Elimination of Main Studio Rule; Petition for Partial Reconsideration, 19186-19187 [2018-09294]

Download as PDF 19186 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 2, 2018 / Rules and Regulations under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); • Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); and • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). In addition, this rule is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA. It also does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). This action does not apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. As such, it does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62 Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Air pollution control, Aluminum, Fertilizers, Fluoride, Intergovernmental relations, Manufacturing, Phosphate, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Waste treatment and disposal. daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:16 May 01, 2018 Jkt 244001 Dated: April 2, 2018. Onis ‘‘Trey’’ Glenn, III, Regional Administrator, Region 4. 40 CFR part 62 is amended as follows: PART 62—APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF STATE PLANS FOR DESIGNATED FACILITIES AND POLLUTANTS 1. The authority citation for part 62 continues to read as follows: ■ (b) Identification of sources. The MOA and related Federal plan apply to all affected SSI units for which construction commenced on or before October 14, 2010. (c) Effective date of delegation. The delegation became fully effective on April 2, 2018, the effective date of the MOA between the EPA and the WNCRAQA. [FR Doc. 2018–09202 Filed 5–1–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart II—North Carolina 2. Add an undesignated center heading and §§ 62.8362 and 62.8363 to subpart II to read as follows: ■ Air Emissions From Existing Sewage Sludge Incinerators (SSI)—Section 111(d)/129 Plan § 62.8362 Identification of plan—North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality. (a) Delegation of authority. On April 2, 2018, the EPA signed a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) that defines policies, responsibilities, and procedures pursuant to 40 CFR part 62, subpart LLL (the ‘‘Federal plan’’) by which the Federal plan will be administered by the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ). (b) Identification of sources. The MOA and related Federal plan apply to all affected SSI units for which construction commenced on or before October 14, 2010. (c) Effective date of delegation. The delegation became fully effective on April 2, 2018, the effective date of the MOA between the EPA and the NCDEQ. § 62.8363 Identification of plan—Western North Carolina Regional Air Quality Agency. (a) Delegation of authority. On April 2, 2018, the EPA signed a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) that defines policies, responsibilities, and procedures pursuant to 40 CFR part 62, subpart LLL (the ‘‘Federal plan’’) by which the Federal plan will be administered by the Western North Carolina Regional Air Quality Agency (WNCRAQA). PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 47 CFR Parts 1 and 73 [MB Docket No. 17–106; DA 18–326] Elimination of Main Studio Rule; Petition for Partial Reconsideration Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Dismissal and denial of petition for partial reconsideration. AGENCY: This document dismisses and otherwise denies the Petition for Reconsideration filed by De La Hunt Broadcasting Corp. The Commission’s rules provide that a petition for reconsideration which relies on facts or arguments not previously presented to the Commission will only be granted if one of three circumstances is present, and the Media Bureau concludes that none of the specified circumstances is present here. Because this is a factspecific inquiry, and not an issue of general applicability, a waiver request is the proper means for considering this issue, and De La Hunt states that it has already requested such a waiver from the Media Bureau. DATES: May 2, 2018. ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diana Sokolow, Diana.Sokolow@fcc.gov, of the Policy Division, Media Bureau, (202) 418–2120. SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\02MYR1.SGM 02MYR1 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 2, 2018 / Rules and Regulations This is a summary of the Commission’s Memorandum Opinion and Order, MB Docket No. 17–106, adopted and released on April 2, 2018. The full text of this document is available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours in the FCC Reference Center, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554. This document will also be available via ECFS at https:// fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/. Documents will be available electronically in ASCII, daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:16 May 01, 2018 Jkt 244001 Microsoft Word, and/or Adobe Acrobat. Copies of the materials can be obtained from the FCC’s Reference Information Center at (202) 418–0270. Alternative formats are available for people with disabilities (Braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), by sending an email to fcc504@fcc.gov or calling the Commission’s Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432 (TTY). This document is not subject to the Congressional Review Act. The Commission is, therefore, not required PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 9990 19187 to submit a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to the General Accounting Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A), because the Petition for Reconsideration was dismissed and otherwise denied. Federal Communications Commission. Thomas Horan, Chief of Staff, Media Bureau. [FR Doc. 2018–09294 Filed 5–1–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712–01–P E:\FR\FM\02MYR1.SGM 02MYR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 2, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 19186-19187]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-09294]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Parts 1 and 73

[MB Docket No. 17-106; DA 18-326]


Elimination of Main Studio Rule; Petition for Partial 
Reconsideration

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Dismissal and denial of petition for partial reconsideration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document dismisses and otherwise denies the Petition for 
Reconsideration filed by De La Hunt Broadcasting Corp. The Commission's 
rules provide that a petition for reconsideration which relies on facts 
or arguments not previously presented to the Commission will only be 
granted if one of three circumstances is present, and the Media Bureau 
concludes that none of the specified circumstances is present here. 
Because this is a fact-specific inquiry, and not an issue of general 
applicability, a waiver request is the proper means for considering 
this issue, and De La Hunt states that it has already requested such a 
waiver from the Media Bureau.

DATES: May 2, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diana Sokolow, [email protected], 
of the Policy Division, Media Bureau, (202) 418-2120.

[[Page 19187]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's 
Memorandum Opinion and Order, MB Docket No. 17-106, adopted and 
released on April 2, 2018. The full text of this document is available 
for public inspection and copying during regular business hours in the 
FCC Reference Center, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th 
Street SW, Washington, DC 20554. This document will also be available 
via ECFS at https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/. Documents will be available 
electronically in ASCII, Microsoft Word, and/or Adobe Acrobat. Copies 
of the materials can be obtained from the FCC's Reference Information 
Center at (202) 418-0270. Alternative formats are available for people 
with disabilities (Braille, large print, electronic files, audio 
format), by sending an email to [email protected] or calling the 
Commission's Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 
(voice), (202) 418-0432 (TTY). This document is not subject to the 
Congressional Review Act. The Commission is, therefore, not required to 
submit a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to the General 
Accounting Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 
U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A), because the Petition for Reconsideration was 
dismissed and otherwise denied.


Federal Communications Commission.
Thomas Horan,
Chief of Staff, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2018-09294 Filed 5-1-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.