Special Local Regulation; Pensacola Bay, Pensacola, FL, 9454-9456 [2018-04503]
Download as PDF
9454
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 6, 2018 / Proposed Rules
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
The Proposed Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as
follows:
1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103,
40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR,
1959–1963 Comp., p. 389.
T–705 Utica, NY (UCA) to IKNAR, Canada [New]
Utica, NY (UCA)
VORTAC
(Lat.
USICI, NY
Fix
(Lat.
GACKE, NY
Fix
(Lat.
BECKS, NY
Fix
(Lat.
SMAIR, NY
Fix
(Lat.
FOSYU, NY
Fix
(Lat.
Saranac Lake, NY (SLK)
VOR/DME
(Lat.
RIGID, NY
Fix
(Lat.
WP
(Lat.
PBERG, NY
LATTS, NY
WP
(Lat.
EBDOT, CD
WP
(Lat.
DUNUP, CD
WP
(Lat.
TAMKO, CD
INT
(Lat.
LIVBA, CD
WP
(Lat.
NOSUT, CD
WP
(Lat.
IKNAR, CD
WP
(Lat.
43°01′35.45″
43°11′23.04″
43°19′11.10″
43°32′56.63″
44°03′32.47″
44°12′25.39″
44°23′04.41″
44°35′19.53″
44°42′06.25″
44°51′29.78″
45°05′25.23″
45°17′34.90″
46°02′54.00″
46°14′17.05″
46°21′38.00″
47°11′35.44″
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11B,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 3, 2017 and
effective September 15, 2017, is
amended as follows:
■
Paragraph 6013
Routes.
Canadian Area Navigation
*
*
*
75°09′52.28″
75°03′06.15″
74°57′40.88″
74°48′03.47″
74°26′20.99″
74°19′58.15″
74°12′16.21″
73°44′34.07″
73°31′22.18″
73°32′29.26″
73°34′01.25″
73°35′21.89″
73°54′39.00″
73°57′05.38″
73°58′38.00″
74°09′31.38″
*
*
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
Excluding the airspace within Canada.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2018–04415 Filed 3–5–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket Number USCG–2018–0103]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulation; Pensacola
Bay, Pensacola, FL
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a temporary special local
regulation on Pensacola Bay in
Pensacola, FL. The proposed
rulemaking is needed to protect the
persons participating in the Pensacola
Triathlon marine event. This proposed
rulemaking restricts transit into, through
and within the regulated area unless
specifically authorized by the Captain of
the Port Sector Mobile (COTP) or a
designated representative. We invite
your comments on this proposed
rulemaking.
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:05 Mar 05, 2018
Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before April 5, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2018–0103 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email LT Kyle D.
Berry, Sector Mobile, Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast
Guard; telephone 251–441–5940, email
kyle.d.berry@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Issued in Washington, DC, on February 26,
2018.
Rodger A. Dean Jr.,
Manager, Airspace Policy Group.
Jkt 244001
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port Sector Mobile
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
PATCOM Patrol Commander
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
On January 16, 2018, the marine event
sponsor for the annual Pensacola
Triathlon marine event submitted an
application for a marine event permit.
The Captain of the Port Sector Mobile
(COTP) has determined a special local
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
regulation is needed to protect the
persons participating in and viewing the
Pensacola Triathlon marine event.
The purpose of this proposed
rulemaking is to restrict transit into,
through and within the regulated area
on Pensacola Bay extending in a 300
yard radius from position 30°24′16.4″ N,
87°12′55.2″ W in Pensacola, FL during
the Pensacola Triathlon. The Coast
Guard proposes this rulemaking under
authority in 33 U.S.C. 1233.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to establish
a temporary special local regulation on
Pensacola Bay extending in a 300 yard
radius from position 30°24′16.4″ N,
87°12′55.2″ W in Pensacola, FL. The
proposed rulemaking is needed to
needed to protect the persons
participating in the Pensacola Triathlon
marine event. This proposed rulemaking
restricts transit into, through and within
the regulated area unless specifically
authorized by the COTP. No vessel or
person would be permitted to enter the
regulated area without obtaining
permission from the COTP or a
designated representative. A designated
representative may be a Patrol
Commander (PATCOM). The PATCOM
would be aboard either a Coast Guard or
Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel. The Patrol
Commander may be contacted on
Channel 16 VHF–FM (156.8 MHz) by
the call sign ‘‘PATCOM’’. All persons
and vessels not registered with the
sponsor as participants or official patrol
vessels are considered spectators. The
E:\FR\FM\06MRP1.SGM
06MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 6, 2018 / Proposed Rules
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
‘‘official patrol vessels’’ consist of any
Coast Guard, state, or local law
enforcement and sponsor provided
vessels assigned or approved by the
COTP to patrol the regulated area.
Spectator vessels desiring to transit
the regulated area may do so only with
prior approval of the Patrol Commander
and when so directed by that officer
would be operated at a minimum safe
navigation speed in a manner which
will not endanger participants in the
regulated area or any other vessels. No
spectator vessel shall anchor, block,
loiter, or impede the through transit of
participants or official patrol vessels in
the regulated area during the effective
dates and times, unless cleared for entry
by or through an official patrol vessel.
Any spectator vessel may anchor
outside the regulated area, but may not
anchor in, block, or loiter in a navigable
channel. Spectator vessels may be
moored to a waterfront facility within
the regulated area in such a way that
they shall not interfere with the progress
of the event. Such mooring must be
complete at least 30 minutes prior to the
establishment of the regulated area and
remain moored through the duration of
the event.
The COTP or a designated
representative may forbid and control
the movement of all vessels in the
regulated area. When hailed or signaled
by an official patrol vessel, a vessel shall
come to an immediate stop and comply
with the directions given. Failure to do
so may result in expulsion from the
area, citation for failure to comply, or
both.
The COTP or a designated
representative may terminate the event
or the operation of any vessel at any
time it is deemed necessary for the
protection of life or property. The COTP
or a designated representative would
terminate enforcement of the special
local regulations at the conclusion of the
event.
The regulatory text we are proposing
appears at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:05 Mar 05, 2018
Jkt 244001
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This NPRM has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on size, location, and duration
of the proposed rulemaking. The
proposed special local regulation on
Pensacola Bay extending in a 300 yard
radius from position 30°24′16.4″ N,
87°12′55.2″ W in Pensacola, FL from 4
a.m. to 10 a.m. on April 29, 2018.
Additionally, the Coast Guard will issue
Broadcast Notices to Mariners via
VHF–FM marine channel 16 about the
regulation so that waterway users may
plan accordingly for transits during this
restriction. The rule also allows vessels
to seek permission from the COTP or a
designated representative to enter the
regulated area.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section IV.A above,
this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
9455
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for
a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and have determined that it is
consistent with the fundamental
federalism principles and preemption
requirements described in Executive
Order 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
If you believe this proposed rule has
implications for federalism or Indian
tribes, please contact the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01, which guides the
Coast Guard in complying with the
E:\FR\FM\06MRP1.SGM
06MRP1
9456
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 6, 2018 / Proposed Rules
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a
special local regulation on Pensacola
Bay extending in a 300 yard radius from
position 30°24′16.4″ N, 87°12′55.2″ W in
Pensacola, FL. It is categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph L61 of Appendix A, Table 1
of DHS Instruction Manual 023–01–
001–01, Rev. 01. A Record of
Environmental Consideration (REC)
supporting this determination would be
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
We seek any comments or information
that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
this proposed rule.
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, visit https://
www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in the docket, and all
public comments, will be in our online
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:05 Mar 05, 2018
Jkt 244001
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
website’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; 33 CFR 1.05–1.
2. Add § 100.35T08–0103 to read as
follows:
■
§ 100.35T08–0103 Special Local
Regulation; Pensacola Bay, Pensacola, FL
(a) Regulated area. All navigable
waters of Pensacola Bay extending in a
300 yard radius from position
30°24′16.4″ N, 87°12′55.2″ W in
Pensacola, FL.
(b) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced on April 29, 2018.
(c) Special local regulations.
(1) In accordance with the general
regulations in § 100.801, entry into,
transit within or through, or exit from
this area is prohibited unless authorized
by the Captain of the Port Sector Mobile
(COTP) or a designated representative.
A designated representative may be a
Patrol Commander (PATCOM). The
PATCOM will be aboard either a Coast
Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel.
The Patrol Commander may be
contacted on Channel 16 VHF–FM
(156.8 MHz) by the call sign
‘‘PATCOM’’.
(2) All persons and vessels not
registered with the sponsor as
participants or official patrol vessels are
considered spectators. The ‘‘official
patrol vessels’’ consist of any Coast
Guard, state, or local law enforcement
and sponsor provided vessels assigned
or approved by the Captain of the Port
(COTP) Mobile to patrol the regulated
area.
(3) Spectator vessels desiring to
transit the regulated area may do so only
with prior approval of the Patrol
Commander and when so directed by
that officer will be operated at a
minimum safe navigation speed in a
manner which will not endanger
participants in the regulated area or any
other vessels.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(4) No spectator vessel shall anchor,
block, loiter, or impede the through
transit of participants or official patrol
vessels in the regulated area during the
effective dates and times, unless cleared
for entry by or through an official patrol
vessel.
(5) Any spectator vessel may anchor
outside the regulated area, but may not
anchor in, block, or loiter in a navigable
channel. Spectator vessels may be
moored to a waterfront facility within
the regulated area in such a way that
they shall not interfere with the progress
of the event. Such mooring must be
complete at least 30 minutes prior to the
establishment of the regulated area and
remain moored through the duration of
the event.
(6) The COTP or a designated
representative may forbid and control
the movement of all vessels in the
regulated area. When hailed or signaled
by an official patrol vessel, a vessel shall
come to an immediate stop and comply
with the directions given. Failure to do
so may result in expulsion from the
area, citation for failure to comply, or
both.
(7) The COTP or a designated
representative may terminate the event
or the operation of any vessel at any
time it is deemed necessary for the
protection of life or property.
(8) The COTP or a designated
representative will terminate
enforcement of the special local
regulations at the conclusion of the
event.
(d) Informational broadcasts. The
COTP or a designated representative
will inform the public through
Broadcast Notices to Mariners of the
enforcement period for the temporary
safety zone as well as any changes in the
planned schedule
Dated: February 26, 2018.
M.R. McLellan,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector Mobile.
[FR Doc. 2018–04503 Filed 3–5–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2018–0029]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone for Fireworks Display;
Patapsco River, Inner Harbor,
Baltimore, MD
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\06MRP1.SGM
Coast Guard, DHS.
06MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 6, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 9454-9456]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-04503]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket Number USCG-2018-0103]
RIN 1625-AA08
Special Local Regulation; Pensacola Bay, Pensacola, FL
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary special
local regulation on Pensacola Bay in Pensacola, FL. The proposed
rulemaking is needed to protect the persons participating in the
Pensacola Triathlon marine event. This proposed rulemaking restricts
transit into, through and within the regulated area unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector Mobile (COTP) or a
designated representative. We invite your comments on this proposed
rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before April 5, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2018-0103 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email LT Kyle D. Berry, Sector Mobile,
Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 251-441-
5940, email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port Sector Mobile
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
PATCOM Patrol Commander
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
On January 16, 2018, the marine event sponsor for the annual
Pensacola Triathlon marine event submitted an application for a marine
event permit. The Captain of the Port Sector Mobile (COTP) has
determined a special local regulation is needed to protect the persons
participating in and viewing the Pensacola Triathlon marine event.
The purpose of this proposed rulemaking is to restrict transit
into, through and within the regulated area on Pensacola Bay extending
in a 300 yard radius from position 30[deg]24'16.4'' N, 87[deg]12'55.2''
W in Pensacola, FL during the Pensacola Triathlon. The Coast Guard
proposes this rulemaking under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1233.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary special local
regulation on Pensacola Bay extending in a 300 yard radius from
position 30[deg]24'16.4'' N, 87[deg]12'55.2'' W in Pensacola, FL. The
proposed rulemaking is needed to needed to protect the persons
participating in the Pensacola Triathlon marine event. This proposed
rulemaking restricts transit into, through and within the regulated
area unless specifically authorized by the COTP. No vessel or person
would be permitted to enter the regulated area without obtaining
permission from the COTP or a designated representative. A designated
representative may be a Patrol Commander (PATCOM). The PATCOM would be
aboard either a Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel. The Patrol
Commander may be contacted on Channel 16 VHF-FM (156.8 MHz) by the call
sign ``PATCOM''. All persons and vessels not registered with the
sponsor as participants or official patrol vessels are considered
spectators. The
[[Page 9455]]
``official patrol vessels'' consist of any Coast Guard, state, or local
law enforcement and sponsor provided vessels assigned or approved by
the COTP to patrol the regulated area.
Spectator vessels desiring to transit the regulated area may do so
only with prior approval of the Patrol Commander and when so directed
by that officer would be operated at a minimum safe navigation speed in
a manner which will not endanger participants in the regulated area or
any other vessels. No spectator vessel shall anchor, block, loiter, or
impede the through transit of participants or official patrol vessels
in the regulated area during the effective dates and times, unless
cleared for entry by or through an official patrol vessel. Any
spectator vessel may anchor outside the regulated area, but may not
anchor in, block, or loiter in a navigable channel. Spectator vessels
may be moored to a waterfront facility within the regulated area in
such a way that they shall not interfere with the progress of the
event. Such mooring must be complete at least 30 minutes prior to the
establishment of the regulated area and remain moored through the
duration of the event.
The COTP or a designated representative may forbid and control the
movement of all vessels in the regulated area. When hailed or signaled
by an official patrol vessel, a vessel shall come to an immediate stop
and comply with the directions given. Failure to do so may result in
expulsion from the area, citation for failure to comply, or both.
The COTP or a designated representative may terminate the event or
the operation of any vessel at any time it is deemed necessary for the
protection of life or property. The COTP or a designated representative
would terminate enforcement of the special local regulations at the
conclusion of the event.
The regulatory text we are proposing appears at the end of this
document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on size, location,
and duration of the proposed rulemaking. The proposed special local
regulation on Pensacola Bay extending in a 300 yard radius from
position 30[deg]24'16.4'' N, 87[deg]12'55.2'' W in Pensacola, FL from 4
a.m. to 10 a.m. on April 29, 2018. Additionally, the Coast Guard will
issue Broadcast Notices to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about
the regulation so that waterway users may plan accordingly for transits
during this restriction. The rule also allows vessels to seek
permission from the COTP or a designated representative to enter the
regulated area.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the
[[Page 9456]]
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have determined that this action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the
human environment. This rule involves a special local regulation on
Pensacola Bay extending in a 300 yard radius from position
30[deg]24'16.4'' N, 87[deg]12'55.2'' W in Pensacola, FL. It is
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L61 of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A
Record of Environmental Consideration (REC) supporting this
determination would be available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
We seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery
of a significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, visit https://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; 33 CFR 1.05-1.
0
2. Add Sec. 100.35T08-0103 to read as follows:
Sec. 100.35T08-0103 Special Local Regulation; Pensacola Bay,
Pensacola, FL
(a) Regulated area. All navigable waters of Pensacola Bay extending
in a 300 yard radius from position 30[deg]24'16.4'' N, 87[deg]12'55.2''
W in Pensacola, FL.
(b) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced on April 29,
2018.
(c) Special local regulations.
(1) In accordance with the general regulations in Sec. 100.801,
entry into, transit within or through, or exit from this area is
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector Mobile
(COTP) or a designated representative. A designated representative may
be a Patrol Commander (PATCOM). The PATCOM will be aboard either a
Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel. The Patrol Commander may
be contacted on Channel 16 VHF-FM (156.8 MHz) by the call sign
``PATCOM''.
(2) All persons and vessels not registered with the sponsor as
participants or official patrol vessels are considered spectators. The
``official patrol vessels'' consist of any Coast Guard, state, or local
law enforcement and sponsor provided vessels assigned or approved by
the Captain of the Port (COTP) Mobile to patrol the regulated area.
(3) Spectator vessels desiring to transit the regulated area may do
so only with prior approval of the Patrol Commander and when so
directed by that officer will be operated at a minimum safe navigation
speed in a manner which will not endanger participants in the regulated
area or any other vessels.
(4) No spectator vessel shall anchor, block, loiter, or impede the
through transit of participants or official patrol vessels in the
regulated area during the effective dates and times, unless cleared for
entry by or through an official patrol vessel.
(5) Any spectator vessel may anchor outside the regulated area, but
may not anchor in, block, or loiter in a navigable channel. Spectator
vessels may be moored to a waterfront facility within the regulated
area in such a way that they shall not interfere with the progress of
the event. Such mooring must be complete at least 30 minutes prior to
the establishment of the regulated area and remain moored through the
duration of the event.
(6) The COTP or a designated representative may forbid and control
the movement of all vessels in the regulated area. When hailed or
signaled by an official patrol vessel, a vessel shall come to an
immediate stop and comply with the directions given. Failure to do so
may result in expulsion from the area, citation for failure to comply,
or both.
(7) The COTP or a designated representative may terminate the event
or the operation of any vessel at any time it is deemed necessary for
the protection of life or property.
(8) The COTP or a designated representative will terminate
enforcement of the special local regulations at the conclusion of the
event.
(d) Informational broadcasts. The COTP or a designated
representative will inform the public through Broadcast Notices to
Mariners of the enforcement period for the temporary safety zone as
well as any changes in the planned schedule
Dated: February 26, 2018.
M.R. McLellan,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Mobile.
[FR Doc. 2018-04503 Filed 3-5-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P