Expansion of the Abbreviated 510(k) Program: Demonstrating Substantial Equivalence Through Performance Criteria; Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff; Availability, 15847-15848 [2018-07564]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 71 / Thursday, April 12, 2018 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2018–D–1387]
Expansion of the Abbreviated 510(k)
Program: Demonstrating Substantial
Equivalence Through Performance
Criteria; Draft Guidance for Industry
and Food and Drug Administration
Staff; Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice of availability.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or Agency) is
announcing the availability of the draft
guidance entitled ‘‘Expansion of the
Abbreviated 510(k) Program:
Demonstrating Substantial Equivalence
Through Performance Criteria; Draft
Guidance for Industry and Food and
Drug Administration Staff.’’ This draft
guidance provides FDA’s current
thinking on expanding the abbreviated
510(k) program for demonstrating
substantial equivalence for premarket
notification (510(k)) submissions. The
intent of the draft guidance is to
describe an optional program for certain
well understood device types, where a
submitter could demonstrate that a new
device meets FDA-identified
performance criteria instead of directly
comparing the performance of the new
device to a specific, submitter-identified
predicate device as part of a
demonstration of substantial
equivalence. This draft guidance is not
final nor is it in effect at this time.
DATES: Submit either electronic or
written comments on the draft guidance
by July 11, 2018 to ensure that the
Agency considers your comment on this
draft guidance before it begins work on
the final version of the guidance.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on any guidance at any time as follows:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:20 Apr 11, 2018
Jkt 244001
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Dockets
Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Dockets Management
Staff, FDA will post your comment, as
well as any attachments, except for
information submitted, marked and
identified, as confidential, if submitted
as detailed in ‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2018–D–1387 for ‘‘Expansion of the
Abbreviated 510(k) Program:
Demonstrating Substantial Equivalence
Through Performance Criteria; Draft
Guidance for Industry and Food and
Drug Administration Staff.’’ Received
comments will be placed in the docket
and, except for those submitted as
‘‘Confidential Submissions,’’ publicly
viewable at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Dockets Management Staff
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The
second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
for public viewing and posted on
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
both copies to the Dockets Management
Staff. If you do not wish your name and
contact information to be made publicly
available, you can provide this
information on the cover sheet and not
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15847
in the body of your comments and you
must identify this information as
‘‘confidential.’’ Any information marked
as ‘‘confidential’’ will not be disclosed
except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20
and other applicable disclosure law. For
more information about FDA’s posting
of comments to public dockets, see 80
FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://www.gpo.gov/
fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/201523389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Dockets Management
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852.
You may submit comments on any
guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)).
An electronic copy of the guidance
document is available for download
from the internet. See the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
information on electronic access to the
guidance. Submit written requests for a
single hard copy of the draft guidance
document entitled ‘‘Expansion of the
Abbreviated 510(k) Program:
Demonstrating Substantial Equivalence
Through Performance Criteria; Draft
Guidance for Industry and Food and
Drug Administration Staff’’ to the Office
of the Center Director, Guidance and
Policy Development, Center for Devices
and Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 5431, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002; or the Office of
Communication, Outreach and
Development, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 3128,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002. Send
one self-addressed adhesive label to
assist that office in processing your
request.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For Center for Devices and
Radiological Health-regulated devices:
Sonja Fulmer, Office of the Center
Director, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 5421, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 301–402–5979.
For Center for Biologics Evaluation
and Research-regulated devices:
Stephen Ripley, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 240–402–7911.
E:\FR\FM\12APN1.SGM
12APN1
15848
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 71 / Thursday, April 12, 2018 / Notices
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FDA has explained and clarified,
through the guidance entitled, ‘‘The
510(k) Program: Evaluating Substantial
Equivalence in Premarket Notifications
[510(k)]’’ (Ref. 1), how it makes
substantial equivalence decisions under
section 513(i)(1)(A) of the Federal, Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) (21
U.S.C. 360c(i)(1)(A)). Substantial
equivalence is rooted in comparisons
between new devices and predicate
devices. However, the FD&C Act does
not preclude FDA from using
performance criteria to facilitate this
comparison. If a legally marketed device
performs at certain levels relevant to its
safety and effectiveness, and a new
device meets or exceeds those levels of
performance for the same
characteristics, FDA could find the new
device as safe and effective as the
legally marketed device. Instead of
reviewing data from direct comparison
testing between the two devices, FDA
could support a finding of substantial
equivalence with data showing the new
device meets or exceeds the level of
performance of appropriate predicate
device(s). Under the approach expanded
in this guidance, a submitter could
satisfy the requirement to compare its
device with a legally marketed device
by, among other things, demonstrating
conformance to performance criteria
established in FDA-recognized
consensus standards, FDA guidance,
and/or special controls.
Use of this approach may also
streamline the review of 510(k)
submissions, thereby reducing burdens
on the Agency and possibly review
times on individual submissions. In
addition, this approach may facilitate
healthcare professionals and patients
making better informed decisions, by
helping ensure a device cleared through
this pathway meets a transparent set of
performance criteria. At the same time,
this approach satisfies the statutory
standard for demonstrating substantial
equivalence. As a result, this expanded
approach is intended to promote the
public health by helping patients gain
more timely access to new medical
devices that are high quality, safe, and
effective. FDA welcomes public input
on device types for which FDA should
consider identifying performance
criteria and evidence-based suggestions
on what the performance criteria should
be.
II. Significance of Guidance
This draft guidance is being issued
consistent with FDA’s good guidance
practices regulation (§ 10.115). The draft
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:20 Apr 11, 2018
Jkt 244001
guidance, when finalized, will represent
the current thinking of FDA on
‘‘Expansion of the Abbreviated 510(k)
Program: Demonstrating Substantial
Equivalence Through Performance
Criteria; Draft Guidance for Industry and
Food and Drug Administration Staff.’’ It
does not establish any rights for any
person and is not binding on FDA or the
public. You can use an alternative
approach if it satisfies the requirements
of the applicable statutes and
regulations. This guidance is not subject
to Executive Order 12866.
III. Electronic Access
Persons interested in obtaining a copy
of the draft guidance may do so by
downloading an electronic copy from
the internet. A search capability for all
Center for Devices and Radiological
Health guidance documents is available
at https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/
DeviceRegulationandGuidance/
GuidanceDocuments/default.htm. This
draft guidance document is also
available at either https://www.fda.gov/
BiologicsBloodVaccines/Guidance
ComplianceRegulatoryInformation/
default.htm or https://
www.regulations.gov. Persons unable to
download an electronic copy of
‘‘Expansion of the Abbreviated 510(k)
Program: Demonstrating Substantial
Equivalence Through Performance
Criteria; Draft Guidance for Industry and
Food and Drug Administration Staff’’
may send an email request to CDRHGuidance@fda.hhs.gov to receive an
electronic copy of the document. Please
use the document number 17038 to
identify the guidance you are
requesting.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This draft guidance refers to
previously approved collections of
information found in FDA regulations
and guidance. These collections of
information are subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). The
collections of information in 21 CFR
807, subpart E have been approved
under OMB control number 0910–0120
and the collections of information in the
guidance document ‘‘Requests for
Feedback on Medical Device
Submissions: The Pre-Submission
Program and Meetings with Food and
Drug Administration Staff’’ have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0756.
V. Reference
The following reference is on display
in the Dockets Management Staff (see
ADDRESSES) and is available for viewing
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
by interested persons between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday; it
is also available electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov. FDA has verified
the website address, as of the date this
document publishes in the Federal
Register, but websites are subject to
change over time.
1. ‘‘The 510(k) Program: Evaluating
Substantial Equivalence in Premarket
Notifications [510(k)]—Guidance for
Industry and Food and Drug
Administration Staff,’’ July 28, 2014,
available at: https://www.fda.gov/
MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulation
andGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/
UCM284443.
Dated: April 9, 2018.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018–07564 Filed 4–11–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2014–N–1030]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for Office of
Management and Budget Review;
Comment Request; Food Allergen
Labeling and Reporting
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing
that a proposed collection of
information has been submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Fax written comments on the
collection of information by May 14,
2018.
ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on
the information collection are received,
OMB recommends that written
comments be faxed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, Fax: 202–
395–7285, or emailed to oira_
submission@omb.eop.gov. All
comments should be identified with the
OMB control number 0910–0792. Also
include the FDA docket number found
in brackets in the heading of this
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Domini Bean, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, Three
White Flint North, 10A–12M, 11601
Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\12APN1.SGM
12APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 71 (Thursday, April 12, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15847-15848]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-07564]
[[Page 15847]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2018-D-1387]
Expansion of the Abbreviated 510(k) Program: Demonstrating
Substantial Equivalence Through Performance Criteria; Draft Guidance
for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff; Availability
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is announcing
the availability of the draft guidance entitled ``Expansion of the
Abbreviated 510(k) Program: Demonstrating Substantial Equivalence
Through Performance Criteria; Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and
Drug Administration Staff.'' This draft guidance provides FDA's current
thinking on expanding the abbreviated 510(k) program for demonstrating
substantial equivalence for premarket notification (510(k))
submissions. The intent of the draft guidance is to describe an
optional program for certain well understood device types, where a
submitter could demonstrate that a new device meets FDA-identified
performance criteria instead of directly comparing the performance of
the new device to a specific, submitter-identified predicate device as
part of a demonstration of substantial equivalence. This draft guidance
is not final nor is it in effect at this time.
DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the draft
guidance by July 11, 2018 to ensure that the Agency considers your
comment on this draft guidance before it begins work on the final
version of the guidance.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on any guidance at any time as
follows:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2018-D-1387 for ``Expansion of the Abbreviated 510(k) Program:
Demonstrating Substantial Equivalence Through Performance Criteria;
Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff.''
Received comments will be placed in the docket and, except for those
submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets Management Staff between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish
your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you
can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of
your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
You may submit comments on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)).
An electronic copy of the guidance document is available for
download from the internet. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
for information on electronic access to the guidance. Submit written
requests for a single hard copy of the draft guidance document entitled
``Expansion of the Abbreviated 510(k) Program: Demonstrating
Substantial Equivalence Through Performance Criteria; Draft Guidance
for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff'' to the Office of
the Center Director, Guidance and Policy Development, Center for
Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 5431, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002;
or the Office of Communication, Outreach and Development, Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 3128, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002.
Send one self-addressed adhesive label to assist that office in
processing your request.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For Center for Devices and Radiological Health-regulated devices:
Sonja Fulmer, Office of the Center Director, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 5421, Silver
Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-402-5979.
For Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research-regulated devices:
Stephen Ripley, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave.,
Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 240-402-7911.
[[Page 15848]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FDA has explained and clarified, through the guidance entitled,
``The 510(k) Program: Evaluating Substantial Equivalence in Premarket
Notifications [510(k)]'' (Ref. 1), how it makes substantial equivalence
decisions under section 513(i)(1)(A) of the Federal, Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 360c(i)(1)(A)). Substantial
equivalence is rooted in comparisons between new devices and predicate
devices. However, the FD&C Act does not preclude FDA from using
performance criteria to facilitate this comparison. If a legally
marketed device performs at certain levels relevant to its safety and
effectiveness, and a new device meets or exceeds those levels of
performance for the same characteristics, FDA could find the new device
as safe and effective as the legally marketed device. Instead of
reviewing data from direct comparison testing between the two devices,
FDA could support a finding of substantial equivalence with data
showing the new device meets or exceeds the level of performance of
appropriate predicate device(s). Under the approach expanded in this
guidance, a submitter could satisfy the requirement to compare its
device with a legally marketed device by, among other things,
demonstrating conformance to performance criteria established in FDA-
recognized consensus standards, FDA guidance, and/or special controls.
Use of this approach may also streamline the review of 510(k)
submissions, thereby reducing burdens on the Agency and possibly review
times on individual submissions. In addition, this approach may
facilitate healthcare professionals and patients making better informed
decisions, by helping ensure a device cleared through this pathway
meets a transparent set of performance criteria. At the same time, this
approach satisfies the statutory standard for demonstrating substantial
equivalence. As a result, this expanded approach is intended to promote
the public health by helping patients gain more timely access to new
medical devices that are high quality, safe, and effective. FDA
welcomes public input on device types for which FDA should consider
identifying performance criteria and evidence-based suggestions on what
the performance criteria should be.
II. Significance of Guidance
This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good
guidance practices regulation (Sec. 10.115). The draft guidance, when
finalized, will represent the current thinking of FDA on ``Expansion of
the Abbreviated 510(k) Program: Demonstrating Substantial Equivalence
Through Performance Criteria; Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and
Drug Administration Staff.'' It does not establish any rights for any
person and is not binding on FDA or the public. You can use an
alternative approach if it satisfies the requirements of the applicable
statutes and regulations. This guidance is not subject to Executive
Order 12866.
III. Electronic Access
Persons interested in obtaining a copy of the draft guidance may do
so by downloading an electronic copy from the internet. A search
capability for all Center for Devices and Radiological Health guidance
documents is available at https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/default.htm. This draft
guidance document is also available at either https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/default.htm or https://www.regulations.gov. Persons unable to download
an electronic copy of ``Expansion of the Abbreviated 510(k) Program:
Demonstrating Substantial Equivalence Through Performance Criteria;
Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff''
may send an email request to [email protected] to receive an
electronic copy of the document. Please use the document number 17038
to identify the guidance you are requesting.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This draft guidance refers to previously approved collections of
information found in FDA regulations and guidance. These collections of
information are subject to review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520). The collections of information in 21 CFR 807, subpart E have
been approved under OMB control number 0910-0120 and the collections of
information in the guidance document ``Requests for Feedback on Medical
Device Submissions: The Pre-Submission Program and Meetings with Food
and Drug Administration Staff'' have been approved under OMB control
number 0910-0756.
V. Reference
The following reference is on display in the Dockets Management
Staff (see ADDRESSES) and is available for viewing by interested
persons between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday; it is also
available electronically at https://www.regulations.gov. FDA has
verified the website address, as of the date this document publishes in
the Federal Register, but websites are subject to change over time.
1. ``The 510(k) Program: Evaluating Substantial Equivalence in
Premarket Notifications [510(k)]--Guidance for Industry and Food and
Drug Administration Staff,'' July 28, 2014, available at: https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/UCM284443.
Dated: April 9, 2018.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-07564 Filed 4-11-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P