Veterans' Group Life Insurance Increased Coverage, 18491-18494 [2018-08855]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 82 / Friday, April 27, 2018 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 110 [Docket Number USCG–2016–0916] RIN 1625–AA01 Anchorages; Captain of the Port Puget Sound Zone, WA Coast Guard, DHS. Notice of proposed rulemaking; withdrawal. AGENCY: ACTION: The Coast Guard is withdrawing its notice of proposed rulemaking entitled ‘‘Anchorages; Captain of the Port Puget Sound Zone, WA’’ that we published on February 10, 2017. The Coast Guard is withdrawing this rulemaking in response to public comments and to better analyze potential impacts to tribal treaty rights, especially treaty fishing rights. DATES: The notice of proposed rulemaking is withdrawn on April 27, 2018. ADDRESSES: The docket for this withdrawn rulemaking is available by searching docket number USCG–2016– 0916 using the Federal portal at https:// www.regulations.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this notice of inquiry, call or email LCDR Christina Sullivan, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Puget Sound; telephone 206–217–6042, email SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: I. Table of Abbreviations jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS FR Federal Register NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking II. Background We published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal Register on February 10, 2017 (82 FR 10313), entitled ‘‘Anchorages; Captain of the Port Puget Sound Zone, WA.’’ In the NPRM, we proposed the creation of several new anchorages, holding areas, and a non-anchorage area as well as the expansion of one existing general anchorage in the Puget Sound area, as detailed in the proposed regulatory text. The Coast Guard received feedback from concerned citizens, commercial entities, environmental groups, and from Indian Tribal Governments and tribal officials regarding the proposed rulemaking. These comments were made available in the docket. Based on the information received from the tribes in the docket, the Coast Guard is withdrawing the proposed rulemaking at this time so as VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:38 Apr 26, 2018 Jkt 244001 to better analyze tribal impacts before conducting further rulemaking on anchorages in Puget Sound. The Coast Guard actively exercises its authority to manage vessel traffic in the Puget Sound in a safe and effective manner, both historically and at present. The Coast Guard is committed to improving the navigational safety of all Puget Sound waterway users, and is continually engaged in efforts to improve safety through coordination with waterways users. The Coast Guard provided notice of its intent to withdraw the rulemaking and also its intent not to schedule consultation with the tribes on the proposed rulemaking in light of the withdrawal. In that published notification (82 FR 54307, November 17, 2017), the Coast Guard requested comment on whether or not withdrawal is appropriate, and also if tribal consultation was still necessary in light of the Coast Guard’s stated intent to withdraw the proposed rule. III. Discussion of Comments The Coast Guard received nine written submissions in response to its request for comment on its intent to withdraw the proposed rule; six concerned citizens, two on behalf of coalitions of environmental groups, and one from a federally recognized tribe. Of the nine commenters, one commenter supported the withdrawal, three commenters indicated that withdrawal is not supported without an environmental impact statement being done, one commenter supported continuing with the rule so long as an environmental impact study is conducted, and four commenters made no affirmative or negative comment on withdrawal of the proposed rule, but requested an environmental impact statement. The Coast Guard is withdrawing its proposed rulemaking based on the comments received and in order to better analyze the impacts to tribal treaty rights, especially treaty fishing rights. All commenters requested or emphasized the importance of an environmental impact statement. The Coast Guard will follow all applicable laws and regulations, including the National Environmental Policy Act, with respect to any anchorages rulemaking in the Puget Sound that may be conducted in the future. Two commenters requested the Coast Guard conduct an environmental impact statement on the use of uncodified anchorages before withdrawing the current proposed rule. The Coast Guard’s withdrawal of the proposed anchorage rule is not a government PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 18491 action for which an environmental impact statement on the uncodified anchorages is required. Two commenters indicated that tribal consultation is appropriate within the proposal area with respect to the proposed rule, two commenters deferred to tribal governments on the issue of whether tribal consultation on this rule is appropriate, and one tribe commented that it had previously engaged with the Coast Guard on a government-togovernment basis and submitted comments on the proposed rule. The Coast Guard is committed to upholding its responsibilities as the federal trustee of the tribes’ interests, and will conduct formal government-to-government consultation when required under Executive Order 13175. The Coast Guard is withdrawing the current proposed rulemaking and has engaged with the tribes to address broader treaty rights issues in processes outside this rulemaking. As a result of the above actions, the Coast Guard will not conduct consultation on this specific rulemaking. IV. Withdrawal The Coast Guard has determined that withdrawing the proposed rule is appropriate based on the new information received from the tribes in the docket. Accordingly, the Coast Guard is withdrawing the ‘‘Anchorages; Captain of the Port Puget Sound Zone, WA’’ proposed rulemaking announced in an NPRM published February 10, 2017 (82 FR 10313). As noted, the Coast Guard has the authority and ability to manage vessel traffic in the Puget Sound in a safe and effective manner. We are committed to improving the navigational safety of all Puget Sound waterway users, and will continually consider ways to do so in an effective and least burdensome manner consistent with tribal treaty fishing rights. Dated: April 23, 2018. David G. Throop, Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Thirteenth Coast Guard District. [FR Doc. 2018–08871 Filed 4–26–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110–04–P DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 38 CFR Part 9 RIN 2900–AQ12 Veterans’ Group Life Insurance Increased Coverage AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\27APP1.SGM Department of Veterans Affairs. 27APP1 18492 ACTION: Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 82 / Friday, April 27, 2018 / Proposed Rules Proposed rule. Current statutory provisions provide Veterans’ Group Life Insurance (VGLI) insureds under the age of 60 with the opportunity to increase their VGLI coverage by $25,000 not more than once in each 5-year period beginning on the 1-year anniversary of the date a person becomes insured under VGLI. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) proposes to amend its VGLI regulations to establish a permanent regulatory framework for such elections of increased coverage. The proposed rule would also clarify that coverage increases in an amount less than $25,000 are available only when existing VGLI coverage is within $25,000 of the Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance current maximum of $400,000, and any increases of less than $25,000 must be only in an amount that would bring the insurance coverage up to the statutory maximum. DATES: Comment Date: Comments must be received by VA on or before June 26, 2018. ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted through https:// www.Regulations.gov; by mail or handdelivery to the Director, Regulation Policy and Management (00REG), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave. NW, Room 1063B, Washington, DC 20420; or by fax to (202) 273–9026. Comments should indicate that they are submitted in response to ‘‘RIN 2900–AQ12 Veterans’ Group Life Insurance Increased Coverage.’’ Copies of comments received will be available for public inspection in the Office of Regulation Policy and Management, Room 1063B, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday (except holidays). Please call (202) 461–4902 for an appointment. (This is not a toll free number.) In addition, during the comment period, comments are available online through the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) at https://www.Regulations.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Naccarelli, Department of Veterans Affairs Insurance Center (310/ 290B), P.O. Box 13399, Philadelphia, PA 19101, (215) 381–3029. (This is not a toll free number.) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Before the passage of the Veterans’ Benefits Act of 2010, Public Law 111–275, 404, 124 Stat. 2864, 2879–2880 (2010), the maximum amount of VGLI coverage available to a former member (also referred to as ‘‘the insured’’ hereafter) was limited to the amount of Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:38 Apr 26, 2018 Jkt 244001 (SGLI) coverage in force at the time of separation from service. See 38 U.S.C. 1977(a)(1). Section 404 of the Veterans’ Benefits Act of 2010 amended the governing statute, 38 U.S.C. 1977, to authorize insureds who are under 60 years of age and who have less than the statutory maximum of SGLI coverage to elect in writing to increase coverage by $25,000 not more than once in each 5year period beginning on their 1-year VGLI coverage anniversary date. Section 404 enables former members to keep pace with changing economic conditions by purchasing adequate amounts of life insurance to protect their families. Section 404 added to 38 U.S.C. 1977(a) a new paragraph (3), which took effect April 11, 2011. To promptly implement this statutory change, VA adopted interim procedures for increasing VGLI coverage. See ‘‘Servicemembers’ and Veterans’ Group Life Insurance Handbook,’’ ch. 12, para. 12.01, on the VA Insurance website at https://www.benefits.va.gov/ INSURANCE/resources_handbook_ins_ chapter12.asp (outlining the interim process). Since the 2011 change in law, 70,569 VGLI insureds have participated in VGLI increased coverage opportunities as of the end of calendar year 2016, electing additional coverage in the amount of $1,764,710,000. The proposed regulation is intended to establish a permanent regulatory framework for affording additional VGLI coverage under section 404. VA proposes to exercise the Secretary’s authority under 38 U.S.C. 501 and amend its regulations to establish a permanent regulatory framework for affording VGLI insureds the opportunity to purchase increased coverage pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 1977(a)(3). Under 38 U.S.C. 1977(b)(2), VGLI is only renewable on a ‘‘five-year term basis,’’ while subsection (a)(3) provides for elections of increased coverage of $25,000 not more than once in each 5-year period beginning on the 1-year anniversary of the date a person becomes insured under VGLI. See 38 U.S.C. 1977. Because the statutory language does not specify the invitation period(s) for VGLI insureds to elect increased coverage, VA proposes to amend 38 CFR 9.2 to address the gap. Proposed § 9.2(b)(5) would provide that the VGLI insured’s first opportunity to increase coverage would be on the oneyear VGLI coverage anniversary date, the earliest date permissible under the authorizing statute. The insured could subsequently elect to increase coverage on the 5-year anniversary date from the first VGLI coverage increase election opportunity and on each 5-year PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 anniversary from the date of the last VGLI coverage increase opportunity thereafter. The proposed amendment of § 9.2 is consistent with 38 U.S.C. 1977(a)(3), which states that the insured has the opportunity to increase coverage ‘‘[n]ot more than once in each five-year period beginning on the 1-year anniversary of the date a person becomes insured under Veterans’ Group Life Insurance.’’ As stated, the authorizing statute is silent about if and when an insured will be notified about the opportunity to increase coverage. Accordingly, VA’s proposed regulation is intended, in part, to address this gap in the statutory language. Specifically, the proposed regulation would provide that after VGLI enrollment, the insurer will invite insureds to increase coverage not less than 120 days prior to the 1-year anniversary from initial VGLI coverage and not less than 120 days prior to each 5-year anniversary date from the date of the last VGLI coverage increase election opportunity, until the former member has elected the SGLI statutory maximum (currently $400,000) or has attained the age of 60 years, whichever occurs first. In addition, VA seeks to make clear in this proposed rule that insureds must elect increased coverage within 120 days prior to their VGLI one-year anniversary date and/or within 120 days prior to each subsequent 5-year anniversary date from the last VGLI coverage increase election opportunity. VA has determined that the 120-day period is a reasonable period of time for insureds to review their financial needs and make informed decisions regarding whether to request additional coverage. As such, the proposed regulation would allow VGLI insureds to elect increased coverage within 120 days prior to the 1year anniversary date and within 120 days prior to each 5-year anniversary date from the date of the last VGLI increase opportunity as long as the insured remains eligible to do so, i.e., is under the statutory coverage limit and under 60 years of age. For example, if a former member purchased $300,000 in VGLI coverage effective April 11, 2017, the former member would be eligible to request an additional $25,000 of VGLI coverage beginning 120 days prior to April 11, 2018. The increased coverage would be effective April 11, 2018. The next opportunity to increase coverage would be April 11, 2023, the first 5-year anniversary date from the last VGLI coverage increase election opportunity. Subsequently, the former member would have the opportunity to buy an additional $25,000 in VGLI coverage once every five years for as long as the E:\FR\FM\27APP1.SGM 27APP1 jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 82 / Friday, April 27, 2018 / Proposed Rules former member was under 60 years of age and held $400,000 or less in VGLI coverage. See 38 U.S.C. 1977(a)(3). The proposed regulation would afford the insured the earliest opportunity to increase coverage permitted under the statute, namely on the one-year anniversary after coverage begins and on each subsequent 5-year anniversary date from the last VGLI increase election opportunity. See 38 U.S.C. 1977(b)(2). Moreover, the proposed amendment would ensure that such increases in coverage would occur during predictable periods. This would allow both the insured and the insurer to plan for any potential changes in the in-force coverage amount and the corresponding premiums. This aspect of predictability about the timing of coverage elections would support the goal of managing the VGLI program based on sound actuarial principles, while also affording insureds ample opportunities to elect increased coverage if they choose to do so. Under the proposed regulatory amendment, insureds could make assessments about future financial plans and the insurer could apply the increased coverage amount(s) at predictable intervals, namely at the time of the first year anniversary date after coverage began or at the time of each subsequent 5-year anniversary date(s) of the last VGLI coverage increase election opportunity. The insurer would apply any increased coverage from the date of the 1-year anniversary and/or from any 5-year anniversary date from the most recent VGLI coverage increase election opportunity. By limiting opportunities to increase VGLI coverage to the initial, 1-year coverage anniversary date and every 5year anniversary date of the last VGLI coverage increase election opportunity thereafter, VA would provide insureds the opportunity to meet their financial needs while mitigating the potentially negative impact of adverse selection in the VGLI program. Adverse selection occurs when individuals use their superior knowledge of their insurability to minimize the period of time over which they are likely to pay premiums for coverage. Such a practice unfairly shifts the premium paying burden to other individuals paying premiums for coverage over a longer period of time and potentially undermines the financial health of the program to the detriment of all insureds. Insurance programs rely on a pooling of risks, and premium rates are set according to the expected mortality of the insurance pool. If a disproportionate number of insureds in substandard health enter the program or carry higher coverage amounts than healthier individuals in VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:38 Apr 26, 2018 Jkt 244001 the program, the increased mortality experience will exceed that upon which the premium rates are based and could impact the program negatively by driving up the cost of premiums for all program participants. Consistent with industry practices designed to keep premium rates affordable, insurance providers typically limit changes in policies to certain defined periods of time, such as open seasons or during renewal periods. By limiting VGLI coverage changes only at established intervals, such as the initial, 1-year anniversary from the coverage date and each 5-year anniversary date from the last VGLI coverage increase election opportunity thereafter, VA would ensure that VGLI insureds have ample opportunity to increase coverage in a manner that is both consistent with industry practice and beneficial to insureds. As it relates to the amount of increased coverage elected at one time, the statutory language of 38 U.S.C. 1977(a)(3) provides that an increase in coverage is generally allowable in intervals of $25,000; however, the statute is silent as to the options available to VGLI insureds who have coverage of more than $375,000, i.e., within less than $25,000 of the current statutory maximum. To address this gap in the statutory language, VA’s proposed rule would also clarify that increases of less than $25,000 shall be permitted only when VGLI coverage in force is within less than $25,000 of the statutory maximum. In such circumstances, coverage increases in an amount less than $25,000 would only be allowed in the amount required to increase coverage up to the current statutory maximum of $400,000. For example, if an insured has coverage of $380,000, the proposed rule would permit an increase of $20,000 in order to bring the insured’s coverage up to the current SGLI maximum of $400,000. If not for this exception, those within less than $25,000 of the statutory maximum coverage amount would be forever barred from increasing their coverage because doing so would result in coverage in excess of the SGLI maximum of $400,000, which is not permitted by law. VA’s proposed rule would seek to avoid this harsh result and make permanent the current, interim policy that allows insureds with more than $375,000 coverage the opportunity to elect additional coverage up to the statutory maximum. There is flexibility in this area because 38 U.S.C. 1977(b)(5) authorizes the Secretary to set terms and conditions for VGLI that he determines to be reasonable and PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 18493 practicable. The exception outlined above is both permissible within the scope of the statute and furthers its intent to allow up to $400,000 in VGLI coverage. Unfunded Mandates The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure by state, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for inflation) in any one year. This proposed rule would have no such effect on state, local, and tribal governments or the private sector. Paperwork Reduction Act This proposed rule contains no provisions constituting a collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C 3501–3521). Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 13771 Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review) emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility. Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) defines a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ requiring review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), unless OMB waives such review, as ‘‘any regulatory action that is likely to result in a rule that may: (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or state, local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President’s priorities, or the principles set forth in this Executive Order.’’ E:\FR\FM\27APP1.SGM 27APP1 18494 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 82 / Friday, April 27, 2018 / Proposed Rules The economic, interagency, budgetary, legal, and policy implications of this regulatory action have been examined, and it has been determined not to be a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866. VA’s impact analysis can be found as a supporting document at https://www.regulations.gov, usually within 48 hours after the rulemaking document is published. Additionally, a copy of the rulemaking and its impact analysis are available on VA’s website at https://www.va.gov/orpm/, by following the link for ‘‘VA Regulations Published From FY 2004 Through Fiscal Year to Date.’’ This proposed rule is not expected to be an E.O. 13771 regulatory action because this proposed rule is not significant under E.O. 12866. Regulatory Flexibility Act The Secretary hereby certifies that this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612). This proposed rule would directly affect only individuals and would not directly affect small entities. Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this rulemaking is exempt from the initial and final regulatory flexibility analysis requirements of sections 603 and 604. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance number and title for the programs affected by this document is 64.103, Life Insurance for Veterans. List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 9 Life insurance; Military personnel; Veterans. Signing Authority jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or designee, approved this document and authorized the undersigned to sign and submit the document to the Office of the Federal Register for publication electronically as an official document of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Jacquelyn Hayes-Byrd, Deputy Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs, approved this document on February 23, 2018, for publication. PART 9—SERVICEMEMBERS’ GROUP LIFE INSURANCE AND VETERANS’ GROUP LIFE INSURANCE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ■ 1. The authority citation for part 9 continues to read as follows: [EPA–R08–OAR–2018–0136; FRL–9976– 44—Region 8] Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1965–1980A, unless otherwise noted. Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; State of Montana; Revisions to PSD Permitting Rules 2. In § 9.2, add new paragraph (b)(5) to read as follows: ■ § 9.2 Effective date; applications. * * * * * (b) * * * (5) Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 1977(a)(3), former members under the age of 60 can elect to increase their Veterans’ Group Life Insurance coverage by $25,000, up to the existing Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance maximum. The insured’s first opportunity to elect to increase coverage is on the one-year Veterans’ Group Life Insurance coverage anniversary date. Thereafter, the insured could elect to increase coverage on the five-year anniversary date of the first VGLI coverage increase election opportunity and subsequently every five years from the anniversary date of the insured’s last VGLI coverage increase election opportunity. Increases of less than $25,000 are only available when existing Veterans’ Group Life Insurance coverage is within less than $25,000 of the Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance maximum and any increases of less than $25,000 must be only in the amount needed to bring the insurance coverage up to the statutory maximum allowable amount of Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance. The eligible former members must apply for the increased coverage through the administrative office, within 120 days of invitation prior to the initial one-year anniversary date or within 120 days prior to each subsequent five-year coverage anniversary date from the first VGLI coverage increase election opportunity. The increased coverage will be effective from the anniversary date immediately following the election. * * * * * [FR Doc. 2018–08855 Filed 4–26–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8320–01–P Dated: April 23, 2018. Jeffrey M. Martin, Impact Analyst, Office of Regulation Policy & Management, Office of the Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs. For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of Veterans Affairs proposes to amend 38 CFR part 9 as follows: VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:38 Apr 26, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to fully approve the State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of Montana on October 14, 2016. Montana’s October 14, 2016 submittal revises their prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) regulations. This action is being taken under section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) (Act). DATES: Written comments must be received on or before May 29, 2018. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by EPA–R08–OAR–2018– 0136 at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from www.regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Leone, Air Program, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P–AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202–1129, (303) 312–6227, leone.kevin@epa.gov. SUMMARY: I. Background In Montana’s letter from Governor Steve Bullock to EPA Regional Frm 00035 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\27APP1.SGM 27APP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 82 (Friday, April 27, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 18491-18494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-08855]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

38 CFR Part 9

RIN 2900-AQ12


Veterans' Group Life Insurance Increased Coverage

AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.

[[Page 18492]]


ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Current statutory provisions provide Veterans' Group Life 
Insurance (VGLI) insureds under the age of 60 with the opportunity to 
increase their VGLI coverage by $25,000 not more than once in each 5-
year period beginning on the 1-year anniversary of the date a person 
becomes insured under VGLI. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) 
proposes to amend its VGLI regulations to establish a permanent 
regulatory framework for such elections of increased coverage. The 
proposed rule would also clarify that coverage increases in an amount 
less than $25,000 are available only when existing VGLI coverage is 
within $25,000 of the Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance current 
maximum of $400,000, and any increases of less than $25,000 must be 
only in an amount that would bring the insurance coverage up to the 
statutory maximum.

DATES: Comment Date: Comments must be received by VA on or before June 
26, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted through https://www.Regulations.gov; by mail or hand-delivery to the Director, 
Regulation Policy and Management (00REG), Department of Veterans 
Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave. NW, Room 1063B, Washington, DC 20420; or by 
fax to (202) 273-9026. Comments should indicate that they are submitted 
in response to ``RIN 2900-AQ12 Veterans' Group Life Insurance Increased 
Coverage.'' Copies of comments received will be available for public 
inspection in the Office of Regulation Policy and Management, Room 
1063B, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through 
Friday (except holidays). Please call (202) 461-4902 for an 
appointment. (This is not a toll free number.) In addition, during the 
comment period, comments are available online through the Federal 
Docket Management System (FDMS) at https://www.Regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Naccarelli, Department of 
Veterans Affairs Insurance Center (310/290B), P.O. Box 13399, 
Philadelphia, PA 19101, (215) 381-3029. (This is not a toll free 
number.)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Before the passage of the Veterans' Benefits 
Act of 2010, Public Law 111-275, 404, 124 Stat. 2864, 2879-2880 (2010), 
the maximum amount of VGLI coverage available to a former member (also 
referred to as ``the insured'' hereafter) was limited to the amount of 
Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance (SGLI) coverage in force at the 
time of separation from service. See 38 U.S.C. 1977(a)(1). Section 404 
of the Veterans' Benefits Act of 2010 amended the governing statute, 38 
U.S.C. 1977, to authorize insureds who are under 60 years of age and 
who have less than the statutory maximum of SGLI coverage to elect in 
writing to increase coverage by $25,000 not more than once in each 5-
year period beginning on their 1-year VGLI coverage anniversary date. 
Section 404 enables former members to keep pace with changing economic 
conditions by purchasing adequate amounts of life insurance to protect 
their families. Section 404 added to 38 U.S.C. 1977(a) a new paragraph 
(3), which took effect April 11, 2011. To promptly implement this 
statutory change, VA adopted interim procedures for increasing VGLI 
coverage. See ``Servicemembers' and Veterans' Group Life Insurance 
Handbook,'' ch. 12, para. 12.01, on the VA Insurance website at https://www.benefits.va.gov/INSURANCE/resources_handbook_ins_chapter12.asp 
(outlining the interim process). Since the 2011 change in law, 70,569 
VGLI insureds have participated in VGLI increased coverage 
opportunities as of the end of calendar year 2016, electing additional 
coverage in the amount of $1,764,710,000. The proposed regulation is 
intended to establish a permanent regulatory framework for affording 
additional VGLI coverage under section 404.
    VA proposes to exercise the Secretary's authority under 38 U.S.C. 
501 and amend its regulations to establish a permanent regulatory 
framework for affording VGLI insureds the opportunity to purchase 
increased coverage pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 1977(a)(3). Under 38 U.S.C. 
1977(b)(2), VGLI is only renewable on a ``five-year term basis,'' while 
subsection (a)(3) provides for elections of increased coverage of 
$25,000 not more than once in each 5-year period beginning on the 1-
year anniversary of the date a person becomes insured under VGLI. See 
38 U.S.C. 1977. Because the statutory language does not specify the 
invitation period(s) for VGLI insureds to elect increased coverage, VA 
proposes to amend 38 CFR 9.2 to address the gap. Proposed Sec.  
9.2(b)(5) would provide that the VGLI insured's first opportunity to 
increase coverage would be on the one-year VGLI coverage anniversary 
date, the earliest date permissible under the authorizing statute. The 
insured could subsequently elect to increase coverage on the 5-year 
anniversary date from the first VGLI coverage increase election 
opportunity and on each 5-year anniversary from the date of the last 
VGLI coverage increase opportunity thereafter.
    The proposed amendment of Sec.  9.2 is consistent with 38 U.S.C. 
1977(a)(3), which states that the insured has the opportunity to 
increase coverage ``[n]ot more than once in each five-year period 
beginning on the 1-year anniversary of the date a person becomes 
insured under Veterans' Group Life Insurance.'' As stated, the 
authorizing statute is silent about if and when an insured will be 
notified about the opportunity to increase coverage. Accordingly, VA's 
proposed regulation is intended, in part, to address this gap in the 
statutory language. Specifically, the proposed regulation would provide 
that after VGLI enrollment, the insurer will invite insureds to 
increase coverage not less than 120 days prior to the 1-year 
anniversary from initial VGLI coverage and not less than 120 days prior 
to each 5-year anniversary date from the date of the last VGLI coverage 
increase election opportunity, until the former member has elected the 
SGLI statutory maximum (currently $400,000) or has attained the age of 
60 years, whichever occurs first.
    In addition, VA seeks to make clear in this proposed rule that 
insureds must elect increased coverage within 120 days prior to their 
VGLI one-year anniversary date and/or within 120 days prior to each 
subsequent 5-year anniversary date from the last VGLI coverage increase 
election opportunity. VA has determined that the 120-day period is a 
reasonable period of time for insureds to review their financial needs 
and make informed decisions regarding whether to request additional 
coverage. As such, the proposed regulation would allow VGLI insureds to 
elect increased coverage within 120 days prior to the 1-year 
anniversary date and within 120 days prior to each 5-year anniversary 
date from the date of the last VGLI increase opportunity as long as the 
insured remains eligible to do so, i.e., is under the statutory 
coverage limit and under 60 years of age.
    For example, if a former member purchased $300,000 in VGLI coverage 
effective April 11, 2017, the former member would be eligible to 
request an additional $25,000 of VGLI coverage beginning 120 days prior 
to April 11, 2018. The increased coverage would be effective April 11, 
2018. The next opportunity to increase coverage would be April 11, 
2023, the first 5-year anniversary date from the last VGLI coverage 
increase election opportunity. Subsequently, the former member would 
have the opportunity to buy an additional $25,000 in VGLI coverage once 
every five years for as long as the

[[Page 18493]]

former member was under 60 years of age and held $400,000 or less in 
VGLI coverage. See 38 U.S.C. 1977(a)(3).
    The proposed regulation would afford the insured the earliest 
opportunity to increase coverage permitted under the statute, namely on 
the one-year anniversary after coverage begins and on each subsequent 
5-year anniversary date from the last VGLI increase election 
opportunity. See 38 U.S.C. 1977(b)(2). Moreover, the proposed amendment 
would ensure that such increases in coverage would occur during 
predictable periods. This would allow both the insured and the insurer 
to plan for any potential changes in the in-force coverage amount and 
the corresponding premiums. This aspect of predictability about the 
timing of coverage elections would support the goal of managing the 
VGLI program based on sound actuarial principles, while also affording 
insureds ample opportunities to elect increased coverage if they choose 
to do so. Under the proposed regulatory amendment, insureds could make 
assessments about future financial plans and the insurer could apply 
the increased coverage amount(s) at predictable intervals, namely at 
the time of the first year anniversary date after coverage began or at 
the time of each subsequent 5-year anniversary date(s) of the last VGLI 
coverage increase election opportunity. The insurer would apply any 
increased coverage from the date of the 1-year anniversary and/or from 
any 5-year anniversary date from the most recent VGLI coverage increase 
election opportunity.
    By limiting opportunities to increase VGLI coverage to the initial, 
1-year coverage anniversary date and every 5-year anniversary date of 
the last VGLI coverage increase election opportunity thereafter, VA 
would provide insureds the opportunity to meet their financial needs 
while mitigating the potentially negative impact of adverse selection 
in the VGLI program. Adverse selection occurs when individuals use 
their superior knowledge of their insurability to minimize the period 
of time over which they are likely to pay premiums for coverage. Such a 
practice unfairly shifts the premium paying burden to other individuals 
paying premiums for coverage over a longer period of time and 
potentially undermines the financial health of the program to the 
detriment of all insureds. Insurance programs rely on a pooling of 
risks, and premium rates are set according to the expected mortality of 
the insurance pool. If a disproportionate number of insureds in 
substandard health enter the program or carry higher coverage amounts 
than healthier individuals in the program, the increased mortality 
experience will exceed that upon which the premium rates are based and 
could impact the program negatively by driving up the cost of premiums 
for all program participants. Consistent with industry practices 
designed to keep premium rates affordable, insurance providers 
typically limit changes in policies to certain defined periods of time, 
such as open seasons or during renewal periods. By limiting VGLI 
coverage changes only at established intervals, such as the initial, 1-
year anniversary from the coverage date and each 5-year anniversary 
date from the last VGLI coverage increase election opportunity 
thereafter, VA would ensure that VGLI insureds have ample opportunity 
to increase coverage in a manner that is both consistent with industry 
practice and beneficial to insureds.
    As it relates to the amount of increased coverage elected at one 
time, the statutory language of 38 U.S.C. 1977(a)(3) provides that an 
increase in coverage is generally allowable in intervals of $25,000; 
however, the statute is silent as to the options available to VGLI 
insureds who have coverage of more than $375,000, i.e., within less 
than $25,000 of the current statutory maximum. To address this gap in 
the statutory language, VA's proposed rule would also clarify that 
increases of less than $25,000 shall be permitted only when VGLI 
coverage in force is within less than $25,000 of the statutory maximum. 
In such circumstances, coverage increases in an amount less than 
$25,000 would only be allowed in the amount required to increase 
coverage up to the current statutory maximum of $400,000. For example, 
if an insured has coverage of $380,000, the proposed rule would permit 
an increase of $20,000 in order to bring the insured's coverage up to 
the current SGLI maximum of $400,000. If not for this exception, those 
within less than $25,000 of the statutory maximum coverage amount would 
be forever barred from increasing their coverage because doing so would 
result in coverage in excess of the SGLI maximum of $400,000, which is 
not permitted by law. VA's proposed rule would seek to avoid this harsh 
result and make permanent the current, interim policy that allows 
insureds with more than $375,000 coverage the opportunity to elect 
additional coverage up to the statutory maximum. There is flexibility 
in this area because 38 U.S.C. 1977(b)(5) authorizes the Secretary to 
set terms and conditions for VGLI that he determines to be reasonable 
and practicable. The exception outlined above is both permissible 
within the scope of the statute and furthers its intent to allow up to 
$400,000 in VGLI coverage.

Unfunded Mandates

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and 
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure by 
state, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the 
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for 
inflation) in any one year. This proposed rule would have no such 
effect on state, local, and tribal governments or the private sector.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    This proposed rule contains no provisions constituting a collection 
of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C 3501-3521).

Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 13771

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public 
health and safety effects, and other advantages; distributive impacts; 
and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory 
Review) emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and 
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility. 
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) defines a 
``significant regulatory action'' requiring review by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB), unless OMB waives such review, as ``any 
regulatory action that is likely to result in a rule that may: (1) Have 
an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely 
affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, 
productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or 
safety, or state, local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) 
Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action 
taken or planned by another agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary 
impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the 
rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal 
or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's 
priorities, or the principles set forth in this Executive Order.''

[[Page 18494]]

    The economic, interagency, budgetary, legal, and policy 
implications of this regulatory action have been examined, and it has 
been determined not to be a significant regulatory action under 
Executive Order 12866. VA's impact analysis can be found as a 
supporting document at https://www.regulations.gov, usually within 48 
hours after the rulemaking document is published. Additionally, a copy 
of the rulemaking and its impact analysis are available on VA's website 
at https://www.va.gov/orpm/, by following the link for ``VA Regulations 
Published From FY 2004 Through Fiscal Year to Date.'' This proposed 
rule is not expected to be an E.O. 13771 regulatory action because this 
proposed rule is not significant under E.O. 12866.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Secretary hereby certifies that this proposed rule would not 
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 
U.S.C. 601-612). This proposed rule would directly affect only 
individuals and would not directly affect small entities. Therefore, 
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this rulemaking is exempt from the initial 
and final regulatory flexibility analysis requirements of sections 603 
and 604.

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance

    The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance number and title for the 
programs affected by this document is 64.103, Life Insurance for 
Veterans.

List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 9

    Life insurance; Military personnel; Veterans.

Signing Authority

    The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or designee, approved this 
document and authorized the undersigned to sign and submit the document 
to the Office of the Federal Register for publication electronically as 
an official document of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Jacquelyn 
Hayes-Byrd, Deputy Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs, 
approved this document on February 23, 2018, for publication.

    Dated: April 23, 2018.
Jeffrey M. Martin,
Impact Analyst, Office of Regulation Policy & Management, Office of the 
Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of Veterans 
Affairs proposes to amend 38 CFR part 9 as follows:

PART 9--SERVICEMEMBERS' GROUP LIFE INSURANCE AND VETERANS' GROUP 
LIFE INSURANCE

0
1. The authority citation for part 9 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  38 U.S.C. 501, 1965-1980A, unless otherwise noted.

0
2. In Sec.  9.2, add new paragraph (b)(5) to read as follows:


Sec.  9.2  Effective date; applications.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (5) Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 1977(a)(3), former members under the age 
of 60 can elect to increase their Veterans' Group Life Insurance 
coverage by $25,000, up to the existing Servicemembers' Group Life 
Insurance maximum. The insured's first opportunity to elect to increase 
coverage is on the one-year Veterans' Group Life Insurance coverage 
anniversary date. Thereafter, the insured could elect to increase 
coverage on the five-year anniversary date of the first VGLI coverage 
increase election opportunity and subsequently every five years from 
the anniversary date of the insured's last VGLI coverage increase 
election opportunity. Increases of less than $25,000 are only available 
when existing Veterans' Group Life Insurance coverage is within less 
than $25,000 of the Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance maximum and 
any increases of less than $25,000 must be only in the amount needed to 
bring the insurance coverage up to the statutory maximum allowable 
amount of Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance. The eligible former 
members must apply for the increased coverage through the 
administrative office, within 120 days of invitation prior to the 
initial one-year anniversary date or within 120 days prior to each 
subsequent five-year coverage anniversary date from the first VGLI 
coverage increase election opportunity. The increased coverage will be 
effective from the anniversary date immediately following the election.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2018-08855 Filed 4-26-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.