Approval and Promulgation of State Air Quality Plans for Designated Facilities and Pollutants; City of Philadelphia; Control of Emissions From Existing Sewage Sludge Incineration Units, 11418-11420 [2018-05293]
Download as PDF
11418
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 51 / Thursday, March 15, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action
approving the negative declaration for
existing HMIWI units within the City of
Philadelphia may not be challenged
later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waste treatment and
disposal.
Dated: February 23, 2018.
Cosmo Servidio,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2018–05294 Filed 3–14–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 62
[EPA–R03–OAR–2017–0509; FRL–9975–38–
Region 3]
Approval and Promulgation of State
Air Quality Plans for Designated
Facilities and Pollutants; City of
Philadelphia; Control of Emissions
From Existing Sewage Sludge
Incineration Units
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is taking final action to
notify the public that it has received a
negative declaration for sewage sludge
incineration (SSI) units within the City
of Philadelphia. This negative
declaration certifies that SSI units
subject to the requirements of sections
111(d) and 129 of the Clean Air Act
(CAA) do not exist in Pennsylvania
within the jurisdictional boundaries of
the Philadelphia Air Management
Service (AMS). EPA is accepting the
negative declaration in accordance with
the requirements of the CAA.
DATES: This rule is effective on April 16,
2018.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R03–OAR–2017–0509. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov website.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Mar 14, 2018
Jkt 244001
e.g., confidential business information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mike Gordon, (215) 814–2039, or by
email at gordon.mike@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Sections 111(d) and 129 of the CAA
require states to submit plans to control
certain pollutants (designated
pollutants) at existing solid waste
combustor facilities (designated
facilities) whenever standards of
performance have been established
under section 111(b) for new sources of
the same type, and EPA has established
emission guidelines (EG) for such
existing sources. CAA section 129
directs EPA to establish standards of
performance for new sources and
emissions guidelines for existing
sources for each category of solid waste
incineration unit. CAA section 129(a)
and (b). EPA also must specify
numerical emissions limitations for
particulate matter (total and fine),
opacity (as appropriate), sulfur dioxide,
hydrogen chloride, oxides of nitrogen,
carbon monoxide, lead, cadmium,
mercury, and dioxins and
dibenzofurans. CAA section 129(a)(4).
On March 21, 2011 (76 FR 15372),
EPA promulgated SSI unit new source
performance standards, 40 CFR part 60,
subpart LLL, and EG at 40 CFR part 60,
subpart MMMM. The designated
facilities to which the EG apply are
existing SSI units that: (1) Commenced
construction on or before October 14,
2010; (2) meet the definition of a SSI
unit as defined in 40 CFR 60.5250; and
(3) are not exempt under 40 CFR
60.5065.
Subpart B of 40 CFR part 60
establishes procedures to be followed
and requirements to be met in the
development and submission of state
plans for controlling designated
pollutants. Also, 40 CFR part 62
provides the procedural framework for
the submission of these plans. When
designated facilities are located in a
state, the state must then develop and
submit a plan for the control of the
designated pollutant. However, 40 CFR
60.23(b) and 62.06 provide that if there
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
are no existing sources of the designated
pollutant in the state, the state may
submit a letter of certification to that
effect (i.e., negative declaration) in lieu
of a plan. The negative declaration
exempts the state from the requirements
of subpart B that require the submittal
of a CAA section 111(d)/129 plan.
On October 26, 2017 (82 FR 49563
and 82 FR 49511), EPA simultaneously
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) and a direct final rule
(DFR) for the City of Philadelphia
approving a negative declaration from
Philadelphia AMS that there are no
existing SSI units subject to the
requirements of sections 111(d) and 129
of the CAA in its respective air
pollution control jurisdiction. EPA
received an adverse comment on the
rulemaking and withdrew the DFR prior
to the effective date on December 26,
2017 (82 FR 60872). In this final
rulemaking, EPA is responding to the
comment submitted on the proposed
approval of the negative declaration and
is approving the negative declaration.
II. State Submittal and EPA Analysis
Philadelphia AMS has determined
that there are no existing SSI units
subject to the requirements of sections
111(d) and 129 of the CAA in its
respective air pollution control
jurisdiction. Accordingly, Philadelphia
AMS submitted a negative declaration
letter to EPA certifying this fact on
March 28, 2012. The negative
declaration letter and EPA’s technical
support document for this action are
available in the docket for this
rulemaking and are available online at
www.regulations.gov.
III. Public Comments and EPA
Responses
EPA received one adverse comment
on the proposed approval of the
negative declaration for SSI units
submitted by Philadelphia AMS. All
other comments received were either
supportive of or not specific to this
action and thus are not addressed here.
Comment: The commenter stated that
EPA must confirm that no additional
SSI units exist or have been constructed
since the time of Philadelphia’s
certification letter, citing the amount of
time between receipt of the negative
declaration and the proposed approval.
Response: EPA does not agree with
the commenter’s assertion that EPA
must ensure that no additional SSI units
have been constructed since
Philadelphia AMS submitted the
negative declaration in order to finalize
this action. As stated in the technical
support document for the NPR and in
the EG for existing SSI units (40 CFR 60,
E:\FR\FM\15MRR1.SGM
15MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 51 / Thursday, March 15, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
subpart MMMM), the designated
facilities to which the EG apply are SSI
units that: (1) Commenced construction
on or before October 14, 2010; (2) meet
the definition of a SSI unit as defined
in 40 CFR 60.5250; and (3) are not
exempt under 40 CFR 60.5065. Thus, for
EPA approval of Philadelphia AMS’
negative declaration regarding existing
SSI, Philadelphia only needed to assert
no SSI units exist that commenced
construction on or before October 14,
2010. Because Philadelphia’s negative
declaration was submitted on March 28,
2012—after the October 14, 2010
deadline to be considered an existing
SSI unit—there is no need to revisit the
initial determination of Philadelphia
AMS that no existing SSI units exist
within the jurisdictional boundaries of
the local air pollution control agency.
Prior to Philadelphia’s submission, EPA
worked with Philadelphia AMS and
reviewed Philadelphia’s inventory of
sources to ensure no existing SSI units
existed within Philadelphia, and the
commenter has not provided any
information to the contrary that would
cause EPA to reconsider the assessment
of Philadelphia AMS’s negative
declaration. EPA’s acceptance of
Philadelphia’s negative declaration
therefore is appropriate. SSI units
constructed after the above cited date
(i.e., October 14, 2010) would be
considered ‘‘new,’’ as opposed to
‘‘existing,’’ and therefore would be
subject to a separate rule—40 CFR 60
subpart LLL, ‘‘Standards of Performance
for new Sewage Sludge Incineration
Units.’’ EPA is therefore finalizing the
negative declaration for existing SSI
units in this action.
IV. Final Action
In this final action, EPA is amending
40 CFR part 62 to reflect receipt of the
negative declaration letter from
Philadelphia AMS. EPA is accepting the
negative declaration in accordance with
the requirements of the CAA and 40
CFR 60.23(b) and 62.06.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely notifies
the public of EPA receipt of a negative
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Mar 14, 2018
Jkt 244001
declaration from an air pollution control
agency without any existing SSI units in
their jurisdiction. This action imposes
no requirements. Accordingly, EPA
certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this action
does not impose any additional
enforceable duty beyond that required
by state law, it does not contain any
unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as
described in the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104–4).
This action also does not have tribal
implications because it will not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
approves the negative declaration for
existing SSI units from the Philadelphia
AMS and does not alter the relationship
or the distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act. This action also is not subject
to Executive Order 13045 ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant.
With regard to negative declarations
for designated facilities received by EPA
from states, EPA’s role is to notify the
public of the receipt of such negative
declarations and revise 40 CFR part 62
accordingly. In this context, in the
absence of a prior existing requirement
for the State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to approve or disapprove a CAA section
111(d)/129 plan negative declaration
submission for failure to use VCS. It
would thus be inconsistent with
applicable law for EPA, when it reviews
a CAA section 111(d)/129 negative
declaration, to use VCS in place of a
section 111(d)/129 negative declaration
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
11419
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This action does
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
B. Submission to Congress and the
Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by May 14, 2018. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action
approving the negative declaration for
SSI units within the City of
Philadelphia may not be challenged
later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waste treatment and
disposal.
Dated: February 23, 2018.
Cosmo Servidio,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR part 62 is amended as follows:
PART 62—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF STATE PLANS
FOR DESIGNATED FACILITIES AND
POLLUTANTS
1. The authority citation for part 62
continues to read as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\15MRR1.SGM
15MRR1
11420
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 51 / Thursday, March 15, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart NN—Pennsylvania
2. Subpart NN is amended by adding
a new undesignated centerheading and
§ 62.9665 to read as follows:
■
Emissions From Existing Sewage Sludge
Incineration Units
§ 62.9665 Identification of plan—negative
declaration.
Letter from the City of Philadelphia,
Department of Public Health, submitted
March 28, 2012, certifying that there are
no existing sewage sludge incineration
units within the City of Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania that are subject to 40 CFR
part 60, subpart MMMM.
[FR Doc. 2018–05293 Filed 3–14–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2016–0365; FRL–9973–20]
Trinexapac-ethyl; Pesticide Tolerances
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation establishes a
tolerance for residues of trinexapacethyl in or on poppy, seed. Syngenta
Crop Protection, LLC requested this
tolerance under the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) in order to
cover residues of trinexapac-ethyl in
imported poppy seed commodities.
DATES: This regulation is effective
March 15, 2018. Objections and requests
for hearings must be received on or
before May 14, 2018, and must be filed
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2016–0365, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Mar 14, 2018
Jkt 244001
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael L. Goodis, Director,
Registration Division (7505P), Office of
Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001;
Main telephone number: (703) 305–
7090; email address: RDFRNotices@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of EPA’s tolerance
regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through
the Government Printing Office’s e-CFR
site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/textidx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/
40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing
request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2016–0365 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing
must be in writing, and must be
received by the Hearing Clerk on or
before May 14, 2018. Addresses for mail
and hand delivery of objections and
hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR
178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
submit a copy of the filing (excluding
any Confidential Business Information
(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
objection or hearing request, identified
by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2016–0365, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be CBI or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on
commenting or visiting the docket,
along with more information about
dockets generally, is available at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Summary of Petitioned-For
Tolerance
In the Federal Register of November
30, 2016 (81 FR 86312) (FRL–9954–06),
EPA issued a document pursuant to
FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C.
346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a
pesticide petition (PP 6E8462) by
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC., P.O.
Box 18300, Greensboro, NC 27419.
The petition requested that 40 CFR part
180 be amended by establishing a
tolerance for residues of the herbicide
trinexapac-ethyl, ethyl 4(cyclopropylhydroxymethylene)-3,5dioxocyclohexanecarboxylate expressed
as its primary metabolite trinexpac, 4(cyclopropylhydroxymethylene)-3,5dioxocyclohexanecarboxylic acid, in or
on poppy, seed at 8 parts per million
(ppm). That document referenced a
summary of the petition prepared by
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, the
registrant, which is available in the
docket, https://www.regulations.gov.
There were no comments received in
response to the notice of filing.
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and
Determination of Safety
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA
allows EPA to establish a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA
E:\FR\FM\15MRR1.SGM
15MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 51 (Thursday, March 15, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 11418-11420]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-05293]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 62
[EPA-R03-OAR-2017-0509; FRL-9975-38-Region 3]
Approval and Promulgation of State Air Quality Plans for
Designated Facilities and Pollutants; City of Philadelphia; Control of
Emissions From Existing Sewage Sludge Incineration Units
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is taking final action to notify the public that it has
received a negative declaration for sewage sludge incineration (SSI)
units within the City of Philadelphia. This negative declaration
certifies that SSI units subject to the requirements of sections 111(d)
and 129 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) do not exist in Pennsylvania within
the jurisdictional boundaries of the Philadelphia Air Management
Service (AMS). EPA is accepting the negative declaration in accordance
with the requirements of the CAA.
DATES: This rule is effective on April 16, 2018.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R03-OAR-2017-0509. All documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, e.g., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available through
https://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional availability
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Gordon, (215) 814-2039, or by
email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Sections 111(d) and 129 of the CAA require states to submit plans
to control certain pollutants (designated pollutants) at existing solid
waste combustor facilities (designated facilities) whenever standards
of performance have been established under section 111(b) for new
sources of the same type, and EPA has established emission guidelines
(EG) for such existing sources. CAA section 129 directs EPA to
establish standards of performance for new sources and emissions
guidelines for existing sources for each category of solid waste
incineration unit. CAA section 129(a) and (b). EPA also must specify
numerical emissions limitations for particulate matter (total and
fine), opacity (as appropriate), sulfur dioxide, hydrogen chloride,
oxides of nitrogen, carbon monoxide, lead, cadmium, mercury, and
dioxins and dibenzofurans. CAA section 129(a)(4).
On March 21, 2011 (76 FR 15372), EPA promulgated SSI unit new
source performance standards, 40 CFR part 60, subpart LLL, and EG at 40
CFR part 60, subpart MMMM. The designated facilities to which the EG
apply are existing SSI units that: (1) Commenced construction on or
before October 14, 2010; (2) meet the definition of a SSI unit as
defined in 40 CFR 60.5250; and (3) are not exempt under 40 CFR 60.5065.
Subpart B of 40 CFR part 60 establishes procedures to be followed
and requirements to be met in the development and submission of state
plans for controlling designated pollutants. Also, 40 CFR part 62
provides the procedural framework for the submission of these plans.
When designated facilities are located in a state, the state must then
develop and submit a plan for the control of the designated pollutant.
However, 40 CFR 60.23(b) and 62.06 provide that if there are no
existing sources of the designated pollutant in the state, the state
may submit a letter of certification to that effect (i.e., negative
declaration) in lieu of a plan. The negative declaration exempts the
state from the requirements of subpart B that require the submittal of
a CAA section 111(d)/129 plan.
On October 26, 2017 (82 FR 49563 and 82 FR 49511), EPA
simultaneously published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) and a
direct final rule (DFR) for the City of Philadelphia approving a
negative declaration from Philadelphia AMS that there are no existing
SSI units subject to the requirements of sections 111(d) and 129 of the
CAA in its respective air pollution control jurisdiction. EPA received
an adverse comment on the rulemaking and withdrew the DFR prior to the
effective date on December 26, 2017 (82 FR 60872). In this final
rulemaking, EPA is responding to the comment submitted on the proposed
approval of the negative declaration and is approving the negative
declaration.
II. State Submittal and EPA Analysis
Philadelphia AMS has determined that there are no existing SSI
units subject to the requirements of sections 111(d) and 129 of the CAA
in its respective air pollution control jurisdiction. Accordingly,
Philadelphia AMS submitted a negative declaration letter to EPA
certifying this fact on March 28, 2012. The negative declaration letter
and EPA's technical support document for this action are available in
the docket for this rulemaking and are available online at
www.regulations.gov.
III. Public Comments and EPA Responses
EPA received one adverse comment on the proposed approval of the
negative declaration for SSI units submitted by Philadelphia AMS. All
other comments received were either supportive of or not specific to
this action and thus are not addressed here.
Comment: The commenter stated that EPA must confirm that no
additional SSI units exist or have been constructed since the time of
Philadelphia's certification letter, citing the amount of time between
receipt of the negative declaration and the proposed approval.
Response: EPA does not agree with the commenter's assertion that
EPA must ensure that no additional SSI units have been constructed
since Philadelphia AMS submitted the negative declaration in order to
finalize this action. As stated in the technical support document for
the NPR and in the EG for existing SSI units (40 CFR 60,
[[Page 11419]]
subpart MMMM), the designated facilities to which the EG apply are SSI
units that: (1) Commenced construction on or before October 14, 2010;
(2) meet the definition of a SSI unit as defined in 40 CFR 60.5250; and
(3) are not exempt under 40 CFR 60.5065. Thus, for EPA approval of
Philadelphia AMS' negative declaration regarding existing SSI,
Philadelphia only needed to assert no SSI units exist that commenced
construction on or before October 14, 2010. Because Philadelphia's
negative declaration was submitted on March 28, 2012--after the October
14, 2010 deadline to be considered an existing SSI unit--there is no
need to revisit the initial determination of Philadelphia AMS that no
existing SSI units exist within the jurisdictional boundaries of the
local air pollution control agency. Prior to Philadelphia's submission,
EPA worked with Philadelphia AMS and reviewed Philadelphia's inventory
of sources to ensure no existing SSI units existed within Philadelphia,
and the commenter has not provided any information to the contrary that
would cause EPA to reconsider the assessment of Philadelphia AMS's
negative declaration. EPA's acceptance of Philadelphia's negative
declaration therefore is appropriate. SSI units constructed after the
above cited date (i.e., October 14, 2010) would be considered ``new,''
as opposed to ``existing,'' and therefore would be subject to a
separate rule--40 CFR 60 subpart LLL, ``Standards of Performance for
new Sewage Sludge Incineration Units.'' EPA is therefore finalizing the
negative declaration for existing SSI units in this action.
IV. Final Action
In this final action, EPA is amending 40 CFR part 62 to reflect
receipt of the negative declaration letter from Philadelphia AMS. EPA
is accepting the negative declaration in accordance with the
requirements of the CAA and 40 CFR 60.23(b) and 62.06.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely notifies the public of EPA receipt of a negative declaration
from an air pollution control agency without any existing SSI units in
their jurisdiction. This action imposes no requirements. Accordingly,
EPA certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this action does not
impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by state
law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4). This action also does
not have tribal implications because it will not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian
tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000). This action also does not have Federalism implications because
it does not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August
10, 1999). This action merely approves the negative declaration for
existing SSI units from the Philadelphia AMS and does not alter the
relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities
established in the Clean Air Act. This action also is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of Children from Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because
it is not economically significant.
With regard to negative declarations for designated facilities
received by EPA from states, EPA's role is to notify the public of the
receipt of such negative declarations and revise 40 CFR part 62
accordingly. In this context, in the absence of a prior existing
requirement for the State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS),
EPA has no authority to approve or disapprove a CAA section 111(d)/129
plan negative declaration submission for failure to use VCS. It would
thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a CAA
section 111(d)/129 negative declaration, to use VCS in place of a
section 111(d)/129 negative declaration that otherwise satisfies the
provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements of section
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This action does not impose an
information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by May 14, 2018. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action approving the negative declaration for SSI units
within the City of Philadelphia may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Waste treatment and disposal.
Dated: February 23, 2018.
Cosmo Servidio,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR part 62 is amended as follows:
PART 62--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF STATE PLANS FOR DESIGNATED
FACILITIES AND POLLUTANTS
0
1. The authority citation for part 62 continues to read as follows:
[[Page 11420]]
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart NN--Pennsylvania
0
2. Subpart NN is amended by adding a new undesignated centerheading and
Sec. 62.9665 to read as follows:
Emissions From Existing Sewage Sludge Incineration Units
Sec. 62.9665 Identification of plan--negative declaration.
Letter from the City of Philadelphia, Department of Public Health,
submitted March 28, 2012, certifying that there are no existing sewage
sludge incineration units within the City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
that are subject to 40 CFR part 60, subpart MMMM.
[FR Doc. 2018-05293 Filed 3-14-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P