Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest; Nevada; Humboldt-Toiyabe Integrated Invasive Plant Treatment Project, 8963-8965 [2018-04306]
Download as PDF
8963
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 83, No. 42
Friday, March 2, 2018
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
National Agricultural Statistics Service
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
February 27, 2018
The Department of Agriculture will
submit the following information
collection requirement(s) to OMB for
review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13 on or after the date
of publication of this notice. Comments
are requested regarding: (1) Whether the
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (2) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of burden including
the validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (4)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology
should be addressed to: Desk Officer for
Agriculture, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), New
Executive Office Building, Washington,
DC; New Executive Office Building,
725—17th Street NW, Washington, DC
20503. Commenters are encouraged to
submit their comments to OMB via
email to: OIRA_Submission@
omb.eop.gov or fax (202) 395–5806 and
to Departmental Clearance Office,
USDA, OCIO, Mail Stop 7602,
Washington, DC 20250–7602.
Comments regarding these
information collections are best assured
of having their full effect if received by
April 2, 2018. Copies of the
submission(s) may be obtained by
calling (202) 720–8681.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:10 Mar 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor a collection of information
unless the collection of information
displays a currently valid OMB control
number and the agency informs
potential persons who are to respond to
the collection of information that such
persons are not required to respond to
the collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Title: Field Crops Objective Yield.
OMB Control Number: 0535–0088.
Summary of Collection: The primary
function of the National Agricultural
Statistics Service (NASS) is to prepare
and issue current official State and
national estimates of crop and livestock
production. General authority for these
data collection activities is granted
under U.S. Code Title 7, Section 2204.
This statute specifies the ‘‘The Secretary
of Agriculture shall procure and
preserve all information concerning
agriculture which he can obtain . . . by
the collection of statistics . . . and shall
distribute them among agriculturists’’.
Data collected provides yield estimates
for corn, cotton, potatoes, soybeans and
winter wheat. In addition NASS has
been contacted by several state
cooperators to conduct projected yield
studies for citrus, almonds, hazelnuts
and walnuts. These fruit and nut
surveys will be conducted through
cooperative agreements with the states
and will be totally funded by the
individual states. The yield estimates
for all of these crops are extremely
important because they are used in
conjunction with price data to estimate
production and in making policy
decisions in agricultural sectors.
Need and Use of the Information:
NASS will collect information on
sample fields of, corn, cotton, potatoes,
soybeans, and winter wheat. The
information will be used by USDA to
anticipate loan receipts and pricing of
loan stocks for grains. Farmers and
businesses use the production estimates
in marketing decisions to evaluate
expected prices and to determine when
to sell. The fruit and nut data will be
used by the State Departments of
Agriculture and commodity marketing
boards to make informed decisions
concerning the stocks and marketing of
these commodities.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Description of Respondents: Farms
and businesses or other for-profit
operations.
Number of Respondents: 15,850.
Frequency of Responses: Reporting:
Monthly during growing season or
annually.
Total Burden Hours: 5,456.
Ruth Brown,
Departmental Information Collection
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018–04292 Filed 3–1–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–20–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest;
Nevada; Humboldt-Toiyabe Integrated
Invasive Plant Treatment Project
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Humboldt-Toiyabe
National Forest is preparing an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
to evaluate the effects of controlling and
eradicating non-native invasive plants
and restoring native vegetation on
national forest lands in Nevada. The EIS
will analyze actions to be implemented
on known infested areas, as well as on
infested areas that may be discovered
over the next 15 years using a variety of
tools, methods, and products.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be received in
writing by April 16, 2018. The Draft
Environmental Impact Statement is
expected in September 2018, and the
Final Environmental Impact Statement
is expected in May 2019.
ADDRESSES: Electronic comments are
encouraged. Electronic comments
should be submitted through the
comment section at https://
www.fs.usda.gov/project/
?project=53031. Mail comments to
Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest:
Attn: Integrated Invasive Plant
Treatment EIS, 1200 Franklin Way,
Sparks, Nevada 89431.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information concerning this
project, please contact James Winfrey,
Interdisciplinary Team Leader, at 775–
355–5308 or ht_invasive_plant_
treatment@fs.fed.us. Information about
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM
02MRN1
8964
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 42 / Friday, March 2, 2018 / Notices
this EIS will be posted on the internet
at: https://www.fs.usda.gov/project/
?project=53031. This website will be
used to post all public documents
during the environmental review
process and announce opportunities for
public participation and comment.
Invasive
plants have been identified as a major
threat to the biological diversity and
ecological integrity in and near the
Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest
(HTNF). Invasive plants displace native
plants; reduce habitat and forage for
wildlife and livestock; diminish
populations of threatened, endangered,
and sensitive species; alter soil
properties and productivity; change the
intensity and frequency of wildfires;
and impact recreation opportunities.
The HTNF encompasses
approximately 5.6 million acres across
the state of Nevada, with land in Carson,
Clark, Douglas, Elko, Eureka, Humboldt,
Lander, Lincoln, Lyon, Mineral, Nye,
Washoe, and White Pine counties. There
are approximately 28,500 acres
identified as being infested with
invasive, non-native, and/or State-listed
noxious weeds. These invasive plant
infestations have a high potential to
expand on lands within and adjacent to
the HTNF, degrading desired plant
communities and the values provided
by those communities.
Forestlands are also threatened by
‘‘potential invaders,’’ invasive plants
that have not been found on the HTNF
but are known to occur in adjacent
lands, counties, or states. Infestations
can be controlled and eradicated, and
native vegetation can be restored,
through the use of specific management
practices. A clear and comprehensive
integrated invasive plan management
strategy would allow for the
implementation of timely and effective
invasive plant management and
prevention for projects and programs on
the HTNF. In the absence of an
aggressive invasive plant management
program, the number, density, and
distribution of invasive plants on the
forest will continue to increase.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose of this analysis is to
update current management to provide
for integrated and timely management of
invasive species, now and in the future,
with the goal of promoting healthy and
thriving native plant communities
across the HTNF. The proposal is in
response to an underlying need to
implement management direction as
described in the Regulatory Framework
section below.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:10 Mar 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
The need for comprehensive and
aggressive management of invasive
plant species is multifaceted:
Invasive plants are diminishing the
natural resource values of the forest:
Forest resources are negatively impacted
by existing and expanding invasive
plant infestations. Invasive species are
known to out-compete native plants,
which can reduce productivity and
biodiversity, cause habitat loss, and
have economic impacts.
There must be a timely response to
new infestations, new invasive plant
species, and landscape-scale
disturbances: On the HTNF, invasive
plants are spread by use of
transportation systems, livestock
grazing, and off-road fire suppression
activities. They are also spread by wild
animals, wind, and water. Wildland
fires are frequent on HTNF lands, and
afterwards the burned areas typically
become more densely infested with
invasive plants such as cheatgrass and
non-native thistles. The forest needs the
flexibility to treat expanded and/or
newly identified infestations in a timely
manner, based on local site conditions
and identified Forest priorities.
Existing and future invasive plant
populations in the HTNF require active
and adaptive management: Invasive
plant infestations already exist
throughout the HTNF, and without
management they will increase in
density and distribution. Active and
adaptive integrated pest management is
necessary to contain invasive plants
within existing boundaries, reduce
infestation densities, and retard the
establishment of new infestations.
Control efforts should be focused on
infestations that can realize the greatest
resource benefits: those with the highest
risk of spread, those that have not
become established, and those with the
best likelihood of control success.
Rehabilitation and restoration of
infested areas can inhibit the spread
and establishment of invasive plants:
Appropriate rehabilitation efforts are a
critical component of a fully functional
invasive plant management program.
The goals of rehabilitating degraded
areas may include preventing new
infestations, preventing the
reoccurrence of eradicated infestations,
and/or reducing the density and spread
of existing infestations. Post-fire
rehabilitation efforts may incorporate
one or more of the established control
techniques outlined in the proposed
action.
Federal, State, and Forest Service
laws, regulation, policy and direction
relating to invasive plant management
must be implemented and followed:
Implementing invasive species laws and
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
policies requires aggressive invasive
plant management. This analysis would
identify the strategies that the HTNF
would use to comply with laws and
policies pertaining to invasive plant
management.
Proposed Action
The HTNF proposes to implement
adaptive and integrated invasive plant
treatments on current and future
infested areas using tools and products
currently available, and those that may
become available in the next 15 years.
Activities would be implemented with
partners at the federal, state, and local
level where opportunities exist. To
provide for ‘‘Early Detection Rapid
Response’’ (EDRR), the Forest would
design a plan that allows treatment of
invasive plant infestations located
outside of currently identified infested
areas. Infestations outside of currently
identified areas may include new sites
that arise in the future, or sites that
currently exist, but have not been
identified in Forest inventories to date.
The intent of EDRR is to allow timely
control, so that new infestations can be
treated when they are small, preventing
establishment and spread, while
reducing the costs and potential side
effects of treatment.
Proposed control methods would be
based on integrated pest management
principles and methods known to be
effective for each target species. They
include, but are not limited to, manual
mechanical techniques, such as mowing
and pulling; biological control agents,
such as pathogens, insects, and
controlled grazing; prescribed fire; and
herbicides (including aerial and groundbased application methods) that target
specific invasive plant species.
Restoration actions include planting,
seeding, and fertilizing using a variety
of equipment and methods. Control,
eradication, and restoration methods
could be employed alone or in
combination to achieve the most
effective results. Treatments over a
number of years may be necessary to
achieve control, eradication, and
restoration goals.
Treatment methods would be based
on the extent, location, type, and
character of an infestation and would be
implemented using project design
features developed to reduce or
eliminate potential adverse effects.
Restoration activities would be
designed and implemented based on the
conditions found in and around infested
areas. Both active and passive (allowing
plants on site to fill in a treated area)
revegetation would be considered.
Restoration techniques would be
assessed and implemented in order to
E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM
02MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 42 / Friday, March 2, 2018 / Notices
promote native plant communities that
are resistant to infestation by invasive
plants.
Lead and Cooperating Agencies
The Forest Service will be the lead
federal agency in accordance with 40
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
1501.5(b) and is responsible for the
preparation of the EIS. The Forest
Service is in the process of inviting
other federal, state, and local agencies to
participate as cooperating agencies. At
this time, these include the Bureau of
Land Management, Natural Resource
Conservation Service, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Nevada Departments
of Wildlife, Nevada Department of
Agriculture and local Conservation
Districts. Scoping will determine if any
other cooperating agencies are needed.
Responsible Official
The responsible official for this EIS is
William A. Dunkelberger, Forest
Supervisor, Humboldt-Toiyabe National
Forest Supervisor’s Office, 1200
Franklin Way, Sparks, Nevada 89431.
Decision To Be Made
The Forest Supervisor will decide
whether to treat invasive plants and
conduct restoration activities on the
Nevada portion of the HTNF, and if so,
what methods and strategies (including
adaptive management and EDRR) will
be used to contain, control, or eradicate
invasive plants.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Permits or Licenses Required
A permit from the State of Nevada
would be required prior to use of
prescribed fire. Pesticide applicators
would be certified as required by the
Nevada Department of Agriculture, and
all other permits required by regulatory
agencies would be obtained prior to
implementation.
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping process, which guides the
development of the EIS. The Forest
Service will be seeking information,
comments, and assistance from federal,
state, and local agencies, American
Indian Tribes, as well as other
individuals and organizations that may
be interested in, or affected by, the
proposed project. Comments on the
proposed project should be in writing
and should be specific to the proposed
action, describing as clearly and
completely as possible any issues or
concerns the commenter has with the
proposal. Comments received, including
the names and addresses of those who
comment, will become part of the public
record for this EIS, and will be available
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:10 Mar 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
on request for public inspection (see 40
CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service
Handbook 1909.15, Section 21). For full
consideration, scientific articles or other
items cited in support of comments
should be submitted in their entirety by
the commenter. Comments submitted
anonymously will be accepted and
considered; however, anonymous
comments will not provide the Agency
with the ability to provide the
respondent with subsequent
environmental documents.
Comments that would be most useful
are those concerning developing or
refining the proposed action, site
specific concerns, and those concerns
that can help us develop treatments that
would be responsive to our goal to
control, contain, or eradicate invasive
plants.
It is important that reviewers provide
their comments at such times and in
such manner that they are useful to the
agency’s preparation of the EIS.
Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the
comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer’s concerns and
contentions. Public meetings are
anticipated to be held following
publication of the Draft Environmental
Impact Statement.
Dated: January 9, 2018.
Chris French,
Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest
System.
[FR Doc. 2018–04306 Filed 3–1–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[B–14–2018]
Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 158—
Vicksburg/Jackson, Mississippi,
Notification of Proposed Production
Activity, International Converter,
(Insulation Facer), Iuka, Mississippi
International Converter (IC) submitted
a notification of proposed production
activity to the FTZ Board for its facility
in Iuka, Mississippi. The notification
conforming to the requirements of the
regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR
400.22) was received on February 23,
2018.
The applicant indicates that it will be
submitting a separate application for
FTZ designation at the IC facility under
FTZ 158. The facility is used for the
production of insulation facer using a
wet-bond or dry-bond lamination
process. Pursuant to 15 CFR 400.14(b),
FTZ activity would be limited to the
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8965
specific foreign-status materials/
components and specific finished
products described in the submitted
notification (as described below) and
subsequently authorized by the FTZ
Board.
Production under FTZ procedures
could exempt IC from customs duty
payments on the foreign-status
materials/components used in export
production. For foreign-status
components subject to antidumping/
countervailing duty (AD/CVD)
investigations/orders, the applicant only
requests authority to use such
components in the company’s export
production. On its domestic sales, for
the foreign-status materials/components
noted below not subject to AD/CVD
orders/investigations, IC would be able
to choose the duty rates during customs
entry procedures that apply to: Printed
duplex insulation facer consisting of
paper backed with aluminum foil; not
printed duplex insulation facer
consisting of paper backed with
aluminum foil; printed triplex
insulation facer, consisting of paper
with aluminum foil on either side; not
printed triplex insulation facer,
consisting of paper with aluminum foil
on either side; printed quadlaminate
insulation facer, consisting of paper
with aluminum foil on either side, and
fabric scrim on one outer layer; and, not
printed quadlaminate insulation facer,
consisting of paper with aluminum foil
on either side, and fabric scrim on one
outer layer (duty rate ranges from dutyfree to 3.7%). IC has indicated that all
scrap/waste from the lamination process
would be exported. Customs duties also
could possibly be deferred or reduced
on foreign-status production equipment.
The materials/components sourced
from abroad include: Aluminum foil in
rolls, 0.00025 inches thick; aluminum
foil in rolls, 0.00027 inches thick;
aluminum foil in rolls, 0.000285 inches
thick; and, nonwoven polyethylene
terephthalate scrim fabric, in rolls, 33.84
grams per square meter (duty rate ranges
from duty-free to 5.8%). The request
indicates that the aluminum foil is
subject to AD and CVD investigations if
imported from a certain country. The
FTZ Board’s regulations (15 CFR
400.14(e)) require that merchandise
subject to AD/CVD orders, or items
which would be otherwise subject to
suspension of liquidation under AD/
CVD procedures if they entered U.S.
customs territory, be admitted to the
zone in privileged foreign status (19
CFR 146.41). As noted above, the
request indicates that any aluminum foil
subject to an AD/CVD investigation/
order would be used only in production
for export.
E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM
02MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8963-8965]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-04306]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest; Nevada; Humboldt-Toiyabe
Integrated Invasive Plant Treatment Project
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest is preparing an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to evaluate the effects of
controlling and eradicating non-native invasive plants and restoring
native vegetation on national forest lands in Nevada. The EIS will
analyze actions to be implemented on known infested areas, as well as
on infested areas that may be discovered over the next 15 years using a
variety of tools, methods, and products.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received
in writing by April 16, 2018. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement
is expected in September 2018, and the Final Environmental Impact
Statement is expected in May 2019.
ADDRESSES: Electronic comments are encouraged. Electronic comments
should be submitted through the comment section at https://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=53031. Mail comments to Humboldt-
Toiyabe National Forest: Attn: Integrated Invasive Plant Treatment EIS,
1200 Franklin Way, Sparks, Nevada 89431.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information concerning
this project, please contact James Winfrey, Interdisciplinary Team
Leader, at 775-355-5308 or [email protected].
Information about
[[Page 8964]]
this EIS will be posted on the internet at: https://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=53031. This website will be used to post all public
documents during the environmental review process and announce
opportunities for public participation and comment.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Invasive plants have been identified as a
major threat to the biological diversity and ecological integrity in
and near the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest (HTNF). Invasive plants
displace native plants; reduce habitat and forage for wildlife and
livestock; diminish populations of threatened, endangered, and
sensitive species; alter soil properties and productivity; change the
intensity and frequency of wildfires; and impact recreation
opportunities.
The HTNF encompasses approximately 5.6 million acres across the
state of Nevada, with land in Carson, Clark, Douglas, Elko, Eureka,
Humboldt, Lander, Lincoln, Lyon, Mineral, Nye, Washoe, and White Pine
counties. There are approximately 28,500 acres identified as being
infested with invasive, non-native, and/or State-listed noxious weeds.
These invasive plant infestations have a high potential to expand on
lands within and adjacent to the HTNF, degrading desired plant
communities and the values provided by those communities.
Forestlands are also threatened by ``potential invaders,'' invasive
plants that have not been found on the HTNF but are known to occur in
adjacent lands, counties, or states. Infestations can be controlled and
eradicated, and native vegetation can be restored, through the use of
specific management practices. A clear and comprehensive integrated
invasive plan management strategy would allow for the implementation of
timely and effective invasive plant management and prevention for
projects and programs on the HTNF. In the absence of an aggressive
invasive plant management program, the number, density, and
distribution of invasive plants on the forest will continue to
increase.
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose of this analysis is to update current management to
provide for integrated and timely management of invasive species, now
and in the future, with the goal of promoting healthy and thriving
native plant communities across the HTNF. The proposal is in response
to an underlying need to implement management direction as described in
the Regulatory Framework section below.
The need for comprehensive and aggressive management of invasive
plant species is multifaceted:
Invasive plants are diminishing the natural resource values of the
forest: Forest resources are negatively impacted by existing and
expanding invasive plant infestations. Invasive species are known to
out-compete native plants, which can reduce productivity and
biodiversity, cause habitat loss, and have economic impacts.
There must be a timely response to new infestations, new invasive
plant species, and landscape-scale disturbances: On the HTNF, invasive
plants are spread by use of transportation systems, livestock grazing,
and off-road fire suppression activities. They are also spread by wild
animals, wind, and water. Wildland fires are frequent on HTNF lands,
and afterwards the burned areas typically become more densely infested
with invasive plants such as cheatgrass and non-native thistles. The
forest needs the flexibility to treat expanded and/or newly identified
infestations in a timely manner, based on local site conditions and
identified Forest priorities.
Existing and future invasive plant populations in the HTNF require
active and adaptive management: Invasive plant infestations already
exist throughout the HTNF, and without management they will increase in
density and distribution. Active and adaptive integrated pest
management is necessary to contain invasive plants within existing
boundaries, reduce infestation densities, and retard the establishment
of new infestations. Control efforts should be focused on infestations
that can realize the greatest resource benefits: those with the highest
risk of spread, those that have not become established, and those with
the best likelihood of control success.
Rehabilitation and restoration of infested areas can inhibit the
spread and establishment of invasive plants: Appropriate rehabilitation
efforts are a critical component of a fully functional invasive plant
management program. The goals of rehabilitating degraded areas may
include preventing new infestations, preventing the reoccurrence of
eradicated infestations, and/or reducing the density and spread of
existing infestations. Post-fire rehabilitation efforts may incorporate
one or more of the established control techniques outlined in the
proposed action.
Federal, State, and Forest Service laws, regulation, policy and
direction relating to invasive plant management must be implemented and
followed: Implementing invasive species laws and policies requires
aggressive invasive plant management. This analysis would identify the
strategies that the HTNF would use to comply with laws and policies
pertaining to invasive plant management.
Proposed Action
The HTNF proposes to implement adaptive and integrated invasive
plant treatments on current and future infested areas using tools and
products currently available, and those that may become available in
the next 15 years. Activities would be implemented with partners at the
federal, state, and local level where opportunities exist. To provide
for ``Early Detection Rapid Response'' (EDRR), the Forest would design
a plan that allows treatment of invasive plant infestations located
outside of currently identified infested areas. Infestations outside of
currently identified areas may include new sites that arise in the
future, or sites that currently exist, but have not been identified in
Forest inventories to date. The intent of EDRR is to allow timely
control, so that new infestations can be treated when they are small,
preventing establishment and spread, while reducing the costs and
potential side effects of treatment.
Proposed control methods would be based on integrated pest
management principles and methods known to be effective for each target
species. They include, but are not limited to, manual mechanical
techniques, such as mowing and pulling; biological control agents, such
as pathogens, insects, and controlled grazing; prescribed fire; and
herbicides (including aerial and ground-based application methods) that
target specific invasive plant species. Restoration actions include
planting, seeding, and fertilizing using a variety of equipment and
methods. Control, eradication, and restoration methods could be
employed alone or in combination to achieve the most effective results.
Treatments over a number of years may be necessary to achieve control,
eradication, and restoration goals.
Treatment methods would be based on the extent, location, type, and
character of an infestation and would be implemented using project
design features developed to reduce or eliminate potential adverse
effects.
Restoration activities would be designed and implemented based on
the conditions found in and around infested areas. Both active and
passive (allowing plants on site to fill in a treated area)
revegetation would be considered. Restoration techniques would be
assessed and implemented in order to
[[Page 8965]]
promote native plant communities that are resistant to infestation by
invasive plants.
Lead and Cooperating Agencies
The Forest Service will be the lead federal agency in accordance
with 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 1501.5(b) and is responsible
for the preparation of the EIS. The Forest Service is in the process of
inviting other federal, state, and local agencies to participate as
cooperating agencies. At this time, these include the Bureau of Land
Management, Natural Resource Conservation Service, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Nevada Departments of Wildlife, Nevada Department of
Agriculture and local Conservation Districts. Scoping will determine if
any other cooperating agencies are needed.
Responsible Official
The responsible official for this EIS is William A. Dunkelberger,
Forest Supervisor, Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest Supervisor's
Office, 1200 Franklin Way, Sparks, Nevada 89431.
Decision To Be Made
The Forest Supervisor will decide whether to treat invasive plants
and conduct restoration activities on the Nevada portion of the HTNF,
and if so, what methods and strategies (including adaptive management
and EDRR) will be used to contain, control, or eradicate invasive
plants.
Permits or Licenses Required
A permit from the State of Nevada would be required prior to use of
prescribed fire. Pesticide applicators would be certified as required
by the Nevada Department of Agriculture, and all other permits required
by regulatory agencies would be obtained prior to implementation.
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the scoping process, which guides
the development of the EIS. The Forest Service will be seeking
information, comments, and assistance from federal, state, and local
agencies, American Indian Tribes, as well as other individuals and
organizations that may be interested in, or affected by, the proposed
project. Comments on the proposed project should be in writing and
should be specific to the proposed action, describing as clearly and
completely as possible any issues or concerns the commenter has with
the proposal. Comments received, including the names and addresses of
those who comment, will become part of the public record for this EIS,
and will be available on request for public inspection (see 40 CFR
1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section 21). For
full consideration, scientific articles or other items cited in support
of comments should be submitted in their entirety by the commenter.
Comments submitted anonymously will be accepted and considered;
however, anonymous comments will not provide the Agency with the
ability to provide the respondent with subsequent environmental
documents.
Comments that would be most useful are those concerning developing
or refining the proposed action, site specific concerns, and those
concerns that can help us develop treatments that would be responsive
to our goal to control, contain, or eradicate invasive plants.
It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times
and in such manner that they are useful to the agency's preparation of
the EIS. Therefore, comments should be provided prior to the close of
the comment period and should clearly articulate the reviewer's
concerns and contentions. Public meetings are anticipated to be held
following publication of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement.
Dated: January 9, 2018.
Chris French,
Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest System.
[FR Doc. 2018-04306 Filed 3-1-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411-15-P