Addition to the National Network, 15524-15526 [2018-07480]
Download as PDF
15524
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 11, 2018 / Proposed Rules
157°32′31″ W; to lat. 23°59′14″ N, long.
156°28′23″ W; to lat. 23°53′49″ N, long.
155°25′33″ W; to lat. 23°24′55″ N, long.
154°15′20″ W; to lat. 22°41′48″ N, long.
153°28′59″ W; to lat. 21°45′32″ N, long.
152°58′57″ W; to lat. 20°35′50″ N, long.
152°48′18″ W; thence to the point of
beginning, excluding that airspace within 12
miles of the shoreline of the State of Hawaii.
That airspace upward from 10,000 feet MSL
within the area bounded by a line beginning
at lat. 19°12′44″ N, long. 152°12′34″ W; to lat.
19°08′32″ N, long. 154°29′00″ W; to lat.
17°20′23″ N, long. 156°36′33″ W; to lat.
18°33′07″ N, long. 159°55′59″ W; to lat.
19°03′09″ N, long. 161°10′15″ W; to lat.
19°31′51″ N, long. 162°00′41″ W; to lat.
20°11′04″ N, long. 162°40′05″ W; to lat.
20°58′47″ N, long. 163°04′59″ W; to lat.
21°56′05″ N, long. 163°19′16″ W; to lat.
22°54′36″ N, long. 163°13′18″ W; to lat.
23°36′43″ N, long. 162°58′50″ W; to lat.
24°30′39″ N, long. 162°32′55″ W; to lat.
25°07′02″ N, long. 161°36′02″ W; to lat.
25°33′41″ N, long. 160°06′39″ W; to lat.
25°27′34″ N, long. 158°34′55″ W; to lat.
24°43′37″ N, long. 156°56′38″ W; to lat.
24°30′12″ N, long. 155°51′07″ W; to lat.
24°16′10″ N, long. 154°47′02″ W; to lat.
23°53′14″ N, long. 153°57′47″ W; to lat.
23°14′36″ N, long. 153°08′32″ W; to lat.
22°20′47″ N, long. 152°35′51″ W; to lat.
21°12′25″ N, long. 152°13′34″ W; to lat.
20°33′20″ N, long. 152°11′55″ W; thence to
the point of beginning, excluding that
airspace within 12 miles of the shoreline of
the State of Hawaii.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 4,
2018.
Rodger A. Dean Jr.,
Manager, Airspace Policy Group.
[FR Doc. 2018–07384 Filed 4–10–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
23 CFR Part 658
[FHWA Docket No. FHWA–2018–0016]
RIN 2125–AF82
Addition to the National Network
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The FHWA is proposing to
approve the addition of Sheridan
Boulevard (NY 895) to the National
Network (NN) and to revise its
regulations to reflect the addition. The
facility currently known as ‘‘Interstate895 Sheridan Expressway’’ in New York
City, located in Bronx County, will be
reconstructed, removed from the
National System of Interstate and
nshattuck on DSK9F9SC42PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:59 Apr 10, 2018
Jkt 244001
Defense Highways (Interstate System) to
accommodate new design features, and
classified as an ‘‘Urban Principal
Arterial—Other.’’ This facility will be
identified as the ‘‘Sheridan Boulevard
(NY 895).’’
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before April 23, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Mail or hand deliver
comments to Docket Management
Facility: U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590,
submit comments electronically at
https://www.regulations.gov.
All comments should include the
docket number that appears in the
heading of this document. All
comments received will be available for
examination and copying at the above
address from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., e.t.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. Those desiring notifications of
receipt of comments must include a selfaddressed, stamped postcard or may
print the acknowledgment page that
appears after submitting comments
electronically. Anyone can search the
electronic form of all comments in any
one of our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, or
labor union). You may review DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11,
2000, (Volume 65, Number 70, Pages
19477–78) or you may visit https://
DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
Background
The NN consists of Interstate System
routes (except exempted routes) and
those non-Interstate System routes
added through the rulemaking process.
See 49 U.S.C. 31111(e)–(f) and 31113(e);
23 CFR 658 Appendix A; see also 49 FR
23302 (June 5, 1984). To ensure that the
NN remains substantially intact, FHWA
retains the authority to rule upon all
requests for additions to and deletions
from the NN as well as requests for the
imposition of certain restrictions.
Pursuant to 23 CFR 658.11, requests for
additions to the NN must be submitted
in writing to the appropriate FHWA
Division Office and endorsed by the
Governor or the Governor’s authorized
representative. Proposals for addition of
routes to the NN must also be
accompanied by an analysis of
suitability based on the criteria in 23
CFR 658.9. Once a non-Interstate
System route is added to the NN, it is
included in Appendix A of 23 CFR part
658—National Network—Federally
Designated Routes.
On November 10, 2017, FHWA
received a request from the New York
State Department of Transportation
(NYSDOT) proposing a modification to
the Interstate System. The request,
available in the rulemaking docket,
proposes the de-designation (removal
from the Interstate System) of the
Sheridan Expressway (I–895),
approximately a 1.3-mile Interstate
between the Bruckner Expressway (I–
278) and the Cross Bronx Expressway
(I–95). As part of the de-designation, the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
State also proposes the functional
technical information, contact Ms.
reclassification of this highway segment
Crystal Jones, FHWA Office of Freight
from an Interstate to ‘‘Urban Principal
Management and Operations, (202) 366– Arterial—Other’’ and to rename the road
2976. For legal information, contact Mr. Sheridan Boulevard (NY–895). The
William Winne, Office of Chief Counsel, physical alignment of the highway
(202) 366–1397. Federal Highway
would be maintained and it would
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
therefore continue to provide the same
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
access for commercial vehicles as
Office hours are from 7:45 a.m. to 4:15
currently exists. The FHWA intends to
p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday,
act on this request pursuant to its
except Federal holidays.
regulatory authority on revisions to the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Interstate System (23 CFR 470.115(a)
and 23 CFR 658.11(d)) and guidance on
Electronic Access and Filing
Interstate System de-designations
You may submit or retrieve comments (https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/
online through the Federal eRulemaking national_highway_system/interstate_
portal at www.regulations.gov. It is
highway_system/withdrawalqa.cfm).
available 24 hours each day, 365 days
The NYSDOT intends to keep
each year. Please follow the instructions Sheridan Boulevard (NY–895) in the
online for more information and help.
NN. Because the route would no longer
be in the Interstate System, it must be
An electronic copy of this document
added to NN as a non-Interstate System
may also be downloaded by accessing
the Office of the Federal Register’s home route and be listed in 23 CFR 658
page at: https://www.archives.gov and the Appendix A. The NYSDOT proposal
included the required analysis of
Government Publishing Office’s web
suitability based on the criteria in 23
page at: https://www.access.gpo.gov/
CFR 658.9, which includes a crash
nara.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\11APP1.SGM
11APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 11, 2018 / Proposed Rules
analysis and safety study, and also
documents effects on Interstate
commerce, effects on alternate routes,
effects on traffic operations, and
consultation with local governments.
The FHWA reviewed NYSDOT’s
proposal and affirms that the request to
add a route to the NN is consistent with
23 CFR 658.9 and 658.11 with respect
to the criteria for the NN and the
procedures for additions to the NN. In
this Notice of Proposal Rulemaking,
FHWA is proposing to approve the
addition of Sheridan Boulevard (NY
895) to the NN and to revise existing
regulations (23 CFR 658 Appendix A) to
reflect the addition.
nshattuck on DSK9F9SC42PROD with PROPOSALS
Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
As the Sheridan Expressway is
already part of the NN due to its
Interstate designation, FHWA has
determined there would be no
substantive impact to the public
resulting from the addition of the
reconstructed facility, Sheridan
Boulevard, to the NN.
Executive Order 13771 (Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs), Executive Order 12866
(Regulatory Planning and Review),
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review),
and DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). The FHWA has determined
preliminarily that this action is not a
significant regulatory action within the
meaning of Executive Order 12866 and
is not significant within the meaning of
DOT regulatory policies and procedures.
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, reducing costs,
harmonizing rules, and promoting
flexibility. It is anticipated that the
economic impact of this rulemaking
would be minimal. These changes
would not adversely affect, in a material
way, any sector of the economy. In
addition, these changes would not
interfere with any action taken or
planned by another agency and would
not materially alter the budgetary
impact of any entitlements, grants, user
fees, or loan programs. Consequently, a
full regulatory evaluation is not
required. Finally, this proposed rule is
not an E.O. 13771 regulatory action
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:52 Apr 10, 2018
Jkt 244001
because it is not significant under E.O.
12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
In compliance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96–354, 5 U.S.C.
60l-612) the FHWA has evaluated the
effects of this action on small entities
and has determined that the action
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. ‘‘Small entities’’ include small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations under 50,000. This
action does not affect any funding
distributed under any of the programs
administered by FHWA. For these
reasons, FHWA certifies that this action
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
This rule would not impose unfunded
mandates as defined by the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104–4, 109 Stat. 48). This proposed rule
would not result in the expenditure by
State, local, and Tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$148.1 million or more in any one year
(2 U.S.C. 1532). Further, in compliance
with the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995, the agencies will evaluate
any regulatory action that might be
proposed in subsequent stages of the
proceeding to assess the effects on State,
local, and Tribal governments and the
private sector.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism
Assessment)
This action has been analyzed in
accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order
13132, and FHWA has determined that
this action would not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a federalism assessment.
The FHWA has also determined that
this action would not preempt any State
law or State regulation or affect the
States’ ability to discharge traditional
State governmental functions.
Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects)
We have analyzed this action under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use, dated May 18,
2001. We have determined that it is not
a significant energy action under that
order since it is not likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
15525
distribution, or use of energy. Therefore,
a Statement of Energy Effects is not
required.
Executive Order 12372
(Intergovernmental Review)
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Program Number 20.205,
Highway Planning and Construction.
The regulations implementing Executive
Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to
this program.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501), Federal
agencies must obtain approval from the
Office of Management and Budget for
each collection of information they
conduct, sponsor, or require through
regulations. The FHWA has determined
that this rule does not contain collection
of information requirements for the
purposes of the PRA.
Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice
Reform)
This action meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Executive Order 13045 (Protection of
Children)
The FHWA has analyzed this rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. The FHWA certifies that this
action would not cause any
environmental risk to health or safety
that might disproportionately affect
children.
Executive Order 12630 (Taking of
Private Property)
The FHWA has analyzed this rule
under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interface
with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights. The FHWA does not anticipate
that this action would affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630.
National Environmental Policy Act
The Agency has analyzed this action
for the purpose of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4347) and has determined
that this action would not have any
effect on the quality of the environment.
E:\FR\FM\11APP1.SGM
11APP1
15526
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 11, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Regulation Identification Number
A regulation identification number
(RIN) is assigned to each regulatory
action listed in the Unified Agenda of
Federal Regulations. The Regulatory
Information Service Center publishes
the Unified Agenda in April and
October of each year. The RIN contained
in the heading of this document can be
used to cross reference this action with
the Unified Agenda.
List of Subjects in 23 CFR Part 658
Grants Program—transportation,
Highways and roads, Motor carriers.
Issued on: April 6, 2018.
Brandye L. Hendrickson,
Acting Administrator, Federal Highway
Administration.
In consideration of the foregoing, the
FHWA proposes to amend 23 CFR part
658, as set forth below:
PART 658—TRUCK SIZE AND WEIGHT,
ROUTE DESIGNATIONS—LENGTH,
WIDTH AND WEIGHT LIMITATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 658
continues to read as follows:
■
Route
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 127 and 315; 49
U.S.C. 31111, 31112, and 31114; sec. 347,
Pub. L. 108–7, 117 Stat. 419; sec. 756, Pub.
L. 109–59, 119 Stat. 1219; sec. 115, Pub. L.
109–115, 119 Stat. 2408; 49 CFR 1.48(b)(19)
and (c)(19).
2. Amend Appendix A to Part 658 by
adding an entry to the New York portion
of the table:
■
Appendix A to Part 658—National
Network—Federally—Designated
Routes
*
*
*
*
From
*
To
New York
*
*
Sheridan Boulevard (NY 895) ...........................
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2018–07480 Filed 4–10–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2017–0143; FRL–9976–50–
Region 7]
Air Plan Approval; Iowa; Amendment
to the Administrative Consent Order,
Grain Processing Corporation,
Muscatine, Iowa; Proposal
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
revisions to the State Implementation
Plan (SIP) for the State of Iowa to
incorporate an amendment to the
Administrative Consent Order (ACO) for
Grain Processing Corporation (GPC),
Muscatine, Iowa. The revision amends
the ACO to change the date for
completion of performance testing from
May 31, 2017, to May 31, 2018, to allow
the state more time to complete the
remaining air construction permit
applications submitted by GPC, and to
specify testing requirements as
appropriate in the final permits. When
the state submitted the request to amend
the ACO, twelve of the 107 permits were
incomplete. At this time, only two
permits have not been issued by the
State. The air quality in Muscatine,
Iowa, has not been adversely impacted
nshattuck on DSK9F9SC42PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:52 Apr 10, 2018
*
*
*
I–278 Bruckner Expressway .............................
Jkt 244001
*
Comments must be received on
or before May 11, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
OAR–2017–0143 to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
The EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
DATES:
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
*
*
*
*
by the remaining pending permit
approvals. This revision will not impact
the schedule for installation and
operation of control equipment, will not
alter any other compliance dates, and
will not adversely affect air quality in
Muscatine, Iowa, as explained in the
revised Technical Support Document
that is part of this docket.
This proposal will also address
adverse comments submitted to the
docket.
PO 00000
*
I–95 Cross Bronx Expressway.
Sfmt 4702
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Heather Hamilton, Environmental
Protection Agency, Air Planning and
Development Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at
(913) 551–7039, or by email at
hamilton.heather@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. This section
provides additional information by
addressing the following:
I. Background
II. What is being addressed in this document?
III. Have the requirements for approval of a
SIP revision been met?
IV. EPA’s Response to Comment
V. What action is EPA taking?
VI. Incorporation by Reference
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
On August 25, 2017, EPA proposed to
approve a revision to the Iowa State
Implementation Plan (SIP) which
amended the Administrative Consent
Order (ACO) for Grain Processing
Corporation (GPC), Muscatine, Iowa.
The revision amended the ACO to
change the date for completion of
performance testing from May 31, 2017,
to May 31, 2018, to allow the state more
time to complete processing the
remaining air construction permit
applications submitted by GPC, and to
specify testing requirements as
appropriate in the remaining final
permits. See 82 FR 40519. In
E:\FR\FM\11APP1.SGM
11APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 11, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 15524-15526]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-07480]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
23 CFR Part 658
[FHWA Docket No. FHWA-2018-0016]
RIN 2125-AF82
Addition to the National Network
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FHWA is proposing to approve the addition of Sheridan
Boulevard (NY 895) to the National Network (NN) and to revise its
regulations to reflect the addition. The facility currently known as
``Interstate-895 Sheridan Expressway'' in New York City, located in
Bronx County, will be reconstructed, removed from the National System
of Interstate and Defense Highways (Interstate System) to accommodate
new design features, and classified as an ``Urban Principal Arterial--
Other.'' This facility will be identified as the ``Sheridan Boulevard
(NY 895).''
DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 23, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Mail or hand deliver comments to Docket Management Facility:
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590, submit comments electronically at https://www.regulations.gov.
All comments should include the docket number that appears in the
heading of this document. All comments received will be available for
examination and copying at the above address from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.,
e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Those desiring
notifications of receipt of comments must include a self-addressed,
stamped postcard or may print the acknowledgment page that appears
after submitting comments electronically. Anyone can search the
electronic form of all comments in any one of our dockets by the name
of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association, business, or labor union). You
may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000, (Volume 65, Number 70, Pages 19477-78) or
you may visit https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical information, contact Ms.
Crystal Jones, FHWA Office of Freight Management and Operations, (202)
366-2976. For legal information, contact Mr. William Winne, Office of
Chief Counsel, (202) 366-1397. Federal Highway Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. Office hours are from 7:45 a.m.
to 4:15 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access and Filing
You may submit or retrieve comments online through the Federal
eRulemaking portal at www.regulations.gov. It is available 24 hours
each day, 365 days each year. Please follow the instructions online for
more information and help.
An electronic copy of this document may also be downloaded by
accessing the Office of the Federal Register's home page at: https://www.archives.gov and the Government Publishing Office's web page at:
https://www.access.gpo.gov/nara.
Background
The NN consists of Interstate System routes (except exempted
routes) and those non-Interstate System routes added through the
rulemaking process. See 49 U.S.C. 31111(e)-(f) and 31113(e); 23 CFR 658
Appendix A; see also 49 FR 23302 (June 5, 1984). To ensure that the NN
remains substantially intact, FHWA retains the authority to rule upon
all requests for additions to and deletions from the NN as well as
requests for the imposition of certain restrictions. Pursuant to 23 CFR
658.11, requests for additions to the NN must be submitted in writing
to the appropriate FHWA Division Office and endorsed by the Governor or
the Governor's authorized representative. Proposals for addition of
routes to the NN must also be accompanied by an analysis of suitability
based on the criteria in 23 CFR 658.9. Once a non-Interstate System
route is added to the NN, it is included in Appendix A of 23 CFR part
658--National Network--Federally Designated Routes.
On November 10, 2017, FHWA received a request from the New York
State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) proposing a modification to
the Interstate System. The request, available in the rulemaking docket,
proposes the de-designation (removal from the Interstate System) of the
Sheridan Expressway (I-895), approximately a 1.3-mile Interstate
between the Bruckner Expressway (I-278) and the Cross Bronx Expressway
(I-95). As part of the de-designation, the State also proposes the
functional reclassification of this highway segment from an Interstate
to ``Urban Principal Arterial--Other'' and to rename the road Sheridan
Boulevard (NY-895). The physical alignment of the highway would be
maintained and it would therefore continue to provide the same access
for commercial vehicles as currently exists. The FHWA intends to act on
this request pursuant to its regulatory authority on revisions to the
Interstate System (23 CFR 470.115(a) and 23 CFR 658.11(d)) and guidance
on Interstate System de-designations (https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/national_highway_system/interstate_highway_system/withdrawalqa.cfm).
The NYSDOT intends to keep Sheridan Boulevard (NY-895) in the NN.
Because the route would no longer be in the Interstate System, it must
be added to NN as a non-Interstate System route and be listed in 23 CFR
658 Appendix A. The NYSDOT proposal included the required analysis of
suitability based on the criteria in 23 CFR 658.9, which includes a
crash
[[Page 15525]]
analysis and safety study, and also documents effects on Interstate
commerce, effects on alternate routes, effects on traffic operations,
and consultation with local governments.
The FHWA reviewed NYSDOT's proposal and affirms that the request to
add a route to the NN is consistent with 23 CFR 658.9 and 658.11 with
respect to the criteria for the NN and the procedures for additions to
the NN. In this Notice of Proposal Rulemaking, FHWA is proposing to
approve the addition of Sheridan Boulevard (NY 895) to the NN and to
revise existing regulations (23 CFR 658 Appendix A) to reflect the
addition.
Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
As the Sheridan Expressway is already part of the NN due to its
Interstate designation, FHWA has determined there would be no
substantive impact to the public resulting from the addition of the
reconstructed facility, Sheridan Boulevard, to the NN.
Executive Order 13771 (Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs), Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review),
Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review), and
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). The FHWA
has determined preliminarily that this action is not a significant
regulatory action within the meaning of Executive Order 12866 and is
not significant within the meaning of DOT regulatory policies and
procedures. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules,
and promoting flexibility. It is anticipated that the economic impact
of this rulemaking would be minimal. These changes would not adversely
affect, in a material way, any sector of the economy. In addition,
these changes would not interfere with any action taken or planned by
another agency and would not materially alter the budgetary impact of
any entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs. Consequently, a
full regulatory evaluation is not required. Finally, this proposed rule
is not an E.O. 13771 regulatory action because it is not significant
under E.O. 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
In compliance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96-354,
5 U.S.C. 60l-612) the FHWA has evaluated the effects of this action on
small entities and has determined that the action would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
``Small entities'' include small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with
populations under 50,000. This action does not affect any funding
distributed under any of the programs administered by FHWA. For these
reasons, FHWA certifies that this action would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule would not impose unfunded mandates as defined by the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4, 109 Stat. 48).
This proposed rule would not result in the expenditure by State, local,
and Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$148.1 million or more in any one year (2 U.S.C. 1532). Further, in
compliance with the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, the agencies
will evaluate any regulatory action that might be proposed in
subsequent stages of the proceeding to assess the effects on State,
local, and Tribal governments and the private sector.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism Assessment)
This action has been analyzed in accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order 13132, and FHWA has determined
that this action would not have sufficient federalism implications to
warrant the preparation of a federalism assessment. The FHWA has also
determined that this action would not preempt any State law or State
regulation or affect the States' ability to discharge traditional State
governmental functions.
Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects)
We have analyzed this action under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use, dated May 18, 2001. We have determined that it is
not a significant energy action under that order since it is not likely
to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or
use of energy. Therefore, a Statement of Energy Effects is not
required.
Executive Order 12372 (Intergovernmental Review)
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205,
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this program.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501),
Federal agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and
Budget for each collection of information they conduct, sponsor, or
require through regulations. The FHWA has determined that this rule
does not contain collection of information requirements for the
purposes of the PRA.
Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform)
This action meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Executive Order 13045 (Protection of Children)
The FHWA has analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. The FHWA certifies that this action would not cause any
environmental risk to health or safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Executive Order 12630 (Taking of Private Property)
The FHWA has analyzed this rule under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interface with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights. The FHWA does not anticipate that this action would
affect a taking of private property or otherwise have taking
implications under Executive Order 12630.
National Environmental Policy Act
The Agency has analyzed this action for the purpose of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4347) and has
determined that this action would not have any effect on the quality of
the environment.
[[Page 15526]]
Regulation Identification Number
A regulation identification number (RIN) is assigned to each
regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulations.
The Regulatory Information Service Center publishes the Unified Agenda
in April and October of each year. The RIN contained in the heading of
this document can be used to cross reference this action with the
Unified Agenda.
List of Subjects in 23 CFR Part 658
Grants Program--transportation, Highways and roads, Motor carriers.
Issued on: April 6, 2018.
Brandye L. Hendrickson,
Acting Administrator, Federal Highway Administration.
In consideration of the foregoing, the FHWA proposes to amend 23
CFR part 658, as set forth below:
PART 658--TRUCK SIZE AND WEIGHT, ROUTE DESIGNATIONS--LENGTH, WIDTH
AND WEIGHT LIMITATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 658 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 127 and 315; 49 U.S.C. 31111, 31112, and
31114; sec. 347, Pub. L. 108-7, 117 Stat. 419; sec. 756, Pub. L.
109-59, 119 Stat. 1219; sec. 115, Pub. L. 109-115, 119 Stat. 2408;
49 CFR 1.48(b)(19) and (c)(19).
0
2. Amend Appendix A to Part 658 by adding an entry to the New York
portion of the table:
Appendix A to Part 658--National Network--Federally--Designated Routes
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Route From To
------------------------------------------------------------------------
New York
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Sheridan Boulevard (NY 895). I-278 Bruckner I-95 Cross Bronx
Expressway. Expressway.
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2018-07480 Filed 4-10-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P