Pistachios Grown in California, Arizona, and New Mexico; Decreased Assessment Rate, 11134-11135 [2018-05144]
Download as PDF
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
11134
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 14, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Insurance Act, or who fails to comply
with a requirement of the Federal Crop
Insurance Corporation, codified at 7
U.S.C. 1515(h)(3)(A), has a maximum of
the greater of: the amount of the
pecuniary gain obtained as a result of
the false or inaccurate information or
the noncompliance; or $11,984.
(ii) [Reserved]
(8) Rural Housing Service. (i) Civil
penalty for a violation of section 536 of
Title V of the Housing Act of 1949,
codified at 42 U.S.C. 1490p(e)(2), has a
maximum of $196,387 in the case of an
individual, and a maximum of
$1,963,870 in the case of an applicant
other than an individual.
(ii) Civil penalty for equity skimming
under section 543(a) of the Housing Act
of 1949, codified at 42 U.S.C.
1490s(a)(2), has a maximum of $35,440.
(iii) Civil penalty under section 543b
of the Housing Act of 1949 for a
violation of regulations or agreements
made in accordance with Title V of the
Housing Act of 1949, by submitting false
information, submitting false
certifications, failing to timely submit
information, failing to maintain real
property in good repair and condition,
failing to provide acceptable
management for a project, or failing to
comply with applicable civil rights
statutes and regulations, codified at 42
U.S.C. 1490s(b)(3)(A), has a maximum
of the greater of: twice the damages the
Department, guaranteed lender, or
project that is secured for a loan under
Title V, suffered or would have suffered
as a result of the violation; or $70,881
per violation.
(9) [Reserved]
(10) Commodity Credit Corporation.
(i) Civil penalty for willful failure or
refusal to furnish information, or willful
furnishing of false information under of
section 156 of the Federal Agricultural
Improvement and Reform Act of 1996,
codified at 7 U.S.C. 7272(g)(5), has a
maximum of $15,582 for each violation.
(ii) Civil penalty for willful failure or
refusal to furnish information or willful
furnishing of false data by a processor,
refiner, or importer of sugar, syrup and
molasses under section 156 of the
Federal Agriculture Improvement and
Reform Act of 1996, codified at 7 U.S.C.
7272(g)(5), has a maximum of $15,582
for each violation.
(iii) Civil penalty for filing a false
acreage report that exceeds tolerance
under section 156 of the Federal
Agriculture Improvement and Reform
Act of 1996, codified at 7 U.S.C.
7272(g)(5), has a maximum of $15,582
for each violation.
(iv) Civil penalty for knowingly
violating any regulation of the Secretary
of the Commodity Credit Corporation
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Mar 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
pertaining to flexible marketing
allotments for sugar under section
359h(b) of the Agricultural Adjustment
Act of 1938, codified at 7 U.S.C.
1359hh(b), has a maximum of $11,390
for each violation.
(v) Civil penalty for knowing violation
of regulations promulgated by the
Secretary pertaining to cotton insect
eradication under section 104(d) of the
Agricultural Act of 1949, codified at 7
U.S.C. 1444a(d), has a maximum of
$14,031 for each offense.
(11) Office of the Secretary. (i) Civil
penalty for making, presenting,
submitting or causing to be made,
presented or submitted, a false,
fictitious, or fraudulent claim as defined
under the Program Fraud Civil
Remedies Act of 1986, codified at 31
U.S.C. 3802(a)(1), has a maximum of
$11,182.
(ii) Civil penalty for making,
presenting, submitting or causing to be
made, presented or submitted, a false,
fictitious, or fraudulent written
statement as defined under the Program
Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986,
codified at 31 U.S.C. 3802(a)(2), has a
maximum of $11,182.
Dated: March 6, 2018.
Stephen Censky,
Deputy Secretary, U.S. Department of
Agriculture.
[FR Doc. 2018–04832 Filed 3–13–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–90–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 983
[Docket No. AMS–SC–17–0048; SC17–983–
2 FIR]
Pistachios Grown in California,
Arizona, and New Mexico; Decreased
Assessment Rate
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Department of
Agriculture adopts as final, without
change, an interim rule that
implemented a recommendation from
the Administrative Committee for
Pistachios (Committee) to decrease the
assessment rate established for the
2017–18 and subsequent production
years and administrative revisions to the
subpart headings to bring the language
into conformance with the Office of
Federal Register requirements.
DATES: Effective March 15, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Peter Sommers, Marketing Specialist, or
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Jeffrey Smutny, Regional Director,
California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or Email:
PeterR.Sommers@ams.usda.gov or
Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this and
other marketing order regulations by
viewing a guide at the following
website: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses;
or by contacting Richard Lower,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email:
Richard.Lower@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553,
amends regulations issued to carry out
a marketing order as defined in 7 CFR
900.2(j). This rule is issued under
Marketing Agreement and Order No.
983, both as amended (7 CFR part 983),
regulating the handling of pistachios
grown in California, Arizona, and New
Mexico. Part 983 (referred to as the
‘‘Order’’) is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’ The
Committee locally administers the
Order and is comprised of growers and
handlers of pistachios operating within
the area of production, and a public
member.
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Orders
13563 and 13175. This rule falls within
a category of regulatory actions that the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) exempted from Executive Order
12866 review. Additionally, because
this rule does not meet the definition of
a significant regulatory action, it does
not trigger the requirements contained
in Executive Order 13771. See OMB’s
Memorandum titled ‘‘Interim Guidance
Implementing Section 2 of the Executive
Order of January 30, 2017, titled
‘Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs’ ’’ (February 2, 2017).
Under the Order, pistachio handlers
in California, Arizona, and New Mexico
are subject to assessments, which
provide funds to administer the Order.
Assessment rates issued under the
Order are intended to be applicable to
all assessable pistachios for the entire
production year, and continue
indefinitely until amended, suspended,
or terminated. The Committee’s
E:\FR\FM\14MRR1.SGM
14MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 14, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
production year begins on September 1
and ends on August 31.
In an interim rule published in the
Federal Register on October 24, 2017,
and effective on October 24, 2017, (82
FR 49087, Doc No. AMS–SC–17–0048;
SC17–983–2 IR), § 983.253 was
amended by decreasing the assessment
rate established for pistachios grown in
California, Arizona, and New Mexico for
the 2017–18 and subsequent production
years from $0.0010 to $0.0001 per
pound of assessed weight pistachios
handled. The decreased assessment rate
allows the Committee to maintain their
financial reserve at the limit specified
under the Order while providing
adequate funding to meet program
expenses.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
rule on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this final regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in
order that small businesses will not be
unduly or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are 18 handlers subject to
regulation under the order and
approximately 1,236 producers of
pistachios in the production area. Small
agricultural service firms are defined by
the Small Business Administration as
those having annual receipts of less than
$7,500,000, and small agricultural
producers are defined as those having
annual receipts of less than $750,000
(13 CFR 121.201).
Based on Committee data, it is
estimated that about 50 percent of the
handlers annually ship less than
$7,500,000 worth of pistachios. Nine of
the 18 (50 percent) regulated handlers
received enough pistachios at an
average price of $2.50 per pound to be
considered large handlers, leaving the
percentage of small handlers at 50
percent.
The National Agricultural Statistics
Service (NASS) 2012 data on pistachio
farm size indicates that there were 1,305
pistachio farms, of which 945, or 72
percent, were less than 100 acres. NASS
2016 annual production data indicates
that the per-acre production of
pistachios was 3,750 pounds. At an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Mar 13, 2018
Jkt 244001
average value of $1.68 per pound, each
acre of pistachios could return $6,300.
In order for a producer to have $750,000
in annual receipts, the producer would
have to have at least 119 acres. Thus,
about half the handlers and a majority
of the producers in the production area
may be classified as small entities.
This rule continues in effect the
interim rule that decreased the
assessment rate established and
collected from handlers for the 2017–18
and subsequent production years from
$0.0010 to $0.0001 per pound of
pistachios handled. The Committee
unanimously recommended 2017–18
expenditures of $672,900, and
recommended an assessment rate of
$0.0001 per pound of assessed weight
pistachios, by majority vote. The
$0.0001 assessment rate is $0.0009
lower than the rate previously in effect.
The quantity of assessable pistachios for
the 2017–18 production year is
estimated at 550 million pounds. Thus,
the $0.0001 rate should provide $55,000
in assessment income. Income derived
from handler’s assessments, along with
interest income, California Pistachio
Research Board (CPRB) management
income, and funds from the
Committee’s authorized reserve, will be
adequate to cover expenses for the
2017–18 production year, while not
adding to the financial reserve.
This rule continues in effect the
action that decreased the assessment
obligation imposed on handlers.
Assessments are applied uniformly on
all handlers, and some of the costs may
be passed on to producers. However,
decreasing the assessment rate reduces
the burden on handlers, and may reduce
the burden on producers.
Additionally, the Committee’s
meetings were widely publicized
throughout the California, Arizona, and
New Mexico pistachio industry, and all
interested persons were invited to
attend the meetings and encouraged to
participate in Committee deliberations
on all issues. Like all Committee
meetings, the July 10, 2017, and August
1, 2017, meetings were public meetings
and all entities, both large and small,
were able to express views on this issue.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the Order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by OMB and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0215,
‘‘Vegetable and Specialty Crop
Marketing Orders.’’ No changes in those
requirements as a result of this action
are necessary. Should any changes
become necessary, they would be
submitted to OMB for approval.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
11135
This action imposes no additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
on either small or large California,
Arizona, and New Mexico pistachio
handlers. As with all Federal marketing
order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this rule.
Comments on the interim rule were
required to be received on or before
December, 26, 2017. No comments were
received. Therefore, for reasons given in
the interim rule, we are adopting the
interim rule as a final rule, without
change.
To view the interim rule, go to:
https://www.regulations.gov/
document?D=AMS-SC-17-0048.
This action also affirms information
contained in the interim rule concerning
Executive Orders 12866, 12988, 13175,
13563, and 13771; the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35);
and the E-Gov Act (44 U.S.C. 101).
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, it is found that
finalizing the interim rule, without
change, as published in the Federal
Register (82 FR 49087 October 24, 2017)
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 983
Marketing agreements, Pistachios,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 983—PISTACHIOS GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA, ARIZONA, AND NEW
MEXICO
Accordingly, the interim rule
amending 7 CFR part 983, which was
published at 82 FR 49087 on October
24, 2017, is adopted as final, without
change.
■
Dated: March 9, 2018.
Bruce Summers,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–05144 Filed 3–13–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
E:\FR\FM\14MRR1.SGM
14MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 14, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 11134-11135]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-05144]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 983
[Docket No. AMS-SC-17-0048; SC17-983-2 FIR]
Pistachios Grown in California, Arizona, and New Mexico;
Decreased Assessment Rate
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture adopts as final, without change,
an interim rule that implemented a recommendation from the
Administrative Committee for Pistachios (Committee) to decrease the
assessment rate established for the 2017-18 and subsequent production
years and administrative revisions to the subpart headings to bring the
language into conformance with the Office of Federal Register
requirements.
DATES: Effective March 15, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter Sommers, Marketing Specialist,
or Jeffrey Smutny, Regional Director, California Marketing Field
Office, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops
Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906, or
Email: [email protected] or [email protected].
Small businesses may request information on complying with this and
other marketing order regulations by viewing a guide at the following
website: https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses; or by contacting Richard Lower, Marketing Order and
Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237;
Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553,
amends regulations issued to carry out a marketing order as defined in
7 CFR 900.2(j). This rule is issued under Marketing Agreement and Order
No. 983, both as amended (7 CFR part 983), regulating the handling of
pistachios grown in California, Arizona, and New Mexico. Part 983
(referred to as the ``Order'') is effective under the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674),
hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.'' The Committee locally
administers the Order and is comprised of growers and handlers of
pistachios operating within the area of production, and a public
member.
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Orders 13563 and 13175. This rule falls
within a category of regulatory actions that the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive Order 12866 review.
Additionally, because this rule does not meet the definition of a
significant regulatory action, it does not trigger the requirements
contained in Executive Order 13771. See OMB's Memorandum titled
``Interim Guidance Implementing Section 2 of the Executive Order of
January 30, 2017, titled `Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs'[thinsp]'' (February 2, 2017).
Under the Order, pistachio handlers in California, Arizona, and New
Mexico are subject to assessments, which provide funds to administer
the Order. Assessment rates issued under the Order are intended to be
applicable to all assessable pistachios for the entire production year,
and continue indefinitely until amended, suspended, or terminated. The
Committee's
[[Page 11135]]
production year begins on September 1 and ends on August 31.
In an interim rule published in the Federal Register on October 24,
2017, and effective on October 24, 2017, (82 FR 49087, Doc No. AMS-SC-
17-0048; SC17-983-2 IR), Sec. 983.253 was amended by decreasing the
assessment rate established for pistachios grown in California,
Arizona, and New Mexico for the 2017-18 and subsequent production years
from $0.0010 to $0.0001 per pound of assessed weight pistachios
handled. The decreased assessment rate allows the Committee to maintain
their financial reserve at the limit specified under the Order while
providing adequate funding to meet program expenses.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this rule on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are 18 handlers subject to regulation under the order and
approximately 1,236 producers of pistachios in the production area.
Small agricultural service firms are defined by the Small Business
Administration as those having annual receipts of less than $7,500,000,
and small agricultural producers are defined as those having annual
receipts of less than $750,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
Based on Committee data, it is estimated that about 50 percent of
the handlers annually ship less than $7,500,000 worth of pistachios.
Nine of the 18 (50 percent) regulated handlers received enough
pistachios at an average price of $2.50 per pound to be considered
large handlers, leaving the percentage of small handlers at 50 percent.
The National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) 2012 data on
pistachio farm size indicates that there were 1,305 pistachio farms, of
which 945, or 72 percent, were less than 100 acres. NASS 2016 annual
production data indicates that the per-acre production of pistachios
was 3,750 pounds. At an average value of $1.68 per pound, each acre of
pistachios could return $6,300. In order for a producer to have
$750,000 in annual receipts, the producer would have to have at least
119 acres. Thus, about half the handlers and a majority of the
producers in the production area may be classified as small entities.
This rule continues in effect the interim rule that decreased the
assessment rate established and collected from handlers for the 2017-18
and subsequent production years from $0.0010 to $0.0001 per pound of
pistachios handled. The Committee unanimously recommended 2017-18
expenditures of $672,900, and recommended an assessment rate of $0.0001
per pound of assessed weight pistachios, by majority vote. The $0.0001
assessment rate is $0.0009 lower than the rate previously in effect.
The quantity of assessable pistachios for the 2017-18 production year
is estimated at 550 million pounds. Thus, the $0.0001 rate should
provide $55,000 in assessment income. Income derived from handler's
assessments, along with interest income, California Pistachio Research
Board (CPRB) management income, and funds from the Committee's
authorized reserve, will be adequate to cover expenses for the 2017-18
production year, while not adding to the financial reserve.
This rule continues in effect the action that decreased the
assessment obligation imposed on handlers. Assessments are applied
uniformly on all handlers, and some of the costs may be passed on to
producers. However, decreasing the assessment rate reduces the burden
on handlers, and may reduce the burden on producers.
Additionally, the Committee's meetings were widely publicized
throughout the California, Arizona, and New Mexico pistachio industry,
and all interested persons were invited to attend the meetings and
encouraged to participate in Committee deliberations on all issues.
Like all Committee meetings, the July 10, 2017, and August 1, 2017,
meetings were public meetings and all entities, both large and small,
were able to express views on this issue.
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the Order's information collection requirements have been
previously approved by OMB and assigned OMB No. 0581-0215, ``Vegetable
and Specialty Crop Marketing Orders.'' No changes in those requirements
as a result of this action are necessary. Should any changes become
necessary, they would be submitted to OMB for approval.
This action imposes no additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large California, Arizona, and New
Mexico pistachio handlers. As with all Federal marketing order
programs, reports and forms are periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and duplication by industry and public sector
agencies.
USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with this rule.
Comments on the interim rule were required to be received on or
before December, 26, 2017. No comments were received. Therefore, for
reasons given in the interim rule, we are adopting the interim rule as
a final rule, without change.
To view the interim rule, go to: https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=AMS-SC-17-0048.
This action also affirms information contained in the interim rule
concerning Executive Orders 12866, 12988, 13175, 13563, and 13771; the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35); and the E-Gov Act (44
U.S.C. 101).
After consideration of all relevant material presented, it is found
that finalizing the interim rule, without change, as published in the
Federal Register (82 FR 49087 October 24, 2017) will tend to effectuate
the declared policy of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 983
Marketing agreements, Pistachios, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 983--PISTACHIOS GROWN IN CALIFORNIA, ARIZONA, AND NEW MEXICO
0
Accordingly, the interim rule amending 7 CFR part 983, which was
published at 82 FR 49087 on October 24, 2017, is adopted as final,
without change.
Dated: March 9, 2018.
Bruce Summers,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-05144 Filed 3-13-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P