Tuna Conventions Act; Advance Notice of Rulemaking; Regulatory Amendments to Procedures for the Active and Inactive Vessel Register, 13466-13468 [2018-06373]

Download as PDF rmajette on DSKBCKNHB2PROD with PROPOSALS 13466 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 61 / Thursday, March 29, 2018 / Proposed Rules testing, and integration of automated technologies for surface modes (i.e., highway and rail) on both the HMR and the general transport of hazardous materials. Specifically, PHMSA asks: 1. What are the safety, regulatory, and policy implications of the design, testing, and integration of surface automated vehicles on the requirements in the HMR? Please include any potential solutions PHMSA should consider. 2. What are potential regulatory incompatibilities between the HMR and a future surface transportation system that incorporates automated vehicles? Specific HMR areas could include but are not limited to: (a) Emergency response information and hazard communication (b) Packaging and handling requirements, including pretransportation functions (c) Incident response and reporting (d) Safety and security plans (e.g., en route security) (e) Modal requirements (e.g., highway and rail) 3. Are there specific HMR requirements that would need modifications to become performancebased standards that can accommodate an automated vehicle operating in a surface transportation system? 4. What automated surface transportation technologies are under development that are expected to be relevant to the safe transport of hazardous materials, and how might they be used in a surface transportation system? 5. Under what circumstances do freight operators envision the transportation of hazardous materials in commerce using surface automated vehicles within the next 10 years? (a) To what extent do the HMR restrict the use of surface automated vehicles in the transportation of hazardous materials in non-bulk packaging in parcel delivery and less-thantruckload freight shipments by commercial motor vehicles? (b) To what extent do the HMR restrict the use of surface automated vehicles in the transportation of hazardous materials in bulk packaging by rail and commercial motor vehicles? 6. What issues do automated technologies raise in hazardous materials surface transportation that are not present for human drivers or operators that PHMSA should address? 7. How might potential changes to the HMR for integration of surface automated vehicle technologies impact current requirements for human drivers or operators (i.e., training)? VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:13 Mar 28, 2018 Jkt 244001 8. Do HMR requirements that relate to the operation of surface automated vehicles carrying hazardous materials present different challenges than those that relate to ancillary tasks, such as inspections and packaging requirements? 9. How will the behavioral responses of road and railway users change with the integration of surface automated vehicle technologies? What will the reaction be to automated vehicles or rail cars with markings denoting the presence of hazardous materials? 10. What solutions could PHMSA consider to address potential future regulatory incompatibilities between the HMR and surface automated vehicle technologies? 11. What should PHMSA consider when reviewing applications for special permits seeking regulatory flexibility to allow for the transport of hazardous materials using automated technologies for surface modes? 12. When considering long-term solutions to challenges the HMR may present to the development, testing, and integration of surface automated vehicles, what information and other factors should PHMSA consider? 13. What should PHMSA consider when developing future policy, guidance, and regulations for the safe transportation of hazardous materials in surface transportation systems? Signed in Washington, DC, on March 23, 2018. Drue Pearce, Deputy Administrator, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. [FR Doc. 2018–06290 Filed 3–28–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–60–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 50 CFR Part 300 [Docket No. 171227999–8273–01] RIN 0648–BH48 Tuna Conventions Act; Advance Notice of Rulemaking; Regulatory Amendments to Procedures for the Active and Inactive Vessel Register National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking; request for comment. AGENCY: The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) is considering SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 amending regulations governing the utilization of purse seine vessel capacity limits associated with the Regional Vessel Register of the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission. This advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR) is intended to provide notice to the public of our planning efforts and request comment that will assist in identifying revised administrative processes to improve the efficient utilization and management of capacity limits. This information will help inform our evaluation of what, if any, regulatory amendments are necessary and advisable. DATES: Comments must be submitted in writing by April 30, 2018. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this document, identified by NOAANMFS-2018-0030, by any of the following methods: • Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to www.regulations.gov/ #!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20180030, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon, complete the required fields, and enter or attach your comments. • Mail: Attn: Heidi Taylor, Highly Migratory Species Branch Chief, NMFS West Coast Region, 501 W Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA 90802. Include the identifier ‘‘NOAA–NMFS– 2018–0030’’ in the comments. Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period, may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in the required fields if you wish to remain anonymous). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel Studt, NMFS West Coast Region, 562–980–4073. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background on the IATTC The United States is a member of the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC), which was established under the 1949 Convention for the Establishment of an InterAmerican Tropical Tuna Commission. In 2003, the IATTC adopted the Convention for the Strengthening of the IATTC Established by the 1949 E:\FR\FM\29MRP1.SGM 29MRP1 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 61 / Thursday, March 29, 2018 / Proposed Rules rmajette on DSKBCKNHB2PROD with PROPOSALS Convention between the United States of America and the Republic of Costa Rica (Antigua Convention). The Antigua Convention entered into force in 2010. The United States acceded to the Antigua Convention on February 24, 2016. The full text of the Antigua Convention is available at: https:// www.iattc.org/PDFFiles2/Antigua_ Convention_Jun_2003.pdf. The IATTC consists of 21 Members and five Cooperating Non-Members and facilitates the conservation and management of highly migratory species of fish in the IATTC Convention Area (Convention Area), as well as conducting scientific research on these species. The Convention Area is defined as the waters of the eastern Pacific Ocean (EPO) within the area bounded by the west coast of the Americas, the 50° N latitude, the 150° W longitude, and the 50° S latitude. Obligations of the United States Under the IATTC Convention As a Party to the Antigua Convention and a member of the IATTC, the United States is legally bound to implement certain decisions of the IATTC. The Tuna Conventions Act (16 U.S.C. 951 et seq.), as amended on November 5, 2015, by Title II of Public Law 114–81, directs that the Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the Secretary of State and, with respect to enforcement measures, the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, may promulgate such regulations as may be necessary to carry out the United States’ international obligations under the Antigua Convention, including recommendations and decisions adopted by the IATTC. The Secretary of Commerce’s authority to promulgate such regulations has been delegated to NMFS. In June 2000, the IATTC adopted Resolution C–00–06: Resolution on a Regional Vessel Register. This Resolution has been amended, including most recently through adoption of Resolution C–14–01, which requires that Members submit a list of all vessels authorized to fish in the EPO to be listed on a Regional Vessel Register (Register). Purse seine vessels are further categorized on the Register as either ‘‘active’’ or ‘‘inactive and sunk’’ (inactive). Recognizing concerns of excess fishing capacity, the IATTC in 2002 adopted Resolution C–02–03: Resolution on the Capacity of the Tuna Fleet Operating in the Eastern Pacific Ocean (Revised). The Resolution established a vessel capacity limit of 158,000 cubic meters for all purse seine vessels authorized by the IATTC to fish for tuna species in the EPO. The VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:13 Mar 28, 2018 Jkt 244001 Resolution further specified that each Member and Cooperating Non-Member was allocated a purse seine vessel capacity limit by the IATTC based on historical fishing levels in the EPO, the level of tuna stocks, and other relevant factors. Pursuant to C–02–03, the United States was allocated a purse seine capacity limit of 31,866 cubic meters (m3). Each U.S. purse seine vessel listed on the Register, either as active or inactive, counts towards this U.S. capacity limit, except those utilizing a single-trip option exemption as described at 50 CFR 300.22(b)(1). Background on the Pacific Purse Seine Fleet Since 1971, the number of large (greater than 400 short tons (st) or 362.8 metric tons (mt) carrying capacity) U.S. purse seine vessels fishing for tuna in the EPO has decreased from over 155 to an average of 10 active and inactive large U.S purse seine vessels over the past five years, utilizing an average of roughly 18,209 m3 of capacity. Most of the U.S. vessels that historically fished in the EPO have either re-flagged or are now active in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean (WCPO), fishing under the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission and a treaty between the United States and certain Pacific Island States (the Treaty on Fisheries between the Governments of Certain Pacific Island States and the Government of the United States of America, also known as the South Pacific Tuna Treaty (SPTT)). The number of vessels in the U.S. WCPO purse seine fishery has also gradually decreased; shrinking from the late 1990s until 2006, and it has fluctuated since. In recent years, the U.S. WCPO purse seine fleet has included an average of 37 vessels, with a maximum of 40 vessels allowed to fish under the SPTT. These 37 vessels amount to roughly 55,000 m3 of carrying capacity for reference. In the last few years, changing operating conditions in the WCPO and an increase in the costs assessed to U.S. purse seiners for fishing under the SPTT has led to an increased number of large purse seine vessels seeking to be added to the IATTC Register. In 2016, 17 of the 37 purse seiners authorized to fish in the WCPO also fished in the EPO, which means they either utilized capacity on the Active Register or fished under the single-trip option exemption. Additionally, since 2014, small (less than or equal to 400 st or 362.8 mt carrying capacity) coastal purse seiners have had increased opportunities for catching tuna locally, leading to a growing number of small purse seine vessels utilizing active capacity on the PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 13467 Register. Over the last 5 years, an average of 17 small U.S. purse seine vessels have utilized 1,945 m3 of capacity. This combination of interest by large and small purse seine vessel has led to the U.S. capacity on the Register to become fully allocated in recent years, such that no additional vessels could be added to the Register. The total capacity of requested vessels have exceeded the available capacity and NMFS anticipates this trend may continue. Thus, NMFS seeks to re-examine the administrative processes associated with the Register to ensure that capacity is being utilized to the full extent possible in the most effective way for both large and small purse seine vessels. U.S. Regulations on the Regional Vessel Register NMFS has implemented regulations governing U.S. purse seine vessels on the Register at 50 CFR 300.22(b). These regulations include the process for how vessel owners or managing owners request a purse seine vessel be added to the Register, including when and how to submit such a request; when and how to obtain the appropriate vessel and operator permits; pay the vessel assessment fee; and how vessels permitted and authorized under an alternative international tuna purse seine fisheries management regime in the Pacific Ocean may utilize a one-trip option into the EPO while being exempted from the requirement to be included on the Register. The regulations also address processes for removing a vessel from the Register and for replacing those vessels, and establishes criteria to deem requests for active status as ‘‘frivolous’’ for vessels that occupy U.S. capacity on the Register but do not actually fish in a given year. Furthermore, the regulations lay out the prioritization of requests following a specified hierarchy. Requests for active status are prioritized according to the hierarchy listed at 50 CFR 300.22(b)(4)(i)(C). In general, the requests are prioritized in the following order: Vessels that were listed as active on the Register in the previous year, vessels that were listed as inactive on the Register in the previous year, vessels not listed on the Register in the previous year prioritized on a first-come, first-serve basis, and vessels which were previously listed on the Register as active in a given year but have been determined to have made a frivolous request. Requests for active status are considered ‘‘frivolous’’ if, for a vessel categorized as active in a given calendar year, less than 20 percent of the vessel’s E:\FR\FM\29MRP1.SGM 29MRP1 13468 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 61 / Thursday, March 29, 2018 / Proposed Rules rmajette on DSKBCKNHB2PROD with PROPOSALS total landings, by weight, in that same year is comprised of tuna harvested by purse seine in the Convention Area, or the vessel did not fish for tuna at all in the Convention Area in that same year. Some exceptions to this apply. The frivolous request provisions apply only to large purse seine vessels. These provisions are intended to prevent large purse seine vessel owners who do not have intent to fish in the Convention Area from requesting listing on the Register and occupying assigned capacity that may otherwise be utilized by active fishing vessels. Small purse seine vessels are not subject to the frivolous request provisions because owners of small vessels tend to have difficulty anticipating whether unassociated schools of tuna will migrate within the range of the vessels off the U.S. West Coast during the summer months in the upcoming year. Frivolous requests criteria may need to be reexamined to ensure full utilization of the U.S. capacity limit. Additionally, there is no time limit for how long a vessel may remain on the Register as inactive, provided the vessel owner or managing owner requests this status every year and pays the associated vessel assessment. Since 2015, a single large purse seine vessel has been on the Register as inactive, occupying 1,523 m3 of capacity that would otherwise be available for actively fishing vessels. NMFS seeks VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:13 Mar 28, 2018 Jkt 244001 input on whether to restrict the current practice that allows vessels to be continually listed as inactive, to improve the utilization of the U.S. purse seine capacity limit by vessels that will actually fish. Lastly, NMFS intends to issue a technical correction to existing U.S. regulations to correct the regulatory carrying capacity to match that on record with the IATTC. A vessel which historically fished in the EPO prior to 2002, and whose carrying capacity was used in the initial capacity calculations for allotment to the United States, had its blueprints re-examined by the IATTC and was found to have had an additional 91 m3 of carrying capacity than what was used in the initial calculation. The IATTC recognized that this re-examination increased the United States’ historical capacity, and revised their accounting of U.S. capacity to reflect this. NMFS would, therefore, correct the capacity of 31,775 m3 cited in our domestic regulations to reflect the IATTC’s updated accounting that the U.S. capacity allotment is 31,866 m3. For additional information on current regulations pertaining to the Register and procedures for purse seine vessels to be authorized to fish for tuna and tuna-like species in the EPO, please see the compliance guide located at https:// www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/ publications/fisheries/migratory_ species/iattc-rvr-compliance-guide.pdf PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 and the NMFS website https:// www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/ fisheries/migratory_species/regional_ vessel_register.html. Request for Comment NMFS is soliciting comments from the public to help determine what, if any, regulatory amendments could make management of U.S. tuna purse seine vessels on the IATTC Regional Vessel Register more effective. Comments may include suggestions to improve the procedure for making requests to add vessels to the Register, for the identification of ‘‘frivolous requests for active status’’ and management of such requests, or how the hierarchy of prioritization of requests should be structured to allow for capacity to be utilized to the full extent possible in the most effective way. NMFS will fully consider all relevant information and comments received, and if necessary, issue proposed regulatory amendments for further consideration. Authority: Tuna Conventions Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Dated: March 26, 2018. Alan D. Risenhoover, Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine Fisheries Service. [FR Doc. 2018–06373 Filed 3–28–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–22–P E:\FR\FM\29MRP1.SGM 29MRP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 61 (Thursday, March 29, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 13466-13468]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-06373]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 300

[Docket No. 171227999-8273-01]
RIN 0648-BH48


Tuna Conventions Act; Advance Notice of Rulemaking; Regulatory 
Amendments to Procedures for the Active and Inactive Vessel Register

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking; request for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) is considering 
amending regulations governing the utilization of purse seine vessel 
capacity limits associated with the Regional Vessel Register of the 
Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission. This advance notice of 
proposed rulemaking (ANPR) is intended to provide notice to the public 
of our planning efforts and request comment that will assist in 
identifying revised administrative processes to improve the efficient 
utilization and management of capacity limits. This information will 
help inform our evaluation of what, if any, regulatory amendments are 
necessary and advisable.

DATES: Comments must be submitted in writing by April 30, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this document, identified by 
NOAA-NMFS-2018-0030, by any of the following methods:
     Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public 
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to 
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2018-0030, click the 
``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or 
attach your comments.
     Mail: Attn: Heidi Taylor, Highly Migratory Species Branch 
Chief, NMFS West Coast Region, 501 W Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long 
Beach, CA 90802. Include the identifier ``NOAA-NMFS-2018-0030'' in the 
comments.
    Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other 
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period, 
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the 
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on 
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying 
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business 
information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily 
by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous 
comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain 
anonymous).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel Studt, NMFS West Coast Region, 
562-980-4073.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background on the IATTC

    The United States is a member of the Inter-American Tropical Tuna 
Commission (IATTC), which was established under the 1949 Convention for 
the Establishment of an Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission. In 
2003, the IATTC adopted the Convention for the Strengthening of the 
IATTC Established by the 1949

[[Page 13467]]

Convention between the United States of America and the Republic of 
Costa Rica (Antigua Convention). The Antigua Convention entered into 
force in 2010. The United States acceded to the Antigua Convention on 
February 24, 2016. The full text of the Antigua Convention is available 
at: https://www.iattc.org/PDFFiles2/Antigua_Convention_Jun_2003.pdf.
    The IATTC consists of 21 Members and five Cooperating Non-Members 
and facilitates the conservation and management of highly migratory 
species of fish in the IATTC Convention Area (Convention Area), as well 
as conducting scientific research on these species. The Convention Area 
is defined as the waters of the eastern Pacific Ocean (EPO) within the 
area bounded by the west coast of the Americas, the 50[deg] N latitude, 
the 150[deg] W longitude, and the 50[deg] S latitude.

Obligations of the United States Under the IATTC Convention

    As a Party to the Antigua Convention and a member of the IATTC, the 
United States is legally bound to implement certain decisions of the 
IATTC. The Tuna Conventions Act (16 U.S.C. 951 et seq.), as amended on 
November 5, 2015, by Title II of Public Law 114-81, directs that the 
Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the Secretary of State and, 
with respect to enforcement measures, the Secretary of the Department 
of Homeland Security, may promulgate such regulations as may be 
necessary to carry out the United States' international obligations 
under the Antigua Convention, including recommendations and decisions 
adopted by the IATTC. The Secretary of Commerce's authority to 
promulgate such regulations has been delegated to NMFS.
    In June 2000, the IATTC adopted Resolution C-00-06: Resolution on a 
Regional Vessel Register. This Resolution has been amended, including 
most recently through adoption of Resolution C-14-01, which requires 
that Members submit a list of all vessels authorized to fish in the EPO 
to be listed on a Regional Vessel Register (Register). Purse seine 
vessels are further categorized on the Register as either ``active'' or 
``inactive and sunk'' (inactive). Recognizing concerns of excess 
fishing capacity, the IATTC in 2002 adopted Resolution C-02-03: 
Resolution on the Capacity of the Tuna Fleet Operating in the Eastern 
Pacific Ocean (Revised). The Resolution established a vessel capacity 
limit of 158,000 cubic meters for all purse seine vessels authorized by 
the IATTC to fish for tuna species in the EPO. The Resolution further 
specified that each Member and Cooperating Non-Member was allocated a 
purse seine vessel capacity limit by the IATTC based on historical 
fishing levels in the EPO, the level of tuna stocks, and other relevant 
factors. Pursuant to C-02-03, the United States was allocated a purse 
seine capacity limit of 31,866 cubic meters (m\3\). Each U.S. purse 
seine vessel listed on the Register, either as active or inactive, 
counts towards this U.S. capacity limit, except those utilizing a 
single-trip option exemption as described at 50 CFR 300.22(b)(1).

Background on the Pacific Purse Seine Fleet

    Since 1971, the number of large (greater than 400 short tons (st) 
or 362.8 metric tons (mt) carrying capacity) U.S. purse seine vessels 
fishing for tuna in the EPO has decreased from over 155 to an average 
of 10 active and inactive large U.S purse seine vessels over the past 
five years, utilizing an average of roughly 18,209 m\3\ of capacity. 
Most of the U.S. vessels that historically fished in the EPO have 
either re-flagged or are now active in the Western and Central Pacific 
Ocean (WCPO), fishing under the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries 
Commission and a treaty between the United States and certain Pacific 
Island States (the Treaty on Fisheries between the Governments of 
Certain Pacific Island States and the Government of the United States 
of America, also known as the South Pacific Tuna Treaty (SPTT)). The 
number of vessels in the U.S. WCPO purse seine fishery has also 
gradually decreased; shrinking from the late 1990s until 2006, and it 
has fluctuated since. In recent years, the U.S. WCPO purse seine fleet 
has included an average of 37 vessels, with a maximum of 40 vessels 
allowed to fish under the SPTT. These 37 vessels amount to roughly 
55,000 m\3\ of carrying capacity for reference.
    In the last few years, changing operating conditions in the WCPO 
and an increase in the costs assessed to U.S. purse seiners for fishing 
under the SPTT has led to an increased number of large purse seine 
vessels seeking to be added to the IATTC Register. In 2016, 17 of the 
37 purse seiners authorized to fish in the WCPO also fished in the EPO, 
which means they either utilized capacity on the Active Register or 
fished under the single-trip option exemption. Additionally, since 
2014, small (less than or equal to 400 st or 362.8 mt carrying 
capacity) coastal purse seiners have had increased opportunities for 
catching tuna locally, leading to a growing number of small purse seine 
vessels utilizing active capacity on the Register. Over the last 5 
years, an average of 17 small U.S. purse seine vessels have utilized 
1,945 m\3\ of capacity.
    This combination of interest by large and small purse seine vessel 
has led to the U.S. capacity on the Register to become fully allocated 
in recent years, such that no additional vessels could be added to the 
Register. The total capacity of requested vessels have exceeded the 
available capacity and NMFS anticipates this trend may continue. Thus, 
NMFS seeks to re-examine the administrative processes associated with 
the Register to ensure that capacity is being utilized to the full 
extent possible in the most effective way for both large and small 
purse seine vessels.

U.S. Regulations on the Regional Vessel Register

    NMFS has implemented regulations governing U.S. purse seine vessels 
on the Register at 50 CFR 300.22(b). These regulations include the 
process for how vessel owners or managing owners request a purse seine 
vessel be added to the Register, including when and how to submit such 
a request; when and how to obtain the appropriate vessel and operator 
permits; pay the vessel assessment fee; and how vessels permitted and 
authorized under an alternative international tuna purse seine 
fisheries management regime in the Pacific Ocean may utilize a one-trip 
option into the EPO while being exempted from the requirement to be 
included on the Register. The regulations also address processes for 
removing a vessel from the Register and for replacing those vessels, 
and establishes criteria to deem requests for active status as 
``frivolous'' for vessels that occupy U.S. capacity on the Register but 
do not actually fish in a given year. Furthermore, the regulations lay 
out the prioritization of requests following a specified hierarchy.
    Requests for active status are prioritized according to the 
hierarchy listed at 50 CFR 300.22(b)(4)(i)(C). In general, the requests 
are prioritized in the following order: Vessels that were listed as 
active on the Register in the previous year, vessels that were listed 
as inactive on the Register in the previous year, vessels not listed on 
the Register in the previous year prioritized on a first-come, first-
serve basis, and vessels which were previously listed on the Register 
as active in a given year but have been determined to have made a 
frivolous request.
    Requests for active status are considered ``frivolous'' if, for a 
vessel categorized as active in a given calendar year, less than 20 
percent of the vessel's

[[Page 13468]]

total landings, by weight, in that same year is comprised of tuna 
harvested by purse seine in the Convention Area, or the vessel did not 
fish for tuna at all in the Convention Area in that same year. Some 
exceptions to this apply.
    The frivolous request provisions apply only to large purse seine 
vessels. These provisions are intended to prevent large purse seine 
vessel owners who do not have intent to fish in the Convention Area 
from requesting listing on the Register and occupying assigned capacity 
that may otherwise be utilized by active fishing vessels. Small purse 
seine vessels are not subject to the frivolous request provisions 
because owners of small vessels tend to have difficulty anticipating 
whether unassociated schools of tuna will migrate within the range of 
the vessels off the U.S. West Coast during the summer months in the 
upcoming year. Frivolous requests criteria may need to be reexamined to 
ensure full utilization of the U.S. capacity limit.
    Additionally, there is no time limit for how long a vessel may 
remain on the Register as inactive, provided the vessel owner or 
managing owner requests this status every year and pays the associated 
vessel assessment. Since 2015, a single large purse seine vessel has 
been on the Register as inactive, occupying 1,523 m\3\ of capacity that 
would otherwise be available for actively fishing vessels. NMFS seeks 
input on whether to restrict the current practice that allows vessels 
to be continually listed as inactive, to improve the utilization of the 
U.S. purse seine capacity limit by vessels that will actually fish.
    Lastly, NMFS intends to issue a technical correction to existing 
U.S. regulations to correct the regulatory carrying capacity to match 
that on record with the IATTC. A vessel which historically fished in 
the EPO prior to 2002, and whose carrying capacity was used in the 
initial capacity calculations for allotment to the United States, had 
its blueprints re-examined by the IATTC and was found to have had an 
additional 91 m\3\ of carrying capacity than what was used in the 
initial calculation. The IATTC recognized that this re-examination 
increased the United States' historical capacity, and revised their 
accounting of U.S. capacity to reflect this. NMFS would, therefore, 
correct the capacity of 31,775 m\3\ cited in our domestic regulations 
to reflect the IATTC's updated accounting that the U.S. capacity 
allotment is 31,866 m\3\.
    For additional information on current regulations pertaining to the 
Register and procedures for purse seine vessels to be authorized to 
fish for tuna and tuna-like species in the EPO, please see the 
compliance guide located at https://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/publications/fisheries/migratory_species/iattc-rvr-compliance-guide.pdf 
and the NMFS website https://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/fisheries/migratory_species/regional_vessel_register.html.

Request for Comment

    NMFS is soliciting comments from the public to help determine what, 
if any, regulatory amendments could make management of U.S. tuna purse 
seine vessels on the IATTC Regional Vessel Register more effective. 
Comments may include suggestions to improve the procedure for making 
requests to add vessels to the Register, for the identification of 
``frivolous requests for active status'' and management of such 
requests, or how the hierarchy of prioritization of requests should be 
structured to allow for capacity to be utilized to the full extent 
possible in the most effective way. NMFS will fully consider all 
relevant information and comments received, and if necessary, issue 
proposed regulatory amendments for further consideration.

    Authority: Tuna Conventions Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 
1531 et seq.).

    Dated: March 26, 2018.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-06373 Filed 3-28-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.