Safety Zone; Vigor Industrial Drydock Movement, West Duwamish Waterway; Seattle, WA, 14589-14591 [2018-06924]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 66 / Thursday, April 5, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
States or any other political subdivision
thereof. Although civilian law
enforcement agencies may request
support from DoD, this part neither
confers a benefit not otherwise provided
for in statute nor imposes a burden on
civilian law enforcement agencies.
Therefore, this part may be removed
from the CFR.
DATES: This rule is effective on April 5,
2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James (Coach) Ross at 571–256–8325.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: It has been
determined that publication of this CFR
part removal for public comment is
impracticable, unnecessary, and
contrary to public interest since it is
based on removing DoD internal
policies and procedures that are
publicly available on the Department’s
issuance website.
DoD internal guidance concerning
defense support of civilian law
enforcement agencies will continue to
be published in DoD Instruction
3025.21, ‘‘Defense Support of Civilian
Law Enforcement Agencies,’’ available
at https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/
Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/
302521p.pdf.
This rule is not significant under
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866,
‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review,’’
therefore, E.O. 13771, ‘‘Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs’’ does not apply.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 182
Armed forces, Law enforcement.
PART 182—[REMOVED]
Accordingly, by the authority of 5
U.S.C. 301, 32 CFR part 182 is removed.
■
Dated: March 30, 2018.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
concerning defense support of civil
authorities. This part contains DoD
policy and assigns responsibilities for
Defense Support of Civil Authorities
(DSCA). This part also authorizes
immediate response authority for
providing DSCA, when requested, and
authorizes emergency authority for the
use of military force, under dire
situations. The content of the rule is
internal to DoD and does not require
codification. The part will be removed.
DATES:
This rule is effective on April 5,
2018.
It has been
determined that publication of this CFR
part removal for public comment is
impracticable, unnecessary, and
contrary to public interest since it is
based on removing DoD internal
policies and procedures that are
publicly available on the Department’s
issuance website.
DoD internal guidance concerning
defense support of special events will
continue to be published in DoD
Directive 3025.18, ‘‘Defense Support of
Civil Authorities (DSCA),’’ available at
https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/
Documents/DD/issuances/dodd/
302518p.pdf.
This rule is not significant under
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866,
‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review,’’
therefore, E.O. 13771, ‘‘Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs’’ does not apply.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 185
PART 185—[REMOVED]
Accordingly, by the authority of 5
U.S.C. 301, 32 CFR part 185 is removed.
■
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
Dated: March 30, 2018.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[FR Doc. 2018–06936 Filed 4–4–18; 8:45 am]
32 CFR Part 185
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
[Docket ID: DOD–2017–OS–0054]
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with RULES
Defense Support of Civil Authorities
Under Secretary of Defense for
Policy, DoD.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule removes the
Department of Defense (DoD) regulation
SUMMARY:
17:47 Apr 04, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2015–1061]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Vigor Industrial Drydock
Movement, West Duwamish Waterway;
Seattle, WA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a safety zone in the West
Duwamish Waterway in Seattle,
Washington for scheduled drydock
movements at Vigor Industrial. The
safety zone is necessary to ensure the
safety of the maritime public and
workers involved in the drydock
movements. The safety zone will
prohibit any person or vessel from
entering or remaining in the safety zone
when a notice of enforcement is issued,
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port or a Designated Representative.
DATES: This rule is effective May 7,
2018.
SUMMARY:
To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2015–
1061 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Lieutenant Commander Christina
Sullivan, Waterways Management
Division, Sector Puget Sound, U.S.
Coast Guard; telephone 206–217–6051,
email SectorPugetSoundWWM@
uscg.mil.
ADDRESSES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard periodically receives
notification from Vigor Industrial
regarding their scheduled drydock
movements in the West Duwamish
Waterway, and has established
temporary safety zones to ensure the
safety of the maritime public during
Vigor Industrial’s operations. The Coast
RIN 0790–AK06
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Tom
Lacrosse at 571–256–8319.
Armed forces, Civil defense.
[FR Doc. 2018–06935 Filed 4–4–18; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
ACTION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
14589
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\05APR1.SGM
05APR1
14590
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 66 / Thursday, April 5, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Guard last published a temporary safety
zone; Vigor Industrial Ferry
Construction, West Duwamish
Waterway, Seattle, WA on September 9,
2014 (79 FR 53297).
On November 16, 2016, the Coast
Guard published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) titled Safety Zone;
Vigor Industrial Drydock Movement,
West Duwamish Waterway; Seattle, WA
(81 FR 80621). There we stated why we
issued the NPRM, and invited
comments on our proposed regulatory
action related to this safety zone. During
the comment period that ended January
17, 2017, we received no comments.
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with RULES
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing this
rule under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.
Coast Guard Captains of the Port are
granted authority to establish safety and
security zones in 33 CFR 1.05–1(f) for
safety and environmental purposes as
described in 33 CFR part 165.
Due to the dangers involved with a
large, slow moving drydock that will be
maneuvering close to the shore, the
Coast Guard is establishing a short term
safety zone that is activated on a notice
of enforcement to ensure the safety of
the workers involved as well as the
maritime public during Vigor
Industrial’s operations.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes,
and the Rule
As noted above, we received no
comments on our NPRM published
November 16, 2016. There is one change
in the regulatory text of this rule from
the proposed rule in the NPRM.
We changed the proposed language in
§ 165.1340(b)(2) as follows: In the first
sentence of paragraph (b)(2), the word
‘‘consult’’ is changed to
‘‘communicate.’’ The second sentence of
paragraph (b)(2) remains unchanged.
This change is intended to clarify that
consultation occurs once the Coast
Guard receives sufficient information
from Vigor Industrial and the
Muckleshoot Tribe that there are
impacts to treaty fishing activities.
This rule establishes a safety zone
encompassing all waters in a rectangle
approximately 450-yards-by-500-yards
at the mouth of the West Duwamish
Waterway as it empties into Elliot Bay
in Seattle, Washington. The safety zone
is adjacent to the north-eastern tip of
Harbor Island in Seattle, WA, and will
only be enforced after a notice of
enforcement has been issued by the
Captain of the Port, Sector Puget Sound.
In addition to issuing a notice of
enforcement to be published in the
Federal Register, the Captain of the Port
will use other appropriate means, such
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Apr 04, 2018
Jkt 244001
as Local Notice to Mariners and Special
Marine Information Broadcast, to inform
the public of enforcement periods.
To request permission to enter the
zone during the times set out by the
notice of enforcement, contact the Joint
Harbor Operations Center at 206–217–
6001 or the Vessel Traffic Service Puget
Sound on VHF Channel 14. If
permission for entry is granted vessels
will be required proceed at a minimum
speed for navigation.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This rule has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has
not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, and
duration of the safety zone. This safety
zone will impact a small designated area
of the West Duwamish Waterway for
less than 6 hours per occurrence. From
2005 through 2015, there were a total of
10 instances in which the Coast Guard
issued a safety zone for the movement
of the Vigor Dry Dock. Moreover, the
Coast Guard will issue a Broadcast
Notice to Mariners via VHF–FM marine
channel 16 about the zone, and the rule
allows vessels to seek permission to
enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard received no comments
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
from the Small Business Administration
on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard
certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A above, this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule will
affect your small business, organization,
or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its
provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under E.O. 13132, Federalism, if it has
a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the
fundamental federalism principles and
preemption requirements described in
E.O. 13132.
This rule was determined to have
potential tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal
E:\FR\FM\05APR1.SGM
05APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 66 / Thursday, April 5, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Governments, because it will impact
vessel traffic in the West Duwamish
Waterway. The Coast Guard consulted
with the Muckleshoot tribe on the
NPRM that preceded this rule. In order
to reach an agreeable timeframe that
avoids impacts to treaty fishing
activities, the Coast Guard will
communicate with the Muckleshoot
tribe and Vigor Industrial once it
receives notification from Vigor
Industrial concerning drydock
movements that require the enforcement
of the safety zone. If agreement is not
reached, the Coast Guard, as a Federal
trustee, will conduct consultation with
the Muckleshoot tribe to ensure Vigor
movements will avoid Treaty impacts.
If you believe this rule has additional
implications for federalism or Indian
tribes, please contact the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section above.
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
■
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with RULES
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01 and Commandant
Instruction M16475.1D, which guide the
Coast Guard in complying with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the
establishment of a safety zone to ensure
the safety of the maritime public. It is
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L60(a) of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 01. A
Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Apr 04, 2018
Jkt 244001
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and record keeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.1340 to read as follows:
§ 165.1340 Safety Zone; Vigor Industrial
Drydock Movement, West Duwamish
Waterway; Seattle, WA.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All waters of the West
Duwamish Waterway in Seattle, WA
encompassed within the area created by
connecting the following points:
47°35′04″ N, 122°21′30″ W thence
westerly to 47°35′04″ N, 122°21′50″ W
thence northerly to 47°35′19″ N,
122°21′50″ W thence easterly to
47°35′19″ N, 122°21′30″ W thence
southerly to 47°35′04″ N, 122°21′30″ W.
(b) Regulations. (1) In accordance
with the general regulations in subpart
C of this part, when a notice of
enforcement has been issued, no person
may enter or remain in the safety zone
created by this section unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port or
a Designated Representative. See
subpart C of this part for additional
safety zone information and
requirements. Vessel operators wishing
to enter the zone during the
enforcement period must request
permission for entry by contacting the
Joint Harbor Operation Center at 206–
217–6001 or the Vessel Traffic Service
Puget Sound on VHF channel 14.
(2) In order to reach an agreeable
timeframe that avoids impacts to treaty
fishing activities, the Coast Guard will
communicate with the Muckleshoot
Tribe and Vigor Industrial once it
receives notification from Vigor
Industrial concerning drydock
movements that require the enforcement
of the safety zone. If agreement is not
reached, the Coast Guard, as a federal
trustee, will conduct consultation with
the Muckleshoot Tribe to ensure Vigor
movements will avoid Treaty impacts.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
14591
(c) Enforcement periods. The safety
zone described in paragraph (a) of this
section will be enforced by the Captain
of the Port only upon notice. Notice of
enforcement by the Captain of the Port
will be provided prior to execution of
the drydock movement by all
appropriate means, in accordance with
§ 165.7(a). Such means will include
issuance of a notice of enforcement to be
published in the Federal Register, Local
Notice to Mariners, and Special Marine
Information Broadcast.
L.A. Sturgis,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2018–06924 Filed 4–4–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[SC–2017; FRL–9974–17—Region 4]
Air Plan Approval; South Carolina;
Update to Materials Incorporated by
Reference
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; notification of
administrative change.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is updating the materials
that are incorporated by reference (IBR)
into the South Carolina state
implementation plan (SIP). The
regulations affected by this update have
been previously submitted by South
Carolina and approved by EPA. This
update affects the materials that are
available for public inspection at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA) and the EPA
Regional Office.
DATES: This action is effective April 5,
2018.
ADDRESSES: SIP materials which are
incorporated by reference into 40 CFR
part 52 are available for inspection at
the following locations: Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street SW, Atlanta, GA 30303; and the
National Archives and Records
Administration. For information on the
availability of this material at NARA,
call 202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/
ibr-locations.html. To view the
materials at the Region 4 Office, EPA
requests that you email the contact
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sean Lakeman, Air Regulatory
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\05APR1.SGM
05APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 66 (Thursday, April 5, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 14589-14591]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-06924]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2015-1061]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Vigor Industrial Drydock Movement, West Duwamish
Waterway; Seattle, WA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone in the West
Duwamish Waterway in Seattle, Washington for scheduled drydock
movements at Vigor Industrial. The safety zone is necessary to ensure
the safety of the maritime public and workers involved in the drydock
movements. The safety zone will prohibit any person or vessel from
entering or remaining in the safety zone when a notice of enforcement
is issued, unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or a Designated
Representative.
DATES: This rule is effective May 7, 2018.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2015-1061 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Lieutenant Commander Christina Sullivan, Waterways
Management Division, Sector Puget Sound, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone
206-217-6051, email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard periodically receives notification from Vigor
Industrial regarding their scheduled drydock movements in the West
Duwamish Waterway, and has established temporary safety zones to ensure
the safety of the maritime public during Vigor Industrial's operations.
The Coast
[[Page 14590]]
Guard last published a temporary safety zone; Vigor Industrial Ferry
Construction, West Duwamish Waterway, Seattle, WA on September 9, 2014
(79 FR 53297).
On November 16, 2016, the Coast Guard published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) titled Safety Zone; Vigor Industrial Drydock
Movement, West Duwamish Waterway; Seattle, WA (81 FR 80621). There we
stated why we issued the NPRM, and invited comments on our proposed
regulatory action related to this safety zone. During the comment
period that ended January 17, 2017, we received no comments.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing this rule under authority in 33
U.S.C. 1231. Coast Guard Captains of the Port are granted authority to
establish safety and security zones in 33 CFR 1.05-1(f) for safety and
environmental purposes as described in 33 CFR part 165.
Due to the dangers involved with a large, slow moving drydock that
will be maneuvering close to the shore, the Coast Guard is establishing
a short term safety zone that is activated on a notice of enforcement
to ensure the safety of the workers involved as well as the maritime
public during Vigor Industrial's operations.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule
As noted above, we received no comments on our NPRM published
November 16, 2016. There is one change in the regulatory text of this
rule from the proposed rule in the NPRM.
We changed the proposed language in Sec. 165.1340(b)(2) as
follows: In the first sentence of paragraph (b)(2), the word
``consult'' is changed to ``communicate.'' The second sentence of
paragraph (b)(2) remains unchanged. This change is intended to clarify
that consultation occurs once the Coast Guard receives sufficient
information from Vigor Industrial and the Muckleshoot Tribe that there
are impacts to treaty fishing activities.
This rule establishes a safety zone encompassing all waters in a
rectangle approximately 450-yards-by-500-yards at the mouth of the West
Duwamish Waterway as it empties into Elliot Bay in Seattle, Washington.
The safety zone is adjacent to the north-eastern tip of Harbor Island
in Seattle, WA, and will only be enforced after a notice of enforcement
has been issued by the Captain of the Port, Sector Puget Sound. In
addition to issuing a notice of enforcement to be published in the
Federal Register, the Captain of the Port will use other appropriate
means, such as Local Notice to Mariners and Special Marine Information
Broadcast, to inform the public of enforcement periods.
To request permission to enter the zone during the times set out by
the notice of enforcement, contact the Joint Harbor Operations Center
at 206-217-6001 or the Vessel Traffic Service Puget Sound on VHF
Channel 14. If permission for entry is granted vessels will be required
proceed at a minimum speed for navigation.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, and duration of the safety zone. This safety zone will impact
a small designated area of the West Duwamish Waterway for less than 6
hours per occurrence. From 2005 through 2015, there were a total of 10
instances in which the Coast Guard issued a safety zone for the
movement of the Vigor Dry Dock. Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the
zone, and the rule allows vessels to seek permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule will affect your small
business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under E.O. 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in E.O. 13132.
This rule was determined to have potential tribal implications
under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian
Tribal
[[Page 14591]]
Governments, because it will impact vessel traffic in the West Duwamish
Waterway. The Coast Guard consulted with the Muckleshoot tribe on the
NPRM that preceded this rule. In order to reach an agreeable timeframe
that avoids impacts to treaty fishing activities, the Coast Guard will
communicate with the Muckleshoot tribe and Vigor Industrial once it
receives notification from Vigor Industrial concerning drydock
movements that require the enforcement of the safety zone. If agreement
is not reached, the Coast Guard, as a Federal trustee, will conduct
consultation with the Muckleshoot tribe to ensure Vigor movements will
avoid Treaty impacts.
If you believe this rule has additional implications for federalism
or Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, which guide the
Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is
one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves
the establishment of a safety zone to ensure the safety of the maritime
public. It is categorically excluded from further review under
paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-
01-001-01, Rev. 01. A Record of Environmental Consideration supporting
this determination is available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record
keeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.1340 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.1340 Safety Zone; Vigor Industrial Drydock Movement, West
Duwamish Waterway; Seattle, WA.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All waters of
the West Duwamish Waterway in Seattle, WA encompassed within the area
created by connecting the following points: 47[deg]35'04'' N,
122[deg]21'30'' W thence westerly to 47[deg]35'04'' N, 122[deg]21'50''
W thence northerly to 47[deg]35'19'' N, 122[deg]21'50'' W thence
easterly to 47[deg]35'19'' N, 122[deg]21'30'' W thence southerly to
47[deg]35'04'' N, 122[deg]21'30'' W.
(b) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
subpart C of this part, when a notice of enforcement has been issued,
no person may enter or remain in the safety zone created by this
section unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or a Designated
Representative. See subpart C of this part for additional safety zone
information and requirements. Vessel operators wishing to enter the
zone during the enforcement period must request permission for entry by
contacting the Joint Harbor Operation Center at 206-217-6001 or the
Vessel Traffic Service Puget Sound on VHF channel 14.
(2) In order to reach an agreeable timeframe that avoids impacts to
treaty fishing activities, the Coast Guard will communicate with the
Muckleshoot Tribe and Vigor Industrial once it receives notification
from Vigor Industrial concerning drydock movements that require the
enforcement of the safety zone. If agreement is not reached, the Coast
Guard, as a federal trustee, will conduct consultation with the
Muckleshoot Tribe to ensure Vigor movements will avoid Treaty impacts.
(c) Enforcement periods. The safety zone described in paragraph (a)
of this section will be enforced by the Captain of the Port only upon
notice. Notice of enforcement by the Captain of the Port will be
provided prior to execution of the drydock movement by all appropriate
means, in accordance with Sec. 165.7(a). Such means will include
issuance of a notice of enforcement to be published in the Federal
Register, Local Notice to Mariners, and Special Marine Information
Broadcast.
L.A. Sturgis,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2018-06924 Filed 4-4-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P