Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Axion Series Led Video Display Cabinets, 18321-18324 [2018-08811]
Download as PDF
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 81 / Thursday, April 26, 2018 / Notices
Public scoping is a process for
determining the scope of issues to be
addressed in this EIS and for identifying
the issues related to the proposed action
that may have a significant effect on the
project environment. The scoping
process begins with publication of this
notice and ends after the U.S. Coast
Guard has:
D Invited the participation of Federal,
State, and local agencies, any affected
Indian tribe, and other interested
persons;
D Consulted with affected Federally
Recognized Tribes on a government-togovernment basis, and with affected
Alaska Native corporations, in
accordance with Executive Order 13175
and other policies. Native concerns,
including impacts on Indian trust assets
and potential impacts to cultural
resources, will be given appropriate
consideration;
D Requested the Environmental
Protection Agency, the United States
Fish and Wildlife Service, the National
Marine Fisheries Service, and the
United States Army Corps of Engineers
to serve as cooperating agencies in the
preparation of this EIS. With this Notice
of Intent, we are asking Federal, State,
and local agencies with jurisdiction or
special expertise with respect to
environmental issues in the project area,
in addition to those we have already
contacted, to formally cooperate with us
in the preparation of this EIS;
D Determined the scope and the
issues to be analyzed in depth in the
EIS;
D Allocated responsibility for
preparing the EIS components;
D Indicated any related environmental
assessments or environmental impact
statements that are not part of this EIS;
D Identified other relevant
environmental review and consultation
requirements, such as Coastal Zone
Management Act consistency
determinations, and threatened and
endangered species and habitat impacts;
D Indicated the relationship between
timing of the environmental review and
other aspects of the application process;
and
D Exercised our option under 40 CFR
1501.7(b) to hold the public scoping
meeting announced in this notice.
Once the scoping process is complete,
the U.S. Coast Guard will prepare a draft
EIS, and will publish a Federal Register
notice announcing its public
availability. We will provide the public
with an opportunity to review and
comment on the draft EIS. Comments
received during the draft EIS review
period will be available in the public
docket and made available in the final
EIS. After the U.S. Coast Guard
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:58 Apr 25, 2018
Jkt 244001
considers those comments, we will
prepare the final EIS and similarly
announce its availability and solicit
public review and comment.
IV. Information Requested
We are seeking comments on the
potential environmental impacts that
may result from the development,
building, testing, and operation of up to
three heavy polar icebreakers and
potentially three medium icebreakers to
help in the development of an EIS.
NEPA requires Federal agencies to
consider environmental impacts that
may result from a proposed action, to
inform the public of potential impacts
and alternatives, and to facilitate public
involvement in the assessment process.
An EIS would include, among other
matters, discussions of the purpose and
need for the proposed action, a
description of alternatives, a description
of the affected environment, and an
evaluation of the environmental impacts
of the proposed action and alternatives.
As required by the NEPA, the U.S.
Coast Guard also will analyze the No
Action Alternative as a baseline for
comparing the impacts of the proposed
action. For the purposes of this
proposed action, the No Action
Alternative is defined as not approving
the design and build of new polar
icebreakers. The U.S. Coast Guard
encourages public participation in the
EIS process. The scoping period will
begin upon publication of this notice in
the Federal Register and continue for a
period of sixty (60) days. As part of the
scoping process, and as authorized by
40 CFR 1508.22(b)(4), the U.S. Coast
Guard will hold a public scoping
meeting and informational open house
˙
in Anchorage, Utqiagvik (Barrow),
Nome, and Kotzebue, Alaska in May
2018. Public comments will be accepted
at those meetings and can also be
submitted to the docket, as previously
described under ADDRESSES.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
Pursuant to the CEQ regulations, the
U.S. Coast Guard invites public
participation in the NEPA process. This
notice requests public participation in
the scoping process, establishes a public
comment period, and provides
information on how to participate.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal portal at
https://www.regulations.gov. If your
material cannot be submitted using
https://www.regulations.gov, contact the
person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions. In your
submission, please include the docket
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18321
number for this notice of intent and
provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, visit https://
www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
Documents mentioned in this notice
of intent as being available in the
docket, and all public comments, will
be in our online docket at https://
www.regulations.gov and can be viewed
by following that website’s instructions.
We plan to hold public meetings in
˙
Anchorage, Utqiagvik (Barrow), Nome,
and Kotzebue to receive oral comments
on this notice of intent. The dates,
times, and locations of the public
meetings will be announced in the local
papers (The Arctic Sounder, The
Anchorage Daily News, and The Nome
Nugget) and online at https://
www.dcms.uscg.mil/Our-Organization/
Assistant-Commandant-forAcquisitions-CG-9/Programs/SurfacePrograms/Polar-Icebreaker/. If special
assistance is required to attend the
meetings, such as sign language
interpretation or other reasonable
accommodations, contact the U.S. Coast
Guard as indicated in FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Dated: April 23, 2018.
Ahmedur Majumder,
Deputy Program Manager, Polar Icebreaker
Program, United States Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 2018–08795 Filed 4–25–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Notice of Issuance of Final
Determination Concerning Axion
Series Led Video Display Cabinets
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of final determination.
AGENCY:
This document provides
notice that U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (‘‘CBP’’) has issued a final
determination concerning the country of
origin of Axion series LED video display
cabinets. Based upon the facts
presented, CBP has concluded in the
final determination that Taiwan is the
country of origin of the Axion series
LED video display cabinets for purposes
of U.S. Government procurement.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
18322
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 81 / Thursday, April 26, 2018 / Notices
The final determination was
issued on April 19, 2018. A copy of the
final determination is attached. Any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR
177.22(d), may seek judicial review of
this final determination within May 29,
2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cynthia Reese, Valuation and Special
Programs Branch, Regulations and
Rulings, Office of Trade (202–325–
0046).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that on April 19, 2018,
CBP issued a final determination
concerning the country of origin of
Axion series LED video display cabinets
which may be offered to the United
States Government under an
undesignated government procurement
contract. This final determination, HQ
H292849, was issued at the request of
Vanguard LED Displays, Inc., under
procedures set forth at 19 CFR part 177,
subpart B, which implements Title III of
the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as
amended (19 U.S.C. § 2511–18). In the
final determination, CBP has concluded
that, based upon the facts presented, the
assembly of imported components does
not substantially transform the
components into a product of the
United States, and therefore, the
assembled Axion series LED video
display cabinets derive their origin from
the imported components, nearly all of
which originate in Taiwan. Therefore,
Taiwan is the country of origin of the
Axion series LED video display cabinets
for purposes of U.S. Government
procurement.
Section 177.29, CBP Regulations (19
CFR § 177.29), provides that notice of
final determinations shall be published
in the Federal Register within 60 days
of the date the final determination is
issued. Section 177.30, CBP Regulations
(19 CFR 177.30), provides that any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR
177.22(d), may seek judicial review of a
final determination within 30 days of
publication of such determination in the
Federal Register.
DATES:
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with NOTICES
Dated: April 19, 2018.
Alice A. Kipel,
Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings,
Office of Trade.
HQ H292849
April 19, 2018
OT:RR:CTF:VS H292849 CMR
CATEGORY: Origin
Frank S. Murray, Esq.
Foley & Lardner LLP
Washington Harbour
3000 K Street, NW
Suite 600
Washington, DC 20007
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:58 Apr 25, 2018
Jkt 244001
RE: U.S. Government Procurement; Title
III, Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (19
U.S.C. 2511); subpart B, Part 177, CBP
Regulations; Light Emitting Diode
video display cabinets
Dear Mr. Murray:
This is in response to your request of
December 15, 2017, on behalf of your
client, Vanguard LED Displays, Inc.
(hereinafter, Vanguard), requesting a
final determination concerning Light
Emitting Diode (LED) video display
cabinets for purposes of government
procurement under Title III of the Trade
Agreements Act of 1979 (TAA), as
amended (19 U.S.C. § 2511 et seq.).
Vanguard is a party-at-interest within
the meaning of 19 CFR § 177.22(d)(1)
and (d)(2), and is entitled to request this
final determination under 19 CFR
§ 177.23(a) and (b).
FACTS:
Vanguard seeks a country of origin
determination regarding its Axion series
LED video display cabinets, model
numbers P1 through P2.5. The video
display cabinets are of a uniform size,
640 mm by 360 mm. There are 11
different models offering different
degrees of ‘‘pixel pitch.’’ This request is
limited to the first nine models in the
series, i.e., P1, P1.2, P1.3, P1.4, P1.5,
P1.6, P1.8, P2, P2.5.
You explain that:
The Axion series LED video display
cabinets receive electronic signals and
convert those signals into images that
are displayed via the LEDs on the face
of the cabinet. They are used by
customers to display video images. The
Axion series LED video cabinets can be
used on a stand-alone basis, but are
more commonly attached to other
cabinets to create a much larger video
screen, such as for the presentation of
video images to large audiences.
Vanguard manufactures, sells and
distributes LED video display cabinets
for both indoor and outdoor use. With
regard to the Axion series LED video
display cabinets at issue, Vanguard
imports the components of the video
display cabinets and assembles the
cabinets from the imported components
at their facility in Lakeland, Florida.
You indicate that the components of the
Axion series LED video display cabinets
(some of which are imported with prepackaged screws for use in assembling
the components to the display cabinet)
are:
LED Modules—Manufactured in
Taiwan. Each cabinet includes eight
LED modules. Each LED module is
composed of two subcomponents—
LEDs and LED display drivers. These
subcomponents are manufactured in
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Taiwan. The quantity of LEDs and LED
display drivers in each LED module
depends upon the desired pixel pitch of
the video display.
Receiving Card—Manufactured in
China.
Printed Circuit Board (PCB)—
Manufactured in Taiwan.
Hub Card—Manufactured in Taiwan.
Power Supply—Manufactured in
Taiwan.
Cabinet—Manufactured in China.
You indicate that the LED modules
are specifically designed to be used in
a particular LED video display, based
upon the desired pixel pitch and the
size of the cabinet, as ordered by a
customer. The PCB is custom-made to
meet the criteria specifically requested.
While a particular PCB board could
theoretically be used in another LED
video display, it could not be used in
other types of LED goods. The hub card
is designed to specifically handle the
particular receiving card designed to be
used in the specific LED video display
as ordered by the customer. In theory,
it could be used in a different LED video
display, but it could not be used in
other types of LED goods. Similarly, the
receiving card, power supply, and
cabinet can be used in other LED video
displays, but cannot be used in other
types of LED goods.
You state that the LEDs constitute the
majority of the component costs of the
video display cabinets. You describe the
function of the LEDs as ‘‘a type of semiconductor that conveys electronic
signals into infrared-rays or light.’’ The
LED display driver is described as ‘‘an
integrated circuit that provides the
circuitry necessary to interface most
common microprocessors or digital
systems to an LED display. [It] is an
electrical device that regulates the
power to an LED or a string (or strings)
of LEDs.’’ The receiving card ‘‘reads the
program commands from the sending
card or the computer transmitting the
signals regulating the brightness/
chromaticity of the LEDs.’’ The PCB
‘‘mechanically and electrically connects
electronic components.’’ Vanguard
receives the PCB with the hub card
integrated onto the PCB. The hub card
‘‘sends power to the LED modules, as
well as instructions/information from
the receiving card. The LED modules
and the receiving card are attached to
the PCB by Vanguard. The power
supply component receives electrical
power from an external source and
provides power to the electrical
components of the LED video cabinet.
Finally, the cabinet, a die-cast
aluminum cabinet, provides the
structure into which the other
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 81 / Thursday, April 26, 2018 / Notices
components are installed to create a
video display cabinet.
You describe the assembly process in
the United States as follows:
1. Attaching and affixing (via screws)
the power cable to the cabinet frame.
2. Affixing the power supply to its
mount via screws and connecting the
power cable to the power supply’s
adapter.
3. Placing the integrated PCB/hub
card assembly on top of the previously
attached components, centered in the
cabinet, and affixing the PCB/hub card
assembly (via screws) to the power
supply.
4. Affixing the integrated PCB/hub
assembly (via screws) to the cabinet.
5. Affixing the receiving card to the
integrated PCB/hub card assembly via a
notch in the hub card. (The hub card
. . . has a notch into which the
receiving card is to be installed.)
6. Installing each of the eight
magnetized LED modules into the
cabinet by attaching them to their
respective data/power slots in the
integrated PCB/hub card assembly.
After the video display cabinets are
assembled, Vanguard tests them to
ensure they function properly. Then, the
video display cabinets are packaged for
shipment to customers. You indicate
that the processing in the United States,
including the assembly, testing, and
packaging generally requires no more
than a day to complete, with the testing
and packaging taking more time than
the assembly.
You submit that the manufacturing
processes which occur in Taiwan to
create the Taiwanese components of the
video display cabinet are more complex
than the assembly process which occurs
in the United States or the
manufacturing processes which occur in
China to create the two components of
Chinese origin utilized in the assembly
of the finished video display cabinets.
In addition, you indicate that the
collective value of the Taiwanesemanufactured components is
overwhelmingly the majority of the
component costs of the completed video
display cabinets. Thus, you submit that
the country of origin of the finished
video display cabinets is Taiwan.
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with NOTICES
ISSUE:
What is the country of origin of the
Axion series LED video display cabinets
described herein for U.S. government
procurement purposes?
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) issues country of origin advisory
rulings and final determinations as to
whether an article is or would be a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:58 Apr 25, 2018
Jkt 244001
product of a designated country or
instrumentality for the purpose of
granting waivers of certain ‘‘Buy
American’’ restrictions in U.S. law or
practice for products offered for sale to
the U.S. Government, pursuant to
subpart B of Part 177, 19 CFR 177.21 et
seq., which implements Title III, Trade
Agreements Act of 1979, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2511–2518).
The rule of origin set forth in 19
U.S.C. 2518(4)(B) states:
An article is a product of a country or
instrumentality only if (i) it is wholly
the growth, product, or manufacture of
that country or instrumentality, or (ii) in
the case of an article which consists in
whole or in part of materials from
another country or instrumentality, it
has been substantially transformed into
a new and different article of commerce
with a name, character, or use distinct
from that of the article or articles from
which it was so transformed.
See also 19 CFR 177.22(a).
In rendering advisory rulings and
final determinations for purposes of
U.S. Government procurement, CBP
applies the provisions of subpart B of
Part 177 consistent with the Federal
Procurement Regulations. See 19 CFR
177.21. In this regard, CBP recognizes
that the Federal Acquisition Regulations
restrict the U.S. Government’s purchase
of products to U.S.-made or designated
country end products for acquisitions
subject to the TAA. See 48 CFR
25.403(c)(1). The Federal Acquisition
Regulations define ‘‘U.S.-made end
product’’ as:
. . . an article that is mined,
produced, or manufactured in the
United States or that is substantially
transformed in the United States into a
new and different article of commerce
with a name, character, or use distinct
from that of the article or articles from
which it was transformed.
The regulations define a ‘‘designated
country end product’’ as:
WTO GPA [World Trade Organization
Government Procurement Agreement]
country end product, an FTA [Free
Trade Agreement] country end product,
a least developed country end product,
or a Caribbean Basin country end
product.
A ‘‘WTO GPA country end product’’
is defined as an article that:
(1) Is wholly the growth, product, or
manufacture of a WTO GPA country; or
(2) In the case of an article that
consists in whole or in part of materials
from another country, has been
substantially transformed in a WTO
GPA country into a new and different
article of commerce with a name,
character, or use distinct from that of
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18323
the article or articles from which it was
transformed. The term refers to a
product offered for purchase under a
supply contract, but for purposes of
calculating the value of the end product
includes services (except transportation
services) incidental to the article,
provided that the value of those
incidental services does not exceed that
of the article itself.
See 48 CFR 25.003.
Taiwan is a WTO GPA country; China
is not.
In the Court of International Trade’s
decision in Energizer Battery, Inc. v.
United States, 190 F. Supp. 3d 1308
(2016), the court interpreted the
meaning of ‘‘substantial transformation’’
as used in the Trade Agreements Act of
1979 for purposes of government
procurement. Energizer involved the
determination of the country of origin of
a flashlight, referred to as the
Generation II flashlight, under the TAA.
Other than a white LED and a hydrogen
getter, all of the components of the
Generation II flashlight were of Chinese
origin. The components were imported
into the United States where they were
assembled into the finished Generation
II flashlight.
The court reviewed the ‘‘name,
character and use’’ test in determining
whether a substantial transformation
had occurred, and reviewed various
court decisions involving substantial
transformation determinations. The
court noted, citing Uniroyal, Inc. v.
United States, 3 CIT 220, 226, 542 F.
Supp. 1026, 1031, aff’d, 702 F.2d 1022
(Fed. Cir. 1983), that when ‘‘the postimportation processing consists of
assembly, courts have been reluctant to
find a change in character, particularly
when the imported articles do not
undergo a physical change.’’ Energizer
at 1318. In addition, the court noted that
‘‘when the end-use was pre-determined
at the time of importation, courts have
generally not found a change in use.’’
Energizer at 1319, citing as an example,
National Hand Tool Corp. v. United
States, 16 CIT 308, 310, aff’d 989 F.2d
1201 (Fed. Cir. 1993). Furthermore,
courts have considered the nature of the
assembly, i.e., whether it is a simple
assembly or more complex, such that
individual parts lose their separate
identities and become integral parts of
a new article.
In reaching its decision in Energizer,
the court expressed the question as one
of whether the imported components
retained their names after they were
assembled into the finished Generation
II flashlights. The court found ‘‘[t]he
constitutive components of the
Generation II flashlight do not lose their
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
18324
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 81 / Thursday, April 26, 2018 / Notices
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with NOTICES
individual names as a result [of] the
post-importation assembly.’’ The court
also found that the components had a
pre-determined end-use as parts and
components of a Generation II flashlight
at the time of importation and did not
undergo a change in use due to the postimportation assembly process. Finally,
the court did not find the assembly
process to be sufficiently complex as to
constitute a substantial transformation.
Thus, the court found that Energizer’s
imported components did not undergo a
change in name, character, or use as a
result of the post-importation assembly
of the components into a finished
Generation II flashlight. The court
determined that China, the source of all
but two components, was the correct
country of origin of the finished
Generation II flashlights under the
government procurement provisions of
the TAA.
The production process of the Axion
series LED video display cabinets is
similar to that of the Generation II
flashlight in Energizer. All but two
components are sourced from Taiwan.
The post-importation assembly process
involves manual assembly of
components that are dedicated for use
as components of the LED video display
cabinets. The individual components do
not lose their separate identities as a
result of the assembly process and do
not undergo a change in their predetermined uses. The assembly process,
while more time consuming than that in
Energizer, is not sufficiently complex as
to amount to a substantial
transformation of the imported
components. Considering the totality of
the information provided to CBP, and
relying upon the court’s application of
substantial transformation in Energizer,
we find that the country of origin of the
assembled Axion series LED video
display cabinets, produced as described
herein, is Taiwan.
HOLDING:
Based on the information provided,
and the analysis set forth above, the
imported components of the Axion
series LED video display cabinets are
not substantially transformed as a result
of their assembly in the United States.
Therefore, the country of origin of the
assembled Axion series LED video
display cabinets at issue, is Taiwan, the
country where all of the components of
the Axion series LED video display
cabinets, except two, are made.
Notice of this final determination will
be given in the Federal Register, as
required by 19 CFR 177.29. Any partyat-interest other than the party which
requested this final determination may
request, pursuant to 19 CFR 177.31, that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:58 Apr 25, 2018
Jkt 244001
CBP reexamine the matter anew and
issue a new final determination.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 177.30, any partyat-interest may, within 30 days after
publication of the Federal Register
notice referenced above, seek judicial
review of this final determination before
the Court of International Trade.
Sincerely,
Alice A. Kipel,
Executive Director Regulations and Rulings
Office of Trade.
[FR Doc. 2018–08811 Filed 4–25–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
[Docket ID: FEMA–2018–0014; OMB No.
1660–0073]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; National Urban
Search and Rescue Response System
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The Federal Emergency
Management Agency, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, invites the
general public to take this opportunity
to comment on an extension, without
change, of a currently approved
information collection. In accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, this notice seeks comments
concerning the Urban Search and
Rescue Response System information
collection.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be submitted on
or before June 25, 2018.
ADDRESSES: To avoid duplicate
submissions to the docket, please use
only one of the following means to
submit comments:
(1) Online. Submit comments at
www.regulations.gov under Docket ID
FEMA–2018–0014. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
(2) Mail. Submit written comments to
Docket Manager, Office of Chief
Counsel, DHS/FEMA, 500 C Street SW,
8NE, Washington, DC 20472–3100.
All submissions received must
include the agency name and Docket ID.
Regardless of the method used for
submitting comments or material, all
submissions will be posted, without
change, to the Federal eRulemaking
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov,
and will include any personal
information you provide. Therefore,
submitting this information makes it
public. You may wish to read the
Privacy Act notice that is available via
the link in the footer of
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Wanda Casey, Chief, Program
Management Section, US&R Branch,
FEMA, Response Directorate,
Operations Division, at (202) 646–4013.
You may contact the Information
Management Division for copies of the
proposed collection of information at
email address: FEMA-InformationCollections-Management@fema.dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
303 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act
(Stafford Act), 42 U.S.C. 5144,
authorizes the President of the United
States to form emergency support teams
of Federal personnel to be deployed to
an area affected by major disaster or
emergency. Section 403(a)(3)(B) of the
Stafford Act provides that the President
may authorize Federal Agencies to
perform work on public or private lands
essential to save lives and protect
property, including search and rescue
and emergency medical care, and other
essential needs. Section 327 of the
Stafford Act further authorizes the
National US&R Response System (‘‘the
System’’) and outlines the
Administrator’s authorization to
designate teams as well as outlines
specific protections for System
members.
The information collection activity
authorized under the OMB circular, 2
CFR part 200, ‘‘Uniform Administrative
Requirements, Cost Principles, and
Audit Requirements, for Federal
Awards.’’ The collection contains
information from the programmatic and
administrative activities of the US&R
Sponsoring Agencies relating to the
readiness and response cooperative
agreement awards.
Collection of Information
Title: National Urban Search and
Rescue Response System.
Type of Information Collection:
Extension, without change, of a
currently approved information
collection.
OMB Number: 1660–0073.
FEMA Forms: FEMA Form 089–0–10,
Urban Search Rescue Response System
Narrative Statement Workbook; FEMA
Form 089–0–11, Urban Search Rescue
Response System Semi-Annual
Performance Report; FEMA Form 089–
0–12, Urban Search Rescue Response
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 81 (Thursday, April 26, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18321-18324]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-08811]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Axion Series
Led Video Display Cabinets
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of final determination.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document provides notice that U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (``CBP'') has issued a final determination concerning the
country of origin of Axion series LED video display cabinets. Based
upon the facts presented, CBP has concluded in the final determination
that Taiwan is the country of origin of the Axion series LED video
display cabinets for purposes of U.S. Government procurement.
[[Page 18322]]
DATES: The final determination was issued on April 19, 2018. A copy of
the final determination is attached. Any party-at-interest, as defined
in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial review of this final
determination within May 29, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cynthia Reese, Valuation and Special
Programs Branch, Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade (202-325-
0046).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that on April 19,
2018, CBP issued a final determination concerning the country of origin
of Axion series LED video display cabinets which may be offered to the
United States Government under an undesignated government procurement
contract. This final determination, HQ H292849, was issued at the
request of Vanguard LED Displays, Inc., under procedures set forth at
19 CFR part 177, subpart B, which implements Title III of the Trade
Agreements Act of 1979, as amended (19 U.S.C. Sec. 2511-18). In the
final determination, CBP has concluded that, based upon the facts
presented, the assembly of imported components does not substantially
transform the components into a product of the United States, and
therefore, the assembled Axion series LED video display cabinets derive
their origin from the imported components, nearly all of which
originate in Taiwan. Therefore, Taiwan is the country of origin of the
Axion series LED video display cabinets for purposes of U.S. Government
procurement.
Section 177.29, CBP Regulations (19 CFR Sec. 177.29), provides
that notice of final determinations shall be published in the Federal
Register within 60 days of the date the final determination is issued.
Section 177.30, CBP Regulations (19 CFR 177.30), provides that any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial
review of a final determination within 30 days of publication of such
determination in the Federal Register.
Dated: April 19, 2018.
Alice A. Kipel,
Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade.
HQ H292849
April 19, 2018
OT:RR:CTF:VS H292849 CMR
CATEGORY: Origin
Frank S. Murray, Esq.
Foley & Lardner LLP
Washington Harbour
3000 K Street, NW
Suite 600
Washington, DC 20007
RE: U.S. Government Procurement; Title III, Trade Agreements Act of
1979 (19 U.S.C. 2511); subpart B, Part 177, CBP Regulations; Light
Emitting Diode video display cabinets
Dear Mr. Murray:
This is in response to your request of December 15, 2017, on behalf
of your client, Vanguard LED Displays, Inc. (hereinafter, Vanguard),
requesting a final determination concerning Light Emitting Diode (LED)
video display cabinets for purposes of government procurement under
Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (TAA), as amended (19
U.S.C. Sec. 2511 et seq.). Vanguard is a party-at-interest within the
meaning of 19 CFR Sec. 177.22(d)(1) and (d)(2), and is entitled to
request this final determination under 19 CFR Sec. 177.23(a) and (b).
FACTS:
Vanguard seeks a country of origin determination regarding its
Axion series LED video display cabinets, model numbers P1 through P2.5.
The video display cabinets are of a uniform size, 640 mm by 360 mm.
There are 11 different models offering different degrees of ``pixel
pitch.'' This request is limited to the first nine models in the
series, i.e., P1, P1.2, P1.3, P1.4, P1.5, P1.6, P1.8, P2, P2.5.
You explain that:
The Axion series LED video display cabinets receive electronic
signals and convert those signals into images that are displayed via
the LEDs on the face of the cabinet. They are used by customers to
display video images. The Axion series LED video cabinets can be used
on a stand-alone basis, but are more commonly attached to other
cabinets to create a much larger video screen, such as for the
presentation of video images to large audiences.
Vanguard manufactures, sells and distributes LED video display
cabinets for both indoor and outdoor use. With regard to the Axion
series LED video display cabinets at issue, Vanguard imports the
components of the video display cabinets and assembles the cabinets
from the imported components at their facility in Lakeland, Florida.
You indicate that the components of the Axion series LED video display
cabinets (some of which are imported with pre-packaged screws for use
in assembling the components to the display cabinet) are:
LED Modules--Manufactured in Taiwan. Each cabinet includes eight
LED modules. Each LED module is composed of two subcomponents--LEDs and
LED display drivers. These subcomponents are manufactured in Taiwan.
The quantity of LEDs and LED display drivers in each LED module depends
upon the desired pixel pitch of the video display.
Receiving Card--Manufactured in China.
Printed Circuit Board (PCB)--Manufactured in Taiwan.
Hub Card--Manufactured in Taiwan.
Power Supply--Manufactured in Taiwan.
Cabinet--Manufactured in China.
You indicate that the LED modules are specifically designed to be
used in a particular LED video display, based upon the desired pixel
pitch and the size of the cabinet, as ordered by a customer. The PCB is
custom-made to meet the criteria specifically requested. While a
particular PCB board could theoretically be used in another LED video
display, it could not be used in other types of LED goods. The hub card
is designed to specifically handle the particular receiving card
designed to be used in the specific LED video display as ordered by the
customer. In theory, it could be used in a different LED video display,
but it could not be used in other types of LED goods. Similarly, the
receiving card, power supply, and cabinet can be used in other LED
video displays, but cannot be used in other types of LED goods.
You state that the LEDs constitute the majority of the component
costs of the video display cabinets. You describe the function of the
LEDs as ``a type of semi-conductor that conveys electronic signals into
infrared-rays or light.'' The LED display driver is described as ``an
integrated circuit that provides the circuitry necessary to interface
most common microprocessors or digital systems to an LED display. [It]
is an electrical device that regulates the power to an LED or a string
(or strings) of LEDs.'' The receiving card ``reads the program commands
from the sending card or the computer transmitting the signals
regulating the brightness/chromaticity of the LEDs.'' The PCB
``mechanically and electrically connects electronic components.''
Vanguard receives the PCB with the hub card integrated onto the PCB.
The hub card ``sends power to the LED modules, as well as instructions/
information from the receiving card. The LED modules and the receiving
card are attached to the PCB by Vanguard. The power supply component
receives electrical power from an external source and provides power to
the electrical components of the LED video cabinet. Finally, the
cabinet, a die-cast aluminum cabinet, provides the structure into which
the other
[[Page 18323]]
components are installed to create a video display cabinet.
You describe the assembly process in the United States as follows:
1. Attaching and affixing (via screws) the power cable to the
cabinet frame.
2. Affixing the power supply to its mount via screws and connecting
the power cable to the power supply's adapter.
3. Placing the integrated PCB/hub card assembly on top of the
previously attached components, centered in the cabinet, and affixing
the PCB/hub card assembly (via screws) to the power supply.
4. Affixing the integrated PCB/hub assembly (via screws) to the
cabinet.
5. Affixing the receiving card to the integrated PCB/hub card
assembly via a notch in the hub card. (The hub card . . . has a notch
into which the receiving card is to be installed.)
6. Installing each of the eight magnetized LED modules into the
cabinet by attaching them to their respective data/power slots in the
integrated PCB/hub card assembly.
After the video display cabinets are assembled, Vanguard tests them
to ensure they function properly. Then, the video display cabinets are
packaged for shipment to customers. You indicate that the processing in
the United States, including the assembly, testing, and packaging
generally requires no more than a day to complete, with the testing and
packaging taking more time than the assembly.
You submit that the manufacturing processes which occur in Taiwan
to create the Taiwanese components of the video display cabinet are
more complex than the assembly process which occurs in the United
States or the manufacturing processes which occur in China to create
the two components of Chinese origin utilized in the assembly of the
finished video display cabinets. In addition, you indicate that the
collective value of the Taiwanese-manufactured components is
overwhelmingly the majority of the component costs of the completed
video display cabinets. Thus, you submit that the country of origin of
the finished video display cabinets is Taiwan.
ISSUE:
What is the country of origin of the Axion series LED video display
cabinets described herein for U.S. government procurement purposes?
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) issues country of origin
advisory rulings and final determinations as to whether an article is
or would be a product of a designated country or instrumentality for
the purpose of granting waivers of certain ``Buy American''
restrictions in U.S. law or practice for products offered for sale to
the U.S. Government, pursuant to subpart B of Part 177, 19 CFR 177.21
et seq., which implements Title III, Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 2511-2518).
The rule of origin set forth in 19 U.S.C. 2518(4)(B) states:
An article is a product of a country or instrumentality only if (i)
it is wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of that country or
instrumentality, or (ii) in the case of an article which consists in
whole or in part of materials from another country or instrumentality,
it has been substantially transformed into a new and different article
of commerce with a name, character, or use distinct from that of the
article or articles from which it was so transformed.
See also 19 CFR 177.22(a).
In rendering advisory rulings and final determinations for purposes
of U.S. Government procurement, CBP applies the provisions of subpart B
of Part 177 consistent with the Federal Procurement Regulations. See 19
CFR 177.21. In this regard, CBP recognizes that the Federal Acquisition
Regulations restrict the U.S. Government's purchase of products to
U.S.-made or designated country end products for acquisitions subject
to the TAA. See 48 CFR 25.403(c)(1). The Federal Acquisition
Regulations define ``U.S.-made end product'' as:
. . . an article that is mined, produced, or manufactured in the
United States or that is substantially transformed in the United States
into a new and different article of commerce with a name, character, or
use distinct from that of the article or articles from which it was
transformed.
The regulations define a ``designated country end product'' as:
WTO GPA [World Trade Organization Government Procurement Agreement]
country end product, an FTA [Free Trade Agreement] country end product,
a least developed country end product, or a Caribbean Basin country end
product.
A ``WTO GPA country end product'' is defined as an article that:
(1) Is wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of a WTO GPA
country; or
(2) In the case of an article that consists in whole or in part of
materials from another country, has been substantially transformed in a
WTO GPA country into a new and different article of commerce with a
name, character, or use distinct from that of the article or articles
from which it was transformed. The term refers to a product offered for
purchase under a supply contract, but for purposes of calculating the
value of the end product includes services (except transportation
services) incidental to the article, provided that the value of those
incidental services does not exceed that of the article itself.
See 48 CFR 25.003.
Taiwan is a WTO GPA country; China is not.
In the Court of International Trade's decision in Energizer
Battery, Inc. v. United States, 190 F. Supp. 3d 1308 (2016), the court
interpreted the meaning of ``substantial transformation'' as used in
the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 for purposes of government
procurement. Energizer involved the determination of the country of
origin of a flashlight, referred to as the Generation II flashlight,
under the TAA. Other than a white LED and a hydrogen getter, all of the
components of the Generation II flashlight were of Chinese origin. The
components were imported into the United States where they were
assembled into the finished Generation II flashlight.
The court reviewed the ``name, character and use'' test in
determining whether a substantial transformation had occurred, and
reviewed various court decisions involving substantial transformation
determinations. The court noted, citing Uniroyal, Inc. v. United
States, 3 CIT 220, 226, 542 F. Supp. 1026, 1031, aff'd, 702 F.2d 1022
(Fed. Cir. 1983), that when ``the post-importation processing consists
of assembly, courts have been reluctant to find a change in character,
particularly when the imported articles do not undergo a physical
change.'' Energizer at 1318. In addition, the court noted that ``when
the end-use was pre-determined at the time of importation, courts have
generally not found a change in use.'' Energizer at 1319, citing as an
example, National Hand Tool Corp. v. United States, 16 CIT 308, 310,
aff'd 989 F.2d 1201 (Fed. Cir. 1993). Furthermore, courts have
considered the nature of the assembly, i.e., whether it is a simple
assembly or more complex, such that individual parts lose their
separate identities and become integral parts of a new article.
In reaching its decision in Energizer, the court expressed the
question as one of whether the imported components retained their names
after they were assembled into the finished Generation II flashlights.
The court found ``[t]he constitutive components of the Generation II
flashlight do not lose their
[[Page 18324]]
individual names as a result [of] the post-importation assembly.'' The
court also found that the components had a pre-determined end-use as
parts and components of a Generation II flashlight at the time of
importation and did not undergo a change in use due to the post-
importation assembly process. Finally, the court did not find the
assembly process to be sufficiently complex as to constitute a
substantial transformation. Thus, the court found that Energizer's
imported components did not undergo a change in name, character, or use
as a result of the post-importation assembly of the components into a
finished Generation II flashlight. The court determined that China, the
source of all but two components, was the correct country of origin of
the finished Generation II flashlights under the government procurement
provisions of the TAA.
The production process of the Axion series LED video display
cabinets is similar to that of the Generation II flashlight in
Energizer. All but two components are sourced from Taiwan. The post-
importation assembly process involves manual assembly of components
that are dedicated for use as components of the LED video display
cabinets. The individual components do not lose their separate
identities as a result of the assembly process and do not undergo a
change in their pre-determined uses. The assembly process, while more
time consuming than that in Energizer, is not sufficiently complex as
to amount to a substantial transformation of the imported components.
Considering the totality of the information provided to CBP, and
relying upon the court's application of substantial transformation in
Energizer, we find that the country of origin of the assembled Axion
series LED video display cabinets, produced as described herein, is
Taiwan.
HOLDING:
Based on the information provided, and the analysis set forth
above, the imported components of the Axion series LED video display
cabinets are not substantially transformed as a result of their
assembly in the United States. Therefore, the country of origin of the
assembled Axion series LED video display cabinets at issue, is Taiwan,
the country where all of the components of the Axion series LED video
display cabinets, except two, are made.
Notice of this final determination will be given in the Federal
Register, as required by 19 CFR 177.29. Any party-at-interest other
than the party which requested this final determination may request,
pursuant to 19 CFR 177.31, that CBP reexamine the matter anew and issue
a new final determination. Pursuant to 19 CFR 177.30, any party-at-
interest may, within 30 days after publication of the Federal Register
notice referenced above, seek judicial review of this final
determination before the Court of International Trade.
Sincerely,
Alice A. Kipel,
Executive Director Regulations and Rulings Office of Trade.
[FR Doc. 2018-08811 Filed 4-25-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P