Hiring Flexibility Under Professional Standards, 9447-9451 [2018-04233]
Download as PDF
9447
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 83, No. 44
Tuesday, March 6, 2018
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
7 CFR Parts 210 and 235
[FNS–2017–0039]
RIN 0584–AE60
Hiring Flexibility Under Professional
Standards
Food and Nutrition Service
(FNS), USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This proposed rule would add
four flexibilities to the hiring standards
for new school nutrition program
directors in small local educational
agencies (LEAs) and new school
nutrition program State directors under
the professional standards regulations
for the National School Lunch and
School Breakfast Programs. First, to
address the hiring challenge faced by
small LEAs, those with 2,499 or fewer
students, this rule would require
relevant food service experience rather
than school nutrition program
experience for new directors. Second, it
would provide State agencies with
discretion to consider volunteer or
unpaid work as relevant food service
experience for new school nutrition
program directors in small LEAs. Third,
to further assist LEAs with less than 500
students, this proposed rule would
expand the existing regulatory
flexibility which gives State agencies
discretion to accept less than the
required years of food service
experience when an applicant for a new
director position has the minimum
required education. Fourth, this rule
would also add flexibility to the hiring
standards for State directors of school
nutrition programs by considering
applicants with either a bachelor’s or a
master’s degree in specific, relevant
fields. These proposed changes are
expected to expand the pool of
candidates qualified to serve as leaders
in the school nutrition programs while
continuing to ensure that school
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:05 Mar 05, 2018
Jkt 244001
nutrition professionals are able to
perform their duties effectively and
efficiently.
Written comments must be
received on or before May 7, 2018 to be
assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: The Food and Nutrition
Service, USDA, invites interested
persons to submit written comments on
this proposed rule. Comments may be
submitted in writing by one of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Send comments to School
Programs Branch, Policy and Program
Development Division, Food and
Nutrition Service, 3101 Park Center
Drive, 12th Floor, Alexandria, Virginia
22302.
All written comments submitted in
response to this proposed rule will be
included in the record and will be made
available to the public. Please be
advised that the substance of the
comments and the identity of the
individuals or entities submitting the
comments will be subject to public
disclosure. FNS will make the written
comments publicly available on the
internet via https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tina
Namian, Chief, School Programs
Branch, Policy and Program
Development Division, Food and
Nutrition Service, 3101 Park Center
Drive, 12th Floor, Alexandria, Virginia
22302; 703–305–2590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 1,
2015, FNS implemented professional
standards for school nutrition personnel
who manage and operate the National
School Lunch Program (NSLP) and
School Breakfast Program (SBP), as
required by the final rule Professional
Standards for State and Local School
Nutrition Programs Personnel as
Required by the Healthy, Hunger-Free
Kids Act of 2010 (80 FR 11077) and
section 7(g) of the Child Nutrition Act
of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1776(g)). The
professional standards consist of hiring
and training standards as follows:
• Hiring standards for new school
nutrition program directors of school
food authorities (SFAs). These hiring
standards, established at 7 CFR
210.30(b)(1)(i), (ii) and (iii), are based on
student enrollment for three local
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
educational agency (LEA) sizes: 2,499
students or less; 2,500–9,999 students;
and 10,000 or more students.
• Hiring standards for new State
directors of school nutrition programs
and new State directors of distributing
agencies. These hiring standards are
established at 7 CFR 235.11(g)(1) and
(2), respectively.
• Annual training hours for all State
directors of school nutrition programs
and all State directors of distributing
agencies (established at 7 CFR
235.11(g)(3) and (4)); and annual
training hours for all local school
nutrition program personnel—directors
(at 7 CFR 210.30(b)(3)), managers (at 7
CFR 210.30(c)), and staff (at 7 CFR
210.30(d)).
The professional standards are
intended to ensure that school nutrition
professionals who manage and operate
the NSLP and SBP have adequate
knowledge and training to meet program
requirements. Requiring proper
qualifications to serve in the NSLP and
SBP is expected to improve the quality
of school meals, reduce errors, and
enhance program integrity.
School Nutrition Program Directors
As explained earlier, at the local level,
the hiring standards are based on the
LEA size. To facilitate recruitment and
hiring of new SFA directors in small
LEAs with less than 500 students,
current regulations at 7 CFR
210.30(b)(1)(i)(D) give State agencies
discretion to allow the hiring of a new
school nutrition program director who
holds a high school diploma but less
than the required three years of school
nutrition program experience.
Since implementation of the
professional standards in 2015, FNS has
received multiple inquiries from State
agencies on behalf of SFAs that are
facing challenges with the hiring
standards applicable to LEAs with 500
to 2,499 students. The majority of the
inquiries and/or waiver requests
received by FNS originated in the
Mountain Plains Region, which
includes States with small LEAs such as
those in rural and/or in Tribal
communities. These small LEAs often
have difficulty recruiting new school
nutrition program directors with
previous school nutrition program
experience, as currently required by the
professional standards regulations.
The current regulations at 7 CFR
210.30(b)(1)(i) require from one to three
E:\FR\FM\06MRP1.SGM
06MRP1
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
9448
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 6, 2018 / Proposed Rules
years of prior school nutrition program
experience, depending on the level of
education attained by the new director.
Applicants with an associate’s degree,
or the equivalent, in a relevant field are
required to have at least one year of
relevant school nutrition program
experience. Applicants with a high
school diploma, or the equivalent, are
required to have at least three years of
relevant school nutrition program
experience. School nutrition program
experience is not required for new
directors with: (1) A bachelor’s degree
or higher with a specific academic major
in food and nutrition, food service
management, dietetics, family and
consumer sciences, nutrition education,
culinary arts, business, or a related field;
or (2) a bachelor’s degree with any
academic major or area of concentration
and a State-recognized certificate for
school nutrition directors.
Informal input received by FNS at
State agency meetings and through other
State agency contacts reveals that SFAs
operating in small LEAs, particularly
those in rural or less populated areas,
often struggle to find applicants with
school nutrition program experience. In
the school meal programs, there are
approximately 6,500 LEAs with an
enrollment between 500–2,499 students,
which represents about 36 percent of
the LEA population nationwide. These
small LEAs are found in States across
the nation, including California,
Colorado, Iowa, Montana, New Mexico,
South Dakota, and Wisconsin. For
example, within the last two years, six
SFAs in one State agency were diligent
in advertising director vacancies but
were not able to hire new directors with
the required school nutrition program
experience due to the limited pool of
applicants in the local labor market.
Most applicants in these small LEAs
have acquired relevant food service
experience by working as managers or
chefs at local restaurants and healthcare
facilities. If a SFA hires a new director
without the required education or
school nutrition program experience, in
violation of program requirements, the
SFA is not permitted to use funds from
the non-profit school food service
account, which includes NSLP and SBP
reimbursements, to pay the salary of the
director at issue. This fiscal impact
could jeopardize a SFA’s financial
viability and ability to participate in the
NSLP and SBP.
To assist these SFAs with this
challenge and provide more local
control over hiring decisions that reflect
their unique labor markets, FNS
proposes the following changes to the
hiring standards at 7 CFR 210.30(b)(1)(i)
for LEAs with 2,499 students or less:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:05 Mar 05, 2018
Jkt 244001
• Remove the school nutrition
program experience requirement for
new directors, and instead require
relevant food service experience for this
LEA size only;
• Provide State agencies the
discretion to consider applicants’
volunteer or unpaid food service
experience on a case-by-case basis. This
optional flexibility is expected to be
particularly useful for small LEAs, such
as charter and Tribal schools; and
• In small LEAs with less than 500
students, provide the State agency
discretion to approve the hire of a
director who has less than the required
years of food service experience,
provided that the applicant has the
minimum education specified in the
hiring standards for LEAs with 2,499
students or less.
These proposed flexibilities are
intended to provide LEAs with 2,499
students or less increased access to a
larger pool of applicants with relevant
food service experience gained inside or
outside the NSLP/SBP and applicable to
the director’s position. This food service
experience could be either in a paid
food service position (e.g., restaurant
manager or cook) or could be gained in
an unpaid food service position (e.g., an
unpaid apprenticeship/internship
program or as a volunteer food service
work in a community organization, such
as a homeless shelter). The flexibility to
consider unpaid experience, which is
available at the discretion of the State
agency on a case-by-case basis,
acknowledges that in small
communities there are few employment
opportunities in food service but
residents often volunteer to manage
food service activities for civic and
community organizations. Upon
implementation of this proposed rule,
an applicant with paid and/or unpaid
experience managing the food service at
a healthcare facility, restaurant, civic/
community organization, or other type
of establishment could be considered for
a director’s position, provided that the
applicant also has the required
education.
To provide additional assistance to
small LEAs with less than 500 students,
this proposed rule would modify the
current optional flexibility at 7 CFR
210.30(b)(1)(i)(D), which provides State
agencies discretion to allow an SFA to
hire a new school nutrition program
director with a high school diploma and
less than the required years of
experience. This proposed rule would
allow the State agency to apply this
optional flexibility to address hiring
issues in LEAs with less than 500
students if an applicant has either a
high school diploma, an associate’s
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
degree, or a bachelor’s degree but less
than the required years of food service
experience. Ideally, a new program
director in this situation would have
some paid or unpaid food service
experience. By expanding the existing
optional flexibility at § 210.30(b)(1)(i)(D)
to include other educational levels, FNS
affirms its commitment to provide small
LEAs with less than 500 students more
local control to address their unique
hiring challenges.
Based on the inquiries, waiver
requests, and anecdotal input from State
agencies, FNS understands that these
proposed flexibilities would be helpful
for LEAs with 2,499 students or less,
such as rural and Tribal schools,
residential child care institutions, and
charter schools. It is important to stress
that these proposed flexibilities only
address the specialized experience
requirement at 7 CFR 210.30(b)(1)(i) and
would not affect the number of years of
experience required, which ranges from
one to three years based on the level of
education of the new director, except in
specific situations where the State
agency may use its discretion to assist
an LEA with less than 500 students (as
explained earlier).
Also, although this proposed rule
would remove the specialized
experience requirement for new SFA
directors in LEAs with 2,499 students or
less, hiring a new school nutrition
program director with school nutrition
program experience is a best practice.
Minimizing the learning curve helps
contribute to a smooth transition during
a personnel change, especially at this
level of program administration.
Otherwise, significant State agency
support and guidance would be
essential during the first year to ensure
that the new director is able to manage
the SFA’s meal service as required by
program regulations. Additionally, the
Orientation to School Nutrition
Management Seminar and other training
resources from the Institute of Child
Nutrition are available to help a new
director who has little or no program
experience conduct the day-to-day
operations of the NSLP and SBP
successfully.
This proposed rule would not amend
the school nutrition program experience
requirement for new directors in larger
LEAs, those with 2,500 students or
more. Operational experience since
implementation of the professional
standards in 2015 has not revealed
issues with the experience requirement
for larger LEAs, which are often located
in large towns or cities in urban areas.
FNS understands that such LEAs, which
have a more complex school food
service operation, generally have access
E:\FR\FM\06MRP1.SGM
06MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 6, 2018 / Proposed Rules
helpful in the development of the final
rule.
to a more robust pool of applicants.
Therefore, specific school nutrition
program experience would remain in
place for new directors in LEAs with
2,500 students or more, as required
under 7 CFR 210.30(b)(1)(ii) and (iii).
Procedural Matters
Executive Order 12866 and 13563
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
State Directors
At the State agency level, the
professional standards consist of hiring
standards for new State directors of
school nutrition programs, hiring
standards for new directors of
distributing agencies, and annual
training standards for new and current
State directors. These requirements are
established at 7 CFR 235.11(g).
FNS is proposing to allow flexibility
in the hiring standards for new State
directors of school nutrition programs to
attract a larger number of professionals
qualified to lead and manage the school
nutrition programs statewide. For a new
State director of school nutrition
programs, the current regulations at 7
CFR 235.11(g)(1)(i) require a bachelor’s
degree with an academic major in food
and nutrition, food service management,
dietetics, family and consumer sciences,
nutrition education, culinary arts,
business, or a related field. A master’s
degree in one of the specified fields is
strongly preferred.
To accommodate applicants who have
a master’s degree in one of the specified
fields but a bachelor’s degree in a nonrelated field, FNS proposes to add a
master’s degree in a relevant field to the
basic qualifications listed in 7 CFR
235.11(g)(1)(i). This is intended to help
ensure that highly educated individuals
are not unintentionally prevented from
serving as State director of school
nutrition programs. Adding a master’s
degree in a relevant field to the basic
qualifications acknowledges that many
professionals change careers and gain
relevant experience through advanced
education in areas relevant to school
nutrition. For example, a State agency
supervisor who has a bachelor’s degree
in political science and a master’s
degree in nutrition education or public
administration could be considered to
serve as a State director of school
nutrition programs.
Accordingly, this proposed rule
would add more flexibility to the hiring
standards in 7 CFR 210.30(b)(1)(i) for
new LEA-level school nutrition program
directors, and in 7 CFR 235.11(g)(1)(i)
for new statewide school nutrition
program directors to expand the pool of
candidates qualified to serve in the
school nutrition programs. FNS invites
public comments on the specific
flexibilities addressed in this proposed
rule. Public comments will be extremely
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:05 Mar 05, 2018
Jkt 244001
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This
proposed rule promotes flexibility in the
hiring standards for State and local
school nutrition personnel but has no
measurable costs or benefits. This rule
has been determined to be not
significant and was not reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) in conformance with Executive
Order 12866.
Regulatory Impact Analysis
This rule has been designated as not
significant by the Office of Management
and Budget; therefore, no Regulatory
Impact Analysis is required.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601–612) requires Agencies to
analyze the impact of rulemaking on
small entities and consider alternatives
that would minimize any significant
impacts on a substantial number of
small entities. Pursuant to that review,
it has been certified that this rule would
not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This proposed rule would not have an
adverse impact on small entities in the
National School Lunch Program and
School Breakfast Program rather it
would ease program operations by
adding flexibility in the hiring standards
for new directors in small local
educational agencies and new directors
of State agencies.
Impact: The provisions of this
proposed rule would apply to LEAs
with 2,499 students or less, and to State
agencies operating the National School
Lunch Program and School Breakfast
Program. These entities meet the
definitions of ‘‘small governmental
jurisdiction’’ and ‘‘small entity’’ in the
Regulatory Flexibility Act. These
entities would be able to quickly benefit
from the hiring flexibilities proposed in
this rule.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
9449
Executive Order 13771
This proposed rule is an E.O. 13771
deregulatory action that seeks to ease
the professional standards regulations
for State directors of school nutrition
programs and for school nutrition
program directors in small LEAs with
2,499 students or less, which are often
found in rural communities facing labor
market challenges. This rule addresses
hiring challenges identified by the State
agencies that administer the Child
Nutrition Programs. It would add
flexibility to hiring standards by
expanding the range of allowable
education for new State directors, and
the range of allowable food service
experience for new local directors in
small LEAs.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public
Law 104–4, establishes requirements for
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their regulatory actions on State, local,
and Tribal governments and the private
sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA,
the Department generally must prepare
a written statement, including a cost
benefit analysis, for proposed and final
rules with ‘‘Federal mandates’’ that may
result in expenditures by State, local or
Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or
the private sector, of $100 million or
more in any one year. When such a
statement is needed for a rule, Section
205 of the UMRA generally requires the
Department to identify and consider a
reasonable number of regulatory
alternatives and adopt the most cost
effective or least burdensome alternative
that achieves the objectives of the rule.
This proposed rule does not contain
Federal mandates (under the regulatory
provisions of Title II of the UMRA) for
State, local and Tribal governments or
the private sector of $100 million or
more in any one year. Thus, the rule is
not subject to the requirements of
sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA.
Executive Order 12372
The National School Lunch Program
and School Breakfast Program are listed
in the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance under Number 10.555 and
Number 10.553, respectively, and are
subject to Executive Order 12372, which
requires intergovernmental consultation
with State and local officials. (See 2 CFR
chapter IV.) Since the Child Nutrition
Programs are State-administered,
USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service
(FNS) Regional Offices have formal and
informal discussions with State and
local officials, including representatives
of Indian Tribal Organizations, on an
E:\FR\FM\06MRP1.SGM
06MRP1
9450
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 6, 2018 / Proposed Rules
ongoing basis regarding program
requirements and operation.
Discussions also take place in response
to technical assistance requests
submitted by the State agencies to the
FNS Regional Offices. This regular
interaction with State and local
operators provides FNS valuable input
that informs rulemaking. Based on the
inquiries and waiver requests from the
State agencies disclosing challenges
with the professional standards
regulations, FNS is proposing specific
flexibilities to address the requirement
issues in a manner that promotes
program efficiency and effectiveness.
Federalism Summary Impact Statement
Executive Order 13132 requires
Federal agencies to consider the impact
of their regulatory actions on State and
local governments. Where such actions
have federalism implications, agencies
are directed to provide a statement for
inclusion in the preamble to the
regulations describing the agency’s
considerations in terms of the three
categories called for under Section
(6)(b)(2)(B) of Executive Order 13121.
The Department has considered the
impact of this rule on State and local
governments and has determined that
this rule does not have federalism
implications. Therefore, under section
6(b) of the Executive Order, a federalism
summary is not required.
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is intended to
have preemptive effect with respect to
any State or local laws, regulations or
policies which conflict with its
provisions or which would otherwise
impede its full and timely
implementation. This rule is not
intended to have retroactive effect. Prior
to any judicial challenge to the
provisions of this rule, all applicable
administrative procedures must be
exhausted.
Civil Rights Impact Analysis
FNS has reviewed this proposed rule
in accordance with USDA Regulation
4300–4, ‘‘Civil Rights Impact Analysis,’’
to identify any major civil rights
impacts the rule might have on Program
participants on the basis of age, race,
color, national origin, sex or disability.
After a careful review of the rule’s intent
and provisions, FNS has determined
that this rule is not expected to affect
the participation of protected
individuals in the National School
Lunch Program and School Breakfast
Program, or limit the ability of protected
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:05 Mar 05, 2018
Jkt 244001
classes of individuals to serve as new
directors in LEAs and State agencies.
The provisions of this proposed rule
would add flexibility to the existing
hiring standards for new directors in
order to address difficulties faced by
program operators in finding qualified
applicants.
Executive Order 13175
Executive Order 13175 requires
Federal agencies to consult and
coordinate with Tribes on a
government-to-government basis on
policies that have Tribal implications,
including regulations, legislative
comments or proposed legislation, and
other policy statements or actions that
have substantial direct effects on one or
more Indian Tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
FNS will notify Tribal leaders about this
proposed rule to encourage public
comments, and intends to brief Tribal
leaders at one of the quarterly
consultations or conference calls
scheduled by the Office of Tribal
Relations.
FNS has assessed the impact of this
proposed rule on Indian tribes and
determined that this rule does not, to
our knowledge, have negative Tribal
implications that require Tribal
consultation under E.O. 13175. If a
Tribe requests consultation on this rule,
FNS will work with the Office of Tribal
Relations to ensure meaningful
consultation is provided where changes,
additions and modifications identified
herein are not expressly mandated by
Congress. We are unaware of any
current Tribal laws that could be in
conflict with the proposed provisions of
this rule and anticipate that the
proposed hiring flexibilities will benefit
Tribal schools.
When implemented, the flexibilities
provided by this rule are expected to
increase the pool of candidates qualified
to serve as new directors of school
nutrition programs in small LEAs. This
is expected to benefit Tribal
communities, which often experience
difficulty attracting qualified school
nutrition personnel.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. Chap. 35; 5 CFR 1320)
requires the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) approve all collections of
information by a Federal agency before
they can be implemented. Respondents
are not required to respond to any
collection of information unless it
displays a current valid OMB control
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
number. The provisions of this
proposed rule do not contain
information collection requirements
subject to approval by the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
E-Government Act Compliance
The Department is committed to
complying with the E-Government Act,
to promote the use of the internet and
other information technologies to
provide increased opportunities for
citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other
purposes.
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 210
Children, Commodity school program,
Food assistance programs, Grant
programs—health, Grant programs—
education, School breakfast and lunch
programs, Nutrition, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
7 CFR Part 235
Administrative practice and
procedure, Food assistance programs,
Grant programs—health, Grant
programs—education, School breakfast
and lunch programs, Nutrition,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Accordingly, 7 CFR parts 210 and 235
are proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 210—NATIONAL SCHOOL
LUNCH PROGRAM
1. The authority citation for part 210
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1751–1760, 1779.
2. Amend § 210.30 by:
a. Revising paragraph (b)(1)(i) and;
b. In the table to paragraph (b)(2), in
the column under the heading ‘‘Student
enrollment 2,499 or less’’, removing the
words ‘‘school nutrition program
experience’’ wherever they appear and
adding in their place the words ‘‘food
service experience’’.
■
■
■
§ 210.30 School nutrition program
professional standards.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) School nutrition program directors
with local educational agency
enrollment of 2,499 students or fewer.
Directors must meet the requirements in
either paragraph (b)(1)(i)(A), (B), (C), or
(D) of this section.
(A) A bachelor’s degree, or equivalent
educational experience, with an
academic major or concentration in food
and nutrition, food service management,
E:\FR\FM\06MRP1.SGM
06MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 6, 2018 / Proposed Rules
dietetics, family and consumer sciences,
nutrition education, culinary arts,
business, or a related field;
(B) A bachelor’s degree, or equivalent
educational experience, with any
academic major or area of concentration,
and either a State-recognized certificate
for school nutrition directors or at least
one year of relevant food service
experience. At the discretion of the
State agency, and on a case-by-case
basis, the relevant food service
experience may be unpaid;
(C) An associate’s degree, or
equivalent educational experience, with
an academic major or area of
concentration in food and nutrition,
food service management, dietetics,
family and consumer sciences, nutrition
education, culinary arts, business, or a
related field and at least one year of
relevant food service experience. At the
discretion of the State agency, and on a
case-by-case basis, the relevant food
service experience may be unpaid; or
(D) A high school diploma or
equivalency (such as the general
educational development diploma), and
at least three years of relevant food
service experience. At the discretion of
the State agency, and on a case-by-case
basis, the relevant food service
experience may be unpaid. Directors
hired under this criterion are strongly
encouraged to work toward attaining an
associate’s degree in an academic major
in the fields listed in paragraph (b)(1)(i).
(E) For a local educational agency
with less than 500 students, the State
agency has discretion to approve the
hire of a director who meets one of the
educational criteria in paragraph
(b)(1)(i)(A)–(D) but has less than the
required years of relevant food service
experience.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 235—STATE ADMINISTRATIVE
EXPENSE FUNDS
3. The authority citation for part 235
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Secs. 7 and 10 of the Child
Nutrition Act of 1966, 80 Stat. 888, 889, as
amended (42 U.S.C. 1776, 1779).
§ 235.11
[Amended]
4. In paragraph (g)(1)(i), add at the end
the words ‘‘or a bachelor’s degree with
any academic major and a master’s
degree with an academic major in areas
including food and nutrition, food
service management, dietetics, family
and consumer sciences, nutrition
education, culinary arts, business, or a
related field;’’ and in paragraph
(g)(1)(iv)(A), remove the words
‘‘Master’s degree’’ and add in their place
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:05 Mar 05, 2018
Jkt 244001
the words ‘‘Both a bachelor’s degree and
a master’s degree’’.
Dated: January 16, 2018.
Brandon Lipps,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–04233 Filed 3–5–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2018–0087; Airspace
Docket No. 18–AGL–3]
Proposed Amendment of Class E
Airspace; Mineral Point, WI
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
This action proposes to
amend Class E airspace designated as a
surface area at Iowa County Airport,
Mineral Point, WI, by removing the parttime language from the airspace
description. The FAA is proposing this
action to change the status from parttime to full-time at the request of
Chicago Air Route Traffic Control
Center (ARTCC). This action would also
make an editorial change to the airspace
description by removing the city from
the airport name.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before April 20, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on this
proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202)
366–9826, or (800) 647–5527. You must
identify FAA Docket No. FAA–2018–
0087; Airspace Docket No. 18–AGL–3,
at the beginning of your comments. You
may also submit comments through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
You may review the public docket
containing the proposal, any comments
received, and any final disposition in
person in the Dockets Office between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except federal holidays.
FAA Order 7400.11B, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed
online at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/
publications/. For further information,
you can contact the Airspace Policy
Group, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591;
telephone: (202) 267–8783. The Order is
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
9451
also available for inspection at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of FAA
Order 7400.11B at NARA, call (202)
741–6030, or go to https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/
ibr-locations.html.
FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on
September 15.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Claypool, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support
Group, Central Service Center, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX
76177; telephone (817) 222–5711.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for This Rulemaking
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use
of airspace necessary to ensure the
safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
airspace. This regulation is within the
scope of that authority as it would
amend Class E airspace designated as a
surface area at Iowa County Airport,
Mineral Point, WI, to support
instrument flight rule operations.
Comments Invited
Interested parties are invited to
participate in this proposed rulemaking
by submitting such written data, views,
or arguments, as they may desire.
Comments that provide the factual basis
supporting the views and suggestions
presented are particularly helpful in
developing reasoned regulatory
decisions on the proposal. Comments
are specifically invited on the overall
regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related
aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both
docket numbers and be submitted in
triplicate to the address listed above.
Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this notice must submit with those
comments a self-addressed, stamped
postcard on which the following
statement is made: ‘‘Comments to
Docket No. FAA–2018–0087; Airspace
Docket No. 18–AGL–3.’’ The postcard
E:\FR\FM\06MRP1.SGM
06MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 6, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 9447-9451]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-04233]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 6, 2018 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 9447]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
7 CFR Parts 210 and 235
[FNS-2017-0039]
RIN 0584-AE60
Hiring Flexibility Under Professional Standards
AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would add four flexibilities to the hiring
standards for new school nutrition program directors in small local
educational agencies (LEAs) and new school nutrition program State
directors under the professional standards regulations for the National
School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs. First, to address the
hiring challenge faced by small LEAs, those with 2,499 or fewer
students, this rule would require relevant food service experience
rather than school nutrition program experience for new directors.
Second, it would provide State agencies with discretion to consider
volunteer or unpaid work as relevant food service experience for new
school nutrition program directors in small LEAs. Third, to further
assist LEAs with less than 500 students, this proposed rule would
expand the existing regulatory flexibility which gives State agencies
discretion to accept less than the required years of food service
experience when an applicant for a new director position has the
minimum required education. Fourth, this rule would also add
flexibility to the hiring standards for State directors of school
nutrition programs by considering applicants with either a bachelor's
or a master's degree in specific, relevant fields. These proposed
changes are expected to expand the pool of candidates qualified to
serve as leaders in the school nutrition programs while continuing to
ensure that school nutrition professionals are able to perform their
duties effectively and efficiently.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before May 7, 2018 to be
assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: The Food and Nutrition Service, USDA, invites interested
persons to submit written comments on this proposed rule. Comments may
be submitted in writing by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Mail: Send comments to School Programs Branch, Policy and
Program Development Division, Food and Nutrition Service, 3101 Park
Center Drive, 12th Floor, Alexandria, Virginia 22302.
All written comments submitted in response to this proposed rule
will be included in the record and will be made available to the
public. Please be advised that the substance of the comments and the
identity of the individuals or entities submitting the comments will be
subject to public disclosure. FNS will make the written comments
publicly available on the internet via https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tina Namian, Chief, School Programs
Branch, Policy and Program Development Division, Food and Nutrition
Service, 3101 Park Center Drive, 12th Floor, Alexandria, Virginia
22302; 703-305-2590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 1, 2015, FNS implemented
professional standards for school nutrition personnel who manage and
operate the National School Lunch Program (NSLP) and School Breakfast
Program (SBP), as required by the final rule Professional Standards for
State and Local School Nutrition Programs Personnel as Required by the
Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 (80 FR 11077) and section 7(g) of
the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1776(g)). The professional
standards consist of hiring and training standards as follows:
Hiring standards for new school nutrition program
directors of school food authorities (SFAs). These hiring standards,
established at 7 CFR 210.30(b)(1)(i), (ii) and (iii), are based on
student enrollment for three local educational agency (LEA) sizes:
2,499 students or less; 2,500-9,999 students; and 10,000 or more
students.
Hiring standards for new State directors of school
nutrition programs and new State directors of distributing agencies.
These hiring standards are established at 7 CFR 235.11(g)(1) and (2),
respectively.
Annual training hours for all State directors of school
nutrition programs and all State directors of distributing agencies
(established at 7 CFR 235.11(g)(3) and (4)); and annual training hours
for all local school nutrition program personnel--directors (at 7 CFR
210.30(b)(3)), managers (at 7 CFR 210.30(c)), and staff (at 7 CFR
210.30(d)).
The professional standards are intended to ensure that school
nutrition professionals who manage and operate the NSLP and SBP have
adequate knowledge and training to meet program requirements. Requiring
proper qualifications to serve in the NSLP and SBP is expected to
improve the quality of school meals, reduce errors, and enhance program
integrity.
School Nutrition Program Directors
As explained earlier, at the local level, the hiring standards are
based on the LEA size. To facilitate recruitment and hiring of new SFA
directors in small LEAs with less than 500 students, current
regulations at 7 CFR 210.30(b)(1)(i)(D) give State agencies discretion
to allow the hiring of a new school nutrition program director who
holds a high school diploma but less than the required three years of
school nutrition program experience.
Since implementation of the professional standards in 2015, FNS has
received multiple inquiries from State agencies on behalf of SFAs that
are facing challenges with the hiring standards applicable to LEAs with
500 to 2,499 students. The majority of the inquiries and/or waiver
requests received by FNS originated in the Mountain Plains Region,
which includes States with small LEAs such as those in rural and/or in
Tribal communities. These small LEAs often have difficulty recruiting
new school nutrition program directors with previous school nutrition
program experience, as currently required by the professional standards
regulations.
The current regulations at 7 CFR 210.30(b)(1)(i) require from one
to three
[[Page 9448]]
years of prior school nutrition program experience, depending on the
level of education attained by the new director. Applicants with an
associate's degree, or the equivalent, in a relevant field are required
to have at least one year of relevant school nutrition program
experience. Applicants with a high school diploma, or the equivalent,
are required to have at least three years of relevant school nutrition
program experience. School nutrition program experience is not required
for new directors with: (1) A bachelor's degree or higher with a
specific academic major in food and nutrition, food service management,
dietetics, family and consumer sciences, nutrition education, culinary
arts, business, or a related field; or (2) a bachelor's degree with any
academic major or area of concentration and a State-recognized
certificate for school nutrition directors.
Informal input received by FNS at State agency meetings and through
other State agency contacts reveals that SFAs operating in small LEAs,
particularly those in rural or less populated areas, often struggle to
find applicants with school nutrition program experience. In the school
meal programs, there are approximately 6,500 LEAs with an enrollment
between 500-2,499 students, which represents about 36 percent of the
LEA population nationwide. These small LEAs are found in States across
the nation, including California, Colorado, Iowa, Montana, New Mexico,
South Dakota, and Wisconsin. For example, within the last two years,
six SFAs in one State agency were diligent in advertising director
vacancies but were not able to hire new directors with the required
school nutrition program experience due to the limited pool of
applicants in the local labor market. Most applicants in these small
LEAs have acquired relevant food service experience by working as
managers or chefs at local restaurants and healthcare facilities. If a
SFA hires a new director without the required education or school
nutrition program experience, in violation of program requirements, the
SFA is not permitted to use funds from the non-profit school food
service account, which includes NSLP and SBP reimbursements, to pay the
salary of the director at issue. This fiscal impact could jeopardize a
SFA's financial viability and ability to participate in the NSLP and
SBP.
To assist these SFAs with this challenge and provide more local
control over hiring decisions that reflect their unique labor markets,
FNS proposes the following changes to the hiring standards at 7 CFR
210.30(b)(1)(i) for LEAs with 2,499 students or less:
Remove the school nutrition program experience requirement
for new directors, and instead require relevant food service experience
for this LEA size only;
Provide State agencies the discretion to consider
applicants' volunteer or unpaid food service experience on a case-by-
case basis. This optional flexibility is expected to be particularly
useful for small LEAs, such as charter and Tribal schools; and
In small LEAs with less than 500 students, provide the
State agency discretion to approve the hire of a director who has less
than the required years of food service experience, provided that the
applicant has the minimum education specified in the hiring standards
for LEAs with 2,499 students or less.
These proposed flexibilities are intended to provide LEAs with
2,499 students or less increased access to a larger pool of applicants
with relevant food service experience gained inside or outside the
NSLP/SBP and applicable to the director's position. This food service
experience could be either in a paid food service position (e.g.,
restaurant manager or cook) or could be gained in an unpaid food
service position (e.g., an unpaid apprenticeship/internship program or
as a volunteer food service work in a community organization, such as a
homeless shelter). The flexibility to consider unpaid experience, which
is available at the discretion of the State agency on a case-by-case
basis, acknowledges that in small communities there are few employment
opportunities in food service but residents often volunteer to manage
food service activities for civic and community organizations. Upon
implementation of this proposed rule, an applicant with paid and/or
unpaid experience managing the food service at a healthcare facility,
restaurant, civic/community organization, or other type of
establishment could be considered for a director's position, provided
that the applicant also has the required education.
To provide additional assistance to small LEAs with less than 500
students, this proposed rule would modify the current optional
flexibility at 7 CFR 210.30(b)(1)(i)(D), which provides State agencies
discretion to allow an SFA to hire a new school nutrition program
director with a high school diploma and less than the required years of
experience. This proposed rule would allow the State agency to apply
this optional flexibility to address hiring issues in LEAs with less
than 500 students if an applicant has either a high school diploma, an
associate's degree, or a bachelor's degree but less than the required
years of food service experience. Ideally, a new program director in
this situation would have some paid or unpaid food service experience.
By expanding the existing optional flexibility at Sec.
210.30(b)(1)(i)(D) to include other educational levels, FNS affirms its
commitment to provide small LEAs with less than 500 students more local
control to address their unique hiring challenges.
Based on the inquiries, waiver requests, and anecdotal input from
State agencies, FNS understands that these proposed flexibilities would
be helpful for LEAs with 2,499 students or less, such as rural and
Tribal schools, residential child care institutions, and charter
schools. It is important to stress that these proposed flexibilities
only address the specialized experience requirement at 7 CFR
210.30(b)(1)(i) and would not affect the number of years of experience
required, which ranges from one to three years based on the level of
education of the new director, except in specific situations where the
State agency may use its discretion to assist an LEA with less than 500
students (as explained earlier).
Also, although this proposed rule would remove the specialized
experience requirement for new SFA directors in LEAs with 2,499
students or less, hiring a new school nutrition program director with
school nutrition program experience is a best practice. Minimizing the
learning curve helps contribute to a smooth transition during a
personnel change, especially at this level of program administration.
Otherwise, significant State agency support and guidance would be
essential during the first year to ensure that the new director is able
to manage the SFA's meal service as required by program regulations.
Additionally, the Orientation to School Nutrition Management Seminar
and other training resources from the Institute of Child Nutrition are
available to help a new director who has little or no program
experience conduct the day-to-day operations of the NSLP and SBP
successfully.
This proposed rule would not amend the school nutrition program
experience requirement for new directors in larger LEAs, those with
2,500 students or more. Operational experience since implementation of
the professional standards in 2015 has not revealed issues with the
experience requirement for larger LEAs, which are often located in
large towns or cities in urban areas. FNS understands that such LEAs,
which have a more complex school food service operation, generally have
access
[[Page 9449]]
to a more robust pool of applicants. Therefore, specific school
nutrition program experience would remain in place for new directors in
LEAs with 2,500 students or more, as required under 7 CFR
210.30(b)(1)(ii) and (iii).
State Directors
At the State agency level, the professional standards consist of
hiring standards for new State directors of school nutrition programs,
hiring standards for new directors of distributing agencies, and annual
training standards for new and current State directors. These
requirements are established at 7 CFR 235.11(g).
FNS is proposing to allow flexibility in the hiring standards for
new State directors of school nutrition programs to attract a larger
number of professionals qualified to lead and manage the school
nutrition programs statewide. For a new State director of school
nutrition programs, the current regulations at 7 CFR 235.11(g)(1)(i)
require a bachelor's degree with an academic major in food and
nutrition, food service management, dietetics, family and consumer
sciences, nutrition education, culinary arts, business, or a related
field. A master's degree in one of the specified fields is strongly
preferred.
To accommodate applicants who have a master's degree in one of the
specified fields but a bachelor's degree in a non-related field, FNS
proposes to add a master's degree in a relevant field to the basic
qualifications listed in 7 CFR 235.11(g)(1)(i). This is intended to
help ensure that highly educated individuals are not unintentionally
prevented from serving as State director of school nutrition programs.
Adding a master's degree in a relevant field to the basic
qualifications acknowledges that many professionals change careers and
gain relevant experience through advanced education in areas relevant
to school nutrition. For example, a State agency supervisor who has a
bachelor's degree in political science and a master's degree in
nutrition education or public administration could be considered to
serve as a State director of school nutrition programs.
Accordingly, this proposed rule would add more flexibility to the
hiring standards in 7 CFR 210.30(b)(1)(i) for new LEA-level school
nutrition program directors, and in 7 CFR 235.11(g)(1)(i) for new
statewide school nutrition program directors to expand the pool of
candidates qualified to serve in the school nutrition programs. FNS
invites public comments on the specific flexibilities addressed in this
proposed rule. Public comments will be extremely helpful in the
development of the final rule.
Procedural Matters
Executive Order 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This proposed rule promotes flexibility in the hiring
standards for State and local school nutrition personnel but has no
measurable costs or benefits. This rule has been determined to be not
significant and was not reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) in conformance with Executive Order 12866.
Regulatory Impact Analysis
This rule has been designated as not significant by the Office of
Management and Budget; therefore, no Regulatory Impact Analysis is
required.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612) requires Agencies
to analyze the impact of rulemaking on small entities and consider
alternatives that would minimize any significant impacts on a
substantial number of small entities. Pursuant to that review, it has
been certified that this rule would not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities. This proposed rule would not have
an adverse impact on small entities in the National School Lunch
Program and School Breakfast Program rather it would ease program
operations by adding flexibility in the hiring standards for new
directors in small local educational agencies and new directors of
State agencies.
Impact: The provisions of this proposed rule would apply to LEAs
with 2,499 students or less, and to State agencies operating the
National School Lunch Program and School Breakfast Program. These
entities meet the definitions of ``small governmental jurisdiction''
and ``small entity'' in the Regulatory Flexibility Act. These entities
would be able to quickly benefit from the hiring flexibilities proposed
in this rule.
Executive Order 13771
This proposed rule is an E.O. 13771 deregulatory action that seeks
to ease the professional standards regulations for State directors of
school nutrition programs and for school nutrition program directors in
small LEAs with 2,499 students or less, which are often found in rural
communities facing labor market challenges. This rule addresses hiring
challenges identified by the State agencies that administer the Child
Nutrition Programs. It would add flexibility to hiring standards by
expanding the range of allowable education for new State directors, and
the range of allowable food service experience for new local directors
in small LEAs.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public
Law 104-4, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the
effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and Tribal
governments and the private sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA, the
Department generally must prepare a written statement, including a cost
benefit analysis, for proposed and final rules with ``Federal
mandates'' that may result in expenditures by State, local or Tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or the private sector, of $100 million
or more in any one year. When such a statement is needed for a rule,
Section 205 of the UMRA generally requires the Department to identify
and consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives and adopt
the most cost effective or least burdensome alternative that achieves
the objectives of the rule.
This proposed rule does not contain Federal mandates (under the
regulatory provisions of Title II of the UMRA) for State, local and
Tribal governments or the private sector of $100 million or more in any
one year. Thus, the rule is not subject to the requirements of sections
202 and 205 of the UMRA.
Executive Order 12372
The National School Lunch Program and School Breakfast Program are
listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance under Number
10.555 and Number 10.553, respectively, and are subject to Executive
Order 12372, which requires intergovernmental consultation with State
and local officials. (See 2 CFR chapter IV.) Since the Child Nutrition
Programs are State-administered, USDA's Food and Nutrition Service
(FNS) Regional Offices have formal and informal discussions with State
and local officials, including representatives of Indian Tribal
Organizations, on an
[[Page 9450]]
ongoing basis regarding program requirements and operation. Discussions
also take place in response to technical assistance requests submitted
by the State agencies to the FNS Regional Offices. This regular
interaction with State and local operators provides FNS valuable input
that informs rulemaking. Based on the inquiries and waiver requests
from the State agencies disclosing challenges with the professional
standards regulations, FNS is proposing specific flexibilities to
address the requirement issues in a manner that promotes program
efficiency and effectiveness.
Federalism Summary Impact Statement
Executive Order 13132 requires Federal agencies to consider the
impact of their regulatory actions on State and local governments.
Where such actions have federalism implications, agencies are directed
to provide a statement for inclusion in the preamble to the regulations
describing the agency's considerations in terms of the three categories
called for under Section (6)(b)(2)(B) of Executive Order 13121.
The Department has considered the impact of this rule on State and
local governments and has determined that this rule does not have
federalism implications. Therefore, under section 6(b) of the Executive
Order, a federalism summary is not required.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. This rule is intended to have preemptive effect
with respect to any State or local laws, regulations or policies which
conflict with its provisions or which would otherwise impede its full
and timely implementation. This rule is not intended to have
retroactive effect. Prior to any judicial challenge to the provisions
of this rule, all applicable administrative procedures must be
exhausted.
Civil Rights Impact Analysis
FNS has reviewed this proposed rule in accordance with USDA
Regulation 4300-4, ``Civil Rights Impact Analysis,'' to identify any
major civil rights impacts the rule might have on Program participants
on the basis of age, race, color, national origin, sex or disability.
After a careful review of the rule's intent and provisions, FNS has
determined that this rule is not expected to affect the participation
of protected individuals in the National School Lunch Program and
School Breakfast Program, or limit the ability of protected classes of
individuals to serve as new directors in LEAs and State agencies. The
provisions of this proposed rule would add flexibility to the existing
hiring standards for new directors in order to address difficulties
faced by program operators in finding qualified applicants.
Executive Order 13175
Executive Order 13175 requires Federal agencies to consult and
coordinate with Tribes on a government-to-government basis on policies
that have Tribal implications, including regulations, legislative
comments or proposed legislation, and other policy statements or
actions that have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian
Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian
Tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between
the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. FNS will notify Tribal
leaders about this proposed rule to encourage public comments, and
intends to brief Tribal leaders at one of the quarterly consultations
or conference calls scheduled by the Office of Tribal Relations.
FNS has assessed the impact of this proposed rule on Indian tribes
and determined that this rule does not, to our knowledge, have negative
Tribal implications that require Tribal consultation under E.O. 13175.
If a Tribe requests consultation on this rule, FNS will work with the
Office of Tribal Relations to ensure meaningful consultation is
provided where changes, additions and modifications identified herein
are not expressly mandated by Congress. We are unaware of any current
Tribal laws that could be in conflict with the proposed provisions of
this rule and anticipate that the proposed hiring flexibilities will
benefit Tribal schools.
When implemented, the flexibilities provided by this rule are
expected to increase the pool of candidates qualified to serve as new
directors of school nutrition programs in small LEAs. This is expected
to benefit Tribal communities, which often experience difficulty
attracting qualified school nutrition personnel.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chap. 35; 5 CFR
1320) requires the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approve all
collections of information by a Federal agency before they can be
implemented. Respondents are not required to respond to any collection
of information unless it displays a current valid OMB control number.
The provisions of this proposed rule do not contain information
collection requirements subject to approval by the Office of Management
and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
E-Government Act Compliance
The Department is committed to complying with the E-Government Act,
to promote the use of the internet and other information technologies
to provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other purposes.
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 210
Children, Commodity school program, Food assistance programs, Grant
programs--health, Grant programs--education, School breakfast and lunch
programs, Nutrition, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
7 CFR Part 235
Administrative practice and procedure, Food assistance programs,
Grant programs--health, Grant programs--education, School breakfast and
lunch programs, Nutrition, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, 7 CFR parts 210 and 235 are proposed to be amended as
follows:
PART 210--NATIONAL SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM
0
1. The authority citation for part 210 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1751-1760, 1779.
0
2. Amend Sec. 210.30 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (b)(1)(i) and;
0
b. In the table to paragraph (b)(2), in the column under the heading
``Student enrollment 2,499 or less'', removing the words ``school
nutrition program experience'' wherever they appear and adding in their
place the words ``food service experience''.
Sec. 210.30 School nutrition program professional standards.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) School nutrition program directors with local educational
agency enrollment of 2,499 students or fewer. Directors must meet the
requirements in either paragraph (b)(1)(i)(A), (B), (C), or (D) of this
section.
(A) A bachelor's degree, or equivalent educational experience, with
an academic major or concentration in food and nutrition, food service
management,
[[Page 9451]]
dietetics, family and consumer sciences, nutrition education, culinary
arts, business, or a related field;
(B) A bachelor's degree, or equivalent educational experience, with
any academic major or area of concentration, and either a State-
recognized certificate for school nutrition directors or at least one
year of relevant food service experience. At the discretion of the
State agency, and on a case-by-case basis, the relevant food service
experience may be unpaid;
(C) An associate's degree, or equivalent educational experience,
with an academic major or area of concentration in food and nutrition,
food service management, dietetics, family and consumer sciences,
nutrition education, culinary arts, business, or a related field and at
least one year of relevant food service experience. At the discretion
of the State agency, and on a case-by-case basis, the relevant food
service experience may be unpaid; or
(D) A high school diploma or equivalency (such as the general
educational development diploma), and at least three years of relevant
food service experience. At the discretion of the State agency, and on
a case-by-case basis, the relevant food service experience may be
unpaid. Directors hired under this criterion are strongly encouraged to
work toward attaining an associate's degree in an academic major in the
fields listed in paragraph (b)(1)(i).
(E) For a local educational agency with less than 500 students, the
State agency has discretion to approve the hire of a director who meets
one of the educational criteria in paragraph (b)(1)(i)(A)-(D) but has
less than the required years of relevant food service experience.
* * * * *
PART 235--STATE ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE FUNDS
0
3. The authority citation for part 235 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 7 and 10 of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966, 80
Stat. 888, 889, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1776, 1779).
Sec. 235.11 [Amended]
0
4. In paragraph (g)(1)(i), add at the end the words ``or a bachelor's
degree with any academic major and a master's degree with an academic
major in areas including food and nutrition, food service management,
dietetics, family and consumer sciences, nutrition education, culinary
arts, business, or a related field;'' and in paragraph (g)(1)(iv)(A),
remove the words ``Master's degree'' and add in their place the words
``Both a bachelor's degree and a master's degree''.
Dated: January 16, 2018.
Brandon Lipps,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-04233 Filed 3-5-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-30-P