Adequacy Status of the Sheboygan County, Wisconsin Area for the Submitted 2008 Ozone Standard Attainment Demonstration for Transportation Conformity Purposes, 14637 [2018-06793]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 66 / Thursday, April 5, 2018 / Notices
human-studies-review-board. In
addition, information regarding the
HSRB’s Final Report, will be found at
https://www2.epa.gov/osa/humanstudies-review-board or from Thomas
O’Farrell listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION, CONTACT.
Dated: March 26, 2018.
Jennifer Orme-Zavaleta,
EPA Science Advisor.
[FR Doc. 2018–06990 Filed 4–4–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–R05–OAR–2017–0579; FRL–9976–12–
Region 5]
Adequacy Status of the Sheboygan
County, Wisconsin Area for the
Submitted 2008 Ozone Standard
Attainment Demonstration for
Transportation Conformity Purposes
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of finding of adequacy.
AGENCY:
In this notice, the EPA is
notifying the public that we find the
motor vehicle emissions budgets
(MVEBs) for volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) and oxides of nitrogen (NOX) in
the Sheboygan County, Wisconsin 2008
Ozone Standard nonattainment area
adequate for use in transportation
conformity determinations. On
September 25, 2017, Wisconsin
submitted a 2008 Ozone Standard
Attainment Demonstration for
Sheboygan County, which included the
MVEBs for 2017 and 2018. As a result
of our finding, this area must use these
MVEBs from the submitted Attainment
Demonstration for future transportation
conformity determinations.
DATES: This finding is applicable April
20, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Leslie, Environmental
Engineer, Control Strategies Section
(AR–18J), Air Programs Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, United States
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353–6680,
leslie.michael@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, whenever
‘‘we’’, ‘‘us’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA.
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
Background
This notice is an announcement of a
finding that we have already made. On
January 17, 2018, EPA sent a letter to
the Wisconsin Department of Natural
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:33 Apr 04, 2018
Jkt 244001
Resources stating that the 2017 and
2018 MVEBs contained in the
Attainment Demonstration for the 2008
Ozone Standard for Sheboygan County
are adequate for transportation
conformity purposes. Receipt of these
MVEBs was announced on EPA’s
transportation conformity website, and
no comments were submitted. The
finding is available at EPA’s conformity
website: https://www.epa.gov/state-andlocal-transportation/adequacy-reviewstate-implementation-plan-sipsubmissions-conformity.
The 2017 and 2018 MVEBs, in tons
per day (tpd), for VOCs and NOX for the
Sheboygan County, Wisconsin area are
as follows:
14637
Notice of proposed settlement;
request for public comments.
ACTION:
In accordance with section
122(i) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response Compensation,
and Liability Act, as amended
(‘‘CERCLA’’), notice is hereby given of a
proposed administrative Settlement
Agreement for recovery of Past
Response Costs, as defined in the
Settlement Agreement, under CERCLA
section 122(h) of CERCLA, concerning
the New Hampshire Dioxane Site,
located in Atkinson and Hampstead,
New Hampshire with Gould Electronics
Inc. The settlement requires Gould
Electronics Inc. to pay $1,900,000, plus
interest on that amount calculated from
March 28, 2016 through the date of
NOX
VOCs
Sheboygan County
(tpd)
(tpd)
payment, to the Hazardous Substance
Superfund.
2017 ..............................
1.62
3.29
2018 ..............................
1.49
2.96 DATES: Comments must be submitted by
May 7, 2018.
Transportation conformity is required ADDRESSES: Comments should be
by section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act.
addressed to John Hultgren,
EPA’s conformity rule requires that
Enforcement Counsel, U.S.
transportation plans, programs, and
Environmental Protection Agency, 5
projects conform to state air quality
Post Office Square, Suite 100 (OES04–
implementation plans and establishes
2), Boston, MA 02109–3912 and should
the criteria and procedures for
refer to: In re: New Hampshire Dioxane
determining whether or not they do
Site, EPA Region 1 CERCLA Docket No.
conform. Conformity to a State
01–2018–0013.
Implementation Plan (SIP) means that
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A
transportation activities will not
copy of the proposed Settlement
produce new air quality violations,
Agreement may be obtained from John
worsen existing violations, or delay
Hultgren, Enforcement Counsel, U.S.
timely attainment of the national
Environmental Protection Agency, 5
ambient air quality standards.
Post Office Square, Suite 100 (OES04–
The criteria by which we determine
2), Boston, MA 02109–3912; (617) 918–
whether a SIP’s MVEBs are adequate for 1761; hultgren.john@epa.gov.
transportation conformity purposes are
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For 30
outlined in 40 CFR 93.118(e)(4). Please
note that an adequacy review is separate days following the date of publication of
from EPA’s completeness review, and is this notice, the Agency will receive
written comments relating to the
also a separate action from EPA’s
settlement. The United States will
evaluation of and decision whether to
consider all comments received and
approve a proposed SIP revision.
may modify or withdraw its consent to
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671 q.
the settlement if comments received
Dated: March 20, 2018.
disclose facts or considerations which
indicate that the settlement is
Edward H. Chu,
inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
The Agency’s response to any comments
[FR Doc. 2018–06793 Filed 4–4–18; 8:45 am]
received will be available for public
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
inspection at 5 Post Office Square,
Boston, MA 02109–3912.
The proposed Settlement Agreement
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
includes a covenant from EPA not to sue
AGENCY
or take administrative action against
[9976–15—Region 1]
Gould Electronics Inc. pursuant to
section 107(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C.
Proposed CERCLA Administrative
9607(a), to recover Past Response Costs,
Cost Recovery Settlement; Gould
and protection for Gould Electronics,
Electronics Inc., New Hampshire
Inc. from contribution actions or claims
Dioxane Site, Atkinson/Hampstead,
as provided by sections 113(f)(2) and
New Hampshire
122(h)(4) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. Section
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
9613(f)(2) and 9622(h)(4). The
Agency (EPA).
settlement has been approved by the
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\05APN1.SGM
05APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 66 (Thursday, April 5, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 14637]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-06793]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-R05-OAR-2017-0579; FRL-9976-12-Region 5]
Adequacy Status of the Sheboygan County, Wisconsin Area for the
Submitted 2008 Ozone Standard Attainment Demonstration for
Transportation Conformity Purposes
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of finding of adequacy.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this notice, the EPA is notifying the public that we find
the motor vehicle emissions budgets (MVEBs) for volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) and oxides of nitrogen (NOX) in
the Sheboygan County, Wisconsin 2008 Ozone Standard nonattainment area
adequate for use in transportation conformity determinations. On
September 25, 2017, Wisconsin submitted a 2008 Ozone Standard
Attainment Demonstration for Sheboygan County, which included the MVEBs
for 2017 and 2018. As a result of our finding, this area must use these
MVEBs from the submitted Attainment Demonstration for future
transportation conformity determinations.
DATES: This finding is applicable April 20, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Leslie, Environmental
Engineer, Control Strategies Section (AR-18J), Air Programs Branch, Air
and Radiation Division, United States Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312)
353-6680, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, whenever ``we'',
``us'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.
Background
This notice is an announcement of a finding that we have already
made. On January 17, 2018, EPA sent a letter to the Wisconsin
Department of Natural Resources stating that the 2017 and 2018 MVEBs
contained in the Attainment Demonstration for the 2008 Ozone Standard
for Sheboygan County are adequate for transportation conformity
purposes. Receipt of these MVEBs was announced on EPA's transportation
conformity website, and no comments were submitted. The finding is
available at EPA's conformity website: https://www.epa.gov/state-and-local-transportation/adequacy-review-state-implementation-plan-sip-submissions-conformity.
The 2017 and 2018 MVEBs, in tons per day (tpd), for VOCs and
NOX for the Sheboygan County, Wisconsin area are as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOX VOCs
Sheboygan County (tpd) (tpd)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2017................................................ 1.62 3.29
2018................................................ 1.49 2.96
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transportation conformity is required by section 176(c) of the
Clean Air Act. EPA's conformity rule requires that transportation
plans, programs, and projects conform to state air quality
implementation plans and establishes the criteria and procedures for
determining whether or not they do conform. Conformity to a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) means that transportation activities will not
produce new air quality violations, worsen existing violations, or
delay timely attainment of the national ambient air quality standards.
The criteria by which we determine whether a SIP's MVEBs are
adequate for transportation conformity purposes are outlined in 40 CFR
93.118(e)(4). Please note that an adequacy review is separate from
EPA's completeness review, and is also a separate action from EPA's
evaluation of and decision whether to approve a proposed SIP revision.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671 q.
Dated: March 20, 2018.
Edward H. Chu,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2018-06793 Filed 4-4-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P