Clean Air Act Operating Permit Program; Petition To Object to Title V Permit for Wheelabrator Frackville Energy; Pennsylvania, 19060 [2018-09208]
Download as PDF
19060
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 1, 2018 / Notices
Federal Digital System at: www.gpo.gov/
fdsys. At this site you can view this
document, as well as all other
documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Portable Document Format
(PDF). To use PDF you must have
Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at: www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department.
Margo Anderson,
Acting Assistant Deputy Secretary for
Innovation and Improvement.
[FR Doc. 2018–09215 Filed 4–30–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9977–35—Region 3]
Clean Air Act Operating Permit
Program; Petition To Object to Title V
Permit for Wheelabrator Frackville
Energy; Pennsylvania
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of final action.
AGENCY:
Pursuant to the Clean Air Act
(CAA), the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) Administrator signed an
Order, dated April 6, 2018, denying a
petition to object to a title V operating
permit, issued by the Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental Protection
(PADEP) to the Wheelabrator Frackville
Energy facility in Schuylkill County,
Pennsylvania. The Order responds to a
December 4, 2017 petition. The petition
was submitted by the Environmental
Integrity Project (EIP) and the Sierra
Club (Petitioners). This Order
constitutes final action on that petition
requesting that the Administrator object
to the issuance of the proposed CAA
title V permit.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the final Order,
the petition, and all pertinent
information relating thereto are on file
at the following location: EPA, Region
III, Air Protection Division (APD), 1650
Arch St., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19103. EPA requests that, if at all
possible, you contact the individual
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to view copies of the
final Order, petition, and other
supporting information. You may view
the hard copies Monday through Friday,
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:12 Apr 30, 2018
Jkt 244001
from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m., excluding Federal
holidays. If you wish to examine these
documents, you should make an
appointment at least 24 hours before the
visiting day. The final Order is also
available electronically at the following
website: https://www.epa.gov/title-voperating-permits/title-v-petitiondatabase.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Talley, Air Protection Division,
EPA Region III, telephone (215) 814–
2117, or by email at talley.david@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CAA
affords EPA a 45-day period to review
and object to, as appropriate, operating
permits proposed by state permitting
authorities. Section 505(b)(2) of the
CAA authorizes any person to petition
the EPA Administrator within 60 days
after the expiration of this review period
to object to a state operating permit if
EPA has not done so. Petitions must be
based only on objections raised with
reasonable specificity during the public
comment period, unless the petitioner
demonstrates that it was impracticable
to raise these issues during the comment
period or that the grounds for objection
or other issue arose after the comment
period.
The December 4, 2017 petition
requested that the Administrator object
to the proposed title V operating permit
issued by PADEP (Permit No. 54–00005)
on the grounds that the proposed permit
did not contain adequate monitoring
and testing requirements to demonstrate
compliance with the particulate matter
(PM) emission limits contained in the
permit. The Order denies the
Petitioners’ claims, finding that the
Petitioners failed to demonstrate that
the Permit’s monitoring requirements
for PM emissions are not adequate to
assure compliance with the applicable
PM emission limit, and explains the
rationale behind EPA’s decision.
Dated: April 19, 2018.
Cosmo Servidio,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2018–09208 Filed 4–30–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2017–0751; FRL–9976–82]
Interim Registration Review Decisions
and Case Closures for Several
Pesticides; Notice of Availability
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
This notice announces the
availability of EPA’s interim registration
review decision for the following
chemicals: BT corn coleopteran PIP, BT
corn lepidopteran PIP, clodinafoppropargyl, cyprodinil, diethylene glycol
monomethyl ether (DGME),
dimethomorph, fomesafen, metalaxyl/
mefenoxam, methoxyfenozide, mineral
acids, nitrapyrin, noviflumuron,
pendimethalin, potassium hypochlorite,
sodium hypochlorite and calcium
hypochlorite, and verbenone. It also
announces the case closures for boll
weevil attractant (Case 6044 and Docket
ID Number: EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–0335)
and octanoate esters (Case 6027 and
Docket ID Number: EPA–HQ–OPP–
2017–0087), because the last U.S.
registrations for these pesticides have
been canceled.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
This action is directed to the public
in general, and may be of interest to a
wide range of stakeholders including
environmental, human health, farm
worker, and agricultural advocates; the
chemical industry; pesticide users; and
members of the public interested in the
sale, distribution, or use of pesticides.
Since others also may be interested, the
Agency has not attempted to describe all
the specific entities that may be affected
by this action. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action
to a particular entity, consult the
pesticide specific contact person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
For pesticide specific information,
contact: The Chemical Review Manager
for the pesticide of interest identified in
the Table in Unit IV.
For general information on the
registration review program, contact:
Dana Friedman, Pesticide Re-Evaluation
Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (703) 347–8827; email address:
friedman.dana@epa.gov.
II. Background
Registration review is EPA’s periodic
review of pesticide registrations to
ensure that each pesticide continues to
satisfy the statutory standard for
registration, that is, the pesticide can
perform its intended function without
unreasonable adverse effects on human
health or the environment. As part of
the registration review process, the
Agency has completed interim decisions
for all pesticides listed in the Table in
E:\FR\FM\01MYN1.SGM
01MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 1, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 19060]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-09208]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-9977-35--Region 3]
Clean Air Act Operating Permit Program; Petition To Object to
Title V Permit for Wheelabrator Frackville Energy; Pennsylvania
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of final action.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator signed an Order, dated April 6,
2018, denying a petition to object to a title V operating permit,
issued by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection
(PADEP) to the Wheelabrator Frackville Energy facility in Schuylkill
County, Pennsylvania. The Order responds to a December 4, 2017
petition. The petition was submitted by the Environmental Integrity
Project (EIP) and the Sierra Club (Petitioners). This Order constitutes
final action on that petition requesting that the Administrator object
to the issuance of the proposed CAA title V permit.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the final Order, the petition, and all pertinent
information relating thereto are on file at the following location:
EPA, Region III, Air Protection Division (APD), 1650 Arch St.,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. EPA requests that, if at all
possible, you contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to view copies of the final Order,
petition, and other supporting information. You may view the hard
copies Monday through Friday, from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m., excluding Federal
holidays. If you wish to examine these documents, you should make an
appointment at least 24 hours before the visiting day. The final Order
is also available electronically at the following website: https://www.epa.gov/title-v-operating-permits/title-v-petition-database.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Talley, Air Protection Division,
EPA Region III, telephone (215) 814-2117, or by email at
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CAA affords EPA a 45-day period to
review and object to, as appropriate, operating permits proposed by
state permitting authorities. Section 505(b)(2) of the CAA authorizes
any person to petition the EPA Administrator within 60 days after the
expiration of this review period to object to a state operating permit
if EPA has not done so. Petitions must be based only on objections
raised with reasonable specificity during the public comment period,
unless the petitioner demonstrates that it was impracticable to raise
these issues during the comment period or that the grounds for
objection or other issue arose after the comment period.
The December 4, 2017 petition requested that the Administrator
object to the proposed title V operating permit issued by PADEP (Permit
No. 54-00005) on the grounds that the proposed permit did not contain
adequate monitoring and testing requirements to demonstrate compliance
with the particulate matter (PM) emission limits contained in the
permit. The Order denies the Petitioners' claims, finding that the
Petitioners failed to demonstrate that the Permit's monitoring
requirements for PM emissions are not adequate to assure compliance
with the applicable PM emission limit, and explains the rationale
behind EPA's decision.
Dated: April 19, 2018.
Cosmo Servidio,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2018-09208 Filed 4-30-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P