Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, San Diego County Air Pollution Control District, 13869-13871 [2018-06559]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 63 / Monday, April 2, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by June 1, 2018.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
§ 52.220
Identification of plan-in part.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(342) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(2) Previously approved on October
31, 2006 in paragraph (c)(342)(i)(A)(1) of
this section and now deleted with
replacement in paragraph
(c)(497)(i)(D)(1) of this section, Rule
2.21 amended on September 14, 2005.
*
*
*
*
*
(497) * * *
(i) * * *
(D) Yolo-Solano Air Quality
Management District.
(1) Rule 2.21, ‘‘Organic Liquid Storage
and Transfer,’’ revised on September 14,
2016.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2018–06558 Filed 3–30–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2017–0140; FRL–9975–
66—Region 9]
Dated: March 2, 2018.
Alexis Strauss,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
Approval of California Air Plan
Revisions, San Diego County Air
Pollution Control District
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve revisions to the San Diego
County Air Pollution Control District
(SDCAPCD) portion of the California
State Implementation Plan (SIP). These
revisions concern volatile organic
compound (VOC) emissions from
polyester resin operations. We are
approving a local rule to regulate these
emission sources, as well as a rule
SUMMARY:
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(342)(i)(A)(2) and
(c)(497)(i)(D) to read as follows:
■
13869
rescission, under the Clean Air Act
(CAA or ‘‘the Act’’).
This rule will be effective on
May 2, 2018.
DATES:
The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R09–OAR–2017–0140. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov website.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, (415)
972–3024, lazarus.arnold@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On December 20, 2017, the EPA
proposed to approve the following rule
and rule rescission into the California
SIP (82 FR 60348).
Table 1 lists the rules addressed by
this action with the date that they were
adopted and repealed by the local air
agency, and submitted by the California
Air Resources Board (CARB).
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULES
Local agency
Rule No.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
SDCAPCD .....................
SDCAPCD .....................
67.12
67.12.1
Polyester Resin Operations .................................
Polyester Resin Operations .................................
We proposed to approve this rule and
rule rescission because we determined
that they comply with the relevant CAA
requirements. Our proposed action
contains more information on the rule
and rule rescission, and our evaluation.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:03 Mar 30, 2018
Jkt 244001
Adopted/
amended
Rule title
II. Public Comments
The EPA’s proposed action provided
a 30-day public comment period. During
this period, we received seven
comments. Commenters generally raised
issues that are outside the scope of this
rulemaking, including bird and bat
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
5/15/1996
5/11/2016
Repealed/
rescinded
5/11/2016
........................
Submitted
8/22/2016
8/22/2016
deaths associated with wind and solar
facilities, the regulation of wildfire risks
and emissions from wildfires, and the
study of hydraulic fracturing and
drinking water. One commenter
supported the regulation of emissions
from polyester resin operations, and one
E:\FR\FM\02APR1.SGM
02APR1
13870
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 63 / Monday, April 2, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
commenter wrote that ‘‘I do not want to
repeal the regulations of air pollution.’’
The EPA notes that it proposed to
approve the rescission of SDCAPCD
Rule 67.12, while simultaneously
proposing to approve its replacement:
Rule 67.12.1. The EPA’s Technical
Support Document, included in the
docket for this action, contains the
EPA’s evaluation, including a SIP
relaxation analysis, detailing the EPA’s
proposed conclusion that the rescission
of Rule 67.12 and its replacement with
Rule 67.12.1 met the requirements of the
Act.
The EPA is required to approve a state
submittal if the submittal meets all
applicable requirements. 42 U.S.C.
7410(k)(3). The submitted comments
either fail to identify any specific issue
that is germane to our action, or they do
not change our assessment of the
SDCAPCD Polyester Resin Operations
Rule as described in our proposed
action and supporting documents.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that
change our assessment of the rule and
rule rescission as described in our
proposed action. Therefore, as
authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the
Act, the EPA is fully approving this rule
and rule rescission into the California
SIP.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the
incorporation by reference of the
SDCAPCD rule and rule rescission,
described in the amendments to 40 CFR
part 52 set forth below. The EPA has
made, and will continue to make, these
documents available through
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region IX Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, the EPA’s role is to
approve state choices, provided that
they meet the criteria of the Clean Air
Act. Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:23 Mar 30, 2018
Jkt 244001
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by June 1, 2018.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: March 6, 2018.
Alexis Strauss,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(241)(i)(A)(7) and
(c)(488)(i)(A)(2) to read as follows:
■
§ 52.220
Identification of plan-in part.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(241) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(7) Previously approved on March 27,
1997 in paragraph (c)(241)(i)(A)(1) of
this section and now deleted with
replacement by Rule 67.12.1 in
E:\FR\FM\02APR1.SGM
02APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 63 / Monday, April 2, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
paragraph (c)(488)(i)(A)(2) of this
section, Rule 67.12, ‘‘Polyester Resin
Operations,’’ adopted on May 15, 1996.
*
*
*
*
*
(488) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(2) Rule 67.12.1, ‘‘Polyester Resin
Operations,’’ adopted and effective on
May 11, 2016.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2018–06559 Filed 3–30–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2017–0737; FRL–9976–
08—Region 9]
Approval of California Air Plan
Revisions, Northern Sierra Air Quality
Management District
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Final rule.
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve a revision to the Northern
Sierra Air Quality Management District
(NSAQMD) portion of the California
State Implementation Plan (SIP). This
revision concerns emissions of
particulate matter (PM) from wood
burning devices. We are approving a
local measure to reduce emissions from
these emission sources under the Clean
Air Act (CAA or the Act).
DATES: This rule will be effective on
May 2, 2018.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R09–OAR–2017–0737. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov website.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
SUMMARY:
is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rynda Kay, EPA Region IX, (415) 947–
4118, kay.rynda@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On December 27, 2017 (82 FR 61203),
the EPA proposed to approve the
following measure into the California
SIP.
Local agency
Resolution No.
Measure title
NSAQMD ..........
2017–01 ...........
Northern Sierra Air Quality Management District Resolution #2017–01 ..
We proposed to approve this rule
based on a determination that it satisfies
the applicable CAA requirements. Our
proposed action contains more
information on the measure and our
evaluation.
II. Public Comments
The EPA’s proposed action provided
a 30-day public comment period. During
this period, we received three public
comments that fail to identify any
specific issue that is germane to our
action on the rule. Two of these
comments identify issues that are
outside of the scope of this rulemaking,
including forest management, wildfire
suppression, and greenhouse-gas and
other emissions from wildfires. The
third comment fails to identify any
specific issue. The comment letters are
available in the docket for this
rulemaking.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that
change our assessment of the rule as
described in our proposed action.
Therefore, the EPA is fully approving
this rule into the California SIP in
accordance with section 110(k)(3) of the
Act.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:23 Mar 30, 2018
Jkt 244001
Adopted
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the
incorporation by reference of the
NSAQMD measure described in the
amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. The EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these documents
available through www.regulations.gov
and at the EPA Region IX Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, the EPA’s role is to
approve state choices, provided that
they meet the criteria of the Clean Air
Act. Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
13871
01/23/17
Submitted
02/28/17
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
E:\FR\FM\02APR1.SGM
02APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 63 (Monday, April 2, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 13869-13871]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-06559]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2017-0140; FRL-9975-66--Region 9]
Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, San Diego County Air
Pollution Control District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve revisions to the San Diego County Air Pollution
Control District (SDCAPCD) portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern volatile organic
compound (VOC) emissions from polyester resin operations. We are
approving a local rule to regulate these emission sources, as well as a
rule rescission, under the Clean Air Act (CAA or ``the Act'').
DATES: This rule will be effective on May 2, 2018.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2017-0140. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section for additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, (415)
972-3024, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On December 20, 2017, the EPA proposed to approve the following
rule and rule rescission into the California SIP (82 FR 60348).
Table 1 lists the rules addressed by this action with the date that
they were adopted and repealed by the local air agency, and submitted
by the California Air Resources Board (CARB).
Table 1--Submitted Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adopted/ Repealed/
Local agency Rule No. Rule title amended rescinded Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SDCAPCD....................... 67.12 Polyester Resin 5/15/1996 5/11/2016 8/22/2016
Operations.
SDCAPCD....................... 67.12.1 Polyester Resin 5/11/2016 .............. 8/22/2016
Operations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We proposed to approve this rule and rule rescission because we
determined that they comply with the relevant CAA requirements. Our
proposed action contains more information on the rule and rule
rescission, and our evaluation.
II. Public Comments
The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received seven comments. Commenters generally
raised issues that are outside the scope of this rulemaking, including
bird and bat deaths associated with wind and solar facilities, the
regulation of wildfire risks and emissions from wildfires, and the
study of hydraulic fracturing and drinking water. One commenter
supported the regulation of emissions from polyester resin operations,
and one
[[Page 13870]]
commenter wrote that ``I do not want to repeal the regulations of air
pollution.'' The EPA notes that it proposed to approve the rescission
of SDCAPCD Rule 67.12, while simultaneously proposing to approve its
replacement: Rule 67.12.1. The EPA's Technical Support Document,
included in the docket for this action, contains the EPA's evaluation,
including a SIP relaxation analysis, detailing the EPA's proposed
conclusion that the rescission of Rule 67.12 and its replacement with
Rule 67.12.1 met the requirements of the Act.
The EPA is required to approve a state submittal if the submittal
meets all applicable requirements. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k)(3). The submitted
comments either fail to identify any specific issue that is germane to
our action, or they do not change our assessment of the SDCAPCD
Polyester Resin Operations Rule as described in our proposed action and
supporting documents.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that change our assessment of the rule
and rule rescission as described in our proposed action. Therefore, as
authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully approving
this rule and rule rescission into the California SIP.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the
SDCAPCD rule and rule rescission, described in the amendments to 40 CFR
part 52 set forth below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make,
these documents available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region IX Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more
information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by June 1, 2018. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: March 6, 2018.
Alexis Strauss,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F--California
0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(241)(i)(A)(7) and
(c)(488)(i)(A)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan-in part.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(241) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(7) Previously approved on March 27, 1997 in paragraph
(c)(241)(i)(A)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement by
Rule 67.12.1 in
[[Page 13871]]
paragraph (c)(488)(i)(A)(2) of this section, Rule 67.12, ``Polyester
Resin Operations,'' adopted on May 15, 1996.
* * * * *
(488) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(2) Rule 67.12.1, ``Polyester Resin Operations,'' adopted and
effective on May 11, 2016.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2018-06559 Filed 3-30-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P