Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Provisions; Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Essential Fish Habitat, 15240-15285 [2018-06760]
Download as PDF
15240
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Table of Contents
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 160301163–8204–02]
RIN 0648–BF82
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
Provisions; Fisheries of the
Northeastern United States; Essential
Fish Habitat
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This action implements
approved regulations for the New
England Fishery Management Council’s
Omnibus Essential Fish Habitat
Amendment 2. This rule revises
essential fish habitat and habitat area of
particular concern designations, revises
or creates habitat management areas,
including gear restrictions, to protect
vulnerable habitat from fishing gear
impacts, establishes dedicated habitat
research areas, and implements several
administrative measures related to
reviewing these measures, as well as
other regulatory adjustments to
implement these measures. This action
is necessary to comply with the
requirements of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act to periodically review essential fish
habitat designations and protections.
The measures are designed to minimize
to the extent practicable the adverse
effects of fishing on essential fish
habitat.
DATES: Effective April 9, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the Omnibus
Essential Fish Habitat Amendment 2,
including the Environmental Impact
Statement, the Regulatory Impact
Review, and the Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (EIS/RIR/IRFA)
prepared by the New England Fishery
Management Council in support of this
action are available from Thomas A.
Nies, Executive Director, New England
Fishery Management Council, 50 Water
Street, Mill 2, Newburyport, MA 01950.
The supporting documents are also
accessible via the internet at: https://
www.nefmc.org/library/omnibushabitat-amendment-2 or https://
www.greateratlantic.fisheries.noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Moira Kelly, Senior Fishery Program
Specialist, phone: 978–281–9218,
Moira.Kelly@noaa.gov.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
1. General Background
2. Essential Fish Habitat Designations
3. Habitat Areas of Particular Concern
Designations
4. Spatial Management for Adverse Effects
Minimization
5. Spawning Protection Measures
6. Dedicated Habitat Research Areas
7. Framework Adjustments and Monitoring
8. Description of Regulatory Changes
9. Changes From the Proposed Rule
10. Comments and Responses
1. General Background
On January 3, 2018, NOAA’s National
Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), on
behalf of the Secretary of Commerce,
approved the majority of the New
England Fishery Management Council’s
recommendations for the Omnibus
Essential Fish Habitat Amendment 2
(OHA2). This action implements the
approved management measures in
OHA2. NMFS approved all of the
updated essential fish habitat
designations (EFH), all of the
recommended habitat area of particular
concern (HAPC) designations, and the
majority of the habitat management area
(HMA) recommendations, all of the
Dedicated Habitat Research Area
(DHRA) recommendations, all of the
seasonal spawning area
recommendations, and both of the
framework and administrative
recommendations. Two Council
recommendations were disapproved: (1)
Establishment of The Cox Ledge HMA,
which would prohibit hydraulic clam
dredges and ground cables on trawl
vessels; and (2) changes to the eastern
Georges Bank Areas, as described in
more detail below.
OHA2 was initiated in 2004 to review
and update the EFH components of all
the New England Fishery Management
Council’s fishery management plans
(FMP). The Council established 10 goals
and 14 objectives to guide the
development of this action. Goals 1–8
were established in 2004 at the onset of
the Amendment’s development and
focus on identification of EFH; fishing
and non-fishing activities that may
adversely affect EFH; and the
development of measures and
management programs to conserve,
protect, and enhance EFH and to
minimize to the extent practicable the
adverse effects of fishing on EFH. The
additional goals (9 and 10) were
developed after the Council voted to
incorporate revisions to the groundfish
closures in the Amendment. These goals
are focused on enhancing groundfish
productivity, including protection of
spawning groundfish, and maximizing
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
the societal net benefits from groundfish
stocks.
The 14 objectives map to one or more
of the Amendment’s goals and provide
more guidance on achieving each goal.
For example, the objectives include
identifying new data sources upon
which to base the EFH designations
(Objective A), developing analytical
tools for EFH designation, minimization
of adverse impacts, and monitoring the
effectiveness of measures (Objective D;
Goals 1, 3, and 5). Other objectives
include modifying fishing methods to
reduce impacts (Objective E; Goal 4),
supporting the restoration of degraded
habitat (Objective F; Goal 4), improving
groundfish spawning protection,
including protection of localized
spawning contingents, and improving
protection of critical groundfish habitats
(Goals 9 and 10). Please see Volume 1,
Section 3 of the EIS for more details on
the goals and objectives of this
Amendment.
2. Essential Fish Habitat Designations
The Magnuson-Stevens Act defines
EFH as ‘‘those waters and substrate
necessary to fish for spawning,
breeding, feeding, or growth to
maturity.’’ The EFH regulations (50 CFR
part 600, subpart J) require councils to
describe and identify EFH in text that
clearly states the habitats or habitat
types determined to be EFH for each life
stage of a managed species and in maps
that display the geographic locations of
EFH or within which EFH for each
species and life stage is found. Further,
FMPs should explain the physical,
biological, and chemical characteristics
of EFH and, if known, how these
characteristics influence the use of EFH
for the species/life stage. The EFH
regulations state that councils should
periodically review the EFH provisions
of FMPs and revise or amend as
warranted, based on available
information, and that a complete review
of all EFH information should be
conducted at least once every five years.
A full description of the approved
EFH designations, including maps and
text designations, can be found in
Volume 2 of the EIS. In addition, a
thorough discussion of the data sources
and methods used to assemble the
designations is provided in Appendix A
to the EIS. Another appendix (Appendix
B) includes supplementary EFH
information (e.g., prey species,
temperature, and salinity preferences)
for each species and life stage not
included in the EFH text descriptions in
Volume 2 that may be considered when
the potential effects of any fishing or
non-fishing activity that could adversely
affect EFH are evaluated. All of the
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Council’s recommendations for EFH
designations are approved.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
3. Habitat Area of Particular Concern
Designations
Habitat Areas of Particular Concern
(HAPC) highlight specific types or areas
of habitat within EFH that are
particularly vulnerable to human
impacts. Evaluations of such areas
should give special attention to adverse
effects, including any HAPCs designated
that are particularly vulnerable to
fishing activity. An HAPC designation
alone does not provide any specific
habitat management measures, such as
gear restrictions, and no new measures
are implemented as part of the HAPC
designations in this amendment.
Management measures are discussed
under ‘‘Spatial Management for Adverse
Effects Minimization,’’ below.
HAPC designations are based on one
or more of the following criteria: (1) The
importance of the ecological function
provided by the habitat, including both
the historical and current ecological
function; (2) the extent to which the
habitat is sensitive to human-induced
environmental degradation; (3) whether,
and to what extent, development
activities are, or will be, stressing the
habitat type; and (4) the rarity of the
habitat type (50 CFR 600.815(a)(8)). The
Council solicited and considered HAPC
proposals from the public and added
selection criteria, including whether the
designation would improve fisheries
management in the U.S. Exclusive
Economic Zone (EEZ); whether it
included EFH for more than one
Council-managed species or specifically
for juvenile cod; and whether it met
more than one of the regulatory HAPC
criteria listed above. Discussion of the
areas considered and the degree to
which they satisfied the eight criteria
can be found in Volume 2 of the EIS.
This action approves all of the
Council’s recommendations for HAPC,
including the current Atlantic Salmon
HAPC and the Northern Edge Juvenile
Cod HAPC. In addition, the action
approves the following areas as new
HAPCs: Inshore Juvenile Cod HAPC;
Great South Channel Juvenile Cod
HAPC; Cashes Ledge HAPC; Jeffreys
Ledge/Stellwagen Bank HAPC; Bear and
Retriever Seamount HAPC; and 11
canyon/canyon complexes. Maps and
coordinates for the HAPC designations
can be found in Volume 2 of the EIS. A
summary of the rationale for each
designation (or set of designations) was
provided in the proposed rule for this
action (82 FR 51492; November 6, 2017)
and further rationale is not repeated
here. Detailed discussion of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
rationale is also provided in Volume 2,
Section 3 of the EIS.
As described in the EIS, the HAPCs
are non-regulatory designations. The
designations are intended to provide for
increased attention when habitat
protection measures are considered.
HAPCs that are particularly vulnerable
to the potential impacts from fishing
warrant special attention when
determining appropriate management
measures to minimize, compensate, or
avoid those impacts.
4. Spatial Management for Adverse
Effects Minimization
The Magnuson-Stevens Act requires
that fishery management plans evaluate
and minimize, to the extent practicable,
the adverse effects of fishing on EFH.
The evaluation should consider the
effects of each fishing activity on each
type of habitat found within EFH.
Councils must prevent, mitigate, or
minimize any adverse effects from
fishing on EFH if there is evidence that
a fishing activity adversely affects EFH
in a manner that is more than minimal
and not temporary in nature. Councils
should consider the nature and extent of
any adverse effects along with the longand short-term costs and benefits of the
management measures to EFH,
associated fisheries, and the nation. A
thorough description of the approach
the Council took to achieve this
requirement is provided in the proposed
rule for this action and is not repeated
here.
The approved and disapproved
measures and a brief description of the
rationale for the decision are included
below. A thorough discussion of the
other alternatives considered and the
potential impacts, including economic
impacts, from those alternatives are
included in Volumes 3, 4, and 5 of the
EIS. Coordinates and maps of all areas
can be found in Volume 3 of the EIS.
Approved Habitat Management
Measures
• Establish the (Small) Eastern Maine
Habitat Management Area (HMA),
closed to mobile bottom-tending gear;
• Maintain Cashes Ledge
(Groundfish) Closure Area, with current
restrictions and exemptions;
• Modify the Cashes Ledge Habitat
Closure Area, closed to mobile bottomtending gear;
• Modify the Jeffreys Ledge Habitat
Closure Area, closed to mobile bottomtending gear;
• Establish the Ammen Rock HMA,
closed to all fishing, except lobster
traps;
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
15241
• Establish the Fippennies Ledge
HMA, closed to mobile bottom-tending
gear;
• Maintain the Western Gulf of Maine
Habitat Closure Area, closed to mobile
bottom-tending gear;
• Modify the Western Gulf of Maine
Groundfish Closure Area to align with
the Western Gulf of Maine Habitat
Closure Area, with current restrictions
and exemptions;
• Exempt shrimp trawling from the
designated portion of the northwest
corner of the Western Gulf of Maine
Closure Areas;
• Add the Gulf of Maine Roller Gear
restriction as a habitat protection
measure;
• Remove the Closed Area I Habitat
and Groundfish Closure Area
designations;
• Remove the Nantucket Lightship
Habitat and Groundfish Closure Area
designations; and
• Establish the Great South Channel
HMA, closed to mobile bottom-tending
gear throughout and clam dredge gear in
the defined northeast section. Clam
dredge gear would be permitted
throughout the rest of the HMA for 1
year while the Council considers
restrictions that are more refined.
Disapproved Habitat Management
Measures
The following recommendations were
disapproved. Further rationale for
disapproving these recommendations is
included below in the ‘‘Georges Bank’’
and ‘‘Southern New England/Great
South Channel’’ sections.
• The Cox Ledge HMA, which would
have been closed to hydraulic clam
dredges and prohibiting ground cables
of trawl vessels;
• Removal of the Closed Area II
Habitat and Groundfish Closure Areas;
• The Northern Edge Reduced Impact
HMA, which would have been closed to
mobile bottom-tending gears except
groundfish vessels west of 67° 20′ W
Longitude and scallop vessels fishing in
a scallop rotational program;
• The Northern Edge Mobile BottomTending Gear HMA, which would have
been closed to mobile bottom-tending
gear; and
• The Georges Shoal HMA, which
would have been closed to mobile
bottom-tending gear, except hydraulic
clam dredges that would have been
exempted for 1 year.
Eastern Gulf of Maine
In the Eastern Gulf of Maine, this
action establishes the Small Eastern
Maine HMA, closed to all mobile
bottom-tending gears. (Note, the
regulations refer to this area as simply
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
15242
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
the ‘‘Eastern Maine HMA.’’) This
measure is designed to protect habitats
of similar species as the larger area that
was considered, but with fewer
economic impacts on the fishing
industry. Its protection of vulnerable
habitats and designated EFH coverage
ranks towards the middle of the areas
considered for this sub-region. Because
there is currently no habitat
management area in the eastern Gulf of
Maine, implementing a mobile bottomtending gear closure in any area
represents an improvement in
groundfish habitat protection in this
sub-region. However, bottom trawls and
dredges are used sparingly in any of the
areas that the Council considered and
lobster traps are not subject to any of the
regulations in this amendment.
Therefore, no short-term reductions in
the adverse impacts of fishing in this
sub-region are expected. Overall, the
area provides potential long-term
habitat protection benefits with minimal
costs to the fishing industry.
Central Gulf of Maine
In the Central Gulf of Maine, this rule
maintains the existing Cashes Ledge
Groundfish Closure Area and modifies
the existing Jeffreys Bank and Cashes
Ledge Habitat Closure Areas, with their
current fishing restrictions and
exemptions; establishes the Fippennies
Ledge HMA, closed to mobile bottomtending gears; and establishes the
Ammen Rock HMA, closed to all fishing
except lobster traps.
This combination of measures is
appropriate for this region. Maintaining
the existing Cashes Ledge Groundfish
Closure Area supports the goals and
objectives of improving groundfish
productivity, with no additional
economic burdens on the industry.
Maintaining this closure will also
ensure that a more diverse array of
bottom habitats that support a greater
variety of species remain protected from
fishing impacts.
The other actions in this sub-region
are modifications to the existing Cashes
Ledge and Jeffreys Bank habitat
closures. These modifications were
designed to more closely align with the
location of the shallower, hard-bottom
habitats and to increase fishery access to
the deeper, less vulnerable mud and
sand habitats that surround the ledges.
Ammen Rock on top of Cashes Ledge is
a unique feature within the Gulf of
Maine and features kelp forest habitat
that would benefit from enhanced
protection, which is why there are
additional management restrictions in
that area. Fippennies Ledge is an
additional hard bottom feature within
the Cashes Ledge Groundfish Closure
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
Area that would be protected by
maintaining the existing groundfish
closure. However, should the Cashes
Ledge Groundfish Closure Area be
modified or removed at some point in
the future when groundfish stocks have
recovered and the closure is no longer
required, Fippennies Ledge still
warrants protection from the adverse
effects of mobile bottom-tending gear. In
terms of habitat protection and benefits
to groundfish resources, the approved
measures are high relative to other
alternatives in this sub-region and the
economic impacts are slightly more
positive than the current measures.
Western Gulf of Maine
In the Western Gulf of Maine, this
action maintains the existing Western
Gulf of Maine Habitat Closure Area,
closed to mobile bottom-tending gears,
and modifies the eastern boundary of
the Western Gulf of Maine [Groundfish]
Closure Area to align with the habitat
closure area, while maintaining the
current fishing restrictions and
requirements. This rule also creates an
exemption area within the northwest
corner of those closures for shrimp
trawls and designates the existing Roller
Gear Restricted Area requirements as a
habitat protection measure.
The EIS describes the Council’s
rationale for these areas in detail. In
summary, these areas were selected to
maintain decades’ worth of protections
in this region, while modestly
increasing fishing access to the eastern
edge of the area. The shrimp exemption
was designed to minimize the economic
impact on a fleet whose gear has
minimal habitat impact. The roller gear
restriction has been required for several
years and was originally implemented
through Framework Adjustment 27 to
the Northeast Multispecies Fishery
Management Plan to minimize cod
mortality by preventing trawl gear from
fishing over rocky substrate. As such, it
has been a de facto habitat protection
measure and the Council wanted to note
it formally as such.
These measures are expected to have
the same level of positive impacts on
habitat and groundfish resources as the
existing closures, with the same
economic benefits.
Georges Bank
On Georges Bank, the Council
recommended removing the year-round
and habitat closures of Closed Areas I
and II and replacing them with three
new areas: (1) The Georges Shoal 2
HMA, closed to mobile bottom-tending
gear, with a 1-year delay in closure to
hydraulic clam dredges; (2) the
Northern Edge Reduced Impact HMA,
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
closed to mobile bottom-tending gear,
with two exceptions described below;
and (3) the Northern Edge Mobile
Bottom-Tending Gear HMA, closed to
mobile bottom-tending gear without any
exceptions. Exemptions to the Reduced
Impact HMA would have allowed
scallop dredge fishing under the scallop
rotational area program, and trawl
fishing to the west of the existing
western boundary of Closed Area II (67°
20′ W long.), in what is now the Eastern
Georges Bank Special Access Program.
In addition, any portions of the Closed
Area II groundfish closed area north of
41° 30′ N lat. would have been closed
to scallop fishing between June 15 and
October 31 of each year. Volume 3 of the
EIS describes the Council’s rationale in
detail.
We approved a portion of this
recommendation. The Council
considered Closed Areas I and II in the
same sub-region and included
recommendations in the same
alternative. However, the two closed
areas are substantially distinct in their
scope, nature, and impacts, and;
therefore, changes to either area may be
assessed independently. Whether the
HMAs recommended by the Council
meet the goals and objectives of the
Amendment and Magnuson-Stevens Act
requirements may also be assessed
independently. The Closed Area I
Groundfish Closure, which
encompasses the Closed Area I North
and South Habitat Closures, and a
central portion that has long been part
of the scallop access area program, is
generally less vulnerable to the adverse
effects of fishing than areas of Georges
Bank to the north and east. This action
establishes the Closed Area I South
Habitat Closure as a DHRA (see # 6
below), which will be closed to mobile
bottom-tending gears for at least 3 years
and could be opened after a review of
the research activities in the area.
Closed Area I North Habitat Closure
becomes a seasonal closure from
February 1 to April 15, closed to
commercial and recreational gears
capable of catching groundfish except
scallop dredges. (See #5 below.) The
removal of the Closed Area I
designations and proposed new
designations do not compromise the
ability of the Council’s FMPs to comply
with the EFH requirements of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act.
The changes the Council proposed
would have opened an area that has
been closed to mobile bottom-tending
fishing gear for over 20 years. This
would have allowed rotational scallop
dredge fishing along the northern edge
of Georges Bank. A portion of the
Northern Edge Reduced Impact HMA
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
that would have been opened to
rotational limited access scallop
dredging as part of the Council’s
preferred alternative includes the
northern portion of an area designated
as a Habitat Area of Particular Concern
in 1998 and that is reaffirmed in this
amendment due to the ecological
importance and vulnerability of the area
for juvenile cod.
The Council’s recommended areas on
Georges Bank do not sufficiently
address the impact of limited access
scallop dredging on the highly
vulnerable habitat within the Closed
Area II Habitat Closure Area. Overall,
the changes the Council recommended
to Closed Area II and eastern Georges
Bank are inconsistent with the
Amendment’s goals and objectives of
improving juvenile groundfish habitat
protection and the requirements of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act to minimize the
adverse effects of fishing to the extent
practicable. Furthermore, the Closed
Area II Habitat Closure Area has the
same footprint as the Northern Edge
Juvenile Cod HAPC. The area has been
closed to mobile bottom-tending gear
since 1995 and designated as an HAPC
since 1998. The Council reaffirmed that
designation in this Amendment, but the
recommendation the Council had made
does not avoid, minimize, or
compensate for the adverse effects of
this action on this HAPC.
Based on the factors analyzed in the
Amendment, the quality of the habitat
in the current Closed Area II Habitat
Closure Area is considered much higher
than the habitat in the proposed Georges
Shoal HMA and higher than in the
proposed Northern Edge Mobile BottomTending Gear Closure Area. The
Council’s EIS supporting the
Amendment describes the size, habitat
content (sand/mud vs. gravel, cobble,
boulder), and the results of an EFH
overlap analysis, allowing us to
compare the relative EFH ‘‘value’’ across
areas. The EFH overlap analyses were
done to show the extent to which the
EFH designations for individual
managed species overlap within each
habitat management area the Council
considered. This type of analysis favors
larger areas and was done using several
categories, as follows: Total number of
EFH designations; EFH for overfished
species; EFH for species/life stages with
a known affinity for complex substrate;
juvenile hotspots; and the count of
unique species and designations.
The proposed Georges Shoal HMA
ranks at or near the bottom of the
analysis in almost every measure of EFH
coverage, despite its much larger size,
meaning far fewer managed species and
life stages utilize this area. Of the 49
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
areas considered across all sub-regions,
the Georges Shoal HMA ranks between
36th and 47th, depending on the
measure; in contrast, the Closed Area II
EFH area ranks between 8th and 27th in
the same analysis. Among the 16
alternatives considered for the Georges
Bank sub-region, the Georges Shoal
HMA is the sixth largest, but last or
almost last in each of the EFH overlap
scores. The Georges Shoal HMA is
sandier and more shallow, and,
therefore, less vulnerable to fishing
impacts, than Closed Area II, making it
a much less efficient closure. The
Northern Edge Mobile Bottom-Tending
Gear HMA that had been proposed
ranks in the lower half of almost every
metric as well (from 7–12 out of 16),
despite being a similar size to the
existing Closed Area II EFH closure. The
Northern Edge Reduced Impact HMA
that had been proposed, where scallop
fishing would have been allowed on a
rotational basis, represents the most
complex habitat and ranks in the upper
half of each EFH metric (3–7 out of 16),
despite its much smaller size.
Removing protections from, and
allowing scallop dredging in, the most
vulnerable portion of Closed Area II
compromises the ability of the Council’s
FMPs to continue to meet the
requirements of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act to minimize to the extent
practicable the adverse effects of fishing
on EFH throughout the region and
prevents the Council from achieving
this action’s goals and objectives. The
potential benefits to habitat from the
areas the Council had proposed to close
do not outweigh the potential adverse
effects on highly valuable EFH and
vulnerable groundfish stocks that would
result from opening the Closed Area II
Habitat Closure Area to limited access
scallop dredging.
In addition to the quality and
importance of the habitat on eastern
Georges Bank, the Closed Area II Habitat
Closure Area is also the Northern Edge
Juvenile Cod HAPC. As noted above, the
Council initially made this designation
in 1998 and reaffirmed the importance
of the area in this Amendment. One of
the four considerations for HAPC
designation is sensitivity to
anthropogenic stress. The Council
concluded that there are ‘‘no known
anthropogenic threats to this area
beyond those associated with fishing
activity.’’ While there are no fishery
restrictions associated with HAPC
designations themselves, the
designation should result in the Council
taking a more precautionary approach to
management of those areas, particularly
when the only noted human-induced
stress is fishing. The final rule for the
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
15243
EFH regulations (67 FR 2343; January
17, 2002) notes, ‘‘. . . designation of
HAPCs is a valuable way to highlight
priority areas within EFH for
conservation and management . . .
Proposed fishing activities that might
threaten HAPCs may likewise receive a
higher level of scrutiny.’’ This guidance
suggests that councils should prioritize
the protection of HAPCs where fishing
is a primary or significant threat to the
habitat.
The Council’s recommendations in
this Amendment would have opened
the most vulnerable portions of the
HAPC without closing other comparable
habitat. The Council did not adequately
explain its reasons for concluding that
this HAPC should be opened to fishing
or how the other areas adequately
mitigated or compensated for the
impacts of fishing in this area. The
Council’s recommendation to allow
even rotational fishing in this sensitive
habitat is inconsistent with its own
rationale for the designation that the
habitat in this area warrants particular
concern and consideration. The Council
also did not explain the conditions for
allowing fishing in this area that would
sufficiently minimize adverse effects.
For these reasons, we disapproved the
recommendations to remove the Closed
Area II Habitat and Groundfish Closure
Areas and replace them with the areas
described above.
While disapproving the Council’s
recommendation for eastern Georges
Bank will continue to result in lost
opportunity costs for the scallop
industry, approved changes to current
area closures will provide substantial
new economic opportunity for the
scallop fishery. The Council currently
estimates that access into the Closed
Area I and Nantucket Lightship areas
that were previously closed could
increase scallop revenue by $140-$160
million in the next year (based on
preliminary information in Scallop
Framework Adjustment 29). The
Council may choose to revisit habitat
management on eastern Georges Bank in
a subsequent action that could address
the reasons for disapproval.
Great South Channel/Southern New
England
This rule establishes the Great South
Channel HMA. The northeast corner of
the HMA (12.5 percent of the area) will
be closed to all mobile bottom-tending
gears. The effective date of the closure
will be delayed by 1 year for hydraulic
clam dredges throughout the remainder
of the area. The Council considered the
unique fishing practices in the surfclam
fishery. Based on this information, the
Council is working to identify sub-areas
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
15244
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
that are less vulnerable to clam gear to
determine whether some amount of
clam fishing may continue in a manner
that sufficiently minimizes impacts to
vulnerable substrate. The Council
recommended establishing two small
HMAs on Cox Ledge, closed to
hydraulic clam dredges, and prohibiting
ground cables on trawls fishing in the
areas; however, that recommendation
was disapproved. The Nantucket
Lightship Habitat Closure Area and the
Nantucket Lightship Closed Area are
removed by this action.
Throughout the development of the
action, the Council’s technical team
expressed concern that the ground cable
restriction measures would not
minimize the habitat impacts of fishing.
NMFS reiterated these concerns several
times throughout the development of
OHA2 management measures. Ground
cables account for a significant portion
of a bottom trawl’s seabed impact.
However, the sediment clouds they
create ‘‘herd’’ fish toward the opening of
the net. The gear modifications that had
been proposed would have reduced the
effectiveness of the gear and, in all
likelihood, cause vessels to fish longer
in order to compensate for reduced
catch rates. No studies of the trade-offs
between reduced impacts of ground
cable removal and the duration or
frequency of bottom trawl tows were
cited in the EIS for OHA2. As a result,
we disapproved this recommendation.
The approved recommendation of the
Great South Channel HMA is a
compromise between the larger Great
South Channel East HMA (identified in
the EIS as Alternative 3), located further
to the east, and the slightly smaller
Nantucket Shoals HMA (identified in
the EIS as Alternative 5), located further
to the west, closer to Nantucket Island.
Bottom habitats in these areas are a
mixture of less stable sand and more
stable gravel, cobble, and boulder
substrates and support fisheries for
groundfish, clams, and scallops. The
two most significant fisheries in the area
are for surfclams and scallops. Scallop
dredging is almost entirely restricted to
deeper water along the western side of
the Great South Channel and to an area
east of Cape Cod. Clam dredging occurs
in a large area of mixed bottom types in
shallower water to the west. While the
Council recognized the likelihood of
negative economic impacts of these
alternatives on the clam fishery, they
were also concerned about the negative
effects of hydraulic dredges on complex
habitats occurring in the region. The
discussion and development of more
discrete exemption areas is currently
occurring in a separate framework
adjustment action.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
This action also establishes two
HAPCs in this sub-region. The Inshore
Juvenile Cod HAPC includes waters off
the Massachusetts coast to 20 m deep,
and overlaps slightly with the
Nantucket Shoals and Nantucket Shoals
West HMAs. The Great South Channel
Juvenile Cod HAPC includes additional
waters north and east of the HMAs to a
depth of 120 m and partially overlaps
the Great South Channel HMA in this
sub-region. No management measures
were applied specifically to these areas;
however, they are designated as HAPCs
primarily because they are vulnerable to
adverse anthropogenic impacts from
non-fishing activities.
Results of the habitat impact analyses
in the EIS indicated that the approved
measures are expected to have positive
habitat impacts compared to leaving the
habitat and groundfish closures in the
Nantucket Lightship area in place, even
with the 1-year delay in closure for clam
dredges in most of the area. Impacts to
groundfish resources will be
approximately the same for both the
existing and new measures. The new
measures will have a slightly negative
economic impact on the groundfish
fishery; approximately 1 percent of the
total groundfish revenue from the
statistical areas covered by the closure
are expected to be impacted by this
measure. A highly negative economic
impact on the clam fishery after the 1year delay expires would be expected,
before more discrete exemption areas
are approved and implemented.
5. Groundfish Spawning Measures
The Council has considered how to
most effectively manage fishing during
the spawning periods of key fish in
several actions. During the development
of this Amendment, the Council
recommended, and NMFS
implemented, several modifications to
spawning protections for cod and other
groundfish through Framework
Adjustments 45 and 53. Because these
measures were implemented prior to the
completion of OHA2, there was much
debate over what should be done in this
action. Ultimately, the Council
recommended, and this action
implements, a few minor additional
protections to what is required
currently.
Gulf of Maine
In the Gulf of Maine, this action
establishes two new, relatively small,
cod spawning protections. They include
the Winter Massachusetts Bay Spawning
Closure, which will be in effect from
November 1–January 31 of each year.
During the closure, the area will be
closed to all fishing vessels, with the
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
same exemptions as the existing Gulf of
Maine Cod Spawning Protection Area
(i.e., Whaleback). These exemptions
include vessels fishing in state waters
that do not have a Federal Northeast
multispecies permit; vessels fishing
with exempted gears; charter/party and
private recreational vessels, provided
they are fishing with pelagic hook and
line gear and there is no retention of
regulated groundfish or ocean pout; and
vessels that are transiting. In addition, a
2-week closure (April 15–April 30)
within statistical area 125, referred to as
the Spring Massachusetts Bay Spawning
Protection Area, is established. This
area will be closed to all vessels, except:
Vessels fishing in state waters that do
not have a Federal Northeast
multispecies permit; vessels fishing
with exempted gears; vessels in the midwater trawl and purse seine exempted
fisheries; scallop vessels fishing with
dredges on a scallop day-at-sea; vessels
fishing in the scallop dredge exemption
area; and charter, party, and recreational
fishing vessels.
Georges Bank
Because the Council’s
recommendation to remove the Closed
Area II Groundfish Closure Area in
Georges Bank was disapproved, the
current year-round restrictions and
exemptions remain in effect. Should the
Council revisit habitat management on
Georges Bank, and recommend the
removal of the Closed Area II closure
areas, a seasonal restriction would be in
place for Closed Area II Groundfish
Closure Area and the Closed Area I
North Habitat Closed Area from
February 1–April 15. During the closure
season, the areas will be closed to all
commercial and recreational vessels,
except those that are transiting, fishing
with exempted gears, participating in
the mid-water trawl exempted fishery,
and fishing with scallop dredges, unless
otherwise prohibited elsewhere.
This action removes the May Georges
Bank Spawning Closure. Sector vessels
are exempted from this seasonal closure,
rendering it virtually non-existent.
Removing the closure should minimally
reduce the administrative burden for
sectors, as they will no longer have to
request this exemption.
6. Dedicated Habitat Research Areas
In order to highlight research needs,
particularly relating to evaluating the
assumptions of the Swept Area Seabed
Impact (SASI) model that the Council
used as the basis for HMA development,
this rule establishes two Dedicated
Habitat Research Areas (DHRA), which
will be in effect for 3 years, at which
time the Regional Administrator will
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
consult with the Council as to whether
the designation should be retained. The
Council developed a series of questions
to assist in this future discussion that
include consideration of where in the
research development process an
activity is, how well it aligns with the
Council’s stated habitat research
priorities, and what role the DHRA
designation plays in the research.
This action establishes the Georges
Bank DHRA (footprint is the same as the
existing Closed Area I South Habitat
Closure) and the Stellwagen DHRA
(footprint within the existing Western
Gulf of Maine Habitat Closure). The
Georges Bank DHRA is closed to all
mobile bottom-tending gear. The
Stellwagen DHRA is closed to all
commercial mobile bottom-tending gear,
commercial sink gillnet gear, and
commercial demersal longline gear.
Maps and coordinates of the approved
DHRAs can be found in Volume 3 of the
EIS.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
7. Framework Adjustments and
Monitoring
The designation or removal of HMAs
and changes to fishing restrictions
within HMAs may be considered in a
framework adjustment. In addition, this
action establishes a review process to
evaluate the performance of habitat and
spawning protection measures. Finally,
this action establishes a process for the
Council to identify and periodically
revise research priorities to improve
habitat and spawning area monitoring.
8. Regulatory Changes
This rule implements measures for all
of the approved measures. In order to
improve clarity of the habitat-related
management measures, we have
reorganized § 648.81 to refer solely to
year-round and seasonal closures
designed for purposes of groundfish
protection. All habitat-related measures,
including the newly approved and
existing HMAs and their accompanying
regulatory text, the DHRAs and their
accompanying text, and the MidAtlantic Fishery Management Council’s
Deep-Sea Coral Protection area can be
found in a new subpart (subpart Q). In
addition, the Council stated that all
areas currently closed to scallop
dredging should remain closed upon the
implementation of OHA2 so that the
Scallop Committee can better
incorporate newly opened areas in the
rotational management program. The
existing EFH closures currently reside
in both the groundfish (§ 648.81) and
scallop (§ 648.61) regulations. This
action adds the groundfish closed areas
that would otherwise be removed by
this action to the scallop closure section
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
(§ 648.61) to ensure that the restrictions
on scallop fishing remain in place until
a subsequent scallop action can modify
them. The decisions related to scallop
fishing year 2018 access are being
implemented via Framework
Adjustment 29 to the Atlantic Scallop
FMP. The regulations also update crossreferences and definitions as needed.
The Council deemed the regulations as
necessary and appropriate, as required
in the Magnuson-Stevens Act, on March
28, 2017.
9. Changes From the Proposed Rule
As described above, the differences
from the proposed rule relate to the
recommended measures that were
disapproved by NMFS. Closed Area II
Habitat Closure regulations will be
reassigned to the new habitat
management section in Subpart Q,
while the Closed Area II Groundfish
Closure Area will remain codified in
§ 648.81. Cross-references from other
sections have also been updated to
reflect these changes.
10. Comments and Responses
The Notice of Availability for this
Amendment was published on October
6, 2017 (82 FR 46749), and the proposed
rule was published on November 5,
2017 (82 FR 51492). The comment
periods for both ended on December 5,
2017. In total, 72 comments were
received; many of these comments were
submitted on behalf of environmental or
fishing organizations or businesses.
Seventeen of the comments were not
relevant to the issues under discussion
in this action and were nominally about
the commenter(s) concerns regarding
global climate change. Those comments
are not addressed here.
Comment 1: Nine comments focused
exclusively on EFH, HAPC, and DHRA
designations. Seven of the comments
recommended approving the
regulations, specifically the EFH, HAPC,
and DHRA regulations, with most
specifically noting the importance of the
Inshore Juvenile Cod HAPC, that it was
important to give other areas HAPC
status because of their sensitivity to
trawling, dredging, and other fishing
impacts, and that these designations and
related management measures can help
boost the cod population. Three
commenters also noted the importance
of the Atlantic Salmon HAPC. Another
comment supported the implementing
OHA2 regulations that would allow the
Council to develop analytical tools for
EFH designation, and monitor the
effectiveness of current/future
conservation efforts.
Response: NMFS agrees that the EFH,
HAPC, and DHRA regulations are
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
15245
necessary and appropriate when
supported by the best available science.
We are approving all of the Council’s
recommendations for these
designations, including the Atlantic
Salmon and Inshore Juvenile Cod
HAPCs. We disagree that the 20-meter
depth limit for the Inshore Juvenile Cod
HAPC is overly broad. It was based on
the best scientific information available
that indicates a broader depth range
occupied by young-of-year and 1-yearold cod.
Comment 2: The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers submitted a comment
regarding the winter flounder EFH
designation that the Council and
NOAA/NMFS consult with them to
better inform EFH conservation
recommendations. They are concerned
about re-suspended sediments in or near
designated habitat, and its effect on
Atlantic sturgeon.
Response: This comment has been
forwarded to NMFS staff in the
Protected Resources Division for the
Greater Atlantic Region who work on
Atlantic sturgeon issues to address this
concern with the Army Corps.
Comment 3: Mystic Aquarium
submitted a comment expressing
concern for the lack of analysis and
development of alternatives to conserve
deep-sea corals EFH in Gulf of Maine,
Georges Bank, and southern New
England regions under the purview of
the Council. This commenter contends
that because the revision of the EFH
designation for Acadian redfish
includes deep sea corals, and deep sea
corals have been described as the most
vulnerable form of EFH in reference
materials developed by the NMFS DeepSea Coral Research and Technology
Program and the Northeast Fisheries
Science Center analysis of fishing effects
that the Council should analyze the
fishing effects on these habitats. Because
the deep-sea coral considerations were
split off into a separate action, the
commenter requests that we leave the
status quo HMAs and HAPCs, in both
the Gulf of Maine and along the
continental margin south and west of
Georges Bank, until a refined proposal
is produced by the Council that
addresses these concerns. Alternatively,
the commenter suggests that the
Council’s ongoing coral amendment
could be redirected to address these
issues regarding mitigation of the effects
of fishing on corals functioning as EFH.
Response: This action does not
directly address the impacts of fishing
on corals as a component of EFH for
redfish. Additional information specific
to deep-sea corals would require further
development and consideration of
information that was not available for
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
15246
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
this Amendment. The Council
considered what measures were
necessary for deep-sea coral protection
in the recently completed deep-sea coral
amendment. This action implements the
retention of all three status quo habitat
management areas in the Gulf of Maine,
with some minor modifications, and all
the HAPCs along the outer shelf, largely
because of their importance for deep-sea
corals.
Comment 4: Eighteen comments
focused on maintaining the status quo
spatial management measures. Most of
these comments were from members of
the public who identified themselves as
recreational or for-hire fishing sector
participants. Most commenters
specifically opposed opening the
Western Gulf of Maine and Closed Areas
I and II to commercial fishing, noting
that they considered the closed areas to
be largely responsible for the recovery of
the haddock stocks. A few commenters
mentioned specific support for the new
closed area off downeast Maine (i.e., the
Small Eastern Maine HMA), the new
Great South Channel HMA, and for
maintaining the Cashes Ledge
Groundfish Closure Area with the
current restrictions. Many commenters
noted that recreational fishermen are
currently not allowed to possess cod in
the Gulf of Maine and that allowing
increased commercial fishing pressure
in an area known for cod would be
inconsistent with that restriction.
Response: NMFS agrees that closed
areas can be an effective tool in
rebuilding overfished stocks and
protecting vulnerable habitat. We have
reviewed the best science available in
this action relating to the costs and
benefits of closed areas when
determining whether the Council’s
recommendations minimize the adverse
effects of fishing to the extent
practicable, and whether they meet the
Amendment’s goals and objectives and
comply with all other laws. NMFS
supports the implementation of the
Small Eastern Maine HMA and
implements that measure in this action.
We support maintaining the Cashes
Ledge Closure Area closed as
recommended by the Council. We also
agree that the Cox Ledge proposal
should not be implemented.
We disagree that opening a portion of
the Western Gulf of Maine Closure Area
is inconsistent with the current
restriction on recreational anglers. The
Council manages Gulf of Maine cod
with an overall annual catch limit (ACL)
and distinct sub-ACLs for various
aspects of the fishery. We believe this
system is sufficient to prevent
overfishing and rebuild overfished
stocks. Specific management measures
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
are developed to address the unique
nature of both the commercial and
recreational fisheries. The commercial
fleet is primarily managed using a sector
system, which further allocates the
commercial sub-ACL to fishing sectors.
The recreational sub-ACL is managed by
setting an open fishing season,
minimum fish size, and possession limit
for the recreational and for-hire sectors
that will prevent the sub-ACL from
being exceeded.
The approved measures would reduce
the area protected by about 25 percent;
however, the area remaining closed has
more vulnerable habitat than the area
being opened. As described in the EIS,
measures implemented by this rule will
have a positive impact on groundfish,
albeit slightly less beneficial than the
status quo. Overall, however, NMFS
determined that the collective measures
in the Gulf of Maine represent an
improvement to groundfish protections.
The Great South Channel HMA is
being approved with the clam dredge
exemption, contrary to the
recommendations in some of these
comments. The area covered by the
Great South Channel HMA is currently
open to fishing, including by hydraulic
clam dredges, scallop dredges, and
groundfish trawls. The majority of the
area would be open only to clam
dredges for 1 year while the Council
attempts to develop more specific
exemption areas. The Council notes that
hydraulic clam dredges are capable of
fishing in discrete areas of less
vulnerable habitat around more
complex structure. If, in the coming
year, the Council is unable to develop
a solution that effectively minimizes the
adverse effects of fishing in this area
while minimizing the economic impacts
to the clam fishery, the exemption will
expire, and hydraulic clam dredges
would be prohibited throughout the
HMA.
On Georges Bank, we partially agree
with the recommendations to leave
Closed Areas I and II as they are now.
We are implementing the Council’s
recommendation to remove the Closed
Area I groundfish and habitat closed
area designations, but we are also
implementing a seasonal spawning
closure for Closed Area I North and a
DHRA closed to mobile bottom-tending
gear in Closed Area I South. We have
disapproved the Council’s
recommendation for Closed Area II for
the reasons described in the preamble of
this rule.
Comment 5: The Nature Conservancy
(TNC) believed some of the proposed
measures likely meet the requirements
of the Magnuson-Stevens Act to
periodically review EFH designations
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
and the protection of such habitats. In
particular, they recommended that
NMFS approve all new EFH
designations; the new Small Eastern
Maine Habitat Management Area
(HMA); continue existing protections in
the Cashes Ledge Groundfish Closure
Area; and approve the Jeffreys Bank and
Cashes Ledge Habitat Closure Areas.
They also supported the approval of the
Fippennies Ledge HMA and
establishing the Ammen Rock HMA, as
well as the Cox Ledge spawning area.
TNC also supported the Western Gulf of
Maine Habitat Closure Area and all of
the Council recommended HAPCs and
DHRAs.
TNC expressed concerns with new
habitat closed areas on Georges Bank
and framework provisions that establish
a pathway to allow exemptions for
hydraulic clam dredge gear in habitat
closed areas. Specifically, TNC is
opposed to the Council’s
recommendation on Georges Bank,
citing their Weighted Persistence
Analysis, which is an analysis and that
it supports the concerns noted by NMFS
in the proposed rule. TNC also opposes
the exemption for hydraulic clam
dredges and suggests that a workshop
should be held to review very highresolution data to identify exemption
areas that would be compatible with
requirements to prevent adverse impacts
of fishing. The letter contends that the
TNC analysis showed that, apart from
the Northern Edge Reduced Impact
HMA, the Council recommended
management measures are not located in
high habitat value areas. According to
TNC, this verifies the concerns the
Agency expressed regarding the Georges
Bank area in its request for comments.
Because TNC feels that the proposed
management measures for Georges Bank
do not protect high value habitat, they
strongly recommended that NMFS
disapprove these provisions.
Further, as TNC wrote in its
comments in 2015, surfclam/ocean
quahog vessel monitoring system data
show that this fishery, while largely
concentrated in the Mid-Atlantic and
Southern New England regions, is active
in the Great South Channel, off Cape
Cod, and on Georges Bank. TNC also
asserts that hydraulic surfclam gear is
highly destructive to structured habitats,
and has a lesser impact in high-energy
sand habitats. TNC suggests that a
collaborative workshop process
informed by very high-resolution spatial
data could be used to identify
exemption areas that would be
compatible with requirements to
prevent adverse impacts of fishing.
Response: NMFS agrees that the
Weighted Persistence Analysis supports
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
our decision for Georges Bank and notes
that we referenced that information
when making this determination. The
Cox Ledge area was not recommended
as a spawning closure and is not being
implemented as an HMA for the reasons
noted in the preamble of this rule.
NMFS supports the idea that a
workshop to identify exemption areas
within the Great South Channel HMA
would be beneficial to both the Council
and the clam industry, should the
interested parties agree on that approach
as a way forward.
Comment 6: The Cape Cod
Commercial Fishermen’s Alliance,
representing 150 fishing businesses and
over 300 fishing families, expressed
support for the analytical basis for the
Amendment, namely the SASI and
Local Indicators of Spatial Association
(LISA) analyses, noting this modeling
framework allowed the Habitat
Committee and the Council to make
well-informed decisions when
recommending preferred alternatives.
The Fishermen’s Alliance supported the
Council’s full recommendation to create
a new Habitat Management Area (HMA)
in the Great South Channel to protect
this valuable ground, including closing
12.5 percent of the northeast HMA to all
mobile bottom-tending gears.
Additionally, the Fishermen’s Alliance
asserts that the prohibitions in the
remaining area for dredging are
warranted, particularly given opening of
nearby regions to scalloping that pose
less impacts to the benthic environment.
They also strongly supported the
Council’s decision to designate the
Great South Channel Juvenile Cod
HAPC, stating that these actions would
reduce fishing impacts on habitat, and
(coupled with the Georges Bank
Seasonal Closure Area) protect valuable
spawning and rearing habitat for
Atlantic cod.
The Fishermen’s Alliance also
expressed strong support for the
removal of the Nantucket Lightship and
Closed Area I closures, noting the
significance of the areas to the small
boat scallop fishery (i.e., the limited
access general category fleet),
specifically noting that the habitat
encompassed by the current closed
areas is less important for valuable
species such as Atlantic cod than the
habitat that would be protected under
the new Great South Channel HMA.
Response: We agree with the
Fishermen’s Alliance that the SASI/
LISA results were an appropriate
starting point for the Council’s
discussion. Based in part on those
analyses, the Nantucket Lightship and
Closed Area I closures are removed in
this action. We are also approving the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
recommendations in the Great South
Channel for the reasons described
above.
Comment 7: The Council submitted
comments in support of implementing
the measures as proposed. The Council
contends that the full suite of measures
submitted were in compliance with the
requirements of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act. The Council stated in its comment
its recognition of the important habitats
along the northern edge of Georges Bank
for groundfish, including juvenile cod.
The Council contends that its preferred
approach to management on Georges
Bank keeps certain areas closed to
fishing with mobile bottom-tending
gears, while allowing only rotational
scallop fishing in most of the Reduced
Impact HMA.
The Council took issue with how the
preamble of the proposed rule implied
that scallop fishing in the Reduced
Impact HMA would be unlimited,
contending that while the Council was
not prescriptive about how rotational
scallop fisheries on the northern edge
might be conducted, this statement
ignores the eighteen years of successful
rotational sea scallop management since
Amendment 10 to the Atlantic Sea
Scallop Fishery Management Plan
(FMP) formally adopted the approach.
The Council also expressed concern that
the preamble misconstrues the
economic analysis in Volume 5 of the
EIS with regard to the scallop fishery
loss of opportunity versus realized
costs. The Council states that they are
confident that rational rotational
management can be conducted on the
northern edge while minimizing the
adverse effects of fishing.
Finally, the Council responded to the
concern that it did not give due
consideration to the northern edge’s
status as an HAPC when deciding on
measures to minimize adverse effects.
The rationale for the HAPC given in the
EIS notes that complex gravel habitats,
especially those with structure-forming
epifauna, provide cover for juvenile cod,
reducing predation during a critical life
history stage that may be a bottleneck
for this species.
Response: For the reasons described
in this rule’s preamble, NMFS
disapproved the Council’s
recommendation to allow rotational
scallop fishing on the northern edge of
Georges Bank. NMFS agrees that the
scallop rotational program has
successfully managed scallops, but the
rotational program is designed to
address scallop fishing issues. It was not
designed specifically to minimize
adverse effects on EFH or account for
juvenile cod HAPC. NMFS determined
that the Council did not adequately
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
15247
describe or consider the relationship
between the frequency of scallop fishing
and the recovery time scale of the
habitat features that are particularly
important to juvenile groundfish in the
region. NMFS acknowledges that the
proposed rule inappropriately
misconstrued the potential lost revenues
to the scallop fishery and has updated
the language in the final rule. As
described above, NMFS disagrees that
the Council gave due consideration to
the northern edge’s status as an HAPC.
Comment 8: The Northeast Seafood
Coalition (NSC), representing 250
fishing businesses, submitted a
comment generally in favor of the
Council’s recommendations. The
comment was careful to point out that,
while NSC supports the full suite of
measures recommended by the Council,
it is not fully ‘‘satisfied’’ with the
Amendment as a whole. Specifically,
NSC is unsatisfied with retaining
groundfish closure measures in the
Western Gulf of Maine and on Cashes
Ledge. The NSC requests that the record
identify the overarching purpose of the
Cashes Ledge Closure and the Council’s
intention in recommending that it
remain closed. NSC notes that the
Council was neither bound by the
existing closures nor to selecting new
areas of comparable size. Further, NSC
states that NMFS should not be
evaluating the efficiency of the
proposed Georges Bank
recommendations by comparing them to
habitat protection coincidently provided
by the existing mortality closures. NSC
also questions NMFS’s ‘‘one-sided’’
interest in CPUE as a relevant
consideration for habitat impacts
regarding the ground cable prohibition
on Cox Ledge.
Response: While NMFS agrees that
increases in fishing efficiency that
reduces the amount of time that gear is
in contact with the bottom can enhance
habitat protection, increased efficiency
is not the only way to minimize the
adverse effects of fishing on EFH. Even
highly efficient fishing with mobile
bottom-tending gear can have adverse
effects, defined as effects that are more
than minimal and not temporary, on
highly vulnerable habitat. The
combination of reduced overall effort
and high quality closures is one reason
we supported the Council’s approach
that smaller HMAs that protect more
vulnerable habitat are preferable to
larger HMAs that cover less vulnerable
habitat. As noted above, our disapproval
of the Council’s recommendation on
eastern Georges Bank is in line with this
approach. The Council recommended
larger, less efficient closures as
compensation for increased impacts in
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
15248
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
highly vulnerable substrate. This is also
consistent with our decision to
disapprove the Council’s
recommendation on Cox Ledge. The
Council’s Plan Development Team
noted on several occasions that it was
unable to determine how much less
efficient an average trawl would be
without ground cables, and; therefore,
unable to determine if total bottom
contact time would be reduced or
increased.
We disagree that the restrictions on
gears capable of catching groundfish are
unnecessary in the Western Gulf of
Maine and Cashes Ledge groundfish
closure areas and that these areas were
not intended to support the Council’s
stated goals of improving protection of
critical life stages, including spawning
groundfish. In advance of the April 2015
Council meeting, where a motion was
made to continue the protections on
Cashes Ledge, NMFS advised the
Council that the Council’s goal of
‘‘improving’’ juvenile groundfish habitat
protections would not likely be
achieved without the Cashes Ledge
Closure Area, particularly in
combination with the reduced
groundfish protections from the Western
Gulf of Maine.
NMFS staff reviewed the audio
recording of the April 2015 Council
meeting in response to this comment. It
is clear from that recording that the
maker of the adopted motion for the
Central Gulf of Maine made the
recommendation in response to the
Regional Administrator’s letter dated
April 14, 2015, noting our concerns
relating to the Habitat Committee’s
recommendations in light of the Gulf of
Maine cod stock status. This letter
stated specifically ‘‘there is insufficient
information in the record to show that
the Committee’s recommended
preferred alternative improves juvenile
groundfish habitat protections and
would likely fail to meet the Council’s
stated goals and objectives.’’ We agree
that the Council discussion on the
motion was clear that the intention was
for cod protection given its current
status, and that when the cod is
considered healthy, the Council should
consider the utility of the Cashes Ledge
Closure Area under those conditions.
NMFS would support a review of this
area, as well as the Western Gulf of
Maine Groundfish Closure measures,
when cod and other groundfish stocks
are rebuilt. The Council can revisit the
overall objectives and collection of
management measures in the Northeast
Multispecies FMP as stock conditions
change. This review should include all
measures that have been implemented
or maintained in support of rebuilding
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
stocks that may no longer be necessary
when stocks recover.
Comment 9: The Massachusetts
Division of Marine Fisheries submitted
comments in support of the Council’s
recommendations, particularly those on
Georges Bank, noting the decisions
being developed in Scallop Framework
Adjustment 29 are projected to result in
lower overall groundfish bycatch,
reduced open area effort, increased
scallop catch, and increased revenue
from access to Closed Area I and the
Nantucket Lightship West area.
Response: While we disapproved the
Council’s recommendations for eastern
Georges Bank, we are approving the
recommendations to remove the Closed
Area I and Nantucket Lightship Closure
Areas as year-round closures. A
decision on Framework 29 is pending
finalization by NMFS, which, if
approved, would authorize the scallop
fishery to access portions of these
former closure areas.
Comment 10: The Associated
Fisheries of Maine (AFM), representing
25 fishing businesses, recommended
eliminating closed area restrictions and
allowing vessels to optimize fishing
efficiency and thereby reduce the
intensity and frequency of mobile gear
on the ocean floor. Specifically, the
AFM did not support maintaining the
existing Cashes Ledge Groundfish
Closure Area. AFM asserts that
groundfish mortality objectives are met
with annual catch limits and
accountability measures. AFM contested
the proposed rule claims that this
closure was maintained to ‘‘improve
protection of juvenile and spawning
groundfish’’ because, according to AFM,
the Closed Area Technical Team
analysis does not show the Cashes
Ledge area as either a groundfish
juvenile or spawning ‘‘hotspot.’’ AFM
does support the modifications to the
Cashes Ledge Habitat Closure Area to
allow fishery access to deep mud and
sand habitats.
AFM supported the proposal to align
the eastern boundary of the Western
Gulf of Maine Groundfish Closure Area
with the Western Gulf of Maine Habitat
Closure Area, as well as the exemption
to allow shrimp trawls in the northwest
portion of the area. AFM did not
support maintaining the current
groundfish restrictions in the Western
Gulf of Maine Closure Areas, noting that
groundfish mortality objectives are met
through annual catch limits and
accountability measures, and the use of
fixed gear to target groundfish (as is
allowed for recreational fishing) would
not negatively affect any habitat
objectives for this area.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
AFM supported removal of the Closed
Area I and II Groundfish Closure Areas.
AFM contends that the proposed
exceptions to the Northern Edge should
include all mobile tending bottom gear.
AFM asserted that the groundfish trawl
fleet with the capacity to fish offshore
has been greatly reduced by low annual
catch limits, and therefore the intensity
and frequency of trawl access to the
Northern Edge would be minimal. AFM
also supported the proposal for seasonal
spawning closures on Georges Bank.
Response: As noted in the response to
the Northeast Seafood Coalition, while
NMFS agrees that increases in fishing
efficiency that reduce the amount of
time that gear is in contact with the
bottom can enhance habitat protection,
increased efficiency is not the only way
to minimize the adverse effects of
fishing on EFH. (See comment #4.)
NMFS disagrees that the hotspot
analyses in the EIS failed to show that
Cashes Ledge area is an important area
for juvenile and spawning groundfish
species. The analysis indicates that
there are a number of species that
aggregate in this area as juveniles
(redfish, American plaice, silver hake,
white hake, and haddock) and as large
adults (redfish, red hake, and witch
flounder). In addition, research in this
area shows there are resident and
migratory populations of cod that use
this this area, and that they are growing
faster and living longer than cod
collected outside the Cashes Ledge
Groundfish Closed Area.
Comment 11: Seven comments were
received from businesses and others
with an interest in the surfclam and
ocean quahog fishery. All seven
comments recommended that NMFS
disapprove the Council’s
recommendations for the Great South
Channel and Georges Shoal because of
the economic impacts to the surfclam/
quahog fishery from those HMAs. These
comments also noted that if we did
approve the HMAs, we should only do
so if the 1-year exemption for the clam
fishery were extended. The commenters
varied in the preference for the
extension, but they ranged from 3 or 5
years to a permanent exemption.
Response: NMFS is disapproving the
Georges Shoal HMA as part of the
decision to partially disapprove the
eastern Georges Bank recommendation.
In the Great South Channel, NMFS is
approving the Council’s
recommendation. The Council
considered a permanent exemption, but
selected the 1-year option instead.
Currently, the Council is developing a
framework adjustment that will
consider more discrete, permanent
exemptions for hydraulic clam dredges
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
within the Great South Channel HMA.
NMFS agrees with the Council that the
1-year exemption is enough time to
consider more discrete exemptions,
particularly because it will have been
nearly 4 years since the Council took
final action on its recommendations
when the exemption is scheduled to
expire. The Council has been
considering these issues during this
time. The review and rulemaking
development phase at NMFS has
provided an additional 3 years for the
clam industry to gather data and bring
recommendations to the Council for
consideration.
Comment 12: Three comments were
submitted specific to lobster fishery
issues. The American Offshore
Lobstermen’s Association (AOLA),
which represents the majority of
offshore lobster vessels, commented on
the Council’s recommendations for
eastern Georges Bank. Specifically, the
AOLA noted that NMFS has not
codified the agreement between the
lobster and groundfish fleets that is
designed to eliminate gear conflicts by
setting seasonal restrictions for each
fishery. The comment also noted that
the language in the Council’s motion to
eliminate gear conflicts between the
scallop and lobster fisheries
incorporates language that differs from
the industry discussions. The
organization also noted that there has
been an increase in Jonah crab fishing
in the Nantucket Lightship area and that
if the area were to open in this action,
gear conflicts may arise and should be
addressed. The letter submitted by the
Atlantic States Marine Fisheries
Commission’s American Lobster Board
reiterated many of these same
comments. The third letter, from a
student in a public policy course,
expressed his concern about the lack of
impact analysis for certain fishing areas,
specifically referencing the AOLA letter
and the expansion of the Jonah crab
fishery and lobster fisheries. The
commenter also noted that data relied
on in the document is more than five
years old and that fish and crustacean
populations are likely to have shifted
during that time due to climate change.
Response: We are disapproving the
Council’s recommendations for eastern
Georges Bank, which renders the
concerns about the gear conflict
agreement moot. In the Nantucket
Lightship area, it is difficult to know
how the fixed gear fisheries may interact
with mobile gear fisheries because the
area has been closed and we have no
data showing an expected increase in
gear conflicts. We support industry
initiatives to minimize gear conflict in
this region. We will work with the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
Council and Commission to address
these issues as they arise.
Comment 13: The Pew Charitable
Trust submitted a comment signed by
8,493 members of the public that
contends that the Amendment does not
follow best available science, does not
meet its own goals and objectives, and
does not fulfill legal requirements to
protect fish habitat, especially on
Georges Bank and in Southern New
England. Specifically, the letter focused
on the Northern Edge of Georges Bank
and the surrounding areas that have
been closed to mobile bottom-tending
fishing gears for over 20 years. The letter
contended that the Northern Edge is one
of the most ecologically important
places in New England waters, and it
should remain closed to dredging and
trawling to provide refuge for depleted
groundfish and other marine species,
and that NMFS should reject the
Council’s proposed HMAs on Georges
Bank, including the Northern Edge
Reduced Impact Habitat Management
Area, which would allow scallop
dredging in an area that has been
identified as critically important for
juvenile cod since 1998. This letter also
stated that all clam dredge exemptions
should also be rejected, and this gear
should not operate in any HMAs
identified for protection. The letter
further contends that in Southern New
England, allowing clam dredging in the
proposed Great South Channel HMA
would introduce gear that is destructive
to seafloor habitats. The comments also
stated that NMFS should reject the
Council’s proposal to allow bottom
trawling without ground cable in the
Cox Ledge HMA because the
commenters recommend that this area
should be closed to all mobile
bottom-tending gear. A nearly identical
letter was also submitted by a private
individual.
Response: NMFS agrees that, as
proposed, some of the Council’s
recommendations fall short of achieving
its stated goals and objectives for this
action and the requirements of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act. However, we
have determined that, as approved, the
Council’s FMPs will comply with the
Magnuson-Steven Act, and that the
approved provisions of this action were
based on the best available scientific
information. We agree, and are
disapproving, the Council’s
recommendations for the Northern Edge
and Cox Ledge. We are approving the
clam exemption, for the reasons stated
above.
Comment 14: The United States
Department of the Interior, Office of
Environmental Policy and Compliance,
Bureau of Indian Affairs urged the
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
15249
NMFS to engage interested Indian tribes
as part of this rulemaking process and
to provide such tribes a meaningful
opportunity to consult directly on what
impacts the rule would have on tribes
and tribal resources.
Response: NOAA conducts
government to government consultation
with federally recognized tribes
pursuant to the process identified in its
November 2013 Tribal Consultation
Handbook (https://
www.legislative.noaa.gov/policybriefs/
NOAA%20Tribal%20consultation%20
handbook%20111213.pdf). The actions
identified in this document are not
expected to impact tribal rights or
resources. No Federally recognized tribe
expressed interest in the management
measures proposed nor has any tribe
commented on these measures at any
time throughout the extensive public
development of the Amendment.
Comment 15: Four environmental
non-government organizations
(Conservation Law Foundation, Oceana,
Earthjustice, and the Natural Resource
Defense Council; hereafter
‘‘Conservation NGOs’’) submitted a
detailed, joint comment letter on the
Amendment. These organizations noted
their years of involvement in the
development of this action and raised
concern with the Amendment process.
These conservation organizations
contend that NMFS should not approve
the Amendment until the completion of
the required Endangered Species Act
consultations, and that a reinitiation of
the consultation that covers the affected
fishery management plans is required.
The Conservation NGOs also state that
the Amendment does not satisfy the
requirements of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act, the National Environmental Policy
Act, and the Endangered Species Act.
The Conservation NGOs’ letter
contends that OHA2 and its EIS fail to
recognize the ecological importance of
minimizing the impacts of fishing on
EFH and actions are inconsistent with
the OHA2’s goals and related legal
requirements. The Conservation NGOs
contend that the management attention
and analytical approaches on the
vulnerable complex benthic habitats is
too narrowly focused and does not
acknowledge the potential for adverse
effects to sandy or mud bottoms or the
water column from fishing. The
Conservation NGOs argue that this is a
major deficiency of the Amendment
from a Magnuson-Stevens Act, NEPA,
and ESA perspective. This letter argues
that the statutory task is not limited to
minimizing the physical impacts of
fishing gears on hard, complex benthic
areas to which the bulk of the analysis
in the EIS has been focused.
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
15250
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Response: NMFS does not agree that
sandy or mud bottom habitats were
ignored during the process of
identifying candidate areas, or selecting
preferred habitat management
alternatives. The SASI model was
specifically designed to assess the
relative vulnerability of different types
of bottom habitat to fishing gear impacts
and output from the model accounted
for habitat diversity with areas that
included a greater proportion of more
complex habitats receiving a higher
score. Many of the preferred alternatives
(e.g., the Western Gulf of Maine, Great
South Channel) include sand and mud
habitats as well as rocky habitats. The
Council and NMFS have also
determined that EFH within the water
column is not adversely affected by
fishing and does not require protection
from fishing activities.
Comment 16: The Conservation NGOs
argue that the Amendment and
supporting documentation fails to
protect EFH for managed stocks that its
own analysis concludes is vulnerable to
fishing gears.
Response: NMFS disagrees; the intent
of the action is to minimize impacts to
EFH globally and more specifically to
critical groundfish species. Many of the
HMA alternatives that NMFS approved
protect vulnerable EFH for a variety of
managed stocks. (See the EFH overlap
analysis for each HMA in Volume 4;
Tables 7, 13, 19, 27 and 33.) Approval
of the Great South Channel HMA and
disapproval of the Council’s proposed
alternative on eastern Georges Bank was
predicated on the need to protect
vulnerable habitat for juvenile cod.
OHA2 also includes two new juvenile
cod HAPCs. Other overexploited
groundfish stocks, such as Georges Bank
yellowtail flounder, occupy less
vulnerable sandy habitats, and were
thus not the subject of area management
decisions.
Comment 17: The Conservation
NGOs’ letter argues that the OHA2
decision-making process and the
selected alternatives ignored the
important Weighted Fish Persistence
modeling work done by The Nature
Conservancy.
Response: NMFS acknowledges that
the results of the TNC analysis were not
formally incorporated into the EIS until
after the Council selected preferred
alternatives; however, these analyses
were available to the Council prior to
taking final action. Further, the
Weighted Persistence Analysis did
factor into NMFS’s decision-making
process, as noted above.
Comment 18: The Conservation NGOs
argue that the Amendment fails to
identify significant HMA areas, virtually
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
ignoring all of the habitat protection
alternatives selected and the species
hotspot and habitat vulnerable areas
identified by the SASI, LISA, and
Weighted Fish Persistence models. They
assert numerous alternatives proposed
by the Council’s technical teams were
eliminated by Committees or the
Council out of hand, without any
practicability analysis and based on
multiple, legally irrelevant grounds.
Response: The work done by the
Habitat PDT and the Closed Area
Technical Team (CATT) was considered
by the Habitat Committee when they
decided which HMA and spawning area
alternatives to retain for analysis. The
Committee considered public comment
and other information available to them
to develop a reasonable scope of
alternatives to address the
Amendment’s goals and objectives.
These decisions removed infeasible
alternatives because of extreme costs to
the industry or insufficient EFH
protection. The Council then used the
analyses in the EIS to weigh the benefits
and costs of each alternative and
selected preferred alternatives that
minimized EFH impacts without closing
valuable fishing grounds. Practicability
assessments in the EIS were based on a
thorough analysis and comparison of
the benefits and economic costs of all
the habitat management areas
considered in the Amendment.
Comment 19: The Conservation NGOs
object to the Council’s
recommendations that would open
extensive areas of known cod and other
overfished groundfish EFH areas than
are currently under protection.
Response: NMFS agrees that the
Council’s proposed action would have
opened three large closed areas on
Georges Bank and south of Nantucket,
that provide habitats used by overfished
groundfish species. We have approved
the opening of the habitat and
groundfish closed areas in Closed Area
I and the Nantucket Lightship area, but
not in Closed Area II. Our decision to
disapprove the proposed alternative on
eastern Georges Bank is based, in part,
on the high EFH value of the northern
edge of Georges Bank for cod and the
low overall EFH value of the Georges
Shoal area. We believe the analysis in
the EIS shows that fishing impacts on
more vulnerable hard bottom habitats
used by overfished groundfish species
(e.g., cod) will continue to be minimized
by the OHA2 regulations even with the
opening of Closed Area I and the
Nantucket Lightship Closure Areas.
Other overfished species like yellowtail
flounder utilize less vulnerable sandy
habitats, so opening closed areas will
have less of an impact on their habitats
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
than opening areas more complex
habitats.
Comment 20: The Conservation NGOs
contends that the Amendment contains
only cursory references to reduced
availability of prey species and does not
discuss the loss of prey species and
their habitat. They state this action does
not adequately analyze the potential
adverse effects to EFH for managed
species consistent with the MagnusonStevens Act’s requirement to minimize
the adverse effects of fishing to the
extent practicable.
Response: NMFS acknowledges that
prey is a component of EFH, as defined
by the EFH final rule. NMFS and the
Council considered effects on prey to
the degree afforded by the best available
science. The Habitat PDT attempted to
include infaunal prey organisms in the
vulnerability assessment for SASI, but
there was not enough information
regarding the impacts of fishing gear on
individual prey species and species
groups. A section of the EIS describes
what is known about the loss of prey
species and their habitat and an
appendix that summarizes available
information on their distribution in the
region. There was not enough spatial
information available on the
distribution and abundance of prey to
use in defining habitat management
alternatives. In addition, the Council’s
approach to focus on vulnerable
substrate important to managed species
indirectly protects epifaunal
invertebrates that occupy gravel and
rocky habitats substrates and are eaten
by fish and the habitats that are
important to prey.
Comment 21: The Conservation NGOs
contend that, with the limited exception
of the eastern Gulf of Maine, there are
no alternatives that expand the area of
existing protections within current
closed areas or the size of currently
protected areas.
Response: This is accurate; however,
expansion of existing protections within
current closed areas or the size of
protected areas is not the charge to the
Council from the Magnuson-Stevens
Act. NMFS and the Council have made
it clear from the beginning that size of
HMAs alone is not sufficiently effective
for maintaining habitat protections that
minimize adverse impacts to habitat to
the extent practicable. It is more
effective and efficient to close smaller
areas with a higher proportion of more
vulnerable habitat and increase fishing
access to less vulnerable areas. This
provides for an improved balance of
short- and long-term costs and benefits
for minimizing adverse fishing impacts
to the extent practicable.
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Comment 22: The Conservation NGOs
argue that because practicability by
definition means ‘‘capable of being put
into practice or of being done or
accomplished: Feasible,’’ if an EFH
impact minimization measure can be
feasibly done, then it must be done. In
several places, they compare to the
North Pacific Council’s Alaska EFH plan
and the Pacific Council’s Groundfish
Amendments, where there were specific
analyses on the amount of revenue put
‘‘at-risk’’ from the measures, ranging
from $2.4 to 36.3 million, depending on
the Council/alternative. They further
argue that ‘‘balancing’’ between habitat
protection and economic costs is not
what is required under the EFH
language.
Response: NMFS does not agree that
it is necessary to compare the
approaches to minimizing adverse effect
from fishing on EFH from other regional
fishery management councils. Each
council is afforded the flexibility to
determine what is practicable for its
particular fisheries and habitats. The
recommendations made by the North
Pacific and Pacific Councils, and the
decisions made by NMFS in approving
those recommendations, may be looked
at for guidance on a particular approach,
but it is not required.
Practicability does not mean to the
extent possible. NMFS disagrees with
the assertion that the Magnuson-Stevens
Act requires any EFH protection that is
possible. The Magnuson-Stevens Act
requires minimizing adverse fishing
impacts to the extent practicable. NMFS
agrees that this consideration includes
what is feasible. But feasible means that
which is capable of being done. ‘‘What
is capable’’ is determined by an analysis
and consideration of of the nature and
extent of the adverse effect from fishing
on EFH and the long- and short-term
costs and benefits of potential
management measures to EFH,
associated fisheries, and the nation.
Comment 23: The Conservation NGOs
stated that the economic/displacement
discussion ‘‘ignores the reality of New
England fisheries where gross revenues
for the groundfish fleet have increased
dramatically in the past two decades
despite ever-escalating regulatory limits
and the current habitat closures.’’
Response: The statement that gross
revenues in the groundfish fishery have
‘‘dramatically increased’’ over the past
two decades is not supported by the
facts. While there were increases in
gross revenues in a few years, the
overall trend in revenue has been
downward, when adjusting for inflation,
since 1981. See the ‘‘Measuring the
Effects of Catch Shares Project’’ https://
www.catchshareindicators.org/.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
Comment 24: The Conservation NGOs
further contend that the practicability
analysis fails to adequately account for
the role that closed areas play in
hedging against the numerous forms of
uncertainty inherent in both the marine
environment and in attempting to
manage an extractive industry within
that natural environment. The letter also
argues that the practicability analysis
fails to provide a model or other
meaningful support for its assumptions
related to the likely human behavioral
responses to management measures. The
Conservation NGOs said that the heavy
reliance on a simplistic analysis of the
impacts of lost revenues on the fleet
without consideration of human
behaviors that might mitigate against
potential short-term loss renders the
estimate of the practicability of a given
measure grossly unreliable and often
improperly inflammatory.
Response: The Council considered
potential behavioral responses to the
degree available information supported
responsive measures. The EIS
acknowledges that there was no
objective way to predict how fishermen
would respond to new area closures,
and the results of the analysis are
described as ‘‘revenue at risk’’
calculations. While these calculations
could have over-stated costs of area
closures, NMFS believes that they
provide a reasonable basis for
incorporating potential uncertainty into
what may be practicable. Further, our
partial approval decisions were based
on a careful evaluation of the habitat
benefits and economic costs of the
proposed alternatives.
Comment 25: The Conservation NGOs
maintain that NEPA obligates NMFS to
make available a redline version of the
EIS for public review, and failure to do
so violates NEPA requirements. The
groups also object to the ‘‘ad-hoc’’
method of developing the final Council
alternative on Georges Bank because it
was not within the range of previously
analyzed alternatives. In addition, the
letter points out that The Nature
Conservancy’s weighted persistence
analysis was not formally incorporated
into the draft EIS prior to the June 2015
decision meeting. The environmental
organizations also argue that the EIS
fails to include an adequate range of
alternatives because, while the Council
included an alternative that would have
removed all closures, there was not an
equally extreme alternative on the other
end of the spectrum. The group also
contend that EIS is deficient in that it
fails to develop or analyze any
alternatives that include mitigating the
ubiquitous impacts of lobster gear on
EFH. The letter goes on to argue that the
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
15251
analysis in the Amendment is further
flawed by its failure to consider all the
adverse environmental effects to EFH
associated with the alternatives. Instead,
the Conservation NGOs argue that the
analysis relied too heavily on the SASI/
LISA tools to predict all environmental
impacts.
Response: NMFS disagrees that the
Council and the Agency failed to
appropriately comply with NEPA. There
is no requirement to provide a ‘‘redline’’ version of the EIS for public
review. Further, the Council did not
limit itself to only one end of the
spectrum of possibilities. The
Amendment included a reasonable
range of alternatives that addressed a
wide spectrum of impacts that were
detailed with thorough analysis that
sufficiently informed the public, the
Council, and NMFS. This allowed the
Council and us to take a hard look at the
impacts of the potential choices. For
example, each sub-region, with the
exception of the Central Gulf of Maine,
which was smaller than other areas and
addressed by changes to the Cashes
Ledge area, included an alternative or a
potential combination of areas that
would have dramatically increased
either the total size or total vulnerable
habitat covered by a closure area. The
Council’s selection of Alternative 10 on
eastern Georges Bank, while insufficient
for addressing the requirements of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act and the
Amendment’s goals and objectives, was
within the range of alternatives
previously analyzed. Further, the
Georges Shoal HMA that the Council
recommended was included in
Alternative 7, and the concept of the
Northern Edge Reduced Impact HMA,
combined with a mobile bottom-tending
gear closure to the south, was
substantially and materially similar to
Alternative 9.
The Conservation NGOs do not
provide any information that was
overlooked that would have better
informed the Council’s actions or our
decision. Nor do they provide
information that contradicts our
decision. The groups specifically point
to the Bigelow Bight areas designed by
the CATT as an example that would
have better informed the Council’s
decision if it were included within the
range of alternatives. However, a large
version of that area was incorporated in
Western Gulf of Maine Alternatives 3
and 4, and a smaller version was in
Western Gulf of Maine Alternative 5.
Some of the CATT areas in the Western
Gulf of Maine extended into state
waters, and the Council determined it
would be inappropriate and ineffective
to implement closures in state waters
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
15252
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
because they would only apply to
federally permitted vessels and only
fishing in state-waters would still be
allowed. The Nature Conservancy’s
weighted persistence analysis was not
formally incorporated in the draft EIS
that was prepared for the April and June
2015 Council meetings because the
information was received too late to be
directly incorporated in the document.
However, the information was
distributed to Council members and was
made available to the public in advance
of those meetings.
The SASI model that was used as a
first step in identifying potential HMAs
included an analysis of the effects of
fixed gears, such as lobster traps, and
concluded that those impacts are
minimal. For this reason, they were not
considered when developing gear
management options in OHA2. As
described in the response to Comment
#15, NMFS determined that the impacts
to non-rocky habitats were addressed
appropriately. Further, the Council
analyzed and selected preferred
alternatives partly based on output from
the SASI model as well as information
from a number of other sources, not just
the vulnerability scores from the model.
We are not sure what is meant by ‘‘all
the adverse environmental effects to
EFH associated with the alternatives.’’
The only effect the Council is obligated
to minimize is adverse impacts from
fishing. To the extent that these effects
are mitigated by natural disturbance
factors, these were considered by the
Council and NMFS in selecting and
approving final HMA alternatives.
Comment 26: The Conservation NGOs
supported the revised EFH designations;
however, they contend that because the
Phase I EFH designations were
completed in 2007 and reviewed in
2011, they are now beyond due for the
mandated five-year review, even before
they are approved and implemented.
They state NMFS must initiate action to
analyze and confirm the validity of the
information supporting these changes.
Any required revisions should be
immediately addressed through an
appropriate action.
Response: The EFH final rule states
that EFH designations ‘‘should be’’
revised, as necessary, every five years.
The regulations do not require this.
Updating the designations further in
this action was impracticable. It could
have further complicated and delayed
this action. In practice, there is a great
deal of variability in the timing of the
EFH reviews conducted by the Councils
and NMFS from region to region.
Because it has been 20 years since the
original EFH designations were
approved in the region, we agree that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
the Council will need to consider
review of EFH designations in
upcoming future actions. That review,
however, is not part of the decisions
made in this document.
Comment 27: The letter noted that the
Conservation NGOs are deeply
concerned that known coral areas in the
Gulf of Maine that are essential habitat
for Acadian redfish were not designated
as HAPC, and requested that NMFS
direct the Council to review those
habitats for designation under the HAPC
criteria, especially because the Council’s
Coral Amendment will not protect those
areas.
Response: The EFH Final Rule does
not require the Councils or NMFS to
establish HAPCs. The Council is
currently finalizing its Deep-Sea Coral
Amendment, which will address deepsea coral protection issues in the Gulf of
Maine.
Comment 28: The Conservation NGOs
further insisted that NMFS initiate
action to use the final rule for OHA2 to
confirm that each HAPC reflects current
understanding about the vulnerability
and susceptibility of these areas to
fishing impacts. The comment states
that any required revisions should be
immediately addressed through an
appropriate action.
Response: There is an analysis in the
EIS that shows there is a high degree of
spatial overlap of EFH within the
HAPCs for several groundfish species
that occupy more vulnerable hard
bottom habitat. The EFH value for adult
Atlantic cod, for example, is high in
four of the five HAPCs and high in three
of them for juvenile cod. The results for
haddock are similar. Winter flounder
EFH overlaps highly in three of the five
HAPCs. Although there is no analysis
that directly addresses the vulnerability
of these areas to fishing impacts, the
HAPCs are clearly well located in areas
with vulnerable habitats used by
managed species of groundfish. The EIS
also describes, in general terms, the
susceptibility of each HAPC to
anthropogenic stresses, including
fishing, because that is one of the
criteria that were used to justify the
designations. There are also maps
indicating how well the HAPCs
coincide with the proposed HMAs. In
some situations, an HAPC is entirely
contained within an HMA and, in
others, it is partially included in an
HMA. NMFS agrees with the Council
that the HMAs include appropriate
habitat protections associated with the
HAPCs, with the exception of the
Northern Edge Juvenile Cod HAPC. The
proposed management measures in the
Northern Edge Reduced Impact HMA
did not appropriately protect the HAPC
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
from fishing impacts. This was one
reason why the proposed alternative on
Georges Bank was disapproved.
Comment 29: Generally, the
Conservation NGOs believe that the
habitat protection measures in the Gulf
of Maine do not minimize the adverse
effects of fishing on habitat to the extent
practicable. Specific to the eastern Gulf
of Maine, the groups contend that
because vulnerable EFH must be
protected from fishing impacts to the
extent practicable in this amendment,
selection of the Small Eastern Maine
HMA as the preferred alternative is
irrational. The alternative is not the
most protective of the alternatives
considered or of alternatives considered
but rejected earlier on practicability
grounds, coming in somewhere ‘‘in the
middle’’ of the alternatives considered
in the area. The Conservation NGOs also
assert that this alternative also
encompasses very little of the areas
identified by The Nature Conservancy
in its peer-reviewed Weighted
Persistence Analysis, which identified
this area as one of the highest scoring
areas in the entire region.
Response: NMFS did note some
concerns when preferred HMAs were
being selected that prohibitions on the
use of mobile bottom-tending gear in
this area would do little to minimize the
adverse impacts of this gear because
there is little use of that gear in the area
currently. NMFS acknowledged that the
overall increase in protection in the
region is relatively small. However, the
same could be said for the other HMA
alternatives in eastern Maine. This area
was correctly deemed the most
practicable because it was not adjacent
to disputed waters just inside the
U.S.-Canadian border and because it
provided nearly the same degree of
habitat protection as the Large Eastern
Maine area. The primary benefit of any
HMA in eastern Maine is to protect
vulnerable bottom habitats from any
future resumption of groundfishing,
which used to be more active there.
Comment 30: In the Central Gulf of
Maine, the Conservation NGOs contend
that the failure to designate the entire
Cashes Ledge Closure Area as an HMA
with appropriate protections is
inconsistent with statutory mandates,
the goals and objectives of the
Amendment, and the extensive record
associated with this action. The letter
says that it was one matter to have this
area treated largely as a groundfish
closure historically, but the Amendment
process is intended to advance all
feasible EFH habitat protection as such,
not just as a beneficiary of closures or
openings associated with managed
species FMPs. The commenters
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
maintain that the entire current Cashes
Ledge Closure Area should be identified
as a habitat management area and
managed accordingly to prohibit all
commercial fishing, including gillnets
in the water column EFH and the
pelagic mobile gears may contact the
bottom. The commenters contend that
managing the area solely as a
‘‘groundfish mortality closure’’ leaves
open the possibility that it will be reopened by the Council whenever it
determines that groundfish stock
conditions have improved sufficiently.
The letter also argues that it is
inconsistent with statutory purposes
and the goals and objectives of the
Amendment to reduce the size of the
existing Cashes Ledge Habitat Closure
area by 27 percent. In addition, the
commenters suggest that the Council’s
proposed action in this sub-region was
based in part on poor quality substrate
data and a reliance on ‘‘general
knowledge,’’ particularly in regard to
the extent of rocky bottom in the
vicinity of Cashes Ledge and the
predominance of muddy substrate in the
deeper portions of the Cashes Ledge
Closure Area. Re-designating current
groundfish closures as habitat closures
and expanding the existing protections
for the Cashes Ledge Closure Area to
include all gears would also represent
an appropriate precautionary approach
in light of the lack of survey data
available for this area and the severely
depleted status of Gulf of Maine cod.
Response: NMFS agrees with the
Council recommendation that
maintaining the gear regulations that
have been in place since the closure was
established in 2002 meets the EFH
requirements to minimize the adverse
effects of fishing on habitat. Maintaining
these restrictions allow the protections
afforded to the diversity of habitat types
it encompasses to remain in place and
more effectively protect the resident
groundfish resources from fishing than
regulations associated with HMAs that
only prohibit the use of mobile bottomtending gears. NMFS agrees that this is
a reasonable approach to achieving the
stated goals and objectives of the
Amendment. As noted in the response
to Comment #4, the Council voted to
maintain the Cashes Ledge Closure Area
in response to our concerns that the
goals and objectives relative to critical
groundfish life stages, among others,
would be compromised if these
protections were removed. The Council
could decide in the future to remove the
fishing restrictions in response to the
full recovery of Gulf of Maine cod and
other important groundfish stocks. The
Council would need to consider how
the changes minimize the adverse
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
effects of fishing on EFH to comply with
the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
NMFS does not agree that this area
should be designated as an HMA in
order to prohibit all commercial fishing
activity, including mid-water gillnets
and trawls. Mid-water gears are not
designed or intended to contact the
bottom and do not impact marine
habitats in any significant way so there
is no need to prohibit their use in this
area. In addition, the analysis in the EIS
indicates that the Cashes Ledge HMA
could be reduced in size without
compromising the habitat protection
benefits of the closure. NMFS agrees,
and is implementing the Council’s
recommendation to modify the HMA on
Cashes Ledge. NMFS agrees that
substrate and resource survey data
quality is poor in the central Gulf of
Maine, but is convinced that the
Council made the best possible use of
available scientific information and did
not make any unjustifiable decisions
when selecting preferred alternatives in
this sub-region.
Comment 31: In the Western Gulf of
Maine, the commenters argue that the
Amendment’s proposal to reduce the
size of the current areas with year-round
habitat protection by 25 percent and to
increase the gear exemptions within the
closure is inconsistent with section
303(a)(7) requirements, unless it were
infeasible for the Council to realize
greater habitat and managed species
benefits by protecting a larger area with
more restrictive measures. Based on the
information in the EIS, the commenters
argue that the No Action Alternative 1
(unmodified) is clearly the rational
preferred choice to the Western Gulf of
Maine Preferred Alternative, as it
realizes more habitat benefits at
virtually the same fisheries cost.
Response: We approved the Council’s
proposed action because the bottom
habitats just outside the eastern
boundary of the current groundfish
closure are primarily deeper, low
vulnerability mud habitats. NMFS
determined that allowing access to this
area and maintaining the prohibitions
on a wider variety of gears capable of
catching groundfish in the smaller area
would continue to minimize the adverse
impacts of fishing and protect
groundfish resources at approximately
the same level. Allowing the groundfish
fleet into productive fishing grounds
located just outside the eastern
boundary of the Western Gulf of Maine
HMA maintains approximately the same
level of protections in a less costly,
more practicable way.
NMFS disagrees that that the
exemption for shrimp trawls in the
northwest corner of the closed area
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
15253
negatively impact the protective
measures of the closures. Shrimp trawls
are not allowed to have ground cables;
they are used in deeper, muddy bottom
habitats; and are equipped with a grate
to reduce the catch of juvenile
groundfish. Furthermore, the shrimp
resource is currently in very poor shape
to the extent that fishing has been
completely or severely restricted in
recent years.
Comment 32: The Conservation NGOs
argue that the Council should have
selected Western Gulf of Maine
Alternative 3 with Options 1 or 2 or
Alternative 4 with Options 1 or 2,
arguing that both perform the best in
terms of minimizing the impacts of
fishing on EFH and, with only
moderately to slightly negative social
and economic costs, both of those
alternatives are feasible. They assert that
any other selected alternative would be
inconsistent with the record and
contrary to law.
Response: Both of these alternatives
include the Large Bigelow Bight HMA,
which the Council did not propose for
approval because of their negative social
and economic costs. NMFS agrees with
the Council’s determination that they
would incur unacceptable costs to the
industry, particularly the inshore
groundfish fishery and are, therefore,
impracticable.
Comment 33: The commenters suggest
that Council’s proposed alternative on
George Bank should be rejected by
NMFS and returned to the Council for
further development, public review and
comment, and future action because the
proposed assortment of HMAs do not
minimize, to the extent practicable, the
effect of fishing on the EFH in the
Georges Bank sub-region. Of the
alternatives considered, the alternatives
that scored the highest in terms of
biological benefits to habitats and
managed resources from the habitat
protection measures proposed were
Alternative 6, Options 1 and 2 and
Alternative 8, Options 1 and 2. The
Council determined these alternatives
(Alternatives 6 & 8 with Options 1 & 2)
to be superior to the proposed suite of
management measures (Alternative 10
with Options 1 & 2) for habitat generally
and the large mesh groundfish resource.
Economically, the preferred Georges
Bank alternative (Alternative 10) is
expected to provide similar short- and
long-term economic impacts as the nine
other alternatives/option combinations
that were considered, including the No
Action alternative.
Further, the letter notes that there is
little, if any, social or economic cost to
continuing the closed habitat areas on
Georges Bank because these areas have
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
15254
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
been closed for many years. The limited
access scallop fishery will continue to
be profitable if these areas remain
closed. In addition, the proposed
Georges Bank HMAs do not satisfy the
objectives of OHA2 to improve
protection of critical groundfish habitats
or improve refuge for critical life stages
(e.g., spawning fish) and they are
inconsistent with the Council’s
designation of the Northern Edge
Juvenile Cod HAPC that was established
in 1998.
Response: NMFS agrees that there are
no new direct costs to the industry if the
status quo is maintained, although we
acknowledge there has been substantial
lost opportunity costs due to the closure
of the northern edge that would
continue. (See Comment #7.) NMFS
agrees with the comments relating to the
goals and objectives of OHA2 and the
comment that the Council’s proposal for
eastern Georges Bank is inconsistent
with the designation of the area as a
juvenile cod HAPC, for the reasons
described in the preamble. Because
NMFS determined that the combination
of newly approved and existing
measures that will continue allow each
of the Council’s FMPs to comply with
the EFH requirements of the MagnusonStevens Act, we did not remand the
entire proposal to the Council for action.
The Council may choose to revisit
habitat protection on the northern edge,
and NMFS would provide the necessary
support and guidance throughout that
process as we did for this Amendment.
In order to address a number of the
concerns cited in the preamble
regarding the disapproved measures,
NMFS contends that any future action
should thoroughly evaluate the
geographic extent, duration, and
frequency of any future scallop dredging
activity within any new access area on
the northern edge of the bank and the
habitat features that are used by
groundfish at critical life stages that
need to be protected from impacts.
Comment 34: Specific to the Southern
New England region, the commenters
note that the Amendment considered
more than a dozen alternatives and
options to conserve EFH in this subregion, yet the Council proposed an
alternative that does not minimize
adverse effects on EFH to the extent
practicable, does not satisfy the goals
and objectives of the Amendment, and
does not effectively conserve the newly
designated Habitat Area of Particular
Concern in the Great South Channel
sub-region. The Council considered an
alternative (Alternative 3) that could
have achieved these multiple tasks in
Great South Channel East HMA, yet
chose a less protective area for its
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
preferred alternative. In addition, by
failing to account for the displacement
of fishing effort, the Conservation NGOs
suggest that the EIS does not adequately
evaluate the practicability of any of the
action alternatives that were considered.
Response: The Council is not required
to select the most protective alternative,
regardless of economic impact, but must
also consider their costs and benefits.
The analysis in the EIS shows that the
selected alternative does minimize
impacts to the extent practicable and
complies with the requirements of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act. NMFS agrees
with the Council that the Great South
Channel HMA is a practicable HMA that
minimizes adverse impacts of fishing on
vulnerable EFH.
Further, unlike the Northern Edge
HAPC, the Great South Channel
Juvenile Cod HAPC is vulnerable to
non-fishing impacts, as well as fishing
impacts. The Council considered the
HAPC and how to mitigate or
compensate for adverse fishing impacts.
NMFS determined that the Council’s
approach to overlaying fishing
restrictions on the substantial amount of
complex, gravel, cobble, and boulder
habitat within the HMA, but outside of
the HAPC, is an appropriate approach in
this area, rather than simply relying on
the boundaries of the HAPC to dictate
where the HMA protections should be.
Comment 35: The chief concern of the
Conservation NGOs with the Council’s
proposed action in Southern New
England is the temporary one-year
exemption for hydraulic clam dredges
that allows them to continue fishing in
most of the area. The Conservation
NGOs maintain that if clam dredging is
allowed to continue in areas of
vulnerable bottom habitat after the
exemption expires, the habitat
protection benefits of the HMA will be
substantially compromised.
Response: As approved, clam
dredging will be prohibited in the Great
South Channel HMA after one year. The
Council considered the clam fishery’s
unique fishing activity as providing a
possible basis for allowing limited
fishing that would not substantially
impact EFH for an additional year. The
1-year delay in the closure was
predicated on the understanding that
the Council and the clam industry
would be working to identify the less
vulnerable portions of the Great South
Channel HMA where hydraulic clam
dredging could be allowed to continue
in such a way as to not compromise the
protective benefits of the HMA overall.
NMFS is working with the Council to
ensure that any future framework
adjustment achieves these goals and, as
stated in the framework’s problem
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
statement, that any potential long-term
clam dredge exemption meets the goals
and objectives of this Amendment.
Comment 36: The Conservation NGOs
further argue that all of the alternatives
that use gear modifications, such as
trawl cable restrictions or elevating
disks, to reduce the impacts of fishing
on EFH rely on unproven methods to
reduce adverse effects of fishing on
EFH. Because these gear modification
options would allow continued fishing
in these vulnerable areas with no
objective assessment of their singular or
cumulative adverse effects on EFH, the
commenters argue that the measures
should be disapproved.
Response: NMFS agrees and has
disapproved the Council’s
recommendation on Cox Ledge based on
the recommendation of the Council’s
PDT that there was still too much
uncertainty regarding the loss in
efficiency from the modified gears to
understand if adverse effects would be
increased or reduced.
Comment 37: The Conservation NGOs
state that the DHRAs will enhance
habitat research and adaptive
management, but that the proposed
sunset provision that allows the DHRAs
to lapse after three years if no habitat
research is undertaken is unrealistic.
The process of developing a research
proposal, obtaining funding, and
completing all necessary planning can
take well more than three years.
Response: NMFS agrees that the
DHRAs are an important component of
the Council’s overall plans to continue
to improve habitat research and
management. NMFS disagrees that the
3-year sunset provision is inadequate.
The EIS describes a variety of
considerations that the Regional
Administrator should take into account
when determining if a DHRA
designation should be maintained,
including whether funding has been
requested (not simply obtained). The
most important consideration will be
that the research requires the DHRA to
be successful and that it supports
achieving the Council’s stated habitat
research goals.
Comment 38: The Conservation NGOs
argue that the reductions of spawning
measures from the status quo,
specifically the reduction of current
year-round groundfish closure areas to
the seasonal areas recommended in the
document, insufficiently protect
spawning stocks and that there should
be no exemptions from the spawning
closures because any fishing can disturb
spawning activities. They further assert
that the spawning measures need to
address all managed species and all
closure areas should also be
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
redesignated as spawning protection
areas. They do not support selection of
Northeast multispecies Framework
Adjustment 53 spawning measures.
Response: The Council has and
continues to address spawning
protection with a variety of approaches,
generally relying on species- or fisheryspecific actions. NMFS agrees with the
Council that the measures proposed in
this action augment existing spawning
protection measures previously enacted,
and, in combination with the approved
HMAs, achieve the requirements to
minimize to the extent practicable the
adverse effects of fishing on EFH.
Comment 39: The Conservation NGOs
contend that the proposed
frameworking measures in the
Amendment are directly contrary to
NMFS guidance and should be
disapproved. By adopting an exhaustive
list of issues that can be addressed in a
framework adjustment, the Council will
make virtually anything possible
through an abbreviated framework
process that can take place in as few as
two Council meetings. The commenters
argue that this approach will make the
proposals to modify, adjust, or reduce
management restrictions implemented
through this Amendment a continual
target and will not provide these areas
the long-term protection that they
require.
Response: NMFS disagrees.
Framework measures are limited to
adjustments to FMPs and amendments.
The frameworkable measures allow the
Council to modify or adjust previously
considered measures through a less
onerous approach, provided the
measures are not novel or substantial,
and this is considered when
determining in what manner a council
may address the need for management
changes. Further, the Council’s
collection of FMPs will still be required
to comply with the requirements of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act to continue to
minimize to the extent practicable the
adverse effects of fishing on EFH. As
such, substantial changes in habitat
measures would only be permitted if the
Council could demonstrate, and NMFS
agreed, that the changes would not
compromise that requirement.
Comment 41: The Fisheries Survival
Fund (FSF), representing over 250 fulltime active Atlantic scallop limited
access permit holders, submitted a
detailed comment recommending that
we fully implement the amendment as
recommended by the Council as quickly
as possible, with the exception of the
‘‘lobster closure’’ within Closed Area II.
FSF contends that fishery closures in
historic areas of scallop abundance, as
considered in certain alternatives,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
directly threaten the future success of
scallop area management. Providing
access to the most productive areas
decreases scallop dredge bottom time
and promotes bycatch reduction, cost
efficiency, and safety, and fosters
economic stability in our fishing
communities.
FSF notes that the Magnuson-Stevens
Act allows actions for habitat
management only within a
‘‘practicability’’ standard, and requires
FMPs only to avoid, minimize, or
compensate for adverse impacts to
habitat from fishing, and that the
Council’s recommendations properly
weighed these mandates in choosing
preferred alternatives from the many
options available. That is, the letter
contends the Council’s
recommendations balanced a
comprehensive and strategic approach
to protecting the improvement of fish
habitat in New England with economic
benefits to fisheries communities and
the achievement of optimum yield.
Response: NMFS agrees that the
Magnuson-Stevens Act requires the
Council to avoid, minimize, or
compensate for adverse effects from
fishing on EFH in manner that is
practicable. NMFS determined that, for
the majority of the Council’s
recommendations, this requirement was
met. However, for the reasons described
above, the Council’s recommendations
for eastern Georges Bank did not. As
FSF noted, the Magnuson-Stevens Act
requires a habitat protection measure to
meet two standards. While the
recommendations for this region may
have been practicable from an economic
standpoint, they fell short of minimizing
or compensating for adverse effects of
fishing on highly vulnerable habitat,
and within an HAPC designated
specifically because of its vulnerability
to fishing impacts.
Comment 42: FSF notes that fishery
management decisions must be based on
the best scientific information available.
FSF asserts that, despite the Council’s
thorough efforts to update the scientific
record and the abundance of scientific
information upon which its preferred
alternatives were selected, NMFS and
the EIS continue to inappropriately rely
on biased, qualitative statements to
negatively characterize the Council’s
preferred alternative for Georges Bank
(and, to a lesser extent, for Southern
New England). The letter states that
NMFS ‘‘falsely rel[ied] on the premise
that any decrease in total area where
fishing is prohibited results in negative
impacts to habitat protection—
regardless of the quality of habitat
located in those areas—and that closed
areas, once closed, should not re-open
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
15255
regardless of what science dictates.’’
FSF also notes that not only does the
SASI model not support the contention
that ‘‘bigger is better’’ for habitat
closures, but asserts that NMFS staff
advocated for this approach.
Response: NMFS agrees that fishery
management decisions need to be based
on the best scientific information
available, and that overall, the Council’s
recommendations meet these standards.
However, the SASI model and LISA
cluster analyses were not developed to
be the sole basis for habitat management
decisions. For example, in areas where
there is relatively poor data, the SASI
model outputs, and consequently, the
LISA cluster analysis, can overestimate
the coverage of vulnerable substrate in
a specific area if a single data point is
‘‘blown out’’ as the grid develops. This
is why the Georges Shoal HMA appears,
through the LISA cluster results, to be
highly vulnerable. The Council’s PDT,
recognizing this shortcoming, removed
the layers of the LISA cluster analysis to
examine the underlying substrate data.
Doing so, reveals that the Georges Shoal
HMA is not a highly vulnerable area.
Further, the SASI/LISA analyses are not
the only measures of habitat value in the
EIS. As described above, the utility of
the area to fish stocks, represented by
the EFH overlap analyses, demonstrate
that the Georges Shoal HMA value is
low, despite its much larger size, than
current Closed Area II Closure Area.
FSF assertion that NMFS required a
‘‘bigger is better’’ approach is an
incorrect characterization of the
Agency’s advice during the
development of the Amendment and of
our decision. NMFS staff routinely
pointed to the idea that smaller, higher
quality closures were preferable to
larger, less efficient closures in areas of
less vulnerable habitat. We contend that
our decision to disapprove the Council’s
recommendation on eastern Georges
Bank supports this approach. The
combination of the Council’s two
mobile bottom-tending gear closures are
significantly larger than the existing
Closed Area II habitat closure; however,
these areas are less efficient in
protecting vulnerable habitat, and,
despite their size, include less EFH for
managed species and life stages, as
described above.
Comment 43: FSF states that NMFS
must approve any FMP amendment
submitted by a council unless that
amendment is inconsistent with the
law; that OHA2 is consistent with all
relevant laws; therefore, it must be
implemented as submitted, with the
exception of the lobster closure, ‘‘even
if some on NMFS’ staff may not have
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
15256
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
selected the same alternatives the
Council did.’’
Response: NMFS agrees that we are
obligated to approve any FMP
amendment submitted by a council if
that action is determined to be
consistent with applicable law. NMFS
disagrees that all of the Council’s
recommendations met this standard
and; therefore, disapproved the portions
of the Amendment that did not.
Throughout the development of the
Amendment, there were alternatives in
many areas that NMFS staff
appropriately advocated for that were
ultimately not selected as preferred.
However, with the exception of eastern
Georges Bank and Cox Ledge, NMFS
approved the Council’s
recommendations.
Comment 44: FSF states that through
the process of developing this
amendment, the Council and its
committees made enormous scientific
advances using both new and existing
analytical tools, relying on far more
detailed substrate profiling information
that was not available when the existing
closures were implemented in the first
Omnibus Habitat Amendment in 1998,
such as scallop video survey work by
the University of Massachusetts’ School
for Marine Science and Technology, and
that, therefore, spatial management for
habitat conservation purposes will be
improved by the selection of any
science-based alternative.
Response: NMFS agrees, however, the
scientific information presented in the
EIS by the Council recognizes that there
are areas within existing closures that
are highly vulnerable to the adverse
effects of fishing and that warrant
continued protection. NMFS
determined that the Council’s
recommendations for eastern Georges
Bank and Cox Ledge were not
adequately supported by the scientific
information in the EIS, for the reasons
described above.
Comment 45: FSF notes that the
supporting analyses for the EIS and
proposed rule completely omit any
consideration of possible unintended
consequences that can, and do, result
from effort displacement in areas with
mixed fisheries. FSF contends that such
consequences could readily nullify any
possible benefits of closures or even
incur greater harm to fishery resources.
Failure to consider fishermen’s
behavioral changes associated with
closures can undermine the
achievement of fishery management
goals.
Response: NMFS agrees that
displacement of fishing effort from an
area that is closed into an area that is
open to fishing could have an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
unintended consequence of increasing
habitat impacts in the open area,
especially if it causes increased impacts
on sensitive habitats that have not
previously been exposed to much
bottom fishing activity.
However, this is not likely to happen
in the region affected by this action.
With the exception of the clam fishery
operating in proposed habitat
management area east of Nantucket,
none of the new HMAs that were
approved are located in areas where
there is much mobile bottom-tending
gear fishing activity that could be
displaced into vulnerable habitat areas.
Hydraulic clam dredge vessels that fish
here are likely to shift into nearby, less
vulnerable sandy habitats in the current
Nantucket Lightship Habitat
Management Area (which will open
because of OHA2) if and when they are
required to stop fishing in the new Great
South Channel HMA. In general, any
vessel that is forced to leave a recently
closed area is more likely to move into
an area that is already being fished
rather than a new undisturbed area, in
which case the effects of the additional
effort will have little added impact on
the quality of bottom habitats. In this
more likely scenario, the habitat benefits
of prohibiting fishing in a closed area
would exceed the habitat losses caused
by additional bottom contact in an open
area.
Comment 46: FSF also suggests that
because management measures were
developed based on consideration of
whole sub-regions, the Council’s
proposed measures provide far better
protections for the depleted Georges
Bank cod stock. FSF’s letter states that
the proposed action on Georges Bank
closes approximately 1,120 nm2 of
ocean bottom in areas of ‘‘high
vulnerability.’’ They further note that
the areas cover over 600 nm2 of cobble,
boulder, and granule pebble habitat,
which in total exceeds all three no
action habitat closures combined, and
that a large area that is currently open
with ‘‘demonstrably high habitat
vulnerability on Georges Shoal would
be completely closed to fishing.’’ They
also note that most of the existing
Northern Edge habitat closure would
remain closed and that only the
Northern Edge Reduced Impact HMA
would be open to rotational scallop
fishing. Last, they state that the Great
South Channel HMA covers 1,400 nm2
that is highly vulnerable, and that this
alternative ‘‘includes more than
sufficient mitigation measures to offset
this action.’’
Response: As noted above, the
suggestion that the Georges Shoal HMA
is more vulnerable than the Northern
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Edge HAPC area is demonstrably
incorrect. Our conclusion is based on
other indicators of habitat suitability
and vulnerability in addition to the
output from the SASI model, which the
Council relied on to initially identify
areas of more vulnerable habitat where
other information (e.g., EFH value,
substrate composition, and stability)
proved to be more useful. The mean
SASI vulnerability scores for bottom
trawls for the Georges Shoal area are
higher than for the HAPC, but only by
about 4 percent and because the HAPC
was sampled more intensively. Data
support for substrate—the key
underlying data for the SASI model—is
much higher there than on Georges
Shoal.
We agree that it is important to
evaluate the benefits of spatial habitat
management measures across individual
groundfish stocks and that the effects of
these alternatives on the Georges Bank
cod stock in the Great South Channel
and Georges Bank sub-region was not
explicitly weighed against each other in
this action. Nevertheless, this action
includes the goal of improving
groundfish protections overall. Because
the Georges Bank cod stock is in such
poor condition, protection for juvenile
cod in both the Great South Channel
and on the northern edge of Georges
Bank is a positive element of this action.
Improving benefits to the Georges Bank
stock of cod is best achieved by
approving the Great South Channel
HMA and disapproving the proposed
HMA in Closed Area II. Further, the
rationale for the Council’s proposals on
eastern Georges Bank does not
adequately justify allowing an increase
in adverse effects from fishing on an
HAPC that was designated specifically
because of its vulnerability to fishing.
Comment 47: The FSF letter also
contends that the HAPC is appropriately
treated because Reduced Impact HMA
extends into currently open fishing area
(that would remain open under the
Haddock SAP rules) to compensate for
impacts in the HAPC. Further, the
comment states, ‘‘it is entirely
permissible to allow fishing in the
HAPC.’’ They also note that rotational
scallop fishing will not have unlimited
adverse habitat impacts and that any
increased impacts in Reduced Impact
HMA are offset by reduced bottom
contact time.
Response: NMFS agrees that the
designation of an area as an HAPC does
not inherently require a fishing closure
in the area. However, the Council
provided insufficient information to
understand which aspects of the area
are critical to juvenile cod survival, how
those aspects of the habitat are impacted
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
by scallop dredges, the recovery time for
such impacts, and the anticipated
rotation periods for scallop fishing that
would sufficiently address the
practicability of any proposed fishing or
protective measures. Without a more
full discussion of these critical
components, it is not possible to
sufficiently evaluate the nature, extent,
and scope of rotational scallop fishing
that may be permitted in the Northern
Edge HAPC. The Council’s
recommendations in this Amendment
would open the most vulnerable
portions of the HAPC and do not
adequately avoid, mitigate, or
compensate for those adverse effects.
The Council’s recommendation to allow
even rotational fishing in this sensitive
habitat appears to be inconsistent with
its own rationale for the designation that
the habitat in this area is particularly
susceptible to adverse fishing effects
and warrants particular concern and
consideration.
Comment 48: The scallop industry
argues that the ‘‘lobster closure’’ should
be rejected because it violates Council
policy and adequate alternatives were
not analyzed.
Response: NMFS is disapproving the
lobster closure in conjunction with the
recommendations on eastern Georges
Bank. We agree that further discussion
of this issue would be beneficial if the
Council decides to revisit habitat
management in Closed Area II.
Comment 49: FSF supported the
designation of a DHRA within the
existing Closed Area I South in Georges
Bank. The scallop industry proposed
this area to be dedicated to research
because of the importance of ongoing
scallop studies there. The fleet has
collected video survey data in the area
that will serve as baseline information
for future studies. These studies will
provide valuable information about
scallop productivity, distribution,
abundance, and growth. The
designation of the DHRA is expected to
streamline the permitting process for
these research activities and to reduce
administrative hurdles. Areas that are
designated as DHRAs must have sunset
provisions that will open an area if there
is no habitat research conducted there
within three years. FSF contends that
there is no benefit to excluding
commercial fishing from a DHRA if
there is no interest in or capacity for
actively pursuing research there.
Response: NMFS agrees and is
implementing the DHRAs with the
sunset provisions, as recommended.
Comment 50: Additionally, FSF
supported adding changes in HMA
designations or restrictions to the list of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
items that may be modified through
framework action.
Response: NMFS agrees and is
implementing the recommendation as
proposed.
Classification
The Administrator, Greater Atlantic
Region, NMFS, determined that the
approved portions of OHA2 are
necessary for the conservation and
management of the New England
Fishery Management Council’s fishery
management plans and that the final
rule is consistent with the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act and other applicable
laws.
The Council prepared a final
environmental impact statement for the
Omnibus Essential Fish Habitat
Amendment 2. The EIS was filed with
the Environmental Protection Agency
on October 18, 2017. A notice of
availability was published on October
27, 2017 (82 FR 49802). In approving
the amendment on January 3, 2018,
NMFS issued a Record of Decision
(ROD) identifying the selected
alternative. A copy of the ROD is
available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES).
This rule has been determined to be
significant for purposes of Executive
Orders (E.O.) 12866. Thus, this final
rule is considered an E.O. 13771
deregulatory action. For the reasons
stated earlier regarding updated scallop
biomass information, in the
accompanying EIS, and ‘‘Description of
Methods and Supplemental Analysis of
Economic Benefits of OHA2,’’ we
anticipate this rule will result in
additional harvest opportunities.
Congressional Review Act: The Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has determined that this rule is major
under 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq. Under 5
U.S.C. 808, the minimum 60-day delay
in effectiveness required for major rules
is not applicable because this rule
establishes a regulatory program for a
commercial activity related to fishing.
This rule does not contain policies
with Federalism, as defined in E.O.
13132, or ‘‘takings,’’ as clarified in E.O.
12630.
Section 553 of the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA) establishes
procedural requirements applicable to
rulemaking by Federal agencies. The
purpose of these requirements is to
ensure public access to the Federal
rulemaking process and to give the
public opportunity for comment as well
as adequate notice. Because this rule
opens some areas that are currently
closed, those portions of the regulations
are relieving restrictions and, pursuant
to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1), are not subject to
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
15257
the APA’s requirement for a 30-day
delay in effectiveness.
Additionally, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3), the Assistant Administrator
for Fisheries finds good cause to waive
the 30-day delay in effectiveness for the
remainder of the rule’s provisions
because such a delay is unnecessary and
contrary to the public interest. The
delayed effectiveness is intended to
provide adequate time for the affected
public to comply with the new
regulations. Because this rule is being
implemented at the start of the fishing
year when these types of changes are
typically implemented and expected,
there is minimal effort or time needed
for vessel owners to come into
compliance with the new measures,
which generally only requires updating
navigation systems to identify the new
areas. In addition, fishermen are
accustomed to adjusting to changes in
available fishing areas.
Implementing the measures at the
start of the fishing provide allows the
fishing industry the maximum amount
of time to fish in newly available areas.
As such, the delay in effectiveness is
unnecessary to allow sufficient time for
vessel owners to comply with the new
structure. Further, because NMFS’s
partial approval of the Council’s
recommendations was announced in
early January, the affected public, i.e.,
primarily the commercial groundfish,
scallop, and clam industries, have been
well aware of what changes are coming
and have been anticipating the changes
implemented via this rule.
Although this rule does impose new
restrictions in that certain areas
previously opened will be closed, the
overall impact of the measures being
implemented is a reduction in
management restrictions in the majority
of the areas considered. Particularly
significant is the removal of Closed Area
I and the Nantucket Lightship Closure
Areas that will allow the scallop fishery,
via Scallop Framework Adjustment 29,
to establish access areas and allocations
that are projected to result in an
additional $140–160 million in
potential fishing revenue for the scallop
fishery in the coming year. The
regulated entities will benefit far more
from these provisions that lift
restrictions going into immediate effect,
than they would be disadvantaged by
the waiver of the 30-day delay for the
aspects of the rule that impose
restrictions. Even in areas that are
resulting in new closures, the impacts
are minimal because the Eastern Maine
HMA closure is not expected to have
any immediate impact on mobile
bottom-tending gear fishing; the
hydraulic clam dredge fishery is
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
15258
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
exempted for one year from the date of
implementation of the Great South
Channel HMA; the Closed Area I
Seasonal Closure is the same footprint
as current year-round closure; and the
Spring Massachusetts Bay Spawning
Closure is small and not effective until
April 15. Thus, NMFS finds good cause
to waive the 30-delay in effectiveness
because it is in the regulated entities’
interest.
A final regulatory flexibility analysis
(FRFA) was prepared for this action.
The FRFA incorporates the IRFA, a
summary of the significant issues raised
by the public comments in response to
the IRFA, and NMFS responses to those
comments, and a summary of the
analyses completed to support the
action. A copy of this analysis is
available from the Council (see
ADDRESSES). A summary of this analysis
is provided below.
Section 212 of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 states that, for each rule or group
of related rules for which an agency is
required to prepare a FRFA, the agency
shall publish one or more guides to
assist small entities in complying with
the rule, and shall designate such
publications as ‘‘small entity
compliance guides.’’ The agency shall
explain the actions a small entity is
required to take to comply with a rule
or group of rules. As part of this
rulemaking process, a letter to permit
holders that also serves as a small entity
compliance guide was prepared. Copies
of this final rule are available from the
Greater Atlantic Regional Fisheries
Office (GARFO), and the guide, i.e.,
permit holder letter, will be sent to all
holders of any GARFO permit because
many of the measures impact fisheries
at the gear, rather than permit, level.
The guide and this final rule will be
available upon request.
A Statement of the Need for and
Objectives of the Rule
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
A statement of the necessity for and
for the objectives of this action are
contained in the Omnibus Amendment
EIS, Volume 1, and in the preamble to
this final rule, and is not repeated here.
A Summary of the Significant Issues
Raised by the Public in Response to the
IRFA, a Summary of the Agency’s
Assessment of Such Issues, and a
Statement of Any Changes Made in the
Final Rule as a Result of Such
Comments
No significant issues relative to the
IRFA were raised in the public
comments.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
Description and Estimate of the Number
of Small Entities To Which the Rule
Would Apply
vessels, these two persons would be
considered a separate ownership entity.
On June 1 of each year, NMFS
identifies ownership entities based on a
The Small Business Administration
list of all permits for the most recent
(SBA) defines a small business as one
complete calendar year. The current
that is:
ownership dataset used for this analysis
• Independently owned and operated;
was created based on calendar year 2014
• Not dominant in its field of
and contains average gross sales
operation;
associated with those permits for
• Has annual receipts that do not
calendar years 2012 through 2014.
exceed—
In addition to classifying a business
Æ $20.5 million in the case of
(ownership entity) as small or large, a
commercial finfish harvesting entities
business can also be classified by its
(NAIC 1 114111)
primary source of revenue. A business
Æ $5.5 million in the case of
is defined as being primarily engaged in
commercial shellfish harvesting entities fishing for finfish if it obtains greater
(NAIC 114112)
than 50 percent of its gross sales from
Æ $7.5 million in the case of for-hire
sales of finfish. Similarly, a business is
fishing entities (NAIC 114119); or
defined as being primarily engaged in
• Has fewer than—
fishing for shellfish if it obtains greater
Æ 750 employees in the case of fish
than 50 percent of its gross sales from
processors
sales of shellfish.
Æ 100 employees in the case of fish
A description of the specific permits
dealers.
that are likely to be affected by this
This rule affects commercial and
action is provided below, along with a
recreational fish harvesting entities
discussion of the impacted businesses,
engaged in fisheries throughout New
which can include multiple vessels and/
England that utilize bottom-trawls (large or permit types.
and small mesh), longlines, rod and
NMFS issued a final rule establishing
reel, gillnets, pots and traps, scallop
a small business size standard of $11
dredges, and hydraulic clam dredges.
million in annual gross receipts for all
The gears primarily affected by this
businesses primarily engaged in the
action are two non-mutually exclusive
commercial fishing industry (NAICS
fishing operations: Fishermen using
11411) for RFA compliance purposes
gears capable of catching groundfish
only (80 FR 81194; December 29, 2015).
and fishermen using mobile bottomThe $11 million standard became
tending gears. Individually permitted
effective on July 1, 2016, and is
vessels may hold permits for several
intended to be used in place of the
fisheries, harvesting species of fish that
SBA’s current standards of $20.5
are regulated by several different FMPs. million, $5.5 million, and $7.5 million
Furthermore, multiple-permitted vessels for the finfish (NAICS 114111), shellfish
and/or permits may be owned by
(NAICS 114112), and other marine
entities affiliated by stock ownership,
fishing (NAICS 114119) sectors,
common management, identity of
respectively, of the U.S. commercial
interest, contractual relationships, or
fishing industry.
The Council took final action on
economic dependency. For the purposes
OHA2 in June 2015, and the analyses in
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
analysis, the ownership entities, not the support of this action were developed
throughout the decision process and
individual vessels, are considered the
following the Council’s action, but prior
regulated entities.
to July 1, 2016. This analysis was not
Ownership entities are defined as
updated to reflect a small business rethose entities with common ownership
classification for all of the vessels
personnel as listed on the permit
application. Only permits with identical affected by this amendment using our
new size-standards because we have
ownership personnel are categorized as
determined that this analysis provides a
an ownership entity. For example, if
sufficient estimate of the number of
five permits have the same seven
small entities to which the proposed
persons listed as co-owners on their
permit application, those seven persons rule applies for purposes of determining
this action’s impacts on small entities
would form one ownership entity that
and the considerations required under
holds those five permits. If two of those
the RFA. For the fisheries directly
seven owners also co-own additional
affected by this rule, RFA analyses have
1 The North American Industry Classification
been completed on other actions since
System (NAICS) is the standard used by Federal
the implementation of the revised size
statistical agencies in classifying business
standard. As described in the IRFA, data
establishments for the purpose of collecting,
showed a change in the total number of
analyzing, and publishing statistical data related to
the U.S. business economy.
entities from the last fishery
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
management action analyzed under the
SBA size standards and the first fishery
management action analyzed under the
revised NMFS policy standard.
However, in terms of percentage of each
of the major affected fisheries, the size
standard change results in minimal
changes in categories. As a result, the
revised size standard does not change
the conclusions of the analysis or
notably change the estimation of the
impact on small entities from this
action. As such, it is reasonable to rely
upon the Council’s economic analyses.
No comments or concerns were received
specific to this analysis or about the
change in size classifications.
Regulated Commercial Fish Harvesting
Entities
Table 2 describes revenue by business
type (large or small) and Table 3
describes the total number of
commercial business entities potentially
regulated by the action. As of the time
of the Council’s decisionmaking (2015),
there were 4,071 small businesses (925
finfish, 2,713 shellfish, 433 for-hire) and
18 large businesses (all shellfish)
potentially affected by this action. For
fisheries utilizing mobile bottomtending gear, the approved action
directly regulates affected entities
through restrictions on when and where
vessels may fish to comply with the
Magnuson-Stevens Act requirement to
15259
minimize to the extent practicable the
adverse effects of fishing on essential
fish habitat. For fisheries that use gears
capable of catching groundfish, this
final rule additionally restricts location
and timing of fishing to minimize
impacts on spawning groundfish.
According to the EIS, individuals
fishing with mobile bottom-tending gear
and midwater trawls tend to generate a
substantial portion of their revenue from
other gear types. The vast majority of
individuals either fishing with mobile
bottom-tending gear capable of catching
groundfish or for-hire do not deviate
from that mode, which could relate to
the specialized nature of either the
vessels or the captains’ skills needed for
these types of fishing.
TABLE 2—BUSINESS REVENUE BY TYPE
Year
2012
2012
2012
2012
2013
2013
2013
2013
2014
2014
2014
2014
Business
type
NAICS classification
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
Finfish ..........................
For-hire ........................
Shellfish .......................
Shellfish .......................
Finfish ..........................
For-hire ........................
Shellfish .......................
Shellfish .......................
Finfish ..........................
For-hire ........................
Shellfish .......................
Shellfish .......................
Small
Small
Large
Small
Small
Small
Large
Small
Small
Small
Large
Small
Business
revenue
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
$217,560,996
56,153,981
265,665,371
710,485,816
191,870,635
55,556,751
228,892,465
690,608,565
209,370,022
57,843,562
223,065,022
741,518,137
Shellfish
revenue
$33,546,543
331,674
242,801,113
679,195,607
25,008,297
125,755
208,244,173
663,848,959
23,888,931
15,735
202,580,548
717,031,087
Finfish
revenue
$183,380,312
611,532
22,860,746
30,897,738
166,326,851
588,984
20,642,659
26,381,386
185,335,274
412,061
20,484,474
24,316,466
For-hire
revenue
$634,141
55,210,775
3,512
392,471
535,487
54,842,012
5,633
378,220
145,817
57,415,766
........................
170,584
TABLE 3—NUMBER OF BUSINESSES AND REVENUE GENERATED BY SMALL AND LARGE BUSINESSES, BY COMMERCIAL
GEAR CLASSIFICATION
[MBTG = Mobile bottom-tending gear, Groundfish = gear capable of catching groundfish, Both = Both MBTG and Groundfish designation,
Midwater = Midwater trawls, Clam = clam dredge. Note some data not presented for privacy concerns.]
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
Year
2012
2012
2013
2013
2014
2014
2012
2012
2013
2013
2014
2014
2012
2012
2013
2013
2014
2014
2012
2012
2013
2013
2014
2014
2012
2012
2013
Gear type
................................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Both ................................................
Both ................................................
Both ................................................
Both ................................................
Both ................................................
Both ................................................
Clam ...............................................
Clam ...............................................
Clam ...............................................
Clam ...............................................
Clam ...............................................
Clam ...............................................
Groundfish ......................................
Groundfish ......................................
Groundfish ......................................
Groundfish ......................................
Groundfish ......................................
Groundfish ......................................
MBTG .............................................
MBTG .............................................
MBTG .............................................
MBTG .............................................
MBTG .............................................
MBTG .............................................
Midwater .........................................
Midwater .........................................
Midwater .........................................
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Number of
businesses
Business type
Fmt 4701
Large
Small
Large
Small
Large
Small
Large
Small
Large
Small
Large
Small
Large
Small
Large
Small
Large
Small
Large
Small
Large
Small
Large
Small
Large
Small
Large
Sfmt 4700
..............................................
..............................................
..............................................
..............................................
..............................................
..............................................
..............................................
..............................................
..............................................
..............................................
..............................................
..............................................
..............................................
..............................................
..............................................
..............................................
..............................................
..............................................
..............................................
..............................................
..............................................
..............................................
..............................................
..............................................
..............................................
..............................................
..............................................
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
17
574
17
539
17
528
5
42
4
47
2
41
2
668
2
605
1
592
3
125
3
87
3
26
3
14
3
VTR revenue
$231,658,238
580,827,338
185,435,086
445,971,382
173,348,111
396,470,511
31,160,893
27,738,596
30,008,134
27,874,110
........................
26,867,813
........................
74,103,358
........................
47,920,414
........................
48,959,328
1,072,716
6,120,800
1,375,902
2,940,183
1,216,387
2,857,405
9,289,884
22,865,976
5,535,922
15260
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 3—NUMBER OF BUSINESSES AND REVENUE GENERATED BY SMALL AND LARGE BUSINESSES, BY COMMERCIAL
GEAR CLASSIFICATION—Continued
[MBTG = Mobile bottom-tending gear, Groundfish = gear capable of catching groundfish, Both = Both MBTG and Groundfish designation,
Midwater = Midwater trawls, Clam = clam dredge. Note some data not presented for privacy concerns.]
Year
2013
2014
2014
2012
2012
2013
2013
2014
2014
Gear type
................................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
Midwater .........................................
Midwater .........................................
Midwater .........................................
Other ..............................................
Other ..............................................
Other ..............................................
Other ..............................................
Other ..............................................
Other ..............................................
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
Description of the Projected Reporting,
Record-keeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements of This Proposed Rule
The action does not contain a
collection-of-information requirement
subject to review and approval by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA), and the rule does not impose
any other reporting or record-keeping
requirements. This final rule requires
compliance only with standard fishingrelated issues, including compliance
with gear restricted fishing areas or
seasons.
Description of the Steps the Agency Has
Taken To Minimize the Significant
Economic Impact on Small Entities
Consistent With the Stated Objectives of
Applicable Statutes
The economic impacts of each type of
habitat management measure are
discussed in more detail in Volumes 3,
4, and 5 of the EIS. Because the primary
objective of the Amendment is to
comply with the Magnuson-Stevens Act
requirement to minimize to the extent
practicable the adverse effects of fishing
on EFH, a variety of combinations of
areas could have achieved those goals.
The EFH and HAPC designations are
primarily administrative in nature and
are not expected to result in any direct
economic impacts to the fisheries;
although, indirect positive affects to
stocks are expected.
In general, the overall approved
changes are relatively modest,
particularly when compared to other
alternatives considered. The majority of
areas approved are already closed to
fishing. The current open areas that will
close include the Eastern Maine HMA
and the Great South Channel HMA. As
described above, there is currently very
little mobile bottom-tending gear fishing
in the Eastern Maine HMA because
groundfish stocks have decreased
locally in that region. The Great South
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
Small
Large
Small
Large
Small
Large
Small
Large
Small
..............................................
..............................................
..............................................
..............................................
..............................................
..............................................
..............................................
..............................................
..............................................
Channel HMA was designed to
minimize impact to the scallop fishery,
particularly the design of the eastern
boundary. Scallops occur primarily at
depths beyond the closure boundary.
There is not a significant amount of
trawl fishing in that area because of the
high level of natural disturbance. The
hydraulic clam fishery will be allowed
to continue to operate in this HMA for
1 year, while the Council develops more
discrete exemption areas. It is expected
that the subsequent action will attempt
to balance the economic needs of the
clam fishery with the objectives of
OHA2 and the EFH protections required
by the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
The approved measures that will
increase fishing opportunities include:
(1) Modifying the Western Gulf of Maine
Groundfish Closure Area by aligning the
eastern boundary with the Habitat
Closure Area; (2) modifying the Jeffreys
Bank Habitat Closure Area and exposing
the deeper, northern portion to potential
fishing; (3) eliminating the Nantucket
Lightship Groundfish and Habitat
Closure Areas; and (4) implementing
Closed Area I North as a seasonal,
versus year-round, closure area. The
partial opening of the areas in the Gulf
of Maine are expected to result in
modest increases in groundfish revenue.
The opening of the Nantucket Lightship
and Closed Area I Closure Areas are
expected to result in notable increases
in scallop fishing. Scallop Framework
Adjustment 29, which is intended to set
management measures for the 2018 and
2019 scallop fishing years, estimates
that with access to these newly opened
areas will result in an additional $140–
160 million to the scallop fishery
beyond what the status quo measures
would have generated.
Habitat Management Measure
Alternatives
In the Eastern Gulf of Maine, this
action establishes the Small Eastern
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Number of
businesses
Business type
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
13
3
14
2
566
4
539
3
514
VTR revenue
26,214,983
4,909,077
25,058,119
........................
79,087,347
........................
80,355,177
........................
84,446,720
Maine Habitat Management Area
(HMA), closed to all mobile bottomtending gears. (Note, the regulations
refer to this area as simply the ‘‘Eastern
Maine HMA.’’) Other alternatives
considered would have continued with
no habitat management in this subregion or implemented one or more
additional areas. The Toothaker Ridge
HMA, the Large Eastern Maine HMA,
the Machias HMA, and the Small
Eastern Maine were assembled into two
alternatives. The EIS concluded, and
NMFS agreed, that the Small Eastern
Maine HMA achieves a notable level of
protection for vulnerable habitat
without significant economic impacts.
In the Central Gulf of Maine, this
action maintains the existing Cashes
Ledge Groundfish Closure Area,
modifies the existing Jeffreys Bank and
Cashes Ledge Habitat Closure Areas,
with their current fishing restrictions
and exemptions, establishes the
Fippennies Ledge HMA, closed to
mobile bottom-tending gears, and the
Ammen Rock HMA, closed to all fishing
except lobster traps. Other alternatives
considered would have various
combinations of eight total areas. In
addition to the areas recommended as
preferred, the Council considered
habitat management in the existing
Jeffreys Bank and Cashes Ledge habitat
closure areas, two areas on Platts Bank
and a small area on the top of
Fippennies Ledge. The Council did not
recommend the areas on Platts Bank
because of the concern regarding the
displacement of current fishing and the
economic impact to a sub-set of the
fleet. The final approved measures
provide the best habitat protection
without significant economic impacts.
In the Western Gulf of Maine, this
action maintains the existing Western
Gulf of Maine Habitat Closure Area,
closed to mobile bottom-tending gears,
and modifies the eastern boundary of
the Western Gulf of Maine [Groundfish]
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Closure Area to align with the Habitat
Closure Area, while maintaining the
current fishing restrictions and
requirements. An exemption area within
the northwest corner of those closures
for shrimp trawls is also established and
the existing Roller Gear Restricted Area
requirements is designated as a habitat
protection measure. Other alternatives
would have established a large
(Council’s Alternatives 3 and 4 in
Volume 3 of the EIS) or small
(Alternative 5) version of a closure area
along the state waters boundaries of
New Hampshire and Maine covering
Bigelow Bight, which was deemed by
the Council to have overly severe
economic impacts. Still other options
included consideration of breaking up
the existing Western Gulf of Maine
Habitat Closure Area to focus on the
most vulnerable sections of Jeffreys
Ledge and Stellwagen Bank, either in
two smaller combinations (Alternatives
4 and 5) or only a larger section of the
Stellwagen Bank area (Alternatives 3
and 6). Finally, one option would have
implemented the roller gear restriction
over only the footprint of the other
proposed habitat management areas
(Alternative 7b).
On Georges Bank, this final action
maintains the Closed Area II groundfish
and habitat closure areas, but removes
the Closed Area I groundfish and habitat
closures as year-round closures.
Various combinations of 19 areas,
including the 5 existing habitat and
groundfish closed areas, were
considered for this sub-region. When
combined, these areas covered nearly
the entire Bank area from the Hague
Line up to the Great South Channel.
Some areas were deemed too costly
from an economic standpoint because of
their size or specific location. These
areas included the two alternatives
across the majority of the bank: The
Northern Georges mobile bottomtending gear closure (Alternative 8) and
the Northern Georges gear modification
area (Alternatives 5). Various options of
smaller areas on Georges Shoal, namely
the Georges Shoal 1 (Alternative 5),
Georges Shoal Gear Modification Area
(Alternative 4), Georges Shoal 2
(Alternative 7), and Western HMA
(Alternative 9), were also considered.
Further variations focused more on the
northern edge, included the Northern
Edge HMA in Alternatives 3 and 4; two
variations of expanding the existing
Closed Area II habitat closure
(Alternatives 6A and 6B); the EFH South
HMA as part of Alternative 7; the
Eastern HMA and a Mortality Closure in
Alternative 9. The Council’s
recommendation (Alternative 10) was
disapproved for the reasons described
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
above. The final approved measures
maintain a long-standing closure, but
opens Closed Area I. As described
above, the opening of Closed Area I is
expected to result in significant
economic gains for the scallop fishery.
In the Great South Channel, this
action establishes the Great South
Channel HMA, closed to mobile bottomtending gear, except hydraulic clam
dredges for 1 year, outside of the
northeast corner of the area. The
Nantucket Lightship Habitat Closure
Area and the Nantucket Lightship
Closed Area are removed. Other
alternatives were variations around the
approved alternative, some extending
farther to the east, and some extending
farther to the west. The Council also
recommended an HMA on Cox Ledge
that would have prohibited hydraulic
clam dredges and ground cables on
trawl vessels. That recommendation was
disapproved for the reasons described
above. The Council also considered a
single box to cover both Cox Ledge
areas. The opening of the Nantucket
Lightship Closure Areas is expected to
result in significant economic gains for
the scallop fishery in 2018 and 2019.
Groundfish Spawning Measure
Alternatives
In the Gulf of Maine, the final rule
establishes two new, relatively small
cod spawning protections. They include
the Winter Massachusetts Bay Spawning
Closure, which would be in effect from
November 1–January 31 of each year,
and a 2-week closure (April 15–April
30) within statistical area 125. Other
alternatives considered would have
reinstated or added to existing rolling
closures in the Western Gulf of Maine.
On Georges Bank, this action
establishes the existing Closed Area II
Groundfish Closure Area and the Closed
Area I North Habitat Closed Area as
seasonal closures from February 1–April
15, and removes the May Georges Bank
Spawning Closure. The Council
considered making all of the existing
Closed Area I groundfish closure area a
seasonal spawning closure, but instead
chose just the subset of that area in the
northern portion.
Management alternatives in both
regions included all commercial gears
capable of catching groundfish
(recreational fishing exempted), all
commercial and recreational gears
capable of catching groundfish, and an
exemption for scallop dredges.
Dedicated Habitat Research Area
Alternatives
This action establishes two DHRAs.
The DHRAs will be effective for 3 years,
at which time the Regional
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
15261
Administrator would consult with the
Council as to whether the designation
should be retained. The Council
considered three potential DHRAs, with
varying management restrictions within
them. The action establishes the Georges
Bank DHRA (footprint is the same as the
existing Closed Area I South Habitat
Closure) and the Stellwagen DHRA
(footprint within the existing Western
Gulf of Maine Habitat Closure). The
Council considered two ‘‘reference
areas’’ within the Stellwagen DHRA that
would have prohibited all fishing,
including recreational groundfish
fishing. No reference area was
recommended and none will be
implemented. The Georges Bank DHRA
is closed to all mobile bottom-tending
gear. The Stellwagen DHRA is closed to
all mobile bottom-tending gear, sink
gillnet gear, and demersal longline gear.
Framework Adjustments and
Monitoring
Through this action, the designation
or removal of HMAs and changes to
fishing restrictions within HMAs may
be considered in a future framework
adjustment. In addition, this action
establishes a review process to evaluate
the performance of habitat and
spawning protection measures. Finally,
this action establishes a commitment by
the Council to identify and periodically
revise research priorities to improve
habitat and spawning area monitoring.
Alternatively, the Council considered
not implementing a new process for
habitat and spawning protection
measures review and modification and
using the existing ad-hoc process under
its authority currently.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 648
Fisheries, Fishing, Recordkeeping and
reporting requirements.
Dated: March 29, 2018.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 648 is amended
as follows:
PART 648—FISHERIES OF THE
NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
1. The authority citation for part 648
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. Amend § 648.2 as follows:
a. Revise the definition of ‘‘Bottomtending mobile gear;’’
■ b. Add a definition for ‘‘Bridles,’’ in
alphabetical order;
■
■
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
15262
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
c. Revise the definition of ‘‘Gillnet
gear capable of catching multispecies;’’
■ d. Add a definition for ‘‘Ground
cables,’’ in alphabetical order; and
■ e. Revise the definition of ‘‘Open
areas.’’
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
■
§ 648.2
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
Bottom-tending mobile gear, means
gear in contact with the ocean bottom,
and towed from a vessel, which is
moved through the water during fishing
in order to capture fish, and includes
otter trawls, beam trawls, hydraulic
dredges, non-hydraulic dredges, and
seines (with the exception of a purse
seine).
Bridles connect the wings of a bottom
trawl to the ground cables. The ground
cables lead to the doors or otter boards.
The doors are attached to the towing
vessel via steel cables, referred to as
wires or warps. Each net has two sets of
bridles, one on each side.
*
*
*
*
*
Gillnet gear capable of catching
multispecies means all gillnet gear
except pelagic gillnet gear specified at
§ 648.81(b)(2)(ii) and (d)(5)(ii) and
pelagic gillnet gear that is designed to
fish for and is used to fish for or catch
tunas, swordfish, and sharks.
*
*
*
*
*
Ground cables on a bottom trawl run
between the bridles, which attach
directly to the wings of the net, and the
doors, or otter boards. The doors are
attached to the towing vessel via steel
cables, referred to as wires or warps.
*
*
*
*
*
Open areas, with respect to the
Atlantic sea scallop fishery, means any
area that is not subject to restrictions of
the Sea Scallop Rotational Areas
specified in §§ 648.59 and 648.60, the
Northern Gulf of Maine Management
Area specified in § 648.62, EFH Closed
Areas specified in §§ 648.61 and
648.370, Dedicated Habitat Research
areas specified in § 648.371, or the
Frank R. Lautenberg Deep-Sea Coral
Protection Area described in § 648.372.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Amend § 648.11 by revising
paragraph (m)(1) to read as follows:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
*
§ 648.11 At-sea sea sampler/observer
coverage.
*
*
*
*
*
(m) * * *
(1) Pre-trip notification. At least 48 hr
prior to the beginning of any trip on
which a vessel may harvest, possess, or
land Atlantic herring, a vessel issued a
Limited Access Herring Permit or a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
vessel issued an Areas 2⁄3 Open Access
Herring Permit on a declared herring
trip or a vessel issued an All Areas
Open Access Herring Permit fishing
with midwater trawl gear in
Management Areas 1A, 1B, and/or 3, as
defined in § 648.200(f)(1) and (3), and
herring carriers must provide notice of
the following information to NMFS:
Vessel name, permit category, and
permit number; contact name for
coordination of observer deployment;
telephone number for contact; the date,
time, and port of departure; gear type;
target species; and intended area of
fishing, including whether the vessel
intends to engage in fishing in the
Northeast Multispecies Closed Areas
(Closed Area I North (§ 648.81(c)(3)),
Closed Area II (§ 648.81(a)(5)), Cashes
Ledge Closure Area (§ 648.81(a)(3)), and
Western GOM Closure Area
(§ 648.81(a)(4))) at any point in the trip.
Trip notification calls must be made no
more than 10 days in advance of each
fishing trip. The vessel owner, operator,
or manager must notify NMFS of any
trip plan changes at least 12 hr prior to
vessel departure from port.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Amend § 648.14 by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (b)(10);
■ b. Adding paragraphs (b)(11) and (12);
■ c. Revising paragraphs (i)(1)(vi)(A)(1)
and (2), (k)(6)(i)(E), (k)(6)(ii)(A)(5), and
(k)(7)(i)(A) through (D);
■ d. Removing and reserving paragraph
(k)(7)(i)(E);
■ e. Revising paragraph (k)(7)(i)(F);
■ f. Removing and reserving paragraph
(k)(7)(i)(G); and
■ g. Revising paragraphs (k)(7)(ii),
(k)(12)(iii)(B), (k)(16)(iii)(B), and (r)(2)(v)
and (vi).
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
§ 648.14
Prohibitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(10) Fish with bottom-tending gear
within the Frank R. Lautenberg Deepsea Coral Protection Area described at
§ 648.372, unless transiting pursuant to
§ 648.372(d), fishing lobster trap gear in
accordance with § 697.21 of this
chapter, or fishing red crab trap gear in
accordance with § 648.264. Bottomtending gear includes but is not limited
to bottom-tending otter trawls, bottomtending beam trawls, hydraulic dredges,
non-hydraulic dredges, bottom-tending
seines, bottom longlines, pots and traps,
and sink or anchored gill nets.
(11) If fishing with bottom-tending
mobile gear, fish in, enter, be on a
fishing vessel in, the EFH closure areas
described in § 648.371, unless otherwise
exempted.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(12) Unless otherwise exempted, fish
in the Dedicated Habitat Research Areas
defined in § 648.371.
*
*
*
*
*
(i) * * *
(1) * * *
(vi) * * *
(A) * * *
(1) Fish for scallops in, or possess or
land scallops from, the EFH Closed
Areas and Habitat Management Areas
specified in §§ 648.61 and 648.370,
respectively.
(2) Transit or enter the EFH Closure
Areas or Habitat Management Areas
specified in §§ 648.61 and 648.370,
respectively, except as provided by
§ 648.61(b).
*
*
*
*
*
(k) * * *
(6) * * *
(i) * * *
(E) Use, set, haul back, fish with,
possess on board a vessel, unless stowed
and not available for immediate use as
defined in § 648.2, or fail to remove,
sink gillnet gear and other gillnet gear
capable of catching NE multispecies,
with the exception of single pelagic
gillnets (as described in
§ 648.81(b)(2)(ii) and (d)(5)(ii)), in the
areas and for the times specified in
§ 648.80(g)(6)(i) and (ii), except as
provided in § 648.80(g)(6)(i) and (ii),
and § 648.81(b)(2)(ii) and (d)(5)(ii), or
unless otherwise authorized in writing
by the Regional Administrator.
*
*
*
*
*
(ii)
(A)
(5) Enter, fail to remove sink gillnet
gear or gillnet gear capable of catching
NE multispecies from, or be in the areas,
and for the times, described in
§ 648.80(g)(6)(i) and (ii), except as
provided in §§ 648.80(g)(6)(i) and
648.81(i).
*
*
*
*
*
(7) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) Groundfish Closure Area
restrictions. Enter, be on a fishing vessel
in, or fail to remove gear from the EEZ
portion of the areas described in
§ 648.81(a)(3), (4), and (5) and (d)(3),
except as provided in § 648.81(a)(2),
(d)(2), and (i).
(B) Groundfish Closure Area
possession restrictions. Fish for, harvest,
possess, or land regulated species in or
from the closed areas specified in
§ 648.81(a) through (d) and (n), unless
otherwise specified in § 648.81(c)(2)(iii),
(d)(5)(i), (iv), (viii), and (ix), (i), (b)(2), or
as authorized under § 648.85.
(C) Restricted Gear Areas. (1) Fish, or
be in the areas described in
§ 648.81(f)(3) through (6) on a fishing
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
15263
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
vessel with mobile gear during the time
periods specified in § 648.81(f)(1),
except as provided in § 648.81(f)(2).
(2) Fish, or be in the areas described
in § 648.81(f)(3) through (5) on a fishing
vessel with lobster pot gear during the
time periods specified in § 648.81(f)(1).
(3) Deploy in or fail to remove lobster
pot gear from the areas described in
§ 648.81(f)(3) through (5), during the
time periods specified in § 648.81(f)(1).
(D) Georges Bank Seasonal Closure
Areas. Enter, fail to remove gear from,
or be in the areas described in
§ 648.81(c) during the time periods
specified, except as provided in
§ 648.81(c)(2).
(E) [Reserved]
(F) Closed Area II. Enter or be in the
area described in § 648.81(a)(5) on a
fishing vessel, except as provided in
§ 648.81(a)(5)(ii).
(G) [Reserved]
(ii) Vessel and permit holders. It is
unlawful for any owner or operator of a
vessel issued a valid NE multispecies
permit or letter under § 648.4(a)(1)(i),
unless otherwise specified in § 648.17,
when fishing with bottom-tending
mobile gear, fish in, enter, be on a
fishing vessel in, the Habitat
Management Areas described in
§ 648.370.
*
*
*
*
*
(12) * * *
(iii) * * *
(B) Enter or fish in Closed Area II as
specified in § 648.81(a)(5), unless
declared into the area in accordance
with § 648.85(b)(3)(v) or (b)(8)(v)(D).
*
*
*
*
*
(16) * * *
(iii) * * *
(B) Fail to comply with the
requirements specified in
§ 648.81(d)(5)(v) when fishing in the
areas described in § 648.81(b)(3) and (4)
and (d) during the time periods
specified.
*
*
*
*
*
(r) * * *
(2) * * *
(v) Fish with midwater trawl gear in
any Northeast Multispecies Closed Area,
as defined in § 648.81(a)(3) through (5)
and (c)(3) and (4), without a NMFSapproved observer on board, if the
vessel has been issued an Atlantic
herring permit.
(vi) Slip or operationally discard
catch, as defined at § 648.2, unless for
one of the reasons specified at
§ 648.202(b)(2), if fishing any part of a
tow inside the Northeast Multispecies
Closed Areas, as defined at
§ 648.81(a)(3) through (5) and (c)(3) and
(4).
*
*
*
*
*
§ 648.27
■
■
[Removed]
5. Remove § 648.27.
6. Add § 648.58 to read as follows:
From June 15 through October 31 of
each year, no fishing vessel may fish
with scallop dredge gear in the portion
of Closed Area II, as specified in
§§ 648.61(c)(4) and 648.81(c)(4), north of
41°30′ N lat.
■ 7. In § 648.59, revise paragraph (a)
introductory text to read as follows:
(a) The Sea Scallop Rotational Area
Management Program consists of
Scallop Rotational Areas, as defined in
Point
CAIA1
CAIA2
CAIA3
CAIA4
CAIA1
*
*
*
*
9. In § 648.61, revise the section
heading and add paragraph (c) to read
as follows:
■
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
Sea Scallop Rotational Areas.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) The Closed Area I Scallop
Rotational Area is defined by straight
lines connecting the following points in
the order stated (copies of a chart
depicting this area are available from
the Regional Administrator upon
request), and so that the line connecting
points CAIA3 and CAIA4 is the same as
the portion of the western boundary line
of Closed Area I, defined in
§ 648.61(c)(3), that lies between points
CAIA3 and CAIA4:
W long.
41°26′ N
40°58′ N
40°54.95′ N
41°04′ N
41°26′ N
68°30′ W
68°30′ W
68°53.37′ W
69°01′ W
68°30′ W
Note
........................
........................
(1)
(1)
........................
Point CAIA3 to Point CAIA4 along the western boundary of Closed Area I, defined in § 648.61(c)(3).
*
§ 648.61
Areas.
§ 648.60
N lat.
..........................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................
1 From
8. In § 648.60, revise paragraph (c)(1)
to read as follows:
■
§ 648.58 Closed Area II Seasonal Scallop
Closure.
§ 648.59 Sea Scallop Rotational Area
Management Program and Access Area
Program requirements.
§ 648.2. Guidelines for this area rotation
program (i.e., when to close an area and
reopen it to scallop fishing) are
provided in § 648.55(a)(6). Whether a
rotational area is open or closed to
scallop fishing in a given year, and the
appropriate level of access by limited
access and LAGC IFQ vessels, are
specified through the specifications or
framework adjustment processes
defined in § 648.55. When a rotational
area is open to the scallop fishery, it is
called an Access Area and scallop
vessels fishing in the area are subject to
the Access Area Program Requirements
specified in this section. Areas not
defined as Scallop Rotational Areas
specified in § 648.60, EFH Closed Areas
specified in §§ 648.61 and 648.370,
Dedicated Habitat Research Areas
specified in § 648.371, or areas closed to
scallop fishing under other FMPs, are
governed by other management
measures and restrictions in this part
and are referred to as Open Areas.
*
*
*
*
*
EFH and Groundfish Closed
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Groundfish Closure Areas. No
vessel fishing for scallops, or person on
a vessel fishing for scallops, may enter,
fish in, or be in the Closure Areas
described in paragraphs (c)(1) through
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
(5) of this section, unless otherwise
exempted in the scallop access area
program, described in § 648.59. A chart
depicting these areas is available from
the Regional Administrator upon
request.
(1) Western Gulf of Maine Closure
Area. The Western Gulf of Maine
Closure Area is defined by straight lines
connecting the following points in the
order stated:
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
WESTERN GULF OF MAINE CLOSURE
AREA
Point
WGM1
WGM2
WGM3
WGM4
WGM1
......
......
......
......
......
N lat.
42°15′
42°15′
43°15′
43°15′
42°15′
N
N
N
N
N
W long.
70°15′
69°55′
69°55′
70°15′
70°15′
W
W
W
W
W
(2) Cashes Ledge Closure Area. The
Cashes Ledge Closure Area is defined by
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
15264
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
straight lines connecting the following
points in the order stated:
CASHES LEDGE CLOSURE AREA—
Continued
CASHES LEDGE CLOSURE AREA
Point
CL1
CL2
CL3
CL4
CL5
CL6
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
N lat.
CL1 ...........
W long.
43°07′ N
42°49.5′ N
42°46.5′ N
42°43.5′ N
42°42.5′ N
42°49.5′ N
Point
69°02′ W
68°46′ W
68°50.5′ W
68°58.5′ W
69°17.5′ W
69°26′ W
N lat.
43°07′ N
CLOSED AREA I
Point
W long.
CI1
CI2
CI3
CI4
CI1
69°02′ W
(3) Closed Area I. Closed Area I is
defined by straight lines, unless
otherwise noted, connecting the
following points in the order stated:
............
............
............
............
............
N lat.
41°30′
40°45′
40°45′
41°30′
41°30′
W long.
69°23′
68°45′
68°30′
68°30′
69°23′
(4) Closed Area II. Closed Area II is
defined by straight lines connecting the
following points in the order stated:
CLOSED AREA II
Point
CAII1
CAII2
CAII3
CAII4
CAII5
CAII1
N lat.
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
W long.
41°00′ N
41°00′ N
41°18.45′ N
( 3)
42°22′ N
41°00′ N
67°20′ W
66°35.8′ W
(1)
67°20′ W
67°20′ W
67°20′ W
Note
........................
........................
(2 )
( 2)
........................
........................
1 The
intersection of 41°18.45′ N lat. And the U.S.-Canada Maritime Boundary, approximately 41°18.45′ N lat. and 66°24.89′ W long.
Point CAII3 to Point CAII4 along the U.S.-Canada Maritime Boundary.
3 The intersection of 67°20′ W long. And the U.S.-Canada Maritime Boundary, approximately 42°22.06′ N lat. and 67°20′ W long.
2 From
(5) Nantucket Lightship Closure Area.
The Nantucket Lightship Closure Area
is defined by straight lines connecting
the following points in the order stated:
NANTUCKET LIGHTSHIP CLOSURE AREA
Point
NL1
NL2
NL3
NL4
NL1
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
N lat.
40°50′
40°20′
40°20′
40°50′
40°50′
N
N
N
N
N
W long.
69°00′
69°00′
70°20′
70°20′
69°00′
W
W
W
W
W
10. Amend § 648.80 by:
a. Revising paragraphs (a)(9)(i)(A),
(a)(11) introductory text, (a)(11)(i)(C),
(a)(12), and the introductory text of
paragraphs (a)(13), (14), (15), (16), (18),
and (19);
■ b. Removing paragraph (b)(11)(ii)(D);
and
■ c. Revising paragraphs (d)(2)
introductory text, (d)(2)(i), (d)(5), and
(g)(6).
The revisions read as follows:
■
■
§ 648.80 NE Multispecies regulated mesh
areas and restrictions on gear and methods
of fishing.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(9) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) Unless otherwise prohibited in
§ 648.81, § 648.370, or § 648.371, a
vessel subject to the minimum mesh
size restrictions specified in paragraph
(a)(3) or (4) of this section may fish with
or possess nets with a mesh size smaller
than the minimum size, provided the
vessel complies with the requirements
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
of paragraph (a)(5)(ii) or (a)(9)(ii) of this
section, and § 648.86(d), from July 15
through November 15, when fishing in
Small Mesh Area 1; and from January 1
through June 30, when fishing in Small
Mesh Area 2. While lawfully fishing in
these areas with mesh smaller than the
minimum size, an owner or operator of
any vessel may not fish for, possess on
board, or land any species of fish other
than: Silver hake and offshore hake,
combined, and red hake—up to the
amounts specified in § 648.86(d);
butterfish, Atlantic mackerel, or squid,
up the amounts specified in § 648.26;
spiny dogfish, up to the amount
specified in § 648.235; Atlantic herring,
up to the amount specified in § 648.204;
and scup, up to the amount specified in
§ 648.128.
*
*
*
*
*
(11) GOM Scallop Dredge Exemption
Area. Unless otherwise prohibited in
§ 648.81, § 648.370, or § 648.371, vessels
with a limited access scallop permit that
have declared out of the DAS program
as specified in § 648.10, or that have
used up their DAS allocations, and
vessels issued a General Category
scallop permit, may fish in the GOM
Regulated Mesh Area specified in
paragraph (a)(1) of this section, when
not under a NE multispecies DAS,
providing the vessel fishes in the GOM
Scallop Dredge Exemption Area and
complies with the requirements
specified in paragraph (a)(11)(i) of this
section. The GOM Scallop Dredge
Fishery Exemption Area is defined by
the straight lines connecting the
following points in the order stated
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(copies of a map depicting the area are
available from the Regional
Administrator upon request):
GOM SCALLOP DREDGE EXEMPTION
AREA
Point
SM1
SM2
SM3
SM4
SM5
SM6
SM7
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
N lat.
41°35′
41°35′
42°49.5′
43°12′
43°41′
43°58′
(1 )
W long.
70°00′
69°40′
69°40′
69°00′
68°00′
67°22′
(1 )
1 Northward along the irregular U.S.-Canada
maritime boundary to the shoreline.
(i) * * *
(C) The exemption does not apply to
the Cashes Ledge Closure Area or the
Western GOM Area Closure specified in
§ 648.81(a)(3) and (4), respectively.
*
*
*
*
*
(12) Nantucket Shoals Mussel and Sea
Urchin Dredge Exemption Area. Unless
otherwise prohibited in § 648.81,
§ 648.370, or § 648.371, a vessel may
fish with a dredge in the Nantucket
Shoals Mussel and Sea Urchin Dredge
Exemption Area, provided that any
dredge on board the vessel does not
exceed 8 ft (2.4 m), measured at the
widest point in the bail of the dredge,
and the vessel does not fish for, harvest,
possess, or land any species of fish other
than mussels and sea urchins. The area
coordinates of the Nantucket Shoals
Mussel and Sea Urchin Dredge
Exemption Area are the same
coordinates as those of the Nantucket
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
15265
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Shoals Dogfish Fishery Exemption Area
specified in paragraph (a)(10) of this
section.
(13) GOM/GB Dogfish and Monkfish
Gillnet Fishery Exemption Area. Unless
otherwise prohibited in § 648.81,
§ 648.370, or § 648.371, a vessel may
fish with gillnets in the GOM/GB
Dogfish and Monkfish Gillnet Fishery
Exemption Area when not under a NE
multispecies DAS if the vessel complies
with the requirements specified in
paragraph (a)(13)(i) of this section. The
GOM/GB Dogfish and Monkfish Gillnet
Fishery Exemption Area is defined by
straight lines connecting the following
points in the order stated:
N lat.
41°35′ ...................................
42°49.5′ ................................
42°49.5′ ................................
43°12′ ...................................
(1) ..........................................
1 Due
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
RF
RF
RF
RF
RF
RF
RF
RF
RF
RF
RF
RF
RF
RF
N lat.
1 .........
2 .........
3 .........
4 .........
5 .........
6 .........
7 .........
8 .........
9 .........
10 .......
11 .......
12 .......
13 .......
1 .........
42°14.05′
42°09.2′
41°54.85′
41°41.5′
41°39′
41°45.6′
41°52.3′
41°55.5′
42°08.35′
42°04.75′
42°00′
42°00′
42°07.85′
42°14.05′
W long.
70°08.8′
69°47.8′
69°35.2′
69°32.85′
69°44.3′
69°51.8′
69°52.55′
69°53.45′
70°04.05′
70°16.95′
70°13.2′
70°24.1′
70°30.1′
70°08.8′
RAISED FOOTROPE TRAWL WHITING
FISHERY EXEMPTION AREA
[November 21 through December 31]
Point
north to Maine shoreline.
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
[July 1 through November 30]
Point
70°00′
70°00′
69°40′
69°00′
69°00′
*
*
*
*
(14) GOM/GB Dogfish Gillnet
Exemption. Unless otherwise prohibited
in § 648.81, § 648.370, or § 648.371, a
vessel may fish with gillnets in the
GOM/GB Dogfish and Monkfish Gillnet
Fishery Exemption Area when not
under a NE multispecies DAS if the
vessel complies with the requirements
specified in paragraph (a)(14)(i) of this
section. The area coordinates of the
GOM/GB Dogfish and Monkfish Gillnet
Fishery Exemption Area are specified in
paragraph (a)(13) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(15) Raised Footrope Trawl Exempted
Whiting Fishery. Unless otherwise
prohibited in § 648.370 or § 648.371,
vessels subject to the minimum mesh
size restrictions specified in paragraphs
(a)(3) or (4) of this section may fish
with, use, or possess nets in the Raised
Footrope Trawl Whiting Fishery area
with a mesh size smaller than the
minimum size specified, if the vessel
complies with the requirements
specified in paragraph (a)(15)(i) of this
section. This exemption does not apply
to the Cashes Ledge Closure Areas or the
Western GOM Area Closure specified in
§ 648.81(a)(3) and (4), respectively. The
Raised Footrope Trawl Whiting Fishery
Area (copies of a chart depicting the
area are available from the Regional
Administrator upon request) is defined
by straight lines connecting the
following points in the order stated:
Jkt 244001
GOM GRATE RAISED FOOTROPE
TRAWL WHITING FISHERY EXEMPTION AREA—Continued
[September 1 through November 20]
W long.
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
RAISED FOOTROPE TRAWL WHITING
FISHERY EXEMPTION AREA
RF
RF
RF
RF
RF
RF
RF
RF
RF
RF
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
N lat.
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
42°14.05′
42°09.2′
41°54.85′
41°41.5′
41°39′
41°45.6′
41°52.3′
41°55.5′
42°08.35′
42°14.05′
W long.
70°08.8′
69°47.8′
69°35.2′
69°32.85′
69°44.3′
69°51.8′
69°52.55′
69°53.45′
70°04.05′
70°08.8′
*
*
*
*
*
(16) GOM Grate Raised Footrope
Trawl Exempted Whiting Fishery.
Unless otherwise prohibited in
§ 648.370 or § 648.371, vessels subject to
the minimum mesh size restrictions
specified in paragraphs (a)(3) or (4) of
this section may fish with, use, and
possess in the GOM Grate Raised
Footrope Trawl Whiting Fishery area
from July 1 through November 30 of
each year, nets with a mesh size smaller
than the minimum size specified, if the
vessel complies with the requirements
specified in paragraphs (a)(16)(i) and (ii)
of this section. The GOM Grate Raised
Footrope Trawl Whiting Fishery Area
(copies of a chart depicting the area are
available from the Regional
Administrator upon request) is defined
by straight lines connecting the
following points in the order stated:
GOM GRATE RAISED FOOTROPE
TRAWL WHITING FISHERY EXEMPTION AREA
[July 1 through November 30]
Point
GRF1 ........
GRF2 ........
PO 00000
Frm 00027
N lat.
43°15′
43°15′
Fmt 4701
W long.
70°35.4′
70°00′
Sfmt 4700
Point
GRF3 ........
GRF4 ........
GRF5 ........
*
N lat.
43°25.2′
43°41.8′
43°58.8′
W long.
70°00′
69°20′
69°20′
*
*
*
*
(18) Great South Channel Scallop
Dredge Exemption Area. Unless
otherwise prohibited in § 648.370 or
§ 648.371, vessels issued a LAGC
scallop permit, including limited access
scallop permits that have used up their
DAS allocations, may fish in the Great
South Channel Scallop Dredge
Exemption Area, as defined under
paragraph (a)(18)(i) of this section, when
not under a NE multispecies or scallop
DAS or on a sector trip, provided the
vessel complies with the requirements
specified in paragraph (a)(18)(ii) of this
section and applicable scallop
regulations in subpart D of this part.
*
*
*
*
*
(19) Cape Cod Spiny Dogfish
Exemption Areas. Unless otherwise
prohibited in § 648.370 or § 648.371,
vessels issued a NE multispecies limited
access permit that have declared out of
the DAS program as specified in
§ 648.10, or that have used up their DAS
allocations, may fish in the Eastern or
Western Cape Cod Spiny Dogfish
Exemption Area as defined under
paragraphs (a)(19)(i) and (ii) of this
section, when not under a NE
multispecies or scallop DAS, provided
the vessel complies with the
requirements for the Eastern or Western
area, specified in paragraphs (a)(19)(i)
and (ii) of this section, respectively.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(2) When fishing under this
exemption in the GOM/GB Exemption
Area, as defined in paragraph (a)(17) of
this section, the vessel has on board a
letter of authorization issued by the
Regional Administrator, and complies
with the following restrictions:
(i) The vessel only fishes for,
possesses, or lands Atlantic herring,
blueback herring, or mackerel in areas
north of 42°20′ N lat. and in the areas
described in § 648.81(c)(3) and (4); and
Atlantic herring, blueback herring,
mackerel, or squid in all other areas
south of 42°20′ N. lat.; and
*
*
*
*
*
(5) To fish for herring under this
exemption, a vessel issued an All Areas
Limited Access Herring Permit and/or
an Areas 2 and 3 Limited Access
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
15266
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Herring Permit fishing on a declared
herring trip, or a vessel issued a Limited
Access Incidental Catch Herring Permit
and/or an Open Access Herring Permit
fishing with midwater trawl gear in
Management Areas 1A, 1B, and/or 3, as
defined in § 648.200(f)(1) and (3), must
provide notice of the following
information to NMFS at least 72 hr prior
to beginning any trip into these areas for
the purposes of observer deployment:
Vessel name; contact name for
coordination of observer deployment;
telephone number for contact; the date,
time, and port of departure; and
whether the vessel intends to engage in
fishing in Closed Area I, as defined in
§ 648.81(c)(3), at any point in the trip;
and
*
*
*
*
*
(g) * * *
(6) Gillnet requirements to reduce or
prevent marine mammal takes—(i)
Requirements for gillnet gear capable of
catching NE multispecies to reduce
harbor porpoise takes. In addition to the
requirements for gillnet fishing
identified in this section, all persons
owning or operating vessels in the EEZ
that fish with sink gillnet gear and other
gillnet gear capable of catching NE
multispecies, with the exception of
single pelagic gillnets (as described in
§ 648.81(b)(2)(ii) and (d)(5)(ii)), must
comply with the applicable provisions
of the Harbor Porpoise Take Reduction
Plan found in § 229.33 of this title.
(ii) Requirements for gillnet gear
capable of catching NE multispecies to
prevent large whale takes. In addition to
the requirements for gillnet fishing
identified in this section, all persons
owning or operating vessels in the EEZ
that fish with sink gillnet gear and other
gillnet gear capable of catching NE
multispecies, with the exception of
single pelagic gillnets (as described in
§ 648.81(b)(2)(ii) and (d)(5)(ii)), must
comply with the applicable provisions
of the Atlantic Large Whale Take
Reduction Plan found in § 229.32 of this
title.
*
*
*
*
*
■
11. Revise § 648.81 to read as follows:
§ 648.81 NE multispecies year-round and
seasonal closed areas.
(a) Year-round groundfish closed
areas. (1) Restrictions. No fishing vessel
or person on a fishing vessel may enter,
fish, or be in, and no fishing gear
capable of catching NE multispecies
may be used or on board a vessel in, the,
Cashes Ledge, Western Gulf of Maine, or
Closed Area II Closure Areas, unless
otherwise allowed by or exempted
under this part. Charts of the areas
described in this section are available
from the Regional Administrator upon
request.
(2) Exemptions. Unless restricted by
the requirements of subpart P of this
part or elsewhere in this part, paragraph
(a)(1) of this section does not apply to
a fishing vessel or person on a fishing
vessel when fishing under the following
conditions:
(i) Fishing with or using exempted
gear as defined under this part, except
for pelagic gillnet gear capable of
catching NE multispecies, unless fishing
with a single pelagic gillnet not longer
than 300 ft (91.4 m) and not greater than
6 ft (1.83 m) deep, with a maximum
mesh size of 3 inches (7.6 cm), provided
that:
(A) The net is attached to the boat and
fished in the upper two-thirds of the
water column;
(B) The net is marked with the
owner’s name and vessel identification
number;
(C) No regulated species or ocean pout
are retained; and
(D) No other gear capable of catching
NE multispecies is on board;
(ii) Fishing in the Midwater Trawl
Gear Exempted Fishery as specified in
§ 648.80(d);
(iii) Fishing in the Purse Seine Gear
Exempted Fishery as specified in
§ 648.80(e);
(iv) Fishing under charter/party or
recreational regulations specified in
§ 648.89, provided that:
(A) A letter of authorization issued by
the Regional Administrator is onboard
the vessel, which is valid from the date
of enrollment until the end of the
fishing year;
(B) No harvested or possessed fish
species managed by the NEFMC or
MAFMC are sold or intended for trade,
barter or sale, regardless of where the
fish are caught;
(C) Only rod and reel or handline gear
is on board the vessel; and
(D) No NE multispecies DAS are used
during the entire period for which the
letter of authorization is valid.
(3) Cashes Ledge Closure Area. The
Cashes Ledge Closure Area is defined by
straight lines connecting the following
points in the order stated:
CASHES LEDGE CLOSURE AREA
Point
CL1
CL2
CL3
CL4
CL5
CL6
CL1
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
N lat.
W long.
43°07′ N
42°49.5′ N
42°46.5′ N
42°43.5′ N
42°42.5′ N
42°49.5′ N
43°07′ N
69°02′ W
68°46′ W
68°50.5′ W
68°58.5′ W
69°17.5′ W
69°26′ W
69°02′ W
(4) Western Gulf of Maine Closure
Area. The Western Gulf of Maine
Closure Area is defined by straight lines
connecting the following points in the
order stated:
WESTERN GULF OF MAINE CLOSURE
AREA
Point
WGM1
WGM2
WGM3
WGM4
WGM1
......
......
......
......
......
N lat.
42°15′
42°15′
43°15′
43°15′
42°15′
W long.
70°15′
69°55′
69°55′
70°15′
70°15′
(5) Closed Area II Closure Area. (i)
The Closed Area II Closure Area is
defined by straight lines, unless
otherwise noted, connecting the
following points in the order stated:
CLOSED AREA II CLOSURE AREA
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
Point
CAII1
CAII2
CAII3
CAII4
CAII5
CAII1
N lat.
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
W long.
41°00′
41°00′
41°18.45′
( 3)
42°22′
41°00′
67°20′
66°35.8′
(1)
67°20′
67°20′
67°20′
1 The
Note
........................
........................
(2 )
(2)
........................
........................
intersection of 41°18.45′ N lat. and the U.S.-Canada Maritime Boundary, approximately 41°18.45′ N lat. and 66°24.89′ W long.
Point CAII3 to Point CAII4 along the U.S.-Canada Maritime Boundary.
3 The intersection of 67°20′ W long. And the U.S.-Canada Maritime Boundary, approximately 42°22.06′ N lat. and 67°20′ W long.
2 From
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
(ii) Unless otherwise restricted under
the EFH Closure(s) specified in
paragraph (h) of this section, paragraph
(a)(5)(i) of this section does not apply to
persons on fishing vessels or fishing
vessels—
(A) Fishing with gears as described in
paragraph (a)(2) this section.
(B) Fishing with tuna purse seine gear
outside of the portion of Closed Area II
known as the Habitat Area of Particular
Concern, as described in § 648.370(g).
(C) Fishing in the CA II Yellowtail
Flounder/Haddock SAP or the Eastern
U.S./Canada Haddock SAP Program as
specified in § 648.85(b)(3)(ii) or
(b)(8)(ii), respectively.
(D) Transiting the area, provided the
vessel’s fishing gear is stowed and not
available for immediate use as defined
in § 648.2; and
(1) The operator has determined, and
a preponderance of available evidence
indicates, that there is a compelling
safety reason; or
(2) The vessel has declared into the
Eastern U.S./Canada Area as specified
in § 648.85(a)(3)(ii) and is transiting CA
II in accordance with the provisions of
§ 648.85(a)(3)(vii).
(E) Fishing for scallops within the
Closed Area II Access Area defined in
§ 648.59(c)(3), during the season
specified in § 648.59(c)(4), and pursuant
to the provisions specified in § 648.60.
(b) Gulf of Maine spawning
groundfish closures. (1) Restrictions.
Unless allowed in this part, no fishing
vessel or person on a fishing vessel may
enter, fish, or be in, and no fishing gear
capable of catching NE multispecies
may be used or on board a vessel in, the
spawning closure areas described in
paragraphs (b)(3) and (4) of this section,
during the times specified in this
section. Charts depicting the areas
defined here are available from the RA
upon request.
(2) Exemptions. Paragraph (b)(1) of
this section does not apply to a fishing
vessel or person on a fishing vessel:
(i) That has not been issued a NE
multispecies permit that is fishing
exclusively in state waters;
(ii) That is fishing with or using
exempted gear as defined under this
part, excluding pelagic gillnet gear
capable of catching NE multispecies,
except for a vessel fishing with a single
pelagic gillnet not longer than 300 ft
(91.4 m) and not greater than 6 ft (1.83
m) deep, with a maximum mesh size of
3 inches (7.6 cm), provided:
(A) The net is attached to the vessel
and fished in the upper two-thirds of
the water column;
(B) The net is marked with the vessel
owner’s name and vessel identification
number;
(C) No regulated species or ocean pout
are retained; and
(D) No other gear capable of catching
NE multispecies is on board;
(iii) That is fishing as a charter/party
or recreational fishing vessel, provided
that:
(A) With the exception of tuna, fish
harvested or possessed by the vessel are
not sold or intended for trade, barter, or
sale, regardless of where the species are
caught;
(B) Any gear other than pelagic hook
and line gear, as defined in this part, is
properly stowed and not available for
immediate use as defined in § 648.2;
and
(C) No regulated species or ocean pout
are retained; and
(iv) That is transiting pursuant to
paragraph (e) of this section.
(3) GOM Cod Spawning Protection
Area. Except as specified in paragraph
(b)(2) of this section, from April through
June of each year, no fishing vessel or
person on a fishing vessel may enter,
fish, or be in, and no fishing gear
capable of catching NE multispecies
may be used or on board a vessel in, the
GOM Cod Spawning Protection Area, as
defined by straight lines connecting the
following points in the order stated:
15267
GOM COD SPAWNING PROTECTION
AREA
Point
CSPA1
CSPA2
CSPA3
CSPA4
CSPA1
N latitude
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
42°50.95′
42°47.65′
42°54.91′
42°58.27′
42°50.95′
W longitude
70°32.22′
70°35.64′
70°41.88′
70°38.64′
70°32.22′
(4) Winter Massachusetts Bay
Spawning Protection Area. Except as
specified in paragraph (b)(2) of this
section, from November 1 through
January 31 of each year, no fishing
vessel or person on a fishing vessel may
enter, fish, or be in, and no fishing gear
capable of catching NE multispecies
may be used or be on board a vessel in,
the Massachusetts Bay Protection Area,
as defined on the west and south by the
outer limit of Massachusetts waters and
on the northeast by a straight line
connecting the following points, which
fall along the Massachusetts state waters
boundary:
WINTER MASSACHUSETTS BAY
SPAWNING PROTECTION AREA
Point
WSPA1 .....
WSPA2 .....
N latitude
42° 23.61′
42° 07.68′
W longitude
70° 39.21′
70° 26.79′
(5) Spring Massachusetts Bay
Spawning Protection Area. (i) From
April 15 through April 30 of each year,
no fishing vessel or person on a fishing
vessel may enter, fish, or be in, and no
fishing gear capable of catching NE
multispecies may be used or on board
a vessel in the thirty- minute block
defined by straight lines, unless
otherwise noted, connecting the
following points in the order stated:
SPRING MASSACHUSETTS BAY SPAWNING PROTECTION AREA
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
Point
SSPA1
SSPA2
SSPA3
SSPA4
SSPA5
SSPA6
SSPA1
N latitude
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
(1)
70°30′
70°30′
(2)
71°00′
71°00′
(1)
42°30′
42°30′
42°00′
42°00′
(4)
(5)
42°30′
1 The
intersection of 42°30′ N lat. and the coastline at Marblehead, MA.
intersection of 42°00′ N lat. and the coastline at Kingston, MA.
3 From Point SSPA4 to Point SSPA5 following the coastline of Massachusetts.
4 The intersection of 71°00′ W long. and the coastline at Quincy, MA.
5 The intersection of 71°00′ W long. and the northernmost coastline at East Boston, Boston, MA.
6 From Point SSPA6 back to Point SSPA 1 following the coastline of Massachusetts.
2 The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
W longitude
09APR2
Note
........................
........................
........................
(3 )
(3)
(6)
(6 )
15268
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
(ii) Unless otherwise restricted in this
part, the Spring Massachusetts Bay
Spawning Protection Area closure does
not apply to a fishing vessel or person
on a fishing vessel that meets the
criteria in paragraphs (d)(5)(ii) through
(vi) and (x) of this section (listed under
the exemptions for the GOM Cod
Protection Closures). This includes
recreational vessels meeting the criteria
specified in paragraphs (d)(5)(v)(A)
through (D) of this section.
(c) Georges Bank Spawning
Groundfish Closures. (1) Restrictions.
Unless otherwise allowed in this part,
no fishing vessel or person on a fishing
vessel may enter, fish, or be in, and no
fishing gear capable of catching NE
multispecies may be used on board a
vessel in the spawning closure areas
described in paragraphs (b)(3) and (4) of
this section, and during the times
specified in this section. Charts
depicting the areas defined here are
available from the RA upon request.
(2) Exemptions. Paragraph (c)(1) of
this section does not apply to a fishing
vessel or person on a fishing vessel:
(i) That is fishing with or using
exempted gear as defined under this
part, excluding pelagic gillnet gear
capable of catching NE multispecies,
except for vessels fishing with a single
pelagic gillnet not longer than 300 ft
(91.4 m) and not greater than 6 ft (1.83
m) deep, with a maximum mesh size of
3 inches (7.6 cm), provided:
(A) The net is attached to the vessel
and fished in the upper two-thirds of
the water column;
(B) The net is marked with the vessel
owner’s name and vessel identification
number;
(C) No regulated species or ocean pout
are retained; and
(D) No other gear capable of catching
NE multispecies is on board.
(ii) That is fishing for scallops
consistent with the requirements of the
scallop fishery management plan,
including rotational access program
requirements specified in § 648.59.
(iii) That is fishing in the mid-water
trawl exempted fishery.
(iv) That is transiting pursuant to the
requirements described in § 648.2.
(3) Closed Area I North. Except as
specified in paragraph (c)(2) of this
section, from February 1 through April
15 of each year, no fishing vessel or
person on a fishing vessel may enter,
fish, or be in; and no fishing gear
capable of catching NE multispecies
may be used or on board a vessel in,
Closed Area I North, as defined by
straight lines connecting the following
points in the order stated:
CLOSED AREA I—NORTH
Point
CIN1
CIN2
CIN3
CIN4
CIN1
N lat.
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
41°30′
41°30′
41°26′
41°04′
41°30′
W long.
69°23′
68°30′
68°30′
69°01′
69°23′
(4) Closed Area II. Except as specified
in paragraph (c)(2) of this section, from
February 1 through April 15 of each
year, no fishing vessel or person on a
fishing vessel may enter, fish, or be in,
and no fishing gear capable of catching
NE multispecies may be used or on
board a vessel in, Closed Area II, as
defined by straight lines, unless
otherwise noted, connecting the
following points in the order stated:
CLOSED AREA II
Point
CAII1
CAII2
CAII3
CAII4
CAII5
CAII1
N lat.
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
W long.
41°00′
41°00′
41°18.45
( 3)
42°22′
41°00′
67°20′
66°35.8′
( 1)
67°20′
67°20′
67°20′
Note
........................
........................
(2 )
(2)
........................
........................
1 The
intersection of 41°18.45′ N lat. and the U.S.-Canada Maritime Boundary, approximately 41°18.45′ N lat. and 66°24.89′ W long.
Point CAII3 to Point CAII4 along the U.S.-Canada Maritime Boundary.
3 The intersection of 67°20′ W long. and the U.S.-Canada Maritime Boundary, approximately 42°22.06′ N lat. and 67°20′ W long.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
2 From
(d) GOM Cod Protection Closures. (1)
Restrictions. Unless otherwise allowed
in this part, no fishing vessel or person
on a fishing vessel may enter, fish, or be
in, and no fishing gear capable of
catching NE multispecies may be used
or on board a vessel in, GOM Cod
Protection Closures I through V as
described, and during the times
specified, in paragraphs (d)(4)(i) through
(v) of this section.
(2) Review of closure. The New
England Fishery Management Council
shall review the GOM Cod Protection
Closures Areas specified in this section
when the spawning stock biomass for
GOM cod reaches the minimum biomass
threshold specified for the stock (50
percent of SSBMSY).
(3) Seasons. (i) GOM Cod Protection
Closure I is in effect from May 1 through
May 31.
(ii) GOM Cod Protection Closure II is
in effect from June 1 through June 30.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
(iii) GOM Cod Protection Closure III is
in effect from November 1 through
January 31.
(iv) GOM Cod Protection Closure IV is
in effect from October 1 through October
31.
(v) GOM Cod Protection Closure V is
in effect from March 1 through March
31.
(4) GOM Cod Protection Closure
Areas. Charts depicting these areas are
available from the Regional
Administrator upon request.
(i) GOM Cod Protection Closure I.
GOM Cod Protection Closure I is the
area bounded by the following
coordinates connected in the order
stated by straight lines, unless otherwise
noted:
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
GOM COD PROTECTION CLOSURE I
[May 1–May 31]
Point
CPCI
CPCI
CPCI
CPCI
CPCI
CPCI
CPCI
CPCI
CPCI
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
N latitude
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
43°30′
43°30′
43°00′
43°00′
42°30′
42°30′
42°20′
42°20′
43°30′
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
W longitude
(1)
69°30′
69°30′
70°00′
70°00′
70°30′
70°30′
(2) (3)
(1) (3)
W
W
W
W
W
W
1 The intersection of 43°30′ N latitude and
the coastline of Maine.
2 The intersection of 42°20′ N latitude and
the coastline of Massachusetts.
3 From Point 8 back to Point 1 following the
coastline of the United States.
(ii) GOM Cod Protection Closure II.
GOM Cod Protection Closure II is the
area bounded by the following
coordinates connected in the order
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
stated by straight lines, unless otherwise
noted:
GOM COD PROTECTION CLOSURE
IV—Continued
[October 1–October 31]
GOM COD PROTECTION CLOSURE II
[June 1–June 30]
Point
CPCII
CPCII
CPCII
CPCII
CPCII
CPCII
CPCII
CPCII
CPCII
CPCII
CPCII
CPCII
N latitude
1 ....
2 ....
3 ....
4 ....
5 ....
6 ....
7 ....
8 ....
9 ....
10 ..
11 ..
1 ....
(1)
43°30′
43°30′
42°30′
42°30′
42°20′
42°20′
42°30′
42°30′
43°00′
43°00′
(1)
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Point
W longitude
69°30′
69°30′
70°00′
70°00′
70°30′
70°30′
(2)(3)
((4))(3)
70°30′
70°30′
(5) (6)
69°30′
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W ( 6)
(iii) GOM Cod Protection Closure III.
GOM Cod Protection Closure III is the
area bounded by the following
coordinates connected in the order
stated by straight lines, unless otherwise
noted:
GOM COD PROTECTION CLOSURE III
[November 1–January 31]
CPCIII
CPCIII
CPCIII
CPCIII
CPCIII
CPCIII
CPCIII
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
N latitude
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
42°30′
42°30′
42°15′
42°15′
42°00′
42°00′
42°30′
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
W longitude
(1)
70°30′
70°30′
70°24′
70°24′
(2) (3)
(1) (3)
W
W
W
W
1 The intersection of 42°30′ N latitude and
the Massachusetts coastline.
2 The intersection of 42°00′ N latitude and
the mainland Massachusetts coastline at Kingston, MA.
3 From Point 6 back to Point 1 following the
coastline of Massachusetts.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
(iv) GOM Cod Protection Closure IV.
GOM Cod Protection Closure IV is the
area bounded by the following
coordinates connected in the order
stated by straight lines, unless otherwise
noted:
GOM COD PROTECTION CLOSURE IV
[October 1–October 31]
Point
CPCIV 1 ...
CPCIV 2 ...
CPCIV 3 ...
VerDate Sep<11>2014
N latitude
42°30′ N
42°30′ N
42°00′ N
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
W longitude
(1)
70°00′ W
70°00′ W
Jkt 244001
CPCIV 4 ...
CPCIV 1 ...
W longitude
(2) (3)
(1) (3)
42°00′ N
42°30′ N
1 The intersection of 42°30′ N latitude and
the Massachusetts coastline.
2 The intersection of 42°00′ N latitude and
the mainland Massachusetts coastline at Kingston, MA.
3 From Point 4 back to Point 1 following the
coastline of Massachusetts.
1 The intersection of 69°30′ W longitude and
the coastline of Maine.
2 The intersection of 42°20′ N latitude and
the coastline of Massachusetts.
3 From Point 7 to Point 8 following the
coastline of Massachusetts.
4 The intersection of 42°30′ N latitude and
the coastline of Massachusetts.
5 The intersection of 43°00′ N latitude and
the coastline of New Hampshire.
6 From Point 11 back to Point 1 following
the coastlines of New Hampshire and Maine.
Point
N latitude
(v) GOM Cod Protection Closure V.
GOM Cod Protection Closure V is the
area bounded by the following
coordinates connected in the order
stated by straight lines:
GOM COD PROTECTION CLOSURE V
[March 1–March 31]
Point
CPCV
CPCV
CPCV
CPCV
CPCV
1
2
3
4
1
N latitude
....
....
....
....
....
42°30′
42°30′
42°00′
42°00′
42°30′
N
N
N
N
N
W longitude
70°00′
68°30′
68°30′
70°00′
70°00′
W
W
W
W
W
(5) Exemptions. The GOM cod
protection closures specified in this
section do not apply to a fishing vessel
or person on board a fishing vessel
under any of the following conditions:
(i) No multispecies permit has been
issued and the vessel is fishing
exclusively in state waters;
(ii) Fishing with or using exempted
gear as defined under this part, except
for pelagic gillnet gear capable of
catching NE multispecies, unless fishing
with a single pelagic gillnet not longer
than 300 ft (91.4 m) and not greater than
6 ft (1.83 m) deep, with a maximum
mesh size of 3 inches (7.6 cm), provided
that:
(A) The net is attached to the boat and
fished in the upper two-thirds of the
water column;
(B) The net is marked with the
owner’s name and vessel identification
number;
(C) No regulated species are retained;
and
(D) No other gear capable of catching
NE multispecies is on board;
(iii) Fishing in the Midwater Trawl
Gear Exempted Fishery as specified in
§ 648.80(d);
(iv) Fishing in the Purse Seine Gear
Exempted Fishery as specified in
§ 648.80(e);
(v) Fishing under charter/party or
recreational regulations specified in
§ 648.89, provided that:
(A) A vessel fishing under charter/
party regulations in a GOM cod
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
15269
protection closure described under
paragraph (f)(4) of this section, has on
board a letter of authorization issued by
the Regional Administrator that is valid
from the date of enrollment through the
duration of the closure or 3 months
duration, whichever is greater;
(B) No harvested or possessed fish
species managed by the NEFMC or
MAFMC are sold or intended for trade,
barter or sale, regardless of where the
fish are caught;
(C) Only rod and reel or handline gear
is on board; and
(D) No NE multispecies DAS are used
during the entire period for which the
letter of authorization is valid;
(vi) Fishing with scallop dredge gear
under a scallop DAS or when lawfully
fishing in the Scallop Dredge Fishery
Exemption Area as described in
§ 648.80(a)(11), provided the vessel does
not retain any regulated NE
multispecies during a trip, or on any
part of a trip;
(vii) Fishing in the Raised Footrope
Trawl Exempted Whiting Fishery, as
specified in § 648.80(a)(15), or in the
Small Mesh Area II Exemption Area, as
specified in § 648.80(a)(9);
(viii) Fishing on a sector trip, as
defined in this part, and in the GOM
Cod Protection Closures IV or V, as
specified in paragraphs (f)(4)(iv) and (v)
of this section; or
(ix) Fishing under the provisions of a
Northeast multispecies Handgear A
permit, as specified at § 648.82(b)(6),
and in the GOM Cod Protection
Closures IV or V, as specified in
paragraphs (f)(4)(iv) and (v) of this
section.
(x) Transiting the area, provided it
complies with the requirements
specified in paragraph (e) of this
section.
(e) Transiting. (1) Unless otherwise
restricted or specified in this paragraph
(e), a vessel may transit the Cashes
Ledge Closed Area, the Western GOM
Closure Area, the GOM Cod Protection
Closures, and the GOM Cod Spawning
Protection Area, as defined in
paragraphs (a)(3) and (4), (d)(4), and
(b)(3), of this section, respectively,
provided that its gear is stowed and not
available for immediate use as defined
in § 648.2.
(2) Private recreational or charter/
party vessels fishing under the
Northeast multispecies provisions
specified at § 648.89 may transit the
GOM Cod Spawning Protection Area, as
defined in paragraph (b)(3) of this
section, provided all bait and hooks are
removed from fishing rods, and any
regulated species on board have been
caught outside the GOM Cod Spawning
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
15270
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Protection Area and has been gutted and
stored.
(f) Restricted Gear Areas—(1)
Restricted Gear Area Seasons. No
fishing vessel with mobile gear on
board, or person on a fishing vessel with
mobile gear on board, may fish or be in
the specified Restricted Gear Areas,
unless transiting, during the seasons
below. No fishing vessel with lobster
pot gear on board, or person on a fishing
vessel with lobster pot gear on board,
may fish in, and no lobster pot gear may
be deployed or remain in the specified
Restricted Gear Areas. Vessels with
lobster pot gear on board may transit
during the seasons listed in the table in
this paragraph (f)(1).
Mobile gear
Restricted
Restricted
Restricted
Restricted
Gear
Gear
Gear
Gear
Area
Area
Area
Area
I ......................................................
II .....................................................
III ....................................................
IV ...................................................
(2) Transiting. Vessels with mobile
gear may transit this area, provided that
all mobile gear is on board the vessel
while inside the area, and is stowed and
October 1–June 15 .........................................................
November 27–June 15 ....................................................
June 16–November 26 ....................................................
June 16–September 30 ...................................................
not available for immediate use as
defined in § 648.2.
(3) Restricted Gear Area I. Restricted
Gear Area I is defined by the following
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
Point
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
June 16–September 30.
June 16–November 26.
January 1–April 30.
n/a.
points connected in the order listed by
straight lines (points followed by an
asterisk are shared with an adjacent
Restricted Gear Area):
Latitude
AA ................................................................................................................................................
AB ................................................................................................................................................
AC ...............................................................................................................................................
AD ...............................................................................................................................................
AE ................................................................................................................................................
AF ................................................................................................................................................
AG ...............................................................................................................................................
AH ...............................................................................................................................................
AI .................................................................................................................................................
AJ ................................................................................................................................................
AK ................................................................................................................................................
AL ................................................................................................................................................
AM ...............................................................................................................................................
AN ...............................................................................................................................................
AO ...............................................................................................................................................
AP ................................................................................................................................................
AQ ...............................................................................................................................................
AR ...............................................................................................................................................
AS ................................................................................................................................................
AT ................................................................................................................................................
AU ...............................................................................................................................................
AV ................................................................................................................................................
AW ...............................................................................................................................................
AX ................................................................................................................................................
AY ................................................................................................................................................
AZ ................................................................................................................................................
BA ................................................................................................................................................
BB ................................................................................................................................................
BC ...............................................................................................................................................
BD ...............................................................................................................................................
BE ................................................................................................................................................
BF ................................................................................................................................................
BG ...............................................................................................................................................
BH ...............................................................................................................................................
BI .................................................................................................................................................
BJ ................................................................................................................................................
BK ................................................................................................................................................
BL ................................................................................................................................................
BM ...............................................................................................................................................
BN ...............................................................................................................................................
BO ...............................................................................................................................................
BP ................................................................................................................................................
BQ ...............................................................................................................................................
BR ...............................................................................................................................................
BS ................................................................................................................................................
BT ................................................................................................................................................
BU ...............................................................................................................................................
BV ................................................................................................................................................
BW ...............................................................................................................................................
BX ................................................................................................................................................
BY ................................................................................................................................................
BZ ................................................................................................................................................
CA ...............................................................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Lobster pot gear
40°02.75′
40°02.45′
40°05.20′
40°03.75′
40°00.70′
39°59.20′
39°58.25′
39°56.90′
39°57.40′
39°57.55′
39°56.70′
39°55.75′
39°56.20′
39°58.80′
39°59.15′
40°00.90′
40°00.65′
39°57.85′
39°56.80′
39°56.50′
39°56.75′
39°57.80′
40°00.05′
40°02.65′
40°02.00′
40°02.65′
40°04.10′
40°05.65′
40°08.45′
40°09.75′
40°10.25′
40°11.60′
40°11.00′
40°08.90′
40°05.30′
40°05.20′
40°04.35′
40°03.65′
40°03.60′
40°05.70′
40°08.10′
40°08.70′
40°06.90′
40°07.20′
40°07.90′
40°06.40′
40°05.25′
40°05.40′
40°06.00′
40°07.40′
40°05.55′
40°03.90′
40°02.25′
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
09APR2
Longitude
70°16.10′
70°14.10′
70°10.90′
70°10.15′
70°08.70′
70°04.90′
70°03.00′
69°57.45′
69°55.90′
69°54.05′
69°53.60′
69°41.40′
69°40.20′
69°38.45′
69°37.30′
69°37.30′
69°36.50′
69°35.15′
69°34.10′
69°26.35′
69°24.40′
69°20.35′
69°14.60′
69°11.15′
69°08.35′
69°05.60′
69°03.90′
69°03.55′
69°03.60′
69°04.15′
69°04.40′
69°05.40′
69°03.80′
69°01.75′
69°01.10′
69°00.50′
69°00.50′
69°00.00′
68°57.20′
68°52.40′
68°51.00′
68°49.60′
68°46.50′
68°38.40′
68°36.00′
68°35.80′
68°39.30′
68°44.50′
68°46.50′
68°49.60′
68°49.80′
68°51.70′
68°55.40′
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
Note
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Point
Latitude
CB ...............................................................................................................................................
CC ...............................................................................................................................................
CD ...............................................................................................................................................
CE ...............................................................................................................................................
CF ................................................................................................................................................
CG ...............................................................................................................................................
CH ...............................................................................................................................................
CI .................................................................................................................................................
CJ ................................................................................................................................................
CK ...............................................................................................................................................
CL ................................................................................................................................................
CM ...............................................................................................................................................
CN ...............................................................................................................................................
CO ...............................................................................................................................................
CP ...............................................................................................................................................
CQ ...............................................................................................................................................
CR ...............................................................................................................................................
CS ...............................................................................................................................................
CT ................................................................................................................................................
CU ...............................................................................................................................................
CV ...............................................................................................................................................
CW ..............................................................................................................................................
CX ...............................................................................................................................................
CY ...............................................................................................................................................
CZ ................................................................................................................................................
DA ...............................................................................................................................................
DB ...............................................................................................................................................
DC ...............................................................................................................................................
DD ...............................................................................................................................................
DE ...............................................................................................................................................
DF ................................................................................................................................................
DG ...............................................................................................................................................
DH ...............................................................................................................................................
DI .................................................................................................................................................
DJ ................................................................................................................................................
DK ...............................................................................................................................................
DL ................................................................................................................................................
DM ...............................................................................................................................................
DN ...............................................................................................................................................
DO ...............................................................................................................................................
DP ...............................................................................................................................................
DQ ...............................................................................................................................................
DR ...............................................................................................................................................
DS ...............................................................................................................................................
DT ................................................................................................................................................
DU ...............................................................................................................................................
DV ...............................................................................................................................................
DW ..............................................................................................................................................
DX ...............................................................................................................................................
DY ...............................................................................................................................................
DZ ................................................................................................................................................
EA ................................................................................................................................................
EB ................................................................................................................................................
AA ................................................................................................................................................
(4) Restricted Gear Area II. Restricted
Gear Area II is defined by the following
points connected in the order listed by
straight lines (points followed by an
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
Point
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
69°00.00′
69°00.75′
69°01.75′
69°01.95′
69°02.00′
69°02.25′
69°02.95′
69°03.30′
69°03.85′
69°03.40′
69°03.30′
69°03.10′
69°03.05′
69°03.05′
69°03.55′
69°03.95′
69°04.40′
69°06.25′
69°10.05′
69°11.15′
69°16.05′
69°20.10′
69°25.65′
69°26.90′
69°30.95′
69°33.40′
69°34.90′
69°36.00′
69°36.45′
69°36.30′
69°36.95′
69°38.10′
69°38.25′
69°46.50′
69°50.00′
69°51.40′
69°53.10′
69°53.90′
69°54.90′
69°55.35′
69°56.25′
69°57.10′
69°58.60′
70°00.65′
70°02.95′
70°11.30′
70°11.50′
70°11.10′
70°11.20′
70°12.00′
70°12.30′
70°13.05′
70°14.00′
70°16.10′
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
Note
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
(*)
(*)
asterisk are shared with an adjacent
Restricted Gear Area):
Latitude
AA ................................................................................................................................................
AB ................................................................................................................................................
AC ...............................................................................................................................................
AD ...............................................................................................................................................
AE ................................................................................................................................................
AF ................................................................................................................................................
AG ...............................................................................................................................................
AH ...............................................................................................................................................
AI .................................................................................................................................................
AJ ................................................................................................................................................
AK ................................................................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
40°02.60′
40°02.75′
40°04.20′
40°06.15′
40°07.25′
40°08.50′
40°09.20′
40°09.75′
40°09.55′
40°08.40′
40°07.20′
40°06.00′
40°05.40′
40°04.80′
40°03.55′
40°01.90′
40°01.00′
39°59.90′
40°00.60′
39°59.25′
39°57.45′
39°56.10′
39°54.60′
39°54.65′
39°54.80′
39°54.35′
39°55.00′
39°56.55′
39°57.95′
39°58.75′
39°58.80′
39°57.95′
39°54.50′
39°53.60′
39°54.70′
39°55.25′
39°55.20′
39°54.85′
39°55.70′
39°56.15′
39°56.05′
39°55.30′
39°54.80′
39°56.05′
39°55.30′
39°56.90′
39°58.90′
39°59.60′
40°01.35′
40°02.60′
40°00.40′
39°59.75′
39°59.30′
40°02.75′
Longitude
15271
40°02.75′
40°02.45′
40°05.20′
40°03.75′
40°00.70′
39°59.20′
39°58.25′
39°56.90′
39°57.40′
39°57.55′
39°56.70′
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
09APR2
Longitude
70°16.10′
70°14.10′
70°10.90′
70°10.15′
70°08.70′
70°04.90′
70°03.00′
69°57.45′
69°55.90′
69°54.05′
69°53.60′
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
Note
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
15272
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
Point
Latitude
AL ................................................................................................................................................
AM ...............................................................................................................................................
AN ...............................................................................................................................................
AO ...............................................................................................................................................
AP ................................................................................................................................................
AQ ...............................................................................................................................................
AR ...............................................................................................................................................
AS ................................................................................................................................................
AT ................................................................................................................................................
AU ...............................................................................................................................................
AV ................................................................................................................................................
AW ...............................................................................................................................................
AX ................................................................................................................................................
AY ................................................................................................................................................
AZ ................................................................................................................................................
BA ................................................................................................................................................
BB ................................................................................................................................................
BC ...............................................................................................................................................
BD ...............................................................................................................................................
BE ................................................................................................................................................
BF ................................................................................................................................................
BG ...............................................................................................................................................
BH ...............................................................................................................................................
BI .................................................................................................................................................
BJ ................................................................................................................................................
BK ................................................................................................................................................
BL ................................................................................................................................................
BM ...............................................................................................................................................
BN ...............................................................................................................................................
BO ...............................................................................................................................................
BP ................................................................................................................................................
BQ ...............................................................................................................................................
BR ...............................................................................................................................................
BS ................................................................................................................................................
BT ................................................................................................................................................
BU ...............................................................................................................................................
BV ................................................................................................................................................
BW ...............................................................................................................................................
BX ................................................................................................................................................
BY ................................................................................................................................................
BZ ................................................................................................................................................
CA ...............................................................................................................................................
CB ...............................................................................................................................................
CC ...............................................................................................................................................
CD ...............................................................................................................................................
CE ...............................................................................................................................................
CF ................................................................................................................................................
CG ...............................................................................................................................................
CH ...............................................................................................................................................
CI .................................................................................................................................................
CJ ................................................................................................................................................
CK ...............................................................................................................................................
CL ................................................................................................................................................
CM ...............................................................................................................................................
CN ...............................................................................................................................................
CO ...............................................................................................................................................
CP ...............................................................................................................................................
CQ ...............................................................................................................................................
CR ...............................................................................................................................................
CS ...............................................................................................................................................
CT ................................................................................................................................................
CU ...............................................................................................................................................
CV ...............................................................................................................................................
CW ..............................................................................................................................................
CX ...............................................................................................................................................
CY ...............................................................................................................................................
CZ ................................................................................................................................................
DA ...............................................................................................................................................
DB ...............................................................................................................................................
DC ...............................................................................................................................................
DD ...............................................................................................................................................
DE ...............................................................................................................................................
DF ................................................................................................................................................
DG ...............................................................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
39°55.75′
39°56.20′
39°58.80′
39°59.15′
40°00.90′
40°00.65′
39°57.85′
39°56.80′
39°56.50′
39°56.75′
39°57.80′
40°00.05′
40°02.65′
40°02.00′
40°02.65′
40°04.10′
40°05.65′
40°08.45′
40°09.75′
40°10.25′
40°11.60′
40°11.00′
40°08.90′
40°05.30′
40°05.20′
40°04.35′
40°03.65′
40°03.60′
40°05.70′
40°08.10′
40°08.70′
40°06.90′
40°07.20′
40°07.90′
40°06.40′
40°05.25′
40°05.40′
40°06.00′
40°07.40′
40°05.55′
40°03.90′
40°02.25′
40°02.60′
40°02.75′
40°04.20′
40°06.15′
40°07.25′
40°08.50′
40°09.20′
40°09.75′
40°09.55′
40°08.40′
40°07.20′
40°06.00′
40°05.40′
40°04.80′
40°03.55′
40°01.90′
40°01.00′
39°59.90′
40°00.60′
39°59.25′
39°57.45′
39°56.10′
39°54.60′
39°54.65′
39°54.80′
39°54.35′
39°55.00′
39°56.55′
39°57.95′
39°58.75′
39°58.80′
39°57.95′
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
09APR2
Longitude
69°41.40′
69°40.20′
69°38.45′
69°37.30′
69°37.30′
69°36.50′
69°35.15′
69°34.10′
69°26.35′
69°24.40′
69°20.35′
69°14.60′
69°11.15′
69°08.35′
69°05.60′
69°03.90′
69°03.55′
69°03.60′
69°04.15′
69°04.40′
69°05.40′
69°03.80′
69°01.75′
69°01.10′
69°00.50′
69°00.50′
69°00.00′
68°57.20′
68°52.40′
68°51.00′
68°49.60′
68°46.50′
68°38.40′
68°36.00′
68°35.80′
68°39.30′
68°44.50′
68°46.50′
68°49.60′
68°49.80′
68°51.70′
68°55.40′
69°00.00′
69°00.75′
69°01.75′
69°01.95′
69°02.00′
69°02.25′
69°02.95′
69°03.30′
69°03.85′
69°03.40′
69°03.30′
69°03.10′
69°03.05′
69°03.05′
69°03.55′
69°03.95′
69°04.40′
69°06.25′
69°10.05′
69°11.15′
69°16.05′
69°20.10′
69°25.65′
69°26.90′
69°30.95′
69°33.40′
69°34.90′
69°36.00′
69°36.45′
69°36.30′
69°36.95′
69°38.10′
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
Note
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Point
Latitude
DH ...............................................................................................................................................
DI .................................................................................................................................................
DJ ................................................................................................................................................
DK ...............................................................................................................................................
DL ................................................................................................................................................
DM ...............................................................................................................................................
DN ...............................................................................................................................................
DO ...............................................................................................................................................
DP ...............................................................................................................................................
DQ ...............................................................................................................................................
DR ...............................................................................................................................................
DS ...............................................................................................................................................
DT ................................................................................................................................................
DU ...............................................................................................................................................
DV ...............................................................................................................................................
DW ..............................................................................................................................................
DX ...............................................................................................................................................
DY ...............................................................................................................................................
DZ ................................................................................................................................................
EA ................................................................................................................................................
EB ................................................................................................................................................
AA ................................................................................................................................................
(5) Restricted Gear Area III. Restricted
Gear Area III is defined by the following
points connected in the order listed by
straight lines (points followed by an
Point
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
points connected in the order listed by
straight lines (points followed by an
Point
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
69°38.25′
69°46.50′
69°50.00′
69°51.40′
69°53.10′
69°53.90′
69°54.90′
69°55.35′
69°56.25′
69°57.10′
69°58.60′
70°00.65′
70°02.95′
70°11.30′
70°11.50′
70°11.10′
70°11.20′
70°12.00′
70°12.30′
70°13.05′
70°14.00′
70°16.10′
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
Frm 00035
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Note
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
(*)
(*)
asterisk are shared with an adjacent
Restricted Gear Area):
40°02.75′
40°00.70′
39°59.80′
39°59.75′
40°03.85′
40°00.55′
39°59.15′
39°58.90′
40°00.10′
40°00.50′
40°02.00′
39°59.30′
40°00.70′
39°57.50′
39°53.10′
39°52.60′
39°53.10′
39°46.95′
39°41.15′
39°35.45′
39°32.65′
39°29.75′
39°33.65′
39°47.20′
39°53.75′
39°55.85′
39°55.60′
39°57.90′
40°10.70′
40°12.75′
40°11.05′
40°06.50′
40°05.60′
40°02.75′
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Longitude
70°16.10′
70°18.60′
70°21.75′
70°25.50′
70°28.75′
70°32.10′
70°34.45′
70°38.65′
70°45.10′
70°57.60′
71°01.30′
71°18.40′
71°19.80′
71°20.60′
71°36.10′
71°40.35′
71°42.70′
71°49.00′
71°57.10′
72°02.00′
72°06.10′
72°09.80′
72°15.00′
72°01.60′
71°52.25′
71°45.00′
71°41.20′
71°28.70′
71°10.25′
70°55.05′
70°45.80′
70°40.05′
70°17.70′
70°16.10′
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
Note
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
(*)
asterisk are shared with an adjacent
Restricted Gear Area):
Latitude
AA ................................................................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Latitude
AA ................................................................................................................................................
GL ................................................................................................................................................
GK ...............................................................................................................................................
GJ ................................................................................................................................................
GI .................................................................................................................................................
GH ...............................................................................................................................................
GG ...............................................................................................................................................
GF ...............................................................................................................................................
GE ...............................................................................................................................................
GD ...............................................................................................................................................
GC ...............................................................................................................................................
GB ...............................................................................................................................................
GA ...............................................................................................................................................
FZ ................................................................................................................................................
FY ................................................................................................................................................
FX ................................................................................................................................................
FW ...............................................................................................................................................
FV ................................................................................................................................................
FU ................................................................................................................................................
FT ................................................................................................................................................
FS ................................................................................................................................................
FR ................................................................................................................................................
GM ...............................................................................................................................................
GN ...............................................................................................................................................
GO ...............................................................................................................................................
GP ...............................................................................................................................................
GQ ...............................................................................................................................................
GR ...............................................................................................................................................
GS ...............................................................................................................................................
GT ...............................................................................................................................................
GU ...............................................................................................................................................
GV ...............................................................................................................................................
GW ..............................................................................................................................................
AA ................................................................................................................................................
(6) Restricted Gear Area IV. Restricted
Gear Area IV is defined by the following
39°54.50′
39°53.60′
39°54.70′
39°55.25′
39°55.20′
39°54.85′
39°55.70′
39°56.15′
39°56.05′
39°55.30′
39°54.80′
39°56.05′
39°55.30′
39°56.90′
39°58.90′
39°59.60′
40°01.35′
40°02.60′
40°00.40′
39°59.75′
39°59.30′
40°02.75′
Longitude
15273
Longitude
40°02.75′ N
70°16.10′ W
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
Note
(*)
15274
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Point
Latitude
GX ...............................................................................................................................................
GY ...............................................................................................................................................
GZ ...............................................................................................................................................
HA ...............................................................................................................................................
HB ...............................................................................................................................................
HC ...............................................................................................................................................
HD ...............................................................................................................................................
HE ...............................................................................................................................................
HF ................................................................................................................................................
HG ...............................................................................................................................................
HH ...............................................................................................................................................
HI .................................................................................................................................................
HJ ................................................................................................................................................
HK ...............................................................................................................................................
BS ................................................................................................................................................
BR ...............................................................................................................................................
BQ ...............................................................................................................................................
BP ................................................................................................................................................
BO ...............................................................................................................................................
BN ...............................................................................................................................................
BM ...............................................................................................................................................
BL ................................................................................................................................................
BK ................................................................................................................................................
BJ ................................................................................................................................................
BI .................................................................................................................................................
BH ...............................................................................................................................................
BG ...............................................................................................................................................
BF ................................................................................................................................................
BE ................................................................................................................................................
BD ...............................................................................................................................................
BC ...............................................................................................................................................
BB ................................................................................................................................................
BA ................................................................................................................................................
AZ ................................................................................................................................................
AY ................................................................................................................................................
AX ................................................................................................................................................
AW ...............................................................................................................................................
AV ................................................................................................................................................
AU ...............................................................................................................................................
AT ................................................................................................................................................
AS ................................................................................................................................................
AR ...............................................................................................................................................
AQ ...............................................................................................................................................
AP ................................................................................................................................................
AO ...............................................................................................................................................
AN ...............................................................................................................................................
AM ...............................................................................................................................................
AL ................................................................................................................................................
AK ................................................................................................................................................
AJ ................................................................................................................................................
AI .................................................................................................................................................
AH ...............................................................................................................................................
AG ...............................................................................................................................................
AF ................................................................................................................................................
AE ................................................................................................................................................
AD ...............................................................................................................................................
AC ...............................................................................................................................................
AB ................................................................................................................................................
AA ................................................................................................................................................
12. Amend § 648.87 by revising
paragraphs (c)(2)(i) introductory text
and (c)(2)(ii)(B) to read as follows:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
■
§ 648.87
Sector allocation.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Regulations that may not be
exempted for sector participants. The
Regional Administrator may not exempt
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
participants in a sector from the
following Federal fishing regulations:
Specific times and areas within the NE
multispecies year-round closure areas;
permitting restrictions (e.g., vessel
upgrades, etc.); gear restrictions
designed to minimize habitat impacts
(e.g., roller gear restrictions, etc.);
reporting requirements; and AMs
specified in § 648.90(a)(5)(i)(D). For the
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
40°07.80′
40°07.60′
40°02.10′
40°01.30′
40°00.50′
40°01.70′
40°01.70′
40°00.40′
39°57.30′
40°05.50′
40°14.30′
40°14.00′
40°11.60′
40°13.60′
40°07.90′
40°07.20′
40°06.90′
40°08.70′
40°08.10′
40°05.70′
40°03.60′
40°03.65′
40°04.35′
40°05.20′
40°05.30′
40°08.90′
40°11.00′
40°11.60′
40°10.25′
40°09.75′
40°08.45′
40°05.65′
40°04.10′
40°02.65′
40°02.00′
40°02.65′
40°00.05′
39°57.80′
39°56.75′
39°56.50′
39°56.80′
39°57.85′
40°00.65′
40°00.90′
39°59.15′
39°58.80′
39°56.20′
39°55.75′
39°56.70′
39°57.55′
39°57.40′
39°56.90′
39°58.25′
39°59.20′
40°00.70′
40°03.75′
40°05.20′
40°02.45′
40°02.75′
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Longitude
70°09.20′
70°04.50′
69°45.00′
69°45.00′
69°38.80′
69°37.40′
69°35.40′
69°35.20′
69°25.10′
69°09.00′
69°05.80′
69°04.70′
68°53.00′
68°40.60′
68°36.00′
68°38.40′
68°46.50′
68°49.60′
68°51.00′
68°52.40′
68°57.20′
69°00.00′
69°00.50′
69°00.50′
69°01.10′
69°01.75′
69°03.80′
69°05.40′
69°04.40′
69°04.15′
69°03.60′
69°03.55′
69°03.90′
69°05.60′
69°08.35′
69°11.15′
69°14.60′
69°20.35′
69°24.40′
69°26.35′
69°34.10′
69°35.15′
69°36.50′
69°37.30′
69°37.30′
69°38.45′
69°40.20′
69°41.40′
69°53.60′
69°54.05′
69°55.90′
69°57.45′
70°03.00′
70°04.90′
70°08.70′
70°10.15′
70°10.90′
70°14.10′
70°16.10′
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
Note
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
purposes of this paragraph (c)(2)(i), the
DAS reporting requirements specified in
§ 648.82, the SAP-specific reporting
requirements specified in § 648.85, VMS
requirements for Handgear A category
permitted vessels as specified in
§ 648.10, and the reporting requirements
associated with a dockside monitoring
program are not considered reporting
requirements, and the Regional
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
15275
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Administrator may exempt sector
participants from these requirements as
part of the approval of yearly operations
plans. For the purpose of this paragraph
(c)(2)(i), the Regional Administrator may
not grant sector participants exemptions
from the NE multispecies year-round
closures areas defined as Habitat
Management Areas as defined in
§ 648.370; Closed Area I North and
Closed Area II, as defined in
§ 648.81(c)(3) and (4), respectively,
during the period February 16 through
April 30; and the Western GOM Closure
Area, as defined at § 648.81(a)(4), where
it overlaps with GOM Cod Protection
Closures I through III, as defined in
§ 648.81(d)(4). This list may be modified
through a framework adjustment, as
specified in § 648.90.
*
*
*
*
*
(ii) * * *
(B) The GOM Cod Protection Closures
IV and V specified in § 648.81(d)(4)(iv)
and (v).
*
*
*
*
*
13. In § 648.89, revise paragraph (e)(1)
and remove and reserve paragraph (e)(2)
to read as follows:
■
§ 648.89 Recreational and charter/party
vessel restrictions.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Charter/party vessel restrictions on
fishing in GOM closed areas—(1) GOM
closed areas. (i) A vessel fishing under
charter/party regulations may not fish in
the GOM closed areas specified in
§ 648.81(a)(3) and (4) and (d)(4) during
the time periods specified in those
paragraphs, unless the vessel has on
board a valid letter of authorization
issued by the Regional Administrator
pursuant to § 648.81(d)(5)(v) and
paragraph (e)(3) of this section. The
conditions and restrictions of the letter
of authorization must be complied with
for a minimum of 3 months if the vessel
fishes or intends to fish in the GOM cod
protection closures; or for the rest of the
fishing year, beginning with the start of
the participation period of the letter of
authorization, if the vessel fishes or
intends to fish in the year-round GOM
closure areas.
(ii) A vessel fishing under charter/
party regulations may not fish in the
GOM Cod Spawning Protection Area
specified at § 648.81(b)(3) during the
time period specified in that paragraph,
unless the vessel complies with the
requirements specified at
§ 648.81(b)(2)(iii).
*
*
*
*
*
14. In § 648.202, revise paragraph
(b)(1) to read as follows:
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
§ 648.202
Season and area restrictions.
*
*
*
*
(b) Fishing in Northeast Multispecies
Closed Areas. (1) No vessel issued an
Atlantic herring permit and fishing with
midwater trawl gear, may fish for,
possess or land fish in or from the
Closed Areas, including Cashes Ledge
Closure Area, Western GOM Closure
Area, Closed Area I North (February 1–
April 15), and Closed Area II, as defined
in § 648.81(a)(3), (4), and (5) and (c)(3)
and (4), respectively, unless it has
declared first its intent to fish in the
Closed Areas as required by
§ 648.11(m)(1), and is carrying onboard
a NMFS-certified observer.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 15. Revise § 648.203(a) to read as
follows:
EASTERN MAINE HMA—Continued
*
§ 648.203
Gear restrictions.
(a) Midwater trawl gear may only be
used by a vessel issued a valid herring
permit in the GOM/GB Exemption Area
as defined in § 648.80(a)(17), provided it
complies with the midwater trawl gear
exemption requirements specified under
the NE multispecies regulations at
§ 648.80(d), including issuance of a
Letter of Authorization.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 16. Add subpart Q to part 648 to read
as follows:
Subpart Q—Habitat-Related Management
Measures
Sec.
648.370 Habitat Management Areas.
648.371 Dedicated Habitat Research Areas.
648.372 Frank R. Lautenberg Deep-Sea
Coral Protection Area.
Subpart Q—Habitat-Related
Management Measures
§ 648.370
Unless otherwise specified, no fishing
vessel or person on a fishing vessel may
fish with bottom-tending mobile gear in
the areas defined in this section. Copies
of charts depicting these areas are
available from the Regional
Administrator upon request.
(a) Eastern Maine Habitat
Management Area. The Eastern Maine
HMA is bounded on the northwest by
the outer limit of Maine state waters,
and bounded on all other sides by
straight lines connecting the following
points in the order stated:
EASTERN MAINE HMA
EMH1 1 .....
EMH2 .......
EMH3 .......
PO 00000
Frm 00037
N latitude
44°07.65′ N
44°02.50′ N
43°51.00′ N
Fmt 4701
W longitude
68°10.64′ W
68°06.10′ W
68°33.90′ W
Sfmt 4700
N latitude
EMH4 1 .....
43°56.62′ N
W longitude
68°38.12′ W
1 Points
1 and 4 are intended to fall along
the outer limit of Maine state waters.
(b) Jeffreys Bank Habitat Management
Area. The Jeffreys Bank HMA is defined
by straight lines connecting the
following points in the order stated:
JEFFREYS BANK HMA
Point
JBH1
JBH2
JBH3
JBH4
JBH1
N latitude
........
........
........
........
........
43°31′
43°20′
43°20′
43°31′
43°31′
N
N
N
N
N
W longitude
68°37′
68°37′
68°55′
68°55′
68°37′
W
W
W
W
W
(c) Cashes Ledge Habitat Management
Area. The Cashes Ledge HMA is defined
by straight lines connecting the
following points in the order stated:
CASHES LEDGE HMA
Point
CLH1
CLH2
CLH3
CLH4
CLH1
N latitude
........
........
........
........
........
43°01.0′
43°01.0′
42°45.0′
42°45.0′
43°01.0′
N
N
N
N
N
W longitude
69°00.0′
68°52.0′
68°52.0′
69°00.0′
69°00.0′
W
W
W
W
W
(d) Fippennies Ledge Habitat
Management Area. The Fippennies
Ledge HMA is defined by straight lines
connecting the following points in the
order stated:
FIPPENNIES LEDGE HMA
Point
Habitat Management Areas.
Point
Point
FLH1
FLH2
FLH3
FLH4
FLH1
N latitude
........
........
........
........
........
42°50.0′
42°44.0′
42°44.0′
42°50.0′
42°50.0′
N
N
N
N
N
W longitude
69°17.0′
69°14.0′
69°18.0′
69°21.0′
69°17.0′
W
W
W
W
W
(e) Ammen Rock Habitat Management
Area. (1) The Ammen Rock HMA is
defined by straight lines connecting the
following points in the order stated:
AMMEN ROCK HMA
Point
ARH1
ARH2
ARH3
ARH4
ARH1
........
........
........
........
........
N latitude
42°55.5′
42°52.5′
42°52.5′
42°55.5′
42°55.5′
N
N
N
N
N
W longitude
68°57.0′
68°55.0′
68°57.0′
68°59.0′
68°57.0′
W
W
W
W
W
(2) No fishing vessel, including
private and for-hire recreational fishing
vessels, may fish in the Ammen Rock
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
15276
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
HMA, except for vessels fishing
exclusively with lobster traps, as
defined in § 697.2.
(f) Western Gulf of Maine Habitat
Management Area. (1) Coordinates. The
Western GOM HMA is defined by the
straight lines connecting the following
points in the order stated:
(2) Western Gulf of Maine Shrimp
Exemption Area. Vessels fishing with
shrimp trawls under the Small Mesh
Northern Shrimp Fishery Exemption
specified at § 648.80(a)(5) may fish
within the Western Gulf of Maine HMA
Shrimp Exemption Area which is
defined by the straight lines connecting
the following points in the order stated:
WESTERN GULF OF MAINE HMA
Point
N latitude
WGMH1
WGMH2
WGMH3
WGMH4
WGMH1
...
...
...
...
...
43°15′
42°15′
42°15′
43°15′
43°15′
N
N
N
N
N
Point
SEA4
SEA5
SEA6
SEA7
SEA8
SEA1
WESTERN GULF OF MAINE SHRIMP
EXEMPTION AREA
W longitude
70°15′
70°15′
70°00′
70°15′
70°15′
WESTERN GULF OF MAINE SHRIMP
EXEMPTION AREA—Continued
W
W
W
W
W
Point
N latitude
SEA1 ........
SEA2 ........
SEA3 ........
43°15′ N
43°13′ N
43°13′ N
N latitude
........
........
........
........
........
........
43°09′
43°09′
42°55′
42°55′
43°15′
43°15′
N
N
N
N
N
N
W longitude
70°05′
70°08′
70°08′
70°15′
70°15′
70° W
W
W
W
W
W
(g) Closed Area II Habitat Closure
Area. The Closed Area II Habitat
Closure Area is defined by the straight
lines, except where otherwise noted,
connecting the following points in the
order stated:
W longitude
70° W
70° W
70°05′ W
CLOSED AREA II HABITAT CLOSURE AREA
Point
CIIH1
CIIH2
CIIH3
CIIH4
CIIH5
CIIH6
CIIH1
N latitude
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................
42°10′
42°10′
42°00′
42°00′
41°50′
41°50′
42°10′
W longitude
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
67°20′ W
67°9.38′ W
67°0.63′ W
67°10′ W
67°10′ W
67°20′ W
67°20′ W
Notes
........................
(1 2)
(2 3)
........................
........................
........................
........................
1 Point
CIIH2 represents the intersection of 42°10′ N lat. and the U.S.-Canada Maritime Boundary.
Point CIIH2 to Point CIIH3 along the U.S.-Canada Maritime Boundary.
3 Point CIIH3 represents the intersection of 42°00′ N lat. and the U.S.-Canada maritime Boundary.
2 From
(h) Great South Channel Habitat
Management Area. (1) Coordinates. The
Great South Channel HMA is defined by
the straight lines connecting the
following points in the order stated:
GREAT SOUTH CHANNEL HMA
Point
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
GSCH1
GSCH2
GSCH3
GSCH4
GSCH5
GSCH1
N latitude
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
41°30.3′
41°0.00′
40°51.7′
40°51.6′
41°30.2′
41°30.3′
N
N
N
N
N
N
W longitude
69°31.0′
69°18.5′
69°18.5′
69°48.9′
69°49.3′
69°31.0′
W
W
W
W
W
W
(2) Hydraulic Clam Dredge
Exemption. (i) Except for the portion of
the Great South Channel HMA defined
in paragraph (h)(2)(iii) of this section,
surfclam and ocean quahog permitted
vessels may fish with hydraulic clam
dredges in the Great South Channel
HMA.
(ii) The Hydraulic clam dredge
exemption is effective until April 9,
2019, after which, no vessels fishing
with hydraulic clam dredges may fish
within the Great South Channel HMA.
(iii) The hydraulic clam dredge
exemption does not apply in the area
defined as the straight lines connecting
the following points in the order stated:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
Point
N latitude
GSC1 .......
MBTG2 .....
MBTG3 .....
MBTG4 .....
GSC1 .......
41°30.3′
41°21.0′
41°21.0′
41°30.0′
41°30.3′
N
N
N
N
N
W longitude
69°31.0′
69°27.2′
69°43.0′
69°43.0′
69°31.0′
W
W
W
W
W
(i) Transiting. Unless otherwise
restricted, a vessel may transit the
habitat management areas described in
this section provided that its gear is
stowed and not available for immediate
use as defined in § 648.2.
(j) Other habitat protection measures.
The Inshore Gulf of Maine/Georges
Bank Restricted Roller Gear Area
described in § 648.80(a)(3)(vii) is
considered a habitat protection measure
and the restrictions outlined in that
section apply to all bottom trawl gear.
(k) Review of habitat management
measures. The New England Fishery
Management Council will develop a
strategic process to evaluate the
boundaries, scope, characteristics, and
timing of habitat and spawning
protection areas to facilitate review of
these areas at 10-year intervals.
§ 648.371
Areas.
STELLWAGEN DHRA
Point
SDHRA1
SDHRA2
SDHRA3
SDHRA4
SDHRA5
SDHRA1
Frm 00038
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
N latitude
...
...
...
...
...
...
42°15.0′
42°15.0′
42°45.2′
42°46.0′
42°46.0′
42°15.0′
N
N
N
N
N
N
W longitude
70°00.0′
70°15.0′
70°15.0′
70°13.0′
70°00.0′
70°00.0′
W
W
W
W
W
W
(2) Vessels fishing with bottomtending mobile gear, sink gillnet gear, or
demersal longline gear are prohibited
from fishing in the Stellwagen DHRA,
unless otherwise exempted.
(c) Georges Bank Dedicated Habitat
Research Area. (1) The Georges Bank
DHRA is defined by straight lines
connecting the following points in the
order stated:
GEORGES BANK DHRA
Dedicated Habitat Research
(a) Dedicated Habitat Research Area
(DHRA) topics. The areas defined in this
section are intended to facilitate
coordinated research on gear impacts,
PO 00000
habitat recovery, natural disturbance,
and productivity.
(b) Stellwagen Dedicated Habitat
Research Area. (1) The Stellwagen
DHRA is defined by the straight lines
connecting the following points in the
order stated:
Point
GBDHRA1
GBDHRA2
GBDHRA3
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
Latitude
Longitude
40°54.95′ N
40°58′ N
40°45′ N
68°53.37′ W
68°30′ W
68°30′ W
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
GEORGES BANK DHRA—Continued
Point
GBDHRA4
Latitude
40°45′ N
Longitude
68°45′ W
(2) Vessels fishing with bottomtending mobile gear are prohibited from
fishing in the Georges Bank DHRA,
unless otherwise exempted.
(d) Transiting. Unless otherwise
restricted or specified in this paragraph
(d), a vessel may transit the Dedicated
Habitat Research Areas of this section
provided that its gear is stowed and not
available for immediate use as defined
in § 648.2.
(e) Dedicated Habitat Research Areas
review. (1) The Regional Administrator
shall initiate a review of the DHRAs
defined in this section three years after
implementation.
(2) After initiation of the review and
consultation with the New England
Fishery Management Council, the
Regional Administrator may remove a
DHRA. The following criteria will be
used to determine if DHRA should be
maintained:
(i) Documentation of active and
ongoing research in the DHRA area, in
the form of data records, cruise reports
or inventory samples with analytical
objectives focused on the DHRA topics,
described in paragraph (a) of this
section; and
(ii) Documentation of pending or
approved proposals or funding requests
(including ship time requests), with
objectives specific to the DHRA topics,
described in paragraph (a) of this
section.
(3) The Regional Administrator will
make any such determination in
accordance with the APA through
notification in the Federal Register.
§ 648.372 Frank R. Lautenberg Deep-Sea
Coral Protection Area.
(a) Restrictions. No vessel may fish
with bottom-tending gear within the
Frank R. Lautenberg Deep-Sea Coral
Protection Area described in this
section, unless transiting pursuant to
paragraph (d) of this section, fishing
15277
lobster trap gear in accordance with
§ 697.21 of this chapter, or fishing red
crab trap gear in accordance with
§ 648.264. Bottom-tending gear includes
but is not limited to bottom-tending
otter trawls, bottom-tending beam
trawls, hydraulic dredges, nonhydraulic dredges, bottom-tending
seines, bottom longlines, pots and traps,
and sink or anchored gillnets. The Frank
R. Lautenberg Deep-Sea Coral Protection
Area consists of the Broad and Discrete
Deep-Sea Coral Zones defined in
paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
(b) Broad Deep-Sea Coral Zone. The
Broad Deep-Sea Coral Zone is bounded
on the east by the outer limit of the U.S.
Exclusive Economic Zone, and bounded
on all other sides by straight lines
connecting the following points in the
order stated (copies of a chart depicting
this area are available from the Regional
Administrator upon request). An
asterisk (*) in the Discrete Zone column
means the point is shared with a
Discrete Deep-Sea Coral Zone, as
defined in paragraph (c) of this section.
BROAD ZONE
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
Point
Latitude
1 ..................................................................................................................................................
2 ..................................................................................................................................................
3 ..................................................................................................................................................
4 ..................................................................................................................................................
5 ..................................................................................................................................................
6 ..................................................................................................................................................
7 ..................................................................................................................................................
8 ..................................................................................................................................................
9 ..................................................................................................................................................
10 ................................................................................................................................................
11 ................................................................................................................................................
12 ................................................................................................................................................
13 ................................................................................................................................................
14 ................................................................................................................................................
15 ................................................................................................................................................
16 ................................................................................................................................................
17 ................................................................................................................................................
18 ................................................................................................................................................
19 ................................................................................................................................................
20 ................................................................................................................................................
21 ................................................................................................................................................
22 ................................................................................................................................................
23 ................................................................................................................................................
24 ................................................................................................................................................
25 ................................................................................................................................................
26 ................................................................................................................................................
27 ................................................................................................................................................
28 ................................................................................................................................................
29 ................................................................................................................................................
30 ................................................................................................................................................
31 ................................................................................................................................................
32 ................................................................................................................................................
33 ................................................................................................................................................
34 ................................................................................................................................................
35 ................................................................................................................................................
36 ................................................................................................................................................
37 ................................................................................................................................................
38 ................................................................................................................................................
39 ................................................................................................................................................
40 ................................................................................................................................................
41 ................................................................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Longitude
Discrete zone
36°33.02′ N
36°33.02′ N
36°33.02′ N
36°33.02′ N
36°33.02′ N
36°34.44′ N
36°35.53′ N
36°37.69′ N
36°42.09′ N
36°45.18′ N
36°45.69′ N
36°49.17′ N
36°49.56′ N
36°51.21′ N
36°51.78′ N
36°58.51′ N
36°58.62′ N
37°4.43′ N
37°5.83′ N
37°6.97′ N
37°4.52′ N
37°4.02′ N
37°4.52′ N
37°4.4′ N
37°7.38′ N
37°8.32′ N
37°8.51′ N
37°9.44′ N
37°16.83′ N
37°17.81′ N
37°18.72′ N
37°22.74′ N
37°22.87′ N
37°24.44′ N
37°24.67′ N
37°25.93′ N
37°27.25′ N
37°28.6′ N
37°29.43′ N
37°29.53′ N
37°27.68′ N
71°29.33′ W
72°00′ W
73°00′ W
74°00′ W
74°42.14′ W
74°42.23′ W
74°41.59′ W
74°41.51′ W
74°39.07′ W
74°38′ W
74°38.55′ W
74°38.31′ W
74°37.77′ W
74°37.81′ W
74°37.43′ W
74°36.51′ W
74°36.97′ W
74°41.03′ W
74°45.57′ W
74°40.8′ W
74°37.77′ W
74°33.83′ W
74°33.51′ W
74°33.11′ W
74°31.95′ W
74°32.4′ W
74°31.38′ W
74°31.5′ W
74°28.58′ W
74°27.67′ W
74°28.22′ W
74°26.24′ W
74°26.16′ W
74°28.57′ W
74°29.71′ W
74°30.13′ W
74°30.2′ W
74°30.6′ W
74°30.29′ W
74°29.95′ W
74°28.82′ W
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
15278
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
BROAD ZONE—Continued
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
Point
Latitude
42 ................................................................................................................................................
43 ................................................................................................................................................
44 ................................................................................................................................................
45 ................................................................................................................................................
46 ................................................................................................................................................
47 ................................................................................................................................................
48 ................................................................................................................................................
49 ................................................................................................................................................
50 ................................................................................................................................................
51 ................................................................................................................................................
52 ................................................................................................................................................
53 ................................................................................................................................................
54 ................................................................................................................................................
55 ................................................................................................................................................
56 ................................................................................................................................................
57 ................................................................................................................................................
58 ................................................................................................................................................
59 ................................................................................................................................................
60 ................................................................................................................................................
61 ................................................................................................................................................
62 ................................................................................................................................................
63 ................................................................................................................................................
64 ................................................................................................................................................
65 ................................................................................................................................................
66 ................................................................................................................................................
67 ................................................................................................................................................
68 ................................................................................................................................................
69 ................................................................................................................................................
70 ................................................................................................................................................
71 ................................................................................................................................................
72 ................................................................................................................................................
73 ................................................................................................................................................
74 ................................................................................................................................................
75 ................................................................................................................................................
76 ................................................................................................................................................
77 ................................................................................................................................................
78 ................................................................................................................................................
79 ................................................................................................................................................
80 ................................................................................................................................................
81 ................................................................................................................................................
82 ................................................................................................................................................
83 ................................................................................................................................................
84 ................................................................................................................................................
85 ................................................................................................................................................
86 ................................................................................................................................................
87 ................................................................................................................................................
88 ................................................................................................................................................
89 ................................................................................................................................................
90 ................................................................................................................................................
91 ................................................................................................................................................
92 ................................................................................................................................................
93 ................................................................................................................................................
94 ................................................................................................................................................
95 ................................................................................................................................................
96 ................................................................................................................................................
97 ................................................................................................................................................
98 ................................................................................................................................................
99 ................................................................................................................................................
100 ..............................................................................................................................................
101 ..............................................................................................................................................
102 ..............................................................................................................................................
103 ..............................................................................................................................................
104 ..............................................................................................................................................
105 ..............................................................................................................................................
106 ..............................................................................................................................................
107 ..............................................................................................................................................
108 ..............................................................................................................................................
109 ..............................................................................................................................................
110 ..............................................................................................................................................
111 ..............................................................................................................................................
112 ..............................................................................................................................................
113 ..............................................................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Longitude
Discrete zone
37°27.06′ N
37°26.39′ N
37°26.3′ N
37°25.69′ N
37°25.83′ N
37°25.68′ N
37°28.04′ N
37°27.72′ N
37°30.13′ N
37°33.83′ N
37°35.48′ N
37°36.99′ N
37°37.23′ N
37°42.85′ N
37°43.5′ N
37°45.22′ N
37°45.15′ N
37°45.88′ N
37°46.7′ N
37°49.62′ N
37°51.25′ N
37°51.99′ N
37°51.37′ N
37°50.63′ N
37°49.62′ N
37°50.28′ N
37°53.68′ N
37°55.07′ N
38°3.29′ N
38°6.19′ N
38°7.67′ N
38°9.04′ N
38°10.1′ N
38°11.98′ N
38°13.74′ N
38°13.15′ N
38°10.92′ N
38°10.2′ N
38°9.26′ N
38°8.38′ N
38°7.59′ N
38°6.96′ N
38°6.51′ N
38°5.69′ N
38°6.35′ N
38°7.5′ N
38°9.24′ N
38°9.41′ N
38°15.13′ N
38°15.25′ N
38°16.19′ N
38°16.89′ N
38°16.91′ N
38°17.63′ N
38°18.55′ N
38°18.38′ N
38°19.04′ N
38°25.08′ N
38°26.32′ N
38°29.72′ N
38°28.65′ N
38°25.53′ N
38°25.26′ N
38°23.75′ N
38°23.47′ N
38°22.76′ N
38°22.5′ N
38°21.59′ N
38°23.07′ N
38°25.83′ N
38°25.97′ N
38°34.14′ N
74°28.76′ W
74°27.76′ W
74°26.87′ W
74°25.63′ W
74°24.22′ W
74°24.03′ W
74°23.17′ W
74°22.34′ W
74°17.77′ W
74°17.47′ W
74°14.84′ W
74°14.01′ W
74°13.02′ W
74°9.97′ W
74°8.79′ W
74°9.2′ W
74°7.24′ W
74°7.44′ W
74°5.98′ W
74°6.03′ W
74°5.48′ W
74°4.51′ W
74°3.3′ W
74°2.69′ W
74°2.28′ W
74°0.67′ W
73°57.41′ W
73°57.27′ W
73°49.1′ W
73°51.59′ W
73°52.19′ W
73°52.39′ W
73°52.32′ W
73°52.65′ W
73°50.73′ W
73°49.77′ W
73°50.37′ W
73°49.63′ W
73°49.68′ W
73°49.51′ W
73°47.91′ W
73°47.25′ W
73°46.99′ W
73°45.56′ W
73°44.8′ W
73°45.2′ W
73°42.61′ W
73°41.63′ W
73°37.58′ W
73°36.2′ W
73°36.91′ W
73°36.66′ W
73°36.35′ W
73°35.35′ W
73°34.44′ W
73°33.4′ W
73°33.02′ W
73°34.99′ W
73°33.44′ W
73°30.65′ W
73°29.37′ W
73°30.94′ W
73°29.97′ W
73°30.16′ W
73°29.7′ W
73°29.34′ W
73°27.63′ W
73°26.87′ W
73°24.11′ W
73°22.39′ W
73°21.43′ W
73°11.14′ W
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
........................
........................
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
........................
........................
........................
(*)
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
15279
BROAD ZONE—Continued
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
Point
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
Latitude
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Longitude
Discrete zone
38°35.1′ N
38°35.94′ N
38°37.57′ N
38°37.21′ N
38°36.72′ N
38°43′ N
38°43.66′ N
38°45′ N
38°46.68′ N
38°47.54′ N
38°47.84′ N
38°49.03′ N
38°48.45′ N
38°49.15′ N
38°48.03′ N
38°49.84′ N
38°52.4′ N
38°53.87′ N
38°54.17′ N
38°54.7′ N
38°57.2′ N
38°58.64′ N
38°59.3′ N
38°59.22′ N
39°0.13′ N
39°1.69′ N
39°1.49′ N
39°3.9′ N
39°7.35′ N
39°7.16′ N
39°6.52′ N
39°11.73′ N
39°11.76′ N
39°19.08′ N
39°25.17′ N
39°28.8′ N
39°30.16′ N
39°31.38′ N
39°32.55′ N
39°34.57′ N
39°34.53′ N
39°33.17′ N
39°32.07′ N
39°32.17′ N
39°30.3′ N
39°29.49′ N
39°29.44′ N
39°27.63′ N
39°28.26′ N
39°29.88′ N
39°30.57′ N
39°31.28′ N
39°31.46′ N
39°37.15′ N
39°39.77′ N
39°41.5′ N
39°43.84′ N
39°48.01′ N
39°49.97′ N
39°55.08′ N
39°55.99′ N
39°57.04′ N
39°55.07′ N
39°50.24′ N
39°42.18′ N
39°34.11′ N
39°26.04′ N
39°17.96′ N
39°9.87′ N
39°1.77′ N
38°53.66′ N
38°45.54′ N
73°10.43′ W
73°11.25′ W
73°10.49′ W
73°9.41′ W
73°8.85′ W
73°1.24′ W
73°0.36′ W
73°0.27′ W
73°1.07′ W
73°2.24′ W
73°2.24′ W
73°1.53′ W
73°1′ W
72°58.98′ W
72°56.7′ W
72°55.54′ W
72°52.5′ W
72°53.36′ W
72°52.58′ W
72°50.26′ W
72°47.74′ W
72°48.35′ W
72°47.86′ W
72°46.69′ W
72°45.47′ W
72°45.74′ W
72°43.67′ W
72°40.83′ W
72°41.26′ W
72°37.21′ W
72°35.78′ W
72°25.4′ W
72°22.33′ W
72°9.56′ W
72°13.03′ W
72°17.39′ W
72°20.41′ W
72°23.86′ W
72°25.07′ W
72°25.18′ W
72°24.23′ W
72°24.1′ W
72°22.77′ W
72°22.08′ W
72°15.71′ W
72°14.3′ W
72°13.24′ W
72°5.87′ W
72°2.2′ W
72°3.51′ W
72°3.47′ W
72°2.63′ W
72°1.41′ W
71°55.85′ W
71°53.7′ W
71°51.89′ W
71°44.85′ W
71°45.19′ W
71°39.29′ W
71°18.62′ W
71°16.07′ W
70°50.01′ W
70°32.42′ W
70°27.78′ W
70°20.09′ W
70°12.42′ W
70°4.78′ W
69°57.18′ W
69°49.6′ W
69°42.05′ W
69°34.53′ W
69°27.03′ W
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
........................
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
........................
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
15280
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
BROAD ZONE—Continued
Point
186
187
188
189
190
191
Latitude
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
(c) Discrete Deep-Sea Coral Zones—
(1) Block Canyon. Block Canyon
discrete deep-sea coral zone is defined
by straight lines connecting the
following points in the order stated
(copies of a chart depicting this area are
available from the Regional
Administrator upon request). An
Longitude
Discrete zone
38°37.42′ N
38°29.29′ N
38°21.15′ N
38°13′ N
38°4.84′ N
38°2.21′ N
69°19.57′ W
69°12.13′ W
69°4.73′ W
68°57.35′ W
68°49.99′ W
68°47.62′ W
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
asterisk (*) in the Broad Zone column
means the point is shared with the
Broad Deep-Sea Coral Zone, as defined
in paragraph (b) of this section.
BLOCK CANYON
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
Latitude
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
(2) Ryan and McMaster Canyons.
Ryan and McMaster Canyons discrete
deep-sea coral zone is defined by
straight lines connecting the following
points in the order stated (copies of a
chart depicting this area are available
from the Regional Administrator upon
request). An asterisk (*) in the Broad
Longitude
39°55.08′ N
39°55.99′ N
39°49.51′ N
39°38.09′ N
39°37.4′ N
39°47.26′ N
39°52.6′ N
39°55.08′ N
71°18.62′ W
71°16.07′ W
71°12.12′ W
71°9.5′ W
71°11.87′ W
71°17.38′ W
71°17.51′ W
71°18.62′ W
Broad zone
(*)
(*)
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
(*)
Zone column means the point is shared
with the Broad Deep-sea Coral Zone, as
defined in paragraph (b) of this section.
RYAN AND MCMASTER CANYONS
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
Latitude
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
(3) Emery and Uchupi Canyons.
Emery and Uchupi Canyons discrete
deep-sea coral zone is defined by
straight lines connecting the following
points in the order stated (copies of a
chart depicting this area are available
from the Regional Administrator upon
request). An asterisk (*) in the Broad
39°43.84′
39°48.01′
39°49.97′
39°48.29′
39°42.96′
39°33.43′
39°31.75′
39°34.46′
39°40.12′
39°43.84′
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Longitude
71°44.85′
71°45.19′
71°39.29′
71°37.18′
71°35.01′
71°27.91′
71°30.77′
71°35.68′
71°42.36′
71°44.85′
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
Broad zone
(*)
(*)
(*)
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
(*)
Zone column means the point is shared
with the Broad Deep-sea Coral Zone, as
defined in paragraph (b) of this section.
EMERY AND UCHUPI CANYONS
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
Latitude
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
39°37.15′
39°39.77′
39°39.55′
39°30.78′
39°27.26′
39°28.99′
39°33.91′
39°37.15′
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
09APR2
Longitude
71°55.85′ W
71°53.7′ W
71°47.68′ W
71°36.24′ W
71°39.13′ W
71°45.47′ W
71°52.61′ W
71°55.85′ W
Broad zone
(*)
(*)
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
(*)
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
(4) Jones and Babylon Canyons. Jones
and Babylon Canyons discrete deep-sea
coral zone is defined by straight lines
connecting the following points in the
order stated (copies of a chart depicting
this area are available from the Regional
Administrator upon request). An
asterisk (*) in the Broad Zone column
15281
means the point is shared with the
Broad Deep-sea Coral Zone, as defined
in paragraph (b) of this section.
JONES AND BABYLON CANYONS
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
Latitude
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
(5) Hudson Canyon. Hudson Canyon
discrete deep-sea coral zone is defined
by straight lines connecting the
following points in the order stated
(copies of a chart depicting this area are
available from the Regional
Administrator upon request). An
asterisk (*) in the Broad Zone column
39°28.26′
39°29.88′
39°30.57′
39°31.28′
39°31.46′
39°30.37′
39°30.63′
39°23.81′
39°23′ N
39°28.26′
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Longitude
72°2.2′ W
72°3.51′ W
72°3.47′ W
72°2.63′ W
72°1.41′ W
71°57.72′ W
71°55.13′ W
71°48.15′ W
71°52.48′ W
72°2.2′ W
Broad zone
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
........................
........................
........................
........................
(*)
means the point is shared with the
Broad Deep-Sea Coral Zone, as defined
in paragraph (b) of this section.
HUDSON CANYON
Point
Latitude
1 ..................................................................................................................................................
2 ..................................................................................................................................................
3 ..................................................................................................................................................
4 ..................................................................................................................................................
5 ..................................................................................................................................................
6 ..................................................................................................................................................
7 ..................................................................................................................................................
8 ..................................................................................................................................................
9 ..................................................................................................................................................
10 ................................................................................................................................................
11 ................................................................................................................................................
12 ................................................................................................................................................
13 ................................................................................................................................................
14 ................................................................................................................................................
15 ................................................................................................................................................
16 ................................................................................................................................................
17 ................................................................................................................................................
18 ................................................................................................................................................
1 ..................................................................................................................................................
(6) Mey-Lindenkohl Slope. MeyLindenkohl Slope discrete deep-sea
coral zone is defined by straight lines
connecting the following points in the
order stated (copies of a chart depicting
this area are available from the Regional
Administrator upon request). An
asterisk (*) in the Broad Zone column
Longitude
39°19.08′ N
39°25.17′ N
39°28.8′ N
39°30.16′ N
39°31.38′ N
39°32.55′ N
39°34.57′ N
39°34.53′ N
39°33.17′ N
39°32.07′ N
39°32.17′ N
39°30.3′ N
39°29.49′ N
39°29.44′ N
39°27.63′ N
39°13.93′ N
39°10.39′ N
39°14.27′ N
39°19.08′ N
72°9.56′ W
72°13.03′ W
72°17.39′ W
72°20.41′ W
72°23.86′ W
72°25.07′ W
72°25.18′ W
72°24.23′ W
72°24.1′ W
72°22.77′ W
72°22.08′ W
72°15.71′ W
72°14.3′ W
72°13.24′ W
72°5.87′ W
71°48.44′ W
71°52.98′ W
72°3.09′ W
72°9.56′ W
Broad zone
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
........................
........................
........................
(*)
means the point is shared with the
Broad Deep-Sea Coral Zone, as defined
in paragraph (b) of this section.
MEY-LINDENKOHL SLOPE
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
Point
Latitude
1 ..................................................................................................................................................
2 ..................................................................................................................................................
3 ..................................................................................................................................................
4 ..................................................................................................................................................
5 ..................................................................................................................................................
6 ..................................................................................................................................................
7 ..................................................................................................................................................
8 ..................................................................................................................................................
9 ..................................................................................................................................................
10 ................................................................................................................................................
11 ................................................................................................................................................
12 ................................................................................................................................................
13 ................................................................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Longitude
38°43′ N
38°43.66′ N
38°45′ N
38°46.68′ N
38°47.54′ N
38°47.84′ N
38°49.03′ N
38°48.45′ N
38°49.15′ N
38°48.03′ N
38°49.84′ N
38°52.4′ N
38°53.87′ N
73°1.24′ W
73°0.36′ W
73°0.27′ W
73°1.07′ W
73°2.24′ W
73°2.24′ W
73°1.53′ W
73°1′ W
72°58.98′ W
72°56.7′ W
72°55.54′ W
72°52.5′ W
72°53.36′ W
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
Broad zone
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
15282
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
MEY-LINDENKOHL SLOPE—Continued
Point
Latitude
14 ................................................................................................................................................
15 ................................................................................................................................................
16 ................................................................................................................................................
17 ................................................................................................................................................
18 ................................................................................................................................................
19 ................................................................................................................................................
20 ................................................................................................................................................
21 ................................................................................................................................................
22 ................................................................................................................................................
23 ................................................................................................................................................
24 ................................................................................................................................................
25 ................................................................................................................................................
26 ................................................................................................................................................
27 ................................................................................................................................................
28 ................................................................................................................................................
29 ................................................................................................................................................
30 ................................................................................................................................................
1 ..................................................................................................................................................
(7) Spencer Canyon. Spencer Canyon
discrete deep-sea coral zone is defined
by straight lines connecting the
following points in the order stated
(copies of a chart depicting this area are
available from the Regional
Administrator upon request). An
asterisk (*) in the Broad Zone column
Longitude
38°54.17′ N
38°54.7′ N
38°57.2′ N
38°58.64′ N
38°59.3′ N
38°59.22′ N
39°0.13′ N
39°1.69′ N
39°1.49′ N
39°3.9′ N
39°7.35′ N
39°7.16′ N
39°6.52′ N
39°11.73′ N
38°58.85′ N
38°32.39′ N
38°34.88′ N
38°43′ N
72°52.58′ W
72°50.26′ W
72°47.74′ W
72°48.35′ W
72°47.86′ W
72°46.69′ W
72°45.47′ W
72°45.74′ W
72°43.67′ W
72°40.83′ W
72°41.26′ W
72°37.21′ W
72°35.78′ W
72°25.4′ W
72°11.78′ W
72°47.69′ W
72°53.78′ W
73°1.24′ W
Broad zone
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
........................
........................
........................
(*)
means the point is shared with the
Broad Deep-Sea Coral Zone, as defined
in paragraph (b) of this section.
SPENCER CANYON
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
Latitude
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
(8) Wilmington Canyon. Wilmington
Canyon discrete deep-sea coral zone is
defined by straight lines connecting the
following points in the order stated
(copies of a chart depicting this area are
available from the Regional
Administrator upon request). An
asterisk (*) in the Broad Zone column
Longitude
38°34.14′ N
38°35.1′ N
38°35.94′ N
38°37.57′ N
38°37.21′ N
38°36.72′ N
38°36.59′ N
38°28.94′ N
38°26.45′ N
38°34.14′ N
73°11.14′ W
73°10.43′ W
73°11.25′ W
73°10.49′ W
73°9.41′ W
73°8.85′ W
73°8.25′ W
72°58.96′ W
73°3.24′ W
73°11.14′ W
Broad zone
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
........................
........................
........................
(*)
means the point is shared with the
Broad Deep-sea Coral Zone, as defined
in paragraph (b) of this section.
WILMINGTON CANYON
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
Point
Latitude
1 ..................................................................................................................................................
2 ..................................................................................................................................................
3 ..................................................................................................................................................
4 ..................................................................................................................................................
5 ..................................................................................................................................................
6 ..................................................................................................................................................
7 ..................................................................................................................................................
8 ..................................................................................................................................................
9 ..................................................................................................................................................
10 ................................................................................................................................................
11 ................................................................................................................................................
12 ................................................................................................................................................
13 ................................................................................................................................................
14 ................................................................................................................................................
15 ................................................................................................................................................
16 ................................................................................................................................................
1 ..................................................................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Longitude
38°19.04′ N
38°25.08′ N
38°26.32′ N
38°29.72′ N
38°28.65′ N
38°25.53′ N
38°25.26′ N
38°23.75′ N
38°23.47′ N
38°22.76′ N
38°22.5′ N
38°21.59′ N
38°18.52′ N
38°14.41′ N
38°13.23′ N
38°15.79′ N
38°19.04′ N
73°33.02′ W
73°34.99′ W
73°33.44′ W
73°30.65′ W
73°29.37′ W
73°30.94′ W
73°29.97′ W
73°30.16′ W
73°29.7′ W
73°29.34′ W
73°27.63′ W
73°26.87′ W
73°22.95′ W
73°16.64′ W
73°17.32′ W
73°26.38′ W
73°33.02′ W
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
Broad zone
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
........................
........................
........................
........................
(*)
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
(9) North Heyes and South
Wilmington Canyons. North Heyes and
South Wilmington Canyons discrete
deep-sea coral zone is defined by
straight lines connecting the following
points in the order stated (copies of a
chart depicting this area are available
from the Regional Administrator upon
15283
request). An asterisk (*) in the Broad
Zone column means the point is shared
with the Broad Deep-Sea Coral Zone, as
defined in paragraph (b) of this section.
NORTH HEYES AND SOUTH WILMINGTON CANYONS
Point
Latitude
1 ..................................................................................................................................................
2 ..................................................................................................................................................
3 ..................................................................................................................................................
4 ..................................................................................................................................................
5 ..................................................................................................................................................
6 ..................................................................................................................................................
7 ..................................................................................................................................................
8 ..................................................................................................................................................
9 ..................................................................................................................................................
10 ................................................................................................................................................
11 ................................................................................................................................................
12 ................................................................................................................................................
13 ................................................................................................................................................
1 ..................................................................................................................................................
(10) South Vries Canyon. South Vries
Canyon discrete deep-sea coral zone is
defined by straight lines connecting the
following points in the order stated
(copies of a chart depicting this area are
available from the Regional
Administrator upon request). An
asterisk (*) in the Broad Zone column
38°15.25′
38°16.19′
38°16.89′
38°16.91′
38°17.63′
38°18.55′
38°18.38′
38°19.04′
38°15.79′
38°14.98′
38°12.32′
38°11.06′
38°11.13′
38°15.25′
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Longitude
73°36.2′ W
73°36.91′ W
73°36.66′ W
73°36.35′ W
73°35.35′ W
73°34.44′ W
73°33.4′ W
73°33.02′ W
73°26.38′ W
73°24.73′ W
73°21.22′ W
73°22.21′ W
73°28.72′ W
73°36.2′ W
Broad zone
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
(*)
means the point is shared with the
Broad Deep-Sea Coral Zone, as defined
in paragraph (b) of this section.
SOUTH VRIES CANYON
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
Latitude
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
(11) Baltimore Canyon. Baltimore
Canyon discrete deep-sea coral zone is
defined by straight lines connecting the
following points in the order stated
(copies of a chart depicting this area are
available from the Regional
Administrator upon request). An
asterisk (*) in the Broad Zone column
38°6.35′ N
38°7.5′ N
38°9.24′ N
38°3.22′ N
38°2.38′ N
38°2.54′ N
38°6.35′ N
Longitude
73°44.8′ W
73°45.2′ W
73°42.61′ W
73°29.22′ W
73°29.78′ W
73°36.73′ W
73°44.8′ W
Broad zone
(*)
(*)
(*)
........................
........................
........................
(*)
means the point is shared with the
Broad Deep-Sea Coral Zone, as defined
in paragraph (b) of this section.
BALTIMORE CANYON
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
Point
Latitude
1 ..................................................................................................................................................
2 ..................................................................................................................................................
3 ..................................................................................................................................................
4 ..................................................................................................................................................
5 ..................................................................................................................................................
6 ..................................................................................................................................................
7 ..................................................................................................................................................
8 ..................................................................................................................................................
9 ..................................................................................................................................................
10 ................................................................................................................................................
11 ................................................................................................................................................
12 ................................................................................................................................................
13 ................................................................................................................................................
14 ................................................................................................................................................
15 ................................................................................................................................................
16 ................................................................................................................................................
17 ................................................................................................................................................
18 ................................................................................................................................................
19 ................................................................................................................................................
1 ..................................................................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Longitude
38°3.29′ N
38°6.19′ N
38°7.67′ N
38°9.04′ N
38°10.1′ N
38°11.98′ N
38°13.74′ N
38°13.15′ N
38°10.92′ N
38°10.2′ N
38°9.26′ N
38°8.38′ N
38°7.59′ N
38°6.96′ N
38°6.51′ N
38°5.69′ N
38°6.35′ N
38°2.54′ N
37°59.19′ N
38°3.29′ N
73°49.1′ W
73°51.59′ W
73°52.19′ W
73°52.39′ W
73°52.32′ W
73°52.65′ W
73°50.73′ W
73°49.77′ W
73°50.37′ W
73°49.63′ W
73°49.68′ W
73°49.51′ W
73°47.91′ W
73°47.25′ W
73°46.99′ W
73°45.56′ W
73°44.8′ W
73°36.73′ W
73°40.67′ W
73°49.1′ W
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
Broad zone
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
........................
........................
(*)
15284
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
(12) Warr and Phoenix Canyon
Complex. Warr and Phoenix Canyon
Complex discrete deep-sea coral zone is
defined by straight lines connecting the
following points in the order stated
(copies of a chart depicting this area are
available from the Regional
Administrator upon request). An
asterisk (*) in the Broad Zone column
means the point is shared with the
Broad Deep-Sea Coral Zone, as defined
in paragraph (b) of this section.
WARR AND PHOENIX CANYON COMPLEX
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
Latitude
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................
(13) Accomac and Leonard Canyons.
Accomac and Leonard Canyons discrete
deep-sea coral zone is defined by
straight lines connecting the following
points in the order stated (copies of a
chart depicting this area are available
from the Regional Administrator upon
request). An asterisk (*) in the Broad
Longitude
37°53.68′ N
37°55.07′ N
38°3.29′ N
37°59.19′ N
37°52.5′ N
37°50.92′ N
37°49.84′ N
37°53.68′ N
73°57.41′ W
73°57.27′ W
73°49.1′ W
73°40.67′ W
73°35.28′ W
73°36.59′ W
73°47.11′ W
73°57.41′ W
Broad zone
(*)
(*)
(*)
........................
........................
........................
........................
(*)
Zone column means the point is shared
with the Broad Deep-Sea Coral Zone, as
defined in paragraph (b) of this section.
ACCOMAC AND LEONARD CANYONS
Point
Latitude
1 ..................................................................................................................................................
2 ..................................................................................................................................................
3 ..................................................................................................................................................
4 ..................................................................................................................................................
5 ..................................................................................................................................................
6 ..................................................................................................................................................
7 ..................................................................................................................................................
8 ..................................................................................................................................................
9 ..................................................................................................................................................
10 ................................................................................................................................................
11 ................................................................................................................................................
12 ................................................................................................................................................
13 ................................................................................................................................................
14 ................................................................................................................................................
15 ................................................................................................................................................
16 ................................................................................................................................................
17 ................................................................................................................................................
18 ................................................................................................................................................
1 ..................................................................................................................................................
(14) Washington Canyon. Washington
Canyon discrete deep-sea coral zone is
defined by straight lines connecting the
following points in the order stated
(copies of a chart depicting this area are
available from the Regional
Administrator upon request). An
asterisk (*) in the Broad Zone column
Longitude
37°45.15′ N
37°45.88′ N
37°46.7′ N
37°49.62′ N
37°51.25′ N
37°51.99′ N
37°51.37′ N
37°50.63′ N
37°49.62′ N
37°50.28′ N
37°50.2′ N
37°50.52′ N
37°50.99′ N
37°50.4′ N
37°42.76′ N
37°39.96′ N
37°40.04′ N
37°44.14′ N
37°45.15′ N
74°7.24′ W
74°7.44′ W
74°5.98′ W
74°6.03′ W
74°5.48′ W
74°4.51′ W
74°3.3′ W
74°2.69′ W
74°2.28′ W
74°0.67′ W
74°0.17′ W
73°58.59′ W
73°57.17′ W
73°52.35′ W
73°44.86′ W
73°48.32′ W
73°58.25′ W
74°6.96′ W
74°7.24′ W
Broad zone
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
(*)
means the point is shared with the
Broad Deep-Sea Coral Zone, as defined
in paragraph (b) of this section.
WASHINGTON CANYON
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
Point
Latitude
1 ..................................................................................................................................................
2 ..................................................................................................................................................
3 ..................................................................................................................................................
4 ..................................................................................................................................................
5 ..................................................................................................................................................
6 ..................................................................................................................................................
7 ..................................................................................................................................................
8 ..................................................................................................................................................
9 ..................................................................................................................................................
10 ................................................................................................................................................
11 ................................................................................................................................................
12 ................................................................................................................................................
13 ................................................................................................................................................
14 ................................................................................................................................................
15 ................................................................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Longitude
37°22.74′ N
37°22.87′ N
37°24.44′ N
37°24.67′ N
37°25.93′ N
37°27.25′ N
37°28.6′ N
37°29.43′ N
37°29.53′ N
37°27.68′ N
37°27.06′ N
37°26.39′ N
37°26.3′ N
37°25.69′ N
37°25.83′ N
74°26.24′ W
74°26.16′ W
74°28.57′ W
74°29.71′ W
74°30.13′ W
74°30.2′ W
74°30.6′ W
74°30.29′ W
74°29.95′ W
74°28.82′ W
74°28.76′ W
74°27.76′ W
74°26.87′ W
74°25.63′ W
74°24.22′ W
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
Broad zone
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
15285
WASHINGTON CANYON—Continued
Point
Latitude
16 ................................................................................................................................................
17 ................................................................................................................................................
18 ................................................................................................................................................
19 ................................................................................................................................................
20 ................................................................................................................................................
1 ..................................................................................................................................................
(15) Norfolk Canyon. Norfolk Canyon
discrete deep-sea coral zone is defined
by straight lines connecting the
following points in the order stated
37°25.68′
37°25.08′
37°16.81′
37°11.27′
37°15.73′
37°22.74′
(copies of a chart depicting this area are
available from the Regional
Administrator upon request). An
asterisk (*) in the Broad Zone column
N
N
N
N
N
N
Longitude
74°24.03′ W
74°23.29′ W
73°52.13′ W
73°54.05′ W
74°12.2′ W
74°26.24′ W
Broad zone
(*)
........................
........................
........................
........................
(*)
means the point is shared with the
Broad Deep-Sea Coral Zone, as defined
in paragraph (b) of this section.
NORFOLK CANYON
Point
Latitude
1 ..................................................................................................................................................
2 ..................................................................................................................................................
3 ..................................................................................................................................................
4 ..................................................................................................................................................
5 ..................................................................................................................................................
6 ..................................................................................................................................................
7 ..................................................................................................................................................
8 ..................................................................................................................................................
9 ..................................................................................................................................................
10 ................................................................................................................................................
11 ................................................................................................................................................
12 ................................................................................................................................................
13 ................................................................................................................................................
14 ................................................................................................................................................
15 ................................................................................................................................................
16 ................................................................................................................................................
1 ..................................................................................................................................................
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES2
(d) Transiting. Vessels may transit the
Broad and Discrete Deep-Sea Coral
Zones defined in paragraphs (b) and (c)
of this section, provided bottom-tending
trawl nets are out of the water and
stowed on the reel and any other fishing
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Apr 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
Longitude
36°58.51′ N
36°58.62′ N
37°4.43′ N
37°5.83′ N
37°6.97′ N
37°4.52′ N
37°4.02′ N
37°4.52′ N
37°4.40′ N
37°4.16′ N
37°4.40′ N
37°3.65′ N
36°57.75′ N
36°59.77′ N
36°58.23′ N
36°57.99′ N
36°58.51′ N
74°36.51′ W
74°36.97′ W
74°41.03′ W
74°45.57′ W
74°40.8′ W
74°37.77′ W
74°33.83′ W
74°33.51′ W
74°33.11′ W
74°32.37′ W
74°30.58′ W
74°3.66′ W
74°3.61′ W
74°30′ W
74°32.95′ W
74°34.18′ W
74°36.51′ W
gear that is prohibited in these areas is
onboard, out of the water, and not
deployed. Fishing gear is not required to
meet the definition of ‘‘not available for
immediate use’’ in § 648.2, when a
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
Broad zone
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
(*)
vessel transits the Broad and Discrete
Deep-Sea Coral Zones.
[FR Doc. 2018–06760 Filed 4–6–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\09APR2.SGM
09APR2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 68 (Monday, April 9, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 15240-15285]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-06760]
[[Page 15239]]
Vol. 83
Monday,
No. 68
April 9, 2018
Part II
Department of Commerce
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
50 CFR Part 648
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Provisions;
Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Essential Fish Habitat;
Final Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 83 , No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 15240]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 160301163-8204-02]
RIN 0648-BF82
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
Provisions; Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Essential Fish
Habitat
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action implements approved regulations for the New
England Fishery Management Council's Omnibus Essential Fish Habitat
Amendment 2. This rule revises essential fish habitat and habitat area
of particular concern designations, revises or creates habitat
management areas, including gear restrictions, to protect vulnerable
habitat from fishing gear impacts, establishes dedicated habitat
research areas, and implements several administrative measures related
to reviewing these measures, as well as other regulatory adjustments to
implement these measures. This action is necessary to comply with the
requirements of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act to periodically review essential fish habitat
designations and protections. The measures are designed to minimize to
the extent practicable the adverse effects of fishing on essential fish
habitat.
DATES: Effective April 9, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the Omnibus Essential Fish Habitat Amendment 2,
including the Environmental Impact Statement, the Regulatory Impact
Review, and the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (EIS/RIR/IRFA)
prepared by the New England Fishery Management Council in support of
this action are available from Thomas A. Nies, Executive Director, New
England Fishery Management Council, 50 Water Street, Mill 2,
Newburyport, MA 01950. The supporting documents are also accessible via
the internet at: https://www.nefmc.org/library/omnibus-habitat-amendment-2 or https://www.greateratlantic.fisheries.noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Moira Kelly, Senior Fishery Program
Specialist, phone: 978-281-9218, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
1. General Background
2. Essential Fish Habitat Designations
3. Habitat Areas of Particular Concern Designations
4. Spatial Management for Adverse Effects Minimization
5. Spawning Protection Measures
6. Dedicated Habitat Research Areas
7. Framework Adjustments and Monitoring
8. Description of Regulatory Changes
9. Changes From the Proposed Rule
10. Comments and Responses
1. General Background
On January 3, 2018, NOAA's National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS), on behalf of the Secretary of Commerce, approved the majority
of the New England Fishery Management Council's recommendations for the
Omnibus Essential Fish Habitat Amendment 2 (OHA2). This action
implements the approved management measures in OHA2. NMFS approved all
of the updated essential fish habitat designations (EFH), all of the
recommended habitat area of particular concern (HAPC) designations, and
the majority of the habitat management area (HMA) recommendations, all
of the Dedicated Habitat Research Area (DHRA) recommendations, all of
the seasonal spawning area recommendations, and both of the framework
and administrative recommendations. Two Council recommendations were
disapproved: (1) Establishment of The Cox Ledge HMA, which would
prohibit hydraulic clam dredges and ground cables on trawl vessels; and
(2) changes to the eastern Georges Bank Areas, as described in more
detail below.
OHA2 was initiated in 2004 to review and update the EFH components
of all the New England Fishery Management Council's fishery management
plans (FMP). The Council established 10 goals and 14 objectives to
guide the development of this action. Goals 1-8 were established in
2004 at the onset of the Amendment's development and focus on
identification of EFH; fishing and non-fishing activities that may
adversely affect EFH; and the development of measures and management
programs to conserve, protect, and enhance EFH and to minimize to the
extent practicable the adverse effects of fishing on EFH. The
additional goals (9 and 10) were developed after the Council voted to
incorporate revisions to the groundfish closures in the Amendment.
These goals are focused on enhancing groundfish productivity, including
protection of spawning groundfish, and maximizing the societal net
benefits from groundfish stocks.
The 14 objectives map to one or more of the Amendment's goals and
provide more guidance on achieving each goal. For example, the
objectives include identifying new data sources upon which to base the
EFH designations (Objective A), developing analytical tools for EFH
designation, minimization of adverse impacts, and monitoring the
effectiveness of measures (Objective D; Goals 1, 3, and 5). Other
objectives include modifying fishing methods to reduce impacts
(Objective E; Goal 4), supporting the restoration of degraded habitat
(Objective F; Goal 4), improving groundfish spawning protection,
including protection of localized spawning contingents, and improving
protection of critical groundfish habitats (Goals 9 and 10). Please see
Volume 1, Section 3 of the EIS for more details on the goals and
objectives of this Amendment.
2. Essential Fish Habitat Designations
The Magnuson-Stevens Act defines EFH as ``those waters and
substrate necessary to fish for spawning, breeding, feeding, or growth
to maturity.'' The EFH regulations (50 CFR part 600, subpart J) require
councils to describe and identify EFH in text that clearly states the
habitats or habitat types determined to be EFH for each life stage of a
managed species and in maps that display the geographic locations of
EFH or within which EFH for each species and life stage is found.
Further, FMPs should explain the physical, biological, and chemical
characteristics of EFH and, if known, how these characteristics
influence the use of EFH for the species/life stage. The EFH
regulations state that councils should periodically review the EFH
provisions of FMPs and revise or amend as warranted, based on available
information, and that a complete review of all EFH information should
be conducted at least once every five years.
A full description of the approved EFH designations, including maps
and text designations, can be found in Volume 2 of the EIS. In
addition, a thorough discussion of the data sources and methods used to
assemble the designations is provided in Appendix A to the EIS. Another
appendix (Appendix B) includes supplementary EFH information (e.g.,
prey species, temperature, and salinity preferences) for each species
and life stage not included in the EFH text descriptions in Volume 2
that may be considered when the potential effects of any fishing or
non-fishing activity that could adversely affect EFH are evaluated. All
of the
[[Page 15241]]
Council's recommendations for EFH designations are approved.
3. Habitat Area of Particular Concern Designations
Habitat Areas of Particular Concern (HAPC) highlight specific types
or areas of habitat within EFH that are particularly vulnerable to
human impacts. Evaluations of such areas should give special attention
to adverse effects, including any HAPCs designated that are
particularly vulnerable to fishing activity. An HAPC designation alone
does not provide any specific habitat management measures, such as gear
restrictions, and no new measures are implemented as part of the HAPC
designations in this amendment. Management measures are discussed under
``Spatial Management for Adverse Effects Minimization,'' below.
HAPC designations are based on one or more of the following
criteria: (1) The importance of the ecological function provided by the
habitat, including both the historical and current ecological function;
(2) the extent to which the habitat is sensitive to human-induced
environmental degradation; (3) whether, and to what extent, development
activities are, or will be, stressing the habitat type; and (4) the
rarity of the habitat type (50 CFR 600.815(a)(8)). The Council
solicited and considered HAPC proposals from the public and added
selection criteria, including whether the designation would improve
fisheries management in the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ); whether
it included EFH for more than one Council-managed species or
specifically for juvenile cod; and whether it met more than one of the
regulatory HAPC criteria listed above. Discussion of the areas
considered and the degree to which they satisfied the eight criteria
can be found in Volume 2 of the EIS.
This action approves all of the Council's recommendations for HAPC,
including the current Atlantic Salmon HAPC and the Northern Edge
Juvenile Cod HAPC. In addition, the action approves the following areas
as new HAPCs: Inshore Juvenile Cod HAPC; Great South Channel Juvenile
Cod HAPC; Cashes Ledge HAPC; Jeffreys Ledge/Stellwagen Bank HAPC; Bear
and Retriever Seamount HAPC; and 11 canyon/canyon complexes. Maps and
coordinates for the HAPC designations can be found in Volume 2 of the
EIS. A summary of the rationale for each designation (or set of
designations) was provided in the proposed rule for this action (82 FR
51492; November 6, 2017) and further rationale is not repeated here.
Detailed discussion of the rationale is also provided in Volume 2,
Section 3 of the EIS.
As described in the EIS, the HAPCs are non-regulatory designations.
The designations are intended to provide for increased attention when
habitat protection measures are considered. HAPCs that are particularly
vulnerable to the potential impacts from fishing warrant special
attention when determining appropriate management measures to minimize,
compensate, or avoid those impacts.
4. Spatial Management for Adverse Effects Minimization
The Magnuson-Stevens Act requires that fishery management plans
evaluate and minimize, to the extent practicable, the adverse effects
of fishing on EFH. The evaluation should consider the effects of each
fishing activity on each type of habitat found within EFH. Councils
must prevent, mitigate, or minimize any adverse effects from fishing on
EFH if there is evidence that a fishing activity adversely affects EFH
in a manner that is more than minimal and not temporary in nature.
Councils should consider the nature and extent of any adverse effects
along with the long- and short-term costs and benefits of the
management measures to EFH, associated fisheries, and the nation. A
thorough description of the approach the Council took to achieve this
requirement is provided in the proposed rule for this action and is not
repeated here.
The approved and disapproved measures and a brief description of
the rationale for the decision are included below. A thorough
discussion of the other alternatives considered and the potential
impacts, including economic impacts, from those alternatives are
included in Volumes 3, 4, and 5 of the EIS. Coordinates and maps of all
areas can be found in Volume 3 of the EIS.
Approved Habitat Management Measures
Establish the (Small) Eastern Maine Habitat Management
Area (HMA), closed to mobile bottom-tending gear;
Maintain Cashes Ledge (Groundfish) Closure Area, with
current restrictions and exemptions;
Modify the Cashes Ledge Habitat Closure Area, closed to
mobile bottom-tending gear;
Modify the Jeffreys Ledge Habitat Closure Area, closed to
mobile bottom-tending gear;
Establish the Ammen Rock HMA, closed to all fishing,
except lobster traps;
Establish the Fippennies Ledge HMA, closed to mobile
bottom-tending gear;
Maintain the Western Gulf of Maine Habitat Closure Area,
closed to mobile bottom-tending gear;
Modify the Western Gulf of Maine Groundfish Closure Area
to align with the Western Gulf of Maine Habitat Closure Area, with
current restrictions and exemptions;
Exempt shrimp trawling from the designated portion of the
northwest corner of the Western Gulf of Maine Closure Areas;
Add the Gulf of Maine Roller Gear restriction as a habitat
protection measure;
Remove the Closed Area I Habitat and Groundfish Closure
Area designations;
Remove the Nantucket Lightship Habitat and Groundfish
Closure Area designations; and
Establish the Great South Channel HMA, closed to mobile
bottom-tending gear throughout and clam dredge gear in the defined
northeast section. Clam dredge gear would be permitted throughout the
rest of the HMA for 1 year while the Council considers restrictions
that are more refined.
Disapproved Habitat Management Measures
The following recommendations were disapproved. Further rationale
for disapproving these recommendations is included below in the
``Georges Bank'' and ``Southern New England/Great South Channel''
sections.
The Cox Ledge HMA, which would have been closed to
hydraulic clam dredges and prohibiting ground cables of trawl vessels;
Removal of the Closed Area II Habitat and Groundfish
Closure Areas;
The Northern Edge Reduced Impact HMA, which would have
been closed to mobile bottom-tending gears except groundfish vessels
west of 67[deg] 20' W Longitude and scallop vessels fishing in a
scallop rotational program;
The Northern Edge Mobile Bottom-Tending Gear HMA, which
would have been closed to mobile bottom-tending gear; and
The Georges Shoal HMA, which would have been closed to
mobile bottom-tending gear, except hydraulic clam dredges that would
have been exempted for 1 year.
Eastern Gulf of Maine
In the Eastern Gulf of Maine, this action establishes the Small
Eastern Maine HMA, closed to all mobile bottom-tending gears. (Note,
the regulations refer to this area as simply
[[Page 15242]]
the ``Eastern Maine HMA.'') This measure is designed to protect
habitats of similar species as the larger area that was considered, but
with fewer economic impacts on the fishing industry. Its protection of
vulnerable habitats and designated EFH coverage ranks towards the
middle of the areas considered for this sub-region. Because there is
currently no habitat management area in the eastern Gulf of Maine,
implementing a mobile bottom-tending gear closure in any area
represents an improvement in groundfish habitat protection in this sub-
region. However, bottom trawls and dredges are used sparingly in any of
the areas that the Council considered and lobster traps are not subject
to any of the regulations in this amendment. Therefore, no short-term
reductions in the adverse impacts of fishing in this sub-region are
expected. Overall, the area provides potential long-term habitat
protection benefits with minimal costs to the fishing industry.
Central Gulf of Maine
In the Central Gulf of Maine, this rule maintains the existing
Cashes Ledge Groundfish Closure Area and modifies the existing Jeffreys
Bank and Cashes Ledge Habitat Closure Areas, with their current fishing
restrictions and exemptions; establishes the Fippennies Ledge HMA,
closed to mobile bottom-tending gears; and establishes the Ammen Rock
HMA, closed to all fishing except lobster traps.
This combination of measures is appropriate for this region.
Maintaining the existing Cashes Ledge Groundfish Closure Area supports
the goals and objectives of improving groundfish productivity, with no
additional economic burdens on the industry. Maintaining this closure
will also ensure that a more diverse array of bottom habitats that
support a greater variety of species remain protected from fishing
impacts.
The other actions in this sub-region are modifications to the
existing Cashes Ledge and Jeffreys Bank habitat closures. These
modifications were designed to more closely align with the location of
the shallower, hard-bottom habitats and to increase fishery access to
the deeper, less vulnerable mud and sand habitats that surround the
ledges. Ammen Rock on top of Cashes Ledge is a unique feature within
the Gulf of Maine and features kelp forest habitat that would benefit
from enhanced protection, which is why there are additional management
restrictions in that area. Fippennies Ledge is an additional hard
bottom feature within the Cashes Ledge Groundfish Closure Area that
would be protected by maintaining the existing groundfish closure.
However, should the Cashes Ledge Groundfish Closure Area be modified or
removed at some point in the future when groundfish stocks have
recovered and the closure is no longer required, Fippennies Ledge still
warrants protection from the adverse effects of mobile bottom-tending
gear. In terms of habitat protection and benefits to groundfish
resources, the approved measures are high relative to other
alternatives in this sub-region and the economic impacts are slightly
more positive than the current measures.
Western Gulf of Maine
In the Western Gulf of Maine, this action maintains the existing
Western Gulf of Maine Habitat Closure Area, closed to mobile bottom-
tending gears, and modifies the eastern boundary of the Western Gulf of
Maine [Groundfish] Closure Area to align with the habitat closure area,
while maintaining the current fishing restrictions and requirements.
This rule also creates an exemption area within the northwest corner of
those closures for shrimp trawls and designates the existing Roller
Gear Restricted Area requirements as a habitat protection measure.
The EIS describes the Council's rationale for these areas in
detail. In summary, these areas were selected to maintain decades'
worth of protections in this region, while modestly increasing fishing
access to the eastern edge of the area. The shrimp exemption was
designed to minimize the economic impact on a fleet whose gear has
minimal habitat impact. The roller gear restriction has been required
for several years and was originally implemented through Framework
Adjustment 27 to the Northeast Multispecies Fishery Management Plan to
minimize cod mortality by preventing trawl gear from fishing over rocky
substrate. As such, it has been a de facto habitat protection measure
and the Council wanted to note it formally as such.
These measures are expected to have the same level of positive
impacts on habitat and groundfish resources as the existing closures,
with the same economic benefits.
Georges Bank
On Georges Bank, the Council recommended removing the year-round
and habitat closures of Closed Areas I and II and replacing them with
three new areas: (1) The Georges Shoal 2 HMA, closed to mobile bottom-
tending gear, with a 1-year delay in closure to hydraulic clam dredges;
(2) the Northern Edge Reduced Impact HMA, closed to mobile bottom-
tending gear, with two exceptions described below; and (3) the Northern
Edge Mobile Bottom-Tending Gear HMA, closed to mobile bottom-tending
gear without any exceptions. Exemptions to the Reduced Impact HMA would
have allowed scallop dredge fishing under the scallop rotational area
program, and trawl fishing to the west of the existing western boundary
of Closed Area II (67[deg] 20' W long.), in what is now the Eastern
Georges Bank Special Access Program. In addition, any portions of the
Closed Area II groundfish closed area north of 41[deg] 30' N lat. would
have been closed to scallop fishing between June 15 and October 31 of
each year. Volume 3 of the EIS describes the Council's rationale in
detail.
We approved a portion of this recommendation. The Council
considered Closed Areas I and II in the same sub-region and included
recommendations in the same alternative. However, the two closed areas
are substantially distinct in their scope, nature, and impacts, and;
therefore, changes to either area may be assessed independently.
Whether the HMAs recommended by the Council meet the goals and
objectives of the Amendment and Magnuson-Stevens Act requirements may
also be assessed independently. The Closed Area I Groundfish Closure,
which encompasses the Closed Area I North and South Habitat Closures,
and a central portion that has long been part of the scallop access
area program, is generally less vulnerable to the adverse effects of
fishing than areas of Georges Bank to the north and east. This action
establishes the Closed Area I South Habitat Closure as a DHRA (see # 6
below), which will be closed to mobile bottom-tending gears for at
least 3 years and could be opened after a review of the research
activities in the area. Closed Area I North Habitat Closure becomes a
seasonal closure from February 1 to April 15, closed to commercial and
recreational gears capable of catching groundfish except scallop
dredges. (See #5 below.) The removal of the Closed Area I designations
and proposed new designations do not compromise the ability of the
Council's FMPs to comply with the EFH requirements of the Magnuson-
Stevens Act.
The changes the Council proposed would have opened an area that has
been closed to mobile bottom-tending fishing gear for over 20 years.
This would have allowed rotational scallop dredge fishing along the
northern edge of Georges Bank. A portion of the Northern Edge Reduced
Impact HMA
[[Page 15243]]
that would have been opened to rotational limited access scallop
dredging as part of the Council's preferred alternative includes the
northern portion of an area designated as a Habitat Area of Particular
Concern in 1998 and that is reaffirmed in this amendment due to the
ecological importance and vulnerability of the area for juvenile cod.
The Council's recommended areas on Georges Bank do not sufficiently
address the impact of limited access scallop dredging on the highly
vulnerable habitat within the Closed Area II Habitat Closure Area.
Overall, the changes the Council recommended to Closed Area II and
eastern Georges Bank are inconsistent with the Amendment's goals and
objectives of improving juvenile groundfish habitat protection and the
requirements of the Magnuson-Stevens Act to minimize the adverse
effects of fishing to the extent practicable. Furthermore, the Closed
Area II Habitat Closure Area has the same footprint as the Northern
Edge Juvenile Cod HAPC. The area has been closed to mobile bottom-
tending gear since 1995 and designated as an HAPC since 1998. The
Council reaffirmed that designation in this Amendment, but the
recommendation the Council had made does not avoid, minimize, or
compensate for the adverse effects of this action on this HAPC.
Based on the factors analyzed in the Amendment, the quality of the
habitat in the current Closed Area II Habitat Closure Area is
considered much higher than the habitat in the proposed Georges Shoal
HMA and higher than in the proposed Northern Edge Mobile Bottom-Tending
Gear Closure Area. The Council's EIS supporting the Amendment describes
the size, habitat content (sand/mud vs. gravel, cobble, boulder), and
the results of an EFH overlap analysis, allowing us to compare the
relative EFH ``value'' across areas. The EFH overlap analyses were done
to show the extent to which the EFH designations for individual managed
species overlap within each habitat management area the Council
considered. This type of analysis favors larger areas and was done
using several categories, as follows: Total number of EFH designations;
EFH for overfished species; EFH for species/life stages with a known
affinity for complex substrate; juvenile hotspots; and the count of
unique species and designations.
The proposed Georges Shoal HMA ranks at or near the bottom of the
analysis in almost every measure of EFH coverage, despite its much
larger size, meaning far fewer managed species and life stages utilize
this area. Of the 49 areas considered across all sub-regions, the
Georges Shoal HMA ranks between 36th and 47th, depending on the
measure; in contrast, the Closed Area II EFH area ranks between 8th and
27th in the same analysis. Among the 16 alternatives considered for the
Georges Bank sub-region, the Georges Shoal HMA is the sixth largest,
but last or almost last in each of the EFH overlap scores. The Georges
Shoal HMA is sandier and more shallow, and, therefore, less vulnerable
to fishing impacts, than Closed Area II, making it a much less
efficient closure. The Northern Edge Mobile Bottom-Tending Gear HMA
that had been proposed ranks in the lower half of almost every metric
as well (from 7-12 out of 16), despite being a similar size to the
existing Closed Area II EFH closure. The Northern Edge Reduced Impact
HMA that had been proposed, where scallop fishing would have been
allowed on a rotational basis, represents the most complex habitat and
ranks in the upper half of each EFH metric (3-7 out of 16), despite its
much smaller size.
Removing protections from, and allowing scallop dredging in, the
most vulnerable portion of Closed Area II compromises the ability of
the Council's FMPs to continue to meet the requirements of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act to minimize to the extent practicable the adverse
effects of fishing on EFH throughout the region and prevents the
Council from achieving this action's goals and objectives. The
potential benefits to habitat from the areas the Council had proposed
to close do not outweigh the potential adverse effects on highly
valuable EFH and vulnerable groundfish stocks that would result from
opening the Closed Area II Habitat Closure Area to limited access
scallop dredging.
In addition to the quality and importance of the habitat on eastern
Georges Bank, the Closed Area II Habitat Closure Area is also the
Northern Edge Juvenile Cod HAPC. As noted above, the Council initially
made this designation in 1998 and reaffirmed the importance of the area
in this Amendment. One of the four considerations for HAPC designation
is sensitivity to anthropogenic stress. The Council concluded that
there are ``no known anthropogenic threats to this area beyond those
associated with fishing activity.'' While there are no fishery
restrictions associated with HAPC designations themselves, the
designation should result in the Council taking a more precautionary
approach to management of those areas, particularly when the only noted
human-induced stress is fishing. The final rule for the EFH regulations
(67 FR 2343; January 17, 2002) notes, ``. . . designation of HAPCs is a
valuable way to highlight priority areas within EFH for conservation
and management . . . Proposed fishing activities that might threaten
HAPCs may likewise receive a higher level of scrutiny.'' This guidance
suggests that councils should prioritize the protection of HAPCs where
fishing is a primary or significant threat to the habitat.
The Council's recommendations in this Amendment would have opened
the most vulnerable portions of the HAPC without closing other
comparable habitat. The Council did not adequately explain its reasons
for concluding that this HAPC should be opened to fishing or how the
other areas adequately mitigated or compensated for the impacts of
fishing in this area. The Council's recommendation to allow even
rotational fishing in this sensitive habitat is inconsistent with its
own rationale for the designation that the habitat in this area
warrants particular concern and consideration. The Council also did not
explain the conditions for allowing fishing in this area that would
sufficiently minimize adverse effects. For these reasons, we
disapproved the recommendations to remove the Closed Area II Habitat
and Groundfish Closure Areas and replace them with the areas described
above.
While disapproving the Council's recommendation for eastern Georges
Bank will continue to result in lost opportunity costs for the scallop
industry, approved changes to current area closures will provide
substantial new economic opportunity for the scallop fishery. The
Council currently estimates that access into the Closed Area I and
Nantucket Lightship areas that were previously closed could increase
scallop revenue by $140-$160 million in the next year (based on
preliminary information in Scallop Framework Adjustment 29). The
Council may choose to revisit habitat management on eastern Georges
Bank in a subsequent action that could address the reasons for
disapproval.
Great South Channel/Southern New England
This rule establishes the Great South Channel HMA. The northeast
corner of the HMA (12.5 percent of the area) will be closed to all
mobile bottom-tending gears. The effective date of the closure will be
delayed by 1 year for hydraulic clam dredges throughout the remainder
of the area. The Council considered the unique fishing practices in the
surfclam fishery. Based on this information, the Council is working to
identify sub-areas
[[Page 15244]]
that are less vulnerable to clam gear to determine whether some amount
of clam fishing may continue in a manner that sufficiently minimizes
impacts to vulnerable substrate. The Council recommended establishing
two small HMAs on Cox Ledge, closed to hydraulic clam dredges, and
prohibiting ground cables on trawls fishing in the areas; however, that
recommendation was disapproved. The Nantucket Lightship Habitat Closure
Area and the Nantucket Lightship Closed Area are removed by this
action.
Throughout the development of the action, the Council's technical
team expressed concern that the ground cable restriction measures would
not minimize the habitat impacts of fishing. NMFS reiterated these
concerns several times throughout the development of OHA2 management
measures. Ground cables account for a significant portion of a bottom
trawl's seabed impact. However, the sediment clouds they create
``herd'' fish toward the opening of the net. The gear modifications
that had been proposed would have reduced the effectiveness of the gear
and, in all likelihood, cause vessels to fish longer in order to
compensate for reduced catch rates. No studies of the trade-offs
between reduced impacts of ground cable removal and the duration or
frequency of bottom trawl tows were cited in the EIS for OHA2. As a
result, we disapproved this recommendation.
The approved recommendation of the Great South Channel HMA is a
compromise between the larger Great South Channel East HMA (identified
in the EIS as Alternative 3), located further to the east, and the
slightly smaller Nantucket Shoals HMA (identified in the EIS as
Alternative 5), located further to the west, closer to Nantucket
Island. Bottom habitats in these areas are a mixture of less stable
sand and more stable gravel, cobble, and boulder substrates and support
fisheries for groundfish, clams, and scallops. The two most significant
fisheries in the area are for surfclams and scallops. Scallop dredging
is almost entirely restricted to deeper water along the western side of
the Great South Channel and to an area east of Cape Cod. Clam dredging
occurs in a large area of mixed bottom types in shallower water to the
west. While the Council recognized the likelihood of negative economic
impacts of these alternatives on the clam fishery, they were also
concerned about the negative effects of hydraulic dredges on complex
habitats occurring in the region. The discussion and development of
more discrete exemption areas is currently occurring in a separate
framework adjustment action.
This action also establishes two HAPCs in this sub-region. The
Inshore Juvenile Cod HAPC includes waters off the Massachusetts coast
to 20 m deep, and overlaps slightly with the Nantucket Shoals and
Nantucket Shoals West HMAs. The Great South Channel Juvenile Cod HAPC
includes additional waters north and east of the HMAs to a depth of 120
m and partially overlaps the Great South Channel HMA in this sub-
region. No management measures were applied specifically to these
areas; however, they are designated as HAPCs primarily because they are
vulnerable to adverse anthropogenic impacts from non-fishing
activities.
Results of the habitat impact analyses in the EIS indicated that
the approved measures are expected to have positive habitat impacts
compared to leaving the habitat and groundfish closures in the
Nantucket Lightship area in place, even with the 1-year delay in
closure for clam dredges in most of the area. Impacts to groundfish
resources will be approximately the same for both the existing and new
measures. The new measures will have a slightly negative economic
impact on the groundfish fishery; approximately 1 percent of the total
groundfish revenue from the statistical areas covered by the closure
are expected to be impacted by this measure. A highly negative economic
impact on the clam fishery after the 1-year delay expires would be
expected, before more discrete exemption areas are approved and
implemented.
5. Groundfish Spawning Measures
The Council has considered how to most effectively manage fishing
during the spawning periods of key fish in several actions. During the
development of this Amendment, the Council recommended, and NMFS
implemented, several modifications to spawning protections for cod and
other groundfish through Framework Adjustments 45 and 53. Because these
measures were implemented prior to the completion of OHA2, there was
much debate over what should be done in this action. Ultimately, the
Council recommended, and this action implements, a few minor additional
protections to what is required currently.
Gulf of Maine
In the Gulf of Maine, this action establishes two new, relatively
small, cod spawning protections. They include the Winter Massachusetts
Bay Spawning Closure, which will be in effect from November 1-January
31 of each year. During the closure, the area will be closed to all
fishing vessels, with the same exemptions as the existing Gulf of Maine
Cod Spawning Protection Area (i.e., Whaleback). These exemptions
include vessels fishing in state waters that do not have a Federal
Northeast multispecies permit; vessels fishing with exempted gears;
charter/party and private recreational vessels, provided they are
fishing with pelagic hook and line gear and there is no retention of
regulated groundfish or ocean pout; and vessels that are transiting. In
addition, a 2-week closure (April 15-April 30) within statistical area
125, referred to as the Spring Massachusetts Bay Spawning Protection
Area, is established. This area will be closed to all vessels, except:
Vessels fishing in state waters that do not have a Federal Northeast
multispecies permit; vessels fishing with exempted gears; vessels in
the mid-water trawl and purse seine exempted fisheries; scallop vessels
fishing with dredges on a scallop day-at-sea; vessels fishing in the
scallop dredge exemption area; and charter, party, and recreational
fishing vessels.
Georges Bank
Because the Council's recommendation to remove the Closed Area II
Groundfish Closure Area in Georges Bank was disapproved, the current
year-round restrictions and exemptions remain in effect. Should the
Council revisit habitat management on Georges Bank, and recommend the
removal of the Closed Area II closure areas, a seasonal restriction
would be in place for Closed Area II Groundfish Closure Area and the
Closed Area I North Habitat Closed Area from February 1-April 15.
During the closure season, the areas will be closed to all commercial
and recreational vessels, except those that are transiting, fishing
with exempted gears, participating in the mid-water trawl exempted
fishery, and fishing with scallop dredges, unless otherwise prohibited
elsewhere.
This action removes the May Georges Bank Spawning Closure. Sector
vessels are exempted from this seasonal closure, rendering it virtually
non-existent. Removing the closure should minimally reduce the
administrative burden for sectors, as they will no longer have to
request this exemption.
6. Dedicated Habitat Research Areas
In order to highlight research needs, particularly relating to
evaluating the assumptions of the Swept Area Seabed Impact (SASI) model
that the Council used as the basis for HMA development, this rule
establishes two Dedicated Habitat Research Areas (DHRA), which will be
in effect for 3 years, at which time the Regional Administrator will
[[Page 15245]]
consult with the Council as to whether the designation should be
retained. The Council developed a series of questions to assist in this
future discussion that include consideration of where in the research
development process an activity is, how well it aligns with the
Council's stated habitat research priorities, and what role the DHRA
designation plays in the research.
This action establishes the Georges Bank DHRA (footprint is the
same as the existing Closed Area I South Habitat Closure) and the
Stellwagen DHRA (footprint within the existing Western Gulf of Maine
Habitat Closure). The Georges Bank DHRA is closed to all mobile bottom-
tending gear. The Stellwagen DHRA is closed to all commercial mobile
bottom-tending gear, commercial sink gillnet gear, and commercial
demersal longline gear. Maps and coordinates of the approved DHRAs can
be found in Volume 3 of the EIS.
7. Framework Adjustments and Monitoring
The designation or removal of HMAs and changes to fishing
restrictions within HMAs may be considered in a framework adjustment.
In addition, this action establishes a review process to evaluate the
performance of habitat and spawning protection measures. Finally, this
action establishes a process for the Council to identify and
periodically revise research priorities to improve habitat and spawning
area monitoring.
8. Regulatory Changes
This rule implements measures for all of the approved measures. In
order to improve clarity of the habitat-related management measures, we
have reorganized Sec. 648.81 to refer solely to year-round and
seasonal closures designed for purposes of groundfish protection. All
habitat-related measures, including the newly approved and existing
HMAs and their accompanying regulatory text, the DHRAs and their
accompanying text, and the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's
Deep-Sea Coral Protection area can be found in a new subpart (subpart
Q). In addition, the Council stated that all areas currently closed to
scallop dredging should remain closed upon the implementation of OHA2
so that the Scallop Committee can better incorporate newly opened areas
in the rotational management program. The existing EFH closures
currently reside in both the groundfish (Sec. 648.81) and scallop
(Sec. 648.61) regulations. This action adds the groundfish closed
areas that would otherwise be removed by this action to the scallop
closure section (Sec. 648.61) to ensure that the restrictions on
scallop fishing remain in place until a subsequent scallop action can
modify them. The decisions related to scallop fishing year 2018 access
are being implemented via Framework Adjustment 29 to the Atlantic
Scallop FMP. The regulations also update cross-references and
definitions as needed. The Council deemed the regulations as necessary
and appropriate, as required in the Magnuson-Stevens Act, on March 28,
2017.
9. Changes From the Proposed Rule
As described above, the differences from the proposed rule relate
to the recommended measures that were disapproved by NMFS. Closed Area
II Habitat Closure regulations will be reassigned to the new habitat
management section in Subpart Q, while the Closed Area II Groundfish
Closure Area will remain codified in Sec. 648.81. Cross-references
from other sections have also been updated to reflect these changes.
10. Comments and Responses
The Notice of Availability for this Amendment was published on
October 6, 2017 (82 FR 46749), and the proposed rule was published on
November 5, 2017 (82 FR 51492). The comment periods for both ended on
December 5, 2017. In total, 72 comments were received; many of these
comments were submitted on behalf of environmental or fishing
organizations or businesses. Seventeen of the comments were not
relevant to the issues under discussion in this action and were
nominally about the commenter(s) concerns regarding global climate
change. Those comments are not addressed here.
Comment 1: Nine comments focused exclusively on EFH, HAPC, and DHRA
designations. Seven of the comments recommended approving the
regulations, specifically the EFH, HAPC, and DHRA regulations, with
most specifically noting the importance of the Inshore Juvenile Cod
HAPC, that it was important to give other areas HAPC status because of
their sensitivity to trawling, dredging, and other fishing impacts, and
that these designations and related management measures can help boost
the cod population. Three commenters also noted the importance of the
Atlantic Salmon HAPC. Another comment supported the implementing OHA2
regulations that would allow the Council to develop analytical tools
for EFH designation, and monitor the effectiveness of current/future
conservation efforts.
Response: NMFS agrees that the EFH, HAPC, and DHRA regulations are
necessary and appropriate when supported by the best available science.
We are approving all of the Council's recommendations for these
designations, including the Atlantic Salmon and Inshore Juvenile Cod
HAPCs. We disagree that the 20-meter depth limit for the Inshore
Juvenile Cod HAPC is overly broad. It was based on the best scientific
information available that indicates a broader depth range occupied by
young-of-year and 1-year-old cod.
Comment 2: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers submitted a comment
regarding the winter flounder EFH designation that the Council and
NOAA/NMFS consult with them to better inform EFH conservation
recommendations. They are concerned about re-suspended sediments in or
near designated habitat, and its effect on Atlantic sturgeon.
Response: This comment has been forwarded to NMFS staff in the
Protected Resources Division for the Greater Atlantic Region who work
on Atlantic sturgeon issues to address this concern with the Army
Corps.
Comment 3: Mystic Aquarium submitted a comment expressing concern
for the lack of analysis and development of alternatives to conserve
deep-sea corals EFH in Gulf of Maine, Georges Bank, and southern New
England regions under the purview of the Council. This commenter
contends that because the revision of the EFH designation for Acadian
redfish includes deep sea corals, and deep sea corals have been
described as the most vulnerable form of EFH in reference materials
developed by the NMFS Deep-Sea Coral Research and Technology Program
and the Northeast Fisheries Science Center analysis of fishing effects
that the Council should analyze the fishing effects on these habitats.
Because the deep-sea coral considerations were split off into a
separate action, the commenter requests that we leave the status quo
HMAs and HAPCs, in both the Gulf of Maine and along the continental
margin south and west of Georges Bank, until a refined proposal is
produced by the Council that addresses these concerns. Alternatively,
the commenter suggests that the Council's ongoing coral amendment could
be redirected to address these issues regarding mitigation of the
effects of fishing on corals functioning as EFH.
Response: This action does not directly address the impacts of
fishing on corals as a component of EFH for redfish. Additional
information specific to deep-sea corals would require further
development and consideration of information that was not available for
[[Page 15246]]
this Amendment. The Council considered what measures were necessary for
deep-sea coral protection in the recently completed deep-sea coral
amendment. This action implements the retention of all three status quo
habitat management areas in the Gulf of Maine, with some minor
modifications, and all the HAPCs along the outer shelf, largely because
of their importance for deep-sea corals.
Comment 4: Eighteen comments focused on maintaining the status quo
spatial management measures. Most of these comments were from members
of the public who identified themselves as recreational or for-hire
fishing sector participants. Most commenters specifically opposed
opening the Western Gulf of Maine and Closed Areas I and II to
commercial fishing, noting that they considered the closed areas to be
largely responsible for the recovery of the haddock stocks. A few
commenters mentioned specific support for the new closed area off
downeast Maine (i.e., the Small Eastern Maine HMA), the new Great South
Channel HMA, and for maintaining the Cashes Ledge Groundfish Closure
Area with the current restrictions. Many commenters noted that
recreational fishermen are currently not allowed to possess cod in the
Gulf of Maine and that allowing increased commercial fishing pressure
in an area known for cod would be inconsistent with that restriction.
Response: NMFS agrees that closed areas can be an effective tool in
rebuilding overfished stocks and protecting vulnerable habitat. We have
reviewed the best science available in this action relating to the
costs and benefits of closed areas when determining whether the
Council's recommendations minimize the adverse effects of fishing to
the extent practicable, and whether they meet the Amendment's goals and
objectives and comply with all other laws. NMFS supports the
implementation of the Small Eastern Maine HMA and implements that
measure in this action. We support maintaining the Cashes Ledge Closure
Area closed as recommended by the Council. We also agree that the Cox
Ledge proposal should not be implemented.
We disagree that opening a portion of the Western Gulf of Maine
Closure Area is inconsistent with the current restriction on
recreational anglers. The Council manages Gulf of Maine cod with an
overall annual catch limit (ACL) and distinct sub-ACLs for various
aspects of the fishery. We believe this system is sufficient to prevent
overfishing and rebuild overfished stocks. Specific management measures
are developed to address the unique nature of both the commercial and
recreational fisheries. The commercial fleet is primarily managed using
a sector system, which further allocates the commercial sub-ACL to
fishing sectors. The recreational sub-ACL is managed by setting an open
fishing season, minimum fish size, and possession limit for the
recreational and for-hire sectors that will prevent the sub-ACL from
being exceeded.
The approved measures would reduce the area protected by about 25
percent; however, the area remaining closed has more vulnerable habitat
than the area being opened. As described in the EIS, measures
implemented by this rule will have a positive impact on groundfish,
albeit slightly less beneficial than the status quo. Overall, however,
NMFS determined that the collective measures in the Gulf of Maine
represent an improvement to groundfish protections.
The Great South Channel HMA is being approved with the clam dredge
exemption, contrary to the recommendations in some of these comments.
The area covered by the Great South Channel HMA is currently open to
fishing, including by hydraulic clam dredges, scallop dredges, and
groundfish trawls. The majority of the area would be open only to clam
dredges for 1 year while the Council attempts to develop more specific
exemption areas. The Council notes that hydraulic clam dredges are
capable of fishing in discrete areas of less vulnerable habitat around
more complex structure. If, in the coming year, the Council is unable
to develop a solution that effectively minimizes the adverse effects of
fishing in this area while minimizing the economic impacts to the clam
fishery, the exemption will expire, and hydraulic clam dredges would be
prohibited throughout the HMA.
On Georges Bank, we partially agree with the recommendations to
leave Closed Areas I and II as they are now. We are implementing the
Council's recommendation to remove the Closed Area I groundfish and
habitat closed area designations, but we are also implementing a
seasonal spawning closure for Closed Area I North and a DHRA closed to
mobile bottom-tending gear in Closed Area I South. We have disapproved
the Council's recommendation for Closed Area II for the reasons
described in the preamble of this rule.
Comment 5: The Nature Conservancy (TNC) believed some of the
proposed measures likely meet the requirements of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act to periodically review EFH designations and the protection of such
habitats. In particular, they recommended that NMFS approve all new EFH
designations; the new Small Eastern Maine Habitat Management Area
(HMA); continue existing protections in the Cashes Ledge Groundfish
Closure Area; and approve the Jeffreys Bank and Cashes Ledge Habitat
Closure Areas. They also supported the approval of the Fippennies Ledge
HMA and establishing the Ammen Rock HMA, as well as the Cox Ledge
spawning area. TNC also supported the Western Gulf of Maine Habitat
Closure Area and all of the Council recommended HAPCs and DHRAs.
TNC expressed concerns with new habitat closed areas on Georges
Bank and framework provisions that establish a pathway to allow
exemptions for hydraulic clam dredge gear in habitat closed areas.
Specifically, TNC is opposed to the Council's recommendation on Georges
Bank, citing their Weighted Persistence Analysis, which is an analysis
and that it supports the concerns noted by NMFS in the proposed rule.
TNC also opposes the exemption for hydraulic clam dredges and suggests
that a workshop should be held to review very high-resolution data to
identify exemption areas that would be compatible with requirements to
prevent adverse impacts of fishing. The letter contends that the TNC
analysis showed that, apart from the Northern Edge Reduced Impact HMA,
the Council recommended management measures are not located in high
habitat value areas. According to TNC, this verifies the concerns the
Agency expressed regarding the Georges Bank area in its request for
comments. Because TNC feels that the proposed management measures for
Georges Bank do not protect high value habitat, they strongly
recommended that NMFS disapprove these provisions.
Further, as TNC wrote in its comments in 2015, surfclam/ocean
quahog vessel monitoring system data show that this fishery, while
largely concentrated in the Mid-Atlantic and Southern New England
regions, is active in the Great South Channel, off Cape Cod, and on
Georges Bank. TNC also asserts that hydraulic surfclam gear is highly
destructive to structured habitats, and has a lesser impact in high-
energy sand habitats. TNC suggests that a collaborative workshop
process informed by very high-resolution spatial data could be used to
identify exemption areas that would be compatible with requirements to
prevent adverse impacts of fishing.
Response: NMFS agrees that the Weighted Persistence Analysis
supports
[[Page 15247]]
our decision for Georges Bank and notes that we referenced that
information when making this determination. The Cox Ledge area was not
recommended as a spawning closure and is not being implemented as an
HMA for the reasons noted in the preamble of this rule. NMFS supports
the idea that a workshop to identify exemption areas within the Great
South Channel HMA would be beneficial to both the Council and the clam
industry, should the interested parties agree on that approach as a way
forward.
Comment 6: The Cape Cod Commercial Fishermen's Alliance,
representing 150 fishing businesses and over 300 fishing families,
expressed support for the analytical basis for the Amendment, namely
the SASI and Local Indicators of Spatial Association (LISA) analyses,
noting this modeling framework allowed the Habitat Committee and the
Council to make well-informed decisions when recommending preferred
alternatives. The Fishermen's Alliance supported the Council's full
recommendation to create a new Habitat Management Area (HMA) in the
Great South Channel to protect this valuable ground, including closing
12.5 percent of the northeast HMA to all mobile bottom-tending gears.
Additionally, the Fishermen's Alliance asserts that the prohibitions in
the remaining area for dredging are warranted, particularly given
opening of nearby regions to scalloping that pose less impacts to the
benthic environment. They also strongly supported the Council's
decision to designate the Great South Channel Juvenile Cod HAPC,
stating that these actions would reduce fishing impacts on habitat, and
(coupled with the Georges Bank Seasonal Closure Area) protect valuable
spawning and rearing habitat for Atlantic cod.
The Fishermen's Alliance also expressed strong support for the
removal of the Nantucket Lightship and Closed Area I closures, noting
the significance of the areas to the small boat scallop fishery (i.e.,
the limited access general category fleet), specifically noting that
the habitat encompassed by the current closed areas is less important
for valuable species such as Atlantic cod than the habitat that would
be protected under the new Great South Channel HMA.
Response: We agree with the Fishermen's Alliance that the SASI/LISA
results were an appropriate starting point for the Council's
discussion. Based in part on those analyses, the Nantucket Lightship
and Closed Area I closures are removed in this action. We are also
approving the recommendations in the Great South Channel for the
reasons described above.
Comment 7: The Council submitted comments in support of
implementing the measures as proposed. The Council contends that the
full suite of measures submitted were in compliance with the
requirements of the Magnuson-Stevens Act. The Council stated in its
comment its recognition of the important habitats along the northern
edge of Georges Bank for groundfish, including juvenile cod. The
Council contends that its preferred approach to management on Georges
Bank keeps certain areas closed to fishing with mobile bottom-tending
gears, while allowing only rotational scallop fishing in most of the
Reduced Impact HMA.
The Council took issue with how the preamble of the proposed rule
implied that scallop fishing in the Reduced Impact HMA would be
unlimited, contending that while the Council was not prescriptive about
how rotational scallop fisheries on the northern edge might be
conducted, this statement ignores the eighteen years of successful
rotational sea scallop management since Amendment 10 to the Atlantic
Sea Scallop Fishery Management Plan (FMP) formally adopted the
approach. The Council also expressed concern that the preamble
misconstrues the economic analysis in Volume 5 of the EIS with regard
to the scallop fishery loss of opportunity versus realized costs. The
Council states that they are confident that rational rotational
management can be conducted on the northern edge while minimizing the
adverse effects of fishing.
Finally, the Council responded to the concern that it did not give
due consideration to the northern edge's status as an HAPC when
deciding on measures to minimize adverse effects. The rationale for the
HAPC given in the EIS notes that complex gravel habitats, especially
those with structure-forming epifauna, provide cover for juvenile cod,
reducing predation during a critical life history stage that may be a
bottleneck for this species.
Response: For the reasons described in this rule's preamble, NMFS
disapproved the Council's recommendation to allow rotational scallop
fishing on the northern edge of Georges Bank. NMFS agrees that the
scallop rotational program has successfully managed scallops, but the
rotational program is designed to address scallop fishing issues. It
was not designed specifically to minimize adverse effects on EFH or
account for juvenile cod HAPC. NMFS determined that the Council did not
adequately describe or consider the relationship between the frequency
of scallop fishing and the recovery time scale of the habitat features
that are particularly important to juvenile groundfish in the region.
NMFS acknowledges that the proposed rule inappropriately misconstrued
the potential lost revenues to the scallop fishery and has updated the
language in the final rule. As described above, NMFS disagrees that the
Council gave due consideration to the northern edge's status as an
HAPC.
Comment 8: The Northeast Seafood Coalition (NSC), representing 250
fishing businesses, submitted a comment generally in favor of the
Council's recommendations. The comment was careful to point out that,
while NSC supports the full suite of measures recommended by the
Council, it is not fully ``satisfied'' with the Amendment as a whole.
Specifically, NSC is unsatisfied with retaining groundfish closure
measures in the Western Gulf of Maine and on Cashes Ledge. The NSC
requests that the record identify the overarching purpose of the Cashes
Ledge Closure and the Council's intention in recommending that it
remain closed. NSC notes that the Council was neither bound by the
existing closures nor to selecting new areas of comparable size.
Further, NSC states that NMFS should not be evaluating the efficiency
of the proposed Georges Bank recommendations by comparing them to
habitat protection coincidently provided by the existing mortality
closures. NSC also questions NMFS's ``one-sided'' interest in CPUE as a
relevant consideration for habitat impacts regarding the ground cable
prohibition on Cox Ledge.
Response: While NMFS agrees that increases in fishing efficiency
that reduces the amount of time that gear is in contact with the bottom
can enhance habitat protection, increased efficiency is not the only
way to minimize the adverse effects of fishing on EFH. Even highly
efficient fishing with mobile bottom-tending gear can have adverse
effects, defined as effects that are more than minimal and not
temporary, on highly vulnerable habitat. The combination of reduced
overall effort and high quality closures is one reason we supported the
Council's approach that smaller HMAs that protect more vulnerable
habitat are preferable to larger HMAs that cover less vulnerable
habitat. As noted above, our disapproval of the Council's
recommendation on eastern Georges Bank is in line with this approach.
The Council recommended larger, less efficient closures as compensation
for increased impacts in
[[Page 15248]]
highly vulnerable substrate. This is also consistent with our decision
to disapprove the Council's recommendation on Cox Ledge. The Council's
Plan Development Team noted on several occasions that it was unable to
determine how much less efficient an average trawl would be without
ground cables, and; therefore, unable to determine if total bottom
contact time would be reduced or increased.
We disagree that the restrictions on gears capable of catching
groundfish are unnecessary in the Western Gulf of Maine and Cashes
Ledge groundfish closure areas and that these areas were not intended
to support the Council's stated goals of improving protection of
critical life stages, including spawning groundfish. In advance of the
April 2015 Council meeting, where a motion was made to continue the
protections on Cashes Ledge, NMFS advised the Council that the
Council's goal of ``improving'' juvenile groundfish habitat protections
would not likely be achieved without the Cashes Ledge Closure Area,
particularly in combination with the reduced groundfish protections
from the Western Gulf of Maine.
NMFS staff reviewed the audio recording of the April 2015 Council
meeting in response to this comment. It is clear from that recording
that the maker of the adopted motion for the Central Gulf of Maine made
the recommendation in response to the Regional Administrator's letter
dated April 14, 2015, noting our concerns relating to the Habitat
Committee's recommendations in light of the Gulf of Maine cod stock
status. This letter stated specifically ``there is insufficient
information in the record to show that the Committee's recommended
preferred alternative improves juvenile groundfish habitat protections
and would likely fail to meet the Council's stated goals and
objectives.'' We agree that the Council discussion on the motion was
clear that the intention was for cod protection given its current
status, and that when the cod is considered healthy, the Council should
consider the utility of the Cashes Ledge Closure Area under those
conditions. NMFS would support a review of this area, as well as the
Western Gulf of Maine Groundfish Closure measures, when cod and other
groundfish stocks are rebuilt. The Council can revisit the overall
objectives and collection of management measures in the Northeast
Multispecies FMP as stock conditions change. This review should include
all measures that have been implemented or maintained in support of
rebuilding stocks that may no longer be necessary when stocks recover.
Comment 9: The Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries submitted
comments in support of the Council's recommendations, particularly
those on Georges Bank, noting the decisions being developed in Scallop
Framework Adjustment 29 are projected to result in lower overall
groundfish bycatch, reduced open area effort, increased scallop catch,
and increased revenue from access to Closed Area I and the Nantucket
Lightship West area.
Response: While we disapproved the Council's recommendations for
eastern Georges Bank, we are approving the recommendations to remove
the Closed Area I and Nantucket Lightship Closure Areas as year-round
closures. A decision on Framework 29 is pending finalization by NMFS,
which, if approved, would authorize the scallop fishery to access
portions of these former closure areas.
Comment 10: The Associated Fisheries of Maine (AFM), representing
25 fishing businesses, recommended eliminating closed area restrictions
and allowing vessels to optimize fishing efficiency and thereby reduce
the intensity and frequency of mobile gear on the ocean floor.
Specifically, the AFM did not support maintaining the existing Cashes
Ledge Groundfish Closure Area. AFM asserts that groundfish mortality
objectives are met with annual catch limits and accountability
measures. AFM contested the proposed rule claims that this closure was
maintained to ``improve protection of juvenile and spawning
groundfish'' because, according to AFM, the Closed Area Technical Team
analysis does not show the Cashes Ledge area as either a groundfish
juvenile or spawning ``hotspot.'' AFM does support the modifications to
the Cashes Ledge Habitat Closure Area to allow fishery access to deep
mud and sand habitats.
AFM supported the proposal to align the eastern boundary of the
Western Gulf of Maine Groundfish Closure Area with the Western Gulf of
Maine Habitat Closure Area, as well as the exemption to allow shrimp
trawls in the northwest portion of the area. AFM did not support
maintaining the current groundfish restrictions in the Western Gulf of
Maine Closure Areas, noting that groundfish mortality objectives are
met through annual catch limits and accountability measures, and the
use of fixed gear to target groundfish (as is allowed for recreational
fishing) would not negatively affect any habitat objectives for this
area.
AFM supported removal of the Closed Area I and II Groundfish
Closure Areas. AFM contends that the proposed exceptions to the
Northern Edge should include all mobile tending bottom gear. AFM
asserted that the groundfish trawl fleet with the capacity to fish
offshore has been greatly reduced by low annual catch limits, and
therefore the intensity and frequency of trawl access to the Northern
Edge would be minimal. AFM also supported the proposal for seasonal
spawning closures on Georges Bank.
Response: As noted in the response to the Northeast Seafood
Coalition, while NMFS agrees that increases in fishing efficiency that
reduce the amount of time that gear is in contact with the bottom can
enhance habitat protection, increased efficiency is not the only way to
minimize the adverse effects of fishing on EFH. (See comment #4.) NMFS
disagrees that the hotspot analyses in the EIS failed to show that
Cashes Ledge area is an important area for juvenile and spawning
groundfish species. The analysis indicates that there are a number of
species that aggregate in this area as juveniles (redfish, American
plaice, silver hake, white hake, and haddock) and as large adults
(redfish, red hake, and witch flounder). In addition, research in this
area shows there are resident and migratory populations of cod that use
this this area, and that they are growing faster and living longer than
cod collected outside the Cashes Ledge Groundfish Closed Area.
Comment 11: Seven comments were received from businesses and others
with an interest in the surfclam and ocean quahog fishery. All seven
comments recommended that NMFS disapprove the Council's recommendations
for the Great South Channel and Georges Shoal because of the economic
impacts to the surfclam/quahog fishery from those HMAs. These comments
also noted that if we did approve the HMAs, we should only do so if the
1-year exemption for the clam fishery were extended. The commenters
varied in the preference for the extension, but they ranged from 3 or 5
years to a permanent exemption.
Response: NMFS is disapproving the Georges Shoal HMA as part of the
decision to partially disapprove the eastern Georges Bank
recommendation. In the Great South Channel, NMFS is approving the
Council's recommendation. The Council considered a permanent exemption,
but selected the 1-year option instead. Currently, the Council is
developing a framework adjustment that will consider more discrete,
permanent exemptions for hydraulic clam dredges
[[Page 15249]]
within the Great South Channel HMA. NMFS agrees with the Council that
the 1-year exemption is enough time to consider more discrete
exemptions, particularly because it will have been nearly 4 years since
the Council took final action on its recommendations when the exemption
is scheduled to expire. The Council has been considering these issues
during this time. The review and rulemaking development phase at NMFS
has provided an additional 3 years for the clam industry to gather data
and bring recommendations to the Council for consideration.
Comment 12: Three comments were submitted specific to lobster
fishery issues. The American Offshore Lobstermen's Association (AOLA),
which represents the majority of offshore lobster vessels, commented on
the Council's recommendations for eastern Georges Bank. Specifically,
the AOLA noted that NMFS has not codified the agreement between the
lobster and groundfish fleets that is designed to eliminate gear
conflicts by setting seasonal restrictions for each fishery. The
comment also noted that the language in the Council's motion to
eliminate gear conflicts between the scallop and lobster fisheries
incorporates language that differs from the industry discussions. The
organization also noted that there has been an increase in Jonah crab
fishing in the Nantucket Lightship area and that if the area were to
open in this action, gear conflicts may arise and should be addressed.
The letter submitted by the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries
Commission's American Lobster Board reiterated many of these same
comments. The third letter, from a student in a public policy course,
expressed his concern about the lack of impact analysis for certain
fishing areas, specifically referencing the AOLA letter and the
expansion of the Jonah crab fishery and lobster fisheries. The
commenter also noted that data relied on in the document is more than
five years old and that fish and crustacean populations are likely to
have shifted during that time due to climate change.
Response: We are disapproving the Council's recommendations for
eastern Georges Bank, which renders the concerns about the gear
conflict agreement moot. In the Nantucket Lightship area, it is
difficult to know how the fixed gear fisheries may interact with mobile
gear fisheries because the area has been closed and we have no data
showing an expected increase in gear conflicts. We support industry
initiatives to minimize gear conflict in this region. We will work with
the Council and Commission to address these issues as they arise.
Comment 13: The Pew Charitable Trust submitted a comment signed by
8,493 members of the public that contends that the Amendment does not
follow best available science, does not meet its own goals and
objectives, and does not fulfill legal requirements to protect fish
habitat, especially on Georges Bank and in Southern New England.
Specifically, the letter focused on the Northern Edge of Georges Bank
and the surrounding areas that have been closed to mobile bottom-
tending fishing gears for over 20 years. The letter contended that the
Northern Edge is one of the most ecologically important places in New
England waters, and it should remain closed to dredging and trawling to
provide refuge for depleted groundfish and other marine species, and
that NMFS should reject the Council's proposed HMAs on Georges Bank,
including the Northern Edge Reduced Impact Habitat Management Area,
which would allow scallop dredging in an area that has been identified
as critically important for juvenile cod since 1998. This letter also
stated that all clam dredge exemptions should also be rejected, and
this gear should not operate in any HMAs identified for protection. The
letter further contends that in Southern New England, allowing clam
dredging in the proposed Great South Channel HMA would introduce gear
that is destructive to seafloor habitats. The comments also stated that
NMFS should reject the Council's proposal to allow bottom trawling
without ground cable in the Cox Ledge HMA because the commenters
recommend that this area should be closed to all mobile
bottom[hyphen]tending gear. A nearly identical letter was also
submitted by a private individual.
Response: NMFS agrees that, as proposed, some of the Council's
recommendations fall short of achieving its stated goals and objectives
for this action and the requirements of the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
However, we have determined that, as approved, the Council's FMPs will
comply with the Magnuson-Steven Act, and that the approved provisions
of this action were based on the best available scientific information.
We agree, and are disapproving, the Council's recommendations for the
Northern Edge and Cox Ledge. We are approving the clam exemption, for
the reasons stated above.
Comment 14: The United States Department of the Interior, Office of
Environmental Policy and Compliance, Bureau of Indian Affairs urged the
NMFS to engage interested Indian tribes as part of this rulemaking
process and to provide such tribes a meaningful opportunity to consult
directly on what impacts the rule would have on tribes and tribal
resources.
Response: NOAA conducts government to government consultation with
federally recognized tribes pursuant to the process identified in its
November 2013 Tribal Consultation Handbook (https://www.legislative.noaa.gov/policybriefs/NOAA%20Tribal%20consultation%20handbook%20111213.pdf). The actions
identified in this document are not expected to impact tribal rights or
resources. No Federally recognized tribe expressed interest in the
management measures proposed nor has any tribe commented on these
measures at any time throughout the extensive public development of the
Amendment.
Comment 15: Four environmental non-government organizations
(Conservation Law Foundation, Oceana, Earthjustice, and the Natural
Resource Defense Council; hereafter ``Conservation NGOs'') submitted a
detailed, joint comment letter on the Amendment. These organizations
noted their years of involvement in the development of this action and
raised concern with the Amendment process. These conservation
organizations contend that NMFS should not approve the Amendment until
the completion of the required Endangered Species Act consultations,
and that a reinitiation of the consultation that covers the affected
fishery management plans is required. The Conservation NGOs also state
that the Amendment does not satisfy the requirements of the Magnuson-
Stevens Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, and the Endangered
Species Act.
The Conservation NGOs' letter contends that OHA2 and its EIS fail
to recognize the ecological importance of minimizing the impacts of
fishing on EFH and actions are inconsistent with the OHA2's goals and
related legal requirements. The Conservation NGOs contend that the
management attention and analytical approaches on the vulnerable
complex benthic habitats is too narrowly focused and does not
acknowledge the potential for adverse effects to sandy or mud bottoms
or the water column from fishing. The Conservation NGOs argue that this
is a major deficiency of the Amendment from a Magnuson-Stevens Act,
NEPA, and ESA perspective. This letter argues that the statutory task
is not limited to minimizing the physical impacts of fishing gears on
hard, complex benthic areas to which the bulk of the analysis in the
EIS has been focused.
[[Page 15250]]
Response: NMFS does not agree that sandy or mud bottom habitats
were ignored during the process of identifying candidate areas, or
selecting preferred habitat management alternatives. The SASI model was
specifically designed to assess the relative vulnerability of different
types of bottom habitat to fishing gear impacts and output from the
model accounted for habitat diversity with areas that included a
greater proportion of more complex habitats receiving a higher score.
Many of the preferred alternatives (e.g., the Western Gulf of Maine,
Great South Channel) include sand and mud habitats as well as rocky
habitats. The Council and NMFS have also determined that EFH within the
water column is not adversely affected by fishing and does not require
protection from fishing activities.
Comment 16: The Conservation NGOs argue that the Amendment and
supporting documentation fails to protect EFH for managed stocks that
its own analysis concludes is vulnerable to fishing gears.
Response: NMFS disagrees; the intent of the action is to minimize
impacts to EFH globally and more specifically to critical groundfish
species. Many of the HMA alternatives that NMFS approved protect
vulnerable EFH for a variety of managed stocks. (See the EFH overlap
analysis for each HMA in Volume 4; Tables 7, 13, 19, 27 and 33.)
Approval of the Great South Channel HMA and disapproval of the
Council's proposed alternative on eastern Georges Bank was predicated
on the need to protect vulnerable habitat for juvenile cod. OHA2 also
includes two new juvenile cod HAPCs. Other overexploited groundfish
stocks, such as Georges Bank yellowtail flounder, occupy less
vulnerable sandy habitats, and were thus not the subject of area
management decisions.
Comment 17: The Conservation NGOs' letter argues that the OHA2
decision-making process and the selected alternatives ignored the
important Weighted Fish Persistence modeling work done by The Nature
Conservancy.
Response: NMFS acknowledges that the results of the TNC analysis
were not formally incorporated into the EIS until after the Council
selected preferred alternatives; however, these analyses were available
to the Council prior to taking final action. Further, the Weighted
Persistence Analysis did factor into NMFS's decision-making process, as
noted above.
Comment 18: The Conservation NGOs argue that the Amendment fails to
identify significant HMA areas, virtually ignoring all of the habitat
protection alternatives selected and the species hotspot and habitat
vulnerable areas identified by the SASI, LISA, and Weighted Fish
Persistence models. They assert numerous alternatives proposed by the
Council's technical teams were eliminated by Committees or the Council
out of hand, without any practicability analysis and based on multiple,
legally irrelevant grounds.
Response: The work done by the Habitat PDT and the Closed Area
Technical Team (CATT) was considered by the Habitat Committee when they
decided which HMA and spawning area alternatives to retain for
analysis. The Committee considered public comment and other information
available to them to develop a reasonable scope of alternatives to
address the Amendment's goals and objectives. These decisions removed
infeasible alternatives because of extreme costs to the industry or
insufficient EFH protection. The Council then used the analyses in the
EIS to weigh the benefits and costs of each alternative and selected
preferred alternatives that minimized EFH impacts without closing
valuable fishing grounds. Practicability assessments in the EIS were
based on a thorough analysis and comparison of the benefits and
economic costs of all the habitat management areas considered in the
Amendment.
Comment 19: The Conservation NGOs object to the Council's
recommendations that would open extensive areas of known cod and other
overfished groundfish EFH areas than are currently under protection.
Response: NMFS agrees that the Council's proposed action would have
opened three large closed areas on Georges Bank and south of Nantucket,
that provide habitats used by overfished groundfish species. We have
approved the opening of the habitat and groundfish closed areas in
Closed Area I and the Nantucket Lightship area, but not in Closed Area
II. Our decision to disapprove the proposed alternative on eastern
Georges Bank is based, in part, on the high EFH value of the northern
edge of Georges Bank for cod and the low overall EFH value of the
Georges Shoal area. We believe the analysis in the EIS shows that
fishing impacts on more vulnerable hard bottom habitats used by
overfished groundfish species (e.g., cod) will continue to be minimized
by the OHA2 regulations even with the opening of Closed Area I and the
Nantucket Lightship Closure Areas. Other overfished species like
yellowtail flounder utilize less vulnerable sandy habitats, so opening
closed areas will have less of an impact on their habitats than opening
areas more complex habitats.
Comment 20: The Conservation NGOs contends that the Amendment
contains only cursory references to reduced availability of prey
species and does not discuss the loss of prey species and their
habitat. They state this action does not adequately analyze the
potential adverse effects to EFH for managed species consistent with
the Magnuson-Stevens Act's requirement to minimize the adverse effects
of fishing to the extent practicable.
Response: NMFS acknowledges that prey is a component of EFH, as
defined by the EFH final rule. NMFS and the Council considered effects
on prey to the degree afforded by the best available science. The
Habitat PDT attempted to include infaunal prey organisms in the
vulnerability assessment for SASI, but there was not enough information
regarding the impacts of fishing gear on individual prey species and
species groups. A section of the EIS describes what is known about the
loss of prey species and their habitat and an appendix that summarizes
available information on their distribution in the region. There was
not enough spatial information available on the distribution and
abundance of prey to use in defining habitat management alternatives.
In addition, the Council's approach to focus on vulnerable substrate
important to managed species indirectly protects epifaunal
invertebrates that occupy gravel and rocky habitats substrates and are
eaten by fish and the habitats that are important to prey.
Comment 21: The Conservation NGOs contend that, with the limited
exception of the eastern Gulf of Maine, there are no alternatives that
expand the area of existing protections within current closed areas or
the size of currently protected areas.
Response: This is accurate; however, expansion of existing
protections within current closed areas or the size of protected areas
is not the charge to the Council from the Magnuson-Stevens Act. NMFS
and the Council have made it clear from the beginning that size of HMAs
alone is not sufficiently effective for maintaining habitat protections
that minimize adverse impacts to habitat to the extent practicable. It
is more effective and efficient to close smaller areas with a higher
proportion of more vulnerable habitat and increase fishing access to
less vulnerable areas. This provides for an improved balance of short-
and long-term costs and benefits for minimizing adverse fishing impacts
to the extent practicable.
[[Page 15251]]
Comment 22: The Conservation NGOs argue that because practicability
by definition means ``capable of being put into practice or of being
done or accomplished: Feasible,'' if an EFH impact minimization measure
can be feasibly done, then it must be done. In several places, they
compare to the North Pacific Council's Alaska EFH plan and the Pacific
Council's Groundfish Amendments, where there were specific analyses on
the amount of revenue put ``at-risk'' from the measures, ranging from
$2.4 to 36.3 million, depending on the Council/alternative. They
further argue that ``balancing'' between habitat protection and
economic costs is not what is required under the EFH language.
Response: NMFS does not agree that it is necessary to compare the
approaches to minimizing adverse effect from fishing on EFH from other
regional fishery management councils. Each council is afforded the
flexibility to determine what is practicable for its particular
fisheries and habitats. The recommendations made by the North Pacific
and Pacific Councils, and the decisions made by NMFS in approving those
recommendations, may be looked at for guidance on a particular
approach, but it is not required.
Practicability does not mean to the extent possible. NMFS disagrees
with the assertion that the Magnuson-Stevens Act requires any EFH
protection that is possible. The Magnuson-Stevens Act requires
minimizing adverse fishing impacts to the extent practicable. NMFS
agrees that this consideration includes what is feasible. But feasible
means that which is capable of being done. ``What is capable'' is
determined by an analysis and consideration of of the nature and extent
of the adverse effect from fishing on EFH and the long- and short-term
costs and benefits of potential management measures to EFH, associated
fisheries, and the nation.
Comment 23: The Conservation NGOs stated that the economic/
displacement discussion ``ignores the reality of New England fisheries
where gross revenues for the groundfish fleet have increased
dramatically in the past two decades despite ever-escalating regulatory
limits and the current habitat closures.''
Response: The statement that gross revenues in the groundfish
fishery have ``dramatically increased'' over the past two decades is
not supported by the facts. While there were increases in gross
revenues in a few years, the overall trend in revenue has been
downward, when adjusting for inflation, since 1981. See the ``Measuring
the Effects of Catch Shares Project'' https://www.catchshareindicators.org/.
Comment 24: The Conservation NGOs further contend that the
practicability analysis fails to adequately account for the role that
closed areas play in hedging against the numerous forms of uncertainty
inherent in both the marine environment and in attempting to manage an
extractive industry within that natural environment. The letter also
argues that the practicability analysis fails to provide a model or
other meaningful support for its assumptions related to the likely
human behavioral responses to management measures. The Conservation
NGOs said that the heavy reliance on a simplistic analysis of the
impacts of lost revenues on the fleet without consideration of human
behaviors that might mitigate against potential short-term loss renders
the estimate of the practicability of a given measure grossly
unreliable and often improperly inflammatory.
Response: The Council considered potential behavioral responses to
the degree available information supported responsive measures. The EIS
acknowledges that there was no objective way to predict how fishermen
would respond to new area closures, and the results of the analysis are
described as ``revenue at risk'' calculations. While these calculations
could have over-stated costs of area closures, NMFS believes that they
provide a reasonable basis for incorporating potential uncertainty into
what may be practicable. Further, our partial approval decisions were
based on a careful evaluation of the habitat benefits and economic
costs of the proposed alternatives.
Comment 25: The Conservation NGOs maintain that NEPA obligates NMFS
to make available a redline version of the EIS for public review, and
failure to do so violates NEPA requirements. The groups also object to
the ``ad-hoc'' method of developing the final Council alternative on
Georges Bank because it was not within the range of previously analyzed
alternatives. In addition, the letter points out that The Nature
Conservancy's weighted persistence analysis was not formally
incorporated into the draft EIS prior to the June 2015 decision
meeting. The environmental organizations also argue that the EIS fails
to include an adequate range of alternatives because, while the Council
included an alternative that would have removed all closures, there was
not an equally extreme alternative on the other end of the spectrum.
The group also contend that EIS is deficient in that it fails to
develop or analyze any alternatives that include mitigating the
ubiquitous impacts of lobster gear on EFH. The letter goes on to argue
that the analysis in the Amendment is further flawed by its failure to
consider all the adverse environmental effects to EFH associated with
the alternatives. Instead, the Conservation NGOs argue that the
analysis relied too heavily on the SASI/LISA tools to predict all
environmental impacts.
Response: NMFS disagrees that the Council and the Agency failed to
appropriately comply with NEPA. There is no requirement to provide a
``red-line'' version of the EIS for public review. Further, the Council
did not limit itself to only one end of the spectrum of possibilities.
The Amendment included a reasonable range of alternatives that
addressed a wide spectrum of impacts that were detailed with thorough
analysis that sufficiently informed the public, the Council, and NMFS.
This allowed the Council and us to take a hard look at the impacts of
the potential choices. For example, each sub-region, with the exception
of the Central Gulf of Maine, which was smaller than other areas and
addressed by changes to the Cashes Ledge area, included an alternative
or a potential combination of areas that would have dramatically
increased either the total size or total vulnerable habitat covered by
a closure area. The Council's selection of Alternative 10 on eastern
Georges Bank, while insufficient for addressing the requirements of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act and the Amendment's goals and objectives, was
within the range of alternatives previously analyzed. Further, the
Georges Shoal HMA that the Council recommended was included in
Alternative 7, and the concept of the Northern Edge Reduced Impact HMA,
combined with a mobile bottom-tending gear closure to the south, was
substantially and materially similar to Alternative 9.
The Conservation NGOs do not provide any information that was
overlooked that would have better informed the Council's actions or our
decision. Nor do they provide information that contradicts our
decision. The groups specifically point to the Bigelow Bight areas
designed by the CATT as an example that would have better informed the
Council's decision if it were included within the range of
alternatives. However, a large version of that area was incorporated in
Western Gulf of Maine Alternatives 3 and 4, and a smaller version was
in Western Gulf of Maine Alternative 5. Some of the CATT areas in the
Western Gulf of Maine extended into state waters, and the Council
determined it would be inappropriate and ineffective to implement
closures in state waters
[[Page 15252]]
because they would only apply to federally permitted vessels and only
fishing in state-waters would still be allowed. The Nature
Conservancy's weighted persistence analysis was not formally
incorporated in the draft EIS that was prepared for the April and June
2015 Council meetings because the information was received too late to
be directly incorporated in the document. However, the information was
distributed to Council members and was made available to the public in
advance of those meetings.
The SASI model that was used as a first step in identifying
potential HMAs included an analysis of the effects of fixed gears, such
as lobster traps, and concluded that those impacts are minimal. For
this reason, they were not considered when developing gear management
options in OHA2. As described in the response to Comment #15, NMFS
determined that the impacts to non-rocky habitats were addressed
appropriately. Further, the Council analyzed and selected preferred
alternatives partly based on output from the SASI model as well as
information from a number of other sources, not just the vulnerability
scores from the model. We are not sure what is meant by ``all the
adverse environmental effects to EFH associated with the
alternatives.'' The only effect the Council is obligated to minimize is
adverse impacts from fishing. To the extent that these effects are
mitigated by natural disturbance factors, these were considered by the
Council and NMFS in selecting and approving final HMA alternatives.
Comment 26: The Conservation NGOs supported the revised EFH
designations; however, they contend that because the Phase I EFH
designations were completed in 2007 and reviewed in 2011, they are now
beyond due for the mandated five-year review, even before they are
approved and implemented. They state NMFS must initiate action to
analyze and confirm the validity of the information supporting these
changes. Any required revisions should be immediately addressed through
an appropriate action.
Response: The EFH final rule states that EFH designations ``should
be'' revised, as necessary, every five years. The regulations do not
require this. Updating the designations further in this action was
impracticable. It could have further complicated and delayed this
action. In practice, there is a great deal of variability in the timing
of the EFH reviews conducted by the Councils and NMFS from region to
region. Because it has been 20 years since the original EFH
designations were approved in the region, we agree that the Council
will need to consider review of EFH designations in upcoming future
actions. That review, however, is not part of the decisions made in
this document.
Comment 27: The letter noted that the Conservation NGOs are deeply
concerned that known coral areas in the Gulf of Maine that are
essential habitat for Acadian redfish were not designated as HAPC, and
requested that NMFS direct the Council to review those habitats for
designation under the HAPC criteria, especially because the Council's
Coral Amendment will not protect those areas.
Response: The EFH Final Rule does not require the Councils or NMFS
to establish HAPCs. The Council is currently finalizing its Deep-Sea
Coral Amendment, which will address deep-sea coral protection issues in
the Gulf of Maine.
Comment 28: The Conservation NGOs further insisted that NMFS
initiate action to use the final rule for OHA2 to confirm that each
HAPC reflects current understanding about the vulnerability and
susceptibility of these areas to fishing impacts. The comment states
that any required revisions should be immediately addressed through an
appropriate action.
Response: There is an analysis in the EIS that shows there is a
high degree of spatial overlap of EFH within the HAPCs for several
groundfish species that occupy more vulnerable hard bottom habitat. The
EFH value for adult Atlantic cod, for example, is high in four of the
five HAPCs and high in three of them for juvenile cod. The results for
haddock are similar. Winter flounder EFH overlaps highly in three of
the five HAPCs. Although there is no analysis that directly addresses
the vulnerability of these areas to fishing impacts, the HAPCs are
clearly well located in areas with vulnerable habitats used by managed
species of groundfish. The EIS also describes, in general terms, the
susceptibility of each HAPC to anthropogenic stresses, including
fishing, because that is one of the criteria that were used to justify
the designations. There are also maps indicating how well the HAPCs
coincide with the proposed HMAs. In some situations, an HAPC is
entirely contained within an HMA and, in others, it is partially
included in an HMA. NMFS agrees with the Council that the HMAs include
appropriate habitat protections associated with the HAPCs, with the
exception of the Northern Edge Juvenile Cod HAPC. The proposed
management measures in the Northern Edge Reduced Impact HMA did not
appropriately protect the HAPC from fishing impacts. This was one
reason why the proposed alternative on Georges Bank was disapproved.
Comment 29: Generally, the Conservation NGOs believe that the
habitat protection measures in the Gulf of Maine do not minimize the
adverse effects of fishing on habitat to the extent practicable.
Specific to the eastern Gulf of Maine, the groups contend that because
vulnerable EFH must be protected from fishing impacts to the extent
practicable in this amendment, selection of the Small Eastern Maine HMA
as the preferred alternative is irrational. The alternative is not the
most protective of the alternatives considered or of alternatives
considered but rejected earlier on practicability grounds, coming in
somewhere ``in the middle'' of the alternatives considered in the area.
The Conservation NGOs also assert that this alternative also
encompasses very little of the areas identified by The Nature
Conservancy in its peer-reviewed Weighted Persistence Analysis, which
identified this area as one of the highest scoring areas in the entire
region.
Response: NMFS did note some concerns when preferred HMAs were
being selected that prohibitions on the use of mobile bottom-tending
gear in this area would do little to minimize the adverse impacts of
this gear because there is little use of that gear in the area
currently. NMFS acknowledged that the overall increase in protection in
the region is relatively small. However, the same could be said for the
other HMA alternatives in eastern Maine. This area was correctly deemed
the most practicable because it was not adjacent to disputed waters
just inside the U.S.-Canadian border and because it provided nearly the
same degree of habitat protection as the Large Eastern Maine area. The
primary benefit of any HMA in eastern Maine is to protect vulnerable
bottom habitats from any future resumption of groundfishing, which used
to be more active there.
Comment 30: In the Central Gulf of Maine, the Conservation NGOs
contend that the failure to designate the entire Cashes Ledge Closure
Area as an HMA with appropriate protections is inconsistent with
statutory mandates, the goals and objectives of the Amendment, and the
extensive record associated with this action. The letter says that it
was one matter to have this area treated largely as a groundfish
closure historically, but the Amendment process is intended to advance
all feasible EFH habitat protection as such, not just as a beneficiary
of closures or openings associated with managed species FMPs. The
commenters
[[Page 15253]]
maintain that the entire current Cashes Ledge Closure Area should be
identified as a habitat management area and managed accordingly to
prohibit all commercial fishing, including gillnets in the water column
EFH and the pelagic mobile gears may contact the bottom. The commenters
contend that managing the area solely as a ``groundfish mortality
closure'' leaves open the possibility that it will be re-opened by the
Council whenever it determines that groundfish stock conditions have
improved sufficiently.
The letter also argues that it is inconsistent with statutory
purposes and the goals and objectives of the Amendment to reduce the
size of the existing Cashes Ledge Habitat Closure area by 27 percent.
In addition, the commenters suggest that the Council's proposed action
in this sub-region was based in part on poor quality substrate data and
a reliance on ``general knowledge,'' particularly in regard to the
extent of rocky bottom in the vicinity of Cashes Ledge and the
predominance of muddy substrate in the deeper portions of the Cashes
Ledge Closure Area. Re-designating current groundfish closures as
habitat closures and expanding the existing protections for the Cashes
Ledge Closure Area to include all gears would also represent an
appropriate precautionary approach in light of the lack of survey data
available for this area and the severely depleted status of Gulf of
Maine cod.
Response: NMFS agrees with the Council recommendation that
maintaining the gear regulations that have been in place since the
closure was established in 2002 meets the EFH requirements to minimize
the adverse effects of fishing on habitat. Maintaining these
restrictions allow the protections afforded to the diversity of habitat
types it encompasses to remain in place and more effectively protect
the resident groundfish resources from fishing than regulations
associated with HMAs that only prohibit the use of mobile bottom-
tending gears. NMFS agrees that this is a reasonable approach to
achieving the stated goals and objectives of the Amendment. As noted in
the response to Comment #4, the Council voted to maintain the Cashes
Ledge Closure Area in response to our concerns that the goals and
objectives relative to critical groundfish life stages, among others,
would be compromised if these protections were removed. The Council
could decide in the future to remove the fishing restrictions in
response to the full recovery of Gulf of Maine cod and other important
groundfish stocks. The Council would need to consider how the changes
minimize the adverse effects of fishing on EFH to comply with the
Magnuson-Stevens Act.
NMFS does not agree that this area should be designated as an HMA
in order to prohibit all commercial fishing activity, including mid-
water gillnets and trawls. Mid-water gears are not designed or intended
to contact the bottom and do not impact marine habitats in any
significant way so there is no need to prohibit their use in this area.
In addition, the analysis in the EIS indicates that the Cashes Ledge
HMA could be reduced in size without compromising the habitat
protection benefits of the closure. NMFS agrees, and is implementing
the Council's recommendation to modify the HMA on Cashes Ledge. NMFS
agrees that substrate and resource survey data quality is poor in the
central Gulf of Maine, but is convinced that the Council made the best
possible use of available scientific information and did not make any
unjustifiable decisions when selecting preferred alternatives in this
sub-region.
Comment 31: In the Western Gulf of Maine, the commenters argue that
the Amendment's proposal to reduce the size of the current areas with
year-round habitat protection by 25 percent and to increase the gear
exemptions within the closure is inconsistent with section 303(a)(7)
requirements, unless it were infeasible for the Council to realize
greater habitat and managed species benefits by protecting a larger
area with more restrictive measures. Based on the information in the
EIS, the commenters argue that the No Action Alternative 1 (unmodified)
is clearly the rational preferred choice to the Western Gulf of Maine
Preferred Alternative, as it realizes more habitat benefits at
virtually the same fisheries cost.
Response: We approved the Council's proposed action because the
bottom habitats just outside the eastern boundary of the current
groundfish closure are primarily deeper, low vulnerability mud
habitats. NMFS determined that allowing access to this area and
maintaining the prohibitions on a wider variety of gears capable of
catching groundfish in the smaller area would continue to minimize the
adverse impacts of fishing and protect groundfish resources at
approximately the same level. Allowing the groundfish fleet into
productive fishing grounds located just outside the eastern boundary of
the Western Gulf of Maine HMA maintains approximately the same level of
protections in a less costly, more practicable way.
NMFS disagrees that that the exemption for shrimp trawls in the
northwest corner of the closed area negatively impact the protective
measures of the closures. Shrimp trawls are not allowed to have ground
cables; they are used in deeper, muddy bottom habitats; and are
equipped with a grate to reduce the catch of juvenile groundfish.
Furthermore, the shrimp resource is currently in very poor shape to the
extent that fishing has been completely or severely restricted in
recent years.
Comment 32: The Conservation NGOs argue that the Council should
have selected Western Gulf of Maine Alternative 3 with Options 1 or 2
or Alternative 4 with Options 1 or 2, arguing that both perform the
best in terms of minimizing the impacts of fishing on EFH and, with
only moderately to slightly negative social and economic costs, both of
those alternatives are feasible. They assert that any other selected
alternative would be inconsistent with the record and contrary to law.
Response: Both of these alternatives include the Large Bigelow
Bight HMA, which the Council did not propose for approval because of
their negative social and economic costs. NMFS agrees with the
Council's determination that they would incur unacceptable costs to the
industry, particularly the inshore groundfish fishery and are,
therefore, impracticable.
Comment 33: The commenters suggest that Council's proposed
alternative on George Bank should be rejected by NMFS and returned to
the Council for further development, public review and comment, and
future action because the proposed assortment of HMAs do not minimize,
to the extent practicable, the effect of fishing on the EFH in the
Georges Bank sub-region. Of the alternatives considered, the
alternatives that scored the highest in terms of biological benefits to
habitats and managed resources from the habitat protection measures
proposed were Alternative 6, Options 1 and 2 and Alternative 8, Options
1 and 2. The Council determined these alternatives (Alternatives 6 & 8
with Options 1 & 2) to be superior to the proposed suite of management
measures (Alternative 10 with Options 1 & 2) for habitat generally and
the large mesh groundfish resource. Economically, the preferred Georges
Bank alternative (Alternative 10) is expected to provide similar short-
and long-term economic impacts as the nine other alternatives/option
combinations that were considered, including the No Action alternative.
Further, the letter notes that there is little, if any, social or
economic cost to continuing the closed habitat areas on Georges Bank
because these areas have
[[Page 15254]]
been closed for many years. The limited access scallop fishery will
continue to be profitable if these areas remain closed. In addition,
the proposed Georges Bank HMAs do not satisfy the objectives of OHA2 to
improve protection of critical groundfish habitats or improve refuge
for critical life stages (e.g., spawning fish) and they are
inconsistent with the Council's designation of the Northern Edge
Juvenile Cod HAPC that was established in 1998.
Response: NMFS agrees that there are no new direct costs to the
industry if the status quo is maintained, although we acknowledge there
has been substantial lost opportunity costs due to the closure of the
northern edge that would continue. (See Comment #7.) NMFS agrees with
the comments relating to the goals and objectives of OHA2 and the
comment that the Council's proposal for eastern Georges Bank is
inconsistent with the designation of the area as a juvenile cod HAPC,
for the reasons described in the preamble. Because NMFS determined that
the combination of newly approved and existing measures that will
continue allow each of the Council's FMPs to comply with the EFH
requirements of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, we did not remand the entire
proposal to the Council for action. The Council may choose to revisit
habitat protection on the northern edge, and NMFS would provide the
necessary support and guidance throughout that process as we did for
this Amendment. In order to address a number of the concerns cited in
the preamble regarding the disapproved measures, NMFS contends that any
future action should thoroughly evaluate the geographic extent,
duration, and frequency of any future scallop dredging activity within
any new access area on the northern edge of the bank and the habitat
features that are used by groundfish at critical life stages that need
to be protected from impacts.
Comment 34: Specific to the Southern New England region, the
commenters note that the Amendment considered more than a dozen
alternatives and options to conserve EFH in this sub-region, yet the
Council proposed an alternative that does not minimize adverse effects
on EFH to the extent practicable, does not satisfy the goals and
objectives of the Amendment, and does not effectively conserve the
newly designated Habitat Area of Particular Concern in the Great South
Channel sub-region. The Council considered an alternative (Alternative
3) that could have achieved these multiple tasks in Great South Channel
East HMA, yet chose a less protective area for its preferred
alternative. In addition, by failing to account for the displacement of
fishing effort, the Conservation NGOs suggest that the EIS does not
adequately evaluate the practicability of any of the action
alternatives that were considered.
Response: The Council is not required to select the most protective
alternative, regardless of economic impact, but must also consider
their costs and benefits. The analysis in the EIS shows that the
selected alternative does minimize impacts to the extent practicable
and complies with the requirements of the Magnuson-Stevens Act. NMFS
agrees with the Council that the Great South Channel HMA is a
practicable HMA that minimizes adverse impacts of fishing on vulnerable
EFH.
Further, unlike the Northern Edge HAPC, the Great South Channel
Juvenile Cod HAPC is vulnerable to non-fishing impacts, as well as
fishing impacts. The Council considered the HAPC and how to mitigate or
compensate for adverse fishing impacts. NMFS determined that the
Council's approach to overlaying fishing restrictions on the
substantial amount of complex, gravel, cobble, and boulder habitat
within the HMA, but outside of the HAPC, is an appropriate approach in
this area, rather than simply relying on the boundaries of the HAPC to
dictate where the HMA protections should be.
Comment 35: The chief concern of the Conservation NGOs with the
Council's proposed action in Southern New England is the temporary one-
year exemption for hydraulic clam dredges that allows them to continue
fishing in most of the area. The Conservation NGOs maintain that if
clam dredging is allowed to continue in areas of vulnerable bottom
habitat after the exemption expires, the habitat protection benefits of
the HMA will be substantially compromised.
Response: As approved, clam dredging will be prohibited in the
Great South Channel HMA after one year. The Council considered the clam
fishery's unique fishing activity as providing a possible basis for
allowing limited fishing that would not substantially impact EFH for an
additional year. The 1-year delay in the closure was predicated on the
understanding that the Council and the clam industry would be working
to identify the less vulnerable portions of the Great South Channel HMA
where hydraulic clam dredging could be allowed to continue in such a
way as to not compromise the protective benefits of the HMA overall.
NMFS is working with the Council to ensure that any future framework
adjustment achieves these goals and, as stated in the framework's
problem statement, that any potential long-term clam dredge exemption
meets the goals and objectives of this Amendment.
Comment 36: The Conservation NGOs further argue that all of the
alternatives that use gear modifications, such as trawl cable
restrictions or elevating disks, to reduce the impacts of fishing on
EFH rely on unproven methods to reduce adverse effects of fishing on
EFH. Because these gear modification options would allow continued
fishing in these vulnerable areas with no objective assessment of their
singular or cumulative adverse effects on EFH, the commenters argue
that the measures should be disapproved.
Response: NMFS agrees and has disapproved the Council's
recommendation on Cox Ledge based on the recommendation of the
Council's PDT that there was still too much uncertainty regarding the
loss in efficiency from the modified gears to understand if adverse
effects would be increased or reduced.
Comment 37: The Conservation NGOs state that the DHRAs will enhance
habitat research and adaptive management, but that the proposed sunset
provision that allows the DHRAs to lapse after three years if no
habitat research is undertaken is unrealistic. The process of
developing a research proposal, obtaining funding, and completing all
necessary planning can take well more than three years.
Response: NMFS agrees that the DHRAs are an important component of
the Council's overall plans to continue to improve habitat research and
management. NMFS disagrees that the 3-year sunset provision is
inadequate. The EIS describes a variety of considerations that the
Regional Administrator should take into account when determining if a
DHRA designation should be maintained, including whether funding has
been requested (not simply obtained). The most important consideration
will be that the research requires the DHRA to be successful and that
it supports achieving the Council's stated habitat research goals.
Comment 38: The Conservation NGOs argue that the reductions of
spawning measures from the status quo, specifically the reduction of
current year-round groundfish closure areas to the seasonal areas
recommended in the document, insufficiently protect spawning stocks and
that there should be no exemptions from the spawning closures because
any fishing can disturb spawning activities. They further assert that
the spawning measures need to address all managed species and all
closure areas should also be
[[Page 15255]]
redesignated as spawning protection areas. They do not support
selection of Northeast multispecies Framework Adjustment 53 spawning
measures.
Response: The Council has and continues to address spawning
protection with a variety of approaches, generally relying on species-
or fishery-specific actions. NMFS agrees with the Council that the
measures proposed in this action augment existing spawning protection
measures previously enacted, and, in combination with the approved
HMAs, achieve the requirements to minimize to the extent practicable
the adverse effects of fishing on EFH.
Comment 39: The Conservation NGOs contend that the proposed
frameworking measures in the Amendment are directly contrary to NMFS
guidance and should be disapproved. By adopting an exhaustive list of
issues that can be addressed in a framework adjustment, the Council
will make virtually anything possible through an abbreviated framework
process that can take place in as few as two Council meetings. The
commenters argue that this approach will make the proposals to modify,
adjust, or reduce management restrictions implemented through this
Amendment a continual target and will not provide these areas the long-
term protection that they require.
Response: NMFS disagrees. Framework measures are limited to
adjustments to FMPs and amendments. The frameworkable measures allow
the Council to modify or adjust previously considered measures through
a less onerous approach, provided the measures are not novel or
substantial, and this is considered when determining in what manner a
council may address the need for management changes. Further, the
Council's collection of FMPs will still be required to comply with the
requirements of the Magnuson-Stevens Act to continue to minimize to the
extent practicable the adverse effects of fishing on EFH. As such,
substantial changes in habitat measures would only be permitted if the
Council could demonstrate, and NMFS agreed, that the changes would not
compromise that requirement.
Comment 41: The Fisheries Survival Fund (FSF), representing over
250 full-time active Atlantic scallop limited access permit holders,
submitted a detailed comment recommending that we fully implement the
amendment as recommended by the Council as quickly as possible, with
the exception of the ``lobster closure'' within Closed Area II. FSF
contends that fishery closures in historic areas of scallop abundance,
as considered in certain alternatives, directly threaten the future
success of scallop area management. Providing access to the most
productive areas decreases scallop dredge bottom time and promotes
bycatch reduction, cost efficiency, and safety, and fosters economic
stability in our fishing communities.
FSF notes that the Magnuson-Stevens Act allows actions for habitat
management only within a ``practicability'' standard, and requires FMPs
only to avoid, minimize, or compensate for adverse impacts to habitat
from fishing, and that the Council's recommendations properly weighed
these mandates in choosing preferred alternatives from the many options
available. That is, the letter contends the Council's recommendations
balanced a comprehensive and strategic approach to protecting the
improvement of fish habitat in New England with economic benefits to
fisheries communities and the achievement of optimum yield.
Response: NMFS agrees that the Magnuson-Stevens Act requires the
Council to avoid, minimize, or compensate for adverse effects from
fishing on EFH in manner that is practicable. NMFS determined that, for
the majority of the Council's recommendations, this requirement was
met. However, for the reasons described above, the Council's
recommendations for eastern Georges Bank did not. As FSF noted, the
Magnuson-Stevens Act requires a habitat protection measure to meet two
standards. While the recommendations for this region may have been
practicable from an economic standpoint, they fell short of minimizing
or compensating for adverse effects of fishing on highly vulnerable
habitat, and within an HAPC designated specifically because of its
vulnerability to fishing impacts.
Comment 42: FSF notes that fishery management decisions must be
based on the best scientific information available. FSF asserts that,
despite the Council's thorough efforts to update the scientific record
and the abundance of scientific information upon which its preferred
alternatives were selected, NMFS and the EIS continue to
inappropriately rely on biased, qualitative statements to negatively
characterize the Council's preferred alternative for Georges Bank (and,
to a lesser extent, for Southern New England). The letter states that
NMFS ``falsely rel[ied] on the premise that any decrease in total area
where fishing is prohibited results in negative impacts to habitat
protection--regardless of the quality of habitat located in those
areas--and that closed areas, once closed, should not re-open
regardless of what science dictates.'' FSF also notes that not only
does the SASI model not support the contention that ``bigger is
better'' for habitat closures, but asserts that NMFS staff advocated
for this approach.
Response: NMFS agrees that fishery management decisions need to be
based on the best scientific information available, and that overall,
the Council's recommendations meet these standards. However, the SASI
model and LISA cluster analyses were not developed to be the sole basis
for habitat management decisions. For example, in areas where there is
relatively poor data, the SASI model outputs, and consequently, the
LISA cluster analysis, can overestimate the coverage of vulnerable
substrate in a specific area if a single data point is ``blown out'' as
the grid develops. This is why the Georges Shoal HMA appears, through
the LISA cluster results, to be highly vulnerable. The Council's PDT,
recognizing this shortcoming, removed the layers of the LISA cluster
analysis to examine the underlying substrate data. Doing so, reveals
that the Georges Shoal HMA is not a highly vulnerable area. Further,
the SASI/LISA analyses are not the only measures of habitat value in
the EIS. As described above, the utility of the area to fish stocks,
represented by the EFH overlap analyses, demonstrate that the Georges
Shoal HMA value is low, despite its much larger size, than current
Closed Area II Closure Area. FSF assertion that NMFS required a
``bigger is better'' approach is an incorrect characterization of the
Agency's advice during the development of the Amendment and of our
decision. NMFS staff routinely pointed to the idea that smaller, higher
quality closures were preferable to larger, less efficient closures in
areas of less vulnerable habitat. We contend that our decision to
disapprove the Council's recommendation on eastern Georges Bank
supports this approach. The combination of the Council's two mobile
bottom-tending gear closures are significantly larger than the existing
Closed Area II habitat closure; however, these areas are less efficient
in protecting vulnerable habitat, and, despite their size, include less
EFH for managed species and life stages, as described above.
Comment 43: FSF states that NMFS must approve any FMP amendment
submitted by a council unless that amendment is inconsistent with the
law; that OHA2 is consistent with all relevant laws; therefore, it must
be implemented as submitted, with the exception of the lobster closure,
``even if some on NMFS' staff may not have
[[Page 15256]]
selected the same alternatives the Council did.''
Response: NMFS agrees that we are obligated to approve any FMP
amendment submitted by a council if that action is determined to be
consistent with applicable law. NMFS disagrees that all of the
Council's recommendations met this standard and; therefore, disapproved
the portions of the Amendment that did not. Throughout the development
of the Amendment, there were alternatives in many areas that NMFS staff
appropriately advocated for that were ultimately not selected as
preferred. However, with the exception of eastern Georges Bank and Cox
Ledge, NMFS approved the Council's recommendations.
Comment 44: FSF states that through the process of developing this
amendment, the Council and its committees made enormous scientific
advances using both new and existing analytical tools, relying on far
more detailed substrate profiling information that was not available
when the existing closures were implemented in the first Omnibus
Habitat Amendment in 1998, such as scallop video survey work by the
University of Massachusetts' School for Marine Science and Technology,
and that, therefore, spatial management for habitat conservation
purposes will be improved by the selection of any science-based
alternative.
Response: NMFS agrees, however, the scientific information
presented in the EIS by the Council recognizes that there are areas
within existing closures that are highly vulnerable to the adverse
effects of fishing and that warrant continued protection. NMFS
determined that the Council's recommendations for eastern Georges Bank
and Cox Ledge were not adequately supported by the scientific
information in the EIS, for the reasons described above.
Comment 45: FSF notes that the supporting analyses for the EIS and
proposed rule completely omit any consideration of possible unintended
consequences that can, and do, result from effort displacement in areas
with mixed fisheries. FSF contends that such consequences could readily
nullify any possible benefits of closures or even incur greater harm to
fishery resources. Failure to consider fishermen's behavioral changes
associated with closures can undermine the achievement of fishery
management goals.
Response: NMFS agrees that displacement of fishing effort from an
area that is closed into an area that is open to fishing could have an
unintended consequence of increasing habitat impacts in the open area,
especially if it causes increased impacts on sensitive habitats that
have not previously been exposed to much bottom fishing activity.
However, this is not likely to happen in the region affected by
this action. With the exception of the clam fishery operating in
proposed habitat management area east of Nantucket, none of the new
HMAs that were approved are located in areas where there is much mobile
bottom-tending gear fishing activity that could be displaced into
vulnerable habitat areas. Hydraulic clam dredge vessels that fish here
are likely to shift into nearby, less vulnerable sandy habitats in the
current Nantucket Lightship Habitat Management Area (which will open
because of OHA2) if and when they are required to stop fishing in the
new Great South Channel HMA. In general, any vessel that is forced to
leave a recently closed area is more likely to move into an area that
is already being fished rather than a new undisturbed area, in which
case the effects of the additional effort will have little added impact
on the quality of bottom habitats. In this more likely scenario, the
habitat benefits of prohibiting fishing in a closed area would exceed
the habitat losses caused by additional bottom contact in an open area.
Comment 46: FSF also suggests that because management measures were
developed based on consideration of whole sub-regions, the Council's
proposed measures provide far better protections for the depleted
Georges Bank cod stock. FSF's letter states that the proposed action on
Georges Bank closes approximately 1,120 nm\2\ of ocean bottom in areas
of ``high vulnerability.'' They further note that the areas cover over
600 nm\2\ of cobble, boulder, and granule pebble habitat, which in
total exceeds all three no action habitat closures combined, and that a
large area that is currently open with ``demonstrably high habitat
vulnerability on Georges Shoal would be completely closed to fishing.''
They also note that most of the existing Northern Edge habitat closure
would remain closed and that only the Northern Edge Reduced Impact HMA
would be open to rotational scallop fishing. Last, they state that the
Great South Channel HMA covers 1,400 nm\2\ that is highly vulnerable,
and that this alternative ``includes more than sufficient mitigation
measures to offset this action.''
Response: As noted above, the suggestion that the Georges Shoal HMA
is more vulnerable than the Northern Edge HAPC area is demonstrably
incorrect. Our conclusion is based on other indicators of habitat
suitability and vulnerability in addition to the output from the SASI
model, which the Council relied on to initially identify areas of more
vulnerable habitat where other information (e.g., EFH value, substrate
composition, and stability) proved to be more useful. The mean SASI
vulnerability scores for bottom trawls for the Georges Shoal area are
higher than for the HAPC, but only by about 4 percent and because the
HAPC was sampled more intensively. Data support for substrate--the key
underlying data for the SASI model--is much higher there than on
Georges Shoal.
We agree that it is important to evaluate the benefits of spatial
habitat management measures across individual groundfish stocks and
that the effects of these alternatives on the Georges Bank cod stock in
the Great South Channel and Georges Bank sub-region was not explicitly
weighed against each other in this action. Nevertheless, this action
includes the goal of improving groundfish protections overall. Because
the Georges Bank cod stock is in such poor condition, protection for
juvenile cod in both the Great South Channel and on the northern edge
of Georges Bank is a positive element of this action. Improving
benefits to the Georges Bank stock of cod is best achieved by approving
the Great South Channel HMA and disapproving the proposed HMA in Closed
Area II. Further, the rationale for the Council's proposals on eastern
Georges Bank does not adequately justify allowing an increase in
adverse effects from fishing on an HAPC that was designated
specifically because of its vulnerability to fishing.
Comment 47: The FSF letter also contends that the HAPC is
appropriately treated because Reduced Impact HMA extends into currently
open fishing area (that would remain open under the Haddock SAP rules)
to compensate for impacts in the HAPC. Further, the comment states,
``it is entirely permissible to allow fishing in the HAPC.'' They also
note that rotational scallop fishing will not have unlimited adverse
habitat impacts and that any increased impacts in Reduced Impact HMA
are offset by reduced bottom contact time.
Response: NMFS agrees that the designation of an area as an HAPC
does not inherently require a fishing closure in the area. However, the
Council provided insufficient information to understand which aspects
of the area are critical to juvenile cod survival, how those aspects of
the habitat are impacted
[[Page 15257]]
by scallop dredges, the recovery time for such impacts, and the
anticipated rotation periods for scallop fishing that would
sufficiently address the practicability of any proposed fishing or
protective measures. Without a more full discussion of these critical
components, it is not possible to sufficiently evaluate the nature,
extent, and scope of rotational scallop fishing that may be permitted
in the Northern Edge HAPC. The Council's recommendations in this
Amendment would open the most vulnerable portions of the HAPC and do
not adequately avoid, mitigate, or compensate for those adverse
effects. The Council's recommendation to allow even rotational fishing
in this sensitive habitat appears to be inconsistent with its own
rationale for the designation that the habitat in this area is
particularly susceptible to adverse fishing effects and warrants
particular concern and consideration.
Comment 48: The scallop industry argues that the ``lobster
closure'' should be rejected because it violates Council policy and
adequate alternatives were not analyzed.
Response: NMFS is disapproving the lobster closure in conjunction
with the recommendations on eastern Georges Bank. We agree that further
discussion of this issue would be beneficial if the Council decides to
revisit habitat management in Closed Area II.
Comment 49: FSF supported the designation of a DHRA within the
existing Closed Area I South in Georges Bank. The scallop industry
proposed this area to be dedicated to research because of the
importance of ongoing scallop studies there. The fleet has collected
video survey data in the area that will serve as baseline information
for future studies. These studies will provide valuable information
about scallop productivity, distribution, abundance, and growth. The
designation of the DHRA is expected to streamline the permitting
process for these research activities and to reduce administrative
hurdles. Areas that are designated as DHRAs must have sunset provisions
that will open an area if there is no habitat research conducted there
within three years. FSF contends that there is no benefit to excluding
commercial fishing from a DHRA if there is no interest in or capacity
for actively pursuing research there.
Response: NMFS agrees and is implementing the DHRAs with the sunset
provisions, as recommended.
Comment 50: Additionally, FSF supported adding changes in HMA
designations or restrictions to the list of items that may be modified
through framework action.
Response: NMFS agrees and is implementing the recommendation as
proposed.
Classification
The Administrator, Greater Atlantic Region, NMFS, determined that
the approved portions of OHA2 are necessary for the conservation and
management of the New England Fishery Management Council's fishery
management plans and that the final rule is consistent with the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act and other
applicable laws.
The Council prepared a final environmental impact statement for the
Omnibus Essential Fish Habitat Amendment 2. The EIS was filed with the
Environmental Protection Agency on October 18, 2017. A notice of
availability was published on October 27, 2017 (82 FR 49802). In
approving the amendment on January 3, 2018, NMFS issued a Record of
Decision (ROD) identifying the selected alternative. A copy of the ROD
is available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES).
This rule has been determined to be significant for purposes of
Executive Orders (E.O.) 12866. Thus, this final rule is considered an
E.O. 13771 deregulatory action. For the reasons stated earlier
regarding updated scallop biomass information, in the accompanying EIS,
and ``Description of Methods and Supplemental Analysis of Economic
Benefits of OHA2,'' we anticipate this rule will result in additional
harvest opportunities.
Congressional Review Act: The Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs has determined that this rule is major under 5 U.S.C. 801 et
seq. Under 5 U.S.C. 808, the minimum 60-day delay in effectiveness
required for major rules is not applicable because this rule
establishes a regulatory program for a commercial activity related to
fishing.
This rule does not contain policies with Federalism, as defined in
E.O. 13132, or ``takings,'' as clarified in E.O. 12630.
Section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) establishes
procedural requirements applicable to rulemaking by Federal agencies.
The purpose of these requirements is to ensure public access to the
Federal rulemaking process and to give the public opportunity for
comment as well as adequate notice. Because this rule opens some areas
that are currently closed, those portions of the regulations are
relieving restrictions and, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1), are not
subject to the APA's requirement for a 30-day delay in effectiveness.
Additionally, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Assistant
Administrator for Fisheries finds good cause to waive the 30-day delay
in effectiveness for the remainder of the rule's provisions because
such a delay is unnecessary and contrary to the public interest. The
delayed effectiveness is intended to provide adequate time for the
affected public to comply with the new regulations. Because this rule
is being implemented at the start of the fishing year when these types
of changes are typically implemented and expected, there is minimal
effort or time needed for vessel owners to come into compliance with
the new measures, which generally only requires updating navigation
systems to identify the new areas. In addition, fishermen are
accustomed to adjusting to changes in available fishing areas.
Implementing the measures at the start of the fishing provide
allows the fishing industry the maximum amount of time to fish in newly
available areas. As such, the delay in effectiveness is unnecessary to
allow sufficient time for vessel owners to comply with the new
structure. Further, because NMFS's partial approval of the Council's
recommendations was announced in early January, the affected public,
i.e., primarily the commercial groundfish, scallop, and clam
industries, have been well aware of what changes are coming and have
been anticipating the changes implemented via this rule.
Although this rule does impose new restrictions in that certain
areas previously opened will be closed, the overall impact of the
measures being implemented is a reduction in management restrictions in
the majority of the areas considered. Particularly significant is the
removal of Closed Area I and the Nantucket Lightship Closure Areas that
will allow the scallop fishery, via Scallop Framework Adjustment 29, to
establish access areas and allocations that are projected to result in
an additional $140-160 million in potential fishing revenue for the
scallop fishery in the coming year. The regulated entities will benefit
far more from these provisions that lift restrictions going into
immediate effect, than they would be disadvantaged by the waiver of the
30-day delay for the aspects of the rule that impose restrictions. Even
in areas that are resulting in new closures, the impacts are minimal
because the Eastern Maine HMA closure is not expected to have any
immediate impact on mobile bottom-tending gear fishing; the hydraulic
clam dredge fishery is
[[Page 15258]]
exempted for one year from the date of implementation of the Great
South Channel HMA; the Closed Area I Seasonal Closure is the same
footprint as current year-round closure; and the Spring Massachusetts
Bay Spawning Closure is small and not effective until April 15. Thus,
NMFS finds good cause to waive the 30-delay in effectiveness because it
is in the regulated entities' interest.
A final regulatory flexibility analysis (FRFA) was prepared for
this action. The FRFA incorporates the IRFA, a summary of the
significant issues raised by the public comments in response to the
IRFA, and NMFS responses to those comments, and a summary of the
analyses completed to support the action. A copy of this analysis is
available from the Council (see ADDRESSES). A summary of this analysis
is provided below.
Section 212 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness
Act of 1996 states that, for each rule or group of related rules for
which an agency is required to prepare a FRFA, the agency shall publish
one or more guides to assist small entities in complying with the rule,
and shall designate such publications as ``small entity compliance
guides.'' The agency shall explain the actions a small entity is
required to take to comply with a rule or group of rules. As part of
this rulemaking process, a letter to permit holders that also serves as
a small entity compliance guide was prepared. Copies of this final rule
are available from the Greater Atlantic Regional Fisheries Office
(GARFO), and the guide, i.e., permit holder letter, will be sent to all
holders of any GARFO permit because many of the measures impact
fisheries at the gear, rather than permit, level. The guide and this
final rule will be available upon request.
A Statement of the Need for and Objectives of the Rule
A statement of the necessity for and for the objectives of this
action are contained in the Omnibus Amendment EIS, Volume 1, and in the
preamble to this final rule, and is not repeated here.
A Summary of the Significant Issues Raised by the Public in Response to
the IRFA, a Summary of the Agency's Assessment of Such Issues, and a
Statement of Any Changes Made in the Final Rule as a Result of Such
Comments
No significant issues relative to the IRFA were raised in the
public comments.
Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities To Which the
Rule Would Apply
The Small Business Administration (SBA) defines a small business as
one that is:
Independently owned and operated;
Not dominant in its field of operation;
Has annual receipts that do not exceed--
[cir] $20.5 million in the case of commercial finfish harvesting
entities (NAIC \1\ 114111)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) is
the standard used by Federal statistical agencies in classifying
business establishments for the purpose of collecting, analyzing,
and publishing statistical data related to the U.S. business
economy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[cir] $5.5 million in the case of commercial shellfish harvesting
entities (NAIC 114112)
[cir] $7.5 million in the case of for-hire fishing entities (NAIC
114119); or
Has fewer than--
[cir] 750 employees in the case of fish processors
[cir] 100 employees in the case of fish dealers.
This rule affects commercial and recreational fish harvesting
entities engaged in fisheries throughout New England that utilize
bottom-trawls (large and small mesh), longlines, rod and reel,
gillnets, pots and traps, scallop dredges, and hydraulic clam dredges.
The gears primarily affected by this action are two non-mutually
exclusive fishing operations: Fishermen using gears capable of catching
groundfish and fishermen using mobile bottom-tending gears.
Individually permitted vessels may hold permits for several fisheries,
harvesting species of fish that are regulated by several different
FMPs. Furthermore, multiple-permitted vessels and/or permits may be
owned by entities affiliated by stock ownership, common management,
identity of interest, contractual relationships, or economic
dependency. For the purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
analysis, the ownership entities, not the individual vessels, are
considered the regulated entities.
Ownership entities are defined as those entities with common
ownership personnel as listed on the permit application. Only permits
with identical ownership personnel are categorized as an ownership
entity. For example, if five permits have the same seven persons listed
as co-owners on their permit application, those seven persons would
form one ownership entity that holds those five permits. If two of
those seven owners also co-own additional vessels, these two persons
would be considered a separate ownership entity.
On June 1 of each year, NMFS identifies ownership entities based on
a list of all permits for the most recent complete calendar year. The
current ownership dataset used for this analysis was created based on
calendar year 2014 and contains average gross sales associated with
those permits for calendar years 2012 through 2014.
In addition to classifying a business (ownership entity) as small
or large, a business can also be classified by its primary source of
revenue. A business is defined as being primarily engaged in fishing
for finfish if it obtains greater than 50 percent of its gross sales
from sales of finfish. Similarly, a business is defined as being
primarily engaged in fishing for shellfish if it obtains greater than
50 percent of its gross sales from sales of shellfish.
A description of the specific permits that are likely to be
affected by this action is provided below, along with a discussion of
the impacted businesses, which can include multiple vessels and/or
permit types.
NMFS issued a final rule establishing a small business size
standard of $11 million in annual gross receipts for all businesses
primarily engaged in the commercial fishing industry (NAICS 11411) for
RFA compliance purposes only (80 FR 81194; December 29, 2015). The $11
million standard became effective on July 1, 2016, and is intended to
be used in place of the SBA's current standards of $20.5 million, $5.5
million, and $7.5 million for the finfish (NAICS 114111), shellfish
(NAICS 114112), and other marine fishing (NAICS 114119) sectors,
respectively, of the U.S. commercial fishing industry.
The Council took final action on OHA2 in June 2015, and the
analyses in support of this action were developed throughout the
decision process and following the Council's action, but prior to July
1, 2016. This analysis was not updated to reflect a small business re-
classification for all of the vessels affected by this amendment using
our new size-standards because we have determined that this analysis
provides a sufficient estimate of the number of small entities to which
the proposed rule applies for purposes of determining this action's
impacts on small entities and the considerations required under the
RFA. For the fisheries directly affected by this rule, RFA analyses
have been completed on other actions since the implementation of the
revised size standard. As described in the IRFA, data showed a change
in the total number of entities from the last fishery
[[Page 15259]]
management action analyzed under the SBA size standards and the first
fishery management action analyzed under the revised NMFS policy
standard. However, in terms of percentage of each of the major affected
fisheries, the size standard change results in minimal changes in
categories. As a result, the revised size standard does not change the
conclusions of the analysis or notably change the estimation of the
impact on small entities from this action. As such, it is reasonable to
rely upon the Council's economic analyses. No comments or concerns were
received specific to this analysis or about the change in size
classifications.
Regulated Commercial Fish Harvesting Entities
Table 2 describes revenue by business type (large or small) and
Table 3 describes the total number of commercial business entities
potentially regulated by the action. As of the time of the Council's
decisionmaking (2015), there were 4,071 small businesses (925 finfish,
2,713 shellfish, 433 for-hire) and 18 large businesses (all shellfish)
potentially affected by this action. For fisheries utilizing mobile
bottom-tending gear, the approved action directly regulates affected
entities through restrictions on when and where vessels may fish to
comply with the Magnuson-Stevens Act requirement to minimize to the
extent practicable the adverse effects of fishing on essential fish
habitat. For fisheries that use gears capable of catching groundfish,
this final rule additionally restricts location and timing of fishing
to minimize impacts on spawning groundfish. According to the EIS,
individuals fishing with mobile bottom-tending gear and midwater trawls
tend to generate a substantial portion of their revenue from other gear
types. The vast majority of individuals either fishing with mobile
bottom-tending gear capable of catching groundfish or for-hire do not
deviate from that mode, which could relate to the specialized nature of
either the vessels or the captains' skills needed for these types of
fishing.
Table 2--Business Revenue by Type
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Business Shellfish Finfish For-hire
Year NAICS classification Business type revenue revenue revenue revenue
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2012................................. Finfish................. Small.................. $217,560,996 $33,546,543 $183,380,312 $634,141
2012................................. For-hire................ Small.................. 56,153,981 331,674 611,532 55,210,775
2012................................. Shellfish............... Large.................. 265,665,371 242,801,113 22,860,746 3,512
2012................................. Shellfish............... Small.................. 710,485,816 679,195,607 30,897,738 392,471
2013................................. Finfish................. Small.................. 191,870,635 25,008,297 166,326,851 535,487
2013................................. For-hire................ Small.................. 55,556,751 125,755 588,984 54,842,012
2013................................. Shellfish............... Large.................. 228,892,465 208,244,173 20,642,659 5,633
2013................................. Shellfish............... Small.................. 690,608,565 663,848,959 26,381,386 378,220
2014................................. Finfish................. Small.................. 209,370,022 23,888,931 185,335,274 145,817
2014................................. For-hire................ Small.................. 57,843,562 15,735 412,061 57,415,766
2014................................. Shellfish............... Large.................. 223,065,022 202,580,548 20,484,474 ..............
2014................................. Shellfish............... Small.................. 741,518,137 717,031,087 24,316,466 170,584
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 3--Number of Businesses and Revenue Generated by Small and Large Businesses, by Commercial Gear
Classification
[MBTG = Mobile bottom-tending gear, Groundfish = gear capable of catching groundfish, Both = Both MBTG and
Groundfish designation, Midwater = Midwater trawls, Clam = clam dredge. Note some data not presented for privacy
concerns.]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
Year Gear type Business type businesses VTR revenue
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2012.............................. Both................. Large................ 17 $231,658,238
2012.............................. Both................. Small................ 574 580,827,338
2013.............................. Both................. Large................ 17 185,435,086
2013.............................. Both................. Small................ 539 445,971,382
2014.............................. Both................. Large................ 17 173,348,111
2014.............................. Both................. Small................ 528 396,470,511
2012.............................. Clam................. Large................ 5 31,160,893
2012.............................. Clam................. Small................ 42 27,738,596
2013.............................. Clam................. Large................ 4 30,008,134
2013.............................. Clam................. Small................ 47 27,874,110
2014.............................. Clam................. Large................ 2 ..............
2014.............................. Clam................. Small................ 41 26,867,813
2012.............................. Groundfish........... Large................ 2 ..............
2012.............................. Groundfish........... Small................ 668 74,103,358
2013.............................. Groundfish........... Large................ 2 ..............
2013.............................. Groundfish........... Small................ 605 47,920,414
2014.............................. Groundfish........... Large................ 1 ..............
2014.............................. Groundfish........... Small................ 592 48,959,328
2012.............................. MBTG................. Large................ 3 1,072,716
2012.............................. MBTG................. Small................ 125 6,120,800
2013.............................. MBTG................. Large................ 3 1,375,902
2013.............................. MBTG................. Small................ 87 2,940,183
2014.............................. MBTG................. Large................ 3 1,216,387
2014.............................. MBTG................. Small................ 26 2,857,405
2012.............................. Midwater............. Large................ 3 9,289,884
2012.............................. Midwater............. Small................ 14 22,865,976
2013.............................. Midwater............. Large................ 3 5,535,922
[[Page 15260]]
2013.............................. Midwater............. Small................ 13 26,214,983
2014.............................. Midwater............. Large................ 3 4,909,077
2014.............................. Midwater............. Small................ 14 25,058,119
2012.............................. Other................ Large................ 2 ..............
2012.............................. Other................ Small................ 566 79,087,347
2013.............................. Other................ Large................ 4 ..............
2013.............................. Other................ Small................ 539 80,355,177
2014.............................. Other................ Large................ 3 ..............
2014.............................. Other................ Small................ 514 84,446,720
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Description of the Projected Reporting, Record-keeping, and Other
Compliance Requirements of This Proposed Rule
The action does not contain a collection-of-information requirement
subject to review and approval by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), and the rule does not
impose any other reporting or record-keeping requirements. This final
rule requires compliance only with standard fishing-related issues,
including compliance with gear restricted fishing areas or seasons.
Description of the Steps the Agency Has Taken To Minimize the
Significant Economic Impact on Small Entities Consistent With the
Stated Objectives of Applicable Statutes
The economic impacts of each type of habitat management measure are
discussed in more detail in Volumes 3, 4, and 5 of the EIS. Because the
primary objective of the Amendment is to comply with the Magnuson-
Stevens Act requirement to minimize to the extent practicable the
adverse effects of fishing on EFH, a variety of combinations of areas
could have achieved those goals. The EFH and HAPC designations are
primarily administrative in nature and are not expected to result in
any direct economic impacts to the fisheries; although, indirect
positive affects to stocks are expected.
In general, the overall approved changes are relatively modest,
particularly when compared to other alternatives considered. The
majority of areas approved are already closed to fishing. The current
open areas that will close include the Eastern Maine HMA and the Great
South Channel HMA. As described above, there is currently very little
mobile bottom-tending gear fishing in the Eastern Maine HMA because
groundfish stocks have decreased locally in that region. The Great
South Channel HMA was designed to minimize impact to the scallop
fishery, particularly the design of the eastern boundary. Scallops
occur primarily at depths beyond the closure boundary. There is not a
significant amount of trawl fishing in that area because of the high
level of natural disturbance. The hydraulic clam fishery will be
allowed to continue to operate in this HMA for 1 year, while the
Council develops more discrete exemption areas. It is expected that the
subsequent action will attempt to balance the economic needs of the
clam fishery with the objectives of OHA2 and the EFH protections
required by the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
The approved measures that will increase fishing opportunities
include: (1) Modifying the Western Gulf of Maine Groundfish Closure
Area by aligning the eastern boundary with the Habitat Closure Area;
(2) modifying the Jeffreys Bank Habitat Closure Area and exposing the
deeper, northern portion to potential fishing; (3) eliminating the
Nantucket Lightship Groundfish and Habitat Closure Areas; and (4)
implementing Closed Area I North as a seasonal, versus year-round,
closure area. The partial opening of the areas in the Gulf of Maine are
expected to result in modest increases in groundfish revenue. The
opening of the Nantucket Lightship and Closed Area I Closure Areas are
expected to result in notable increases in scallop fishing. Scallop
Framework Adjustment 29, which is intended to set management measures
for the 2018 and 2019 scallop fishing years, estimates that with access
to these newly opened areas will result in an additional $140-160
million to the scallop fishery beyond what the status quo measures
would have generated.
Habitat Management Measure Alternatives
In the Eastern Gulf of Maine, this action establishes the Small
Eastern Maine Habitat Management Area (HMA), closed to all mobile
bottom-tending gears. (Note, the regulations refer to this area as
simply the ``Eastern Maine HMA.'') Other alternatives considered would
have continued with no habitat management in this sub-region or
implemented one or more additional areas. The Toothaker Ridge HMA, the
Large Eastern Maine HMA, the Machias HMA, and the Small Eastern Maine
were assembled into two alternatives. The EIS concluded, and NMFS
agreed, that the Small Eastern Maine HMA achieves a notable level of
protection for vulnerable habitat without significant economic impacts.
In the Central Gulf of Maine, this action maintains the existing
Cashes Ledge Groundfish Closure Area, modifies the existing Jeffreys
Bank and Cashes Ledge Habitat Closure Areas, with their current fishing
restrictions and exemptions, establishes the Fippennies Ledge HMA,
closed to mobile bottom-tending gears, and the Ammen Rock HMA, closed
to all fishing except lobster traps. Other alternatives considered
would have various combinations of eight total areas. In addition to
the areas recommended as preferred, the Council considered habitat
management in the existing Jeffreys Bank and Cashes Ledge habitat
closure areas, two areas on Platts Bank and a small area on the top of
Fippennies Ledge. The Council did not recommend the areas on Platts
Bank because of the concern regarding the displacement of current
fishing and the economic impact to a sub-set of the fleet. The final
approved measures provide the best habitat protection without
significant economic impacts.
In the Western Gulf of Maine, this action maintains the existing
Western Gulf of Maine Habitat Closure Area, closed to mobile bottom-
tending gears, and modifies the eastern boundary of the Western Gulf of
Maine [Groundfish]
[[Page 15261]]
Closure Area to align with the Habitat Closure Area, while maintaining
the current fishing restrictions and requirements. An exemption area
within the northwest corner of those closures for shrimp trawls is also
established and the existing Roller Gear Restricted Area requirements
is designated as a habitat protection measure. Other alternatives would
have established a large (Council's Alternatives 3 and 4 in Volume 3 of
the EIS) or small (Alternative 5) version of a closure area along the
state waters boundaries of New Hampshire and Maine covering Bigelow
Bight, which was deemed by the Council to have overly severe economic
impacts. Still other options included consideration of breaking up the
existing Western Gulf of Maine Habitat Closure Area to focus on the
most vulnerable sections of Jeffreys Ledge and Stellwagen Bank, either
in two smaller combinations (Alternatives 4 and 5) or only a larger
section of the Stellwagen Bank area (Alternatives 3 and 6). Finally,
one option would have implemented the roller gear restriction over only
the footprint of the other proposed habitat management areas
(Alternative 7b).
On Georges Bank, this final action maintains the Closed Area II
groundfish and habitat closure areas, but removes the Closed Area I
groundfish and habitat closures as year-round closures.
Various combinations of 19 areas, including the 5 existing habitat
and groundfish closed areas, were considered for this sub-region. When
combined, these areas covered nearly the entire Bank area from the
Hague Line up to the Great South Channel. Some areas were deemed too
costly from an economic standpoint because of their size or specific
location. These areas included the two alternatives across the majority
of the bank: The Northern Georges mobile bottom-tending gear closure
(Alternative 8) and the Northern Georges gear modification area
(Alternatives 5). Various options of smaller areas on Georges Shoal,
namely the Georges Shoal 1 (Alternative 5), Georges Shoal Gear
Modification Area (Alternative 4), Georges Shoal 2 (Alternative 7), and
Western HMA (Alternative 9), were also considered. Further variations
focused more on the northern edge, included the Northern Edge HMA in
Alternatives 3 and 4; two variations of expanding the existing Closed
Area II habitat closure (Alternatives 6A and 6B); the EFH South HMA as
part of Alternative 7; the Eastern HMA and a Mortality Closure in
Alternative 9. The Council's recommendation (Alternative 10) was
disapproved for the reasons described above. The final approved
measures maintain a long-standing closure, but opens Closed Area I. As
described above, the opening of Closed Area I is expected to result in
significant economic gains for the scallop fishery.
In the Great South Channel, this action establishes the Great South
Channel HMA, closed to mobile bottom-tending gear, except hydraulic
clam dredges for 1 year, outside of the northeast corner of the area.
The Nantucket Lightship Habitat Closure Area and the Nantucket
Lightship Closed Area are removed. Other alternatives were variations
around the approved alternative, some extending farther to the east,
and some extending farther to the west. The Council also recommended an
HMA on Cox Ledge that would have prohibited hydraulic clam dredges and
ground cables on trawl vessels. That recommendation was disapproved for
the reasons described above. The Council also considered a single box
to cover both Cox Ledge areas. The opening of the Nantucket Lightship
Closure Areas is expected to result in significant economic gains for
the scallop fishery in 2018 and 2019.
Groundfish Spawning Measure Alternatives
In the Gulf of Maine, the final rule establishes two new,
relatively small cod spawning protections. They include the Winter
Massachusetts Bay Spawning Closure, which would be in effect from
November 1-January 31 of each year, and a 2-week closure (April 15-
April 30) within statistical area 125. Other alternatives considered
would have reinstated or added to existing rolling closures in the
Western Gulf of Maine.
On Georges Bank, this action establishes the existing Closed Area
II Groundfish Closure Area and the Closed Area I North Habitat Closed
Area as seasonal closures from February 1-April 15, and removes the May
Georges Bank Spawning Closure. The Council considered making all of the
existing Closed Area I groundfish closure area a seasonal spawning
closure, but instead chose just the subset of that area in the northern
portion.
Management alternatives in both regions included all commercial
gears capable of catching groundfish (recreational fishing exempted),
all commercial and recreational gears capable of catching groundfish,
and an exemption for scallop dredges.
Dedicated Habitat Research Area Alternatives
This action establishes two DHRAs. The DHRAs will be effective for
3 years, at which time the Regional Administrator would consult with
the Council as to whether the designation should be retained. The
Council considered three potential DHRAs, with varying management
restrictions within them. The action establishes the Georges Bank DHRA
(footprint is the same as the existing Closed Area I South Habitat
Closure) and the Stellwagen DHRA (footprint within the existing Western
Gulf of Maine Habitat Closure). The Council considered two ``reference
areas'' within the Stellwagen DHRA that would have prohibited all
fishing, including recreational groundfish fishing. No reference area
was recommended and none will be implemented. The Georges Bank DHRA is
closed to all mobile bottom-tending gear. The Stellwagen DHRA is closed
to all mobile bottom-tending gear, sink gillnet gear, and demersal
longline gear.
Framework Adjustments and Monitoring
Through this action, the designation or removal of HMAs and changes
to fishing restrictions within HMAs may be considered in a future
framework adjustment. In addition, this action establishes a review
process to evaluate the performance of habitat and spawning protection
measures. Finally, this action establishes a commitment by the Council
to identify and periodically revise research priorities to improve
habitat and spawning area monitoring. Alternatively, the Council
considered not implementing a new process for habitat and spawning
protection measures review and modification and using the existing ad-
hoc process under its authority currently.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 648
Fisheries, Fishing, Recordkeeping and reporting requirements.
Dated: March 29, 2018.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National
Marine Fisheries Service.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, 50 CFR part 648 is amended
as follows:
PART 648--FISHERIES OF THE NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
0
1. The authority citation for part 648 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
0
2. Amend Sec. 648.2 as follows:
0
a. Revise the definition of ``Bottom-tending mobile gear;''
0
b. Add a definition for ``Bridles,'' in alphabetical order;
[[Page 15262]]
0
c. Revise the definition of ``Gillnet gear capable of catching
multispecies;''
0
d. Add a definition for ``Ground cables,'' in alphabetical order; and
0
e. Revise the definition of ``Open areas.''
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 648.2 Definitions.
* * * * *
Bottom-tending mobile gear, means gear in contact with the ocean
bottom, and towed from a vessel, which is moved through the water
during fishing in order to capture fish, and includes otter trawls,
beam trawls, hydraulic dredges, non-hydraulic dredges, and seines (with
the exception of a purse seine).
Bridles connect the wings of a bottom trawl to the ground cables.
The ground cables lead to the doors or otter boards. The doors are
attached to the towing vessel via steel cables, referred to as wires or
warps. Each net has two sets of bridles, one on each side.
* * * * *
Gillnet gear capable of catching multispecies means all gillnet
gear except pelagic gillnet gear specified at Sec. 648.81(b)(2)(ii)
and (d)(5)(ii) and pelagic gillnet gear that is designed to fish for
and is used to fish for or catch tunas, swordfish, and sharks.
* * * * *
Ground cables on a bottom trawl run between the bridles, which
attach directly to the wings of the net, and the doors, or otter
boards. The doors are attached to the towing vessel via steel cables,
referred to as wires or warps.
* * * * *
Open areas, with respect to the Atlantic sea scallop fishery, means
any area that is not subject to restrictions of the Sea Scallop
Rotational Areas specified in Sec. Sec. 648.59 and 648.60, the
Northern Gulf of Maine Management Area specified in Sec. 648.62, EFH
Closed Areas specified in Sec. Sec. 648.61 and 648.370, Dedicated
Habitat Research areas specified in Sec. 648.371, or the Frank R.
Lautenberg Deep-Sea Coral Protection Area described in Sec. 648.372.
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec. 648.11 by revising paragraph (m)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 648.11 At-sea sea sampler/observer coverage.
* * * * *
(m) * * *
(1) Pre-trip notification. At least 48 hr prior to the beginning of
any trip on which a vessel may harvest, possess, or land Atlantic
herring, a vessel issued a Limited Access Herring Permit or a vessel
issued an Areas \2/3\ Open Access Herring Permit on a declared herring
trip or a vessel issued an All Areas Open Access Herring Permit fishing
with midwater trawl gear in Management Areas 1A, 1B, and/or 3, as
defined in Sec. 648.200(f)(1) and (3), and herring carriers must
provide notice of the following information to NMFS: Vessel name,
permit category, and permit number; contact name for coordination of
observer deployment; telephone number for contact; the date, time, and
port of departure; gear type; target species; and intended area of
fishing, including whether the vessel intends to engage in fishing in
the Northeast Multispecies Closed Areas (Closed Area I North (Sec.
648.81(c)(3)), Closed Area II (Sec. 648.81(a)(5)), Cashes Ledge
Closure Area (Sec. 648.81(a)(3)), and Western GOM Closure Area (Sec.
648.81(a)(4))) at any point in the trip. Trip notification calls must
be made no more than 10 days in advance of each fishing trip. The
vessel owner, operator, or manager must notify NMFS of any trip plan
changes at least 12 hr prior to vessel departure from port.
* * * * *
0
4. Amend Sec. 648.14 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (b)(10);
0
b. Adding paragraphs (b)(11) and (12);
0
c. Revising paragraphs (i)(1)(vi)(A)(1) and (2), (k)(6)(i)(E),
(k)(6)(ii)(A)(5), and (k)(7)(i)(A) through (D);
0
d. Removing and reserving paragraph (k)(7)(i)(E);
0
e. Revising paragraph (k)(7)(i)(F);
0
f. Removing and reserving paragraph (k)(7)(i)(G); and
0
g. Revising paragraphs (k)(7)(ii), (k)(12)(iii)(B), (k)(16)(iii)(B),
and (r)(2)(v) and (vi).
The revisions and addition read as follows:
Sec. 648.14 Prohibitions.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(10) Fish with bottom-tending gear within the Frank R. Lautenberg
Deep-sea Coral Protection Area described at Sec. 648.372, unless
transiting pursuant to Sec. 648.372(d), fishing lobster trap gear in
accordance with Sec. 697.21 of this chapter, or fishing red crab trap
gear in accordance with Sec. 648.264. Bottom-tending gear includes but
is not limited to bottom-tending otter trawls, bottom-tending beam
trawls, hydraulic dredges, non-hydraulic dredges, bottom-tending
seines, bottom longlines, pots and traps, and sink or anchored gill
nets.
(11) If fishing with bottom-tending mobile gear, fish in, enter, be
on a fishing vessel in, the EFH closure areas described in Sec.
648.371, unless otherwise exempted.
(12) Unless otherwise exempted, fish in the Dedicated Habitat
Research Areas defined in Sec. 648.371.
* * * * *
(i) * * *
(1) * * *
(vi) * * *
(A) * * *
(1) Fish for scallops in, or possess or land scallops from, the EFH
Closed Areas and Habitat Management Areas specified in Sec. Sec.
648.61 and 648.370, respectively.
(2) Transit or enter the EFH Closure Areas or Habitat Management
Areas specified in Sec. Sec. 648.61 and 648.370, respectively, except
as provided by Sec. 648.61(b).
* * * * *
(k) * * *
(6) * * *
(i) * * *
(E) Use, set, haul back, fish with, possess on board a vessel,
unless stowed and not available for immediate use as defined in Sec.
648.2, or fail to remove, sink gillnet gear and other gillnet gear
capable of catching NE multispecies, with the exception of single
pelagic gillnets (as described in Sec. 648.81(b)(2)(ii) and
(d)(5)(ii)), in the areas and for the times specified in Sec.
648.80(g)(6)(i) and (ii), except as provided in Sec. 648.80(g)(6)(i)
and (ii), and Sec. 648.81(b)(2)(ii) and (d)(5)(ii), or unless
otherwise authorized in writing by the Regional Administrator.
* * * * *
(ii)
(A)
(5) Enter, fail to remove sink gillnet gear or gillnet gear capable
of catching NE multispecies from, or be in the areas, and for the
times, described in Sec. 648.80(g)(6)(i) and (ii), except as provided
in Sec. Sec. 648.80(g)(6)(i) and 648.81(i).
* * * * *
(7) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) Groundfish Closure Area restrictions. Enter, be on a fishing
vessel in, or fail to remove gear from the EEZ portion of the areas
described in Sec. 648.81(a)(3), (4), and (5) and (d)(3), except as
provided in Sec. 648.81(a)(2), (d)(2), and (i).
(B) Groundfish Closure Area possession restrictions. Fish for,
harvest, possess, or land regulated species in or from the closed areas
specified in Sec. 648.81(a) through (d) and (n), unless otherwise
specified in Sec. 648.81(c)(2)(iii), (d)(5)(i), (iv), (viii), and
(ix), (i), (b)(2), or as authorized under Sec. 648.85.
(C) Restricted Gear Areas. (1) Fish, or be in the areas described
in Sec. 648.81(f)(3) through (6) on a fishing
[[Page 15263]]
vessel with mobile gear during the time periods specified in Sec.
648.81(f)(1), except as provided in Sec. 648.81(f)(2).
(2) Fish, or be in the areas described in Sec. 648.81(f)(3)
through (5) on a fishing vessel with lobster pot gear during the time
periods specified in Sec. 648.81(f)(1).
(3) Deploy in or fail to remove lobster pot gear from the areas
described in Sec. 648.81(f)(3) through (5), during the time periods
specified in Sec. 648.81(f)(1).
(D) Georges Bank Seasonal Closure Areas. Enter, fail to remove gear
from, or be in the areas described in Sec. 648.81(c) during the time
periods specified, except as provided in Sec. 648.81(c)(2).
(E) [Reserved]
(F) Closed Area II. Enter or be in the area described in Sec.
648.81(a)(5) on a fishing vessel, except as provided in Sec.
648.81(a)(5)(ii).
(G) [Reserved]
(ii) Vessel and permit holders. It is unlawful for any owner or
operator of a vessel issued a valid NE multispecies permit or letter
under Sec. 648.4(a)(1)(i), unless otherwise specified in Sec. 648.17,
when fishing with bottom-tending mobile gear, fish in, enter, be on a
fishing vessel in, the Habitat Management Areas described in Sec.
648.370.
* * * * *
(12) * * *
(iii) * * *
(B) Enter or fish in Closed Area II as specified in Sec.
648.81(a)(5), unless declared into the area in accordance with Sec.
648.85(b)(3)(v) or (b)(8)(v)(D).
* * * * *
(16) * * *
(iii) * * *
(B) Fail to comply with the requirements specified in Sec.
648.81(d)(5)(v) when fishing in the areas described in Sec.
648.81(b)(3) and (4) and (d) during the time periods specified.
* * * * *
(r) * * *
(2) * * *
(v) Fish with midwater trawl gear in any Northeast Multispecies
Closed Area, as defined in Sec. 648.81(a)(3) through (5) and (c)(3)
and (4), without a NMFS-approved observer on board, if the vessel has
been issued an Atlantic herring permit.
(vi) Slip or operationally discard catch, as defined at Sec.
648.2, unless for one of the reasons specified at Sec. 648.202(b)(2),
if fishing any part of a tow inside the Northeast Multispecies Closed
Areas, as defined at Sec. 648.81(a)(3) through (5) and (c)(3) and (4).
* * * * *
Sec. 648.27 [Removed]
0
5. Remove Sec. 648.27.
0
6. Add Sec. 648.58 to read as follows:
Sec. 648.58 Closed Area II Seasonal Scallop Closure.
From June 15 through October 31 of each year, no fishing vessel may
fish with scallop dredge gear in the portion of Closed Area II, as
specified in Sec. Sec. 648.61(c)(4) and 648.81(c)(4), north of
41[deg]30' N lat.
0
7. In Sec. 648.59, revise paragraph (a) introductory text to read as
follows:
Sec. 648.59 Sea Scallop Rotational Area Management Program and
Access Area Program requirements.
(a) The Sea Scallop Rotational Area Management Program consists of
Scallop Rotational Areas, as defined in Sec. 648.2. Guidelines for
this area rotation program (i.e., when to close an area and reopen it
to scallop fishing) are provided in Sec. 648.55(a)(6). Whether a
rotational area is open or closed to scallop fishing in a given year,
and the appropriate level of access by limited access and LAGC IFQ
vessels, are specified through the specifications or framework
adjustment processes defined in Sec. 648.55. When a rotational area is
open to the scallop fishery, it is called an Access Area and scallop
vessels fishing in the area are subject to the Access Area Program
Requirements specified in this section. Areas not defined as Scallop
Rotational Areas specified in Sec. 648.60, EFH Closed Areas specified
in Sec. Sec. 648.61 and 648.370, Dedicated Habitat Research Areas
specified in Sec. 648.371, or areas closed to scallop fishing under
other FMPs, are governed by other management measures and restrictions
in this part and are referred to as Open Areas.
* * * * *
0
8. In Sec. 648.60, revise paragraph (c)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 648.60 Sea Scallop Rotational Areas.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) The Closed Area I Scallop Rotational Area is defined by
straight lines connecting the following points in the order stated
(copies of a chart depicting this area are available from the Regional
Administrator upon request), and so that the line connecting points
CAIA3 and CAIA4 is the same as the portion of the western boundary line
of Closed Area I, defined in Sec. 648.61(c)(3), that lies between
points CAIA3 and CAIA4:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N lat. W long. Note
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAIA1................................ 41[deg]26' N 68[deg]30' W ...............
CAIA2................................ 40[deg]58' N 68[deg]30' W ...............
CAIA3................................ 40[deg]54.95' N 68[deg]53.37' W (\1\)
CAIA4................................ 41[deg]04' N 69[deg]01' W (\1\)
CAIA1................................ 41[deg]26' N 68[deg]30' W ...............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ From Point CAIA3 to Point CAIA4 along the western boundary of Closed Area I, defined in Sec. 648.61(c)(3).
* * * * *
0
9. In Sec. 648.61, revise the section heading and add paragraph (c) to
read as follows:
Sec. 648.61 EFH and Groundfish Closed Areas.
* * * * *
(c) Groundfish Closure Areas. No vessel fishing for scallops, or
person on a vessel fishing for scallops, may enter, fish in, or be in
the Closure Areas described in paragraphs (c)(1) through (5) of this
section, unless otherwise exempted in the scallop access area program,
described in Sec. 648.59. A chart depicting these areas is available
from the Regional Administrator upon request.
(1) Western Gulf of Maine Closure Area. The Western Gulf of Maine
Closure Area is defined by straight lines connecting the following
points in the order stated:
Western Gulf of Maine Closure Area
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N lat. W long.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
WGM1.......................... 42[deg]15' N 70[deg]15' W
WGM2.......................... 42[deg]15' N 69[deg]55' W
WGM3.......................... 43[deg]15' N 69[deg]55' W
WGM4.......................... 43[deg]15' N 70[deg]15' W
WGM1.......................... 42[deg]15' N 70[deg]15' W
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Cashes Ledge Closure Area. The Cashes Ledge Closure Area is
defined by
[[Page 15264]]
straight lines connecting the following points in the order stated:
Cashes Ledge Closure Area
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N lat. W long.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CL1........................... 43[deg]07' N 69[deg]02' W
CL2........................... 42[deg]49.5' N 68[deg]46' W
CL3........................... 42[deg]46.5' N 68[deg]50.5' W
CL4........................... 42[deg]43.5' N 68[deg]58.5' W
CL5........................... 42[deg]42.5' N 69[deg]17.5' W
CL6........................... 42[deg]49.5' N 69[deg]26' W
CL1........................... 43[deg]07' N 69[deg]02' W
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Closed Area I. Closed Area I is defined by straight lines,
unless otherwise noted, connecting the following points in the order
stated:
Closed Area I
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N lat. W long.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CI1........................... 41[deg]30' 69[deg]23'
CI2........................... 40[deg]45' 68[deg]45'
CI3........................... 40[deg]45' 68[deg]30'
CI4........................... 41[deg]30' 68[deg]30'
CI1........................... 41[deg]30' 69[deg]23'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Closed Area II. Closed Area II is defined by straight lines
connecting the following points in the order stated:
Closed Area II
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N lat. W long. Note
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAII1................................ 41[deg]00' N 67[deg]20' W ...............
CAII2................................ 41[deg]00' N 66[deg]35.8' W ...............
CAII3................................ 41[deg]18.45' N (\1\) (\2\)
CAII4................................ (\3\) 67[deg]20' W (\2\)
CAII5................................ 42[deg]22' N 67[deg]20' W ...............
CAII1................................ 41[deg]00' N 67[deg]20' W ...............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The intersection of 41[deg]18.45' N lat. And the U.S.-Canada Maritime Boundary, approximately 41[deg]18.45'
N lat. and 66[deg]24.89' W long.
\2\ From Point CAII3 to Point CAII4 along the U.S.-Canada Maritime Boundary.
\3\ The intersection of 67[deg]20' W long. And the U.S.-Canada Maritime Boundary, approximately 42[deg]22.06' N
lat. and 67[deg]20' W long.
(5) Nantucket Lightship Closure Area. The Nantucket Lightship
Closure Area is defined by straight lines connecting the following
points in the order stated:
Nantucket Lightship Closure Area
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N lat. W long.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NL1........................... 40[deg]50' N 69[deg]00' W
NL2........................... 40[deg]20' N 69[deg]00' W
NL3........................... 40[deg]20' N 70[deg]20' W
NL4........................... 40[deg]50' N 70[deg]20' W
NL1........................... 40[deg]50' N 69[deg]00' W
------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
10. Amend Sec. 648.80 by:
0
a. Revising paragraphs (a)(9)(i)(A), (a)(11) introductory text,
(a)(11)(i)(C), (a)(12), and the introductory text of paragraphs
(a)(13), (14), (15), (16), (18), and (19);
0
b. Removing paragraph (b)(11)(ii)(D); and
0
c. Revising paragraphs (d)(2) introductory text, (d)(2)(i), (d)(5), and
(g)(6).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 648.80 NE Multispecies regulated mesh areas and restrictions on
gear and methods of fishing.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(9) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) Unless otherwise prohibited in Sec. 648.81, Sec. 648.370, or
Sec. 648.371, a vessel subject to the minimum mesh size restrictions
specified in paragraph (a)(3) or (4) of this section may fish with or
possess nets with a mesh size smaller than the minimum size, provided
the vessel complies with the requirements of paragraph (a)(5)(ii) or
(a)(9)(ii) of this section, and Sec. 648.86(d), from July 15 through
November 15, when fishing in Small Mesh Area 1; and from January 1
through June 30, when fishing in Small Mesh Area 2. While lawfully
fishing in these areas with mesh smaller than the minimum size, an
owner or operator of any vessel may not fish for, possess on board, or
land any species of fish other than: Silver hake and offshore hake,
combined, and red hake--up to the amounts specified in Sec. 648.86(d);
butterfish, Atlantic mackerel, or squid, up the amounts specified in
Sec. 648.26; spiny dogfish, up to the amount specified in Sec.
648.235; Atlantic herring, up to the amount specified in Sec. 648.204;
and scup, up to the amount specified in Sec. 648.128.
* * * * *
(11) GOM Scallop Dredge Exemption Area. Unless otherwise prohibited
in Sec. 648.81, Sec. 648.370, or Sec. 648.371, vessels with a
limited access scallop permit that have declared out of the DAS program
as specified in Sec. 648.10, or that have used up their DAS
allocations, and vessels issued a General Category scallop permit, may
fish in the GOM Regulated Mesh Area specified in paragraph (a)(1) of
this section, when not under a NE multispecies DAS, providing the
vessel fishes in the GOM Scallop Dredge Exemption Area and complies
with the requirements specified in paragraph (a)(11)(i) of this
section. The GOM Scallop Dredge Fishery Exemption Area is defined by
the straight lines connecting the following points in the order stated
(copies of a map depicting the area are available from the Regional
Administrator upon request):
GOM Scallop Dredge Exemption Area
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N lat. W long.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SM1........................... 41[deg]35' 70[deg]00'
SM2........................... 41[deg]35' 69[deg]40'
SM3........................... 42[deg]49.5' 69[deg]40'
SM4........................... 43[deg]12' 69[deg]00'
SM5........................... 43[deg]41' 68[deg]00'
SM6........................... 43[deg]58' 67[deg]22'
SM7........................... (\1\) (\1\)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Northward along the irregular U.S.-Canada maritime boundary to the
shoreline.
(i) * * *
(C) The exemption does not apply to the Cashes Ledge Closure Area
or the Western GOM Area Closure specified in Sec. 648.81(a)(3) and
(4), respectively.
* * * * *
(12) Nantucket Shoals Mussel and Sea Urchin Dredge Exemption Area.
Unless otherwise prohibited in Sec. 648.81, Sec. 648.370, or Sec.
648.371, a vessel may fish with a dredge in the Nantucket Shoals Mussel
and Sea Urchin Dredge Exemption Area, provided that any dredge on board
the vessel does not exceed 8 ft (2.4 m), measured at the widest point
in the bail of the dredge, and the vessel does not fish for, harvest,
possess, or land any species of fish other than mussels and sea
urchins. The area coordinates of the Nantucket Shoals Mussel and Sea
Urchin Dredge Exemption Area are the same coordinates as those of the
Nantucket
[[Page 15265]]
Shoals Dogfish Fishery Exemption Area specified in paragraph (a)(10) of
this section.
(13) GOM/GB Dogfish and Monkfish Gillnet Fishery Exemption Area.
Unless otherwise prohibited in Sec. 648.81, Sec. 648.370, or Sec.
648.371, a vessel may fish with gillnets in the GOM/GB Dogfish and
Monkfish Gillnet Fishery Exemption Area when not under a NE
multispecies DAS if the vessel complies with the requirements specified
in paragraph (a)(13)(i) of this section. The GOM/GB Dogfish and
Monkfish Gillnet Fishery Exemption Area is defined by straight lines
connecting the following points in the order stated:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
N lat. W long.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
41[deg]35'.............................. 70[deg]00'
42[deg]49.5'............................ 70[deg]00'
42[deg]49.5'............................ 69[deg]40'
43[deg]12'.............................. 69[deg]00'
(\1\)................................... 69[deg]00'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Due north to Maine shoreline.
* * * * *
(14) GOM/GB Dogfish Gillnet Exemption. Unless otherwise prohibited
in Sec. 648.81, Sec. 648.370, or Sec. 648.371, a vessel may fish
with gillnets in the GOM/GB Dogfish and Monkfish Gillnet Fishery
Exemption Area when not under a NE multispecies DAS if the vessel
complies with the requirements specified in paragraph (a)(14)(i) of
this section. The area coordinates of the GOM/GB Dogfish and Monkfish
Gillnet Fishery Exemption Area are specified in paragraph (a)(13) of
this section.
* * * * *
(15) Raised Footrope Trawl Exempted Whiting Fishery. Unless
otherwise prohibited in Sec. 648.370 or Sec. 648.371, vessels subject
to the minimum mesh size restrictions specified in paragraphs (a)(3) or
(4) of this section may fish with, use, or possess nets in the Raised
Footrope Trawl Whiting Fishery area with a mesh size smaller than the
minimum size specified, if the vessel complies with the requirements
specified in paragraph (a)(15)(i) of this section. This exemption does
not apply to the Cashes Ledge Closure Areas or the Western GOM Area
Closure specified in Sec. 648.81(a)(3) and (4), respectively. The
Raised Footrope Trawl Whiting Fishery Area (copies of a chart depicting
the area are available from the Regional Administrator upon request) is
defined by straight lines connecting the following points in the order
stated:
Raised Footrope Trawl Whiting Fishery Exemption Area
[September 1 through November 20]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N lat. W long.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
RF 1.......................... 42[deg]14.05' 70[deg]08.8'
RF 2.......................... 42[deg]09.2' 69[deg]47.8'
RF 3.......................... 41[deg]54.85' 69[deg]35.2'
RF 4.......................... 41[deg]41.5' 69[deg]32.85'
RF 5.......................... 41[deg]39' 69[deg]44.3'
RF 6.......................... 41[deg]45.6' 69[deg]51.8'
RF 7.......................... 41[deg]52.3' 69[deg]52.55'
RF 8.......................... 41[deg]55.5' 69[deg]53.45'
RF 9.......................... 42[deg]08.35' 70[deg]04.05'
RF 10......................... 42[deg]04.75' 70[deg]16.95'
RF 11......................... 42[deg]00' 70[deg]13.2'
RF 12......................... 42[deg]00' 70[deg]24.1'
RF 13......................... 42[deg]07.85' 70[deg]30.1'
RF 1.......................... 42[deg]14.05' 70[deg]08.8'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Raised Footrope Trawl Whiting Fishery Exemption Area
[November 21 through December 31]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N lat. W long.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
RF 1.......................... 42[deg]14.05' 70[deg]08.8'
RF 2.......................... 42[deg]09.2' 69[deg]47.8'
RF 3.......................... 41[deg]54.85' 69[deg]35.2'
RF 4.......................... 41[deg]41.5' 69[deg]32.85'
RF 5.......................... 41[deg]39' 69[deg]44.3'
RF 6.......................... 41[deg]45.6' 69[deg]51.8'
RF 7.......................... 41[deg]52.3' 69[deg]52.55'
RF 8.......................... 41[deg]55.5' 69[deg]53.45'
RF 9.......................... 42[deg]08.35' 70[deg]04.05'
RF 1.......................... 42[deg]14.05' 70[deg]08.8'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
(16) GOM Grate Raised Footrope Trawl Exempted Whiting Fishery.
Unless otherwise prohibited in Sec. 648.370 or Sec. 648.371, vessels
subject to the minimum mesh size restrictions specified in paragraphs
(a)(3) or (4) of this section may fish with, use, and possess in the
GOM Grate Raised Footrope Trawl Whiting Fishery area from July 1
through November 30 of each year, nets with a mesh size smaller than
the minimum size specified, if the vessel complies with the
requirements specified in paragraphs (a)(16)(i) and (ii) of this
section. The GOM Grate Raised Footrope Trawl Whiting Fishery Area
(copies of a chart depicting the area are available from the Regional
Administrator upon request) is defined by straight lines connecting the
following points in the order stated:
GOM Grate Raised Footrope Trawl Whiting Fishery Exemption Area
[July 1 through November 30]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N lat. W long.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
GRF1.......................... 43[deg]15' 70[deg]35.4'
GRF2.......................... 43[deg]15' 70[deg]00'
GRF3.......................... 43[deg]25.2' 70[deg]00'
GRF4.......................... 43[deg]41.8' 69[deg]20'
GRF5.......................... 43[deg]58.8' 69[deg]20'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
(18) Great South Channel Scallop Dredge Exemption Area. Unless
otherwise prohibited in Sec. 648.370 or Sec. 648.371, vessels issued
a LAGC scallop permit, including limited access scallop permits that
have used up their DAS allocations, may fish in the Great South Channel
Scallop Dredge Exemption Area, as defined under paragraph (a)(18)(i) of
this section, when not under a NE multispecies or scallop DAS or on a
sector trip, provided the vessel complies with the requirements
specified in paragraph (a)(18)(ii) of this section and applicable
scallop regulations in subpart D of this part.
* * * * *
(19) Cape Cod Spiny Dogfish Exemption Areas. Unless otherwise
prohibited in Sec. 648.370 or Sec. 648.371, vessels issued a NE
multispecies limited access permit that have declared out of the DAS
program as specified in Sec. 648.10, or that have used up their DAS
allocations, may fish in the Eastern or Western Cape Cod Spiny Dogfish
Exemption Area as defined under paragraphs (a)(19)(i) and (ii) of this
section, when not under a NE multispecies or scallop DAS, provided the
vessel complies with the requirements for the Eastern or Western area,
specified in paragraphs (a)(19)(i) and (ii) of this section,
respectively.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(2) When fishing under this exemption in the GOM/GB Exemption Area,
as defined in paragraph (a)(17) of this section, the vessel has on
board a letter of authorization issued by the Regional Administrator,
and complies with the following restrictions:
(i) The vessel only fishes for, possesses, or lands Atlantic
herring, blueback herring, or mackerel in areas north of 42[deg]20' N
lat. and in the areas described in Sec. 648.81(c)(3) and (4); and
Atlantic herring, blueback herring, mackerel, or squid in all other
areas south of 42[deg]20' N. lat.; and
* * * * *
(5) To fish for herring under this exemption, a vessel issued an
All Areas Limited Access Herring Permit and/or an Areas 2 and 3 Limited
Access
[[Page 15266]]
Herring Permit fishing on a declared herring trip, or a vessel issued a
Limited Access Incidental Catch Herring Permit and/or an Open Access
Herring Permit fishing with midwater trawl gear in Management Areas 1A,
1B, and/or 3, as defined in Sec. 648.200(f)(1) and (3), must provide
notice of the following information to NMFS at least 72 hr prior to
beginning any trip into these areas for the purposes of observer
deployment: Vessel name; contact name for coordination of observer
deployment; telephone number for contact; the date, time, and port of
departure; and whether the vessel intends to engage in fishing in
Closed Area I, as defined in Sec. 648.81(c)(3), at any point in the
trip; and
* * * * *
(g) * * *
(6) Gillnet requirements to reduce or prevent marine mammal takes--
(i) Requirements for gillnet gear capable of catching NE multispecies
to reduce harbor porpoise takes. In addition to the requirements for
gillnet fishing identified in this section, all persons owning or
operating vessels in the EEZ that fish with sink gillnet gear and other
gillnet gear capable of catching NE multispecies, with the exception of
single pelagic gillnets (as described in Sec. 648.81(b)(2)(ii) and
(d)(5)(ii)), must comply with the applicable provisions of the Harbor
Porpoise Take Reduction Plan found in Sec. 229.33 of this title.
(ii) Requirements for gillnet gear capable of catching NE
multispecies to prevent large whale takes. In addition to the
requirements for gillnet fishing identified in this section, all
persons owning or operating vessels in the EEZ that fish with sink
gillnet gear and other gillnet gear capable of catching NE
multispecies, with the exception of single pelagic gillnets (as
described in Sec. 648.81(b)(2)(ii) and (d)(5)(ii)), must comply with
the applicable provisions of the Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction
Plan found in Sec. 229.32 of this title.
* * * * *
0
11. Revise Sec. 648.81 to read as follows:
Sec. 648.81 NE multispecies year-round and seasonal closed areas.
(a) Year-round groundfish closed areas. (1) Restrictions. No
fishing vessel or person on a fishing vessel may enter, fish, or be in,
and no fishing gear capable of catching NE multispecies may be used or
on board a vessel in, the, Cashes Ledge, Western Gulf of Maine, or
Closed Area II Closure Areas, unless otherwise allowed by or exempted
under this part. Charts of the areas described in this section are
available from the Regional Administrator upon request.
(2) Exemptions. Unless restricted by the requirements of subpart P
of this part or elsewhere in this part, paragraph (a)(1) of this
section does not apply to a fishing vessel or person on a fishing
vessel when fishing under the following conditions:
(i) Fishing with or using exempted gear as defined under this part,
except for pelagic gillnet gear capable of catching NE multispecies,
unless fishing with a single pelagic gillnet not longer than 300 ft
(91.4 m) and not greater than 6 ft (1.83 m) deep, with a maximum mesh
size of 3 inches (7.6 cm), provided that:
(A) The net is attached to the boat and fished in the upper two-
thirds of the water column;
(B) The net is marked with the owner's name and vessel
identification number;
(C) No regulated species or ocean pout are retained; and
(D) No other gear capable of catching NE multispecies is on board;
(ii) Fishing in the Midwater Trawl Gear Exempted Fishery as
specified in Sec. 648.80(d);
(iii) Fishing in the Purse Seine Gear Exempted Fishery as specified
in Sec. 648.80(e);
(iv) Fishing under charter/party or recreational regulations
specified in Sec. 648.89, provided that:
(A) A letter of authorization issued by the Regional Administrator
is onboard the vessel, which is valid from the date of enrollment until
the end of the fishing year;
(B) No harvested or possessed fish species managed by the NEFMC or
MAFMC are sold or intended for trade, barter or sale, regardless of
where the fish are caught;
(C) Only rod and reel or handline gear is on board the vessel; and
(D) No NE multispecies DAS are used during the entire period for
which the letter of authorization is valid.
(3) Cashes Ledge Closure Area. The Cashes Ledge Closure Area is
defined by straight lines connecting the following points in the order
stated:
Cashes Ledge Closure Area
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N lat. W long.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CL1........................... 43[deg]07' N 69[deg]02' W
CL2........................... 42[deg]49.5' N 68[deg]46' W
CL3........................... 42[deg]46.5' N 68[deg]50.5' W
CL4........................... 42[deg]43.5' N 68[deg]58.5' W
CL5........................... 42[deg]42.5' N 69[deg]17.5' W
CL6........................... 42[deg]49.5' N 69[deg]26' W
CL1........................... 43[deg]07' N 69[deg]02' W
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Western Gulf of Maine Closure Area. The Western Gulf of Maine
Closure Area is defined by straight lines connecting the following
points in the order stated:
Western Gulf of Maine Closure Area
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N lat. W long.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
WGM1.......................... 42[deg]15' 70[deg]15'
WGM2.......................... 42[deg]15' 69[deg]55'
WGM3.......................... 43[deg]15' 69[deg]55'
WGM4.......................... 43[deg]15' 70[deg]15'
WGM1.......................... 42[deg]15' 70[deg]15'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5) Closed Area II Closure Area. (i) The Closed Area II Closure
Area is defined by straight lines, unless otherwise noted, connecting
the following points in the order stated:
Closed Area II Closure Area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N lat. W long. Note
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAII1................................ 41[deg]00' 67[deg]20' ...............
CAII2................................ 41[deg]00' 66[deg]35.8' ...............
CAII3................................ 41[deg]18.45' (\1\) (\2\)
CAII4................................ (\3\) 67[deg]20' (\2\)
CAII5................................ 42[deg]22' 67[deg]20' ...............
CAII1................................ 41[deg]00' 67[deg]20' ...............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The intersection of 41[deg]18.45' N lat. and the U.S.-Canada Maritime Boundary, approximately 41[deg]18.45'
N lat. and 66[deg]24.89' W long.
\2\ From Point CAII3 to Point CAII4 along the U.S.-Canada Maritime Boundary.
\3\ The intersection of 67[deg]20' W long. And the U.S.-Canada Maritime Boundary, approximately 42[deg]22.06' N
lat. and 67[deg]20' W long.
[[Page 15267]]
(ii) Unless otherwise restricted under the EFH Closure(s) specified
in paragraph (h) of this section, paragraph (a)(5)(i) of this section
does not apply to persons on fishing vessels or fishing vessels--
(A) Fishing with gears as described in paragraph (a)(2) this
section.
(B) Fishing with tuna purse seine gear outside of the portion of
Closed Area II known as the Habitat Area of Particular Concern, as
described in Sec. 648.370(g).
(C) Fishing in the CA II Yellowtail Flounder/Haddock SAP or the
Eastern U.S./Canada Haddock SAP Program as specified in Sec.
648.85(b)(3)(ii) or (b)(8)(ii), respectively.
(D) Transiting the area, provided the vessel's fishing gear is
stowed and not available for immediate use as defined in Sec. 648.2;
and
(1) The operator has determined, and a preponderance of available
evidence indicates, that there is a compelling safety reason; or
(2) The vessel has declared into the Eastern U.S./Canada Area as
specified in Sec. 648.85(a)(3)(ii) and is transiting CA II in
accordance with the provisions of Sec. 648.85(a)(3)(vii).
(E) Fishing for scallops within the Closed Area II Access Area
defined in Sec. 648.59(c)(3), during the season specified in Sec.
648.59(c)(4), and pursuant to the provisions specified in Sec. 648.60.
(b) Gulf of Maine spawning groundfish closures. (1) Restrictions.
Unless allowed in this part, no fishing vessel or person on a fishing
vessel may enter, fish, or be in, and no fishing gear capable of
catching NE multispecies may be used or on board a vessel in, the
spawning closure areas described in paragraphs (b)(3) and (4) of this
section, during the times specified in this section. Charts depicting
the areas defined here are available from the RA upon request.
(2) Exemptions. Paragraph (b)(1) of this section does not apply to
a fishing vessel or person on a fishing vessel:
(i) That has not been issued a NE multispecies permit that is
fishing exclusively in state waters;
(ii) That is fishing with or using exempted gear as defined under
this part, excluding pelagic gillnet gear capable of catching NE
multispecies, except for a vessel fishing with a single pelagic gillnet
not longer than 300 ft (91.4 m) and not greater than 6 ft (1.83 m)
deep, with a maximum mesh size of 3 inches (7.6 cm), provided:
(A) The net is attached to the vessel and fished in the upper two-
thirds of the water column;
(B) The net is marked with the vessel owner's name and vessel
identification number;
(C) No regulated species or ocean pout are retained; and
(D) No other gear capable of catching NE multispecies is on board;
(iii) That is fishing as a charter/party or recreational fishing
vessel, provided that:
(A) With the exception of tuna, fish harvested or possessed by the
vessel are not sold or intended for trade, barter, or sale, regardless
of where the species are caught;
(B) Any gear other than pelagic hook and line gear, as defined in
this part, is properly stowed and not available for immediate use as
defined in Sec. 648.2; and
(C) No regulated species or ocean pout are retained; and
(iv) That is transiting pursuant to paragraph (e) of this section.
(3) GOM Cod Spawning Protection Area. Except as specified in
paragraph (b)(2) of this section, from April through June of each year,
no fishing vessel or person on a fishing vessel may enter, fish, or be
in, and no fishing gear capable of catching NE multispecies may be used
or on board a vessel in, the GOM Cod Spawning Protection Area, as
defined by straight lines connecting the following points in the order
stated:
GOM Cod Spawning Protection Area
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N latitude W longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSPA1......................... 42[deg]50.95' 70[deg]32.22'
CSPA2......................... 42[deg]47.65' 70[deg]35.64'
CSPA3......................... 42[deg]54.91' 70[deg]41.88'
CSPA4......................... 42[deg]58.27' 70[deg]38.64'
CSPA1......................... 42[deg]50.95' 70[deg]32.22'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Winter Massachusetts Bay Spawning Protection Area. Except as
specified in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, from November 1 through
January 31 of each year, no fishing vessel or person on a fishing
vessel may enter, fish, or be in, and no fishing gear capable of
catching NE multispecies may be used or be on board a vessel in, the
Massachusetts Bay Protection Area, as defined on the west and south by
the outer limit of Massachusetts waters and on the northeast by a
straight line connecting the following points, which fall along the
Massachusetts state waters boundary:
Winter Massachusetts Bay Spawning Protection Area
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N latitude W longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
WSPA1......................... 42[deg] 23.61' 70[deg] 39.21'
WSPA2......................... 42[deg] 07.68' 70[deg] 26.79'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5) Spring Massachusetts Bay Spawning Protection Area. (i) From
April 15 through April 30 of each year, no fishing vessel or person on
a fishing vessel may enter, fish, or be in, and no fishing gear capable
of catching NE multispecies may be used or on board a vessel in the
thirty- minute block defined by straight lines, unless otherwise noted,
connecting the following points in the order stated:
Spring Massachusetts Bay Spawning Protection Area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N latitude W longitude Note
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SSPA1................................ 42[deg]30' (\1\) ...............
SSPA2................................ 42[deg]30' 70[deg]30' ...............
SSPA3................................ 42[deg]00' 70[deg]30' ...............
SSPA4................................ 42[deg]00' (\2\) (\3\)
SSPA5................................ (\4\) 71[deg]00' (\3\)
SSPA6................................ (\5\) 71[deg]00' (\6\)
SSPA1................................ 42[deg]30' (\1\) (\6\)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The intersection of 42[deg]30' N lat. and the coastline at Marblehead, MA.
\2\ The intersection of 42[deg]00' N lat. and the coastline at Kingston, MA.
\3\ From Point SSPA4 to Point SSPA5 following the coastline of Massachusetts.
\4\ The intersection of 71[deg]00' W long. and the coastline at Quincy, MA.
\5\ The intersection of 71[deg]00' W long. and the northernmost coastline at East Boston, Boston, MA.
\6\ From Point SSPA6 back to Point SSPA 1 following the coastline of Massachusetts.
[[Page 15268]]
(ii) Unless otherwise restricted in this part, the Spring
Massachusetts Bay Spawning Protection Area closure does not apply to a
fishing vessel or person on a fishing vessel that meets the criteria in
paragraphs (d)(5)(ii) through (vi) and (x) of this section (listed
under the exemptions for the GOM Cod Protection Closures). This
includes recreational vessels meeting the criteria specified in
paragraphs (d)(5)(v)(A) through (D) of this section.
(c) Georges Bank Spawning Groundfish Closures. (1) Restrictions.
Unless otherwise allowed in this part, no fishing vessel or person on a
fishing vessel may enter, fish, or be in, and no fishing gear capable
of catching NE multispecies may be used on board a vessel in the
spawning closure areas described in paragraphs (b)(3) and (4) of this
section, and during the times specified in this section. Charts
depicting the areas defined here are available from the RA upon
request.
(2) Exemptions. Paragraph (c)(1) of this section does not apply to
a fishing vessel or person on a fishing vessel:
(i) That is fishing with or using exempted gear as defined under
this part, excluding pelagic gillnet gear capable of catching NE
multispecies, except for vessels fishing with a single pelagic gillnet
not longer than 300 ft (91.4 m) and not greater than 6 ft (1.83 m)
deep, with a maximum mesh size of 3 inches (7.6 cm), provided:
(A) The net is attached to the vessel and fished in the upper two-
thirds of the water column;
(B) The net is marked with the vessel owner's name and vessel
identification number;
(C) No regulated species or ocean pout are retained; and
(D) No other gear capable of catching NE multispecies is on board.
(ii) That is fishing for scallops consistent with the requirements
of the scallop fishery management plan, including rotational access
program requirements specified in Sec. 648.59.
(iii) That is fishing in the mid-water trawl exempted fishery.
(iv) That is transiting pursuant to the requirements described in
Sec. 648.2.
(3) Closed Area I North. Except as specified in paragraph (c)(2) of
this section, from February 1 through April 15 of each year, no fishing
vessel or person on a fishing vessel may enter, fish, or be in; and no
fishing gear capable of catching NE multispecies may be used or on
board a vessel in, Closed Area I North, as defined by straight lines
connecting the following points in the order stated:
Closed Area I--North
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N lat. W long.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CIN1.......................... 41[deg]30' 69[deg]23'
CIN2.......................... 41[deg]30' 68[deg]30'
CIN3.......................... 41[deg]26' 68[deg]30'
CIN4.......................... 41[deg]04' 69[deg]01'
CIN1.......................... 41[deg]30' 69[deg]23'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Closed Area II. Except as specified in paragraph (c)(2) of this
section, from February 1 through April 15 of each year, no fishing
vessel or person on a fishing vessel may enter, fish, or be in, and no
fishing gear capable of catching NE multispecies may be used or on
board a vessel in, Closed Area II, as defined by straight lines, unless
otherwise noted, connecting the following points in the order stated:
Closed Area II
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N lat. W long. Note
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAII1................................ 41[deg]00' 67[deg]20' ...............
CAII2................................ 41[deg]00' 66[deg]35.8' ...............
CAII3................................ 41[deg]18.45 (\1\) (\2\)
CAII4................................ (\3\) 67[deg]20' (\2\)
CAII5................................ 42[deg]22' 67[deg]20' ...............
CAII1................................ 41[deg]00' 67[deg]20' ...............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The intersection of 41[deg]18.45' N lat. and the U.S.-Canada Maritime Boundary, approximately 41[deg]18.45'
N lat. and 66[deg]24.89' W long.
\2\ From Point CAII3 to Point CAII4 along the U.S.-Canada Maritime Boundary.
\3\ The intersection of 67[deg]20' W long. and the U.S.-Canada Maritime Boundary, approximately 42[deg]22.06' N
lat. and 67[deg]20' W long.
(d) GOM Cod Protection Closures. (1) Restrictions. Unless otherwise
allowed in this part, no fishing vessel or person on a fishing vessel
may enter, fish, or be in, and no fishing gear capable of catching NE
multispecies may be used or on board a vessel in, GOM Cod Protection
Closures I through V as described, and during the times specified, in
paragraphs (d)(4)(i) through (v) of this section.
(2) Review of closure. The New England Fishery Management Council
shall review the GOM Cod Protection Closures Areas specified in this
section when the spawning stock biomass for GOM cod reaches the minimum
biomass threshold specified for the stock (50 percent of
SSBMSY).
(3) Seasons. (i) GOM Cod Protection Closure I is in effect from May
1 through May 31.
(ii) GOM Cod Protection Closure II is in effect from June 1 through
June 30.
(iii) GOM Cod Protection Closure III is in effect from November 1
through January 31.
(iv) GOM Cod Protection Closure IV is in effect from October 1
through October 31.
(v) GOM Cod Protection Closure V is in effect from March 1 through
March 31.
(4) GOM Cod Protection Closure Areas. Charts depicting these areas
are available from the Regional Administrator upon request.
(i) GOM Cod Protection Closure I. GOM Cod Protection Closure I is
the area bounded by the following coordinates connected in the order
stated by straight lines, unless otherwise noted:
GOM Cod Protection Closure I
[May 1-May 31]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N latitude W longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPCI 1........................ 43[deg]30' N (\1\)
CPCI 2........................ 43[deg]30' N 69[deg]30' W
CPCI 3........................ 43[deg]00' N 69[deg]30' W
CPCI 4........................ 43[deg]00' N 70[deg]00' W
CPCI 5........................ 42[deg]30' N 70[deg]00' W
CPCI 6........................ 42[deg]30' N 70[deg]30' W
CPCI 7........................ 42[deg]20' N 70[deg]30' W
CPCI 8........................ 42[deg]20' N (\2\) (\3\)
CPCI 1........................ 43[deg]30' N (\1\) (\3\)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The intersection of 43[deg]30' N latitude and the coastline of
Maine.
\2\ The intersection of 42[deg]20' N latitude and the coastline of
Massachusetts.
\3\ From Point 8 back to Point 1 following the coastline of the United
States.
(ii) GOM Cod Protection Closure II. GOM Cod Protection Closure II
is the area bounded by the following coordinates connected in the order
[[Page 15269]]
stated by straight lines, unless otherwise noted:
GOM Cod Protection Closure II
[June 1-June 30]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N latitude W longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPCII 1....................... (\1\) 69[deg]30' W
CPCII 2....................... 43[deg]30' N 69[deg]30' W
CPCII 3....................... 43[deg]30' N 70[deg]00' W
CPCII 4....................... 42[deg]30' N 70[deg]00' W
CPCII 5....................... 42[deg]30' N 70[deg]30' W
CPCII 6....................... 42[deg]20' N 70[deg]30' W
CPCII 7....................... 42[deg]20' N (\2\)(\3\)
CPCII 8....................... 42[deg]30' N (\(4)\)(\3\)
CPCII 9....................... 42[deg]30' N 70[deg]30' W
CPCII 10...................... 43[deg]00' N 70[deg]30' W
CPCII 11...................... 43[deg]00' N (\5\) (\6\)
CPCII 1....................... (\1\) 69[deg]30' W (\6\)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The intersection of 69[deg]30' W longitude and the coastline of
Maine.
\2\ The intersection of 42[deg]20' N latitude and the coastline of
Massachusetts.
\3\ From Point 7 to Point 8 following the coastline of Massachusetts.
\4\ The intersection of 42[deg]30' N latitude and the coastline of
Massachusetts.
\5\ The intersection of 43[deg]00' N latitude and the coastline of New
Hampshire.
\6\ From Point 11 back to Point 1 following the coastlines of New
Hampshire and Maine.
(iii) GOM Cod Protection Closure III. GOM Cod Protection Closure
III is the area bounded by the following coordinates connected in the
order stated by straight lines, unless otherwise noted:
GOM Cod Protection Closure III
[November 1-January 31]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N latitude W longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPCIII 1...................... 42[deg]30' N (\1\)
CPCIII 2...................... 42[deg]30' N 70[deg]30' W
CPCIII 3...................... 42[deg]15' N 70[deg]30' W
CPCIII 4...................... 42[deg]15' N 70[deg]24' W
CPCIII 5...................... 42[deg]00' N 70[deg]24' W
CPCIII 6...................... 42[deg]00' N (\2\) (\3\)
CPCIII 1...................... 42[deg]30' N (\1\) (\3\)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The intersection of 42[deg]30' N latitude and the Massachusetts
coastline.
\2\ The intersection of 42[deg]00' N latitude and the mainland
Massachusetts coastline at Kingston, MA.
\3\ From Point 6 back to Point 1 following the coastline of
Massachusetts.
(iv) GOM Cod Protection Closure IV. GOM Cod Protection Closure IV
is the area bounded by the following coordinates connected in the order
stated by straight lines, unless otherwise noted:
GOM Cod Protection Closure IV
[October 1-October 31]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N latitude W longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPCIV 1....................... 42[deg]30' N (\1\)
CPCIV 2....................... 42[deg]30' N 70[deg]00' W
CPCIV 3....................... 42[deg]00' N 70[deg]00' W
CPCIV 4....................... 42[deg]00' N (\2\) (\3\)
CPCIV 1....................... 42[deg]30' N (\1\) (\3\)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The intersection of 42[deg]30' N latitude and the Massachusetts
coastline.
\2\ The intersection of 42[deg]00' N latitude and the mainland
Massachusetts coastline at Kingston, MA.
\3\ From Point 4 back to Point 1 following the coastline of
Massachusetts.
(v) GOM Cod Protection Closure V. GOM Cod Protection Closure V is
the area bounded by the following coordinates connected in the order
stated by straight lines:
GOM Cod Protection Closure V
[March 1-March 31]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N latitude W longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPCV 1........................ 42[deg]30' N 70[deg]00' W
CPCV 2........................ 42[deg]30' N 68[deg]30' W
CPCV 3........................ 42[deg]00' N 68[deg]30' W
CPCV 4........................ 42[deg]00' N 70[deg]00' W
CPCV 1........................ 42[deg]30' N 70[deg]00' W
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5) Exemptions. The GOM cod protection closures specified in this
section do not apply to a fishing vessel or person on board a fishing
vessel under any of the following conditions:
(i) No multispecies permit has been issued and the vessel is
fishing exclusively in state waters;
(ii) Fishing with or using exempted gear as defined under this
part, except for pelagic gillnet gear capable of catching NE
multispecies, unless fishing with a single pelagic gillnet not longer
than 300 ft (91.4 m) and not greater than 6 ft (1.83 m) deep, with a
maximum mesh size of 3 inches (7.6 cm), provided that:
(A) The net is attached to the boat and fished in the upper two-
thirds of the water column;
(B) The net is marked with the owner's name and vessel
identification number;
(C) No regulated species are retained; and
(D) No other gear capable of catching NE multispecies is on board;
(iii) Fishing in the Midwater Trawl Gear Exempted Fishery as
specified in Sec. 648.80(d);
(iv) Fishing in the Purse Seine Gear Exempted Fishery as specified
in Sec. 648.80(e);
(v) Fishing under charter/party or recreational regulations
specified in Sec. 648.89, provided that:
(A) A vessel fishing under charter/party regulations in a GOM cod
protection closure described under paragraph (f)(4) of this section,
has on board a letter of authorization issued by the Regional
Administrator that is valid from the date of enrollment through the
duration of the closure or 3 months duration, whichever is greater;
(B) No harvested or possessed fish species managed by the NEFMC or
MAFMC are sold or intended for trade, barter or sale, regardless of
where the fish are caught;
(C) Only rod and reel or handline gear is on board; and
(D) No NE multispecies DAS are used during the entire period for
which the letter of authorization is valid;
(vi) Fishing with scallop dredge gear under a scallop DAS or when
lawfully fishing in the Scallop Dredge Fishery Exemption Area as
described in Sec. 648.80(a)(11), provided the vessel does not retain
any regulated NE multispecies during a trip, or on any part of a trip;
(vii) Fishing in the Raised Footrope Trawl Exempted Whiting
Fishery, as specified in Sec. 648.80(a)(15), or in the Small Mesh Area
II Exemption Area, as specified in Sec. 648.80(a)(9);
(viii) Fishing on a sector trip, as defined in this part, and in
the GOM Cod Protection Closures IV or V, as specified in paragraphs
(f)(4)(iv) and (v) of this section; or
(ix) Fishing under the provisions of a Northeast multispecies
Handgear A permit, as specified at Sec. 648.82(b)(6), and in the GOM
Cod Protection Closures IV or V, as specified in paragraphs (f)(4)(iv)
and (v) of this section.
(x) Transiting the area, provided it complies with the requirements
specified in paragraph (e) of this section.
(e) Transiting. (1) Unless otherwise restricted or specified in
this paragraph (e), a vessel may transit the Cashes Ledge Closed Area,
the Western GOM Closure Area, the GOM Cod Protection Closures, and the
GOM Cod Spawning Protection Area, as defined in paragraphs (a)(3) and
(4), (d)(4), and (b)(3), of this section, respectively, provided that
its gear is stowed and not available for immediate use as defined in
Sec. 648.2.
(2) Private recreational or charter/party vessels fishing under the
Northeast multispecies provisions specified at Sec. 648.89 may transit
the GOM Cod Spawning Protection Area, as defined in paragraph (b)(3) of
this section, provided all bait and hooks are removed from fishing
rods, and any regulated species on board have been caught outside the
GOM Cod Spawning
[[Page 15270]]
Protection Area and has been gutted and stored.
(f) Restricted Gear Areas--(1) Restricted Gear Area Seasons. No
fishing vessel with mobile gear on board, or person on a fishing vessel
with mobile gear on board, may fish or be in the specified Restricted
Gear Areas, unless transiting, during the seasons below. No fishing
vessel with lobster pot gear on board, or person on a fishing vessel
with lobster pot gear on board, may fish in, and no lobster pot gear
may be deployed or remain in the specified Restricted Gear Areas.
Vessels with lobster pot gear on board may transit during the seasons
listed in the table in this paragraph (f)(1).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mobile gear Lobster pot gear
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Restricted Gear Area I............... October 1-June 15............ June 16-September 30.
Restricted Gear Area II.............. November 27-June 15.......... June 16-November 26.
Restricted Gear Area III............. June 16-November 26.......... January 1-April 30.
Restricted Gear Area IV.............. June 16-September 30......... n/a.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Transiting. Vessels with mobile gear may transit this area,
provided that all mobile gear is on board the vessel while inside the
area, and is stowed and not available for immediate use as defined in
Sec. 648.2.
(3) Restricted Gear Area I. Restricted Gear Area I is defined by
the following points connected in the order listed by straight lines
(points followed by an asterisk are shared with an adjacent Restricted
Gear Area):
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Latitude Longitude Note
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AA................................... 40[deg]02.75' N 70[deg]16.10' W (*)
AB................................... 40[deg]02.45' N 70[deg]14.10' W (*)
AC................................... 40[deg]05.20' N 70[deg]10.90' W (*)
AD................................... 40[deg]03.75' N 70[deg]10.15' W (*)
AE................................... 40[deg]00.70' N 70[deg]08.70' W (*)
AF................................... 39[deg]59.20' N 70[deg]04.90' W (*)
AG................................... 39[deg]58.25' N 70[deg]03.00' W (*)
AH................................... 39[deg]56.90' N 69[deg]57.45' W (*)
AI................................... 39[deg]57.40' N 69[deg]55.90' W (*)
AJ................................... 39[deg]57.55' N 69[deg]54.05' W (*)
AK................................... 39[deg]56.70' N 69[deg]53.60' W (*)
AL................................... 39[deg]55.75' N 69[deg]41.40' W (*)
AM................................... 39[deg]56.20' N 69[deg]40.20' W (*)
AN................................... 39[deg]58.80' N 69[deg]38.45' W (*)
AO................................... 39[deg]59.15' N 69[deg]37.30' W (*)
AP................................... 40[deg]00.90' N 69[deg]37.30' W (*)
AQ................................... 40[deg]00.65' N 69[deg]36.50' W (*)
AR................................... 39[deg]57.85' N 69[deg]35.15' W (*)
AS................................... 39[deg]56.80' N 69[deg]34.10' W (*)
AT................................... 39[deg]56.50' N 69[deg]26.35' W (*)
AU................................... 39[deg]56.75' N 69[deg]24.40' W (*)
AV................................... 39[deg]57.80' N 69[deg]20.35' W (*)
AW................................... 40[deg]00.05' N 69[deg]14.60' W (*)
AX................................... 40[deg]02.65' N 69[deg]11.15' W (*)
AY................................... 40[deg]02.00' N 69[deg]08.35' W (*)
AZ................................... 40[deg]02.65' N 69[deg]05.60' W (*)
BA................................... 40[deg]04.10' N 69[deg]03.90' W (*)
BB................................... 40[deg]05.65' N 69[deg]03.55' W (*)
BC................................... 40[deg]08.45' N 69[deg]03.60' W (*)
BD................................... 40[deg]09.75' N 69[deg]04.15' W (*)
BE................................... 40[deg]10.25' N 69[deg]04.40' W (*)
BF................................... 40[deg]11.60' N 69[deg]05.40' W (*)
BG................................... 40[deg]11.00' N 69[deg]03.80' W (*)
BH................................... 40[deg]08.90' N 69[deg]01.75' W (*)
BI................................... 40[deg]05.30' N 69[deg]01.10' W (*)
BJ................................... 40[deg]05.20' N 69[deg]00.50' W (*)
BK................................... 40[deg]04.35' N 69[deg]00.50' W (*)
BL................................... 40[deg]03.65' N 69[deg]00.00' W (*)
BM................................... 40[deg]03.60' N 68[deg]57.20' W (*)
BN................................... 40[deg]05.70' N 68[deg]52.40' W (*)
BO................................... 40[deg]08.10' N 68[deg]51.00' W (*)
BP................................... 40[deg]08.70' N 68[deg]49.60' W (*)
BQ................................... 40[deg]06.90' N 68[deg]46.50' W (*)
BR................................... 40[deg]07.20' N 68[deg]38.40' W (*)
BS................................... 40[deg]07.90' N 68[deg]36.00' W (*)
BT................................... 40[deg]06.40' N 68[deg]35.80' W ...............
BU................................... 40[deg]05.25' N 68[deg]39.30' W ...............
BV................................... 40[deg]05.40' N 68[deg]44.50' W ...............
BW................................... 40[deg]06.00' N 68[deg]46.50' W ...............
BX................................... 40[deg]07.40' N 68[deg]49.60' W ...............
BY................................... 40[deg]05.55' N 68[deg]49.80' W ...............
BZ................................... 40[deg]03.90' N 68[deg]51.70' W ...............
CA................................... 40[deg]02.25' N 68[deg]55.40' W ...............
[[Page 15271]]
CB................................... 40[deg]02.60' N 69[deg]00.00' W ...............
CC................................... 40[deg]02.75' N 69[deg]00.75' W ...............
CD................................... 40[deg]04.20' N 69[deg]01.75' W ...............
CE................................... 40[deg]06.15' N 69[deg]01.95' W ...............
CF................................... 40[deg]07.25' N 69[deg]02.00' W ...............
CG................................... 40[deg]08.50' N 69[deg]02.25' W ...............
CH................................... 40[deg]09.20' N 69[deg]02.95' W ...............
CI................................... 40[deg]09.75' N 69[deg]03.30' W ...............
CJ................................... 40[deg]09.55' N 69[deg]03.85' W ...............
CK................................... 40[deg]08.40' N 69[deg]03.40' W ...............
CL................................... 40[deg]07.20' N 69[deg]03.30' W ...............
CM................................... 40[deg]06.00' N 69[deg]03.10' W ...............
CN................................... 40[deg]05.40' N 69[deg]03.05' W ...............
CO................................... 40[deg]04.80' N 69[deg]03.05' W ...............
CP................................... 40[deg]03.55' N 69[deg]03.55' W ...............
CQ................................... 40[deg]01.90' N 69[deg]03.95' W ...............
CR................................... 40[deg]01.00' N 69[deg]04.40' W ...............
CS................................... 39[deg]59.90' N 69[deg]06.25' W ...............
CT................................... 40[deg]00.60' N 69[deg]10.05' W ...............
CU................................... 39[deg]59.25' N 69[deg]11.15' W ...............
CV................................... 39[deg]57.45' N 69[deg]16.05' W ...............
CW................................... 39[deg]56.10' N 69[deg]20.10' W ...............
CX................................... 39[deg]54.60' N 69[deg]25.65' W ...............
CY................................... 39[deg]54.65' N 69[deg]26.90' W ...............
CZ................................... 39[deg]54.80' N 69[deg]30.95' W ...............
DA................................... 39[deg]54.35' N 69[deg]33.40' W ...............
DB................................... 39[deg]55.00' N 69[deg]34.90' W ...............
DC................................... 39[deg]56.55' N 69[deg]36.00' W ...............
DD................................... 39[deg]57.95' N 69[deg]36.45' W ...............
DE................................... 39[deg]58.75' N 69[deg]36.30' W ...............
DF................................... 39[deg]58.80' N 69[deg]36.95' W ...............
DG................................... 39[deg]57.95' N 69[deg]38.10' W ...............
DH................................... 39[deg]54.50' N 69[deg]38.25' W ...............
DI................................... 39[deg]53.60' N 69[deg]46.50' W ...............
DJ................................... 39[deg]54.70' N 69[deg]50.00' W ...............
DK................................... 39[deg]55.25' N 69[deg]51.40' W ...............
DL................................... 39[deg]55.20' N 69[deg]53.10' W ...............
DM................................... 39[deg]54.85' N 69[deg]53.90' W ...............
DN................................... 39[deg]55.70' N 69[deg]54.90' W ...............
DO................................... 39[deg]56.15' N 69[deg]55.35' W ...............
DP................................... 39[deg]56.05' N 69[deg]56.25' W ...............
DQ................................... 39[deg]55.30' N 69[deg]57.10' W ...............
DR................................... 39[deg]54.80' N 69[deg]58.60' W ...............
DS................................... 39[deg]56.05' N 70[deg]00.65' W ...............
DT................................... 39[deg]55.30' N 70[deg]02.95' W ...............
DU................................... 39[deg]56.90' N 70[deg]11.30' W ...............
DV................................... 39[deg]58.90' N 70[deg]11.50' W ...............
DW................................... 39[deg]59.60' N 70[deg]11.10' W ...............
DX................................... 40[deg]01.35' N 70[deg]11.20' W ...............
DY................................... 40[deg]02.60' N 70[deg]12.00' W ...............
DZ................................... 40[deg]00.40' N 70[deg]12.30' W ...............
EA................................... 39[deg]59.75' N 70[deg]13.05' W ...............
EB................................... 39[deg]59.30' N 70[deg]14.00' W (*)
AA................................... 40[deg]02.75' N 70[deg]16.10' W (*)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Restricted Gear Area II. Restricted Gear Area II is defined by
the following points connected in the order listed by straight lines
(points followed by an asterisk are shared with an adjacent Restricted
Gear Area):
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Latitude Longitude Note
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AA................................... 40[deg]02.75' N 70[deg]16.10' W (*)
AB................................... 40[deg]02.45' N 70[deg]14.10' W (*)
AC................................... 40[deg]05.20' N 70[deg]10.90' W (*)
AD................................... 40[deg]03.75' N 70[deg]10.15' W (*)
AE................................... 40[deg]00.70' N 70[deg]08.70' W (*)
AF................................... 39[deg]59.20' N 70[deg]04.90' W (*)
AG................................... 39[deg]58.25' N 70[deg]03.00' W (*)
AH................................... 39[deg]56.90' N 69[deg]57.45' W (*)
AI................................... 39[deg]57.40' N 69[deg]55.90' W (*)
AJ................................... 39[deg]57.55' N 69[deg]54.05' W (*)
AK................................... 39[deg]56.70' N 69[deg]53.60' W (*)
[[Page 15272]]
AL................................... 39[deg]55.75' N 69[deg]41.40' W (*)
AM................................... 39[deg]56.20' N 69[deg]40.20' W (*)
AN................................... 39[deg]58.80' N 69[deg]38.45' W (*)
AO................................... 39[deg]59.15' N 69[deg]37.30' W (*)
AP................................... 40[deg]00.90' N 69[deg]37.30' W (*)
AQ................................... 40[deg]00.65' N 69[deg]36.50' W (*)
AR................................... 39[deg]57.85' N 69[deg]35.15' W (*)
AS................................... 39[deg]56.80' N 69[deg]34.10' W (*)
AT................................... 39[deg]56.50' N 69[deg]26.35' W (*)
AU................................... 39[deg]56.75' N 69[deg]24.40' W (*)
AV................................... 39[deg]57.80' N 69[deg]20.35' W (*)
AW................................... 40[deg]00.05' N 69[deg]14.60' W (*)
AX................................... 40[deg]02.65' N 69[deg]11.15' W (*)
AY................................... 40[deg]02.00' N 69[deg]08.35' W (*)
AZ................................... 40[deg]02.65' N 69[deg]05.60' W (*)
BA................................... 40[deg]04.10' N 69[deg]03.90' W (*)
BB................................... 40[deg]05.65' N 69[deg]03.55' W (*)
BC................................... 40[deg]08.45' N 69[deg]03.60' W (*)
BD................................... 40[deg]09.75' N 69[deg]04.15' W (*)
BE................................... 40[deg]10.25' N 69[deg]04.40' W (*)
BF................................... 40[deg]11.60' N 69[deg]05.40' W (*)
BG................................... 40[deg]11.00' N 69[deg]03.80' W (*)
BH................................... 40[deg]08.90' N 69[deg]01.75' W (*)
BI................................... 40[deg]05.30' N 69[deg]01.10' W (*)
BJ................................... 40[deg]05.20' N 69[deg]00.50' W (*)
BK................................... 40[deg]04.35' N 69[deg]00.50' W (*)
BL................................... 40[deg]03.65' N 69[deg]00.00' W (*)
BM................................... 40[deg]03.60' N 68[deg]57.20' W (*)
BN................................... 40[deg]05.70' N 68[deg]52.40' W (*)
BO................................... 40[deg]08.10' N 68[deg]51.00' W (*)
BP................................... 40[deg]08.70' N 68[deg]49.60' W (*)
BQ................................... 40[deg]06.90' N 68[deg]46.50' W (*)
BR................................... 40[deg]07.20' N 68[deg]38.40' W (*)
BS................................... 40[deg]07.90' N 68[deg]36.00' W (*)
BT................................... 40[deg]06.40' N 68[deg]35.80' W ...............
BU................................... 40[deg]05.25' N 68[deg]39.30' W ...............
BV................................... 40[deg]05.40' N 68[deg]44.50' W ...............
BW................................... 40[deg]06.00' N 68[deg]46.50' W ...............
BX................................... 40[deg]07.40' N 68[deg]49.60' W ...............
BY................................... 40[deg]05.55' N 68[deg]49.80' W ...............
BZ................................... 40[deg]03.90' N 68[deg]51.70' W ...............
CA................................... 40[deg]02.25' N 68[deg]55.40' W ...............
CB................................... 40[deg]02.60' N 69[deg]00.00' W ...............
CC................................... 40[deg]02.75' N 69[deg]00.75' W ...............
CD................................... 40[deg]04.20' N 69[deg]01.75' W ...............
CE................................... 40[deg]06.15' N 69[deg]01.95' W ...............
CF................................... 40[deg]07.25' N 69[deg]02.00' W ...............
CG................................... 40[deg]08.50' N 69[deg]02.25' W ...............
CH................................... 40[deg]09.20' N 69[deg]02.95' W ...............
CI................................... 40[deg]09.75' N 69[deg]03.30' W ...............
CJ................................... 40[deg]09.55' N 69[deg]03.85' W ...............
CK................................... 40[deg]08.40' N 69[deg]03.40' W ...............
CL................................... 40[deg]07.20' N 69[deg]03.30' W ...............
CM................................... 40[deg]06.00' N 69[deg]03.10' W ...............
CN................................... 40[deg]05.40' N 69[deg]03.05' W ...............
CO................................... 40[deg]04.80' N 69[deg]03.05' W ...............
CP................................... 40[deg]03.55' N 69[deg]03.55' W ...............
CQ................................... 40[deg]01.90' N 69[deg]03.95' W ...............
CR................................... 40[deg]01.00' N 69[deg]04.40' W ...............
CS................................... 39[deg]59.90' N 69[deg]06.25' W ...............
CT................................... 40[deg]00.60' N 69[deg]10.05' W ...............
CU................................... 39[deg]59.25' N 69[deg]11.15' W ...............
CV................................... 39[deg]57.45' N 69[deg]16.05' W ...............
CW................................... 39[deg]56.10' N 69[deg]20.10' W ...............
CX................................... 39[deg]54.60' N 69[deg]25.65' W ...............
CY................................... 39[deg]54.65' N 69[deg]26.90' W ...............
CZ................................... 39[deg]54.80' N 69[deg]30.95' W ...............
DA................................... 39[deg]54.35' N 69[deg]33.40' W ...............
DB................................... 39[deg]55.00' N 69[deg]34.90' W ...............
DC................................... 39[deg]56.55' N 69[deg]36.00' W ...............
DD................................... 39[deg]57.95' N 69[deg]36.45' W ...............
DE................................... 39[deg]58.75' N 69[deg]36.30' W ...............
DF................................... 39[deg]58.80' N 69[deg]36.95' W ...............
DG................................... 39[deg]57.95' N 69[deg]38.10' W ...............
[[Page 15273]]
DH................................... 39[deg]54.50' N 69[deg]38.25' W ...............
DI................................... 39[deg]53.60' N 69[deg]46.50' W ...............
DJ................................... 39[deg]54.70' N 69[deg]50.00' W ...............
DK................................... 39[deg]55.25' N 69[deg]51.40' W ...............
DL................................... 39[deg]55.20' N 69[deg]53.10' W ...............
DM................................... 39[deg]54.85' N 69[deg]53.90' W ...............
DN................................... 39[deg]55.70' N 69[deg]54.90' W ...............
DO................................... 39[deg]56.15' N 69[deg]55.35' W ...............
DP................................... 39[deg]56.05' N 69[deg]56.25' W ...............
DQ................................... 39[deg]55.30' N 69[deg]57.10' W ...............
DR................................... 39[deg]54.80' N 69[deg]58.60' W ...............
DS................................... 39[deg]56.05' N 70[deg]00.65' W ...............
DT................................... 39[deg]55.30' N 70[deg]02.95' W ...............
DU................................... 39[deg]56.90' N 70[deg]11.30' W ...............
DV................................... 39[deg]58.90' N 70[deg]11.50' W ...............
DW................................... 39[deg]59.60' N 70[deg]11.10' W ...............
DX................................... 40[deg]01.35' N 70[deg]11.20' W ...............
DY................................... 40[deg]02.60' N 70[deg]12.00' W ...............
DZ................................... 40[deg]00.40' N 70[deg]12.30' W ...............
EA................................... 39[deg]59.75' N 70[deg]13.05' W ...............
EB................................... 39[deg]59.30' N 70[deg]14.00' W (*)
AA................................... 40[deg]02.75' N 70[deg]16.10' W (*)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5) Restricted Gear Area III. Restricted Gear Area III is defined
by the following points connected in the order listed by straight lines
(points followed by an asterisk are shared with an adjacent Restricted
Gear Area):
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Latitude Longitude Note
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AA................................... 40[deg]02.75' N 70[deg]16.10' W (*)
GL................................... 40[deg]00.70' N 70[deg]18.60' W (*)
GK................................... 39[deg]59.80' N 70[deg]21.75' W (*)
GJ................................... 39[deg]59.75' N 70[deg]25.50' W (*)
GI................................... 40[deg]03.85' N 70[deg]28.75' W (*)
GH................................... 40[deg]00.55' N 70[deg]32.10' W (*)
GG................................... 39[deg]59.15' N 70[deg]34.45' W (*)
GF................................... 39[deg]58.90' N 70[deg]38.65' W (*)
GE................................... 40[deg]00.10' N 70[deg]45.10' W (*)
GD................................... 40[deg]00.50' N 70[deg]57.60' W (*)
GC................................... 40[deg]02.00' N 71[deg]01.30' W (*)
GB................................... 39[deg]59.30' N 71[deg]18.40' W (*)
GA................................... 40[deg]00.70' N 71[deg]19.80' W (*)
FZ................................... 39[deg]57.50' N 71[deg]20.60' W (*)
FY................................... 39[deg]53.10' N 71[deg]36.10' W (*)
FX................................... 39[deg]52.60' N 71[deg]40.35' W (*)
FW................................... 39[deg]53.10' N 71[deg]42.70' W (*)
FV................................... 39[deg]46.95' N 71[deg]49.00' W (*)
FU................................... 39[deg]41.15' N 71[deg]57.10' W (*)
FT................................... 39[deg]35.45' N 72[deg]02.00' W (*)
FS................................... 39[deg]32.65' N 72[deg]06.10' W (*)
FR................................... 39[deg]29.75' N 72[deg]09.80' W (*)
GM................................... 39[deg]33.65' N 72[deg]15.00' W ...............
GN................................... 39[deg]47.20' N 72[deg]01.60' W ...............
GO................................... 39[deg]53.75' N 71[deg]52.25' W ...............
GP................................... 39[deg]55.85' N 71[deg]45.00' W ...............
GQ................................... 39[deg]55.60' N 71[deg]41.20' W ...............
GR................................... 39[deg]57.90' N 71[deg]28.70' W ...............
GS................................... 40[deg]10.70' N 71[deg]10.25' W ...............
GT................................... 40[deg]12.75' N 70[deg]55.05' W ...............
GU................................... 40[deg]11.05' N 70[deg]45.80' W ...............
GV................................... 40[deg]06.50' N 70[deg]40.05' W ...............
GW................................... 40[deg]05.60' N 70[deg]17.70' W ...............
AA................................... 40[deg]02.75' N 70[deg]16.10' W (*)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(6) Restricted Gear Area IV. Restricted Gear Area IV is defined by
the following points connected in the order listed by straight lines
(points followed by an asterisk are shared with an adjacent Restricted
Gear Area):
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Latitude Longitude Note
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AA................................... 40[deg]02.75' N 70[deg]16.10' W (*)
[[Page 15274]]
GX................................... 40[deg]07.80' N 70[deg]09.20' W ...............
GY................................... 40[deg]07.60' N 70[deg]04.50' W ...............
GZ................................... 40[deg]02.10' N 69[deg]45.00' W ...............
HA................................... 40[deg]01.30' N 69[deg]45.00' W ...............
HB................................... 40[deg]00.50' N 69[deg]38.80' W ...............
HC................................... 40[deg]01.70' N 69[deg]37.40' W ...............
HD................................... 40[deg]01.70' N 69[deg]35.40' W ...............
HE................................... 40[deg]00.40' N 69[deg]35.20' W ...............
HF................................... 39[deg]57.30' N 69[deg]25.10' W ...............
HG................................... 40[deg]05.50' N 69[deg]09.00' W ...............
HH................................... 40[deg]14.30' N 69[deg]05.80' W ...............
HI................................... 40[deg]14.00' N 69[deg]04.70' W ...............
HJ................................... 40[deg]11.60' N 68[deg]53.00' W ...............
HK................................... 40[deg]13.60' N 68[deg]40.60' W ...............
BS................................... 40[deg]07.90' N 68[deg]36.00' W (*)
BR................................... 40[deg]07.20' N 68[deg]38.40' W (*)
BQ................................... 40[deg]06.90' N 68[deg]46.50' W (*)
BP................................... 40[deg]08.70' N 68[deg]49.60' W (*)
BO................................... 40[deg]08.10' N 68[deg]51.00' W (*)
BN................................... 40[deg]05.70' N 68[deg]52.40' W (*)
BM................................... 40[deg]03.60' N 68[deg]57.20' W (*)
BL................................... 40[deg]03.65' N 69[deg]00.00' W (*)
BK................................... 40[deg]04.35' N 69[deg]00.50' W (*)
BJ................................... 40[deg]05.20' N 69[deg]00.50' W (*)
BI................................... 40[deg]05.30' N 69[deg]01.10' W (*)
BH................................... 40[deg]08.90' N 69[deg]01.75' W (*)
BG................................... 40[deg]11.00' N 69[deg]03.80' W (*)
BF................................... 40[deg]11.60' N 69[deg]05.40' W (*)
BE................................... 40[deg]10.25' N 69[deg]04.40' W (*)
BD................................... 40[deg]09.75' N 69[deg]04.15' W (*)
BC................................... 40[deg]08.45' N 69[deg]03.60' W (*)
BB................................... 40[deg]05.65' N 69[deg]03.55' W (*)
BA................................... 40[deg]04.10' N 69[deg]03.90' W (*)
AZ................................... 40[deg]02.65' N 69[deg]05.60' W (*)
AY................................... 40[deg]02.00' N 69[deg]08.35' W (*)
AX................................... 40[deg]02.65' N 69[deg]11.15' W (*)
AW................................... 40[deg]00.05' N 69[deg]14.60' W (*)
AV................................... 39[deg]57.80' N 69[deg]20.35' W (*)
AU................................... 39[deg]56.75' N 69[deg]24.40' W (*)
AT................................... 39[deg]56.50' N 69[deg]26.35' W (*)
AS................................... 39[deg]56.80' N 69[deg]34.10' W (*)
AR................................... 39[deg]57.85' N 69[deg]35.15' W (*)
AQ................................... 40[deg]00.65' N 69[deg]36.50' W (*)
AP................................... 40[deg]00.90' N 69[deg]37.30' W (*)
AO................................... 39[deg]59.15' N 69[deg]37.30' W (*)
AN................................... 39[deg]58.80' N 69[deg]38.45' W (*)
AM................................... 39[deg]56.20' N 69[deg]40.20' W (*)
AL................................... 39[deg]55.75' N 69[deg]41.40' W (*)
AK................................... 39[deg]56.70' N 69[deg]53.60' W (*)
AJ................................... 39[deg]57.55' N 69[deg]54.05' W (*)
AI................................... 39[deg]57.40' N 69[deg]55.90' W (*)
AH................................... 39[deg]56.90' N 69[deg]57.45' W (*)
AG................................... 39[deg]58.25' N 70[deg]03.00' W (*)
AF................................... 39[deg]59.20' N 70[deg]04.90' W (*)
AE................................... 40[deg]00.70' N 70[deg]08.70' W (*)
AD................................... 40[deg]03.75' N 70[deg]10.15' W (*)
AC................................... 40[deg]05.20' N 70[deg]10.90' W (*)
AB................................... 40[deg]02.45' N 70[deg]14.10' W (*)
AA................................... 40[deg]02.75' N 70[deg]16.10' W (*)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
12. Amend Sec. 648.87 by revising paragraphs (c)(2)(i) introductory
text and (c)(2)(ii)(B) to read as follows:
Sec. 648.87 Sector allocation.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Regulations that may not be exempted for sector participants.
The Regional Administrator may not exempt participants in a sector from
the following Federal fishing regulations: Specific times and areas
within the NE multispecies year-round closure areas; permitting
restrictions (e.g., vessel upgrades, etc.); gear restrictions designed
to minimize habitat impacts (e.g., roller gear restrictions, etc.);
reporting requirements; and AMs specified in Sec. 648.90(a)(5)(i)(D).
For the purposes of this paragraph (c)(2)(i), the DAS reporting
requirements specified in Sec. 648.82, the SAP-specific reporting
requirements specified in Sec. 648.85, VMS requirements for Handgear A
category permitted vessels as specified in Sec. 648.10, and the
reporting requirements associated with a dockside monitoring program
are not considered reporting requirements, and the Regional
[[Page 15275]]
Administrator may exempt sector participants from these requirements as
part of the approval of yearly operations plans. For the purpose of
this paragraph (c)(2)(i), the Regional Administrator may not grant
sector participants exemptions from the NE multispecies year-round
closures areas defined as Habitat Management Areas as defined in Sec.
648.370; Closed Area I North and Closed Area II, as defined in Sec.
648.81(c)(3) and (4), respectively, during the period February 16
through April 30; and the Western GOM Closure Area, as defined at Sec.
648.81(a)(4), where it overlaps with GOM Cod Protection Closures I
through III, as defined in Sec. 648.81(d)(4). This list may be
modified through a framework adjustment, as specified in Sec. 648.90.
* * * * *
(ii) * * *
(B) The GOM Cod Protection Closures IV and V specified in Sec.
648.81(d)(4)(iv) and (v).
* * * * *
0
13. In Sec. 648.89, revise paragraph (e)(1) and remove and reserve
paragraph (e)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 648.89 Recreational and charter/party vessel restrictions.
* * * * *
(e) Charter/party vessel restrictions on fishing in GOM closed
areas--(1) GOM closed areas. (i) A vessel fishing under charter/party
regulations may not fish in the GOM closed areas specified in Sec.
648.81(a)(3) and (4) and (d)(4) during the time periods specified in
those paragraphs, unless the vessel has on board a valid letter of
authorization issued by the Regional Administrator pursuant to Sec.
648.81(d)(5)(v) and paragraph (e)(3) of this section. The conditions
and restrictions of the letter of authorization must be complied with
for a minimum of 3 months if the vessel fishes or intends to fish in
the GOM cod protection closures; or for the rest of the fishing year,
beginning with the start of the participation period of the letter of
authorization, if the vessel fishes or intends to fish in the year-
round GOM closure areas.
(ii) A vessel fishing under charter/party regulations may not fish
in the GOM Cod Spawning Protection Area specified at Sec. 648.81(b)(3)
during the time period specified in that paragraph, unless the vessel
complies with the requirements specified at Sec. 648.81(b)(2)(iii).
* * * * *
0
14. In Sec. 648.202, revise paragraph (b)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 648.202 Season and area restrictions.
* * * * *
(b) Fishing in Northeast Multispecies Closed Areas. (1) No vessel
issued an Atlantic herring permit and fishing with midwater trawl gear,
may fish for, possess or land fish in or from the Closed Areas,
including Cashes Ledge Closure Area, Western GOM Closure Area, Closed
Area I North (February 1-April 15), and Closed Area II, as defined in
Sec. 648.81(a)(3), (4), and (5) and (c)(3) and (4), respectively,
unless it has declared first its intent to fish in the Closed Areas as
required by Sec. 648.11(m)(1), and is carrying onboard a NMFS-
certified observer.
* * * * *
0
15. Revise Sec. 648.203(a) to read as follows:
Sec. 648.203 Gear restrictions.
(a) Midwater trawl gear may only be used by a vessel issued a valid
herring permit in the GOM/GB Exemption Area as defined in Sec.
648.80(a)(17), provided it complies with the midwater trawl gear
exemption requirements specified under the NE multispecies regulations
at Sec. 648.80(d), including issuance of a Letter of Authorization.
* * * * *
0
16. Add subpart Q to part 648 to read as follows:
Subpart Q--Habitat-Related Management Measures
Sec.
648.370 Habitat Management Areas.
648.371 Dedicated Habitat Research Areas.
648.372 Frank R. Lautenberg Deep-Sea Coral Protection Area.
Subpart Q--Habitat-Related Management Measures
Sec. 648.370 Habitat Management Areas.
Unless otherwise specified, no fishing vessel or person on a
fishing vessel may fish with bottom-tending mobile gear in the areas
defined in this section. Copies of charts depicting these areas are
available from the Regional Administrator upon request.
(a) Eastern Maine Habitat Management Area. The Eastern Maine HMA is
bounded on the northwest by the outer limit of Maine state waters, and
bounded on all other sides by straight lines connecting the following
points in the order stated:
Eastern Maine HMA
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N latitude W longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
EMH1 \1\...................... 44[deg]07.65' N 68[deg]10.64' W
EMH2.......................... 44[deg]02.50' N 68[deg]06.10' W
EMH3.......................... 43[deg]51.00' N 68[deg]33.90' W
EMH4 \1\...................... 43[deg]56.62' N 68[deg]38.12' W
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Points 1 and 4 are intended to fall along the outer limit of Maine
state waters.
(b) Jeffreys Bank Habitat Management Area. The Jeffreys Bank HMA is
defined by straight lines connecting the following points in the order
stated:
Jeffreys Bank HMA
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N latitude W longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
JBH1.......................... 43[deg]31' N 68[deg]37' W
JBH2.......................... 43[deg]20' N 68[deg]37' W
JBH3.......................... 43[deg]20' N 68[deg]55' W
JBH4.......................... 43[deg]31' N 68[deg]55' W
JBH1.......................... 43[deg]31' N 68[deg]37' W
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(c) Cashes Ledge Habitat Management Area. The Cashes Ledge HMA is
defined by straight lines connecting the following points in the order
stated:
Cashes Ledge HMA
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N latitude W longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CLH1.......................... 43[deg]01.0' N 69[deg]00.0' W
CLH2.......................... 43[deg]01.0' N 68[deg]52.0' W
CLH3.......................... 42[deg]45.0' N 68[deg]52.0' W
CLH4.......................... 42[deg]45.0' N 69[deg]00.0' W
CLH1.......................... 43[deg]01.0' N 69[deg]00.0' W
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(d) Fippennies Ledge Habitat Management Area. The Fippennies Ledge
HMA is defined by straight lines connecting the following points in the
order stated:
Fippennies Ledge HMA
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N latitude W longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FLH1.......................... 42[deg]50.0' N 69[deg]17.0' W
FLH2.......................... 42[deg]44.0' N 69[deg]14.0' W
FLH3.......................... 42[deg]44.0' N 69[deg]18.0' W
FLH4.......................... 42[deg]50.0' N 69[deg]21.0' W
FLH1.......................... 42[deg]50.0' N 69[deg]17.0' W
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(e) Ammen Rock Habitat Management Area. (1) The Ammen Rock HMA is
defined by straight lines connecting the following points in the order
stated:
Ammen Rock HMA
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N latitude W longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ARH1.......................... 42[deg]55.5' N 68[deg]57.0' W
ARH2.......................... 42[deg]52.5' N 68[deg]55.0' W
ARH3.......................... 42[deg]52.5' N 68[deg]57.0' W
ARH4.......................... 42[deg]55.5' N 68[deg]59.0' W
ARH1.......................... 42[deg]55.5' N 68[deg]57.0' W
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) No fishing vessel, including private and for-hire recreational
fishing vessels, may fish in the Ammen Rock
[[Page 15276]]
HMA, except for vessels fishing exclusively with lobster traps, as
defined in Sec. 697.2.
(f) Western Gulf of Maine Habitat Management Area. (1) Coordinates.
The Western GOM HMA is defined by the straight lines connecting the
following points in the order stated:
Western Gulf of Maine HMA
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N latitude W longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
WGMH1......................... 43[deg]15' N 70[deg]15' W
WGMH2......................... 42[deg]15' N 70[deg]15' W
WGMH3......................... 42[deg]15' N 70[deg]00' W
WGMH4......................... 43[deg]15' N 70[deg]15' W
WGMH1......................... 43[deg]15' N 70[deg]15' W
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Western Gulf of Maine Shrimp Exemption Area. Vessels fishing
with shrimp trawls under the Small Mesh Northern Shrimp Fishery
Exemption specified at Sec. 648.80(a)(5) may fish within the Western
Gulf of Maine HMA Shrimp Exemption Area which is defined by the
straight lines connecting the following points in the order stated:
Western Gulf of Maine Shrimp Exemption Area
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N latitude W longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEA1.......................... 43[deg]15' N 70[deg] W
SEA2.......................... 43[deg]13' N 70[deg] W
SEA3.......................... 43[deg]13' N 70[deg]05' W
SEA4.......................... 43[deg]09' N 70[deg]05' W
SEA5.......................... 43[deg]09' N 70[deg]08' W
SEA6.......................... 42[deg]55' N 70[deg]08' W
SEA7.......................... 42[deg]55' N 70[deg]15' W
SEA8.......................... 43[deg]15' N 70[deg]15' W
SEA1.......................... 43[deg]15' N 70[deg] W
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(g) Closed Area II Habitat Closure Area. The Closed Area II Habitat
Closure Area is defined by the straight lines, except where otherwise
noted, connecting the following points in the order stated:
Closed Area II Habitat Closure Area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N latitude W longitude Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CIIH1................................ 42[deg]10' N 67[deg]20' W ...............
CIIH2................................ 42[deg]10' N 67[deg]9.38' W (\1 2\)
CIIH3................................ 42[deg]00' N 67[deg]0.63' W (\2 3\)
CIIH4................................ 42[deg]00' N 67[deg]10' W ...............
CIIH5................................ 41[deg]50' N 67[deg]10' W ...............
CIIH6................................ 41[deg]50' N 67[deg]20' W ...............
CIIH1................................ 42[deg]10' N 67[deg]20' W ...............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Point CIIH2 represents the intersection of 42[deg]10' N lat. and the U.S.-Canada Maritime Boundary.
\2\ From Point CIIH2 to Point CIIH3 along the U.S.-Canada Maritime Boundary.
\3\ Point CIIH3 represents the intersection of 42[deg]00' N lat. and the U.S.-Canada maritime Boundary.
(h) Great South Channel Habitat Management Area. (1) Coordinates.
The Great South Channel HMA is defined by the straight lines connecting
the following points in the order stated:
Great South Channel HMA
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N latitude W longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
GSCH1......................... 41[deg]30.3' N 69[deg]31.0' W
GSCH2......................... 41[deg]0.00' N 69[deg]18.5' W
GSCH3......................... 40[deg]51.7' N 69[deg]18.5' W
GSCH4......................... 40[deg]51.6' N 69[deg]48.9' W
GSCH5......................... 41[deg]30.2' N 69[deg]49.3' W
GSCH1......................... 41[deg]30.3' N 69[deg]31.0' W
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Hydraulic Clam Dredge Exemption. (i) Except for the portion of
the Great South Channel HMA defined in paragraph (h)(2)(iii) of this
section, surfclam and ocean quahog permitted vessels may fish with
hydraulic clam dredges in the Great South Channel HMA.
(ii) The Hydraulic clam dredge exemption is effective until April
9, 2019, after which, no vessels fishing with hydraulic clam dredges
may fish within the Great South Channel HMA.
(iii) The hydraulic clam dredge exemption does not apply in the
area defined as the straight lines connecting the following points in
the order stated:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N latitude W longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
GSC1.......................... 41[deg]30.3' N 69[deg]31.0' W
MBTG2......................... 41[deg]21.0' N 69[deg]27.2' W
MBTG3......................... 41[deg]21.0' N 69[deg]43.0' W
MBTG4......................... 41[deg]30.0' N 69[deg]43.0' W
GSC1.......................... 41[deg]30.3' N 69[deg]31.0' W
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) Transiting. Unless otherwise restricted, a vessel may transit
the habitat management areas described in this section provided that
its gear is stowed and not available for immediate use as defined in
Sec. 648.2.
(j) Other habitat protection measures. The Inshore Gulf of Maine/
Georges Bank Restricted Roller Gear Area described in Sec.
648.80(a)(3)(vii) is considered a habitat protection measure and the
restrictions outlined in that section apply to all bottom trawl gear.
(k) Review of habitat management measures. The New England Fishery
Management Council will develop a strategic process to evaluate the
boundaries, scope, characteristics, and timing of habitat and spawning
protection areas to facilitate review of these areas at 10-year
intervals.
Sec. 648.371 Dedicated Habitat Research Areas.
(a) Dedicated Habitat Research Area (DHRA) topics. The areas
defined in this section are intended to facilitate coordinated research
on gear impacts, habitat recovery, natural disturbance, and
productivity.
(b) Stellwagen Dedicated Habitat Research Area. (1) The Stellwagen
DHRA is defined by the straight lines connecting the following points
in the order stated:
Stellwagen DHRA
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N latitude W longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SDHRA1........................ 42[deg]15.0' N 70[deg]00.0' W
SDHRA2........................ 42[deg]15.0' N 70[deg]15.0' W
SDHRA3........................ 42[deg]45.2' N 70[deg]15.0' W
SDHRA4........................ 42[deg]46.0' N 70[deg]13.0' W
SDHRA5........................ 42[deg]46.0' N 70[deg]00.0' W
SDHRA1........................ 42[deg]15.0' N 70[deg]00.0' W
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Vessels fishing with bottom-tending mobile gear, sink gillnet
gear, or demersal longline gear are prohibited from fishing in the
Stellwagen DHRA, unless otherwise exempted.
(c) Georges Bank Dedicated Habitat Research Area. (1) The Georges
Bank DHRA is defined by straight lines connecting the following points
in the order stated:
Georges Bank DHRA
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Latitude Longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
GBDHRA1....................... 40[deg]54.95' N 68[deg]53.37' W
GBDHRA2....................... 40[deg]58' N 68[deg]30' W
GBDHRA3....................... 40[deg]45' N 68[deg]30' W
[[Page 15277]]
GBDHRA4....................... 40[deg]45' N 68[deg]45' W
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Vessels fishing with bottom-tending mobile gear are prohibited
from fishing in the Georges Bank DHRA, unless otherwise exempted.
(d) Transiting. Unless otherwise restricted or specified in this
paragraph (d), a vessel may transit the Dedicated Habitat Research
Areas of this section provided that its gear is stowed and not
available for immediate use as defined in Sec. 648.2.
(e) Dedicated Habitat Research Areas review. (1) The Regional
Administrator shall initiate a review of the DHRAs defined in this
section three years after implementation.
(2) After initiation of the review and consultation with the New
England Fishery Management Council, the Regional Administrator may
remove a DHRA. The following criteria will be used to determine if DHRA
should be maintained:
(i) Documentation of active and ongoing research in the DHRA area,
in the form of data records, cruise reports or inventory samples with
analytical objectives focused on the DHRA topics, described in
paragraph (a) of this section; and
(ii) Documentation of pending or approved proposals or funding
requests (including ship time requests), with objectives specific to
the DHRA topics, described in paragraph (a) of this section.
(3) The Regional Administrator will make any such determination in
accordance with the APA through notification in the Federal Register.
Sec. 648.372 Frank R. Lautenberg Deep-Sea Coral Protection Area.
(a) Restrictions. No vessel may fish with bottom-tending gear
within the Frank R. Lautenberg Deep-Sea Coral Protection Area described
in this section, unless transiting pursuant to paragraph (d) of this
section, fishing lobster trap gear in accordance with Sec. 697.21 of
this chapter, or fishing red crab trap gear in accordance with Sec.
648.264. Bottom-tending gear includes but is not limited to bottom-
tending otter trawls, bottom-tending beam trawls, hydraulic dredges,
non-hydraulic dredges, bottom-tending seines, bottom longlines, pots
and traps, and sink or anchored gillnets. The Frank R. Lautenberg Deep-
Sea Coral Protection Area consists of the Broad and Discrete Deep-Sea
Coral Zones defined in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
(b) Broad Deep-Sea Coral Zone. The Broad Deep-Sea Coral Zone is
bounded on the east by the outer limit of the U.S. Exclusive Economic
Zone, and bounded on all other sides by straight lines connecting the
following points in the order stated (copies of a chart depicting this
area are available from the Regional Administrator upon request). An
asterisk (*) in the Discrete Zone column means the point is shared with
a Discrete Deep-Sea Coral Zone, as defined in paragraph (c) of this
section.
Broad Zone
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Latitude Longitude Discrete zone
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.................................... 36[deg]33.02' N 71[deg]29.33' W ...............
2.................................... 36[deg]33.02' N 72[deg]00' W ...............
3.................................... 36[deg]33.02' N 73[deg]00' W ...............
4.................................... 36[deg]33.02' N 74[deg]00' W ...............
5.................................... 36[deg]33.02' N 74[deg]42.14' W ...............
6.................................... 36[deg]34.44' N 74[deg]42.23' W ...............
7.................................... 36[deg]35.53' N 74[deg]41.59' W ...............
8.................................... 36[deg]37.69' N 74[deg]41.51' W ...............
9.................................... 36[deg]42.09' N 74[deg]39.07' W ...............
10................................... 36[deg]45.18' N 74[deg]38' W ...............
11................................... 36[deg]45.69' N 74[deg]38.55' W ...............
12................................... 36[deg]49.17' N 74[deg]38.31' W ...............
13................................... 36[deg]49.56' N 74[deg]37.77' W ...............
14................................... 36[deg]51.21' N 74[deg]37.81' W ...............
15................................... 36[deg]51.78' N 74[deg]37.43' W ...............
16................................... 36[deg]58.51' N 74[deg]36.51' W (*)
17................................... 36[deg]58.62' N 74[deg]36.97' W (*)
18................................... 37[deg]4.43' N 74[deg]41.03' W (*)
19................................... 37[deg]5.83' N 74[deg]45.57' W (*)
20................................... 37[deg]6.97' N 74[deg]40.8' W (*)
21................................... 37[deg]4.52' N 74[deg]37.77' W (*)
22................................... 37[deg]4.02' N 74[deg]33.83' W (*)
23................................... 37[deg]4.52' N 74[deg]33.51' W (*)
24................................... 37[deg]4.4' N 74[deg]33.11' W (*)
25................................... 37[deg]7.38' N 74[deg]31.95' W ...............
26................................... 37[deg]8.32' N 74[deg]32.4' W ...............
27................................... 37[deg]8.51' N 74[deg]31.38' W ...............
28................................... 37[deg]9.44' N 74[deg]31.5' W ...............
29................................... 37[deg]16.83' N 74[deg]28.58' W ...............
30................................... 37[deg]17.81' N 74[deg]27.67' W ...............
31................................... 37[deg]18.72' N 74[deg]28.22' W ...............
32................................... 37[deg]22.74' N 74[deg]26.24' W (*)
33................................... 37[deg]22.87' N 74[deg]26.16' W (*)
34................................... 37[deg]24.44' N 74[deg]28.57' W (*)
35................................... 37[deg]24.67' N 74[deg]29.71' W (*)
36................................... 37[deg]25.93' N 74[deg]30.13' W (*)
37................................... 37[deg]27.25' N 74[deg]30.2' W (*)
38................................... 37[deg]28.6' N 74[deg]30.6' W (*)
39................................... 37[deg]29.43' N 74[deg]30.29' W (*)
40................................... 37[deg]29.53' N 74[deg]29.95' W (*)
41................................... 37[deg]27.68' N 74[deg]28.82' W (*)
[[Page 15278]]
42................................... 37[deg]27.06' N 74[deg]28.76' W (*)
43................................... 37[deg]26.39' N 74[deg]27.76' W (*)
44................................... 37[deg]26.3' N 74[deg]26.87' W (*)
45................................... 37[deg]25.69' N 74[deg]25.63' W (*)
46................................... 37[deg]25.83' N 74[deg]24.22' W (*)
47................................... 37[deg]25.68' N 74[deg]24.03' W (*)
48................................... 37[deg]28.04' N 74[deg]23.17' W ...............
49................................... 37[deg]27.72' N 74[deg]22.34' W ...............
50................................... 37[deg]30.13' N 74[deg]17.77' W ...............
51................................... 37[deg]33.83' N 74[deg]17.47' W ...............
52................................... 37[deg]35.48' N 74[deg]14.84' W ...............
53................................... 37[deg]36.99' N 74[deg]14.01' W ...............
54................................... 37[deg]37.23' N 74[deg]13.02' W ...............
55................................... 37[deg]42.85' N 74[deg]9.97' W ...............
56................................... 37[deg]43.5' N 74[deg]8.79' W ...............
57................................... 37[deg]45.22' N 74[deg]9.2' W ...............
58................................... 37[deg]45.15' N 74[deg]7.24' W (*)
59................................... 37[deg]45.88' N 74[deg]7.44' W (*)
60................................... 37[deg]46.7' N 74[deg]5.98' W (*)
61................................... 37[deg]49.62' N 74[deg]6.03' W (*)
62................................... 37[deg]51.25' N 74[deg]5.48' W (*)
63................................... 37[deg]51.99' N 74[deg]4.51' W (*)
64................................... 37[deg]51.37' N 74[deg]3.3' W (*)
65................................... 37[deg]50.63' N 74[deg]2.69' W (*)
66................................... 37[deg]49.62' N 74[deg]2.28' W (*)
67................................... 37[deg]50.28' N 74[deg]0.67' W (*)
68................................... 37[deg]53.68' N 73[deg]57.41' W (*)
69................................... 37[deg]55.07' N 73[deg]57.27' W (*)
70................................... 38[deg]3.29' N 73[deg]49.1' W (*)
71................................... 38[deg]6.19' N 73[deg]51.59' W (*)
72................................... 38[deg]7.67' N 73[deg]52.19' W (*)
73................................... 38[deg]9.04' N 73[deg]52.39' W (*)
74................................... 38[deg]10.1' N 73[deg]52.32' W (*)
75................................... 38[deg]11.98' N 73[deg]52.65' W (*)
76................................... 38[deg]13.74' N 73[deg]50.73' W (*)
77................................... 38[deg]13.15' N 73[deg]49.77' W (*)
78................................... 38[deg]10.92' N 73[deg]50.37' W (*)
79................................... 38[deg]10.2' N 73[deg]49.63' W (*)
80................................... 38[deg]9.26' N 73[deg]49.68' W (*)
81................................... 38[deg]8.38' N 73[deg]49.51' W (*)
82................................... 38[deg]7.59' N 73[deg]47.91' W (*)
83................................... 38[deg]6.96' N 73[deg]47.25' W (*)
84................................... 38[deg]6.51' N 73[deg]46.99' W (*)
85................................... 38[deg]5.69' N 73[deg]45.56' W (*)
86................................... 38[deg]6.35' N 73[deg]44.8' W (*)
87................................... 38[deg]7.5' N 73[deg]45.2' W (*)
88................................... 38[deg]9.24' N 73[deg]42.61' W (*)
89................................... 38[deg]9.41' N 73[deg]41.63' W ...............
90................................... 38[deg]15.13' N 73[deg]37.58' W ...............
91................................... 38[deg]15.25' N 73[deg]36.2' W (*)
92................................... 38[deg]16.19' N 73[deg]36.91' W (*)
93................................... 38[deg]16.89' N 73[deg]36.66' W (*)
94................................... 38[deg]16.91' N 73[deg]36.35' W (*)
95................................... 38[deg]17.63' N 73[deg]35.35' W (*)
96................................... 38[deg]18.55' N 73[deg]34.44' W (*)
97................................... 38[deg]18.38' N 73[deg]33.4' W (*)
98................................... 38[deg]19.04' N 73[deg]33.02' W (*)
99................................... 38[deg]25.08' N 73[deg]34.99' W (*)
100.................................. 38[deg]26.32' N 73[deg]33.44' W (*)
101.................................. 38[deg]29.72' N 73[deg]30.65' W (*)
102.................................. 38[deg]28.65' N 73[deg]29.37' W (*)
103.................................. 38[deg]25.53' N 73[deg]30.94' W (*)
104.................................. 38[deg]25.26' N 73[deg]29.97' W (*)
105.................................. 38[deg]23.75' N 73[deg]30.16' W (*)
106.................................. 38[deg]23.47' N 73[deg]29.7' W (*)
107.................................. 38[deg]22.76' N 73[deg]29.34' W (*)
108.................................. 38[deg]22.5' N 73[deg]27.63' W (*)
109.................................. 38[deg]21.59' N 73[deg]26.87' W (*)
110.................................. 38[deg]23.07' N 73[deg]24.11' W ...............
111.................................. 38[deg]25.83' N 73[deg]22.39' W ...............
112.................................. 38[deg]25.97' N 73[deg]21.43' W ...............
113.................................. 38[deg]34.14' N 73[deg]11.14' W (*)
[[Page 15279]]
114.................................. 38[deg]35.1' N 73[deg]10.43' W (*)
115.................................. 38[deg]35.94' N 73[deg]11.25' W (*)
116.................................. 38[deg]37.57' N 73[deg]10.49' W (*)
117.................................. 38[deg]37.21' N 73[deg]9.41' W (*)
118.................................. 38[deg]36.72' N 73[deg]8.85' W (*)
119.................................. 38[deg]43' N 73[deg]1.24' W (*)
120.................................. 38[deg]43.66' N 73[deg]0.36' W (*)
121.................................. 38[deg]45' N 73[deg]0.27' W (*)
122.................................. 38[deg]46.68' N 73[deg]1.07' W (*)
123.................................. 38[deg]47.54' N 73[deg]2.24' W (*)
124.................................. 38[deg]47.84' N 73[deg]2.24' W (*)
125.................................. 38[deg]49.03' N 73[deg]1.53' W (*)
126.................................. 38[deg]48.45' N 73[deg]1' W (*)
127.................................. 38[deg]49.15' N 72[deg]58.98' W (*)
128.................................. 38[deg]48.03' N 72[deg]56.7' W (*)
129.................................. 38[deg]49.84' N 72[deg]55.54' W (*)
130.................................. 38[deg]52.4' N 72[deg]52.5' W (*)
131.................................. 38[deg]53.87' N 72[deg]53.36' W (*)
132.................................. 38[deg]54.17' N 72[deg]52.58' W (*)
133.................................. 38[deg]54.7' N 72[deg]50.26' W (*)
134.................................. 38[deg]57.2' N 72[deg]47.74' W (*)
135.................................. 38[deg]58.64' N 72[deg]48.35' W (*)
136.................................. 38[deg]59.3' N 72[deg]47.86' W (*)
137.................................. 38[deg]59.22' N 72[deg]46.69' W (*)
138.................................. 39[deg]0.13' N 72[deg]45.47' W (*)
139.................................. 39[deg]1.69' N 72[deg]45.74' W (*)
140.................................. 39[deg]1.49' N 72[deg]43.67' W (*)
141.................................. 39[deg]3.9' N 72[deg]40.83' W (*)
142.................................. 39[deg]7.35' N 72[deg]41.26' W (*)
143.................................. 39[deg]7.16' N 72[deg]37.21' W (*)
144.................................. 39[deg]6.52' N 72[deg]35.78' W (*)
145.................................. 39[deg]11.73' N 72[deg]25.4' W (*)
146.................................. 39[deg]11.76' N 72[deg]22.33' W ...............
147.................................. 39[deg]19.08' N 72[deg]9.56' W (*)
148.................................. 39[deg]25.17' N 72[deg]13.03' W (*)
149.................................. 39[deg]28.8' N 72[deg]17.39' W (*)
150.................................. 39[deg]30.16' N 72[deg]20.41' W (*)
151.................................. 39[deg]31.38' N 72[deg]23.86' W (*)
152.................................. 39[deg]32.55' N 72[deg]25.07' W (*)
153.................................. 39[deg]34.57' N 72[deg]25.18' W (*)
154.................................. 39[deg]34.53' N 72[deg]24.23' W (*)
155.................................. 39[deg]33.17' N 72[deg]24.1' W (*)
156.................................. 39[deg]32.07' N 72[deg]22.77' W (*)
157.................................. 39[deg]32.17' N 72[deg]22.08' W (*)
158.................................. 39[deg]30.3' N 72[deg]15.71' W (*)
159.................................. 39[deg]29.49' N 72[deg]14.3' W (*)
160.................................. 39[deg]29.44' N 72[deg]13.24' W (*)
161.................................. 39[deg]27.63' N 72[deg]5.87' W (*)
162.................................. 39[deg]28.26' N 72[deg]2.2' W (*)
163.................................. 39[deg]29.88' N 72[deg]3.51' W (*)
164.................................. 39[deg]30.57' N 72[deg]3.47' W (*)
165.................................. 39[deg]31.28' N 72[deg]2.63' W (*)
166.................................. 39[deg]31.46' N 72[deg]1.41' W (*)
167.................................. 39[deg]37.15' N 71[deg]55.85' W (*)
168.................................. 39[deg]39.77' N 71[deg]53.7' W (*)
169.................................. 39[deg]41.5' N 71[deg]51.89' W ...............
170.................................. 39[deg]43.84' N 71[deg]44.85' W (*)
171.................................. 39[deg]48.01' N 71[deg]45.19' W (*)
172.................................. 39[deg]49.97' N 71[deg]39.29' W (*)
173.................................. 39[deg]55.08' N 71[deg]18.62' W (*)
174.................................. 39[deg]55.99' N 71[deg]16.07' W (*)
175.................................. 39[deg]57.04' N 70[deg]50.01' W ...............
176.................................. 39[deg]55.07' N 70[deg]32.42' W ...............
177.................................. 39[deg]50.24' N 70[deg]27.78' W ...............
178.................................. 39[deg]42.18' N 70[deg]20.09' W ...............
179.................................. 39[deg]34.11' N 70[deg]12.42' W ...............
180.................................. 39[deg]26.04' N 70[deg]4.78' W ...............
181.................................. 39[deg]17.96' N 69[deg]57.18' W ...............
182.................................. 39[deg]9.87' N 69[deg]49.6' W ...............
183.................................. 39[deg]1.77' N 69[deg]42.05' W ...............
184.................................. 38[deg]53.66' N 69[deg]34.53' W ...............
185.................................. 38[deg]45.54' N 69[deg]27.03' W ...............
[[Page 15280]]
186.................................. 38[deg]37.42' N 69[deg]19.57' W ...............
187.................................. 38[deg]29.29' N 69[deg]12.13' W ...............
188.................................. 38[deg]21.15' N 69[deg]4.73' W ...............
189.................................. 38[deg]13' N 68[deg]57.35' W ...............
190.................................. 38[deg]4.84' N 68[deg]49.99' W ...............
191.................................. 38[deg]2.21' N 68[deg]47.62' W ...............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(c) Discrete Deep-Sea Coral Zones--(1) Block Canyon. Block Canyon
discrete deep-sea coral zone is defined by straight lines connecting
the following points in the order stated (copies of a chart depicting
this area are available from the Regional Administrator upon request).
An asterisk (*) in the Broad Zone column means the point is shared with
the Broad Deep-Sea Coral Zone, as defined in paragraph (b) of this
section.
Block Canyon
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Latitude Longitude Broad zone
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.................................... 39[deg]55.08' N 71[deg]18.62' W (*)
2.................................... 39[deg]55.99' N 71[deg]16.07' W (*)
3.................................... 39[deg]49.51' N 71[deg]12.12' W ...............
4.................................... 39[deg]38.09' N 71[deg]9.5' W ...............
5.................................... 39[deg]37.4' N 71[deg]11.87' W ...............
6.................................... 39[deg]47.26' N 71[deg]17.38' W ...............
7.................................... 39[deg]52.6' N 71[deg]17.51' W ...............
1.................................... 39[deg]55.08' N 71[deg]18.62' W (*)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Ryan and McMaster Canyons. Ryan and McMaster Canyons discrete
deep-sea coral zone is defined by straight lines connecting the
following points in the order stated (copies of a chart depicting this
area are available from the Regional Administrator upon request). An
asterisk (*) in the Broad Zone column means the point is shared with
the Broad Deep-sea Coral Zone, as defined in paragraph (b) of this
section.
Ryan and McMaster Canyons
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Latitude Longitude Broad zone
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.................................... 39[deg]43.84' N 71[deg]44.85' W (*)
2.................................... 39[deg]48.01' N 71[deg]45.19' W (*)
3.................................... 39[deg]49.97' N 71[deg]39.29' W (*)
4.................................... 39[deg]48.29' N 71[deg]37.18' W ...............
5.................................... 39[deg]42.96' N 71[deg]35.01' W ...............
6.................................... 39[deg]33.43' N 71[deg]27.91' W ...............
7.................................... 39[deg]31.75' N 71[deg]30.77' W ...............
8.................................... 39[deg]34.46' N 71[deg]35.68' W ...............
9.................................... 39[deg]40.12' N 71[deg]42.36' W ...............
1.................................... 39[deg]43.84' N 71[deg]44.85' W (*)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Emery and Uchupi Canyons. Emery and Uchupi Canyons discrete
deep-sea coral zone is defined by straight lines connecting the
following points in the order stated (copies of a chart depicting this
area are available from the Regional Administrator upon request). An
asterisk (*) in the Broad Zone column means the point is shared with
the Broad Deep-sea Coral Zone, as defined in paragraph (b) of this
section.
Emery and Uchupi Canyons
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Latitude Longitude Broad zone
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.................................... 39[deg]37.15' N 71[deg]55.85' W (*)
2.................................... 39[deg]39.77' N 71[deg]53.7' W (*)
3.................................... 39[deg]39.55' N 71[deg]47.68' W ...............
4.................................... 39[deg]30.78' N 71[deg]36.24' W ...............
5.................................... 39[deg]27.26' N 71[deg]39.13' W ...............
6.................................... 39[deg]28.99' N 71[deg]45.47' W ...............
7.................................... 39[deg]33.91' N 71[deg]52.61' W ...............
1.................................... 39[deg]37.15' N 71[deg]55.85' W (*)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 15281]]
(4) Jones and Babylon Canyons. Jones and Babylon Canyons discrete
deep-sea coral zone is defined by straight lines connecting the
following points in the order stated (copies of a chart depicting this
area are available from the Regional Administrator upon request). An
asterisk (*) in the Broad Zone column means the point is shared with
the Broad Deep-sea Coral Zone, as defined in paragraph (b) of this
section.
Jones and Babylon Canyons
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Latitude Longitude Broad zone
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.................................... 39[deg]28.26' N 72[deg]2.2' W (*)
2.................................... 39[deg]29.88' N 72[deg]3.51' W (*)
3.................................... 39[deg]30.57' N 72[deg]3.47' W (*)
4.................................... 39[deg]31.28' N 72[deg]2.63' W (*)
5.................................... 39[deg]31.46' N 72[deg]1.41' W (*)
6.................................... 39[deg]30.37' N 71[deg]57.72' W ...............
7.................................... 39[deg]30.63' N 71[deg]55.13' W ...............
8.................................... 39[deg]23.81' N 71[deg]48.15' W ...............
9.................................... 39[deg]23' N 71[deg]52.48' W ...............
1.................................... 39[deg]28.26' N 72[deg]2.2' W (*)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5) Hudson Canyon. Hudson Canyon discrete deep-sea coral zone is
defined by straight lines connecting the following points in the order
stated (copies of a chart depicting this area are available from the
Regional Administrator upon request). An asterisk (*) in the Broad Zone
column means the point is shared with the Broad Deep-Sea Coral Zone, as
defined in paragraph (b) of this section.
Hudson Canyon
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Latitude Longitude Broad zone
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.................................... 39[deg]19.08' N 72[deg]9.56' W (*)
2.................................... 39[deg]25.17' N 72[deg]13.03' W (*)
3.................................... 39[deg]28.8' N 72[deg]17.39' W (*)
4.................................... 39[deg]30.16' N 72[deg]20.41' W (*)
5.................................... 39[deg]31.38' N 72[deg]23.86' W (*)
6.................................... 39[deg]32.55' N 72[deg]25.07' W (*)
7.................................... 39[deg]34.57' N 72[deg]25.18' W (*)
8.................................... 39[deg]34.53' N 72[deg]24.23' W (*)
9.................................... 39[deg]33.17' N 72[deg]24.1' W (*)
10................................... 39[deg]32.07' N 72[deg]22.77' W (*)
11................................... 39[deg]32.17' N 72[deg]22.08' W (*)
12................................... 39[deg]30.3' N 72[deg]15.71' W (*)
13................................... 39[deg]29.49' N 72[deg]14.3' W (*)
14................................... 39[deg]29.44' N 72[deg]13.24' W (*)
15................................... 39[deg]27.63' N 72[deg]5.87' W (*)
16................................... 39[deg]13.93' N 71[deg]48.44' W ...............
17................................... 39[deg]10.39' N 71[deg]52.98' W ...............
18................................... 39[deg]14.27' N 72[deg]3.09' W ...............
1.................................... 39[deg]19.08' N 72[deg]9.56' W (*)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(6) Mey-Lindenkohl Slope. Mey-Lindenkohl Slope discrete deep-sea
coral zone is defined by straight lines connecting the following points
in the order stated (copies of a chart depicting this area are
available from the Regional Administrator upon request). An asterisk
(*) in the Broad Zone column means the point is shared with the Broad
Deep-Sea Coral Zone, as defined in paragraph (b) of this section.
Mey-Lindenkohl Slope
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Latitude Longitude Broad zone
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.................................... 38[deg]43' N 73[deg]1.24' W (*)
2.................................... 38[deg]43.66' N 73[deg]0.36' W (*)
3.................................... 38[deg]45' N 73[deg]0.27' W (*)
4.................................... 38[deg]46.68' N 73[deg]1.07' W (*)
5.................................... 38[deg]47.54' N 73[deg]2.24' W (*)
6.................................... 38[deg]47.84' N 73[deg]2.24' W (*)
7.................................... 38[deg]49.03' N 73[deg]1.53' W (*)
8.................................... 38[deg]48.45' N 73[deg]1' W (*)
9.................................... 38[deg]49.15' N 72[deg]58.98' W (*)
10................................... 38[deg]48.03' N 72[deg]56.7' W (*)
11................................... 38[deg]49.84' N 72[deg]55.54' W (*)
12................................... 38[deg]52.4' N 72[deg]52.5' W (*)
13................................... 38[deg]53.87' N 72[deg]53.36' W (*)
[[Page 15282]]
14................................... 38[deg]54.17' N 72[deg]52.58' W (*)
15................................... 38[deg]54.7' N 72[deg]50.26' W (*)
16................................... 38[deg]57.2' N 72[deg]47.74' W (*)
17................................... 38[deg]58.64' N 72[deg]48.35' W (*)
18................................... 38[deg]59.3' N 72[deg]47.86' W (*)
19................................... 38[deg]59.22' N 72[deg]46.69' W (*)
20................................... 39[deg]0.13' N 72[deg]45.47' W (*)
21................................... 39[deg]1.69' N 72[deg]45.74' W (*)
22................................... 39[deg]1.49' N 72[deg]43.67' W (*)
23................................... 39[deg]3.9' N 72[deg]40.83' W (*)
24................................... 39[deg]7.35' N 72[deg]41.26' W (*)
25................................... 39[deg]7.16' N 72[deg]37.21' W (*)
26................................... 39[deg]6.52' N 72[deg]35.78' W (*)
27................................... 39[deg]11.73' N 72[deg]25.4' W (*)
28................................... 38[deg]58.85' N 72[deg]11.78' W ...............
29................................... 38[deg]32.39' N 72[deg]47.69' W ...............
30................................... 38[deg]34.88' N 72[deg]53.78' W ...............
1.................................... 38[deg]43' N 73[deg]1.24' W (*)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(7) Spencer Canyon. Spencer Canyon discrete deep-sea coral zone is
defined by straight lines connecting the following points in the order
stated (copies of a chart depicting this area are available from the
Regional Administrator upon request). An asterisk (*) in the Broad Zone
column means the point is shared with the Broad Deep-Sea Coral Zone, as
defined in paragraph (b) of this section.
Spencer Canyon
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Latitude Longitude Broad zone
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.................................... 38[deg]34.14' N 73[deg]11.14' W (*)
2.................................... 38[deg]35.1' N 73[deg]10.43' W (*)
3.................................... 38[deg]35.94' N 73[deg]11.25' W (*)
4.................................... 38[deg]37.57' N 73[deg]10.49' W (*)
5.................................... 38[deg]37.21' N 73[deg]9.41' W (*)
6.................................... 38[deg]36.72' N 73[deg]8.85' W (*)
7.................................... 38[deg]36.59' N 73[deg]8.25' W ...............
8.................................... 38[deg]28.94' N 72[deg]58.96' W ...............
9.................................... 38[deg]26.45' N 73[deg]3.24' W ...............
1.................................... 38[deg]34.14' N 73[deg]11.14' W (*)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(8) Wilmington Canyon. Wilmington Canyon discrete deep-sea coral
zone is defined by straight lines connecting the following points in
the order stated (copies of a chart depicting this area are available
from the Regional Administrator upon request). An asterisk (*) in the
Broad Zone column means the point is shared with the Broad Deep-sea
Coral Zone, as defined in paragraph (b) of this section.
Wilmington Canyon
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Latitude Longitude Broad zone
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.................................... 38[deg]19.04' N 73[deg]33.02' W (*)
2.................................... 38[deg]25.08' N 73[deg]34.99' W (*)
3.................................... 38[deg]26.32' N 73[deg]33.44' W (*)
4.................................... 38[deg]29.72' N 73[deg]30.65' W (*)
5.................................... 38[deg]28.65' N 73[deg]29.37' W (*)
6.................................... 38[deg]25.53' N 73[deg]30.94' W (*)
7.................................... 38[deg]25.26' N 73[deg]29.97' W (*)
8.................................... 38[deg]23.75' N 73[deg]30.16' W (*)
9.................................... 38[deg]23.47' N 73[deg]29.7' W (*)
10................................... 38[deg]22.76' N 73[deg]29.34' W (*)
11................................... 38[deg]22.5' N 73[deg]27.63' W (*)
12................................... 38[deg]21.59' N 73[deg]26.87' W (*)
13................................... 38[deg]18.52' N 73[deg]22.95' W ...............
14................................... 38[deg]14.41' N 73[deg]16.64' W ...............
15................................... 38[deg]13.23' N 73[deg]17.32' W ...............
16................................... 38[deg]15.79' N 73[deg]26.38' W ...............
1.................................... 38[deg]19.04' N 73[deg]33.02' W (*)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 15283]]
(9) North Heyes and South Wilmington Canyons. North Heyes and South
Wilmington Canyons discrete deep-sea coral zone is defined by straight
lines connecting the following points in the order stated (copies of a
chart depicting this area are available from the Regional Administrator
upon request). An asterisk (*) in the Broad Zone column means the point
is shared with the Broad Deep-Sea Coral Zone, as defined in paragraph
(b) of this section.
North Heyes and South Wilmington Canyons
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Latitude Longitude Broad zone
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.................................... 38[deg]15.25' N 73[deg]36.2' W (*)
2.................................... 38[deg]16.19' N 73[deg]36.91' W (*)
3.................................... 38[deg]16.89' N 73[deg]36.66' W (*)
4.................................... 38[deg]16.91' N 73[deg]36.35' W (*)
5.................................... 38[deg]17.63' N 73[deg]35.35' W (*)
6.................................... 38[deg]18.55' N 73[deg]34.44' W (*)
7.................................... 38[deg]18.38' N 73[deg]33.4' W (*)
8.................................... 38[deg]19.04' N 73[deg]33.02' W (*)
9.................................... 38[deg]15.79' N 73[deg]26.38' W ...............
10................................... 38[deg]14.98' N 73[deg]24.73' W ...............
11................................... 38[deg]12.32' N 73[deg]21.22' W ...............
12................................... 38[deg]11.06' N 73[deg]22.21' W ...............
13................................... 38[deg]11.13' N 73[deg]28.72' W ...............
1.................................... 38[deg]15.25' N 73[deg]36.2' W (*)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(10) South Vries Canyon. South Vries Canyon discrete deep-sea coral
zone is defined by straight lines connecting the following points in
the order stated (copies of a chart depicting this area are available
from the Regional Administrator upon request). An asterisk (*) in the
Broad Zone column means the point is shared with the Broad Deep-Sea
Coral Zone, as defined in paragraph (b) of this section.
South Vries Canyon
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Latitude Longitude Broad zone
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.................................... 38[deg]6.35' N 73[deg]44.8' W (*)
2.................................... 38[deg]7.5' N 73[deg]45.2' W (*)
3.................................... 38[deg]9.24' N 73[deg]42.61' W (*)
4.................................... 38[deg]3.22' N 73[deg]29.22' W ...............
5.................................... 38[deg]2.38' N 73[deg]29.78' W ...............
6.................................... 38[deg]2.54' N 73[deg]36.73' W ...............
1.................................... 38[deg]6.35' N 73[deg]44.8' W (*)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(11) Baltimore Canyon. Baltimore Canyon discrete deep-sea coral
zone is defined by straight lines connecting the following points in
the order stated (copies of a chart depicting this area are available
from the Regional Administrator upon request). An asterisk (*) in the
Broad Zone column means the point is shared with the Broad Deep-Sea
Coral Zone, as defined in paragraph (b) of this section.
Baltimore Canyon
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Latitude Longitude Broad zone
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.................................... 38[deg]3.29' N 73[deg]49.1' W (*)
2.................................... 38[deg]6.19' N 73[deg]51.59' W (*)
3.................................... 38[deg]7.67' N 73[deg]52.19' W (*)
4.................................... 38[deg]9.04' N 73[deg]52.39' W (*)
5.................................... 38[deg]10.1' N 73[deg]52.32' W (*)
6.................................... 38[deg]11.98' N 73[deg]52.65' W (*)
7.................................... 38[deg]13.74' N 73[deg]50.73' W (*)
8.................................... 38[deg]13.15' N 73[deg]49.77' W (*)
9.................................... 38[deg]10.92' N 73[deg]50.37' W (*)
10................................... 38[deg]10.2' N 73[deg]49.63' W (*)
11................................... 38[deg]9.26' N 73[deg]49.68' W (*)
12................................... 38[deg]8.38' N 73[deg]49.51' W (*)
13................................... 38[deg]7.59' N 73[deg]47.91' W (*)
14................................... 38[deg]6.96' N 73[deg]47.25' W (*)
15................................... 38[deg]6.51' N 73[deg]46.99' W (*)
16................................... 38[deg]5.69' N 73[deg]45.56' W (*)
17................................... 38[deg]6.35' N 73[deg]44.8' W (*)
18................................... 38[deg]2.54' N 73[deg]36.73' W ...............
19................................... 37[deg]59.19' N 73[deg]40.67' W ...............
1.................................... 38[deg]3.29' N 73[deg]49.1' W (*)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 15284]]
(12) Warr and Phoenix Canyon Complex. Warr and Phoenix Canyon
Complex discrete deep-sea coral zone is defined by straight lines
connecting the following points in the order stated (copies of a chart
depicting this area are available from the Regional Administrator upon
request). An asterisk (*) in the Broad Zone column means the point is
shared with the Broad Deep-Sea Coral Zone, as defined in paragraph (b)
of this section.
Warr and Phoenix Canyon Complex
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Latitude Longitude Broad zone
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.................................... 37[deg]53.68' N 73[deg]57.41' W (*)
2.................................... 37[deg]55.07' N 73[deg]57.27' W (*)
3.................................... 38[deg]3.29' N 73[deg]49.1' W (*)
4.................................... 37[deg]59.19' N 73[deg]40.67' W ...............
5.................................... 37[deg]52.5' N 73[deg]35.28' W ...............
6.................................... 37[deg]50.92' N 73[deg]36.59' W ...............
7.................................... 37[deg]49.84' N 73[deg]47.11' W ...............
1.................................... 37[deg]53.68' N 73[deg]57.41' W (*)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(13) Accomac and Leonard Canyons. Accomac and Leonard Canyons
discrete deep-sea coral zone is defined by straight lines connecting
the following points in the order stated (copies of a chart depicting
this area are available from the Regional Administrator upon request).
An asterisk (*) in the Broad Zone column means the point is shared with
the Broad Deep-Sea Coral Zone, as defined in paragraph (b) of this
section.
Accomac and Leonard Canyons
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Latitude Longitude Broad zone
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.................................... 37[deg]45.15' N 74[deg]7.24' W (*)
2.................................... 37[deg]45.88' N 74[deg]7.44' W (*)
3.................................... 37[deg]46.7' N 74[deg]5.98' W (*)
4.................................... 37[deg]49.62' N 74[deg]6.03' W (*)
5.................................... 37[deg]51.25' N 74[deg]5.48' W (*)
6.................................... 37[deg]51.99' N 74[deg]4.51' W (*)
7.................................... 37[deg]51.37' N 74[deg]3.3' W (*)
8.................................... 37[deg]50.63' N 74[deg]2.69' W (*)
9.................................... 37[deg]49.62' N 74[deg]2.28' W (*)
10................................... 37[deg]50.28' N 74[deg]0.67' W (*)
11................................... 37[deg]50.2' N 74[deg]0.17' W ...............
12................................... 37[deg]50.52' N 73[deg]58.59' W ...............
13................................... 37[deg]50.99' N 73[deg]57.17' W ...............
14................................... 37[deg]50.4' N 73[deg]52.35' W ...............
15................................... 37[deg]42.76' N 73[deg]44.86' W ...............
16................................... 37[deg]39.96' N 73[deg]48.32' W ...............
17................................... 37[deg]40.04' N 73[deg]58.25' W ...............
18................................... 37[deg]44.14' N 74[deg]6.96' W ...............
1.................................... 37[deg]45.15' N 74[deg]7.24' W (*)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(14) Washington Canyon. Washington Canyon discrete deep-sea coral
zone is defined by straight lines connecting the following points in
the order stated (copies of a chart depicting this area are available
from the Regional Administrator upon request). An asterisk (*) in the
Broad Zone column means the point is shared with the Broad Deep-Sea
Coral Zone, as defined in paragraph (b) of this section.
Washington Canyon
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Latitude Longitude Broad zone
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.................................... 37[deg]22.74' N 74[deg]26.24' W (*)
2.................................... 37[deg]22.87' N 74[deg]26.16' W (*)
3.................................... 37[deg]24.44' N 74[deg]28.57' W (*)
4.................................... 37[deg]24.67' N 74[deg]29.71' W (*)
5.................................... 37[deg]25.93' N 74[deg]30.13' W (*)
6.................................... 37[deg]27.25' N 74[deg]30.2' W (*)
7.................................... 37[deg]28.6' N 74[deg]30.6' W (*)
8.................................... 37[deg]29.43' N 74[deg]30.29' W (*)
9.................................... 37[deg]29.53' N 74[deg]29.95' W (*)
10................................... 37[deg]27.68' N 74[deg]28.82' W (*)
11................................... 37[deg]27.06' N 74[deg]28.76' W (*)
12................................... 37[deg]26.39' N 74[deg]27.76' W (*)
13................................... 37[deg]26.3' N 74[deg]26.87' W (*)
14................................... 37[deg]25.69' N 74[deg]25.63' W (*)
15................................... 37[deg]25.83' N 74[deg]24.22' W (*)
[[Page 15285]]
16................................... 37[deg]25.68' N 74[deg]24.03' W (*)
17................................... 37[deg]25.08' N 74[deg]23.29' W ...............
18................................... 37[deg]16.81' N 73[deg]52.13' W ...............
19................................... 37[deg]11.27' N 73[deg]54.05' W ...............
20................................... 37[deg]15.73' N 74[deg]12.2' W ...............
1.................................... 37[deg]22.74' N 74[deg]26.24' W (*)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(15) Norfolk Canyon. Norfolk Canyon discrete deep-sea coral zone is
defined by straight lines connecting the following points in the order
stated (copies of a chart depicting this area are available from the
Regional Administrator upon request). An asterisk (*) in the Broad Zone
column means the point is shared with the Broad Deep-Sea Coral Zone, as
defined in paragraph (b) of this section.
Norfolk Canyon
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Latitude Longitude Broad zone
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.................................... 36[deg]58.51' N 74[deg]36.51' W (*)
2.................................... 36[deg]58.62' N 74[deg]36.97' W (*)
3.................................... 37[deg]4.43' N 74[deg]41.03' W (*)
4.................................... 37[deg]5.83' N 74[deg]45.57' W (*)
5.................................... 37[deg]6.97' N 74[deg]40.8' W (*)
6.................................... 37[deg]4.52' N 74[deg]37.77' W (*)
7.................................... 37[deg]4.02' N 74[deg]33.83' W (*)
8.................................... 37[deg]4.52' N 74[deg]33.51' W (*)
9.................................... 37[deg]4.40' N 74[deg]33.11' W (*)
10................................... 37[deg]4.16' N 74[deg]32.37' W ...............
11................................... 37[deg]4.40' N 74[deg]30.58' W ...............
12................................... 37[deg]3.65' N 74[deg]3.66' W ...............
13................................... 36[deg]57.75' N 74[deg]3.61' W ...............
14................................... 36[deg]59.77' N 74[deg]30' W ...............
15................................... 36[deg]58.23' N 74[deg]32.95' W ...............
16................................... 36[deg]57.99' N 74[deg]34.18' W ...............
1.................................... 36[deg]58.51' N 74[deg]36.51' W (*)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(d) Transiting. Vessels may transit the Broad and Discrete Deep-Sea
Coral Zones defined in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, provided
bottom-tending trawl nets are out of the water and stowed on the reel
and any other fishing gear that is prohibited in these areas is
onboard, out of the water, and not deployed. Fishing gear is not
required to meet the definition of ``not available for immediate use''
in Sec. 648.2, when a vessel transits the Broad and Discrete Deep-Sea
Coral Zones.
[FR Doc. 2018-06760 Filed 4-6-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P