Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Vision, 18648-18649 [2018-08913]
Download as PDF
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
18648
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 82 / Friday, April 27, 2018 / Notices
provide a level of safety that would be
equivalent to or greater than, the level
of safety that would be obtained by
complying with the regulation 49 CFR
391.41(b)(3). Therefore, the 17
applicants in this notice have been
denied exemptions from the physical
qualification standards in 49 CFR
391.41(b)(3).
Each applicant has, prior to this
notice, received a letter of final
disposition regarding his/her exemption
request. Those decision letters fully
outlined the basis for the denial and
constitutes final action by the Agency.
This notice summarizes the Agency’s
recent denials as required under 49
U.S.C. 31315(b)(4) by periodically
publishing names and reasons for
denial.
The following six applicants have had
more than one hypoglycemic episode
requiring hospitalization or the
assistance of others, or has had one such
episode but has not had one year of
stability following the episode:
Michael W. Boyll (IN)
Robert T. Mitchell (CA)
Todd E. Bakner (PA)
Donald J. Glass (AR)
Cameron C. Kenyon (WA)
Mark E. Jordan (IN)
The following two applicants had
other medical conditions making the
applicant otherwise unqualified under
the Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Regulations: Rodney Purcell (NY); Bruce
A. Hammond (GA).
The following seven applicants did
not have endocrinologists willing to
make statements that they are able to
operate CMVs from a diabetes
standpoint:
John W. Ringbloom (PA)
Travis L. Reese (MA)
Ronald J. Marchewka (PA)
Gregory W. Bell (NJ)
David W. DeGraw (NJ)
John A. Bright (PA)
Dennis F. Comp (PA)
The following applicant, Peter E.
Halter (NJ), is unable or has not
demonstrated willingness to properly
monitor and manage his diabetes,
whether by a personal decision or
medical inability.
The following applicant, Gerald D.
Tower, Jr. (MI), has peripheral
neuropathy or circulatory insufficiency
of the extremities likely to interfere with
the ability to operate a CMV.
Issued on: April 23, 2018.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018–08910 Filed 4–26–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Apr 26, 2018
Jkt 244001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA–2017–0026]
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption
Applications; Vision
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of final disposition.
AGENCY:
FMCSA announces its
decision to exempt 18 individuals from
the vision requirement in the Federal
Motor Carrier Safety Regulations
(FMCSRs) to operate a commercial
motor vehicle (CMV) in interstate
commerce. They are unable to meet the
vision requirement in one eye for
various reasons. The exemptions enable
these individuals to operate CMVs in
interstate commerce without meeting
the vision requirement in one eye.
DATES: The exemptions were applicable
on February 16, 2018. The exemptions
expire on February 16, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Christine A. Hydock, Chief, Medical
Programs Division, (202) 366–4001,
fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA,
Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Room W64–224,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Office
hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., e.t.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. If you have questions
regarding viewing or submitting
material to the docket, contact Docket
Services, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Electronic Access
You may see all the comments online
through the Federal Document
Management System (FDMS) at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and/or Room
W12–140 on the ground level of the
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Privacy Act: In accordance with 5
U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
from the public to better inform its
rulemaking process. DOT posts these
comments, without edit, including any
personal information the commenter
provides, to https://www.regulations.gov,
as described in the system of records
notice (DOT/ALL–14 FDMS), which can
be reviewed at https://www.dot.gov/
privacy.
PO 00000
Frm 00148
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
II. Background
On January 16, 2018, FMCSA
published a notice announcing receipt
of applications from 18 individuals
requesting an exemption from vision
requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10)
and requested comments from the
public (83 FR 2311). The public
comment period ended on February 15,
2018, and one comment was received.
FMCSA has evaluated the eligibility
of these applicants and determined that
granting the exemptions to these
individuals would achieve a level of
safety equivalent to or greater than the
level that would be achieved by
complying with the current regulation
49 CFR 391.41(b)(10).
The physical qualification standard
for drivers regarding vision found in 49
CFR 391.41(b)(10) states that a person is
physically qualified to driver a CMV if
that person has distant visual acuity of
at least 20/40 (Snellen) in each eye
without corrective lenses or visual
acuity separately corrected to 20/40
(Snellen) or better with corrective
lenses, distant binocular acuity of a least
20/40 (Snellen) in both eyes with or
without corrective lenses, field of vision
of at least 70° in the horizontal meridian
in each eye, and the ability to recognize
the colors of traffic signals and devices
showing red, green, and amber.
III. Discussion of Comments
FMCSA received one comment in this
proceeding. Vanessa Jones commented
that drivers with a visual deficiency
should have to take a specific driving
test to demonstrate safe operation with
the deficiency rather than relying on a
review of the driving record to
determine their level of safety. In
addition, she indicated that vision
exempted drivers should not be seen by
an optometrist and instead should be
seen by a specialized eye doctor.
FMCSA conducts a thorough review
of a 3-year Commercial and Personal
Driving record in conjunction with
actual driving experience with their
vision deficiency to determine if an
equivalent or greater level of safety is
likely to be achieved by granting the
exemptions as would be without the
exemptions. Drivers are not granted a
Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) by
the Federal Government but by their
State. Each state has specific skill
testing requirements that must be met.
FMCSA has utilized a Medical Expert
Panel consisting of a team of Medical
Doctors who have extensively
researched and recommended the
process that the Agency follows to
qualify these drivers. FMCSA requires
all individuals applying for a vision
E:\FR\FM\27APN1.SGM
27APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 82 / Friday, April 27, 2018 / Notices
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
exemption to be evaluated by an
optometrist or ophthalmologist. Both
optometrists and ophthalmologists are
medically qualified to evaluate the
applicant’s eye conditions when
applying to the vision exemption
program. The examination includes
identifying and defining the nature of
the vision deficiency, how long the
deficiency has been present, stability,
visual acuity, field of vision, and color
vision.
IV. Basis for Exemption Determination
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315,
FMCSA may grant an exemption from
the vision standard in 49 CFR
391.41(b)(10) if the exemption is likely
to achieve an equivalent or greater level
of safety than would be achieved
without the exemption. The exemption
allows applicants to operate CMVs in
interstate commerce.
The Agency’s decision regarding these
exemption applications is based on
medical reports about the applicants’
vision as well as their driving records
and experience driving with the vision
deficiency. The qualifications,
experience, and medical condition of
each applicant were stated and
discussed in detail in the January 16,
2018, Federal Register notice (83 FR
2311) and will not be repeated in this
notice.
FMCSA recognizes that some drivers
do not meet the vision requirement but
have adapted their driving to
accommodate their limitation and
demonstrated their ability to drive
safely. The 18 exemption applicants
listed in this notice are in this category.
They are unable to meet the vision
requirement in one eye for various
reasons, including amblyopia, aphakia,
cataracts, central scarring, complete loss
of vision, glaucoma, macular scarring,
retinal detachment, retinal scarring. In
most cases, their eye conditions were
not recently developed. Nine of the
applicants were either born with their
vision impairments or have had them
since childhood. The nine individuals
that sustained their vision conditions as
adults have had it for a range of 4 to 26
years. Although each applicant has one
eye which does not meet the vision
requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10),
each has at least 20/40 corrected vision
in the other eye, and in a doctor’s
opinion, has sufficient vision to perform
all the tasks necessary to operate a CMV.
Doctors’ opinions are supported by
the applicants’ possession of a valid
license to operate a CMV. By meeting
State licensing requirements, the
applicants demonstrated their ability to
operate a CMV, with their limited vision
in intrastate commerce, even though
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Apr 26, 2018
Jkt 244001
their vision disqualified them from
driving in interstate commerce. We
believe that the applicants’ intrastate
driving experience and history provide
an adequate basis for predicting their
ability to drive safely in interstate
commerce. Intrastate driving, like
interstate operations, involves
substantial driving on highways on the
interstate system and on other roads
built to interstate standards. Moreover,
driving in congested urban areas
exposes the driver to more pedestrian
and vehicular traffic than exists on
interstate highways. Faster reaction to
traffic and traffic signals is generally
required because distances between
them are more compact. These
conditions tax visual capacity and
driver response just as intensely as
interstate driving conditions.
The applicants in this notice have
driven CMVs with their limited vision
in careers ranging for 3 to 70 years. In
the past three years, one driver was
involved in a crash, and two drivers
were convicted of moving violations in
CMVs. All the applicants achieved a
record of safety while driving with their
vision impairment, demonstrating the
likelihood that they have adapted their
driving skills to accommodate their
condition. As the applicants’ ample
driving histories with their vision
deficiencies are good predictors of
future performance, FMCSA concludes
their ability to drive safely can be
projected into the future.
Consequently, FMCSA finds that in
each case exempting these applicants
from the vision requirement in 49 CFR
391.41(b)(10) is likely to achieve a level
of safety equal to that existing without
the exemption.
V. Conditions and Requirements
The terms and conditions of the
exemption are provided to the
applicants in the exemption document
and includes the following: (1) Each
driver must be physically examined
every year (a) by an ophthalmologist or
optometrist who attests that the vision
in the better eye continues to meet the
standard in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10) and (b)
by a certified Medical Examiner who
attests that the individual is otherwise
physically qualified under 49 CFR
391.41; (2) each driver must provide a
copy of the ophthalmologist’s or
optometrist’s report to the Medical
Examiner at the time of the annual
medical examination; and (3) each
driver must provide a copy of the
annual medical certification to the
employer for retention in the driver’s
qualification file, or keep a copy in his/
her driver’s qualification file if he/she is
self-employed. The driver must also
PO 00000
Frm 00149
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18649
have a copy of the exemption when
driving, for presentation to a duly
authorized Federal, State, or local
enforcement official.
VI. Preemption
During the period the exemption is in
effect, no State shall enforce any law or
regulation that conflicts with this
exemption with respect to a person
operating under the exemption.
VII. Conclusion
Based upon its evaluation of the 18
exemption applications, FMCSA
exempts the following drivers from the
vision requirement, 49 CFR
391.41(b)(10), subject to the
requirements cited above:
Michael H. Eheler, II (WI)
Roberto Espinosa (FL)
Lee J. Gaffney (OH)
Mark S. Hale (AL)
Raymundo Maldonado (TX)
Mickey D. McCoy (TN)
Colin D. McGregor (WI)
Thomas B. Miller (VA)
Ryan J. Plank (PA)
Donald J. Poague (GA)
Jose R. Ponce (TX)
Ronald F. Prezzia (IL)
Jorge A. Rodriguez (CA)
Jimmy W. Rowland (FL)
Aaron R. Rupe (IL)
Charles L. Sauls (FL)
Gery M. Shoultz (IN)
Juan D. Zertuche, Jr. (TX)
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e)
and 31315, each exemption will be valid
for two years from the effective date
unless revoked earlier by FMCSA. The
exemption will be revoked if the
following occurs: (1) The person fails to
comply with the terms and conditions
of the exemption; (2) the exemption has
resulted in a lower level of safety than
was maintained prior to being granted;
or (3) continuation of the exemption
would not be consistent with the goals
and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136 and
31315.
Issued on: April 23, 2018.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018–08913 Filed 4–26–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2018–0056]
Request for Information: Improving
Prehospital Trauma Care
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\27APN1.SGM
27APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 82 (Friday, April 27, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18648-18649]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-08913]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA-2017-0026]
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Vision
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of final disposition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its decision to exempt 18 individuals from the
vision requirement in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations
(FMCSRs) to operate a commercial motor vehicle (CMV) in interstate
commerce. They are unable to meet the vision requirement in one eye for
various reasons. The exemptions enable these individuals to operate
CMVs in interstate commerce without meeting the vision requirement in
one eye.
DATES: The exemptions were applicable on February 16, 2018. The
exemptions expire on February 16, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Christine A. Hydock, Chief,
Medical Programs Division, (202) 366-4001, [email protected], FMCSA,
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room W64-224,
Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.,
e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. If you have
questions regarding viewing or submitting material to the docket,
contact Docket Services, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Electronic Access
You may see all the comments online through the Federal Document
Management System (FDMS) at https://www.regulations.gov.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments, go to https://www.regulations.gov and/or Room W12-140 on the
ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Privacy Act: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits
comments from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT
posts these comments, without edit, including any personal information
the commenter provides, to https://www.regulations.gov, as described in
the system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed
at https://www.dot.gov/privacy.
II. Background
On January 16, 2018, FMCSA published a notice announcing receipt of
applications from 18 individuals requesting an exemption from vision
requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10) and requested comments from the
public (83 FR 2311). The public comment period ended on February 15,
2018, and one comment was received.
FMCSA has evaluated the eligibility of these applicants and
determined that granting the exemptions to these individuals would
achieve a level of safety equivalent to or greater than the level that
would be achieved by complying with the current regulation 49 CFR
391.41(b)(10).
The physical qualification standard for drivers regarding vision
found in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10) states that a person is physically
qualified to driver a CMV if that person has distant visual acuity of
at least 20/40 (Snellen) in each eye without corrective lenses or
visual acuity separately corrected to 20/40 (Snellen) or better with
corrective lenses, distant binocular acuity of a least 20/40 (Snellen)
in both eyes with or without corrective lenses, field of vision of at
least 70[deg] in the horizontal meridian in each eye, and the ability
to recognize the colors of traffic signals and devices showing red,
green, and amber.
III. Discussion of Comments
FMCSA received one comment in this proceeding. Vanessa Jones
commented that drivers with a visual deficiency should have to take a
specific driving test to demonstrate safe operation with the deficiency
rather than relying on a review of the driving record to determine
their level of safety. In addition, she indicated that vision exempted
drivers should not be seen by an optometrist and instead should be seen
by a specialized eye doctor.
FMCSA conducts a thorough review of a 3-year Commercial and
Personal Driving record in conjunction with actual driving experience
with their vision deficiency to determine if an equivalent or greater
level of safety is likely to be achieved by granting the exemptions as
would be without the exemptions. Drivers are not granted a Commercial
Driver's License (CDL) by the Federal Government but by their State.
Each state has specific skill testing requirements that must be met.
FMCSA has utilized a Medical Expert Panel consisting of a team of
Medical Doctors who have extensively researched and recommended the
process that the Agency follows to qualify these drivers. FMCSA
requires all individuals applying for a vision
[[Page 18649]]
exemption to be evaluated by an optometrist or ophthalmologist. Both
optometrists and ophthalmologists are medically qualified to evaluate
the applicant's eye conditions when applying to the vision exemption
program. The examination includes identifying and defining the nature
of the vision deficiency, how long the deficiency has been present,
stability, visual acuity, field of vision, and color vision.
IV. Basis for Exemption Determination
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may grant an exemption
from the vision standard in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10) if the exemption is
likely to achieve an equivalent or greater level of safety than would
be achieved without the exemption. The exemption allows applicants to
operate CMVs in interstate commerce.
The Agency's decision regarding these exemption applications is
based on medical reports about the applicants' vision as well as their
driving records and experience driving with the vision deficiency. The
qualifications, experience, and medical condition of each applicant
were stated and discussed in detail in the January 16, 2018, Federal
Register notice (83 FR 2311) and will not be repeated in this notice.
FMCSA recognizes that some drivers do not meet the vision
requirement but have adapted their driving to accommodate their
limitation and demonstrated their ability to drive safely. The 18
exemption applicants listed in this notice are in this category. They
are unable to meet the vision requirement in one eye for various
reasons, including amblyopia, aphakia, cataracts, central scarring,
complete loss of vision, glaucoma, macular scarring, retinal
detachment, retinal scarring. In most cases, their eye conditions were
not recently developed. Nine of the applicants were either born with
their vision impairments or have had them since childhood. The nine
individuals that sustained their vision conditions as adults have had
it for a range of 4 to 26 years. Although each applicant has one eye
which does not meet the vision requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10),
each has at least 20/40 corrected vision in the other eye, and in a
doctor's opinion, has sufficient vision to perform all the tasks
necessary to operate a CMV.
Doctors' opinions are supported by the applicants' possession of a
valid license to operate a CMV. By meeting State licensing
requirements, the applicants demonstrated their ability to operate a
CMV, with their limited vision in intrastate commerce, even though
their vision disqualified them from driving in interstate commerce. We
believe that the applicants' intrastate driving experience and history
provide an adequate basis for predicting their ability to drive safely
in interstate commerce. Intrastate driving, like interstate operations,
involves substantial driving on highways on the interstate system and
on other roads built to interstate standards. Moreover, driving in
congested urban areas exposes the driver to more pedestrian and
vehicular traffic than exists on interstate highways. Faster reaction
to traffic and traffic signals is generally required because distances
between them are more compact. These conditions tax visual capacity and
driver response just as intensely as interstate driving conditions.
The applicants in this notice have driven CMVs with their limited
vision in careers ranging for 3 to 70 years. In the past three years,
one driver was involved in a crash, and two drivers were convicted of
moving violations in CMVs. All the applicants achieved a record of
safety while driving with their vision impairment, demonstrating the
likelihood that they have adapted their driving skills to accommodate
their condition. As the applicants' ample driving histories with their
vision deficiencies are good predictors of future performance, FMCSA
concludes their ability to drive safely can be projected into the
future.
Consequently, FMCSA finds that in each case exempting these
applicants from the vision requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10) is
likely to achieve a level of safety equal to that existing without the
exemption.
V. Conditions and Requirements
The terms and conditions of the exemption are provided to the
applicants in the exemption document and includes the following: (1)
Each driver must be physically examined every year (a) by an
ophthalmologist or optometrist who attests that the vision in the
better eye continues to meet the standard in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10) and
(b) by a certified Medical Examiner who attests that the individual is
otherwise physically qualified under 49 CFR 391.41; (2) each driver
must provide a copy of the ophthalmologist's or optometrist's report to
the Medical Examiner at the time of the annual medical examination; and
(3) each driver must provide a copy of the annual medical certification
to the employer for retention in the driver's qualification file, or
keep a copy in his/her driver's qualification file if he/she is self-
employed. The driver must also have a copy of the exemption when
driving, for presentation to a duly authorized Federal, State, or local
enforcement official.
VI. Preemption
During the period the exemption is in effect, no State shall
enforce any law or regulation that conflicts with this exemption with
respect to a person operating under the exemption.
VII. Conclusion
Based upon its evaluation of the 18 exemption applications, FMCSA
exempts the following drivers from the vision requirement, 49 CFR
391.41(b)(10), subject to the requirements cited above:
Michael H. Eheler, II (WI)
Roberto Espinosa (FL)
Lee J. Gaffney (OH)
Mark S. Hale (AL)
Raymundo Maldonado (TX)
Mickey D. McCoy (TN)
Colin D. McGregor (WI)
Thomas B. Miller (VA)
Ryan J. Plank (PA)
Donald J. Poague (GA)
Jose R. Ponce (TX)
Ronald F. Prezzia (IL)
Jorge A. Rodriguez (CA)
Jimmy W. Rowland (FL)
Aaron R. Rupe (IL)
Charles L. Sauls (FL)
Gery M. Shoultz (IN)
Juan D. Zertuche, Jr. (TX)
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, each exemption
will be valid for two years from the effective date unless revoked
earlier by FMCSA. The exemption will be revoked if the following
occurs: (1) The person fails to comply with the terms and conditions of
the exemption; (2) the exemption has resulted in a lower level of
safety than was maintained prior to being granted; or (3) continuation
of the exemption would not be consistent with the goals and objectives
of 49 U.S.C. 31136 and 31315.
Issued on: April 23, 2018.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-08913 Filed 4-26-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P