Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District, 13867-13869 [2018-06558]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 63 / Monday, April 2, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
schedule that governs the Tower
Drawbridge across the Sacramento
River, mile 59.0 at Sacramento, CA. The
deviation is necessary to allow the local
community to participate in the
Sactown Run 10-mile and 5K races. This
deviation allows the bridge to remain in
the closed-to-navigation position during
the deviation period.
This deviation is effective from
5 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. on April 8, 2018.
DATES:
The docket for this
deviation, USCG–2018–0122, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov.
Type the docket number in the
‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’
Click on Open Docket Folder on the line
associated with this deviation.
Dated: March 19, 2018.
Carl T. Hausner,
District Bridge Chief, Eleventh Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 2018–06536 Filed 3–30–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
ADDRESSES:
If
you have questions on this temporary
deviation, call or email Carl T. Hausner,
Chief, Bridge Section, Eleventh Coast
Guard District; telephone 510–437–
3516, email Carl.T.Hausner@uscg.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The
California Department of Transportation
has requested a temporary change to the
operation of the Tower Drawbridge,
mile 59.0, over the Sacramento River, at
Sacramento, CA. The drawbridge
navigation span provides a vertical
clearance of 30 feet above Mean High
Water in the closed-to-navigation
position. The draw operates as required
by 33 CFR 117.189(a). Navigation on the
waterway is commercial and
recreational.
The drawspan will be secured in the
closed-to-navigation position 5 a.m. to
11:30 a.m. on April 8, 2018, to allow the
community to participate in the
Sactown Run 10 mile and 5K races. This
temporary deviation has been
coordinated with the waterway users.
No objections to the proposed
temporary deviation were raised.
Vessels able to pass through the
bridge in the closed position may do so
at any time. The bridge will be able to
open for emergencies and there is no
immediate alternate route for vessels to
pass. The Coast Guard will also inform
the users of the waterway through our
Local and Broadcast Notices to Mariners
of the change in operating schedule for
the bridge so that vessel operators can
arrange their transits to minimize any
impact caused by the temporary
deviation.
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e),
the drawbridge must return to its regular
operating schedule immediately at the
end of the effective period of this
temporary deviation. This deviation
from the operating regulations is
authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:23 Mar 30, 2018
Jkt 244001
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2018–0200]
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Willamette River, Portland, OR
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of deviation from
drawbridge regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard has issued a
temporary deviation from the operating
schedule that governs the lower deck of
the Steel Bridge across the Willamette
River, mile 12.1, in Portland, OR. The
deviation is necessary to support the
Bridge to Brews run event. This
deviation allows the upper lift span of
the bridge to remain in the closed-tonavigation position to ensure the safety
of event participants.
DATES: This deviation is effective from
8:30 a.m. to 10:45 a.m. on April 15,
2018.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this
deviation, USCG–2018–0200, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov.
Type the docket number in the
‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’
Click on Open Docket Folder on the line
associated with this deviation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
deviation, call or email Mr. Steven
Fischer, Bridge Administrator,
Thirteenth Coast Guard District;
telephone 206–220–7282, email d13-pfd13bridges@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Union
Pacific Railroad Company (UPRR) owns
and operates the Steel Bridge across the
Willamette River, at mile 12.1, in
Portland, OR. UPRR has requested a
temporary deviation from the operating
schedule for the Steel Bridge upper lift
span. The deviation is necessary to
accommodate the annual Bridge to
Brews run event. The Steel Bridge is a
double-deck lift bridge, and the lower
lift span operates independent of the
upper lift span. To facilitate this
temporary deviation request, the upper
lift span is authorized to remain in the
closed-to-navigation position, and need
not open to marine vessels from 8:30
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
13867
a.m. to 10:45 a.m. on April 15, 2018.
When the lower span is in the closedto-navigation position, the bridge
provides 26 feet of vertical clearance
above Columbia River Datum 0.0. When
the upper span is in the closed-tonavigation position, and the lower span
is in the open-to-navigation position,
the vertical clearance is 71 feet above
Columbia River Datum 0.0. The lower
lift span of the Steel Bridge operates in
accordance with 33 CFR 117.5.
Waterway usage on this part of the
Willamette River includes vessels
ranging from commercial tug and barge
to small pleasure craft. Vessels able to
pass through the subject bridge with the
lower deck in the closed-to-navigation
position, or in the open-to-navigation
position may do so at any time. The
lower and upper lift of the Steel Bridge
will be able to open for emergencies,
and there is no immediate alternate
route for vessels to pass. The Coast
Guard requested objections to this
deviation be submitted to the Local
Notice to Mariners. We have not
received any objections to this
temporary deviation from the operating
schedule. The Coast Guard will also
inform the users of the waterway
through our Local and Broadcast
Notices to Mariners of the change in
operating schedule for the subject bridge
so that vessel operators can arrange their
transits to minimize any impact caused
by the temporary deviation.
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e),
the drawbridge must return to its regular
operating schedule immediately at the
end of the designated time period. This
deviation from the operating regulations
is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.
Dated: March 13, 2018.
Steven M. Fischer,
Bridge Administrator, Thirteenth Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 2018–06534 Filed 3–30–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2017–0680; FRL–9975–
65—Region 9]
Approval of California Air Plan
Revisions, Yolo-Solano Air Quality
Management District
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02APR1.SGM
02APR1
13868
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 63 / Monday, April 2, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
approve a revision to the Yolo-Solano
Air Quality Management District
(YSAQMD) portion of the California
State Implementation Plan (SIP). This
revision concerns emissions of volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) from
organic liquid storage and transfer
operations. We are approving a local
rule that regulates these emission
sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA
or the Act).
DATES: This rule will be effective on
May 2, 2018.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R09–OAR–2017–0680. All
documents in the docket are listed on
Local agency
Rule #
YSAQMD ................................
2.21
II. Public Comments
The EPA’s proposed action provided
a 30-day public comment period. During
this period, we received one public
comment that fails to identify any
specific issue that is germane to our
action on the rule. The comment letter
is available in the docket for this
rulemaking.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that
change our assessment of the rule as
described in our proposed action.
Therefore, as authorized in section
110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully
approving this rule into the California
SIP.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the
incorporation by reference of the
YSAQMD rule described in the
amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. The EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these documents
available through www.regulations.gov
and at the EPA Region IX Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble for more information).
16:23 Mar 30, 2018
Jkt 244001
(415) 972–3004, newhouse.rebecca@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On January 9, 2018 (83 FR 1001), the
EPA proposed to approve the following
rule into the California SIP.
Rule Title
We proposed to approve this rule
based on a determination that it satisfies
the applicable CAA requirements. Our
proposed action contains more
information on the rule and our
evaluation.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
the https://www.regulations.gov website.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rebecca Newhouse, EPA Region IX,
Revised
Organic Liquid Storage and Transfer .....................................
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, the EPA’s role is to
approve state choices, provided that
they meet the criteria of the Clean Air
Act. Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Public Law 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
09/14/16
Submitted
01/24/17
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
E:\FR\FM\02APR1.SGM
02APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 63 / Monday, April 2, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by June 1, 2018.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
§ 52.220
Identification of plan-in part.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(342) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(2) Previously approved on October
31, 2006 in paragraph (c)(342)(i)(A)(1) of
this section and now deleted with
replacement in paragraph
(c)(497)(i)(D)(1) of this section, Rule
2.21 amended on September 14, 2005.
*
*
*
*
*
(497) * * *
(i) * * *
(D) Yolo-Solano Air Quality
Management District.
(1) Rule 2.21, ‘‘Organic Liquid Storage
and Transfer,’’ revised on September 14,
2016.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2018–06558 Filed 3–30–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2017–0140; FRL–9975–
66—Region 9]
Dated: March 2, 2018.
Alexis Strauss,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
Approval of California Air Plan
Revisions, San Diego County Air
Pollution Control District
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve revisions to the San Diego
County Air Pollution Control District
(SDCAPCD) portion of the California
State Implementation Plan (SIP). These
revisions concern volatile organic
compound (VOC) emissions from
polyester resin operations. We are
approving a local rule to regulate these
emission sources, as well as a rule
SUMMARY:
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(342)(i)(A)(2) and
(c)(497)(i)(D) to read as follows:
■
13869
rescission, under the Clean Air Act
(CAA or ‘‘the Act’’).
This rule will be effective on
May 2, 2018.
DATES:
The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R09–OAR–2017–0140. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov website.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, (415)
972–3024, lazarus.arnold@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On December 20, 2017, the EPA
proposed to approve the following rule
and rule rescission into the California
SIP (82 FR 60348).
Table 1 lists the rules addressed by
this action with the date that they were
adopted and repealed by the local air
agency, and submitted by the California
Air Resources Board (CARB).
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULES
Local agency
Rule No.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
SDCAPCD .....................
SDCAPCD .....................
67.12
67.12.1
Polyester Resin Operations .................................
Polyester Resin Operations .................................
We proposed to approve this rule and
rule rescission because we determined
that they comply with the relevant CAA
requirements. Our proposed action
contains more information on the rule
and rule rescission, and our evaluation.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:03 Mar 30, 2018
Jkt 244001
Adopted/
amended
Rule title
II. Public Comments
The EPA’s proposed action provided
a 30-day public comment period. During
this period, we received seven
comments. Commenters generally raised
issues that are outside the scope of this
rulemaking, including bird and bat
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
5/15/1996
5/11/2016
Repealed/
rescinded
5/11/2016
........................
Submitted
8/22/2016
8/22/2016
deaths associated with wind and solar
facilities, the regulation of wildfire risks
and emissions from wildfires, and the
study of hydraulic fracturing and
drinking water. One commenter
supported the regulation of emissions
from polyester resin operations, and one
E:\FR\FM\02APR1.SGM
02APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 63 (Monday, April 2, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 13867-13869]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-06558]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2017-0680; FRL-9975-65--Region 9]
Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Yolo-Solano Air
Quality Management District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to
[[Page 13868]]
approve a revision to the Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District
(YSAQMD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP).
This revision concerns emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
from organic liquid storage and transfer operations. We are approving a
local rule that regulates these emission sources under the Clean Air
Act (CAA or the Act).
DATES: This rule will be effective on May 2, 2018.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2017-0680. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca Newhouse, EPA Region IX, (415)
972-3004, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On January 9, 2018 (83 FR 1001), the EPA proposed to approve the
following rule into the California SIP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local agency Rule # Rule Title Revised Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YSAQMD................................ 2.21 Organic Liquid Storage 09/14/16 01/24/17
and Transfer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We proposed to approve this rule based on a determination that it
satisfies the applicable CAA requirements. Our proposed action contains
more information on the rule and our evaluation.
II. Public Comments
The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received one public comment that fails to
identify any specific issue that is germane to our action on the rule.
The comment letter is available in the docket for this rulemaking.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that change our assessment of the rule
as described in our proposed action. Therefore, as authorized in
section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully approving this rule into
the California SIP.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the
YSAQMD rule described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents
available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region IX Office
(please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
[[Page 13869]]
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by June 1, 2018. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: March 2, 2018.
Alexis Strauss,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F--California
0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(342)(i)(A)(2) and
(c)(497)(i)(D) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan-in part.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(342) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(2) Previously approved on October 31, 2006 in paragraph
(c)(342)(i)(A)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in
paragraph (c)(497)(i)(D)(1) of this section, Rule 2.21 amended on
September 14, 2005.
* * * * *
(497) * * *
(i) * * *
(D) Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District.
(1) Rule 2.21, ``Organic Liquid Storage and Transfer,'' revised on
September 14, 2016.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2018-06558 Filed 3-30-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P