Special Conditions: Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation Model GVII-G500 Series Airplanes; Flight Envelope Protection-High Incidence Protection System., 22214-22219 [2018-10168]
Download as PDF
22214
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 93 / Monday, May 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules
of this action, nor have any compliance
requirements changed. Also, this action
does not provide for any new or
changed reporting and recordkeeping
requirements. Accordingly, all
supporting forms for the proposed
program will be withdrawn.
Termination of Proceeding
In view of the foregoing, it is hereby
determined that the rulemaking
proceeding proposing to establish a
national research and promotion
program for certified organic products
should be and is hereby terminated.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1255
Administrative practice and
procedure, Advertising, Consumer
information, Marketing agreements,
Organic, Promotion, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7411–7425; 7 U.S.C.
7401.
Dated: May 8, 2018.
Bruce Summers,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–10131 Filed 5–11–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
Docket No. FAA–2015–0310; Notice No. 25–
18–02–SC]
Special Conditions: Gulfstream
Aerospace Corporation Model GVII–
G500 Series Airplanes; Flight Envelope
Protection—High Incidence Protection
System.
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed special
conditions.
AGENCY:
This action proposes special
conditions for the Gulfstream Aerospace
Corporation (Gulfstream) Model GVII–
G500 series airplanes. These airplanes
will have a novel or unusual design
feature when compared to the state of
technology and design envisioned in the
airworthiness standards for transport
category airplanes. This design feature
is a high incidence protection system
that limits the angle of attack at which
the airplane can be flown during normal
low speed operation. The applicable
airworthiness regulations do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for this design feature. These special
conditions contain the additional safety
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:11 May 11, 2018
Jkt 244001
standards that the Administrator
considers necessary to establish a level
of safety equivalent to that established
by the existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: Send your comments on or
before June 4, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by docket number FAA–2015–0310
using any of the following methods:
• Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/ and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at 202–493–2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all
comments it receives, without change,
to https://www.regulations.gov/,
including any personal information the
commenter provides. Using the search
function of the docket website, anyone
can find and read the electronic form of
all comments received into any FAA
docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or
signing the comment for an association,
business, labor union, etc.). DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement can be
found in the Federal Register published
on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–19478).
Docket: Background documents or
comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov/ at any time.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to Docket
Operations in Room W12–140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe
Jacobsen, Airframe & Flight Crew
Interface Section, AIR–671, Transport
Standards Branch, Policy and
Innovation Division, Aircraft
Certification Service, Federal Aviation
Administration, 2200 SE 216th Street,
Des Moines, Washington 98098;
telephone and facsimile 206–231–3158;
email Joe.Jacobsen@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Certification of the Gulfstream Model
GVII–G500 series airplanes is currently
scheduled for July 2018. Because a
delay in design approval would
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
significantly affect the certification of
the airplane and thus delivery of the
airplane, we are shortening the publiccomment period to 20 days.
Comments Invited
We invite interested people to take
part in this rulemaking by sending
written comments, data, or views. The
most helpful comments reference a
specific portion of the special
conditions, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data.
We will consider all comments we
receive by the closing date for
comments. We may change these special
conditions based on the comments we
receive.
Background
On June 30, 2013, Gulfstream
Aerospace Corporation applied for a
type certificate for its new Model GVII–
G500 series airplane. The Gulfstream
Model GVII–G500 series airplane will be
a business jet with seating for up to 19
passengers. It will incorporate a low,
swept-wing design with a T-tail. The
powerplant will consist of two aftfuselage-mounted turbofan engines. The
Gulfstream Model GVII–G500 series
airplane’s maximum takeoff weight will
be approximately 79,600 lbs.
The high incidence protection system
prevents the airplane from stalling at
low speeds and, therefore, a stall
warning system is not needed during
normal flight conditions.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of title 14, Code
of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 21.17,
Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation must
show that the Model GVII–G500 series
airplane meets the applicable provisions
of 14 CFR part 25, as amended by
amendments 25–1 through 25–137.
If the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness regulations
(i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for the Gulfstream Model GVII–G500
series airplane because of a novel or
unusual design feature, special
conditions are prescribed under the
provisions of § 21.16.
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the type certificate
for that model be amended later to
include any other model that
incorporates the same novel or unusual
design feature, these special conditions
would also apply to the other model
under § 21.101.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Gulfstream Model GVII–
E:\FR\FM\14MYP1.SGM
14MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 93 / Monday, May 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules
G500 series airplanes must comply with
the fuel vent and exhaust emission
requirements of 14 CFR part 34, and the
noise certification requirements of 14
CFR part 36.
The FAA issues special conditions, as
defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in accordance
with § 11.38, and they become part of
the type certification basis under
§ 21.17(a)(2).
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Gulfstream Model GVII–G500
series airplane will incorporate the
following novel or unusual design
feature: A high incidence protection
system, which limits the angle of attack
at which the airplane can be flown
during normal low speed operation,
prohibits the airplane from stalling, and
cannot be overridden by the flightcrew.
The application of this angle of attack
limit influences the stall speed
determination, stall characteristics, stall
warning demonstration, and
longitudinal handling characteristics of
the airplane. Existing airworthiness
regulations do not contain adequate
standards to address this feature.
Discussion
The high incidence protection system
prevents the airplane from stalling at
low speeds and, therefore, a stall
warning system is not needed during
normal flight conditions. However,
during failures, which are not shown to
be extremely improbable, the
requirements of §§ 25.203 and 25.207
apply, although slightly modified by
these conditions. If there are failures of
the high incidence protection system
that are not shown to be extremely
improbable, the flight characteristics at
the angle of attack for CLMAX must be
suitable in the traditional sense, and
stall warning must be provided in a
conventional manner.
Part I of the following special
conditions is in lieu of §§ 25.21(b),
25.103, 25.145(a), 25.145(b)(6), 25.175(c)
and (d), 25.201, 25.203, 25.207, and
25.1323(d). Part II is in lieu of
§§ 25.21(g)(1), 25.105(a)(2)(i), 25.107(c)
and (g), 25.121(b)(2)(ii)(A),
25.121(c)(2)(ii)(A), 25.121(d)(2)(ii),
25.123(b)(2)(i), 25.125(b)(2)(ii)(B), and
25.143(j).
These proposed special conditions
address this novel or unusual design
feature on the Gulfstream Model GVII–
G500 airplane, and contain the
additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to
that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
These proposed special conditions are
different from special conditions
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:11 May 11, 2018
Jkt 244001
previously issued on this topic. In Part
1, sections 3.b.iv., 3.b.vi., 3.e.vi., 5.a.i.1.,
5.a.i.4., 5.a.i.6., 5.a.i.7., 5.c.i.4., 5.c.i.5.,
5.c.i.6, 5.c.ii.4., and 5.cii.5., previously
used verbiage was updated to reflect
language recommended in the ARAC
Flight Test Harmonization Working
Group (FTHWG) Phase 2 report. This
language more accurately describes the
actions required and formulas to be
used to obtain the required result. In
Part 1, sections 3.b.ii and 5.a.ii.4., the
ARAC FTHWG language was adapted to
reflect specific Gulfstream design
features.
In several previous special conditions
on this subject, we used the
nomenclature VCLMAX. To avoid
confusion with previous Gulfstream
special conditions, we have changed the
nomenclature to VCLMAX Demo to
highlight a difference. The difference is
not significant, but the change in
nomenclature was considered clarifying
and therefore was adopted in this
instance.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special
conditions are applicable to the
Gulfstream Model GVII–G500 series
airplanes. Should Gulfstream Aerospace
Corporation apply at a later date for a
change to the type certificate to include
another model incorporating the same
novel or unusual design feature, these
special conditions would apply to that
model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features on
Gulfstream Model GVII–G500 series of
airplanes. It is not a rule of general
applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting,
and recordkeeping requirements.
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40113,
44701, 44702, 44704.
The Proposed Special Conditions
Accordingly, the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) proposes the
following special conditions as part of
the type certification basis for
Gulfstream Model GVII–G500 series
airplanes.
Part I: Stall Protection and Scheduled
Operating Speeds
In the following sections, ‘‘in icing
conditions,’’ means with ice accretions
(relative to the relevant flight phase) as
defined in appendix C to part 25, at
amendment 25–121.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
22215
1. Definitions
These special conditions use
terminology that does not appear in 14
CFR part 25. For the purpose of these
special conditions, the following terms
describe certain aspects of this novel or
unusual design feature:
High-Incidence Protection System
A system that operates directly and
automatically on the airplane’s flight
controls to limit the maximum angle of
attack that can be attained to a value
below that at which an aerodynamic
stall would occur.
Alpha-Limit
The maximum angle of attack at
which an airplane stabilizes with the
high incidence protection system
operating and the longitudinal control
held on its aft stop.
VMIN
The minimum steady flight speed in
the airplane’s configuration under
consideration with the high incidence
protection system operating. See Part I,
Section 3, ‘‘Minimum Steady Flight
Speed and Reference Stall Speed,’’ of
these special conditions.
VMIN1g
VMIN corrected to 1g acceleration of
gravity conditions. See Part I, Section 3,
‘‘Minimum Steady Flight Speed and
Reference Stall Speed,’’ of these special
conditions. This is the minimum
calibrated airspeed at which the
airplane can develop a lift force normal
to the flight path and equal to its weight
when at an angle of attack not greater
than that determined for VMIN.
2. Capability and Reliability of the High
Incidence Protection System
The applicant must establish the
capability and reliability of the high
incidence protection system. The
applicant may establish this capability
and reliability by flight testing,
simulation, or analysis as appropriate.
The capability and reliability required
are:
a. It must not be possible to encounter
a stall during the pilot-induced
maneuvers required by Part I, section
5(a), ‘‘High Incidence Handling
Demonstrations,’’ and the handling
characteristics must be acceptable as
required by Part I, section 5(b),
‘‘Characteristics in High Incidence
Maneuvers’’ of these special conditions;
b. The airplane must be protected
against stalling due to the effects of
wind shears and gusts at low speeds as
required by Section 6, ‘‘Atmospheric
Disturbances’’ of these special
conditions;
E:\FR\FM\14MYP1.SGM
14MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 93 / Monday, May 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules
c. The ability of the high incidence
protection system to accommodate any
reduction in stalling incidence must be
verified in icing conditions;
d. The high incidence protection
system must be provided in each
abnormal configuration of the high lift
devices that is likely to be used in flight
following system failures; and
e. The reliability of the system and the
effects of failures must be acceptable in
accordance with § 25.1309.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS
3. Minimum Steady Flight Speed and
Reference Stall Speed
In lieu of § 25.103, ‘‘Stall speed,’’ the
following applies:
a. The minimum steady flight speed,
VMIN, is the final, stabilized, calibrated
airspeed obtained when an airplane is
decelerated until the longitudinal
control is on its stop in such a way that
the entry rate does not exceed 1 knot per
second.
b. The minimum steady flight speed,
VMIN, must be determined in icing and
non-icing conditions with:
i. The high incidence protection
system operating normally;
ii. Idle thrust;
iii. All combinations of flap settings
and landing gear positions for which
VMIN is required to be determined;
iv. The weight used when the
reference stall speed, VSR, is used as a
factor to determine compliance with a
required performance standard;
v. The most unfavorable center of
gravity (CG) allowable; and
vi. The airplane trimmed for straight
flight at a speed selected by the
applicant, but not less than 1.13 VSR and
not greater than 1.3 VSR.
c. The 1g minimum steady flight
speed, VMIN1g, is the minimum
calibrated airspeed at which an airplane
can develop a lift force (normal to the
flight path) equal to its weight, while at
an angle of attack not greater than that
at which the minimum steady flight
speed referenced in section 3(a) of this
special condition is determined. These
minimum calibrated airspeeds must be
determined for both icing and non-icing
conditions.
d. The reference stall speed, VSR, is a
calibrated airspeed defined by the
applicant. VSR may not be less than a 1g
stall speed. VSR must be determined in
non-icing conditions and expressed as:
Where:
VCLMAX Demo = Demonstrated calibrated
airspeed obtained when the corrected lift
coefficient of the load factor
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:11 May 11, 2018
Jkt 244001
is first a maximum during the
maneuver prescribed in
section 3(e)(viii)
of this
special condition.
nZW = Load factor normal to the flight path
at VCLMAX Demo
W = Airplane gross weight;
S = Aerodynamic reference wing area; and
q = Dynamic pressure.
e. VCLMAX Demo is determined in nonicing conditions with:
i. Engines idling, or, if that resultant
thrust causes an appreciable decrease in
stall speed, not more than zero thrust at
the stall speed;
ii. The airplane in other respects
(such as flaps and landing gear) in the
condition existing in the test or
performance standard in which VSR is
being used;
iii. The weight used when VSR is
being used as a factor to determine
compliance with a required
performance standard;
iv. The CG position that results in the
highest value of the reference stall
speed;
v. The airplane trimmed for straight
flight at a speed selected by the
applicant, but not less than 1.13 VSR and
not greater than 1.3 VSR;
vi. At the option of the applicant, the
high incidence protection system can be
disabled or adjusted to allow full
development of the maneuver to the
angle of attack corresponding to VSR;
and
vii. Starting from the stabilized trim
condition, with an application of the
longitudinal control to decelerate the
airplane so that the speed reduction
does not exceed 1 knot per second.
4. Stall Warning
In lieu of § 25.207, the following
apply:
a. Normal Operation
If the design meets all conditions of
Part I, section 2 of these special
conditions, then the airplane need not
provide stall warning during normal
operation. The conditions of Part I,
section 2 provide a level of safety equal
to the intent of § 25.207, ‘‘Stall
warning,’’ so the provision of an
additional, unique warning device for
normal operations is not required.
b. High Incidence Protection System
Failure
For any failures of the high incidence
protection system that the applicant
cannot show to be extremely
improbable, and that result in the
capability of the system no longer
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
satisfying any part of sections 2(a), (b),
and (c) of Part I of these special
conditions: The design must provide
stall warning that protects against
encountering unacceptable
characteristics and against encountering
stall.
i. This stall warning, with the flaps
and landing gear in any normal
position, must be clear and distinctive
to the pilot, and must meet the
requirements specified in sections
4(b)(iv) and 4(b)(v) of Part I of these
special conditions.
ii. The design must also provide this
stall warning in each abnormal
configuration of the high lift devices
that is likely to be used in flight
following system failures.
iii. The design may furnish this stall
warning either through the inherent
aerodynamic qualities of the airplane or
by a device that will provide clearly
distinguishable indications to the
flightcrew under all expected conditions
of flight. However, a visual stall warning
device that requires the attention of the
flightcrew within the flight deck is not
acceptable by itself. If a warning device
is used, it must provide a warning in
each of the airplane configurations
prescribed in section 4(b)(i), above, and
for the conditions prescribed in sections
4(b)(iv) and 4(b)(v) of Part I of these
special conditions.
iv. In non-icing conditions, the stall
warning must provide sufficient margin
to prevent encountering unacceptable
characteristics and encountering stall in
the following conditions:
1. In power-off straight deceleration
not exceeding 1 knot per second to a
speed of 5 knots or 5 percent calibrated
airspeed (CAS), whichever is greater,
below the warning onset; and
2. In turning flight, stall deceleration
at entry rates up to 3 knots per second
when recovery is initiated not less than
1 second after the warning onset.
v. In icing conditions, the stall
warning must provide sufficient margin
to prevent encountering unacceptable
characteristics and encountering stall in
power-off straight and turning flight
decelerations not exceeding 1 knot per
second, when the pilot starts a recovery
maneuver not less than three seconds
after the onset of stall warning.
vi. An airplane is considered stalled
when the behavior of the airplane gives
the pilot a clear, distinctive, and
acceptable indication that the airplane
is stalled. Acceptable indications of a
stall, occurring either individually or in
combination, are:
1. A nose-down pitch that cannot be
readily arrested;
2. Buffeting of a magnitude and
severity that is strong and thereby an
E:\FR\FM\14MYP1.SGM
14MYP1
EP14MY18.000 EP14MY18.001
22216
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 93 / Monday, May 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules
effective deterrent to further speed
reduction; or
3. The pitch control reaches the aft
stop, and no further increase in pitch
attitude occurs when the control is held
full aft for a short time before recovery
is initiated.
vii. An airplane exhibits unacceptable
characteristics during straight or turning
flight decelerations if it is not always
possible to produce and to correct roll
and yaw by unreversed use of aileron
and rudder controls, or abnormal noseup pitching occurs.
5. Handling Characteristics at High
Incidence
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS
a. High Incidence Handling
Demonstrations
In lieu of § 25.201, ‘‘Stall
demonstration,’’ the following is
required:
i. Maneuvers to the limit of the
longitudinal control, in the nose-up
sense, must be demonstrated in straight
flight and in 30-degree banked turns
with:
1. The high incidence protection
system operating normally;
2. Initial power conditions of:
a. Power off; and
b. Power necessary to maintain level
flight at 1.5 VSR1, where VSR1 is the
reference stall speed with flaps in
approach position, landing gear
retracted, and maximum landing
weight;
3. None;
4. Flaps, landing gear, and
deceleration devices in any likely
combination of positions not prohibited
by the airplane flight manual (AFM);
5. Representative weights within the
range for which certification is
requested;
6. The most adverse CG for recovery;
and
7. The airplane trimmed for straight
flight at the speed prescribed in section
3(e)(v) of these special conditions.
ii. The following procedures must be
used to show compliance in non-icing
and icing conditions:
1. Starting at a speed sufficiently
above the minimum steady flight speed
to ensure that a steady rate of speed
reduction can be established, apply the
longitudinal control so that the speed
reduction does not exceed 1 knot per
second until the control reaches the
stop.
2. The longitudinal control must be
maintained at the stop until the airplane
has reached a stabilized flight condition,
and must then be recovered by normal
recovery techniques.
3. Maneuvers with increased
deceleration rates:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:11 May 11, 2018
Jkt 244001
a. In non-icing conditions, the
requirements must also be met with
increased rates of entry to the incidence
limit, up to the maximum rate
achievable.
b. In icing conditions, with the antiice system working normally, the
requirements must also be met with
increased rates of entry to the incidence
limit, up to three knots per second.
4. Maneuvers with ice accretion prior
to normal operation of the ice protection
system:
For flight in icing conditions before
the ice protection system has been
activated and is performing its intended
function, the handling demonstration
requirements identified in section 5(a)(i)
must be satisfied using the procedures
specified in sections 5(a)(ii)(1) and
5(a)(ii)(2) of these special conditions.
The airplane configurations required to
be tested must be in accordance with
the limitations and procedures for
operating the ice protection system
provided in the AFM, per § 25.21(g)(1),
as modified by and Part II of these
special conditions.
b. Characteristics in High Incidence
Maneuvers
In lieu of § 25.203, ‘‘Stall
characteristics,’’ the following apply:
i. Throughout maneuvers with a rate
of deceleration of not more than 1 knot
per second, both in straight flight and in
30-degree banked turns, the airplane’s
characteristics must be as follows:
1. There must not be any abnormal
nose-up pitching;
2. There must not be any
uncommanded nose-down pitching,
which would be indicative of stall.
However, reasonable attitude changes
associated with stabilizing the incidence
at Alpha limit, as the longitudinal
control reaches the stop would be
acceptable;
3. There must not be any
uncommanded lateral or directional
motion, and the pilot must retain good
lateral and directional control by
conventional use of the controls
throughout the maneuver; and
4. The airplane must not exhibit
buffeting of a magnitude and severity
that would act as a deterrent from
completing the maneuver specified in
section 5(a)(i) of these special
conditions.
ii. In maneuvers with increased rates
of deceleration, some degradation of
characteristics is acceptable, associated
with a transient excursion beyond the
stabilized Alpha limit. However, the
airplane must not exhibit dangerous
characteristics or characteristics that
would deter the pilot from holding the
longitudinal control on the stop for a
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
22217
period of time appropriate to the
maneuver.
iii. It must always be possible for
flightcrew to reduce incidence by
conventional use of the controls.
iv. The rate at which the airplane can
be maneuvered from trim speeds,
associated with scheduled operating
speeds such as V2 and VREF up to Alpha
limit, must not be unduly damped or be
significantly slower than can be
achieved on conventionally controlled
transport airplanes.
c. Characteristics Up to the Maximum
Lift Angle of Attack
In addition to the requirements in
section 5(b) of this special condition,
the following requirements apply:
i. In non-icing conditions, maneuvers
with a rate of deceleration of not more
than 1 knot per second, up to the angle
of attack corresponding to VSR obtained
using sections 3(d) and (e) of this
special condition, must be demonstrated
in straight flight and in 30-degree
banked turns in the following
configurations:
1. The high incidence protection
system deactivated or adjusted, at the
option of the applicant, to allow higher
incidence than is possible with the
normal production system;
2. Automatic-thrust-increase system
inhibited (if applicable);
3. Engines idling;
4. Flaps, landing gear, and
deceleration devices in any likely
combination of positions not prohibited
by the AFM;
5. The most adverse CG for recovery;
and
6. The airplane trimmed for straight
flight at the speed prescribed in section
3(e)(v) of this special condition.
ii. In icing conditions, maneuvers
with a rate of deceleration of not more
than 1 knot per second up to the
maximum angle of attack reached
during maneuvers from section
5(a)(ii)(3)(b) must be demonstrated in
straight flight with:
1. The high incidence protection
system deactivated or adjusted, at the
option of the applicant, to allow higher
incidence than is possible with the
normal production system;
2. Automatic-thrust-increase system
inhibited (if applicable);
3. Engines idling;
4. Flaps, landing gear, and
deceleration devices in any likely
combination of positions not prohibited
by the AFM;
5. The most adverse CG for recovery;
and
6. The airplane trimmed for straight
flight at the speed prescribed in section
3(e)(v) of this special condition.
E:\FR\FM\14MYP1.SGM
14MYP1
22218
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 93 / Monday, May 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules
iii. During the maneuvers used to
show compliance with sections 5(c)(i)
and 5(c)(ii) of Part I of these special
conditions, the airplane must not
exhibit dangerous characteristics and it
must always be possible for flightcrew
to reduce angle of attack by
conventional use of the controls. The
pilot must retain good lateral and
directional control, by conventional use
of the controls, throughout the
maneuver.
6. Atmospheric Disturbances
Operation of the high incidence
protection system must not adversely
affect airplane control during expected
levels of atmospheric disturbances, nor
impede the application of recovery
procedures in case of wind shear. This
must be demonstrated in non-icing and
icing conditions.
7. None
8. Proof of Compliance
Add the following requirement to that
of § 25.21:
(b) The flying qualities will be
evaluated at the most unfavorable CG
position.
9. The Design Must Meet the Following
Modified Requirements
14 CFR
section
Change
25.145(a) ...........
‘‘VMIN’’ in lieu of ‘‘stall identification’’.
‘‘VMIN’’ in lieu of ‘‘VSW’’.
‘‘VMIN’’ in lieu of ‘‘VSW’’.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS
25.145(b)(6) ......
25.175(c) and
(d).
25.1323(d) .........
‘‘From 1.23 VSR to VMIN’’ in lieu
of ‘‘From 1.23 VSR to the
speed at which stall warning
begins;’’ and ‘‘speeds below
VMIN’’ in lieu of ‘‘speeds below
stall warning speed.’’
Part II: Credit for Robust Envelope
Protection in Icing Conditions
1. In lieu of § 25.21(g)(1), the
following applies:
(g) The requirements of this subpart
associated with icing conditions apply
only if certification for flight in icing
conditions is desired. If certification for
flight in icing conditions is desired, the
following requirements also apply (see
AC 25–25):
(1) Each requirement of this subpart,
except §§ 25.121(a), 25.123(c),
25.143(b)(1) and (b)(2), 25.149,
25.201(c)(2), 25.207(c) and (d), and
25.251(b) through (e), must be met in
icing conditions. Compliance must be
shown using the ice accretions defined
in appendix C to part 25, assuming
normal operation of the airplane and its
ice protection system in accordance
with the operating limitations and
operating procedures established by the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:11 May 11, 2018
Jkt 244001
applicant and provided in the Airplane
Flight Manual.
2. In lieu of § 25.103, ‘‘Stall speed,’’
define the stall speed as provided in
Special Conditions Part I, section 3,
‘‘Minimum Steady Flight Speed and
Reference Stall Speed.’’
3. In lieu of § 25.105(a)(2)(i) to read as
follows:
(2) In icing conditions, if in the
configuration of § 25.121(b) with the
‘‘Takeoff Ice’’ accretion defined in
appendix C to part 25:
(i) the V2 speed scheduled in nonicing conditions does not provide the
maneuvering capability specified in
§ 25.143(h) for the takeoff configuration,
or
4. In lieu of § 25.107(c) and (g), the
following apply, with additional
sections (c’) and (g’):
(c) In non-icing conditions, V2, in
terms of calibrated airspeed, must be
selected by the applicant to provide at
least the gradient of climb required by
§ 25.121(b) but may not be less than—
1. V2MIN;
2. VR plus the speed increment
attained (in accordance with
§ 25.111(c)(2)) before reaching a height
of 35 feet above the takeoff surface; and
3. A speed that provides the
maneuvering capability specified in
§ 25.143(h).
(c’) In icing conditions with the
‘‘Takeoff Ice’’ accretion defined in
appendix C to part 25, V2 may not be
less than—
1. The V2 speed determined in nonicing conditions.
2. A speed that provides the
maneuvering capability specified in
§ 25.143(h).
(g) In non-icing conditions, VFTO, in
terms of calibrated airspeed, must be
selected by the applicant to provide at
least the gradient of climb required by
§ 25.121(c), but may not be less than—
1. 1.18 VSR; and
2. A speed that provides the
maneuvering capability specified in
§ 25.143(h).
(g’) In icing conditions with the
‘‘Final Takeoff Ice’’ accretion defined in
appendix C to part 25, VFTO may not be
less than—
1. The VFTO speed determined in nonicing conditions.
2. A speed that provides the
maneuvering capability specified in
§ 25.143(h).
5. In lieu of §§ 25.121(b)(2)(ii)(A),
25.121(c)(2)(ii)(A), and 25.121(d)(2)(ii),
the following apply:
§ 25.121 Climb: One-engine
inoperative:
(b) Takeoff; landing gear retracted. In
the takeoff configuration existing at the
point of the flight path at which the
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
landing gear is fully retracted, and in
the configuration used in § 25.111, but
without ground effect,
* * *
2. The requirements of subparagraph
(b)(1) of this section must be met:
* * *
(ii) In icing conditions with the
‘‘Takeoff Ice’’ accretion defined in
appendix C of part 25, if in the
configuration of § 25.121(b) with the
‘‘Takeoff Ice’’ accretion:
(A) The V2 speed scheduled in nonicing conditions does not provide the
maneuvering capability specified in
§ 25.143(h) for the takeoff configuration;
or
(c) Final takeoff. In the en route
configuration at the end of the takeoff
path determined in accordance with
§ 25.111:
* * *
2. The requirements of subparagraph
(c)(1) of this section must be met:
* * *
(ii) In icing conditions with the ‘‘Final
Takeoff Ice’’ accretion defined in
appendix C of part 25, if:
(A) The VFTO speed scheduled in nonicing conditions does not provide the
maneuvering capability specified in
§ 25.143(h) for the en route
configuration; or
(d) Approach. In a configuration
corresponding to the normal all-engines
operating procedure in which VSR for
this configuration does not exceed 110
percent of the VSR for the related allengines-operating landing configuration:
*
*
*
*
*
2. The requirements of sub-paragraph
(d)(1) of this section must be met:
*
*
*
*
*
(ii) In icing conditions with the
‘‘Approach Ice’’ accretion defined in
appendix C to part 25, in a configuration
corresponding to the normal all-enginesoperating procedure in which VMIN1g for
this configuration does not exceed
110% of the VMIN1g for the related all
engines-operating landing configuration
in icing, with a climb speed established
with normal landing procedures, but not
more than 1.4 VSR (VSR determined in
non-icing conditions).
6. In lieu of § 25.123 (b)(2)(i), the
following applies:
§ 25.123 En route flight paths:
(b) The one-engine-inoperative net
flight path data must represent the
actual climb performance diminished by
a gradient of climb of 1.1 percent for
two-engine airplanes, 1.4 percent for
three-engine airplanes, and 1.6 percent
for four-engine airplanes.
*
*
*
*
*
2. In icing conditions with the ‘‘En
route Ice’’ accretion defined in appendix
C to part 25 if:
E:\FR\FM\14MYP1.SGM
14MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 93 / Monday, May 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS
(i) The minimum en route speed
scheduled in non-icing conditions does
not provide the maneuvering capability
specified in § 25.143(h) for the en route
configuration, or
7. In lieu of § 25.125(b)(2)(ii)(B) and
§ 25.125(b)(2)(ii)(C), the following
applies:
§ 25.125 Landing.
(b) In determining the distance in (a):
*
*
*
*
*
2. A stabilized approach, with a
calibrated airspeed of not less than
VREF, must be maintained down to the
50-foot height.
*
*
*
*
*
(ii) In icing conditions, VREF may not
be less than:
(A) The speed determined in subparagraph (b)(2)(i) of this section;
(B) A speed that provides the
maneuvering capability specified in
§ 25.143(h) with the ‘‘Landing Ice’’
accretion defined in appendix C to part
25.
8. In lieu of § 25.143(j), the following
applies:
§ 25.143 General.
(j) For flight in icing conditions—
before the ice protection system has
been activated and is performing its
intended function—the following
requirements apply:
(1) If activating the ice protection
system depends on the pilot seeing a
specified ice accretion on a reference
surface (not just the first indication of
icing), the requirements of § 25.143
apply with the ice accretion defined in
part II(e) of appendix C to part 25.
(2) For other means of activating the
ice protection system, it must be
demonstrated in flight with the ice
accretion defined in part II(e) of
appendix C to part 25 that:
(i) The airplane is controllable in a
pull-up maneuver up to 1.5 g load factor
or lower if limited by AOA protection;
and
(ii) There is no reversal of pitch
control force during a pushover
maneuver down to 0.5 g load factor.
9. In lieu of § 25.207, ‘‘Stall warning,’’
to read as the requirements defined in
Part I of these special conditions.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 8,
2018.
Victor Wicklund,
Manager, Transport Standards Branch, Policy
and Innovation Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–10168 Filed 5–11–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:11 May 11, 2018
Jkt 244001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2018–0364; Product
Identifier 2017–NM–154–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Airbus Model A300 and A310 series
airplanes; Model A300 B4–600, B4–
600R, and F4–600R series airplanes, and
Model A300 C4–605R Variant F
airplanes (collectively called Model
A300–600 series airplanes). This
proposed AD was prompted by a
determination that new or more
restrictive maintenance requirements
and airworthiness limitations are
necessary. This proposed AD would
require revising the maintenance or
inspection program, as applicable, to
incorporate new or more restrictive
maintenance requirements and
airworthiness limitations. We are
proposing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by June 28, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this NPRM, contact Airbus SAS,
Airworthiness Office—EAW, 1 Rond
Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36
96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email
account.airworth-eas@airbus.com;
internet https://www.airbus.com. You
may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200
South 216th Street, Des Moines, WA.
For information on the availability of
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
22219
this material at the FAA, call 206–231–
3195.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–
0364; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this NPRM, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone
800–647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan
Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Section, Transport
Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
telephone and fax 206–231–3225.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposal. Send your comments to
an address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2018–0364; Product Identifier 2017–
NM–154–AD’’ at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this NPRM. We will consider
all comments received by the closing
date and may amend this NPRM based
on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this NPRM.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Union, has issued EASA Airworthiness
Directive 2017–0204, dated October 12,
2017 (referred to after this as the
Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness
Information, or ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct
an unsafe condition for all Airbus
Model A300 and A310 series airplanes,
and Model A300 B4–600, B4–600R, and
F4–600R series airplanes, and Model
A300 C4–605R Variant F airplanes
(collectively called Model A300–600
series airplanes). The MCAI states:
The airworthiness limitations for the
Airbus A300, A310, A300–600 and A300–
E:\FR\FM\14MYP1.SGM
14MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 93 (Monday, May 14, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 22214-22219]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-10168]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
Docket No. FAA-2015-0310; Notice No. 25-18-02-SC]
Special Conditions: Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation Model GVII-
G500 Series Airplanes; Flight Envelope Protection--High Incidence
Protection System.
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed special conditions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action proposes special conditions for the Gulfstream
Aerospace Corporation (Gulfstream) Model GVII-G500 series airplanes.
These airplanes will have a novel or unusual design feature when
compared to the state of technology and design envisioned in the
airworthiness standards for transport category airplanes. This design
feature is a high incidence protection system that limits the angle of
attack at which the airplane can be flown during normal low speed
operation. The applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards for this design feature. These
special conditions contain the additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: Send your comments on or before June 4, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2015-0310
using any of the following methods:
Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/ and follow the online instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30, U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at 202-493-2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all comments it receives, without
change, to https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal
information the commenter provides. Using the search function of the
docket website, anyone can find and read the electronic form of all
comments received into any FAA docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or signing the comment for an
association, business, labor union, etc.). DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement can be found in the Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477-19478).
Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov/ at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to Docket Operations in Room W12-140 of
the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe Jacobsen, Airframe & Flight Crew
Interface Section, AIR-671, Transport Standards Branch, Policy and
Innovation Division, Aircraft Certification Service, Federal Aviation
Administration, 2200 SE 216th Street, Des Moines, Washington 98098;
telephone and facsimile 206-231-3158; email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Certification of the Gulfstream Model GVII-
G500 series airplanes is currently scheduled for July 2018. Because a
delay in design approval would significantly affect the certification
of the airplane and thus delivery of the airplane, we are shortening
the public-comment period to 20 days.
Comments Invited
We invite interested people to take part in this rulemaking by
sending written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the special conditions, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data.
We will consider all comments we receive by the closing date for
comments. We may change these special conditions based on the comments
we receive.
Background
On June 30, 2013, Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation applied for a
type certificate for its new Model GVII-G500 series airplane. The
Gulfstream Model GVII-G500 series airplane will be a business jet with
seating for up to 19 passengers. It will incorporate a low, swept-wing
design with a T-tail. The powerplant will consist of two aft-fuselage-
mounted turbofan engines. The Gulfstream Model GVII-G500 series
airplane's maximum takeoff weight will be approximately 79,600 lbs.
The high incidence protection system prevents the airplane from
stalling at low speeds and, therefore, a stall warning system is not
needed during normal flight conditions.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14
CFR) 21.17, Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation must show that the Model
GVII-G500 series airplane meets the applicable provisions of 14 CFR
part 25, as amended by amendments 25-1 through 25-137.
If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the Gulfstream Model GVII-G500 series
airplane because of a novel or unusual design feature, special
conditions are prescribed under the provisions of Sec. 21.16.
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended
later to include any other model that incorporates the same novel or
unusual design feature, these special conditions would also apply to
the other model under Sec. 21.101.
In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Gulfstream Model GVII-
[[Page 22215]]
G500 series airplanes must comply with the fuel vent and exhaust
emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34, and the noise certification
requirements of 14 CFR part 36.
The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in
accordance with Sec. 11.38, and they become part of the type
certification basis under Sec. 21.17(a)(2).
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Gulfstream Model GVII-G500 series airplane will incorporate the
following novel or unusual design feature: A high incidence protection
system, which limits the angle of attack at which the airplane can be
flown during normal low speed operation, prohibits the airplane from
stalling, and cannot be overridden by the flightcrew. The application
of this angle of attack limit influences the stall speed determination,
stall characteristics, stall warning demonstration, and longitudinal
handling characteristics of the airplane. Existing airworthiness
regulations do not contain adequate standards to address this feature.
Discussion
The high incidence protection system prevents the airplane from
stalling at low speeds and, therefore, a stall warning system is not
needed during normal flight conditions. However, during failures, which
are not shown to be extremely improbable, the requirements of
Sec. Sec. 25.203 and 25.207 apply, although slightly modified by these
conditions. If there are failures of the high incidence protection
system that are not shown to be extremely improbable, the flight
characteristics at the angle of attack for CLMAX must be
suitable in the traditional sense, and stall warning must be provided
in a conventional manner.
Part I of the following special conditions is in lieu of Sec. Sec.
25.21(b), 25.103, 25.145(a), 25.145(b)(6), 25.175(c) and (d), 25.201,
25.203, 25.207, and 25.1323(d). Part II is in lieu of Sec. Sec.
25.21(g)(1), 25.105(a)(2)(i), 25.107(c) and (g), 25.121(b)(2)(ii)(A),
25.121(c)(2)(ii)(A), 25.121(d)(2)(ii), 25.123(b)(2)(i),
25.125(b)(2)(ii)(B), and 25.143(j).
These proposed special conditions address this novel or unusual
design feature on the Gulfstream Model GVII-G500 airplane, and contain
the additional safety standards that the Administrator considers
necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established
by the existing airworthiness standards.
These proposed special conditions are different from special
conditions previously issued on this topic. In Part 1, sections
3.b.iv., 3.b.vi., 3.e.vi., 5.a.i.1., 5.a.i.4., 5.a.i.6., 5.a.i.7.,
5.c.i.4., 5.c.i.5., 5.c.i.6, 5.c.ii.4., and 5.cii.5., previously used
verbiage was updated to reflect language recommended in the ARAC Flight
Test Harmonization Working Group (FTHWG) Phase 2 report. This language
more accurately describes the actions required and formulas to be used
to obtain the required result. In Part 1, sections 3.b.ii and
5.a.ii.4., the ARAC FTHWG language was adapted to reflect specific
Gulfstream design features.
In several previous special conditions on this subject, we used the
nomenclature VCLMAX. To avoid confusion with previous
Gulfstream special conditions, we have changed the nomenclature to
VCLMAX Demo to highlight a difference. The difference is not
significant, but the change in nomenclature was considered clarifying
and therefore was adopted in this instance.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the
Gulfstream Model GVII-G500 series airplanes. Should Gulfstream
Aerospace Corporation apply at a later date for a change to the type
certificate to include another model incorporating the same novel or
unusual design feature, these special conditions would apply to that
model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
on Gulfstream Model GVII-G500 series of airplanes. It is not a rule of
general applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting, and recordkeeping
requirements.
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.
The Proposed Special Conditions
Accordingly, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) proposes the
following special conditions as part of the type certification basis
for Gulfstream Model GVII-G500 series airplanes.
Part I: Stall Protection and Scheduled Operating Speeds
In the following sections, ``in icing conditions,'' means with ice
accretions (relative to the relevant flight phase) as defined in
appendix C to part 25, at amendment 25-121.
1. Definitions
These special conditions use terminology that does not appear in 14
CFR part 25. For the purpose of these special conditions, the following
terms describe certain aspects of this novel or unusual design feature:
High-Incidence Protection System
A system that operates directly and automatically on the airplane's
flight controls to limit the maximum angle of attack that can be
attained to a value below that at which an aerodynamic stall would
occur.
Alpha-Limit
The maximum angle of attack at which an airplane stabilizes with
the high incidence protection system operating and the longitudinal
control held on its aft stop.
VMIN
The minimum steady flight speed in the airplane's configuration
under consideration with the high incidence protection system
operating. See Part I, Section 3, ``Minimum Steady Flight Speed and
Reference Stall Speed,'' of these special conditions.
VMIN1g
VMIN corrected to 1g acceleration of gravity conditions.
See Part I, Section 3, ``Minimum Steady Flight Speed and Reference
Stall Speed,'' of these special conditions. This is the minimum
calibrated airspeed at which the airplane can develop a lift force
normal to the flight path and equal to its weight when at an angle of
attack not greater than that determined for VMIN.
2. Capability and Reliability of the High Incidence Protection System
The applicant must establish the capability and reliability of the
high incidence protection system. The applicant may establish this
capability and reliability by flight testing, simulation, or analysis
as appropriate. The capability and reliability required are:
a. It must not be possible to encounter a stall during the pilot-
induced maneuvers required by Part I, section 5(a), ``High Incidence
Handling Demonstrations,'' and the handling characteristics must be
acceptable as required by Part I, section 5(b), ``Characteristics in
High Incidence Maneuvers'' of these special conditions;
b. The airplane must be protected against stalling due to the
effects of wind shears and gusts at low speeds as required by Section
6, ``Atmospheric Disturbances'' of these special conditions;
[[Page 22216]]
c. The ability of the high incidence protection system to
accommodate any reduction in stalling incidence must be verified in
icing conditions;
d. The high incidence protection system must be provided in each
abnormal configuration of the high lift devices that is likely to be
used in flight following system failures; and
e. The reliability of the system and the effects of failures must
be acceptable in accordance with Sec. 25.1309.
3. Minimum Steady Flight Speed and Reference Stall Speed
In lieu of Sec. 25.103, ``Stall speed,'' the following applies:
a. The minimum steady flight speed, VMIN, is the final,
stabilized, calibrated airspeed obtained when an airplane is
decelerated until the longitudinal control is on its stop in such a way
that the entry rate does not exceed 1 knot per second.
b. The minimum steady flight speed, VMIN, must be
determined in icing and non-icing conditions with:
i. The high incidence protection system operating normally;
ii. Idle thrust;
iii. All combinations of flap settings and landing gear positions
for which VMIN is required to be determined;
iv. The weight used when the reference stall speed, VSR,
is used as a factor to determine compliance with a required performance
standard;
v. The most unfavorable center of gravity (CG) allowable; and
vi. The airplane trimmed for straight flight at a speed selected by
the applicant, but not less than 1.13 VSR and not greater
than 1.3 VSR.
c. The 1g minimum steady flight speed, VMIN1g, is the
minimum calibrated airspeed at which an airplane can develop a lift
force (normal to the flight path) equal to its weight, while at an
angle of attack not greater than that at which the minimum steady
flight speed referenced in section 3(a) of this special condition is
determined. These minimum calibrated airspeeds must be determined for
both icing and non-icing conditions.
d. The reference stall speed, VSR, is a calibrated
airspeed defined by the applicant. VSR may not be less than
a 1g stall speed. VSR must be determined in non-icing
conditions and expressed as:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP14MY18.000
Where:
VCLMAX Demo = Demonstrated calibrated airspeed obtained
when the corrected lift coefficient of the load factor
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP14MY18.001
is first a maximum during the
maneuver prescribed in
section 3(e)(viii)
of this
special condition.
nZW = Load factor normal to the flight path at
VCLMAX Demo
W = Airplane gross weight;
S = Aerodynamic reference wing area; and
q = Dynamic pressure.
e. VCLMAX Demo is determined in non-icing conditions
with:
i. Engines idling, or, if that resultant thrust causes an
appreciable decrease in stall speed, not more than zero thrust at the
stall speed;
ii. The airplane in other respects (such as flaps and landing gear)
in the condition existing in the test or performance standard in which
VSR is being used;
iii. The weight used when VSR is being used as a factor
to determine compliance with a required performance standard;
iv. The CG position that results in the highest value of the
reference stall speed;
v. The airplane trimmed for straight flight at a speed selected by
the applicant, but not less than 1.13 VSR and not greater
than 1.3 VSR;
vi. At the option of the applicant, the high incidence protection
system can be disabled or adjusted to allow full development of the
maneuver to the angle of attack corresponding to VSR; and
vii. Starting from the stabilized trim condition, with an
application of the longitudinal control to decelerate the airplane so
that the speed reduction does not exceed 1 knot per second.
4. Stall Warning
In lieu of Sec. 25.207, the following apply:
a. Normal Operation
If the design meets all conditions of Part I, section 2 of these
special conditions, then the airplane need not provide stall warning
during normal operation. The conditions of Part I, section 2 provide a
level of safety equal to the intent of Sec. 25.207, ``Stall warning,''
so the provision of an additional, unique warning device for normal
operations is not required.
b. High Incidence Protection System Failure
For any failures of the high incidence protection system that the
applicant cannot show to be extremely improbable, and that result in
the capability of the system no longer satisfying any part of sections
2(a), (b), and (c) of Part I of these special conditions: The design
must provide stall warning that protects against encountering
unacceptable characteristics and against encountering stall.
i. This stall warning, with the flaps and landing gear in any
normal position, must be clear and distinctive to the pilot, and must
meet the requirements specified in sections 4(b)(iv) and 4(b)(v) of
Part I of these special conditions.
ii. The design must also provide this stall warning in each
abnormal configuration of the high lift devices that is likely to be
used in flight following system failures.
iii. The design may furnish this stall warning either through the
inherent aerodynamic qualities of the airplane or by a device that will
provide clearly distinguishable indications to the flightcrew under all
expected conditions of flight. However, a visual stall warning device
that requires the attention of the flightcrew within the flight deck is
not acceptable by itself. If a warning device is used, it must provide
a warning in each of the airplane configurations prescribed in section
4(b)(i), above, and for the conditions prescribed in sections 4(b)(iv)
and 4(b)(v) of Part I of these special conditions.
iv. In non-icing conditions, the stall warning must provide
sufficient margin to prevent encountering unacceptable characteristics
and encountering stall in the following conditions:
1. In power-off straight deceleration not exceeding 1 knot per
second to a speed of 5 knots or 5 percent calibrated airspeed (CAS),
whichever is greater, below the warning onset; and
2. In turning flight, stall deceleration at entry rates up to 3
knots per second when recovery is initiated not less than 1 second
after the warning onset.
v. In icing conditions, the stall warning must provide sufficient
margin to prevent encountering unacceptable characteristics and
encountering stall in power-off straight and turning flight
decelerations not exceeding 1 knot per second, when the pilot starts a
recovery maneuver not less than three seconds after the onset of stall
warning.
vi. An airplane is considered stalled when the behavior of the
airplane gives the pilot a clear, distinctive, and acceptable
indication that the airplane is stalled. Acceptable indications of a
stall, occurring either individually or in combination, are:
1. A nose-down pitch that cannot be readily arrested;
2. Buffeting of a magnitude and severity that is strong and thereby
an
[[Page 22217]]
effective deterrent to further speed reduction; or
3. The pitch control reaches the aft stop, and no further increase
in pitch attitude occurs when the control is held full aft for a short
time before recovery is initiated.
vii. An airplane exhibits unacceptable characteristics during
straight or turning flight decelerations if it is not always possible
to produce and to correct roll and yaw by unreversed use of aileron and
rudder controls, or abnormal nose-up pitching occurs.
5. Handling Characteristics at High Incidence
a. High Incidence Handling Demonstrations
In lieu of Sec. 25.201, ``Stall demonstration,'' the following is
required:
i. Maneuvers to the limit of the longitudinal control, in the nose-
up sense, must be demonstrated in straight flight and in 30-degree
banked turns with:
1. The high incidence protection system operating normally;
2. Initial power conditions of:
a. Power off; and
b. Power necessary to maintain level flight at 1.5 VSR1,
where VSR1 is the reference stall speed with flaps in
approach position, landing gear retracted, and maximum landing weight;
3. None;
4. Flaps, landing gear, and deceleration devices in any likely
combination of positions not prohibited by the airplane flight manual
(AFM);
5. Representative weights within the range for which certification
is requested;
6. The most adverse CG for recovery; and
7. The airplane trimmed for straight flight at the speed prescribed
in section 3(e)(v) of these special conditions.
ii. The following procedures must be used to show compliance in
non-icing and icing conditions:
1. Starting at a speed sufficiently above the minimum steady flight
speed to ensure that a steady rate of speed reduction can be
established, apply the longitudinal control so that the speed reduction
does not exceed 1 knot per second until the control reaches the stop.
2. The longitudinal control must be maintained at the stop until
the airplane has reached a stabilized flight condition, and must then
be recovered by normal recovery techniques.
3. Maneuvers with increased deceleration rates:
a. In non-icing conditions, the requirements must also be met with
increased rates of entry to the incidence limit, up to the maximum rate
achievable.
b. In icing conditions, with the anti-ice system working normally,
the requirements must also be met with increased rates of entry to the
incidence limit, up to three knots per second.
4. Maneuvers with ice accretion prior to normal operation of the
ice protection system:
For flight in icing conditions before the ice protection system has
been activated and is performing its intended function, the handling
demonstration requirements identified in section 5(a)(i) must be
satisfied using the procedures specified in sections 5(a)(ii)(1) and
5(a)(ii)(2) of these special conditions. The airplane configurations
required to be tested must be in accordance with the limitations and
procedures for operating the ice protection system provided in the AFM,
per Sec. 25.21(g)(1), as modified by and Part II of these special
conditions.
b. Characteristics in High Incidence Maneuvers
In lieu of Sec. 25.203, ``Stall characteristics,'' the following
apply:
i. Throughout maneuvers with a rate of deceleration of not more
than 1 knot per second, both in straight flight and in 30-degree banked
turns, the airplane's characteristics must be as follows:
1. There must not be any abnormal nose-up pitching;
2. There must not be any uncommanded nose-down pitching, which
would be indicative of stall. However, reasonable attitude changes
associated with stabilizing the incidence at Alpha limit, as the
longitudinal control reaches the stop would be acceptable;
3. There must not be any uncommanded lateral or directional motion,
and the pilot must retain good lateral and directional control by
conventional use of the controls throughout the maneuver; and
4. The airplane must not exhibit buffeting of a magnitude and
severity that would act as a deterrent from completing the maneuver
specified in section 5(a)(i) of these special conditions.
ii. In maneuvers with increased rates of deceleration, some
degradation of characteristics is acceptable, associated with a
transient excursion beyond the stabilized Alpha limit. However, the
airplane must not exhibit dangerous characteristics or characteristics
that would deter the pilot from holding the longitudinal control on the
stop for a period of time appropriate to the maneuver.
iii. It must always be possible for flightcrew to reduce incidence
by conventional use of the controls.
iv. The rate at which the airplane can be maneuvered from trim
speeds, associated with scheduled operating speeds such as
V2 and VREF up to Alpha limit, must not be unduly
damped or be significantly slower than can be achieved on
conventionally controlled transport airplanes.
c. Characteristics Up to the Maximum Lift Angle of Attack
In addition to the requirements in section 5(b) of this special
condition, the following requirements apply:
i. In non-icing conditions, maneuvers with a rate of deceleration
of not more than 1 knot per second, up to the angle of attack
corresponding to VSR obtained using sections 3(d) and (e) of
this special condition, must be demonstrated in straight flight and in
30-degree banked turns in the following configurations:
1. The high incidence protection system deactivated or adjusted, at
the option of the applicant, to allow higher incidence than is possible
with the normal production system;
2. Automatic-thrust-increase system inhibited (if applicable);
3. Engines idling;
4. Flaps, landing gear, and deceleration devices in any likely
combination of positions not prohibited by the AFM;
5. The most adverse CG for recovery; and
6. The airplane trimmed for straight flight at the speed prescribed
in section 3(e)(v) of this special condition.
ii. In icing conditions, maneuvers with a rate of deceleration of
not more than 1 knot per second up to the maximum angle of attack
reached during maneuvers from section 5(a)(ii)(3)(b) must be
demonstrated in straight flight with:
1. The high incidence protection system deactivated or adjusted, at
the option of the applicant, to allow higher incidence than is possible
with the normal production system;
2. Automatic-thrust-increase system inhibited (if applicable);
3. Engines idling;
4. Flaps, landing gear, and deceleration devices in any likely
combination of positions not prohibited by the AFM;
5. The most adverse CG for recovery; and
6. The airplane trimmed for straight flight at the speed prescribed
in section 3(e)(v) of this special condition.
[[Page 22218]]
iii. During the maneuvers used to show compliance with sections
5(c)(i) and 5(c)(ii) of Part I of these special conditions, the
airplane must not exhibit dangerous characteristics and it must always
be possible for flightcrew to reduce angle of attack by conventional
use of the controls. The pilot must retain good lateral and directional
control, by conventional use of the controls, throughout the maneuver.
6. Atmospheric Disturbances
Operation of the high incidence protection system must not
adversely affect airplane control during expected levels of atmospheric
disturbances, nor impede the application of recovery procedures in case
of wind shear. This must be demonstrated in non-icing and icing
conditions.
7. None
8. Proof of Compliance
Add the following requirement to that of Sec. 25.21:
(b) The flying qualities will be evaluated at the most unfavorable
CG position.
9. The Design Must Meet the Following Modified Requirements
------------------------------------------------------------------------
14 CFR section Change
------------------------------------------------------------------------
25.145(a)................................. ``VMIN'' in lieu of ``stall
identification''.
25.145(b)(6).............................. ``VMIN'' in lieu of ``VSW''.
25.175(c) and (d)......................... ``VMIN'' in lieu of ``VSW''.
25.1323(d)................................ ``From 1.23 VSR to VMIN'' in
lieu of ``From 1.23 VSR to
the speed at which stall
warning begins;'' and
``speeds below VMIN'' in
lieu of ``speeds below
stall warning speed.''
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part II: Credit for Robust Envelope Protection in Icing Conditions
1. In lieu of Sec. 25.21(g)(1), the following applies:
(g) The requirements of this subpart associated with icing
conditions apply only if certification for flight in icing conditions
is desired. If certification for flight in icing conditions is desired,
the following requirements also apply (see AC 25-25):
(1) Each requirement of this subpart, except Sec. Sec. 25.121(a),
25.123(c), 25.143(b)(1) and (b)(2), 25.149, 25.201(c)(2), 25.207(c) and
(d), and 25.251(b) through (e), must be met in icing conditions.
Compliance must be shown using the ice accretions defined in appendix C
to part 25, assuming normal operation of the airplane and its ice
protection system in accordance with the operating limitations and
operating procedures established by the applicant and provided in the
Airplane Flight Manual.
2. In lieu of Sec. 25.103, ``Stall speed,'' define the stall speed
as provided in Special Conditions Part I, section 3, ``Minimum Steady
Flight Speed and Reference Stall Speed.''
3. In lieu of Sec. 25.105(a)(2)(i) to read as follows:
(2) In icing conditions, if in the configuration of Sec. 25.121(b)
with the ``Takeoff Ice'' accretion defined in appendix C to part 25:
(i) the V2 speed scheduled in non-icing conditions does not provide
the maneuvering capability specified in Sec. 25.143(h) for the takeoff
configuration, or
4. In lieu of Sec. 25.107(c) and (g), the following apply, with
additional sections (c') and (g'):
(c) In non-icing conditions, V2, in terms of calibrated
airspeed, must be selected by the applicant to provide at least the
gradient of climb required by Sec. 25.121(b) but may not be less
than--
1. V2MIN;
2. VR plus the speed increment attained (in accordance
with Sec. 25.111(c)(2)) before reaching a height of 35 feet above the
takeoff surface; and
3. A speed that provides the maneuvering capability specified in
Sec. 25.143(h).
(c') In icing conditions with the ``Takeoff Ice'' accretion defined
in appendix C to part 25, V2 may not be less than--
1. The V2 speed determined in non-icing conditions.
2. A speed that provides the maneuvering capability specified in
Sec. 25.143(h).
(g) In non-icing conditions, VFTO, in terms of
calibrated airspeed, must be selected by the applicant to provide at
least the gradient of climb required by Sec. 25.121(c), but may not be
less than--
1. 1.18 VSR; and
2. A speed that provides the maneuvering capability specified in
Sec. 25.143(h).
(g') In icing conditions with the ``Final Takeoff Ice'' accretion
defined in appendix C to part 25, VFTO may not be less
than--
1. The VFTO speed determined in non-icing conditions.
2. A speed that provides the maneuvering capability specified in
Sec. 25.143(h).
5. In lieu of Sec. Sec. 25.121(b)(2)(ii)(A), 25.121(c)(2)(ii)(A),
and 25.121(d)(2)(ii), the following apply:
Sec. 25.121 Climb: One-engine inoperative:
(b) Takeoff; landing gear retracted. In the takeoff configuration
existing at the point of the flight path at which the landing gear is
fully retracted, and in the configuration used in Sec. 25.111, but
without ground effect,
* * *
2. The requirements of subparagraph (b)(1) of this section must be
met:
* * *
(ii) In icing conditions with the ``Takeoff Ice'' accretion defined
in appendix C of part 25, if in the configuration of Sec. 25.121(b)
with the ``Takeoff Ice'' accretion:
(A) The V2 speed scheduled in non-icing conditions does
not provide the maneuvering capability specified in Sec. 25.143(h) for
the takeoff configuration; or
(c) Final takeoff. In the en route configuration at the end of the
takeoff path determined in accordance with Sec. 25.111:
* * *
2. The requirements of subparagraph (c)(1) of this section must be
met:
* * *
(ii) In icing conditions with the ``Final Takeoff Ice'' accretion
defined in appendix C of part 25, if:
(A) The VFTO speed scheduled in non-icing conditions
does not provide the maneuvering capability specified in Sec.
25.143(h) for the en route configuration; or
(d) Approach. In a configuration corresponding to the normal all-
engines operating procedure in which VSR for this
configuration does not exceed 110 percent of the VSR for the
related all-engines-operating landing configuration:
* * * * *
2. The requirements of sub-paragraph (d)(1) of this section must be
met:
* * * * *
(ii) In icing conditions with the ``Approach Ice'' accretion
defined in appendix C to part 25, in a configuration corresponding to
the normal all-engines-operating procedure in which VMIN1g
for this configuration does not exceed 110% of the VMIN1g
for the related all engines-operating landing configuration in icing,
with a climb speed established with normal landing procedures, but not
more than 1.4 VSR (VSR determined in non-icing
conditions).
6. In lieu of Sec. 25.123 (b)(2)(i), the following applies:
Sec. 25.123 En route flight paths:
(b) The one-engine-inoperative net flight path data must represent
the actual climb performance diminished by a gradient of climb of 1.1
percent for two-engine airplanes, 1.4 percent for three-engine
airplanes, and 1.6 percent for four-engine airplanes.
* * * * *
2. In icing conditions with the ``En route Ice'' accretion defined
in appendix C to part 25 if:
[[Page 22219]]
(i) The minimum en route speed scheduled in non-icing conditions
does not provide the maneuvering capability specified in Sec.
25.143(h) for the en route configuration, or
7. In lieu of Sec. 25.125(b)(2)(ii)(B) and Sec.
25.125(b)(2)(ii)(C), the following applies:
Sec. 25.125 Landing.
(b) In determining the distance in (a):
* * * * *
2. A stabilized approach, with a calibrated airspeed of not less
than VREF, must be maintained down to the 50-foot height.
* * * * *
(ii) In icing conditions, VREF may not be less than:
(A) The speed determined in sub-paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this
section;
(B) A speed that provides the maneuvering capability specified in
Sec. 25.143(h) with the ``Landing Ice'' accretion defined in appendix
C to part 25.
8. In lieu of Sec. 25.143(j), the following applies:
Sec. 25.143 General.
(j) For flight in icing conditions--before the ice protection
system has been activated and is performing its intended function--the
following requirements apply:
(1) If activating the ice protection system depends on the pilot
seeing a specified ice accretion on a reference surface (not just the
first indication of icing), the requirements of Sec. 25.143 apply with
the ice accretion defined in part II(e) of appendix C to part 25.
(2) For other means of activating the ice protection system, it
must be demonstrated in flight with the ice accretion defined in part
II(e) of appendix C to part 25 that:
(i) The airplane is controllable in a pull-up maneuver up to 1.5 g
load factor or lower if limited by AOA protection; and
(ii) There is no reversal of pitch control force during a pushover
maneuver down to 0.5 g load factor.
9. In lieu of Sec. 25.207, ``Stall warning,'' to read as the
requirements defined in Part I of these special conditions.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 8, 2018.
Victor Wicklund,
Manager, Transport Standards Branch, Policy and Innovation Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-10168 Filed 5-11-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P