Plan for Periodic Review of Regulations, 8812-8814 [2018-04178]
Download as PDF
8812
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 41 / Thursday, March 1, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA–2018–
0118; Product Identifier 2017–NM–083–
AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by April 16,
2018.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc.,
Model DHC–8–400, –401, and –402
airplanes, certificated in any category, serial
numbers 4001 through 4524 inclusive.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 30, Ice and Rain Protection.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports of arcing
and smoke emanating from the windshields.
We are issuing this AD to detect and correct
loose windshield heater terminal lugs. Loose
terminal lugs could create sparks that lead to
burning of the lugs and, due to the excessive
heat, cracking of the windshields. If not
corrected, such a condition could cause a
loss of cabin pressure resulting in an
emergency descent.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Revision to Inspection or Maintenance
Program
Within 30 days after the effective date of
this AD: Revise the maintenance or
inspection program, as applicable, to
incorporate the task specified in Q400 Dash
8 (Bombardier) Temporary Revision (TR)
MRB–0099, dated December 9, 2016, into
Part 1 of Bombardier, Inc., Q400 Dash 8
Maintenance Requirements Manual (MRM),
PSM 1–84–7.
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS
(h) No Alternative Actions and Intervals
After the maintenance or inspection
program has been revised as required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, no alternative
actions (e.g., inspections), intervals, may be
used unless the actions and intervals are
approved as an alternative method of
compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (k)(1) of
this AD.
(i) Inspection and Corrective Action
Within 1,600 flight hours or 12 months
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs first, do a general visual inspection of
the moisture seal on the left and right
windshields for signs of cracks, erosion,
wear, and other deterioration (including
discoloration, warping, or missing material).
If any crack, erosion, wear, or other
deterioration is found, before further flight,
repair the moisture seal in accordance with
a method approved by the Manager, New
York ACO Branch, FAA; or Transport Canada
Civil Aviation (TCCA); or Bombardier, Inc.’s
TCCA Design Approval Organization (DAO).
If approved by the DAO, the approval must
include the DAO-authorized signature.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:26 Feb 28, 2018
Jkt 244001
Note 1 to paragraph (i) of this AD:
Additional guidance for repair of the
moisture seal can be found in PPG Aerospace
Transparencies Abbreviated Component
Maintenance Manual, Part Number NP–
157901, dated June 16, 2015.
(j) Re-Torqueing and Sealing Screws
Within 8,000 flight hours or 60 months
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs first: Re-torque the windshield heater
terminal lug screws for the left and right
windshields and apply Humiseal to the
screw heads of the windshield heaters, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin
84–30–16, Revision A, dated September 27,
2017.
(k) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, New York ACO
Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the certification office,
send it to ATTN: Program Manager,
Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New
York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue,
Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone:
516–228–7300; fax: 516–794–5531. Before
using any approved AMOC, notify your
appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a
principal inspector, the manager of the local
flight standards district office/certificate
holding district office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer, the action must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, New York ACO Branch,
FAA; or TCCA; or Bombardier, Inc.’s TCCA
DAO. If approved by the DAO, the approval
must include the DAO-authorized signature.
(l) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) Canadian
AD CF–2017–18, dated May 26, 2017, for
related information. This MCAI may be
found in the AD docket on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–0118.
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact Assata Dessaline, Aerospace
Engineer, Avionics and Administrative
Services Section, FAA, New York ACO
Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone: 516–228–
7301; fax: 516–794–5531.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., Q-Series
Technical Help Desk, 123 Garratt Boulevard,
Toronto, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada;
telephone: 416–375–4000; fax: 416–375–
4539; email: thd.qseries@
aero.bombardier.com; internet: https://
www.bombardier.com. You may view this
service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
206–231–3195.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February
21, 2018.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–04149 Filed 2–28–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
15 CFR Part 922
RIN 0648–XF789
Plan for Periodic Review of
Regulations
Office of National Marine
Sanctuaries (ONMS), National Ocean
Service (NOS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Department of Commerce (DOC).
ACTION: Notification of plan for periodic
review of regulations; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA) section 610 requires that NOAA
Office of National Marine Sanctuaries
(ONMS) periodically review existing
regulations that have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities, such as small
businesses, small organizations, and
small governmental jurisdictions. This
plan describes how ONMS will perform
this review and describes the
regulations proposed for review in 2018.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before April 2, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted by:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/#!docket
Detail;D=NOAA-NOS-2017-0133, click
the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon, complete
the required fields, and enter or attach
your comments.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NOAA. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personally
identifiable information (for example,
name, address, etc.), confidential
business information, or otherwise
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\01MRP1.SGM
01MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 41 / Thursday, March 1, 2018 / Proposed Rules
sensitive information submitted
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
will be publicly accessible. NOAA will
accept anonymous comments (enter
‘‘N/A’’ in the required fields if you wish
to remain anonymous).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Meredith Walz, NOAA Office of
National Marine Sanctuaries, 1305 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910, Meredith.Walz@noaa.gov, or
240–355–0686.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS
Background
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., requires that federal
agencies take into account how their
regulations affect ‘‘small entities,’’
including small businesses, small
governmental jurisdictions and small
organizations. For regulations proposed
after January 1, 1981, the agency must
either prepare a Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis or certify the regulation, if
promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Section 610 of the RFA, 5 U.S.C. 610,
requires federal agencies to review
existing regulations. It requires that
ONMS publish a plan in the Federal
Register explaining how it will review
existing regulations that may have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Regulations that become effective after
January 1, 1981 must be reviewed
within 10 years of the publication date
of the final rule. Section 610(c) requires
that ONMS publish in the Federal
Register a list of rules it will review
during the succeeding 12 months. The
list must describe, explain the need for,
and provide the legal basis for the rules,
as well as invite public comment on the
rules.
In addition, section 605 of the RFA
provides that, when a rule is
promulgated, the head of an agency may
certify to the Small Business
Administration’s Chief Counsel for
Advocacy that a rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Guidance on implementing the
requirements of RFA section 610
indicates that agencies should also
determine if previously changed
conditions may mean that a certified
rule now does have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Criteria for Review of Existing
Regulations
The purpose of the review is to
determine whether existing rules should
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:26 Feb 28, 2018
Jkt 244001
be left unchanged, or whether they
should be revised or rescinded in order
to minimize significant economic
impacts on a substantial number of
small entities, consistent with the
objectives of other applicable statutes.
In deciding whether change is
necessary, RFA section 610(b)
establishes five factors that agencies will
consider in reviewing existing
regulations:
(1) Whether the rule is still needed;
(2) What type of public complaints or
comments were received concerning the
rule;
(3) How complex is the rule;
(4) How much the rule overlaps,
duplicates or conflicts with other
federal rules, and, to the extent feasible,
with state and local governmental rules;
and
(5) How long it has been since the rule
has been evaluated or how much the
technology, economic conditions, or
other factors have changed in the area
affected by the rule.
Plan for Periodic Review of Rules
ONMS will conduct reviews in such
a way as to ensure that all rules for
which a Final Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis was prepared are reviewed
within 10 years of the year in which
they were originally issued. During this
same period, ONMS will also review
other rules certified under RFA section
605 as not having significant impacts.
ONMS will evaluate whether those rules
now have a significant impact and
therefore should be reviewed under
RFA section 610. ONMS intends that it
will conduct section 610 reviews on
applicable regulations on an annual
basis. ONMS will make RFA Section
610 review reports available at the
following website: https://
sanctuaries.noaa.gov/library/
alldocs.html.
ONMS Regulation Requiring Review for
2018
One rulemaking finalized in 2008,
and one rulemaking finalized in January
2009, are being reviewed under RFA
section 610. The Chief Counsel for
Regulation of the Department of
Commerce certified to the Chief Counsel
for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration (SBA) that these rules
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. As a result, a regulatory
flexibility analysis was not required,
and none were prepared for the
following actions:
1. ‘‘Gulf of the Farallones National
Marine Sanctuary Regulations;
Monterey Bay National Marine
Sanctuary Regulations; and Cordell
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8813
Bank National Marine Sanctuary
Regulations’’. RINs 0648–AT14, 0648–
AT15, 0648–AT16 (73 FR 70488;
November 20, 2008). ONMS issued this
rule, along with final revised
management plans, for the Gulf of the
Farallones (now renamed Greater
Farallones), Cordell Bank, and Monterey
Bay national marine sanctuaries
(GFNMS, CBNMS, and MBNMS
respectively). This final rule updated
the regulations for the three sanctuaries,
and established new regulatory
prohibitions for them. New prohibitions
contained in the regulations included
restrictions on: The introduction of
introduced species; discharges from
cruise ships and other vessels; attracting
or approaching white sharks in GFNMS;
anchoring vessels in seagrass in
Tomales Bay; deserting vessels;
motorized personal watercraft use in the
MBNMS (definition revision); and,
possessing, moving, or injuring historic
resources. This final rule also codified
three dredge disposal sites in the
MBNMS that existed prior to the
MBNMS designation in 1992, and
expanded the boundaries of the
MBNMS to include the Davidson
Seamount and surrounding area.
2. ‘‘Channel Islands National Marine
Sanctuary Regulations’’. RIN 0648–
AT17 (74 FR 3216; January 16, 2009).
ONMS published this rule, along with
final revised management plans, to
finalize the regulations for the Channel
Islands National Marine Sanctuary
(CINMS or Sanctuary). The rule revised
the regulations to implement
prohibitions on: Exploring for,
developing, or producing minerals
within the sanctuary; abandoning matter
on or in sanctuary submerged lands;
taking marine mammals, sea turtles, or
seabirds within or above the sanctuary;
possessing within the sanctuary any
marine mammal, sea turtle, or seabird;
marking, defacing, damaging, moving,
removing, or tampering with sanctuary
signs, monuments, boundary markers,
or similar items; introducing or
otherwise releasing from within or into
the sanctuary an introduced species;
and operating motorized personal
watercraft within waters of the
sanctuary that are coextensive with the
Channel Islands National Park. NOAA
also made additional changes to the
grammar and wording of several
sections of the regulations to ensure
clarity.
ONMS invites comments on these
rules. ONMS plans to complete the RFA
section 610 review of the regulations by
November 1, 2018. Unless we publish a
notification stating otherwise, ONMS
will make the final report available at
E:\FR\FM\01MRP1.SGM
01MRP1
8814
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 41 / Thursday, March 1, 2018 / Proposed Rules
https://sanctuaries.noaa.gov/library/
alldocs.html.
Dated: December 27, 2017.
John Armor,
Director, Office of National Marine
Sanctuaries.
[FR Doc. 2018–04178 Filed 2–28–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–NK–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2017–0601; FRL–9974–
99—Region 3]
Air Plan Approval; Virginia; Regional
Haze Plan and Visibility for the 2010
SO2 and 2012 PM2.5 Standards
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
state implementation plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the Commonwealth of
Virginia (the Commonwealth or
Virginia) that changes reliance on the
Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) to
reliance on the Cross-State Air Pollution
Rule (CSAPR) to address certain
regional haze requirements. EPA’s
approval of this SIP revision would
convert the Agency’s limited approval/
limited disapproval of Virginia’s
regional haze SIP to a full approval. EPA
is also proposing to approve the
visibility element of Virginia’s
infrastructure SIP submittals for the
2010 sulfur dioxide (SO2) and 2012 fine
particulate matter (PM2.5) national
ambient air quality standards (NAAQS).
These proposed actions are supported
by EPA’s recent final determination that
a state’s participation in CSAPR
continues to meet the Regional Haze
Rule’s (RHR) criteria to qualify as an
alternative to the application of best
available retrofit technology (BART).
This action is being taken under the
Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before April 2, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R03–
OAR–2017–0601 at https://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
spielberger.susan@epa.gov. For
comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for
submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed
from Regulations.gov. For either manner
of submission, EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:26 Feb 28, 2018
Jkt 244001
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
confidential business information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. EPA will generally not consider
comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e.,
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission
methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the
full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ellen Schmitt, (215) 814–5787 or at
schmitt.ellen@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July
16, 2015, the Virginia Department of
Environmental Quality (VA DEQ)
submitted a revision to its SIP to update
its regional haze plan and to meet
visibility requirements in section
110(a)(2)(D) of the CAA.
I. Background
A. Regional Haze and the Relationship
With CAIR and CSAPR
In section 169A of the 1977
Amendments to the CAA, Congress
created a program for protecting
visibility in the nation’s national parks
and wilderness areas. This section of the
CAA establishes ‘‘as a national goal the
prevention of any future, and the
remedying of any existing, impairment
of visibility in mandatory Class I federal
areas which impairment results from
manmade air pollution.’’ 1 On December
2, 1980, EPA promulgated regulations to
address visibility impairment in Class I
areas that are reasonably attributable to
a single source or small group of
sources.2 Then, in 1990 Congress added
section 169B to the CAA to address
1 42 U.S.C. 7491(a). Mandatory Class I federal
areas are defined as national parks exceeding 6,000
acres, wilderness areas and national memorial parks
exceeding 5,000 acres, and all international parks
that were in existence on August 7, 1977. 42 U.S.C.
7472(a). In accordance with section 169A of the
CAA, EPA, in consultation with the Department of
Interior, promulgated a list of 156 mandatory Class
I federal areas where visibility is identified as an
important value. 44 FR 69122 (November 30, 1979).
When we use the term Class I area in this action,
we mean a mandatory Class I federal area.
2 These regulations are the reasonably attributable
visibility impairment (RAVI) provisions. 45 FR
80084 (December 2, 1980).
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
regional haze issues. EPA subsequently
promulgated regulations pursuant to
section 169B to address regional haze.3
The RHR focuses on visibility
impairment that is caused by the
emission of air pollutants from
numerous sources located over a wide
geographic area, requiring states to
establish goals and emission reduction
strategies for improving visibility in
Class I areas.
The CAA requires each state to
develop, and submit for approval by
EPA, a SIP to meet various air quality
requirements, including the protection
of visibility in Class I areas.4 Section
169A(b)(2) of the CAA requires that
applicable 5 state SIPs must contain
such emission limits, schedules of
compliance and other measures as may
be necessary to make reasonable
progress toward meeting the national
visibility goal. Such measures include
the application of BART by any BARTeligible sources 6 that emit air pollutants
such as SO2 and nitrogen oxides (NOX) 7
that may reasonably be anticipated to
cause or contribute to visibility
impairment in a Class I area. The BART
provisions of the RHR generally direct
states to follow these steps to address
the BART requirements: (1) Identify all
BART-eligible sources; (2) determine
which of those sources may reasonably
be anticipated to cause or contribute to
visibility impairment in a Class I area,
and are therefore subject to BART
requirements; (3) determine sourcespecific BART for each source that is
subject to BART requirements; and (4)
include the emission limitations
reflecting those BART determinations in
their SIPs.8 However, the RHR also
provides states with the flexibility to
adopt an emissions trading program or
other alternative program instead of
requiring source-specific BART
controls, as long as the alternative
provides greater reasonable progress
towards the national goal of achieving
natural visibility conditions in Class I
3 These regulations are known as the Regional
Haze Rule or RHR. 64 FR 35714, 35714 (July 1,
1999) (codified at 40 CFR part 51, subpart P).
4 42 U.S.C. 7410(a), 7491, and 7492(a), CAA
sections 110(a), 169A, and 169B.
5 States that have a federal Class I area, listed by
the Administrator under subsection 169A(a)(2) of
the CAA, and/or states from which the emissions
may reasonably be anticipated to cause or
contribute to any impairment of visibility in any
federal Class I area.
6 A BART-eligible source is any one of the 26
specified source categories listed in appendix Y to
40 CFR part 51, Guidelines for BART
Determinations Under the Regional Haze Rule.
7 SO and NO are considered the most
2
X
significant visibility impairing pollutants.
8 40 CFR 51.308(e)(1).
E:\FR\FM\01MRP1.SGM
01MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 41 (Thursday, March 1, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 8812-8814]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-04178]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
15 CFR Part 922
RIN 0648-XF789
Plan for Periodic Review of Regulations
AGENCY: Office of National Marine Sanctuaries (ONMS), National Ocean
Service (NOS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Department of Commerce (DOC).
ACTION: Notification of plan for periodic review of regulations;
request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) section 610 requires that
NOAA Office of National Marine Sanctuaries (ONMS) periodically review
existing regulations that have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities, such as small businesses, small
organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions. This plan
describes how ONMS will perform this review and describes the
regulations proposed for review in 2018.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 2, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted by:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NOS-2017-0133, click the
``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or
attach your comments.
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered by NOAA. All comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personally identifiable
information (for example, name, address, etc.), confidential business
information, or otherwise
[[Page 8813]]
sensitive information submitted voluntarily submitted by the commenter
will be publicly accessible. NOAA will accept anonymous comments (enter
``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain anonymous).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Meredith Walz, NOAA Office of National
Marine Sanctuaries, 1305 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910,
[email protected], or 240-355-0686.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.,
requires that federal agencies take into account how their regulations
affect ``small entities,'' including small businesses, small
governmental jurisdictions and small organizations. For regulations
proposed after January 1, 1981, the agency must either prepare a
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis or certify the regulation, if
promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Section 610 of the RFA, 5 U.S.C. 610, requires federal agencies to
review existing regulations. It requires that ONMS publish a plan in
the Federal Register explaining how it will review existing regulations
that may have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. Regulations that become effective after January 1, 1981
must be reviewed within 10 years of the publication date of the final
rule. Section 610(c) requires that ONMS publish in the Federal Register
a list of rules it will review during the succeeding 12 months. The
list must describe, explain the need for, and provide the legal basis
for the rules, as well as invite public comment on the rules.
In addition, section 605 of the RFA provides that, when a rule is
promulgated, the head of an agency may certify to the Small Business
Administration's Chief Counsel for Advocacy that a rule would not have
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Guidance on implementing the requirements of RFA section 610
indicates that agencies should also determine if previously changed
conditions may mean that a certified rule now does have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Criteria for Review of Existing Regulations
The purpose of the review is to determine whether existing rules
should be left unchanged, or whether they should be revised or
rescinded in order to minimize significant economic impacts on a
substantial number of small entities, consistent with the objectives of
other applicable statutes. In deciding whether change is necessary, RFA
section 610(b) establishes five factors that agencies will consider in
reviewing existing regulations:
(1) Whether the rule is still needed;
(2) What type of public complaints or comments were received
concerning the rule;
(3) How complex is the rule;
(4) How much the rule overlaps, duplicates or conflicts with other
federal rules, and, to the extent feasible, with state and local
governmental rules; and
(5) How long it has been since the rule has been evaluated or how
much the technology, economic conditions, or other factors have changed
in the area affected by the rule.
Plan for Periodic Review of Rules
ONMS will conduct reviews in such a way as to ensure that all rules
for which a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis was prepared are
reviewed within 10 years of the year in which they were originally
issued. During this same period, ONMS will also review other rules
certified under RFA section 605 as not having significant impacts. ONMS
will evaluate whether those rules now have a significant impact and
therefore should be reviewed under RFA section 610. ONMS intends that
it will conduct section 610 reviews on applicable regulations on an
annual basis. ONMS will make RFA Section 610 review reports available
at the following website: https://sanctuaries.noaa.gov/library/alldocs.html.
ONMS Regulation Requiring Review for 2018
One rulemaking finalized in 2008, and one rulemaking finalized in
January 2009, are being reviewed under RFA section 610. The Chief
Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce certified to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration (SBA)
that these rules would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. As a result, a regulatory
flexibility analysis was not required, and none were prepared for the
following actions:
1. ``Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary Regulations;
Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary Regulations; and Cordell Bank
National Marine Sanctuary Regulations''. RINs 0648-AT14, 0648-AT15,
0648-AT16 (73 FR 70488; November 20, 2008). ONMS issued this rule,
along with final revised management plans, for the Gulf of the
Farallones (now renamed Greater Farallones), Cordell Bank, and Monterey
Bay national marine sanctuaries (GFNMS, CBNMS, and MBNMS respectively).
This final rule updated the regulations for the three sanctuaries, and
established new regulatory prohibitions for them. New prohibitions
contained in the regulations included restrictions on: The introduction
of introduced species; discharges from cruise ships and other vessels;
attracting or approaching white sharks in GFNMS; anchoring vessels in
seagrass in Tomales Bay; deserting vessels; motorized personal
watercraft use in the MBNMS (definition revision); and, possessing,
moving, or injuring historic resources. This final rule also codified
three dredge disposal sites in the MBNMS that existed prior to the
MBNMS designation in 1992, and expanded the boundaries of the MBNMS to
include the Davidson Seamount and surrounding area.
2. ``Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary Regulations''. RIN
0648-AT17 (74 FR 3216; January 16, 2009). ONMS published this rule,
along with final revised management plans, to finalize the regulations
for the Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary (CINMS or Sanctuary).
The rule revised the regulations to implement prohibitions on:
Exploring for, developing, or producing minerals within the sanctuary;
abandoning matter on or in sanctuary submerged lands; taking marine
mammals, sea turtles, or seabirds within or above the sanctuary;
possessing within the sanctuary any marine mammal, sea turtle, or
seabird; marking, defacing, damaging, moving, removing, or tampering
with sanctuary signs, monuments, boundary markers, or similar items;
introducing or otherwise releasing from within or into the sanctuary an
introduced species; and operating motorized personal watercraft within
waters of the sanctuary that are coextensive with the Channel Islands
National Park. NOAA also made additional changes to the grammar and
wording of several sections of the regulations to ensure clarity.
ONMS invites comments on these rules. ONMS plans to complete the
RFA section 610 review of the regulations by November 1, 2018. Unless
we publish a notification stating otherwise, ONMS will make the final
report available at
[[Page 8814]]
https://sanctuaries.noaa.gov/library/alldocs.html.
Dated: December 27, 2017.
John Armor,
Director, Office of National Marine Sanctuaries.
[FR Doc. 2018-04178 Filed 2-28-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-NK-P