Proposed Data Collection Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations, 15839-15840 [2018-07562]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 71 / Thursday, April 12, 2018 / Notices the agency name and docket number [CDC–2018–0033; NIOSH–311]. All relevant comments received will be posted without change to https:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov. All information received in response to this notice will also be available for public examination and copying at the NIOSH Docket Office, 1150 Tusculum Avenue, Room 155, Cincinnati, OH 45226–1998. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Novicki (NORACoordinator@ cdc.gov), National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Mailstop E–20, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30329, phone (404) 498– 2581 (not a toll free number). The National Occupational Research Agenda (NORA) is a partnership program created to stimulate innovative research and improved workplace practices. The national agenda is developed and implemented through the NORA sector and cross-sector councils. Each council develops and maintains an agenda for its sector or cross-sector. Background: The National Occupational Research Agenda for Public Safety is intended to identify the research, information, and actions most urgently needed to prevent occupational injuries. The National Occupational Research Agenda for public safety provides a vehicle for stakeholders to describe the most relevant issues, gaps, and safety and health needs for the public safety sector. Each NORA research agenda is meant to guide or promote high priority research efforts on a national level, conducted by various entities, including: government, higher education, and the private sector. The first National Occupational Research Agenda for Public Safety was published in 2009 for the second decade of NORA (2006–2016). This draft is an updated agenda for the third decade of NORA (2016–2026). The revised agenda was developed considering new information about injuries and illnesses, the state of the science, and the probability that new information and approaches will make a difference. As the steward of the NORA process, NIOSH invites comments on the draft National Occupational Research Agenda for Public Safety. Comments expressing support or with specific recommendations to improve the Agenda are requested. A copy of the draft Agenda is available at https:// sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:20 Apr 11, 2018 Jkt 244001 www.regulations.gov (see Docket Number CDC–2018–0033). John J. Howard, Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [FR Doc. 2018–07374 Filed 4–11–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4163–19–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [60Day–18–18UF; Docket No. CDC–2018– 0032] Proposed Data Collection Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). ACTION: Notice with comment period. AGENCY: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), as part of its continuing effort to reduce public burden and maximize the utility of government information, invites the general public and other Federal agencies the opportunity to comment on a proposed and/or continuing information collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This notice invites comment on a proposed information collection project titled Evidence to Inform Standards that Ensure Turnout Gear Remains Protective Throughout Its Lifecycle that will provide data that links turnout gear use conditions to its resulting performance characteristics. DATES: CDC must receive written comments on or before June 11, 2018. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. CDC–2018– 0032 by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Mail: Leroy A. Richardson, Information Collection Review Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, MS– D74, Atlanta, Georgia 30329. Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name and Docket Number. CDC will post, without change, all relevant comments to Regulations.gov. Please note: Submit all Federal comments through the Federal eRulemaking portal (regulations.gov) or by U.S. mail to the address listed above. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request more information on the SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 15839 proposed project or to obtain a copy of the information collection plan and instruments, contact Leroy A. Richardson, Information Collection Review Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, MS–D74, Atlanta, Georgia 30329; phone: 404–639–7570; Email: omb@cdc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), Federal agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor. In addition, the PRA also requires Federal agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including each new proposed collection, each proposed extension of existing collection of information, and each reinstatement of previously approved information collection before submitting the collection to the OMB for approval. To comply with this requirement, we are publishing this notice of a proposed data collection as described below. The OMB is particularly interested in comments that will help: 1. Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; 2. Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; 3. Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and 4. Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submissions of responses. 5. Assess information collection costs. Proposed Project Evidence to Inform Standards that Ensure Turnout Gear Remains Protective Throughout Its Lifecycle— New—National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Background and Brief Description The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has been tasked to assure safe E:\FR\FM\12APN1.SGM 12APN1 15840 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 71 / Thursday, April 12, 2018 / Notices and healthful working conditions for men and women (Occupational Safety and Health Act, 1970, Pub. L. 91–596 (Section 20[a][1])). The National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory focuses on improving personal protective equipment across many industries, including the fire services. NIOSH seeks to request a three-year Office of Management and Budget approval to gather data about Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) use conditions. Turnout gear is a type of PPE used by the 1.1 million U.S. fire fighters to shield the body from carcinogens, flames, heat, and chemical/biological agents. It serves as a barrier to external hazards while simultaneously allowing for the escape of metabolic heat to prevent elevated core body temperatures. To provide the necessary performance characteristics, turnout gear design is complex, consisting of three major layers that work as a composite—a thermal liner, a moisture barrier, and an outer shell. Consensus standards provide performance requirements and retirement criteria for turnout gear. The retirement criteria is based on visual inspections and a 10-year age cap with visual inspection being less effective for the moisture barrier and thermal liner layers. Recent data of turnout gear (2) surveying the fire fighters assigned to each set of sampled gear to obtain one-month of retrospective information about the use conditions to which it was likely exposed; and (3) a 6-month prospective data collection where the fire fighters assigned to each set of sampled gear provide information about their shiftspecific exposures. The survey will provide details about the use conditions (e.g., number and type of launderings, repair history, and exposure to fire-related calls) specific to the fire fighters who used the sampled turnout gear. The data produced by this study will be used to improve confidence that turnout gear will remain protective throughout its lifecycle. Samples of 300 individuals will be collected from three fire departments. The time required to complete a data collection instrument will be about 30 minutes for the paper retrospective study and 10 minutes for each electronic prospective survey to be completed at the end of each shift, which is estimated to be 60 shifts over a 6-month period. The following table provides an estimate of the annualized burden hours. The estimated total hours for this information collection is 3,150, over a three-year timeframe, with a maximum of 300 people. donated from fire departments demonstrates that turnout gear from 2 to 10 years old was unable to meet all performance requirements. Thus, under the current retirement criteria, turnout gear that may not be protective against all hazards is being used by fire fighters. Intuitively, the use conditions to which turnout gear would be exposed to when used by a large or medium metropolitan fire department would be very different from those of a smaller department. However, the absence of scientific data to link performance to use conditions (e.g., number and type of washings, number of fire-related calls) provides a barrier to transitioning to an alternative approach to retirement. This study will obtain a statistically meaningful sample of turnout gear from three fire departments. The use conditions for the sampled turnout gear will be determined, and the gear will be subjected to established performance requirements. For each set of gear, its performance will be directly linked to its use condition history. This combined lab and field data will help determine if there is a relationship between turnout and gear use conditions. As well as the ability for turnout, gear too effectively protect the user. The use conditions for each set of sampled gear will be determined by: (1) Reviewing fire department records, practices, and policies; ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS Number of respondents Number of responses per respondent Average burden per response (in hours) Total burden (in hours) Type of respondents Form name Individual Fire Fighter .... Turnout Gear Safety Survey—Retrospective Exposures for past month. Turnout Gear Safety Survey—Prospective Exposures for six months. 100 1 30/60 50 100 60 10/60 1,000 .............................................................................. ........................ ........................ ........................ 1,050 Total ........................ Leroy A. Richardson, Chief, Information Collection Review Office, Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of the Associate Director for Science, Office of the Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [FR Doc. 2018–07562 Filed 4–11–18; 8:45 am] DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [60Day–18–0200; Docket No. CDC–2018– 0030] sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES BILLING CODE 4163–18–P Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). ACTION: Notice with comment period. AGENCY: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), as part of SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:20 Apr 11, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00057 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 its continuing effort to reduce public burden and maximize the utility of government information, invites the general public and other Federal agencies the opportunity to comment on a proposed and/or continuing information collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This notice invites comment on a proposed information collection project titled ‘‘Coal Workers’ Health Surveillance Program (CWHSP). The CWHSP is a congressionally-mandated medical examination program for monitoring the health of coal miners and was originally established under the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety E:\FR\FM\12APN1.SGM 12APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 71 (Thursday, April 12, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15839-15840]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-07562]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

[60Day-18-18UF; Docket No. CDC-2018-0032]


Proposed Data Collection Submitted for Public Comment and 
Recommendations

AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of 
Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice with comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), as part 
of its continuing effort to reduce public burden and maximize the 
utility of government information, invites the general public and other 
Federal agencies the opportunity to comment on a proposed and/or 
continuing information collection, as required by the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995. This notice invites comment on a proposed 
information collection project titled Evidence to Inform Standards that 
Ensure Turnout Gear Remains Protective Throughout Its Lifecycle that 
will provide data that links turnout gear use conditions to its 
resulting performance characteristics.

DATES: CDC must receive written comments on or before June 11, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. CDC-2018-
0032 by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Regulations.gov. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Leroy A. Richardson, Information Collection Review 
Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road 
NE, MS-D74, Atlanta, Georgia 30329.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and Docket Number. CDC will post, without change, all relevant comments 
to Regulations.gov.
    Please note: Submit all Federal comments through the Federal 
eRulemaking portal (regulations.gov) or by U.S. mail to the address 
listed above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request more information on the 
proposed project or to obtain a copy of the information collection plan 
and instruments, contact Leroy A. Richardson, Information Collection 
Review Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton 
Road NE, MS-D74, Atlanta, Georgia 30329; phone: 404-639-7570; Email: 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 
(PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal agencies must obtain approval from 
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for each collection of 
information they conduct or sponsor. In addition, the PRA also requires 
Federal agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal Register 
concerning each proposed collection of information, including each new 
proposed collection, each proposed extension of existing collection of 
information, and each reinstatement of previously approved information 
collection before submitting the collection to the OMB for approval. To 
comply with this requirement, we are publishing this notice of a 
proposed data collection as described below.
    The OMB is particularly interested in comments that will help:
    1. Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is 
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, 
including whether the information will have practical utility;
    2. Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of 
the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the 
methodology and assumptions used;
    3. Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to 
be collected; and
    4. Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those 
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, 
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or 
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic 
submissions of responses.
    5. Assess information collection costs.

Proposed Project

    Evidence to Inform Standards that Ensure Turnout Gear Remains 
Protective Throughout Its Lifecycle--New--National Institute for 
Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC).

Background and Brief Description

    The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) 
has been tasked to assure safe

[[Page 15840]]

and healthful working conditions for men and women (Occupational Safety 
and Health Act, 1970, Pub. L. 91-596 (Section 20[a][1])). The National 
Personal Protective Technology Laboratory focuses on improving personal 
protective equipment across many industries, including the fire 
services. NIOSH seeks to request a three-year Office of Management and 
Budget approval to gather data about Personal Protective Equipment 
(PPE) use conditions.
    Turnout gear is a type of PPE used by the 1.1 million U.S. fire 
fighters to shield the body from carcinogens, flames, heat, and 
chemical/biological agents. It serves as a barrier to external hazards 
while simultaneously allowing for the escape of metabolic heat to 
prevent elevated core body temperatures. To provide the necessary 
performance characteristics, turnout gear design is complex, consisting 
of three major layers that work as a composite--a thermal liner, a 
moisture barrier, and an outer shell.
    Consensus standards provide performance requirements and retirement 
criteria for turnout gear. The retirement criteria is based on visual 
inspections and a 10-year age cap with visual inspection being less 
effective for the moisture barrier and thermal liner layers. Recent 
data of turnout gear donated from fire departments demonstrates that 
turnout gear from 2 to 10 years old was unable to meet all performance 
requirements. Thus, under the current retirement criteria, turnout gear 
that may not be protective against all hazards is being used by fire 
fighters.
    Intuitively, the use conditions to which turnout gear would be 
exposed to when used by a large or medium metropolitan fire department 
would be very different from those of a smaller department. However, 
the absence of scientific data to link performance to use conditions 
(e.g., number and type of washings, number of fire-related calls) 
provides a barrier to transitioning to an alternative approach to 
retirement.
    This study will obtain a statistically meaningful sample of turnout 
gear from three fire departments. The use conditions for the sampled 
turnout gear will be determined, and the gear will be subjected to 
established performance requirements. For each set of gear, its 
performance will be directly linked to its use condition history. This 
combined lab and field data will help determine if there is a 
relationship between turnout and gear use conditions. As well as the 
ability for turnout, gear too effectively protect the user.
    The use conditions for each set of sampled gear will be determined 
by:
    (1) Reviewing fire department records, practices, and policies;
    (2) surveying the fire fighters assigned to each set of sampled 
gear to obtain one-month of retrospective information about the use 
conditions to which it was likely exposed; and
    (3) a 6-month prospective data collection where the fire fighters 
assigned to each set of sampled gear provide information about their 
shift-specific exposures.
    The survey will provide details about the use conditions (e.g., 
number and type of launderings, repair history, and exposure to fire-
related calls) specific to the fire fighters who used the sampled 
turnout gear. The data produced by this study will be used to improve 
confidence that turnout gear will remain protective throughout its 
lifecycle. Samples of 300 individuals will be collected from three fire 
departments. The time required to complete a data collection instrument 
will be about 30 minutes for the paper retrospective study and 10 
minutes for each electronic prospective survey to be completed at the 
end of each shift, which is estimated to be 60 shifts over a 6-month 
period.
    The following table provides an estimate of the annualized burden 
hours. The estimated total hours for this information collection is 
3,150, over a three-year timeframe, with a maximum of 300 people.

                                                            Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                              Average
                                                                                             Number of       Number of      burden per     Total burden
              Type of respondents                               Form name                   respondents    responses per   response  (in    (in hours)
                                                                                                            respondent        hours)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Individual Fire Fighter........................  Turnout Gear Safety Survey--                        100               1           30/60              50
                                                  Retrospective Exposures for past month.
                                                 Turnout Gear Safety Survey--Prospective             100              60           10/60           1,000
                                                  Exposures for six months.
                                                                                         ---------------------------------------------------------------
    Total......................................  .......................................  ..............  ..............  ..............           1,050
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Leroy A. Richardson,
Chief, Information Collection Review Office, Office of Scientific 
Integrity, Office of the Associate Director for Science, Office of the 
Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2018-07562 Filed 4-11-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.