Safety Zone for Fireworks Display; Patapsco River, Inner Harbor, Baltimore, MD, 9456-9459 [2018-04487]
Download as PDF
9456
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 6, 2018 / Proposed Rules
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a
special local regulation on Pensacola
Bay extending in a 300 yard radius from
position 30°24′16.4″ N, 87°12′55.2″ W in
Pensacola, FL. It is categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph L61 of Appendix A, Table 1
of DHS Instruction Manual 023–01–
001–01, Rev. 01. A Record of
Environmental Consideration (REC)
supporting this determination would be
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
We seek any comments or information
that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
this proposed rule.
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, visit https://
www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in the docket, and all
public comments, will be in our online
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:05 Mar 05, 2018
Jkt 244001
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
website’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; 33 CFR 1.05–1.
2. Add § 100.35T08–0103 to read as
follows:
■
§ 100.35T08–0103 Special Local
Regulation; Pensacola Bay, Pensacola, FL
(a) Regulated area. All navigable
waters of Pensacola Bay extending in a
300 yard radius from position
30°24′16.4″ N, 87°12′55.2″ W in
Pensacola, FL.
(b) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced on April 29, 2018.
(c) Special local regulations.
(1) In accordance with the general
regulations in § 100.801, entry into,
transit within or through, or exit from
this area is prohibited unless authorized
by the Captain of the Port Sector Mobile
(COTP) or a designated representative.
A designated representative may be a
Patrol Commander (PATCOM). The
PATCOM will be aboard either a Coast
Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel.
The Patrol Commander may be
contacted on Channel 16 VHF–FM
(156.8 MHz) by the call sign
‘‘PATCOM’’.
(2) All persons and vessels not
registered with the sponsor as
participants or official patrol vessels are
considered spectators. The ‘‘official
patrol vessels’’ consist of any Coast
Guard, state, or local law enforcement
and sponsor provided vessels assigned
or approved by the Captain of the Port
(COTP) Mobile to patrol the regulated
area.
(3) Spectator vessels desiring to
transit the regulated area may do so only
with prior approval of the Patrol
Commander and when so directed by
that officer will be operated at a
minimum safe navigation speed in a
manner which will not endanger
participants in the regulated area or any
other vessels.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(4) No spectator vessel shall anchor,
block, loiter, or impede the through
transit of participants or official patrol
vessels in the regulated area during the
effective dates and times, unless cleared
for entry by or through an official patrol
vessel.
(5) Any spectator vessel may anchor
outside the regulated area, but may not
anchor in, block, or loiter in a navigable
channel. Spectator vessels may be
moored to a waterfront facility within
the regulated area in such a way that
they shall not interfere with the progress
of the event. Such mooring must be
complete at least 30 minutes prior to the
establishment of the regulated area and
remain moored through the duration of
the event.
(6) The COTP or a designated
representative may forbid and control
the movement of all vessels in the
regulated area. When hailed or signaled
by an official patrol vessel, a vessel shall
come to an immediate stop and comply
with the directions given. Failure to do
so may result in expulsion from the
area, citation for failure to comply, or
both.
(7) The COTP or a designated
representative may terminate the event
or the operation of any vessel at any
time it is deemed necessary for the
protection of life or property.
(8) The COTP or a designated
representative will terminate
enforcement of the special local
regulations at the conclusion of the
event.
(d) Informational broadcasts. The
COTP or a designated representative
will inform the public through
Broadcast Notices to Mariners of the
enforcement period for the temporary
safety zone as well as any changes in the
planned schedule
Dated: February 26, 2018.
M.R. McLellan,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector Mobile.
[FR Doc. 2018–04503 Filed 3–5–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2018–0029]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone for Fireworks Display;
Patapsco River, Inner Harbor,
Baltimore, MD
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\06MRP1.SGM
Coast Guard, DHS.
06MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 6, 2018 / Proposed Rules
ACTION:
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a temporary safety zone for
certain waters of the Patapsco River.
This action is necessary to provide for
the safety of life on the navigable waters
of the Inner Harbor at Baltimore, MD,
during a fireworks display on April 21,
2018. If necessary, due to inclement
weather, the event will be rescheduled
to April 22, 2018. This action will
prohibit persons and vessels from
entering the safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Maryland-National Capital Region or a
designated representative. We invite
your comments on this proposed
rulemaking.
SUMMARY:
Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before April 5, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2018–0029 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
DATES:
If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email Mr. Ronald
Houck, Sector Maryland-National
Capital Region Waterways Management
Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone
410–576–2674, email Ronald.L.Houck@
uscg.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
On December 15, 2017, the Baltimore
Office of Promotion and The Arts
notified the Coast Guard that it will be
conducting a fireworks display from
11:59 p.m. on April 21, 2018, to 12:06
a.m. on April 22, 2018, or if necessary,
due to inclement weather, from 11:59
p.m. on April 22, 2018 to 12:06 a.m. on
April 23, 2018. Final details of the event
were received by the Coast Guard on
January 30, 2018. The public fireworks
display will be conducted by Fireworks
by Grucci, Inc., and launched from five
floating platforms located within the
waters of Inner Harbor Baltimore,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:05 Mar 05, 2018
Jkt 244001
between Inner Harbor Pier 3 and Inner
Harbor Pier 5 in Baltimore, MD. Hazards
from firework displays include
accidental discharge of fireworks,
dangerous projectiles, and falling hot
embers or other debris. The COTP has
determined that potential hazards
associated with the fireworks to be used
in this display would be a safety
concern for anyone within 75 yards of
each of the five fireworks discharge
sites.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to
ensure the safety of persons and vessels
on the navigable waters of the Inner
Harbor before, during, and after the
scheduled event. The Coast Guard
proposes this rulemaking under
authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP proposes to establish a
safety zone from 11 p.m. on April 21,
2018, until 1 a.m. on April 22, 2018, or
if necessary, due to inclement weather,
from 11 p.m. on April 22, 2018, until 1
a.m. on April 23, 2018. The safety zone
will cover all navigable waters of the
Patapsco River, Inner Harbor, from
shoreline to shoreline, within an area
bounded on the east by longitude
076°36′12″ W, and bounded on the west
by the Inner Harbor west bulkhead,
located at Baltimore, MD. The duration
of the zone is intended to ensure the
safety of persons and vessels on the
specified navigable waters before,
during, and after the scheduled 11:59
p.m. fireworks display. No vessel or
person will be permitted to enter the
safety zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP or a
designated representative. The
regulatory text we are proposing appears
at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This NPRM has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
9457
Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, duration,
and time-of-day of the safety zone.
Although this safety zone would restrict
the entire width of the waterway, it
would impact a small designated area of
the Inner Harbor for two hours during
the evening when vessel traffic is
normally low. The Coast Guard will
issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via
VHF–FM marine band channel 16 to
provide information about the safety
zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section IV.A above this
proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
E:\FR\FM\06MRP1.SGM
06MRP1
9458
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 6, 2018 / Proposed Rules
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for
a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and have determined that it is
consistent with the fundamental
federalism principles and preemption
requirements described in Executive
Order 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
If you believe this proposed rule has
implications for federalism or Indian
tribes, please contact the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a
preliminary determination that this
action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. This proposed rule
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:05 Mar 05, 2018
Jkt 244001
involves a safety zone lasting two hours
that would prohibit vessel movement
within the Inner Harbor at Baltimore,
MD. Normally such actions are
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L60(a) of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 01. A
preliminary Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this
determination is available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES. We
seek any comments or information that
may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, visit https://
www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in the docket, and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
website’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T05–0029 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T05–0029 Safety Zone for Fireworks
Display; Patapsco River, Inner Harbor,
Baltimore, MD.
(a) Definitions. As used in this
section:
(1) Captain of the Port MarylandNational Capital Region means the
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Maryland-National Capital Region.
(2) Designated representative means
any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer who has been
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Maryland-National Capital Region to
assist in enforcement of the safety zone
described in paragraph (a) of this
section.
(b) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All navigable waters of the
Patapsco River, Inner Harbor, from
shoreline to shoreline, within an area
bounded on the east by longitude
076°36′12″ W, and bounded on the west
by the Inner Harbor west bulkhead,
located at Baltimore, MD. All
coordinates refer to datum NAD 1983.
(c) Regulations. The general safety
zone regulations found in 33 CFR part
165, subpart C apply to the safety zone
created by this section.
(1) All persons are required to comply
with the general regulations governing
safety zones found in 33 CFR 165.23.
(2) Entry into or remaining in this
safety zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Coast Guard Captain
of the Port Maryland-National Capital
Region. All vessels underway within
this safety zone at the time it is
implemented are to depart the zone.
(3) Persons desiring to transit the area
of the safety zone shall obtain
authorization from the Captain of the
Port Maryland-National Capital Region
or designated representative. To request
permission to transit the area, the
Captain of the Port Maryland-National
E:\FR\FM\06MRP1.SGM
06MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 6, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Capital Region and or designated
representatives can be contacted at
telephone number 410–576–2693 or on
marine band radio VHF–FM channel 16
(156.8 MHz). The Coast Guard vessels
enforcing this section can be contacted
on marine band radio VHF–FM channel
16 (156.8 MHz). Upon being hailed by
a U.S. Coast Guard vessel, or other
Federal, State, or local agency vessel, by
siren, radio, flashing light, or other
means, the operator of a vessel shall
proceed as directed. If permission is
granted to enter the safety zone, all
persons and vessels shall comply with
the instructions of the Captain of the
Port Maryland-National Capital Region
or designated representative and
proceed as directed while within the
zone.
(4) Enforcement officials. The U.S.
Coast Guard may be assisted in the
patrol and enforcement of the zone by
Federal, State, and local agencies.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 11 p.m. on April
21, 2018, until 1 a.m. on April 22, 2018,
or if necessary, due to inclement
weather, from 11 p.m. on April 22,
2018, until 1 a.m. on April 23, 2018.
Dated: February 22, 2018.
Lonnie P. Harrison, Jr.,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Maryland-National Capital Region.
[FR Doc. 2018–04487 Filed 3–5–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
Written comments must be
received by the Trust on or before April
24, 2018. Comments received by mail
will be considered timely if they are
postmarked on or before that date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Email: scarp@presidiotrust.gov.
Include ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ in the subject
line of the message.
• Mail: Steve Carp, Legal Analyst,
Presidio Trust, 103 Montgomery Street,
P.O. Box 29052, San Francisco, CA
94129–0052.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Steve Carp,
Legal Analyst, Presidio Trust, 103
Montgomery Street, San Francisco, CA
94129–0052.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steve Carp, Legal Analyst,
415.561.5300, scarp@presidiotrust.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Background
Section 104(j) of the Presidio Trust
Act (16 U.S.C. 460bb appendix)
authorizes the Trust to prescribe
regulations governing the manner in
which it conducts its business and
exercises its powers. This rulemaking
revises the Trust’s administrative
regulations at 36 CFR part 1007 (FOIA),
part 1008 (Privacy Act), part 1009
(FTCA), and part 1011 (Debt Collection),
as described below. In addition, the
Trust has made minor ministerial
changes and corrected typographical
errors to these parts of its regulations.
PRESIDIO TRUST
Proposed Revisions to 36 CFR Part 1007
(Requests Under the FOIA)
36 CFR Parts 1007, 1008, 1009, and
1011
The Trust adopted FOIA regulations
effective January 29, 1999. The FOIA
Improvement Act of 2016 (Act)
amended the FOIA on June 30, 2016.
Those FOIA amendments require
federal agencies to review and update
their FOIA regulations in accordance
with the provisions of the Act. The
Trust proposes revisions to conform its
regulations to the Act, as well as to the
Department of Justice’s revised FOIA
regulations. Specifically, this
rulemaking proposes revisions to
§ 1007.1 (Purpose and scope) by adding
references to the text of FOIA and the
Trust’s Privacy Act regulations; § 1007.2
(Records available) by adopting a policy
of presumption of openness and the
‘‘foreseeable harm’’ standard; § 1007.3
(Requests for records) by providing a
requester an opportunity to consult with
the Trust’s FOIA Officer to perfect a
request and adding procedures to verify
the requester’s identity; § 1007.4
(Preliminary processing of requests) by
specifying the date used for searching,
adding consultation and referral
RIN 3212–AA08; 3212–AA09; 3212–AA10;
3212–AA11
Freedom of Information Act; Privacy
Act; Federal Tort Claims Act; Debt
Collection
Presidio Trust.
Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Presidio Trust (Trust)
proposes revisions to its regulations
addressing requests under the Freedom
of Information Act (FOIA), requests
under the Privacy Act, administrative
claims under the Federal Tort Claims
Act (FTCA), and Debt Collection. The
Trust is revising these regulations to
update and streamline the language of
several procedural provisions, and to
reflect amendments pursuant to the
FOIA Improvement Act of 2016 and the
Digital Accountability and
Transparency Act of 2014.
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:05 Mar 05, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
9459
procedures for requests of records of
other departments and agencies, and
adding procedures to notify submitters
and requesters of actions taken with
respect to requests containing
commercial or financial information;
§ 1007.5 (Action on initial requests) by
specifying decisions that constitute
adverse determinations of requests,
adding procedures for notifying
requesters of dispute resolution
services, and adding types of requests
that would qualify for expedited
processing; § 1007.7 (Appeals) by
changing the time period for requesters
to file an administrative appeal from 20
working days to 90 calendar days and
requiring an appeal of an adverse
determination before seeking a court
order; § 1007.8 (Action on appeals) by
adding procedures for notifying
requesters of dispute resolution
services; and § 1007.9 (Fees) by adding
definitions for the terms ‘‘direct costs’’
and ‘‘review.’’
The Trust also proposes revisions to
§ 1007.9 to update the fees charged by
the Trust for processing FOIA requests.
The Trust previously published its fees
on December 2, 1998 in its Interim
Compendium. Under the proposed
revisions to § 1007.9, the Trust’s
Executive Director will set fees for
processing these requests and will
publish the fees on the Trust’s website
instead of the Interim Compendium.
With these changes, the fees previously
listed in § 1007.9 of the Interim
Compendium will no longer be
effective.
Proposed Revisions to 36 CFR Part 1008
(Requests Under the Privacy Act)
The Trust adopted Privacy Act
regulations effective January 29, 1999.
There has been little statutory change to
the Privacy Act of 1974 since the Trust
adopted its Privacy Act regulations.
However, the Trust proposes revisions
to conform its regulations to guidance
issued by the Department of Justice and
the Office of Management and Budget.
Specifically, this rulemaking proposes
revisions to § 1008.2 (Definitions) by
changing the definition of ‘‘individual’’;
§ 1008.9 (Disclosure of records) by
adding procedures for notice of courtordered and emergency disclosures; and
§§ 1008.11 (Request for notification of
existence of records: Submission),
1008.14 (Requests for access to records:
Submission), and 1008.19 (Petitions for
amendment: Submission and form) by
adding procedures to verify the
requester’s identity.
The Trust also proposes revisions to
§ 1008.15 (Requests for access to
records: Initial decision) to update the
fees charged by the Trust for processing
E:\FR\FM\06MRP1.SGM
06MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 6, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 9456-9459]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-04487]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2018-0029]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone for Fireworks Display; Patapsco River, Inner Harbor,
Baltimore, MD
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
[[Page 9457]]
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone
for certain waters of the Patapsco River. This action is necessary to
provide for the safety of life on the navigable waters of the Inner
Harbor at Baltimore, MD, during a fireworks display on April 21, 2018.
If necessary, due to inclement weather, the event will be rescheduled
to April 22, 2018. This action will prohibit persons and vessels from
entering the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port
Maryland-National Capital Region or a designated representative. We
invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before April 5, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2018-0029 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email Mr. Ronald Houck, Sector Maryland-
National Capital Region Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast
Guard; telephone 410-576-2674, email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
On December 15, 2017, the Baltimore Office of Promotion and The
Arts notified the Coast Guard that it will be conducting a fireworks
display from 11:59 p.m. on April 21, 2018, to 12:06 a.m. on April 22,
2018, or if necessary, due to inclement weather, from 11:59 p.m. on
April 22, 2018 to 12:06 a.m. on April 23, 2018. Final details of the
event were received by the Coast Guard on January 30, 2018. The public
fireworks display will be conducted by Fireworks by Grucci, Inc., and
launched from five floating platforms located within the waters of
Inner Harbor Baltimore, between Inner Harbor Pier 3 and Inner Harbor
Pier 5 in Baltimore, MD. Hazards from firework displays include
accidental discharge of fireworks, dangerous projectiles, and falling
hot embers or other debris. The COTP has determined that potential
hazards associated with the fireworks to be used in this display would
be a safety concern for anyone within 75 yards of each of the five
fireworks discharge sites.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of persons
and vessels on the navigable waters of the Inner Harbor before, during,
and after the scheduled event. The Coast Guard proposes this rulemaking
under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP proposes to establish a safety zone from 11 p.m. on April
21, 2018, until 1 a.m. on April 22, 2018, or if necessary, due to
inclement weather, from 11 p.m. on April 22, 2018, until 1 a.m. on
April 23, 2018. The safety zone will cover all navigable waters of the
Patapsco River, Inner Harbor, from shoreline to shoreline, within an
area bounded on the east by longitude 076[deg]36'12'' W, and bounded on
the west by the Inner Harbor west bulkhead, located at Baltimore, MD.
The duration of the zone is intended to ensure the safety of persons
and vessels on the specified navigable waters before, during, and after
the scheduled 11:59 p.m. fireworks display. No vessel or person will be
permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from
the COTP or a designated representative. The regulatory text we are
proposing appears at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-day of the safety zone. Although this
safety zone would restrict the entire width of the waterway, it would
impact a small designated area of the Inner Harbor for two hours during
the evening when vessel traffic is normally low. The Coast Guard will
issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine band channel 16
to provide information about the safety zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
[[Page 9458]]
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves a safety
zone lasting two hours that would prohibit vessel movement within the
Inner Harbor at Baltimore, MD. Normally such actions are categorically
excluded from further review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A,
Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A preliminary
Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, visit https://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T05-0029 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T05-0029 Safety Zone for Fireworks Display; Patapsco River,
Inner Harbor, Baltimore, MD.
(a) Definitions. As used in this section:
(1) Captain of the Port Maryland-National Capital Region means the
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Maryland-National Capital Region.
(2) Designated representative means any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the
Port Maryland-National Capital Region to assist in enforcement of the
safety zone described in paragraph (a) of this section.
(b) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All navigable
waters of the Patapsco River, Inner Harbor, from shoreline to
shoreline, within an area bounded on the east by longitude
076[deg]36'12'' W, and bounded on the west by the Inner Harbor west
bulkhead, located at Baltimore, MD. All coordinates refer to datum NAD
1983.
(c) Regulations. The general safety zone regulations found in 33
CFR part 165, subpart C apply to the safety zone created by this
section.
(1) All persons are required to comply with the general regulations
governing safety zones found in 33 CFR 165.23.
(2) Entry into or remaining in this safety zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port Maryland-
National Capital Region. All vessels underway within this safety zone
at the time it is implemented are to depart the zone.
(3) Persons desiring to transit the area of the safety zone shall
obtain authorization from the Captain of the Port Maryland-National
Capital Region or designated representative. To request permission to
transit the area, the Captain of the Port Maryland-National
[[Page 9459]]
Capital Region and or designated representatives can be contacted at
telephone number 410-576-2693 or on marine band radio VHF-FM channel 16
(156.8 MHz). The Coast Guard vessels enforcing this section can be
contacted on marine band radio VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). Upon
being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard vessel, or other Federal, State, or
local agency vessel, by siren, radio, flashing light, or other means,
the operator of a vessel shall proceed as directed. If permission is
granted to enter the safety zone, all persons and vessels shall comply
with the instructions of the Captain of the Port Maryland-National
Capital Region or designated representative and proceed as directed
while within the zone.
(4) Enforcement officials. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in
the patrol and enforcement of the zone by Federal, State, and local
agencies.
(d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 11 p.m.
on April 21, 2018, until 1 a.m. on April 22, 2018, or if necessary, due
to inclement weather, from 11 p.m. on April 22, 2018, until 1 a.m. on
April 23, 2018.
Dated: February 22, 2018.
Lonnie P. Harrison, Jr.,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Maryland-National
Capital Region.
[FR Doc. 2018-04487 Filed 3-5-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P