Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; 2018-2020 Small-Mesh Multispecies Specifications, 15780-15783 [2018-07536]
Download as PDF
15780
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 71 / Thursday, April 12, 2018 / Proposed Rules
PART 17—ENDANGERED AND
THREATENED WILDLIFE AND PLANTS
1. The authority citation for part 17
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361–1407; 1531–
1544; 4201–4245, unless otherwise noted.
§ 17.11
[Amended]
2. Amend § 17.11(h) by removing the
entry ‘‘Warbler (wood), Kirtland’s’’
under ‘‘BIRDS’’ from the List of
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife.
■
Dated: March 8, 2018.
James W. Kurth,
Deputy Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Exercising the Authority of the
Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–06864 Filed 4–11–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 180209147–8147–01]
RIN 0648–BH76
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; 2018–2020 Small-Mesh
Multispecies Specifications
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS proposes small-mesh
multispecies specifications for fishing
years 2018–2020 and corrects a
regulatory error from a previous
rulemaking action. The specifications
are intended to establish allowable
catch limits for each stock within the
fishery to control overfishing while
allowing optimum yield. This action
also informs the public of the proposed
fishery specifications and regulatory
correction, and provides an opportunity
for comment.
DATES: Comments must be received by
5:00 p.m. local time, on April 27, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this document, identified by NOAA–
NMFS–2018–0031, by either of the
following methods:
Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal.
1. Go to www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20180031,
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:32 Apr 11, 2018
Jkt 244001
2. Click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and
3. Enter or attach your comments.
—OR—
Mail: Submit written comments to
Michael Pentony, Regional
Administrator, National Marine
Fisheries Service, 55 Great Republic
Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930. Mark the
outside of the envelope: ‘‘Comments on
the Proposed Rule for Small-Mesh
Multispecies Specifications.’’
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter
‘‘N/A’’ in the required fields if you wish
to remain anonymous).
A draft environmental assessment
(EA) has been prepared for this action
that describes the proposed measures
and other considered alternatives, as
well as provides an analysis of the
impacts of the proposed measures and
alternatives. Copies of the specifications
document, including the EA and the
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(IRFA), are available on request from
Thomas A. Nies, Executive Director,
New England Fishery Management
Council, 50 Water Street, Newburyport,
MA 01950. These documents are also
accessible via the internet at
www.nefmc.org.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cynthia Hanson, Fishery Management
Specialist, (978) 281–9180.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The New England Fishery
Management Council manages the
small-mesh multispecies fishery within
the Northeast Multispecies Fishery
Management Plan (FMP). The smallmesh multispecies fishery is composed
of five stocks of three species of hakes:
Northern silver hake, southern silver
hake, northern red hake, southern red
hake, and offshore hake. Southern silver
hake and offshore hake are often
grouped together and collectively
referred to as ‘‘southern whiting.’’ The
small-mesh multispecies fishery is
managed separately from the groundfish
fishery because it is conducted with
much smaller mesh, and does not
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
generally result in the catch of regulated
groundfish species like cod and
haddock. Amendment 19 to the FMP
(April 4, 2013; 78 FR 20260) established
the process and framework for setting
catch specifications for the small-mesh
fishery. The FMP requires that catch
and landing limits for the small-mesh
multispecies fishery be established
through the specifications process on an
annual basis for up to three years at a
time.
The Whiting Plan Development Team
(PDT) met in July 2017 to review the
latest Stock Assessment and Fishery
Evaluation (SAFE) report for the smallmesh multispecies fishery. This
assessment update indicated that, in
general, small-mesh multispecies stocks
(whiting and hake) are increasing in the
north and decreasing in the south. The
Council’s Scientific and Statistical
Committee (SSC) conducted a final
review of the PDT’s recommended
specifications and the SAFE report at
their October 2017 meeting. On
December 7, 2017, the Council approved
the final recommended 2018–2020 catch
limit specifications for the small-mesh
multispecies fishery.
During development of these
specifications, NMFS identified an error
in the small-mesh multispecies
regulations. In a previous action (80 FR
30379; May 28, 2015), we approved a
Council-recommended reduction in the
northern red hake possession limit from
5,000 lb (2,268 kg) to 3,000 lb (1,361 kg).
However, when we drafted the rule
implementing this change, we did not
clarify that the possession limit for
southern red hake remained unchanged
at 5,000 lb (2,268 kg). In addition to
setting new specifications for the
whiting fishery for 2018 and projecting
specifications for 2019 and 2020, this
action would correct the error, and
clarify the red hake possession limits in
the regulations.
The recommended specifications
would adjust the overfishing limit
(OFL), allowable biological catch (ABC),
annual catch limit (ACL), and total
allowable landings (TAL) for the four
main stocks in the small-mesh
multispecies fishery (Table 1). These
adjustments are based on Council
recommendations, and account for the
changes in stock biomass shown in the
latest stock assessment update from
2017. The specification limits are
intended to provide for sustainable
yield and keep the risk of overfishing at
acceptable levels as defined by the
Council and its SSC.
Proposed Specifications
This action proposes the Council’s
recommended specifications for the
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 71 / Thursday, April 12, 2018 / Proposed Rules
2018–2020 small-mesh multispecies
fishery, which are consistent with the
catch and landings limits recommended
by the PDT and SSC. A summary of the
15781
proposed specifications is shown below
in Table 1.
TABLE 1—SUMMARY OF PROPOSED SMALL-MESH MULTISPECIES SPECIFICATIONS FOR FISHING YEARS 2018–2020, WITH
PERCENT CHANGE FROM 2017, IN METRIC TONS
OFL
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Northern Silver Hake ...............................
Northern Red Hake ..................................
Southern Whiting .....................................
Southern Red Hake .................................
58,350
840
31,180
1,150
These proposed specifications
represent increases in the catch limits of
the northern stocks, and decreases in
the catch limits of the southern stocks.
These changes are unlikely to have a
significant impact because generally the
small-mesh multispecies fishery
harvests less than 50 percent of any
given TAL each year; except in the case
of northern red hake. In the southern
fishery, southern red hake landings have
approached 50 percent of the TAL,
while southern whiting landings have
not exceeded 20 percent of the TAL in
the last five years. The northern fishery
is usually limited by the northern red
hake stock, which has achieved or
exceeded the TAL, triggering inseason
accountability measures (AM) to reduce
the possession limit, each year for the
past several years. These restrictions
often prevent the northern silver hake
landings from reaching much higher
than 30 percent of the TAL because of
the geographic overlap of the two
species and similar fishing practices
used. The proposed increase to the
northern stocks catch limits, based on
evidence in the SAFE report that
populations of northern silver hake and
northern red hake have increased, may
have a positive impact on the fishery by
delaying the need for inseason AMs,
avoiding unnecessary discards, and
allowing better utilization of the
increase in biomass of both stocks.
The 2017 stock assessment update
showed that the risk of overfishing in
the northern stocks is relatively low.
Therefore, the increase in ACL and TAL
should not negatively affect the
northern stocks. However, the update
did show that southern red hake is
overfished and overfishing is occurring,
and while southern whiting is not
overfished, the stock is declining. The
Council was notified of the overfished
status of southern red hake at their
meeting in Gloucester, MA on
September 26, 2017, and will begin
development of a rebuilding program
within the next couple of years. The
decrease in southern ACLs is intended
to end overfishing. Because recruitment
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Apr 11, 2018
Jkt 244001
ABC
ACL
31,030
721
19,395
1,060
29,475
685
18,425
1,007
data is conflicting in recent years, the
Council is suggesting a full benchmark
assessment to re-evaluate southern red
hake status before initiating the
rebuilding process. The next benchmark
assessment for small-mesh multispecies
is scheduled for 2019. All other
management measures in the smallmesh multispecies fishery (such as
possession limits) will remain
unchanged. If approved, these
specifications would remain effective
for fishing years 2018–2020 unless
otherwise revised during that time.
Regulatory Correction
This action also proposes to correct
regulatory text that specifies the red
hake possession limits in the southern
small mesh exemption areas (Southern
New England and Mid-Atlantic
Exemption Areas). In the 2015–2017
specifications for the small-mesh
multispecies fishery (May 28, 2015; 80
FR 30379), the possession limit for red
hake in the northern exemption areas
was reduced from 5,000 lb (2,268 kg) to
3,000 lb (1,361 kg), but did not specify
that the possession limit in the southern
areas would remain 5,000 lb (2,268 kg).
The Council never intended to change
the possession limit for the southern red
hake fishery. This action would modify
the text in the regulations, consistent
with the Council’s intent, to specify that
the northern red hake possession limit
is 3,000 lb (1,361 kg), and the southern
red hake possession limit remains 5,000
lb (2,268 kg). This minor modification
would reduce confusion in the industry,
as it clarifies the difference in red hake
possession limits between the northern
and southern exemption areas, as
originally intended by the Council.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the
Magnuson Stevens Fishery Conservation
and Management Act (MagnusonStevens Act), the NMFS Assistant
Administrator has determined that this
proposed rule is consistent with the
Northeast Multispecies FMP, other
provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Percent
change
+27
+45
¥35
¥38
TAL
26,604
274
14,465
305
Percent
change
+33
+128
¥39
¥59
Act, and other applicable law, subject to
further consideration after public
comment.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
The Council prepared a draft EA for
this action that analyzes the impacts of
this proposed rule. The EA includes an
IRFA, as required by section 603 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), which
is supplemented by information
contained in the preamble of this
proposed rule. The IRFA was prepared
to examine the economic impacts of this
proposed rule, if adopted, on small
business entities. A description of the
specifications, why they are being
considered, and the legal basis for this
action are contained at the beginning of
this section and in the preamble to this
proposed rule. A copy of the detailed
RFA analysis is available from the
Council (see ADDRESSES). A summary of
the 2018–2020 small-mesh multispecies
specifications IRFA analysis follows.
Description of the Reasons Why Action
by the Agency Is Being Considered
This action proposes catch limits and
fishery specifications for the 2018–2020
small-mesh multispecies fishery. The
measures are consistent with the best
scientific information available, and the
most recent catch limit
recommendations of the Council’s SSC
to prevent overfishing, as well as
achieve sustainable yield in the fishery.
This action also clarifies regulatory text
to specify the red hake possession limits
for the northern and southern stocks.
Statement of the Objectives of, and
Legal Basis for, This Proposed Rule
The legal basis and objectives for this
action are contained in the preamble to
this proposed rule, and are not repeated
here.
Description and Estimate of the Number
of Small Entities to Which This
Proposed Rule Would Apply
This proposed rule affects commercial
fish harvesting entities engaged in the
northeast multispecies limited access
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
15782
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 71 / Thursday, April 12, 2018 / Proposed Rules
fishery and the small-mesh multispecies
fishery. For the purposes of the RFA
analysis, the ownership entities (or
firms), not the individual vessels, are
considered to be the regulated entities.
Ownership entities are defined as those
entities or firms with common
ownership personnel as listed on the
permit application. Because of this,
some vessels with northeast
multispecies permits may be considered
to be part of the same firm because they
may have the same owners. The North
American Industry Classification
System (NAICS) is the standard used by
Federal statistical agencies in classifying
business establishments for the purpose
of collecting, analyzing, and publishing
statistical data related to the U.S.
business economy. In terms of RFA, a
business primarily engaged in
commercial fishing activity is classified
as a small business if it has combined
annual gross receipts not in excess of
$11 million (NAICS 11411) for all its
affiliated operations worldwide. To
identify these small and large firms,
vessel ownership data from the permit
database were grouped according to
common owners and sorted by size. The
current ownership data set used for this
analysis is based on calendar year 2016
(the most recent complete year
available) and contains average gross
sales associated with those permits for
calendar years 2014 through 2016.
The small-mesh exempted fishery
allows vessels to harvest species in
designated areas using mesh sizes
smaller than the minimum mesh size
required by Regulated Mesh Area (RMA)
regulations. To participate in the smallmesh multispecies exempted fishery,
vessels must possess either a limited
access multispecies permit (categories
A, C, D, E or F) or an open access
multispecies permit (category K).
Limited access multispecies permit
holders can target small-mesh
multispecies with different possession
limit requirements depending on fishing
region and mesh size used, and open
access, Category K permit holders may
fish for small-mesh multispecies when
participating in an exempted fishing
program. Therefore, entities holding one
or more multispecies permits (permit
type A, C–F, K) are the entities that have
the potential to be directly impacted by
this action. According to the
commercial database, there were 853
distinct ownership entities, based on
entities’ participation during the 2014–
2016 time-period, that could potentially
target small-mesh multispecies. This
includes entities that could not be
classified into a business type because
they did not earn revenue from landing
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Apr 11, 2018
Jkt 244001
and selling fish in 2014–2016 and thus
are considered to be small. Of the 853
total firms, 844 are categorized as small
business entities and nine are
categorized as large business.
While 853 commercial entities have
the potential to be impacted by the
proposed action, not all of these entities
actively land small-mesh multispecies
for commercial sale. Therefore, not all
853 entities may be directly affected by
the proposed action. There are 406
distinct entities that commercially sold
small-mesh multispecies from 2014–
2016 and may be directly affected by the
proposed action. Of those, 404 (over 99
percent) are categorized as small
business.
Description of the Projected Reporting,
Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements of This Proposed Rule
There are no new reporting,
recordkeeping, or other compliance
requirements contained in this proposed
rule, or any of the alternatives
considered for this action.
Federal Rules Which May Duplicate,
Overlap, or Conflict With This Proposed
Rule
NMFS is not aware of any relevant
Federal rules that may duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with this proposed
rule.
Description of Significant Alternatives
to the Proposed Action Which
Accomplish the Stated Objectives of
Applicable Statutes and Which
Minimize Any Significant Economic
Impact on Small Entities
This action (the preferred alternative)
proposes 2018–2020 commercial catch
specifications for the small-mesh
multispecies fishery based on the most
recent stock assessment update, which
would increase the ACLs and TALs for
the northern stocks of red and silver
hake, and decrease the ACLs and TALs
of southern red hake and whiting. The
Council also considered a No Action
alternative, where the same catch limits
and specifications from 2017 would
continue into 2018 with no change.
Only these two alternatives are
considered significant because in order
to be considered, alternatives must be
recommended by the Council and
satisfy Magnuson-Stevens Act
requirements. These alternatives were
the only two that met these
qualifications.
While catch limits for the southern
stocks are more restrictive in the
preferred alternative, they will not
necessarily have a negative impact.
Landings of both southern whiting and
southern red hake in 2016 were well
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
below the respective 2016 TALs, and
southern whiting landings in 2016 were
well below the proposed 2018–2020
preferred specifications. Based on 2016
landings, southern red hake landings
would likely exceed the proposed TAL,
but only by a very small amount.
Therefore, we expect the proposed
action to have minimal economic
impact in the southern region compared
to the no action alternative.
For the northern stocks, the proposed
action is less restrictive than the no
action alternatives and raises the TAL
by 33 percent for silver hake and 128
percent for red hake. This is expected to
have no impact or low positive impacts
on profit relative to the TAL under the
no action alternative, depending on
availability and market conditions.
The Council recommended these
proposed specifications (preferred
alternative) over the no action
alternative to satisfy the MagnusonStevens Act requirements to end
overfishing, while allowing the greatest
opportunity to achieve sustainable
yield. This also increases the likelihood
that the fishery will remain a viable
source of fishing revenues for smallmesh multispecies entities in the long
term, and makes it the better economic
choice. Overall, we expect the proposed
action to have no impact or slight
positive impacts compared to the noaction alternative.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 648
Fisheries, Fishing, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: April 6, 2018.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 648 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PART 648—FISHERIES OF THE
NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
1. The authority citation for part 648
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In § 648.86, revise the introductory
text of paragraphs of (d)(1)(i), (d)(1)(ii),
and (d)(1)(iii), and add paragraph
(d)(1)(v) to read as follows:
■
§ 648.86 NE Multispecies possession
restrictions.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) Vessels possessing on board or
using nets of mesh size smaller than 2.5
in (6.35 cm). Owners or operators of a
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 71 / Thursday, April 12, 2018 / Proposed Rules
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
vessel may possess and land not more
than 3,500 lb (1,588 kg) of combined
silver hake and offshore hake, if either
of the following conditions apply:
*
*
*
*
*
(ii) Vessels possessing on board or
using nets of mesh size equal to or
greater than 2.5 in (6.35 cm) but less
than 3 in (7.62 cm). An owner or
operator of a vessel that is not subject
to the possession limit specified in
paragraph (d)(1)(i) of this section may
possess and land not more than 7,500 lb
(3,402 kg) of combined silver hake and
offshore hake if either of the following
conditions apply:
*
*
*
*
*
(iii) Vessels possessing on board or
using nets of mesh size equal to or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Apr 11, 2018
Jkt 244001
greater than 3 in (7.62 cm). An owner
or operator of a vessel that is not subject
to the possession limits specified in
paragraphs (d)(1)(i) and (ii) of this
section may possess and land not more
than 30,000 lb (13,608 kg) of combined
silver hake and offshore hake when
fishing in the Gulf of Maine or Georges
Bank Exemption Areas, as described in
§ 648.80(a), and not more than 40,000 lb
(18,144 kg) of combined silver hake and
offshore hake when fishing in the
Southern New England or Mid-Atlantic
Exemption Areas, as described in
§§ 648.80(b)(10) and 648.80(c)(5),
respectively, if both of the following
conditions apply:
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
15783
(v) Possession limits for red hake.
Vessels participating in the small-mesh
multispecies fishery consistent with
§ 648.86(d)(1), may possess and land not
more than 3,000 lb (1,361 kg) of red
hake when fishing in the Gulf of Maine
or Georges Bank Exemption areas, as
described in § 648.80(a), and not more
than 5,000 lb (2,268 kg) of red hake
when fishing in the Southern New
England or Mid-Atlantic Exemption
Areas, as described in §§ 648.80(b)(10)
and 648.80(c)(5), respectively.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2018–07536 Filed 4–11–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 71 (Thursday, April 12, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 15780-15783]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-07536]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 180209147-8147-01]
RIN 0648-BH76
Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; 2018-2020 Small-Mesh
Multispecies Specifications
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes small-mesh multispecies specifications for
fishing years 2018-2020 and corrects a regulatory error from a previous
rulemaking action. The specifications are intended to establish
allowable catch limits for each stock within the fishery to control
overfishing while allowing optimum yield. This action also informs the
public of the proposed fishery specifications and regulatory
correction, and provides an opportunity for comment.
DATES: Comments must be received by 5:00 p.m. local time, on April 27,
2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this document, identified by
NOAA-NMFS-2018-0031, by either of the following methods:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public comments via
the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal.
1. Go to www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2018-0031,
2. Click the ``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields,
and
3. Enter or attach your comments.
--OR--
Mail: Submit written comments to Michael Pentony, Regional
Administrator, National Marine Fisheries Service, 55 Great Republic
Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930. Mark the outside of the envelope:
``Comments on the Proposed Rule for Small-Mesh Multispecies
Specifications.''
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are part of the
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily
by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous).
A draft environmental assessment (EA) has been prepared for this
action that describes the proposed measures and other considered
alternatives, as well as provides an analysis of the impacts of the
proposed measures and alternatives. Copies of the specifications
document, including the EA and the Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (IRFA), are available on request from Thomas A. Nies,
Executive Director, New England Fishery Management Council, 50 Water
Street, Newburyport, MA 01950. These documents are also accessible via
the internet at www.nefmc.org.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cynthia Hanson, Fishery Management
Specialist, (978) 281-9180.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The New England Fishery Management Council manages the small-mesh
multispecies fishery within the Northeast Multispecies Fishery
Management Plan (FMP). The small-mesh multispecies fishery is composed
of five stocks of three species of hakes: Northern silver hake,
southern silver hake, northern red hake, southern red hake, and
offshore hake. Southern silver hake and offshore hake are often grouped
together and collectively referred to as ``southern whiting.'' The
small-mesh multispecies fishery is managed separately from the
groundfish fishery because it is conducted with much smaller mesh, and
does not generally result in the catch of regulated groundfish species
like cod and haddock. Amendment 19 to the FMP (April 4, 2013; 78 FR
20260) established the process and framework for setting catch
specifications for the small-mesh fishery. The FMP requires that catch
and landing limits for the small-mesh multispecies fishery be
established through the specifications process on an annual basis for
up to three years at a time.
The Whiting Plan Development Team (PDT) met in July 2017 to review
the latest Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation (SAFE) report for
the small-mesh multispecies fishery. This assessment update indicated
that, in general, small-mesh multispecies stocks (whiting and hake) are
increasing in the north and decreasing in the south. The Council's
Scientific and Statistical Committee (SSC) conducted a final review of
the PDT's recommended specifications and the SAFE report at their
October 2017 meeting. On December 7, 2017, the Council approved the
final recommended 2018-2020 catch limit specifications for the small-
mesh multispecies fishery.
During development of these specifications, NMFS identified an
error in the small-mesh multispecies regulations. In a previous action
(80 FR 30379; May 28, 2015), we approved a Council-recommended
reduction in the northern red hake possession limit from 5,000 lb
(2,268 kg) to 3,000 lb (1,361 kg). However, when we drafted the rule
implementing this change, we did not clarify that the possession limit
for southern red hake remained unchanged at 5,000 lb (2,268 kg). In
addition to setting new specifications for the whiting fishery for 2018
and projecting specifications for 2019 and 2020, this action would
correct the error, and clarify the red hake possession limits in the
regulations.
The recommended specifications would adjust the overfishing limit
(OFL), allowable biological catch (ABC), annual catch limit (ACL), and
total allowable landings (TAL) for the four main stocks in the small-
mesh multispecies fishery (Table 1). These adjustments are based on
Council recommendations, and account for the changes in stock biomass
shown in the latest stock assessment update from 2017. The
specification limits are intended to provide for sustainable yield and
keep the risk of overfishing at acceptable levels as defined by the
Council and its SSC.
Proposed Specifications
This action proposes the Council's recommended specifications for
the
[[Page 15781]]
2018-2020 small-mesh multispecies fishery, which are consistent with
the catch and landings limits recommended by the PDT and SSC. A summary
of the proposed specifications is shown below in Table 1.
Table 1--Summary of Proposed Small-Mesh Multispecies Specifications for Fishing Years 2018-2020, With Percent Change From 2017, in Metric Tons
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OFL ABC ACL Percent change TAL Percent change
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northern Silver Hake.................................... 58,350 31,030 29,475 +27 26,604 +33
Northern Red Hake....................................... 840 721 685 +45 274 +128
Southern Whiting........................................ 31,180 19,395 18,425 -35 14,465 -39
Southern Red Hake....................................... 1,150 1,060 1,007 -38 305 -59
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
These proposed specifications represent increases in the catch
limits of the northern stocks, and decreases in the catch limits of the
southern stocks. These changes are unlikely to have a significant
impact because generally the small-mesh multispecies fishery harvests
less than 50 percent of any given TAL each year; except in the case of
northern red hake. In the southern fishery, southern red hake landings
have approached 50 percent of the TAL, while southern whiting landings
have not exceeded 20 percent of the TAL in the last five years. The
northern fishery is usually limited by the northern red hake stock,
which has achieved or exceeded the TAL, triggering inseason
accountability measures (AM) to reduce the possession limit, each year
for the past several years. These restrictions often prevent the
northern silver hake landings from reaching much higher than 30 percent
of the TAL because of the geographic overlap of the two species and
similar fishing practices used. The proposed increase to the northern
stocks catch limits, based on evidence in the SAFE report that
populations of northern silver hake and northern red hake have
increased, may have a positive impact on the fishery by delaying the
need for inseason AMs, avoiding unnecessary discards, and allowing
better utilization of the increase in biomass of both stocks.
The 2017 stock assessment update showed that the risk of
overfishing in the northern stocks is relatively low. Therefore, the
increase in ACL and TAL should not negatively affect the northern
stocks. However, the update did show that southern red hake is
overfished and overfishing is occurring, and while southern whiting is
not overfished, the stock is declining. The Council was notified of the
overfished status of southern red hake at their meeting in Gloucester,
MA on September 26, 2017, and will begin development of a rebuilding
program within the next couple of years. The decrease in southern ACLs
is intended to end overfishing. Because recruitment data is conflicting
in recent years, the Council is suggesting a full benchmark assessment
to re-evaluate southern red hake status before initiating the
rebuilding process. The next benchmark assessment for small-mesh
multispecies is scheduled for 2019. All other management measures in
the small-mesh multispecies fishery (such as possession limits) will
remain unchanged. If approved, these specifications would remain
effective for fishing years 2018-2020 unless otherwise revised during
that time.
Regulatory Correction
This action also proposes to correct regulatory text that specifies
the red hake possession limits in the southern small mesh exemption
areas (Southern New England and Mid-Atlantic Exemption Areas). In the
2015-2017 specifications for the small-mesh multispecies fishery (May
28, 2015; 80 FR 30379), the possession limit for red hake in the
northern exemption areas was reduced from 5,000 lb (2,268 kg) to 3,000
lb (1,361 kg), but did not specify that the possession limit in the
southern areas would remain 5,000 lb (2,268 kg). The Council never
intended to change the possession limit for the southern red hake
fishery. This action would modify the text in the regulations,
consistent with the Council's intent, to specify that the northern red
hake possession limit is 3,000 lb (1,361 kg), and the southern red hake
possession limit remains 5,000 lb (2,268 kg). This minor modification
would reduce confusion in the industry, as it clarifies the difference
in red hake possession limits between the northern and southern
exemption areas, as originally intended by the Council.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the Magnuson Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), the NMFS
Assistant Administrator has determined that this proposed rule is
consistent with the Northeast Multispecies FMP, other provisions of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable law, subject to further
consideration after public comment.
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
The Council prepared a draft EA for this action that analyzes the
impacts of this proposed rule. The EA includes an IRFA, as required by
section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), which is
supplemented by information contained in the preamble of this proposed
rule. The IRFA was prepared to examine the economic impacts of this
proposed rule, if adopted, on small business entities. A description of
the specifications, why they are being considered, and the legal basis
for this action are contained at the beginning of this section and in
the preamble to this proposed rule. A copy of the detailed RFA analysis
is available from the Council (see ADDRESSES). A summary of the 2018-
2020 small-mesh multispecies specifications IRFA analysis follows.
Description of the Reasons Why Action by the Agency Is Being Considered
This action proposes catch limits and fishery specifications for
the 2018-2020 small-mesh multispecies fishery. The measures are
consistent with the best scientific information available, and the most
recent catch limit recommendations of the Council's SSC to prevent
overfishing, as well as achieve sustainable yield in the fishery. This
action also clarifies regulatory text to specify the red hake
possession limits for the northern and southern stocks.
Statement of the Objectives of, and Legal Basis for, This Proposed Rule
The legal basis and objectives for this action are contained in the
preamble to this proposed rule, and are not repeated here.
Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which This
Proposed Rule Would Apply
This proposed rule affects commercial fish harvesting entities
engaged in the northeast multispecies limited access
[[Page 15782]]
fishery and the small-mesh multispecies fishery. For the purposes of
the RFA analysis, the ownership entities (or firms), not the individual
vessels, are considered to be the regulated entities. Ownership
entities are defined as those entities or firms with common ownership
personnel as listed on the permit application. Because of this, some
vessels with northeast multispecies permits may be considered to be
part of the same firm because they may have the same owners. The North
American Industry Classification System (NAICS) is the standard used by
Federal statistical agencies in classifying business establishments for
the purpose of collecting, analyzing, and publishing statistical data
related to the U.S. business economy. In terms of RFA, a business
primarily engaged in commercial fishing activity is classified as a
small business if it has combined annual gross receipts not in excess
of $11 million (NAICS 11411) for all its affiliated operations
worldwide. To identify these small and large firms, vessel ownership
data from the permit database were grouped according to common owners
and sorted by size. The current ownership data set used for this
analysis is based on calendar year 2016 (the most recent complete year
available) and contains average gross sales associated with those
permits for calendar years 2014 through 2016.
The small-mesh exempted fishery allows vessels to harvest species
in designated areas using mesh sizes smaller than the minimum mesh size
required by Regulated Mesh Area (RMA) regulations. To participate in
the small-mesh multispecies exempted fishery, vessels must possess
either a limited access multispecies permit (categories A, C, D, E or
F) or an open access multispecies permit (category K). Limited access
multispecies permit holders can target small-mesh multispecies with
different possession limit requirements depending on fishing region and
mesh size used, and open access, Category K permit holders may fish for
small-mesh multispecies when participating in an exempted fishing
program. Therefore, entities holding one or more multispecies permits
(permit type A, C-F, K) are the entities that have the potential to be
directly impacted by this action. According to the commercial database,
there were 853 distinct ownership entities, based on entities'
participation during the 2014-2016 time-period, that could potentially
target small-mesh multispecies. This includes entities that could not
be classified into a business type because they did not earn revenue
from landing and selling fish in 2014-2016 and thus are considered to
be small. Of the 853 total firms, 844 are categorized as small business
entities and nine are categorized as large business.
While 853 commercial entities have the potential to be impacted by
the proposed action, not all of these entities actively land small-mesh
multispecies for commercial sale. Therefore, not all 853 entities may
be directly affected by the proposed action. There are 406 distinct
entities that commercially sold small-mesh multispecies from 2014-2016
and may be directly affected by the proposed action. Of those, 404
(over 99 percent) are categorized as small business.
Description of the Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other
Compliance Requirements of This Proposed Rule
There are no new reporting, recordkeeping, or other compliance
requirements contained in this proposed rule, or any of the
alternatives considered for this action.
Federal Rules Which May Duplicate, Overlap, or Conflict With This
Proposed Rule
NMFS is not aware of any relevant Federal rules that may duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with this proposed rule.
Description of Significant Alternatives to the Proposed Action Which
Accomplish the Stated Objectives of Applicable Statutes and Which
Minimize Any Significant Economic Impact on Small Entities
This action (the preferred alternative) proposes 2018-2020
commercial catch specifications for the small-mesh multispecies fishery
based on the most recent stock assessment update, which would increase
the ACLs and TALs for the northern stocks of red and silver hake, and
decrease the ACLs and TALs of southern red hake and whiting. The
Council also considered a No Action alternative, where the same catch
limits and specifications from 2017 would continue into 2018 with no
change. Only these two alternatives are considered significant because
in order to be considered, alternatives must be recommended by the
Council and satisfy Magnuson-Stevens Act requirements. These
alternatives were the only two that met these qualifications.
While catch limits for the southern stocks are more restrictive in
the preferred alternative, they will not necessarily have a negative
impact. Landings of both southern whiting and southern red hake in 2016
were well below the respective 2016 TALs, and southern whiting landings
in 2016 were well below the proposed 2018-2020 preferred
specifications. Based on 2016 landings, southern red hake landings
would likely exceed the proposed TAL, but only by a very small amount.
Therefore, we expect the proposed action to have minimal economic
impact in the southern region compared to the no action alternative.
For the northern stocks, the proposed action is less restrictive
than the no action alternatives and raises the TAL by 33 percent for
silver hake and 128 percent for red hake. This is expected to have no
impact or low positive impacts on profit relative to the TAL under the
no action alternative, depending on availability and market conditions.
The Council recommended these proposed specifications (preferred
alternative) over the no action alternative to satisfy the Magnuson-
Stevens Act requirements to end overfishing, while allowing the
greatest opportunity to achieve sustainable yield. This also increases
the likelihood that the fishery will remain a viable source of fishing
revenues for small-mesh multispecies entities in the long term, and
makes it the better economic choice. Overall, we expect the proposed
action to have no impact or slight positive impacts compared to the no-
action alternative.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 648
Fisheries, Fishing, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: April 6, 2018.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 648 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 648--FISHERIES OF THE NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
0
1. The authority citation for part 648 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 648.86, revise the introductory text of paragraphs of
(d)(1)(i), (d)(1)(ii), and (d)(1)(iii), and add paragraph (d)(1)(v) to
read as follows:
Sec. 648.86 NE Multispecies possession restrictions.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) Vessels possessing on board or using nets of mesh size smaller
than 2.5 in (6.35 cm). Owners or operators of a
[[Page 15783]]
vessel may possess and land not more than 3,500 lb (1,588 kg) of
combined silver hake and offshore hake, if either of the following
conditions apply:
* * * * *
(ii) Vessels possessing on board or using nets of mesh size equal
to or greater than 2.5 in (6.35 cm) but less than 3 in (7.62 cm). An
owner or operator of a vessel that is not subject to the possession
limit specified in paragraph (d)(1)(i) of this section may possess and
land not more than 7,500 lb (3,402 kg) of combined silver hake and
offshore hake if either of the following conditions apply:
* * * * *
(iii) Vessels possessing on board or using nets of mesh size equal
to or greater than 3 in (7.62 cm). An owner or operator of a vessel
that is not subject to the possession limits specified in paragraphs
(d)(1)(i) and (ii) of this section may possess and land not more than
30,000 lb (13,608 kg) of combined silver hake and offshore hake when
fishing in the Gulf of Maine or Georges Bank Exemption Areas, as
described in Sec. 648.80(a), and not more than 40,000 lb (18,144 kg)
of combined silver hake and offshore hake when fishing in the Southern
New England or Mid-Atlantic Exemption Areas, as described in Sec. Sec.
648.80(b)(10) and 648.80(c)(5), respectively, if both of the following
conditions apply:
* * * * *
(v) Possession limits for red hake. Vessels participating in the
small-mesh multispecies fishery consistent with Sec. 648.86(d)(1), may
possess and land not more than 3,000 lb (1,361 kg) of red hake when
fishing in the Gulf of Maine or Georges Bank Exemption areas, as
described in Sec. 648.80(a), and not more than 5,000 lb (2,268 kg) of
red hake when fishing in the Southern New England or Mid-Atlantic
Exemption Areas, as described in Sec. Sec. 648.80(b)(10) and
648.80(c)(5), respectively.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2018-07536 Filed 4-11-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P