Melvin R. Sampson Hatchery, Yakima Basin Coho Project, 17542-17545 [2018-08285]
Download as PDF
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
17542
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 77 / Friday, April 20, 2018 / Notices
efforts to reduce the risk of dam failure.
During the PIE, additional risk issues
were noted concerning the 70-year old
main dam spillway gates. Electrical,
mechanical and structural operability
issues affect the reliability of controlled
spillway releases. If the spillway gates
do not reliably operate during an
extreme flood event, the reservoir would
raise and potentially result in a
premature fuse plug operation. The fuse
plug is designed to discharge
approximately 400,000 cubic feet per
second within 30 minutes. The
consequences of premature discharge of
an enormous volume of flood water are
estimated to be above the Corps of
Engineer’s tolerable risk limit. The draft
EIS would address the findings of the
PIE and assess effectiveness of potential
alternatives to further reduce risk and
increase dam safety. The dam seepage
repair construction contracts noted
previously, have increased dam safety
and were covered under previous NEPA
documents.
2. Potential Alternatives. The draft
EIS would address an array of
alternatives that could reduce the risk of
life loss, extensive downstream damage,
functional loss of the project, and the
loss of project benefits. The nature and
extent of the alternatives would be
determined based on the results of ongoing engineering studies, public and
agency input during the scoping period,
and preparation of the draft EIS.
Alternatives, either individually or in
combination, that have potential to
affect structures or operations of the
dam may include the following:
a. Replacement of the current gate
machinery with hydraulic machinery
that can operate under water;
b. Addition of equipment to the
current spillway gates to keep them
open if the operating machinery is
underwater;
c. Modification of the spillway gates
or gate machinery to allow operation
from the top of the dam;
d. Relocation of the gate operating
machinery to the road level, which
would require raising or relocating
Highway 96 which currently crosses
over the dam;
e. Removal of the existing fuse plug at
the saddle dam and installation of
spillway additions on top of the newly
constructed RCC Berm to discharge
flood water down the valley;
f. Modification of the emergency
operations plan in the water control
manual that determines how to manage
floods at Center Hill Dam; and
g. Other alternatives as identified by
on-going engineering studies, the
public, and agencies.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:44 Apr 19, 2018
Jkt 244001
3. Issues To Be Addressed. USACE is
evaluating ways of raising, modifying,
and/or replacing existing spillway gates
and operating equipment to address
spillway gate reliability for all range of
possible flood events, especially large
and more extreme flood events. The
DSMSR and draft EIS would evaluate
the Center Hill Dam Water Control
Manual emergency operating
procedures and potential alternative
spillway options to determine if changes
are warranted to minimize overall dam
safety risk. The draft EIS would include,
but is not limited to identification and
evaluation of effects to aquatic and
terrestrial habitats, cultural resources,
state and federally listed species,
socioeconomics, public safety,
structures, hydrology and hydraulics,
recreation, water supply, water quality,
flood storage, hydropower production,
land use, visual and aesthetic resources,
and dam safety risk reduction at Center
Hill Dam as a result of the proposed
alternatives.
4. Public Involvement and Scoping.
This NOI serves as the initial step to
involve Federal and state agencies,
Indian Tribes, local governments, and
the public in an early and transparent
process in accordance with NEPA
requirements. The draft EIS would
address impacts to the human
environment due to the proposed
alternatives. Concerns would be
identified based on public and agency
input during the scoping process and
during preparation of the draft EIS. All
interested parties are encouraged to
submit their name and email address to
the address noted above, to be placed on
the project mailing list to receive fact
sheets, newsletters and related public
notices. All interested parties are
invited to identify issues that should be
addressed in the draft EIS. A scoping
meeting is scheduled for May 3, 2018
from 6:00–8:00 p.m. at The Buffalo
Valley Community Center, 2717 Buffalo
Valley School Road, Buffalo Valley,
Tennessee. The purpose of the public
scoping meeting is to present
information to the public regarding
potential alternatives that would be
addressed in the draft EIS, receive
public comments, and to solicit input
regarding dam safety concerns,
alternatives to consider, and
environmental or social issues of
concern to the public.
6. Availability of the Draft EIS.
USACE intends to circulate the draft EIS
in the late 2018/early 2019 time frame.
USACE will announce availability of the
draft EIS in the Federal Register and
other media, and will provide interested
parties an opportunity to submit
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
comments to be addressed in the final
EIS.
Dated: April 13, 2018.
Angela E. Dunn,
Project Planning Branch Chief, U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, Nashville District.
[FR Doc. 2018–08291 Filed 4–19–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720–58–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Bonneville Power Administration
Melvin R. Sampson Hatchery, Yakima
Basin Coho Project
Bonneville Power
Administration (BPA), Department of
Energy (DOE).
ACTION: Record of Decision (ROD).
AGENCY:
The Bonneville Power
Administration (BPA) has decided to
implement the Proposed Action as
described in the Melvin R. Sampson
Hatchery, Yakima Basin Coho Project
Final Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) (DOE/EIS–0522, November 27,
2017). Under the Proposed Action, BPA
will fund the construction and
operation of the Melvin R. Sampson
Hatchery (MRS Hatchery) in the Yakima
Basin in central Washington. Operation
of the MRS Hatchery will involve
production of up to 700,000 coho
salmon for release in the Yakima River
and its subbasin, the Naches River. The
hatchery will be owned and operated by
the Confederated Tribes and Bands of
the Yakama Nation (Yakama Nation)
and will be constructed on land owned
by the Yakama Nation northwest of
Ellensburg in Kittitas County,
Washington.
ADDRESSES: This ROD will be available
to all interested parties and affected
persons and agencies. It is being sent to
all stakeholders who requested a copy.
Copies of the Melvin R. Sampson
Hatchery, Yakima Basin Coho Project
Draft and Final EISs and additional
copies of this ROD are available from
BPA’s Public Information Center, P.O.
Box 3621, Portland, Oregon 97208.
Copies of these documents may also be
obtained by using BPA’s nationwide
toll-free document request line: 1–800–
622–4520, or by accessing the project
website at www.bpa.gov/goto/Melvin
SampsonHatchery.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dave Goodman, Bonneville Power
Administration—ECF–4, P.O. Box 3621,
Portland, Oregon, 97208–3621; toll-free
telephone number 1–800–622–4519; fax
number 503–230–5699; or email
jdgoodman@bpa.gov.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM
20APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 77 / Friday, April 20, 2018 / Notices
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Background
BPA is a federal agency that markets
power generated from the federal
hydroelectric facilities on the Columbia
River and its tributaries. BPA’s
operations are governed by several
statutes, including the Northwest Power
Act. The Northwest Power Act directs
BPA to protect, mitigate, and enhance
fish and wildlife affected by the
development and operation of those
federal hydroelectric facilities. To assist
in accomplishing this, the Northwest
Power and Conservation Council
(Council) makes recommendations to
BPA concerning which fish and wildlife
projects to fund. The Council gives
deference to project proposals
developed by state and tribal fishery
managers and has a three-step process
for reviewing artificial propagation
project (i.e., hatcheries). The Yakama
Nation’s MRS Hatchery proposal is one
of the projects recommended to BPA by
the Council (Fritsch 2013) through their
three-step review process, which
included reviews from the Council’s
Independent Scientific Review Panel
(ISRP).1
In addition, BPA, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, and U.S. Bureau of
Reclamation signed an agreement in
2008 with the Yakama Nation and other
Tribes to work as partners to provide
tangible survival benefits for salmon
recovery. The 2008 Columbia Basin Fish
Accords Memorandum of Agreement
includes an agreement to fund the MRS
Hatchery contingent on the favorable
recommendation from the Council,
completion of site-specific
environmental review under the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), and compliance with other
environmental laws.
To meet obligations under NEPA,
BPA prepared an EIS in which the
Washington Department of Ecology was
a cooperating agency. Public scoping for
the MRS Hatchery EIS was initiated
with the publication of the Notice of
Intent in the Federal Register (80
Federal Register [FR] 70770) on
November 16, 2015. Concurrent with
the publication of the Notice of Intent,
BPA mailed a letter and map describing
1 The Council and the ISRP reviewed the Yakima
Subbasin Summer and Fall Run Chinook and Coho
Salmon Hatchery Master Plan (Yakama Nation
2012a), providing feedback and recommendations
to the Yakama Nation on scientific goals and
methods related to the coho program. On October
1, 2013, the Council and the ISRP determined the
proposed Master Plan, as related to activities for the
MRS Hatchery component of the coho program,
sufficiently met scientific review criteria to
recommend that BPA and the Yakama Nation move
to Step 2 of the Council’s process.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:44 Apr 19, 2018
Jkt 244001
the proposal to neighboring landowners,
affected tribes, local, state, and federal
government officials, and known
interested parties. BPA also held a
public scoping meeting in Ellensburg,
Washington (19 members of the public
attended) and established a website
(www.bpa.gov/goto/MelvinSampson
Hatchery) with information about the
project and the EIS process. The public
scoping period ran from November 16,
2015 through January 4, 2016. BPA
received comments from ten entities.
In March 2017, BPA issued the draft
EIS for public review and comment.
Notice of Availability for the draft EIS
was published in the Federal Register
(Volume 82, Number 51) on March 17,
2017. In addition, the EIS or an
announcement of its availability was
emailed or mailed to over 100 entities—
individuals, organizations, tribes, and
agencies who had previously requested
it—and the EIS was posted on the
project website. The comment period
ran from March 10, 2017 through May
1, 2017 and an open-house public
meeting was held in Ellensburg,
Washington.
BPA received comments from nine
entities on the draft EIS. After
consideration of the comments, BPA
issued the final EIS in November 2017.
The final EIS responded to comments
received on the draft EIS and made
necessary corrections and revisions to
the EIS text. As with the draft EIS, BPA
distributed the final EIS to individuals,
organizations, tribes, and agencies who
had previously requested it, posted it on
the BPA project website, and sent out
letters announcing its availability to
potentially interested parties. A Notice
of Availability of the final EIS was
published in the Federal Register (82
FR 55831) on November 24, 2017.
Alternatives Considered
The final EIS considered in detail the
Proposed Action and the No Action
Alternative. The final EIS also discussed
other alternatives that were considered
but eliminated from detailed study. The
following summarizes the alternatives
that were considered in detail in the
EIS.
Proposed Action
Under the Proposed Action, BPA will
fund the Yakama Nation for the
construction and operation of the MRS
Hatchery. The Proposed Action will
help transition the Yakama Nation’s
existing coho restoration program in
which broodstock are collected out-ofbasin and juveniles are reared out-ofbasin, to a program that will use inbasin rearing (at the MRS Hatchery) and
the use of out-of-basin broodstock will
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17543
be phased out as natural-origin
broodstock become available.
The Proposed Action will involve
construction of a coho hatchery facility
on eight acres at the former Holmes
Ranch property. Facilities will include a
hatchery building; adult holding and
spawning ponds; a shop building; three
employee houses; intake screens and a
surface water pump station to provide
Yakima River water via the existing
New Cascade Canal diversion; stoplog
supports to allow surface water to be
diverted; one existing groundwater well
and up to eight new wells; centralized
degassing headbox for groundwater
treatment and supply; site utilities,
including pipes for water intake and
discharge (outfall); a waste treatment
pond; acclimation ponds and tanks; and
site access roads.
Under the Proposed Action, the MRS
Hatchery will produce and release up to
500,000 coho parr and up to 200,000
coho smolts as part of the overall coho
reintroduction program. Per NMFS
consultation (NWR–2011–06509; NMFS
2016a), the production of up to 200,000
smolts and 500,000 parr is authorized.
Conversion to an all-smolt release (i.e.,
700,000 smolts) is proposed if the parr/
smolt release strategy does not meet
adult return objectives, or if drought
conditions preclude summer parr
releases. The goal of the Proposed
Action is for in-basin rearing of
integrated coho juveniles at the MRS
Hatchery using localized broodstock,
with a goal to phase out all out-of-basin
production. The transition to locallyadapted broodstock will occur at everincreasing rates as natural-origin
broodstock become available.
Up to 1,000 coho adults, including
natural- and hatchery-origin, will be
collected at Roza Dam for broodstock for
the proposed MRS Hatchery. Adults
may also be collected at Prosser Dam as
a backup source, and possibly in the
future at the Cowiche or Wapatox Dams.
The broodstock goal is to collect 1,000
fish that will be processed over a four
month period.
Prior to release, smolts will be
acclimated in ponds adjacent to
tributaries in which they will be
released to help encourage their return
as adults to these locations. A number
of existing ponds, including Jack Creek,
Hundley, Boone, and Easton will be
used to acclimate coho smolts from the
MRS Hatchery. Mobile acclimation
units will also be used for a small
number of coho smolts in the basin.
Juvenile coho propagated at the MRS
Hatchery will be released into
tributaries that are not currently subject
to coho releases, with a goal of seeding
more habitats throughout the basin.
E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM
20APN1
17544
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 77 / Friday, April 20, 2018 / Notices
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Monitoring, research, and evaluation
of the overall Yakima-Klickitat Fisheries
Project (YKFP) coho reintroduction
program is ongoing and would continue
under the Proposed Action. Such
activities would include coho spawning
surveys, snorkel surveys, juvenile
collection, and juvenile abundance
surveys.
Construction under the Proposed
Action will comply with applicable
regulatory requirements, permits, and
guidance for protection of the
environment and human well-being and
safety, and will incorporate Best
Management Practices such as erosion
and dust control, waste management,
weed management, fire prevention, and
work-hour and noise restrictions. The
Proposed Action incorporates special
measures such as retaining as much
native vegetation as possible,
landscaping with native plants, erecting
buildings reflective of local character,
shielding of facility lighting, and
installing water reuse and treatment
systems. Instream structures will meet
applicable NOAA Fisheries and U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service fish passage
design requirements, and construction
will be managed to accommodate and
reduce impacts on existing fish
production and fish use of the affected
waters.
Instream work will occur behind
temporary cofferdams or other
appropriate water diversions and
comply with applicable regulations and
permits. Solid waste management and
hatchery effluent treatment and filtering
systems will ensure that discharge will
comply with applicable regulations and
permit standards.
No Action Alternative
Under the No Action Alternative as
described in the EIS, BPA would have
not funded the construction and
operation of the proposed MRS
Hatchery. The Yakama Nation would
have still expanded juvenile release and
acclimation locations, but would have
not converted to complete in-basin
rearing. The Yakama Nation would have
likely continued using a combination of
artificial production and habitat
improvements to meet natural
production and harvest goals, including
increasing coho spawning in tributaries,
phasing out imported releases of coho in
the Yakima Basin, and testing and
monitoring new acclimation techniques.
Under the No Action Alternative, a
portion of the juvenile coho released
into the Yakima River as part of the
overall YKFP coho reintroduction
program would have continued to be
reared out-of-basin. The release of outof-basin juveniles would have expected
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:44 Apr 19, 2018
Jkt 244001
to result in reduced survival and adult
returns and would have not met the
Yakama Nation’s goal of providing a
self-sustaining coho run throughout its
historic range.
Comments Received Since Issuance of
the Final EIS
Following the issuance of the final
EIS, BPA received comments from the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) Region 10 in accordance with
EPA responsibilities to review EISs
under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act.
The comments were received in a letter
dated December 21, 2017 and in followup conversations with EPA staff. These
comments can be viewed on-line at
www.bpa.gov/goto/MelvinSampson
Hatchery. BPA has reviewed and
considered EPA’s comments in making
its decision about funding the Melvin R.
Sampson Hatchery Yakima Basin Coho
Project.
Although NEPA does not require
written responses to comments received
on a final EIS, this section of the ROD
summarizes and addresses the EPA
comments received since issuance of the
final EIS.
EPA’s letter stated that the final EIS
was responsive to their comments
submitted on the draft EIS. EPA also
further expanded on comments sent on
the draft EIS and requested that BPA
conduct additional quantitative analysis
of water quality impacts due to hatchery
effluent discharge. More specially, EPA
requested that various parameters
(ammonia nitrogen, dissolved oxygen,
and phosphorous, total suspended
solids [TSS], turbidity, and biochemical
oxygen demand BOD) be considered in
the effluent dilution calculations; that
effluent dilution calculations be at the
point of discharge into the side channel
(which flows into the main channel of
the Yakima River); that consideration be
taken for effluent plumes in the Yakima
River if lateral mixing is incomplete;
and that BPA provide rationale that the
analysis is considering worst-case
conditions and rationale that the
effluent discharge will achieve water
quality standards.
In response to these comments, BPA
continued to work with the Washington
State Department of Ecology (Ecology),
the entity responsible for regulating
water quality in the State of
Washington, conducted additional
waste load calculations, and had further
conversations and email exchanges with
EPA.
As described in Sections 2.2.3.3,
3.5.1.4.2, 3.5.2.2.4, and 4.1.3.1.2 of the
EIS, BPA and the Yakama Nation have
worked with Ecology to ensure that the
hatchery complies with National
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) requirements. Per Washington
State Administrative Code (WAC) 173–
221A–100, all upland fin fish facilities
require wastewater discharge permits
requiring compliance with defined
effluent standards, and must comply
with the applicable Total Maximum
Daily Loads (TMDLs). The TMDLs
determine the amount of pollutants that
a given waterbody, in this case it is the
Yakima River, can receive and still meet
or exceed water quality standards. The
permit application submitted to Ecology
described the hatchery design (size,
number of fish, water sources and flow
rates, dimensions and volumes of
settling ponds, discharge points and
receiving waters, solid waste disposal
areas, and details about the water
condition equipment) and the water
quality characterization of the hatchery
effluent. The technical memo
supporting the permit application and
the additional hatchery effluent
discharge analysis may be viewed on
BPA’s project website at www.bpa.gov/
goto/MelvinSampsonHatchery.
The Yakima River 7Q10 flow rate (the
lowest 7-day average flow occurring on
average once every 10 years) is 1,891
cubic feet per second (cfs), while the
volume of discharge from the hatchery
will be 4 cfs, 0.002 percent of the river
flow. As described in Section 3.5.2.2.4
of the EIS, the effluent limits for general
NPDES permit treatment requirements
include a net total suspended solids
(TSS) maximum concentration of 5
milligrams per liter (mg/l); the
calculated TSS concentrations in the
hatchery effluent during peak fish
feeding (worst case pollutant discharge
conditions) is 0.73 mg/l— which is well
under the requirements. This TSS
limitation requirement is for the end-ofpipe effluent and does not require
determinations of lateral mixing or
dilution. The hatchery easily meets the
TMDL load allocation that has been
approved by EPA for the Yakima River.
The additional waste load
calculations conducted at EPA’s request
found that waste load allocations for
total ammonia nitrogen (TAN),
dissolved oxygen (DO), and total
phosphorous associated with hatchery
discharge had no-to-minimal influence
on the background concentrations (TAN
changed background river levels by
0.002mg/l; DO had no change; total
phosphorous changed by 0.0004 mg/l
over background levels). As described
above, the TSS levels would be well
under the TMDL load allocation
requirements, and because of the
correlation of TSS and turbidity,
Ecology determined that, based on the
limitations associated with TSS, the
E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM
20APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 77 / Friday, April 20, 2018 / Notices
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
facility would not impact the Yakima
River turbidity. BOD is not a pollutant
of concern with fish hatcheries; there
are no BOD limitations in either federal
requirements or in the 2015 Upland FinFish Hatchery and Rearing general
permit requirements. Therefore, BPA
believes it has sufficiently considered
the potential impacts of the effluent
pollutants on water quality.
Regarding EPA’s comment that the
side channel dilution rates should be
considered, the end-of-pipe effluent that
would be discharged into the side
channel would meet the water quality
standards for the Yakima River, whether
it is into the side channel or the main
stem itself; dilution is not part of the
criteria for meeting the effluent water
quality standards. Therefore, BPA
believes that further calculations of
dilution rates are not necessary or
relevant to water quality considerations.
The end-of-pipe effluent water quality
also pertains to EPA’s comment on
whether there would be effluent plumes
due to incomplete lateral mixing in the
Yakima River. The hatchery operation at
full capacity has to meet end-of-pipe
discharge limitations that reduce the
existing load present in the Yakima
River. The WAC sets effluent limitation
guidelines for the pollutant of concern
to meet water quality standards at the
end-of-pipe, not at some point
downstream after a mixing zone or
dilution factor are taken into
consideration. Therefore, because the
effluent itself would meet load
requirements, there would be no plumes
within the river due to the effluent and
further consideration of lateral mixing is
not necessary or relevant.
Ecology is poised to issue an NPDES
permit for the hatchery and has stated
that it is satisfied that the hatchery
effluent would clearly meet all water
quality criteria. As such, BPA believes
it has a sufficient understanding of the
impacts of the hatchery effluent on
water quality, that the final EIS provides
appropriate consideration and analyses
of these impacts to meet the
requirements of NEPA, and that the
additional calculations do not alter the
conclusions made in the final EIS about
potential water quality impacts.
Rationale for Decision
In making its decision to implement
the Proposed Action, BPA has
considered and balanced a variety of
relevant factors. BPA considered how
well the Proposed Action and the No
Action Alternative would fit with BPA’s
statutory missions and relevant policies
and procedures. BPA also considered
the environmental impacts described in
the final EIS, as well as public
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:44 Apr 19, 2018
Jkt 244001
comments received throughout the
NEPA process for the Project.
Another consideration was the extent
to which each alternative under
consideration would meet the following
BPA purposes (i.e., objectives)
identified in the final EIS:
• Support efforts to mitigate for
effects of the development and
operation of the Federal Columbia River
Power System on fish and wildlife in
the mainstem Columbia River and its
tributaries under the Northwest Power
Act.
• Assist in carrying out commitments
related to proposed hatchery actions
that are contained in the 2008 Columbia
Basin Fish Accords Memorandum of
Agreement with the Yakama Nation and
others.
• Implement BPA’s Fish and Wildlife
Implementation Plan EIS and Record of
Decision policy direction, which calls
for protecting weak stocks, while
sustaining overall populations of fish for
their economic and cultural value.
• Minimize harm to natural and
human resources, including species
listed under the Endangered Species
Act.
After considering and balancing all of
these factors, BPA has decided to fund
the Melvin R. Sampson Hatchery,
Yakima Basin Coho Project. The
Proposed Action was recommended to
BPA for funding by the Northwest
Power and Conservation Council and is
consistent with the Council’s Columbia
River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program.
Providing funding for the construction
of the Proposed Action will help
mitigate for the effects of the FCRPS on
fish and wildlife by restoring natural
coho spawning in the Yakima Basin. In
addition, the Proposed Action is
consistent with commitments contained
in the 2008 Columbia Basin Fish
Accords, as well as with BPA’s Fish and
Wildlife Implementation Plan policy
direction for protecting weak stocks,
while sustaining overall populations of
fish for their economic and cultural
value.
In planning and designing the
hatchery, BPA, the Yakama Nation, and
other project designers worked to
minimize environmental and social
impacts through project design,
consultation with regulatory entities,
and development of mitigation
measures. Impacts considered and fully
disclosed in the final EIS, include
disturbance of soils, vegetation removal,
conversion of habitat, groundwater and
surface water impacts on aquifers and
floodplains, impacts of hatchery effluent
discharge, impacts of hatchery
construction and juvenile coho releases
on species such as bull trout and
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17545
steelhead, and visual changes associated
with new structures.
Mitigation
All mitigation measures described in
the final EIS and the project Biological
Assessment with the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service have been adopted. A
complete list of these measures is
presented in the project Mitigation
Action Plan, available on the project
website. All practicable means to avoid
or minimize environmental harm are
adopted.
Issued in Portland, Oregon, on April 10,
2018.
Dated: April 10, 2018.
Elliot E. Mainzer,
Administrator and Chief Executive Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018–08285 Filed 4–19–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Proposed Subsequent Arrangement
National Nuclear Security
Administration, Department of Energy.
ACTION: Proposed subsequent
arrangement.
AGENCY:
This document is being
issued under the authority of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended.
The Department is providing notice of a
proposed subsequent arrangement
under the Agreement between the
Government of the United States of
America and the Government of
Australia Concerning Peaceful Uses of
Nuclear Energy and the Agreement for
Cooperation in the Peaceful Uses of
Nuclear Energy between the United
States of America and the European
Atomic Energy Community (Euratom).
DATES: This subsequent arrangement
will take effect no sooner than May 7,
2018 and after 15 days of continuous
session of the Congress has elapsed,
beginning the day after the date on
which the reports required under
section 131b.(1) of the Atomic Energy
Act of 1954, as amended, are submitted
to the House Foreign Affairs Committee
and the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee. The two time periods
referred to above may run concurrently.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Sean Oehlbert, Office of
Nonproliferation and Arms Control,
National Nuclear Security
Administration, Department of Energy.
Telephone: 202–586–3806 or email:
Sean.Oehlbert@nnsa.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
subsequent arrangement concerns the
retransfer of 507,713 g of U.S.-obligated
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM
20APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 77 (Friday, April 20, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17542-17545]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-08285]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Bonneville Power Administration
Melvin R. Sampson Hatchery, Yakima Basin Coho Project
AGENCY: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), Department of Energy
(DOE).
ACTION: Record of Decision (ROD).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) has decided to
implement the Proposed Action as described in the Melvin R. Sampson
Hatchery, Yakima Basin Coho Project Final Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) (DOE/EIS-0522, November 27, 2017). Under the Proposed
Action, BPA will fund the construction and operation of the Melvin R.
Sampson Hatchery (MRS Hatchery) in the Yakima Basin in central
Washington. Operation of the MRS Hatchery will involve production of up
to 700,000 coho salmon for release in the Yakima River and its
subbasin, the Naches River. The hatchery will be owned and operated by
the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation (Yakama Nation)
and will be constructed on land owned by the Yakama Nation northwest of
Ellensburg in Kittitas County, Washington.
ADDRESSES: This ROD will be available to all interested parties and
affected persons and agencies. It is being sent to all stakeholders who
requested a copy. Copies of the Melvin R. Sampson Hatchery, Yakima
Basin Coho Project Draft and Final EISs and additional copies of this
ROD are available from BPA's Public Information Center, P.O. Box 3621,
Portland, Oregon 97208. Copies of these documents may also be obtained
by using BPA's nationwide toll-free document request line: 1-800-622-
4520, or by accessing the project website at www.bpa.gov/goto/MelvinSampsonHatchery.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dave Goodman, Bonneville Power
Administration--ECF-4, P.O. Box 3621, Portland, Oregon, 97208-3621;
toll-free telephone number 1-800-622-4519; fax number 503-230-5699; or
email [email protected].
[[Page 17543]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
BPA is a federal agency that markets power generated from the
federal hydroelectric facilities on the Columbia River and its
tributaries. BPA's operations are governed by several statutes,
including the Northwest Power Act. The Northwest Power Act directs BPA
to protect, mitigate, and enhance fish and wildlife affected by the
development and operation of those federal hydroelectric facilities. To
assist in accomplishing this, the Northwest Power and Conservation
Council (Council) makes recommendations to BPA concerning which fish
and wildlife projects to fund. The Council gives deference to project
proposals developed by state and tribal fishery managers and has a
three-step process for reviewing artificial propagation project (i.e.,
hatcheries). The Yakama Nation's MRS Hatchery proposal is one of the
projects recommended to BPA by the Council (Fritsch 2013) through their
three-step review process, which included reviews from the Council's
Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Council and the ISRP reviewed the Yakima Subbasin Summer
and Fall Run Chinook and Coho Salmon Hatchery Master Plan (Yakama
Nation 2012a), providing feedback and recommendations to the Yakama
Nation on scientific goals and methods related to the coho program.
On October 1, 2013, the Council and the ISRP determined the proposed
Master Plan, as related to activities for the MRS Hatchery component
of the coho program, sufficiently met scientific review criteria to
recommend that BPA and the Yakama Nation move to Step 2 of the
Council's process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, BPA, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and U.S. Bureau of
Reclamation signed an agreement in 2008 with the Yakama Nation and
other Tribes to work as partners to provide tangible survival benefits
for salmon recovery. The 2008 Columbia Basin Fish Accords Memorandum of
Agreement includes an agreement to fund the MRS Hatchery contingent on
the favorable recommendation from the Council, completion of site-
specific environmental review under the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA), and compliance with other environmental laws.
To meet obligations under NEPA, BPA prepared an EIS in which the
Washington Department of Ecology was a cooperating agency. Public
scoping for the MRS Hatchery EIS was initiated with the publication of
the Notice of Intent in the Federal Register (80 Federal Register [FR]
70770) on November 16, 2015. Concurrent with the publication of the
Notice of Intent, BPA mailed a letter and map describing the proposal
to neighboring landowners, affected tribes, local, state, and federal
government officials, and known interested parties. BPA also held a
public scoping meeting in Ellensburg, Washington (19 members of the
public attended) and established a website (www.bpa.gov/goto/MelvinSampsonHatchery) with information about the project and the EIS
process. The public scoping period ran from November 16, 2015 through
January 4, 2016. BPA received comments from ten entities.
In March 2017, BPA issued the draft EIS for public review and
comment. Notice of Availability for the draft EIS was published in the
Federal Register (Volume 82, Number 51) on March 17, 2017. In addition,
the EIS or an announcement of its availability was emailed or mailed to
over 100 entities--individuals, organizations, tribes, and agencies who
had previously requested it--and the EIS was posted on the project
website. The comment period ran from March 10, 2017 through May 1, 2017
and an open-house public meeting was held in Ellensburg, Washington.
BPA received comments from nine entities on the draft EIS. After
consideration of the comments, BPA issued the final EIS in November
2017. The final EIS responded to comments received on the draft EIS and
made necessary corrections and revisions to the EIS text. As with the
draft EIS, BPA distributed the final EIS to individuals, organizations,
tribes, and agencies who had previously requested it, posted it on the
BPA project website, and sent out letters announcing its availability
to potentially interested parties. A Notice of Availability of the
final EIS was published in the Federal Register (82 FR 55831) on
November 24, 2017.
Alternatives Considered
The final EIS considered in detail the Proposed Action and the No
Action Alternative. The final EIS also discussed other alternatives
that were considered but eliminated from detailed study. The following
summarizes the alternatives that were considered in detail in the EIS.
Proposed Action
Under the Proposed Action, BPA will fund the Yakama Nation for the
construction and operation of the MRS Hatchery. The Proposed Action
will help transition the Yakama Nation's existing coho restoration
program in which broodstock are collected out-of-basin and juveniles
are reared out-of-basin, to a program that will use in-basin rearing
(at the MRS Hatchery) and the use of out-of-basin broodstock will be
phased out as natural-origin broodstock become available.
The Proposed Action will involve construction of a coho hatchery
facility on eight acres at the former Holmes Ranch property. Facilities
will include a hatchery building; adult holding and spawning ponds; a
shop building; three employee houses; intake screens and a surface
water pump station to provide Yakima River water via the existing New
Cascade Canal diversion; stoplog supports to allow surface water to be
diverted; one existing groundwater well and up to eight new wells;
centralized degassing headbox for groundwater treatment and supply;
site utilities, including pipes for water intake and discharge
(outfall); a waste treatment pond; acclimation ponds and tanks; and
site access roads.
Under the Proposed Action, the MRS Hatchery will produce and
release up to 500,000 coho parr and up to 200,000 coho smolts as part
of the overall coho reintroduction program. Per NMFS consultation (NWR-
2011-06509; NMFS 2016a), the production of up to 200,000 smolts and
500,000 parr is authorized. Conversion to an all-smolt release (i.e.,
700,000 smolts) is proposed if the parr/smolt release strategy does not
meet adult return objectives, or if drought conditions preclude summer
parr releases. The goal of the Proposed Action is for in-basin rearing
of integrated coho juveniles at the MRS Hatchery using localized
broodstock, with a goal to phase out all out-of-basin production. The
transition to locally-adapted broodstock will occur at ever-increasing
rates as natural-origin broodstock become available.
Up to 1,000 coho adults, including natural- and hatchery-origin,
will be collected at Roza Dam for broodstock for the proposed MRS
Hatchery. Adults may also be collected at Prosser Dam as a backup
source, and possibly in the future at the Cowiche or Wapatox Dams. The
broodstock goal is to collect 1,000 fish that will be processed over a
four month period.
Prior to release, smolts will be acclimated in ponds adjacent to
tributaries in which they will be released to help encourage their
return as adults to these locations. A number of existing ponds,
including Jack Creek, Hundley, Boone, and Easton will be used to
acclimate coho smolts from the MRS Hatchery. Mobile acclimation units
will also be used for a small number of coho smolts in the basin.
Juvenile coho propagated at the MRS Hatchery will be released into
tributaries that are not currently subject to coho releases, with a
goal of seeding more habitats throughout the basin.
[[Page 17544]]
Monitoring, research, and evaluation of the overall Yakima-
Klickitat Fisheries Project (YKFP) coho reintroduction program is
ongoing and would continue under the Proposed Action. Such activities
would include coho spawning surveys, snorkel surveys, juvenile
collection, and juvenile abundance surveys.
Construction under the Proposed Action will comply with applicable
regulatory requirements, permits, and guidance for protection of the
environment and human well-being and safety, and will incorporate Best
Management Practices such as erosion and dust control, waste
management, weed management, fire prevention, and work-hour and noise
restrictions. The Proposed Action incorporates special measures such as
retaining as much native vegetation as possible, landscaping with
native plants, erecting buildings reflective of local character,
shielding of facility lighting, and installing water reuse and
treatment systems. Instream structures will meet applicable NOAA
Fisheries and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service fish passage design
requirements, and construction will be managed to accommodate and
reduce impacts on existing fish production and fish use of the affected
waters.
Instream work will occur behind temporary cofferdams or other
appropriate water diversions and comply with applicable regulations and
permits. Solid waste management and hatchery effluent treatment and
filtering systems will ensure that discharge will comply with
applicable regulations and permit standards.
No Action Alternative
Under the No Action Alternative as described in the EIS, BPA would
have not funded the construction and operation of the proposed MRS
Hatchery. The Yakama Nation would have still expanded juvenile release
and acclimation locations, but would have not converted to complete in-
basin rearing. The Yakama Nation would have likely continued using a
combination of artificial production and habitat improvements to meet
natural production and harvest goals, including increasing coho
spawning in tributaries, phasing out imported releases of coho in the
Yakima Basin, and testing and monitoring new acclimation techniques.
Under the No Action Alternative, a portion of the juvenile coho
released into the Yakima River as part of the overall YKFP coho
reintroduction program would have continued to be reared out-of-basin.
The release of out-of-basin juveniles would have expected to result in
reduced survival and adult returns and would have not met the Yakama
Nation's goal of providing a self-sustaining coho run throughout its
historic range.
Comments Received Since Issuance of the Final EIS
Following the issuance of the final EIS, BPA received comments from
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 10 in accordance
with EPA responsibilities to review EISs under Section 309 of the Clean
Air Act. The comments were received in a letter dated December 21, 2017
and in follow-up conversations with EPA staff. These comments can be
viewed on-line at www.bpa.gov/goto/MelvinSampsonHatchery. BPA has
reviewed and considered EPA's comments in making its decision about
funding the Melvin R. Sampson Hatchery Yakima Basin Coho Project.
Although NEPA does not require written responses to comments
received on a final EIS, this section of the ROD summarizes and
addresses the EPA comments received since issuance of the final EIS.
EPA's letter stated that the final EIS was responsive to their
comments submitted on the draft EIS. EPA also further expanded on
comments sent on the draft EIS and requested that BPA conduct
additional quantitative analysis of water quality impacts due to
hatchery effluent discharge. More specially, EPA requested that various
parameters (ammonia nitrogen, dissolved oxygen, and phosphorous, total
suspended solids [TSS], turbidity, and biochemical oxygen demand BOD)
be considered in the effluent dilution calculations; that effluent
dilution calculations be at the point of discharge into the side
channel (which flows into the main channel of the Yakima River); that
consideration be taken for effluent plumes in the Yakima River if
lateral mixing is incomplete; and that BPA provide rationale that the
analysis is considering worst-case conditions and rationale that the
effluent discharge will achieve water quality standards.
In response to these comments, BPA continued to work with the
Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology), the entity
responsible for regulating water quality in the State of Washington,
conducted additional waste load calculations, and had further
conversations and email exchanges with EPA.
As described in Sections 2.2.3.3, 3.5.1.4.2, 3.5.2.2.4, and
4.1.3.1.2 of the EIS, BPA and the Yakama Nation have worked with
Ecology to ensure that the hatchery complies with National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements. Per Washington State
Administrative Code (WAC) 173-221A-100, all upland fin fish facilities
require wastewater discharge permits requiring compliance with defined
effluent standards, and must comply with the applicable Total Maximum
Daily Loads (TMDLs). The TMDLs determine the amount of pollutants that
a given waterbody, in this case it is the Yakima River, can receive and
still meet or exceed water quality standards. The permit application
submitted to Ecology described the hatchery design (size, number of
fish, water sources and flow rates, dimensions and volumes of settling
ponds, discharge points and receiving waters, solid waste disposal
areas, and details about the water condition equipment) and the water
quality characterization of the hatchery effluent. The technical memo
supporting the permit application and the additional hatchery effluent
discharge analysis may be viewed on BPA's project website at
www.bpa.gov/goto/MelvinSampsonHatchery.
The Yakima River 7Q10 flow rate (the lowest 7-day average flow
occurring on average once every 10 years) is 1,891 cubic feet per
second (cfs), while the volume of discharge from the hatchery will be 4
cfs, 0.002 percent of the river flow. As described in Section 3.5.2.2.4
of the EIS, the effluent limits for general NPDES permit treatment
requirements include a net total suspended solids (TSS) maximum
concentration of 5 milligrams per liter (mg/l); the calculated TSS
concentrations in the hatchery effluent during peak fish feeding (worst
case pollutant discharge conditions) is 0.73 mg/l-- which is well under
the requirements. This TSS limitation requirement is for the end-of-
pipe effluent and does not require determinations of lateral mixing or
dilution. The hatchery easily meets the TMDL load allocation that has
been approved by EPA for the Yakima River.
The additional waste load calculations conducted at EPA's request
found that waste load allocations for total ammonia nitrogen (TAN),
dissolved oxygen (DO), and total phosphorous associated with hatchery
discharge had no-to-minimal influence on the background concentrations
(TAN changed background river levels by 0.002mg/l; DO had no change;
total phosphorous changed by 0.0004 mg/l over background levels). As
described above, the TSS levels would be well under the TMDL load
allocation requirements, and because of the correlation of TSS and
turbidity, Ecology determined that, based on the limitations associated
with TSS, the
[[Page 17545]]
facility would not impact the Yakima River turbidity. BOD is not a
pollutant of concern with fish hatcheries; there are no BOD limitations
in either federal requirements or in the 2015 Upland Fin-Fish Hatchery
and Rearing general permit requirements. Therefore, BPA believes it has
sufficiently considered the potential impacts of the effluent
pollutants on water quality.
Regarding EPA's comment that the side channel dilution rates should
be considered, the end-of-pipe effluent that would be discharged into
the side channel would meet the water quality standards for the Yakima
River, whether it is into the side channel or the main stem itself;
dilution is not part of the criteria for meeting the effluent water
quality standards. Therefore, BPA believes that further calculations of
dilution rates are not necessary or relevant to water quality
considerations.
The end-of-pipe effluent water quality also pertains to EPA's
comment on whether there would be effluent plumes due to incomplete
lateral mixing in the Yakima River. The hatchery operation at full
capacity has to meet end-of-pipe discharge limitations that reduce the
existing load present in the Yakima River. The WAC sets effluent
limitation guidelines for the pollutant of concern to meet water
quality standards at the end-of-pipe, not at some point downstream
after a mixing zone or dilution factor are taken into consideration.
Therefore, because the effluent itself would meet load requirements,
there would be no plumes within the river due to the effluent and
further consideration of lateral mixing is not necessary or relevant.
Ecology is poised to issue an NPDES permit for the hatchery and has
stated that it is satisfied that the hatchery effluent would clearly
meet all water quality criteria. As such, BPA believes it has a
sufficient understanding of the impacts of the hatchery effluent on
water quality, that the final EIS provides appropriate consideration
and analyses of these impacts to meet the requirements of NEPA, and
that the additional calculations do not alter the conclusions made in
the final EIS about potential water quality impacts.
Rationale for Decision
In making its decision to implement the Proposed Action, BPA has
considered and balanced a variety of relevant factors. BPA considered
how well the Proposed Action and the No Action Alternative would fit
with BPA's statutory missions and relevant policies and procedures. BPA
also considered the environmental impacts described in the final EIS,
as well as public comments received throughout the NEPA process for the
Project.
Another consideration was the extent to which each alternative
under consideration would meet the following BPA purposes (i.e.,
objectives) identified in the final EIS:
Support efforts to mitigate for effects of the development
and operation of the Federal Columbia River Power System on fish and
wildlife in the mainstem Columbia River and its tributaries under the
Northwest Power Act.
Assist in carrying out commitments related to proposed
hatchery actions that are contained in the 2008 Columbia Basin Fish
Accords Memorandum of Agreement with the Yakama Nation and others.
Implement BPA's Fish and Wildlife Implementation Plan EIS
and Record of Decision policy direction, which calls for protecting
weak stocks, while sustaining overall populations of fish for their
economic and cultural value.
Minimize harm to natural and human resources, including
species listed under the Endangered Species Act.
After considering and balancing all of these factors, BPA has
decided to fund the Melvin R. Sampson Hatchery, Yakima Basin Coho
Project. The Proposed Action was recommended to BPA for funding by the
Northwest Power and Conservation Council and is consistent with the
Council's Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program. Providing
funding for the construction of the Proposed Action will help mitigate
for the effects of the FCRPS on fish and wildlife by restoring natural
coho spawning in the Yakima Basin. In addition, the Proposed Action is
consistent with commitments contained in the 2008 Columbia Basin Fish
Accords, as well as with BPA's Fish and Wildlife Implementation Plan
policy direction for protecting weak stocks, while sustaining overall
populations of fish for their economic and cultural value.
In planning and designing the hatchery, BPA, the Yakama Nation, and
other project designers worked to minimize environmental and social
impacts through project design, consultation with regulatory entities,
and development of mitigation measures. Impacts considered and fully
disclosed in the final EIS, include disturbance of soils, vegetation
removal, conversion of habitat, groundwater and surface water impacts
on aquifers and floodplains, impacts of hatchery effluent discharge,
impacts of hatchery construction and juvenile coho releases on species
such as bull trout and steelhead, and visual changes associated with
new structures.
Mitigation
All mitigation measures described in the final EIS and the project
Biological Assessment with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service have been
adopted. A complete list of these measures is presented in the project
Mitigation Action Plan, available on the project website. All
practicable means to avoid or minimize environmental harm are adopted.
Issued in Portland, Oregon, on April 10, 2018.
Dated: April 10, 2018.
Elliot E. Mainzer,
Administrator and Chief Executive Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-08285 Filed 4-19-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P