Receipt of Several Pesticide Petitions Filed for Residues of Pesticide Chemicals in or on Various Commodities, 15528-15530 [2018-07516]

Download as PDF 15528 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 11, 2018 / Proposed Rules of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); • Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); • Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and • Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by June 11, 2018. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: March 27, 2018. Karen A. Flournoy, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7. For the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA proposes to amend 40 CFR part 52 as set forth below: PART 52—APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart Q—Iowa 2. Section 52.820 paragraph(d) is amended by revising the entry ‘‘(29) Grain Processing Corporation’’ to read as follows: ■ § 52.820 * Identification of plan. * * (d)* * * * * EPA-APPROVED IOWA SOURCE-SPECIFIC ORDERS/PERMITS Name of source Order/Permit No. * (29) Grain Processing Corporation. * Administrative Consent Order No. 2014–AQ–A1. * * * * * * State effective date * 1–16–17 EPA approval date Explanation * * 12/1/14, 79 FR 71025; amendment approved [date of final publication in the Federal Register], [final Federal Register citation]. * * The last sentence of Paragraph 5, Section III and Section VI are not approved by EPA as part of the SIP. * * [FR Doc. 2018–07218 Filed 4–10–18; 8:45 am] * * ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 40 CFR Part 180 nshattuck on DSK9F9SC42PROD with PROPOSALS [EPA–HQ–OPP–2017–0006; FRL–9975–57] Receipt of Several Pesticide Petitions Filed for Residues of Pesticide Chemicals in or on Various Commodities Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice of filing of petitions and request for comment. AGENCY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:52 Apr 10, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 * * This document announces the Agency’s receipt of several initial filings of pesticide petitions requesting the establishment or modification of regulations for residues of pesticide chemicals in or on various commodities. SUMMARY: Comments must be received on or before May 11, 2018. DATES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification (ID) number and the pesticide petition number (PP) of interest as shown in the body of this document, by one of the following methods: ADDRESSES: E:\FR\FM\11APP1.SGM 11APP1 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 11, 2018 / Proposed Rules • Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. • Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001. • Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the instructions at https:// www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more information about dockets generally, is available at https:// www.epa.gov/dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert McNally, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division (BPPD) (7511P), main telephone number: (703) 305–7090, email address: BPPDFRNotices@epa.gov; or Michael Goodis, Registration Division (RD) (7505P), main telephone number: (703) 305–7090, email address: RDFRNotices@epa.gov. The mailing address for each contact person is: Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001. As part of the mailing address, include the contact person’s name, division, and mail code. The division to contact is listed at the end of each pesticide petition summary. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: nshattuck on DSK9F9SC42PROD with PROPOSALS I. General Information A. Does this action apply to me? You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. The following list of North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them. Potentially affected entities may include: • Crop production (NAICS code 111). • Animal production (NAICS code 112). • Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311). • Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532). If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT for the division listed at the VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:52 Apr 10, 2018 Jkt 244001 end of the pesticide petition summary of interest. B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA? 1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or CD–ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD–ROM the specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. 2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting your comments, see the commenting tips at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/ comments.html. 3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to achieve environmental justice, the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of any group, including minority and/or low-income populations, in the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies. To help address potential environmental justice issues, the Agency seeks information on any groups or segments of the population who, as a result of their location, cultural practices, or other factors, may have atypical or disproportionately high and adverse human health impacts or environmental effects from exposure to the pesticides discussed in this document, compared to the general population. II. What action is the Agency taking? EPA is announcing its receipt of several pesticide petitions filed under section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a, requesting the establishment or modification of regulations in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of pesticide chemicals in or on various food commodities. The Agency is taking public comment on the requests before responding to the petitioners. EPA is not proposing any particular action at this time. EPA has determined that the pesticide petitions described in this document contain the data or information prescribed in FFDCA section 408(d)(2), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(2); however, EPA has not fully evaluated PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 15529 the sufficiency of the submitted data at this time or whether the data support granting of the pesticide petitions. After considering the public comments, EPA intends to evaluate whether and what action may be warranted. Additional data may be needed before EPA can make a final determination on these pesticide petitions. Pursuant to 40 CFR 180.7(f), a summary of each of the petitions that are the subject of this document, prepared by the petitioner, is included in a docket EPA has created for each rulemaking. The docket for each of the petitions is available at https:// www.regulations.gov. As specified in FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), EPA is publishing notice of the petitions so that the public has an opportunity to comment on these requests for the establishment or modification of regulations for residues of pesticides in or on food commodities. Further information on the petitions may be obtained through the petition summaries referenced in this unit. New Tolerance Exemptions for Inerts (Except PIPS) 1. PP IN–11074. (EPA–HQ–OPP– 2018–0032). Spring Trading Company, 203 Dogwood Trail, Magnolia, TX 77354, on behalf of Clariant Corporation, Clariant Plastics & Coatings, (Deutschland) GmbH, Bruningstrasse 50, 65929 Frankfurt am Main, Germany, requests to establish an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of rice bran wax (CAS Reg. No. 1883583–80–9) when used as an inert ingredient in pesticide formulations under 40 CFR 180.910, 180.930, and 180.940(a). The petitioner believes no analytical method is needed because it is not required for an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. Contact: RD. 2. PP IN–11075. (EPA–HQ–OPP– 2018–0091). ADAMA Agan, Ltd., c/o Makhteshim Agan of North America, Inc., 3120 Highwoods Blvd., Suite 100, Raleigh NC, requests to establish an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of calcium formate; (CAS Reg. No. 544–17–2) when used as an inert ingredient (carrier) in pesticide formulations applied to growing crops under 40 CFR 180.920. The petitioner believes no analytical method is needed because it is not required for an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. Contact: RD. 3. PP IN–11083. (EPA–HQ–OPP– 2018–0089). Morse Enterprises Limited, Inc., d/b/a KeyPlex, P.O. Box 2515, Winter Park, FL 32790, requests to establish an exemption from the E:\FR\FM\11APP1.SGM 11APP1 15530 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 11, 2018 / Proposed Rules nshattuck on DSK9F9SC42PROD with PROPOSALS requirement of a tolerance for residues of a-terpineol (CAS Reg. No. 98–55–5) when used as an inert ingredient (solvent) in pesticide formulations applied to growing crops under 40 CFR 180.920. The petitioner believes no analytical method is needed because it is not required for an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. Contact: RD. 4. PP IN–11093. (EPA–HQ–OPP– 2018–0090). Morse Enterprises Limited Inc. d/b/a KeyPlex, P.O. Box 2515, Winter Park, FL 32790, requests to establish an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of trans-anethole (CAS Reg. No. 4180– 23–8) when used as an inert ingredient (fragrance) in pesticide formulations applied to growing crops under 40 CFR 180.920. The petitioner believes no analytical method is needed because it is not required for an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. Contact: RD. 5. PP IN–11112. (EPA–HQ–OPP– 2018–0071). SciReg, Inc., 12733 Director’s Loop, Woodbridge, VA 22192, on behalf of Solvay USA Inc., 504 Carnegie Center Princeton, NJ 08540, requests to establish an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues for oxirane, 2-methyl-, polymer with oxirane, mono[2-[2-(2methoxymethylethoxy) methylethoxy]methylether] ether (CAS Reg. No. 2112825–11–1) with a minimum number average molecular weight (in amu) of 10,000 Daltons, when used as an inert ingredient in pesticide formulations under 40 CFR 180.960. The petitioner believes no analytical method is needed because it is not required for an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. Contact: RD. New Tolerance Exemptions for NonInerts (Except PIPS) 1. PP 7F8626. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2018– 0070). Ecolab, Inc., 1 Ecolab Place, St. Paul, MN 55102, requests to establish an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of the antimicrobial pesticide C10–C16 Alkylbenzene Sulfonates in or on food contact surfaces in public eating places, dairy processing equipment, and food processing equipment and utensils up to a maximum of 700 ppm when ready for use, in the end-use concentration. The petitioner believes no analytical method is needed because an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is being proposed. Contact: AD. 2. PP 7F8655. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2018– 0092). Clarke Mosquito Control Products, Inc., 675 Sidwell Ct., St. Charles, IL 60174, requests to establish VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:52 Apr 10, 2018 Jkt 244001 an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of the insecticide l-carvone in or on all raw agricultural commodities. The petitioner believes no analytical method is needed because residues of this chemical are not expected on food commodities due to the ultra-low application rates and the volatile nature of the chemical, which has a vapor pressure of 24.37 Pascals at 25°C and falls into the category of ‘‘intermediate to high volatility under field conditions.’’ Contact: BPPD. New Tolerances for Non-Inerts 1. PP 7E8636. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2018– 0037). Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, P.O. Box 18300, Greensboro, NC 27419, requests to establish a tolerance in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of the insecticide avermectin B1 (a mixture of avermectins containing greater than or equal to 80% avermectin B1a (5-Odemethyl avermectin A1) and less than or equal to 20% avermectin B1b (5-Odemethyl-25-de(1-methylpropyl)-25-(1methylethyl) avermectin A1)) in or on the raw agricultural commodity tea at 1 parts per million (ppm). The analytical methods involve homogenization, filtration, partition, and cleanup with analysis by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-fluorescence detection. Contact: RD. 2. PP 7E8637. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2018– 0037). Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, P.O. Box 18300, Greensboro, NC 27419, requests to establish a tolerance in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of the insecticide avermectin B1 (a mixture of avermectins containing greater than or equal to 80% avermectin B1a (5-Odemethyl avermectin A1) and less than or equal to 20% avermectin B1b (5-Odemethyl-25-de(1-methylpropyl)-25-(1methylethyl) avermectin A1)) in or on the raw agricultural commodity banana at 0.002 parts per million (ppm). The analytical methods involve homogenization, filtration, partition, and cleanup with analysis by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-fluorescence detection. Contact: RD. 3. PP 7E8656. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2018– 0047). Bayer CropScience, 2 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, requests to establish a tolerance in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of the fungicide isotianil, 3,4dichloro-2′-cyano-1,2-thiazole-5carboxanilide in or on banana, fruit at 0.01 parts per million (ppm). The analytical method involves solvent extraction, purification through a Chromabond XTR cartridge (diatomaceous earth) column, and addition of a mixture of stable, PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 isotopically labelled internal standards. Quantitation is by high performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization/tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS/MS). Contact: RD. 4. PP 7F8572. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2017– 0510). FMC Corporation, 2929 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, requests to establish a tolerance in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of the herbicide pethoxamid in or on corn, field, forage at 0.015 parts per million (ppm); corn, field, stover at 0.02 ppm; corn, field, grain at 0.01 ppm; popcorn, stover at 0.01 ppm; popcorn, grain at 0.01 ppm; corn, sweet, forage at 0.50 ppm; corn, sweet, stover at 0.60 ppm; corn, sweet, kernel plus cobb with husk removed at 0.01 ppm; cotton, undelinted seed at 0.01 ppm; cotton, gin byproducts at 0.09 ppm; soybean, forage at 3.0 ppm; soybean, hay at 4.5 ppm; and soybean, seed at 0.01 ppm. An LC–MS/MS method is used to measure and evaluate the chemical pethoxamid. Contact: RD. 5. PP 7F8622. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2017– 0694). DuPont Crop Protection, StineHaskell Research Center, P.O. Box 30, Newark, DE 19714–0030, requests to establish a tolerance in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of the insecticide, cyantraniliprole, in or on rice, hulls at 0.05 parts per million (ppm), rice, straw at 0.015 ppm, soybean, forage at 15 ppm, soybean, hay at 50 ppm, soybean, seed at 0.4 ppm, soybean, hulls at 1 ppm, and aspirated grain fractions at 200 ppm. Upon approval of the proposed tolerances in soybean forage and hay, it is proposed that the existing tolerances for indirect or inadvertent residues in soybean forage and hay be cancelled. In addition, DuPont Crop Protection requests to amend the tolerance(s) in 40 CFR.672, in or on rice, grain at 0.02 ppm by replacing an existing tolerance at the same level that is only for imported grain with a tolerance supporting both domestic production and imported grain. The high-pressure liquid chromatography with ESI- MS/MS detection is used to measure and evaluate the chemical. Contact: RD. Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a. Dated: March 20, 2018. Delores Barber, Director, Information Technology and Resources Management Division, Office of Pesticide Programs. [FR Doc. 2018–07516 Filed 4–10–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P E:\FR\FM\11APP1.SGM 11APP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 11, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 15528-15530]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-07516]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0006; FRL-9975-57]


Receipt of Several Pesticide Petitions Filed for Residues of 
Pesticide Chemicals in or on Various Commodities

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of filing of petitions and request for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document announces the Agency's receipt of several 
initial filings of pesticide petitions requesting the establishment or 
modification of regulations for residues of pesticide chemicals in or 
on various commodities.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 11, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification 
(ID) number and the pesticide petition number (PP) of interest as shown 
in the body of this document, by one of the following methods:

[[Page 15529]]

     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit 
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business 
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted 
by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket 
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand 
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the 
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along 
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert McNally, Biopesticides and 
Pollution Prevention Division (BPPD) (7511P), main telephone number: 
(703) 305-7090, email address: [email protected]; or Michael 
Goodis, Registration Division (RD) (7505P), main telephone number: 
(703) 305-7090, email address: [email protected]. The mailing address 
for each contact person is: Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental 
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-
0001. As part of the mailing address, include the contact person's 
name, division, and mail code. The division to contact is listed at the 
end of each pesticide petition summary.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an 
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. 
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System 
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a 
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them. 
Potentially affected entities may include:
    [emsp14]Crop production (NAICS code 111).
    [emsp14]Animal production (NAICS code 112).
    [emsp14]Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
    [emsp14]Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
    If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this 
action to a particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT for the division listed at the end of the 
pesticide petition summary of interest.

B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through 
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the 
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or 
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as 
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the 
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one 
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as 
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information 
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. 
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with 
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting 
your comments, see the commenting tips at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html.
    3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to achieve environmental 
justice, the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of any group, 
including minority and/or low-income populations, in the development, 
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and 
policies. To help address potential environmental justice issues, the 
Agency seeks information on any groups or segments of the population 
who, as a result of their location, cultural practices, or other 
factors, may have atypical or disproportionately high and adverse human 
health impacts or environmental effects from exposure to the pesticides 
discussed in this document, compared to the general population.

II. What action is the Agency taking?

    EPA is announcing its receipt of several pesticide petitions filed 
under section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 
21 U.S.C. 346a, requesting the establishment or modification of 
regulations in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of pesticide chemicals in 
or on various food commodities. The Agency is taking public comment on 
the requests before responding to the petitioners. EPA is not proposing 
any particular action at this time. EPA has determined that the 
pesticide petitions described in this document contain the data or 
information prescribed in FFDCA section 408(d)(2), 21 U.S.C. 
346a(d)(2); however, EPA has not fully evaluated the sufficiency of the 
submitted data at this time or whether the data support granting of the 
pesticide petitions. After considering the public comments, EPA intends 
to evaluate whether and what action may be warranted. Additional data 
may be needed before EPA can make a final determination on these 
pesticide petitions.
    Pursuant to 40 CFR 180.7(f), a summary of each of the petitions 
that are the subject of this document, prepared by the petitioner, is 
included in a docket EPA has created for each rulemaking. The docket 
for each of the petitions is available at https://www.regulations.gov.
    As specified in FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), EPA 
is publishing notice of the petitions so that the public has an 
opportunity to comment on these requests for the establishment or 
modification of regulations for residues of pesticides in or on food 
commodities. Further information on the petitions may be obtained 
through the petition summaries referenced in this unit.

New Tolerance Exemptions for Inerts (Except PIPS)

    1. PP IN-11074. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0032). Spring Trading Company, 203 
Dogwood Trail, Magnolia, TX 77354, on behalf of Clariant Corporation, 
Clariant Plastics & Coatings, (Deutschland) GmbH, Bruningstrasse 50, 
65929 Frankfurt am Main, Germany, requests to establish an exemption 
from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of rice bran wax (CAS 
Reg. No. 1883583-80-9) when used as an inert ingredient in pesticide 
formulations under 40 CFR 180.910, 180.930, and 180.940(a). The 
petitioner believes no analytical method is needed because it is not 
required for an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. Contact: 
RD.
    2. PP IN-11075. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0091). ADAMA Agan, Ltd., c/o 
Makhteshim Agan of North America, Inc., 3120 Highwoods Blvd., Suite 
100, Raleigh NC, requests to establish an exemption from the 
requirement of a tolerance for residues of calcium formate; (CAS Reg. 
No. 544-17-2) when used as an inert ingredient (carrier) in pesticide 
formulations applied to growing crops under 40 CFR 180.920. The 
petitioner believes no analytical method is needed because it is not 
required for an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. Contact: 
RD.
    3. PP IN-11083. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0089). Morse Enterprises Limited, 
Inc., d/b/a KeyPlex, P.O. Box 2515, Winter Park, FL 32790, requests to 
establish an exemption from the

[[Page 15530]]

requirement of a tolerance for residues of [alpha]-terpineol (CAS Reg. 
No. 98-55-5) when used as an inert ingredient (solvent) in pesticide 
formulations applied to growing crops under 40 CFR 180.920. The 
petitioner believes no analytical method is needed because it is not 
required for an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. Contact: 
RD.
    4. PP IN-11093. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0090). Morse Enterprises Limited 
Inc. d/b/a KeyPlex, P.O. Box 2515, Winter Park, FL 32790, requests to 
establish an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues 
of trans-anethole (CAS Reg. No. 4180-23-8) when used as an inert 
ingredient (fragrance) in pesticide formulations applied to growing 
crops under 40 CFR 180.920. The petitioner believes no analytical 
method is needed because it is not required for an exemption from the 
requirement of a tolerance. Contact: RD.
    5. PP IN-11112. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0071). SciReg, Inc., 12733 
Director's Loop, Woodbridge, VA 22192, on behalf of Solvay USA Inc., 
504 Carnegie Center Princeton, NJ 08540, requests to establish an 
exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues for oxirane, 
2-methyl-, polymer with oxirane, mono[2-[2-(2-
methoxymethylethoxy)methylethoxy]methylether] ether (CAS Reg. No. 
2112825-11-1) with a minimum number average molecular weight (in amu) 
of 10,000 Daltons, when used as an inert ingredient in pesticide 
formulations under 40 CFR 180.960. The petitioner believes no 
analytical method is needed because it is not required for an exemption 
from the requirement of a tolerance. Contact: RD.

New Tolerance Exemptions for Non-Inerts (Except PIPS)

    1. PP 7F8626. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0070). Ecolab, Inc., 1 Ecolab Place, 
St. Paul, MN 55102, requests to establish an exemption from the 
requirement of a tolerance in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of the 
antimicrobial pesticide C10-C16 Alkylbenzene Sulfonates in or on food 
contact surfaces in public eating places, dairy processing equipment, 
and food processing equipment and utensils up to a maximum of 700 ppm 
when ready for use, in the end-use concentration. The petitioner 
believes no analytical method is needed because an exemption from the 
requirement of a tolerance is being proposed. Contact: AD.
    2. PP 7F8655. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0092). Clarke Mosquito Control 
Products, Inc., 675 Sidwell Ct., St. Charles, IL 60174, requests to 
establish an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance in 40 CFR 
part 180 for residues of the insecticide l-carvone in or on all raw 
agricultural commodities. The petitioner believes no analytical method 
is needed because residues of this chemical are not expected on food 
commodities due to the ultra-low application rates and the volatile 
nature of the chemical, which has a vapor pressure of 24.37 Pascals at 
25[deg]C and falls into the category of ``intermediate to high 
volatility under field conditions.'' Contact: BPPD.

New Tolerances for Non-Inerts

    1. PP 7E8636. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0037). Syngenta Crop Protection, 
LLC, P.O. Box 18300, Greensboro, NC 27419, requests to establish a 
tolerance in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of the insecticide avermectin 
B1 (a mixture of avermectins containing greater than or equal to 80% 
avermectin B1a (5-O-demethyl avermectin A1) and less than or equal to 
20% avermectin B1b (5-O-demethyl-25-de(1-methylpropyl)-25-(1-
methylethyl) avermectin A1)) in or on the raw agricultural commodity 
tea at 1 parts per million (ppm). The analytical methods involve 
homogenization, filtration, partition, and cleanup with analysis by 
high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-fluorescence detection. 
Contact: RD.
    2. PP 7E8637. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0037). Syngenta Crop Protection, 
LLC, P.O. Box 18300, Greensboro, NC 27419, requests to establish a 
tolerance in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of the insecticide avermectin 
B1 (a mixture of avermectins containing greater than or equal to 80% 
avermectin B1a (5-O-demethyl avermectin A1) and less than or equal to 
20% avermectin B1b (5-O-demethyl-25-de(1-methylpropyl)-25-(1-
methylethyl) avermectin A1)) in or on the raw agricultural commodity 
banana at 0.002 parts per million (ppm). The analytical methods involve 
homogenization, filtration, partition, and cleanup with analysis by 
high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-fluorescence detection. 
Contact: RD.
    3. PP 7E8656. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0047). Bayer CropScience, 2 T.W. 
Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, requests to 
establish a tolerance in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of the fungicide 
isotianil, 3,4-dichloro-2'-cyano-1,2-thiazole-5-carboxanilide in or on 
banana, fruit at 0.01 parts per million (ppm). The analytical method 
involves solvent extraction, purification through a Chromabond XTR 
cartridge (diatomaceous earth) column, and addition of a mixture of 
stable, isotopically labelled internal standards. Quantitation is by 
high performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization/tandem 
mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS/MS). Contact: RD.
    4. PP 7F8572. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0510). FMC Corporation, 2929 Walnut 
Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, requests to establish a tolerance in 40 
CFR part 180 for residues of the herbicide pethoxamid in or on corn, 
field, forage at 0.015 parts per million (ppm); corn, field, stover at 
0.02 ppm; corn, field, grain at 0.01 ppm; popcorn, stover at 0.01 ppm; 
popcorn, grain at 0.01 ppm; corn, sweet, forage at 0.50 ppm; corn, 
sweet, stover at 0.60 ppm; corn, sweet, kernel plus cobb with husk 
removed at 0.01 ppm; cotton, undelinted seed at 0.01 ppm; cotton, gin 
byproducts at 0.09 ppm; soybean, forage at 3.0 ppm; soybean, hay at 4.5 
ppm; and soybean, seed at 0.01 ppm. An LC-MS/MS method is used to 
measure and evaluate the chemical pethoxamid. Contact: RD.
    5. PP 7F8622. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0694). DuPont Crop Protection, 
Stine-Haskell Research Center, P.O. Box 30, Newark, DE 19714-0030, 
requests to establish a tolerance in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of 
the insecticide, cyantraniliprole, in or on rice, hulls at 0.05 parts 
per million (ppm), rice, straw at 0.015 ppm, soybean, forage at 15 ppm, 
soybean, hay at 50 ppm, soybean, seed at 0.4 ppm, soybean, hulls at 1 
ppm, and aspirated grain fractions at 200 ppm. Upon approval of the 
proposed tolerances in soybean forage and hay, it is proposed that the 
existing tolerances for indirect or inadvertent residues in soybean 
forage and hay be cancelled. In addition, DuPont Crop Protection 
requests to amend the tolerance(s) in 40 CFR.672, in or on rice, grain 
at 0.02 ppm by replacing an existing tolerance at the same level that 
is only for imported grain with a tolerance supporting both domestic 
production and imported grain. The high-pressure liquid chromatography 
with ESI- MS/MS detection is used to measure and evaluate the chemical. 
Contact: RD.

    Authority:  21 U.S.C. 346a.

    Dated: March 20, 2018.
Delores Barber,
Director, Information Technology and Resources Management Division, 
Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2018-07516 Filed 4-10-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.