Walnuts Grown in California; Order Amending Marketing Order 984, 21841-21843 [2018-10106]
Download as PDF
21841
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 83, No. 92
Friday, May 11, 2018
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 984
[Doc. No. AMS–SC–16–0053; SC16–984–1
FR]
Walnuts Grown in California; Order
Amending Marketing Order 984
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule amends
Marketing Order No. 984, which
regulates the handling of walnuts grown
in California. The amendment, which
was proposed by the California Walnut
Board (Board), was approved by growers
in the referendum. This action
authorizes the Board to borrow from a
commercial lending institution to fund
operations and marketing/research
expenses for the program.
DATES: This rule is effective June 11,
2018.
SUMMARY:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Geronimo Quinones, Marketing
Specialist, or Julie Santoboni,
Rulemaking Branch Chief, Marketing
Order and Agreement Division,
Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA,
1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237;
Telephone: (202) 720–2491, Fax: (202)
720–8938, or Email:
Geronimo.Quinones@ams.usda.gov or
Julie.Santoboni@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Richard Lower,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email:
Richard.Lower@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:27 May 10, 2018
Jkt 244001
finalizes an amendment to a marketing
order as defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j). This
rule is issued under Marketing Order
No. 984, as amended (7 CFR part 984),
regulating the handling of walnuts
grown in California. Part 984 hereinafter
(referred to as the ‘‘Order’’) is effective
under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7
U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to
as the ‘‘Act.’’ The Board, which is
responsible for the local administration
of the Order, is comprised of walnut
growers and handlers operating within
the production area. The applicable
rules of practice and procedure
governing the formulation of Marketing
Agreements and Orders (7 CFR part 900)
authorize amendment of the Order
through this informal rulemaking
action.
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Orders
13563 and 13175. This action falls
within a category of regulatory actions
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive
Order 12866 review. Additionally,
because this rule does not meet the
definition of a significant regulatory
action, it does not trigger the
requirements contained in Executive
Order 13771. See OMB’s Memorandum
titled ‘‘Interim Guidance Implementing
Section 2 of the Executive Order of
January 30, 2017, titled ‘Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs’ ’’ (February 2, 2017).
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule is not intended to
have retroactive effect. This rule shall
not be deemed to preclude, preempt, or
supersede any State program covering
walnuts grown in California.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
Section 1504 of the Food,
Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008
(2008 Farm Bill) (Pub. L. 110–246)
amended section 18c(17) of the Act,
which in turn required the addition of
supplemental rules of practice to 7 CFR
part 900 (73 FR 49307). The amendment
of section 18c(17) of the Act and
additional supplemental rules of
practice authorize the use of informal
rulemaking (5 U.S.C. 553) to amend
Federal fruit, vegetable, and nut
marketing agreements and orders. USDA
may use informal rulemaking to amend
marketing orders based on the nature
and complexity of the proposed
amendments, the potential regulatory
and economic impacts on affected
entities, and any other relevant matters.
The Agricultural Marketing Service
(AMS) considered the nature and
complexity of the proposed amendment,
the potential regulatory and economic
impacts on affected entities, and other
relevant matters, and determined that
amending the Order as proposed by the
Board could appropriately be
accomplished through informal
rulemaking.
The proposed amendment was
unanimously recommended by the
Board following deliberations at a
public meeting held on February 19,
2016.
A proposed rule soliciting comments
on the amendment was issued on
September 12, 2016, and published in
the Federal Register on September 16,
2016 (81 FR 63721). Two comments
were received, both in support of the
amendment. A proposed rule and
referendum order was issued on May
19, 2017, and published in the Federal
Register on May 26, 2017 (82 FR 24255).
This document also directed that a
referendum among walnut growers be
conducted August 7, 2017 through
August 18, 2017 to determine whether
they favored the proposal. To become
effective, the amendment had to be
approved by either two-thirds of the
growers voting in the referendum or by
those representing at least two-thirds of
the volume of walnuts produced by
those voting in the referendum. The
amendment was favored by 61 percent
E:\FR\FM\11MYR1.SGM
11MYR1
21842
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 92 / Friday, May 11, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
of the growers voting and by 68 percent
of the volume represented, the second of
which exceeds the two-thirds volume
requirement.
The amendment in this final rule
authorizes the Board to borrow from a
commercial lending institution during
times of cash shortages to help ensure
continuity of operations.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), AMS has considered
the economic impact of this action on
small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this final regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 5,700
growers of California walnuts in the
production area and approximately 90
handlers subject to regulation under the
Order. The Small Business
Administration (SBA) defines small
agricultural growers as those having
annual receipts of less than $750,000
and defines small agricultural service
firms as those whose annual receipts are
less than $7,500,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
According to USDA’s National
Agricultural Statistics Service’s
(NASS’s) 2012 Census of Agriculture,
approximately 86 percent of California’s
walnut farms were smaller than 100
acres. Further, NASS reports that the
average yield for 2014 was 1.97 tons per
acre, and the average price received for
2014 was $3,230 per ton. A 100-acre
farm with an average yield of 1.97 tons
per acre would therefore have been
expected to produce about 197 tons of
walnuts during 2014–15 marketing year.
At $3,230 per ton, that farm’s
production would have had an
approximate value of $636,310. Since
Census of Agriculture information
indicates that the majority of
California’s walnut farms are smaller
than 100 acres, it could be concluded
that the majority of the growers had
receipts of less than $636,310 in 2014–
15, which is below the SBA threshold
of $750,000. Thus, the majority of
California’s walnut growers would be
considered small growers according to
SBA’s definition. According to
information supplied by the Board,
approximately two-thirds of California’s
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:27 May 10, 2018
Jkt 244001
walnut handlers shipped merchantable
walnuts valued under $7,500,000 during
the 2014–15 marketing year and would,
therefore, be considered small handlers
according to the SBA definition.
The Board’s proposed amendment
authorizing the Board to borrow from
commercial lending institutions was
unanimously recommended at a public
meeting on February 19, 2016. This
amendment will help to ensure
continuity in operations.
The Board reviewed and identified
the most costly portion of its domestic
advertising program. That portion of the
program operates during the first six
months of the Board’s marketing year
and costs must be paid by mid-year.
Since assessment revenues are collected
throughout the marketing year, not
enough is on hand when these large
payments are due. In the past, the Board
has used reserve funds to help pay for
marketing and advertising expenses.
However, due to the increased size of
the advertising program, the Board
cannot rely on reserve funds to cover
the costs. Based on this fact, the Board
believes the program could become
unsustainable in the long term.
While this action could result in a
temporary increase in handler
assessment costs, these increases would
be small and uniform on all handlers
and proportional to the size of their
businesses. These costs are expected to
be offset by the benefits derived from a
sustained marketing and advertising
program. Additionally, these costs
would help to ensure that the Board has
sufficient funds to meet its financial
obligations. Such stability is expected to
allow the Board to conduct a program
that would benefit all entities,
regardless of size. California walnut
growers should see an improved
business environment and a more
sustainable business model because of
the improved business efficiency.
Alternatives were considered to this
proposal, including making no change
at this time. However, the Board
believes it would be beneficial to have
the means and funds necessary to
effectively administer the program.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the Order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by OMB and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0178,
‘‘Vegetable and Specialty Crops.’’ No
changes in those requirements as a
result of this action are necessary.
Should any changes become necessary,
they would be submitted to OMB for
approval.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
This amendment will not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
California walnut handlers.
As with all Federal marketing order
programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies. In addition, USDA has
not identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with
this rule.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
The Board’s meeting was widely
publicized throughout the California
walnut production area. All interested
persons were invited to attend and
participate in Board deliberations on all
issues. The February 19, 2016, meeting
was public, and all entities, both large
and small, were encouraged to express
their views on the proposal.
A proposed rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on September 16, 2016 (81 FR
63721). Copies of the proposed rule
were mailed or sent via facsimile to all
Board members and walnut growers.
Finally, the rule was made available
through the internet by USDA and the
Office of the Federal Register. A 60-day
comment period ending November 15,
2016, was provided to allow interested
persons to respond to the proposal. Two
comments were received, both in
support of the amendment. No changes
were made to the proposed amendments
as a result of the comments received.
A proposed rule and referendum
order was then issued on May 19, 2017,
and published in the Federal Register
on May 26, 2017 (82 FR 24255). This
document directed that a referendum
among walnut growers be conducted
during the period of August 7, 2017
through August 18, 2017 to determine
whether they favored the proposed
amendment to the Order. To become
effective, the amendment had to be
approved by at least two-thirds of the
growers voting, or two-thirds of the
volume of walnuts represented by voters
in the referendum. The amendment was
favored by 61 percent of the growers
voting and by 68 percent of the volume
represented, the latter of which exceeds
the two-thirds volume requirement.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide.
E:\FR\FM\11MYR1.SGM
11MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 92 / Friday, May 11, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
not signed an amended marketing
agreement; and
2. The issuance of this amendatory
Order, amending the aforesaid Order, is
favored or approved by producers
representing at least two-thirds of the
Order Amending the Order Regulating
volume of walnuts produced by those
the Handling of Walnuts Grown in
voting in a referendum on the question
California
of approval and who, during the period
(a) Findings and Determinations Upon of September 1, 2015, through August
31, 2016, have been engaged within the
the Basis of the Rulemaking Record.
The findings are supplementary to the production area in the production of
findings and determinations which were such walnuts.
3. The issuance of this amendatory
previously made in connection with the
Order advances the interests of growers
issuance of the Order; and all said
of walnuts in the production area
previous findings and determinations
pursuant to the declared policy of the
are hereby ratified and affirmed, except
Act.
insofar as such findings and
determinations may be in conflict with
Order Relative to Handling
the findings and determinations set
It is therefore ordered, that on and
forth herein.
after the effective date hereof, all
1. The Order, as amended, and as
handling of walnuts grown in California
hereby further amended, and all of the
shall be in conformity to, and in
terms and conditions thereof, will tend
compliance with, the terms and
to effectuate the declared policy of the
conditions of the said Order as hereby
Act;
amended as follows:
2. The Order, as amended, and as
The provisions of the proposed
hereby further amended, regulates the
Marketing Order amending the Order
handling of walnuts grown in California
contained in the proposed rule issued
in the same manner as, and is applicable
by the Associate Administrator on
only to, persons in the respective classes
September 12, 2016, and published in
of commercial and industrial activity
the Federal Register on September 16,
specified in the Order;
2016 (81 FR 63721), shall be and are the
3. The Order, as amended, and as
terms and provisions of this order
hereby further amended, is limited in
amending the Order and are set forth in
application to the smallest regional
full herein.
production area which is practicable,
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 984
consistent with carrying out the
declared policy of the Act, and the
Walnuts, Marketing agreements,
issuance of several orders applicable to
Reporting and recordkeeping
subdivisions of the production area
requirements.
would not effectively carry out the
For the reasons set forth in the
declared policy of the Act;
preamble, 7 CFR part 984 is amended as
4. The Order, as amended, and as
follows:
hereby further amended, prescribes,
insofar as practicable, such different
PART 984—WALNUTS GROWN IN
terms applicable to different parts of the CALIFORNIA
production area as are necessary to give
due recognition to the differences in the ■ 1. The authority citation for part 984
continues to read as follows:
production and marketing of walnuts
produced or packed in the production
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
area; and
■ 2. Amend 984.69 by redesignating
5. All handling of walnuts produced
paragraph (d) as paragraph (e) and
in the production area as defined in the
adding a new paragraph (d) to read as
Order is in the current of interstate or
follows:
foreign commerce or directly burdens,
§ 984.69 Assessments.
obstructs, or affects such commerce.
(b) Determinations. It is hereby
*
*
*
*
*
determined that:
(d) Advanced assessments and
1. Handlers (excluding cooperative
commercial loans. To provide funds for
associations of producers who are not
the administration of the provisions of
engaged in processing, distributing, or
this part during the part of a fiscal
shipping of walnuts covered under the
period when neither sufficient operating
Order) who during the period
reserve funds nor sufficient revenue
September 1, 2015, through August 31,
from assessments on the current
2016, handled not less than 50 percent
season’s certifications are available, the
of the volume of such walnuts covered
Board may accept payment of
by said Order, as hereby amended, have assessments in advance or may borrow
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Richard Lower
at the previously mentioned address in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:27 May 10, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
21843
money from a commercial lending
institution for such purposes.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: May 8, 2018.
Bruce Summers,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–10106 Filed 5–10–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1006
[AMS–DA–17–0068; AO–18–0008]
Milk in the Florida Marketing Area;
Order Amending the Order
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule amends the
Florida Federal milk marketing order
(FMMO) to adopt a temporary
assessment on Class I milk. Assessment
revenue will be disbursed to handlers
and producers who incurred
extraordinary marketing losses and
expenses due to Hurricane Irma in
September 2017. More than the required
number of producers for the Florida
marketing area have approved the
issuance of the final order as amended.
DATES: This rule is effective July 1,
2018.
SUMMARY:
Erin
C. Taylor, Order Formulation and
Enforcement Division, USDA/AMS/
Dairy Program, STOP 0231-Room 2963,
1400 Independence Ave SW,
Washington, DC 20250–0231, (202) 720–
7183, email address: erin.taylor@
ams.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
This rule,
in accordance with 7 CFR 900.14(c), is
the Secretary’s final rule in this
proceeding and issues a marketing order
as defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j).
Accordingly, this final rule adopts
proposed amendments detailed in the
proposed rule (83 FR 13691).
This administrative action is governed
by the provisions of Sections 556 and
557 of Title 5 of the United States Code
and is therefore excluded from the
requirements of Executive Order 12866.
This final rule is not considered an
Executive Order 13771 regulatory action
because it does not meet the definition
of a ‘‘regulation’’ or ‘‘rule’’ under
Executive Order 12866.
The proposed amendments adopted
in this final rule have been reviewed
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\11MYR1.SGM
11MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 92 (Friday, May 11, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21841-21843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-10106]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 92 / Friday, May 11, 2018 / Rules and
Regulations
[[Page 21841]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 984
[Doc. No. AMS-SC-16-0053; SC16-984-1 FR]
Walnuts Grown in California; Order Amending Marketing Order 984
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule amends Marketing Order No. 984, which
regulates the handling of walnuts grown in California. The amendment,
which was proposed by the California Walnut Board (Board), was approved
by growers in the referendum. This action authorizes the Board to
borrow from a commercial lending institution to fund operations and
marketing/research expenses for the program.
DATES: This rule is effective June 11, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Geronimo Quinones, Marketing
Specialist, or Julie Santoboni, Rulemaking Branch Chief, Marketing
Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue SW, Stop 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237;
Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Email:
[email protected] or [email protected].
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Richard Lower, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue
SW, STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491,
Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553,
finalizes an amendment to a marketing order as defined in 7 CFR
900.2(j). This rule is issued under Marketing Order No. 984, as amended
(7 CFR part 984), regulating the handling of walnuts grown in
California. Part 984 hereinafter (referred to as the ``Order'') is
effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.'' The
Board, which is responsible for the local administration of the Order,
is comprised of walnut growers and handlers operating within the
production area. The applicable rules of practice and procedure
governing the formulation of Marketing Agreements and Orders (7 CFR
part 900) authorize amendment of the Order through this informal
rulemaking action.
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Orders 13563 and 13175. This action falls
within a category of regulatory actions that the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive Order 12866 review.
Additionally, because this rule does not meet the definition of a
significant regulatory action, it does not trigger the requirements
contained in Executive Order 13771. See OMB's Memorandum titled
``Interim Guidance Implementing Section 2 of the Executive Order of
January 30, 2017, titled `Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs'[thinsp]'' (February 2, 2017).
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect.
This rule shall not be deemed to preclude, preempt, or supersede any
State program covering walnuts grown in California.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
Section 1504 of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008
(2008 Farm Bill) (Pub. L. 110-246) amended section 18c(17) of the Act,
which in turn required the addition of supplemental rules of practice
to 7 CFR part 900 (73 FR 49307). The amendment of section 18c(17) of
the Act and additional supplemental rules of practice authorize the use
of informal rulemaking (5 U.S.C. 553) to amend Federal fruit,
vegetable, and nut marketing agreements and orders. USDA may use
informal rulemaking to amend marketing orders based on the nature and
complexity of the proposed amendments, the potential regulatory and
economic impacts on affected entities, and any other relevant matters.
The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) considered the nature and
complexity of the proposed amendment, the potential regulatory and
economic impacts on affected entities, and other relevant matters, and
determined that amending the Order as proposed by the Board could
appropriately be accomplished through informal rulemaking.
The proposed amendment was unanimously recommended by the Board
following deliberations at a public meeting held on February 19, 2016.
A proposed rule soliciting comments on the amendment was issued on
September 12, 2016, and published in the Federal Register on September
16, 2016 (81 FR 63721). Two comments were received, both in support of
the amendment. A proposed rule and referendum order was issued on May
19, 2017, and published in the Federal Register on May 26, 2017 (82 FR
24255). This document also directed that a referendum among walnut
growers be conducted August 7, 2017 through August 18, 2017 to
determine whether they favored the proposal. To become effective, the
amendment had to be approved by either two-thirds of the growers voting
in the referendum or by those representing at least two-thirds of the
volume of walnuts produced by those voting in the referendum. The
amendment was favored by 61 percent
[[Page 21842]]
of the growers voting and by 68 percent of the volume represented, the
second of which exceeds the two-thirds volume requirement.
The amendment in this final rule authorizes the Board to borrow
from a commercial lending institution during times of cash shortages to
help ensure continuity of operations.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), AMS has considered the economic impact of
this action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final
regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that
they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 5,700 growers of California walnuts in the
production area and approximately 90 handlers subject to regulation
under the Order. The Small Business Administration (SBA) defines small
agricultural growers as those having annual receipts of less than
$750,000 and defines small agricultural service firms as those whose
annual receipts are less than $7,500,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
According to USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service's
(NASS's) 2012 Census of Agriculture, approximately 86 percent of
California's walnut farms were smaller than 100 acres. Further, NASS
reports that the average yield for 2014 was 1.97 tons per acre, and the
average price received for 2014 was $3,230 per ton. A 100-acre farm
with an average yield of 1.97 tons per acre would therefore have been
expected to produce about 197 tons of walnuts during 2014-15 marketing
year. At $3,230 per ton, that farm's production would have had an
approximate value of $636,310. Since Census of Agriculture information
indicates that the majority of California's walnut farms are smaller
than 100 acres, it could be concluded that the majority of the growers
had receipts of less than $636,310 in 2014-15, which is below the SBA
threshold of $750,000. Thus, the majority of California's walnut
growers would be considered small growers according to SBA's
definition. According to information supplied by the Board,
approximately two-thirds of California's walnut handlers shipped
merchantable walnuts valued under $7,500,000 during the 2014-15
marketing year and would, therefore, be considered small handlers
according to the SBA definition.
The Board's proposed amendment authorizing the Board to borrow from
commercial lending institutions was unanimously recommended at a public
meeting on February 19, 2016. This amendment will help to ensure
continuity in operations.
The Board reviewed and identified the most costly portion of its
domestic advertising program. That portion of the program operates
during the first six months of the Board's marketing year and costs
must be paid by mid-year. Since assessment revenues are collected
throughout the marketing year, not enough is on hand when these large
payments are due. In the past, the Board has used reserve funds to help
pay for marketing and advertising expenses. However, due to the
increased size of the advertising program, the Board cannot rely on
reserve funds to cover the costs. Based on this fact, the Board
believes the program could become unsustainable in the long term.
While this action could result in a temporary increase in handler
assessment costs, these increases would be small and uniform on all
handlers and proportional to the size of their businesses. These costs
are expected to be offset by the benefits derived from a sustained
marketing and advertising program. Additionally, these costs would help
to ensure that the Board has sufficient funds to meet its financial
obligations. Such stability is expected to allow the Board to conduct a
program that would benefit all entities, regardless of size. California
walnut growers should see an improved business environment and a more
sustainable business model because of the improved business efficiency.
Alternatives were considered to this proposal, including making no
change at this time. However, the Board believes it would be beneficial
to have the means and funds necessary to effectively administer the
program.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the Order's information collection requirements have been
previously approved by OMB and assigned OMB No. 0581-0178, ``Vegetable
and Specialty Crops.'' No changes in those requirements as a result of
this action are necessary. Should any changes become necessary, they
would be submitted to OMB for approval.
This amendment will not impose any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either small or large California walnut
handlers.
As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. In addition, USDA
has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap,
or conflict with this rule.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
The Board's meeting was widely publicized throughout the California
walnut production area. All interested persons were invited to attend
and participate in Board deliberations on all issues. The February 19,
2016, meeting was public, and all entities, both large and small, were
encouraged to express their views on the proposal.
A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal
Register on September 16, 2016 (81 FR 63721). Copies of the proposed
rule were mailed or sent via facsimile to all Board members and walnut
growers. Finally, the rule was made available through the internet by
USDA and the Office of the Federal Register. A 60-day comment period
ending November 15, 2016, was provided to allow interested persons to
respond to the proposal. Two comments were received, both in support of
the amendment. No changes were made to the proposed amendments as a
result of the comments received.
A proposed rule and referendum order was then issued on May 19,
2017, and published in the Federal Register on May 26, 2017 (82 FR
24255). This document directed that a referendum among walnut growers
be conducted during the period of August 7, 2017 through August 18,
2017 to determine whether they favored the proposed amendment to the
Order. To become effective, the amendment had to be approved by at
least two-thirds of the growers voting, or two-thirds of the volume of
walnuts represented by voters in the referendum. The amendment was
favored by 61 percent of the growers voting and by 68 percent of the
volume represented, the latter of which exceeds the two-thirds volume
requirement.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide.
[[Page 21843]]
Any questions about the compliance guide should be sent to Richard
Lower at the previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Order Amending the Order Regulating the Handling of Walnuts Grown in
California
(a) Findings and Determinations Upon the Basis of the Rulemaking
Record.
The findings are supplementary to the findings and determinations
which were previously made in connection with the issuance of the
Order; and all said previous findings and determinations are hereby
ratified and affirmed, except insofar as such findings and
determinations may be in conflict with the findings and determinations
set forth herein.
1. The Order, as amended, and as hereby further amended, and all of
the terms and conditions thereof, will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act;
2. The Order, as amended, and as hereby further amended, regulates
the handling of walnuts grown in California in the same manner as, and
is applicable only to, persons in the respective classes of commercial
and industrial activity specified in the Order;
3. The Order, as amended, and as hereby further amended, is limited
in application to the smallest regional production area which is
practicable, consistent with carrying out the declared policy of the
Act, and the issuance of several orders applicable to subdivisions of
the production area would not effectively carry out the declared policy
of the Act;
4. The Order, as amended, and as hereby further amended,
prescribes, insofar as practicable, such different terms applicable to
different parts of the production area as are necessary to give due
recognition to the differences in the production and marketing of
walnuts produced or packed in the production area; and
5. All handling of walnuts produced in the production area as
defined in the Order is in the current of interstate or foreign
commerce or directly burdens, obstructs, or affects such commerce.
(b) Determinations. It is hereby determined that:
1. Handlers (excluding cooperative associations of producers who
are not engaged in processing, distributing, or shipping of walnuts
covered under the Order) who during the period September 1, 2015,
through August 31, 2016, handled not less than 50 percent of the volume
of such walnuts covered by said Order, as hereby amended, have not
signed an amended marketing agreement; and
2. The issuance of this amendatory Order, amending the aforesaid
Order, is favored or approved by producers representing at least two-
thirds of the volume of walnuts produced by those voting in a
referendum on the question of approval and who, during the period of
September 1, 2015, through August 31, 2016, have been engaged within
the production area in the production of such walnuts.
3. The issuance of this amendatory Order advances the interests of
growers of walnuts in the production area pursuant to the declared
policy of the Act.
Order Relative to Handling
It is therefore ordered, that on and after the effective date
hereof, all handling of walnuts grown in California shall be in
conformity to, and in compliance with, the terms and conditions of the
said Order as hereby amended as follows:
The provisions of the proposed Marketing Order amending the Order
contained in the proposed rule issued by the Associate Administrator on
September 12, 2016, and published in the Federal Register on September
16, 2016 (81 FR 63721), shall be and are the terms and provisions of
this order amending the Order and are set forth in full herein.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 984
Walnuts, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 984 is
amended as follows:
PART 984--WALNUTS GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
0
1. The authority citation for part 984 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
0
2. Amend 984.69 by redesignating paragraph (d) as paragraph (e) and
adding a new paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 984.69 Assessments.
* * * * *
(d) Advanced assessments and commercial loans. To provide funds for
the administration of the provisions of this part during the part of a
fiscal period when neither sufficient operating reserve funds nor
sufficient revenue from assessments on the current season's
certifications are available, the Board may accept payment of
assessments in advance or may borrow money from a commercial lending
institution for such purposes.
* * * * *
Dated: May 8, 2018.
Bruce Summers,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-10106 Filed 5-10-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P