Bacillus Licheniformis, 17496-17498 [2018-08309]
Download as PDF
17496
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 77 / Friday, April 20, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01 and Commandant
Instruction M16475.1D, which guide the
Coast Guard in complying with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety
zone lasting two hours that would
prohibit vessel movement within the
Inner Harbor at Baltimore, MD. It is
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L60(a) of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 01. A
Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T05–0029 to read as
follows:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
■
§ 165.T05–0029 Safety Zone for Fireworks
Display; Patapsco River, Inner Harbor,
Baltimore, MD.
(a) Definitions. As used in this
section:
(1) Captain of the Port MarylandNational Capital Region means the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Apr 19, 2018
Jkt 244001
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Maryland-National Capital Region.
(2) Designated representative means
any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer who has been
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Maryland-National Capital Region to
assist in enforcement of the safety zone
described in paragraph (b) of this
section.
(b) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All navigable waters of the
Patapsco River, Inner Harbor, from
shoreline to shoreline, within an area
bounded on the east by longitude
076°36′12″ W, and bounded on the west
by the Inner Harbor west bulkhead,
located at Baltimore, MD. All
coordinates refer to datum NAD 1983.
(c) Regulations. The general safety
zone regulations found in 33 CFR part
165, subpart C apply to the safety zone
created by this section.
(1) All persons are required to comply
with the general regulations governing
safety zones found in 33 CFR 165.23.
(2) Entry into or remaining in this
safety zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Coast Guard Captain
of the Port Maryland-National Capital
Region. All vessels underway within
this safety zone at the time it is
implemented are to depart the zone.
(3) Persons desiring to transit the area
of the safety zone shall obtain
authorization from the Captain of the
Port Maryland-National Capital Region
or designated representative. To request
permission to transit the area, the
Captain of the Port Maryland-National
Capital Region and or designated
representatives can be contacted at
telephone number 410–576–2693 or on
marine band radio VHF–FM channel 16
(156.8 MHz). The Coast Guard vessels
enforcing this section can be contacted
on marine band radio VHF–FM channel
16 (156.8 MHz). Upon being hailed by
a U.S. Coast Guard vessel, or other
Federal, State, or local agency vessel, by
siren, radio, flashing light, or other
means, the operator of a vessel shall
proceed as directed. If permission is
granted to enter the safety zone, all
persons and vessels shall comply with
the instructions of the Captain of the
Port Maryland-National Capital Region
or designated representative and
proceed as directed while within the
zone.
(4) Enforcement officials. The U.S.
Coast Guard may be assisted in the
patrol and enforcement of the zone by
Federal, State, and local agencies.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 11 p.m. on April
21, 2018, until 1 a.m. on April 22, 2018,
or if necessary, due to inclement
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
weather, from 11 p.m. on April 22,
2018, until 1 a.m. on April 23, 2018.
Dated: April 16, 2018.
Lonnie P. Harrison, Jr.,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Maryland-National Capital Region.
[FR Doc. 2018–08283 Filed 4–19–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2017–0185; FRL–9971–54]
Bacillus Licheniformis Strain
FMCH001; Exemption From the
Requirement of a Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation establishes an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of Bacillus
licheniformis strain FMCH001 in or on
all food commodities when used in
accordance with label directions and
good agricultural practices. FMC
Corporation submitted a petition to EPA
under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting the
exemption from a requirement of a
tolerance. This regulation eliminates the
need to establish a maximum
permissible level for residues of Bacillus
licheniformis strain FMCH001 under
FFDCA.
DATES: This regulation is effective April
20, 2018. Objections and requests for
hearings must be received on or before
June 19, 2018, and must be filed in
accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2017–0185, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20APR1.SGM
20APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 77 / Friday, April 20, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert McNally, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (7511P),
Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001; main telephone number:
(703) 305–7090; email address:
BPPDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of 40 CFR part 180
through the Government Printing
Office’s e-CFR site at https://
www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=
ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_
02.tpl.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
C. How can I file an objection or hearing
request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2017–0185 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing
must be in writing, and must be
received by the Hearing Clerk on or
before June 19, 2018. Addresses for mail
and hand delivery of objections and
hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR
178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing (excluding
any Confidential Business Information
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Apr 19, 2018
Jkt 244001
(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
objection or hearing request, identified
by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2017–0185, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be CBI or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting
or visiting the docket, along with more
information about dockets generally, is
available at https://www.epa.gov/
dockets.
II. Background
In the Federal Register of July 26,
2017 (82 FR 34664) (FRL–9963–50),
EPA issued a document pursuant to
FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C.
346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a
pesticide tolerance petition (PP 6F8514)
by FMC Corporation, FMC Tower at Cira
Centre South, 2929 Walnut St.,
Philadelphia, PA 19104. The petition
requested that 40 CFR part 180 be
amended by establishing an exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance for
residues of Bacillus licheniformis strain
FMCH001 in or on all food
commodities. That document referenced
a summary of the petition prepared by
the petitioner FMC Corporation, which
is available in the docket via https://
www.regulations.gov. No comments
were received on the notice of filing.
EPA added ‘‘in or on all food
commodities’’ to align with the
Agency’s language and to more clearly
define the petitioner’s request.
III. Final Rule
A. EPA’s Safety Determination
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA
allows EPA to establish an exemption
from the requirement for a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the exemption is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
17497
result from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ This includes
exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings but does not include
occupational exposure. Pursuant to
FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), in
establishing or maintaining in effect an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance, EPA must take into account
the factors set forth in FFDCA section
408(b)(2)(C), which require EPA to give
special consideration to exposure of
infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a
tolerance or tolerance exemption and to
‘‘ensure that there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result to
infants and children from aggregate
exposure to the pesticide chemical
residue. . . .’’ Additionally, FFDCA
section 408(b)(2)(D) requires that EPA
consider ‘‘available information
concerning the cumulative effects of [a
particular pesticide’s] . . . residues
and other substances that have a
common mechanism of toxicity.’’
EPA evaluated the available toxicity
and exposure data on Bacillus
licheniformis strain FMCH001 and
considered its validity, completeness,
and reliability, as well as the
relationship of this information to
human risk. A full explanation of the
data upon which EPA relied and its risk
assessment based on that data can be
found within the document entitled
‘‘Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA) Considerations for Bacillus
licheniformis strain FMCH001.’’ This
document, as well as other relevant
information, is available in the docket
for this action as described under
ADDRESSES.
Based upon its evaluation, EPA
concludes that Bacillus licheniformis
strain FMCH001 is not toxic, not
pathogenic, and not infective. Although
there may be some exposure to residues
when used on all food commodities in
accordance with label directions and
good agricultural practices, there is a
reasonable certainty that such exposure
will not cause adverse effects. EPA also
determined that retention of the Food
Quality Protection Act (FQPA) safety
factor was not necessary as part of the
qualitative assessment conducted for
Bacillus licheniformis strain FMCH001.
Based upon its evaluation, EPA
concludes that there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result to the
U.S. population, including infants and
children, from aggregate exposure to
residues of Bacillus licheniformis strain
FMCH001. Therefore, an exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance is
E:\FR\FM\20APR1.SGM
20APR1
17498
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 77 / Friday, April 20, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
established for residues of Bacillus
licheniformis strain FMCH001 in or on
all food commodities when used in
accordance with label directions and
good agricultural practices.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
B. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
EPA is establishing an exemption
from a tolerance on all food
commodities without any numerical
limitation and thus an analytical
method is not required for enforcement
purposes.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This action establishes exemptions
from the requirement of a tolerance
under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to EPA.
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has exempted these types of
actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this action
has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this action is
not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001), or Executive
Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997). This action does not
contain any information collections
subject to OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) nor does it require
any special considerations under
Executive Order 12898, entitled
‘‘Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
the tolerance exemptions in this action,
do not require the issuance of a
proposed rule, the requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers,
food processors, food handlers, and food
retailers, not States or tribes. As a result,
this action does not alter the
relationships or distribution of power
and responsibilities established by
Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such,
EPA has determined that this action will
not have a substantial direct effect on
States or tribal governments, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States or tribal
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Apr 19, 2018
Jkt 244001
governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
tribes. Thus, EPA has determined that
Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999), and Executive Order 13175,
entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000), do not apply
to this action. In addition, this action
does not impose any enforceable duty or
contain any unfunded mandate as
described under Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C.
1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
EPA’s consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
V. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: March 16, 2018.
Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. Add § 180.1350 to subpart D to read
as follows:
■
§ 180.1350 Bacillus licheniformis strain
FMCH001; exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance.
An exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance is established for residues
of Bacillus licheniformis strain
FMCH001 in or on all food commodities
when used in accordance with label
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
directions and good agricultural
practices.
[FR Doc. 2018–08309 Filed 4–19–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2017–0186; FRL–9971–55]
Bacillus subtilis strain FMCH002;
Exemption From the Requirement of a
Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation establishes an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of Bacillus subtilis
strain FMCH002 in or on all food
commodities when used in accordance
with label directions and good
agricultural practices. FMC Corporation
submitted a petition to EPA under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA), requesting the exemption
from a requirement of a tolerance. This
regulation eliminates the need to
establish a maximum permissible level
for residues of Bacillus subtilis strain
FMCH002 under FFDCA.
DATES: This regulation is effective April
20, 2018. Objections and requests for
hearings must be received on or before
June 19, 2018, and must be filed in
accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
SUMMARY:
The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2017–0186, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert McNally, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (7511P),
Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\20APR1.SGM
20APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 77 (Friday, April 20, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 17496-17498]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-08309]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0185; FRL-9971-54]
Bacillus Licheniformis Strain FMCH001; Exemption From the
Requirement of a Tolerance
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance for residues of Bacillus licheniformis strain FMCH001 in
or on all food commodities when used in accordance with label
directions and good agricultural practices. FMC Corporation submitted a
petition to EPA under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA),
requesting the exemption from a requirement of a tolerance. This
regulation eliminates the need to establish a maximum permissible level
for residues of Bacillus licheniformis strain FMCH001 under FFDCA.
DATES: This regulation is effective April 20, 2018. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before June 19, 2018, and
must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR
part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0185, is available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305-5805. Please review the visitor instructions and
additional information about the docket available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
[[Page 17497]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert McNally, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (7511P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington,
DC 20460-0001; main telephone number: (703) 305-7090; email address:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?
You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR
part 180 through the Government Printing Office's e-CFR site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file
an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0185 in the subject line on the first
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must
be in writing, and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before
June 19, 2018. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and
hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0185, by one of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. Additional
instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more
information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Background
In the Federal Register of July 26, 2017 (82 FR 34664) (FRL-9963-
50), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21
U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide tolerance
petition (PP 6F8514) by FMC Corporation, FMC Tower at Cira Centre
South, 2929 Walnut St., Philadelphia, PA 19104. The petition requested
that 40 CFR part 180 be amended by establishing an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance for residues of Bacillus licheniformis
strain FMCH001 in or on all food commodities. That document referenced
a summary of the petition prepared by the petitioner FMC Corporation,
which is available in the docket via https://www.regulations.gov. No
comments were received on the notice of filing.
EPA added ``in or on all food commodities'' to align with the
Agency's language and to more clearly define the petitioner's request.
III. Final Rule
A. EPA's Safety Determination
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish an
exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a
pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that
the exemption is ``safe.'' Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines
``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm
will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue,
including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for
which there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through
drinking water and in residential settings but does not include
occupational exposure. Pursuant to FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), in
establishing or maintaining in effect an exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance, EPA must take into account the factors set forth in
FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C), which require EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance or tolerance exemption and
to ``ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue. . . .'' Additionally, FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D)
requires that EPA consider ``available information concerning the
cumulative effects of [a particular pesticide's] . . . residues and
other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
EPA evaluated the available toxicity and exposure data on Bacillus
licheniformis strain FMCH001 and considered its validity, completeness,
and reliability, as well as the relationship of this information to
human risk. A full explanation of the data upon which EPA relied and
its risk assessment based on that data can be found within the document
entitled ``Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) Considerations
for Bacillus licheniformis strain FMCH001.'' This document, as well as
other relevant information, is available in the docket for this action
as described under ADDRESSES.
Based upon its evaluation, EPA concludes that Bacillus
licheniformis strain FMCH001 is not toxic, not pathogenic, and not
infective. Although there may be some exposure to residues when used on
all food commodities in accordance with label directions and good
agricultural practices, there is a reasonable certainty that such
exposure will not cause adverse effects. EPA also determined that
retention of the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) safety factor was
not necessary as part of the qualitative assessment conducted for
Bacillus licheniformis strain FMCH001.
Based upon its evaluation, EPA concludes that there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result to the U.S. population, including
infants and children, from aggregate exposure to residues of Bacillus
licheniformis strain FMCH001. Therefore, an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance is
[[Page 17498]]
established for residues of Bacillus licheniformis strain FMCH001 in or
on all food commodities when used in accordance with label directions
and good agricultural practices.
B. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
EPA is establishing an exemption from a tolerance on all food
commodities without any numerical limitation and thus an analytical
method is not required for enforcement purposes.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This action establishes exemptions from the requirement of a
tolerance under FFDCA section 408(d) in response to a petition
submitted to EPA. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order
12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this action has been exempted from review
under Executive Order 12866, this action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001), or Executive Order 13045, entitled ``Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not contain any information
collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) nor does it require any special
considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal Actions
to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance
exemptions in this action, do not require the issuance of a proposed
rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes. As a result, this
action does not alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, EPA has determined that this
action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or tribal
governments, on the relationship between the national government and
the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government or between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, EPA has determined that
Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999), and Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), do not apply to this action. In addition, this action does not
impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as
described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2
U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require EPA's consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
V. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: March 16, 2018.
Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. Add Sec. 180.1350 to subpart D to read as follows:
Sec. 180.1350 Bacillus licheniformis strain FMCH001; exemption from
the requirement of a tolerance.
An exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is established for
residues of Bacillus licheniformis strain FMCH001 in or on all food
commodities when used in accordance with label directions and good
agricultural practices.
[FR Doc. 2018-08309 Filed 4-19-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P