Security Zone, Seattle's Seafair Fleet Week Moving Vessels, Puget Sound, WA, 14801-14803 [2018-07026]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 67 / Friday, April 6, 2018 / Proposed Rules
3. Subpart C is amended by adding
§ 9.___to read as follows:
■
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 9.___
Van Duzer Corridor.
(a) Name. The name of the viticultural
area described in this section is ‘‘Van
Duzer Corridor’’. For purposes of part 4
of this chapter, ‘‘Van Duzer Corridor’’ is
a term of viticultural significance.
(b) Approved maps. The five United
States Geological Survey (USGS)
1:24,000 scale topographic maps used to
determine the boundary of the Van
Duzer Corridor viticultural area are
titled:
(1) Sheridan, Oreg., 1956; revised
1992;
(2) Ballston, Oreg., 1956; revised
1992;
(3) Dallas, Oreg., 1974; photorevised
1986;
(4) Amity, Oreg., 1957; revised 1993;
and
(5) Rickreall, Oreg., 1969;
photorevised 1976;
(c) Boundary. The Van Duzer Corridor
viticultural area is located in Polk and
Yamhill Counties, in Oregon. The
boundary of the Van Duzer Corridor
viticultural area is as described below:
(1) The beginning point is on the
Sheridan map at the intersection of
State Highway 22 and Red Prairie Road.
From the beginning point, proceed
southeasterly along State Highway 22
for a total of 12.4 miles, crossing over
the Ballston and Dallas maps and onto
the Rickreall map, to the intersection of
the highway with the 200-foot elevation
contour west of the Oak Knoll Golf
Course; then
(2) Proceed north on the 200-foot
elevation contour, crossing onto the
Amity map, to the third intersection of
the elevation contour with Frizzell
Road; then
(3) Proceed east on Frizzell Road for
0.3 mile to the intersection of the road
with Oak Grove Road; then
(4) Proceed north along Oak Grove
Road for 1.7 miles to the intersection of
the road with Zena Road; then
(5) Proceed east on Zena Road for
approximately 0.25 mile to the second
intersection of the road with the 200foot elevation contour; then
(6) Proceed northwest along the 200foot elevation contour to the
intersection of the elevation contour
with Oak Grove Road; then
(7) Proceed north along Oak Grove
Road (which becomes Old Bethel Road)
approximately 7.75 miles to the
intersection of the road with Patty Lane;
then
(8) Proceed west in a straight line for
a total of 10.8 miles, crossing over the
Ballston map and onto the Sheridan
map, to the intersection of the line with
State Highway 18; then
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:58 Apr 05, 2018
Jkt 244001
(9) Proceed southwest along State
Highway 18 for 0.3 miles to the
intersection of the highway with Red
Prairie Road; then
(10) Proceed south along Red Prairie
Road for approximately 5.3 miles,
returning to the beginning point.
Signed: November 30, 2017.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
Approved: March 30, 2018.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax, Trade, and
Tariff Policy).
[FR Doc. 2018–07089 Filed 4–5–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2018–0105]
RIN 1625–AA87
Security Zone, Seattle’s Seafair Fleet
Week Moving Vessels, Puget Sound,
WA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
amend its Seattle Seafair Fleet Week
Moving Vessels Security Zone
regulation. This amendment would
change the information in annual
notices of enforcement that are
published both in the Federal Register
and Local Notice to Mariners. This
action is necessary because last minute
changes in the vessels participating in
the Parade of Ships during Fleet Week
prevent the Coast Guard from
identifying the designated participating
vessels in the Federal Register within
the allotted timeframe. We invite your
comments on this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before May 21, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2018–0105 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
SUMMARY:
If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Petty Officer Zachary
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14801
Spence, Sector Puget Sound Waterways
Management Branch, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone 206–217–6051, email
SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
On July 10, 2012 (77 FR 40521), the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port, Sector
Puget Sound, published a final rule that
became effective Aug. 1, 2012; the
Seattle’s Seafair Fleet Week Moving
Vessels security zone. That final rule
establishes a security zone around
designated participating vessels that are
not protected by the Naval Vessel
Protection Zone in Seattle’s Seafair Fleet
Week Parade of Ships. Designated
participating vessels are named by the
Coast Guard each year prior to the event
in a Federal Register notice, as well as
the Local Notice to Mariners. These
security zones are necessary to help
ensure the security of the vessels from
sabotage or other subversive acts.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to
amend the information required in the
Notice of Enforcement published in the
Federal Register and Local Notice to
Mariner and add the requirement to
publish the names of participating
vessel in a Broadcast Notice to Mariners
before the scheduled event. The Coast
Guard proposes this rulemaking under
authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Captain of the Port Puget Sound
proposes to amend the provisions in 33
CFR 165.1333 regarding information
published in the notice of enforcement
for the annual security zone for Seattle’s
Seafair Fleet Weeks Parade of Ships.
Currently, the Coast Guard publishes
the names of the vessels participating in
the Parade of Ships, in a notice of
enforcement at least 3 days prior to the
beginning of Seattle’s Seafair. These are
military vessels. In past years, some
vessels participating in the Parade of
Ships changed their plans due to
operational needs, and as a result, the
changes precluded the Coast Guard from
providing sufficient notice in the
Federal Register. This proposed
amendment is necessary because the
changing schedules of vessels
sometimes makes it impossible to know
which vessels will ultimately
participate in the Parade of Ships and
E:\FR\FM\06APP1.SGM
06APP1
14802
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 67 / Friday, April 6, 2018 / Proposed Rules
also provide timely notice in the
Federal Register.
The Coast Guard proposes to amend
the information required in the notice of
enforcement to only include the date
and time of the Parade of Ships, and not
the names of the vessels. In order to
provide notice to the public regarding
the vessels requiring the security zone,
the Coast Guard will provide notice to
the public of the designated
participating vessels by issuing a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners before and
during the event. In addition, the
security zone will be enforced with
actual notice during the Seattle Seafair
Fleet Week each year. The regulatory
text we are proposing appears at the end
of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This NPRM has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the fact that this rule would
only change the mean in which the
public will be notified about the
security zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:58 Apr 05, 2018
Jkt 244001
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the security
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section IV.A above,
this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for
a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and have determined that it is
consistent with the fundamental
federalism principles and preemption
requirements described in Executive
Order 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
If you believe this proposed rule has
implications for federalism or Indian
tribes, please contact the person listed
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023–01, which guides
the Coast Guard in complying with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
made a preliminary determination that
this action is one of a category of actions
that do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. This proposed rule
involves amending the way in which
the Coast Guard will notify the public
which vessels are designated
participants in Seattle’s Seafair Fleet
Week. Normally such actions are
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L60(a) of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 01. A
preliminary Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this
determination is available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES. We
seek any comments or information that
may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
E:\FR\FM\06APP1.SGM
06APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 67 / Friday, April 6, 2018 / Proposed Rules
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, visit https://
www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in the docket, and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
website’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Amend § 165.1333 by revising
paragraphs (a) and (e) to read as follows:
■
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 165.1333 Security Zones, Seattle’s
Seafair Fleet Week moving vessels, Puget
Sound, WA.
(a) Location. The following areas are
security zones: all navigable waters
within 500 yards of each designated
participating vessel in the Parade of
Ships while each such vessel is in the
Sector Puget Sound Captain of the Port
(COTP) zone, as defined in 33 CFR
3.65–10, during a time specified in
paragraph (e) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Annual enforcement period. The
security zones described in paragraph
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:58 Apr 05, 2018
Jkt 244001
(a) of this section will be enforced with
actual notice during Seattle Seafair Fleet
Week each year for a period of up to 1
week. The Seattle Seafair Fleet Week
will occur annually sometime between
July 25 and August 14. The Coast Guard
will publish an annual notice
enforcement containing the dates that
this section will be enforced in the
Federal Register and Local Notice to
Mariners. A Broadcast Notice to
Mariners will also be issued before the
start of the Seattle Seafair Fleet Week to
identify the designated participating
vessels for that year.
Dated: April 2, 2018.
Linda A. Sturgis,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2018–07026 Filed 4–5–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Parts 3 and 5
RIN 2900–AO13
VA Compensation and Pension
Regulation Rewrite Project
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Withdrawal of proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) published a notice of
proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register on November 27, 2013,
proposing to reorganize and rewrite its
compensation and pension regulations
in a logical, claimant focused, and userfriendly format. The intended effect of
the proposed revisions was to assist
claimants, beneficiaries, veterans’
representatives, and VA personnel in
locating and understanding these
regulations. VA has since determined
that an incremental approach to revising
these regulations is the only feasible
method for the Veterans Benefit
Administration (VBA) as it exists today.
Therefore, VA is withdrawing the
proposed rule, RIN 2900–AO13–VA
Compensation and Pension Regulation
Rewrite Project, that was published on
November 27, 2013, at 78 FR 71,042.
DATES: The proposed rule published on
November 27, 2013, at 78 FR 71,042, is
withdrawn as of April 6, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael P. Shores, Director, Office of
Regulations Policy & Management
(00REG), Office of the Secretary,
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810
Vermont Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20420, (202) 461–4902 (this is not a tollfree number).
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14803
The VA
Office of the Secretary provides
centralized management and
coordination of VA’s rulemaking
process through its Office of Regulation
Policy and Management (ORPM). ORPM
oversaw VA’s Regulation Rewrite
Project (the Project) to improve the
organization and clarity of VA’s
adjudication regulations, which are in
current 38 CFR part 3. These regulations
govern the adjudication of claims for
VA’s monetary benefits (including
compensation, pension, dependency
and indemnity compensation, and
burial benefits), which are administered
by the Veterans Benefits Administration
(VBA).
The Project responded to a
recommendation made by the VA
Claims Processing Task Force in its
October 2001 ‘‘Report to the Secretary of
Veterans Affairs’’ and to criticisms of
VA regulations by the U.S. Court of
Appeals for Veterans Claims. The Task
Force recommended that VA reorganize
its regulations in a logical, coherent
manner. The Court referred to the
current regulations as a ‘‘confusing
tapestry’’ and criticized VA for
maintaining substantive rules in its
Adjudication Procedures Manual
(manual). Accordingly, the Project
reviewed the manual to identify
provisions that might be substantive and
proposed to incorporate those
provisions in a complete rewrite of part
3 that would be located at a new part
5. To be clear, the goal was never to
substantively alter the law pertaining to
VA monetary benefits, but to convey
this law (to include current regulations,
VA General Counsel opinions, court
decisions, and substantive manual
provisions) in readable language and an
organized format. 78 FR at 71,042; see
also 79 FR 57,660, 57,678 (Sep. 25,
2014) (commenting on the scope of the
Rewrite Project).
VA published the rewritten material
in 20 Notices of Proposed Rulemaking
(NPRMs) and gave interested persons 60
days to submit comments after each
publication. These NPRMs addressed
specific topics, programs, or groups of
regulatory material organized under the
following Rulemaking Identifier
Numbers (RIN):
• RIN 2900–AL67, Service
Requirements for Veterans (January
30, 2004)
• RIN 2900–AL70, Presumptions of
Service Connection for Certain
Disabilities, and Related Matters (July
27, 2004)
• RIN 2900–AL71, Accrued Benefits,
Death Compensation, and Special
Rules Applicable Upon Death of a
Beneficiary (October 1, 2004)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\06APP1.SGM
06APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 67 (Friday, April 6, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 14801-14803]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-07026]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2018-0105]
RIN 1625-AA87
Security Zone, Seattle's Seafair Fleet Week Moving Vessels, Puget
Sound, WA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to amend its Seattle Seafair Fleet
Week Moving Vessels Security Zone regulation. This amendment would
change the information in annual notices of enforcement that are
published both in the Federal Register and Local Notice to Mariners.
This action is necessary because last minute changes in the vessels
participating in the Parade of Ships during Fleet Week prevent the
Coast Guard from identifying the designated participating vessels in
the Federal Register within the allotted timeframe. We invite your
comments on this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before May 21, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2018-0105 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Petty Officer Zachary Spence, Sector Puget Sound
Waterways Management Branch, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 206-217-6051,
email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
On July 10, 2012 (77 FR 40521), the Coast Guard Captain of the
Port, Sector Puget Sound, published a final rule that became effective
Aug. 1, 2012; the Seattle's Seafair Fleet Week Moving Vessels security
zone. That final rule establishes a security zone around designated
participating vessels that are not protected by the Naval Vessel
Protection Zone in Seattle's Seafair Fleet Week Parade of Ships.
Designated participating vessels are named by the Coast Guard each year
prior to the event in a Federal Register notice, as well as the Local
Notice to Mariners. These security zones are necessary to help ensure
the security of the vessels from sabotage or other subversive acts.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to amend the information required
in the Notice of Enforcement published in the Federal Register and
Local Notice to Mariner and add the requirement to publish the names of
participating vessel in a Broadcast Notice to Mariners before the
scheduled event. The Coast Guard proposes this rulemaking under
authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Captain of the Port Puget Sound proposes to amend the
provisions in 33 CFR 165.1333 regarding information published in the
notice of enforcement for the annual security zone for Seattle's
Seafair Fleet Weeks Parade of Ships. Currently, the Coast Guard
publishes the names of the vessels participating in the Parade of
Ships, in a notice of enforcement at least 3 days prior to the
beginning of Seattle's Seafair. These are military vessels. In past
years, some vessels participating in the Parade of Ships changed their
plans due to operational needs, and as a result, the changes precluded
the Coast Guard from providing sufficient notice in the Federal
Register. This proposed amendment is necessary because the changing
schedules of vessels sometimes makes it impossible to know which
vessels will ultimately participate in the Parade of Ships and
[[Page 14802]]
also provide timely notice in the Federal Register.
The Coast Guard proposes to amend the information required in the
notice of enforcement to only include the date and time of the Parade
of Ships, and not the names of the vessels. In order to provide notice
to the public regarding the vessels requiring the security zone, the
Coast Guard will provide notice to the public of the designated
participating vessels by issuing a Broadcast Notice to Mariners before
and during the event. In addition, the security zone will be enforced
with actual notice during the Seattle Seafair Fleet Week each year. The
regulatory text we are proposing appears at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on the fact that this
rule would only change the mean in which the public will be notified
about the security zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
security zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023-01, which guides the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-
4370f), and have made a preliminary determination that this action is
one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule
involves amending the way in which the Coast Guard will notify the
public which vessels are designated participants in Seattle's Seafair
Fleet Week. Normally such actions are categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS
Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A preliminary Record of
Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available
in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the
[[Page 14803]]
docket number for this rulemaking, indicate the specific section of
this document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for
each suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, visit https://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Amend Sec. 165.1333 by revising paragraphs (a) and (e) to read as
follows:
Sec. 165.1333 Security Zones, Seattle's Seafair Fleet Week moving
vessels, Puget Sound, WA.
(a) Location. The following areas are security zones: all navigable
waters within 500 yards of each designated participating vessel in the
Parade of Ships while each such vessel is in the Sector Puget Sound
Captain of the Port (COTP) zone, as defined in 33 CFR 3.65-10, during a
time specified in paragraph (e) of this section.
* * * * *
(e) Annual enforcement period. The security zones described in
paragraph (a) of this section will be enforced with actual notice
during Seattle Seafair Fleet Week each year for a period of up to 1
week. The Seattle Seafair Fleet Week will occur annually sometime
between July 25 and August 14. The Coast Guard will publish an annual
notice enforcement containing the dates that this section will be
enforced in the Federal Register and Local Notice to Mariners. A
Broadcast Notice to Mariners will also be issued before the start of
the Seattle Seafair Fleet Week to identify the designated participating
vessels for that year.
Dated: April 2, 2018.
Linda A. Sturgis,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2018-07026 Filed 4-5-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P