Notice of Availability of the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Louisiana Trustee Implementation Group Final Strategic Restoration Plan and Environmental Assessment #3, 12340-12342 [2018-05691]
Download as PDF
12340
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 21, 2018 / Notices
requirements to assess, minimize, and/
or monitor impacts to different
resources, including marine mammals.
While the State has coordinated most
closely with NMFS on the Mid-Barataria
Sediment Diversion to date, it is likely
the other two projects covered under the
waiver will be similarly coordinated
with NMFS to some degree due to the
NEPA processes and permitting
requirements under other Federal
statutes. We believe that in many cases
other statutes and processes will
provide the State efficient frameworks
within which to conduct the required
consultation with NMFS, and we will
support the State in integrating Budget
Act compliance into these processes,
discussions, and timelines, as needed.
Regardless, NMFS is prepared to
support the State in identifying and
developing practicable measures to
minimize and monitor impacts of the
covered projects on marine mammals.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.
Dated: March 15, 2018.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–05652 Filed 3–20–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XE201
Notice of Availability of the Deepwater
Horizon Oil Spill Louisiana Trustee
Implementation Group Final Strategic
Restoration Plan and Environmental
Assessment #3
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the Oil
Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA), the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), and a Consent Decree with BP
Exploration & Production Inc. (BP), the
Deepwater Horizon Federal and State
natural resource trustee agencies for the
Louisiana Trustee Implementation
Group (LA TIG) have prepared the Final
Strategic Restoration Plan and
Environmental Assessment #3:
Restoration of Wetlands, Coastal, and
Nearshore Habitats in the Barataria
Basin, Louisiana (SRP/EA). The Final
SRP/EA identifies and, in conjunction
with the associated Finding of No
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:34 Mar 20, 2018
Jkt 244001
Significant Impact (FONSI), selects a
restoration strategy that will help
prioritize future decisions regarding
project selection and funding. Rather
than selecting specific projects for
construction, the Trustees evaluated a
suite of restoration techniques and
approaches, for example large-scale
diversions or marsh creation, to
determine how to best support restoring
ecosystem-level injuries in the Gulf of
Mexico through restoration in the
Barataria Basin. This strategic approach
to restoration will allow the Trustees to
prioritize projects for further evaluation
by the LA TIG. The purpose of this
notice is to inform the public of the
availability of the Final SRP/EA and
FONSI.
ADDRESSES: Obtaining Documents: You
may download the Final SRP/EA and
FONSI at: https://www.gulfspill
restoration.noaa.gov and https://www.ladwh.com. Alternatively, you may
request a CD of the Final SRP/EA and
FONSI (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT). In addition, you may view the
document at any of the public facilities
listed at https://www.gulfspill
restoration.noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
• National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration—Mel Landry,
gulfspill.restoration@noaa.gov, (301)
427–8711.
• Louisiana—Joann Hicks,
LATIGPublicComments@la.gov, (225)
342–7308.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
On April 20, 2010, the mobile
offshore drilling unit Deepwater
Horizon, which was being used to drill
a well for BP in the Macondo prospect
(Mississippi Canyon 252–MC252),
exploded, caught fire, and subsequently
sank in the Gulf of Mexico, resulting in
an unprecedented volume of oil and
other discharges from the rig and from
the wellhead on the seabed. The
Deepwater Horizon oil spill is the
largest maritime oil spill in United
States history, discharging millions of
barrels of oil over a period of 87 days.
In addition, well over one million
gallons of dispersants were applied to
the waters of the spill area in an attempt
to disperse the spilled oil. An
undetermined amount of natural gas
also was released to the environment as
a result of the spill.
The Deepwater Horizon Federal and
State natural resource trustees (DWH
Trustees) conducted the NRDA for the
Deepwater Horizon oil spill under the
Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA; 33
U.S.C. 2701 et seq.). Pursuant to OPA,
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Federal and State agencies act as
trustees on behalf of the public to assess
natural resource injuries and losses and
to determine the actions required to
compensate the public for those injuries
and losses. OPA further instructs the
designated trustees to develop and
implement a plan for the restoration,
rehabilitation, replacement, or
acquisition of the equivalent of the
injured natural resources under their
trusteeship, including the loss of use
and services from those resources from
the time of injury until the time of
restoration to baseline (the resource
quality and conditions that would exist
if the spill had not occurred) is
complete.
The DWH Trustees are:
• U.S. Department of the Interior, as
represented by the National Park
Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
and Bureau of Land Management;
• National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, on behalf of the U.S.
Department of Commerce;
• U.S. Department of Agriculture;
• U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency;
• State of Louisiana Coastal
Protection and Restoration Authority,
Oil Spill Coordinator’s Office,
Department of Environmental Quality,
Department of Wildlife and Fisheries,
and Department of Natural Resources;
• State of Mississippi Department of
Environmental Quality;
• State of Alabama Department of
Conservation and Natural Resources and
Geological Survey of Alabama;
• State of Florida Department of
Environmental Protection and Fish and
Wildlife Conservation Commission; and
• For the State of Texas, Texas Parks
and Wildlife Department, Texas General
Land Office, and Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality.
On April 4, 2016, the DWH Trustees
reached and finalized a settlement of
their natural resource damages claims
with BP in a Consent Decree approved
by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern
District of Louisiana. Pursuant to that
Consent Decree, restoration projects in
the Louisiana Restoration Area are now
chosen and managed by the LA TIG.
The LA TIG is comprised of the
following DWH Trustees:
• State of Louisiana Coastal
Protection and Restoration Authority
(CPRA);
• Louisiana Oil Spill Coordinator’s
Office (LOSCO);
• Louisiana Department of
Environmental Quality (LDEQ);
• Louisiana Department of Wildlife
and Fisheries (LDWF);
• Louisiana Department of Natural
Resources (LDNR);
E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM
21MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 21, 2018 / Notices
• U.S. Department of the Interior, as
represented by National Park Service,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and
Bureau of Land Management;
• National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, on behalf of the U.S.
Department of Commerce;
• U.S. Department of Agriculture; and
• U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency.
This restoration planning activity is
proceeding in accordance with the
PDARP/PEIS. Information on the
Restoration Type considered in the
Final SRP/EA, as well as the OPA
criteria against which alternatives were
evaluated, can be viewed in the PDARP/
PEIS (https://www.gulfspill
restoration.noaa.gov/restorationplanning/gulf-plan) and in the
Overview of the PDARP/PEIS (https://
www.gulfspillrestoration.noaa.gov/
restoration-planning/gulf-plan).
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Background
On March 29, 2017, the LA TIG
solicited project ideas to sustainably
create, restore, and enhance coastal
wetlands, and restore or preserve
Mississippi River processes (https://
www.gulfspillrestoration.noaa.gov/
2017/03/request-restoration-projectideas-louisiana). From that input and
review of other Louisiana restoration
planning efforts, including Louisiana’s
Coastal Master Plan and Deepwater
Horizon restoration planning efforts, the
LA TIG published a notice of intent on
April 28, 2017 announcing its initiation
of strategic restoration planning through
two phases (82 FR 19659). The first
phase would prepare a strategic
restoration plan for Louisiana’s
Barataria Basin. The Deepwater Horizon
spill created an ecosystem-level injury
to the Gulf of Mexico, which included
accelerated loss of critical wetlands,
coastal, and nearshore habitats as well
as injuries across all trophic levels in
the Gulf of Mexico. The most severe
losses to coastal marshes, which
represent the foundation of the Gulf of
Mexico ecosystem, were focused on the
Barataria Basin. As described in the
April 28, 2017 notice, the LA TIG
prepared a Draft SRP/EA which focused
on wetlands, coastal, and nearshore
habitat restoration type projects in the
Barataria Basin restoration area. This
geographic focus is appropriate as the
PDARP/PEIS found that the Barataria
Basin experienced some of the heaviest
and most persistent oiling from the
DWH spill and because the Basin
supports very high primary and
secondary production that contributes
to the overall health of the northern Gulf
of Mexico ecosystem.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:34 Mar 20, 2018
Jkt 244001
A Notice of Availability of the
Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Louisiana
Trustee Implementation Group Draft
Strategic Restoration Plan and
Environmental Assessment #3:
Restoration of Wetlands, Coastal and
Nearshore Habitats in the Barataria
Basin, Louisiana (Draft SRP/EA) was
published in the Federal Register on
December 20, 2017. The Draft SRP/EA
proposed four strategic alternatives
consistent with the Restoration Types
selected in the PDARP/PEIS. The LA
TIG evaluated these alternatives under
criteria set forth in the OPA regulations,
and evaluated the environmental
consequences of the restoration
alternatives in accordance with NEPA.
The LA TIG provided the public with 45
days to review and provide comment on
the Draft SRP/EA. During the public
review period, which ended on
February 5, 2018, the LA TIG held a
public meeting in New Orleans on
January 24, 2018. The LA TIG
considered the public comments
received, which informed the LA TIG’s
analyses and selection of the preferred
alternative in the Final SRP/EA. A
summary of the public comments
received and the Trustees’ responses to
those comments are addressed in
Chapter 7 of the Final SRP/EA.
Overview of the Final SRP/EA
The Final SRP/EA is being released in
accordance with OPA, the OPA
regulations in the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) at 15 CFR part 990,
and NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
The LA TIG focused the SRP/EA on
two restoration approaches in the
wetlands, coastal and nearshore habitat
type described in the PDARP/PEIS:
creating, restoring and enhancing
coastal wetlands; and restoring and
preserving Mississippi-Atchafalaya
River processes. Within the two
restoration approaches, the PDARP/PEIS
identifies a series of potential
restoration techniques. These
techniques, spanning both restoration
approaches, are as follows (PDARP/
PEIS, Appendix 5.D):
• Create or enhance coastal wetlands
through placement of dredged material;
• Backfill canals;
• Restore hydrologic connections to
enhance coastal habitats;
• Construct breakwaters; and
• Controlled river diversions.
Four project types, consistent with the
restoration approaches in the PDARP/
PEIS, are carried forward for additional
consideration in the SRP/EA:
• Sediment diversion projects;
• Large-scale marsh creation projects;
• Ridge restoration projects; and
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12341
• Breakwater construction projects
(also referred to as shoreline protection
projects).
After reviewing the restoration
approaches and techniques, the LA TIG
identified 13 example projects from
public submissions in response to the
Notice of Solicitation and from the 2017
Coastal Master Plan. The LA TIG then
combined restoration techniques into
four strategic restoration alternatives.
With the exception of the natural
recovery/no action alternative, each of
these alternatives meets the Final SRP/
EA’s purpose and need ‘‘to restore the
ecosystem level injuries in Barataria
Basin and to restore, rehabilitate,
replace, or acquire the equivalent of the
injured wetlands, coastal, and nearshore
habitat resources and services and
compensate for interim losses of those
resources from the DWH oil spill.’’ The
four strategic restoration alternatives are
as follows:
• Alternative 1: Marsh creation, ridge
restoration, and large-scale sediment
diversion;
• Alternative 2: Marsh creation, ridge
restoration, and shoreline protection;
• Alternative 3: Marsh creation and
ridge restoration; and
• Alternative 4: Natural recovery/no
action.
In the Final SRP/EA, the LA TIG
identifies two decisions to restore
ecosystem-level injuries in the Gulf of
Mexico through restoration of critical
wetlands, coastal, and nearshore habitat
resources and services in the Barataria
Basin. First, the LA TIG selects a
preferred alternative that relies on a
suite of restoration approaches and
techniques in the Barataria Basin,
including large-scale sediment
diversions to restore deltaic processes,
marsh creation, and ridge restoration.
Second, the LA TIG selects to advance
several projects forward for further
evaluation and planning: The MidBarataria Sediment Diversion and one
marsh creation increment within Large
Scale Marsh Creation: Component E in
northern Barataria Basin. The LA TIG
also confirms its 2017 decision to move
the Spanish Pass Increment of the
Barataria Basin Ridge and Marsh
Creation project forward for further
evaluation and planning. The trustees
are not proposing these projects for
construction funding at this time.
Rather, the trustees will continue to
consider the selected projects in future
Phase II restoration plans including
further OPA and NEPA evaluation.
The LA TIG evaluated strategic
restoration alternatives under criteria set
forth in the OPA regulations. The
strategic restoration alternatives are
consistent with the restoration
E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM
21MRN1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
12342
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 21, 2018 / Notices
alternatives selected in the Deepwater
Horizon Oil Spill: Final Programmatic
Damage Assessment and Restoration
Plan/Programmatic Environmental
Impact Statement (PDARP/PEIS).
NEPA requires federal agencies to
consider the potential environmental
impacts of planned actions. NEPA
provides a mandate and framework for
federal agencies to determine if their
proposed actions have significant
environmental effects and related social
and economic effects, consider these
effects when choosing between
alternative approaches, and inform and
involve the public in the environmental
analysis and decision-making process.
The LA TIG exercised its discretion
pursuant to NEPA (40 CFR 1501.3(b)) to
integrate an EA with this SRP in order
to assist with restoration planning
efforts and to further the purposes of
NEPA. This SRP/EA tiers from the
PDARP/PEIS and incorporates by
reference the NEPA environmental
consequences analysis found in Chapter
6 of the PDARP/PEIS (40 CFR 1502.20;
1502.21). The LA TIG has found, based
on its evaluation in the EA portion of
this SRP/EA that: (1) The PDARP/PEIS
included a thorough evaluation of the
potential range of environmental effects
that could result from the various
restoration approaches and techniques
analyzed in the PDARP/PEIS; (2) the
analysis of the environmental
consequences of those approaches and
techniques in the PDARP/PEIS remains
valid; (3) the effects of the restoration
approaches and techniques, including
the project selected for further planning
and environmental review, evaluated in
this SRP/EA are within the range of
impacts evaluated in the PDARP/PEIS;
and (4) any new information regarding
the environmental consequences of the
restoration approaches and techniques,
including the projects selected for
further planning and environmental
review, evaluated within this SRP/EA
are within the range of and consistent
with the environmental impacts
identified and analyzed within the
PDARP/PEIS. The Federal Trustees of
the LA TIG have determined that
implementation of the Final SRP/EA is
not a major Federal Action significantly
affecting the quality of the human
environment within the context of
NEPA. They have concluded a FONSI is
appropriate, and, therefore, an
Environmental Impact Statement will
not be prepared for this action.
Administrative Record
The documents comprising the
Administrative Record for the Draft
SRP/EA can be viewed electronically at
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:34 Mar 20, 2018
Jkt 244001
https://www.doi.gov/deepwaterhorizon/
adminrecord.
Authority
The authority for this action is OPA
(33 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.), the OPA NRDA
regulations at 15 CFR part 990, and
NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
Dated: March 15, 2018.
Carrie Selberg,
Deputy Director, Office of Habitat
Conservation, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–05691 Filed 3–20–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XG068
Fisheries of the South Atlantic;
Southeast Data, Assessment, and
Review (SEDAR); Stock ID Workshop
for Cobia (Rachycentron canadum)
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of SEDAR 58 Stock
Identification (ID) Workshop for Cobia.
AGENCY:
The SEDAR 58 Cobia Stock ID
Process will be a multi-step process
consisting of a series of workshops and
webinars: Stock ID Workshop; Stock ID
Review Workshop; Joint Cooperator
Technical Review; and a Science and
Management Leadership Call. See
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
DATES: The SEDAR 58 Stock ID
Workshop will be held on April 10–11,
2018, from 8:30 a.m. until 6 p.m.; and
April 12, 2018, from 8:30 a.m. until 1
p.m. The established times may be
adjusted as necessary to accommodate
the timely completion of discussion
relevant to the Stock ID process. Such
adjustments may result in the meeting
being extended from, or completed prior
to the time established by this notice.
Additional SEDAR 58 Stock ID Process
workshops and webinar dates and times
will publish in a subsequent issue in the
Federal Register.
ADDRESSES:
Meeting address: The SEDAR 58
Stock ID Workshop will be held at the
Town and Country Inn, 2008 Savannah
Highway, Charleston, SC 29407l; phone:
(843) 571–1000.
SEDAR address: South Atlantic
Fishery Management Council, 4055
Faber Place Drive, Suite 201, N
Charleston, SC 29405;
www.sedarweb.org.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Julia
Byrd, SEDAR Coordinator, 4055 Faber
Place Drive, Suite 201, North
Charleston, SC 29405; phone: (843) 571–
4366; email: julia.byrd@safmc.net.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Gulf
of Mexico, South Atlantic, and
Caribbean Fishery Management
Councils, in conjunction with NOAA
Fisheries and the Atlantic and Gulf
States Marine Fisheries Commissions,
have implemented the Southeast Data,
Assessment and Review (SEDAR)
process, a multi-step method for
determining the status of fish stocks in
the Southeast Region. SEDAR is a threestep process including: (1) Data
Workshop; (2) Assessment Process
utilizing a workshop and/or webinars;
and (3) Review Workshop. Cobia Stock
ID will be resolved prior to the start of
the SEDAR 58 Data Workshop using the
multi-step Stock ID Process. The
product of the Data Workshop is a data
report which compiles and evaluates
potential datasets and recommends
which datasets are appropriate for
assessment analyses. The product of the
Assessment Process is a stock
assessment report which describes the
fisheries, evaluates the status of the
stock, estimates biological benchmarks,
projects future population conditions,
and recommends research and
monitoring needs. The assessment is
independently peer reviewed at the
Review Workshop. The product of the
Review Workshop is a Summary
documenting panel opinions regarding
the strengths and weaknesses of the
stock assessment and input data.
Participants for SEDAR Workshops are
appointed by the Gulf of Mexico, South
Atlantic, and Caribbean Fishery
Management Councils and NOAA
Fisheries Southeast Regional Office,
Highly Migratory Species Management
Division, and Southeast Fisheries
Science Center. Participants include:
Data collectors and database managers;
stock assessment scientists, biologists,
and researchers; constituency
representatives including fishermen,
environmentalists, and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs);
international experts; and staff of
Councils, Commissions, and state and
federal agencies.
The items of discussion at the Stock
ID Workshop are as follows:
1. Review information including
genetic studies, growth patterns,
movement and migration, existing stock
definitions, otolith chemistry,
oceanographic and habitat
characteristics, prior SEDAR stock ID
recommendations and any other
relevant information on stock structure.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM
21MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 21, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12340-12342]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-05691]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XE201
Notice of Availability of the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill
Louisiana Trustee Implementation Group Final Strategic Restoration Plan
and Environmental Assessment #3
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA), the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and a Consent Decree with BP
Exploration & Production Inc. (BP), the Deepwater Horizon Federal and
State natural resource trustee agencies for the Louisiana Trustee
Implementation Group (LA TIG) have prepared the Final Strategic
Restoration Plan and Environmental Assessment #3: Restoration of
Wetlands, Coastal, and Nearshore Habitats in the Barataria Basin,
Louisiana (SRP/EA). The Final SRP/EA identifies and, in conjunction
with the associated Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI), selects a
restoration strategy that will help prioritize future decisions
regarding project selection and funding. Rather than selecting specific
projects for construction, the Trustees evaluated a suite of
restoration techniques and approaches, for example large-scale
diversions or marsh creation, to determine how to best support
restoring ecosystem-level injuries in the Gulf of Mexico through
restoration in the Barataria Basin. This strategic approach to
restoration will allow the Trustees to prioritize projects for further
evaluation by the LA TIG. The purpose of this notice is to inform the
public of the availability of the Final SRP/EA and FONSI.
ADDRESSES: Obtaining Documents: You may download the Final SRP/EA and
FONSI at: https://www.gulfspillrestoration.noaa.gov and https://www.la-dwh.com. Alternatively, you may request a CD of the Final SRP/EA and
FONSI (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). In addition, you may view
the document at any of the public facilities listed at https://www.gulfspillrestoration.noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration--Mel
Landry, [email protected], (301) 427-8711.
Louisiana--Joann Hicks, [email protected], (225)
342-7308.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
On April 20, 2010, the mobile offshore drilling unit Deepwater
Horizon, which was being used to drill a well for BP in the Macondo
prospect (Mississippi Canyon 252-MC252), exploded, caught fire, and
subsequently sank in the Gulf of Mexico, resulting in an unprecedented
volume of oil and other discharges from the rig and from the wellhead
on the seabed. The Deepwater Horizon oil spill is the largest maritime
oil spill in United States history, discharging millions of barrels of
oil over a period of 87 days. In addition, well over one million
gallons of dispersants were applied to the waters of the spill area in
an attempt to disperse the spilled oil. An undetermined amount of
natural gas also was released to the environment as a result of the
spill.
The Deepwater Horizon Federal and State natural resource trustees
(DWH Trustees) conducted the NRDA for the Deepwater Horizon oil spill
under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA; 33 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.).
Pursuant to OPA, Federal and State agencies act as trustees on behalf
of the public to assess natural resource injuries and losses and to
determine the actions required to compensate the public for those
injuries and losses. OPA further instructs the designated trustees to
develop and implement a plan for the restoration, rehabilitation,
replacement, or acquisition of the equivalent of the injured natural
resources under their trusteeship, including the loss of use and
services from those resources from the time of injury until the time of
restoration to baseline (the resource quality and conditions that would
exist if the spill had not occurred) is complete.
The DWH Trustees are:
U.S. Department of the Interior, as represented by the
National Park Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and Bureau of
Land Management;
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, on behalf
of the U.S. Department of Commerce;
U.S. Department of Agriculture;
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency;
State of Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration
Authority, Oil Spill Coordinator's Office, Department of Environmental
Quality, Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, and Department of
Natural Resources;
State of Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality;
State of Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural
Resources and Geological Survey of Alabama;
State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection
and Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission; and
For the State of Texas, Texas Parks and Wildlife
Department, Texas General Land Office, and Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality.
On April 4, 2016, the DWH Trustees reached and finalized a
settlement of their natural resource damages claims with BP in a
Consent Decree approved by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern
District of Louisiana. Pursuant to that Consent Decree, restoration
projects in the Louisiana Restoration Area are now chosen and managed
by the LA TIG. The LA TIG is comprised of the following DWH Trustees:
State of Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration
Authority (CPRA);
Louisiana Oil Spill Coordinator's Office (LOSCO);
Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ);
Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries (LDWF);
Louisiana Department of Natural Resources (LDNR);
[[Page 12341]]
U.S. Department of the Interior, as represented by
National Park Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and Bureau of
Land Management;
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, on behalf
of the U.S. Department of Commerce;
U.S. Department of Agriculture; and
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
This restoration planning activity is proceeding in accordance with
the PDARP/PEIS. Information on the Restoration Type considered in the
Final SRP/EA, as well as the OPA criteria against which alternatives
were evaluated, can be viewed in the PDARP/PEIS (https://www.gulfspillrestoration.noaa.gov/restoration-planning/gulf-plan) and
in the Overview of the PDARP/PEIS (https://www.gulfspillrestoration.noaa.gov/restoration-planning/gulf-plan).
Background
On March 29, 2017, the LA TIG solicited project ideas to
sustainably create, restore, and enhance coastal wetlands, and restore
or preserve Mississippi River processes (https://www.gulfspillrestoration.noaa.gov/2017/03/request-restoration-project-ideas-louisiana). From that input and review of other Louisiana
restoration planning efforts, including Louisiana's Coastal Master Plan
and Deepwater Horizon restoration planning efforts, the LA TIG
published a notice of intent on April 28, 2017 announcing its
initiation of strategic restoration planning through two phases (82 FR
19659). The first phase would prepare a strategic restoration plan for
Louisiana's Barataria Basin. The Deepwater Horizon spill created an
ecosystem-level injury to the Gulf of Mexico, which included
accelerated loss of critical wetlands, coastal, and nearshore habitats
as well as injuries across all trophic levels in the Gulf of Mexico.
The most severe losses to coastal marshes, which represent the
foundation of the Gulf of Mexico ecosystem, were focused on the
Barataria Basin. As described in the April 28, 2017 notice, the LA TIG
prepared a Draft SRP/EA which focused on wetlands, coastal, and
nearshore habitat restoration type projects in the Barataria Basin
restoration area. This geographic focus is appropriate as the PDARP/
PEIS found that the Barataria Basin experienced some of the heaviest
and most persistent oiling from the DWH spill and because the Basin
supports very high primary and secondary production that contributes to
the overall health of the northern Gulf of Mexico ecosystem.
A Notice of Availability of the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill
Louisiana Trustee Implementation Group Draft Strategic Restoration Plan
and Environmental Assessment #3: Restoration of Wetlands, Coastal and
Nearshore Habitats in the Barataria Basin, Louisiana (Draft SRP/EA) was
published in the Federal Register on December 20, 2017. The Draft SRP/
EA proposed four strategic alternatives consistent with the Restoration
Types selected in the PDARP/PEIS. The LA TIG evaluated these
alternatives under criteria set forth in the OPA regulations, and
evaluated the environmental consequences of the restoration
alternatives in accordance with NEPA. The LA TIG provided the public
with 45 days to review and provide comment on the Draft SRP/EA. During
the public review period, which ended on February 5, 2018, the LA TIG
held a public meeting in New Orleans on January 24, 2018. The LA TIG
considered the public comments received, which informed the LA TIG's
analyses and selection of the preferred alternative in the Final SRP/
EA. A summary of the public comments received and the Trustees'
responses to those comments are addressed in Chapter 7 of the Final
SRP/EA.
Overview of the Final SRP/EA
The Final SRP/EA is being released in accordance with OPA, the OPA
regulations in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 15 CFR part
990, and NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
The LA TIG focused the SRP/EA on two restoration approaches in the
wetlands, coastal and nearshore habitat type described in the PDARP/
PEIS: creating, restoring and enhancing coastal wetlands; and restoring
and preserving Mississippi-Atchafalaya River processes. Within the two
restoration approaches, the PDARP/PEIS identifies a series of potential
restoration techniques. These techniques, spanning both restoration
approaches, are as follows (PDARP/PEIS, Appendix 5.D):
Create or enhance coastal wetlands through placement of
dredged material;
Backfill canals;
Restore hydrologic connections to enhance coastal
habitats;
Construct breakwaters; and
Controlled river diversions.
Four project types, consistent with the restoration approaches in
the PDARP/PEIS, are carried forward for additional consideration in the
SRP/EA:
Sediment diversion projects;
Large-scale marsh creation projects;
Ridge restoration projects; and
Breakwater construction projects (also referred to as
shoreline protection projects).
After reviewing the restoration approaches and techniques, the LA
TIG identified 13 example projects from public submissions in response
to the Notice of Solicitation and from the 2017 Coastal Master Plan.
The LA TIG then combined restoration techniques into four strategic
restoration alternatives. With the exception of the natural recovery/no
action alternative, each of these alternatives meets the Final SRP/EA's
purpose and need ``to restore the ecosystem level injuries in Barataria
Basin and to restore, rehabilitate, replace, or acquire the equivalent
of the injured wetlands, coastal, and nearshore habitat resources and
services and compensate for interim losses of those resources from the
DWH oil spill.'' The four strategic restoration alternatives are as
follows:
Alternative 1: Marsh creation, ridge restoration, and
large-scale sediment diversion;
Alternative 2: Marsh creation, ridge restoration, and
shoreline protection;
Alternative 3: Marsh creation and ridge restoration; and
Alternative 4: Natural recovery/no action.
In the Final SRP/EA, the LA TIG identifies two decisions to restore
ecosystem-level injuries in the Gulf of Mexico through restoration of
critical wetlands, coastal, and nearshore habitat resources and
services in the Barataria Basin. First, the LA TIG selects a preferred
alternative that relies on a suite of restoration approaches and
techniques in the Barataria Basin, including large-scale sediment
diversions to restore deltaic processes, marsh creation, and ridge
restoration. Second, the LA TIG selects to advance several projects
forward for further evaluation and planning: The Mid-Barataria Sediment
Diversion and one marsh creation increment within Large Scale Marsh
Creation: Component E in northern Barataria Basin. The LA TIG also
confirms its 2017 decision to move the Spanish Pass Increment of the
Barataria Basin Ridge and Marsh Creation project forward for further
evaluation and planning. The trustees are not proposing these projects
for construction funding at this time. Rather, the trustees will
continue to consider the selected projects in future Phase II
restoration plans including further OPA and NEPA evaluation.
The LA TIG evaluated strategic restoration alternatives under
criteria set forth in the OPA regulations. The strategic restoration
alternatives are consistent with the restoration
[[Page 12342]]
alternatives selected in the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill: Final
Programmatic Damage Assessment and Restoration Plan/Programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement (PDARP/PEIS).
NEPA requires federal agencies to consider the potential
environmental impacts of planned actions. NEPA provides a mandate and
framework for federal agencies to determine if their proposed actions
have significant environmental effects and related social and economic
effects, consider these effects when choosing between alternative
approaches, and inform and involve the public in the environmental
analysis and decision-making process. The LA TIG exercised its
discretion pursuant to NEPA (40 CFR 1501.3(b)) to integrate an EA with
this SRP in order to assist with restoration planning efforts and to
further the purposes of NEPA. This SRP/EA tiers from the PDARP/PEIS and
incorporates by reference the NEPA environmental consequences analysis
found in Chapter 6 of the PDARP/PEIS (40 CFR 1502.20; 1502.21). The LA
TIG has found, based on its evaluation in the EA portion of this SRP/EA
that: (1) The PDARP/PEIS included a thorough evaluation of the
potential range of environmental effects that could result from the
various restoration approaches and techniques analyzed in the PDARP/
PEIS; (2) the analysis of the environmental consequences of those
approaches and techniques in the PDARP/PEIS remains valid; (3) the
effects of the restoration approaches and techniques, including the
project selected for further planning and environmental review,
evaluated in this SRP/EA are within the range of impacts evaluated in
the PDARP/PEIS; and (4) any new information regarding the environmental
consequences of the restoration approaches and techniques, including
the projects selected for further planning and environmental review,
evaluated within this SRP/EA are within the range of and consistent
with the environmental impacts identified and analyzed within the
PDARP/PEIS. The Federal Trustees of the LA TIG have determined that
implementation of the Final SRP/EA is not a major Federal Action
significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the
context of NEPA. They have concluded a FONSI is appropriate, and,
therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared for
this action.
Administrative Record
The documents comprising the Administrative Record for the Draft
SRP/EA can be viewed electronically at https://www.doi.gov/deepwaterhorizon/adminrecord.
Authority
The authority for this action is OPA (33 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.), the
OPA NRDA regulations at 15 CFR part 990, and NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.).
Dated: March 15, 2018.
Carrie Selberg,
Deputy Director, Office of Habitat Conservation, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-05691 Filed 3-20-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P