Special Conditions: Textron Aviation Inc. Model 700 Airplane; Occupant Protection for Side-Facing Seats Installed Forward of Aft-Facing Seats, 17744-17746 [2018-08556]
Download as PDF
17744
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 79 / Tuesday, April 24, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
(iii) The FDIC has notified you, in
connection with its review of a capital
restoration plan required under section
38 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act
or subpart H of part 324 of this chapter
or otherwise, that a notice is required
under §§ 390.360 through 390.368; or
*
*
*
*
*
§§ 390.450 through 390.455
Reserved]
[Removed and
56. Remove and reserve §§ 390.450
through 390.455.
■
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) Pursuant to § 324.403(d) of this
chapter, the FDIC may reclassify a well
capitalized State savings association as
adequately capitalized or subject an
adequately capitalized or
undercapitalized institution to the
supervisory actions applicable to the
next lower capital category if:
(1) The FDIC determines that the State
savings association is in unsafe or
unsound condition; or
(2) The FDIC deems the State savings
association to be engaged in an unsafe
or unsound practice and not to have
corrected the deficiency.
*
*
*
*
*
(ii) Prior notice to institution. Prior to
taking action pursuant to § 324.403(d) of
this chapter, the FDIC shall issue and
serve on the State savings association a
written notice of the FDIC’s intention to
reclassify the State savings association.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart Z—[Removed and Reserved]
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with RULES
[FR Doc. 2018–06881 Filed 4–23–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:18 Apr 23, 2018
Jkt 244001
[Docket No. FAA–2017–0637; Special
Conditions No. 25–724–SC]
Special Conditions: Textron Aviation
Inc. Model 700 Airplane; Occupant
Protection for Side-Facing Seats
Installed Forward of Aft-Facing Seats
These special conditions are
issued for the Textron Aviation Inc.
(Textron) Model 700 airplane. This
airplane will have a novel or unusual
design feature when compared to the
state of technology envisioned in the
airworthiness standards for transportcategory airplanes. This design feature
is side-facing seats installed forward of
aft-facing seats. The applicable
airworthiness regulations do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for this design feature. These special
conditions contain the additional safety
standards that the Administrator
considers necessary to establish a level
of safety equivalent to that established
by the existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: This action is effective on
Textron on April 24, 2018. Send your
comments by June 8, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by docket number FAA–2017–0637
using any of the following methods:
• Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington,
DC, 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at 202–493–2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all
comments it receives, without change,
to https://www.regulations.gov/,
including any personal information the
commenter provides. Using the search
function of the docket website, anyone
can find and read the electronic form of
all comments received into any FAA
SUMMARY:
§ 390.457 Procedures for reclassifying a
State savings association based on criteria
other than capital.
Dated at Washington, DC, on March 20,
2018.
By order of the Board of Directors.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Valerie Best,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
14 CFR Part 25
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request
for comments.
57. Section 390.457 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a)(1)(i)(A) and
(a)(1)(ii) to read as follows:
58. Remove and reserve subpart Z.
Federal Aviation Administration
AGENCY:
■
■
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or
signing the comment for an association,
business, labor union, etc.). DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement can be
found in the Federal Register published
on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–19478).
Docket: Background documents or
comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov/ at any time.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to Docket
Operations in Room W12–140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alan Sinclair, FAA, Airframe and Cabin
Safety Section, AIR–675, Transport
Standards Branch, Policy and
Innovation Division, Aircraft
Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW, Renton, Washington 98057–3356;
telephone 425–227–2195; facsimile
425–227–1320.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
substance of these special conditions
has been published in the Federal
Register for public comment in several
prior instances with no substantive
comments received. The FAA therefore
finds it unnecessary to delay the
effective date and finds that good cause
exists for making these special
conditions effective upon publication in
the Federal Register.
Comments Invited
We invite interested people to take
part in this rulemaking by sending
written comments, data, or views. The
most helpful comments reference a
specific portion of the special
conditions, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data.
We will consider all comments we
receive by the closing date for
comments. We may change these special
conditions based on the comments we
receive.
Background
On November 20, 2014, Textron
applied for a type certificate for their
new Model 700 airplane. The Model 700
airplane is a turbofan-powered
executive-jet airplane with seating for
two crewmembers and 12 passengers.
This airplane will have a maximum
takeoff weight of 38,514 pounds.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of title 14, Code
of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 21.17,
Textron must show that the Model 700
airplane meets the applicable provisions
of 14 CFR part 25, as amended by
E:\FR\FM\24APR1.SGM
24APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 79 / Tuesday, April 24, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
would also apply to the other model
under § 21.101.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Model 700 airplane must
comply with the fuel-vent and exhaustemission requirements of 14 CFR part
34, and the noise-certification
requirements of 14 CFR part 36.
The FAA issues special conditions, as
defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in accordance
with § 11.38, and they become part of
the type certification basis under
§ 21.17(a)(2).
Dynamic seat testing is required of all
applicants who plan to install sidefacing and oblique-angled seats in
passenger airplanes. The intent of
dynamic seat testing is to evaluate
airplane seats, restraints, and related
interior systems to demonstrate their
structural strength and their ability to
protect an occupant from serious
injuries in a survivable crash. The
current regulations in §§ 25.561, 25.562,
and 25.785 address occupant injury
protection for forward and aft-facing
seats.
The FAA will issue special conditions
separately to address the additional
occupant-injury protection concerns
raised for side-facing seats. However,
the aft occupant of the side-facing seat
(see Figure 1 in these special
conditions) may interact with the aftfacing seat, a scenario that the
regulations do not specifically address.
The aft-facing seat back could deform
during the dynamic-test event, and
could contact the occupant in the aft
side-facing seat. The point that the seat
back contacts the occupant could be in
an area of the body that has no defined,
acceptable, injury-evaluation method,
such as the shoulder. This type of
contact is addressed in these sidefacing-seat special conditions, which
prohibit body-to-body contact.
The applicant proposed installing a
structural armrest between the sidefacing seat and the aft-facing seat to help
prevent contact between the aft-facing
seat and the aft occupant of the sidefacing seat. This contact would be likely
to occur if the structural armrest failed
to perform as intended in an emergency
landing. Therefore, the purpose of these
special conditions is to define the
specific structural requirements of the
proposed structural armrest, and the
additional requirements necessary to
protect the seated occupant from both
the side-facing seat and the adjacent aftfacing seat.
The applicant is likely to have to
conduct two or more 16g forward
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:18 Apr 23, 2018
Jkt 244001
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Textron Model 700 will
incorporate the following novel or
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
unusual design feature: Side-facing seats
installed forward of aft-facing seats.
Discussion
Many of the Textron Model 700
interior configurations include a
multiple-place side-facing seat installed
just forward of an aft-facing seat. There
is the possibility of interaction between
the aft-facing seat and the occupant in
the aft-most seating position on the
multiple-place side-facing seat. Textron
is proposing to install a structural
armrest aft of the multiple-place sidefacing seat and forward of the aft-facing
seat. See Figure 1.
structural tests with the combination of
the side-facing seat, structural armrest,
and aft-facing seat to account for all
critical cases.
These special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to
that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special
conditions are applicable to the Textron
Model 700 airplane. Should Textron
apply at a later date for a change to the
type certificate to include another
model incorporating the same novel or
unusual design feature, these special
conditions would apply to that model as
well.
Conclusion
This action affects only a certain
novel or unusual design feature on one
E:\FR\FM\24APR1.SGM
24APR1
ER24AP18.000
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with RULES
Amendments 25–1 through 25–139, 25–
141, and 25–143.
If the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness regulations
(i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for the Textron Model 700 airplane
because of a novel or unusual design
feature, special conditions are
prescribed under the provisions of
§ 21.16.
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the type certificate
for that model be amended later to
include any other model that
incorporates the same novel or unusual
design feature, these special conditions
17745
17746
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 79 / Tuesday, April 24, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
model of airplane. It is not a rule of
general applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701,
44702, 44704.
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with RULES
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special
conditions are issued as part of the type
certification basis for Textron Model
700 airplanes with a structural armrest
installed between a side-facing seat,
located forward of aft-facing seats, and
the aft-facing seats.
1. The applicant must propose a
certification strategy for the structural
armrest. This strategy must address the
structural integrity of the structural
armrest and occupant protection after a
survivable crash. The strategy must
define how the applicant will ensure
that the installation, when permanently
deformed due to the application of
static, dynamic, and interaction (with
aft-facing seat) loads, and while
complying with the applicable §§ 25.561
and 25.562 requirements, meets the
following conditions:
a. The proposed structural armrest
must not contact the occupant in the aftmost seating position of the side-facing
seat, such that the armrest imparts any
load, other than incidental and noninjurious contact, with the seat
occupant.
b. The backrest of the aft-facing seat
must not touch the occupant in the aftmost seating position of the side-facing
seat.
c. The proposed structural armrest
must not impose loads to the side-facing
seat structure, and;
d. The seat back of the aft-facing seat
must not, as a result of contact with the
structural armrest, result in damage or
permanent deformation of the seat back
that could be injurious to the occupant
of the aft-facing seat.
2. In addition, the applicant must:
a. Test, to the emergency-landing
conditions listed in § 25.562, the
structural armrest and the aft-facing seat
together, as a system, with pitch and roll
of the seat track to ensure that the
armrest continues to protect the
occupant of the side-facing seat.
b. Conduct 16g forward structural
tests with the combination of the sidefacing seat, structural armrest, and the
aft-facing seat, accounting for all critical
cases. For these tests, the applicant
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:18 Apr 23, 2018
Jkt 244001
should account for all structural
requirements and post-test conditions.
Anthropomorphic test dummies are
required as part of § 25.562 structural
testing.
c. Apply to the seat track the worstcase floor deformation that:
i. Produces the maximum load into
the structural armrest for armrests that
are integrally a part of any seat
structure. This maximum load includes
the load caused by the floor deformation
and the load from the aft-facing seat
back.
ii. Allows the aft-facing seat back the
most forward dynamic deformation in
the area of the side-facing seat’s aft
occupant. No contact between the aftfacing seat and the side-facing seat aft
occupant is acceptable.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 17,
2018.
Paul Siegmund,
Acting Manager, Transport Standards
Branch, Policy and Innovation Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–08556 Filed 4–23–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2018–0314; Product
Identifier 2018–NE–11–AD; Amendment 39–
19255; AD 2018–08–02]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce
plc Turbofan Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
Examining the AD Docket
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Rolls-Royce plc (RR) Trent 1000–A2,
Trent 1000–AE2, Trent 1000–C2, Trent
1000–CE2, Trent 1000–D2, Trent 1000–
E2, Trent 1000–G2, Trent 1000–H2,
Trent 1000–J2, Trent 1000–K2, and
Trent 1000–L2 turbofan engines. This
AD requires initial and repetitive
inspections of the intermediate-pressure
compressor (IPC) stage 1 rotor blades,
IPC stage 2 rotor blades, and IPC shaft
stage 2 dovetail posts, and removing any
cracked parts from service. This AD was
prompted by IPC blade separations
resulting in engine failures. We are
issuing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective April 24,
2018.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in this AD
as of April 24, 2018.
We must receive comments on this
AD by June 8, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this final rule, contact Rolls-Royce plc,
Corporate Communications, P.O. Box
31, Derby, England, DE24 8BJ; phone:
011–44–1332–242424; fax: 011–44–
1332–249936; email: corporate.care@
rolls-royce.com. Internet: https://
customers.rolls-royce.com/public/
rollsroycecare. You may view this
service information at the FAA, Engine
& Propeller Standards Branch, 1200
District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 781–238–
7759. It is also available on the internet
at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2018–0314.
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–
0314; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this final rule,
the mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI), the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
Docket Operations (phone: 800–647–
5527) is listed above. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kevin M. Clark, Aerospace Engineer,
ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District
Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone:
781–238–7088; fax: 781–238–7199;
email: kevin.m.clark@faa.gov.
E:\FR\FM\24APR1.SGM
24APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 24, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 17744-17746]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-08556]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA-2017-0637; Special Conditions No. 25-724-SC]
Special Conditions: Textron Aviation Inc. Model 700 Airplane;
Occupant Protection for Side-Facing Seats Installed Forward of Aft-
Facing Seats
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued for the Textron Aviation
Inc. (Textron) Model 700 airplane. This airplane will have a novel or
unusual design feature when compared to the state of technology
envisioned in the airworthiness standards for transport-category
airplanes. This design feature is side-facing seats installed forward
of aft-facing seats. The applicable airworthiness regulations do not
contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for this design
feature. These special conditions contain the additional safety
standards that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a
level of safety equivalent to that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
DATES: This action is effective on Textron on April 24, 2018. Send your
comments by June 8, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2017-0637
using any of the following methods:
Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30, U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC, 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at 202-493-2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all comments it receives, without
change, to https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal
information the commenter provides. Using the search function of the
docket website, anyone can find and read the electronic form of all
comments received into any FAA docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or signing the comment for an
association, business, labor union, etc.). DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement can be found in the Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477-19478).
Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov/ at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to Docket Operations in Room W12-140 of
the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Sinclair, FAA, Airframe and Cabin
Safety Section, AIR-675, Transport Standards Branch, Policy and
Innovation Division, Aircraft Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW, Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone 425-227-2195; facsimile
425-227-1320.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The substance of these special conditions
has been published in the Federal Register for public comment in
several prior instances with no substantive comments received. The FAA
therefore finds it unnecessary to delay the effective date and finds
that good cause exists for making these special conditions effective
upon publication in the Federal Register.
Comments Invited
We invite interested people to take part in this rulemaking by
sending written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the special conditions, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data.
We will consider all comments we receive by the closing date for
comments. We may change these special conditions based on the comments
we receive.
Background
On November 20, 2014, Textron applied for a type certificate for
their new Model 700 airplane. The Model 700 airplane is a turbofan-
powered executive-jet airplane with seating for two crewmembers and 12
passengers. This airplane will have a maximum takeoff weight of 38,514
pounds.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14
CFR) 21.17, Textron must show that the Model 700 airplane meets the
applicable provisions of 14 CFR part 25, as amended by
[[Page 17745]]
Amendments 25-1 through 25-139, 25-141, and 25-143.
If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the Textron Model 700 airplane because
of a novel or unusual design feature, special conditions are prescribed
under the provisions of Sec. 21.16.
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended
later to include any other model that incorporates the same novel or
unusual design feature, these special conditions would also apply to
the other model under Sec. 21.101.
In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Model 700 airplane must comply with the fuel-vent and
exhaust-emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34, and the noise-
certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36.
The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in
accordance with Sec. 11.38, and they become part of the type
certification basis under Sec. 21.17(a)(2).
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Textron Model 700 will incorporate the following novel or
unusual design feature: Side-facing seats installed forward of aft-
facing seats.
Discussion
Many of the Textron Model 700 interior configurations include a
multiple-place side-facing seat installed just forward of an aft-facing
seat. There is the possibility of interaction between the aft-facing
seat and the occupant in the aft-most seating position on the multiple-
place side-facing seat. Textron is proposing to install a structural
armrest aft of the multiple-place side-facing seat and forward of the
aft-facing seat. See Figure 1.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR24AP18.000
Dynamic seat testing is required of all applicants who plan to
install side-facing and oblique-angled seats in passenger airplanes.
The intent of dynamic seat testing is to evaluate airplane seats,
restraints, and related interior systems to demonstrate their
structural strength and their ability to protect an occupant from
serious injuries in a survivable crash. The current regulations in
Sec. Sec. 25.561, 25.562, and 25.785 address occupant injury
protection for forward and aft-facing seats.
The FAA will issue special conditions separately to address the
additional occupant-injury protection concerns raised for side-facing
seats. However, the aft occupant of the side-facing seat (see Figure 1
in these special conditions) may interact with the aft-facing seat, a
scenario that the regulations do not specifically address.
The aft-facing seat back could deform during the dynamic-test
event, and could contact the occupant in the aft side-facing seat. The
point that the seat back contacts the occupant could be in an area of
the body that has no defined, acceptable, injury-evaluation method,
such as the shoulder. This type of contact is addressed in these side-
facing-seat special conditions, which prohibit body-to-body contact.
The applicant proposed installing a structural armrest between the
side-facing seat and the aft-facing seat to help prevent contact
between the aft-facing seat and the aft occupant of the side-facing
seat. This contact would be likely to occur if the structural armrest
failed to perform as intended in an emergency landing. Therefore, the
purpose of these special conditions is to define the specific
structural requirements of the proposed structural armrest, and the
additional requirements necessary to protect the seated occupant from
both the side-facing seat and the adjacent aft-facing seat.
The applicant is likely to have to conduct two or more 16g forward
structural tests with the combination of the side-facing seat,
structural armrest, and aft-facing seat to account for all critical
cases.
These special conditions contain the additional safety standards
that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of
safety equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness
standards.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the
Textron Model 700 airplane. Should Textron apply at a later date for a
change to the type certificate to include another model incorporating
the same novel or unusual design feature, these special conditions
would apply to that model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only a certain novel or unusual design feature
on one
[[Page 17746]]
model of airplane. It is not a rule of general applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of
the type certification basis for Textron Model 700 airplanes with a
structural armrest installed between a side-facing seat, located
forward of aft-facing seats, and the aft-facing seats.
1. The applicant must propose a certification strategy for the
structural armrest. This strategy must address the structural integrity
of the structural armrest and occupant protection after a survivable
crash. The strategy must define how the applicant will ensure that the
installation, when permanently deformed due to the application of
static, dynamic, and interaction (with aft-facing seat) loads, and
while complying with the applicable Sec. Sec. 25.561 and 25.562
requirements, meets the following conditions:
a. The proposed structural armrest must not contact the occupant in
the aft-most seating position of the side-facing seat, such that the
armrest imparts any load, other than incidental and non-injurious
contact, with the seat occupant.
b. The backrest of the aft-facing seat must not touch the occupant
in the aft-most seating position of the side-facing seat.
c. The proposed structural armrest must not impose loads to the
side-facing seat structure, and;
d. The seat back of the aft-facing seat must not, as a result of
contact with the structural armrest, result in damage or permanent
deformation of the seat back that could be injurious to the occupant of
the aft-facing seat.
2. In addition, the applicant must:
a. Test, to the emergency-landing conditions listed in Sec.
25.562, the structural armrest and the aft-facing seat together, as a
system, with pitch and roll of the seat track to ensure that the
armrest continues to protect the occupant of the side-facing seat.
b. Conduct 16g forward structural tests with the combination of the
side-facing seat, structural armrest, and the aft-facing seat,
accounting for all critical cases. For these tests, the applicant
should account for all structural requirements and post-test
conditions. Anthropomorphic test dummies are required as part of Sec.
25.562 structural testing.
c. Apply to the seat track the worst-case floor deformation that:
i. Produces the maximum load into the structural armrest for
armrests that are integrally a part of any seat structure. This maximum
load includes the load caused by the floor deformation and the load
from the aft-facing seat back.
ii. Allows the aft-facing seat back the most forward dynamic
deformation in the area of the side-facing seat's aft occupant. No
contact between the aft-facing seat and the side-facing seat aft
occupant is acceptable.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 17, 2018.
Paul Siegmund,
Acting Manager, Transport Standards Branch, Policy and Innovation
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-08556 Filed 4-23-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P