The release of the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan, on Bogue Banks Barrier Island, Carteret County, NC, 9300-9301 [2018-04408]
Download as PDF
9300
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 43 / Monday, March 5, 2018 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army, Corps of
Engineers
The release of the Final Environmental
Impact Statement (FEIS) for the Bogue
Banks Master Beach Nourishment
Plan, on Bogue Banks Barrier Island,
Carteret County, NC
Department of the Army, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of Availability.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (COE), Wilmington District,
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office has
received a request for Department of the
Army authorization, pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and Section
10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, from
Carteret County to implement, under an
inter-local agreement between the towns
on Bogue Banks barrier island, a
comprehensive 50-year beach and inlet
management plan for the protection of
approximately 25 miles of Bogue Banks
shoreline. The island’s shoreline has
been managed in some capacity for over
35 years by Federal projects
administered through the COE Civil
Works program and by non-federal
projects implemented by the County,
and/or local municipalities through the
COE Regulatory permit program. Since
1978, roughly 11 million cubic yards of
sand have been placed upon the beaches
of Bogue Banks at a total cost of
approximately $95 million. Past
management efforts have largely
consisted of stand-alone projects that
were undertaken to address site-specific
erosional problems. This stand-alone
approach has limited the efficiency and
effectiveness of past and current efforts
by the County and island municipalities
to implement shore protection projects
and to maintain the beaches. In order to
address ongoing shoreline erosion in a
more effective manner, the County and
island municipalities (Towns of Atlantic
Beach, Pine Knoll Shores, Indian Beach,
and Emerald Isle) are proposing to
combine their shore protection efforts
under a more efficient comprehensive
50-year beach and inlet management
plan known as the Bogue Banks Master
Beach Nourishment Plan (BBMBNP).
DATES: Written comments on the FEIS
must be received at (see ADDRESSES) no
later than 5 p.m. on April 2, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Copies of comments and
questions regarding the FEIS may be
addressed to: U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, Wilmington District,
Regulatory Division, ATTN: File
Number SAW–2009–00293, 69
Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, NC
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:25 Mar 02, 2018
Jkt 244001
28403. Copies of the FEIS can be
reviewed on the Corps homepage at,
https://www.saw.usace.army.mil/
Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/
MajorProjects.aspx, under Bogue Banks
50-Year Project: Corps ID # SAW–2009–
00293.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions about the proposed action
and FEIS and/or to request a CD or
written copies of the FEIS can be
directed to Mr. Mickey Sugg,
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office,
telephone: (910) 251–4811 or
mickey.t.sugg@usace.army.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Project Purpose and Need. The
proposed action is to establish and
implement a comprehensive, long-term,
non-federal beach and inlet
management program that would
preserve Bogue Banks’ tax base, protect
its infrastructure, and maintain its
tourism-based economy. The COE Civil
Work’s investigation of a long-term
federal Coastal Storm Damaged
Reduction (CSDR) project for Bogue
Banks has been ongoing for nearly 30
years. As federal funding for shore
protection projects has declined, the
future of a long-term federal CSDR
project has grown increasingly
uncertain. The proposed action would
address the ongoing trend of declining
federal shore protection funding by
establishing a non-federal management
program under the autonomous control
of the County and the island
municipalities. An island wide regional
strategy was developed to do the
following: (1) Establish a regional
approach by consolidating local
community resources, both financially
and logistically, to manage Bogue Inlet
and the beaches on Bogue Banks in an
effective manner, (2) Provide long-term
shoreline protection stabilization and an
equivalent level of protection along
Bogue Banks’ 25-mile oceanfront/inlet
shorelines addressing long-term erosion,
(3) Provide long-term protection to
Bogue Banks’ tourism industry, (4)
Provide short and long-term protection
to residential and commercial structures
and island infrastructure, (5) Provide
long-term protection to the local tax
base by protection existing and future
tax bases and public access/use, (6)
Maintain and improve natural resources
along Bogue Banks’ oceanfront and inlet
shoreline by using compatible beach
material in compliance with the North
Carolina State Sediment Criteria for
shore protection, (7) Maintain and
improve recreational uses of Bogue
Banks’ oceanfront/inlet shorelines, (8)
Maintain navigation conditions within
Bogue Inlet, and (9) Balance the needs
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of the human environment with the
protection of existing natural resources.
2. Proposed Action. Within the
County’s preferred alternative, known as
Alternative 4 (or the BBMBNP), the
County would manage all of the
approximately 18 miles of beaches along
Pine Knoll Shores, Indian Beach/Salter
Path, and Emerald Isle, along with the
eastern shoreline of Bogue Inlet. The
oceanfront of Atlantic Beach is an ongoing recipient of regular USACE
placements of navigation dredged
material and this is expected to be
sufficient in for the needs of its
approximate 5.0-mile shoreline.
However, the County’s 50-year plan
would provide for interim maintenance
nourishment should the USACE
placements cease or if storm-response
nourishment for Atlantic Beach is
needed.
The 50-year management would
employ a regular and recurring cycle of
nourishment events, in combination
with periodic realignments of the Bogue
Inlet ebb tide channel, to continuously
maintain beach profile sand volumes at
a 25-year Level of Protection (LOP). This
LOP equates to protection for upland
structures against a 25-year storm event,
and nourishment events would be
implemented according to 25-year LOP
beach profile volumetric triggers.
Volumetric triggers were developed by
analyzing and adjusting design beach
profiles in a series of iterative SBEACH
numerical modeling runs. The final
modeling results indicated appropriate
volumetric triggers ranging from 211–
266 cubic yards/foot along Bogue Banks,
averaging 238 cubic yards/foot. Based
on variability in the volumetric triggers,
the project shoreline was divided into
management reaches ranging in length
from 2.4 to 4.5 miles. Reaches include
Pine Knoll Shores, Indian Beach/Salter
Path, Emerald Isle (EI) East, EI Central,
EI West, and Bogue Inlet. Based on the
SBEACH modeling results and observed
background erosional loss rates, EI
Central, EI West, and Bogue Inlet
management reaches are expected to
require recurring nourishment of
approximately 0.06 to 0.23 million
cubic yards of material at intervals of six
or nine years to offset background
erosion. For Pine Knoll Shores, Indian
Beach/Salter Path, and EI East, recurring
maintenance events would place
approximately 0.2 to 0.5 million cubic
yards of material at intervals of three or
six years to offset background erosion.
Actual maintenance nourishment
intervals would be expected to vary in
response to background erosion rate
variability over the course of the 50-year
project.
E:\FR\FM\05MRN1.SGM
05MRN1
9301
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 43 / Monday, March 5, 2018 / Notices
For Bogue Inlet management, the
proposal has designated a ‘‘safe box’’
within the inlet throat where the ebb
channel would be allowed to migrate
freely so long as it remains within the
boundaries of the safe box. If the
channel migrates beyond the eastern
boundary of the safe box (or toward
Emerald Isle), this would trigger a
preemptive event to realign the ebb
channel mid-center within the
established boundary. The limits of the
safe box were developed and evaluated
through empirical analysis of historical
inlet changes and supplemental
numerical modeling. Historical ebb
channel alignments and corresponding
inlet shoreline positions were analyzed
through GIS analysis of historical aerial
photography, National Ocean Service
(NOS) T-sheet maps, and LIDAR
topographic maps. Past migration rates
and corresponding shoreline changes
indicate that once eastward migration
accelerates toward Emerald Isle, the
migrating channel has the potential to
threaten structures along the shoreline
within two to three years. Based on the
historical patterns, a safe box was
established with boundaries
corresponding to the location where
acceleration of the ebb channel towards
the west end of Emerald Isle has
occurred in the past. The validity of the
boundaries were then evaluated by
modeling a series of six idealized inlet
configurations encompassing the range
of most relevant historical ebb channel
alignments. Modeling results did not
show any additional geomorphological
indicators of an impending shift to
accelerated migration that warranted
modifications to the initial safe box.
Once the boundary threshold is
triggered, the relocation event would
entail the construction of a channel
approximately 6,000-feet long with
variable bottom widths ranging from
150 to 500 feet. The dimensions of the
channel would be similar to the
footprint of the ebb tide channel
realignment construction completed in
2005. Maintenance events of Bogue Inlet
are expected approximately every ten to
fifteen years, with corresponding
placement of dredged material on the
beaches of Emerald Isle.
Beach fill for all the proposed
nourishment activities on Bogue Banks
would be acquired from a combination
of sources including offshore borrow
sites, Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway
disposal areas, upland sand mines, and
the management of the Bogue Inlet. The
offshore borrow sites consist of the Old
Offshore Dredge Material Disposal Site
(ODMDS) and the current ODMDS,
which are located approximately 3
nautical miles offshore from Beaufort
Inlet, and Area Y, which is located over
1.0 mile offshore from EI West reach. It
is expected that hopper dredge plants
will be used to extract beach fill
material from the offshore borrow sites.
Material would be transported from the
hopper dredges to offshore booster
pumps and carried to the appropriate
nourishment reaches via pipeline. A
hydraulic cutterhead dredge will likely
be used during the management of the
inlet bar channel event, which would
transport the dredge material directly
from the dredge plant onto the beach via
pipelines.
3. Alternatives. Several alternatives
have been identified and evaluated
through the scoping process, and further
detailed description of all alternatives is
disclosed in Section 3.0 of the FEIS.
4. Scoping Process. To date, a public
scoping meeting was held on September
30, 2010 in Morehead City; several
Project Delivery Team (PDT) meetings
have been held, which were comprised
of local, state, and federal government
officials, local residents and nonprofit
organizations; and the Draft EIS was
released and published in the Federal
Register on April 14, 2017 (82 FR
17984).
The COE has coordinated closely with
Bureau of Ocean Energy and
Management (BOEM), which is a
cooperating agency, in the development
of the FEIS to ensure the process
complies with the requirements of the
Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act
(OCSLA) and with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
Additionally, the COE has consulted
with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
and the National Marine Fisheries
Service Protected Resources Division
under the Endangered Species Act; with
U.S. Fish and Wildlife and National
Marine Fisheries Service Habitat
Conservation Division under the Fish
and Wildlife Coordination Act; and with
the National Marine Fisheries Service
Habitat Conservation Division under the
Magnuson-Stevens Act. The FEIS
assesses the potential water quality
impacts pursuant to Section 401 of the
Clean Water Act, and is coordinated
with the North Carolina Division of
Coastal Management (DCM) to ensure
consistency with the Coastal Zone
Management Act.
Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018–04408 Filed 3–2–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720–58–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Notice of Orders Issued Under Section
3 of The Natural Gas Act During
January 2018
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
FE Docket Nos.
PUGET SOUND ENERGY, INC .....................................................................................................................................
SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COMPANY d/b/a NV ENERGY .........................................................................................
COLONIAL ENERGY, INC .............................................................................................................................................
CONSOLIDATED EDISON ENERGY, INC ....................................................................................................................
HOUSTON PIPE LINE COMPANY LP ..........................................................................................................................
REV LNG LLC ................................................................................................................................................................
SABINE PASS LIQUEFACTION, LLC ...........................................................................................................................
PASO NORTE GAS EXPORT, LLC ...............................................................................................................................
EQT ENERGY, LLC .......................................................................................................................................................
UNIPER TRADING CANADA LTD .................................................................................................................................
BG LNG SERVICES, LLC ..............................................................................................................................................
PEMCORP, S.A.P.I. DE C.V ..........................................................................................................................................
ENSTOR ENERGY SERVICES, LLC ............................................................................................................................
ENSTOR ENERGY SERVICES, LLC ............................................................................................................................
IRVING OIL COMMERICAL GP .....................................................................................................................................
GOLDEN PASS LNG TERMINAL LLC ..........................................................................................................................
MACQUARIE ENERGY LLC ..........................................................................................................................................
PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY ................................................................................................................................................
CITADEL ENERGY MARKETING LLC ..........................................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:25 Mar 02, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\05MRN1.SGM
05MRN1
17–149–NG; 17–24–NG
17–158–NG
17–162–NG
17–157–NG
17–163–NG
17–155–LNG
17–161–LNG
17–160–NG
17–156–NG
17–165–NG
18–04–LNG
18–02–NG
18–01–NG
18–05–NG
18–09–NG
18–06–LNG
17–152–LNG
18–07–NG
18–08–NG; 17–45–NG
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 43 (Monday, March 5, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9300-9301]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-04408]
[[Page 9300]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers
The release of the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS)
for the Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan, on Bogue Banks
Barrier Island, Carteret County, NC
AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of Availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE), Wilmington District,
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office has received a request for
Department of the Army authorization, pursuant to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, from
Carteret County to implement, under an inter-local agreement between
the towns on Bogue Banks barrier island, a comprehensive 50-year beach
and inlet management plan for the protection of approximately 25 miles
of Bogue Banks shoreline. The island's shoreline has been managed in
some capacity for over 35 years by Federal projects administered
through the COE Civil Works program and by non-federal projects
implemented by the County, and/or local municipalities through the COE
Regulatory permit program. Since 1978, roughly 11 million cubic yards
of sand have been placed upon the beaches of Bogue Banks at a total
cost of approximately $95 million. Past management efforts have largely
consisted of stand-alone projects that were undertaken to address site-
specific erosional problems. This stand-alone approach has limited the
efficiency and effectiveness of past and current efforts by the County
and island municipalities to implement shore protection projects and to
maintain the beaches. In order to address ongoing shoreline erosion in
a more effective manner, the County and island municipalities (Towns of
Atlantic Beach, Pine Knoll Shores, Indian Beach, and Emerald Isle) are
proposing to combine their shore protection efforts under a more
efficient comprehensive 50-year beach and inlet management plan known
as the Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan (BBMBNP).
DATES: Written comments on the FEIS must be received at (see ADDRESSES)
no later than 5 p.m. on April 2, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Copies of comments and questions regarding the FEIS may be
addressed to: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District,
Regulatory Division, ATTN: File Number SAW-2009-00293, 69 Darlington
Avenue, Wilmington, NC 28403. Copies of the FEIS can be reviewed on the
Corps homepage at, https://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/MajorProjects.aspx, under Bogue Banks 50-Year
Project: Corps ID # SAW-2009-00293.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions about the proposed action
and FEIS and/or to request a CD or written copies of the FEIS can be
directed to Mr. Mickey Sugg, Wilmington Regulatory Field Office,
telephone: (910) 251-4811 or [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Project Purpose and Need. The proposed action is to establish
and implement a comprehensive, long-term, non-federal beach and inlet
management program that would preserve Bogue Banks' tax base, protect
its infrastructure, and maintain its tourism-based economy. The COE
Civil Work's investigation of a long-term federal Coastal Storm Damaged
Reduction (CSDR) project for Bogue Banks has been ongoing for nearly 30
years. As federal funding for shore protection projects has declined,
the future of a long-term federal CSDR project has grown increasingly
uncertain. The proposed action would address the ongoing trend of
declining federal shore protection funding by establishing a non-
federal management program under the autonomous control of the County
and the island municipalities. An island wide regional strategy was
developed to do the following: (1) Establish a regional approach by
consolidating local community resources, both financially and
logistically, to manage Bogue Inlet and the beaches on Bogue Banks in
an effective manner, (2) Provide long-term shoreline protection
stabilization and an equivalent level of protection along Bogue Banks'
25-mile oceanfront/inlet shorelines addressing long-term erosion, (3)
Provide long-term protection to Bogue Banks' tourism industry, (4)
Provide short and long-term protection to residential and commercial
structures and island infrastructure, (5) Provide long-term protection
to the local tax base by protection existing and future tax bases and
public access/use, (6) Maintain and improve natural resources along
Bogue Banks' oceanfront and inlet shoreline by using compatible beach
material in compliance with the North Carolina State Sediment Criteria
for shore protection, (7) Maintain and improve recreational uses of
Bogue Banks' oceanfront/inlet shorelines, (8) Maintain navigation
conditions within Bogue Inlet, and (9) Balance the needs of the human
environment with the protection of existing natural resources.
2. Proposed Action. Within the County's preferred alternative,
known as Alternative 4 (or the BBMBNP), the County would manage all of
the approximately 18 miles of beaches along Pine Knoll Shores, Indian
Beach/Salter Path, and Emerald Isle, along with the eastern shoreline
of Bogue Inlet. The oceanfront of Atlantic Beach is an on-going
recipient of regular USACE placements of navigation dredged material
and this is expected to be sufficient in for the needs of its
approximate 5.0-mile shoreline. However, the County's 50-year plan
would provide for interim maintenance nourishment should the USACE
placements cease or if storm-response nourishment for Atlantic Beach is
needed.
The 50-year management would employ a regular and recurring cycle
of nourishment events, in combination with periodic realignments of the
Bogue Inlet ebb tide channel, to continuously maintain beach profile
sand volumes at a 25-year Level of Protection (LOP). This LOP equates
to protection for upland structures against a 25-year storm event, and
nourishment events would be implemented according to 25-year LOP beach
profile volumetric triggers. Volumetric triggers were developed by
analyzing and adjusting design beach profiles in a series of iterative
SBEACH numerical modeling runs. The final modeling results indicated
appropriate volumetric triggers ranging from 211-266 cubic yards/foot
along Bogue Banks, averaging 238 cubic yards/foot. Based on variability
in the volumetric triggers, the project shoreline was divided into
management reaches ranging in length from 2.4 to 4.5 miles. Reaches
include Pine Knoll Shores, Indian Beach/Salter Path, Emerald Isle (EI)
East, EI Central, EI West, and Bogue Inlet. Based on the SBEACH
modeling results and observed background erosional loss rates, EI
Central, EI West, and Bogue Inlet management reaches are expected to
require recurring nourishment of approximately 0.06 to 0.23 million
cubic yards of material at intervals of six or nine years to offset
background erosion. For Pine Knoll Shores, Indian Beach/Salter Path,
and EI East, recurring maintenance events would place approximately 0.2
to 0.5 million cubic yards of material at intervals of three or six
years to offset background erosion. Actual maintenance nourishment
intervals would be expected to vary in response to background erosion
rate variability over the course of the 50-year project.
[[Page 9301]]
For Bogue Inlet management, the proposal has designated a ``safe
box'' within the inlet throat where the ebb channel would be allowed to
migrate freely so long as it remains within the boundaries of the safe
box. If the channel migrates beyond the eastern boundary of the safe
box (or toward Emerald Isle), this would trigger a preemptive event to
realign the ebb channel mid-center within the established boundary. The
limits of the safe box were developed and evaluated through empirical
analysis of historical inlet changes and supplemental numerical
modeling. Historical ebb channel alignments and corresponding inlet
shoreline positions were analyzed through GIS analysis of historical
aerial photography, National Ocean Service (NOS) T-sheet maps, and
LIDAR topographic maps. Past migration rates and corresponding
shoreline changes indicate that once eastward migration accelerates
toward Emerald Isle, the migrating channel has the potential to
threaten structures along the shoreline within two to three years.
Based on the historical patterns, a safe box was established with
boundaries corresponding to the location where acceleration of the ebb
channel towards the west end of Emerald Isle has occurred in the past.
The validity of the boundaries were then evaluated by modeling a series
of six idealized inlet configurations encompassing the range of most
relevant historical ebb channel alignments. Modeling results did not
show any additional geomorphological indicators of an impending shift
to accelerated migration that warranted modifications to the initial
safe box. Once the boundary threshold is triggered, the relocation
event would entail the construction of a channel approximately 6,000-
feet long with variable bottom widths ranging from 150 to 500 feet. The
dimensions of the channel would be similar to the footprint of the ebb
tide channel realignment construction completed in 2005. Maintenance
events of Bogue Inlet are expected approximately every ten to fifteen
years, with corresponding placement of dredged material on the beaches
of Emerald Isle.
Beach fill for all the proposed nourishment activities on Bogue
Banks would be acquired from a combination of sources including
offshore borrow sites, Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway disposal areas,
upland sand mines, and the management of the Bogue Inlet. The offshore
borrow sites consist of the Old Offshore Dredge Material Disposal Site
(ODMDS) and the current ODMDS, which are located approximately 3
nautical miles offshore from Beaufort Inlet, and Area Y, which is
located over 1.0 mile offshore from EI West reach. It is expected that
hopper dredge plants will be used to extract beach fill material from
the offshore borrow sites. Material would be transported from the
hopper dredges to offshore booster pumps and carried to the appropriate
nourishment reaches via pipeline. A hydraulic cutterhead dredge will
likely be used during the management of the inlet bar channel event,
which would transport the dredge material directly from the dredge
plant onto the beach via pipelines.
3. Alternatives. Several alternatives have been identified and
evaluated through the scoping process, and further detailed description
of all alternatives is disclosed in Section 3.0 of the FEIS.
4. Scoping Process. To date, a public scoping meeting was held on
September 30, 2010 in Morehead City; several Project Delivery Team
(PDT) meetings have been held, which were comprised of local, state,
and federal government officials, local residents and nonprofit
organizations; and the Draft EIS was released and published in the
Federal Register on April 14, 2017 (82 FR 17984).
The COE has coordinated closely with Bureau of Ocean Energy and
Management (BOEM), which is a cooperating agency, in the development of
the FEIS to ensure the process complies with the requirements of the
Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA) and with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Additionally, the COE has consulted
with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine
Fisheries Service Protected Resources Division under the Endangered
Species Act; with U.S. Fish and Wildlife and National Marine Fisheries
Service Habitat Conservation Division under the Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act; and with the National Marine Fisheries Service
Habitat Conservation Division under the Magnuson-Stevens Act. The FEIS
assesses the potential water quality impacts pursuant to Section 401 of
the Clean Water Act, and is coordinated with the North Carolina
Division of Coastal Management (DCM) to ensure consistency with the
Coastal Zone Management Act.
Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-04408 Filed 3-2-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720-58-P