Department of Justice's Initiative to Seek Termination of Legacy Antitrust Judgments, 19837 [2018-09461]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 87 / Friday, May 4, 2018 / Notices
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on March 12, 2018 (83 FR 10753).
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. 2018–09460 Filed 5–3–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Department of Justice’s Initiative to
Seek Termination of Legacy Antitrust
Judgments
Antitrust Division, Department
of Justice.
ACTION: Notice of initiative.
AGENCY:
This notice describes the
Department of Justice’s new initiative
for seeking unilaterally to terminate
‘‘legacy’’ antitrust judgments. Legacy
antitrust judgments are those judgments
that do not include an express
termination date and that a court has
not terminated by an order. The vast
majority of these judgments were
entered before 1979, when the Division
adopted the general practice of using
sunset provisions to terminate a
judgment automatically, usually 10
years after entry of the judgment. Nearly
1300 legacy judgments remain open on
the books of the Antitrust Division, and
nearly all of them likely remain open on
the dockets of courts around the
country. Many of these legacy
judgments do not serve their original
purpose of protecting competition. To
eliminate the burden on defendants,
courts, and the Division of complying
with, overseeing, and enforcing
outdated judgments, the Division has
announced an initiative whereby it
unilaterally will seek to terminate
legacy judgments, as appropriate. The
initiative provides for public notice and
comment before the Division seeks to
terminate a judgment. The Division has
established a website to keep the public
apprised of this initiative and its efforts
to terminate outdated judgments:
www.justice.gov/atr/
JudgmentTermination.
SUMMARY:
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dorothy B. Fountain, Office of the Chief
Legal Advisor, Antitrust Division, U.S.
Department of Justice, at (202) 514–
3543, ChiefLegalAdvisor@usdoj.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: From the
early days of the Sherman Act until the
late 1970s, the Antitrust Division of the
Department of Justice often entered into
judgments to settle violations of the
antitrust laws that included no express
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:16 May 03, 2018
Jkt 244001
termination date. In 1979, the Division
adopted the general practice of
including sunset provisions that
automatically terminate judgments,
usually 10 years from entry. However,
nearly 1300 judgments entered before
the Division put the practice into full
effect remain on the books of the
Division, and nearly all of them likely
remain open on the dockets of courts
around the country. The vast majority of
these outstanding legacy judgments no
longer protect competition because of
changes in industry conditions, changes
in economics, changes in law, or for
other reasons. The Division has
announced a new initiative that will
seek to identify and expedite the
termination of such legacy judgments.
Division review of legacy judgments.
Under the new initiative, announced
April 25, 2018, the Division will review
its legacy judgments to identify those
that no longer protect competition. The
Division has assigned each legacy
judgment to a Division attorney. Using
court papers, information available in
Division files, and public information,
attorneys will review each judgment to
determine whether changes in industry
conditions, changes in economics,
changes in the law, or other factors have
rendered the judgment outdated and
appropriate for termination. Examples
of legacy judgments for which
termination may be appropriate include
judgments whose terms have been
completely satisfied, judgments
governing defendants who are deceased
or no longer in existence, and judgments
governing products that no longer are
produced.
New termination process for legacy
judgments. Once the Division identifies
judgments appropriate for termination,
it will list those judgments on a website
established for purposes of informing
the public of the progress of the
initiative: www.justice.gov/atr/
JudgmentTermination. The Division
will invite the public to submit
comments within 30 days of listing on
the website regarding the Division’s
assessment that termination is
appropriate. This website will identify
the name of the case, the court that
entered the judgment, the date the court
entered the judgment, and the date by
which comments are due to the
Division; the website also will link to
the text of the judgment. The Division
will consult with the relevant court to
determine the most appropriate means
of termination.
The Division has established an email
address through which the public may
submit comments:
JudgmentTerminationComments@
usdoj.gov. Members of the public are
PO 00000
Frm 00158
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19837
encouraged to supply any additional
information they may have regarding
the efficacy of judgments the Division
proposes to terminate. Absent public
comments or other factors that lead the
Division to revise its determination that
termination of a judgment is
appropriate, it will proceed as directed
by the court. In many cases, this will
entail filing a motion to terminate.
When feasible and when allowed by
local rules, the Division will seek to
terminate judgments in ‘‘batches.’’ That
is, rather than file a motion for each
judgment it seeks to terminate, the
Division would make a single filing
seeking to terminate a group of
judgments in the same court. In this
way, the Division hopes to expedite
termination and ease the burden on the
courts of reviewing multiple motions.
Existing process for modification of
judgments unaffected. The new
initiative does not replace the Antitrust
Division’s existing process for
consenting to a defendant’s request to
modify or terminate an existing antitrust
judgment. Defendants still may seek the
Division’s consent to terminate or
modify any judgment as described in
the Antitrust Division Manual (see
Section III.H.5, https://www.justice.gov/
atr/file/761141/download).
Mailing list for updates. Members of
the public interested in receiving notice
of updates to the public website,
including posting of judgments that the
Division believes should be terminated,
may subscribe to email updates at
https://public.govdelivery.com/
accounts/USDOJ/subscriber/new.
Dated: April 30, 2018.
Dorothy B. Fountain,
Chief Legal Advisor.
[FR Doc. 2018–09461 Filed 5–3–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request; Employee
Retirement Income Security Act
Regulation
Notice of availability; request
for comments.
ACTION:
The Department of Labor
(DOL) is submitting the Employee
Benefits Security Administration
(EBSA) sponsored information
collection request (ICR) titled,
‘‘Employee Retirement Income Security
Act Section 408(b)(2) Regulation,’’ to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval for
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\04MYN1.SGM
04MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 87 (Friday, May 4, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 19837]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-09461]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Department of Justice's Initiative to Seek Termination of Legacy
Antitrust Judgments
AGENCY: Antitrust Division, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Notice of initiative.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice describes the Department of Justice's new
initiative for seeking unilaterally to terminate ``legacy'' antitrust
judgments. Legacy antitrust judgments are those judgments that do not
include an express termination date and that a court has not terminated
by an order. The vast majority of these judgments were entered before
1979, when the Division adopted the general practice of using sunset
provisions to terminate a judgment automatically, usually 10 years
after entry of the judgment. Nearly 1300 legacy judgments remain open
on the books of the Antitrust Division, and nearly all of them likely
remain open on the dockets of courts around the country. Many of these
legacy judgments do not serve their original purpose of protecting
competition. To eliminate the burden on defendants, courts, and the
Division of complying with, overseeing, and enforcing outdated
judgments, the Division has announced an initiative whereby it
unilaterally will seek to terminate legacy judgments, as appropriate.
The initiative provides for public notice and comment before the
Division seeks to terminate a judgment. The Division has established a
website to keep the public apprised of this initiative and its efforts
to terminate outdated judgments: www.justice.gov/atr/JudgmentTermination.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dorothy B. Fountain, Office of the
Chief Legal Advisor, Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of Justice, at
(202) 514-3543, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: From the early days of the Sherman Act until
the late 1970s, the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice
often entered into judgments to settle violations of the antitrust laws
that included no express termination date. In 1979, the Division
adopted the general practice of including sunset provisions that
automatically terminate judgments, usually 10 years from entry.
However, nearly 1300 judgments entered before the Division put the
practice into full effect remain on the books of the Division, and
nearly all of them likely remain open on the dockets of courts around
the country. The vast majority of these outstanding legacy judgments no
longer protect competition because of changes in industry conditions,
changes in economics, changes in law, or for other reasons. The
Division has announced a new initiative that will seek to identify and
expedite the termination of such legacy judgments.
Division review of legacy judgments. Under the new initiative,
announced April 25, 2018, the Division will review its legacy judgments
to identify those that no longer protect competition. The Division has
assigned each legacy judgment to a Division attorney. Using court
papers, information available in Division files, and public
information, attorneys will review each judgment to determine whether
changes in industry conditions, changes in economics, changes in the
law, or other factors have rendered the judgment outdated and
appropriate for termination. Examples of legacy judgments for which
termination may be appropriate include judgments whose terms have been
completely satisfied, judgments governing defendants who are deceased
or no longer in existence, and judgments governing products that no
longer are produced.
New termination process for legacy judgments. Once the Division
identifies judgments appropriate for termination, it will list those
judgments on a website established for purposes of informing the public
of the progress of the initiative: www.justice.gov/atr/JudgmentTermination. The Division will invite the public to submit
comments within 30 days of listing on the website regarding the
Division's assessment that termination is appropriate. This website
will identify the name of the case, the court that entered the
judgment, the date the court entered the judgment, and the date by
which comments are due to the Division; the website also will link to
the text of the judgment. The Division will consult with the relevant
court to determine the most appropriate means of termination.
The Division has established an email address through which the
public may submit comments: [email protected].
Members of the public are encouraged to supply any additional
information they may have regarding the efficacy of judgments the
Division proposes to terminate. Absent public comments or other factors
that lead the Division to revise its determination that termination of
a judgment is appropriate, it will proceed as directed by the court. In
many cases, this will entail filing a motion to terminate. When
feasible and when allowed by local rules, the Division will seek to
terminate judgments in ``batches.'' That is, rather than file a motion
for each judgment it seeks to terminate, the Division would make a
single filing seeking to terminate a group of judgments in the same
court. In this way, the Division hopes to expedite termination and ease
the burden on the courts of reviewing multiple motions.
Existing process for modification of judgments unaffected. The new
initiative does not replace the Antitrust Division's existing process
for consenting to a defendant's request to modify or terminate an
existing antitrust judgment. Defendants still may seek the Division's
consent to terminate or modify any judgment as described in the
Antitrust Division Manual (see Section III.H.5, https://www.justice.gov/atr/file/761141/download).
Mailing list for updates. Members of the public interested in
receiving notice of updates to the public website, including posting of
judgments that the Division believes should be terminated, may
subscribe to email updates at https://public.govdelivery.com/accounts/USDOJ/subscriber/new.
Dated: April 30, 2018.
Dorothy B. Fountain,
Chief Legal Advisor.
[FR Doc. 2018-09461 Filed 5-3-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-P