Veterans' Group Life Insurance Increased Coverage, 18491-18494 [2018-08855]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 82 / Friday, April 27, 2018 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 110
[Docket Number USCG–2016–0916]
RIN 1625–AA01
Anchorages; Captain of the Port Puget
Sound Zone, WA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking;
withdrawal.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
withdrawing its notice of proposed
rulemaking entitled ‘‘Anchorages;
Captain of the Port Puget Sound Zone,
WA’’ that we published on February 10,
2017. The Coast Guard is withdrawing
this rulemaking in response to public
comments and to better analyze
potential impacts to tribal treaty rights,
especially treaty fishing rights.
DATES: The notice of proposed
rulemaking is withdrawn on April 27,
2018.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this
withdrawn rulemaking is available by
searching docket number USCG–2016–
0916 using the Federal portal at https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this notice of
inquiry, call or email LCDR Christina
Sullivan, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Puget
Sound; telephone 206–217–6042, email
SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Table of Abbreviations
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
II. Background
We published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal
Register on February 10, 2017 (82 FR
10313), entitled ‘‘Anchorages; Captain
of the Port Puget Sound Zone, WA.’’ In
the NPRM, we proposed the creation of
several new anchorages, holding areas,
and a non-anchorage area as well as the
expansion of one existing general
anchorage in the Puget Sound area, as
detailed in the proposed regulatory text.
The Coast Guard received feedback from
concerned citizens, commercial entities,
environmental groups, and from Indian
Tribal Governments and tribal officials
regarding the proposed rulemaking.
These comments were made available in
the docket. Based on the information
received from the tribes in the docket,
the Coast Guard is withdrawing the
proposed rulemaking at this time so as
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:38 Apr 26, 2018
Jkt 244001
to better analyze tribal impacts before
conducting further rulemaking on
anchorages in Puget Sound. The Coast
Guard actively exercises its authority to
manage vessel traffic in the Puget Sound
in a safe and effective manner, both
historically and at present. The Coast
Guard is committed to improving the
navigational safety of all Puget Sound
waterway users, and is continually
engaged in efforts to improve safety
through coordination with waterways
users.
The Coast Guard provided notice of
its intent to withdraw the rulemaking
and also its intent not to schedule
consultation with the tribes on the
proposed rulemaking in light of the
withdrawal. In that published
notification (82 FR 54307, November 17,
2017), the Coast Guard requested
comment on whether or not withdrawal
is appropriate, and also if tribal
consultation was still necessary in light
of the Coast Guard’s stated intent to
withdraw the proposed rule.
III. Discussion of Comments
The Coast Guard received nine
written submissions in response to its
request for comment on its intent to
withdraw the proposed rule; six
concerned citizens, two on behalf of
coalitions of environmental groups, and
one from a federally recognized tribe. Of
the nine commenters, one commenter
supported the withdrawal, three
commenters indicated that withdrawal
is not supported without an
environmental impact statement being
done, one commenter supported
continuing with the rule so long as an
environmental impact study is
conducted, and four commenters made
no affirmative or negative comment on
withdrawal of the proposed rule, but
requested an environmental impact
statement. The Coast Guard is
withdrawing its proposed rulemaking
based on the comments received and in
order to better analyze the impacts to
tribal treaty rights, especially treaty
fishing rights.
All commenters requested or
emphasized the importance of an
environmental impact statement. The
Coast Guard will follow all applicable
laws and regulations, including the
National Environmental Policy Act,
with respect to any anchorages
rulemaking in the Puget Sound that may
be conducted in the future.
Two commenters requested the Coast
Guard conduct an environmental impact
statement on the use of uncodified
anchorages before withdrawing the
current proposed rule. The Coast
Guard’s withdrawal of the proposed
anchorage rule is not a government
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
18491
action for which an environmental
impact statement on the uncodified
anchorages is required.
Two commenters indicated that tribal
consultation is appropriate within the
proposal area with respect to the
proposed rule, two commenters deferred
to tribal governments on the issue of
whether tribal consultation on this rule
is appropriate, and one tribe commented
that it had previously engaged with the
Coast Guard on a government-togovernment basis and submitted
comments on the proposed rule. The
Coast Guard is committed to upholding
its responsibilities as the federal trustee
of the tribes’ interests, and will conduct
formal government-to-government
consultation when required under
Executive Order 13175. The Coast
Guard is withdrawing the current
proposed rulemaking and has engaged
with the tribes to address broader treaty
rights issues in processes outside this
rulemaking. As a result of the above
actions, the Coast Guard will not
conduct consultation on this specific
rulemaking.
IV. Withdrawal
The Coast Guard has determined that
withdrawing the proposed rule is
appropriate based on the new
information received from the tribes in
the docket. Accordingly, the Coast
Guard is withdrawing the ‘‘Anchorages;
Captain of the Port Puget Sound Zone,
WA’’ proposed rulemaking announced
in an NPRM published February 10,
2017 (82 FR 10313). As noted, the Coast
Guard has the authority and ability to
manage vessel traffic in the Puget Sound
in a safe and effective manner. We are
committed to improving the
navigational safety of all Puget Sound
waterway users, and will continually
consider ways to do so in an effective
and least burdensome manner
consistent with tribal treaty fishing
rights.
Dated: April 23, 2018.
David G. Throop,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Thirteenth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2018–08871 Filed 4–26–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 9
RIN 2900–AQ12
Veterans’ Group Life Insurance
Increased Coverage
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\27APP1.SGM
Department of Veterans Affairs.
27APP1
18492
ACTION:
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 82 / Friday, April 27, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Proposed rule.
Current statutory provisions
provide Veterans’ Group Life Insurance
(VGLI) insureds under the age of 60
with the opportunity to increase their
VGLI coverage by $25,000 not more than
once in each 5-year period beginning on
the 1-year anniversary of the date a
person becomes insured under VGLI.
The Department of Veterans Affairs
(VA) proposes to amend its VGLI
regulations to establish a permanent
regulatory framework for such elections
of increased coverage. The proposed
rule would also clarify that coverage
increases in an amount less than
$25,000 are available only when
existing VGLI coverage is within
$25,000 of the Servicemembers’ Group
Life Insurance current maximum of
$400,000, and any increases of less than
$25,000 must be only in an amount that
would bring the insurance coverage up
to the statutory maximum.
DATES: Comment Date: Comments must
be received by VA on or before June 26,
2018.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted through https://
www.Regulations.gov; by mail or handdelivery to the Director, Regulation
Policy and Management (00REG),
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810
Vermont Ave. NW, Room 1063B,
Washington, DC 20420; or by fax to
(202) 273–9026. Comments should
indicate that they are submitted in
response to ‘‘RIN 2900–AQ12 Veterans’
Group Life Insurance Increased
Coverage.’’ Copies of comments
received will be available for public
inspection in the Office of Regulation
Policy and Management, Room 1063B,
between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday (except
holidays). Please call (202) 461–4902 for
an appointment. (This is not a toll free
number.) In addition, during the
comment period, comments are
available online through the Federal
Docket Management System (FDMS) at
https://www.Regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karen Naccarelli, Department of
Veterans Affairs Insurance Center (310/
290B), P.O. Box 13399, Philadelphia, PA
19101, (215) 381–3029. (This is not a
toll free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Before the
passage of the Veterans’ Benefits Act of
2010, Public Law 111–275, 404, 124
Stat. 2864, 2879–2880 (2010), the
maximum amount of VGLI coverage
available to a former member (also
referred to as ‘‘the insured’’ hereafter)
was limited to the amount of
Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:38 Apr 26, 2018
Jkt 244001
(SGLI) coverage in force at the time of
separation from service. See 38 U.S.C.
1977(a)(1). Section 404 of the Veterans’
Benefits Act of 2010 amended the
governing statute, 38 U.S.C. 1977, to
authorize insureds who are under 60
years of age and who have less than the
statutory maximum of SGLI coverage to
elect in writing to increase coverage by
$25,000 not more than once in each 5year period beginning on their 1-year
VGLI coverage anniversary date. Section
404 enables former members to keep
pace with changing economic
conditions by purchasing adequate
amounts of life insurance to protect
their families. Section 404 added to 38
U.S.C. 1977(a) a new paragraph (3),
which took effect April 11, 2011. To
promptly implement this statutory
change, VA adopted interim procedures
for increasing VGLI coverage. See
‘‘Servicemembers’ and Veterans’ Group
Life Insurance Handbook,’’ ch. 12, para.
12.01, on the VA Insurance website at
https://www.benefits.va.gov/
INSURANCE/resources_handbook_ins_
chapter12.asp (outlining the interim
process). Since the 2011 change in law,
70,569 VGLI insureds have participated
in VGLI increased coverage
opportunities as of the end of calendar
year 2016, electing additional coverage
in the amount of $1,764,710,000. The
proposed regulation is intended to
establish a permanent regulatory
framework for affording additional VGLI
coverage under section 404.
VA proposes to exercise the
Secretary’s authority under 38 U.S.C.
501 and amend its regulations to
establish a permanent regulatory
framework for affording VGLI insureds
the opportunity to purchase increased
coverage pursuant to 38 U.S.C.
1977(a)(3). Under 38 U.S.C. 1977(b)(2),
VGLI is only renewable on a ‘‘five-year
term basis,’’ while subsection (a)(3)
provides for elections of increased
coverage of $25,000 not more than once
in each 5-year period beginning on the
1-year anniversary of the date a person
becomes insured under VGLI. See 38
U.S.C. 1977. Because the statutory
language does not specify the invitation
period(s) for VGLI insureds to elect
increased coverage, VA proposes to
amend 38 CFR 9.2 to address the gap.
Proposed § 9.2(b)(5) would provide that
the VGLI insured’s first opportunity to
increase coverage would be on the oneyear VGLI coverage anniversary date,
the earliest date permissible under the
authorizing statute. The insured could
subsequently elect to increase coverage
on the 5-year anniversary date from the
first VGLI coverage increase election
opportunity and on each 5-year
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
anniversary from the date of the last
VGLI coverage increase opportunity
thereafter.
The proposed amendment of § 9.2 is
consistent with 38 U.S.C. 1977(a)(3),
which states that the insured has the
opportunity to increase coverage ‘‘[n]ot
more than once in each five-year period
beginning on the 1-year anniversary of
the date a person becomes insured
under Veterans’ Group Life Insurance.’’
As stated, the authorizing statute is
silent about if and when an insured will
be notified about the opportunity to
increase coverage. Accordingly, VA’s
proposed regulation is intended, in part,
to address this gap in the statutory
language. Specifically, the proposed
regulation would provide that after
VGLI enrollment, the insurer will invite
insureds to increase coverage not less
than 120 days prior to the 1-year
anniversary from initial VGLI coverage
and not less than 120 days prior to each
5-year anniversary date from the date of
the last VGLI coverage increase election
opportunity, until the former member
has elected the SGLI statutory maximum
(currently $400,000) or has attained the
age of 60 years, whichever occurs first.
In addition, VA seeks to make clear in
this proposed rule that insureds must
elect increased coverage within 120
days prior to their VGLI one-year
anniversary date and/or within 120 days
prior to each subsequent 5-year
anniversary date from the last VGLI
coverage increase election opportunity.
VA has determined that the 120-day
period is a reasonable period of time for
insureds to review their financial needs
and make informed decisions regarding
whether to request additional coverage.
As such, the proposed regulation would
allow VGLI insureds to elect increased
coverage within 120 days prior to the 1year anniversary date and within 120
days prior to each 5-year anniversary
date from the date of the last VGLI
increase opportunity as long as the
insured remains eligible to do so, i.e., is
under the statutory coverage limit and
under 60 years of age.
For example, if a former member
purchased $300,000 in VGLI coverage
effective April 11, 2017, the former
member would be eligible to request an
additional $25,000 of VGLI coverage
beginning 120 days prior to April 11,
2018. The increased coverage would be
effective April 11, 2018. The next
opportunity to increase coverage would
be April 11, 2023, the first 5-year
anniversary date from the last VGLI
coverage increase election opportunity.
Subsequently, the former member
would have the opportunity to buy an
additional $25,000 in VGLI coverage
once every five years for as long as the
E:\FR\FM\27APP1.SGM
27APP1
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 82 / Friday, April 27, 2018 / Proposed Rules
former member was under 60 years of
age and held $400,000 or less in VGLI
coverage. See 38 U.S.C. 1977(a)(3).
The proposed regulation would afford
the insured the earliest opportunity to
increase coverage permitted under the
statute, namely on the one-year
anniversary after coverage begins and on
each subsequent 5-year anniversary date
from the last VGLI increase election
opportunity. See 38 U.S.C. 1977(b)(2).
Moreover, the proposed amendment
would ensure that such increases in
coverage would occur during
predictable periods. This would allow
both the insured and the insurer to plan
for any potential changes in the in-force
coverage amount and the corresponding
premiums. This aspect of predictability
about the timing of coverage elections
would support the goal of managing the
VGLI program based on sound actuarial
principles, while also affording insureds
ample opportunities to elect increased
coverage if they choose to do so. Under
the proposed regulatory amendment,
insureds could make assessments about
future financial plans and the insurer
could apply the increased coverage
amount(s) at predictable intervals,
namely at the time of the first year
anniversary date after coverage began or
at the time of each subsequent 5-year
anniversary date(s) of the last VGLI
coverage increase election opportunity.
The insurer would apply any increased
coverage from the date of the 1-year
anniversary and/or from any 5-year
anniversary date from the most recent
VGLI coverage increase election
opportunity.
By limiting opportunities to increase
VGLI coverage to the initial, 1-year
coverage anniversary date and every 5year anniversary date of the last VGLI
coverage increase election opportunity
thereafter, VA would provide insureds
the opportunity to meet their financial
needs while mitigating the potentially
negative impact of adverse selection in
the VGLI program. Adverse selection
occurs when individuals use their
superior knowledge of their insurability
to minimize the period of time over
which they are likely to pay premiums
for coverage. Such a practice unfairly
shifts the premium paying burden to
other individuals paying premiums for
coverage over a longer period of time
and potentially undermines the
financial health of the program to the
detriment of all insureds. Insurance
programs rely on a pooling of risks, and
premium rates are set according to the
expected mortality of the insurance
pool. If a disproportionate number of
insureds in substandard health enter the
program or carry higher coverage
amounts than healthier individuals in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:38 Apr 26, 2018
Jkt 244001
the program, the increased mortality
experience will exceed that upon which
the premium rates are based and could
impact the program negatively by
driving up the cost of premiums for all
program participants. Consistent with
industry practices designed to keep
premium rates affordable, insurance
providers typically limit changes in
policies to certain defined periods of
time, such as open seasons or during
renewal periods. By limiting VGLI
coverage changes only at established
intervals, such as the initial, 1-year
anniversary from the coverage date and
each 5-year anniversary date from the
last VGLI coverage increase election
opportunity thereafter, VA would
ensure that VGLI insureds have ample
opportunity to increase coverage in a
manner that is both consistent with
industry practice and beneficial to
insureds.
As it relates to the amount of
increased coverage elected at one time,
the statutory language of 38 U.S.C.
1977(a)(3) provides that an increase in
coverage is generally allowable in
intervals of $25,000; however, the
statute is silent as to the options
available to VGLI insureds who have
coverage of more than $375,000, i.e.,
within less than $25,000 of the current
statutory maximum. To address this gap
in the statutory language, VA’s proposed
rule would also clarify that increases of
less than $25,000 shall be permitted
only when VGLI coverage in force is
within less than $25,000 of the statutory
maximum. In such circumstances,
coverage increases in an amount less
than $25,000 would only be allowed in
the amount required to increase
coverage up to the current statutory
maximum of $400,000. For example, if
an insured has coverage of $380,000, the
proposed rule would permit an increase
of $20,000 in order to bring the
insured’s coverage up to the current
SGLI maximum of $400,000. If not for
this exception, those within less than
$25,000 of the statutory maximum
coverage amount would be forever
barred from increasing their coverage
because doing so would result in
coverage in excess of the SGLI
maximum of $400,000, which is not
permitted by law. VA’s proposed rule
would seek to avoid this harsh result
and make permanent the current,
interim policy that allows insureds with
more than $375,000 coverage the
opportunity to elect additional coverage
up to the statutory maximum. There is
flexibility in this area because 38 U.S.C.
1977(b)(5) authorizes the Secretary to
set terms and conditions for VGLI that
he determines to be reasonable and
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
18493
practicable. The exception outlined
above is both permissible within the
scope of the statute and furthers its
intent to allow up to $400,000 in VGLI
coverage.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in the
expenditure by state, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
one year. This proposed rule would
have no such effect on state, local, and
tribal governments or the private sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no
provisions constituting a collection of
information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C 3501–3521).
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and
13771
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review)
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. Executive Order
12866 (Regulatory Planning and
Review) defines a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ requiring review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), unless OMB waives such
review, as ‘‘any regulatory action that is
likely to result in a rule that may: (1)
Have an annual effect on the economy
of $100 million or more or adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a
sector of the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment,
public health or safety, or state, local, or
tribal governments or communities; (2)
Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency; (3)
Materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in this Executive
Order.’’
E:\FR\FM\27APP1.SGM
27APP1
18494
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 82 / Friday, April 27, 2018 / Proposed Rules
The economic, interagency,
budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this regulatory action
have been examined, and it has been
determined not to be a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866. VA’s impact analysis can be
found as a supporting document at
https://www.regulations.gov, usually
within 48 hours after the rulemaking
document is published. Additionally, a
copy of the rulemaking and its impact
analysis are available on VA’s website at
https://www.va.gov/orpm/, by following
the link for ‘‘VA Regulations Published
From FY 2004 Through Fiscal Year to
Date.’’ This proposed rule is not
expected to be an E.O. 13771 regulatory
action because this proposed rule is not
significant under E.O. 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that
this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities as
they are defined in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612). This
proposed rule would directly affect only
individuals and would not directly
affect small entities. Therefore, pursuant
to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this rulemaking is
exempt from the initial and final
regulatory flexibility analysis
requirements of sections 603 and 604.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance number and title for the
programs affected by this document is
64.103, Life Insurance for Veterans.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 9
Life insurance; Military personnel;
Veterans.
Signing Authority
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or
designee, approved this document and
authorized the undersigned to sign and
submit the document to the Office of the
Federal Register for publication
electronically as an official document of
the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Jacquelyn Hayes-Byrd, Deputy Chief of
Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs,
approved this document on February
23, 2018, for publication.
PART 9—SERVICEMEMBERS’ GROUP
LIFE INSURANCE AND VETERANS’
GROUP LIFE INSURANCE
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
■
1. The authority citation for part 9
continues to read as follows:
[EPA–R08–OAR–2018–0136; FRL–9976–
44—Region 8]
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1965–1980A,
unless otherwise noted.
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; State of
Montana; Revisions to PSD Permitting
Rules
2. In § 9.2, add new paragraph (b)(5)
to read as follows:
■
§ 9.2
Effective date; applications.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(5) Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 1977(a)(3),
former members under the age of 60 can
elect to increase their Veterans’ Group
Life Insurance coverage by $25,000, up
to the existing Servicemembers’ Group
Life Insurance maximum. The insured’s
first opportunity to elect to increase
coverage is on the one-year Veterans’
Group Life Insurance coverage
anniversary date. Thereafter, the insured
could elect to increase coverage on the
five-year anniversary date of the first
VGLI coverage increase election
opportunity and subsequently every five
years from the anniversary date of the
insured’s last VGLI coverage increase
election opportunity. Increases of less
than $25,000 are only available when
existing Veterans’ Group Life Insurance
coverage is within less than $25,000 of
the Servicemembers’ Group Life
Insurance maximum and any increases
of less than $25,000 must be only in the
amount needed to bring the insurance
coverage up to the statutory maximum
allowable amount of Servicemembers’
Group Life Insurance. The eligible
former members must apply for the
increased coverage through the
administrative office, within 120 days of
invitation prior to the initial one-year
anniversary date or within 120 days
prior to each subsequent five-year
coverage anniversary date from the first
VGLI coverage increase election
opportunity. The increased coverage
will be effective from the anniversary
date immediately following the election.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2018–08855 Filed 4–26–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
Dated: April 23, 2018.
Jeffrey M. Martin,
Impact Analyst, Office of Regulation Policy
& Management, Office of the Secretary,
Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Department of Veterans
Affairs proposes to amend 38 CFR part
9 as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:38 Apr 26, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to fully
approve the State Implementation Plan
(SIP) revision submitted by the State of
Montana on October 14, 2016.
Montana’s October 14, 2016 submittal
revises their prevention of significant
deterioration (PSD) regulations. This
action is being taken under section 110
of the Clean Air Act (CAA) (Act).
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before May 29, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by EPA–R08–OAR–2018–
0136 at https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for
submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed
from www.regulations.gov. The EPA
may publish any comment received to
its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or
comment contents located outside of the
primary submission (i.e., on the web,
cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kevin Leone, Air Program, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P–AR, 1595
Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129, (303) 312–6227,
leone.kevin@epa.gov.
SUMMARY:
I. Background
In Montana’s letter from Governor
Steve Bullock to EPA Regional
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\27APP1.SGM
27APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 82 (Friday, April 27, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 18491-18494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-08855]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 9
RIN 2900-AQ12
Veterans' Group Life Insurance Increased Coverage
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
[[Page 18492]]
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Current statutory provisions provide Veterans' Group Life
Insurance (VGLI) insureds under the age of 60 with the opportunity to
increase their VGLI coverage by $25,000 not more than once in each 5-
year period beginning on the 1-year anniversary of the date a person
becomes insured under VGLI. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
proposes to amend its VGLI regulations to establish a permanent
regulatory framework for such elections of increased coverage. The
proposed rule would also clarify that coverage increases in an amount
less than $25,000 are available only when existing VGLI coverage is
within $25,000 of the Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance current
maximum of $400,000, and any increases of less than $25,000 must be
only in an amount that would bring the insurance coverage up to the
statutory maximum.
DATES: Comment Date: Comments must be received by VA on or before June
26, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted through https://www.Regulations.gov; by mail or hand-delivery to the Director,
Regulation Policy and Management (00REG), Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave. NW, Room 1063B, Washington, DC 20420; or by
fax to (202) 273-9026. Comments should indicate that they are submitted
in response to ``RIN 2900-AQ12 Veterans' Group Life Insurance Increased
Coverage.'' Copies of comments received will be available for public
inspection in the Office of Regulation Policy and Management, Room
1063B, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday (except holidays). Please call (202) 461-4902 for an
appointment. (This is not a toll free number.) In addition, during the
comment period, comments are available online through the Federal
Docket Management System (FDMS) at https://www.Regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Naccarelli, Department of
Veterans Affairs Insurance Center (310/290B), P.O. Box 13399,
Philadelphia, PA 19101, (215) 381-3029. (This is not a toll free
number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Before the passage of the Veterans' Benefits
Act of 2010, Public Law 111-275, 404, 124 Stat. 2864, 2879-2880 (2010),
the maximum amount of VGLI coverage available to a former member (also
referred to as ``the insured'' hereafter) was limited to the amount of
Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance (SGLI) coverage in force at the
time of separation from service. See 38 U.S.C. 1977(a)(1). Section 404
of the Veterans' Benefits Act of 2010 amended the governing statute, 38
U.S.C. 1977, to authorize insureds who are under 60 years of age and
who have less than the statutory maximum of SGLI coverage to elect in
writing to increase coverage by $25,000 not more than once in each 5-
year period beginning on their 1-year VGLI coverage anniversary date.
Section 404 enables former members to keep pace with changing economic
conditions by purchasing adequate amounts of life insurance to protect
their families. Section 404 added to 38 U.S.C. 1977(a) a new paragraph
(3), which took effect April 11, 2011. To promptly implement this
statutory change, VA adopted interim procedures for increasing VGLI
coverage. See ``Servicemembers' and Veterans' Group Life Insurance
Handbook,'' ch. 12, para. 12.01, on the VA Insurance website at https://www.benefits.va.gov/INSURANCE/resources_handbook_ins_chapter12.asp
(outlining the interim process). Since the 2011 change in law, 70,569
VGLI insureds have participated in VGLI increased coverage
opportunities as of the end of calendar year 2016, electing additional
coverage in the amount of $1,764,710,000. The proposed regulation is
intended to establish a permanent regulatory framework for affording
additional VGLI coverage under section 404.
VA proposes to exercise the Secretary's authority under 38 U.S.C.
501 and amend its regulations to establish a permanent regulatory
framework for affording VGLI insureds the opportunity to purchase
increased coverage pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 1977(a)(3). Under 38 U.S.C.
1977(b)(2), VGLI is only renewable on a ``five-year term basis,'' while
subsection (a)(3) provides for elections of increased coverage of
$25,000 not more than once in each 5-year period beginning on the 1-
year anniversary of the date a person becomes insured under VGLI. See
38 U.S.C. 1977. Because the statutory language does not specify the
invitation period(s) for VGLI insureds to elect increased coverage, VA
proposes to amend 38 CFR 9.2 to address the gap. Proposed Sec.
9.2(b)(5) would provide that the VGLI insured's first opportunity to
increase coverage would be on the one-year VGLI coverage anniversary
date, the earliest date permissible under the authorizing statute. The
insured could subsequently elect to increase coverage on the 5-year
anniversary date from the first VGLI coverage increase election
opportunity and on each 5-year anniversary from the date of the last
VGLI coverage increase opportunity thereafter.
The proposed amendment of Sec. 9.2 is consistent with 38 U.S.C.
1977(a)(3), which states that the insured has the opportunity to
increase coverage ``[n]ot more than once in each five-year period
beginning on the 1-year anniversary of the date a person becomes
insured under Veterans' Group Life Insurance.'' As stated, the
authorizing statute is silent about if and when an insured will be
notified about the opportunity to increase coverage. Accordingly, VA's
proposed regulation is intended, in part, to address this gap in the
statutory language. Specifically, the proposed regulation would provide
that after VGLI enrollment, the insurer will invite insureds to
increase coverage not less than 120 days prior to the 1-year
anniversary from initial VGLI coverage and not less than 120 days prior
to each 5-year anniversary date from the date of the last VGLI coverage
increase election opportunity, until the former member has elected the
SGLI statutory maximum (currently $400,000) or has attained the age of
60 years, whichever occurs first.
In addition, VA seeks to make clear in this proposed rule that
insureds must elect increased coverage within 120 days prior to their
VGLI one-year anniversary date and/or within 120 days prior to each
subsequent 5-year anniversary date from the last VGLI coverage increase
election opportunity. VA has determined that the 120-day period is a
reasonable period of time for insureds to review their financial needs
and make informed decisions regarding whether to request additional
coverage. As such, the proposed regulation would allow VGLI insureds to
elect increased coverage within 120 days prior to the 1-year
anniversary date and within 120 days prior to each 5-year anniversary
date from the date of the last VGLI increase opportunity as long as the
insured remains eligible to do so, i.e., is under the statutory
coverage limit and under 60 years of age.
For example, if a former member purchased $300,000 in VGLI coverage
effective April 11, 2017, the former member would be eligible to
request an additional $25,000 of VGLI coverage beginning 120 days prior
to April 11, 2018. The increased coverage would be effective April 11,
2018. The next opportunity to increase coverage would be April 11,
2023, the first 5-year anniversary date from the last VGLI coverage
increase election opportunity. Subsequently, the former member would
have the opportunity to buy an additional $25,000 in VGLI coverage once
every five years for as long as the
[[Page 18493]]
former member was under 60 years of age and held $400,000 or less in
VGLI coverage. See 38 U.S.C. 1977(a)(3).
The proposed regulation would afford the insured the earliest
opportunity to increase coverage permitted under the statute, namely on
the one-year anniversary after coverage begins and on each subsequent
5-year anniversary date from the last VGLI increase election
opportunity. See 38 U.S.C. 1977(b)(2). Moreover, the proposed amendment
would ensure that such increases in coverage would occur during
predictable periods. This would allow both the insured and the insurer
to plan for any potential changes in the in-force coverage amount and
the corresponding premiums. This aspect of predictability about the
timing of coverage elections would support the goal of managing the
VGLI program based on sound actuarial principles, while also affording
insureds ample opportunities to elect increased coverage if they choose
to do so. Under the proposed regulatory amendment, insureds could make
assessments about future financial plans and the insurer could apply
the increased coverage amount(s) at predictable intervals, namely at
the time of the first year anniversary date after coverage began or at
the time of each subsequent 5-year anniversary date(s) of the last VGLI
coverage increase election opportunity. The insurer would apply any
increased coverage from the date of the 1-year anniversary and/or from
any 5-year anniversary date from the most recent VGLI coverage increase
election opportunity.
By limiting opportunities to increase VGLI coverage to the initial,
1-year coverage anniversary date and every 5-year anniversary date of
the last VGLI coverage increase election opportunity thereafter, VA
would provide insureds the opportunity to meet their financial needs
while mitigating the potentially negative impact of adverse selection
in the VGLI program. Adverse selection occurs when individuals use
their superior knowledge of their insurability to minimize the period
of time over which they are likely to pay premiums for coverage. Such a
practice unfairly shifts the premium paying burden to other individuals
paying premiums for coverage over a longer period of time and
potentially undermines the financial health of the program to the
detriment of all insureds. Insurance programs rely on a pooling of
risks, and premium rates are set according to the expected mortality of
the insurance pool. If a disproportionate number of insureds in
substandard health enter the program or carry higher coverage amounts
than healthier individuals in the program, the increased mortality
experience will exceed that upon which the premium rates are based and
could impact the program negatively by driving up the cost of premiums
for all program participants. Consistent with industry practices
designed to keep premium rates affordable, insurance providers
typically limit changes in policies to certain defined periods of time,
such as open seasons or during renewal periods. By limiting VGLI
coverage changes only at established intervals, such as the initial, 1-
year anniversary from the coverage date and each 5-year anniversary
date from the last VGLI coverage increase election opportunity
thereafter, VA would ensure that VGLI insureds have ample opportunity
to increase coverage in a manner that is both consistent with industry
practice and beneficial to insureds.
As it relates to the amount of increased coverage elected at one
time, the statutory language of 38 U.S.C. 1977(a)(3) provides that an
increase in coverage is generally allowable in intervals of $25,000;
however, the statute is silent as to the options available to VGLI
insureds who have coverage of more than $375,000, i.e., within less
than $25,000 of the current statutory maximum. To address this gap in
the statutory language, VA's proposed rule would also clarify that
increases of less than $25,000 shall be permitted only when VGLI
coverage in force is within less than $25,000 of the statutory maximum.
In such circumstances, coverage increases in an amount less than
$25,000 would only be allowed in the amount required to increase
coverage up to the current statutory maximum of $400,000. For example,
if an insured has coverage of $380,000, the proposed rule would permit
an increase of $20,000 in order to bring the insured's coverage up to
the current SGLI maximum of $400,000. If not for this exception, those
within less than $25,000 of the statutory maximum coverage amount would
be forever barred from increasing their coverage because doing so would
result in coverage in excess of the SGLI maximum of $400,000, which is
not permitted by law. VA's proposed rule would seek to avoid this harsh
result and make permanent the current, interim policy that allows
insureds with more than $375,000 coverage the opportunity to elect
additional coverage up to the statutory maximum. There is flexibility
in this area because 38 U.S.C. 1977(b)(5) authorizes the Secretary to
set terms and conditions for VGLI that he determines to be reasonable
and practicable. The exception outlined above is both permissible
within the scope of the statute and furthers its intent to allow up to
$400,000 in VGLI coverage.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure by
state, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year. This proposed rule would have no such
effect on state, local, and tribal governments or the private sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no provisions constituting a collection
of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C 3501-3521).
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 13771
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, and other advantages; distributive impacts;
and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review) emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility.
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) defines a
``significant regulatory action'' requiring review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), unless OMB waives such review, as ``any
regulatory action that is likely to result in a rule that may: (1) Have
an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or state, local, or tribal governments or communities; (2)
Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action
taken or planned by another agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary
impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal
or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's
priorities, or the principles set forth in this Executive Order.''
[[Page 18494]]
The economic, interagency, budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this regulatory action have been examined, and it has
been determined not to be a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866. VA's impact analysis can be found as a
supporting document at https://www.regulations.gov, usually within 48
hours after the rulemaking document is published. Additionally, a copy
of the rulemaking and its impact analysis are available on VA's website
at https://www.va.gov/orpm/, by following the link for ``VA Regulations
Published From FY 2004 Through Fiscal Year to Date.'' This proposed
rule is not expected to be an E.O. 13771 regulatory action because this
proposed rule is not significant under E.O. 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601-612). This proposed rule would directly affect only
individuals and would not directly affect small entities. Therefore,
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this rulemaking is exempt from the initial
and final regulatory flexibility analysis requirements of sections 603
and 604.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance number and title for the
programs affected by this document is 64.103, Life Insurance for
Veterans.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 9
Life insurance; Military personnel; Veterans.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or designee, approved this
document and authorized the undersigned to sign and submit the document
to the Office of the Federal Register for publication electronically as
an official document of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Jacquelyn
Hayes-Byrd, Deputy Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs,
approved this document on February 23, 2018, for publication.
Dated: April 23, 2018.
Jeffrey M. Martin,
Impact Analyst, Office of Regulation Policy & Management, Office of the
Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of Veterans
Affairs proposes to amend 38 CFR part 9 as follows:
PART 9--SERVICEMEMBERS' GROUP LIFE INSURANCE AND VETERANS' GROUP
LIFE INSURANCE
0
1. The authority citation for part 9 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1965-1980A, unless otherwise noted.
0
2. In Sec. 9.2, add new paragraph (b)(5) to read as follows:
Sec. 9.2 Effective date; applications.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(5) Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 1977(a)(3), former members under the age
of 60 can elect to increase their Veterans' Group Life Insurance
coverage by $25,000, up to the existing Servicemembers' Group Life
Insurance maximum. The insured's first opportunity to elect to increase
coverage is on the one-year Veterans' Group Life Insurance coverage
anniversary date. Thereafter, the insured could elect to increase
coverage on the five-year anniversary date of the first VGLI coverage
increase election opportunity and subsequently every five years from
the anniversary date of the insured's last VGLI coverage increase
election opportunity. Increases of less than $25,000 are only available
when existing Veterans' Group Life Insurance coverage is within less
than $25,000 of the Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance maximum and
any increases of less than $25,000 must be only in the amount needed to
bring the insurance coverage up to the statutory maximum allowable
amount of Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance. The eligible former
members must apply for the increased coverage through the
administrative office, within 120 days of invitation prior to the
initial one-year anniversary date or within 120 days prior to each
subsequent five-year coverage anniversary date from the first VGLI
coverage increase election opportunity. The increased coverage will be
effective from the anniversary date immediately following the election.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2018-08855 Filed 4-26-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P