Freedom of Information Act; Privacy Act; Federal Tort Claims Act; Debt Collection, 9459-9470 [2018-03939]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 6, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Capital Region and or designated
representatives can be contacted at
telephone number 410–576–2693 or on
marine band radio VHF–FM channel 16
(156.8 MHz). The Coast Guard vessels
enforcing this section can be contacted
on marine band radio VHF–FM channel
16 (156.8 MHz). Upon being hailed by
a U.S. Coast Guard vessel, or other
Federal, State, or local agency vessel, by
siren, radio, flashing light, or other
means, the operator of a vessel shall
proceed as directed. If permission is
granted to enter the safety zone, all
persons and vessels shall comply with
the instructions of the Captain of the
Port Maryland-National Capital Region
or designated representative and
proceed as directed while within the
zone.
(4) Enforcement officials. The U.S.
Coast Guard may be assisted in the
patrol and enforcement of the zone by
Federal, State, and local agencies.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 11 p.m. on April
21, 2018, until 1 a.m. on April 22, 2018,
or if necessary, due to inclement
weather, from 11 p.m. on April 22,
2018, until 1 a.m. on April 23, 2018.
Dated: February 22, 2018.
Lonnie P. Harrison, Jr.,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Maryland-National Capital Region.
[FR Doc. 2018–04487 Filed 3–5–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
Written comments must be
received by the Trust on or before April
24, 2018. Comments received by mail
will be considered timely if they are
postmarked on or before that date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Email: scarp@presidiotrust.gov.
Include ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ in the subject
line of the message.
• Mail: Steve Carp, Legal Analyst,
Presidio Trust, 103 Montgomery Street,
P.O. Box 29052, San Francisco, CA
94129–0052.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Steve Carp,
Legal Analyst, Presidio Trust, 103
Montgomery Street, San Francisco, CA
94129–0052.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steve Carp, Legal Analyst,
415.561.5300, scarp@presidiotrust.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Background
Section 104(j) of the Presidio Trust
Act (16 U.S.C. 460bb appendix)
authorizes the Trust to prescribe
regulations governing the manner in
which it conducts its business and
exercises its powers. This rulemaking
revises the Trust’s administrative
regulations at 36 CFR part 1007 (FOIA),
part 1008 (Privacy Act), part 1009
(FTCA), and part 1011 (Debt Collection),
as described below. In addition, the
Trust has made minor ministerial
changes and corrected typographical
errors to these parts of its regulations.
PRESIDIO TRUST
Proposed Revisions to 36 CFR Part 1007
(Requests Under the FOIA)
36 CFR Parts 1007, 1008, 1009, and
1011
The Trust adopted FOIA regulations
effective January 29, 1999. The FOIA
Improvement Act of 2016 (Act)
amended the FOIA on June 30, 2016.
Those FOIA amendments require
federal agencies to review and update
their FOIA regulations in accordance
with the provisions of the Act. The
Trust proposes revisions to conform its
regulations to the Act, as well as to the
Department of Justice’s revised FOIA
regulations. Specifically, this
rulemaking proposes revisions to
§ 1007.1 (Purpose and scope) by adding
references to the text of FOIA and the
Trust’s Privacy Act regulations; § 1007.2
(Records available) by adopting a policy
of presumption of openness and the
‘‘foreseeable harm’’ standard; § 1007.3
(Requests for records) by providing a
requester an opportunity to consult with
the Trust’s FOIA Officer to perfect a
request and adding procedures to verify
the requester’s identity; § 1007.4
(Preliminary processing of requests) by
specifying the date used for searching,
adding consultation and referral
RIN 3212–AA08; 3212–AA09; 3212–AA10;
3212–AA11
Freedom of Information Act; Privacy
Act; Federal Tort Claims Act; Debt
Collection
Presidio Trust.
Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Presidio Trust (Trust)
proposes revisions to its regulations
addressing requests under the Freedom
of Information Act (FOIA), requests
under the Privacy Act, administrative
claims under the Federal Tort Claims
Act (FTCA), and Debt Collection. The
Trust is revising these regulations to
update and streamline the language of
several procedural provisions, and to
reflect amendments pursuant to the
FOIA Improvement Act of 2016 and the
Digital Accountability and
Transparency Act of 2014.
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:05 Mar 05, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
9459
procedures for requests of records of
other departments and agencies, and
adding procedures to notify submitters
and requesters of actions taken with
respect to requests containing
commercial or financial information;
§ 1007.5 (Action on initial requests) by
specifying decisions that constitute
adverse determinations of requests,
adding procedures for notifying
requesters of dispute resolution
services, and adding types of requests
that would qualify for expedited
processing; § 1007.7 (Appeals) by
changing the time period for requesters
to file an administrative appeal from 20
working days to 90 calendar days and
requiring an appeal of an adverse
determination before seeking a court
order; § 1007.8 (Action on appeals) by
adding procedures for notifying
requesters of dispute resolution
services; and § 1007.9 (Fees) by adding
definitions for the terms ‘‘direct costs’’
and ‘‘review.’’
The Trust also proposes revisions to
§ 1007.9 to update the fees charged by
the Trust for processing FOIA requests.
The Trust previously published its fees
on December 2, 1998 in its Interim
Compendium. Under the proposed
revisions to § 1007.9, the Trust’s
Executive Director will set fees for
processing these requests and will
publish the fees on the Trust’s website
instead of the Interim Compendium.
With these changes, the fees previously
listed in § 1007.9 of the Interim
Compendium will no longer be
effective.
Proposed Revisions to 36 CFR Part 1008
(Requests Under the Privacy Act)
The Trust adopted Privacy Act
regulations effective January 29, 1999.
There has been little statutory change to
the Privacy Act of 1974 since the Trust
adopted its Privacy Act regulations.
However, the Trust proposes revisions
to conform its regulations to guidance
issued by the Department of Justice and
the Office of Management and Budget.
Specifically, this rulemaking proposes
revisions to § 1008.2 (Definitions) by
changing the definition of ‘‘individual’’;
§ 1008.9 (Disclosure of records) by
adding procedures for notice of courtordered and emergency disclosures; and
§§ 1008.11 (Request for notification of
existence of records: Submission),
1008.14 (Requests for access to records:
Submission), and 1008.19 (Petitions for
amendment: Submission and form) by
adding procedures to verify the
requester’s identity.
The Trust also proposes revisions to
§ 1008.15 (Requests for access to
records: Initial decision) to update the
fees charged by the Trust for processing
E:\FR\FM\06MRP1.SGM
06MRP1
9460
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 6, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Privacy Act requests. The Trust
previously published its fees on
December 2, 1998 in its Interim
Compendium. Under the proposed
revisions to § 1008.15, the Trust’s
Executive Director will set fees for
processing these requests and will
publish the fees on the Trust’s website
instead of the Interim Compendium.
With these changes, the fees previously
listed in § 1008.15 of the Interim
Compendium will no longer be
effective.
Proposed Revisions to 36 CFR Part 1009
(Administrative Claims Under the
FTCA)
The Trust adopted FTCA regulations
effective January 29, 1999. This
rulemaking proposes revisions to
§ 1009.4 (Payment of claims) by adding
procedures the Trust uses to pay FTCA
claims from its proceeds or revenues.
Proposed Revisions to 36 CFR Part 1011
(Debt Collection)
The Trust adopted debt collection
regulations effective January 12, 2006.
The Digital Accountability and
Transparency Act of 2014 amended
federal debt collection law to require
federal agencies to refer eligible
delinquent debts to the Department of
the Treasury for administrative offset
after 120 days, rather than 180 days.
This rulemaking proposes minor
revisions to §§ 1011.4 (What notice will
the Presidio Trust send to a debtor when
collecting a debt?), 1011.9 (When will
the Presidio Trust transfer a debt to the
Financial Management Service for
collection?), and 1011.10 (How will the
Presidio Trust use administrative offset
(offset of non-tax federal payments) to
collect a debt?) to reflect this
requirement.
Regulatory Analysis of the Proposed
Revisions
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA) in the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) will
review all significant rules. OIRA has
determined that this rule is not
significant. This rule:
(1) Will not have an effect of $100
million or more on the economy. It will
not adversely affect in a material way
the economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities.
(2) Will not create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:05 Mar 05, 2018
Jkt 244001
another agency. The rule only affects
management and operations of the
Presidio Trust.
(3) Does not alter the budgetary effects
of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights or obligations of
their recipients.
(4) Does raise novel legal or policy
issues.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the
principles of Executive Order 12866
while calling for improvements in the
nation’s regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty,
and to use the best, most innovative,
and least burdensome tools for
achieving regulatory ends. The
Executive Order directs agencies to
consider regulatory approaches that
reduce burdens and maintain flexibility
and freedom of choice for the public
where these approaches are relevant,
feasible, and consistent with regulatory
objectives. Executive Order 13563
emphasizes further that regulations
must be based on the best available
science and that the rulemaking process
must allow for public participation and
an open exchange of ideas. The Trust
has developed this proposed rule in a
manner consistent with these
requirements.
Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs (Executive Order
13771)
Executive Order 13771 requires an
agency, unless prohibited by law, to
identify at least two existing regulations
to be repealed when the agency publicly
proposes for notice and comment or
otherwise promulgates a new regulation.
In furtherance of this requirement,
section 2(c) of the Executive Order
requires that the new incremental costs
associated with new regulations must,
to the extent permitted by law, be offset
by the elimination of existing costs
associated with at least two prior
regulations. The OMB’s interim
guidance issued on February 2, 2017
explains that the above requirements
only apply to each new ‘‘significant
regulatory action that imposes costs.’’
The OMB has determined that this
proposed rule is only related to the
Trust’s organization and management
and is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action that imposes costs.’’ Thus, this
rule does not trigger the above
requirements of Executive Order 13771.
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.)
This proposed rule will not have a
significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act (5 U.S.C. 804(2))
This proposed rule is not a major rule
under the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule: (a)
Does not have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more; (b)
will not cause a major increase in costs
or prices for consumers, individual
industries, Federal, State, or local
government agencies, or geographic
regions; or (c) does not have significant
adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity,
innovation, or the ability of U.S.-based
enterprises to compete with foreignbased enterprises.
This rule relates to internal
administrative procedures and
management of government function. It
does not regulate external entities,
impose any costs on them, or eliminate
any procedures or functions that would
result in a loss of employment or
income on the part of the private sector.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)
This proposed rule does not impose
an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of more than $100 million per year. This
rule does not have a significant or
unique effect on State, local or tribal
governments, or the private sector. A
statement containing the information
required by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act is not required. This rule
produces no costs outside of the Federal
government and does not create an
additional burden on State, local, or
tribal governments, or the private sector.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
This proposed rule does not affect a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630. A takings
implication assessment is not required.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
This proposed rule does not have
sufficient federalism implications, as
defined by section 1 of Executive Order
13132, to warrant the preparation of a
federalism summary impact statement.
This rule only affects use of Trust
administered lands. It has no outside
effects on other areas. A federalism
summary impact statement is not
required.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order
12988)
This proposed rule complies with the
requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rule: (a) Meets the
criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all
regulations be reviewed to eliminate
E:\FR\FM\06MRP1.SGM
06MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 6, 2018 / Proposed Rules
errors and ambiguity and be written to
minimize litigation; and (b) meets the
criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that
all regulations be written in clear
language and contain clear legal
standards.
Effects on the Energy Supply (Executive
Order 13211)
This proposed rule is not a significant
energy action under the definition in
Executive Order 13211. A Statement of
Energy Effects is not required.
Consultation With Indian Tribes
(Executive Order 13175)
This proposed rule has no substantial
direct effects on federally recognized
Indian tribes. Consultation under the
Department’s tribal consultation policy
is not required.
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.)
This proposed rule does not contain
new collections of information that
require approval by the OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act. The rule does
not impose new recordkeeping or
reporting requirements on State, tribal,
or local governments; individuals;
businesses; or organizations.
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.)
This proposed rule does not
constitute a major Federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment under the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and
the Trust’s NEPA regulations at 36 CFR
1010.16. It is a modification of existing
Trust regulations in order to make them
clearer, more complete, and consistent
with current Federal statutory law.
Moreover, a detailed statement under
the NEPA is not required because the
rule is covered by a categorical
exclusion. The Trust has determined
that the proposed rule is categorically
excluded under 36 CFR 1010.7(a)(10)(i)
as it is a revision of Trust regulations
that does not increase public use to the
extent of compromising the nature and
character of the Presidio Area B or of
causing significant physical damage to
it. Further, the rule will not result in the
introduction of non-compatible uses,
which might compromise the nature
and characteristics of the Presidio Area
B or cause significant physical damage
to it. Finally, the rule will not conflict
with adjacent ownerships or land uses
or cause a significant nuisance to
adjacent owners or occupants. The Trust
has also determined that the rule does
not involve any of the extraordinary
circumstances listed in 36 CFR
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:05 Mar 05, 2018
Jkt 244001
9461
1010.7(b) that would require further
analysis under the NEPA.
information, Privacy, Public lands,
Recreation and recreation areas.
Clarity of This Regulation
36 CFR Part 1009
Administrative practice and
procedure, Claims, National parks,
Natural resources, Public lands,
Recreation and recreation areas, Tort
claims.
The Trust is required by Executive
Orders 12866 (section 1(b)(12)), 12988
(section 3(b)(1)(B)), and 13563 (section
1(a)), and by the Presidential
Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write
all rules in plain language. This means
that each rule the Trust publishes must:
(a) Be logically organized; (b) use the
active voice to address readers directly;
(c) use common, everyday words and
clear language rather than jargon; (d) be
divided into short sections and
sentences; and (e) use lists and tables
wherever possible.
If you feel that the Trust has not met
these requirements, send the Trust your
comments by one of the methods listed
in the ADDRESSES section. To better help
the Trust revise the rule, your comments
should be as specific as possible. For
example, you should tell the Trust the
numbers of the sections or paragraphs
that you find unclear, which paragraphs
or sentences are too long, the sections
where you feel lists or tables would be
useful, etc.
Public Participation
It is the policy of the Trust, whenever
practicable, to afford the public an
opportunity to participate in the
rulemaking process. Accordingly,
interested persons may submit written
comments regarding this proposed rule
by following the instructions in the
ADDRESSES section of this document.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, be aware that your entire
comment—including your personally
identifiable information—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask in your comment to
withhold your personal identifiable
information from public view, the Trust
cannot guarantee that it will be able to
do so.
List of Subjects
36 CFR Part 1007
Administrative practice and
procedure, Archives and records,
Freedom of information, National parks,
Natural resources, Public lands,
Records, Recreation and recreation
areas.
36 CFR Part 1008
Administrative practice and
procedure, National parks, Natural
resources, Personally identifiable
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
36 CFR Part 1011
Administrative practice and
procedure, Claims, Credit, Debt
collection, Government employees,
National parks, Natural resources,
Public lands, Recreation and recreation
areas, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Wages.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Presidio Trust proposes to
amend Chapter X of title 36 of the Code
of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 1007—REQUESTS UNDER THE
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT
1. The authority citation for part 1007
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Pub. L. 104–333, 110 Stat. 4097
(16 U.S.C. 460bb note); 5 U.S.C. 552; E.O.
12,600, 52 FR 23781, 3 CFR, 1988 Comp., p.
235.
■
2. Revise § 1007.1 to read as follows:
§ 1007.1
Purpose and scope.
(a) This part contains the procedures
for submission to and consideration by
the Presidio Trust of requests for records
under the FOIA. As used in this part,
the term ‘‘FOIA’’ means the Freedom of
Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552. The
regulations in this part should be read
in conjunction with the text of the
FOIA. Requests made by individuals for
records about themselves under the
Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, are
processed in accordance with the
Presidio Trust’s Privacy Act regulations
as well as under this subpart.
(b) Before invoking the formal
procedures set out below, persons
seeking records from the Presidio Trust
may find it useful to consult with the
Presidio Trust’s FOIA Officer, who can
be reached at The Presidio Trust, P.O.
Box 29052, San Francisco, CA 94129–
0052, Telephone: 415.561.5300. As used
in this part, the term ‘‘FOIA Officer’’
means the employee designated by the
Executive Director to process FOIA
requests and otherwise supervise the
Presidio Trust’s compliance with the
FOIA, or the alternate employee so
designated to perform these duties in
the absence of the FOIA Officer.
(c) The procedures in this part do not
apply to:
(1) Records published in the Federal
Register, the Bylaws of the Presidio
E:\FR\FM\06MRP1.SGM
06MRP1
9462
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 6, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Trust, statements of policy and
interpretations, and other materials that
have been published by the Presidio
Trust on its internet website (https://
www.presidiotrust.gov) or are routinely
made available for inspection and
copying at the requester’s expense.
(2) Records or information compiled
for law enforcement purposes and
covered by the disclosure exemption
described in § 1007.2(c)(7) if:
(i) The investigation or proceeding
involves a possible violation of criminal
law; and
(ii) There is reason to believe that:
(A) The subject of the investigation or
proceeding is not aware of its pendency;
and
(B) Disclosure of the existence of the
records could reasonably be expected to
interfere with enforcement proceedings.
(3) Informant records maintained by
the United States Park Police under an
informant’s name or personal identifier,
if requested by a third party according
to the informant’s name or personal
identifier, unless the informant’s status
as an informant has been officially
confirmed.
■ 3. Revise § 1007.2 to read as follows:
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 1007.2
Records available.
(a) Policy. It is the policy of the
Presidio Trust to make its records
available to the public to the greatest
extent possible consistent with the
purposes of the Presidio Trust Act and
the FOIA. The Presidio Trust
administers the FOIA with a
presumption of openness. As a matter of
policy, the Presidio Trust may make
discretionary disclosures of records or
information exempt from disclosure
under the FOIA whenever disclosure
would not foreseeably harm an interest
protected by a FOIA exemption. This
policy does not create any right
enforceable in court.
(b) Statutory disclosure requirement.
The FOIA requires that the Presidio
Trust, on a request from a member of the
public submitted in accordance with the
procedures in this part, make requested
records available for inspection and
copying.
(c) Statutory exemptions. Exempted
from the FOIA’s statutory disclosure
requirement are matters that are:
(1)(i) Specifically authorized under
criteria established by an Executive
order to be kept secret in the interest of
national defense or foreign policy; and
(ii) Are in fact properly classified
pursuant to such Executive order.
(2) Related solely to the internal
personnel rules and practices of an
agency;
(3) Specifically exempted from
disclosure by statute (other than the
Privacy Act), provided that such statute:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:05 Mar 05, 2018
Jkt 244001
(i) Requires that the matters be
withheld from the public in such a
manner as to leave no discretion on the
issue; or
(ii) Establishes particular criteria for
withholding or refers to particular types
of matters to be withheld.
(4) Trade secrets and commercial or
financial information obtained from a
person and privileged or confidential;
(5) Inter-agency or intra-agency
memorandums or letters which would
not be available by law to a party other
than an agency in litigation with the
agency;
(6) Personnel and medical files and
similar files the disclosure of which
would constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy;
(7) Records or information compiled
for law enforcement purposes, but only
to the extent that the production of such
law enforcement records or information:
(i) Could reasonably be expected to
interfere with enforcement proceedings;
(ii) Would deprive a person of a right
to a fair or an impartial adjudication;
(iii) Could reasonably be expected to
constitute an unwarranted invasion of
personal privacy;
(iv) Could reasonably be expected to
disclose the identity of a confidential
source, including a State, local, or
foreign agency or authority or any
private institution which furnished
information on a confidential basis, and,
in the case of a record or information
compiled by a criminal law enforcement
authority in the course of a criminal
investigation, or by an agency
conducting a lawful national security
intelligence investigation, information
furnished by a confidential source;
(v) Would disclose techniques and
procedures for law enforcement
investigations or prosecutions or would
disclose guidelines for law enforcement
investigations or prosecutions if such
disclosure could reasonably be expected
to risk circumvention of the law; or
(vi) Could reasonably be expected to
endanger the life or physical safety of
any individual.
(8) Contained in or related to
examination, operating, or condition
reports prepared by, on behalf of, or for
the use of an agency responsible for the
regulation or supervision of financial
institutions; or
(9) Geological and geophysical
information and data, including maps,
concerning wells.
(d) Decisions on requests. It is the
policy of the Presidio Trust to withhold
information falling within an exemption
only if:
(1) Disclosure is prohibited by statute
or Executive order; or
(2) Sound grounds exist for invocation
of the exemption.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(e) Disclosure of reasonably
segregable nonexempt material. If a
requested record contains material
covered by an exemption and material
that is not exempt, and it is determined
under the procedures in this part to
withhold the exempt material, any
reasonably segregable nonexempt
material shall be separated from the
exempt material and released. In such
circumstances, the records disclosed in
part shall be marked or annotated to
show both the amount and the location
of the information deleted wherever
practicable.
■ 4. Revise § 1007.3 to read as follows:
§ 1007.3
Requests for records.
(a) Submission of requests. A request
to inspect or copy records shall be
submitted to the Presidio Trust’s FOIA
Officer at P.O. Box 29052, San
Francisco, CA 94129–0052.
(b) Form of perfected requests. (1)
Requests under this part shall be in
writing and must specifically invoke the
FOIA.
(2) A request must reasonably
describe the records requested. A
request reasonably describes the records
requested if it will enable an employee
of the Presidio Trust familiar with the
subject area of the request to locate the
record with a reasonable amount of
effort. If such information is available,
the request should identify the subject
matter of the record, the date when it
was made, the place where it was made,
the person or office that made it, the
present custodian of the record, and any
other information that will assist in
locating the requested record. If the
request involves a matter known by the
requester to be in litigation, the request
should also state the case name and
court hearing the case. If after receiving
a request the FOIA Officer determines
that the request does not reasonably
describe the records sought, the FOIA
Officer will inform the requester what
additional information is needed or why
the request is otherwise insufficient.
Requesters who are attempting to
reformulate or modify such a request
may discuss their request with the FOIA
Officer. If a request does not reasonably
describe the records sought, the Presidio
Trust’s response to the request may be
delayed or an adverse determination
under § 1007.5(e).
(3)(i) A perfected request shall:
(A) Specify the fee category
(commercial use, educational
institution, noncommercial scientific
institution, news media, or other, as
defined in § 1007.9) in which the
requester claims the request falls and
the basis of this claim;
E:\FR\FM\06MRP1.SGM
06MRP1
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 6, 2018 / Proposed Rules
(B) State the maximum amount of fees
that the requester is willing to pay or
include a request for a fee waiver; and
(C) Provide contact information for
the requester, such as phone number,
email address and/or mailing address, to
assist the Presidio Trust in
communicating with them and
providing released records.
(ii) Requesters who make requests for
records about themselves must verify
their identity.
(iii) Where a request for records
pertains to another individual, a
requester may receive greater access by
submitting either a notarized
authorization signed by that individual
or a declaration made in compliance
with the requirements set forth in 28
U.S.C. 1746 by that individual
authorizing disclosure of the records to
the requester, or by submitting proof
that the individual is deceased (e.g., a
copy of a death certificate or an
obituary). As an exercise of
administrative discretion, the Presidio
Trust may require a requester to supply
additional information if necessary in
order to verify that a particular
individual has consented to disclosure.
(iv) Requesters are advised that, under
§ 1007.9 (f), (g) and (h), the time for
responding to requests may be delayed:
(A) If a requester has not sufficiently
identified the fee category applicable to
the request;
(B) If a requester has not stated a
willingness to pay fees as high as
anticipated by the Presidio Trust; or
(C) If a fee waiver request is denied
and the requester has not included an
alternative statement of willingness to
pay fees as high as anticipated by the
Presidio Trust.
(4) A request seeking a fee waiver
shall, to the extent possible, address
why the requester believes that the
criteria for fee waivers set out in
§ 1007.10 are met.
(5) To expedite processing, both the
envelope containing a request and the
face of the request should bear the
legend ‘‘FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
REQUEST.’’
(c) Creation of records. A request may
seek only records that are in existence
at the time the request is received. A
request may not seek records that come
into existence after the date on which it
is received and may not require that
new records be created in response to
the request by, for example, combining
or compiling selected items from
manual files, preparing a new computer
program, or calculating proportions,
percentages, frequency distributions,
trends or comparisons. In those
instances where the Presidio Trust
determines that creating a new record
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:05 Mar 05, 2018
Jkt 244001
will be less burdensome than disclosing
large volumes of unassembled material,
the Presidio Trust may, in its discretion,
agree to creation of a new record as an
alternative to disclosing existing
records.
■ 5. Revise § 1007.4 to read as follows:
§ 1007.4 Preliminary processing of
requests.
(a) Scope of requests. Unless a request
clearly specifies otherwise, requests to
the Presidio Trust may be presumed to
seek only records of the Presidio Trust
in possession of the Presidio Trust at the
time the Presidio Trust begins it search.
If any other date is used, the Presidio
Trust will inform the requester of that
date. A record that is excluded from the
requirements of the FOIA pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 552(c) is not considered
responsive to a request.
(b) Records of other departments and
agencies. (1) When reviewing records in
response to a request, the Presidio Trust
will determine whether another Federal
department or agency is better able to
determine whether the record is exempt
from disclosure under the FOIA. As to
any such record, the Presidio Trust will
proceed in one of the following ways:
(i) Consultation. When records
originating with the Presidio Trust, but
contain within them information of
interest to another Federal department
or agency, the Presidio Trust will
consult with that other entity prior to
making a release determination; or
(ii) Referral. (A) When the Presidio
Trust believes that another department
or agency is best able to determine
whether to disclose the record, the
Presidio Trust will refer the
responsibility for responding to the
request regarding the record to that
department or agency. Ordinarily, the
department or agency that originated the
record is presumed to be the best entity
to make the disclosure determination.
However, if the Presidio Trust and the
originating department or agency jointly
agree that the Presidio Trust is in the
best position to respond to the request,
then the record may be handled as a
consultation.
(B) If the Presidio Trust refers any part
of the responsibility for responding to a
request to another department or
agency, the Presidio Trust will
document the referral, maintain a copy
of the record that it refers, and notify the
requester of the referral, informing the
requester of the name(s) of the
department or agency to which the
record was referred, including that
entity’s FOIA contact information.
(2) Timing of responses to
consultations and referrals. All
consultations and referrals received by
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
9463
the Presidio Trust will be handled
according to the date that the Presidio
Trust received the perfected FOIA
request.
(3) A request for documents that were
classified by another agency shall be
referred to that agency.
(c) Consultation with submitters of
commercial and financial information.
(1) If a request seeks a record containing
trade secrets or commercial or financial
information submitted by a person
outside of the Federal government, the
Presidio Trust shall provide the
submitter with notice of the request
whenever:
(i) The submitter has made a good
faith designation of the information as
commercially or financially sensitive; or
(ii) The Presidio Trust has reason to
believe that disclosure of the
information may result in commercial or
financial injury to the submitter.
(2) Where notification of a
voluminous number of submitters is
required, such notification may be
accomplished by posting or publishing
the notice in a place reasonably
calculated to accomplish notification.
(3) The notice to the submitter shall
afford the submitter a reasonable period
within which to provide a detailed
statement of any objection to disclosure.
The submitter’s statement shall explain
the basis on which the information is
claimed to be exempt under the FOIA,
including a specification of any claim of
competitive or other business harm that
would result from disclosure. The
statement shall also include a
certification that the information is
confidential, has not been disclosed to
the public by the submitter, and is not
routinely available to the public from
other sources.
(4) A submitter who fails to respond
within the time period specified in the
notice will be deemed to have no
objection to disclosure of the
information. The Presidio Trust shall
not be required to consider any
information received from the submitter
after the date of any disclosure decision.
Any information provided by a
submitter under this subpart may itself
be subject to disclosure under the FOIA.
(5) The Presidio Trust will notify the
requester whenever it provides the
submitter with notice and an
opportunity to object to disclosure;
whenever it notifies the submitter of its
intent to disclose the requested
information; and whenever a submitter
files a lawsuit to prevent the disclosure
of the information.
(6) If a submitter’s statement cannot
be obtained within the time limit for
processing the request under § 1007.6,
E:\FR\FM\06MRP1.SGM
06MRP1
9464
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 6, 2018 / Proposed Rules
the requester shall be notified of the
delay as provided in § 1007.6(f).
(7) Notification to a submitter is not
required if:
(i) The Presidio Trust determines,
prior to giving notice, that the request
for the record should be denied;
(ii) The information has previously
been lawfully published or officially
made available to the public;
(iii) Disclosure is required by a statute
(other than the FOIA) or regulation
(other than this part);
(iv) Disclosure is clearly prohibited by
a statute, as described in § 1007.2(c)(3);
(v) The information was not
designated by the submitter as
confidential when it was submitted, or
a reasonable time thereafter, if the
submitter was specifically afforded an
opportunity to make such a designation;
however, a submitter will be notified of
a request for information that was not
designated as confidential at the time of
submission, or a reasonable time
thereafter, if there is substantial reason
to believe that disclosure of the
information would result in competitive
harm;
(vi) The designation of confidentiality
made by the submitter is obviously
frivolous; or
(vii) The information was submitted
to the Presidio Trust more than ten
years prior to the date of the request,
unless the Presidio Trust has reason to
believe that it continues to be
confidential.
(8) If a requester brings suit to compel
disclosure of information, the submitter
of the information will be promptly
notified.
■ 6. Revise § 1007.5 to read as follows:
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 1007.5
Action on initial requests.
(a) Authority. (1) Requests shall be
decided by the FOIA Officer.
(2) A decision to withhold a requested
record, to release a record that is exempt
from disclosure, or to deny a fee waiver
shall be made only after consultation
with the General Counsel.
(b) Acknowledgement of requests. (1)
The Presidio Trust shall send the
requester a written acknowledgement of
the receipt of the request, provide the
requester with an individualized
tracking number, and provide the
requester with contact information for
the FOIA Officer.
(2) Requesters must include the
individualized tracking number in all
communications with the Presidio Trust
regarding the request.
(c) Estimated dates of completion and
interim responses. Upon request, the
Presidio Trust will provide an estimated
date by which the Presidio Trust
expects to provide a response to the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:05 Mar 05, 2018
Jkt 244001
requester. If a request involves a
voluminous amount of material, or
searches in multiple locations, the
Presidio Trust may provide interim
responses, releasing records on a rolling
basis.
(d) Form of grant. (1) When a
requested record has been determined to
be available, the FOIA Officer shall
notify the requester as to when and
where the record is available for
inspection or, as the case may be, when
and how copies will be provided. If fees
are due, the FOIA Officer shall state the
amount of fees due and the procedures
for payment, as described in § 1007.9.
(2) The FOIA Officer shall honor a
requester’s specified preference of form
or format of disclosure (e.g., paper,
microform, audiovisual materials, or
electronic records) if the record is
readily available to the Presidio Trust in
the requested form or format or if the
record is reproducible by the Presidio
Trust with reasonable efforts in the
requested form or format.
(3) If a requested record (or portion
thereof) is being made available over the
objections of a submitter made in
accordance with § 1007.4(c), both the
requester and the submitter shall be
notified of the decision. The notice to
the submitter (a copy of which shall be
made available to the requester) shall be
forwarded a reasonable number of days
prior to the date on which disclosure is
to be made and shall include:
(i) A statement of the reasons why the
submitter’s objections were not
sustained;
(ii) A specification of the portions of
the record to be disclosed, if the
submitter’s objections were sustained in
part; and
(iii) A specified disclosure date.
(4) If a claim of confidentiality has
been found frivolous in accordance with
§ 1007.4(c)(7)(vi) and a determination is
made to release the information without
consultation with the submitter, the
submitter of the information shall be
notified of the decision and the reasons
therefor a reasonable number of days
prior to the date on which disclosure is
to be made.
(e) Adverse determinations of
requests. Adverse determinations, or
denials of requests, include decisions
that:
(1) The requester has not submitted a
perfected request;
(2) The requested record is exempt, in
whole or in part;
(3) The request does not reasonably
describe the records sought;
(4) The information is not a record
subject to the FOIA;
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(5) The requested record does not
exist, cannot be located, or has been
destroyed; or
(6) The requested record is not readily
reproducible in the form or format
sought by the requester. Adverse
determinations also include denials
involving fees or fee waivers or denials
of requests for expedited processing.
(f) Form of denial. (1) A decision
withholding a requested record shall be
in writing and shall include:
(i) A listing of the names and titles or
positions of each person responsible for
the denial;
(ii) A reference to the specific
exemption or exemptions authorizing
the withholding;
(iii) If neither a statute nor an
Executive order requires withholding,
the sound ground for withholding;
(iv) An estimate of the volume of
records or information withheld, in
number of pages or in some other
reasonable form of estimation. This
estimate does not need to be provided
if the volume is otherwise indicated
through deletions on records disclosed
in part, or if providing an estimate
would harm an interest protected by an
applicable exemption;
(v) A statement that the denial may be
appealed and a reference to the
procedures in § 1007.7 for appeal; and
(vi) A statement notifying the
requester of the dispute resolution
services offered by the Office of
Government Information Services.
(2) A decision denying a request for
failure to reasonably describe requested
records or for other procedural
deficiency or because requested records
cannot be located shall be in writing
and shall include:
(i) A description of the basis of the
decision;
(ii) A list of the names and titles or
positions of each person responsible;
(iii) A statement that the matter may
be appealed and a reference to the
procedures in § 1007.7 for appeal; and
(iv) A statement notifying the
requester of the dispute resolution
services offered by the Office of
Government Information Services.
(g) Expedited processing. (1) Requests
and appeals will be taken out of order
and given expedited treatment
whenever it is determined by the FOIA
Officer that they involve:
(i) Circumstances in which the lack of
expedited treatment could reasonably be
expected to pose an imminent threat to
the life or physical safety of an
individual;
(ii) An urgency to inform the public
about an actual or alleged Federal
government activity, if made by a
person primarily engaged in
disseminating information;
E:\FR\FM\06MRP1.SGM
06MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 6, 2018 / Proposed Rules
(iii) The loss of substantial due
process rights; or
(iv) A matter of widespread and
exceptional media interest in which
there exist possible questions about the
government’s integrity that affect public
confidence.
(2) A request for expedited processing
may be made at the time of the initial
request for records or at any later time.
(3) A requester who seeks expedited
processing must submit a statement,
certified to be true and correct to the
best of that person’s knowledge and
belief, explaining in detail the basis for
requesting expedited processing.
(4) Within ten calendar days of
receiving of a request for expedited
processing, the FOIA Officer shall
decide whether to grant the request for
expedited processing and shall notify
the requester of the decision. If a request
for expedited processing is granted, the
underlying FOIA request shall be given
priority and shall be processed as soon
as practicable. If a request for expedited
processing is denied, any appeal of that
decision shall be acted on
expeditiously.
■ 7. Revise § 1007.6 to read as follows:
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 1007.6 Time limits for processing initial
requests.
(a) Basic limit. Requests for records
shall be processed promptly. A
determination whether to grant or deny
a request shall be made within 20
working days after receipt of a request.
This determination shall be
communicated immediately to the
requester.
(b) Running of basic time limit. (1)
The 20 working day time limit begins to
run when a perfected request meeting
the requirements of § 1007.3(b) is
received at the Presidio Trust.
(2) The running of the basic time limit
may be delayed or tolled as explained
in § 1007.9 (f), (g) and (h) if a requester:
(i) Has not stated a willingness to pay
fees as high as are anticipated and has
not sought and been granted a full fee
waiver; or
(ii) Has not made a required advance
payment.
(c) Extensions of time. In the
following unusual circumstances, the
time limit for acting on an initial request
may be extended to the extent
reasonably necessary to the proper
processing of the request, but in no case
may the time limit be extended by more
than 20 working days:
(1) The need to search for and collect
the requested records from facilities or
other establishments that are separate
from the main office of the Presidio
Trust;
(2) The need to search for, collect, and
appropriately examine a voluminous
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:05 Mar 05, 2018
Jkt 244001
amount of separate and distinct records
demanded in a single request; or
(3) The need for consultation, which
shall be conducted with all practicable
speed, with another department or
agency having a substantial interest in
the determination of the request.
(d) Notice of extension. A requester
shall be notified in writing of an
extension under paragraph (c) of this
section. The notice shall state the reason
for the extension and the date on which
a determination on the request is
expected to be made.
(e) Treatment of delay as denial. If no
determination has been reached at the
end of the 20 working day period for
deciding an initial request, or an
extension thereof under § 1007.6(c), the
requester may deem the request denied
and may exercise a right of appeal in
accordance with § 1007.7.
(f) Notice of delay. When a
determination cannot be reached within
the time limit, or extension thereof, the
requester shall be notified of the reason
for the delay, of the date on which a
determination may be expected, and of
the right to treat the delay as a denial
for purposes of appeal, including a
reference to the procedures for filing an
appeal in § 1007.7.
■ 8. Revise § 1007.7 to read as follows:
§ 1007.7
Appeals.
(a) Right of appeal. A requester may
appeal to the Executive Director when:
(1) Records have been withheld;
(2) A request has been denied for
failure to describe requested records or
for other procedural deficiency or
because requested records cannot be
located;
(3) A fee waiver has been denied;
(4) A request has not been decided
within the time limits provided in
§ 1007.6; or
(5) A request for expedited processing
under § 1007.5(g) has been denied.
(b) Time for appeal. An appeal must
be received at the office of the Presidio
Trust no later than 90 calendar days
after the date of the initial denial, in the
case of a denial of an entire request, or
90 calendar days after records have been
made available, in the case of a partial
denial.
(c) Form of appeal. (1) An appeal
shall be initiated by filing a written
notice of appeal. The notice shall be
accompanied by copies of the original
request and the initial denial and
should, in order to expedite the
appellate process and give the requester
an opportunity to present his or her
arguments, contain a brief statement of
the reasons why the requester believes
the initial denial to have been in error.
(2) The appeal shall be addressed to
the Executive Director, The Presidio
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
9465
Trust, P.O. Box 29052, San Francisco,
CA 94129–0052.
(3) To expedite processing, both the
envelope containing a notice of appeal
and the face of the notice should bear
the legend ‘‘FREEDOM OF
INFORMATION APPEAL.’’
(d) Appeal required. Before seeking
review by a court of an adverse
determination by the Presidio Trust, a
requester must first submit a timely
administrative appeal.
■ 9. Revise § 1007.8 to read as follows:
§ 1007.8
Action on appeals.
(a) Authority. Appeals shall be
decided by the Executive Director after
consultation with the FOIA Officer and
the General Counsel.
(b) Time limit. A final determination
shall be made within 20 working days
after receipt of an appeal meeting the
requirements of § 1007.7(c).
(c) Extensions of time. (1) If the time
limit for responding to the initial
request for a record was not extended
under the provisions of § 1007.6(c) or
was extended for fewer than ten
working days, the time for processing of
the appeal may be extended to the
extent reasonably necessary to the
proper processing of the appeal, but in
no event may the extension, when taken
together with any extension made
during processing of the initial request,
result in an aggregate extension with
respect to any one request of more than
ten working days. The time for
processing of an appeal may be
extended only if one or more of the
unusual circumstances listed in
§ 1007.6(c) requires an extension.
(2) The appellant shall be advised in
writing of the reasons for the extension
and the date on which a final
determination on the appeal is expected
to be dispatched.
(3) If no determination on the appeal
has been reached at the end of the 20
working day period, or the extension
thereof, the requester is deemed to have
exhausted administrative remedies,
giving rise to a right of review in the
United States District Court for the
Northern District of California, as
specified in 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4).
(4) When no determination can be
reached within the applicable time
limit, the appeal will nevertheless
continue to be processed. On expiration
of the time limit, the requester shall be
informed of the reason for the delay, of
the date on which a determination may
be reached to be dispatched, and of the
right to seek judicial review.
(5) An appeal ordinarily will not be
adjudicated if the request becomes a
matter of FOIA litigation.
E:\FR\FM\06MRP1.SGM
06MRP1
9466
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 6, 2018 / Proposed Rules
(d) Form of decision. (1) The final
determination on an appeal shall be in
writing and shall state the basis for the
determination. If the determination is to
release the requested records or portions
thereof, the FOIA Officer shall
immediately make the records available.
If the determination upholds in whole
or part the initial denial of a request for
records, the determination shall advise
the requester of the right to obtain
judicial review in the U.S. District Court
for the Northern District of California
and shall set forth the names and titles
or positions of each person responsible
for the denial. The determination shall
also inform the requester of the dispute
resolution services offered by the Office
of Government Information Services.
(2) If a requested record (or portion
thereof) is being made available over the
objections of a submitter made in
accordance with § 1007.4(c), the
submitter shall be provided notice as
described in § 1007.5(b)(3).
■ 10. Revise § 1007.9 to read as follows:
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 1007.9
Fees.
(a) Policy. (1) Unless waived pursuant
to the provisions of § 1007.10, fees for
responding to FOIA requests shall be
charged in accordance with the
provisions of this section and the
current schedule of charges determined
by the Executive Director and published
on the Presidio Trust’s website. Such
charges shall be set at the level
necessary to recoup the full allowable
direct costs to the Presidio Trust.
(2) Fees shall not be charged if the
total amount chargeable does not exceed
the costs of routine collection and
processing of the fee. The Presidio Trust
shall periodically determine the cost of
routine collection and processing of a
fee and publish such amount on its
website.
(3) Where there is a reasonable basis
to conclude that a requester or group of
requesters acting in concert has divided
a request into a series of requests on a
single subject or related subjects to
avoid assessment of fees, the requests
may be aggregated and fees charged
accordingly.
(4) Fees shall be charged to recover
the full costs of providing such services
as certifying that records are true copies
or sending records by a method other
than regular mail, when the Presidio
Trust elects to provide such services.
(5) The following definitions shall
apply to this part:
(i) A commercial use request is a
request from or on behalf of a person
who seeks information for a use or
purpose that furthers the commercial,
trade or profit interests of the requester
or the person on whose behalf the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:05 Mar 05, 2018
Jkt 244001
request is made, which can include
furthering those interests through
litigation. The intended use of records
may be determined on the basis of
information submitted by a requester
and from reasonable inferences based on
the identity of the requester and any
other available information.
(ii) The term direct costs refers to
those expenses the Presidio Trust incurs
in searching for and duplicating (and, in
the case of commercial use requests,
reviewing) records in order to respond
to a FOIA request. For example, direct
costs include the salary of the employee
performing the work (i.e., the basic rate
of pay for the employee, plus 16 percent
of that rate to cover benefits) and the
cost of operating computers and other
electronic equipment, such as
photocopiers and scanners. Direct costs
do not include overhead expenses such
as the costs of space, and of heating or
lighting a facility.
(iii) The term duplication refers to the
process of making a copy of a record
necessary to respond to a FOIA request.
Such copies can take the form of paper
copy, microform, audio-visual materials,
or machine-readable documentation
(e.g., magnetic tape or disk), among
others. The copy provided shall be in a
form that is reasonably usable by
requesters.
(iv) An educational institution is a
preschool, a public or private
elementary or secondary school, an
institution of graduate higher education,
an institution of undergraduate higher
education, an institution of professional
education, or an institution of
vocational education, which operates a
program or programs of scholarly
research.
(v) A noncommercial scientific
institution is an institution that is not
operated for commerce, trade or profit
and that is operated solely for the
purpose of conducting scientific
research the results of which are not
intended to promote any particular
product or industry.
(vi) A representative of the news
media is any person actively gathering
news for an entity that is organized and
operated to publish or broadcast news to
the public. The term ‘‘news’’ means
information that is about current events
or that is (or would be) of current
interest to the public. Examples of news
media entities include, but are not
limited to, television or radio stations
broadcasting to the public at large, and
publishers of periodicals (but only in
those instances when they can qualify
as disseminators of ‘‘news’’) who make
their products available for purchase or
subscription by the general public. As
traditional methods of news delivery
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
evolve (e.g., electronic dissemination of
newspapers through
telecommunications services), such
alternative media would be included in
this category. Free-lance journalists may
be considered representatives of the
news media if they demonstrate a solid
basis for expecting publication through
a news organization, even though not
actually employed by it. A publication
contract or past record of publication, or
evidence of a specific free-lance
assignment from a news organization
may indicate a solid basis for expecting
publication.
(vii) The term review refers to the
examination of a record located in
response to a request in order to
determine whether any portion of it is
exempt from disclosure. Review time
includes processing any record for
disclosure, such as doing all that is
necessary to prepare the record for
disclosure, including the process of
redacting the record and marking the
appropriate exemptions. Review costs
are properly charged even if a record
ultimately is not disclosed. Review time
also includes time spent both obtaining
and considering any formal objection to
disclosure under § 1007.4(c) made by a
submitter of confidential commercial
information, but it does not include
time spent resolving general legal or
policy issues regarding the application
of exemptions.
(viii) The term search includes all
time spent looking for material that is
responsive to a request, including pageby-page or line-by-line identification of
material within documents, databases
and information in other electronic
records. Searches shall be undertaken in
the most efficient and least expensive
manner possible, consistent with the
Presidio Trust’s obligations under the
FOIA and other applicable laws.
(b) Commercial use requests. (1) A
requester seeking records for
commercial use shall be charged fees for
direct costs incurred in document
search and review (even if the search
and review fails to locate records that
are not exempt from disclosure) and
duplication.
(2) A commercial use requester may
not be charged fees for time spent
resolving legal and policy issues
affecting access to requested records.
(c) Educational and noncommercial
scientific institution requests. (1) A
requester seeking records under the
auspices of an educational institution in
furtherance of scholarly research or a
noncommercial scientific institution in
furtherance of scientific research shall
be charged for document duplication,
except that the first 100 pages of paper
copies (or the equivalent cost thereof if
E:\FR\FM\06MRP1.SGM
06MRP1
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 6, 2018 / Proposed Rules
the records are in some other form) shall
be provided without charge.
(2) Such requesters may not be
charged fees for costs incurred in:
(i) Searching for requested records;
(ii) Examining requested records to
determine whether they are exempt
from mandatory disclosure;
(iii) Deleting reasonably segregable
exempt matter;
(iv) Monitoring the requester’s
inspection of agency records; or
(v) Resolving legal and policy issues
affecting access to requested records.
(d) News media requests. (1) A
representative of the news media shall
be charged for document duplication,
except that the first 100 pages of paper
copies (or the equivalent cost thereof if
the records are in some other form) shall
be provided without charge.
(2) Representatives of the news media
may not be charged fees for costs
incurred in:
(i) Searching for requested records;
(ii) Examining requested records to
determine whether they are exempt
from mandatory disclosure;
(iii) Deleting reasonably segregable
exempt matter;
(iv) Monitoring the requester’s
inspection of agency records; or
(v) Resolving legal and policy issues
affecting access to requested records.
(e) Other requests. (1) A requester not
covered by paragraphs (b), (c), or (d) of
this section shall be charged fees for the
direct costs for document search (even
if the search fails to locate records that
are not exempt from disclosure) and
duplication, except that the first two
hours of search time and the first 100
pages of paper copies (or the equivalent
cost thereof if the records are in some
other form) shall be provided without
charge.
(2) Such requesters may not be
charged for costs incurred in:
(i) Examining requested records to
determine whether they are exempt
from disclosure;
(ii) Deleting reasonably segregable
exempt matter;
(iii) Monitoring the requester’s
inspection of agency records; or
(iv) Resolving legal and policy issues
affecting access to requested records.
(f) Requests for clarification. Where a
request does not provide sufficient
information to determine whether it is
covered by paragraph (b), (c), (d), or (e)
of this section, the requester should be
asked to provide additional
clarification. If it is necessary to seek
such clarification, the request may be
deemed to have not been received for
purposes of the time limits established
in § 1007.6 until the clarification is
received. Requests to requesters for
clarification shall be made promptly.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:05 Mar 05, 2018
Jkt 244001
(g) Notice of anticipated fees. Where
a request does not state a willingness to
pay fees as high as anticipated by the
Presidio Trust, and the requester has not
sought and been granted a full waiver of
fees under § 1007.10, the request may be
deemed to have not been received for
purposes of the time limits established
in § 1007.6 until the requester has been
notified of and agrees to pay the
anticipated fee. Advice to requesters
with respect to anticipated fees shall be
provided promptly.
(h) Advance payment. (1) Where it is
anticipated that allowable fees are likely
to exceed $250.00, the requester may be
required to make an advance payment of
the entire fee before processing of his or
her request.
(2) Where a requester has previously
failed to pay a fee within 30 days of the
date of billing, processing of any request
from that requester shall ordinarily be
suspended until the requester pays any
amount still owed, including applicable
interest, and makes advance payment of
allowable fees anticipated in connection
with the request.
(3) Advance payment of fees may not
be required except as described in
paragraphs (h) (1) and (2) of this section.
(4) Issuance of a notice requiring
payment of overdue fees or advance
payment shall toll the time limit in
§ 1007.6 until receipt of payment.
(i) Form of payment. Payment of fees
should be made by check or money
order payable to the Presidio Trust.
Where appropriate, the official
responsible for handling a request may
require that payment by check be made
in the form of a certified check.
(j) Billing procedures. A bill for
collection shall be prepared for each
request that requires collection of fees.
(k) Collection of fees. The bill for
collection or an accompanying letter to
the requester shall include a statement
that interest will be charged in
accordance with the Debt Collection Act
of 1982, 31 U.S.C. 3717, and
implementing regulations, 4 CFR
102.13, if the fees are not paid within
30 days of the date of the bill for
collection is mailed or hand-delivered
to the requester. This requirement does
not apply if the requester is a unit of
State or local government. Other
authorities of the Debt Collection Act of
1982 shall be used, as appropriate, to
collect the fees.
PART 1008—REQUESTS UNDER THE
PRIVACY ACT
11. The authority citation for part
1008 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Pub. L. 104–333, 110 Stat. 4097
(16 U.S.C. 460bb note); 5 U.S.C. 552a.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
9467
12. Amend § 1008.2 to revise the
definition of individual in alphabetical
order to read as follows:
■
§ 1008.2
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Individual means a citizen of the
United States or an alien who is
currently lawfully admitted for
permanent residence.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 13. Revise § 1008.9 to read as follows:
§ 1008.9
Disclosure of records.
(a) Prohibition of disclosure. No
record contained in a system of records
may be disclosed by any means of
communication to any person, or to
another agency, except pursuant to a
written request by, or with the prior
written consent of, the individual to
whom the record pertains.
(b) General exceptions. The
prohibition contained in paragraph (a)
of this section does not apply where
disclosure of the record would be:
(1) To those officers or employees of
the Presidio Trust who have a need for
the record in the performance of their
duties; or
(2) Required by the Freedom of
Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552.
(c) Specific exceptions. The
prohibition contained in paragraph (a)
of this section does not apply where
disclosure of the record would be:
(1) For a routine use which has been
described in a system notice published
in the Federal Register;
(2) To the Bureau of the Census for
purposes of planning or carrying out a
census or survey or related activity
pursuant to the provisions of Title 13,
U.S. Code.
(3) To a recipient who has provided
the system manager responsible for the
system in which the record is
maintained with advance adequate
written assurance that the record will be
used solely as a statistical research or
reporting record, and the record is to be
transferred in a form that is not
individually identifiable;
(4) To the National Archives and
Records Administration as a record
which has sufficient historical or other
value to warrant its continued
preservation by the U.S. Government, or
for evaluation by the Archivist of the
United States or the designee of the
Archivist to determine whether the
record has such value;
(5) To another agency or to an
instrumentality of any governmental
jurisdiction within or under the control
of the United States for a civil or
criminal law enforcement activity if the
activity is authorized by law, and if the
head of the agency or instrumentality
E:\FR\FM\06MRP1.SGM
06MRP1
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
9468
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 6, 2018 / Proposed Rules
has made a written request to the
Presidio Trust specifying the particular
portion desired and the law
enforcement activity for which the
record is sought;
(6) To a person pursuant to a showing
of compelling circumstances affecting
the health or safety of an individual if
upon such disclosure notification is
transmitted to the last known address of
such individual;
(7) To either House of Congress, or, to
the extent of matter within its
jurisdiction, any committee or
subcommittee thereof, any joint
committee of Congress or subcommittee
of any such joint committee;
(8) To the Comptroller General, or any
of his authorized representatives, in the
course of the performance of the duties
of the General Accounting Office;
(9) Pursuant to the order of a court of
competent jurisdiction; or
(10) To a consumer reporting agency
in accordance with section 3(d) of the
Federal Claims Collection Act of 1966,
as amended (31 U.S.C. 3711(e)).
(d) Reviewing records prior to
disclosure. (1) Prior to any disclosure of
a record about an individual, unless
disclosure is required by the Freedom of
Information Act, reasonable efforts shall
be made to ensure that the records are
accurate, complete, timely and relevant
for agency purposes.
(2) When a record is disclosed in
connection with a Freedom of
Information Act request made under
this part and it is appropriate and
administratively feasible to do so, the
requester shall be informed of any
information known to the Presidio Trust
indicating that the record may not be
fully accurate, complete, or timely.
(e) Notice of court-ordered and
emergency disclosures. (1) Courtordered disclosures. When a record
pertaining to an individual is required
to be disclosed by a court order, the
Presidio Trust will make reasonable
efforts to provide notice of this to the
individual. Notice will be given within
a reasonable time after the Presidio
Trust’s receipt of the order—except that
in a case in which the order is not a
matter of public record, the notice will
be given only after the order becomes
public. This notice will be mailed to the
individual’s last known address and
will contain a copy of the order and a
description of the information
disclosed. Notice will not be given if
disclosure is made from a criminal law
enforcement system of records that has
been exempted from the notice
requirement.
(2) Emergency disclosures. Upon
disclosing a record pertaining to an
individual made under compelling
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:05 Mar 05, 2018
Jkt 244001
circumstances affecting health or safety,
the Presidio Trust will notify that
individual of the disclosure. This notice
will be mailed to the individual’s last
known address and will state the nature
of the information disclosed, the person,
organization or agency to which it was
disclosed, the date of the disclosure,
and the compelling circumstances
justifying the disclosure.
■ 14. Revise § 1008.10 to read as
follows:
§ 1008.10
Accounting for disclosures.
(a) Maintenance of an accounting. (1)
Where a record is disclosed to any
person, or to another agency, under any
of the specific exceptions provided by
§ 1008.9(c), an accounting shall be
made.
(2) The accounting shall record:
(i) The date, nature, and purpose of
each disclosure of a record to any
person or to another agency; and
(ii) The name and address of the
person or agency to whom the
disclosure was made.
(3) Accountings prepared under this
section shall be maintained for at least
five years or the life of the record,
whichever is longer, after the disclosure
for which the accounting is made.
(b) Access to accountings. (1) Except
for accountings of disclosures made
under § 1008.9(b) or 1008.9(c)(5),
accountings of all disclosures of a
record shall be made available to the
individual to whom the record relates at
the individual’s request.
(2) An individual desiring access to
an accounting of disclosures of a record
pertaining to the individual shall submit
a request by following the procedures of
§ 1008.13.
(c) Notification of disclosure. When a
record is disclosed pursuant to
§ 1008.9(c)(9) as the result of the order
of a court of competent jurisdiction,
reasonable efforts shall be made to
notify the individual to whom the
record pertains as soon as the order
becomes a matter of public record.
■ 15. Revise § 1008.11 to read as
follows:
§ 1008.11 Request for notification of
existence of records: Submission.
(a) Submission of requests. (1)
Individuals desiring to determine under
the Privacy Act whether a system of
records contains records pertaining to
them shall address inquiries to the
Privacy Act Officer, The Presidio Trust,
P.O. Box 29052, San Francisco, CA
94129–0052, unless the system notice
describing the system prescribes or
permits submission to some other
official or officials.
(2) Individuals desiring to determine
whether records pertaining to them are
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
maintained in two or more systems shall
make a separate inquiry concerning
each system.
(b) Form of request. (1) An inquiry to
determine whether a system of records
contains records pertaining to an
individual shall be in writing.
(2) To expedite processing, both the
envelope containing a request and the
face of the request should bear the
legend ‘‘PRIVACY ACT INQUIRY.’’
(3) The request shall state that the
individual is seeking information
concerning records pertaining to him or
herself and shall supply such additional
identifying information, if any, as is
called for in the system notice
describing the system.
(4) The request must include
verification of the requester’s identity,
including the requester’s full name,
current address, and date and place of
birth. The request must be signed by the
requester, and the signature must be
notarized or submitted under 28 U.S.C.
1746, which permits statements to be
made under penalty of perjury as a
substitute for notarization.
(5) If the request is made on behalf of
a minor or someone determined by a
court to be incompetent, for access to
records about that individual, the
requester must establish:
(i) The identity of the individual who
is the subject of the record, by stating
the name, current address, date and
place of birth, and, at the requester’s
option, the Social Security number of
the individual;
(ii) The requester’s identity, as
required in paragraph 4 above of this
section;
(iii) That the requester is the parent or
guardian of that individual, which the
requester may prove by providing a
copy of the individual’s birth certificate
showing the requester’s parentage or by
providing a court order establishing the
requester’s guardianship; and
(iv) That the requester is acting on
behalf of that individual in making the
request.
(6) Individuals who have reason to
believe that information pertaining to
them may be filed under a name other
than the name they are currently using
(e.g., maiden name), shall include such
information in the request.
■ 16. Revise § 1008.14 to read as
follows:
§ 1008.14 Requests for access to records:
Submission.
(a) Submission of requests. (1)
Requests for access to records shall be
submitted to the Privacy Act Officer
unless the system notice describing the
system prescribes or permits submission
to some other official or officials.
E:\FR\FM\06MRP1.SGM
06MRP1
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 6, 2018 / Proposed Rules
(2) Individuals desiring access to
records maintained in two or more
separate systems shall submit a separate
request for access to the records in each
system.
(b) Form of request. (1) A request for
access to records subject to the Privacy
Act shall be in writing and addressed to
Privacy Act Officer, The Presidio Trust,
P.O. Box 29052, San Francisco, CA
94129–0052.
(2) To expedite processing, both the
envelope containing a request and the
face of the request should bear the
legend ‘‘PRIVACY ACT REQUEST FOR
ACCESS.’’
(3) Requesters shall specify whether
they seek all of the records contained in
the system which relate to them or only
some portion thereof. If only a portion
of the records which relate to the
individual are sought, the request shall
reasonably describe the specific record
or records sought.
(4) If the requester seeks to have
copies of the requested records made,
the request shall state the maximum
amount of copying fees which the
requester is willing to pay. A request
which does not state the amount of fees
the requester is willing to pay will be
treated as a request to inspect the
requested records. Requesters are
further notified that under § 1008.15(d)
the failure to state willingness to pay
fees as high as are anticipated by the
Presidio Trust will delay processing of
a request.
(5) The request shall supply such
identifying information, if any, as is
called for in the system notice
describing the system.
(6) The request must include
verification of the requester’s identity,
including the requester’s full name,
current address, and date and place of
birth. The request must be signed by the
requester, and the signature must be
notarized or submitted under 28 U.S.C.
1746, which permits statements to be
made under penalty of perjury as a
substitute for notarization.
(7) If the request is made on behalf of
a minor or someone determined by a
court to be incompetent, for access to
records about that individual, the
requester must establish:
(i) The identity of the individual who
is the subject of the record, by stating
the name, current address, date and
place of birth, and, at the requester’s
option, the Social Security number of
the individual;
(ii) The requester’s identity, as
required in paragraph 6 above of this
section;
(iii) That the requester is the parent or
guardian of that individual, which the
requester may prove by providing a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:05 Mar 05, 2018
Jkt 244001
copy of the individual’s birth certificate
showing the requester’s parentage or by
providing a court order establishing the
requester’s guardianship; and
(iv) That the requester is acting on
behalf of that individual in making the
request.
(8) Requests failing to meet the
requirements of this paragraph shall be
returned to the requester with a written
notice advising the requester of the
deficiency in the request.
■ 17. Revise § 1008.15 to read as
follows:
§ 1008.15 Requests for access to records:
Initial decision.
(a) Acknowledgements of requests.
Upon receipt of a request, the Presidio
Trust ordinarily will send an
acknowledgement letter to the requester
which will confirm the requester’s
agreement to pay fees and will provide
an assigned request number for further
reference.
(b) Decisions on requests. A request
made under this part for access to a
record shall be granted promptly unless
the record:
(1) Was compiled in reasonable
anticipation of a civil action or
proceeding; or
(2) Is contained in a system of records
which has been excepted from the
access provisions of the Privacy Act by
rulemaking.
(c) Authority to deny requests. A
decision to deny a request for access
under this part shall be made by the
Privacy Act Officer in consultation with
the General Counsel.
(d) Form of decision. (1) No particular
form is required for a decision granting
access to a record. The decision shall,
however, advise the individual
requesting the record as to where and
when the record is available for
inspection or, as the case may be, where
and when copies will be available. If
fees are due under § 1008.15(e), the
individual requesting the record shall
also be notified of the amount of fees
due or, if the exact amount has not been
determined, the approximate amount of
fees due.
(2) A decision denying a request for
access, in whole or part, shall be in
writing and shall:
(i) State the basis for denial of the
request;
(ii) Contain a statement that the denial
may be appealed to the Executive
Director pursuant to § 1008.16 by
writing to the Executive Director, The
Presidio Trust, P.O. Box 29052, San
Francisco, CA 94129–0052; and
(iii) State that the appeal must be
received by the foregoing official within
20 working days of the date of the
decision.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
9469
(3) If the decision denying a request
for access involves records which fall
under the jurisdiction of another
agency, the individual shall be informed
in a written response which shall:
(i) State the reasons for the denial;
(ii) Include the name, position title,
and address of the official responsible
for the denial; and
(iii) Advise the individual that an
appeal of the declination may be made
only to the appropriate official of the
relevant agency, and include that
official’s name, position title, and
address.
(4) Copies of decisions denying
requests for access made pursuant to
paragraphs (d)(2) and (d)(3) of this
section will be provided to the Privacy
Act Officer.
(e) Fees. (1) No fees may be charged
for the cost of searching for or reviewing
a record in response to a request made
under § 1008.14.
(2) Unless the Privacy Act Officer
determines that reduction or waiver of
fees is appropriate, fees for copying a
record in response to a request made
under § 1008.14 shall be charged in
accordance with the provisions of this
section and the current schedule of
charges determined by the Executive
Director and published on the Trust’s
website. Such charges shall be set at the
level necessary to recoup the full
allowable direct costs to the Trust.
(3) Where it is anticipated that fees
chargeable in connection with a request
will exceed the amount the person
submitting the request has indicated a
willingness to pay, the Privacy Act
Officer shall notify the requester and
shall not complete processing of the
request until the requester has agreed, in
writing, to pay fees as high as are
anticipated.
■ 18. Revise § 1008.18 to read as
follows:
§ 1008.18
Amendment of records.
The Privacy Act permits individuals
to request amendment of records
pertaining to them contained in a
system of records if they believe the
records are not accurate, relevant,
timely or complete. 5 U.S.C. 552a(d)(2).
A request for amendment of a record
shall be submitted in accordance with
the procedures in this part.
■ 19. Revise § 1008.19 to read as
follows:
§ 1008.19 Petitions for amendment:
Submission and form.
(a) Submission of petitions for
amendment. (1) A request for
amendment of a record shall be
submitted to the Privacy Act Officer
unless the system notice describing the
E:\FR\FM\06MRP1.SGM
06MRP1
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
9470
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 6, 2018 / Proposed Rules
system prescribes or permits submission
to a different official or officials. If an
individual wishes to request
amendment of records located in more
than one system, a separate petition
must be submitted with respect to each
system.
(2) A petition for amendment of a
record may be submitted only if the
individual submitting the petition has
previously requested and been granted
access to the record and has inspected
or been given a copy of the record.
(b) Form of petition. (1) A petition for
amendment shall be in writing, shall
specifically identify the record for
which amendment is sought, and shall
be addressed to the Privacy Act Officer,
The Presidio Trust, P.O. Box 29052, San
Francisco, CA 94129–0052.
(2) To expedite processing, both the
envelope containing a petition and the
face of the petition should bear the
legend ‘‘PRIVACY ACT PETITION FOR
AMENDMENT.’’
(3) The petition shall state, in detail,
the reasons why the petitioner believes
the record, or the objectionable portion
thereof, is not accurate, relevant, timely
or complete. Copies of documents or
evidence relied upon in support of these
reasons shall be submitted with the
petition.
(4) The petition shall state,
specifically and in detail, the changes
sought in the record. If the changes
involve rewriting the record or portions
thereof or involve adding new language
to the record, the petition shall propose
specific language to implement the
changes.
(5) The petition must include
verification of the petitioner’s identity,
including the petitioner’s full name,
current address, and date and place of
birth. The petition must be signed by
the petitioner, and the signature must be
notarized or submitted under 28 U.S.C.
1746, which permits statements to be
made under penalty of perjury as a
substitute for notarization.
(6) If the petition is made on behalf of
a minor or someone determined by a
court to be incompetent, for access to
records about that individual, the
petitioner must establish:
(i) The identity of the individual who
is the subject of the record, by stating
the name, current address, date and
place of birth, and, at the petitioner’s
option, the Social Security number of
the individual;
(ii) The petitioner’s identity, as
required in paragraph 5 above of this
section;
(iii) That the petitioner is the parent
or guardian of that individual, which
the petitioner may prove by providing a
copy of the individual’s birth certificate
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:05 Mar 05, 2018
Jkt 244001
showing the petitioner’s parentage or by
providing a court order establishing the
petitioner’s guardianship; and
(iv) That the petitioner is acting on
behalf of that individual in making the
request.
(7) Petitions failing to meet the
requirements of this paragraph shall be
returned to the petitioner with a written
notice advising the petitioner of the
deficiency in the petition.
PART 1009—ADMINISTRATIVE
CLAIMS UNDER THE FEDERAL TORT
CLAIMS ACT
20. The authority citation for part
1009 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Pub. L. 104–333, 110 Stat. 4097
(16 U.S.C. 460bb note); 28 U.S.C. 2672.
■
21. Revise § 1009.1 to read as follows:
§ 1009.1
Purpose.
The purpose of this part is to establish
procedures for the filing and settlement
of claims under the Federal Tort Claims
Act (in part, 28 U.S.C. secs. 2401(b),
2671–2680, as amended). The officers to
whom authority is delegated to settle
tort claims shall follow and be guided
by the regulations issued by the
Attorney General prescribing standards
and procedures for settlement of tort
claims (28 CFR part 14).
■ 22. Revise § 1009.4 to read as follows:
§ 1009.4
Payment of claims.
(a) In making an award from proceeds
or revenues of the Presidio Trust, the
Presidio Trust will process payment
using an agreement signed by the
claimant and the Executive Director, or
his or her designee. In making an award
from proceeds or revenues not provided
for by the Presidio Trust, the Presidio
Trust will process payment as
prescribed by 28 CFR 14.10.
(b) Prior to payment, appropriate
releases shall be obtained as provided in
28 CFR 14.10.
(c) Any award, compromise, or
settlement in excess of $25,000 shall be
effected only with the prior written
approval of the Attorney General or his
or her designee.
PART 1011—DEBT COLLECTION
23. The authority citation for part
1011 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 460bb appendix, as
amended.
24. Revise § 1011.4(a)(7) to read as
follows:
■
§ 1011.4 What notice will the Presidio
Trust send to a debtor when collecting a
debt?
(a) * * *
PO 00000
Frm 00024
(7) The following timelines for the
referral of a delinquent debt to the FMS:
(i) That debts over 120 days
delinquent and eligible for the
centralized administrative offset
collection actions described in
paragraph (a)(6)(i) of this section must
be referred to the FMS for collection
(see §§ 1011.10 through 1011.12);
(ii) That debts over 180 days
delinquent not previously referred to
the FMS under paragraph (i) of this
section must be referred to the FMS for
cross servicing debt collection (see
§ 1011.9).
■ 25. Revise § 1011.9(a) to read as
follows:
§ 1011.9 When will the Presidio Trust
transfer a debt to the Financial Management
Service for collection?
(a) Cross-servicing. Unless a
delinquent debt has previously been
transferred to the FMS for
administrative offset in accordance with
§ 1011.10, the Presidio Trust will
transfer any eligible debt that is more
than 180 days delinquent to the FMS for
debt collection services, a process
known as ‘‘cross-servicing.’’ The
Presidio Trust may transfer debts
delinquent 180 days or less to the FMS
in accordance with the procedures
described in 31 CFR 285.12. The FMS
takes appropriate action to collect or
compromise the transferred debt, or to
suspend or terminate collection action
thereon, in accordance with the
statutory and regulatory requirements
and authorities applicable to the debt
and the collection action to be taken.
Appropriate action includes, without
limitation, contact with the debtor,
referral of the debt to the Treasury
Offset Program, private collection
agencies or the Department of Justice,
reporting of the debt to credit bureaus,
and administrative wage garnishment.
■ 26. Revise § 1011.10(a)(1) to read as
follows:
§ 1011.10 How will the Presidio Trust use
administrative offset (offset of non-tax
federal payments) to collect a debt?
(a) Centralized administrative offset
through the Treasury Offset Program. (1)
The Presidio Trust will refer any eligible
debt over 120 days delinquent to the
Treasury Offset Program for collection
by centralized administrative offset. The
Presidio Trust may refer any eligible
debt less than 120 days delinquent to
the Treasury Offset Program for offset.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: February 16, 2018.
Nancy J. Koch,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2018–03939 Filed 3–5–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–4R–P
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\06MRP1.SGM
06MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 6, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 9459-9470]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-03939]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
PRESIDIO TRUST
36 CFR Parts 1007, 1008, 1009, and 1011
RIN 3212-AA08; 3212-AA09; 3212-AA10; 3212-AA11
Freedom of Information Act; Privacy Act; Federal Tort Claims Act;
Debt Collection
AGENCY: Presidio Trust.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Presidio Trust (Trust) proposes revisions to its
regulations addressing requests under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA), requests under the Privacy Act, administrative claims under the
Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), and Debt Collection. The Trust is
revising these regulations to update and streamline the language of
several procedural provisions, and to reflect amendments pursuant to
the FOIA Improvement Act of 2016 and the Digital Accountability and
Transparency Act of 2014.
DATES: Written comments must be received by the Trust on or before
April 24, 2018. Comments received by mail will be considered timely if
they are postmarked on or before that date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
Email: [email protected]. Include ``Proposed Rule''
in the subject line of the message.
Mail: Steve Carp, Legal Analyst, Presidio Trust, 103
Montgomery Street, P.O. Box 29052, San Francisco, CA 94129-0052.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Steve Carp, Legal Analyst, Presidio
Trust, 103 Montgomery Street, San Francisco, CA 94129-0052.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve Carp, Legal Analyst,
415.561.5300, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 104(j) of the Presidio Trust Act (16 U.S.C. 460bb appendix)
authorizes the Trust to prescribe regulations governing the manner in
which it conducts its business and exercises its powers. This
rulemaking revises the Trust's administrative regulations at 36 CFR
part 1007 (FOIA), part 1008 (Privacy Act), part 1009 (FTCA), and part
1011 (Debt Collection), as described below. In addition, the Trust has
made minor ministerial changes and corrected typographical errors to
these parts of its regulations.
Proposed Revisions to 36 CFR Part 1007 (Requests Under the FOIA)
The Trust adopted FOIA regulations effective January 29, 1999. The
FOIA Improvement Act of 2016 (Act) amended the FOIA on June 30, 2016.
Those FOIA amendments require federal agencies to review and update
their FOIA regulations in accordance with the provisions of the Act.
The Trust proposes revisions to conform its regulations to the Act, as
well as to the Department of Justice's revised FOIA regulations.
Specifically, this rulemaking proposes revisions to Sec. 1007.1
(Purpose and scope) by adding references to the text of FOIA and the
Trust's Privacy Act regulations; Sec. 1007.2 (Records available) by
adopting a policy of presumption of openness and the ``foreseeable
harm'' standard; Sec. 1007.3 (Requests for records) by providing a
requester an opportunity to consult with the Trust's FOIA Officer to
perfect a request and adding procedures to verify the requester's
identity; Sec. 1007.4 (Preliminary processing of requests) by
specifying the date used for searching, adding consultation and
referral procedures for requests of records of other departments and
agencies, and adding procedures to notify submitters and requesters of
actions taken with respect to requests containing commercial or
financial information; Sec. 1007.5 (Action on initial requests) by
specifying decisions that constitute adverse determinations of
requests, adding procedures for notifying requesters of dispute
resolution services, and adding types of requests that would qualify
for expedited processing; Sec. 1007.7 (Appeals) by changing the time
period for requesters to file an administrative appeal from 20 working
days to 90 calendar days and requiring an appeal of an adverse
determination before seeking a court order; Sec. 1007.8 (Action on
appeals) by adding procedures for notifying requesters of dispute
resolution services; and Sec. 1007.9 (Fees) by adding definitions for
the terms ``direct costs'' and ``review.''
The Trust also proposes revisions to Sec. 1007.9 to update the
fees charged by the Trust for processing FOIA requests. The Trust
previously published its fees on December 2, 1998 in its Interim
Compendium. Under the proposed revisions to Sec. 1007.9, the Trust's
Executive Director will set fees for processing these requests and will
publish the fees on the Trust's website instead of the Interim
Compendium. With these changes, the fees previously listed in Sec.
1007.9 of the Interim Compendium will no longer be effective.
Proposed Revisions to 36 CFR Part 1008 (Requests Under the Privacy Act)
The Trust adopted Privacy Act regulations effective January 29,
1999. There has been little statutory change to the Privacy Act of 1974
since the Trust adopted its Privacy Act regulations. However, the Trust
proposes revisions to conform its regulations to guidance issued by the
Department of Justice and the Office of Management and Budget.
Specifically, this rulemaking proposes revisions to Sec. 1008.2
(Definitions) by changing the definition of ``individual''; Sec.
1008.9 (Disclosure of records) by adding procedures for notice of
court-ordered and emergency disclosures; and Sec. Sec. 1008.11
(Request for notification of existence of records: Submission), 1008.14
(Requests for access to records: Submission), and 1008.19 (Petitions
for amendment: Submission and form) by adding procedures to verify the
requester's identity.
The Trust also proposes revisions to Sec. 1008.15 (Requests for
access to records: Initial decision) to update the fees charged by the
Trust for processing
[[Page 9460]]
Privacy Act requests. The Trust previously published its fees on
December 2, 1998 in its Interim Compendium. Under the proposed
revisions to Sec. 1008.15, the Trust's Executive Director will set
fees for processing these requests and will publish the fees on the
Trust's website instead of the Interim Compendium. With these changes,
the fees previously listed in Sec. 1008.15 of the Interim Compendium
will no longer be effective.
Proposed Revisions to 36 CFR Part 1009 (Administrative Claims Under the
FTCA)
The Trust adopted FTCA regulations effective January 29, 1999. This
rulemaking proposes revisions to Sec. 1009.4 (Payment of claims) by
adding procedures the Trust uses to pay FTCA claims from its proceeds
or revenues.
Proposed Revisions to 36 CFR Part 1011 (Debt Collection)
The Trust adopted debt collection regulations effective January 12,
2006. The Digital Accountability and Transparency Act of 2014 amended
federal debt collection law to require federal agencies to refer
eligible delinquent debts to the Department of the Treasury for
administrative offset after 120 days, rather than 180 days. This
rulemaking proposes minor revisions to Sec. Sec. 1011.4 (What notice
will the Presidio Trust send to a debtor when collecting a debt?),
1011.9 (When will the Presidio Trust transfer a debt to the Financial
Management Service for collection?), and 1011.10 (How will the Presidio
Trust use administrative offset (offset of non-tax federal payments) to
collect a debt?) to reflect this requirement.
Regulatory Analysis of the Proposed Revisions
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) in the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
will review all significant rules. OIRA has determined that this rule
is not significant. This rule:
(1) Will not have an effect of $100 million or more on the economy.
It will not adversely affect in a material way the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities.
(2) Will not create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by another agency. The rule only
affects management and operations of the Presidio Trust.
(3) Does not alter the budgetary effects of entitlements, grants,
user fees, or loan programs or the rights or obligations of their
recipients.
(4) Does raise novel legal or policy issues.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the principles of Executive Order
12866 while calling for improvements in the nation's regulatory system
to promote predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best,
most innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory
ends. The Executive Order directs agencies to consider regulatory
approaches that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of
choice for the public where these approaches are relevant, feasible,
and consistent with regulatory objectives. Executive Order 13563
emphasizes further that regulations must be based on the best available
science and that the rulemaking process must allow for public
participation and an open exchange of ideas. The Trust has developed
this proposed rule in a manner consistent with these requirements.
Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs (Executive Order
13771)
Executive Order 13771 requires an agency, unless prohibited by law,
to identify at least two existing regulations to be repealed when the
agency publicly proposes for notice and comment or otherwise
promulgates a new regulation. In furtherance of this requirement,
section 2(c) of the Executive Order requires that the new incremental
costs associated with new regulations must, to the extent permitted by
law, be offset by the elimination of existing costs associated with at
least two prior regulations. The OMB's interim guidance issued on
February 2, 2017 explains that the above requirements only apply to
each new ``significant regulatory action that imposes costs.'' The OMB
has determined that this proposed rule is only related to the Trust's
organization and management and is not a ``significant regulatory
action that imposes costs.'' Thus, this rule does not trigger the above
requirements of Executive Order 13771.
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
This proposed rule will not have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (5 U.S.C. 804(2))
This proposed rule is not a major rule under the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule: (a) Does not have an
annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; (b) will not
cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual
industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic
regions; or (c) does not have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the
ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based
enterprises.
This rule relates to internal administrative procedures and
management of government function. It does not regulate external
entities, impose any costs on them, or eliminate any procedures or
functions that would result in a loss of employment or income on the
part of the private sector.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)
This proposed rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State,
local, or tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100
million per year. This rule does not have a significant or unique
effect on State, local or tribal governments, or the private sector. A
statement containing the information required by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act is not required. This rule produces no costs outside of the
Federal government and does not create an additional burden on State,
local, or tribal governments, or the private sector.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
This proposed rule does not affect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630. A
takings implication assessment is not required.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
This proposed rule does not have sufficient federalism
implications, as defined by section 1 of Executive Order 13132, to
warrant the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. This
rule only affects use of Trust administered lands. It has no outside
effects on other areas. A federalism summary impact statement is not
required.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order 12988)
This proposed rule complies with the requirements of Executive
Order 12988. Specifically, this rule: (a) Meets the criteria of section
3(a) requiring that all regulations be reviewed to eliminate
[[Page 9461]]
errors and ambiguity and be written to minimize litigation; and (b)
meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all regulations be
written in clear language and contain clear legal standards.
Effects on the Energy Supply (Executive Order 13211)
This proposed rule is not a significant energy action under the
definition in Executive Order 13211. A Statement of Energy Effects is
not required.
Consultation With Indian Tribes (Executive Order 13175)
This proposed rule has no substantial direct effects on federally
recognized Indian tribes. Consultation under the Department's tribal
consultation policy is not required.
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)
This proposed rule does not contain new collections of information
that require approval by the OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act. The
rule does not impose new recordkeeping or reporting requirements on
State, tribal, or local governments; individuals; businesses; or
organizations.
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.)
This proposed rule does not constitute a major Federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the human environment under the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Trust's NEPA
regulations at 36 CFR 1010.16. It is a modification of existing Trust
regulations in order to make them clearer, more complete, and
consistent with current Federal statutory law. Moreover, a detailed
statement under the NEPA is not required because the rule is covered by
a categorical exclusion. The Trust has determined that the proposed
rule is categorically excluded under 36 CFR 1010.7(a)(10)(i) as it is a
revision of Trust regulations that does not increase public use to the
extent of compromising the nature and character of the Presidio Area B
or of causing significant physical damage to it. Further, the rule will
not result in the introduction of non-compatible uses, which might
compromise the nature and characteristics of the Presidio Area B or
cause significant physical damage to it. Finally, the rule will not
conflict with adjacent ownerships or land uses or cause a significant
nuisance to adjacent owners or occupants. The Trust has also determined
that the rule does not involve any of the extraordinary circumstances
listed in 36 CFR 1010.7(b) that would require further analysis under
the NEPA.
Clarity of This Regulation
The Trust is required by Executive Orders 12866 (section 1(b)(12)),
12988 (section 3(b)(1)(B)), and 13563 (section 1(a)), and by the
Presidential Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write all rules in plain
language. This means that each rule the Trust publishes must: (a) Be
logically organized; (b) use the active voice to address readers
directly; (c) use common, everyday words and clear language rather than
jargon; (d) be divided into short sections and sentences; and (e) use
lists and tables wherever possible.
If you feel that the Trust has not met these requirements, send the
Trust your comments by one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES
section. To better help the Trust revise the rule, your comments should
be as specific as possible. For example, you should tell the Trust the
numbers of the sections or paragraphs that you find unclear, which
paragraphs or sentences are too long, the sections where you feel lists
or tables would be useful, etc.
Public Participation
It is the policy of the Trust, whenever practicable, to afford the
public an opportunity to participate in the rulemaking process.
Accordingly, interested persons may submit written comments regarding
this proposed rule by following the instructions in the ADDRESSES
section of this document.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, be aware that
your entire comment--including your personally identifiable
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask in your comment to withhold your personal identifiable information
from public view, the Trust cannot guarantee that it will be able to do
so.
List of Subjects
36 CFR Part 1007
Administrative practice and procedure, Archives and records,
Freedom of information, National parks, Natural resources, Public
lands, Records, Recreation and recreation areas.
36 CFR Part 1008
Administrative practice and procedure, National parks, Natural
resources, Personally identifiable information, Privacy, Public lands,
Recreation and recreation areas.
36 CFR Part 1009
Administrative practice and procedure, Claims, National parks,
Natural resources, Public lands, Recreation and recreation areas, Tort
claims.
36 CFR Part 1011
Administrative practice and procedure, Claims, Credit, Debt
collection, Government employees, National parks, Natural resources,
Public lands, Recreation and recreation areas, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Wages.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Presidio Trust
proposes to amend Chapter X of title 36 of the Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
PART 1007--REQUESTS UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT
0
1. The authority citation for part 1007 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Pub. L. 104-333, 110 Stat. 4097 (16 U.S.C. 460bb
note); 5 U.S.C. 552; E.O. 12,600, 52 FR 23781, 3 CFR, 1988 Comp., p.
235.
0
2. Revise Sec. 1007.1 to read as follows:
Sec. 1007.1 Purpose and scope.
(a) This part contains the procedures for submission to and
consideration by the Presidio Trust of requests for records under the
FOIA. As used in this part, the term ``FOIA'' means the Freedom of
Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552. The regulations in this part should be
read in conjunction with the text of the FOIA. Requests made by
individuals for records about themselves under the Privacy Act of 1974,
5 U.S.C. 552a, are processed in accordance with the Presidio Trust's
Privacy Act regulations as well as under this subpart.
(b) Before invoking the formal procedures set out below, persons
seeking records from the Presidio Trust may find it useful to consult
with the Presidio Trust's FOIA Officer, who can be reached at The
Presidio Trust, P.O. Box 29052, San Francisco, CA 94129-0052,
Telephone: 415.561.5300. As used in this part, the term ``FOIA
Officer'' means the employee designated by the Executive Director to
process FOIA requests and otherwise supervise the Presidio Trust's
compliance with the FOIA, or the alternate employee so designated to
perform these duties in the absence of the FOIA Officer.
(c) The procedures in this part do not apply to:
(1) Records published in the Federal Register, the Bylaws of the
Presidio
[[Page 9462]]
Trust, statements of policy and interpretations, and other materials
that have been published by the Presidio Trust on its internet website
(https://www.presidiotrust.gov) or are routinely made available for
inspection and copying at the requester's expense.
(2) Records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes
and covered by the disclosure exemption described in Sec. 1007.2(c)(7)
if:
(i) The investigation or proceeding involves a possible violation
of criminal law; and
(ii) There is reason to believe that:
(A) The subject of the investigation or proceeding is not aware of
its pendency; and
(B) Disclosure of the existence of the records could reasonably be
expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings.
(3) Informant records maintained by the United States Park Police
under an informant's name or personal identifier, if requested by a
third party according to the informant's name or personal identifier,
unless the informant's status as an informant has been officially
confirmed.
0
3. Revise Sec. 1007.2 to read as follows:
Sec. 1007.2 Records available.
(a) Policy. It is the policy of the Presidio Trust to make its
records available to the public to the greatest extent possible
consistent with the purposes of the Presidio Trust Act and the FOIA.
The Presidio Trust administers the FOIA with a presumption of openness.
As a matter of policy, the Presidio Trust may make discretionary
disclosures of records or information exempt from disclosure under the
FOIA whenever disclosure would not foreseeably harm an interest
protected by a FOIA exemption. This policy does not create any right
enforceable in court.
(b) Statutory disclosure requirement. The FOIA requires that the
Presidio Trust, on a request from a member of the public submitted in
accordance with the procedures in this part, make requested records
available for inspection and copying.
(c) Statutory exemptions. Exempted from the FOIA's statutory
disclosure requirement are matters that are:
(1)(i) Specifically authorized under criteria established by an
Executive order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense
or foreign policy; and
(ii) Are in fact properly classified pursuant to such Executive
order.
(2) Related solely to the internal personnel rules and practices of
an agency;
(3) Specifically exempted from disclosure by statute (other than
the Privacy Act), provided that such statute:
(i) Requires that the matters be withheld from the public in such a
manner as to leave no discretion on the issue; or
(ii) Establishes particular criteria for withholding or refers to
particular types of matters to be withheld.
(4) Trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained
from a person and privileged or confidential;
(5) Inter-agency or intra-agency memorandums or letters which would
not be available by law to a party other than an agency in litigation
with the agency;
(6) Personnel and medical files and similar files the disclosure of
which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal
privacy;
(7) Records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes,
but only to the extent that the production of such law enforcement
records or information:
(i) Could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement
proceedings;
(ii) Would deprive a person of a right to a fair or an impartial
adjudication;
(iii) Could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy;
(iv) Could reasonably be expected to disclose the identity of a
confidential source, including a State, local, or foreign agency or
authority or any private institution which furnished information on a
confidential basis, and, in the case of a record or information
compiled by a criminal law enforcement authority in the course of a
criminal investigation, or by an agency conducting a lawful national
security intelligence investigation, information furnished by a
confidential source;
(v) Would disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement
investigations or prosecutions or would disclose guidelines for law
enforcement investigations or prosecutions if such disclosure could
reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law; or
(vi) Could reasonably be expected to endanger the life or physical
safety of any individual.
(8) Contained in or related to examination, operating, or condition
reports prepared by, on behalf of, or for the use of an agency
responsible for the regulation or supervision of financial
institutions; or
(9) Geological and geophysical information and data, including
maps, concerning wells.
(d) Decisions on requests. It is the policy of the Presidio Trust
to withhold information falling within an exemption only if:
(1) Disclosure is prohibited by statute or Executive order; or
(2) Sound grounds exist for invocation of the exemption.
(e) Disclosure of reasonably segregable nonexempt material. If a
requested record contains material covered by an exemption and material
that is not exempt, and it is determined under the procedures in this
part to withhold the exempt material, any reasonably segregable
nonexempt material shall be separated from the exempt material and
released. In such circumstances, the records disclosed in part shall be
marked or annotated to show both the amount and the location of the
information deleted wherever practicable.
0
4. Revise Sec. 1007.3 to read as follows:
Sec. 1007.3 Requests for records.
(a) Submission of requests. A request to inspect or copy records
shall be submitted to the Presidio Trust's FOIA Officer at P.O. Box
29052, San Francisco, CA 94129-0052.
(b) Form of perfected requests. (1) Requests under this part shall
be in writing and must specifically invoke the FOIA.
(2) A request must reasonably describe the records requested. A
request reasonably describes the records requested if it will enable an
employee of the Presidio Trust familiar with the subject area of the
request to locate the record with a reasonable amount of effort. If
such information is available, the request should identify the subject
matter of the record, the date when it was made, the place where it was
made, the person or office that made it, the present custodian of the
record, and any other information that will assist in locating the
requested record. If the request involves a matter known by the
requester to be in litigation, the request should also state the case
name and court hearing the case. If after receiving a request the FOIA
Officer determines that the request does not reasonably describe the
records sought, the FOIA Officer will inform the requester what
additional information is needed or why the request is otherwise
insufficient. Requesters who are attempting to reformulate or modify
such a request may discuss their request with the FOIA Officer. If a
request does not reasonably describe the records sought, the Presidio
Trust's response to the request may be delayed or an adverse
determination under Sec. 1007.5(e).
(3)(i) A perfected request shall:
(A) Specify the fee category (commercial use, educational
institution, noncommercial scientific institution, news media, or
other, as defined in Sec. 1007.9) in which the requester claims the
request falls and the basis of this claim;
[[Page 9463]]
(B) State the maximum amount of fees that the requester is willing
to pay or include a request for a fee waiver; and
(C) Provide contact information for the requester, such as phone
number, email address and/or mailing address, to assist the Presidio
Trust in communicating with them and providing released records.
(ii) Requesters who make requests for records about themselves must
verify their identity.
(iii) Where a request for records pertains to another individual, a
requester may receive greater access by submitting either a notarized
authorization signed by that individual or a declaration made in
compliance with the requirements set forth in 28 U.S.C. 1746 by that
individual authorizing disclosure of the records to the requester, or
by submitting proof that the individual is deceased (e.g., a copy of a
death certificate or an obituary). As an exercise of administrative
discretion, the Presidio Trust may require a requester to supply
additional information if necessary in order to verify that a
particular individual has consented to disclosure.
(iv) Requesters are advised that, under Sec. 1007.9 (f), (g) and
(h), the time for responding to requests may be delayed:
(A) If a requester has not sufficiently identified the fee category
applicable to the request;
(B) If a requester has not stated a willingness to pay fees as high
as anticipated by the Presidio Trust; or
(C) If a fee waiver request is denied and the requester has not
included an alternative statement of willingness to pay fees as high as
anticipated by the Presidio Trust.
(4) A request seeking a fee waiver shall, to the extent possible,
address why the requester believes that the criteria for fee waivers
set out in Sec. 1007.10 are met.
(5) To expedite processing, both the envelope containing a request
and the face of the request should bear the legend ``FREEDOM OF
INFORMATION REQUEST.''
(c) Creation of records. A request may seek only records that are
in existence at the time the request is received. A request may not
seek records that come into existence after the date on which it is
received and may not require that new records be created in response to
the request by, for example, combining or compiling selected items from
manual files, preparing a new computer program, or calculating
proportions, percentages, frequency distributions, trends or
comparisons. In those instances where the Presidio Trust determines
that creating a new record will be less burdensome than disclosing
large volumes of unassembled material, the Presidio Trust may, in its
discretion, agree to creation of a new record as an alternative to
disclosing existing records.
0
5. Revise Sec. 1007.4 to read as follows:
Sec. 1007.4 Preliminary processing of requests.
(a) Scope of requests. Unless a request clearly specifies
otherwise, requests to the Presidio Trust may be presumed to seek only
records of the Presidio Trust in possession of the Presidio Trust at
the time the Presidio Trust begins it search. If any other date is
used, the Presidio Trust will inform the requester of that date. A
record that is excluded from the requirements of the FOIA pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 552(c) is not considered responsive to a request.
(b) Records of other departments and agencies. (1) When reviewing
records in response to a request, the Presidio Trust will determine
whether another Federal department or agency is better able to
determine whether the record is exempt from disclosure under the FOIA.
As to any such record, the Presidio Trust will proceed in one of the
following ways:
(i) Consultation. When records originating with the Presidio Trust,
but contain within them information of interest to another Federal
department or agency, the Presidio Trust will consult with that other
entity prior to making a release determination; or
(ii) Referral. (A) When the Presidio Trust believes that another
department or agency is best able to determine whether to disclose the
record, the Presidio Trust will refer the responsibility for responding
to the request regarding the record to that department or agency.
Ordinarily, the department or agency that originated the record is
presumed to be the best entity to make the disclosure determination.
However, if the Presidio Trust and the originating department or agency
jointly agree that the Presidio Trust is in the best position to
respond to the request, then the record may be handled as a
consultation.
(B) If the Presidio Trust refers any part of the responsibility for
responding to a request to another department or agency, the Presidio
Trust will document the referral, maintain a copy of the record that it
refers, and notify the requester of the referral, informing the
requester of the name(s) of the department or agency to which the
record was referred, including that entity's FOIA contact information.
(2) Timing of responses to consultations and referrals. All
consultations and referrals received by the Presidio Trust will be
handled according to the date that the Presidio Trust received the
perfected FOIA request.
(3) A request for documents that were classified by another agency
shall be referred to that agency.
(c) Consultation with submitters of commercial and financial
information. (1) If a request seeks a record containing trade secrets
or commercial or financial information submitted by a person outside of
the Federal government, the Presidio Trust shall provide the submitter
with notice of the request whenever:
(i) The submitter has made a good faith designation of the
information as commercially or financially sensitive; or
(ii) The Presidio Trust has reason to believe that disclosure of
the information may result in commercial or financial injury to the
submitter.
(2) Where notification of a voluminous number of submitters is
required, such notification may be accomplished by posting or
publishing the notice in a place reasonably calculated to accomplish
notification.
(3) The notice to the submitter shall afford the submitter a
reasonable period within which to provide a detailed statement of any
objection to disclosure. The submitter's statement shall explain the
basis on which the information is claimed to be exempt under the FOIA,
including a specification of any claim of competitive or other business
harm that would result from disclosure. The statement shall also
include a certification that the information is confidential, has not
been disclosed to the public by the submitter, and is not routinely
available to the public from other sources.
(4) A submitter who fails to respond within the time period
specified in the notice will be deemed to have no objection to
disclosure of the information. The Presidio Trust shall not be required
to consider any information received from the submitter after the date
of any disclosure decision. Any information provided by a submitter
under this subpart may itself be subject to disclosure under the FOIA.
(5) The Presidio Trust will notify the requester whenever it
provides the submitter with notice and an opportunity to object to
disclosure; whenever it notifies the submitter of its intent to
disclose the requested information; and whenever a submitter files a
lawsuit to prevent the disclosure of the information.
(6) If a submitter's statement cannot be obtained within the time
limit for processing the request under Sec. 1007.6,
[[Page 9464]]
the requester shall be notified of the delay as provided in Sec.
1007.6(f).
(7) Notification to a submitter is not required if:
(i) The Presidio Trust determines, prior to giving notice, that the
request for the record should be denied;
(ii) The information has previously been lawfully published or
officially made available to the public;
(iii) Disclosure is required by a statute (other than the FOIA) or
regulation (other than this part);
(iv) Disclosure is clearly prohibited by a statute, as described in
Sec. 1007.2(c)(3);
(v) The information was not designated by the submitter as
confidential when it was submitted, or a reasonable time thereafter, if
the submitter was specifically afforded an opportunity to make such a
designation; however, a submitter will be notified of a request for
information that was not designated as confidential at the time of
submission, or a reasonable time thereafter, if there is substantial
reason to believe that disclosure of the information would result in
competitive harm;
(vi) The designation of confidentiality made by the submitter is
obviously frivolous; or
(vii) The information was submitted to the Presidio Trust more than
ten years prior to the date of the request, unless the Presidio Trust
has reason to believe that it continues to be confidential.
(8) If a requester brings suit to compel disclosure of information,
the submitter of the information will be promptly notified.
0
6. Revise Sec. 1007.5 to read as follows:
Sec. 1007.5 Action on initial requests.
(a) Authority. (1) Requests shall be decided by the FOIA Officer.
(2) A decision to withhold a requested record, to release a record
that is exempt from disclosure, or to deny a fee waiver shall be made
only after consultation with the General Counsel.
(b) Acknowledgement of requests. (1) The Presidio Trust shall send
the requester a written acknowledgement of the receipt of the request,
provide the requester with an individualized tracking number, and
provide the requester with contact information for the FOIA Officer.
(2) Requesters must include the individualized tracking number in
all communications with the Presidio Trust regarding the request.
(c) Estimated dates of completion and interim responses. Upon
request, the Presidio Trust will provide an estimated date by which the
Presidio Trust expects to provide a response to the requester. If a
request involves a voluminous amount of material, or searches in
multiple locations, the Presidio Trust may provide interim responses,
releasing records on a rolling basis.
(d) Form of grant. (1) When a requested record has been determined
to be available, the FOIA Officer shall notify the requester as to when
and where the record is available for inspection or, as the case may
be, when and how copies will be provided. If fees are due, the FOIA
Officer shall state the amount of fees due and the procedures for
payment, as described in Sec. 1007.9.
(2) The FOIA Officer shall honor a requester's specified preference
of form or format of disclosure (e.g., paper, microform, audiovisual
materials, or electronic records) if the record is readily available to
the Presidio Trust in the requested form or format or if the record is
reproducible by the Presidio Trust with reasonable efforts in the
requested form or format.
(3) If a requested record (or portion thereof) is being made
available over the objections of a submitter made in accordance with
Sec. 1007.4(c), both the requester and the submitter shall be notified
of the decision. The notice to the submitter (a copy of which shall be
made available to the requester) shall be forwarded a reasonable number
of days prior to the date on which disclosure is to be made and shall
include:
(i) A statement of the reasons why the submitter's objections were
not sustained;
(ii) A specification of the portions of the record to be disclosed,
if the submitter's objections were sustained in part; and
(iii) A specified disclosure date.
(4) If a claim of confidentiality has been found frivolous in
accordance with Sec. 1007.4(c)(7)(vi) and a determination is made to
release the information without consultation with the submitter, the
submitter of the information shall be notified of the decision and the
reasons therefor a reasonable number of days prior to the date on which
disclosure is to be made.
(e) Adverse determinations of requests. Adverse determinations, or
denials of requests, include decisions that:
(1) The requester has not submitted a perfected request;
(2) The requested record is exempt, in whole or in part;
(3) The request does not reasonably describe the records sought;
(4) The information is not a record subject to the FOIA;
(5) The requested record does not exist, cannot be located, or has
been destroyed; or
(6) The requested record is not readily reproducible in the form or
format sought by the requester. Adverse determinations also include
denials involving fees or fee waivers or denials of requests for
expedited processing.
(f) Form of denial. (1) A decision withholding a requested record
shall be in writing and shall include:
(i) A listing of the names and titles or positions of each person
responsible for the denial;
(ii) A reference to the specific exemption or exemptions
authorizing the withholding;
(iii) If neither a statute nor an Executive order requires
withholding, the sound ground for withholding;
(iv) An estimate of the volume of records or information withheld,
in number of pages or in some other reasonable form of estimation. This
estimate does not need to be provided if the volume is otherwise
indicated through deletions on records disclosed in part, or if
providing an estimate would harm an interest protected by an applicable
exemption;
(v) A statement that the denial may be appealed and a reference to
the procedures in Sec. 1007.7 for appeal; and
(vi) A statement notifying the requester of the dispute resolution
services offered by the Office of Government Information Services.
(2) A decision denying a request for failure to reasonably describe
requested records or for other procedural deficiency or because
requested records cannot be located shall be in writing and shall
include:
(i) A description of the basis of the decision;
(ii) A list of the names and titles or positions of each person
responsible;
(iii) A statement that the matter may be appealed and a reference
to the procedures in Sec. 1007.7 for appeal; and
(iv) A statement notifying the requester of the dispute resolution
services offered by the Office of Government Information Services.
(g) Expedited processing. (1) Requests and appeals will be taken
out of order and given expedited treatment whenever it is determined by
the FOIA Officer that they involve:
(i) Circumstances in which the lack of expedited treatment could
reasonably be expected to pose an imminent threat to the life or
physical safety of an individual;
(ii) An urgency to inform the public about an actual or alleged
Federal government activity, if made by a person primarily engaged in
disseminating information;
[[Page 9465]]
(iii) The loss of substantial due process rights; or
(iv) A matter of widespread and exceptional media interest in which
there exist possible questions about the government's integrity that
affect public confidence.
(2) A request for expedited processing may be made at the time of
the initial request for records or at any later time.
(3) A requester who seeks expedited processing must submit a
statement, certified to be true and correct to the best of that
person's knowledge and belief, explaining in detail the basis for
requesting expedited processing.
(4) Within ten calendar days of receiving of a request for
expedited processing, the FOIA Officer shall decide whether to grant
the request for expedited processing and shall notify the requester of
the decision. If a request for expedited processing is granted, the
underlying FOIA request shall be given priority and shall be processed
as soon as practicable. If a request for expedited processing is
denied, any appeal of that decision shall be acted on expeditiously.
0
7. Revise Sec. 1007.6 to read as follows:
Sec. 1007.6 Time limits for processing initial requests.
(a) Basic limit. Requests for records shall be processed promptly.
A determination whether to grant or deny a request shall be made within
20 working days after receipt of a request. This determination shall be
communicated immediately to the requester.
(b) Running of basic time limit. (1) The 20 working day time limit
begins to run when a perfected request meeting the requirements of
Sec. 1007.3(b) is received at the Presidio Trust.
(2) The running of the basic time limit may be delayed or tolled as
explained in Sec. 1007.9 (f), (g) and (h) if a requester:
(i) Has not stated a willingness to pay fees as high as are
anticipated and has not sought and been granted a full fee waiver; or
(ii) Has not made a required advance payment.
(c) Extensions of time. In the following unusual circumstances, the
time limit for acting on an initial request may be extended to the
extent reasonably necessary to the proper processing of the request,
but in no case may the time limit be extended by more than 20 working
days:
(1) The need to search for and collect the requested records from
facilities or other establishments that are separate from the main
office of the Presidio Trust;
(2) The need to search for, collect, and appropriately examine a
voluminous amount of separate and distinct records demanded in a single
request; or
(3) The need for consultation, which shall be conducted with all
practicable speed, with another department or agency having a
substantial interest in the determination of the request.
(d) Notice of extension. A requester shall be notified in writing
of an extension under paragraph (c) of this section. The notice shall
state the reason for the extension and the date on which a
determination on the request is expected to be made.
(e) Treatment of delay as denial. If no determination has been
reached at the end of the 20 working day period for deciding an initial
request, or an extension thereof under Sec. 1007.6(c), the requester
may deem the request denied and may exercise a right of appeal in
accordance with Sec. 1007.7.
(f) Notice of delay. When a determination cannot be reached within
the time limit, or extension thereof, the requester shall be notified
of the reason for the delay, of the date on which a determination may
be expected, and of the right to treat the delay as a denial for
purposes of appeal, including a reference to the procedures for filing
an appeal in Sec. 1007.7.
0
8. Revise Sec. 1007.7 to read as follows:
Sec. 1007.7 Appeals.
(a) Right of appeal. A requester may appeal to the Executive
Director when:
(1) Records have been withheld;
(2) A request has been denied for failure to describe requested
records or for other procedural deficiency or because requested records
cannot be located;
(3) A fee waiver has been denied;
(4) A request has not been decided within the time limits provided
in Sec. 1007.6; or
(5) A request for expedited processing under Sec. 1007.5(g) has
been denied.
(b) Time for appeal. An appeal must be received at the office of
the Presidio Trust no later than 90 calendar days after the date of the
initial denial, in the case of a denial of an entire request, or 90
calendar days after records have been made available, in the case of a
partial denial.
(c) Form of appeal. (1) An appeal shall be initiated by filing a
written notice of appeal. The notice shall be accompanied by copies of
the original request and the initial denial and should, in order to
expedite the appellate process and give the requester an opportunity to
present his or her arguments, contain a brief statement of the reasons
why the requester believes the initial denial to have been in error.
(2) The appeal shall be addressed to the Executive Director, The
Presidio Trust, P.O. Box 29052, San Francisco, CA 94129-0052.
(3) To expedite processing, both the envelope containing a notice
of appeal and the face of the notice should bear the legend ``FREEDOM
OF INFORMATION APPEAL.''
(d) Appeal required. Before seeking review by a court of an adverse
determination by the Presidio Trust, a requester must first submit a
timely administrative appeal.
0
9. Revise Sec. 1007.8 to read as follows:
Sec. 1007.8 Action on appeals.
(a) Authority. Appeals shall be decided by the Executive Director
after consultation with the FOIA Officer and the General Counsel.
(b) Time limit. A final determination shall be made within 20
working days after receipt of an appeal meeting the requirements of
Sec. 1007.7(c).
(c) Extensions of time. (1) If the time limit for responding to the
initial request for a record was not extended under the provisions of
Sec. 1007.6(c) or was extended for fewer than ten working days, the
time for processing of the appeal may be extended to the extent
reasonably necessary to the proper processing of the appeal, but in no
event may the extension, when taken together with any extension made
during processing of the initial request, result in an aggregate
extension with respect to any one request of more than ten working
days. The time for processing of an appeal may be extended only if one
or more of the unusual circumstances listed in Sec. 1007.6(c) requires
an extension.
(2) The appellant shall be advised in writing of the reasons for
the extension and the date on which a final determination on the appeal
is expected to be dispatched.
(3) If no determination on the appeal has been reached at the end
of the 20 working day period, or the extension thereof, the requester
is deemed to have exhausted administrative remedies, giving rise to a
right of review in the United States District Court for the Northern
District of California, as specified in 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4).
(4) When no determination can be reached within the applicable time
limit, the appeal will nevertheless continue to be processed. On
expiration of the time limit, the requester shall be informed of the
reason for the delay, of the date on which a determination may be
reached to be dispatched, and of the right to seek judicial review.
(5) An appeal ordinarily will not be adjudicated if the request
becomes a matter of FOIA litigation.
[[Page 9466]]
(d) Form of decision. (1) The final determination on an appeal
shall be in writing and shall state the basis for the determination. If
the determination is to release the requested records or portions
thereof, the FOIA Officer shall immediately make the records available.
If the determination upholds in whole or part the initial denial of a
request for records, the determination shall advise the requester of
the right to obtain judicial review in the U.S. District Court for the
Northern District of California and shall set forth the names and
titles or positions of each person responsible for the denial. The
determination shall also inform the requester of the dispute resolution
services offered by the Office of Government Information Services.
(2) If a requested record (or portion thereof) is being made
available over the objections of a submitter made in accordance with
Sec. 1007.4(c), the submitter shall be provided notice as described in
Sec. 1007.5(b)(3).
0
10. Revise Sec. 1007.9 to read as follows:
Sec. 1007.9 Fees.
(a) Policy. (1) Unless waived pursuant to the provisions of Sec.
1007.10, fees for responding to FOIA requests shall be charged in
accordance with the provisions of this section and the current schedule
of charges determined by the Executive Director and published on the
Presidio Trust's website. Such charges shall be set at the level
necessary to recoup the full allowable direct costs to the Presidio
Trust.
(2) Fees shall not be charged if the total amount chargeable does
not exceed the costs of routine collection and processing of the fee.
The Presidio Trust shall periodically determine the cost of routine
collection and processing of a fee and publish such amount on its
website.
(3) Where there is a reasonable basis to conclude that a requester
or group of requesters acting in concert has divided a request into a
series of requests on a single subject or related subjects to avoid
assessment of fees, the requests may be aggregated and fees charged
accordingly.
(4) Fees shall be charged to recover the full costs of providing
such services as certifying that records are true copies or sending
records by a method other than regular mail, when the Presidio Trust
elects to provide such services.
(5) The following definitions shall apply to this part:
(i) A commercial use request is a request from or on behalf of a
person who seeks information for a use or purpose that furthers the
commercial, trade or profit interests of the requester or the person on
whose behalf the request is made, which can include furthering those
interests through litigation. The intended use of records may be
determined on the basis of information submitted by a requester and
from reasonable inferences based on the identity of the requester and
any other available information.
(ii) The term direct costs refers to those expenses the Presidio
Trust incurs in searching for and duplicating (and, in the case of
commercial use requests, reviewing) records in order to respond to a
FOIA request. For example, direct costs include the salary of the
employee performing the work (i.e., the basic rate of pay for the
employee, plus 16 percent of that rate to cover benefits) and the cost
of operating computers and other electronic equipment, such as
photocopiers and scanners. Direct costs do not include overhead
expenses such as the costs of space, and of heating or lighting a
facility.
(iii) The term duplication refers to the process of making a copy
of a record necessary to respond to a FOIA request. Such copies can
take the form of paper copy, microform, audio-visual materials, or
machine-readable documentation (e.g., magnetic tape or disk), among
others. The copy provided shall be in a form that is reasonably usable
by requesters.
(iv) An educational institution is a preschool, a public or private
elementary or secondary school, an institution of graduate higher
education, an institution of undergraduate higher education, an
institution of professional education, or an institution of vocational
education, which operates a program or programs of scholarly research.
(v) A noncommercial scientific institution is an institution that
is not operated for commerce, trade or profit and that is operated
solely for the purpose of conducting scientific research the results of
which are not intended to promote any particular product or industry.
(vi) A representative of the news media is any person actively
gathering news for an entity that is organized and operated to publish
or broadcast news to the public. The term ``news'' means information
that is about current events or that is (or would be) of current
interest to the public. Examples of news media entities include, but
are not limited to, television or radio stations broadcasting to the
public at large, and publishers of periodicals (but only in those
instances when they can qualify as disseminators of ``news'') who make
their products available for purchase or subscription by the general
public. As traditional methods of news delivery evolve (e.g.,
electronic dissemination of newspapers through telecommunications
services), such alternative media would be included in this category.
Free-lance journalists may be considered representatives of the news
media if they demonstrate a solid basis for expecting publication
through a news organization, even though not actually employed by it. A
publication contract or past record of publication, or evidence of a
specific free-lance assignment from a news organization may indicate a
solid basis for expecting publication.
(vii) The term review refers to the examination of a record located
in response to a request in order to determine whether any portion of
it is exempt from disclosure. Review time includes processing any
record for disclosure, such as doing all that is necessary to prepare
the record for disclosure, including the process of redacting the
record and marking the appropriate exemptions. Review costs are
properly charged even if a record ultimately is not disclosed. Review
time also includes time spent both obtaining and considering any formal
objection to disclosure under Sec. 1007.4(c) made by a submitter of
confidential commercial information, but it does not include time spent
resolving general legal or policy issues regarding the application of
exemptions.
(viii) The term search includes all time spent looking for material
that is responsive to a request, including page-by-page or line-by-line
identification of material within documents, databases and information
in other electronic records. Searches shall be undertaken in the most
efficient and least expensive manner possible, consistent with the
Presidio Trust's obligations under the FOIA and other applicable laws.
(b) Commercial use requests. (1) A requester seeking records for
commercial use shall be charged fees for direct costs incurred in
document search and review (even if the search and review fails to
locate records that are not exempt from disclosure) and duplication.
(2) A commercial use requester may not be charged fees for time
spent resolving legal and policy issues affecting access to requested
records.
(c) Educational and noncommercial scientific institution requests.
(1) A requester seeking records under the auspices of an educational
institution in furtherance of scholarly research or a noncommercial
scientific institution in furtherance of scientific research shall be
charged for document duplication, except that the first 100 pages of
paper copies (or the equivalent cost thereof if
[[Page 9467]]
the records are in some other form) shall be provided without charge.
(2) Such requesters may not be charged fees for costs incurred in:
(i) Searching for requested records;
(ii) Examining requested records to determine whether they are
exempt from mandatory disclosure;
(iii) Deleting reasonably segregable exempt matter;
(iv) Monitoring the requester's inspection of agency records; or
(v) Resolving legal and policy issues affecting access to requested
records.
(d) News media requests. (1) A representative of the news media
shall be charged for document duplication, except that the first 100
pages of paper copies (or the equivalent cost thereof if the records
are in some other form) shall be provided without charge.
(2) Representatives of the news media may not be charged fees for
costs incurred in:
(i) Searching for requested records;
(ii) Examining requested records to determine whether they are
exempt from mandatory disclosure;
(iii) Deleting reasonably segregable exempt matter;
(iv) Monitoring the requester's inspection of agency records; or
(v) Resolving legal and policy issues affecting access to requested
records.
(e) Other requests. (1) A requester not covered by paragraphs (b),
(c), or (d) of this section shall be charged fees for the direct costs
for document search (even if the search fails to locate records that
are not exempt from disclosure) and duplication, except that the first
two hours of search time and the first 100 pages of paper copies (or
the equivalent cost thereof if the records are in some other form)
shall be provided without charge.
(2) Such requesters may not be charged for costs incurred in:
(i) Examining requested records to determine whether they are
exempt from disclosure;
(ii) Deleting reasonably segregable exempt matter;
(iii) Monitoring the requester's inspection of agency records; or
(iv) Resolving legal and policy issues affecting access to
requested records.
(f) Requests for clarification. Where a request does not provide
sufficient information to determine whether it is covered by paragraph
(b), (c), (d), or (e) of this section, the requester should be asked to
provide additional clarification. If it is necessary to seek such
clarification, the request may be deemed to have not been received for
purposes of the time limits established in Sec. 1007.6 until the
clarification is received. Requests to requesters for clarification
shall be made promptly.
(g) Notice of anticipated fees. Where a request does not state a
willingness to pay fees as high as anticipated by the Presidio Trust,
and the requester has not sought and been granted a full waiver of fees
under Sec. 1007.10, the request may be deemed to have not been
received for purposes of the time limits established in Sec. 1007.6
until the requester has been notified of and agrees to pay the
anticipated fee. Advice to requesters with respect to anticipated fees
shall be provided promptly.
(h) Advance payment. (1) Where it is anticipated that allowable
fees are likely to exceed $250.00, the requester may be required to
make an advance payment of the entire fee before processing of his or
her request.
(2) Where a requester has previously failed to pay a fee within 30
days of the date of billing, processing of any request from that
requester shall ordinarily be suspended until the requester pays any
amount still owed, including applicable interest, and makes advance
payment of allowable fees anticipated in connection with the request.
(3) Advance payment of fees may not be required except as described
in paragraphs (h) (1) and (2) of this section.
(4) Issuance of a notice requiring payment of overdue fees or
advance payment shall toll the time limit in Sec. 1007.6 until receipt
of payment.
(i) Form of payment. Payment of fees should be made by check or
money order payable to the Presidio Trust. Where appropriate, the
official responsible for handling a request may require that payment by
check be made in the form of a certified check.
(j) Billing procedures. A bill for collection shall be prepared for
each request that requires collection of fees.
(k) Collection of fees. The bill for collection or an accompanying
letter to the requester shall include a statement that interest will be
charged in accordance with the Debt Collection Act of 1982, 31 U.S.C.
3717, and implementing regulations, 4 CFR 102.13, if the fees are not
paid within 30 days of the date of the bill for collection is mailed or
hand-delivered to the requester. This requirement does not apply if the
requester is a unit of State or local government. Other authorities of
the Debt Collection Act of 1982 shall be used, as appropriate, to
collect the fees.
PART 1008--REQUESTS UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT
0
11. The authority citation for part 1008 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Pub. L. 104-333, 110 Stat. 4097 (16 U.S.C. 460bb
note); 5 U.S.C. 552a.
0
12. Amend Sec. 1008.2 to revise the definition of individual in
alphabetical order to read as follows:
Sec. 1008.2 Definitions.
* * * * *
Individual means a citizen of the United States or an alien who is
currently lawfully admitted for permanent residence.
* * * * *
0
13. Revise Sec. 1008.9 to read as follows:
Sec. 1008.9 Disclosure of records.
(a) Prohibition of disclosure. No record contained in a system of
records may be disclosed by any means of communication to any person,
or to another agency, except pursuant to a written request by, or with
the prior written consent of, the individual to whom the record
pertains.
(b) General exceptions. The prohibition contained in paragraph (a)
of this section does not apply where disclosure of the record would be:
(1) To those officers or employees of the Presidio Trust who have a
need for the record in the performance of their duties; or
(2) Required by the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552.
(c) Specific exceptions. The prohibition contained in paragraph (a)
of this section does not apply where disclosure of the record would be:
(1) For a routine use which has been described in a system notice
published in the Federal Register;
(2) To the Bureau of the Census for purposes of planning or
carrying out a census or survey or related activity pursuant to the
provisions of Title 13, U.S. Code.
(3) To a recipient who has provided the system manager responsible
for the system in which the record is maintained with advance adequate
written assurance that the record will be used solely as a statistical
research or reporting record, and the record is to be transferred in a
form that is not individually identifiable;
(4) To the National Archives and Records Administration as a record
which has sufficient historical or other value to warrant its continued
preservation by the U.S. Government, or for evaluation by the Archivist
of the United States or the designee of the Archivist to determine
whether the record has such value;
(5) To another agency or to an instrumentality of any governmental
jurisdiction within or under the control of the United States for a
civil or criminal law enforcement activity if the activity is
authorized by law, and if the head of the agency or instrumentality
[[Page 9468]]
has made a written request to the Presidio Trust specifying the
particular portion desired and the law enforcement activity for which
the record is sought;
(6) To a person pursuant to a showing of compelling circumstances
affecting the health or safety of an individual if upon such disclosure
notification is transmitted to the last known address of such
individual;
(7) To either House of Congress, or, to the extent of matter within
its jurisdiction, any committee or subcommittee thereof, any joint
committee of Congress or subcommittee of any such joint committee;
(8) To the Comptroller General, or any of his authorized
representatives, in the course of the performance of the duties of the
General Accounting Office;
(9) Pursuant to the order of a court of competent jurisdiction; or
(10) To a consumer reporting agency in accordance with section 3(d)
of the Federal Claims Collection Act of 1966, as amended (31 U.S.C.
3711(e)).
(d) Reviewing records prior to disclosure. (1) Prior to any
disclosure of a record about an individual, unless disclosure is
required by the Freedom of Information Act, reasonable efforts shall be
made to ensure that the records are accurate, complete, timely and
relevant for agency purposes.
(2) When a record is disclosed in connection with a Freedom of
Information Act request made under this part and it is appropriate and
administratively feasible to do so, the requester shall be informed of
any information known to the Presidio Trust indicating that the record
may not be fully accurate, complete, or timely.
(e) Notice of court-ordered and emergency disclosures. (1) Court-
ordered disclosures. When a record pertaining to an individual is
required to be disclosed by a court order, the Presidio Trust will make
reasonable efforts to provide notice of this to the individual. Notice
will be given within a reasonable time after the Presidio Trust's
receipt of the order--except that in a case in which the order is not a
matter of public record, the notice will be given only after the order
becomes public. This notice will be mailed to the individual's last
known address and will contain a copy of the order and a description of
the information disclosed. Notice will not be given if disclosure is
made from a criminal law enforcement system of records that has been
exempted from the notice requirement.
(2) Emergency disclosures. Upon disclosing a record pertaining to
an individual made under compelling circumstances affecting health or
safety, the Presidio Trust will notify that individual of the
disclosure. This notice will be mailed to the individual's last known
address and will state the nature of the information disclosed, the
person, organization or agency to which it was disclosed, the date of
the disclosure, and the compelling circumstances justifying the
disclosure.
0
14. Revise Sec. 1008.10 to read as follows:
Sec. 1008.10 Accounting for disclosures.
(a) Maintenance of an accounting. (1) Where a record is disclosed
to any person, or to another agency, under any of the specific
exceptions provided by Sec. 1008.9(c), an accounting shall be made.
(2) The accounting shall record:
(i) The date, nature, and purpose of each disclosure of a record to
any person or to another agency; and
(ii) The name and address of the person or agency to whom the
disclosure was made.
(3) Accountings prepared under this section shall be maintained for
at least five years or the life of the record, whichever is longer,
after the disclosure for which the accounting is made.
(b) Access to accountings. (1) Except for accountings of
disclosures made under Sec. 1008.9(b) or 1008.9(c)(5), accountings of
all disclosures of a record shall be made available to the individual
to whom the record relates at the individual's request.
(2) An individual desiring access to an accounting of disclosures
of a record pertaining to the individual shall submit a request by
following the procedures of Sec. 1008.13.
(c) Notification of disclosure. When a record is disclosed pursuant
to Sec. 1008.9(c)(9) as the result of the order of a court of
competent jurisdiction, reasonable efforts shall be made to notify the
individual to whom the record pertains as soon as the order becomes a
matter of public record.
0
15. Revise Sec. 1008.11 to read as follows:
Sec. 1008.11 Request for notification of existence of records:
Submission.
(a) Submission of requests. (1) Individuals desiring to determine
under the Privacy Act whether a system of records contains records
pertaining to them shall address inquiries to the Privacy Act Officer,
The Presidio Trust, P.O. Box 29052, San Francisco, CA 94129-0052,
unless the system notice describing the system prescribes or permits
submission to some other official or officials.
(2) Individuals desiring to determine whether records pertaining to
them are maintained in two or more systems shall make a separate
inquiry concerning each system.
(b) Form of request. (1) An inquiry to determine whether a system
of records contains records pertaining to an individual shall be in
writing.
(2) To expedite processing, both the envelope containing a request
and the face of the request should bear the legend ``PRIVACY ACT
INQUIRY.''
(3) The request shall state that the individual is seeking
information concerning records pertaining to him or herself and shall
supply such additional identifying information, if any, as is called
for in the system notice describing the system.
(4) The request must include verification of the requester's
identity, including the requester's full name, current address, and
date and place of birth. The request must be signed by the requester,
and the signature must be notarized or submitted under 28 U.S.C. 1746,
which permits statements to be made under penalty of perjury as a
substitute for notarization.
(5) If the request is made on behalf of a minor or someone
determined by a court to be incompetent, for access to records about
that individual, the requester must establish:
(i) The identity of the individual who is the subject of the
record, by stating the name, current address, date and place of birth,
and, at the requester's option, the Social Security number of the
individual;
(ii) The requester's identity, as required in paragraph 4 above of
this section;
(iii) That the requester is the parent or guardian of that
individual, which the requester may prove by providing a copy of the
individual's birth certificate showing the requester's parentage or by
providing a court order establishing the requester's guardianship; and
(iv) That the requester is acting on behalf of that individual in
making the request.
(6) Individuals who have reason to believe that information
pertaining to them may be filed under a name other than the name they
are currently using (e.g., maiden name), shall include such information
in the request.
0
16. Revise Sec. 1008.14 to read as follows:
Sec. 1008.14 Requests for access to records: Submission.
(a) Submission of requests. (1) Requests for access to records
shall be submitted to the Privacy Act Officer unless the system notice
describing the system prescribes or permits submission to some other
official or officials.
[[Page 9469]]
(2) Individuals desiring access to records maintained in two or
more separate systems shall submit a separate request for access to the
records in each system.
(b) Form of request. (1) A request for access to records subject to
the Privacy Act shall be in writing and addressed to Privacy Act
Officer, The Presidio Trust, P.O. Box 29052, San Francisco, CA 94129-
0052.
(2) To expedite processing, both the envelope containing a request
and the face of the request should bear the legend ``PRIVACY ACT
REQUEST FOR ACCESS.''
(3) Requesters shall specify whether they seek all of the records
contained in the system which relate to them or only some portion
thereof. If only a portion of the records which relate to the
individual are sought, the request shall reasonably describe the
specific record or records sought.
(4) If the requester seeks to have copies of the requested records
made, the request shall state the maximum amount of copying fees which
the requester is willing to pay. A request which does not state the
amount of fees the requester is willing to pay will be treated as a
request to inspect the requested records. Requesters are further
notified that under Sec. 1008.15(d) the failure to state willingness
to pay fees as high as are anticipated by the Presidio Trust will delay
processing of a request.
(5) The request shall supply such identifying information, if any,
as is called for in the system notice describing the system.
(6) The request must include verification of the requester's
identity, including the requester's full name, current address, and
date and place of birth. The request must be signed by the requester,
and the signature must be notarized or submitted under 28 U.S.C. 1746,
which permits statements to be made under penalty of perjury as a
substitute for notarization.
(7) If the request is made on behalf of a minor or someone
determined by a court to be incompetent, for access to records about
that individual, the requester must establish:
(i) The identity of the individual who is the subject of the
record, by stating the name, current address, date and place of birth,
and, at the requester's option, the Social Security number of the
individual;
(ii) The requester's identity, as required in paragraph 6 above of
this section;
(iii) That the requester is the parent or guardian of that
individual, which the requester may prove by providing a copy of the
individual's birth certificate showing the requester's parentage or by
providing a court order establishing the requester's guardianship; and
(iv) That the requester is acting on behalf of that individual in
making the request.
(8) Requests failing to meet the requirements of this paragraph
shall be returned to the requester with a written notice advising the
requester of the deficiency in the request.
0
17. Revise Sec. 1008.15 to read as follows:
Sec. 1008.15 Requests for access to records: Initial decision.
(a) Acknowledgements of requests. Upon receipt of a request, the
Presidio Trust ordinarily will send an acknowledgement letter to the
requester which will confirm the requester's agreement to pay fees and
will provide an assigned request number for further reference.
(b) Decisions on requests. A request made under this part for
access to a record shall be granted promptly unless the record:
(1) Was compiled in reasonable anticipation of a civil action or
proceeding; or
(2) Is contained in a system of records which has been excepted
from the access provisions of the Privacy Act by rulemaking.
(c) Authority to deny requests. A decision to deny a request for
access under this part shall be made by the Privacy Act Officer in
consultation with the General Counsel.
(d) Form of decision. (1) No particular form is required for a
decision granting access to a record. The decision shall, however,
advise the individual requesting the record as to where and when the
record is available for inspection or, as the case may be, where and
when copies will be available. If fees are due under Sec. 1008.15(e),
the individual requesting the record shall also be notified of the
amount of fees due or, if the exact amount has not been determined, the
approximate amount of fees due.
(2) A decision denying a request for access, in whole or part,
shall be in writing and shall:
(i) State the basis for denial of the request;
(ii) Contain a statement that the denial may be appealed to the
Executive Director pursuant to Sec. 1008.16 by writing to the
Executive Director, The Presidio Trust, P.O. Box 29052, San Francisco,
CA 94129-0052; and
(iii) State that the appeal must be received by the foregoing
official within 20 working days of the date of the decision.
(3) If the decision denying a request for access involves records
which fall under the jurisdiction of another agency, the individual
shall be informed in a written response which shall:
(i) State the reasons for the denial;
(ii) Include the name, position title, and address of the official
responsible for the denial; and
(iii) Advise the individual that an appeal of the declination may
be made only to the appropriate official of the relevant agency, and
include that official's name, position title, and address.
(4) Copies of decisions denying requests for access made pursuant
to paragraphs (d)(2) and (d)(3) of this section will be provided to the
Privacy Act Officer.
(e) Fees. (1) No fees may be charged for the cost of searching for
or reviewing a record in response to a request made under Sec.
1008.14.
(2) Unless the Privacy Act Officer determines that reduction or
waiver of fees is appropriate, fees for copying a record in response to
a request made under Sec. 1008.14 shall be charged in accordance with
the provisions of this section and the current schedule of charges
determined by the Executive Director and published on the Trust's
website. Such charges shall be set at the level necessary to recoup the
full allowable direct costs to the Trust.
(3) Where it is anticipated that fees chargeable in connection with
a request will exceed the amount the person submitting the request has
indicated a willingness to pay, the Privacy Act Officer shall notify
the requester and shall not complete processing of the request until
the requester has agreed, in writing, to pay fees as high as are
anticipated.
0
18. Revise Sec. 1008.18 to read as follows:
Sec. 1008.18 Amendment of records.
The Privacy Act permits individuals to request amendment of records
pertaining to them contained in a system of records if they believe the
records are not accurate, relevant, timely or complete. 5 U.S.C.
552a(d)(2). A request for amendment of a record shall be submitted in
accordance with the procedures in this part.
0
19. Revise Sec. 1008.19 to read as follows:
Sec. 1008.19 Petitions for amendment: Submission and form.
(a) Submission of petitions for amendment. (1) A request for
amendment of a record shall be submitted to the Privacy Act Officer
unless the system notice describing the
[[Page 9470]]
system prescribes or permits submission to a different official or
officials. If an individual wishes to request amendment of records
located in more than one system, a separate petition must be submitted
with respect to each system.
(2) A petition for amendment of a record may be submitted only if
the individual submitting the petition has previously requested and
been granted access to the record and has inspected or been given a
copy of the record.
(b) Form of petition. (1) A petition for amendment shall be in
writing, shall specifically identify the record for which amendment is
sought, and shall be addressed to the Privacy Act Officer, The Presidio
Trust, P.O. Box 29052, San Francisco, CA 94129-0052.
(2) To expedite processing, both the envelope containing a petition
and the face of the petition should bear the legend ``PRIVACY ACT
PETITION FOR AMENDMENT.''
(3) The petition shall state, in detail, the reasons why the
petitioner believes the record, or the objectionable portion thereof,
is not accurate, relevant, timely or complete. Copies of documents or
evidence relied upon in support of these reasons shall be submitted
with the petition.
(4) The petition shall state, specifically and in detail, the
changes sought in the record. If the changes involve rewriting the
record or portions thereof or involve adding new language to the
record, the petition shall propose specific language to implement the
changes.
(5) The petition must include verification of the petitioner's
identity, including the petitioner's full name, current address, and
date and place of birth. The petition must be signed by the petitioner,
and the signature must be notarized or submitted under 28 U.S.C. 1746,
which permits statements to be made under penalty of perjury as a
substitute for notarization.
(6) If the petition is made on behalf of a minor or someone
determined by a court to be incompetent, for access to records about
that individual, the petitioner must establish:
(i) The identity of the individual who is the subject of the
record, by stating the name, current address, date and place of birth,
and, at the petitioner's option, the Social Security number of the
individual;
(ii) The petitioner's identity, as required in paragraph 5 above of
this section;
(iii) That the petitioner is the parent or guardian of that
individual, which the petitioner may prove by providing a copy of the
individual's birth certificate showing the petitioner's parentage or by
providing a court order establishing the petitioner's guardianship; and
(iv) That the petitioner is acting on behalf of that individual in
making the request.
(7) Petitions failing to meet the requirements of this paragraph
shall be returned to the petitioner with a written notice advising the
petitioner of the deficiency in the petition.
PART 1009--ADMINISTRATIVE CLAIMS UNDER THE FEDERAL TORT CLAIMS ACT
0
20. The authority citation for part 1009 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Pub. L. 104-333, 110 Stat. 4097 (16 U.S.C. 460bb
note); 28 U.S.C. 2672.
0
21. Revise Sec. 1009.1 to read as follows:
Sec. 1009.1 Purpose.
The purpose of this part is to establish procedures for the filing
and settlement of claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act (in part, 28
U.S.C. secs. 2401(b), 2671-2680, as amended). The officers to whom
authority is delegated to settle tort claims shall follow and be guided
by the regulations issued by the Attorney General prescribing standards
and procedures for settlement of tort claims (28 CFR part 14).
0
22. Revise Sec. 1009.4 to read as follows:
Sec. 1009.4 Payment of claims.
(a) In making an award from proceeds or revenues of the Presidio
Trust, the Presidio Trust will process payment using an agreement
signed by the claimant and the Executive Director, or his or her
designee. In making an award from proceeds or revenues not provided for
by the Presidio Trust, the Presidio Trust will process payment as
prescribed by 28 CFR 14.10.
(b) Prior to payment, appropriate releases shall be obtained as
provided in 28 CFR 14.10.
(c) Any award, compromise, or settlement in excess of $25,000 shall
be effected only with the prior written approval of the Attorney
General or his or her designee.
PART 1011--DEBT COLLECTION
0
23. The authority citation for part 1011 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 460bb appendix, as amended.
0
24. Revise Sec. 1011.4(a)(7) to read as follows:
Sec. 1011.4 What notice will the Presidio Trust send to a debtor
when collecting a debt?
(a) * * *
(7) The following timelines for the referral of a delinquent debt
to the FMS:
(i) That debts over 120 days delinquent and eligible for the
centralized administrative offset collection actions described in
paragraph (a)(6)(i) of this section must be referred to the FMS for
collection (see Sec. Sec. 1011.10 through 1011.12);
(ii) That debts over 180 days delinquent not previously referred to
the FMS under paragraph (i) of this section must be referred to the FMS
for cross servicing debt collection (see Sec. 1011.9).
0
25. Revise Sec. 1011.9(a) to read as follows:
Sec. 1011.9 When will the Presidio Trust transfer a debt to the
Financial Management Service for collection?
(a) Cross-servicing. Unless a delinquent debt has previously been
transferred to the FMS for administrative offset in accordance with
Sec. 1011.10, the Presidio Trust will transfer any eligible debt that
is more than 180 days delinquent to the FMS for debt collection
services, a process known as ``cross-servicing.'' The Presidio Trust
may transfer debts delinquent 180 days or less to the FMS in accordance
with the procedures described in 31 CFR 285.12. The FMS takes
appropriate action to collect or compromise the transferred debt, or to
suspend or terminate collection action thereon, in accordance with the
statutory and regulatory requirements and authorities applicable to the
debt and the collection action to be taken. Appropriate action
includes, without limitation, contact with the debtor, referral of the
debt to the Treasury Offset Program, private collection agencies or the
Department of Justice, reporting of the debt to credit bureaus, and
administrative wage garnishment.
0
26. Revise Sec. 1011.10(a)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 1011.10 How will the Presidio Trust use administrative offset
(offset of non-tax federal payments) to collect a debt?
(a) Centralized administrative offset through the Treasury Offset
Program. (1) The Presidio Trust will refer any eligible debt over 120
days delinquent to the Treasury Offset Program for collection by
centralized administrative offset. The Presidio Trust may refer any
eligible debt less than 120 days delinquent to the Treasury Offset
Program for offset.
* * * * *
Dated: February 16, 2018.
Nancy J. Koch,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2018-03939 Filed 3-5-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-4R-P