Anchorages; Captain of the Port Puget Sound Zone, WA, 18491 [2018-08871]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 82 / Friday, April 27, 2018 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 110
[Docket Number USCG–2016–0916]
RIN 1625–AA01
Anchorages; Captain of the Port Puget
Sound Zone, WA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking;
withdrawal.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
withdrawing its notice of proposed
rulemaking entitled ‘‘Anchorages;
Captain of the Port Puget Sound Zone,
WA’’ that we published on February 10,
2017. The Coast Guard is withdrawing
this rulemaking in response to public
comments and to better analyze
potential impacts to tribal treaty rights,
especially treaty fishing rights.
DATES: The notice of proposed
rulemaking is withdrawn on April 27,
2018.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this
withdrawn rulemaking is available by
searching docket number USCG–2016–
0916 using the Federal portal at https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this notice of
inquiry, call or email LCDR Christina
Sullivan, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Puget
Sound; telephone 206–217–6042, email
SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Table of Abbreviations
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
II. Background
We published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal
Register on February 10, 2017 (82 FR
10313), entitled ‘‘Anchorages; Captain
of the Port Puget Sound Zone, WA.’’ In
the NPRM, we proposed the creation of
several new anchorages, holding areas,
and a non-anchorage area as well as the
expansion of one existing general
anchorage in the Puget Sound area, as
detailed in the proposed regulatory text.
The Coast Guard received feedback from
concerned citizens, commercial entities,
environmental groups, and from Indian
Tribal Governments and tribal officials
regarding the proposed rulemaking.
These comments were made available in
the docket. Based on the information
received from the tribes in the docket,
the Coast Guard is withdrawing the
proposed rulemaking at this time so as
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:38 Apr 26, 2018
Jkt 244001
to better analyze tribal impacts before
conducting further rulemaking on
anchorages in Puget Sound. The Coast
Guard actively exercises its authority to
manage vessel traffic in the Puget Sound
in a safe and effective manner, both
historically and at present. The Coast
Guard is committed to improving the
navigational safety of all Puget Sound
waterway users, and is continually
engaged in efforts to improve safety
through coordination with waterways
users.
The Coast Guard provided notice of
its intent to withdraw the rulemaking
and also its intent not to schedule
consultation with the tribes on the
proposed rulemaking in light of the
withdrawal. In that published
notification (82 FR 54307, November 17,
2017), the Coast Guard requested
comment on whether or not withdrawal
is appropriate, and also if tribal
consultation was still necessary in light
of the Coast Guard’s stated intent to
withdraw the proposed rule.
III. Discussion of Comments
The Coast Guard received nine
written submissions in response to its
request for comment on its intent to
withdraw the proposed rule; six
concerned citizens, two on behalf of
coalitions of environmental groups, and
one from a federally recognized tribe. Of
the nine commenters, one commenter
supported the withdrawal, three
commenters indicated that withdrawal
is not supported without an
environmental impact statement being
done, one commenter supported
continuing with the rule so long as an
environmental impact study is
conducted, and four commenters made
no affirmative or negative comment on
withdrawal of the proposed rule, but
requested an environmental impact
statement. The Coast Guard is
withdrawing its proposed rulemaking
based on the comments received and in
order to better analyze the impacts to
tribal treaty rights, especially treaty
fishing rights.
All commenters requested or
emphasized the importance of an
environmental impact statement. The
Coast Guard will follow all applicable
laws and regulations, including the
National Environmental Policy Act,
with respect to any anchorages
rulemaking in the Puget Sound that may
be conducted in the future.
Two commenters requested the Coast
Guard conduct an environmental impact
statement on the use of uncodified
anchorages before withdrawing the
current proposed rule. The Coast
Guard’s withdrawal of the proposed
anchorage rule is not a government
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
18491
action for which an environmental
impact statement on the uncodified
anchorages is required.
Two commenters indicated that tribal
consultation is appropriate within the
proposal area with respect to the
proposed rule, two commenters deferred
to tribal governments on the issue of
whether tribal consultation on this rule
is appropriate, and one tribe commented
that it had previously engaged with the
Coast Guard on a government-togovernment basis and submitted
comments on the proposed rule. The
Coast Guard is committed to upholding
its responsibilities as the federal trustee
of the tribes’ interests, and will conduct
formal government-to-government
consultation when required under
Executive Order 13175. The Coast
Guard is withdrawing the current
proposed rulemaking and has engaged
with the tribes to address broader treaty
rights issues in processes outside this
rulemaking. As a result of the above
actions, the Coast Guard will not
conduct consultation on this specific
rulemaking.
IV. Withdrawal
The Coast Guard has determined that
withdrawing the proposed rule is
appropriate based on the new
information received from the tribes in
the docket. Accordingly, the Coast
Guard is withdrawing the ‘‘Anchorages;
Captain of the Port Puget Sound Zone,
WA’’ proposed rulemaking announced
in an NPRM published February 10,
2017 (82 FR 10313). As noted, the Coast
Guard has the authority and ability to
manage vessel traffic in the Puget Sound
in a safe and effective manner. We are
committed to improving the
navigational safety of all Puget Sound
waterway users, and will continually
consider ways to do so in an effective
and least burdensome manner
consistent with tribal treaty fishing
rights.
Dated: April 23, 2018.
David G. Throop,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Thirteenth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2018–08871 Filed 4–26–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 9
RIN 2900–AQ12
Veterans’ Group Life Insurance
Increased Coverage
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\27APP1.SGM
Department of Veterans Affairs.
27APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 82 (Friday, April 27, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 18491]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-08871]
[[Page 18491]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 110
[Docket Number USCG-2016-0916]
RIN 1625-AA01
Anchorages; Captain of the Port Puget Sound Zone, WA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; withdrawal.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is withdrawing its notice of proposed
rulemaking entitled ``Anchorages; Captain of the Port Puget Sound Zone,
WA'' that we published on February 10, 2017. The Coast Guard is
withdrawing this rulemaking in response to public comments and to
better analyze potential impacts to tribal treaty rights, especially
treaty fishing rights.
DATES: The notice of proposed rulemaking is withdrawn on April 27,
2018.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this withdrawn rulemaking is available by
searching docket number USCG-2016-0916 using the Federal portal at
https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
notice of inquiry, call or email LCDR Christina Sullivan, U.S. Coast
Guard Sector Puget Sound; telephone 206-217-6042, email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
II. Background
We published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal
Register on February 10, 2017 (82 FR 10313), entitled ``Anchorages;
Captain of the Port Puget Sound Zone, WA.'' In the NPRM, we proposed
the creation of several new anchorages, holding areas, and a non-
anchorage area as well as the expansion of one existing general
anchorage in the Puget Sound area, as detailed in the proposed
regulatory text. The Coast Guard received feedback from concerned
citizens, commercial entities, environmental groups, and from Indian
Tribal Governments and tribal officials regarding the proposed
rulemaking. These comments were made available in the docket. Based on
the information received from the tribes in the docket, the Coast Guard
is withdrawing the proposed rulemaking at this time so as to better
analyze tribal impacts before conducting further rulemaking on
anchorages in Puget Sound. The Coast Guard actively exercises its
authority to manage vessel traffic in the Puget Sound in a safe and
effective manner, both historically and at present. The Coast Guard is
committed to improving the navigational safety of all Puget Sound
waterway users, and is continually engaged in efforts to improve safety
through coordination with waterways users.
The Coast Guard provided notice of its intent to withdraw the
rulemaking and also its intent not to schedule consultation with the
tribes on the proposed rulemaking in light of the withdrawal. In that
published notification (82 FR 54307, November 17, 2017), the Coast
Guard requested comment on whether or not withdrawal is appropriate,
and also if tribal consultation was still necessary in light of the
Coast Guard's stated intent to withdraw the proposed rule.
III. Discussion of Comments
The Coast Guard received nine written submissions in response to
its request for comment on its intent to withdraw the proposed rule;
six concerned citizens, two on behalf of coalitions of environmental
groups, and one from a federally recognized tribe. Of the nine
commenters, one commenter supported the withdrawal, three commenters
indicated that withdrawal is not supported without an environmental
impact statement being done, one commenter supported continuing with
the rule so long as an environmental impact study is conducted, and
four commenters made no affirmative or negative comment on withdrawal
of the proposed rule, but requested an environmental impact statement.
The Coast Guard is withdrawing its proposed rulemaking based on the
comments received and in order to better analyze the impacts to tribal
treaty rights, especially treaty fishing rights.
All commenters requested or emphasized the importance of an
environmental impact statement. The Coast Guard will follow all
applicable laws and regulations, including the National Environmental
Policy Act, with respect to any anchorages rulemaking in the Puget
Sound that may be conducted in the future.
Two commenters requested the Coast Guard conduct an environmental
impact statement on the use of uncodified anchorages before withdrawing
the current proposed rule. The Coast Guard's withdrawal of the proposed
anchorage rule is not a government action for which an environmental
impact statement on the uncodified anchorages is required.
Two commenters indicated that tribal consultation is appropriate
within the proposal area with respect to the proposed rule, two
commenters deferred to tribal governments on the issue of whether
tribal consultation on this rule is appropriate, and one tribe
commented that it had previously engaged with the Coast Guard on a
government-to-government basis and submitted comments on the proposed
rule. The Coast Guard is committed to upholding its responsibilities as
the federal trustee of the tribes' interests, and will conduct formal
government-to-government consultation when required under Executive
Order 13175. The Coast Guard is withdrawing the current proposed
rulemaking and has engaged with the tribes to address broader treaty
rights issues in processes outside this rulemaking. As a result of the
above actions, the Coast Guard will not conduct consultation on this
specific rulemaking.
IV. Withdrawal
The Coast Guard has determined that withdrawing the proposed rule
is appropriate based on the new information received from the tribes in
the docket. Accordingly, the Coast Guard is withdrawing the
``Anchorages; Captain of the Port Puget Sound Zone, WA'' proposed
rulemaking announced in an NPRM published February 10, 2017 (82 FR
10313). As noted, the Coast Guard has the authority and ability to
manage vessel traffic in the Puget Sound in a safe and effective
manner. We are committed to improving the navigational safety of all
Puget Sound waterway users, and will continually consider ways to do so
in an effective and least burdensome manner consistent with tribal
treaty fishing rights.
Dated: April 23, 2018.
David G. Throop,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Thirteenth Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 2018-08871 Filed 4-26-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P