since 2011
and using an FMSY proxy of F50%. The ABC of 48 mt is a 16.7 percent reduction from the OFL (s = 0.72/P* = 0.40) as it is a category 2 stock.
The 20 mt ACL is based on the current rebuilding plan with a target year to rebuild of 2074 and an SPR harvest rate of 76.0 percent. 6 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (2.3 mt), the incidental open access fishery (0.4 mt), EFP catch (less than 0.1 mt) and
research catch (3.27 mt) resulting in a fishery HG of 14 mt. Recreational HGs are: 3.3 mt (Washington); 3 mt (Oregon); and 3.9 mt (California).
h Arrowtooth flounder. The arrowtooth flounder stock was last assessed in 2007 and was estimated to be at 79 percent of its unfished biomass
in 2007. The OFL of 16,498 mt is derived from a catch-only update of the 2007 assessment assuming actual catches since 2007 and using an
F30% FMSY proxy. The ABC of 13,743 mt is a 16.7 percent reduction from the OFL (s = 0.72/P* = 0.40) as it is a category 2 stock. The ACL is
set equal to the ABC because the stock is above its target biomass of B25%. 2,098.1 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal
fishery (2,041 mt), the incidental open access fishery (40.8 mt), and research catch (16.4 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 11,644.9 mt.
i Big skate. The OFL of 541 mt is based on an estimate of trawl survey biomass and natural mortality. The ABC of 494 mt is a 8.7 percent reduction from the OFL (s = 0.72/P* = 0.45) as it is a category 2 stock. The ACL is set equal to the ABC. 57.4 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (15 mt), the incidental open access fishery (38.4 mt), and research catch (4 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 436.6
mt.
j Black rockfish (California). A 2015 stock assessment estimated the stock to be at 33 percent of its unfished biomass in 2015. The OFL of 347
mt is projected in the 2015 stock assessment using an FMSY proxy of F50%. The ABC of 332 mt is a 4.4 percent reduction from the OFL (s =
0.36/P* = 0.45) because it is a category 1 stock. The ACL is set equal to the ABC because the stock is projected to be above its target biomass
of B40% in 2018. 1 mt is deducted from the ACL for EFP catch, resulting in a fishery HG of 331 mt.
b Fishery
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
1,944
500
NA
1,698
898
2,083
1,761
1,282
12,655
6,002
105
2,047
1,754
1,179
1,624
709
7,281
441
Fishery HG b
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 May 14, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 94 / Tuesday, May 15, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
22407
k Black rockfish (Oregon). A 2015 stock assessment estimated the stock to be at 60 percent of its unfished biomass in 2015. The OFL of 570
mt is projected in the 2015 stock assessment using an FMSY proxy of F50%. The ABC of 520 mt is an 8.7 percent reduction from the OFL (s =
0.72/P* = 0.45) because it is a category 2 stock. The ACL is set equal to the ABC because the stock is above its target biomass of B40%. 0.6 mt
is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the incidental open access fishery, resulting in a fishery HG of 519.4 mt.
l Black rockfish (Washington). A 2015 stock assessment estimated the stock to be at 43 percent of its unfished biomass in 2015. The OFL of
315 mt is projected in the 2015 stock assessment using an FMSY proxy of F50%. The ABC of 301 mt is a 4.4 percent reduction from the OFL (s =
0.36/P* = 0.45) because it is a category 1 stock. The ACL is set equal to the ABC because the stock is above its target biomass of B40%. 18 mt
is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery, resulting in a fishery HG of 283 mt.
m Blackgill rockfish. Blackgill rockfish contributes to the harvest specifications for the Minor Slope Rockfish South complex. See footnote pp.
n Cabezon (California). A cabezon stock assessment was conducted in 2009. The cabezon spawning biomass in waters off California was estimated to be at 48.3 percent of its unfished biomass in 2009. The OFL of 156 mt is calculated using an FMSYproxy of F50%. The ABC of 149 mt is
based on a 4.4 percent reduction from the OFL (s = 0.36/P* = 0.45) because it is a category 1 stock. The ACL is set equal to the ABC because
the stock is above its target biomass of B40%. 0.3 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the incidental open access fishery (0.3 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 148.7 mt.
o Cabezon (Oregon). A cabezon stock assessment was conducted in 2009. The cabezon spawning biomass in waters off Oregon was estimated to be at 52 percent of its unfished biomass in 2009. The OFL of 49 mt is calculated using an FMSYproxy of F45%. The ABC of 47 mt is
based on a 4.4 percent reduction from the OFL (s = 0.36/P* = 0.45) because it is a category 1 species. The ACL is set equal to the ABC because the stock is above its target biomass of B40%. There are no deductions from the ACL so the fishery HG is also equal to the ACL of 47 mt.
p California scorpionfish. A California scorpionfish assessment was conducted in 2005 and was estimated to be at 79.8 percent of its unfished
biomass in 2005. The OFL of 278 mt is based on projections from a catch-only update of the 2005 assessment assuming actual catches since
2005 and using an FMSY harvest rate proxy of F50%. The ABC of 254 mt is an 8.7 percent reduction from the OFL (s = 0.72/P* = 0.45) because
it is a category 2 stock. The ACL is set at a constant catch amount of 150 mt. 2.2 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the incidental
open access fishery (2 mt) and research catch (0.2 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 147.8 mt. An ACT of 111 mt is established.
q Canary rockfish. A stock assessment was conducted in 2015 and the stock was estimated to be at 55.5 percent of its unfished biomass
coastwide in 2015. The coastwide OFL of 1,596 mt is projected in the 2015 assessment using an FMSYharvest rate proxy of F50%. The ABC of
1,526 mt is a 4.4 percent reduction from the OFL (s = 0.36/P* = 0.45) as it is a category 1 stock. The ACL is set equal to the ABC because the
stock is above its target biomass of B40%. 59.4 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (50 mt), the incidental open access fishery (1.2 mt), EFP catch (1 mt) and research catch (7.2 mt) resulting in a fishery HG of 1,466.6 mt. Recreational HGs are: 50 mt (Washington); 75 mt (Oregon); and 135 mt (California).
r Chilipepper. A coastwide update assessment of the chilipepper stock was conducted in 2015 and estimated to be at 64 percent of its unfished
biomass in 2015. Chilipepper are managed with stock-specific harvest specifications south of 40deg;10′N lat. and within the Minor Shelf Rockfish
complex north of 40deg;10′ N lat. Projected OFLs are stratified north and south of 40deg;10′ N lat. based on the average historical assessed
area catch, which is 93 percent for the area south of 40deg;10′ N lat. and 7 percent for the area north of 40deg;10′ N lat. The OFL of 2,623 mt
for the area south of 40deg;10′ N lat. is projected in the 2015 assessment using an FMSY proxy of F50%. The ABC of 2,507 mt is a 4.4 percent
reduction from the OFL (s = 0.36/P* = 0.45) because it is a category 1 stock. The ACL is set equal to the ABC because the stock is above its
target biomass of B40%. 45.9 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the incidental open access fishery (5 mt), EFP fishing (30 mt), and
research catch (10.9 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 2,461.1 mt.
s Dover sole. A 2011 Dover sole assessment estimated the stock to be at 83.7 percent of its unfished biomass in 2011. The OFL of 90,282 mt
is based on an updated catch-only projection from the 2011 stock assessment assuming actual catches since 2011 and using an FMSY proxy of
F30%. The ABC of 86,310 mt is a 4.4 percent reduction from the OFL (s = 0.36/P* = 0.45) because it is a category 1 stock. The ACL could be
set equal to the ABC because the stock is above its target biomass of B25%. However, the ACL of 50,000 mt is set at a level below the ABC and
higher than the maximum historical landed catch. 1,593.7 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (1,497 mt), the incidental open access fishery (54.8 mt), and research catch (41.9 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 48,406.3 mt.
t English sole. A 2013 stock assessment was conducted, which estimated the stock to be at 88 percent of its unfished biomass in 2013. The
OFL of 8,255 mt is projected in the 2013 assessment using an FMSY proxy of F30%. The ABC of 7,537 mt is an 8.7 percent reduction from the
OFL (s = 0.72/P* = 0.45) because it is a category 2 stock. The ACL is set equal to the ABC because the stock is above its target biomass of
B25%. 212.8 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (200 mt), the incidental open access fishery (7 mt) and research
catch (5.8 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 7,324.2 mt.
u Lingcod north. The 2009 lingcod assessment modeled two populations north and south of the California-Oregon border (42° N lat.). Both populations were healthy with stock depletion estimated at 62 and 74 percent for the north and south, respectively in 2009.The OFL is based on an
updated catch-only projection from the 2009 assessment assuming actual catches since 2009 and using an FMSY proxy of F45%. The OFL is apportioned by adding 48 percent of the OFL from California, resulting in an OFL of 3,310 mt for the area north of 40deg;10′ N lat. The ABC of
3,110 mt is based on a 4.4 percent reduction (s = 0.36/P* = 0.45) from the OFL contribution for the area north of 42° N lat. because it is a category 1 stock, and an 8.7 percent reduction (s = 0.72/P* = 0.45) from the OFL contribution for the area between 42° N lat. and 40deg;10′ N lat.
because it is a category 2 stock. The ACL is set equal to the ABC because the stock is above its target biomass of B40%. 278.2 mt is deducted
from the ACL for the Tribal fishery (250 mt), the incidental open access fishery (16 mt), EFP catch (0.5 mt) and research catch (11.7 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 2,831.8 mt.
v Lingcod south. The 2009 lingcod assessment modeled two populations north and south of the California-Oregon border (42° N lat.). Both
populations were healthy with stock depletion estimated at 62 and 74 percent for the north and south, respectively in 2009. The OFL is based on
an updated catch-only projection of the 2009 stock assessment assuming actual catches since 2009 and using an FMSY proxy of F45%. The OFL
is apportioned by subtracting 48 percent of the California OFL, resulting in an OFL of 1,373 mt for the area south of 40deg;10′ N lat. The ABC of
1,144 mt is based on a 16.7 percent reduction from the OFL (s = 0.72/P* = 0.40) because it is a category 2 stock. The ACL is set equal to the
ABC because the stock is above its target biomass of B40%. 9 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the incidental open access fishery
(6.9 mt), EFP fishing (1 mt), and research catch (1.1 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,135 mt.
w Longnose skate. A stock assessment was conducted in 2007 and the stock was estimated to be at 66 percent of its unfished biomass. The
OFL of 2,526 mt is derived from the 2007 stock assessment using an FMSY proxy of F50%. The ABC of 2,415 mt is a 4.4 percent reduction from
the OFL (s = 0.36/P* = 0.45) because it is a category 1 stock. The ACL of 2,000 mt is a fixed harvest level that provides greater access to the
stock and is less than the ABC. 147 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (130 mt), incidental open access fishery
(3.8 mt), and research catch (13.2 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,853 mt.
x Longspine thornyhead. A 2013 longspine thornyhead coastwide stock assessment estimated the stock to be at 75 percent of its unfished biomass in 2013. A coastwide OFL of 4,339 mt is projected in the 2013 stock assessment using an F50%FMSY proxy. The coastwide ABC of 3,614
mt is a 16.7 percent reduction from the OFL (s = 0.72/P* = 0.40) because it is a category 2 stock. For the portion of the stock that is north of
34°27′ N lat., the ACL is 2,747 mt, and is 76 percent of the coastwide ABC based on the average swept-area biomass estimates (2003–2012)
from the NMFS NWFSC trawl survey. 46.8 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (30 mt), the incidental open access
fishery (3.3 mt), and research catch (13.5 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 2,700.2 mt. For that portion of the stock south of 34°27′ N lat. the ACL
is 867 mt and is 24 percent of the coastwide ABC based on the average swept-area biomass estimates (2003–2012) from the NMFS NWFSC
trawl survey. 3.2 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the incidental open access fishery (1.8 mt), and research catch (1.4 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 863.8 mt.
y Pacific cod. The 3,200 mt OFL is based on the maximum level of historic landings. The ABC of 2,221 mt is a 30.6 percent reduction from the
OFL (s = 1.44/P* = 0.40) as it is a category 3 stock. The 1,600 mt ACL is the OFL reduced by 50 percent as a precautionary adjustment. 509 mt
is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (500 mt), research catch (7 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (2 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,091 mt.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 May 14, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
22408
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 94 / Tuesday, May 15, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
z Pacific whiting. The coastwide stock assessment was published in 2018 and estimated the spawning stock to be at 66.7 percent of its
unfished biomass. The 2018 OFL of 725,984 mt is based on the 2018 assessment with an F40% FMSY proxy. The 2018 coastwide, unadjusted
Total Allowable Catch (TAC) of 517,775 mt is based on the 2018 stock assessment. The U.S. TAC is 73.88 percent of the coastwide unadjusted
TAC. Up to 15 percent of each party’s unadjusted 2017 TAC (58,901 mt for the U.S. and 20,824 mt for Canada) is added to each party’s 2018
unadjusted TAC, resulting in a U.S. adjusted 2018 TAC of 441,433 mt. From the adjusted U.S. TAC, 77,251 mt is deducted to accommodate the
Tribal fishery, and 1,500 mt is deducted to accommodate research and bycatch in other fisheries, resulting in a fishery HG of 362,682 mt. The
TAC for Pacific whiting is established under the provisions of the Agreement with Canada on Pacific Hake/Whiting and the Pacific Whiting Act of
2006, 16 U.S.C. 7001–7010, and the international exception applies. Therefore, no ABC or ACL values are provided for Pacific whiting.
aa Petrale sole. A 2015 stock assessment update was conducted, which estimated the stock to be at 31 percent of its unfished biomass in
2015. The OFL of 3,152 mt is projected in the 2015 assessment using an FMSY proxy of F30%. The ABC of 3,013 mt is a 4.4 percent reduction
from the OFL (s = 0.36/P* = 0.45) because it is a category 1 stock. The ACL is set equal to the ABC because the stock is above its target biomass of B25%. 240.9 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (220 mt), the incidental open access fishery (3.2 mt) and
research catch (17.7 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 2,772.1 mt.
bb Sablefish north. A coastwide sablefish stock assessment update was conducted in 2015. The coastwide sablefish biomass was estimated to
be at 33 percent of its unfished biomass in 2015. The coastwide OFL of 8,329 mt is projected in the 2015 stock assessment using an FMSY
proxy of F45%. The ABC of 7,604 mt is an 8.7 percent reduction from the OFL (s = 0.36/P* = 0.40). The 40ndash;10 adjustment is applied to the
ABC to derive a coastwide ACL value because the stock is in the precautionary zone. This coastwide ACL value is not specified in regulations.
The coastwide ACL value is apportioned north and south of 36° N lat., using the 2003–2014 average estimated swept area biomass from the
NMFS NWFSC trawl survey, with 73.8 percent apportioned north of 36° N lat. and 26.2 percent apportioned south of 36° N lat. The northern
ACL is 5,475 mt and is reduced by 548 mt for the Tribal allocation (10 percent of the ACL north of 36° N lat.). The 548 mt Tribal allocation is reduced by 1.5 percent to account for discard mortality. Detailed sablefish allocations are shown in Table 2c.
cc Sablefish south. The ACL for the area south of 36° N lat. is 1,944 mt (26.2 percent of the calculated coastwide ACL value). 5 mt is deducted
from the ACL to accommodate the incidental open acrdedseescess fishery (2 mt) and research catch (3 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,939
mt.
dd Shortbelly rockfish. A non-quantitative shortbelly rockfish assessment was conducted in 2007. The spawning stock biomass of shortbelly
rockfish was estimated to be 67 percent of its unfished biomass in 2005. The OFL of 6,950 mt is based on the estimated MSY in the 2007 stock
assessment. The ABC of 5,789 mt is a 16.7 percent reduction of the OFL (s = 0.72/P* = 0.40) because it is a category 2 stock. The 500 mt ACL
is set to accommodate incidental catch when fishing for co-occurring healthy stocks and in recognition of the stock’s importance as a forage species in the California Current ecosystem. 10.9 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the incidental open access fishery (8.9 mt) and research catch (2 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 489.1 mt.
ee Shortspine thornyhead. A 2013 coastwide shortspine thornyhead stock assessment estimated the stock to be at 74.2 percent of its unfished
biomass in 2013. A coastwide OFL of 3,116 mt is projected in the 2013 stock assessment using an F50%FMSY proxy. The coastwide ABC of
2,596 mt is a 16.7 percent reduction from the OFL (s = 0.72/P* = 0.40) because it is a category 2 stock. For the portion of the stock that is north
of 34°27′ N lat., the ACL is 1,698 mt. The northern ACL is 65.4 percent of the coastwide ABC based on the average swept-area biomass estimates (2003–2012) from the NMFS NWFSC trawl survey. 59 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (50 mt), the incidental open access fishery (1.8 mt), and research catch (7.2 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,639 mt for the area north of 34°27′ N lat. For that
portion of the stock south of 34°27′ N lat. the ACL is 898 mt. The southern ACL is 34.6 percent of the coastwide ABC based on the average
swept-area biomass estimates (2003–2012) from the NMFS NWFSC trawl survey. 42.3 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the incidental open access fishery (41.3 mt) and research catch (1 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 855.7 mt for the area south of 34°27′ N lat.
ff Spiny dogfish. A coastwide spiny dogfish stock assessment was conducted in 2011. The coastwide spiny dogfish biomass was estimated to
be at 63 percent of its unfished biomass in 2011. The coastwide OFL of 2,500 mt is derived from the 2011 assessment using an FMSY proxy of
F50%. The coastwide ABC of 2,083 mt is a 16.7 percent reduction from the OFL (s = 0.72/P* = 0.40) because it is a category 2 stock. The ACL
is set equal to the ABC because the stock is above its target biomass of B40%. 338 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (275 mt), the incidental open access fishery (49.5 mt), EFP catch (1 mt), and research catch (12.5 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,745 mt.
gg Splitnose rockfish. A coastwide splitnose rockfish assessment was conducted in 2009 that estimated the stock to be at 66 percent of its
unfished biomass in 2009. Splitnose rockfish in the north is managed in the Minor Slope Rockfish complex and with stock-specific harvest specifications south of 40deg;10′ N lat. The coastwide OFL is projected in the 2009 assessment using an FMSY proxy of F50%. The coastwide OFL is
apportioned north and south of 40deg;10′ N lat. based on the average 1916–2008 assessed area catch resulting in 64.2 percent of the coastwide
OFL apportioned south of 40deg;10′ N lat., and 35.8 percent apportioned for the contribution of splitnose rockfish to the northern Minor Slope
Rockfish complex. The southern OFL of 1,842 mt results from the apportionment described above. The southern ABC of 1,761 mt is a 4.4 percent reduction from the southern OFL (s = 0.36/P* = 0.45) because it is a category 1 stock. The ACL is set equal to the ABC because the stock
is estimated to be above its target biomass of B40%. 10.7 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the incidental open access fishery (0.2
mt), research catch (9 mt) and EFP catch (1.5 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,750.3 mt.
hh Starry flounder. The stock was assessed in 2005 and was estimated to be above 40 percent of its unfished biomass in 2005 (44 percent in
Washington and Oregon, and 62 percent in California). The coastwide OFL of 1,847 mt is set equal to the 2016 OFL, which was derived from
the 2005 assessment using an FMSY proxy of F30%. The ABC of 1,282 mt is a 30.6 percent reduction from the OFL (s = 1.44/P* = 0.40) because
it is a category 3 stock. The ACL is set equal to the ABC because the stock was estimated to be above its target biomass of B25% in 2018. 10.3
mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (2 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (8.3 mt), resulting in a fishery HG
of 1,271.7 mt.
ii Widow rockfish. The widow rockfish stock was assessed in 2015 and was estimated to be at 75 percent of its unfished biomass in 2015. The
OFL of 13,237 mt is projected in the 2015 stock assessment using the F50% FMSY proxy. The ABC of 12,655 mt is a 4.4 percent reduction from
the OFL (s = 0.36/P* = 0.45) because it is a category 1 stock. The ACL is set equal to the ABC because the stock is above its target biomass of
B40%. 217.7 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (200 mt), the incidental open access fishery (0.5 mt), EFP catch (9
mt) and research catch (8.2 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 12,437.3 mt.
jj Yellowtail rockfish. A 2013 yellowtail rockfish stock assessment was conducted for the portion of the population north of 40deg;10′ N. lat. The
estimated stock depletion is 67 percent of its unfished biomass in 2013. The OFL of 6,574 mt is projected in the 2013 stock assessment using
an FMSY proxy of F50%. The ABC of 6,002 mt is an 8.7 percent reduction from the OFL (s = 0.72/P*= 0.45) because it is a category 2 stock. The
ACL is set equal to the ABC because the stock is above its target biomass of B40%. 1,030 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the
Tribal fishery (1,000 mt), the incidental open access fishery (3.4 mt), EFP catch (10 mt) and research catch (16.6 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of
4,972.1 mt.
kk Minor Nearshore Rockfish north. The OFL for Minor Nearshore Rockfish north of 40deg;10′ N lat. of 119 mt is the sum of the OFL contributions for the component species managed in the complex. The ABCs for the minor rockfish complexes are based on a sigma value of 0.72 for
category 2 stocks (blue/deacon rockfish in California, brown rockfish, China rockfish, and copper rockfish) and a sigma value of 1.44 for category
3 stocks (all others) with a P* of 0.45. The resulting ABC of 105 mt is the summed contribution of the ABCs for the component species. The ACL
of 105 mt is the sum of contributing ABCs. 1.8 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (1.5 mt), and the incidental open
access fishery (0.3 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 103.2 mt. Between 40deg;10′ N lat. and 42° N lat. the Minor Nearshore Rockfish complex
north has a harvest guideline of 40.2 mt. Blue/deacon rockfish south of 42° N lat. has a species-specific HG, described in footnote pp.
ll Minor Shelf Rockfish north. The OFL for Minor Shelf Rockfish north of 40deg;10′ N lat. of 2,302 mt is the sum of the OFL contributions for the
component species within the complex. The ABCs for the minor rockfish complexes are based on a sigma value of 0.36 for a category 1 stock
(chilipepper), a sigma value of 0.72 for category 2 stocks (greenspotted rockfish between 40deg;10′ and 42° N lat. and greenstriped rockfish) and
a sigma value of 1.44 for category 3 stocks (all others) with a P* of 0.45. The resulting ABC of 2,048 mt is the summed contribution of the ABCs
for the component species. The ACL of 2,047 mt is the sum of contributing ABCs of healthy assessed stocks and unassessed stocks, plus the
ACL contribution of greenspotted rockfish in California where the 40ndash;10 adjustment was applied to the ABC contribution for this stock because it is in the precautionary zone. 83.8 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (30 mt), the incidental open access
fishery (26 mt), EFP catch (3 mt), and research catch (24.8 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,963.2 mt.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 May 14, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 94 / Tuesday, May 15, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
22409
mm Minor Slope Rockfish north. The OFL for Minor Slope Rockfish north of 40deg;10′ N. lat. of 1,896 mt is the sum of the OFL contributions for
the component species within the complex. The ABCs for the Minor Slope Rockfish complexes are based on a sigma value of 0.39 for aurora
rockfish, a sigma value of 0.36 for the other category 1 stock (splitnose rockfish), a sigma value of 0.72 for category 2 stocks (rougheye rockfish,
blackspotted rockfish, and sharpchin rockfish), and a sigma value of 1.44 for category 3 stocks (all others) with a P* of 0.45. A unique sigma of
0.39 was calculated for aurora rockfish because the variance in estimated spawning biomass was greater than the 0.36 used as a proxy for
other category 1 stocks. The resulting ABC of 1,754 mt is the summed contribution of the ABCs for the component species. The ACL is set
equal to the ABC because all the assessed component stocks (rougheye rockfish, blackspotted rockfish, sharpchin rockfish, and splitnose rockfish) are above the target biomass of B40%. 65.1 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (36 mt), the incidental open access fishery (18.6 mt), EFP catch (1 mt), and research catch (9.5 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,688.9 mt.
nn Minor Nearshore Rockfish south. The OFL for the Minor Nearshore Rockfish complex south of 40deg;10′ N lat. of 1,344 mt is the sum of the
OFL contributions for the component species within the complex. The ABC for the southern Minor Nearshore Rockfish complex is based on a
sigma value of 0.72 for category 2 stocks (blue/deacon rockfish north of 34°27′ N lat., brown rockfish, China rockfish, and copper rockfish) and a
sigma value of 1.44 for category 3 stocks (all others) with a P* of 0.45. The resulting ABC of 1,180 mt is the summed contribution of the ABCs
for the component species. The ACL of 1,179 mt is the sum of the contributing ABCs of healthy assessed stocks and unassessed stocks, plus
the ACL contribution for China rockfish where the 40ndash;10 adjustment was applied to the ABC contribution for this stock because it is in the
precautionary zone. 4.1 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the incidental open access fishery (1.4 mt) and research catch (2.7 mt),
resulting in a fishery HG of 1,174.9 mt. Blue/deacon rockfish south of 42° N lat. has a species-specific HG set equal to the 40ndash;10-adjusted
ACL for the portion of the stock north of 34°27′ N lat. (250.3 mt) plus the ABC contribution for the unassessed portion of the stock south of
34°27′ N lat. (60.8 mt). The California (i.e., south of 42° N lat.) blue/deacon rockfish HG is 311.1 mt.
oo Minor Shelf Rockfish south. The OFL for the Minor Shelf Rockfish complex south of 40deg;10′ N lat. of 1,918 mt is the sum of the OFL contributions for the component species within the complex. The ABC for the southern Minor Shelf Rockfish complex is based on a sigma value of
0.72 for category 2 stocks (i.e., greenspotted and greenstriped rockfish) and a sigma value of 1.44 for category 3 stocks (all others) with a P* of
0.45. The resulting ABC of 1,625 mt is the summed contribution of the ABCs for the component species. The ACL of 1,624 mt is the sum of contributing ABCs of healthy assessed stocks and unassessed stocks, plus the ACL contribution of greenspotted rockfish in California where the
40ndash;10 adjustment was applied to the ABC contribution for this stock because it is in the precautionary zone. 47.2 mt is deducted from the
ACL to accommodate the incidental open access fishery (8.6 mt), EFP catch (30 mt), and research catch (8.6 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of
1,576.8 mt.
pp Minor Slope Rockfish south. The OFL of 829 mt is the sum of the OFL contributions for the component species within the complex. The
ABC for the southern Minor Slope Rockfish complex is based on a sigma value of 0.39 for aurora rockfish, a sigma value of 0.72 for category 2
stocks (blackgill rockfish, rougheye rockfish, blackspotted rockfish, and sharpchin rockfish) and a sigma value of 1.44 for category 3 stocks (all
others) with a P* of 0.45. A unique sigma of 0.39 was calculated for aurora rockfish because the variance in estimated biomass was greater than
the 0.36 used as a proxy for other category 1 stocks. The resulting ABC of 719 mt is the summed contribution of the ABCs for the component
species. The ACL of 709 mt is the sum of the contributing ABCs of healthy assessed stocks and unassessed stocks, plus the ACL contribution
of blackgill rockfish where the 40ndash;10 adjustment was applied to the ABC contribution for this stock because it is in the precautionary zone.
20.2 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the incidental open access fishery (17.2 mt), EFP catch (1 mt), and research catch (2 mt),
resulting in a fishery HG of 688.8 mt. Blackgill rockfish has a stock-specific HG for the entire groundfish fishery south of 40deg;10′ N lat. set
equal to the species’ contribution to the 40ndash;10-adjusted ACL. Harvest of blackgill rockfish in all groundfish fisheries counts against this HG
of 122.4 mt. Nontrawl fisheries are subject to a blackgill rockfish HG of 45.3 mt.
qq Other Flatfish. The Other Flatfish complex is comprised of flatfish species managed in the PCGFMP that are not managed with species-specific OFLs/ABCs/ACLs. Most of the species in the Other Flatfish complex are unassessed and include: Butter sole, curlfin sole, flathead sole, Pacific sanddab, rock sole, sand sole, and rex sole. The Other Flatfish OFL of 9,690 mt is based on the sum of the OFL contributions of the component stocks. The ABC of 7,281 mt is based on a sigma value of 0.72 for a category 2 stock (rex sole) and a sigma value of 1.44 for category 3
stocks (all others) with a P* of 0.40. The ACL is set equal to the ABC. The ACL is set equal to the ABC because all of the assessed stocks (i.e.,
Pacific sanddabs and rex sole) were above their target biomass of B25%. 204 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (60
mt), the incidental open access fishery 125 mt), and research catch (19 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 7,077 mt.
rr Other Fish. The Other Fish complex is comprised of kelp greenling coastwide, cabezon off Washington, and leopard shark coastwide. The
2015 assessment for the kelp greenling stock off of Oregon projected an estimated depletion of 80 percent. All other stocks are unassessed. The
OFL of 501 mt is the sum of the OFL contributions for kelp greenling coastwide, cabezon off Washington, and leopard shark coastwide. The
ABC for the Other Fish complex is based on a sigma value of 0.44 for kelp greenling off Oregon and a sigma value of 1.44 for category 3 stocks
(all others) with a P* of 0.45. A unique sigma of 0.44 was calculated for kelp greenling off Oregon because the variance in estimated spawning
biomass was greater than the 0.36 sigma used as a proxy for other category 1 stocks. The resulting ABC of 441 mt is the summed contribution
of the ABCs for the component species. The ACL is set equal to the ABC because all of the assessed stocks (kelp greenling off Oregon) were
above their target biomass of B40%. There are no deductions from the ACL so the fishery HG is equal to the ACL of 441 mt.
4. Table 2b to part 660, subpart C, is
revised to read as follows:
■
TABLE 2b TO PART 660, SUBPART C—2018, AND BEYOND, ALLOCATIONS BY SPECIES OR SPECIES GROUP
[Weight in metric tons]
Species
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
BOCACCIO a
.......................
COWCOD a b .......................
DARKBLOTCHED ROCKFISH c.
PACIFIC OCEAN PERCH d
YELLOWEYE ROCKFISH a
Arrowtooth flounder .............
Big skate a ...........................
Canary rockfish a e ...............
Chilipepper ..........................
Dover sole ...........................
English sole .........................
Lingcod ................................
Lingcod ................................
Longnose skate a ................
Longspine thornyhead ........
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Fishery HG or
ACT
Area
Trawl
Percent
Non-trawl
Mt
Percent
Mt
S of 40°10′ N lat .................
S of 40°10′ N lat .................
Coastwide ...........................
725.6
4.0
575.8
39
36
95
283.3
1.4
547.0
61
64
5
442.3
2.6
28.8
N of 40°10′ N lat ................
Coastwide ...........................
Coastwide ...........................
Coastwide ...........................
Coastwide ...........................
S of 40°10′ N lat .................
Coastwide ...........................
Coastwide ...........................
N of 40°10′ N lat ................
S of 40°10′ N lat .................
Coastwide ...........................
N of 34°27′ N lat ................
231.6
14.0
11,644.9
436.6
1,466.6
2,461.1
48,406.3
7,324.2
2,831.8
1,135.0
1,853.0
2,700.2
95
NA
95
95
NA
75
95
95
45
45
90
95
220.0
1.1
11,062.6
414.8
1,060.1
1,845.8
45,986.0
6,958.0
1,274.3
510.8
1,667.7
2,565.2
5
NA
5
5
NA
25
5
5
55
55
10
5
11.6
12.9
582.2
21.8
406.5
615.3
2,420.3
366.2
1,557.5
624.3
185.3
135.0
16:07 May 14, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
22410
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 94 / Tuesday, May 15, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 2b TO PART 660, SUBPART C—2018, AND BEYOND, ALLOCATIONS BY SPECIES OR SPECIES GROUP—Continued
[Weight in metric tons]
Species
Trawl
Fishery HG or
ACT
Area
Percent
Pacific cod ...........................
Pacific whiting g ...................
Petrale sole .........................
Coastwide ...........................
Coastwide ...........................
Coastwide ...........................
1,091.0
362,682.0
2,772.1
Sablefish .............................
N of 36° N lat .....................
S of 36° N lat .....................
N of 34°27′ N lat ................
S of 34°27′ N lat .................
S of 40°10′ N lat .................
Coastwide ...........................
Coastwide ...........................
N of 40°10′ N lat ................
N of 40°10′ N lat ................
N of 40°10′ N lat ................
S of 40°10′ N lat .................
S of 40°10′ N lat .................
Coastwide ...........................
1,939.0
1,639.0
855.7
1,750.3
1,271.7
12,437.3
4,972.1
1,963.2
1,688.9
1,576.8
688.8
7,077.0
Mt
N/A
Sablefish .............................
Shortspine thornyhead ........
Shortspine thornyhead ........
Splitnose rockfish ................
Starry flounder ....................
Widow rockfish f ..................
Yellowtail rockfish ...............
Minor Shelf Rockfish a .........
Minor Slope Rockfish ..........
Minor Shelf Rockfish a .........
Minor Slope Rockfish ..........
Other Flatfish ......................
Non-trawl
95
100
95
Percent
1,036.4
362,682.0
2,633.5
Mt
5
0
5
54.5
0.0
138.6
58
5
NA
5
50
9
12
40
19
88
37
10
1,124.6
81.9
805.7
87.5
635.9
1,119.4
596.6
781.4
320.9
1,384.4
254.9
707.7
See Table 2c
42
95
NA
95
50
91
88
60
81
12
63
90
814.4
1,557.0
50.0
1,662.8
635.9
11,317.9
4,375.4
1,181.8
1,368.0
192.37
433.9
6,369.3
a Allocations
decided through the biennial specification process.
cowcod fishery harvest guideline is further reduced to an ACT of 4.0 mt.
c Consistent with regulations at § 660.55(c), 9 percent (49.2 mt) of the total trawl allocation for darkblotched rockfish is allocated to the Pacific
whiting fishery, as follows: 20.7 mt for the Shorebased IFQ Program, 11.8 mt is managed as a set-aside for the MS sector, and 16.7 mt is managed as a set-aside for the C/P sector. The tonnage calculated here for the Pacific whiting IFQ fishery contributes to the total shorebased trawl
allocation, which is found at § 660.140(d)(1)(ii)(D).
d Consistent with regulations at § 660.55(c), 17 percent (37.4 mt) of the total trawl allocation for POP is allocated to the Pacific whiting fishery,
as follows: 15.7 mt for the Shorebased IFQ Program, 9.0 mt is managed as a set-aside the MS sector, and 12.7 mt is managed as a set-aside
for the C/P sector. The tonnage calculated here for the Pacific whiting IFQ fishery contributes to the total shorebased trawl allocation, which is
found at § 660.140(d)(1)(ii)(D).
e Canary rockfish is allocated approximately 72 percent to trawl and 28 percent to non-trawl. 46 mt of the total trawl allocation of canary rockfish is allocated to the MS and C/P sectors, as follows: 30 mt for the MS sector, and 16 mt for the C/P sector.
f Consistent with regulations at § 660.55(c), 10 percent (1,131.8 mt) of the total trawl allocation for widow rockfish is allocated to the Pacific
whiting fishery, as follows: 475.4 mt for the Shorebased IFQ Program, 271.6 mt for the MS sector, and 384.8 mt for the C/P sector. The tonnage
calculated here for the Pacific whiting IFQ fishery contributes to the total shorebased trawl allocation, which is found at § 660.140(d)(1)(ii)(D).
g Consistent with regulations at § 660.55(i)(2), the commercial harvest guideline for Pacific whiting is allocated as follows: 34 percent (123,312
mt) for the C/P Coop Program; 24 percent (87,044 mt) for the MS Coop Program; and 42 percent (152,326.5 mt) for the Shorebased IFQ Program. No more than 5 percent of the Shore based IFQ Program allocation (7,616 mt) may be taken and retained south of 42° N lat. before the
start of the primary Pacific whiting season north of 42° N lat.
b The
*
*
*
*
§ 660.140
*
5. In § 660.140, revise paragraph
(d)(1)(ii)(D) to read as follows:
■
*
Shorebased IFQ Program.
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
*
*
(ii) * * *
(D) For the trawl fishery, NMFS will
issue QP based on the following
shorebased trawl allocations:
2017 shorebased
trawl allocation
(mt)
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
IFQ species
Area
Arrowtooth flounder ................................................
BOCACCIO .............................................................
Canary rockfish .......................................................
Chilipepper ..............................................................
COWCOD ...............................................................
DARKBLOTCHED ROCKFISH ...............................
Dover sole ...............................................................
English sole ............................................................
Lingcod ...................................................................
Lingcod ...................................................................
Longspine thornyhead ............................................
Minor Shelf Rockfish complex ................................
Minor Shelf Rockfish complex ................................
Minor Slope Rockfish complex ...............................
Minor Slope Rockfish complex ...............................
Other Flatfish complex ............................................
Pacific cod ..............................................................
PACIFIC OCEAN PERCH ......................................
Pacific whiting .........................................................
Petrale sole .............................................................
Sablefish .................................................................
Sablefish .................................................................
Coastwide ...............................................................
South of 40°10′ N lat ..............................................
Coastwide ...............................................................
South of 40°10′ N lat ..............................................
South of 40°10′ N lat ..............................................
Coastwide ...............................................................
Coastwide ...............................................................
Coastwide ...............................................................
North of 40°10′ N lat ..............................................
South of 40°10′ N lat ..............................................
North of 34°27′ N lat ..............................................
North of 40°10′ N lat ..............................................
South of 40°10′ N lat ..............................................
North of 40°10′ N lat ..............................................
South of 40°10′ N lat ..............................................
Coastwide ...............................................................
Coastwide ...............................................................
North of 40°10′ N lat ..............................................
Coastwide ...............................................................
Coastwide ...............................................................
North of 36° N lat ...................................................
South of 36° N lat ..................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 May 14, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
11,050.6
302.4
1,014.1
1,920.8
1.40
507.6
45,981.0
9,258.6
1,359.7
558.9
2,699.8
1,148.1
192.2
1,268.8
432.7
7,455.4
1,031.4
198.3
152,326.5
2,745.3
2,416.4
780.8
15MYR1
2018 shorebased
trawl allocation
(mt)
10,992.6
283.3
1,014.1
1,845.8
1.40
518.4
45,981.0
6,953.0
1,259.32
510.75
2,560.2
1,146.8
192.4
1,268.0
433.9
6,349.3
1,031.4
198.3
152,326.5
2,628.5
2,521.9
814.4
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 94 / Tuesday, May 15, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
2017 shorebased
trawl allocation
(mt)
IFQ species
Area
Shortspine thornyhead ............................................
Shortspine thornyhead ............................................
Splitnose rockfish ....................................................
Starry flounder ........................................................
Widow rockfish ........................................................
YELLOWEYE ROCKFISH ......................................
Yellowtail rockfish ...................................................
North of 34°27′ N lat ..............................................
South of 34°27′ N lat ..............................................
South of 40°10′ N lat ..............................................
Coastwide ...............................................................
Coastwide ...............................................................
Coastwide ...............................................................
North of 40°10′ N lat ..............................................
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2018–10230 Filed 5–14–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 170816769–8162–02]
RIN 0648–XG225
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone Off Alaska; Deep-Water Species
Fishery by Vessels Using Trawl Gear in
the Gulf of Alaska
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; opening.
AGENCY:
NMFS is opening directed
fishing for species that comprise the
deep-water species fishery by vessels
using trawl gear in the Gulf of Alaska
(GOA). This action is necessary to fully
use the 2018 groundfish total allowable
catch specified for the species
comprising the deep-water species
category in the GOA.
DATES: Effective 1200 hours, Alaska
local time (A.l.t.), May 15, 2018, through
1200 hours, A.l.t., July 1, 2018.
Comments must be received at the
following address no later than 4:30
p.m., A.l.t., May 29, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this document, identified by FDMS
Docket Number NOAA–NMFS–2017–
0107 by any of the following methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20170107, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: Address written comments to
Glenn Merrill, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries
Division, Alaska Region NMFS, Attn:
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 May 14, 2018
Jkt 244001
Ellen Sebastian. Mail comments to P.O.
Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802–1668.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter
‘‘N/A’’ in the required fields if you wish
to remain anonymous). Attachments to
electronic comments will be accepted in
Microsoft Word, Excel, or Adobe PDF
file formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Obren Davis, 907–586–7228.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS
manages the groundfish fishery in the
GOA exclusive economic zone
according to the Fishery Management
Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of
Alaska (FMP) prepared by the North
Pacific Fishery Management Council
under authority of the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act. Regulations governing
fishing by U.S. vessels in accordance
with the FMP appear at subpart H of 50
CFR part 600 and 50 CFR part 679.
NMFS prohibited directed fishing for
species that comprise the deep-water
species fishery by vessels using trawl
gear in the GOA, effective 1200 hours,
A.l.t., April 23, 2018 (83 FR 18235,
April 26, 2018) under § 679.21(d)(6)(i).
That action was necessary because the
second seasonal apportionment of the
Pacific halibut catch (PSC) allowance
specified for the deep-water species
fishery in the GOA was reached. The
species and species groups that
comprise the deep-water species fishery
include sablefish, rockfish, deep-water
flatfish, rex sole, and arrowtooth
flounder.
Regulations at § 679.21(d)(4)(iii)(D)
require NMFS to combine management
of the available trawl halibut PSC limits
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1551.3
50.0
1661.8
630.9
11,392.7
1.10
4,246.1
22411
2018 shorebased
trawl allocation
(mt)
1,537.0
50.0
1,662.8
630.9
10,661.5
1.10
4,075.4
in the second season (April 1 through
July 1) deep-water and shallow-water
species fishery categories for use in
either fishery from May 15 through June
30 of each year. The combined second
seasonal apportionment of Pacific
halibut PSC limit is 702 metric tons
(mt). This includes the deep-water and
shallow water Pacific halibut PSC limits
carried forward from the first seasonal
apportionments (January 20 through
April 1). The deep-water and shallowwater Pacific halibut PSC limit
apportionments were established by the
final 2018 and 2019 harvest
specifications for groundfish of the GOA
(83 FR 8768, March 1, 2018).
As of May 9, 2018, NMFS has
determined that there is approximately
411 mt of the trawl Pacific halibut PSC
limit remaining in the deep-water
fishery and shallow-water fishery
second seasonal apportionments.
Therefore, in accordance with
§ 679.25(a)(1)(i), (a)(2)(i)(C), and
(a)(2)(iii)(D), and to fully utilize the
2018 groundfish total allowable catch
available in the deep-water species
fishery category NMFS is terminating
the previous closure and is reopening
directed fishing for species comprising
the deep-water fishery category in the
GOA. The Administrator, Alaska Region
(Regional Administrator) considered the
following factors in reaching this
decision: (1) The current harvest of
Pacific halibut PSC in the deep-water
species trawl fishery of the GOA and, (2)
the harvest capacity and stated intent on
future harvesting patterns of vessels in
participating in this fishery.
Classification
This action responds to the best
available information recently obtained
from the fishery. The Assistant
Administrator for Fisheries, NOAA
(AA), finds good cause to waive the
requirement to provide prior notice and
opportunity for public comment
pursuant to the authority set forth at 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B) as such requirement is
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest. This requirement is
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest as it would prevent NMFS from
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 15, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 22401-22411]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-10230]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 171023999-8440-02]
RIN 0648-BH31
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; Fisheries Off West Coast States;
Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery; Annual Specifications and Management
Measures for the 2018 Tribal and Non-Tribal Fisheries for Pacific
Whiting
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS issues this final rule for the 2018 Pacific whiting
fishery under the authority of the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery
Management Plan (FMP), the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), and the Pacific Whiting Act of
2006. This final rule announces the 2018 U.S. Total Allowable Catch of
441,433 metric tons (mt) of Pacific whiting, establishes a tribal
allocation of 77,251 mt, establishes a set-aside for research and
bycatch of 1,500 mt, and announces the allocations of Pacific whiting
to the non-tribal fishery for 2018. The catch limits in this rule are
intended to ensure the long-term sustainability of the Pacific whiting
stock.
DATES: Effective May 15, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frank Lockhart (West Coast Region,
NMFS), phone: 206-526-6142, and email: [email protected].
Electronic Access
This final rule is accessible via the internet at the Office of the
Federal Register website at https://www.federalregister.gov. Background
information and documents are available at the NMFS West Coast Region
website at https://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/fisheries/management/whiting/pacific_whiting.html and at the Pacific Fishery
Management Council's website at https://www.pcouncil.org/.
The final environmental impact statement regarding Harvest
Specifications and Management Measures for 2015-2016 and Biennial
Periods Thereafter, and the Final Environmental Assessment for Pacific
Coast Groundfish Harvest Specifications and Management Measures for
2017-2018 and Amendment 27 to the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery
Management Plan, are available on the NMFS West Coast Region website
at: www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/publications/nepa/groundfish/groundfish_nepa_documents.html and copies are available from Chuck
Tracy, Executive Director, Pacific Fishery Management Council
(Council), 7700 NE Ambassador Place, Portland, OR 97220, phone: 503-
820-2280.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This final rule announces the total allowable catch (TAC) for
Pacific whiting, which was determined under the terms of the Agreement
with Canada on Pacific Hake/Whiting (Agreement) and the Pacific Whiting
Act of 2006 (Whiting Act). The Agreement and the Whiting Act establish
bilateral bodies to implement the terms of the Agreement. The bilateral
bodies include: The Joint Management Committee (JMC), which recommends
the annual catch level for Pacific whiting; the Joint Technical
Committee (JTC), which conducts the Pacific whiting stock assessment;
the Scientific Review Group (SRG), which reviews the stock assessment;
and the Advisory Panel (AP), which provides stakeholder input to the
JMC.
The Agreement establishes a default harvest policy of F-40 percent,
which means a fishing mortality rate that would reduce the biomass to
40 percent of the estimated unfished level (F-40). The Agreement also
allocates 73.88 percent of the TAC to the United States and 26.12
percent of the TAC to Canada. The JMC is primarily responsible for
developing a TAC recommendation to the United States and Canada. The
Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the Secretary of State, has
the authority to accept or reject this recommendation.
[[Page 22402]]
2018 Pacific Whiting Stock Assessment
The JTC completed a stock assessment for Pacific whiting in March
2018. The assessment is available at https://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/fisheries/management/whiting/pacific_whiting_treaty.html. The assessment presents a model that
depends primarily upon an acoustic survey biomass index and catches of
the transboundary Pacific whiting stock to estimate the biomass of the
current stock. The most recent survey, conducted collaboratively
between the Canadian Department of Fisheries and Oceans and NMFS, was
completed in 2017.
Pacific whiting spawning stock biomass has been relatively stable
since 2013. The 2018 spawning biomass estimated to be 1.357 million mt.
Relative female spawning biomass for 2018 is estimated at 66.7 percent
of the unfished levels. The stock is currently estimated to be at its
highest level since the 1980s, as a result of an exceptionally strong
2010 cohort and above average 2014 cohort. As with past estimates,
there is a considerable range of uncertainty associated with this
estimate, because the youngest cohorts that make up a large portion of
the survey biomass have not been observed for very long.
The JTC provided tables showing catch alternatives for 2018. Using
the default F-40 percent harvest rate identified in the Agreement
(Paragraph 1 of Article III), the coastwide TAC for 2018 would be
725,984 mt. Projections setting the 2018 and 2019 catch equal to the
2017 TAC of 597,500 mt show the estimated median relative spawning
biomass decreasing from 67 percent in 2018 to 59 percent in 2019 and to
50 percent in 2020, with a 36 percent chance of the spawning biomass
falling below 40 percent of estimated historic biomass levels in 2020.
There is an estimated 73 percent chance of the spawning biomass
declining from 2018 to 2019, and an 82 percent chance of it declining
from 2019 to 2020 under this constant catch level. However, the 2018
estimate of median stock biomass is well above the overfished
threshold, and fishing intensity is below the F-40 percent target. This
indicates that the coastal Pacific whiting stock is not overfished and
that overfishing is not occurring.
Scientific and Management Reviews
The SRG, a bilateral body created under the Agreement, met in
Lynnwood, Washington on February 26-March 1, 2018, to review the draft
stock assessment document. The SRG determined that the 2018 Pacific
whiting assessment report and appendices present the best available
scientific information for the management of Pacific whiting. During
the meeting, however, the SRG raised a concern that the model results
and corresponding estimates of spawning stock biomass are strongly
affected by the choice of weights-at-age used in estimating fecundity.
To consider the variability in stock status estimates, the SRG
requested that the JTC analyze two approaches using different weights-
at-age (Appendix A in the stock assessment report). The first approach
is consistent with previous assessments, and includes time-invariant
fecundity-at-age based on the average vector of weights-at-age over all
years. The second approach is derived from an alternative model using
time-varying fecundity-at-age calculated with annual estimates of mean
weights-at-age. The range of uncertainty of each model includes the
median estimate of current spawning biomass estimated by the other
model. However, the alternative model estimates that 2018 spawning
stock biomass is lower and much closer to the reference point (B40)
than the base-case model. The SRG's analysis suggested that this may be
because weights-at-age are important to calculating unfished spawning
biomass (B0), and the alternative model estimates a higher B0 as a
consequence of using higher mean weights-at-age in the early years of
the time series (1975-1979). The probability that 2018 spawning biomass
is below the B40 reference point is estimated as 7 percent by the base-
case model and 48 percent by the alternative model. Despite substantial
discussion, the SRG was unable to offer advice on which model is more
plausible, and requested additional work in the coming year from the
JTC to address the issue.
The AP and JMC met on March 5-6, 2018, in Lynnwood, Washington, to
develop advice on a 2018 coastwide TAC. The AP provided its 2018 TAC
recommendation to the JMC on March 6, 2018. The JMC reviewed the advice
of the JTC, the SRG, and the AP, and agreed on a TAC recommendation for
transmittal to the United States and Canadian Governments.
The Agreement directs the JMC to base the catch limit
recommendation on the default harvest rate unless scientific evidence
demonstrates that a different rate is necessary to sustain the offshore
Pacific whiting resource. After consideration of the 2018 stock
assessment and other relevant scientific information, the JMC did not
use the default harvest rate, and instead agreed on a more conservative
approach, using the same catch limits as 2017. There were three primary
reasons for choosing a TAC below the default level of F-40 percent.
First, the growth of the 2010 year class is slowing, which the recent
historic-high catch has in part depended on, and JMC members wanted to
extend the harvest available from this year class. Second, the 2018
stock assessment estimated a lower abundance than last year's
assessment for the 2014 year class, which comprised more of the 2016
fall catch than the large 2010 cohort, so the JMC did not want to
increase mortality on this year class, which is anticipated to be
important to the fishery over the next several years. Finally, the
overall abundance of Pacific hake/whiting is projected to begin
declining from its recent historic high levels, and the JMC did not
want to accelerate this decline by increasing the TAC. This
conservative TAC setting process, endorsed by the AP, resulted in a TAC
that is less than what it would be using the default harvest rate under
the Agreement.
The recommendation for an unadjusted 2018 U.S. TAC of 382,532 mt,
plus 58,901 mt carryover of uncaught quota from 2017 results in an
adjusted U.S. TAC of 441,433 mt for 2018 (73.88 percent of the
coastwide TAC). This recommendation is consistent with the best
available scientific information, provisions of the Agreement, and the
Whiting Act. The recommendation was transmitted via letter to the
United States and Canadian Governments on March 6, 2018. NMFS, under
delegation of authority from the Secretary of Commerce, approved the
adjusted TAC recommendation of 441,433 mt for U.S. fisheries on April
23, 2018.
Tribal Fishery Allocation
This final rule establishes the tribal allocation of Pacific
whiting for 2018. NMFS issued a proposed rule regarding this allocation
on January 24, 2018 (83 FR 3291). This action finalizes the tribal
allocation. Since 1996, NMFS has been allocating a portion of the U.S.
TAC of Pacific whiting to the tribal fishery. Regulations for the
Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Management Plan specify that the
tribal allocation is subtracted from the total U.S. Pacific whiting
TAC. The tribal Pacific whiting fishery is managed separately from the
non-tribal Pacific whiting fishery, and is not governed by limited
entry or open access regulations or allocations.
The proposed rule described the tribal allocation as 17.5 percent
of the U.S. TAC, and projected a range of potential tribal allocations
for 2018 based on a
[[Page 22403]]
range of U.S. TACs over the last 10 years (plus or minus 25 percent to
capture variability in stock abundance). As described in the proposed
rule, the resulting range of potential tribal allocations was 17,842 to
96,563 mt. Applying the approach described in the proposed rule, NMFS
is establishing the 2018 tribal allocation of 77,251 mt (17.5 percent
of the U.S. TAC) in this final rule. In 2009, NMFS, the states of
Washington and Oregon, and the tribes with treaty rights to harvest
whiting started a process to determine the long-term tribal allocation
for Pacific whiting; however, no long-term allocation has been
determined. While new scientific information or discussions with the
relevant parties may impact that decision, the best available
scientific information to date suggests that 77,251 mt is within the
likely range of potential treaty right amounts.
As with prior tribal Pacific whiting allocations, this final rule
is not intended to establish precedent for future Pacific whiting
seasons, or for the determination of the total amount of whiting to
which the Tribes are entitled under their treaty right. Rather, this
rule adopts an interim allocation. The long-term tribal treaty amount
will be based on further development of scientific information and
additional coordination and discussion with and among the coastal
tribes and the states of Washington and Oregon.
Harvest Guidelines and Allocations
In addition to the tribal allocation described in the proposed
rule, this final rule establishes the fishery harvest guideline (HG),
called the non-tribal allocation, which had not yet been determined at
the time the proposed rule was published. Although this was not part of
the proposed rule, the environmental assessment for the 2017-2018
harvest specifications rule (see ELECTRONIC ACCESS) analyzed a range of
TAC alternatives for 2018, and the final 2018 TAC falls within this
analyzed range. In addition, via the 2017-2018 specifications
rulemaking process, the public had an opportunity to comment on the
2017-2018 TACs for whiting, just as they did for all species in the
groundfish FMP. NMFS follows this process because, unlike for all other
groundfish species, the TAC for whiting is decided in a highly
abbreviated annual process from February through April of every year,
and the normal rulemaking process would not allow for the fishery to
open with the new TAC on the annual season opening date of May 15.
The HG is allocated among the three non-tribal sectors of the
Pacific whiting fishery. The 2018 fishery HG for Pacific whiting is
362,682 mt. This amount was determined by deducting the 77,251 mt
tribal allocation and the 1,500 mt allocation for scientific research
catch and fishing mortality in non-groundfish fisheries from the total
U.S. TAC of 441,433 mt.
NMFS did not include the HG in the tribal whiting proposed rule
published on January 24, 2018 (83 FR 3291), for two reasons related to
timing and process. First, a recommendation on the coastwide TAC for
Pacific whiting for 2018, under the terms of the Agreement with Canada,
was not available during development of the proposed rule. NMFS, under
delegation of authority from the Secretary of Commerce, approved a U.S.
TAC on April 23, 2018. Second, the fishery HG is established following
deductions from the U.S. TAC for the tribal allocation, mortality in
scientific research activities, and fishing mortality in non-groundfish
fisheries. The Council recommends to NMFS the research and bycatch set-
aside on an annual basis, based on estimates of scientific research
catch and estimated bycatch mortality in non-groundfish fisheries.
The regulations further allocate the fishery HG among the non-
tribal catcher/processor (C/P) Coop Program, Mothership (MS) Coop
Program, and Shorebased Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ) Program sectors
of the Pacific whiting fishery. The C/P Coop Program is allocated 34
percent (123,312 mt for 2018), the MS Coop Program is allocated 24
percent (87,044 mt for 2018), and the Shorebased IFQ Program is
allocated 42 percent (152,326.5 mt for 2018). The fishery south of
42[deg] N lat. may not take more than 7,616 mt (5 percent of the
Shorebased IFQ Program allocation) prior to May 15, the start of the
primary Pacific whiting season north of 42[deg] N lat.
Table 1--2018 Pacific Whiting Allocations
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2018 Pacific
whiting
Sector allocation
(mt)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tribal.................................................... 77,251
Catcher/Processor (C/P) Coop Program...................... 123,312
Mothership (MS) Coop Program.............................. 87,044
Shorebased IFQ Program.................................... 152,326.5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 2018, NMFS published a final rule changing the management of
darkblotched rockfish and Pacific ocean perch from a total catch limit
allocation to a set-aside (January 8, 2018; 83 FR 757). These set
asides as well as the allocations of canary and widow rockfish to the
Pacific whiting fishery are described in the footnotes to Table 2.b to
part 660, subpart C and are not changed in this rulemaking.
Comments and Responses
On January 24, 2018, NMFS issued a proposed rule for the allocation
and management of the 2018 tribal Pacific whiting fishery (83 FR 3291).
The comment period on the proposed rule closed on February 23, 2018. No
relevant comments were received, and no changes were made from the
proposed allocation and management measures for the 2018 tribal Pacific
whiting fishery.
Classification
The Annual Specifications and Management Measures for the 2018
Tribal and non-Tribal Fisheries for Pacific Whiting are issued under
the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and the Whiting Act of 2006.
The measures are in accordance with 50 CFR part 660, subparts C through
G, the regulations implementing the Pacific Coast Groundfish FMP, and
NMFS has determined that this rule is consistent with the national
standards of the Magnuson-Stevens Act and other applicable laws.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) and (d)(3), the NMFS Assistant
Administrator finds good cause to waive prior public notice and comment
and delay in effectiveness for those provisions in this final rule that
were not included in proposed rule (83 FR 3291), e.g., the U.S. TAC, as
delaying this rule would be impracticable and contrary to the public
interest. The annual harvest specifications for Pacific whiting must be
implemented by the start of the primary Pacific whiting season, which
begins on May 15, 2018, or the primary Pacific whiting fishery will
effectively remain closed.
Every year, NMFS conducts a Pacific whiting stock assessment with
participation from U.S. and Canadian scientists. The 2018 stock
assessment for Pacific whiting was prepared in early 2018, and included
updated total catch, length and age data from the U.S. and Canadian
fisheries from 2017, and biomass indices from the 2017 Joint U.S.-
Canadian acoustic/midwater trawl surveys. Because of this late
availability of the most recent data for the assessment, and the need
for time to conduct the treaty process for determining the TAC using
the most recent assessment, a determination on
[[Page 22404]]
TAC could not be completed before April 23, 2018. Thus, it is not
possible to allow for notice and comment before the start of the
primary Pacific whiting season on May 15.
A delay in implementing the Pacific whiting harvest specifications
to allow for notice and comment would be contrary to the public
interest because it would require either a shorter primary whiting
season or development of a TAC without the most recent data. A shorter
season could prevent the tribal and non-tribal fisheries from attaining
their 2018 allocations, which would result in unnecessary short-term
adverse economic effects for the Pacific whiting fishing vessels and
the associated fishing communities. A TAC determined without the most
recent data could fail to account for significant fluctuations in the
biomass of this relatively short-lived species. To prevent these
adverse effects and to allow the Pacific whiting season to commence, it
is in the best interest of the public to waive prior notice and
comment.
In addition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the NMFS Assistant
Administrator finds good cause to waive the 30-day delay in
effectiveness. Waiving the 30-day delay in effectiveness will not have
a negative impact on any entities, as there are no new compliance
requirements or other burdens placed on the fishing community with this
rule. Failure to make this final rule effective at the start of the
fishing year will undermine the intent of the rule, which is to promote
the optimal utilization and conservation of Pacific whiting. Making
this rule effective immediately would also serve the best interests of
the public because it will allow for the longest possible Pacific
whiting fishing season and therefore the best possible economic outcome
for those whose livelihoods depend on this fishery. Because the 30-day
delay in effectiveness would potentially cause significant financial
harm without providing any corresponding benefits, this final rule is
effective upon publication in the Federal Register.
The Office of Management and Budget has determined that this final
rule is not significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866. This
rule is not an Executive Order 13771 regulatory action because this
rule is not significant under Executive Order 12866.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
The description of this action, its purpose, and its legal basis
are described in the preamble to the proposed rule and are not repeated
here. A final regulatory flexibility analysis (FRFA) was prepared and
incorporates the initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA). NMFS
also prepared a Regulatory Impact Review (RIR) for this action. A copy
of the RIR/FRFA is available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES). A summary of
the FRFA, per the requirements of 5 U.S.C. 604 follows.
A Summary of the Significant Issues Raised by the Public in Response to
the IRFA, a Summary of the Agency's Assessment of Such Issues, and a
Statement of Any Changes Made in the Final Rule as a Result of Such
Comments
NMFS published a proposed rule on January 24, 2018 (83 FR 13291),
for the allocation of the 2018 tribal Pacific whiting fishery. The
comment period on the proposed rule closed on February 23, 2018, and no
comments were received from either the public or the Small Business
Administration on the initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA) or
the economic impacts of this action generally.
Description and Estimate of Number of Small Entities To Which the Rule
Would Apply
The FRFA describes the impacts on small entities, which are defined
in the IRFA for this action and not repeated here.
The current Shorebased IFQ Program is composed of 180 Quota Share
permits/accounts, 154 vessel accounts, and 47 first receivers, only a
portion of which participate in the Pacific whiting fishery. These
regulations also directly affect participants in the MS Coop Program, a
general term to describe the limited access program that applies to
eligible harvesters and processors in the MS sector of the Pacific
whiting at-sea trawl fishery. This program currently consists of six MS
processor permits, and a catcher vessel fleet currently composed of a
single coop, with 34 Mothership/Catcher Vessel (MS/CV) endorsed permits
(with three permits each having two catch history assignments).
These regulations also directly affect the C/P Coop Program,
composed of 10 C/P endorsed permits owned by three companies that have
formed a single coop. These coops are considered large entities from
several perspectives; they have participants that are large entities,
and have in total more than 750 employees worldwide including
affiliates.
Although there are three non-tribal sectors, many companies
participate in two sectors and some participate in all three sectors.
As part of the permit application processes for the non-tribal
fisheries, based on a review of the Small Business Administration size
criteria, permit applicants were asked if they considered themselves a
``small'' business, and to provide detailed ownership information.
After accounting for cross participation, multiple quota share account
holders, and affiliation through ownership, NMFS estimates there are
103 non-tribal entities directly affected by these final regulations,
89 of which are considered ``small'' businesses.
Description of the Steps the Agency Has Taken To Minimize the
Significant Economic Impact on Small Entities Consistent With the
Stated Objectives of Applicable Statutes
Sector allocations in 2018 are the same as those in 2017. NMFS
concludes that this rule will have similar outcomes as 2017 for both
large and small entities, and will not disproportionately affect small
entities. The U.S. portion of the TAC is divided between tribal, at-sea
mothership, at-sea catcher processors, and shoreside whiting sectors at
fixed percentages described above. Within the non-tribal sectors, a
catch share program allocates whiting to the individual vessel level
based on history in the shoreside and mothership sectors. The catcher-
processor coop harvests according to a coop agreement with agreed upon
allocations to each company, which have not changed in the past eight
years. With allocation determined down to the individual level in each
sector, the TAC should benefit both large and small entities equal to
the proportion of the individual level, and small entities would not
feel disproportionate effects relative to large entities. With the high
2018 TAC, small entities are expected to benefit, and experience no
adverse effects from this rule.
NMFS considered two alternatives for this action: The ``No-Action''
and the ``Proposed Action.'' Under the Proposed Action alternative,
NMFS proposed to set the tribal allocation percentage at 17.5 percent,
as requested by the tribes. These requests reflect the level of
participation in the fishery that will allow the tribes to exercise
their treaty right to fish for Pacific whiting. Consideration of a
percentage lower than the tribal request of 17.5 percent is not
appropriate in this instance. As a matter of policy, NMFS has
historically supported the harvest levels requested by the tribes.
Based on the information available to NMFS, the tribal request is
within their tribal treaty rights. A higher percentage would arguably
also be within the scope of the treaty right.
[[Page 22405]]
However, a higher percentage would unnecessarily limit the non-tribal
fishery. Under the no-action alternative, NMFS would not make an
allocation to the tribal sector. This alternative was considered, but
the regulatory framework provides for a tribal allocation on an annual
basis only. Therefore, the no-action alternative would result in no
allocation of Pacific whiting to the tribal sector in 2018, which would
be inconsistent with NMFS' responsibility to manage the fishery
consistent with the tribes' treaty rights. Given that there is a tribal
request for allocation in 2018, this alternative received no further
consideration.
Description of Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements
There are no reporting or recordkeeping requirements associated
with this final rule. No federal rules have been identified that
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this action.
Small Entity Compliance Guide
Section 212 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness
Act of 1996 states that, for each rule or group of related rules for
which an agency is required to prepare a FRFA, the agency shall publish
one or more guides to assist small entities in complying with the rule,
and shall designate such publications as ``small entity compliance
guides.'' The agency shall explain the actions a small entity is
required to take to comply with a rule or group of rules. As part of
this rulemaking process, a small entity compliance guide will be sent
to stakeholders, and copies of this final rule and guides (i.e.,
information bulletins) are available from NMFS at the following
website: https://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/fisheries/management/whiting/pacific_whiting.html.
Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments
Pursuant to Executive Order 13175, this final rule was developed
after meaningful collaboration with tribal officials from the area
covered by the FMP. Consistent with the Magnuson-Stevens Act at 16
U.S.C. 1852(b)(5), one of the voting members of the Pacific Council is
a representative of an Indian tribe with federally recognized fishing
rights from the area of the Council's jurisdiction. In addition, NMFS
has coordinated specifically with the tribes interested in the whiting
fishery regarding the issues addressed by this final rule.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 660
Fisheries, Fishing, Indian fisheries.
Dated: May 9, 2018.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 660 is amended
as follows:
PART 660--FISHERIES OFF WEST COAST STATES
0
1. The authority citation for part 660 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq., and
16 U.S.C. 7001 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 660.50, revise paragraph (f)(4) to read as follows:
Sec. 660.50 Pacific Coast treaty Indian fisheries.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(4) Pacific whiting. The tribal allocation for 2018 is 77,251 mt.
* * * * *
0
3. Table 2a to part 660, subpart C, is revised to read as follows:
Table 2a to Part 660, Subpart C--2018, and Beyond, Specifications of OFL, ABC, ACL, ACT and Fishery Harvest Guidelines
[Weights in metric tons]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Species Area OFL ABC ACL \a\ Fishery HG \b\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BOCACCIO \c\................................... S of 40[deg]10' N lat.................. 2,013 1,924 741 726
COWCOD \d\..................................... S of 40[deg]10' N lat.................. 71 64 10 8
DARKBLOTCHED ROCKFISH \e\...................... Coastwide.............................. 683 653 653 576
PACIFIC OCEAN PERCH \f\........................ N of 40[deg]10' N lat.................. 984 941 281 232
YELLOWEYE ROCKFISH \g\......................... Coastwide.............................. 58 48 20 14
Arrowtooth flounder \h\........................ Coastwide.............................. 16,498 13,743 13,743 11,645
Big skate \i\.................................. Coastwide.............................. 541 494 494 437
Black rockfish \j\............................. California (South of 42[deg] N lat.)... 347 332 332 331
Black rockfish \k\............................. Oregon (Between 46[deg]16' N lat. and 570 520 520 519
42[deg] N lat.).
Black rockfish \l\............................. Washington (N of 46[deg]16' N lat.).... 315 301 301 283
Blackgill rockfish \m\......................... S of 40[deg]10' N lat.................. NA NA NA NA
Cabezon \n\.................................... California (South of 42[deg] N lat.)... 156 149 149 149
Cabezon \o\.................................... Oregon (Between 46[deg]16' N lat. and 49 47 47 47
42[deg] N lat.).
California scorpionfish \p\.................... S of 34[deg]27' N lat.................. 278 254 150 148
Canary rockfish \q\............................ Coastwide.............................. 1,596 1,526 1,526 1,467
Chilipepper \r\................................ S of 40[deg]10' N lat.................. 2,623 2,507 2,507 2,461
Dover sole \s\................................. Coastwide.............................. 90,282 86,310 50,000 48,406
English sole \t\............................... Coastwide.............................. 8,255 7,537 7,537 7,324
Lingcod \u\.................................... N of 40[deg]10' N lat.................. 3,310 3,110 3,110 2,832
Lingcod \v\.................................... S of 40[deg]10' N lat.................. 1,373 1,144 1,144 1,135
Longnose skate \w\............................. Coastwide.............................. 2,526 2,415 2,000 1,853
Longspine thornyhead \x\....................... Coastwide.............................. 4,339 3,614 NA NA
Longspine thornyhead........................... N of 34[deg]27' N lat.................. NA NA 2,747 2,700
Longspine thornyhead........................... S of 34[deg]27' N lat.................. NA NA 867 864
Pacific cod \y\................................ Coastwide.............................. 3,200 2,221 1,600 1,091
Pacific whiting \z\............................ Coastwide.............................. 725,984 \z\ \z\ 362,682
Petrale sole \aa\.............................. Coastwide.............................. 3,152 3,013 3,013 2,772
Sablefish...................................... Coastwide.............................. 8,329 7,604 NA NA
Sablefish \bb\................................. N of 36[deg] N lat..................... NA NA 5,475 See Table 2c
[[Page 22406]]
Sablefish \cc\................................. S of 36[deg] N lat..................... NA NA 1,944 1,939
Shortbelly rockfish \dd\....................... Coastwide.............................. 6,950 5,789 500 489
Shortspine thornyhead \ee\..................... Coastwide.............................. 3,116 2,596 NA NA
Shortspine thornyhead.......................... N of 34[deg]27' N lat.................. NA NA 1,698 1,639
Shortspine thornyhead.......................... S of 34[deg]27' N lat.................. NA NA 898 856
Spiny dogfish \ff\............................. Coastwide.............................. 2,500 2,083 2,083 1,745
Splitnose rockfish \gg\........................ S of 40[deg]10' N lat.................. 1,842 1,761 1,761 1,750
Starry flounder \hh\........................... Coastwide.............................. 1,847 1,282 1,282 1,272
Widow rockfish \ii\............................ Coastwide.............................. 13,237 12,655 12,655 12,437
Yellowtail rockfish \jj\....................... N of 40[deg]10' N lat.................. 6,574 6,002 6,002 4,972
Minor Nearshore Rockfish \kk\.................. N of 40[deg]10' N lat.................. 119 105 105 103
Minor Shelf Rockfish \ll\...................... N of 40[deg]10' N lat.................. 2,302 2,048 2,047 1,963
Minor Slope Rockfish \mm\...................... N of 40[deg]10' N lat.................. 1,896 1,754 1,754 1,689
Minor Nearshore Rockfish \nn\.................. S of 40[deg]10' N lat.................. 1,344 1,180 1,179 1,175
Minor Shelf Rockfish \oo\...................... S of 40[deg]10' N lat.................. 1,918 1,625 1,624 1,577
Minor Slope Rockfish \pp\...................... S of 40[deg]10' N lat.................. 829 719 709 689
Other Flatfish \qq\............................ Coastwide.............................. 9,690 7,281 7,281 7,077
Other Fish \rr\................................ Coastwide.............................. 501 441 441 441
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Annual catch limits (ACLs), annual catch targets (ACTs) and harvest guidelines (HGs) are specified as total catch values.
\b\ Fishery harvest guidelines means the harvest guideline or quota after subtracting Pacific Coast treaty Indian tribes allocations and projected
catch, projected research catch, deductions for fishing mortality in non-groundfish fisheries, and deductions for EFPs from the ACL or ACT.
\c\ Bocaccio. A stock assessment was conducted in 2015 for the bocaccio stock between the U.S.-Mexico border and Cape Blanco. The stock is managed with
stock-specific harvest specifications south of 40deg;10' N lat. and within the Minor Shelf Rockfish complex north of 40deg;10' N lat. A historical
catch distribution of approximately 7.4 percent was used to apportion the assessed stock to the area north of 40deg;10' N lat. The bocaccio stock was
estimated to be at 36.8 percent of its unfished biomass in 2015. The OFL of 2,013 mt is projected in the 2015 stock assessment using an FMSY proxy of
F50. The ABC of 1,924 mt is a 4.4 percent reduction from the OFL ([sigma] = 0.36/P* = 0.45) because it is a category 1 stock. The 741 mt ACL
is based on the current rebuilding plan with a target year to rebuild of 2022 and an SPR harvest rate of 77.7 percent. 15.4 mt is deducted from the
ACL to accommodate the incidental open access fishery (0.8 mt), EFP catch (10 mt) and research catch (4.6 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 725.6 mt.
The California recreational fishery has an HG of 305.5 mt.
\d\ Cowcod. A stock assessment for the Conception Area was conducted in 2013 and the stock was estimated to be at 33.9 percent of its unfished biomass
in 2013. The Conception Area OFL of 59 mt is projected in the 2013 rebuilding analysis using an FMSY proxy of F50. The OFL contribution of 12
mt for the unassessed portion of the stock in the Monterey area is based on depletion-based stock reduction analysis. The OFLs for the Monterey and
Conception areas were summed to derive the south of 40deg;10' N lat. OFL of 71 mt. The ABC for the area south of 40deg;10' N lat. is 64 mt. The
assessed portion of the stock in the Conception Area is considered category 2, with a Conception area contribution to the ABC of 54 mt, which is an
8.7 percent reduction from the Conception area OFL ([sigma] = 0.72/P* = 0.45). The unassessed portion of the stock in the Monterey area is considered
a category 3 stock, with a contribution to the ABC of 10 mt, which is a 16.6 percent reduction from the Monterey area OFL ([sigma] = 1.44/P* = 0.45).
A single ACL of 10 mt is being set for both areas combined. The ACL of 10 mt is based on the rebuilding plan with a target year to rebuild of 2020 and
an SPR harvest rate of 82.7 percent, which is equivalent to an exploitation rate (catch over age 11+ biomass) of 0.007. 2 mt is deducted from the ACL
to accommodate the incidental open access fishery (less than 0.1 mt), EFP fishing (less than 0.1 mt) and research activity (2 mt), resulting in a
fishery HG of 8 mt. Any additional mortality in research activities will be deducted from the ACL. A single ACT of 4 mt is being set for both areas
combined.
\e\ Darkblotched rockfish. A 2015 stock assessment estimated the stock to be at 39 percent of its unfished biomass in 2015. The OFL of 683 mt is
projected in the 2015 stock assessment using an FMSY proxy of F50. The ABC of 653 mt is a 4.4 percent reduction from the OFL ([sigma] = 0.36/
P* = 0.45) because it is a category 1 stock. The ACL is set equal to the ABC, as the stock is projected to be above its target biomass of B40
in 2017. 77.3 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (0.2 mt), the incidental open access fishery (24.5 mt), EFP catch (0.1
mt), research catch (2.5 mt) and an additional deduction for unforeseen catch events (50 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 575.8 mt.
\f\ Pacific ocean perch. A stock assessment was conducted in 2011 and the stock was estimated to be at 19.1 percent of its unfished biomass in 2011. The
OFL of 984 mt for the area north of 40deg;10' N lat. is based on an updated catch-only projection of the 2011 rebuilding analysis using an F50
FMSY proxy. The ABC of 941 mt is a 4.4 percent reduction from the OFL ([sigma] = 0.36/P* = 0.45) as it is a category 1 stock. The ACL is based on the
current rebuilding plan with a target year to rebuild of 2051 and a constant catch amount of 281 mt in 2017 and 2018, followed in 2019 and beyond by
ACLs based on an SPR harvest rate of 86.4 percent. 49.4 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (9.2 mt), the incidental open
access fishery (10 mt), research catch (5.2 mt) and an additional deduction for unforeseen catch events (25 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 231.6
mt.
\g\ Yelloweye rockfish. A stock assessment update was conducted in 2011. The stock was estimated to be at 21.4 percent of its unfished biomass in 2011.
The 58 mt coastwide OFL is based on a catch-only update of the 2011 stock assessment, assuming actual catches since 2011 and using an FMSY proxy of
F50. The ABC of 48 mt is a 16.7 percent reduction from the OFL ([sigma] = 0.72/P* = 0.40) as it is a category 2 stock. The 20 mt ACL is based
on the current rebuilding plan with a target year to rebuild of 2074 and an SPR harvest rate of 76.0 percent. 6 mt is deducted from the ACL to
accommodate the Tribal fishery (2.3 mt), the incidental open access fishery (0.4 mt), EFP catch (less than 0.1 mt) and research catch (3.27 mt)
resulting in a fishery HG of 14 mt. Recreational HGs are: 3.3 mt (Washington); 3 mt (Oregon); and 3.9 mt (California).
\h\ Arrowtooth flounder. The arrowtooth flounder stock was last assessed in 2007 and was estimated to be at 79 percent of its unfished biomass in 2007.
The OFL of 16,498 mt is derived from a catch-only update of the 2007 assessment assuming actual catches since 2007 and using an F30 FMSY
proxy. The ABC of 13,743 mt is a 16.7 percent reduction from the OFL ([sigma] = 0.72/P* = 0.40) as it is a category 2 stock. The ACL is set equal to
the ABC because the stock is above its target biomass of B25. 2,098.1 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (2,041
mt), the incidental open access fishery (40.8 mt), and research catch (16.4 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 11,644.9 mt.
\i\ Big skate. The OFL of 541 mt is based on an estimate of trawl survey biomass and natural mortality. The ABC of 494 mt is a 8.7 percent reduction
from the OFL ([sigma] = 0.72/P* = 0.45) as it is a category 2 stock. The ACL is set equal to the ABC. 57.4 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate
the Tribal fishery (15 mt), the incidental open access fishery (38.4 mt), and research catch (4 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 436.6 mt.
\j\ Black rockfish (California). A 2015 stock assessment estimated the stock to be at 33 percent of its unfished biomass in 2015. The OFL of 347 mt is
projected in the 2015 stock assessment using an FMSY proxy of F50. The ABC of 332 mt is a 4.4 percent reduction from the OFL ([sigma] = 0.36/
P* = 0.45) because it is a category 1 stock. The ACL is set equal to the ABC because the stock is projected to be above its target biomass of B40 in 2018. 1 mt is deducted from the ACL for EFP catch, resulting in a fishery HG of 331 mt.
[[Page 22407]]
\k\ Black rockfish (Oregon). A 2015 stock assessment estimated the stock to be at 60 percent of its unfished biomass in 2015. The OFL of 570 mt is
projected in the 2015 stock assessment using an FMSY proxy of F50. The ABC of 520 mt is an 8.7 percent reduction from the OFL ([sigma] = 0.72/
P* = 0.45) because it is a category 2 stock. The ACL is set equal to the ABC because the stock is above its target biomass of B40. 0.6 mt is
deducted from the ACL to accommodate the incidental open access fishery, resulting in a fishery HG of 519.4 mt.
\l\ Black rockfish (Washington). A 2015 stock assessment estimated the stock to be at 43 percent of its unfished biomass in 2015. The OFL of 315 mt is
projected in the 2015 stock assessment using an FMSY proxy of F50. The ABC of 301 mt is a 4.4 percent reduction from the OFL ([sigma] = 0.36/
P* = 0.45) because it is a category 1 stock. The ACL is set equal to the ABC because the stock is above its target biomass of B40. 18 mt is
deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery, resulting in a fishery HG of 283 mt.
\m\ Blackgill rockfish. Blackgill rockfish contributes to the harvest specifications for the Minor Slope Rockfish South complex. See footnote pp.
\n\ Cabezon (California). A cabezon stock assessment was conducted in 2009. The cabezon spawning biomass in waters off California was estimated to be at
48.3 percent of its unfished biomass in 2009. The OFL of 156 mt is calculated using an FMSYproxy of F50. The ABC of 149 mt is based on a 4.4
percent reduction from the OFL ([sigma] = 0.36/P* = 0.45) because it is a category 1 stock. The ACL is set equal to the ABC because the stock is above
its target biomass of B40. 0.3 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the incidental open access fishery (0.3 mt), resulting in a fishery
HG of 148.7 mt.
\o\ Cabezon (Oregon). A cabezon stock assessment was conducted in 2009. The cabezon spawning biomass in waters off Oregon was estimated to be at 52
percent of its unfished biomass in 2009. The OFL of 49 mt is calculated using an FMSYproxy of F45. The ABC of 47 mt is based on a 4.4 percent
reduction from the OFL ([sigma] = 0.36/P* = 0.45) because it is a category 1 species. The ACL is set equal to the ABC because the stock is above its
target biomass of B40. There are no deductions from the ACL so the fishery HG is also equal to the ACL of 47 mt.
\p\ California scorpionfish. A California scorpionfish assessment was conducted in 2005 and was estimated to be at 79.8 percent of its unfished biomass
in 2005. The OFL of 278 mt is based on projections from a catch-only update of the 2005 assessment assuming actual catches since 2005 and using an
FMSY harvest rate proxy of F50. The ABC of 254 mt is an 8.7 percent reduction from the OFL ([sigma] = 0.72/P* = 0.45) because it is a category
2 stock. The ACL is set at a constant catch amount of 150 mt. 2.2 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the incidental open access fishery (2 mt)
and research catch (0.2 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 147.8 mt. An ACT of 111 mt is established.
\q\ Canary rockfish. A stock assessment was conducted in 2015 and the stock was estimated to be at 55.5 percent of its unfished biomass coastwide in
2015. The coastwide OFL of 1,596 mt is projected in the 2015 assessment using an FMSYharvest rate proxy of F50. The ABC of 1,526 mt is a 4.4
percent reduction from the OFL ([sigma] = 0.36/P* = 0.45) as it is a category 1 stock. The ACL is set equal to the ABC because the stock is above its
target biomass of B40. 59.4 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (50 mt), the incidental open access fishery (1.2
mt), EFP catch (1 mt) and research catch (7.2 mt) resulting in a fishery HG of 1,466.6 mt. Recreational HGs are: 50 mt (Washington); 75 mt (Oregon);
and 135 mt (California).
\r\ Chilipepper. A coastwide update assessment of the chilipepper stock was conducted in 2015 and estimated to be at 64 percent of its unfished biomass
in 2015. Chilipepper are managed with stock-specific harvest specifications south of 40deg;10'N lat. and within the Minor Shelf Rockfish complex north
of 40deg;10' N lat. Projected OFLs are stratified north and south of 40deg;10' N lat. based on the average historical assessed area catch, which is 93
percent for the area south of 40deg;10' N lat. and 7 percent for the area north of 40deg;10' N lat. The OFL of 2,623 mt for the area south of
40deg;10' N lat. is projected in the 2015 assessment using an FMSY proxy of F50. The ABC of 2,507 mt is a 4.4 percent reduction from the OFL
([sigma] = 0.36/P* = 0.45) because it is a category 1 stock. The ACL is set equal to the ABC because the stock is above its target biomass of B40. 45.9 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the incidental open access fishery (5 mt), EFP fishing (30 mt), and research catch (10.9 mt),
resulting in a fishery HG of 2,461.1 mt.
\s\ Dover sole. A 2011 Dover sole assessment estimated the stock to be at 83.7 percent of its unfished biomass in 2011. The OFL of 90,282 mt is based on
an updated catch-only projection from the 2011 stock assessment assuming actual catches since 2011 and using an FMSY proxy of F30. The ABC of
86,310 mt is a 4.4 percent reduction from the OFL ([sigma] = 0.36/P* = 0.45) because it is a category 1 stock. The ACL could be set equal to the ABC
because the stock is above its target biomass of B25. However, the ACL of 50,000 mt is set at a level below the ABC and higher than the
maximum historical landed catch. 1,593.7 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (1,497 mt), the incidental open access fishery
(54.8 mt), and research catch (41.9 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 48,406.3 mt.
\t\ English sole. A 2013 stock assessment was conducted, which estimated the stock to be at 88 percent of its unfished biomass in 2013. The OFL of 8,255
mt is projected in the 2013 assessment using an FMSY proxy of F30. The ABC of 7,537 mt is an 8.7 percent reduction from the OFL ([sigma] =
0.72/P* = 0.45) because it is a category 2 stock. The ACL is set equal to the ABC because the stock is above its target biomass of B25. 212.8
mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (200 mt), the incidental open access fishery (7 mt) and research catch (5.8 mt),
resulting in a fishery HG of 7,324.2 mt.
\u\ Lingcod north. The 2009 lingcod assessment modeled two populations north and south of the California-Oregon border (42[deg] N lat.). Both
populations were healthy with stock depletion estimated at 62 and 74 percent for the north and south, respectively in 2009.The OFL is based on an
updated catch-only projection from the 2009 assessment assuming actual catches since 2009 and using an FMSY proxy of F45. The OFL is
apportioned by adding 48 percent of the OFL from California, resulting in an OFL of 3,310 mt for the area north of 40deg;10' N lat. The ABC of 3,110
mt is based on a 4.4 percent reduction ([sigma] = 0.36/P* = 0.45) from the OFL contribution for the area north of 42[deg] N lat. because it is a
category 1 stock, and an 8.7 percent reduction ([sigma] = 0.72/P* = 0.45) from the OFL contribution for the area between 42[deg] N lat. and 40deg;10'
N lat. because it is a category 2 stock. The ACL is set equal to the ABC because the stock is above its target biomass of B40. 278.2 mt is
deducted from the ACL for the Tribal fishery (250 mt), the incidental open access fishery (16 mt), EFP catch (0.5 mt) and research catch (11.7 mt),
resulting in a fishery HG of 2,831.8 mt.
\v\ Lingcod south. The 2009 lingcod assessment modeled two populations north and south of the California-Oregon border (42[deg] N lat.). Both
populations were healthy with stock depletion estimated at 62 and 74 percent for the north and south, respectively in 2009. The OFL is based on an
updated catch-only projection of the 2009 stock assessment assuming actual catches since 2009 and using an FMSY proxy of F45. The OFL is
apportioned by subtracting 48 percent of the California OFL, resulting in an OFL of 1,373 mt for the area south of 40deg;10' N lat. The ABC of 1,144
mt is based on a 16.7 percent reduction from the OFL ([sigma] = 0.72/P* = 0.40) because it is a category 2 stock. The ACL is set equal to the ABC
because the stock is above its target biomass of B40. 9 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the incidental open access fishery (6.9
mt), EFP fishing (1 mt), and research catch (1.1 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,135 mt.
\w\ Longnose skate. A stock assessment was conducted in 2007 and the stock was estimated to be at 66 percent of its unfished biomass. The OFL of 2,526
mt is derived from the 2007 stock assessment using an FMSY proxy of F50. The ABC of 2,415 mt is a 4.4 percent reduction from the OFL ([sigma]
= 0.36/P* = 0.45) because it is a category 1 stock. The ACL of 2,000 mt is a fixed harvest level that provides greater access to the stock and is less
than the ABC. 147 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (130 mt), incidental open access fishery (3.8 mt), and research catch
(13.2 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,853 mt.
\x\ Longspine thornyhead. A 2013 longspine thornyhead coastwide stock assessment estimated the stock to be at 75 percent of its unfished biomass in
2013. A coastwide OFL of 4,339 mt is projected in the 2013 stock assessment using an F50FMSY proxy. The coastwide ABC of 3,614 mt is a 16.7
percent reduction from the OFL ([sigma] = 0.72/P* = 0.40) because it is a category 2 stock. For the portion of the stock that is north of 34[deg]27' N
lat., the ACL is 2,747 mt, and is 76 percent of the coastwide ABC based on the average swept-area biomass estimates (2003-2012) from the NMFS NWFSC
trawl survey. 46.8 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (30 mt), the incidental open access fishery (3.3 mt), and research
catch (13.5 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 2,700.2 mt. For that portion of the stock south of 34[deg]27' N lat. the ACL is 867 mt and is 24 percent
of the coastwide ABC based on the average swept-area biomass estimates (2003-2012) from the NMFS NWFSC trawl survey. 3.2 mt is deducted from the ACL
to accommodate the incidental open access fishery (1.8 mt), and research catch (1.4 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 863.8 mt.
\y\ Pacific cod. The 3,200 mt OFL is based on the maximum level of historic landings. The ABC of 2,221 mt is a 30.6 percent reduction from the OFL
([sigma] = 1.44/P* = 0.40) as it is a category 3 stock. The 1,600 mt ACL is the OFL reduced by 50 percent as a precautionary adjustment. 509 mt is
deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (500 mt), research catch (7 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (2 mt), resulting in a
fishery HG of 1,091 mt.
[[Page 22408]]
\z\ Pacific whiting. The coastwide stock assessment was published in 2018 and estimated the spawning stock to be at 66.7 percent of its unfished
biomass. The 2018 OFL of 725,984 mt is based on the 2018 assessment with an F40 FMSY proxy. The 2018 coastwide, unadjusted Total Allowable
Catch (TAC) of 517,775 mt is based on the 2018 stock assessment. The U.S. TAC is 73.88 percent of the coastwide unadjusted TAC. Up to 15 percent of
each party's unadjusted 2017 TAC (58,901 mt for the U.S. and 20,824 mt for Canada) is added to each party's 2018 unadjusted TAC, resulting in a U.S.
adjusted 2018 TAC of 441,433 mt. From the adjusted U.S. TAC, 77,251 mt is deducted to accommodate the Tribal fishery, and 1,500 mt is deducted to
accommodate research and bycatch in other fisheries, resulting in a fishery HG of 362,682 mt. The TAC for Pacific whiting is established under the
provisions of the Agreement with Canada on Pacific Hake/Whiting and the Pacific Whiting Act of 2006, 16 U.S.C. 7001-7010, and the international
exception applies. Therefore, no ABC or ACL values are provided for Pacific whiting.
\aa\ Petrale sole. A 2015 stock assessment update was conducted, which estimated the stock to be at 31 percent of its unfished biomass in 2015. The OFL
of 3,152 mt is projected in the 2015 assessment using an FMSY proxy of F30. The ABC of 3,013 mt is a 4.4 percent reduction from the OFL
([sigma] = 0.36/P* = 0.45) because it is a category 1 stock. The ACL is set equal to the ABC because the stock is above its target biomass of B25. 240.9 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (220 mt), the incidental open access fishery (3.2 mt) and research catch
(17.7 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 2,772.1 mt.
\bb\ Sablefish north. A coastwide sablefish stock assessment update was conducted in 2015. The coastwide sablefish biomass was estimated to be at 33
percent of its unfished biomass in 2015. The coastwide OFL of 8,329 mt is projected in the 2015 stock assessment using an FMSY proxy of F45.
The ABC of 7,604 mt is an 8.7 percent reduction from the OFL ([sigma] = 0.36/P* = 0.40). The 40ndash;10 adjustment is applied to the ABC to derive a
coastwide ACL value because the stock is in the precautionary zone. This coastwide ACL value is not specified in regulations. The coastwide ACL value
is apportioned north and south of 36[deg] N lat., using the 2003-2014 average estimated swept area biomass from the NMFS NWFSC trawl survey, with 73.8
percent apportioned north of 36[deg] N lat. and 26.2 percent apportioned south of 36[deg] N lat. The northern ACL is 5,475 mt and is reduced by 548 mt
for the Tribal allocation (10 percent of the ACL north of 36[deg] N lat.). The 548 mt Tribal allocation is reduced by 1.5 percent to account for
discard mortality. Detailed sablefish allocations are shown in Table 2c.
\cc\ Sablefish south. The ACL for the area south of 36[deg] N lat. is 1,944 mt (26.2 percent of the calculated coastwide ACL value). 5 mt is deducted
from the ACL to accommodate the incidental open acrdedseescess fishery (2 mt) and research catch (3 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,939 mt.
\dd\ Shortbelly rockfish. A non-quantitative shortbelly rockfish assessment was conducted in 2007. The spawning stock biomass of shortbelly rockfish was
estimated to be 67 percent of its unfished biomass in 2005. The OFL of 6,950 mt is based on the estimated MSY in the 2007 stock assessment. The ABC of
5,789 mt is a 16.7 percent reduction of the OFL ([sigma] = 0.72/P* = 0.40) because it is a category 2 stock. The 500 mt ACL is set to accommodate
incidental catch when fishing for co-occurring healthy stocks and in recognition of the stock's importance as a forage species in the California
Current ecosystem. 10.9 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the incidental open access fishery (8.9 mt) and research catch (2 mt), resulting in
a fishery HG of 489.1 mt.
\ee\ Shortspine thornyhead. A 2013 coastwide shortspine thornyhead stock assessment estimated the stock to be at 74.2 percent of its unfished biomass in
2013. A coastwide OFL of 3,116 mt is projected in the 2013 stock assessment using an F50FMSY proxy. The coastwide ABC of 2,596 mt is a 16.7
percent reduction from the OFL ([sigma] = 0.72/P* = 0.40) because it is a category 2 stock. For the portion of the stock that is north of 34[deg]27' N
lat., the ACL is 1,698 mt. The northern ACL is 65.4 percent of the coastwide ABC based on the average swept-area biomass estimates (2003-2012) from
the NMFS NWFSC trawl survey. 59 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (50 mt), the incidental open access fishery (1.8 mt),
and research catch (7.2 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,639 mt for the area north of 34[deg]27' N lat. For that portion of the stock south of
34[deg]27' N lat. the ACL is 898 mt. The southern ACL is 34.6 percent of the coastwide ABC based on the average swept-area biomass estimates (2003-
2012) from the NMFS NWFSC trawl survey. 42.3 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the incidental open access fishery (41.3 mt) and research
catch (1 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 855.7 mt for the area south of 34[deg]27' N lat.
\ff\ Spiny dogfish. A coastwide spiny dogfish stock assessment was conducted in 2011. The coastwide spiny dogfish biomass was estimated to be at 63
percent of its unfished biomass in 2011. The coastwide OFL of 2,500 mt is derived from the 2011 assessment using an FMSY proxy of F50. The
coastwide ABC of 2,083 mt is a 16.7 percent reduction from the OFL ([sigma] = 0.72/P* = 0.40) because it is a category 2 stock. The ACL is set equal
to the ABC because the stock is above its target biomass of B40. 338 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (275 mt),
the incidental open access fishery (49.5 mt), EFP catch (1 mt), and research catch (12.5 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,745 mt.
\gg\ Splitnose rockfish. A coastwide splitnose rockfish assessment was conducted in 2009 that estimated the stock to be at 66 percent of its unfished
biomass in 2009. Splitnose rockfish in the north is managed in the Minor Slope Rockfish complex and with stock-specific harvest specifications south
of 40deg;10' N lat. The coastwide OFL is projected in the 2009 assessment using an FMSY proxy of F50. The coastwide OFL is apportioned north
and south of 40deg;10' N lat. based on the average 1916-2008 assessed area catch resulting in 64.2 percent of the coastwide OFL apportioned south of
40deg;10' N lat., and 35.8 percent apportioned for the contribution of splitnose rockfish to the northern Minor Slope Rockfish complex. The southern
OFL of 1,842 mt results from the apportionment described above. The southern ABC of 1,761 mt is a 4.4 percent reduction from the southern OFL ([sigma]
= 0.36/P* = 0.45) because it is a category 1 stock. The ACL is set equal to the ABC because the stock is estimated to be above its target biomass of
B40. 10.7 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the incidental open access fishery (0.2 mt), research catch (9 mt) and EFP catch (1.5
mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,750.3 mt.
\hh\ Starry flounder. The stock was assessed in 2005 and was estimated to be above 40 percent of its unfished biomass in 2005 (44 percent in Washington
and Oregon, and 62 percent in California). The coastwide OFL of 1,847 mt is set equal to the 2016 OFL, which was derived from the 2005 assessment
using an FMSY proxy of F30. The ABC of 1,282 mt is a 30.6 percent reduction from the OFL ([sigma] = 1.44/P* = 0.40) because it is a category 3
stock. The ACL is set equal to the ABC because the stock was estimated to be above its target biomass of B25 in 2018. 10.3 mt is deducted from
the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (2 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (8.3 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,271.7 mt.
\ii\ Widow rockfish. The widow rockfish stock was assessed in 2015 and was estimated to be at 75 percent of its unfished biomass in 2015. The OFL of
13,237 mt is projected in the 2015 stock assessment using the F50 FMSY proxy. The ABC of 12,655 mt is a 4.4 percent reduction from the OFL
([sigma] = 0.36/P* = 0.45) because it is a category 1 stock. The ACL is set equal to the ABC because the stock is above its target biomass of B40. 217.7 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (200 mt), the incidental open access fishery (0.5 mt), EFP catch (9 mt) and
research catch (8.2 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 12,437.3 mt.
\jj\ Yellowtail rockfish. A 2013 yellowtail rockfish stock assessment was conducted for the portion of the population north of 40deg;10' N. lat. The
estimated stock depletion is 67 percent of its unfished biomass in 2013. The OFL of 6,574 mt is projected in the 2013 stock assessment using an FMSY
proxy of F50. The ABC of 6,002 mt is an 8.7 percent reduction from the OFL ([sigma] = 0.72/P*= 0.45) because it is a category 2 stock. The ACL
is set equal to the ABC because the stock is above its target biomass of B40. 1,030 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal
fishery (1,000 mt), the incidental open access fishery (3.4 mt), EFP catch (10 mt) and research catch (16.6 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 4,972.1
mt.
\kk\ Minor Nearshore Rockfish north. The OFL for Minor Nearshore Rockfish north of 40deg;10' N lat. of 119 mt is the sum of the OFL contributions for
the component species managed in the complex. The ABCs for the minor rockfish complexes are based on a sigma value of 0.72 for category 2 stocks (blue/
deacon rockfish in California, brown rockfish, China rockfish, and copper rockfish) and a sigma value of 1.44 for category 3 stocks (all others) with
a P* of 0.45. The resulting ABC of 105 mt is the summed contribution of the ABCs for the component species. The ACL of 105 mt is the sum of
contributing ABCs. 1.8 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (1.5 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (0.3 mt),
resulting in a fishery HG of 103.2 mt. Between 40deg;10' N lat. and 42[deg] N lat. the Minor Nearshore Rockfish complex north has a harvest guideline
of 40.2 mt. Blue/deacon rockfish south of 42[deg] N lat. has a species-specific HG, described in footnote pp.
\ll\ Minor Shelf Rockfish north. The OFL for Minor Shelf Rockfish north of 40deg;10' N lat. of 2,302 mt is the sum of the OFL contributions for the
component species within the complex. The ABCs for the minor rockfish complexes are based on a sigma value of 0.36 for a category 1 stock
(chilipepper), a sigma value of 0.72 for category 2 stocks (greenspotted rockfish between 40deg;10' and 42[deg] N lat. and greenstriped rockfish) and
a sigma value of 1.44 for category 3 stocks (all others) with a P* of 0.45. The resulting ABC of 2,048 mt is the summed contribution of the ABCs for
the component species. The ACL of 2,047 mt is the sum of contributing ABCs of healthy assessed stocks and unassessed stocks, plus the ACL contribution
of greenspotted rockfish in California where the 40ndash;10 adjustment was applied to the ABC contribution for this stock because it is in the
precautionary zone. 83.8 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (30 mt), the incidental open access fishery (26 mt), EFP catch
(3 mt), and research catch (24.8 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,963.2 mt.
[[Page 22409]]
\mm\ Minor Slope Rockfish north. The OFL for Minor Slope Rockfish north of 40deg;10' N. lat. of 1,896 mt is the sum of the OFL contributions for the
component species within the complex. The ABCs for the Minor Slope Rockfish complexes are based on a sigma value of 0.39 for aurora rockfish, a sigma
value of 0.36 for the other category 1 stock (splitnose rockfish), a sigma value of 0.72 for category 2 stocks (rougheye rockfish, blackspotted
rockfish, and sharpchin rockfish), and a sigma value of 1.44 for category 3 stocks (all others) with a P* of 0.45. A unique sigma of 0.39 was
calculated for aurora rockfish because the variance in estimated spawning biomass was greater than the 0.36 used as a proxy for other category 1
stocks. The resulting ABC of 1,754 mt is the summed contribution of the ABCs for the component species. The ACL is set equal to the ABC because all
the assessed component stocks (rougheye rockfish, blackspotted rockfish, sharpchin rockfish, and splitnose rockfish) are above the target biomass of
B40. 65.1 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (36 mt), the incidental open access fishery (18.6 mt), EFP catch (1
mt), and research catch (9.5 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,688.9 mt.
\nn\ Minor Nearshore Rockfish south. The OFL for the Minor Nearshore Rockfish complex south of 40deg;10' N lat. of 1,344 mt is the sum of the OFL
contributions for the component species within the complex. The ABC for the southern Minor Nearshore Rockfish complex is based on a sigma value of
0.72 for category 2 stocks (blue/deacon rockfish north of 34[deg]27' N lat., brown rockfish, China rockfish, and copper rockfish) and a sigma value of
1.44 for category 3 stocks (all others) with a P* of 0.45. The resulting ABC of 1,180 mt is the summed contribution of the ABCs for the component
species. The ACL of 1,179 mt is the sum of the contributing ABCs of healthy assessed stocks and unassessed stocks, plus the ACL contribution for China
rockfish where the 40ndash;10 adjustment was applied to the ABC contribution for this stock because it is in the precautionary zone. 4.1 mt is
deducted from the ACL to accommodate the incidental open access fishery (1.4 mt) and research catch (2.7 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,174.9 mt.
Blue/deacon rockfish south of 42[deg] N lat. has a species-specific HG set equal to the 40ndash;10-adjusted ACL for the portion of the stock north of
34[deg]27' N lat. (250.3 mt) plus the ABC contribution for the unassessed portion of the stock south of 34[deg]27' N lat. (60.8 mt). The California
(i.e., south of 42[deg] N lat.) blue/deacon rockfish HG is 311.1 mt.
\oo\ Minor Shelf Rockfish south. The OFL for the Minor Shelf Rockfish complex south of 40deg;10' N lat. of 1,918 mt is the sum of the OFL contributions
for the component species within the complex. The ABC for the southern Minor Shelf Rockfish complex is based on a sigma value of 0.72 for category 2
stocks (i.e., greenspotted and greenstriped rockfish) and a sigma value of 1.44 for category 3 stocks (all others) with a P* of 0.45. The resulting
ABC of 1,625 mt is the summed contribution of the ABCs for the component species. The ACL of 1,624 mt is the sum of contributing ABCs of healthy
assessed stocks and unassessed stocks, plus the ACL contribution of greenspotted rockfish in California where the 40ndash;10 adjustment was applied to
the ABC contribution for this stock because it is in the precautionary zone. 47.2 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the incidental open
access fishery (8.6 mt), EFP catch (30 mt), and research catch (8.6 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,576.8 mt.
\pp\ Minor Slope Rockfish south. The OFL of 829 mt is the sum of the OFL contributions for the component species within the complex. The ABC for the
southern Minor Slope Rockfish complex is based on a sigma value of 0.39 for aurora rockfish, a sigma value of 0.72 for category 2 stocks (blackgill
rockfish, rougheye rockfish, blackspotted rockfish, and sharpchin rockfish) and a sigma value of 1.44 for category 3 stocks (all others) with a P* of
0.45. A unique sigma of 0.39 was calculated for aurora rockfish because the variance in estimated biomass was greater than the 0.36 used as a proxy
for other category 1 stocks. The resulting ABC of 719 mt is the summed contribution of the ABCs for the component species. The ACL of 709 mt is the
sum of the contributing ABCs of healthy assessed stocks and unassessed stocks, plus the ACL contribution of blackgill rockfish where the 40ndash;10
adjustment was applied to the ABC contribution for this stock because it is in the precautionary zone. 20.2 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate
the incidental open access fishery (17.2 mt), EFP catch (1 mt), and research catch (2 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 688.8 mt. Blackgill rockfish
has a stock-specific HG for the entire groundfish fishery south of 40deg;10' N lat. set equal to the species' contribution to the 40ndash;10-adjusted
ACL. Harvest of blackgill rockfish in all groundfish fisheries counts against this HG of 122.4 mt. Nontrawl fisheries are subject to a blackgill
rockfish HG of 45.3 mt.
\qq\ Other Flatfish. The Other Flatfish complex is comprised of flatfish species managed in the PCGFMP that are not managed with species-specific OFLs/
ABCs/ACLs. Most of the species in the Other Flatfish complex are unassessed and include: Butter sole, curlfin sole, flathead sole, Pacific sanddab,
rock sole, sand sole, and rex sole. The Other Flatfish OFL of 9,690 mt is based on the sum of the OFL contributions of the component stocks. The ABC
of 7,281 mt is based on a sigma value of 0.72 for a category 2 stock (rex sole) and a sigma value of 1.44 for category 3 stocks (all others) with a P*
of 0.40. The ACL is set equal to the ABC. The ACL is set equal to the ABC because all of the assessed stocks (i.e., Pacific sanddabs and rex sole)
were above their target biomass of B25. 204 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (60 mt), the incidental open access
fishery 125 mt), and research catch (19 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 7,077 mt.
\rr\ Other Fish. The Other Fish complex is comprised of kelp greenling coastwide, cabezon off Washington, and leopard shark coastwide. The 2015
assessment for the kelp greenling stock off of Oregon projected an estimated depletion of 80 percent. All other stocks are unassessed. The OFL of 501
mt is the sum of the OFL contributions for kelp greenling coastwide, cabezon off Washington, and leopard shark coastwide. The ABC for the Other Fish
complex is based on a sigma value of 0.44 for kelp greenling off Oregon and a sigma value of 1.44 for category 3 stocks (all others) with a P* of
0.45. A unique sigma of 0.44 was calculated for kelp greenling off Oregon because the variance in estimated spawning biomass was greater than the 0.36
sigma used as a proxy for other category 1 stocks. The resulting ABC of 441 mt is the summed contribution of the ABCs for the component species. The
ACL is set equal to the ABC because all of the assessed stocks (kelp greenling off Oregon) were above their target biomass of B40. There are
no deductions from the ACL so the fishery HG is equal to the ACL of 441 mt.
0
4. Table 2b to part 660, subpart C, is revised to read as follows:
Table 2b to Part 660, Subpart C--2018, and Beyond, Allocations by Species or Species Group
[Weight in metric tons]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trawl Non-trawl
Species Area Fishery HG or ---------------------------------------------------------------
ACT Percent Mt Percent Mt
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BOCACCIO \a\.............................. S of 40[deg]10' N lat....... 725.6 39 283.3 61 442.3
COWCOD \a\ \b\............................ S of 40[deg]10' N lat....... 4.0 36 1.4 64 2.6
DARKBLOTCHED ROCKFISH \c\................. Coastwide................... 575.8 95 547.0 5 28.8
PACIFIC OCEAN PERCH \d\................... N of 40[deg]10' N lat....... 231.6 95 220.0 5 11.6
YELLOWEYE ROCKFISH \a\.................... Coastwide................... 14.0 NA 1.1 NA 12.9
Arrowtooth flounder....................... Coastwide................... 11,644.9 95 11,062.6 5 582.2
Big skate \a\............................. Coastwide................... 436.6 95 414.8 5 21.8
Canary rockfish \a\ \e\................... Coastwide................... 1,466.6 NA 1,060.1 NA 406.5
Chilipepper............................... S of 40[deg]10' N lat....... 2,461.1 75 1,845.8 25 615.3
Dover sole................................ Coastwide................... 48,406.3 95 45,986.0 5 2,420.3
English sole.............................. Coastwide................... 7,324.2 95 6,958.0 5 366.2
Lingcod................................... N of 40[deg]10' N lat....... 2,831.8 45 1,274.3 55 1,557.5
Lingcod................................... S of 40[deg]10' N lat....... 1,135.0 45 510.8 55 624.3
Longnose skate \a\........................ Coastwide................... 1,853.0 90 1,667.7 10 185.3
Longspine thornyhead...................... N of 34[deg]27' N lat....... 2,700.2 95 2,565.2 5 135.0
[[Page 22410]]
Pacific cod............................... Coastwide................... 1,091.0 95 1,036.4 5 54.5
Pacific whiting \g\....................... Coastwide................... 362,682.0 100 362,682.0 0 0.0
Petrale sole.............................. Coastwide................... 2,772.1 95 2,633.5 5 138.6
---------------------------------------------------------------
Sablefish................................. N of 36[deg] N lat.......... N/A See Table 2c
---------------------------------------------------------------
Sablefish................................. S of 36[deg] N lat.......... 1,939.0 42 814.4 58 1,124.6
Shortspine thornyhead..................... N of 34[deg]27' N lat....... 1,639.0 95 1,557.0 5 81.9
Shortspine thornyhead..................... S of 34[deg]27' N lat....... 855.7 NA 50.0 NA 805.7
Splitnose rockfish........................ S of 40[deg]10' N lat....... 1,750.3 95 1,662.8 5 87.5
Starry flounder........................... Coastwide................... 1,271.7 50 635.9 50 635.9
Widow rockfish \f\........................ Coastwide................... 12,437.3 91 11,317.9 9 1,119.4
Yellowtail rockfish....................... N of 40[deg]10' N lat....... 4,972.1 88 4,375.4 12 596.6
Minor Shelf Rockfish \a\.................. N of 40[deg]10' N lat....... 1,963.2 60 1,181.8 40 781.4
Minor Slope Rockfish...................... N of 40[deg]10' N lat....... 1,688.9 81 1,368.0 19 320.9
Minor Shelf Rockfish \a\.................. S of 40[deg]10' N lat....... 1,576.8 12 192.37 88 1,384.4
Minor Slope Rockfish...................... S of 40[deg]10' N lat....... 688.8 63 433.9 37 254.9
Other Flatfish............................ Coastwide................... 7,077.0 90 6,369.3 10 707.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Allocations decided through the biennial specification process.
\b\ The cowcod fishery harvest guideline is further reduced to an ACT of 4.0 mt.
\c\ Consistent with regulations at Sec. 660.55(c), 9 percent (49.2 mt) of the total trawl allocation for darkblotched rockfish is allocated to the
Pacific whiting fishery, as follows: 20.7 mt for the Shorebased IFQ Program, 11.8 mt is managed as a set-aside for the MS sector, and 16.7 mt is
managed as a set-aside for the C/P sector. The tonnage calculated here for the Pacific whiting IFQ fishery contributes to the total shorebased trawl
allocation, which is found at Sec. 660.140(d)(1)(ii)(D).
\d\ Consistent with regulations at Sec. 660.55(c), 17 percent (37.4 mt) of the total trawl allocation for POP is allocated to the Pacific whiting
fishery, as follows: 15.7 mt for the Shorebased IFQ Program, 9.0 mt is managed as a set-aside the MS sector, and 12.7 mt is managed as a set-aside for
the C/P sector. The tonnage calculated here for the Pacific whiting IFQ fishery contributes to the total shorebased trawl allocation, which is found
at Sec. 660.140(d)(1)(ii)(D).
\e\ Canary rockfish is allocated approximately 72 percent to trawl and 28 percent to non-trawl. 46 mt of the total trawl allocation of canary rockfish
is allocated to the MS and C/P sectors, as follows: 30 mt for the MS sector, and 16 mt for the C/P sector.
\f\ Consistent with regulations at Sec. 660.55(c), 10 percent (1,131.8 mt) of the total trawl allocation for widow rockfish is allocated to the
Pacific whiting fishery, as follows: 475.4 mt for the Shorebased IFQ Program, 271.6 mt for the MS sector, and 384.8 mt for the C/P sector. The tonnage
calculated here for the Pacific whiting IFQ fishery contributes to the total shorebased trawl allocation, which is found at Sec.
660.140(d)(1)(ii)(D).
\g\ Consistent with regulations at Sec. [thinsp]660.55(i)(2), the commercial harvest guideline for Pacific whiting is allocated as follows: 34 percent
(123,312 mt) for the C/P Coop Program; 24 percent (87,044 mt) for the MS Coop Program; and 42 percent (152,326.5 mt) for the Shorebased IFQ Program.
No more than 5 percent of the Shore based IFQ Program allocation (7,616 mt) may be taken and retained south of 42[deg] N lat. before the start of the
primary Pacific whiting season north of 42[deg] N lat.
* * * * *
0
5. In Sec. 660.140, revise paragraph (d)(1)(ii)(D) to read as follows:
Sec. 660.140 Shorebased IFQ Program.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) * * *
(D) For the trawl fishery, NMFS will issue QP based on the
following shorebased trawl allocations:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2017 shorebased 2018 shorebased
IFQ species Area trawl allocation trawl allocation
(mt) (mt)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arrowtooth flounder..................... Coastwide....................... 11,050.6 10,992.6
BOCACCIO................................ South of 40[deg]10' N lat....... 302.4 283.3
Canary rockfish......................... Coastwide....................... 1,014.1 1,014.1
Chilipepper............................. South of 40[deg]10' N lat....... 1,920.8 1,845.8
COWCOD.................................. South of 40[deg]10' N lat....... 1.40 1.40
DARKBLOTCHED ROCKFISH................... Coastwide....................... 507.6 518.4
Dover sole.............................. Coastwide....................... 45,981.0 45,981.0
English sole............................ Coastwide....................... 9,258.6 6,953.0
Lingcod................................. North of 40[deg]10' N lat....... 1,359.7 1,259.32
Lingcod................................. South of 40[deg]10' N lat....... 558.9 510.75
Longspine thornyhead.................... North of 34[deg]27' N lat....... 2,699.8 2,560.2
Minor Shelf Rockfish complex............ North of 40[deg]10' N lat....... 1,148.1 1,146.8
Minor Shelf Rockfish complex............ South of 40[deg]10' N lat....... 192.2 192.4
Minor Slope Rockfish complex............ North of 40[deg]10' N lat....... 1,268.8 1,268.0
Minor Slope Rockfish complex............ South of 40[deg]10' N lat....... 432.7 433.9
Other Flatfish complex.................. Coastwide....................... 7,455.4 6,349.3
Pacific cod............................. Coastwide....................... 1,031.4 1,031.4
PACIFIC OCEAN PERCH..................... North of 40[deg]10' N lat....... 198.3 198.3
Pacific whiting......................... Coastwide....................... 152,326.5 152,326.5
Petrale sole............................ Coastwide....................... 2,745.3 2,628.5
Sablefish............................... North of 36[deg] N lat.......... 2,416.4 2,521.9
Sablefish............................... South of 36[deg] N lat.......... 780.8 814.4
[[Page 22411]]
Shortspine thornyhead................... North of 34[deg]27' N lat....... 1551.3 1,537.0
Shortspine thornyhead................... South of 34[deg]27' N lat....... 50.0 50.0
Splitnose rockfish...................... South of 40[deg]10' N lat....... 1661.8 1,662.8
Starry flounder......................... Coastwide....................... 630.9 630.9
Widow rockfish.......................... Coastwide....................... 11,392.7 10,661.5
YELLOWEYE ROCKFISH...................... Coastwide....................... 1.10 1.10
Yellowtail rockfish..................... North of 40[deg]10' N lat....... 4,246.1 4,075.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2018-10230 Filed 5-14-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P