Tuna Conventions Act; Advance Notice of Rulemaking; Regulatory Amendments to Procedures for the Active and Inactive Vessel Register, 13466-13468 [2018-06373]
Download as PDF
rmajette on DSKBCKNHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
13466
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 61 / Thursday, March 29, 2018 / Proposed Rules
testing, and integration of automated
technologies for surface modes (i.e.,
highway and rail) on both the HMR and
the general transport of hazardous
materials.
Specifically, PHMSA asks:
1. What are the safety, regulatory, and
policy implications of the design,
testing, and integration of surface
automated vehicles on the requirements
in the HMR? Please include any
potential solutions PHMSA should
consider.
2. What are potential regulatory
incompatibilities between the HMR and
a future surface transportation system
that incorporates automated vehicles?
Specific HMR areas could include but
are not limited to:
(a) Emergency response information and
hazard communication
(b) Packaging and handling
requirements, including pretransportation functions
(c) Incident response and reporting
(d) Safety and security plans (e.g., en
route security)
(e) Modal requirements (e.g., highway
and rail)
3. Are there specific HMR
requirements that would need
modifications to become performancebased standards that can accommodate
an automated vehicle operating in a
surface transportation system?
4. What automated surface
transportation technologies are under
development that are expected to be
relevant to the safe transport of
hazardous materials, and how might
they be used in a surface transportation
system?
5. Under what circumstances do
freight operators envision the
transportation of hazardous materials in
commerce using surface automated
vehicles within the next 10 years?
(a) To what extent do the HMR restrict
the use of surface automated vehicles
in the transportation of hazardous
materials in non-bulk packaging in
parcel delivery and less-thantruckload freight shipments by
commercial motor vehicles?
(b) To what extent do the HMR restrict
the use of surface automated vehicles
in the transportation of hazardous
materials in bulk packaging by rail
and commercial motor vehicles?
6. What issues do automated
technologies raise in hazardous
materials surface transportation that are
not present for human drivers or
operators that PHMSA should address?
7. How might potential changes to the
HMR for integration of surface
automated vehicle technologies impact
current requirements for human drivers
or operators (i.e., training)?
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:13 Mar 28, 2018
Jkt 244001
8. Do HMR requirements that relate to
the operation of surface automated
vehicles carrying hazardous materials
present different challenges than those
that relate to ancillary tasks, such as
inspections and packaging
requirements?
9. How will the behavioral responses
of road and railway users change with
the integration of surface automated
vehicle technologies? What will the
reaction be to automated vehicles or rail
cars with markings denoting the
presence of hazardous materials?
10. What solutions could PHMSA
consider to address potential future
regulatory incompatibilities between the
HMR and surface automated vehicle
technologies?
11. What should PHMSA consider
when reviewing applications for special
permits seeking regulatory flexibility to
allow for the transport of hazardous
materials using automated technologies
for surface modes?
12. When considering long-term
solutions to challenges the HMR may
present to the development, testing, and
integration of surface automated
vehicles, what information and other
factors should PHMSA consider?
13. What should PHMSA consider
when developing future policy,
guidance, and regulations for the safe
transportation of hazardous materials in
surface transportation systems?
Signed in Washington, DC, on March 23,
2018.
Drue Pearce,
Deputy Administrator, Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.
[FR Doc. 2018–06290 Filed 3–28–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 300
[Docket No. 171227999–8273–01]
RIN 0648–BH48
Tuna Conventions Act; Advance
Notice of Rulemaking; Regulatory
Amendments to Procedures for the
Active and Inactive Vessel Register
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed
rulemaking; request for comment.
AGENCY:
The National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) is considering
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
amending regulations governing the
utilization of purse seine vessel capacity
limits associated with the Regional
Vessel Register of the Inter-American
Tropical Tuna Commission. This
advance notice of proposed rulemaking
(ANPR) is intended to provide notice to
the public of our planning efforts and
request comment that will assist in
identifying revised administrative
processes to improve the efficient
utilization and management of capacity
limits. This information will help
inform our evaluation of what, if any,
regulatory amendments are necessary
and advisable.
DATES: Comments must be submitted in
writing by April 30, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this document, identified by NOAANMFS-2018-0030, by any of the
following methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20180030, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: Attn: Heidi Taylor, Highly
Migratory Species Branch Chief, NMFS
West Coast Region, 501 W Ocean Blvd.,
Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA 90802.
Include the identifier ‘‘NOAA–NMFS–
2018–0030’’ in the comments.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter
‘‘N/A’’ in the required fields if you wish
to remain anonymous).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Daniel Studt, NMFS West Coast Region,
562–980–4073.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background on the IATTC
The United States is a member of the
Inter-American Tropical Tuna
Commission (IATTC), which was
established under the 1949 Convention
for the Establishment of an InterAmerican Tropical Tuna Commission.
In 2003, the IATTC adopted the
Convention for the Strengthening of the
IATTC Established by the 1949
E:\FR\FM\29MRP1.SGM
29MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 61 / Thursday, March 29, 2018 / Proposed Rules
rmajette on DSKBCKNHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Convention between the United States
of America and the Republic of Costa
Rica (Antigua Convention). The Antigua
Convention entered into force in 2010.
The United States acceded to the
Antigua Convention on February 24,
2016. The full text of the Antigua
Convention is available at: https://
www.iattc.org/PDFFiles2/Antigua_
Convention_Jun_2003.pdf.
The IATTC consists of 21 Members
and five Cooperating Non-Members and
facilitates the conservation and
management of highly migratory species
of fish in the IATTC Convention Area
(Convention Area), as well as
conducting scientific research on these
species. The Convention Area is defined
as the waters of the eastern Pacific
Ocean (EPO) within the area bounded
by the west coast of the Americas, the
50° N latitude, the 150° W longitude,
and the 50° S latitude.
Obligations of the United States Under
the IATTC Convention
As a Party to the Antigua Convention
and a member of the IATTC, the United
States is legally bound to implement
certain decisions of the IATTC. The
Tuna Conventions Act (16 U.S.C. 951 et
seq.), as amended on November 5, 2015,
by Title II of Public Law 114–81, directs
that the Secretary of Commerce, in
consultation with the Secretary of State
and, with respect to enforcement
measures, the Secretary of the
Department of Homeland Security, may
promulgate such regulations as may be
necessary to carry out the United States’
international obligations under the
Antigua Convention, including
recommendations and decisions
adopted by the IATTC. The Secretary of
Commerce’s authority to promulgate
such regulations has been delegated to
NMFS.
In June 2000, the IATTC adopted
Resolution C–00–06: Resolution on a
Regional Vessel Register. This
Resolution has been amended,
including most recently through
adoption of Resolution C–14–01, which
requires that Members submit a list of
all vessels authorized to fish in the EPO
to be listed on a Regional Vessel
Register (Register). Purse seine vessels
are further categorized on the Register as
either ‘‘active’’ or ‘‘inactive and sunk’’
(inactive). Recognizing concerns of
excess fishing capacity, the IATTC in
2002 adopted Resolution C–02–03:
Resolution on the Capacity of the Tuna
Fleet Operating in the Eastern Pacific
Ocean (Revised). The Resolution
established a vessel capacity limit of
158,000 cubic meters for all purse seine
vessels authorized by the IATTC to fish
for tuna species in the EPO. The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:13 Mar 28, 2018
Jkt 244001
Resolution further specified that each
Member and Cooperating Non-Member
was allocated a purse seine vessel
capacity limit by the IATTC based on
historical fishing levels in the EPO, the
level of tuna stocks, and other relevant
factors. Pursuant to C–02–03, the United
States was allocated a purse seine
capacity limit of 31,866 cubic meters
(m3). Each U.S. purse seine vessel listed
on the Register, either as active or
inactive, counts towards this U.S.
capacity limit, except those utilizing a
single-trip option exemption as
described at 50 CFR 300.22(b)(1).
Background on the Pacific Purse Seine
Fleet
Since 1971, the number of large
(greater than 400 short tons (st) or 362.8
metric tons (mt) carrying capacity) U.S.
purse seine vessels fishing for tuna in
the EPO has decreased from over 155 to
an average of 10 active and inactive
large U.S purse seine vessels over the
past five years, utilizing an average of
roughly 18,209 m3 of capacity. Most of
the U.S. vessels that historically fished
in the EPO have either re-flagged or are
now active in the Western and Central
Pacific Ocean (WCPO), fishing under
the Western and Central Pacific
Fisheries Commission and a treaty
between the United States and certain
Pacific Island States (the Treaty on
Fisheries between the Governments of
Certain Pacific Island States and the
Government of the United States of
America, also known as the South
Pacific Tuna Treaty (SPTT)). The
number of vessels in the U.S. WCPO
purse seine fishery has also gradually
decreased; shrinking from the late 1990s
until 2006, and it has fluctuated since.
In recent years, the U.S. WCPO purse
seine fleet has included an average of 37
vessels, with a maximum of 40 vessels
allowed to fish under the SPTT. These
37 vessels amount to roughly 55,000 m3
of carrying capacity for reference.
In the last few years, changing
operating conditions in the WCPO and
an increase in the costs assessed to U.S.
purse seiners for fishing under the SPTT
has led to an increased number of large
purse seine vessels seeking to be added
to the IATTC Register. In 2016, 17 of the
37 purse seiners authorized to fish in
the WCPO also fished in the EPO, which
means they either utilized capacity on
the Active Register or fished under the
single-trip option exemption.
Additionally, since 2014, small (less
than or equal to 400 st or 362.8 mt
carrying capacity) coastal purse seiners
have had increased opportunities for
catching tuna locally, leading to a
growing number of small purse seine
vessels utilizing active capacity on the
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
13467
Register. Over the last 5 years, an
average of 17 small U.S. purse seine
vessels have utilized 1,945 m3 of
capacity.
This combination of interest by large
and small purse seine vessel has led to
the U.S. capacity on the Register to
become fully allocated in recent years,
such that no additional vessels could be
added to the Register. The total capacity
of requested vessels have exceeded the
available capacity and NMFS
anticipates this trend may continue.
Thus, NMFS seeks to re-examine the
administrative processes associated
with the Register to ensure that capacity
is being utilized to the full extent
possible in the most effective way for
both large and small purse seine vessels.
U.S. Regulations on the Regional Vessel
Register
NMFS has implemented regulations
governing U.S. purse seine vessels on
the Register at 50 CFR 300.22(b). These
regulations include the process for how
vessel owners or managing owners
request a purse seine vessel be added to
the Register, including when and how to
submit such a request; when and how
to obtain the appropriate vessel and
operator permits; pay the vessel
assessment fee; and how vessels
permitted and authorized under an
alternative international tuna purse
seine fisheries management regime in
the Pacific Ocean may utilize a one-trip
option into the EPO while being
exempted from the requirement to be
included on the Register. The
regulations also address processes for
removing a vessel from the Register and
for replacing those vessels, and
establishes criteria to deem requests for
active status as ‘‘frivolous’’ for vessels
that occupy U.S. capacity on the
Register but do not actually fish in a
given year. Furthermore, the regulations
lay out the prioritization of requests
following a specified hierarchy.
Requests for active status are
prioritized according to the hierarchy
listed at 50 CFR 300.22(b)(4)(i)(C). In
general, the requests are prioritized in
the following order: Vessels that were
listed as active on the Register in the
previous year, vessels that were listed as
inactive on the Register in the previous
year, vessels not listed on the Register
in the previous year prioritized on a
first-come, first-serve basis, and vessels
which were previously listed on the
Register as active in a given year but
have been determined to have made a
frivolous request.
Requests for active status are
considered ‘‘frivolous’’ if, for a vessel
categorized as active in a given calendar
year, less than 20 percent of the vessel’s
E:\FR\FM\29MRP1.SGM
29MRP1
13468
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 61 / Thursday, March 29, 2018 / Proposed Rules
rmajette on DSKBCKNHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
total landings, by weight, in that same
year is comprised of tuna harvested by
purse seine in the Convention Area, or
the vessel did not fish for tuna at all in
the Convention Area in that same year.
Some exceptions to this apply.
The frivolous request provisions
apply only to large purse seine vessels.
These provisions are intended to
prevent large purse seine vessel owners
who do not have intent to fish in the
Convention Area from requesting listing
on the Register and occupying assigned
capacity that may otherwise be utilized
by active fishing vessels. Small purse
seine vessels are not subject to the
frivolous request provisions because
owners of small vessels tend to have
difficulty anticipating whether
unassociated schools of tuna will
migrate within the range of the vessels
off the U.S. West Coast during the
summer months in the upcoming year.
Frivolous requests criteria may need to
be reexamined to ensure full utilization
of the U.S. capacity limit.
Additionally, there is no time limit for
how long a vessel may remain on the
Register as inactive, provided the vessel
owner or managing owner requests this
status every year and pays the
associated vessel assessment. Since
2015, a single large purse seine vessel
has been on the Register as inactive,
occupying 1,523 m3 of capacity that
would otherwise be available for
actively fishing vessels. NMFS seeks
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:13 Mar 28, 2018
Jkt 244001
input on whether to restrict the current
practice that allows vessels to be
continually listed as inactive, to
improve the utilization of the U.S. purse
seine capacity limit by vessels that will
actually fish.
Lastly, NMFS intends to issue a
technical correction to existing U.S.
regulations to correct the regulatory
carrying capacity to match that on
record with the IATTC. A vessel which
historically fished in the EPO prior to
2002, and whose carrying capacity was
used in the initial capacity calculations
for allotment to the United States, had
its blueprints re-examined by the IATTC
and was found to have had an
additional 91 m3 of carrying capacity
than what was used in the initial
calculation. The IATTC recognized that
this re-examination increased the
United States’ historical capacity, and
revised their accounting of U.S. capacity
to reflect this. NMFS would, therefore,
correct the capacity of 31,775 m3 cited
in our domestic regulations to reflect the
IATTC’s updated accounting that the
U.S. capacity allotment is 31,866 m3.
For additional information on current
regulations pertaining to the Register
and procedures for purse seine vessels
to be authorized to fish for tuna and
tuna-like species in the EPO, please see
the compliance guide located at https://
www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/
publications/fisheries/migratory_
species/iattc-rvr-compliance-guide.pdf
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
and the NMFS website https://
www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/
fisheries/migratory_species/regional_
vessel_register.html.
Request for Comment
NMFS is soliciting comments from
the public to help determine what, if
any, regulatory amendments could make
management of U.S. tuna purse seine
vessels on the IATTC Regional Vessel
Register more effective. Comments may
include suggestions to improve the
procedure for making requests to add
vessels to the Register, for the
identification of ‘‘frivolous requests for
active status’’ and management of such
requests, or how the hierarchy of
prioritization of requests should be
structured to allow for capacity to be
utilized to the full extent possible in the
most effective way. NMFS will fully
consider all relevant information and
comments received, and if necessary,
issue proposed regulatory amendments
for further consideration.
Authority: Tuna Conventions Act of 1973,
as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Dated: March 26, 2018.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–06373 Filed 3–28–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\29MRP1.SGM
29MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 61 (Thursday, March 29, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 13466-13468]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-06373]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 300
[Docket No. 171227999-8273-01]
RIN 0648-BH48
Tuna Conventions Act; Advance Notice of Rulemaking; Regulatory
Amendments to Procedures for the Active and Inactive Vessel Register
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking; request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) is considering
amending regulations governing the utilization of purse seine vessel
capacity limits associated with the Regional Vessel Register of the
Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission. This advance notice of
proposed rulemaking (ANPR) is intended to provide notice to the public
of our planning efforts and request comment that will assist in
identifying revised administrative processes to improve the efficient
utilization and management of capacity limits. This information will
help inform our evaluation of what, if any, regulatory amendments are
necessary and advisable.
DATES: Comments must be submitted in writing by April 30, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this document, identified by
NOAA-NMFS-2018-0030, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2018-0030, click the
``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or
attach your comments.
Mail: Attn: Heidi Taylor, Highly Migratory Species Branch
Chief, NMFS West Coast Region, 501 W Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long
Beach, CA 90802. Include the identifier ``NOAA-NMFS-2018-0030'' in the
comments.
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily
by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel Studt, NMFS West Coast Region,
562-980-4073.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background on the IATTC
The United States is a member of the Inter-American Tropical Tuna
Commission (IATTC), which was established under the 1949 Convention for
the Establishment of an Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission. In
2003, the IATTC adopted the Convention for the Strengthening of the
IATTC Established by the 1949
[[Page 13467]]
Convention between the United States of America and the Republic of
Costa Rica (Antigua Convention). The Antigua Convention entered into
force in 2010. The United States acceded to the Antigua Convention on
February 24, 2016. The full text of the Antigua Convention is available
at: https://www.iattc.org/PDFFiles2/Antigua_Convention_Jun_2003.pdf.
The IATTC consists of 21 Members and five Cooperating Non-Members
and facilitates the conservation and management of highly migratory
species of fish in the IATTC Convention Area (Convention Area), as well
as conducting scientific research on these species. The Convention Area
is defined as the waters of the eastern Pacific Ocean (EPO) within the
area bounded by the west coast of the Americas, the 50[deg] N latitude,
the 150[deg] W longitude, and the 50[deg] S latitude.
Obligations of the United States Under the IATTC Convention
As a Party to the Antigua Convention and a member of the IATTC, the
United States is legally bound to implement certain decisions of the
IATTC. The Tuna Conventions Act (16 U.S.C. 951 et seq.), as amended on
November 5, 2015, by Title II of Public Law 114-81, directs that the
Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the Secretary of State and,
with respect to enforcement measures, the Secretary of the Department
of Homeland Security, may promulgate such regulations as may be
necessary to carry out the United States' international obligations
under the Antigua Convention, including recommendations and decisions
adopted by the IATTC. The Secretary of Commerce's authority to
promulgate such regulations has been delegated to NMFS.
In June 2000, the IATTC adopted Resolution C-00-06: Resolution on a
Regional Vessel Register. This Resolution has been amended, including
most recently through adoption of Resolution C-14-01, which requires
that Members submit a list of all vessels authorized to fish in the EPO
to be listed on a Regional Vessel Register (Register). Purse seine
vessels are further categorized on the Register as either ``active'' or
``inactive and sunk'' (inactive). Recognizing concerns of excess
fishing capacity, the IATTC in 2002 adopted Resolution C-02-03:
Resolution on the Capacity of the Tuna Fleet Operating in the Eastern
Pacific Ocean (Revised). The Resolution established a vessel capacity
limit of 158,000 cubic meters for all purse seine vessels authorized by
the IATTC to fish for tuna species in the EPO. The Resolution further
specified that each Member and Cooperating Non-Member was allocated a
purse seine vessel capacity limit by the IATTC based on historical
fishing levels in the EPO, the level of tuna stocks, and other relevant
factors. Pursuant to C-02-03, the United States was allocated a purse
seine capacity limit of 31,866 cubic meters (m\3\). Each U.S. purse
seine vessel listed on the Register, either as active or inactive,
counts towards this U.S. capacity limit, except those utilizing a
single-trip option exemption as described at 50 CFR 300.22(b)(1).
Background on the Pacific Purse Seine Fleet
Since 1971, the number of large (greater than 400 short tons (st)
or 362.8 metric tons (mt) carrying capacity) U.S. purse seine vessels
fishing for tuna in the EPO has decreased from over 155 to an average
of 10 active and inactive large U.S purse seine vessels over the past
five years, utilizing an average of roughly 18,209 m\3\ of capacity.
Most of the U.S. vessels that historically fished in the EPO have
either re-flagged or are now active in the Western and Central Pacific
Ocean (WCPO), fishing under the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries
Commission and a treaty between the United States and certain Pacific
Island States (the Treaty on Fisheries between the Governments of
Certain Pacific Island States and the Government of the United States
of America, also known as the South Pacific Tuna Treaty (SPTT)). The
number of vessels in the U.S. WCPO purse seine fishery has also
gradually decreased; shrinking from the late 1990s until 2006, and it
has fluctuated since. In recent years, the U.S. WCPO purse seine fleet
has included an average of 37 vessels, with a maximum of 40 vessels
allowed to fish under the SPTT. These 37 vessels amount to roughly
55,000 m\3\ of carrying capacity for reference.
In the last few years, changing operating conditions in the WCPO
and an increase in the costs assessed to U.S. purse seiners for fishing
under the SPTT has led to an increased number of large purse seine
vessels seeking to be added to the IATTC Register. In 2016, 17 of the
37 purse seiners authorized to fish in the WCPO also fished in the EPO,
which means they either utilized capacity on the Active Register or
fished under the single-trip option exemption. Additionally, since
2014, small (less than or equal to 400 st or 362.8 mt carrying
capacity) coastal purse seiners have had increased opportunities for
catching tuna locally, leading to a growing number of small purse seine
vessels utilizing active capacity on the Register. Over the last 5
years, an average of 17 small U.S. purse seine vessels have utilized
1,945 m\3\ of capacity.
This combination of interest by large and small purse seine vessel
has led to the U.S. capacity on the Register to become fully allocated
in recent years, such that no additional vessels could be added to the
Register. The total capacity of requested vessels have exceeded the
available capacity and NMFS anticipates this trend may continue. Thus,
NMFS seeks to re-examine the administrative processes associated with
the Register to ensure that capacity is being utilized to the full
extent possible in the most effective way for both large and small
purse seine vessels.
U.S. Regulations on the Regional Vessel Register
NMFS has implemented regulations governing U.S. purse seine vessels
on the Register at 50 CFR 300.22(b). These regulations include the
process for how vessel owners or managing owners request a purse seine
vessel be added to the Register, including when and how to submit such
a request; when and how to obtain the appropriate vessel and operator
permits; pay the vessel assessment fee; and how vessels permitted and
authorized under an alternative international tuna purse seine
fisheries management regime in the Pacific Ocean may utilize a one-trip
option into the EPO while being exempted from the requirement to be
included on the Register. The regulations also address processes for
removing a vessel from the Register and for replacing those vessels,
and establishes criteria to deem requests for active status as
``frivolous'' for vessels that occupy U.S. capacity on the Register but
do not actually fish in a given year. Furthermore, the regulations lay
out the prioritization of requests following a specified hierarchy.
Requests for active status are prioritized according to the
hierarchy listed at 50 CFR 300.22(b)(4)(i)(C). In general, the requests
are prioritized in the following order: Vessels that were listed as
active on the Register in the previous year, vessels that were listed
as inactive on the Register in the previous year, vessels not listed on
the Register in the previous year prioritized on a first-come, first-
serve basis, and vessels which were previously listed on the Register
as active in a given year but have been determined to have made a
frivolous request.
Requests for active status are considered ``frivolous'' if, for a
vessel categorized as active in a given calendar year, less than 20
percent of the vessel's
[[Page 13468]]
total landings, by weight, in that same year is comprised of tuna
harvested by purse seine in the Convention Area, or the vessel did not
fish for tuna at all in the Convention Area in that same year. Some
exceptions to this apply.
The frivolous request provisions apply only to large purse seine
vessels. These provisions are intended to prevent large purse seine
vessel owners who do not have intent to fish in the Convention Area
from requesting listing on the Register and occupying assigned capacity
that may otherwise be utilized by active fishing vessels. Small purse
seine vessels are not subject to the frivolous request provisions
because owners of small vessels tend to have difficulty anticipating
whether unassociated schools of tuna will migrate within the range of
the vessels off the U.S. West Coast during the summer months in the
upcoming year. Frivolous requests criteria may need to be reexamined to
ensure full utilization of the U.S. capacity limit.
Additionally, there is no time limit for how long a vessel may
remain on the Register as inactive, provided the vessel owner or
managing owner requests this status every year and pays the associated
vessel assessment. Since 2015, a single large purse seine vessel has
been on the Register as inactive, occupying 1,523 m\3\ of capacity that
would otherwise be available for actively fishing vessels. NMFS seeks
input on whether to restrict the current practice that allows vessels
to be continually listed as inactive, to improve the utilization of the
U.S. purse seine capacity limit by vessels that will actually fish.
Lastly, NMFS intends to issue a technical correction to existing
U.S. regulations to correct the regulatory carrying capacity to match
that on record with the IATTC. A vessel which historically fished in
the EPO prior to 2002, and whose carrying capacity was used in the
initial capacity calculations for allotment to the United States, had
its blueprints re-examined by the IATTC and was found to have had an
additional 91 m\3\ of carrying capacity than what was used in the
initial calculation. The IATTC recognized that this re-examination
increased the United States' historical capacity, and revised their
accounting of U.S. capacity to reflect this. NMFS would, therefore,
correct the capacity of 31,775 m\3\ cited in our domestic regulations
to reflect the IATTC's updated accounting that the U.S. capacity
allotment is 31,866 m\3\.
For additional information on current regulations pertaining to the
Register and procedures for purse seine vessels to be authorized to
fish for tuna and tuna-like species in the EPO, please see the
compliance guide located at https://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/publications/fisheries/migratory_species/iattc-rvr-compliance-guide.pdf
and the NMFS website https://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/fisheries/migratory_species/regional_vessel_register.html.
Request for Comment
NMFS is soliciting comments from the public to help determine what,
if any, regulatory amendments could make management of U.S. tuna purse
seine vessels on the IATTC Regional Vessel Register more effective.
Comments may include suggestions to improve the procedure for making
requests to add vessels to the Register, for the identification of
``frivolous requests for active status'' and management of such
requests, or how the hierarchy of prioritization of requests should be
structured to allow for capacity to be utilized to the full extent
possible in the most effective way. NMFS will fully consider all
relevant information and comments received, and if necessary, issue
proposed regulatory amendments for further consideration.
Authority: Tuna Conventions Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C.
1531 et seq.).
Dated: March 26, 2018.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-06373 Filed 3-28-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P