Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; State of Maryland; Control of Emissions From Existing Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incinerator Units, 13878-13879 [2018-06653]
Download as PDF
13878
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 63 / Monday, April 2, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2018–06542 Filed 3–30–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 62
[EPA–R03–OAR–2017–0570; FRL–9976–
31—Region 3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; State of
Maryland; Control of Emissions From
Existing Commercial and Industrial
Solid Waste Incinerator Units
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve a negative declaration for
existing commercial and industrial solid
waste incineration (CISWI) units within
the State of Maryland. This negative
declaration certifies that CISWI units
subject to the requirements of sections
111(d) and 129 of the Clean Air Act
(CAA) do not exist within the
jurisdictional boundaries of the State of
Maryland. EPA is accepting the negative
declaration in accordance with the
requirements of the CAA.
DATES: This rule is effective on May 2,
2018.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R03–OAR–2017–0570. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov website.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., confidential business information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mike Gordon, (215) 814–2039, or by
email at gordon.mike@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
I. Background
Sections 111(d) and 129 of the CAA
require states to submit plans to control
certain pollutants (designated
pollutants) at existing solid waste
combustor facilities (designated
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:23 Mar 30, 2018
Jkt 244001
facilities) whenever standards of
performance have been established
under section 111(b) for new sources of
the same type, and EPA has established
emission guidelines (EG) for such
existing sources. CAA section 129
directs EPA to establish standards of
performance for new sources and
emissions guidelines for existing
sources for each category of solid waste
incineration unit. CAA section 129(a)
and (b). According to section 129(a)(4)
of the CAA, EPA also must specify
numerical emissions limitations for
particulate matter (total and fine),
opacity (as appropriate), sulfur dioxide,
hydrogen chloride, oxides of nitrogen,
carbon monoxide, lead, cadmium,
mercury, and dioxins and
dibenzofurans.
If a state fails to submit a satisfactory
plan, the CAA provides EPA the
authority to prescribe a plan for
regulating the designated pollutants at
the designated facilities. EPA prescribed
plan, also known as a federal plan, is
often delegated to states with designated
facilities but no EPA approved statespecific plan. If no such designated
facilities exist within a state’s
jurisdiction, a state may submit to the
EPA a letter of certification to that effect
(referred to as a negative declaration) in
lieu of a state plan to satisfy the state’s
obligation. 40 CFR 60.23(b) and 62.06. A
negative declaration exempts the state
from the requirement to submit a CAA
section 111(d)/section 129 plan for that
designated pollutant and source
category. 40 CFR 60.23(b).
II. State Submittal and EPA Analysis
The Maryland Department of the
Environment (MDE) has determined that
there are no existing CISWI units subject
to the requirements of sections 111(d)
and 129 of the CAA in its respective air
pollution control jurisdiction.
Accordingly, MDE submitted a negative
declaration letter to EPA certifying this
fact on January 20, 2017. A notice of
proposed rulemaking was published in
the Federal Register on February 1,
2018 (83 FR 4621). EPA received three
comments during the public comment
that were not specific nor related to this
action and thus are not addressed here.
The negative declaration letter and
EPA’s notice of proposed rulemaking
are available in the docket for this
rulemaking and online at
www.regulations.gov.
III. Final Action
In this final action, EPA is approving
the negative declaration for CISWI units
submitted by MDE on January 20, 2017
and amending part 62 to reflect receipt
of the negative declaration and
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
subsequent approval by EPA. EPA is
accepting the negative declaration in
accordance with the requirements of the
CAA and 40 CFR 60.23(b) and 62.06.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely notifies
the public of EPA receipt of a negative
declaration from an air pollution control
agency without any existing CISWI
units in their jurisdiction. This action
imposes no requirements. Accordingly,
EPA certifies that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this action
does not impose any additional
enforceable duty beyond that required
by state law, it does not contain any
unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as
described in the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4).
This action also does not have tribal
implications because it will not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
approves the negative declaration for
existing CISWI units from the MDE and
does not alter the relationship or the
distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act. This action also is not subject
to Executive Order 13045 ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant.
E:\FR\FM\02APR1.SGM
02APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 63 / Monday, April 2, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
With regard to negative declarations
for designated facilities received by EPA
from states, EPA’s role is to notify the
public of the receipt of such negative
declarations and revise 40 CFR part 62
accordingly. In this context, in the
absence of a prior existing requirement
for the State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to approve or disapprove a CAA section
111(d)/129 plan negative declaration
submission for failure to use VCS. It
would thus be inconsistent with
applicable law for EPA, when it reviews
a CAA section 111(d)/129 negative
declaration, to use VCS in place of a
section 111(d)/129 negative declaration
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This action does
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
B. Submission to Congress and the
Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:23 Mar 30, 2018
Jkt 244001
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by June 1, 2018. Filing a petition
for reconsideration by the Administrator
of this final rule does not affect the
finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the
time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action approving the
negative declaration for existing CISWI
units within the State of Maryland may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waste treatment and
disposal.
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
13879
Dated: March 22, 2018.
Cecil Rodrigues,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR part 62 is amended as follows:
PART 62—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF STATE PLANS
FOR DESIGNATED FACILITIES AND
POLLUTANTS
1. The authority citation for part 62
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart V—Maryland
■
2. Revise § 62.5127 to read as follows:
§ 62.5127 Identification of plan—negative
declaration.
(a) May 12, 2005 Maryland
Department of the Environment letter
certifying that existing CISWI units,
subject to 40 CFR part 60, subpart
DDDD, have been permanently shut
down and have been dismantled in the
state.
(b) Letter from the State of Maryland,
Department of the Environment,
submitted January 20, 2017, certifying
that there are no existing commercial/
industrial solid waste incineration units
within the State of Maryland that are
subject to 40 CFR part 60, subpart
DDDD.
[FR Doc. 2018–06653 Filed 3–30–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\02APR1.SGM
02APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 63 (Monday, April 2, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 13878-13879]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-06653]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 62
[EPA-R03-OAR-2017-0570; FRL-9976-31--Region 3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
State of Maryland; Control of Emissions From Existing Commercial and
Industrial Solid Waste Incinerator Units
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve a negative declaration for existing commercial and
industrial solid waste incineration (CISWI) units within the State of
Maryland. This negative declaration certifies that CISWI units subject
to the requirements of sections 111(d) and 129 of the Clean Air Act
(CAA) do not exist within the jurisdictional boundaries of the State of
Maryland. EPA is accepting the negative declaration in accordance with
the requirements of the CAA.
DATES: This rule is effective on May 2, 2018.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R03-OAR-2017-0570. All documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, e.g., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available through
https://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in
the For Further Information Contact section for additional availability
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Gordon, (215) 814-2039, or by
email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Sections 111(d) and 129 of the CAA require states to submit plans
to control certain pollutants (designated pollutants) at existing solid
waste combustor facilities (designated facilities) whenever standards
of performance have been established under section 111(b) for new
sources of the same type, and EPA has established emission guidelines
(EG) for such existing sources. CAA section 129 directs EPA to
establish standards of performance for new sources and emissions
guidelines for existing sources for each category of solid waste
incineration unit. CAA section 129(a) and (b). According to section
129(a)(4) of the CAA, EPA also must specify numerical emissions
limitations for particulate matter (total and fine), opacity (as
appropriate), sulfur dioxide, hydrogen chloride, oxides of nitrogen,
carbon monoxide, lead, cadmium, mercury, and dioxins and dibenzofurans.
If a state fails to submit a satisfactory plan, the CAA provides
EPA the authority to prescribe a plan for regulating the designated
pollutants at the designated facilities. EPA prescribed plan, also
known as a federal plan, is often delegated to states with designated
facilities but no EPA approved state-specific plan. If no such
designated facilities exist within a state's jurisdiction, a state may
submit to the EPA a letter of certification to that effect (referred to
as a negative declaration) in lieu of a state plan to satisfy the
state's obligation. 40 CFR 60.23(b) and 62.06. A negative declaration
exempts the state from the requirement to submit a CAA section 111(d)/
section 129 plan for that designated pollutant and source category. 40
CFR 60.23(b).
II. State Submittal and EPA Analysis
The Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) has determined
that there are no existing CISWI units subject to the requirements of
sections 111(d) and 129 of the CAA in its respective air pollution
control jurisdiction. Accordingly, MDE submitted a negative declaration
letter to EPA certifying this fact on January 20, 2017. A notice of
proposed rulemaking was published in the Federal Register on February
1, 2018 (83 FR 4621). EPA received three comments during the public
comment that were not specific nor related to this action and thus are
not addressed here. The negative declaration letter and EPA's notice of
proposed rulemaking are available in the docket for this rulemaking and
online at www.regulations.gov.
III. Final Action
In this final action, EPA is approving the negative declaration for
CISWI units submitted by MDE on January 20, 2017 and amending part 62
to reflect receipt of the negative declaration and subsequent approval
by EPA. EPA is accepting the negative declaration in accordance with
the requirements of the CAA and 40 CFR 60.23(b) and 62.06.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely notifies the public of EPA receipt of a negative declaration
from an air pollution control agency without any existing CISWI units
in their jurisdiction. This action imposes no requirements.
Accordingly, EPA certifies that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this action
does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). This action also does not
have tribal implications because it will not have a substantial direct
effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
This action also does not have Federalism implications because it does
not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government,
as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999).
This action merely approves the negative declaration for existing CISWI
units from the MDE and does not alter the relationship or the
distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air
Act. This action also is not subject to Executive Order 13045
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically
significant.
[[Page 13879]]
With regard to negative declarations for designated facilities
received by EPA from states, EPA's role is to notify the public of the
receipt of such negative declarations and revise 40 CFR part 62
accordingly. In this context, in the absence of a prior existing
requirement for the State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS),
EPA has no authority to approve or disapprove a CAA section 111(d)/129
plan negative declaration submission for failure to use VCS. It would
thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a CAA
section 111(d)/129 negative declaration, to use VCS in place of a
section 111(d)/129 negative declaration that otherwise satisfies the
provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements of section
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This action does not impose an
information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by June 1, 2018. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action approving the negative declaration for existing
CISWI units within the State of Maryland may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Waste treatment and disposal.
Dated: March 22, 2018.
Cecil Rodrigues,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR part 62 is amended as follows:
PART 62--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF STATE PLANS FOR DESIGNATED
FACILITIES AND POLLUTANTS
0
1. The authority citation for part 62 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart V--Maryland
0
2. Revise Sec. 62.5127 to read as follows:
Sec. 62.5127 Identification of plan--negative declaration.
(a) May 12, 2005 Maryland Department of the Environment letter
certifying that existing CISWI units, subject to 40 CFR part 60,
subpart DDDD, have been permanently shut down and have been dismantled
in the state.
(b) Letter from the State of Maryland, Department of the
Environment, submitted January 20, 2017, certifying that there are no
existing commercial/industrial solid waste incineration units within
the State of Maryland that are subject to 40 CFR part 60, subpart DDDD.
[FR Doc. 2018-06653 Filed 3-30-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P